HomeMy WebLinkAboutDecember 19, 2006 CCP14
Lake Elmo City Council Agenda
December 19, 2006
PaaP
7. MAINTENANCE/PARK/FIRE/BUILDING:
A. Fire Department:
(1) Inflatable Rescue Boat
(2) First Response/Command/Chiefs
Vehicle Replacement
B. Building Department: Building Activity
8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT:
A. Water Tower Warranty
9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING:
Kelli Matzek
A. Oakdale Gun Club CUP Amendment;
Resolution No. 2006-145
B. Final Plat Discover Crossing 2"d
Addition; Resolution No. 2006-146
C. Request Extension from Met Council
J.Filla
D. Proposed Steps for the Citywide
S.Hoyt/K.Matzek
Rezoning Process
10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:
A. Update on 8475 Hidden Bay Trail -
verbal
11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
12. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS AND
REPORTS:
A. Mayor Johnston — Search for City
Administrator
B. Council Member Conlin
C. Council Member DeLapp — Lake
Elmo Compensation Plan
D. Council Member Johnson
E. Council Member Smith
"Boulevard trees (size to be determined) will be planted with a minimum average spacing of
one tree per 40 feet, but no further than one tree per 60 feet, inside the City rights -of -
way on both sides of all new roads. Where sections of roadsides have a heavy existing
tree coverage or where conditions which are unsuitable for planting boulevard trees, the
60 feet maximum spacing for new trees will not apply, however, the average spacing will
require a corresponding increase in clustered trees.
Land set aside for open space will be provided with a plan reviewed by the City Forester
and the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council which shows initial design
and a procedure for continuous maintenance and enhancement of the land. Primary elements
in the design will be native trees and grasses, open water, seasonal wetlands, detention
and retention ponding, and gardens. The open space should be designed to provide shelter
and foraging land for native wildlife, particularly wildlife dispaced by new development.
Mowed lawns are resticted to a maximum of 10% of designated open space, excluding open
space approved for ballfields, sliding hills, landscaping around community buildings and
land with similar uses.
Islands at the ends of cul-de-sacs, or separating roadway lanes are to be landscaped with
plans reviewed by the City Forester and the Planning Commission and approved by the City
Council. Gravel will be be considered an acceptable landscape material in these spaces,
unless it is designed to be covered by planting within 5 years."
Steve DeLapp
8468 Lake Jane Trail
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
1
DRAFT December 5, 2006
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
DECEMBER 5, 2006
1. AGENDA
2. MINUTES: November 21, 2006, November 8, 2006, October 21, 2006
3. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL:
A. PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL:
B. PUBLIC INQUIRIRES:
4. CONSENT AGENDA:
A. Resolution No. 2006-131: Approve Claims
B. Escrow Reduction for Farms of Lake Elmo
C. DELETED
D. Final Escrow Reduction for Cardinal View
E. 2007 Liquor Licenses
F. Arts Center Agreement (postponed)
G. Resolution No. 2006-132: Partial Payment No '5, Park Construction — Tablyn
Park/Lake Elmo Heights Water Main 02
H. Resolution No, 2006-133: Partial Payment No- 6, Riley Brothers Construction,
Water System Interconnect (Jamaca Avenue, Stillwater Boulevard, 315f Street)
I. Resolution No. 2006-134A: Partiall ayment No I -hakes Mechanical Services,
Inc., Tablyn Park/Lake Elmo Heights Plurimbing Connections Contract A; Resolution No.
2006-134B: Partial Payment No. 1, Lakes Mechani6al.Services, Inc., Tablyn Park/Lake
Elmo Heights Plumbing Connections, Contract B
J. TKDA Authorization I�t+4, for Additional Meetings and Preparations of New
A. Fire Dept.: VerbaFUpdate
1. Donation
2. Grant to Purchase 800 MHz Radios
8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT:
A. Old Village Sanitary Sewer Study
B. Water Tower Warranty (moved to 9D)
C. Resolution No. 2006-138: Well Abatement
9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING:
A. Resolution No. 2006-139: Eagle Point Business Park 7ch Addition PUD,
Preliminary Plat and Final Plat; Resolution No. 2006-140: Section 520 Site Plan
B. Resolution No 2006-141: Eagle Point Business Park PUD Final Plan
Amendment (sign)
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES December 5, 2006
1
DRAFT December 5, 2006
C. System Statement Review (Addition)
10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: Verbal update
A. EB & I Mediation Resolution
B. City Planner
C. Acting Interim City Administrator
11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:
A. Mayor Johnston
B. Council Member Conlin
C. Council Member DeLapp
D. Council Member Johnson
E. Council Member Smith
REMINDER:
Continuation c
7:00 P.M. —
stricts
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES December 5, 2006
E
DRAFT December 5, 2006
Mayor Johnston called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Conlin, DeLapp, Johnson, Smith.
STAFF PRESENT: Project Director Hoyt, Assistant City Planner Matzek, Finance
Director/Interim City Administrator Bouthilet, City Attorney Filla, Fire Chief Malmquist,
City Engineer Prew, City Clerk Lumby, and Recording Secretary Luczak.
Pledge of Allegiance:
L AGENDA:
Additions: 9C: METC System Statement
Deletions: 4F: Art Center Agreement
Changes: Move 8B: Water Tower Warranty to 1 OD: Attorney's Report
M/S/P Johnson/Smith — to approve the December 5, 2006, City Council Agenda as
amended. (Motion passed 4-1: DeLapp) Ate.
2. MINUTES:
M/S/P Johnson/Smith — to approve the November 21, 200City Council Minutes as
amended. (Motion passed 5-0)
3.
A. Public Inquiries: None
B. Public Informational:
Terry Arends, 8815 27th Street,
installed in the Tablyn Park hon
that he would be able to maintai
fit
water now smells like chlorine':
ri about the 5/8" water meters being
d"if he'could receive a larger meter so
pressure as before. He also stated his
Ann Bucheck, 2301 Legion Aventd; stated that any future development should be south
of I Oth Street, and questioned if there would be any conflict of interest regarding the
proposed Sewer Study area.
Tim Mandel, 2479 Lisbon AV"", ue, believed the Comprehensive Plan was complete and
questioned the Counei)',,�nteions since he lives next to Open Land.
Council Member DeLapp stated the MOU states North of 10`h Street, and it would not
happen,
Dave Moore, 8680 Stillwater Boulevard, asked if a homeowner could purchase a bigger
water meter if requested, and clarification of Tablyn Park and any assessments.
The Council and City Engineer requested that residents wait and see if the water meter
provides the same water pressure, before the City considered installation of a larger
meter.
The City Engineer confirmed that the chlorine smell would have been caused due to the
new water tower being filled and should clear soon, and the water had not yet been tested.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES December 5, 2006
DRAFT December 5, 2006
4. CONSENT AGENDA:
A. Resolution No. 2006-131: Approve Claims
M/S/P Johnson/Conlin — to approve Resolution No. 2006-131, approving Claim Numbers
361, 362, DD983 through DD995, 30072 through 30120, were used for Staff Payroll
dated November 22, 2006; 363, 364, 30121 through 30159, in the total amount of
$1,166,430.06 are hereby approved. (Motion passed 5-0)
B. Escrow Reduction for Farms of Lake Elmo
M/S/P Johnson/Conlin — to approve Escrow Reduction for Farms of Lake Elmo, as
presented in the City Engineer's Memo dated November 30, 2006. (Motion passed 5-0)
C. Deleted
D. Escrow Reduction for Cardinal View
M/S/P Johnson/Conlin — to approve Escrow Reduction for Cardinal View, as presented in
gw
the City Engineer's Memo dated November 28, 2006. (Motiorle'dssed 5-0)
E. 2007 Liquor Licenses
M/S/P Johnson/Conlin — to grant a 2007 On -Sale
intoxicating liquor license to 3M Club of St. Paul
Machine Shed Restaurant by Heart of America R
approval by the Washington County Sheriffs De:
M/S/P Johnson/Conlin — to grant a 2007 )?
intoxicating liquor, and On -Sale Sunday it
Tavern and Lake Elmo Inn; conditioned on
Dept, Motion passed 5-0 �l
P ( P ) �� "`
F.
G.
liquor and On -Sale Sunday
of Tartan ark) and to the
id Inn; conditioned on
passed 5-0)
liquor, Off -Sale
4icense to the Twin Point
Washington County Sheriffs
M/S/P Johnson/Conlin to ado t Resolution No. 2006-132, approving Partial Payment
No. 5 to Park Construction, Chfange Order No. 3 and No. 4, in the amount of
�u
$541,852.36, for work imprpy'Rnents for the Tablyn Park/Lake Elmo Heights Water
Main. (Motion passed 5-0)
H. Resolution No. 2006-133: Partial Payment No. 6, Riley Brothers Construction
Water System Interconnect — Phase III (Jamaca Avenue, Stillwater Boulevard. 31 st
Street
M/S/P Johnson/Conlin — to adopt Resolution No, 2006-133, approving Partial Payment
No. 6, to Riley Brothers Construction, for the Water System Interconnect — Phase III
(Jamaca Avenue, Stillwater Boulevard, 31", Street), in the amount of $53,412.88.
(Motion passed 5-0)
2006-134B: Partial Payment to Lakes Mechanical Services, Inc., Tablyn Park/Lake Elmo
Heights Plumbing Connections, Contract B
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES December 5, 2006
DRAFT December 5, 2006
M/S/P Johnson/Conlin — to adopt Resolution No. 2006-134A, approving Partial Payment
No. 1, to Lakes Mechanical Services, Inc. for Tablyn Park/Lake Elmo Heights Plumbing
Connections — Contract A, in the amount of $155,192.00, verified by the City Engineer.
(Motion passed 5-0)
M/S/P Johnson/Conlin — to adopt Resolution No. 2006-134B, approving Partial Payment
No. 1, to Lakes Mechanical Services, Inc. for Tablyn Park/Lake Elmo Heights Plumbing
Connections — Contract B, in the amount of $65,695.35, verified by the City Engineer.
(Motion passed 5-0)
J. TKDA Authorization No. 4, for Additional Meetings and Preparations of New
Public Works Buildine
M/S/P Johnson/Conlin — to authorize TKDA to Conduct Additional Meetings and
Preparations as Necessary to Defend Legal Claims for the New Lake Elmo Public Works
Facility. (Motion passed 5-0)
5. FINANCE:
A. Resolution No. 2006-135: 2007 General F1
Resolution No. 2006-136: Final Tax Lew
Finance Director Bouthilet informed the Council t
June, 2006, and the Council had adopted the pro
could not be raised, but could be lowered. The av
but there has been a slight decrease in the tax rate.
A Public Hearing was conducted on
Their comments have been taken in1
;etings for, 2007 began in
budget. The budget
has seen a 6.4% increase,
residents appeared.
The Finance Director provided two resiilutions for Adoption of the Final 2007 Budget
and Levy. He reported the h.07 prR ,6o edtax rate has been reduced from 19.35% in
2006 to 19.27% and reflects a2� % increase in the Levy which is primarily attributed
to an increase in nronertu` valuafr rnS.
M/S/P Johnston'' mith — to adapt Resolution Nos. 2006-135, approving the General Fund
Budget in the am upt of $3,956,308.00. (Motion approved 4-1: DeLapp, three
consecutive increases and get better fiscal discipline)
Sri
Council requested that Quarterly Reviews be scheduled during the Council Workshops to
conduct an intense budget and financial project review. The CIP is a planning document.
M/S/P Johnson/DeLapp — to adopt Resolution No. 2006-136, approving the Final Tax
Levy in the amount of $2,428,600.00. (Motion passed 5-0)
B. Resolution No. 2006-137: Tort Liability Non -Waiver of Monetary Limits
The Finance Director recommends the City to adopt a resolution stating that the City does
not waive the monetary limits on municipal tort liability as established under Minnesota
Statutes §466.04. Currently, each occurrence is $1,000,000.00/person.
M/S/P CondrilDeLapp — to adopt Resolution No. 2006-IP, approving the Tort Liability
Non -Waiver of Monetary Limits. (Motion approved 5-0)
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES December 5. 2006
DRAFT December 5, 2006
6. PROJECT DIRECTOR'S REPORT: Verbal Update
Project Director Hoyt updated the Council on the implementation of the Old Village
Master Plan and the water project with 3M and MDH. She has been contacted by several
people and is getting the feel of the project, what decisions are needed and what needs to
happen. Utilities, sewer service area, engineering infrastructure and streetscape and park
costs are being gathered so the plan can move from the vision stage to reality. An RFQ
on the Alternative Urban Area Study RFQ has been sent, which will be due in January
2007.
7. MAINTENANCE/PARK/FIRE/BUILDING:
A. Fire Dept.: Verbal
1. Donation
Fire Chief Malmquist informed the Council the Fire Dept. had received a $3,000.00
donation from Retail Construction Services, and the Dept. would be utilizing the money
toward the purchase of an inflatable rescue boat.
M/S/P DeLapp/Smith — to accept the $3,000.00 donation from Retail Construction
Services, and to write a letter thanking them. (Motion passed 5 0)
2. Grant to Purchase 800 MHz Radios
Fire Chief Malmquist updated the Council about&6 Regional Application Grant applied
for earlier in 2006 has been awarded. Bob Sherman, ;,QWf'Malmquist, and two Members
from the Woodbury Fire Dept. worked together on behdlf of the 15 fire depts. in
Washington County to submit this grant the purpose oof the purchase of the 800 MHz
Radios. Their successful application will - ng K000,000 of Federal funds into the
County, which will be distributed among al fhe f1re depts: It is the largest grant awarded
in the nation, to date.
This Grant does require a match by all,1'S cities to meet the 80/20 requirement. Lake
Elmo's share is already budge11 =43nee the system is activated, there will be a $400/year
per radio user fee paid to Washington County. The 15 fire depts. in Washington County
will pay approximately $212,000/year to the County.
City Council
Fire Dept, on their accomplishment.
8. CITY ENGINEER'S'REPORT:
City Engineer Prew updated the Council on the boundaries for the Old Village Sanitary
Sewer Study. The Memo of Understanding (MOU) shows that the City should design the
sewer system for 2,750 Equivalent Residential Units (ERU). Because this area will
require a lift station and a forced main, the capacity of the pipe is variable. The
recommended design is for a minimum of 1,000 ERU. The City Engineer stated that the
boundaries of the Study Area between 20`h Street and 30th Street could be for retrofitting.
Council discussed the range proposed, the size of the pipe and pump, and questioned
when a decision was needed. Council Members also requested that the Heritage Park,
Eden Park, and the older houses on 301h Street 201 System be include in the Study.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES December 5, 2006
6
DRAFT December 5, 2006
M/S/P Johnston/Smith — to direct the City Engineer to perform the Old Village Study
using an initial sewage usage of 1,000 REC's and an ultimate use of 3,000 REC's.
(Motion passed 5-0)
M/S/P Johnston/Smith — to direct the City Engineer to use the shaded area in the present
zoning area, as shown on the attached figure dated November 30, 2006, as the Old
Village Sewer Study area. (Motion passed 4-1: DeLapp — potential failing systems
should have the option)
B. Water Tower Warranty (moved to 9D)
C. Resolution No. 2006-138: Well Abatement
The City Engineer informed Council there is one residence refusing to participate in the
well sealing program. The resident is unwilling to allow the City to cap his well without
compensation. City Engineer Prew is requesting the Council to direct the City Attorney
to proceed with Abatement Action.
M/S/P Johnson/Johnston — to adopt Resolution No.
Action for the residence at 9198 31st Street North.
(Motion passed 4-0-1: Conlin -Abstained)
9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING:
A. Resolution No.2006-139: EaglePoin
Assistant Planner Matzek reported that
Hearin on November 27, 2006, and re
Park 7` Addition and a Section 520t
The Council also discusse
due to the enlargement of
Dale Glowa,
Branch annrc
Abatement
conducted a Public
M approval of the Eagle Point Business
one of the newly created lots.
rking spaces, and possible flooding
Point project.
>ed the parking concerns, lighting and Valley
of the pond.
M/S Smith/Johnson" to,adopt Resolution No. 2006-139, approving the Preliminary Plat
and Final Plat, and Resn1'u, on No. 2006-140, approving the Site Plan for Eagle Point
Business Park 7th AdditioA.
M/S/P Johnson/DeLapp — to amend Resolution No. 2006-139 and Resolution No.
2006-140, to include the recommendations of the City Engineer and Planning
Commission as conditions of approval. (Motion to amend passed 5-0)
M/S/P Smith/Johnson — to adopt Resolution No. 2006-139, approving the Preliminary
Plat and Final Plat, and Resolution No. 2006-140, approving the Site Plan for Eagle Point
Business Park 7`h Addition as amended. (Motion passed 5-0)
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES December 5, 2006
7
DRAFT December 5, 2006
B. Resolution No. 2006-141: Eagle Point Business Park PUD Final Plan Amendment
si n
Assistant Planner Matzek recommends approval of the requested PUD Final Plan
Amendment. In 1999, a PUD Development Stage Plan was approved for the entire Eagle
Point Business Park site. As a part of that plan, a master sign plan was submitted for the
entire PUD site and sign types were established.
The applicant is proposing to move the location of the "secondary signage" from the
northeast corner of Inwood Avenue and Hudson Boulevard to the southeast corner of
Hudson Boulevard and Eagle Point Circle. The sign would be subject to the condition
that it would be located at least 145 feet from any property line or public street right-of-
way line.
