HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ Packet 03-26-12( LAKE City ®f Lake Elmo
ju ELM13 3800 Laverne Avenue North
Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042
(651)777-5510 Fax: (651)777-9615
Www.LakeElmo.Org
The City of Lake Elmo
Planning Commission will conduct a meeting on
Monday, March 26, 2012, at 7:00 p.m.
1. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Moment of Silence for Bob Van Zandt/Reflections
3. Election of Chairperson Pro Tem
4. Approve Agenda
5. Approve Minutes
a. March 12, 2012
6. Public Hearings - None
7. Business Items
a. MINOR SUBDIVISION — 11240 50' STREET NORTH. Consideration of a
request for a Minor Subdivision by Jean Madrinich to accommodate one new
building site and a one -acre parcel for a new City well.
b. LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE WEST SIDE ACCESS PLAN. Review of a
trail plan drafted by Washington County to provide access to the west side of
the Lake Elmo Park Reserve.
8. Updates (Verbal)
a. City Council Updates.
i. 5577 Lake Elmo Avenue Variance - request tabled at the 3/20/12 City
Council meeting.
b. Staff Updates
i. Election of New Chairperson —Add to Future Agenda
ii. Village landowner meeting on 3/15/22
iii. Upcoming Meetings:
1. 3/29/12 — Village Draft Land Use Plan Open House
c. Commission Concerns
9. Adjourn
Planning Commission
Date: 3/26/12
Business Item
Item: 7a
ITEM: Minor Subdivision — 11240 50th Street North
SUBMITTED BY: Kyle Klatt, Planning Director
M
REVIEWED BY: Nick Johnson, Interim City Planner
Jack Griffin, City Engineer
SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED
The Planning Commission is being asked to consider a request from Jean Madrinich, 11240 50th
Street North, for a minor subdivision to allow the splitting of her existing 19.72 -acre parcel into
three separate lots in accordance with the attached certificate of survey as follows:
• A 9.36 acre parcel (Parcel X) to be retained by the applicant and on which her present
homestead is located.
• A 9.36 acre parcel (Parcel Y) that will be available for future sale and use as a residential
building site.
A 1 acre parcel (Exception) that will be deeded to the City of Lake Elmo for future use as
a well site.
This request has been made primarily to accommodate the City's identification of the applicant's
property as a suitable location for a future City well. As part of its negotiations concerning the
acquisition of property from the applicant, the City agreed to prepare the survey work necessary
for the applicant to create a second building site on her property. With recent ordinance changes
to accommodate a situation such as this, the applicant's request for a minor subdivision does
comply with the City's zoning and subdivision regulations.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant's property is located along 501h Street and is surrounding by either large lot
residential development or agricultural activities. Tana Ridge is the closest open space
development, about a quarter mile from the applicant's property. At present, there is one home
on the site along with two outbuildings and detached accessory garage. There is little information
in the property address file other than miscellaneous building and septic permits. The house was
built prior to 1979, which is the earliest record available for the property. A sizable amount of the
site is covered with wooded vegetation, which is reflected as a tree line on the attached surveys.
As part of its ongoing planning for water services in the community, the City's water plans identify
the area near the 50 Street/Lake Elmo Avenue intersection as the preferred location for a new
City Well. After conducting an exhaustive search for suitable sites for a new well, the City
Engineer identified the applicant's property as a potential location that fit the City's search criteria.
One of the factors that led the City to this particular site was that it is large enough to split off the
one acre needed for a well site and allow the remaining parcel to meet the minimum lot size
requirements of the underlying RR — Rural Residential Zoning District.
In order to address situations like this one, where the City needs to plan for the siting of public
services, and to also help property owners preserve their property rights, the City has adopted an
ordinance that allows for the acquisition of property for public services without impacting
underlying zoning rights. Specifically, the City can acquire up to 10% of a lot without impacting
the owner's ability to split this lot at some point in the future. For instance, the City can acquire 2
acres of a 20 -acre parcel in a zoning district with a 10 -acre minimum lot size, and the property
owner would still be able to split the resulting 18 acres into two separate lots.
The applicant's property is zoned RR — Rural Residential, which is subject to a minimum lot size
requirement of 10 acres (which can be further reduced, as is the case in the current situation, due
to road right-of-way and other survey variations). The overall property is 19.72 acres in size, and
the City has agreed to acquire 1 acre from the applicant, which is the minimum needed to
accommodate a public well. The applicant has further requested to split the remaining piece
evenly at this point in time, in order to facilitate a transfer of the back portion of the property to a
future buyer. The resulting parcels each will be 9.36 acres in size, which is consistent with the
public property allowance described above.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the applicant's
request to subdivision the existing 19.72 acre parcel at 11240 50`" Street North into three
separate parcels, one of which (the exception parcel) will be acquired by the City of Lake Elmo
for a future well.
Please note that as part of this recommendation, Staff will be suggesting at least two conditions
of approval, but as of today's date, has not yet been able to review these proposed conditions
with the applicant. Any recommended conditions will be discussed at the meeting.
ORDER OF BUSINESS:
Introduction
........Planning Director
Report by staff.....................................................................................Planning Director
Questions from the Commission ................................... Chair & Commission Members
Applicant Comments ....................
Questions of the Applicant ...........
Open the Public Hearing
.................................................Chair facilitates
........................ Chair & Commission Members
................................................................. Chair
Close the Public Hearing .............................
Call for a motion .......................................................
Discussion of Commission on the motion ................
Action by the Planning Commission
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Staff Report
2. Application Form
3. Certificate of Surveys:
o Entire Lot with City Property
........................ Chair
...... Chair Facilitates
..... Chair Facilitates
....................... Chair & Commission Members
o City of Lake Elmo Parcel (with topographic information)
o Proposed Lot Split (Parcel X and Parcel Y)
4, Aerial Photograph
City of Lake Elmo
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM
❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment
❑ Zoning District Amendment
❑ Text Amendment
❑ Flood Plain C.U.P.
Conditional Use Permit
❑ Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.)
APPLICANT: JOA -r -i MkDW-tno1(
(Name)
❑ Variance " (See below)
Minor Subdivision
❑ Lot Line Adjustment
❑ Residential Subdivision
Sketch/Concept Plan
❑ Site & Building Plan Review
Address)
Q
Fee S
❑ Residential Subdivision
Preliminary/Final Plat
O 01 - 10 Lots
O 11 - 20 Lots
O 21 Lots or More
❑ Excavating & Grading Permit
❑ Appeal ❑ PUD
LAk�. FWo . AAr4
TELEPHONES: &si. 434t.0n2) -W-11 , GB4-.W '.}�-5
(Home) (Work) (Mobile) (Fax)
FEE OWNER: J
(Name)
TELEPHONES:
(Home)
(Mobile)
(zip)
(Zip)
(Fax)
PROPERTY LOCATION (Address and Complete (Long) Legal Description): It240 Sort{ StJecer hh
LAS E-tauo, NW 5576142 T1fe SbUTttwL-ST "nyL OF THE Sof &T- Qu EK
t<Kcer 11-106 "-Sr t.&D R-er rke-,2oF, sic-Tttw t-, T&-t.JrLoLtte ?, &A*-,eE Et
—WA-6wil,&L � Cb l MAL,
DETAILED REASON FOR REQUEST: _A M AAA':h2 tgb'OI ViJlat�4 JM -V- of
-IAAAM ReSu rs-rin(r 9)A&&6L. 046 Folit TM tr SAS &F PRAft9c t -Y TO Ttte c4T;k at=
LAS k�UA-w ECNI, w.U.J\C-L,frf.. wlax"Lb-Lst-�fLY WeLL ate.'( ANO Tia A00LT.0'"J&(-
f aaG tMRa , t Ul l �� ar n nlmt t � to z
"VARIANCE REQUESTS: As outlined in Section 301.060 C. of the Lake Elmo Municipal Code, the Applicant must
demonstrate a hardship before a variance can be granted. The hardship related to this application is as follows:
In signing this application, I hereby, acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the
Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and current administrative procedures. I further acknowledee the fee explanation as
outlined in the application procedures and hereby agree to pav all statements received from the City_pertainine to
additional application expense.