M/S/P DeLapp/Smith — to approve the Final PUD Plan amendment of the Eagle Point
Business Park to permit a secondary project identification sign per, plans Staff dated
November 21, 2006. (Motion passed 5-0)
C. System Statement Review
Council Member DeLapp stated again Council is not being kept informed, and the Mayor
was meeting with the METC regarding the MOU 0,,Ahen asked why Tom Weaver
couldn't come before the Council, instead of a r ent contacting the M,ETC for
information.
M/S Johnston/Smith — to allow the Assisi
present to the Planning Commission, and
discussion.
Point of order was re
time limit on debate.
M/S/P Johnstor
(Motion passed
10.
review the document, and
it with an informed
Johnson, stating there needed to be a
limit on Debate.
Verbal
A. EB & I Mediation Resolution
City Attorney Filla receiVefiirequest from EB & I to enter into a Binding Arbitration
�,�
Agreement with Park Construction. Attorney Filla does not know if this would be best
for the City and will be contacting the LMNC.
B. City Planner
City Attorney Filla announced that after a three-part Performance Evaluation, City
Planner Dillerud agreed to resign his position, effective December 6, 2006, Mr. Dillerud
will work on a consultant basis until July 7, 2007, on zoning matters and matters assigned
by Acting City Administrator Bouthilet.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES December 5, 2006
DRAFT December 5, 2006
C. Acting Interim City Administrator
Mayor Johnston requested the Council to extend the Interim City Administrator's duties
until the new Administrator is hired.
M/S/P DeLapp/Johnson — to appoint Thomas Bouthilet, Finance Director, as Interim
City Administrator/Treasurer until a new City Administrator has been hired, to reimburse
him for the additional responsibilities, and to suspend the City's Policy regarding the
supervising of relatives during the interim period.. (Motion passed 5-0)
D. Water Tower Warranty (Addition)
City Attorney Filla informed the Council on the status of the water tower warranty,
stating that Tank Industries, an independent contractor, had inspected the tower. The
Contractor has agreed to increase the warranty to five (5) years, but not the 1-3-5 year
inspections by an independent contractor.
11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: None
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:
A. Mayor Johnston announced to the viewing
Regional Art Center; Legislative Agenda is currej
traffic enforcement.
B. Council Member Conlin updated
Elmo Heights area streets are being ree`
C. Council Member DeLapp
to go visit the Lake Elmo
;sing options�o improve
audience about the Lake
ig per City Engineer Prew.
Fire Dept., and directed Staff to
about the speed issue.
REMINDER: Planning Commission Meeting on December 1, 2006, at 7:00 p.m.
Continuation of Public Hearing on Rezoning, Zoning Map and Zoning Districts
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES December 5, 2006
DRAFT December 5, 2006
Resolution No. 2006-131: Approve Claims
Resolution No. 2006-132: Partial Payment No. 5, Park Construction — Tablyn Park/Lake
Elmo Heights Water Main
Resolution No. 2006-133: Partial Payment No. 6, Riley Brothers Construction, Water
System Interconnect (Jamaca Avenue, Stillwater Boulevard, 315f Street)
Resolution No. 2006-134A: Partial Payment No. 1, to Lakes Mechanical Services, Inc.
for Tablyn Park/Lake Elmo Heights Plumbing Connections — Contract A
Resolution No. 2006-134B: Partial Payment No. 1, to Lakes Mechanical Services, Inc,
for Tablyn Park/Lake Elmo Heights Plumbing Connections — Contract B
Resolution No. 2006-135: Final 2007 General Fund Budget
Resolution No. 2006-136: Final Tax Levy
Resolution No. 2006-137: Tort Liability Non -Waiver of Monetary Limits
Resolution No. 2006-138: Well Abatement
Resolution No. 2006-139: Eagle Point Business Park 7th Addition;%PUD, Preliminary
Plat and Final Plat; Resolution No. 2006-140: Section 520 Site"Plan
Resolution No. 2006-140: Eagle Point Business Park See nn 520 Site Plan
Resolution No. 2006-141: Eagle Point Business Park PLI'Final Plan Amendment (sign)
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES December 5, 2006
10
`? A -
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.2006-142
RESOLUTION APPROVING CLAIMS
BE IT RESOLVED THAT Claim Numbers 365, 366, DD996 through DD1019,
30160 through 30182, were used for Staff Payroll dated December 71h, 2006; 30183
through 30244, in the total amount of $432,295.67 are hereby approved.
ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 19th day of December, 2006.
Dean A. Johnston
Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas Bouthilet
Acting City Administrator
MOWN %.'
aP
�Z
viV 1, Aj
AMOCO,
lou"Amp. WIN
ply: 000011. 7
VIS
A loAt ST 0
-As 0
ASK
FIT
-A wasp w
5 il; 016 ci,
I -z my yq!:�
1K
IVIC
A6VE,A, GJAV A
1ri
, q
nkMan
I
0
m
0 0 0 0 0 0
TM z z z z z z
A m ro m
(o(]o 00 0 0 000v, o
A
N N N N ON N N N O O N N
SOAT O�O� O\i U O��O�iT O�
C M 1� O 0 0 0 0p 00 V ¢h N O M M 00 M M
V t 00
N N
b Pi
�D O
� M Q
N a
pp v�
da �
o 0 0 0 0 E" o v o ., w a' a o '� •`
O W a�F• UUUF a' ai F., x•�F. V
¢�cG� ¢¢"U2��v
aXi
a
(� ^ is � O tJ pOp pNp •o b y�j .d �D •d � U
O N k > qm O. Cd. in Gin C O� C rnM OM.� Ay�j
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
43
B
v
00000000
0
0y
00
0000
0
000
NNNNNNNN
�n
m m
~NNNN
vmi
M m M
aCiSooSooSo
�o
v�
�vo
�0000
�o
�
,a
c
7 .-. �., .-� N .-. N .+ .--�
C V
7�
C O..r
❑ V' V dd'
❑ O
voi NoN�o
C 7 N V
F
G
�T M M M Vl M Vl M M
�• A
$' --�
O .+ M
p' p1 T Q\ O\
p' W
O' T N T
NOOo00000
!nV
U7O
Vi 00
V}a � V V
V]O
rn vi Ode
Z
yaaYS�gMY
�Y�
�Y
�Ya
�vvv
u00
'45�VY
d
w
Ab�Dbb�Ob
G
bb
0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0
1p
O
�D
O
bb
O O
�O �O �D lO
O O O O
�D
O
bbl0
O O O
N
N N
N N N N
N
N N N
O�O\O'
G
O0\h W V O1� O h
00
OO
oO MN
O\b
OO
W bM
N�h
.
. V ate
Q
N tf
N •- M
ti
tn
a ro
U°
�
�
� �
'•Or,
Q � b-0 C�C O t�-
0 �
N l�tl �
p p �
� � t�
r� d N N � �
> O �
�
ry
�M
y^ V a N d O
W O
U O
tpi C q O
�a+� �r N FL p
N •A p
N a� O
Ifn333c�i=u
R
Uw riiuu camQ
UwU
VDU
Ut=�=U
rj
gc0v
r1- [=
0
0
CY
CY
W
�jo'.
y0000
`�o.a m �n t�a000
�O N �n �n o 00 00 00
W
O
E.,00
a
•� o 0 0 0
N
o.
U W OOO N M �Db
Ud\
V
N
61
C Vt Vl V1 Vt Vl Vl VI
p V
pN
l� h
p00
O��bb
O Q
b2N
.� .�
'pOOOO
C ti .-.
'd
C F
bD\aD\
C
NN NNO N N N N
W
8 F
7��r0/J
> W
>000
J
i%r
,'���
r0/1
a
M
N
w
z z z z z z z z
B
a
yyll yQpyyp'V dv y' Cy (V jQp
F a''" •• �d' 7� 7 V 7�N 77 �N^•.r 7NN
G y M M �'N � •-+ � � �MN �°� � vimm $•NN
V�O O tn0 Vi 0 rn O fn 00 N �' N dOO fnOO
y� M M x N� .+ Y•- x M N � � n m m N N
Voo U.� v000 Voo
a
m
'�" M 00 N O �ti 00 a0 7 C OOO h 1�n np
C0 M, ip O
G h P vi m m ri b r ri h IeV� hl lD b � M O O
M M P T 00 OD � �
4 �
C N
° w
a
vq� w
U 33 u
p ''' v •i�• t' q '"I.' G U k'�' q '�1 'y �a �' " •y . i °; °;' w wo �n
q o0 0
a �6bu•� >�.ac o�,c A°�d"v� 3�aa ro�.a 00o,n�'ww. o A V wfn�nU wU w4wU .T.cGU ..a U `.C`J.'U gUum
w
Q w U U
°Oyh m m
O b vmi � Cr^n 'dp 'O O •{h V m •°ONv`D1 'd N N U
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
v
d
a
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
Nm
MOO
�4
�ONNNN
hO
CO�
Y
gavva
g�
W
C O
C O O.
C 0 0 0
tl 0 0 0
C O O CS o
tl 0
tl o
CM
tl d V
P
M C+�MN
(nO
fn 'yV
� 000
fnOOO
NOOOO
y0
U70
V
L O
U 0 0
.tl O O O
r O O O
0 0 0 0
O
-tl
N
V
Ctl
Q
O
O O
O O O
V
qq
N
N N
N N N
0 0 0
N N N
O O O O
N N N N
O
N
O
N
N
rOhO�
'hN
N I
o1pO�Ov�i
h
00 I
LZ
Om�O
hM
7 aoN
9
H
U
U
u
0QQ
b
Wr�wwmH
awwwwU
W
z
a
�
W O
V1Dt
*^
H000
iiM M00 OO
ti�
w�
Co00
C.N. tiO
9NN N8
V1
02
'°d2
M
n
C
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
v
as
a
d
d
d
d
Q
d
d
Q
1-1
P VO OV d0'd0'
O�Op
."O
N W
MV iOp OM
�O
viN
`000� �O
N W W 00 op
N
M N
M N
M�
M00
M N,-�M
eMy�
eMy�O
Q• ^ N In
�•M
�% O�
�• N
Q M M M
Q' N
P
d'M M W
6 8
<nd000
v�o
env
v�o
vi000
rnIN
�h
rn000
Q 1' a In
x
u V
x
x
U IN
Y
x P
uq
U mop
YY
F O O O O
F O
F O
F O
F O 0 o
F O
F O
F~~
O O O O
O
O
O
0 0 0
O
O
O O O
0 0 0 0
O
O
O
O O O
O
O
O O O
.-.
7-
O O
� b
I
P P P N
N M
V V
00 W
V 1 7 O
00 00
MO
O l� h m
VM1
OM
�D M 00 00
m
N
[N[
G
O
�
C
•;9
x
m a��i 3
voi
•�
3 N o
o
pB
n
'—�'
`n ''�'
� � � � � �-'
� .°tn�
v¢i � •�
z, ttt6Qyyy '�
in .�
W > '`a
.`.q a�'i `S
chi � .^. }�.
°T' u d
H,oF
o of
OF
�F
calf-O
a3 F
W ens!-o
aiF
CO rn y u
U� u
O 0. xi
W x
� .� I Ay x
U Vl .1
O ty x
y q O •k
o F
Oar (\r
Or
OM
ON
O
Oo
Opp
O PPP
GNNNN
M
0
CP
Cb,cOM
CIn
GOp
q
h^
J
W
r> O.
> V N ,m
> M
> O
, N N N
'm,
G
4
P.
•U
4
z z
z
z
z
z
z z
v
w w
w
w
w
w
w w
x x
x
x
x
x
x x
a
h 0
<{
O O
O
d'
70
IN
00
d' �
7MN00 MO � M
ind
v��
v,d
d
rnd
rizd
v�d
ri
rndddddd d
O
S O
O
O
O
O
u O
U 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
u
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
�
O O IO W V OF O O p O+ 7 R vt Vl O V1 O h cf O T
0 0 lD 1p (7\ O) O� T O N O h h vi M
non bb !�h h h OO 00M t.t N YlM O (V IN
MN
h h o0 00 V d� "I
U
q
U
C
O
$ > �o
Z 0ot
3 U o
o v O
o
oC �o
5b
*Eb N
d x .q o .q o a
,ZUU fa.0 �U Z0L) Vv,U OwV c7a�'J aaw�L1�[-�cGV
w a
W z
o d
z� 00 0 o a`O0 °o °o0
O 0, 00O ymj O N N�INNNN
v� U h U O U O D O v h
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
b
b
4
c
2
il
_,
�o 0 00 0 0 000 0000 0
�M � eF qq M M N� ti❑ M N V eF i U i l i� U
vo Nd0' N N� N N NN N d0' V O Np N O 7.O N
7 .-, yQ, ❑ M01 ❑ m �m qrn a,� �.. �rn.. � V
�,a �o moo �o �o �000 fn0000 ln0
X X X N M N m y
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
a a as a a aaa aaaa a
U R
7-0
L
W
H a
V o U E o
N� oN UU o
x oz,
N a_ zpp
UAp
wwU awU v,000 uU v,mmar�f� v,Fu
aa w vo�i �o a..
N C� GO.. CO�i CO C 000 b��b 7 TJ pip
W J 7?.N. J
T I-
I
z z z �z 0 z
il Y aJ .4pJ LN N
❑ �C G C F C
sJ, W W W W W W
at
0 0 0 0 o 00000000000000000000
n M 'n0 'n ,� 'n '+ 'n N 'n 000 0000 00 0000 0000000
N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
go ❑o cIo- Rio �000000 op pop 000 opo op000 o�ooS
� 7N �N � o C.+ O •- 7v1•vv oOMi 'n V °M^.7 rn0 oin d�•70000a
^� cno rno mo v�o v>o �nvvvoo �6484 oo 8,6 viv odoov
�y �q �vv$yav5ya"OpY��YYYY IT IT
U y•� M^ M N O� M M N^ O M N O�� -+
7 oo �o io �07 o0 dd•�O
d
0 0 0 0 0 00000000000000000000
m o 0 0 0 0 00000000000000000000
c1 N N N �V N NN �VN �J NN NNNN NNN�VNN(`V N�1
� °` O. � � � Q\ a D\ O� T O� Q\ D\ � T T T O� T � O� T D, � Q•
M
❑ 0 0 O O O O O O '+ N -+ M N 'n N �D �p M V 1 1� h N �O O V l � °�
h h Vl 06 d' T Q` h
vi 'n 00 W NN 0000 h�O 1'h W M 00 W D\O 00 M ap NOp O�MO Vl
h ^
� bC0
N
U? y
8
ut a3 a C �,$ aa°i `3 ❑3 o°q0 yp g
° u CG b.Ci ov�•c�b�`�."°4.`''a",T6U
lzw
�c ��� ?o`er. •�� •�'F ��d��cW Nitl•o�cv3���a•ro�i �
y c'xi � ai IN
A v�u u F- uu "ate Uz ma. �aawgoo
NNS
0
a
rn `D rn � �� E o00000000
>o >� >N >o >a ?00000000000000000000
z
z
z
z
Lv44
aJ
0 0
O_
0 0
_ O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
000
n(�
BOO
b00
N
�D CO CO CO W CO CO 00
d
O O O
g o
g 0
g N M
g O W O do ON
VO1 o N
0 0 0
O
U O
O
^C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
U�
U �D
U� .-�O
d
L+
CC
C
O O O
O
O
0 0
p 0 0 0 0 0 0
C!
O O O
O
O
O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
y�
NN N
N
�V
NN
NN NN NN�1
+'
Mln t�0
CO d',D
N N
aD\
00
OO
f�0 h
h h
hh hNCO Vl V �D
700
NN
Mi0
C
6
0 0 1' � b
V
�
O O
yO d'
W V 1 C O T O C O lV N 1
O
.• V vein
tD
NN
O��
MNv� M.�`. �M
r
M
(n
N
b
W
G1
0,0aV
FxU
FfAU
3 (aU
a�wUU
�F
�gC n°
O O O h Y l N M
>
o00
��
gh
goo
gggYl^I^�4-�
i
M
TKDA
ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
MEMORANDUM
To: Kelli Matzek Reference:
Copies To: Todd Erickson, P. E.
Sharon Lumby
From: Thomas D. Prew, P.E.
Date: December 14. 2006
Project No.
Routing:
y-
1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza —
444 Cedar Street
Saint Paul, MN 55101-2140
(651)292-4400
(651)292-0083 Fax
www.tkda.com
Escrow Reduction #4
Sanctuary
City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota
13267.000
An escrow reduction has been requested for the drainfield work completed.
I would recommend that escrow be reduced to the amounts listed below:
Item
Original Amount
Work Remaining
Site Grading/ Turf Establishment
$0.00
$0.00
Storm Sewer
$285.209.00
$5,000.00
Sanitary Sewer
$132.468.00
$5,000.00
Drainfield
$775,000.00
$50,000.00
Watermain
$510,339.00
$5,000.00
Streets
$488,948.00
$5,000.00
Street Signs
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
Landscaping
$110,000.00
$110,000.00
Subtotal
125% Security
$2,302,964.00 $181,000.00
$2,878,705.00 $226,250.00
An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity
...... I IS
cvt
nnP
nAo
Ak W__T,%R
, MiR
- *W
:K—, J�,, "4-
e I f
I' �� `..��r .1'X L �_` .L t r'.��=T'- `1 �.. ;..,.. F _-�''.� �vJ 7(Ya/�jY z rJ {'�.� ��,s 21y U:r rt`���/� ,Sy�Ls..�,FS .-���
rj-l- 4Ljl
V
l4
MA
NP�
1A b
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-143A
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 29
TO LAKES MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC.
FOR TABLYN PARK/LAKE ELMO HEIGHTS
PLUMBING CONNECTIONS — CONTRACT A
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lake Elmo City Council hereby
approves Partial Payment No. 1 to Lakes Mechanical Services, Inc. for
Tablyn Park/Lake Elmo Heights Plumbing Connections — Contract A in the
amount of $43,731.11, verified by the City Engineer.
ADOPTED by the Lake Elmo City Council the 19th day of
December, 2006.
Dean A. Johnston, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas Bouthilet, Interim City Administrator
j7 7
� F>,r �ri � �z��� {n k t`J-:- -i 41. r'cL I t {ti �1 ��3�1>� 1*''�r�i,• i^,r' �r rt� �� T' '�
J F �` 'IJ.+�b l�`v �u� .Y5 hi ifi� i�.I-• ����� �1--7 r��ra y.*'hF �J�i "s �
f�+y7
n,e � its-�,i 7� � '} s �Sttl'. f ( rj ) 1,7 r7itf �. 3r1 rl�t+ y 'iS�•Y.L� F' ]'
. >•t.i �,�.:;.�.. �, ,r �.. L � u J. -fir , S r� a+ i -'•fb' v � 'i3.L,
llitr µY ay .! F! LJ4
. b:t 'Q �,•Y �,1 Ji r�._ �
��t �yc r� £ i y �� ^� p.r-+ l` -...y� 4 �,i+tj[� '1 ���v 's �Pll°__:r �u ��i'€ , U 'L.:. i , 4 rr�rh�'� `�3•, ,;��, r:,
r r� � �e lT' r` , ,r ✓�t1T`f 1,f�'a` LfJ frf: f w` n i�
. z { �'.e,-�. x.♦^-;J;l.� ,i(.. `+'`r >v°. '..% � �. n-!.:::� .� t. -��`` :r.� � '!il.�_ �J�-�
i ys !zl i _tom
444 Cedar Street, Sulte 1500
Saint Paul, MN 55101.2140
ENGINEERS• ARCHITECTS °PLANNERS
(651)292-4400
(651) 292-0083 Fax
www.tkda,aam
Proj. No. 13524.000 Cert. No. 2 St. Paul, MN, December 15 , 20 06
To City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota Owner
This Certifies that Lakes Mechanical Services Inc. Contractor
For TablynPark/Lake Elmo Heights Plumbing Connections - Contract A
Is entitled to Forty -Three Thousand Seven Hundred Thirty -One Dollars and 11/100-------------------- ($43,731.11)
being 2nd estimate for partial payment on contract with you dated October 17 2006
Received payment in full of above Certificate. TKDA
Lakes Mechanical Services, Inc.
120 Thomas D. Prew, P.E.
RECAPITULATION OF ACCOUNT
CONTRACT
PLUS EXTRAS
PAYMENTS
CREDITS
Contract price plus a#ras
$ 527,410.00
All previous payments
$ 155,192.00
All previous credits
FXm No.
Credit No.
$ -
AMOUNT OF THIS CERTIFICATE
$ 43,731.11
Totals
$ 527,410.00
$ 198,923.11
$
Credit Balance
$ -
There will remain unpaid on contract after
_a mentoftliisCertificate _
p Y
_
__
$.._____ 328,486.89
__...
$ 527,410.00
l $ 527,410.00
$
An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity
TKDA
Engineers -Architects -Planners Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENTS
Estimate No, 2 Period Ending December 14 120 06 Page 1 of 1 Proj. No, 13524.000
Contractor Lakes Mechanical Services Inc. Original Contract Amount $527,410.00
Project Tablyn Park/Lake Elmo Heights Plumbing Connections- Contract A
Location City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota
Total Contract Work Completed
Total Approved Credits
Total Approved Extra Work Completed
Approved Extra Orders Amount Completed
Total Amount Earned This Estimate
Less Approved Credits
Less 5 % Retained
Less Previous Payments
Total Deductions
Amount Due This Estimate
Contractor
Engineer
Lakes Mechanical Services, Inc.
Thomas D. Prew, P.E.
$
HIN
$ 209,392.75
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 209,392.75
$ 0.00
$ 10,469.64
$ 155,192.00
$ 165,661.64
$ 43,731.11
Date
Date December 15, 2006
ESTIMATE NO, 2 PERIOD ENDING: December 14, 2006
TABLYN PARK/LAKE ELMO HEIGHTS
PLUMBING CONNECTIONS
CONTRACTA
CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA
TKDA PROJECT NO. 13524.000
ITEM
CONTRACT
QUANTITY
UNIT
AMOUNT
NO.
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
QUANTITY
TO DATE
PRICE
TO DATE
CONTRACTA
1
OBTAIN PLUMBING PERMIT
EA
102.0
44.00
$ 4,060.00
$
178,200.00
2
INSTALL WATER METER/PLUMBING WORK
EA
102.0
32.00
$ 680.00
$
21,760,00
3
SALVAGE GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON (GAC) FILTER
EA
7.0
4.00
$ 350.00
$
, 1,400.00
4
ADDITIONAL PLUMBING WORK
HR
300.0
41.77
$ 75.00
$
3,132.75
5
ADDITIONAL CARPENTRY, SHEET ROCK, PAINTING
HR
200.0
0.00
$ 65.00
$
-
6
CONNECT SERVICE LINE TO EXISTING WELL PIPING OUTSIDE OF
THE HOUSE
EA
10.0
7.00
$ 700.00
$
4,900,00
TOTAL ESTIMATE NO. 2 $ 209,392.75
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.2006-143B
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 29
TO LAKES MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC.
FOR TABLYN PARK/LAKE ELMO HEIGHTS
PLUMBING CONNECTIONS — CONTRACT B
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lake Elmo City Council hereby
approves Partial Payment No. 1 to Lakes Mechanical Services, Inc. for
Tablyn Park/Lake Elmo Heights Plumbing Connections — Contract B in the
amount of $181,871.90, verified by the City Engineer.
ADOPTED by the Lake Elmo City Council the 19th day of
December, 2006.
Dean A. Johnston, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas Bouthilet, Interim City Administrator
TA
ENGINEERS• ARCHITECTS• PLANNERS
444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500
Saint Paul, MN 55101.2140
(651) 292-4400
(651) 292-0083 Fax
www.tkda.com
Proj. No. 13524.000 Cert. No. 2 St. Paul, MN, December 15, 120 06
To City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota Owner
This Certifies that Lakes Mechanical Services Inc Contractor
For Tablyn Park/Lake Elmo Heights Plumbing Connections - Contract B
Is entitled to One Hundred Eight -One Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy -One Dollars and 90/100--- ($181,871 90)
being 2nd estimate for partial payment on contract with you dated October 17 2006
Received payment in full of above Certificate.
Lakes Mechanical Services, Inc.
, 20
Thomas D. Prew, P.E.
RECAPITULATION OF ACCOUNT
CONTRACT
PLUS EXTRAS
PAYMENTS
CREDITS
Contract price plus extras
$ 555,000.00
All previous payments
$ 65,695.35
All previous credits
Cadra No.
Credit No.
$
AMOUNT OF THIS CERTIFICATE
$ 181,871.90
Totals
$ 555,000.00
$ 247,567.25
$
Credit Balance
$ -
There will remain unpaid on contract after
payment ofthis Certificate
$ 307,432.75
„
$ 555,000.00
$ 555,000.00�
An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity
ESTIMATE NO. 2 PERIOD ENDING: December 15, 2006
TABLYN PARKILAKE ELMO HEIGHTS
PLUMBING CONNECTIONS
CONTRACT B
CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA
TKDA PROJECT NO. 13524.000
ITEM
CONTRACT
QUANTITY
UNIT
AMOUNT
NO.
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
QUANTITY
TO DATE
PRICE
TO DATE
CONTRACT B
1
OBTAIN PLUMBING PERMIT
EA
96.0
55.00
$ 4,050.00
$
222,750.00
2
INSTALL WATER METER/PLUMBING WORK
EA
96.0
25.00
$ 900.00
$
22,500.00
3
SALVAGE GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON (GAG) FILTER
EA
12.0
2.00
$ 400.00
$
800.00
4
ADDITIONAL PLUMBING WORK
HR
300.0
59.03
$ 80.00
$
4,722.40
5
ADDITIONAL CARPENTRY, SHEET ROCK, PAINTING
HR
200.0
3.21
$ 70.00
$
224.70
6
INSTALL BOOSTER PUMP
EA
20.0
3.00
$ 1,400.00
$
4,200.00
7
CONNECT SERVICE LINE TO EXISTING WELL PIPING OUTSIDE OF
THE HOUSE
EA
10.0
6.00
$ 900.00
$
5,400,00
TOTAL ESTIMATE NO. 2 $ 260,597.10
TKDA
Engineers -Architects -Planners Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENTS
Estimate No. 2 Period Ending December 15, 20 06 Page 1 of 1 Proj. No. 13524,000
Contractor Lakes Mechanical Services Inc. Original Contract Amount $555,000,00
Project Tablvn Park/Lake Elmo Heights Plumbing Connections Contract B
Location City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota
Total Contract Work Completed
Total Approved Credits
Total Approved Extra Work Completed
Approved Extra Orders Amount Completed
Total Amount Earned This Estimate
Less Approved Credits
Less 5 %Retained
Less Previous Payments
Total Deductions
Amount Due This Estimate
Contractor
$ 260,597.10
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 13,029.86
$ 65,695.35
Date
$ 260,597.10
78,725.21
181.871.90
Lakes Mechanical Services, Inc.
Engineer Date December 15, 2006
Thomas D. Prew, P.E.
Lake Elmo
Agenda Section: CONSENT AGENDA
No 4 E.
City Council
Dec. 19, 2006
Agenda Item: Street Name Change
Within the Plat of HIDDEN MEADOWS OF LAKE ELMO is a small street running generally north/south
(see attached map) that was platted as Kindred Avenue North. The applicant chose that street name even
though the street aligns with Kelvin Avenue North. City street names and addresses are issued by the
Building Official. The Building Official issued an address for the church as 5825 Kelvin Avenue North.
After the building permit was issued, there was confusion because contractors would refer to Kindred and
city files and addressing refer to Kelvin.
Action Items:
Person responsible:
Motion /Second , to change the
name of Kindred Avenue North within the Plat of HIDDEN
MEADOWS OF LAKE ELMO to Kelvin Avenue North because
its north/south alignment is to Kelvin Avenue in other areas of the
city, and to direct staff to notify the owner and appropriate
agencies of the change, particularly the 9-1-1 Emergency System.
Attachments:
Time Allocated:
Location Map
Resolution to Change Street Name
.1, !�z
tug
L* ."
Mi
sg_'4A
IF,
Ij C. -am
ip-
I iv
Vt
A W
47
"if
K- 0
C,-9
FI
-f
L. Lt
so- WK
A kit
-I
Ell
,WllT �?_,'
how
,&M
I I
UAW VOW R19W
l'J2N 1IDN
®
Ulm DIN
1
DIAN HI L 3RD SUBDIVISIO tr
1
TOM Yoo Are., ON
Z q 0
1
h9N R9N
1
crvaweecm
sarz ��wnwv v
lggN URN
STATE 3 .
n D'N
HIDDEN MEADOWS OF LAKE ECMO —w•
•�^•
luaw ulw N.w
x
�.........Zr.
59TH STREET -- -
e
w
'
Z
Ir
Vicinity Map
•
I Y I p
i
- o e
a ¢ ;
,
I I
1 I
0 600
— —
Scale in Feel
a
a
�
a
,s e
JESSES I
1T�1¢as po glon'ofhnERn�mOamllAey'
¢pgel NVailwn WS¢Mnplbn CounlVolAnz.
ma m W��na ¢lium b¢ wee toe �.1.�.M¢
®
pVpa¢esmly. WesMplon County lsr'd
�e¢ponsiblo M oMlmccmW¢.
--
Location
Map �
w.u'W¢¢Nnplon CauMYSweYw9 glue.
iNuu R.,,,ypA.,.
PA?wl@ta MW R89W lnbnnallon
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-144
A RESOLUTION RENAMING
KINDRED AVENUE NORTH TO KELVIN AVENUE NORTH
WITHIN THE PLAT OF HIDDEN MEADOWS OF LAKE ELMO
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo previously named a platted roadway as
Kindred Avenue North within its jurisdiction which is located within Section 2,
Township 29 North, Range 21 West; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo desires to rename that portion of Kindred
Avenue North to Kelvin Avenue North, and wants to ensure that all local jurisdictions are
aware of the change and also wants to ensure that the new name is placed in the 9-1-1
system; and
WHEREAS, a Resolution is necessary to change the name of a street, and the
information and the Resolution must be forwarded to the Washington County Surveyor's
Office in order to effectuate the change.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Lake Elmo does hereby approve and accept that Kindred Avenue North which lies in
those portions of Section 2 within the City of Lake Elmo as identified within the Plat of
HIDDEN MEADOWS OF LAKE ELMO is hereby renamed to Kelvin Avenue North.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk shall provide a certified
copy of this Resolution to the Washington County Surveyor's Office and any other
department within Washington County to ensure that the name is placed within the
records of Washington County and the 9-1-1 Emergency System.
ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 19`h day of December 2006.
Dean A. Johnston, Mayor
Attest:
Thomas Bouthilet, Interim City Administrator
Lake Elmo
Agenda Section: FINANCE
No. 5A
City Council
12-19-2006
Agenda Item: Miller Variance Refund Request
Background Information for December 19, 2006:
Attached, please find a letter from Neil and Elizabeth Miller requesting withdrawal of their variance application and
refund of $725.00.
Neil and Elizabeth Miller submitted a variance application for lot width on a public street, lot size and lot size for
septic on October 27, 2006. It is my understanding that many meetings and conversations have taken place in the past
2-3 months with the previous City Administrator and City Planner. I am unaware of the results of the previous
discussions which makes it difficult to determine the validity of this request.
A public hearing was published, public hearing notices mailed, two staff reports written by the Assistant Planner and
reports were received from the VBWD, DNR and the City Engineer. A copy of November 27th Planning Commission
minutes have been provided for your review. Please note it is City Policy not to grant refunds for variances denied.
Action Items:
Person responsible:
Tom Bouthilet
Attachments:
1. Letter of Withdrawal/Refund Request
2. November 27, 2006 Planning Commission Minutes
0
o-J rl�!`d l�JIT't{' �J r,- •Ct' 3'tJ �Iy"'d,.F�s"�r•� rFr�;
1tt7
r i7 ,Y t } r / �,ly 3 s !3, ice' i•:
jo
7 'JAI
} � i
>< r t
rr
{• l � r. f � F i
'�iFt. i.�,�lT ..�' mil st+�'•:;-' _..r.r, t.�' fr: � _ ._.� � �'1. .. �s-�,51.. ?�J�
7.T . _ 1 jl e r ' ' V 'ri.� ! Cr m, [ i ! .t} t •�
1 `
r_I
�r 'Ater trl�)'li r4'rzt/r( •-fr�l ar'--' rr l'' i -�. ' ry,{ F ,p# E� I,
i f., �: .- ' "tbi i.,�: .. ', rt i. 1s.; i4:� ... ! .�,.'f{'!. _-.'Y. • .. i,l
f
.i� r r? ._ . �7 s}S 1i , �.-ti{ t.ls y�bC 1. Nam..[ F•i� rr li rti.� :rr i-'� r ' ��� �. ir. j''F:
i 1 ' . I T� , ry't y . �i l rk 1 , !! lI > °� � r r,) i „ � n 3 r,:
Y: r. , ,t �,.♦ 1 ct� H r a --�iAc�i--{, %..a t .r��7 b. �? y 1 i,' I �� . a : +., Z 1 3i
JL..' 1.,.�.�. InS yA .. 1 7, fFt� rtil � 4�'ir { It;l� �k' r ors.-- T ZTry ~ t '' ar.:, r ;� r VI 'sir s•.-iyS
`1 r-% t i � J r 1 'U _ ��. d }• 'a � �z 1 i r 1 r �r t � I,
`,d
�..1
FROM FAX NO. :6517790612 Dec, 11 2006 12:28PM P2
December 11, 2006
To; Interim City Administrator Tom Bouthilet
From: Neil and Elizabeth Miller
Due to the inadequacies and inexperience of some city stat'T'members we hereby
withdraw our variance request to build on lots 0502921440024 and 0502921440026 in
Lane's Demontreviile,
We are requesting a full refund of the seven hundred and twenty five dollars ($725) we
submitted with the application.
Respectfully,
Neil and Elizabeth Miller
APPROVED: 12/11/06
City of Lake Elmo
Planning Commission Meeting
Minutes of November 27, 2006
Chairman Helwig called to order the meeting of the Lake Elmo Planning Commission at 7:00
p.m. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Van Zandt, Deziel, Ptacek, Roth, Lyzenga, Schneider,
McGinnis, Armstrong, and Commissioner Fliflet, COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Johnston and
Councilmember Johnson, STAFF PRESENT: Finance Director Bouthilet, Assistant Planner
Matzek and Recording Secretary Anez.
Pledge of Allegiance
Agenda
M/S/P, Ptacek/Van Zandt to accept the Agenda as presented. Vote: 9:0.