Sign rT
of Applicant Date Signature of Applicant Date
1/22/2004 City of Lake Elmo • 3800 Laverne Avenue North • Lake Elmo • 55042 • 651-777-5510 • Fax 651-777-9615
I
Xo r/L Mc aw"vm" size msXs3u°i oixl"3°is'vi
I
i
H,.L£�bL00S
b8'YT£i I
B>30
lay
a
a� I�J9
Sli
1.1
-11.1--l- . _.
s
• k'9 Lrr-. ,.-9✓ '^fin q. nx .Y6 3
......, 915 ..... S � �..........� t �' � ��'- g �• ! X _
5
6
. s
�gg A ow
�s�.. 3 x�
n"° b
bu
a 6b
5e 5a
a a
•IIIc
Fd&
F �
b etl-
?
aY
�
5M M
�
lau zrem lsys eo n dssm �
A1. ST TI,ODN I
£L'80Z
e
L�
� '�
-
su
I/L M53 3XI fD 3"1
tiff 00tl6DI 1S3" 3W f] 3Nn
mtCS01 Me
f0
10tl3 �
i
�
m.xa
�
ReE
5a
lam
8
as
N
- m
r
o
d
i1i11
tey
�'oyl
ov
F�
w
CD.
u ocLu
�ill
F
tlb
9
X
♦.=1
me
®J
0
V
Q
�n 3vIW-
V
o mOco u3m
4I.
ai
L.
LL
w
IQ
G
Eo
W
Ca
_
Lim®
�'
�•'
--�fm
p3
SOS
�
•>
✓im m
- _
o11
(.�
V
�"
II
-r adv o�
pm'
P
m
-
^d
_
w
2
�g
cmW
wn
p'N
itl
_
/y�
k 8
prg
6
Sli
1.1
-11.1--l- . _.
s
• k'9 Lrr-. ,.-9✓ '^fin q. nx .Y6 3
......, 915 ..... S � �..........� t �' � ��'- g �• ! X _
5
6
. s
�gg A ow
�s�.. 3 x�
n"° b
bu
a 6b
5e 5a
a a
•IIIc
Fd&
F �
b etl-
?
aY
�
5M M
�
lau zrem lsys eo n dssm �
A1. ST TI,ODN I
£L'80Z
e
L�
881
a
5a
lam
8
as
N
- m
r
o
d
i1i11
tey
�'oyl
ov
F�
CD.
u ocLu
�ill
F
tlb
9
X
♦.=1
me
®J
0
V
Q
�n 3vIW-
V
o mOco u3m
4I.
ai
L.
LL
w
IQ
G
Eo
W
Ca
_
Lim®
�'
�•'
--�fm
�
SOS
�
•>
✓im m
- _
o11
(.�
V
�"
II
-r adv o�
pm'
P
_
cmW
_
Q
a sfsvv sz amsxxm 6T'LT£i
'10 IpLL]3 )J i/1 Ms 3X1 fD t/1 MS 31LL� '' H.16T.TTd)08
!0 31LL d0 ll3f D99 15yA 3X1 f0 3Nn 19tl3
ao
W o tarn_
%
cm
_ ohm
uoa
Q
Q VIa_ -LLau {E
wry .-v3 ¢ •` �n000 "_a m_oum:W...mam u_ Q
� `oos noece
N 0 1 1 d 3 0 X-]
9
a
Fd&
F �
b etl-
?
aY
�
5M M
�
lau zrem lsys eo n dssm �
A1. ST TI,ODN I
£L'80Z
e
L�
a
5a
8
as
r
o
d
F
tlb
5A I
-®
I
w
Nk� n
zee
MAI
P 3
F
I
a
w I
� I
� I
i
c _
/�O'�-�.--._`. •.�-•.•�•�•. •_`•�•.• -' � 13„ILeIIZ 1S3N !]3Nn ,N3�
� ALSISLOON
v I
M,ft N Z3'=; -:- r.
"Q—
r rima •eL alavww
o}�
E2
dao
I I
��
L
I
ass
1
,o ,xn Asn
IL SJNItl'eL aIF5LWA1 'L° LpLL°Ta _�
,4 4/I M$ 3NI p 9/I Ms 3XL ,° 3X11 ISp,
— '
a„LE,vt.00s
`l b8 9IEi �
p
"
oho
MAI
P 3
F
I
a
w I
� I
� I
i
c _
/�O'�-�.--._`. •.�-•.•�•�•. •_`•�•.• -' � 13„ILeIIZ 1S3N !]3Nn ,N3�
� ALSISLOON
v I
M,ft N Z3'=; -:- r.
N 0 1 1 d j O X-2
-- co Yos v" mE
No yE�G� �To4m -- VaQ Eo
�Uc?Y5t oroP> -
--
_`°'wca.Eo uE oa ei,EoZn -f!E_m
"Q—
r rima •eL alavww
6i'Ll£T '
E2
dao
��
es 3w ,o,sv
ass
is3v, 3w
,o ,xn Asn
"
oho
o
—
C:
c
�iE
v
C
—
oaf o3v v
z
..0
W
J �
Co
co
-
o N
O
a r.o
ti
3
o
CL6
Q y
a
Com.=x°�_.. a
N 0 1 1 d j O X-2
-- co Yos v" mE
No yE�G� �To4m -- VaQ Eo
�Uc?Y5t oroP> -
--
_`°'wca.Eo uE oa ei,EoZn -f!E_m
Jn
^o%
n �
OJ4
0
i
"Q—
E2e"
z
E2
dao
��
rc
"
oho
Jn
^o%
n �
OJ4
0
i
CERTIFICATE 6r' SURVEY
-for- City of lake Elmo
-via- Focus Engineering
LEBENR
DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS tABELEp
o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 25341
DENOTES WASHINGTON COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT
❑ DENOTES CATCH BASIN
® DENOTES STORM SEWER MANHOLE
DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE
DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE
DENOTES TREE LINE
® DENOTES WELL
xa x DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION
VICINITY MAP
PART (F SEC. 01, TWP, 29, RNG. 21
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY,MINNESOTA
(NO SCALE)
PARCEL DESCRIPTION
The South 208.]1 feel of the West 20B.71 Feet of the
following described property.