Minutes
M/S/P, Roth/Flifltet to accept the Minutes of November 6, 2006 as presented. Vote: 8:0:1,
Abstain: Ptacek-Absence.
M/S/P, Ptacelc/Roth to accept the Minutes of October 30, 2006 as presented. Vote: 9:0.
Public Hearing: Variances on Bennett Avenue for Neil and Elizabeth Miller
The Assistant Planner introduced the application for the variances for The Miller's property on
unimproved Bennett Avenue. She explained the past vacations of two roads and the unimproved
dedicated roads that remain. The road frontage requirements in the R-1 Zoning District are 125
feet, and the applicants only have sixty feet on the unimproved Bennett Avenue.
The Assistant Planner reported that the Fire Chief said he would prefer 14 feet in width and
height for safety vehicle access. He also said he has concerns with the curves and corners in the
proposed driveway as well.
Assistant Planner Matzek said that the driveway would be created on a neighboring parcel then
crossing the city's right-of-way. An agreement would have to be drafted to protect the city from
liability for the crossing of the right of way. She pointed out that shared driveways also
sometimes present problems for maintenance issues.
The Assistant Planner said the address files for two neighbors had drainage reports and a history
of flooding on those parcels is well documented. Valley Branch Watershed District added
requirements for lowest floor elevation as well as the requirement that a watershed district permit
would be necessary for any work at or below 932.5 feet in elevation.
The Assistant Planner pointed out that the northern parcel was assessed as a Recreational Lot
when the roadway was improved in the past.
The Assistant Planner recommended denial of the application for variances due to the safety
concerns and the impact on adjacent properties based upon flooding history.
She said that if the Planning Commission recommends approval, an easement agreement for the
driveway would be a requirement of approval.
Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes from November 27, 2006
APPROVED: 12/11/06
Neil and Elizabeth Miller
Mr. Miller asked if the Assistant Planner had visited the site. He said that no homes are served
by those two roads. The driveway on the Severin property goes straight out to 501h Street. Mrs.
Miller said they could meet the 14 feet requirement for fire access and for emergency vehicles to
turn around, They would be willing to meet the fire chief to create that. Mr. Miller said
shouldn't the previous owner have been required to combine the two parcels in the past. He said
that the parcels combined would meet the city's 60% rule. He said that the City Engineer is
wrong, that Argyle Street and Bennett Avenue are not being used. Snow plowing would not be
performed by the city, and there would be no reason for it because they are not improved roads.
Mrs. Miller asked why it would be a health, safety, and welfare issue. She said that the existing
driveway has been there for seventy-five years. She asked why not vacate the streets there. She
said they would be able to meet city requirements as a piece of cake. Mr. Miller said the bank
thought it was buildable with the access easement from 8012 50th Street North or they would not
have loaned them the money. He said the land is worthless if it can't be built upon.
The Assistant Planner said she was unable to see the lot from the road because it was not staked
and the parcel is landlocked. The planner explained it would not meet the 60% rule because that
section of the code addresses a parcel of record in October of 1979 that is 60% of the lot size
standard. These parcels were not combined and have not been a parcel of record since 1979.
Commissioner Ptacek asked whether the applicants purchased both lots. They said they did
purchase two property identification numbers. Commissioner Ptacek said it is incumbent upon
the owner to consolidate. He said it is unclear precisely where they want to place the driveway.
The applicant presented an aerial that Commissioner Ptacek said verified the engineer and
chief s concerns about angles and access for the driveway.
Commissioner Deziel asked if there is a maintenance agreement with the owner of the
underlying land for the ingress/egress easement. The applicants said they could do that if that is
a city requirement.
Commissioner Van Zandt asked if they met with staff prior to purchasing this land. They replied
that they met with the administrator and city planner one year ago. At that time, they said that
the concern was for lot size and not so much the access.
Chairman Helwig asked the width and height of the existing driveway. They did not lrnow the
answer. He asked if The Severins would be willing to improve their driveway to that extent.
The applicants said they would.
THE CIIAIRMAN OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:37 P.M.
Kevin Clemens 7920 Hill Trail North
Mr. Clemmons said he lives west of and adjacent to the wetland that abuts the subject property.
That property is upslope from the wetland. He said he is worried about the wetland; there is a
fragile ecosystem in that small pond. If the runoff would cause it to flood it could be damaged
beyond repair. 1.5 acres as a minimum lot size is also a quality of life issue and neighbors in the
area would like that standard to remain.
Carl Abrahamson, Resident
Mr. Abrahamson said he has lived there 42 years and knows why they left those two roads open.
The roads could be used in the future by the city. All the roads in the neighborhood are 30 feet
Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes from November 27, 2006
APPROVED: 12/11/06
wide. Owners take care of plowing in there. He did express concern for the fire department
access. He said if that portion of Bennett Avenue adjacent to the subject parcel was not vacated
it could be buildable. He recommends approval with the conditions including widening the
driveways.
Commissioner Pelletier read two letters, one from Michael and Maura Severin of 8012 501"
Street North (attached) and the other from Allen R. Siedle of 7951 Hill Trail Court (attached).
THE CHAIRMAN CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:43 P.M.
Commissioner Deziel said a city 201 System was built into Unimproved Argyle Street and the
fence around it runs nearly down the middle so he assumed that meant Argyle Street was not
going to be improved.
Commissioner Fliflet asked when the land was purchased. The Millers said they bought the land
in July of 2006.
Assistant Planner Matzek said that the report from Valley Branch Watershed District came too
late for the staff report. As a consequence she would add Findings for flooding of neighboring
properties.
Commissioner Ptacek said that adding the remainder of Bennett Avenue would still not meet lot
size or road frontage requirements. Even if the parcel is rezoned to NC in the future, it would
not meet road frontage requirements. He said that he is uncomfortable with anything other than
denial for lot size until NC comes in the future.
The Chairman asked the applicants if they would like to table to a date uncertain in the future.
Mr. Severin, 8012 50th Street North
Mr. Severin said he knows why those roads weren't vacated when the remainder of the roads
near there were. He said because that lot still had access. I-Ie said it is not landlocked because it
has an easement.
Assistant Planner Matzek said she would have to find out the legal impact of vacating those
additional streets. She said there are still problems for road frontage, wetland concerns, and
emergency access.
Commissioner Fliflet asked if the applicants would table in order to prepare and present plans for
the easement, agreements, driveway and accessibility, and other concerns presented tonight.
The Commission asked staff whether or not this is a protected wetland, how much of the parcel
is buildable with the setback from the 100 year flood elevation for the wetland and with the
septic system. They would also like more information for safety vehicles and a permanent
driveway maintenance agreement.
M/S/P, Roth/Van Zandt-to direct staff to- evaluate -a- permanent maintenance agreement, --- -- --
environmental impact, and wetland setbacks and bring it back with the additional information
requested to the next meeting and to look at the legal ramifications of street vacation for Bennett
Avenue because the City may anticipate soon receiving a petition to vacate. Vote: 9:0.
Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes from November 27, 2006
APPROVED: 12/11/06
Commission Roth said he has difficulty with the existing lot size.
Commissioner Armstrong said the city should not be creating new lots with easements for
access. He said there are serious environmental concerns for the septic system on this parcel in a
neighborhood with a history of bad soils and failing septic systems. There are 201 systems in
this area.
M/S/P, Roth/Deziel to table the Miller application for variances until the December 11, 2006
Meeting where the requested information will be provided by the applicants. Vote: 9:0,
Public Hearing:
Preliminary Plat of EAGLE POINT BUSINESS PARK 7TH ADDITION
and also Section 520 Site Plan Review for Phase 3 Office Center
The Assistant Planner said the pro
within Eagle Point Business Park
also been provided for a 2-story, 4
applicants do not have a tenant foi
the two newly platted lots from Hi
and water will be available to this
maintain the pond so no easement
yet. The Landscape Plan was revi
Dale Glowa, United Land, LLC
Mr. Glowa said this site plan is a
and it will be constructed of the si
another phase in the future. The I
property owners. It is like a shop,
maintained by the owners.
THE CHAIRMAN OPENED THE
Nobody came forward to speak.
THE CHAIRMAN CLOSED THE
rosal before the Planning Commission is a replat of one outlot
;"' Addition into two parcels and one outlot. A site plan has
),000 square feet office building on one of the lots. The
the building at this time. The street will be located between
dson Boulevard northerly to Eagle Point Boulevard. Sewer
tte. She said that the City Engineer said the city does not
suggested for it. No exterior lighting plan was submitted
ed by the City Forester and it meets minimum requirements.
M/S/P, Ptacek/Roth to recommend
plan of EAGLE POINT BUSINESS
Section 520 Site Plan for the 40,000
Office Center Phase III on Lot 2, BI
on plans within the planning packet
following conditions:
1. Compliance with the
2, Compliance with the
ication of the phase II building which is now 80% leased,
material but this will be a two-story version. There will be
to drive is created by an access agreement among all the
center with drive aisles but built to city specifications but
HEARING AT 8:05 P.M.
HEARING AT 8:06 P.M.
oval of the preliminary plat and PUD development stage
RK 7TH ADDITION, and to recommend approval of the
are feet, two-story office building known as Eagle Point
i of Eagle Point Business Park 7 h Addition as depicted
as recommended by the Assistant City Planner with the
3. Only parking depicted by the SitA Plan
Point Business Park 7`' Addition slier
4. Submission of a complete exterio gh
of the City Engineer,
of the Watershed District, as found to be
on Lot 2, Block 1, Eagle
photometric plan demonstrating compliance
Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes from November 27, 2006
NOV. 24. 2006 2:08PM SCIENCE RESEARCH CTR NO, 831 P, 2
Allen P— Siedle
7951 Hill Trail CT.
Lake Elmo, Minn. 55042
251b November 2006
City Council of Lake Ehno;
I am writing you in the matter of a public hearing about Property ID numbers
05.029.21.44.0024 and 0.5.029.21.44.0026 because I will be out of town on the day and
time of the hearing.
The varianoe request is objectionable for two reasons. The first is whether the Municipal
Code means what it says; or whether it means what Is convenient at the moment. The
code has as reasonable bases a desire to maintain quality of lifestyle; and to avoid
burdening the environment. The variances sought require so elastic a reading of'the code
as to defeat its purposes. Granting them would leave the city council with Iittle
principled reason not to rule similarly in similar situations where the land parcel is
grossly wnoonfomnxug.
Second, the combined parcels are very near a wetland. No one has come forth with an
assessment of the impact of the proposed building activity on the wetland and on the
wildlife that make it their home. An evaluation of environmental impact ensuing from
the variances, if granted, should be made.
P41VT of o,c-
Michael and Maura Severin RECEIVED
6012 - 500' Street North
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
November 24, 2006
City of Lake Elmo
Re: Miller Variance
To Whom It May Concern:
I have lived next to the property in question for 27 years. I feel I know what is there as
welt as anyone.
I see no reason to deny this request for a variance. Having lived in the neighborhood
for 27 years, I have seen many homes built, some on lots smaller than this.
Through the years, several attempts have been made to secure this property for the
purpose of building. However, the only access to the property was on unimproved city
streets that all knew well would never be improved.
Poor planning in 1926 still effects some properties in this neighborhood. This property
now has good access on an existing driveway, meets lot size requirements pursuant to
the 60% rule, and has perked out well for a septic system.
I see no reason to deny the current owners full use of their property. It only seems fair
that if a property is assessed taxes and street improvements, that it should also be
treated the same as any of the other properties in the neighborhood, Granting this
variance will give the city the opportunity to vacate existing, worthless streets and clean
up Denny Lanes mess from 1926.
Resp7tfully bmitted,
Michael and Maura Severin
/f Yl-z `- o7C
Lake Elmo
City Council
Agenda Section: Project Director
No 6A
December
19,2006
Agenda Item:
St. Croix Valley Area Community Family Center Integrated Planning Team (IPT) request to
consider locating the future facility in Lake Elmo
Purpose. The city council is being asked to receive a request from Doris Karls, Chair of the Integrated
Planning Team for the St. Croix Valley Area Family Center, to explore the location of the facility in Lake
Elmo. The city council is also being asked to review the attached list of questions for its completeness and
to give the staff direction on how to proceed with this request and the questions.
Background. The city of Lake Elmo participates in the Integrated Planning Team for the St. Croix Valley
Area Community Family Center. The Center provides a variety of community services related to adult,
special needs and parent/child education as well as other services. The programs are available to residents
outside of the IDP School District #834. Several partners are involved in the facility planning including the
United Way, the YMCA, Courage St. Croix, Andersen Corporation, Human Services, the Stillwater Public
Schools and the cities served by #834. The IPT met over the past several months to evaluate sites for the
new St. Croix Family Resource Center and possible associated community recreation facilities. Fourteen
sites were evaluated. The Lake Elmo site ranked highest. In addition, a survey of residents in Lake Elmo,
Stillwater, Bayport and Oak Park Heights demonstrated that 70% of area households believe that their
members may visit the center either frequently or occasionally.
Facili The proposed facility is 40,000 square feet. It includes several meeting rooms, classrooms, gyms,
an indoor playground, an outdoor play area and parking lot. The facility operates about 12 hours a day with
programs that serve a wide variety of people. There may be opportunities to share space with community
organizations in this facility.
Proposed site. A possible site for the facility and related facilities is identified in the Lake Elmo Old
Village masterplan.
Specific information. The staff suggests meeting with members of the IPT to gather information about
specific needs including: 1) the land area required for the facility; 2) the possible land lease/ownership
needs, and 3) the minimum and maximum time frame for the propject.
Action Items
Person responsible:
Receive a request from Doris Karls, Chair of the IPT group,
asking the city council to make the St. Croix Valley Community
Susan Hoyt, Project Director
Family Center a reality at the Lake Elmo site in the Old Village.
Request a motion directing the project director to:
I ) meet with the St. Croix Valley Area Community Family Center
partners to get specific information on the partners' needs for its
proposed facility in Lake Elmo; and 2) to identify questions and
gather information related information to the questions to report at
the city council workshop on January 8, 2007.
Attachments:
Time Allocated:
• List of questions asked by city councilmembers
To be determined by city council.
• IPT powerpoint presentation from December 12, 2006
�� ' �i�$ F 1r*t i`r J y4�� I U.�,,� u51'i. �r t �� '.: �tr S s•�'-' � i. ' -+��, 1_.i�""sn`�..�t"'�"�.��- rt`�e
�t Y.1,��'7 � � Y rSx � r''ar . �2y l Y� , .�L•y "rZ l t. � ,,, L � f � �� 1. •'rt
C t } d it
i' r F 7 �.! � V lr -nc f ! _t .�,� l / � { � c z , •,�v� .,� �1t� ..-,
ly r y `� �rC..^ ��II•l �S'tt'��. sib nt y t s t yl�r`rl�'�r �IAy � 't'a�hN h�•�-�-4 ���+k �F
J e 7....:.`� dn:�st... r.�!',�i'�•.F�.�l,tr.:2r �`.r-.:e.;rr3.� iLf'2.�;1s. �'�nt:�h., �.l�.: ti1 .:c� ��: �'1.n����•r.-'rr;r:!
y�lr"AlrS'"e 7 .
r T`�a3��sld
s �/Y � �l. A=,r�yu rT�� •c..SJ,sr .r f� jf rr y ri . + ?z•�` n�vr�
�'_! �T' � ��r�j,,,t �•-'a �] �L �r 1{r .'fix I I�'F' �.�,�; ,�+ -�r� s h?`f•''r_
,win'i`I in
We
December14, 2006
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE
STCRO|XVALLEY COMMUNITY FAMILY CENTER
POTENTIAL LOCATION |NLAKE F|k4O
� 8nofthis writing the |PThas not formally requested any incentives from the city for locating
Costs
What is the impact on city services like police and fire?
What, if any, loss will there be in property tax revenue from this facility
on this site because if it isn't owned by a taxpaying entity?
Will non Lake Elmo users participate in sharing the cost of having the
facility in the city through fees or some other mechanism?
Will Lake Elmo taxpayers be paying for the construction of the facility?
Can donations cover the cost of the land for Lake Elmo, if Lake Elmo is
asked to lease land or donate land at a less than market value amount?
What entity will cover the related infrastructure costs (water, sewer,
road, surface water)?
Relationship to the Old Village's goals
Does the facility help the city meet the goals established for the Old
Village Masterplan?
For example:
-is there space for this facility? Related facilities?
-does it physicallycomplement the proposed adjoininigland uses9
-is the scale appropriate?
December 14.z000
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE
5T.CRO|XVALLEY COMMUNITY FAMILY CENTER
POTENTIAL LOCATION |NLAKE ELk4U
* As of this writing the I PT has not forma I ly requested any incentives from the city for locating
Is it assured that there will be a YMCA to provide community recreation
for Lake Elmo residents as part of this project?
Is the library and/or art center better suited to be part of a city hall
complex elsewhere in the community?
How will the proposed playing fields relate to the center and other
facilities proposed for this area?
What are the potential programming collaborations/relationships
among the organizations in the proposed area?
What traffic impacts will emerge from this intensity of use in this area of
the city?
How does this facility's programs and services relate to the elementary
school for use and location?
sers of the facility want bike path access?
December 14, 2006
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE
ST. CROIX VALLEY COMMUNITY FAMILY CENTER
POTENTIAL LOCATION IN LAKE ELMO
• As of this writing the IPT has not formally requested any incentives from the city for locating
the structure in Lake Elmo. Several questions anticipate this request.
._. ._ .......__._,_,
Incentives
_ ,...,,,,, . _._.._.. .. ......