The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter except the
west 650 feet thereof, Section 1, Township 29, Ronge 21,
according to the United States Government Survey thereof
and situated 1, Washington County Minnesota.
Ars. of Parcel A = 43.563sf (1.OD Aeras)
NOUN Easement Dear PARCEL A
A perpetual easement for egress egress and driveway
purposes aver, uns
der old a o s the West 30 feet of the
follower, tloscrI", property
rhe South 201 reel of the Wast 208.71 that of the
following threshold property
The Southwest Courter of the Southwest Quarter
cent the. wet 560 feet thereofSection 1
Townshp 29 Ron, 21 recording' to the Unitetl
States Government Survey thereof and of...... 'n
Wosh'ngton County, Minnesota,
GENERAL NOTES
1 Fee awnereh p to vealetl 1, (NOT C'."NEO)
2. hornet 10 Number: (NOi OETERMINEO).
3. Aaareee of Na .....you mear... (NOT ESTA911STEP)
9. Be"rin, shown merman ore L.,a, no the Wo9Nidatum n Dion County Gaortl In ole Srelem
5, to-cOmmall "DOT CSID Stotlon No. 85668 (52141). Norlhin9-200587.897,
foaling -493024.202. "motion m 143.082 (NA.RS).
E. proper 9 ore" o1 the --I,' premi ee: 43,563T m9, IL T o5! ounce)
%. U11111on mown n m arc brewed mExmvatianm we .1 nn9 the process
a1 n -m or,, to acme nomrernana uNlfem dna/ora o'm are Toe , Toon a1
u era utlli(as ontl/or mtru cfurem may vary hem locol'om all..,, hereon ontl
oatltannl frompaquound ulllllae ontl/or etructurem may be an coon Fared Cuomet
Gopher Star, one Cmi N trimnt, I:_m, orHIST
HIST 466 a002 for veal c"Ilon of
atlliy ty+m dna nela mmaf an pdor la e
8 pr eeeyo of tris ya mnl ermen mel mmentntax were not a neo or considered during me
andorgrouna ar "momma conlome so or to muluot �nolx"'no tea exm a of
awlapmenl of Ina m—ted p "msec. may aIri tom ..a
Ip Euemmld ao J L f this 5 'Ye ^Dieted on Morcn 14th 2012.
an 3/rs /12. N -come eerie sumo Dern mutt I+rop al'Yma ov amgfmrea nmdnammm m[
11. Am al In- oma 01 thimn9ar-, edit ."ram no not KI chill o0 hem a 6'geer them of
ml ,ci amrl m nm PIN number m Fere o enh p IlAcd SnN
cc"eg/tlrivow,y oo m,l m .vo as, no
m scorn
E. Rn R110 SON&, !Ne,
Professional Land Surveyors
www,egrud.com 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite I10
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
Tet. (651) 361-200 FC1x (651) 361.8701
,aa<
due
°a. 'rn ,!,e.
S89103106"Al
209.73
f8are ..
GRAPHIC SCALD•
^ IN FIRST )
I i oh - 2n IT
Cwe dr ... mail IT
^Ern
Ili
fir.
-
J� n•ceW
I
Eww
W
es Nama nxrmr-
.SR9 03 06AW-
Grearmi
To.
Nose ;
..
I
1
Ili
j"
E w'/+ or
—smnm, v
Sp + m=
e .
01 x. m/ NIlar
EP
i
-
J� n•ceW
I
12098lS
-
J� n•ceW
W
es Nama nxrmr-
.SR9 03 06AW-
Grearmi
To.
Nose ;
..
E w'/+ or
—smnm, v
Sp + m=
01 x. m/ NIlar
I scrobt, cortRYthat INS surlily. Olm
aRNNM R1': awn J09 NO' 1p096C5 IDT R: ]/IG/1:
r t -. d 5 u
week Y awe iscnxN[5 ❑
my Armor suirsonwasch ands on, r .m
Dilly k s Iturd S ya. a
Ida ons or the
„)ff.l f M soto�
DANIEL Nr OBERMILLER
s•,.aatvnovleo.o lV2aspVepa=-aa
- [ .i,iF,3Jli r3bef. an. w,
Dole 3/16/I2 License No z53N:
12098lS
Planning Commission
Date: 3/26/12
Business Item
Item: 7b
ITEM: Lake Elmo Park Reserve West Side Access Plan
SUBMITTED BY: Kyle Klatt, Planning Director
REVIEWED BY: Nick Johnson, Interim City Planner
Park Commission
SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED
The Planning Commission is being asked to review and provide comments on a plan that has
been prepared by Washington County to identify potential options for improving access to the
Lake Elmo Park Reserve from the west side of park property. The Lake Elmo Park Commission
has reviewed the plan and adopted a motion in support of the plan as presented. Staff has
participated in a stakeholder group that has been reviewing the plan over the past year or so, and
there have also been two public open houses to solicit public feedback on the plan as well.
Please note that the West Side Access plan does incorporate several of the recommendations
from Lake Elmo's trail plan, including a proposed trail along 15th Street between the park and
Inwood Avenue. Staff will spend additional time reviewing specific elements of the plan with the
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission review the Lake Elmo Park Reserve West
Side Access Plan and provide staff with ant comments or suggestions that can be passed on to
the County parks department.
ORDER OF BUSINESS:
Introduction......................................................................................... Planning Director
Report by staff..................................................................................... Planning Director
Questions from the Commission....................................Chair & Commission Members
- Discussion by the Commission..........
- Action by the Planning Commission....
ATTACHMENTS:
............................................Chair Facilitates
.....................Chair & Commission Members
1. DRAFT -Lake Elmo Park Reserve West Side Access Plan
Washington LivingWeelthy
v-W
►��yy�"w�.,v( 'I"ry yyl y 7111�1�1111►� INVVASNINOTON COUNTY ° """dO"°'ny�'+�../1.+'V{.a.n t.�,� 1, hliSIUIP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acknowledgements
2
Introduction and Project Goals
3
Active and Healthy Living Initiatives
3
Trail Demographics
4
Regional Context
5
Existing Site Conditions
6
Trail Connection Corridors
8
County Trail Initiatives
8
City Trail Initiatives
13
Trail Section Details and Crossings
15
Study Findings and Conclusions
18
Preliminary'Ikail Implementation Plan
18
Preliminary Cost Estimate
20
Appendix A- Public Comment
A-1
WASHINGTON COUNTY -LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDETRAIL ACCESS PLAN
1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND PUBLIC OUTREACH
This study involved the participation of a wide variety of stakeholders for
planning new trail connections to Lake Elmo Park Reserve. A technical
advisory committee comprised of Washington County, City of Lake Elmo,
and City of Oakdale staff met on May 17th and July 14th, 2011 to provide
comment and feedback during the planning process. Open house meet-
ings were also held on June 8th and July 27th, 2011 at Lake Elmo City Hall
for the general public to review alternative and refined plans for the plan-
ning and development of new trail system connections to the park. See
appendix A for a list of recorded comments submitted at each open house
meeting. The following staff members collaborated to provide input for
this study:
John Elholm, Parks Director, Washington County
Peter Mott, Parks Manager, Washington County
Jean Streetar, Public Health and Environment - SHIP Coordinator, Wash-
ington County
Kenneth Heuer, Washington County Parks and Open Space Commission
Ann Pung-Terwedo, Senior Planner, Washington County
Bruce Messelt, City Administrator, City of Lake Elmo
ICelli Matzek, Planner, City of Lake Elmo
Kyle Klatt, Planning Director, City of Lake Elmo
Bob Streetar, Community Development Director, City of Oakdale
Whitney Ridlon, Planner, City of Oakdale
Jen Hassebroek, Senior Community Development Specialist, City of
Oakdale
CONSULTANT TEAM:
SRF CONSULTING GROUP
Ken Grieshaber, ASLA
Nichole Schlepp, ASLA
WASHINGTON COUNTY — LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDE TRAIL ACCESS PLAN
2
INTRODUCTION
This trail planning study is being undertaken as a collaborative effort with
Washington County and the cities of Lake Elmo and Oakdale for estab-
lishing off road trail connections to the west boundary of Lake Elmo Park
Reserve. Funding secured for this study through the Statewide Health
Improvement Program (SHIP) sets forth initiatives for establishing inter-
connected trail systems which encourage residents to lead more active
and healthy lives by participating in recreational trail use and activities.