What incentive, if any, does the IPT group need to locate the family
center in Lake Elmo?
If the incentive is to locate on city owned land, why does Lake Elmo
want to consider leasing the land rather than having the Center or
another entity own the property and lease it to the Center?
Are there other/additional incentives for the center in addition or
instead of providing city owned land for the center?
...... , ,,,,,,,
Did other locations/cities offer incentives for the Center?
_. ._...,.... _„_,. .......
How will the infrastructure construction costs to the site be paid for?
(road, water, sewer)
Facility
How much property is required for the facility, parking, play area?
How can parking be efficiently shared with other facilities and potential
play fields to minimize asphalt/ impervious surfaces?
What interior spaces, if any, can be shared with other community
groups/private parties?
What Is the minimum / maximum time frame for the construction and
opening of the facility?
Who will own the facility?
-Will the users lease the space?
- If so, who will be the leasor? If it is leased to the partners and the city
has a lease, will it be with the building owner not the partners?
-If the city leases land for the center, what entity will the city be leasing
too? (e.g. this affects property taxes)
-how will the partners in the facility share leasing costs?
Will there ,be a stormwater pond_ associated with this project?
December 14, 2006
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE
ST. CROIX VALLEY COMMUNITY FAMILY CENTER
POTENTIAL LOCATION IN LAKE ELMO
• As of this writing the IPT has not formally requested any incentives from the city for locating
the structure In Lake Elmo. Several questions anticipate this request.
Center Programs
What specific programs are offered in the facility, by what providers and
who do they serve?
How many staff are associated with the programs? How many staff are
anticipated over the next five years?
Other questions -
It may be desirable to cities served by only local school district rather
than three as in Lake Elmo, if this is so are local school districts asking
the legislature to work toward this goal?
St. Croix Valley Area
Community Family
Cuter
�4
" Purpose of Presentation
The Lake Elmo site emerged out of the Site
Selection Study as a primary site for
consideration for the Community Family Center.
:• The Integrated Planning Team recommended the
development of the Lake Elmo site for the
Community Family Center,
Lake Elmo City Council will be approached at an
upcoming meeting to discuss how to make the
Community Family Center a reality at the Lake
Elmo site.
M
Presentation Outline
:•Community Family Center Concept
°-Community Survey and Study Findings
•:Program Overview/Space Needs
Next Steps
1
WShared Vision
An integrated Community Family
Center to meet the educational,
recreational and wellness needs of
families and individuals - serving
the whole child, whole family, and
whole community.
y)Partners Uniting Around
;J a Shared Mission
,*-Provide Core Services that Complement Each Other
-*.-Eliminate Duplication
•: Identify and Address Service Gaps
-'-Address Space Needs
•..Remove Barriers
•:Address Funding Issues by Sharing Resources
..Provide Accessibility
Accessibility
bResponsible to Local Tax Payers and Donors
:•Provide Services in the Most Efficient,
Cost -Effective Manner 1.0
Integrated Program
The Community Family Center
program will provide accessible,
integrated programs and
services through public and
private partnerships.
2
Integration
-e Shared Mission and Vision
-:Joint Comprehensive Planning
Seamless Services - "One -Stop Shop"
Education, Health, Wellness and
Recreation Programs
4%Collaborative Leadership Structure
<Merged / Jointly Secured Resources
&YMCA
Partners of Greater Stillwater Area
St. Paul Public Schools
Local St Croix Area
Municipalities United Way
Bayport
take Elmo
Oak Park Helghh Andersen
st0w&.e Corporation
Human Services,
Lakeview Hospital Inc.
Courage St.Crolx
IRp6
Scope of Services
3
Programs and Facilities
•:• Educational Facilities: Classrooms for Early
Childhood and Adult Basic Education
•:• Community Facilities: Meeting Rooms,
Resource Area, Shared Office Space
:• Recreational Facilities: Pool, Gymnasium,
Indoor and Outdoor Play Areas
S• Child Care Facilities: Licensed Child Care
+ Health/Weliness/Medical Facilities: Health
Screening, Rehabilitation, Fitness Center
and Studio
Leadership Structure
Integrated Planning Team (IPT)
Program Planning Team
Planning Accomplishments
+Developed Common Mission and Vision
.,Developed Integrated Program Plan
:•Acquired Resolutions of Support from Boards/Councils
of Partnering Organizations
•}Secured Financial Support from Partnering
Organizations and Local Foundations for Planning
-.Implemented Community Survey and Focus Groups
:•Completed Site Selection Study
+Approved Phase I Site Development
ws
0
Community Survey
Conducted by Decislon Resources, Ltd.
Adminlsierad to 516 adults across ISD #8341ncluding
I00 household sub -samples In each city of 51111woter• Oak
Park Heights, Bayport and Lake Elmo
Key Findings
a Almost two-thirds (2/3) of the sample initially support The
construction and operation of the center. After hearing more
about the facility, support increases to aver three-quarters (3/4)
of the respondents,
•:• There is strong support for the potential services to be offered at
the Community Family Center such as: Education programs for
children birth to five; Adult Basic Education; and Recreational
facilities.
•: seventy percent (70%) of the households think members will visit
the Community Family Center either frequently or occasionally.
tame
Focus Groups
Conducted by Stillwater Area Public Schools and
Courage St. Croix Program Coordinators
9B Current PortidpaMs In Education and 5pedu Needs Progwrcs
Key Findings
+The participants are generally, very happy with and appreciative of
the programs in which they ore currently participating.
•e The aealinbllity, of a family resources coordinator at the Community
Family Center would build trust with these parents and Increase
their participation.
i• Programs should focus on the whole family, with opportunities to
more fully Integrate children with special needs Into the
community.
:•The Integrated Community Family Center concept is well received
by current program users provided attention is given to designing
environments that accommodate special needs. tws
Site Selection Study
Conducted by Men field Research Inc.
Lake Elmo emerged as a primary site for consideration.
Assessment Criteria
b Access/Visibility
a Proximity to Major Transportation Arteries
<• Proximity to Population bensitles (Current and Future) -
L• Baseline Acquisalon Casts
o Additional Infrastructure Casts
•? 51.. of 51te and Expansion Potential-
+.• Development Timing'
Proximity to Bus Transit Routes and Walking/Biking Trails
•: Current Traffic Counts (Flows) and Projected Traffic Flows
:• Possible Environmental Issues
12n6
5
W
Benefits to Area Residents
,.,community Gathering Space Vision Is Explored In the Lake Elmo
Village Area Master Plan
:•Opportun dies for Families and Community Members to Come
Together for Education, Recreation and Special Events
:•Classrooms and Support Areas for Optimal Parent/Child
Learning Experiences
,Mdoor and Outdoor Environments for Children, Families and
Individuals to Promote Health and Wellness
oEffective Use of Resources, Equipment and Supplies by Sharing
Costs Across Programs and Agencies
;•Enhanced Programming Among Community Organizations that
are Already Successfully Partnering, Along with New Partners
tams
Phase I
Integrated Programs
o Early Childhood Education (classes for children of ell Wilk.
age birth to five and their poreem)
•, Spad.11.ed Progrninming far Children and Famllles with Unique
Needs
Early Childhood Screening
o Preschool
;, Family Resource, Coordmatlan
s• Adult Basic Education (GE)/Workforce Education/ELL)
a Transition Program for youth with Special Needs
Liunsed Child Care
n Supervised Child Care
..a Facility Needs
M
•:,Families and Individuals Served
q Space Needs (40,000 Sq. R. Est.) Indoor far Phase I Programs
Classrooms far Parent/Child Education Program
Preschool Classrooms
Classrooms far Adult Basic Education
Child Care Room;
Conference Rooms
Gym/Indoor Playground
5.11 Assessment/Therapy Rooms
Office Space
Outdoor Playground
Parking Lot
bHaurs of Operation
•:Traffic Patterns
It�"J
1.
2
Next Steps
>Determi me Feasibility of Lake Elmo Site for the
Community Family Center Concept (Education/Health
and Wellness Facility/Recreation)
,'Approach the Lake Elmo City Council at an upcoming
meeting to discuss how to make the Community
Family Center a reality at the Lake Elmo site.
12YIB
7
December 19, 2006
Project Director
WOO Draft for Discussion
Proposed Workshops and Meetings on Implementation of the Old Village
Tuesday, January 9, 2007
Regular workshop item
Community Family Center
- review information
- direction from council
Saturday, January 20, 2007
Special workshop
Provide context for the
9 AM to 12 NOON
adoption of the masterplan
and the priority implementation
steps
- principles/policies
behind OV
- specific challenges in
the plan as proposed
- nuts and bolts about
all required
infrastructure and
upcoming decisions to
be made
- timeline for decisions
and construction
Tuesday, January 23, 2007
Special Workshop
The nuts and bolts of
6 PM to 8 PM
financing the OV
- options
- estimated costs
- decisions to be made
- how to proceed
- timeline for financing
decisions
Tuesday, February 16, 2007
Regular workshop
Decisions on sewer alignment;
receipt of sewer report
Direction from council
February — TBD
Special workshop
Review of final masterplan
Next steps
March - TBD
Workshop/Council meeting
Approve masterplan
March - TBD
Special workshop
Defining the plan in the zoning
code
Consider inviting Planning
Commission
December 19. 2006
Organizing Principles for Implementing the Old Village
LAND USES
Comprehensive Plan
Principles
Masterplan Vision
Masterplan Document
Masterplan review with
Boards, commissions, citizens G
Masterplan approval by
Citv Council
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
Zoning regulations '
s
AUAR Environmental Review
i
INFRASTRUCTURE
Comprehensive Plan
Principles
Infrastructure need studies
ifrastructure studies for:
-sewer
-water
- surface water
- roads
repare specific infrastructure
plans with construction
timeline
Construct infrastructure
by priority
FINANCING
Amenity Costs
I
Infrastructure Costs =
Total Costs
implementing all
improvements
Capital improvement plan
- - funding sources
priorities for funding
pt financing Plan
financing for priority
projects
City Council refines Determine the cost of the
building/housing quality and-- --� —`y�-W - building/housing quality to the
character w developer
Design guidelines
Adopt policies defining the
cost share of public costs
between the city and the
developer
Proceed with private development Proceed with public priorities
Lead Expertise:
Planning Team Technical land use planner
Engineer „ Financial advisor
AUAR planning/engineering team
q4+
Lake Elmo
Agenda Section: MAINTNANCE/PARK/FIRE/BUIDING:
No .7 A 1
City Council
December 19,
2006
Agenda Item: Inflatable Rescue Boat
Background Information for December 19, 2006:
The fire department is requesting approval to proceed with finalizing specifications, pricing and funding package for
an Inflatable Rescue Boat. The equipment committee of the fire department has researched this item over the last
year. They have visited and spoken to other fire depts. with similar boats and gotten pricing from vendors. The
approx. cost of this package (boat, motor, lights, rescue equipment and trailer) is $11,000.00.
We have already received a donation in the amount of $3,000.00 toward this purchase. Chief Malmquist is currently
seeking additional outside funding/donations for this project. Before proceeding with the process, it would be
beneficial to know that this project has the support of the council.
Action Items:
Person responsible:
Chief Malmquist
Direct Chief Malmquist to proceed with project and solicitation of
outside funding/donations.
Attachments:
Ja
VM
V I
�7'NA
. ... .. .....
Lake Elmo
Agenda Section: MAINTNANCE/PARK/FIRE/BUIDING:
No .7(A)2
City Council
December 19,
2006
Agenda Item: Command/First Response Vehicle
Background Information for December 19, 2006:
Staff is recommending the purchase of a 2007 Chevrolet Suburban, 4x4, 2500 from the State Contract. This includes
emergency lighting, markings, radio installation, and rear cargo storage tray and weather shield.
This vehicle will serve as a First Response/Command/Chiefs vehicle. Staff as well as the officers of the fire
department have explored many styles, makes and models of vehicles and have concluded that this vehicle is best
suited for the intended uses and to carry the necessary equipment.
It has also been recommended by staff that this vehicle be equipped with a plow. This idea was the result of
brainstorming sessions by staff. It was then discussed with and supported by public works staff. This vehicle would
be used primarily to plow the two fire stations and city hall, thus allowing public works staff to focus their time and
efforts on clearing city streets. Having the plow on the "First Response" vehicle would also us to clear unplowed
roads for access by emergency vehicles when responding to an emergency. In the event of a "major" snowstorm, it
could also be used to help public works with the timely clearing of city streets.
Purchase price - $53,520.37 (see attached spreadsheet)
Action Items:
Person responsible:
Motion to approve purchase of 2007 Chevrolet'/ ton Suburban
Chief Malmquist
with listed options for $53,520.37.
Attachments:
Pricing spreadsheet.
4
;r._:a•q '.ill
r7 ixrs "'S�'d21 lunl_
f - r -'s d ' - P.
j?•��tr�' i j'u }EX.'-'s. }. J r >s�.'3T Y-". 'En`F
�rlF trZ- lts r+��j`4 i�t ra7}' fft }i�'frj•L �-C +tT t+.� �� ^�i '� 7.1't =y i _ Y '' .�`
i�'i . ;S J If � l (� � �F � �}., ( d {. t�Irrr i'3`'-slZ. y � - - i tJt' •
d f c i •.. W P4,
:.. 4--1 +,.` 4� ro p ;r�Y"S. ar''ik •�7'•-: �-'�' +' !i , mac.iF�' ♦ r r .t' •; 4 �' ,� :`.
It
s t.,.s, •. ,.._.?L.... t,. S�i.,r.:�.;l�M. 'YJ[.,•1::'' .l"- �.-...j r. >'�' ,. .�.,. _.., ,-d�2%... .. -..
:'.f.% ,tip.•. _. 1,. ,. . 3 l .. .. ?±'.-.�; ,� _.��!�,' _, ,. �:_;' �.�.:•��ie.��
t:i�
1
V
\LU
F
N
^^ O ®
LL
11%
LL
W
V
r U
�.)
O
E
E
UW
� U
® w
N o
I
i
of
O
Cl)
M
N
(O
10
V
r
N
O
(O
M
r
O
Cl
Cl)
N
M
Lo
(f}
y}
fA
m
N
C
K
Y
�
Y
J
w
c
0
a
n
x
w
a
0
LL
0
N
N
N
E
Q
0
a
N
(D
a)
E
C
O
N
N
G
O
V
m rn
U
O 'Q
r 'C
U @
roa
o
O Q
.N
C @
m @
O
N m
o
U N
a
K c
co
Z
O
F-
a
O
W
Z
w
O
W
w
rg
L _ 0
O
3 r E
m
.0 00
s ro a
uo @ o a
U L
N N N
.L+ N
N
N C
N a) O a)
0 j C
U O U 0
0 O p O
..
U u
0
U 3 U N
E o m Y
tt- L
o53°
�aroim
0 ro
•V
E m g c
o �
N
N a N
C Y a C
O @
fl 3 (D° E
2 E
N
a Qma- ao
O
M
00
N
N
61�Lo
N
R
@
U)
O
O
.0
a
@
0
3
a
N
m
N
c
.o
a
a :a
Lake Elmo Agenda Section: Building/Fire/Maintenance No. 7R.
City Council
Dec. 19, 2006
AGENDA
1) Construction activity update for November.
2) Miscellaneous
Action Items: Person responsible:
Informational. No action needed. J. McNamara
Attachments:
1)Summary Building Report for November
F 'T "', t
MI
won, 1
aj
7—
-.700ANA ISO
AT
Alt 7
VAN
4, Iv. 0,
�
�. :Lj
—Q0"y
_Aq ->trA %VNM
Wo.
w ,
41
..........
FA
Summary Building Report
ovem er-
ear to a e
Permits
Permits
Issued
Valuation
Issued
Valuation
New Residential 5
$2,094,000.00
New Residential 29
$12,612,388.00
New Commercial 1
$2,150,000.00
New Commercial 6
$17,172,080.00
Other Residential 10
$63,232.00
Other Residential 319
$6,042,015.00
Other Commercial 9
$339,000.00
Other Commercial 55
$6,820,616.00
Total 25
$4,646,232.00
Total 409
$42,647,099.00
Total Building Fees Collected
$183,768.70
s
Total Building Fees Collected
i
$704,021.30
Summaa Plumbing
Report
Summary Plumbing Report
Plumbing 14
$234,994.00
Plumbing 138
$3,538,390.00
Total Plumbing Fees Collected
$1,987.50
Total Plumbing Fees Collected
$23,228.50
Summary HVAC Report
Summary HVAC Report
HVAC 16
$292,775.00
HVAC 112
$5,277,499.00
Total HVAC Fees Collected
$2,665.05
Total HVAC Fees Collected
$52,289.31
Summary Grand Total Fees
$188,421.25
Summary Grand Total Fees
$779,539.11
Surcharge Fee Paid to State
$2,231.59
Surcharge Fee Paid to State
$21,815.25
SAC Fees Paid to Met Council
$12,152.00
SAC Fees Paid to Met Council
$43,152.00
WAC Fees Paid to Oakdale
$8,000.00
WAC Fees Paid to Oakdale
$18,000.00
Misc. Expenses
Misc. Expenses
l
$0.00
Total Fees Retained
$166,037.66
Total Fees Retained
$696,571.86
Credit -Fees -to -Bldg
- --$35,537.66 -
I
Credit Fees to Bldg
$453;998.01
Groan Fees io water yag,auu.uu urean tees to water $181,896.93
Credit Fees to Sewer $36,000.00 Credit Fees to Sewer $60,679.00
Lake Elmo
Agenda Section: PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING
No. 9A .