PROJECT GOALS
Based on the context identified for this planning study, the following goals
are being pursued for establishing local trail connections to Lake Elmo
Park Reserve:
• Provide safe and convenient off road trail access to the park reserve
from existing surrounding neighborhood trail systems
• Utilize existing road right of way or trail easement areas to locate trail
corridors
• Promote active living and fitness by expanding opportunities for non -
motorized transportation
• Provide safe connections to nearby neighborhood schools
• Establish safe trail roadway crossings
• Expand trail system to connect with other regional park destinations
and trail systems
PROMOTING ACTIVE AND HEALTHY LIVING
INITIATIVES
One of the primary objectives of developing this trail plan is to help
promote active living initiatives as a way of life that integrates physical
activity in to daily living routines. Communities can be proactive in
promoting active lifestyles by providing safe, efficient, and accessible
pedestrian and bicycle transportation systems. This includes establishing
sidewalks, trails and safe crossings of highways, major streets, and rail-
roads. Creating a viable trail network provides residents the opportunity
to access parks, schools, libraries, work, grocery stores, and other destina-
tion amenities that otherwise would be accessed by motorized vehicles.
THE DEMAND FOR TRAIL SYSTEMS
As part of the Metropolitan Regional Parks and Trail Survey completed in
2008, walking and biking are identified as the primary activities sought out
by the general public for meeting their recreational needs. Metropolitan
Council's 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan notes that according to the
State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP), trail recreation
is becoming increasingly important as the interest and demand for more
trails is being felt at all levels of government. This increased interest in trail
recreation reflects the fact that it is a healthful form of exercise for people
WASHINGTON COUNTY —LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDE TRAIL ACCESS PLAN
3
of all age groups, is suitable for all groups of physical conditioning, and
can be carried out by families, groups, or individuals, and is often available
close to home. Over 50% of visitors to regional parks and trail facilities
within Washington County are from the surrounding community, indi-
cating a need for establishing more interconnected trail systems to these
facilities throughout the County.
REGIONAL CONTEXT AND STUDY AREA
Before undertaking a detailed assessment of planning local trail connec-
tions to Lake Elmo Park Reserve, existing and proposed trail systems
within Washington County and the cities of Lake Elmo and Oakdale were
reviewed to gain a better understanding of the regional context of the trail
study area. (See Figure A)
Primary east west trail corridors leading to Lake Elmo Park Reserve from
the west are currently located along Stillwater Boulevard north of the
park, and along 15th Street and CSAH 10 south of the park. All of these
trail corridors offer the opportunity to connect to the park reserve.
As part of the 2006 master plan completed for Lake Elmo Park Reserve,
internal park trail connections are identified to be made at Inwood
Avenue on the northwest corner of the park and at the east end of 15th
Street on the southwest corner of the park. These trail connections will
connect to a future paved trail system identified around Eagle Point Lake.
These study area parameters provide the basis for evaluating existing site
conditions and identifying the best opportunities for establishing trail
connections to and from the park reserve.
Existing Trail along 15th St. in Oakdale
Inwood Ave. and 15th St, West Side,
Looking North
WASHINGTON COUNTY — LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDE TRAIL ACCESS PLAN
4
f
REGIONAL TRAIL CONTEXT - FIGURE A
.'Ef
-Gne"'tA"�iemmW a
e d
fA �p7
�!-
a rpy
J
_._..
lerrwytal�ye I noB6'
— l'dal SlWiifbf. dAi
WASHINGTON COUNTY -LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDE TRAIL ACCESS PLAN
5
•
i 4 `
1 }
�
LEOEND
[j
}
I
\
l f
c
�"
Fll¢tl 9nF pbMJ891a1a. IIs
y
I
• . % JIR%aseJRPolanelTnlb
T
�
e
pefeantlPWltlS
F
•
a f
o s {
�e�ules
s
Py s
016
r _
Source: Map edlfed from Trolls and Transpodafion Map courtesy of Clly of Oakdale
WASHINGTON COUNTY -LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDE TRAIL ACCESS PLAN
5
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
Several existing site conditions within the study area pose issues and chal-
lenges for establishing trail connections to the park reserve. The following
issues have been identified to be evaluated for determining preliminary
trail alignments and connections to the park. (see Figure B)
TRAIL CROSSINGS AT INWOOD AVENUE
The posted high speeds and limited sight lines along this roadway
corridor only allow for safe at grade trail crossings to be made at four way
controlled intersections. Both Stillwater Boulevard and CSAH 10 provide
this opportunity while 15th Street does not offer a safe crossing alternative
because of limited sight lines and only a two way controlled intersection
at this location.
PARK BOUNDARY BARRIERS
Much of the area along the west boundary of the park contains steep
slopes which pose some challenges for establishing accessible trail routes
into the park. Residential properties bordering the south side of the park
boundary also limit trail access opportunities to the site.
PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNER IMPACTS
Residential properties abut many of the roadway corridors being studied
for placement of trail corridors within right-of-way or easement areas.
Trail planning efforts should minimize impacts on adjacent private land
and provide adequate buffers and separation from residential properties.
Establishing safe crossings at driveway crossings should also be integrated
with trail construction efforts.
RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRAINTS
The presence of overhead utilities on the west side of Inwood Avenue
south of Torre Lane and on the east side of Inwood north of 27th Street
places some limitations on determining a trail alignment in these loca-
tions. Some modification of the drainage swales along Inwood Avenue
may also be necessary to accommodate trail corridor alignments. Inwood
Avenue also transitions to an urban road section north of the park
boundary which will provide a minimal or reduced setback for the trail
along this stretch of roadway.
COMPATIBILITY WITH LAKE ELMO PARK MASTER PLAN
Internal trail circulation planned as a part of the master plan for Lake
Elmo Park Reserve should correspond to proposed trail circulation and
connections being made to and along the perimeter of the park.
Existing site conditions within the study area were also documented to
gain a better understanding of site trail alignment issues to be addressed
within the study area.