City Council
December 19,
2006
Agenda Item: Conditional Use Permit Amendment — Oakdale Gun Club
Background Information for December 5, 2006
At its meeting December 11, 2006, the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing and unanimously
adopted a recommendation to approve this application to permit an additional storage structure on the Gun
Club property adjacent to loth Street. The proposed storage shed is 448 square feet in size with an attached
overhang 128 square feet in size for a total of 575 square feet.
Person responsible:
Action items:
K. Matzek
Motion to adopt Resolution #2006 -ly approving an amendment to
the Conditional Use Permit of the Oakdale Gun Club to permit an
additional storage structure, as recommended by the Planning
Commission and per plans staff -dated November 13, 2006.
Attachments: rys-
Time Allocated:
1. Resolution #2006 - Approving CUP Amendment
2. Draft Planning Commission Minutes of December 11, 2006
3. Planning Staff Report
4. Applicant's. Graphics
j --rot
.lT'
YT - ju-
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2006- 1 q'S
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 88-5
GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO THE OAKDALE GUN CLUB FOR AN OUTDOOR TARGET RANGE
IN THE AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 88-5, the Oakdale Gun Club received approval
for a Conditional Use Permit to operate an Outdoor Target Range located at 10386 N.
101' Street,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 9Q-N, the Oakdale Gun Club received approval
for an amendment to allow construction of a caretaker residence and storage building,
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2005-111, the Oakdale Gun Club received
approval for an amendment to allow construction of an expansion to an existing storage
building,
WHEREAS, the Oakdale Gun Club has applied for an amendment to the existing
Conditional Use Permit,
WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted all the required documentation and fees
for the application of such expansion of use for the existing Conditional Use Permit; and
WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission held a public hearing on
December 11, 2006 on the application for an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit
to allow construction of a 575 square foot storage building, based on plans staff dated
November 13, 2006; and recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit
amendment based on the following findings:
1. The proposed CUP amendment will not result in additional impact on the
public health, safety, morals or general welfare of surrounding property.
Operations of the gun club will not be altered as a result of the CUP
amendment.
2. Traffic impacts of the use will not change as a result of the CUP amendment.
3. Effect on public utilities and school capacity are not applicable.
4. There will be minimal changes in visual impact of the use.
- 5. The amendment has no impact on the Comprehensive Plan: - - --
WHEREAS, at its December 19, 2006 meeting, the Lake Elmo City Council
approved the amendment to the Conditional Use Permit allowing construction of a 575
square foot storage building, based on the'plans staff dated November 13, 2006; subject
to the following condition:
1. That the applicant continues to comply with the conditions of Resolution No.
88-5, approving the Master Conditional Use Permit.
ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 19a' day of December, 2006.
Dean Johnston, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas Bouthilet, Interim City Administrator
DRAFT
City of Lake Elmo
Planning Commission Meeting
Minutes of December 11, 2006
Vice Chairman Ptacek called to order the meeting of the Lake Elmo Planning Commission at
7:00 p.m. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Van Zandt, Deziel, Lyzenga, Pelletier, Fliflet,
Schneider, Armstrong, and (7:05) McGinnis. STAFF: Interim Administrator Bouthilet,
Assistant Planner Matzek, and Recording Secretary Anez, ALSO PRESENT: Special Projects
Director Susan Hoyt, Mayor D. Johnston and Councilmember Johnson.
Agenda
M/S/P, Armstrong/Van Zandt to accept the Agenda as presented. Vote: 8:0.
Minutes
M/S/P, Lyzenga/Deziel to accept the Minutes of November 27, 2006 as presented. Vote: TO:1.
Abstain: Pelletier.
Public Hearing: CUP Amendment —Oakdale Gun Club
The Assistant Planner said the gun club sits on 62 acres with extensive history since 1965.
Previous amendments included a caretaker house. They wish now to add an accessory building
for storage.
Schneider asked about the overhang size being exceptionally large.
THE CHAIRMAN OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:05 P.M.
A letter from Knappogue Farm which was signed by Jackie McNamara was read into the record
by Commissioner Pelletier and will be made a part of these minutes.
Richard McNamara, Knappogue Farm
Mr. McNamara said he was not present to complain about the club or the new building but
addressed the sound especially in summer months. He said they cannot hear themselves talk at
their farm at all. He would like some barrier constructed or time constraints for operation and
without everybody shooting all at once. He wondered if there are more people at the gun club
these days. The past year has been really loud. He said they have noticed it more since the Gun
Club relocated the driveway but he doesn't know. He said it really is a health and safety issue
with all that noise. He invited anyone to walk in the back of their forty and they would not hear
themselves think.
THE CHAIRMAN CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:09 P.M.
Jerome Marah, Director of the Gun Club
Mr. Marah said he has been with the club since 1975 and held this position since 1976. He said
the club has done extensive work for sound reduction. They contract for independent sound
studies. Every time they do a sound study, they perform it on the extreme southern boundary for
those neighbors. The contractors have been unable to record 70db leaving the site. They are
generally 65-68 db dependrng on the wrnd. Shooting rangesare under cover. They havu almost
totally enclosed one of the gun ranges. They are working to close other ranges too to keep noise
within boundaries. They have looked at planting more trees too but trees only deafen sound a
little bit.
Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 11, 2006
l
Mr, Marah said that traffic in and out of the driveway was a concern for these neighbors across
the street so the club.relocated their driveway further to the west and got it out of the hole there
malting it safer. He said the overhang for the storage building will be for a canopy for the rain.
Commissioner Pelletier asked the hours of operation.
Mr. Marah said they are open to the public from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m, On November 19, 2006, they
closed until the I" Saturday in June 2007; The range is open each year on Saturday and Sunday
until mid -October and then open to the public every day after that from 8 to 4, 45 minutes before
sunset club members must stop shooting. Timetables are taken from the DNR hunting regulation
book. Mr. Marah said they once had complaints about shooting at sunrise but that was goose
hunters someplace else.
Assistant Planner Matzek said Building Official/Code Enforcement Officer Jim McNamara went
out to the site after a verbal complaint was received last week followed by the letter from
Knappogue Farm, and after inspecting the site said there were no violations of the CUP.
M/S/P, Armstrong/Schneider to recommend approval of an Amendment to the Conditional Use
Permit of the Oakdale Gun Club for construction of a 36 X 60 accessory structure for storage.
Vote: 9:0.
PUBLIC HEARING: Rezoning to Village Residential
Assistant Planner Matzek explained that this rezoning of the Village Area will be responsive to
the Village Master Plan. The specifies of that plan are not yet finished so specifics as to use and
density are not yet available. The proposal presented tonight is flexible enough to allow for the
completion of the Village Master Plan.
The Assistant Planner also noted that the city has requested an extension from the Met Council
because the zoning districts and map are required by January 16, 2007, and it will be difficult to
meet that deadline given the loss of key staff members. The City Council will review it at their
next meeting.
Chairman Ptacek said he spoke with the City Attorney and staff and both recommendations are
to request an extension of our deadline.
THE CHAIRMAN OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:24 P.M.
Jose Chaves, 3505 Kelvin Avenue North
Mr. Chaves said his property is south of Hamlet on Sunfish Lake, next to Schiltgen Farm, and
indicated on the map that it was just west of the Village Area and adjacent to Sunfish Lake. He
said the parcel is landlocked. He would like to find road access for that property. He has tried
for a long time and there is no access. He hopes he will learn how this plan will affect him and
his access. Preliminary surveying estimates say it is buildable and meets setbacks. He was
assured when Hamlet on Sunfish was constructed that the city would not allow him to become
landlocked but that is what happened.
........._ _.__. .....
Peter Coyle, Larkin and Hoffman
Mr. Coyle he said he is hear on behalf of The Screatons whose affected land is on the northeast
tip of the Village Area at Highway S and Manning. He asked if the substance of the Village Plan
Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 11, 2006 2
LAKE ELMO PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
Date: December 7, 2006 for the Meeting of December 11, 2006
Applicant: Oakdale Gun Club
Location: 10386 10`h Street North
Requested Action: Conditional Use Permit Amendment
Land Use Plan Guiding: AG (Agriculture)
Existing Zoning: AG (Subject to a Conditional Use Permit)
Site History and Existing Conditions:
The City (and East Oakdale Township) file on this 62 acre site extend back to 1965; and, the use
of the site as a gun club likely extends even further back in time. There have been several actions
for the City regarding the gun club, including extensive activity in 1981-1982.
The last formal renewal of the "Master" Conditional Use Permit was in 1988 (Resolution #88-5).
The City approved an amendment to that CUP in 1998 (Resolution #98-58) to permit construction
of a new caretaker residence, a garage related to the residence; and, an accessory storage structure.
The 62 acre site is divided into a 22 acre east portion (where no structures or formal range
facilities are located); and, a 40 acre west portion (upon which all structures and formal range
facilities are located). The 1998 application for an amended CUP resulted in a lengthy Planning
Staff description of a zoning issue related to an earlier mass rezoning of large portions of
undeveloped land in Lake Elmo to OP. (including the 22 acre east Gun Club site). While the issue
appears to remain pending the general city-wide rezoning actions that will follow the activation of
the new Land Use Plan, this application for CUP amendment again relates to a facility on the west
40 acres (properly zoned AG), so we will not address the OP zoning matter further at this time.
In 2005 a CUP amendment was approved to permit an addition to an existing storage structure.
The City has no record of violations of the 1998 CUP; and, the conditions to the approval of the
1998 CUP amendment have been complied with by the applicant. After the public hearing in
connection with this application was noticed, a complaint was received by City staff regarding
noise related to Gun Club operations.
Discussion and Analysis:
The applicant proposes to amend the CUP to permit an additional accessory structure 448 square
feet in size with an attached overhang 128 square feet in size for a total of 576 square feet. The
building will be 300+ feet from 10`h Street North and will be largely screened from public roads or
adjoining properties. The additional shed will be used for storage purposes.
Findings and Recommendations:
This proposal to amend the CUP to move storage to an enclosure appears to be a positive step
toward the "good neighbor" strategy of the Club. As with any application for a CUP (or
Amendment) this application should be addressed as to its compliance with the CUP Findings
prescribed by Section 300.06, Subd. 4, Para.A of the City Code. In that regard, Staff suggests the
following:
1. The proposed CUP amendment will not result in additional impact on the public health,
safety, morals or general welfare of surrounding property. Operations of the gun club will
not be altered as a result of the CUP amendment. The structure to be added is located 300+
feet from the roadway which focuses any impacts internally to the site.
2. Traffic impacts of the use will not change as a result of the CUP amendment.
3. Effect on public utilities and school capacity are not applicable.
4. There will be no changes in visual impact of the use.
5. The amendment does not have an impact on the Comprehensive Plan.
Based on the foregoing, Staff recommends approval of the CUP amendment.
Planning Commission Actions Requested:
Motion to recommend approval of an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit of the
Oakdale Gun Club to permit a 36 foot by 16 foot storage building located 300+ feet from 10u'
Street North per plans staff -dated November 13, 2006.
Kelli R. Matzek, Assistant Planner
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Applicant's Documentation
I'M mw RIM
Dw nyN
TUN TAN
ON VON
YnIIMiIYOV.
IR9N 9N
T HN WN
nTN d nm
uzw m1w NOW
Vldnity Map
0 2164
Scale In Feet
Location Map
PIWp
' M1�W axe 6eeaam PBW MMmNIen
0 tv w�
0
tz �
a
b
I
tv
o
"
ro
b
O
p
H
M
r
m
�I
C
• .� � ��'.�� OPJ7Nk 0.N CLU3— �'
rs+rcvxxn.
k6l-,r
I ON
r I Prl
637 G
ILL
. � �.'. �,,j4�, I�t1s_ r �(�.... . 5.;, � ECEIYE➢ . .
I' Y'• d K 7
E
whsr..edmewV'•
I�f/uesn Irs r��,+F 7/r.
' � /�nevawar 1-OrsreN2 _{`
'w y a_a, aw.muv
- - _-
d.
y r41 X�, GIgLL'PNNW
IO:N9NSi.1ldmug..
,F,
Lake Elmo
Agenda Section: Planning, Land Use and Zoning
Nov
City Council
December 19,
2006
Agenda Item: Final Plat — Discover Crossing 2°a Addition
Background Information for December 19, 2006:
The 2006 approval of the PUD Preliminary and Final Plans/Plats of Discover Crossing included 3 outlots
designed as building lots that could be re -platted as legal lots in the future responsive to then -contemplated
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan that would increase the maximum allowable OP density to 18 per
40 acres from 16 per 40 acres. By July, 2006 that Comprehensive Plan to increase OP density to 18 units
per 40 acres was approved by both the city and the Metropolitan Council. While the City continues to work
toward amending its zoning ordinance text to include that change, whenever a Comp Plan and Zoning
ordinance conflict (as they do in this regard today), the Comprehensive Plan prevails. Therefore, the three
outlots are eligible for final platting into building lots.
The attached Resolution is for approval of the outlot/building lot conversion by Final Plat. All required
plans, escrows, Development Agreements and fees involving these 3 lots were addressed/completed by the
original Final Plat and Agreement.
Action Items:
Person responsible:
Motion to adopt Resolution #2006 -'y approving the Final Plat of
Assistant Planner
Discover Crossing 2°d Addition.
Attachments:
Time Allocated:
1. ResoIution
2. City Council Minutes, April 18, 2006
3. Approved Original Final Plat
4. Final Plat
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.2006- 1'4(D
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF DISCOVER CROSSING
2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo City Council considered and approved the OP Stage
Plan/Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit of DISCOVER CROSSING on April 18,
2006;
WHEREAS, the Final Plat of DISCOVER CROSSING 2ND ADDITION
presented to the City Council conforms to the standards of Section 300 and Section 400
of the City Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lake Elmo City�Council
does hereby approve and accept the Final Plat of DISCOVER CROSSING 2
ADDITION, per plans staff -dated November 30, 2006 as on file with the City
Administrator.
ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 19a' day of December 2006.
Dean A. Johnston, Mayor
ATTEST:
Thomas Bouthilet, Interim City Administrator
APPROVED AS . _AENDED MAY 16, 2006
Daniel Novak, 8520 Ironwood Trail N., had concerns about the cost; road width;
assessment repayment; water and road construction; corner lots; bituminous vs. cement
curb and height; underground electricity.
City Engineer Prew responded that cost would be divided equally between the 63 build-
able lots with assessment costs of RI zoning with an assessment cost $1309. Road
widths will remain the same. Water and road resurfacing will be done simultaneous.
Owners of corner lots will decide where to place the curb, but cannot change the water
flow. Bids will be for bituminous curbing only, but can be changed to include concrete.
Prew will contact Xcel Energy about the possibility and cost of installing underground
electricity. Another Public Hearing would be required if underground electricity were to
be installed.
Mark Busta thought the assessment amount was fair.
Public Hearing Closed at 8:48 p.m.
M/S/P Johnson/Smith - to amend Resolution 2006-035, a Resolution Ordering
Improvement and Preparation of Plans for the Tablyn Park Neighborhood, and to include
an alternate bid for two landscaped islands. (Motion passed 5-0)
B. Resolution 2006-036: Approve Plans and Authorize Advertisement for Bids Tablyn Park / Lake Elmo Heights Watermain Project
In his letter dated April 13, 2006, the City Engineer reported that Plans and Specifications
are complete on the Tablyn Park/Lake Elmo Heights Watermain Project. This project
will provide water for over 200 residences in an area of the City that has many
contaminated wells with PFOA and PFOS. Following water service installation, each
residential well will be sealed.
M/S/P Johnson/Conlin — to adopt Resolution 2006-037, approving Plans and Authorizing
the Advertisement for Bids for Tablyn Parkl/Lake Elmo Heights Watermain Project.
This bid does not include well abandonment and plumbing connections.
(Motion passed 5-0)
9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING:
A. Final Plat & Development Agreement — Discover Crossing:
Resolution 2006-037.
City Planner recommended approval of Final Plat and Development Agreement —
Discover Crossing. There are several outlots, three of which are going to be converted
into lots after approved zoning changes. Staff has prepared a draft Development
Agreement for the plat that has also been reviewed by and concurred in by the City
Engineer.
Council Member DeLapp would like to see the three lots be put into conservation
easements and a copy of -the covenants -for -the -landscaping -plan. ----- -- - -
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 18, 2006
APPROVED AS ,..:TENDED MAY 16, 2006
M/S/P Conlin/Smith - to adopt Resolution 2006-037 approving the Final Plat, OP Final
Plat and Development Agreement for Discover Crossing, with the additional condition of
compliance with the recommendations as determined by the City Forester and approved
by the City Planner. (Motion passed 5-0)
A (1). Discover Crossing Letter of Credit Reduction:
City Plarmer recommended the Letter of Credit for Discover Crossing be reduced from
$1,811,325.00 to $1,006,075.00, as presented in Memorandum 9A (1).
M/S/P lohnson/DeLapp — to approve the Escrow reduction for Discover Crossing from
$1,811,325.00 to $1,006,075.00. (Motion passed 5-0)
B. OP Development Stage Plan / Preliminary Plat and CUP - Hidden Meadows:
Resolution 2006-038
City Planner presented the second step of the residential portion of a 68-acre portion of
Hidden Meadows. The Public Hearing brought several concerns about several
infrastructure design issues and the screening plan along the east property line. The
property abuts to an OP, requiring a 200' buffer, but can be reduced to 100' if the
developer proposes landscaping that will serve as a year round visual buffer acceptable to
the City.
The drainfield proposed is 50' from their property line, and the Ziertman's expressed
concerns about the health, safety and welfare if the wetland treatment system proposed
for the development and the church were to fail. The Ziertman's are requesting more
than a 100' setback. In their opinion, the Ziertman's stated, that OP ordinance states that
a drainfield is a structure and is entitled to a 200' buffer zone, and a paved trail be added
to that. City Planner Dillerud and City Attorney Filla clarified that a Pump Station is not
a structure. Setback requirements are 50'/200' on -site.
City Planner Dillerud stated there are no trail setback requirements, but the trail can be
moved.
The Ziertman's would like to know how the size of the wetlands compares to the Fields I
development. City Engineer will provide that information to them this week. Developer
confirmed that the alternate drainfield is north of the church and is a constructed wetland.
He further stated that restriction will be placed on this site to maintain its continued
suitability as a back-up location.
The Ziertman's would also like to see screening provided to their property line, buffering
them from the project. City Planner Dillerud stated the City would be receiving the final
landscape plan next week.
Council Member DeLapp stated that the required trail systems are expected to be integral
components of OP development and not tacked on to meet the City Code. The
Ziertman's-asked why the -trail -couldn't beputsecond drainfield site, with a 15'- -
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 18, 2006
DISCOVER CROSSING LANDP Freeman,
LAND PLANNWG a SURV
56:
wlr�sSr-o ST
t Pk
*Nv
PRELIARNAR
Y PRI
SUBJECT T TO REVISION
Rfllm !dMY4m'
\- A
'IN ME NW r/4 OFW 1/4 1, 67.7'ff ST_NORTH m u r 1
'AI IINE SW I/40F NEf/4 Li'-: �A /r'eWN ru+2�S@1 Z.]1'W NORiN 51�'E B£I/4 OF JNE I/4 a3�W/ dA 100.�, $%TH ST.
1&5B mrro \ Yd b N I arae.w10O 'W r a 1.s0.u1es/-/�4
/ /i'.
L.IOO.BJ SOUTH 'W8BYYYJ
/°MIB>.J
W-NB•JIRV)OUTLOTG
/
R-Ioam 4BS'29'W iso
sw�
dBYB'J9' \ OMINAOEBUTILT'£AB£MENT y�('j@
�1/-_R-IS;00 rt xY4YR8R'JB'
13 4/6HY'Y4' p�Lb11
'69L-fYBP irai:t L.l0.JB �seeYaC I u R-f3a.00 o r' WWW 1 xm
5 u N \✓� �"i'-s°Sxm I
PB0.27
e nem• •
N5 WW.W
�10.W
/(r / / 11 rere°
01,.@c' , `n� eJBMSYI• t-n.st .. y
war 'C k �/ t� ` B-154B'sJ o
. O((� \v\t1-9}W'm}�''/ 1 i R is4W �i
ti
10 °Rii'� o!. bra-sJ4ss.�.W \c->Y}arr/yn �' r///'- -� i\a pd
oy �p!II 9N l R-IYS.OB
OUTLOTA I ' $
I GTi�� Le xum9• .{� //� � eurrev/ W-N131M'44'E
f I ;3 _ LNeBRP'JB'f___ , r^�'i ♦ // ! 4'uH/ I dTJ'}b'Y3' 1 N
g pt T—j- -Prs.n____ ef\ '"§r. \�//e.uwm• }e.R,q
A > P r3 � w '�}Nro ♦r � wsw e� / `L->2b � I H
s0.1YlYJ' ezemh• Mim }: e I I
/ I z� W-N41JH'H@•W \ \a r%T%E' �i-,r�r�a�a •'',}i+mnlau 's�':tr
B93P'J9•E_J __O�
R-sa@u_c OUTLOTD\°Bay'
w f -- -Isis 4 DUTLOT 8 / L—_sesPz'39'w__ J @ wwm
jd rJr'ae• d"�-sssp9'}9t _ ,y AJZW su\\\
O R-IJ6.Oq m d TJf W wsu
5 8 L-YJ01 _ I 1 9b-__ R-12A00
L-10.43 3 B-1GE d1�•0'
W-NJ029w-W R9A
.
m
d @VIYS' R L-120M
wR4P'J9'F__ ;E •LR'->.f@--BB9SPY1'W---1 {' ♦\ /
'F .x 104BB��_ 0 '580Zf'Yi'VlJ 1@200 / r
\'\srsnr TR r�W•I// Id BJ54'23' I • - jr
\\e.> C-B>.BB l -27,0e % a
PAR9FL BEBWIBW M
9EruHB 1 OUTLOT E BOOK zse oEP � s •I r
�'I 391et d }B
///iBYO'I _•, .. / ORAWA@EB UiILITYFAB£NfNt
R.
BBs9}Yd'1- J N6619141'E _
@JB.db
. ,• _°°if.°pNH@^ICsaY--__J _NBBve'saT�� _ �•�/ V '
i eris> s4sBe sn.Je 3 T [ / a'
OUTLOTE ��
2M Ww4rr < ^
(QV NQYUMLNT • l RRAINAUE6 UIILITYEA3EMENT < / l d / / W- ---
/rsBN, R YrW JP
OUTLOTF !'p
_._... ...
_—d l - �JJ 90 SW FSE1 OF NE } --• ___ ERISRNG ORI4EWAY £ASEA1flIT OOG N0. i>{JB rc4a�_ s--
V 8 89'48I 5Bp lI 1823.72 Y
589'49'S8"W We
IV
JB57.85 �
I �
N
W-+E
S
1
ORIGINAL SCALE
T INCH = 10 FUTF
00
SCALE IN FEET \
W \ R=225.00
A=2"57'2'
CB=S45*51
1 / \
\ I
2 CQ \l
oS
BLOCK ONE
o �+
R=50.00
L=10.21
CB-N41.35'5
o
I
Q
TZ
- LOT I
'
3+
H
LO
ul zo
CB.
J
01,710
Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc.
LAND PLANNING F SURVEYING 4 ENGINECRING
567A RiALAVP RTH
Sill.LWATWATM±SOTA ER,MMOTA 55082
KRI-,(651)439.31133 1.(651) 430,9331
LHGEND
DENOTES FOUND 1/2 INCH WON PIPE MONUMENT MANNED Mlles
A PLASTIC CRP INSCRI9ED 'FREEMAN IS 16909'
1) ORIENTATION OF MI5 REARING SYSTEM IS DASD ON THE RECORDED
PUT OF DISCOVER CROSSING
WCMTYMAP
SEC. 2, T29N, R21 W
69TH STREET NORTH
- I MN STATE ffiGHWAY]6
z
/ NEi/4
¢
. -+-'NW1/4 SITE
m ED scuE
z
z
a
SW1/4
aqoLSE1/450TH
+
NOR
VA C)'A:/ x1 nVTA IT
ADDITION
Lake Elmo
Agenda Section: Planning and Zoning
No 9d
City Council
Dec. 19,2006
Agenda Item: Proposed Process for Moving Ahead �i,ith Re -Zoning
Purpose. The city council is being asked to provide direction on how to proceed with the re -zoning
process that the planning commission is undertaking in light of the request for an extension for submitting
the zoning code to the Metropolitan Council. It will be important to submit a framework for proceeding
with this rezoning to the Metropolitan Council. The staff is proposing a process that begins with joint city
council and planning commission workshops to review the draft code and to allow the two bodies to
discuss the code and the process. If need be, it will also allow the city council, as the policy setting body
for the city, to clarify for the planning commission any policy directions that the city council wants to see
specifically incorporated in to the new zoning code. The process also includes a suggestion for ways to
communicate the proposed zoning code changes with property owners and citizens.
Background. The city's zoning code is the implementation tool for its comprehensive plan. It provides
the legal regulations for what property owners can and cannot do on their land. Because zoning is the
city's Iegal tool for managing its land use and because it is critical for property owners' use of their
properties, any zoning code must be specific about what is allowed in each district. Depending upon the
magnitude of the changes in the zoning districts, a new zoning code potentially affects every property
owner in the city (except for the Cimarron area). In most cases the revisions in the zoning districts may be
so minor that there is no real change to how the property owners in that district may use their land. (There
are approximately 3,000 parcels of land that are part of zoning districts that are scheduled for some type
of revision.) Although many revisions may be very minor, it is important to clearly communicate
proposed zoning code changes so no property owner is taken by surprise when they come in for a building
permit or other land use planning request. In order to assure property owners that there will be a public
process for making any changes, state law requires that planning commissions' hold public hearings on
proposed zoning code amendments and that property owners of acres that are 5 acres or less in size and
property within 350 feet of these property owners must be notified of the hearing by mail.
Process to date. The preparation of a new zoning code got underway, in part, because the Metropolitan
Council required the city to submit a zoning code that reflected the comprehensive plan policies within
nine months of the comprehensive plan's adoption. For Lake Elmo, the deadline for submitting the
revised zoning code to the Metropolitan Council is January 17, 2007. The city is requesting an extension
to that deadline. Providing a process that the city is following will help the city's application for an
extension. Over the past several months the planning commission has spent time, care and thought in
preparing a revised zoning code for the city. The commission has worked diligently in an effort to meet
the Metropolitan Council's January 17, 2007 deadline. The proposed code includes new districts with
significantly revised zoning regulations as well as districts with almost no changes. The planning
commission is now preparing to bring these revisions to property owners at public hearings before
adopting the revised code and recommending it to the city council for the city council's review, revisions
and approval. On December 11, 2006 the planning commission held its first public hearing on the new
zone, Village Residential (VR). Several property owners and interested citizens in the proposed Village
Residential zone attended the hearings._ The _planning commission hoped to_ adopt the VR zone changes
as well as move forward with the other 10 districts in December. However, there was not time to mail out
the legally required notices to property owners in time for the planning commission to complete its
process and make a recommendation to the council in time for the council to take action before the
Metropolitan Council deadline of January 17, 2007.
Communicating re -zoning to property owners and citizens. The request for an extension from the
Metropolitan Council for the submission of its zoning code gives the city an opportunity to re -visit how it
wants to proceed with this critical land use document. From a communication standpoint two things are
desirable in the re -zoning process: 1) that property owners' be invited to learn about the proposed zoning
code changes in a manner that allows clear information and questions, and 2) that, if at all possible, the
zoning code approved by the planning commission and recommended to the city council reflect the policy
direction that the city council wants to see in the document going before the public hearings so that the
document recommended by the planning commission does not undergo substantial policy revisions if at
all possible. This is not a legal issue, but a communication issue.
To accomplish the first objective, providing information to property owners, the staff suggests a process
that provides for public information meetings/hearings by the planning commission to be held on
individual zones (one or a few at time). Information handouts accompanied by maps that are easily
understandable can be distributed to those attending the meeting and also be provided to those who cannot
attend. The format for these meetings might include some informal question/ answer and information
gathering time prior to the start of the formal public hearing.
To accomplish the second objective, asking the planning commission to incorporate city council policy
direction into the draft zoning code, is more complex and may not be viewed as desirable by all parties.
However, to minimize major changes occurring between the planning commission's adoption of the
zoning code for recommendation to the city council and the final zoning code adopted by the city
council, the staff suggests that the city council and planning commission jointly meet so that the city
council can learn about the planning commission's work on the zoning code and the planning
commission has the opportunity to understand what key policies the city council will want to see
incorporated into the revised code. Using this approach, the zoning code prepared by the planning
commission and presented to the public by the planning commission may reflect the policies that the city
council will want incorporated into the original draft document.
Proposed process. Please see the attached chart for a possible process for proceeding with this approach
to the zoning code for your input and comment.
Action Items:
Direct staff on how to proceed with the process for moving ahead
with re -zoning
Attachments:
Proposed process for proceeding with the rezoning
Person responsible:
Susan Hoyt, Project Director
Kelli Matzek, Assistant Planner
Time Allocated:
To be determined by city council.
December 13, 2006 PROPOSED PROCESS FOR MOVING FORWARD WITH RE -ZONING
Goals: To create consistent policies between the council and commission;
To maximize communication of public information
� RESPONSIBLE PARTY I ACTIVITY
Joint workshop to:
Review roles of plannhtg commissions/ city councils according to
statute. (Attorney)
Review the statutes related to comprehensive planning and zoning
code. (Attorney)
Identify approach to reviewing proposed revisions to the zoning code.
Commission
?.}'_..0 ..__. .. .._._ .., _ _ _ _. _ __. .... . _ ....._ .. , Y p Y P P omng code to &pl!i g commis: ounce rov e <e o c rmci es or z
Planning Commission Meeting Review draft zoning code
Determine next steps for any changes in zoning code
Identify public communication process to follow as sections of the
code become readv to nubile innut/hearines
Koview aratr zoning coae sections as they are aranea ror iegal
and report back to the.plammpg commission
COmmlSslon Revise if needed based, upon attorney s review _
_ .. _.._.,__.__.. ... _ .. . ......... . ... ... ...... ,....
Commission Plan meetings on individual or a few zones at a time
Determine format for meetings —
Consider time for informal information and Q and A
as well as the public hearing portion
Determine location for meetings
Determine ._notices..._................._prop.............................g.. .....,... _..._.. ......-. cts at sc edule for in n s of in ividual few districts a time
dist_ _
Prepare for erty owners that briefly explain what the
purpose of the meeting is and why it is important
Public notice in paper with explanation
Prepare materials for handouts/presentations at the meetings and for
distribution to those property owners/citizens who cannot be at the
on proposed zoning code districts as
to
Review sections of the zoning code as they are passed on by the
tannin commission
Final legal review
.... ...... .......---
. . ._.... .. . ..................
Incorporate legal comments
are
e
l Lat
er
THE BIRTHPLACE OF MINNESOTA
December 19, 2006
City of Grant
sty of Lake Elmo
City of Oak Park Heights
Stillwater Area Public Schools
Stillwater Township
Re: City of Stillwater — Liberty West Comprehensive Plan Amendment
To Whom It May Concern:
For your review and comment please find attached a Comprehensive Plan Amendment
(CPA) for the Liberty West development in the City of Stillwater. This amendment is
also being forward to the Metropolitan Council for their consideration.
I would ask that you please provide a letter, with or without comments, regarding this
proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment by January 31, 2007.
If you have any questions or connnents, please call me at 651-430-8822. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Michel Pogge, AICP
City Planner
CITY HALL: 216 NORTH FOURTH STREET • STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082
PHONE: 651-430-8800 • WEBSITE: www.ci.stillwater.mn.us
It Metropolitan Council Local Planning Handbook I Amendment Form
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Submittal Form
AMENDMENT NAME Liberty West Comprehensive Plan Amendment
This form is available in MS Word format on the Metropolitan Council's website:
http://www.metrocouncii.org/plannina/assistance/resources. htm.
COMMUNITY PROFILE AND AMENDMENT OVERVIEW
1. Provide the following information:
Local governmental unit City of Stillwater
Contact name Michel
Contact title City Planner
216 N. Fourth Street
City, State, and Zip Stillwater MN 55082
Telephone number 651-430-8822
FAX number 651-430-8810
Email address mpogge(a_ci.stillwater.mn us
Date of preparation December 20, 2006
2. Identify type of amendment and describe. Check all that apply:
X
2a. Land use change
CPA of 8.0 acres of land from rural residential to small lot single
family. Withincurrent MUSA.
2b. MUSA Expansion or Change
2c. Text Change
2d. Other
3. Provide a description of the amendment.
General location East of and adjacent to Manning Ave and approximately 725 feet north of Liberty
Brief description CPA of 8.0 acres of land from rural residential to small lot single family. The
current land use designation allows up to 3 units. The proposed change would
allow up to 32 units on 8 acres. The development plan under review would allow
20 single-family dwelling units or 2.5 dwelling units per acre.
Affected area, in acres 8.0 acres
February 2006
SECTION 1: PROCESS OVERVIEW
http://wvvw.metrocounci1.orci/planning/LPH/LPHSect1 pdf
4. Indicate official local status of the plan amendment. (Check all that apply.) The local governing body
must take action on the proposed amendment before submittal to the Metropolitan Council.
Acted
Action
commission
Approved by governing body, contingent upon
Metropolitan Council review
1 /3/2006
Date of Action
5. List adjacent local governments, school districts and other jurisdictions and the date the copies were sent.
Notifying adjacent governmental units and affected school districts is one of the criteria the
Council will use in determining whether an application is deemed complete for review.
The City mailed copies of this proposed CPA to the following jurisdiction of December 19, 2006:
• City of Grant
• City of Lake Elmo
• City of Oak Park Heights
• Stillwater Township
• Stillwater Area Schools — District 834
6. Identify outstanding issues or conditions made in the Metropolitan Council's review of the municipality's
2020 Comprehensive Plan Update or subsequent comprehensive plan amendment?
I I No, the Council's review did not identify any issues or conditions.
Issue/Condition Steps taken or future planned actions including date
(e.g.) Tier II Sewer Plan City Engineer drafting. Will submit to Council for review by December 2005
I/I problem The City has undertaken improvements to City's sanitary sewer mains and is
looking at potential areas for excess inflow to help alleviate the 1/1 problem.
The City of Stillwater has submitted a work plan that commits the City to
investigate and mitigate 1/1 problems in the City.
Additionally, with the 2008 comprehensive plan update the City will be
addressing the following items as required by the City's system statement:
• A flood related 1/1 study and implementation program for the elimination of
the flood related inflow from its sanitary sewer system.