15th St. Near Park Boundary, Looking
West
Inwood Ave. Near 15th St., Looking
North
WASHINGTON COUNTY — LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDETRAIL ACCESS PLAN
6
wh
��W
-14
p
+ 1 7W yatx' � fi
ggi
h
€ U:."r '
IZ
ii
TRAIL CONNECTION CORRIDORS - ISSUES AND
OPPORTUNITIES
While reviewing the potential for establishing trail connections to the
west side of Lake Elmo Park Reserve, other amenities were studied to be
integrated with a new trail system including creating on street or off street
trailhead parking areas near trail entrances to the park. After additional
review and comment by local residents, it was determined adding new
parking facilities was not desired by the local community and should not
be pursued as part of the overall plan.
Several trail corridors were evaluated for establishing trail connections to
the Park Reserve from existing local city trails and new proposed county
trails along Inwood Avenue. The following issues and opportunities are
identified for implementing each county and city trail corridor segment.
COUNTY TRAIL CORRIDOR PLANNING INITIATIVES
Establishing county trail corridors along Stillwater Boulevard and Inwood
Avenue will further enhance the connectivity of the local trail system
with other park destination amenities and to other communities in close
proximity to Lake Elmo Park Reserve. The following county trail segments
have been evaluated to increase the connectivity of trail systems from local
neighborhoods to the park reserve.
Trail Segment 1- Stillwater Boulevard — (County Segment between
Ideal Avenue and Inwood Avenue — (See Figure Q
This key link of trail establishes an important connection to Inwood
Avenue from Stillwater Boulevard which provides more direct access to
the park for Oakdale residents. The proposed trail connection extends
along the south side of Stillwater Boulevard to a controlled intersection
crossing at Inwood Avenue.
Trail Segment 2- West Side of Inwood Avenue- (County Segment
between Stillwater Boulevard and CSAH 10 — (See Figure Q
This segment of trail provides the opportunity for residents living directly
west of Inwood Avenue to have convenient access to trail systems along
Stillwater Boulevard,15th Street, and CSAH 10. The potential also exists
to integrate a grade separated crossing under Inwood Avenue for direct
access to the park south of 26th Street or south of Torre Lane.
Inwood Ave. near Stillwater Blvd.,
Looking South
26th St. and Inwood Ave. West Side,
Looking North
WASHINGTON COUNTY —LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDETRAIL ACCESS PLAN
8
In aF
4
-
t•`s
1 t
l
ZIAv
1
3
1 l
Segment 2A- Stillwater Boulevard to 26th Street (see Figure D)
This segment of trail is located within the right -of- way along mostly
rear yard property lines which are also buffered with landscaping along
Inwood Avenue.
Segment 213- 26th Street to 15th Street (see Figure D and E)
This rural section of Inwood Avenue remains mostly undeveloped with
the exception of the Torre Pines development and a few remaining
farmsteads. An expanded right-of-way north of 15th Street will allow for
overhead utilities to be avoided in this area.
Segment 2C -15th Street to CSAH 10 (see Figure E)
This section of trail provides a connection to a controlled intersection
crossing at CSAH 10 which will allow trail users to cross Inwood Avenue
and gain access to the park along 15th Street.
Trail Section 3- East Side of Inwood Avenue - County Segment
between Stillwater Boulevard and CSAH 10 (See Figure D & E)
The establishment of this trail on the east side of Inwood Avenue between
Stillwater Boulevard and CSAR 10 provides the best opportunity to
improve trail access to the Park Reserve from surrounding trail systems.
Funding for this segment of trail is currently being pursued by the County
as part of a TE grant application.
Segment 3A- Stillwater Boulevard to 27th Street (see Figure D)
This segment of trail poses some challenges for integrating a trail align-
ment based on the limited available right-of-way, front yard orientation
of residential properties, overhead utilities, and driveways which intersect
with the trail corridor. This segment of trail Will have to be implemented
with a minimal or no setback from the roadway and utilize the existing
curb to provide separation
Segment 313- 27th Street to southwest corner of park (see Figure D)
Several options exist for how this segment of trail should be aligned along
the edge of the park property. Both the potential addition of subsurface
crossings along Inwood Avenue and locating a bridge or culvert crossing
over the creek will determine how this trail segment is aligned within the
Inwood right-of-way or internal park boundary.
Segment 3C- Internal Park Trail Circulation (see Figure D)
As part of developing future internal park trail circulation to connect to
the west side of the park, the master plan identifies the establishment of a
paved looped trail system around Eagle Point Lake. Initial priority will be
placed on establishing a trail alignment connection around the north side
of Eagle Point Lake to the existing trail system already established within
the park.
Existing trail along 10th St.,
Looking West
WASHINGTON COUNTY — LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDE TRAIL ACCESS PLAN
10
ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES
POTENTIAL TRAIL SEGMENTS - FIGURE D
Trail Segment 2
WEST SIDE OF INWOOD AVENUE
Opportunities:
• Does Not Require an At -grade Trail Crossing of Inwood Avenue/
Stillwater Boulevard Intersection
Segment 2A Urban Road Section
Issues:
• On Opposite Side of the Park
• Crossing to Park Requires Grade Separated Pedestrian Tunnel;
Significant Construction Costs
• Potential Property Impacts
Segment 2B Rural Road Section
Issues:
• On Opposite Side of the Park
• Crossing to Park Requires Grade Separated Pedestrian Tunnel;
Significant Construction Costs
• Potential Impacts to Development Signage
• Drainage Ditch
• Utility Line Begins at Farm North of Torre Lane
Trail Segment 3
EAST SIDE OF INWOOD AVENUE
Opportunities:
• Direct Connection to the Park
• Partially Utilizes Park Land and Conservation Easements
Segment 3A Urban Road Section
Issues:
• Property Impacts- limited right-of-way and multiple driveway
crossings
• Conflicts with Utility Line
• Requires Trail Crossing atthe Intersection of Stillwater Avenue
and Inwood Avenue
• Potential Safety Conflicts with Trail Crossing and Right-hand
Turn Lane at Stillwater Avenue and Inwood Avenue Intersection
Segment 3B Rural Road Section
Issues:
• Steep Grade Along Roadway and Impacts to Existing Buffer
Segment 3C Park Land
Issues:
• Pedestrian Bridge Needed Over Creek
• Maintain Landscape Buffer between Residential and Park/Trail
WASHINGTON COUNTY — LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE; WEST SIDE TRAIL ACCESS PLAN
11
ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES
i POTENTIAL TRAIL SEGMENTS - FIGURE E
9
Trail Segment 2, cont.
WEST SIDE OF INWOOD AVENUE
Opportunities:
• Avoids Crossing of Inwood Avenue/15th
• Connection to Existing City Trail on 10th
Segment 213, cont. Rural Road Section
Issues:
• On Opposite Side of the Park
• Crossing to Park Requires Grade Separated Pedestrian Tunnel;
Significant Construction Costs
• Drainage Ditch
• Utility Line from Farm North of Torre Lane to 15th
Segment 2C Rural Road Section
Issues:
• On Opposite Side of the Park
• Would Impact Existing Vegetated Buffer
• Potential Conflicts with Utility Line
Trail Segment 3, cont.
EAST SIDE OF INWOOD AVENUE
Opportunities:
• Direct Connection to the Park
• Partially Utilizes Park Land and Conservation Easements
• Potential Connections to Existing City Trails
Segment 31) Rural Road Section
Issues:
• Potential Impacts of Development Signage
• Safe Pedestrian Crossing Needed at 15th
• Impacts to Vegetative Buffer at 15th and Inwood
• Provide/Maintain Landscape Buffer between Trail and
Development
Segment 3E Rural Road Section
Issues:
• Utility Line from 15th to 10th
• Provide Pedestrian Countdown Timers at Inwood and 10th for a
Safer Pedestrian Crossing Experience
WASHINGTON COUNTY - LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDE TRAIL ACCESS PLAN
12
Segment 317- Southwest corner of park to 15th Street (see Figure E)
A majority of this trail segment is located within a conservation easement
area and offers the opportunity to connect to existing local trails east of
Inwood Avenue.
Segment 3E -15th Street to CSAH 10 ( see Figure E)
This segment of trail also provides a key link for establishing a safe
crossing of Inwood Avenue at the CSAH 10 intersection. Alignment of this
trail corridor segment should be planned with any current development
proposals being pursued along this stretch of Inwood between 15th Street
and CSAH 10.
CITY TRAIL CORRIDOR PLANNING INITIATIVES
In an effort to coordinate local trail planning efforts with new proposed
County trail connections along Stillwater Boulevard and Inwood Avenue,
the following local trail segments along 15th Street have been evaluated
to complete the connectivity of trail systems from local neighborhoods to
the park reserve.
Segment 4A- City of Oakdale city limits to Inwood Avenue (see
Figure F)
This segment of trail provides a key connection from the city limits of
Oakdale to Inwood Avenue which will transition to establishing trail
connections to Lake Elmo Park Reserve. This trail segment also provides
connections to Eagle Point Elementary and Skyview Middle Schools
which is a desired outcome of SHIP trail planning initiatives.
Segment 413- North Side of 15th between Inwood Avenue and Park
(see Figure F)
In an effort to discourage an at grade trail crossing at 15th Street and
Inwood Avenue, trail users on 15th Street will be directed south along the
west side of Inwood Avenue to the controlled intersection at CSAH 10.
If a trail is established on the west side of Inwood north of 15th, this may
provide the opportunity to direct trail users to either a subsurface crossing
entering the park, or to the Stillwater Boulevard trail connection and
crossing.
Segment 4C- South Side of 15th between Inwood Avenue and Park
(see Figure F)
Establishing a trail corridor along this stretch of 15th Street provides a
direct connection to the park and trail alignment proposed on the east
side of Inwood Avenue. Options exist to locate the trail on either the
north or south side of 15th Street. A 20'trail easement currently exists on
the north side of 15th as well as the potential to establish connections to
existing local trails which outlet on the north side of 15th Street. Estab-
lishing a trail alignment on the south side of 15th Street impacts fewer
WASHINGTON COUNTY - LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDE TRAIL ACCESS PLAN
13
�
LU
CD
LU�
Su5
/ LU
U)
k
E®
b
2/
«�
�
/
qC)
�CL
WASHINGTON COUNTY- LAKrELM o_*RESe»emET zwc :P «
14
!
0
|
\F
}
)
E
/
«
)_\\
,)
\
\
(!/
§
j
\),
/
\r!
�
]E=1
7
)®)\\))
\:)({
{
§
;
§
.
0
E!
-
a
G%»]\\{
WASHINGTON COUNTY- LAKrELM o_*RESe»emET zwc :P «
14
!
|
\F
/
«
)_\\
\
\
(
§
�
7
{
§
;
§
.
0
E!
-
a
G%»]\\{
ƒ
\})!
E
,E3#
E2m
IQ
'o
\/{�/\\
(°�\0
_\J§...
a_...
WASHINGTON COUNTY- LAKrELM o_*RESe»emET zwc :P «
14
private land owners but creates potential conflicts between trail users and
heavy truck traffic utilizing the driveway entrance to the nursery facility
during periodic times of the year.
TYPICAL TRAIL SECTIONS
Several types of trail sections are proposed to implemented as part of this
plan. (see Figure G) A majority of the trail system proposed along Inwood
Avenue would be implemented within a rural roadway section and require
a 25'setback from the roadway to meet federal design standards. A small
segment of trail north of 27th Street would be constructed within an
urban roadway section with separation defined by a raised curb.
Local trails along 15th Street would have a reduced setback of approxi-
mately 5'from the roadway or aligned to match with existing setbacks
already in place along the existing trail corridor.
Trail connections established within Lake Elmo Park Reserve will be single
paved trails maintaining T clear zones while maintaining adequate sepa-
ration and buffers with existing equestrian turf trails within the park .
TYPICAL TRAIL SECTIONS - FIGURE G
Rural Road Section- Paved Troll in Road R.O.W.
WASHINGTON COUNTY —LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDE TRAIL ACCESS PLAN
15
PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASS OPTIONS ALONG INWOOD AVENUE
Options have been studied for establishing a grade separated (subsurface)
crossing into the park from Inwood Avenue to provide a more direct and
safe access route to the park for trail users. (see Figure H) After reviewing
the surrounding topography of the Inwood Avenue corridor, the following
locations could be considered for establishing a subsurface crossing into
the park
Option 1- Eberhard Property
This location has a natural depression on both sides of the roadway which
will minim ze grading efforts need to install a culvert crossing in this area.
Additional right-of-way would most likely need to be acquired to develop
safe trail alignment approaches to the crossing.
Option 2- Farney Creek Crossing
This location is also situated at a low point along the roadway where the
creek extends into the park More extensive retaining wall work would
be required to develop trail approaches to this crossing which could be
further complicated by the presence of a high water table in the area.
Establishing subsurface crossings at both of these locations may be cost
prohibitive based on the limited amount of user groups projected to
initially use this trail corridor. However, with population increases in the
area, justification could be made for its implementation in the future.
TYPICAL SEPARATED GRADE CROSSING -
FIGURE H
Near possible underpass location.
Looking Southwest
GENERAL NOTES:
12'x10' Precast Box Culvert
• 6'Concrele Olslributlon Slab Untler Roatlway
• Minimize Impacts of OR -road Excavelion with Sheeting and Wall.
Separated Grade Crossing Precedent
Wayzata CountryClub Underpass, Wayzata, MN
WASHINGTON COUNTY -LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDETRAIL ACCESS PLAN
16
AT -GRADE TRAIL CROSSINGS
At grade trail crossings identified along Inwood Avenue at Stillwater
Boulevard and CSAR 10 should be designed to meet all current ADA,
AASHTO, and MnDOT bikeway facility design standards. (See Figure I for
a typical trail roadway crossing)
TYPICAL AT -GRADE CROSSING - FIGURE I
WASHINGTON COUNTY —LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDE TRAIL ACCESS PLAN
17
STUDY FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The communities surrounding Lake Elmo Park Reserve are generally supportive of designated; safe
and convenient access points to the park. Undeveloped, poorly defined access points are thought to
create nuisances, safety concerns, and invite unwanted impacts and conflicts with adjacent private
property owners. Through properly placed trail connections and buffer zones, these potential conflicts
can be avoided.
Additional site amenities associated with trailheads, such as parking lots and lighting, are not desired
by most residents living adjacent to or near the park boundary.
Trail access points to the park reserve should be well-defined and easily accessible; and visual impacts
to nearby properties should be minimized with vegetative buffering and careful trail placement.
Trail alignments that take advantage of existing right-of-way (e.g. Section 3, along the east -side of
Inwood Avenue) and avoid at -grade road crossings should take precedence for new trail development.
This plan recognizes the investments local governments have already made in developing trails and
acquiring trail easements for establishing new trail connections. This plan builds upon the existing
public infrastructure in place to make these key trail connections to the park reserve.
PRELIMINARY TRAIL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
In order to help coordinate County and City trail planning efforts, a preliminary trail plan has been
developed to guide its implementation over time. (See Figure J)
The following preliminary construction phases have been identified to be implemented over time by
Washington County and the City of Lake Elmo to improve the connectivity of the trail system to Lake
Elmo Park Reserve:
Phase A (Washington County)
• Construct trail on east side of Inwood Avenue from Stillwater Boulevard to CSAH 10.
• Establish internal park trail circulation around the north side of Eagle Point Lake.
Phase B (Washington County)
• Construct trail on south side of Stillwater Boulevard from Oakdale city lim is to Inwood Avenue
intersection.
Phase C (Washington County)
• Construct trail on west side of Inwood Avenue from Stillwater Boulevard to CSAH 10.
Phase D (Washington County)
• If feasible, construct pedestrian underpass along Inwood Avenue either north or south of the
Torres Pine development.
Phase E (City of Lake Elmo)
• Construct city trail connection along 15th Street from City of Oakdale city limits to new park trail
connection on the south side of the park.
• North side or south side alignment of trail along 15th Street to be determined.
WASHINGTON COUNTY — LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDETRAIL ACCESS PLAN
18
Ai VA
3 S i _ $La�Ce EJrn4#tegl9n�l P�Y�CR�s�ru� i � :� f � �
q` .
L�j i¢yl� e" •Y
M"'.- 3. fa ."3NMI,mjjiv
�
Sol
Yi
�- O ,
� 2
E
i
+t
f�
_ I i
a`r
Tr4i
E�.
{
_
'
t
Ai VA
3 S i _ $La�Ce EJrn4#tegl9n�l P�Y�CR�s�ru� i � :� f � �
q` .
L�j i¢yl� e" •Y
M"'.- 3. fa ."3NMI,mjjiv
�
Sol
Yi
�- O ,
� 2
E
i
+t
f�
_ I i
a`r
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
Table 1 provides a preliminary estimate of costs needed to implement identified trail improvements.
Cost estimates are based on 2011 construction costs. An inflation factor of 5% should be added to the
total estimate for every year beyond identified 2011 construction costs.
UNIT LEGENDS: LS=Lump Sum, SF=Square Feet, SY=Square Yards, EA=Each,
LF=Lineal Foot, CY=Cubic Yards, AC=Acre
TABLE 1- Lake Elmo West Side Access Plan - Preliminary Cost Estimate
Notes Phase A
Estimated
Qty.
Unit
Unit Cost
(in Dollars)
Total Cost
(In Dollars)
1 Provide mobilization and all necessary construction surveying
and staking and erosion control
1
LS
$60,000.00
$60,000.00
Clearing and Grubbing
4
AC
$4,500.00
$17,100.00
2 10' Bituminous Trail Includes base
10,750
LF
$65.00
$698,750.00
2 10' Bituminous Trail - Park Connection
6,200
LF
$65.00
$403,000.00
3 Pedestrian Bridge over Creek
525
SF
$126,00
$65,625.00
Native Seeding and Reafomtion4
AC
$6,000.00
$22,800.00
Trail Si na eNva findin alongTrall Corridor
1
LS 1
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
Phase A Total:
$1,268,775.00
Notes Phase B
EstimatedUnit
Qty.
Unit
Cost
in Dollars
Total Cost
In Dollars
1 Provide mobilization and all necessary construction surveying
and staking and erosion control
1
LS
,$80,000.00
$80,000.00
Clearing and Grubbing
3
AC
$4,500.00
$13,500.00
2 10' Bituminous Trail
12,800
LF
$65.00
$832,000.00
Native Seeding and Restoration
3
AC
$6,000.00
$18,000.00
Trail Signage
1
LS
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
Phase B- Total:
$945,000.00
Notes Phase C
Estimated
Qty.
Unit
Unit Cost
in Dollars
Total Cost
In Dollars
1 Provide mobilization and all necessary construction surveying
and staking and erosion control
1
LS
$35,000.00
$35,000.00
4 Construct Pedestrian Underpass- Includes trail connections,
clearing and grubbing, seeding and restoration
1
LS
$750,000.00
$750,000.00
Phase C Total:
$786,000.00
NEW
No. Phase D
Estimated
Bid Qt .
Unit
Unit Bid
to Dollars
Total Bid
In Dollars
1 Provide mobilization and all necessary construction surveying
and staking and erosion control
1
LS
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
Clearing and Grubbing
1
AC
$4,500.00
$4,385.00
2 10'Bituminous Trail
6768
LF
$65.00
$439,920.00
Native Seeding and Restoration
1
AC
$6,000.00
$6,000.00
Trail SI nae
1
LS
$500.00
$500.00
Phase D Total:
$490,785.00
Subtotal:
$3,489,560.00
15% Contingency:
$523,434.00
Total Estimated with 15% Contingency:
$4,012,994.00
Design and Administration Fees (for physical design, construction admin.,
with contingency):
and related enginneering -20% of total
$802,598.80
Notes
Approximately 6% of Bituminous Costs
Includes base, grading, and striping
Assumes 36 Length and 16' Width Structured Paul Bridge
Does not Include additional R.O.W. acquisition costs
WASHINGTON COUNTY —LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDE TRAIL ACCESS PLAN
20
D 1
WASHINGTON COUNTY -LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDE TRAIL ACCESS PLAN
A-1
Wasbi ngton
County
COMMENTCARD
NAME (Please Print) Lill ul-,dz.r-
ADDRESS ����� I s
CITY �-Q �-� iff'o
COMMENTS P I(� !^51! iib 113' ^-)r\S"
+i-7A;t head (Al- end o-(' 191-h Si_'
WOUId, IN -C. ( VJ ..klrg QeWS5.
cre re.tr Y\O [Laved -i ru a I ,
�YC�Pn }Uee.r�
A -rut!.
Washington
County
COMMENTCARD
NAME (Please Add V,&-- raa.
O/.3.
ADDRESS S :XfLA Sh' XJ
CITY �QKY. t=/
COMMENTS
Wasgton
ounty
COMMENT CARD
NAME (Please Print) "rkurcnu"d'
ADDRESS'S t7j Sl' 0
CITY I ak,e.
a 4Ji^ 5.i' rKa.✓11G1,,.,z/ weotJ yURdYi.
COMMENTS
a liWtm%er o(- uymvr, �Yd3`Fiiu OU J;
r( ,s alm.04 st. &✓Trial IDarf 1e pr—
xr.Ylo-f fl�et�rli&rrlen2c aA I3. �LL
�-nnl Itr„<) horrt,n3 /e'(hla•r!J
2N(,0�(ILQ ncye nsa� fYa i14
e RY�.+�� Ja+r/- entb $%.c'I•nrb Y'+�tYnrtl,ux(
8 f hdonwr.�:� i( ane/,*j fJ6N+7 rr LtirS
Washington
.E County
COMMENTCARD
NAME (Please Print)& —7 Z--,.,• y- T"
N
ADDRESS I I J Q / j q— -4' �
CITY
WASHINGTON COUNTY - LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDE TRAIL ACCESS PLAN
A-2
Was gton __ . _ Washington
ounty County
COMMENTCARD COMMENTCARD
NAME (Please Print) 7VP&df2
ADDRESS 00 Rlat J/ 9)
°�/AIA.NI/LI77L/�7P.al.L/'
l
Was�gton
ounty
COMMENT CARD
NAME (Please Print) cQ.rO 1 m O he -1u I' e —
ADDRESS %& 2 3 �K'Th S -t
CITY LK F.(mu )Mn' '..
COMMENTS C0nC:ie:YY1C:(:C akolkf-
Oari(1nq (XYI.¢ a�-f '.I.nwmra.
1) 11 -' 'i 1 .2aI ±r i G
n rrwtccrn or g --
rei�j + 1r ^.
I"'t 0.6 ::14 i 4-&,
NAME (Please Print) DVAaS EueArsou
ADDRESS /4<8 raga/Ct.e I?vr No.
CITYe2nresoel c M.) .rasa
COMMENTS 4,CZ?061 & 62- 6.9
/V7A/rA y Z07W r 5'trn 6
Was
5 ounty
COMMENTCARD
NAME (Please Print) 3'1p jiin
pr
w
S �i� ../• .l .
q e�
a.u.'
WASHINGTON COUNTY - LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDETRAIL ACCESS PLAN
A-3
�4ife Cr/�. 4itta2*.? '
tilp,e., �,.Crc>.tPdi.aar la-wi�l„n' ^tt.�.. �a-✓4
d6w.9::.ReI7�
Wasl�rngton
ollnty
COMMENTCARD
NAME (Please Print) Le, Vi;1, fl! eco t..e!"
ADDRESS 0"'o•-i+7"'IS).0
CITY I.Ak 0-0 IAO
COMMENTSU0.>A t.[-+bef'L1r
'111-e- {Yui (5 (h.�t trvtA i i�w nn��
f
,f;t.�,� G�LcSrt-F
-1 "lsfl k -ilw P 0 1vAo t- �� t k C i nud*4
iYci� (S Jl '('�-4 LGY11v.4"11c�h to yj&
LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE- JULY 27,2011
Washington
County
COMMENT CARD
NAME (Please
Print) I, f ma—
COMMENTS
�( � Q �r✓''F C.
ADDRESS _/ I ✓I7 / V/
CITY_ GJI H uj17 -
LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE» JULY 27, 2011
WASHINGTON COUNTY -LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDE TRAIL ACCESS PLAN
A-4
Washington
County
WndZa9Qr6�Am n ^� �AaM.0 A .r"%�
COMMENT CARD
NAME (Please Print)
p
ADDRESS 117x0 L; q(,_. P,I,u.4�-Lq
I
11b
��• ""671 S• r4c�! '�'(,' a- ! wr� V I G.,� L
CITY .1 T
CD [,N/r P1 �b
i' -d :1sd��a.�Q/f�/J�-Y.i•a XFv,.-s� C-dAwre.4v,nJ
COMMENTS
COMMENTSiJ-H,.�
Www +c,;,. 1"�O.wO TLs.re.eno,.
Sun.•fSL I.� ✓'a�Y��.'i�a.'rl(GQ Vi lLuu
�4ife Cr/�. 4itta2*.? '
tilp,e., �,.Crc>.tPdi.aar la-wi�l„n' ^tt.�.. �a-✓4
d6w.9::.ReI7�
Wasl�rngton
ollnty
COMMENTCARD
NAME (Please Print) Le, Vi;1, fl! eco t..e!"
ADDRESS 0"'o•-i+7"'IS).0
CITY I.Ak 0-0 IAO
COMMENTSU0.>A t.[-+bef'L1r
'111-e- {Yui (5 (h.�t trvtA i i�w nn��
f
,f;t.�,� G�LcSrt-F
-1 "lsfl k -ilw P 0 1vAo t- �� t k C i nud*4
iYci� (S Jl '('�-4 LGY11v.4"11c�h to yj&
LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE- JULY 27,2011
Washington
County
COMMENT CARD
NAME (Please
Print) I, f ma—
COMMENTS
�( � Q �r✓''F C.
ADDRESS _/ I ✓I7 / V/
CITY_ GJI H uj17 -
LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE» JULY 27, 2011
WASHINGTON COUNTY -LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDE TRAIL ACCESS PLAN
A-4
Wasl�ungton
ounty
C MO MENT CARD
NAME (Please Prinp
Tokn e uha
ADDRESS �+-��j7 =71W"J, _'-.A)
city LaL f I mo
COMMENTS EiEose knytr spW bmi4-
aN.L)" kv.N 9, 1-1. mnl-I,
-�"YK 15i� jam -6 SF; Il uv ler-
Ed. I-6R!e � J17v.a VUAV
�11 NADP SP.kn ARfr)LJPrr�S � ��-a�l'
LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE - JULY 27, 2011
Wasgton
ounty
COMMENTCARD
NAME (Please PPrint) aof` n ( / b('11 a,1 `
ADDRESS 1J �i •`D ��t ) f , al/
p �
CITY 1-61 mn
COMMENTS
LAKEELMO PARK RESERVE- JULY 27,2011
Washington
ounty
COMMENT CARD
NAME (Please PNnD _ 411mo7%2_ ✓rierr•4
ADDRESS S{/H% "AN
CITY_ Cn',{. F/n,z N1xrSi4%t
COMMENTS �COLklcii l\k,(?
S of -t-k e_
Mesa 4s 6 AAV. S1W3\f
t
C )V C4(1 VAC t ( I 1i
rCAKE �LMOPAR/Kt
RESERvr- JULY.2Y, 2011
Was�gton
ounty
COMMENTCARD
NAME (Please PrinQaat! �/v°lA Yirl�1
ADDRESS
CITY
��C>O�MMENTS.Yr :VO 'OHAl4yW ia'C
5 r %/�zGyfi a Q9UG rr—.
�i�G7FL +QP. r -A Lq"�6�7w4u11�e, - GO/J[rr_[a ee'l
lfi,n��jpn-,.�_NILti"" 2yyGE :U/Uz fwn9—lX.fAX&44 _
�yQ�A fi0 1J! �C_ ,ra, (IA9-C1� OISi�G1;tR�
uyCC'd.r ars Qrp .�haa..te,�
LAKE!{LMO�.�A!+�.,KRESERVE - JULY 27, 2011
. �+?nWCA�Aw45{e\y J -d'1.4 .y�jplkl�
,/wo r rc-ze Wive rn", duea(J
AoLgloofa.io !
WASHINGTON COUNTY - LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE: WEST SIDETRAILACCESS PLAN
A-5