• A description of the city's 1/1 program. What efforts does the city make in the
maintenance of its sanitary disposal system? Does the city prohibit the
connection of sump pumps, rain leaders and passive drain tile from the
sanitary sewer
February 2006 2
7. Will/has an environmental review (Environmental Assessment Worksheet, Environmental Impact
Statement or Alternative Urban Areawide Review) be/been completed for the site?
none
X Yes, indicate type of review and approximate date of completion. Include a summary of
findings, if completed: AUAR. Original report was completed in 1998 with updates/reviews
in 1999 and 2005. Reports were reviewed by Metropolitan Council. AUAR did not identify
any issues related to this site.
SECTION 2: FORECASTS http://www.metrocounci1.org/ lap nning/LPH/LPHSect2 pdf
8. Does the plan amendment change the population, household and employment forecasts that appear in the
Metropolitan Council's published forecast tables? (Published forecast tables are online.)
X I No: no chance in community -level forecasts
Yes: identifv the net chanaes to
Net Changes to Community -level Forecasts
Additions or reductions due to the amendment)
2010
2020
2030
HouseholdsPopulationEmployment+/-
For all amendments that propose land use or forecast changes, you must complete the questions #10
(land use), #11 (housing), #1.2 (trip generation), #20 (sewer flow) and #30 (water supply).
February 2006
SECTION 3: LAND USE
httD://www.metrocounci1.ora/i:)Iannill!n,gi/LPH/LPHSe,ct3.Ddf
9. Does the plan amendment propose any impacts to wetlands located on the site?
X I No wetlands on the site.
I I No impacts to wetlands located on the site,
the type of
10. Describe land use changes in acres, applicable to this amendment site, using the following tables and
filling in the community's specific land use categories:
Not Applicable.
Land Use Designation (fill in
Specific land i use categories)
All Land Uses
Residential Land Uses Only
Acres
#Units and Density
Range
Pre CPA
Post CPA
Pre CPA
Post
CPA'
Rural Residential
8.0
0
2 units existin
0
Small Lot, Single Family
0
8.0
0
Up to 32 units
20 units ro osed
Total
8.0
8.0
2
20
CPA = Comprehensive Plan Amendment
February 2006 4
11. If the proposed amendment changes the amount of land city wide staged for development by 2011 for
medium density, high density or mixed use residential development, complete the following table to identify
the amount of land available pre and post amendment: Pre and post amendment is Single Family
Development. Not Applicable to this project.
Fill in all land use categories
that allow for multifamily
residential development
Acres city-wide for each land use
category
Pre -amendment
Acres city-wide for each
land use category
Post -amendment
Total
Acres
Developed
acres
Developable
Acres*
Amendment
acres**
Developable
acres
a
b
a-b=c
d
c+d=e
Not applicable
"Developable" means land planned for urban residential development, infill or redevelopment before 2011.
** Amendment acres from the municipality's response to Question #10 above.
SECTION 4: TRANSPORTATION
http•//www metrocouncil orq/planning/LPH/LPHSect4 pdf
12. Complete the following table using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 6`h
Edition, to show whether this plan amendment increases or decreases trip generation from the planned
land use and transportation element of the community's comprehensive plan.
Trip Generation for the Site Based
Trip Generation for the Site Based
on Planned Land Use
on Planned Land Use
Pre -Amendment
Post -Amendment
Est. average daily traffic
28.7
191.4
Est, peak hour traffic
2.25
15
13. Will these changes require improvements to the existing local and regional road network or interchanges
beyond what is in the community's current transportation plan?
X No, existing local and regional road networks can accommodate increase.
Yes, describe improvements and who will pay for them:
Access
14. if the site has direct access to a principal or "A" minor arterial, is location and spacing consistent with
applicable County guidelines or MnDOT's Access Management Guidelines
(httD://www.oim.dot.state.mn.us/access/index.html)?
Not applicable. no
describe:
or "A" minor arterial.
February 2006 5
Transit and Other Modes of Transportation
15. Will this amendment enhance access to transit services, increase or decrease the demand for transit
services or warrant the extension of new transit service?
R
Yes, list existing routes, describe changes and identify proposed/necessary transit facility improvements
16. Does the plan amendment include Traffic Demand Management (TDM) strategies or land use and urban
design measures, if applicable?
Yes, describe (e.g. car and van pooling, flexible work hours, mixed land uses that discourage vehicle
trips and promote walking, bikina, ridesharina, and transit):
17. Does the plan amendment include pedestrian and bike access and facilities, including crosswalks, bridges,
trails, sidewalks, and bike racks, if applicable?
I X I Yes, describe: 4 foot sidewalk in development with 8 foot trail alona Mannino Ave (CSAH 15)
Aviation
18. Does the plan amendment affect any airport functions?
X I Not applicable, site not within airport influence area or search area.
No, site within airport influence area or search area but no impacts. Explain:
Yes, describe relationship to airport safety/noise zones. land use compatibility or other possible impacts -
SECTION 5: WATER RESOURCES
Wastewater
http://www.metrocouncil.org/planning/LPH/LPHSect5.pdf
19. What type of wastewater treatment will be utilized to serve the proposed amendment?
Private) Owned/Community Treatment System.
Local/Municipal Owned Wastewater Treatment Plant.
February 2006 6
20. Complete the following table, to show whether this plan amendment increases or decreases wastewater
flow from currently planned land use and sewer flow projections.
Total Community Flow
Pre -Amendment m d
Total Community Flow
Post Amendment-(m d
2000
2.30 *
2.30
2010
2.53
2.53
2020
2.68
2.68
2030
2.57
2.57
Mga = million gallons per clay
*Based on average of actual 1999, 2000, and 2001 flows. Per discussion on December 15, 2006 with Kyle Colvin.
21. Does the local wastewater system have adequate capacity, or staged capacity to accommodate the
proposed amendment?
Yes, explain: Mains in area are of adequate size to handle the projected flows (both peak and daily
n:
22. Does the regional wastewater system have adequate capacity, or staged capacity to accommodate the
proposed amendment?
X I Yes, explain: This is a small development within the allocated system statement flows
23. Has the community and/or Metropolitan Council identified an inflow and infiltration (W) problem?
X Yes, describe the steps taken to address the 1/1 issue and plans for future action: See Question 6.
No. the Citv/Two does not have an identified 1/1 croblem.
24. Identify interceptor(s) that will be impacted by these changes and indicate if flows will be diverted from one
interceptor service area to another?
This change will have a minimal impact on the interceptor and will not require any changes.
25. Does the plan amendment include any wastewater flow to an adjacent community? For new
intercommunity agreements, the receiving community must also amend the sewer element of its plan.
enclose a copy of the inter-communit
No.
February 2006 7
Surface Water
26. Will stormwater runoff generated from proposed amendment be treated on -site?
No, check one of the following and describe:
Runoff will receive no treatment:
Runoff will be treated
Yes, describe type and level of on -site pollutant removal treatment/mitigation plans: Will create both
detention and infiltration/retention ponds.
27. Does the community have an updated stormwater management plan, including best management practices
and implementation strategies?
X I Yes. Year
in 1993 with
28. Does the community have an adopted erosion control ordinances?
in 1993 with the latest update completed in Julv of
No.
Water Supply
29. Does the community have an updated water supply plan?
2005.
Yes, Year adopted: The Water Board adopted a water emergency and conservation plan in 2006.
The City, in cooperation with the Water Board, will also be reviewing the water
No.
30. Will the proposed plan amendment increase or decrease projected water use from the community's current
water supply plan?
X I No increase or decrease in proiected water use from water supply plan.
water
SECTION 6: PARKS
or
http://www.metrocouncil.org/planning/LPH/LPHSect6.pdf
31. Does the amendment include, or is it adjacent to or within''/2 a mile of an existing or planned regional park,
reserve or trail, as identified in the 2030 Regional Parks Plan?
Yes, describe potential impacts and mitigation plans: Washington County Greenway regional trail corridor
following Manning Ave, adjacent to this site. The City is working with the County as it is master plans the
trail location with development in the City. A portion of this trail will be constructed as part of this
February 2006 8
32. Does the community have a Parks & Open Space Plan including regional park elements?
Year
No
2000
SECTION 7: IMPLEMENTATION
http://www.metrocouncil.org/plannin /r� LPH/LEHSe�f
33. Will the plan amendment require changes in zoning or subdivision ordinances, capital improvement
program (CIP), or other official controls?
Yes, describe proposed changes and timeline:
34. Does the community have natural resources protection ordinances, including wetland, tree preservation,
and steep slopes?
X I Yes, identify:
Stillwater has ordinances concerning wetlands, tree preservation, and steep
slopes. This project has no wetlands or steep slopes. A tree preservation plan
February 2006 9
"LIBERTY VVEST/I
P%
14%
P% COTTAGE HOMES IN ASETTING
OF PRESERVED OAKS, CONIFERS
AND A PUBLIC TRAIL SYSTEM
ENTWINEDWITH PONDINGAND
WATERFALLS.
DELLWOOD
q
by
oSRILWA
if A a 14, —141
cliw
0
HEIR
66
�S
1000NCEPT:
17b
T\y/p. ,SOUPS OF EXISTING
ENWIMEmmoomm
CROIX CAPITAL
GROUP, INC.
CHRIS AAMODT- PPINCIPAL
6428 MANNING AVE. NORTH
MUM ER, MN 55082
PHONE: (651) 235-7212
"LIBERTY
WEST
oaks, m,iffersanda Ij )u !Acua#s)6b)I
enmiriedWditmclogandmtWis.
LOCATOR
MAP
0 If - 5��, c.—
Sarum
MP, RT LM, NW
4/22-11/18/05
11/23/05
iqt
CROIX CAPITAL
GROUP, INC.
CHRIS AAMODT- PRINCIPAL
6420 MANNING AVE. NORTH
SILLWATER, MN 550II2
PHONE: (651) 235-7212
"LIBERTY
WEST"
CoHagelw vsiiasVtg olprea rwd
wiG,=ifersaddappuuWk Uar'Isyste'n
ffl v md"I pardirigarld srllf,aZ
ILLUSTRATION
PLAN
k
a r r .ue Pn a y
knu Pue P.mn
MP, RT LM, NW
utslrll u _ 4/22 11/18/05
ancxru
pLn11\
Ixnnsw:rrEla=11/23/05
r�
4005 01!i\IdV VLdR4IVG R 0E5!GY
i� �ti ;L.t ik .plwli"fi UF`�:
V.m Tndm�nnal4:wx (U7'fl� EO:8 M1fiU�t
S..naw:riq +lu /Skxi4. m.rwh�A ���
Pi80AxGnx<Ivx,4... ... nAan
l\
L^�
L,
vA Metropolitan Council
December 18, 2006
Travis Germundson
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
1200 Warner Rd.
St. Paul, MN 55106
Re: Water Supply Plan — City of Lake Elmo
Metropolitan Council File Referral No. 19926-1
Metropolitan Council District 12
Dear Mr. Genmundson:
Environmental Services
RECEIVED
The Metropolitan Council (Council) has completed its review of Lake Elmo's water supply plan update as
required under Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.859, subd.3. As agreed upon, please include the
following comments with the Department of Natural Resources comments on the water supply plan.
The average residential per capita demand over the past 5 years was 64 gallons/day, which is below the
2002 metropolitan average of 75 gpcd. The conservation section of the plan describes programs designed
to lower this demand. The Council encourages the city to continue implementing its programs to help
keep water use down.
The city's average maximum day to average day ratio for the last five years was 3.6. This is higher than
the metropolitan average of 2.6. The Council encourages the city to continue enforcing its watering
restrictions and target conservation education at reducing customer water use during peak water use
periods in order to reduce its maximum day to average day ratio.
The city is reminded that if there are any changes in demand projections or in other areas of the water
supply plan, the city will need to provide the Council with the updated information as an amendment to
the water supply plan when it submits its 2008 comprehensive plan.
This letter completes the Council's review process. Should any questions arise on the Council's review
comments or on the process it followed, please feel free to contact Chris Elvrum at (651) 602-1066 or Sara
Bertelsen at (651) 602-1035.
Sincerely,
Keith Buttleman
Assistant General Manager, Environmental Quality Assurance
Cc: Chuck Dillerud, City of Lake Elmo
Chirs Georgacas, Metropolitan Council Member, District 12
Bob Mazanec, Metropolitan Council Sector Representative
www.metrocouncil.org
390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 • (651) 602-1005 • Fax (651) 602-1477 • 1"1'1' (651) 291-0904
An Equal Opportunity Employer
METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMNUSSION
2�,9+,5 S4itirq Minneapolis -Saint Paul International Airport
F� t 'V` 6040 - 28th Avenue South • Minneapolis, MN 55450-2799
Phone (612) 726-8100
pt t N
O 1 a1
O
t G0
RECEIVE17
4�
December 19, 2006
Charles Dillerud, Acting City Administrator
City of Lake Elmo
3800 Laverne Ave. North
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
RE: Metropolitan Airports Commission
Approved 2007 Capital Improvement Program
Dear Mr. Dillerud:
The Metropolitan Airports Commission, at its meeting on December 18, 2006, approved the
Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) to be accomplished on its airport system in 2007 along with
a 2008 Capital Improvement Program. The 2008 projects have been approved for further study
and development of plans and specifications for implementation in the following year.
Staff has also been authorized to conduct studies and develop preliminary plans and
specifications for year 2009 projects. The documentation necessary to encumber Federal
funding for eligible projects will be initiated in conjunction with the development of the
preliminary and final plans. A copy of the CIP spreadsheet that lists the projects and estimated
project costs and a short narrative of each project proposed for 2007 and 2008 are included for
your information.
Sincerel ,
Robert J. Vorpahl, E. -
Program Development Engineer
RJV/Irk
Enclosure
cc: Nigel Finney
Gary Warren
CIP file
FD&E packet file
Day file
The Metropolitan Airports Commission is an affirmative action employer.
www.mspairport.com
Reliever Airports: AIRLAKE • ANOKA COUNTY/BLAINE • CRYSTAL • FLYING CLOUD • LAKE ELMO • SAINT PAUL DOWNTOWN
2007 Capital Improvement Program
Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport
November, 2006
Runway Deicing/Holding Pad program
Runway 12L Snow Melting Pad Expansion $1,700,000
This project provides for the expansion of the Runway 12L snow storage/melting area including the
replacement of the existing snow melter with a three burner melter. These improvements will provide for a
larger snow storage pad and increased melting capacity that will result in increased efficiency of the pad.
Taxiway C/D Complex Construction
Taxiway CID Complex $8,200,000
This project is the third phase of a multi -phase program to reconstruct and reconfigure Taxiways C and D
between Runway 12L/30R and Runway 12R/30L. This project provides for the realignment of Taxiway C
between Taxiways A and Taxiway C6 and the reconstruction of pavement bounded by new alignments of
Taxiways A, B, C and D.
Airfield Rehabilitation Program
Airside Bituminous Rehabilitation $500,000
An ongoing program to construct or reconstruct bituminous pavements within the Air Operations Area. Two
projects areas are planned for implementation in 2007. One involves construction of bituminous shoulders
on Taxiway R from Taxiway R8 to Taxiway R3. The second provides for the mill and overlay of the
bituminous roadway in the tunnel under Runway 12R/30L.
Pavement Rehabilitation — Aprons $2,300,000
This is an ongoing program to replace sections of concrete pavement in the aircraft operational areas that
have deteriorated to a point where maintenance is no longer a viable option. This year's project will
replace approximately 6,000 square yards of apron pavement at gates C1 and D6 including associated
gate fuel hydrant systems...
Pavement Joint Sealing Repair $800,000
An ongoing program to provide for the resealing of joints in existing concrete pavements. The project also
provides for limited crack and surface repair. This year's project is located adjacent to Concourses C, D
and G including adjacent taxiways.
Runway Rehabilitation Program
Pavement Rehabilitation — Runway 12RI30L Seg.2 $17,500,000
This project provides for the reconstruction of the middle section of Runway 12R/30L located between
Runway 4/22 and Taxiway A4. Reconstruction of two separate segments has been completed in previous
years with Segment 2 being the final section of pavement requiring reconstruction.
Terminal Rehabilitation & Development Program
International Arrivals Facilities $200,000
This project provides for improvements to the International Arrivals Facility at both the Lindbergh and
Humphrey Terminals as required.
Landside Rehabilitation & Repair Program
Landside Pavement Construction $400,000
An ongoing program to reconstruct the airport's roadways and parking lots.. A specific project has not been
identified at this time. Pavements will be evaluated in the spring of 2007 to determine whether a pavement
repair project is needed.
Parking Structure Rehabilitation $1,500,000
An ongoing program to maintain the integrity of the airport's multi level parking structures. Projects
typically include concrete repair, joint sealant replacement, expansion joint repairs, concrete sealing and
lighting improvements. A Parking Facility Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Management Program is
currently being prepared and will define the scope of the projects to be completed in 2007.
12/14/06
Summarized below are the categories of the projects which are included in the Terminal Modifications
program:
Building Exterior Rehabilitation
This is a continuation of the program to rehabilitate the exterior of the Lindbergh Terminal and other
MAC buildings including roof and curtain wall rehabilitation.
Terminal Electrical Modifications
An ongoing program to address electrical issues in the terminals due to age and deterioration of the
existing systems or modifications necessary for improved reliability.
Terminal Mechanical Modifications
An ongoing program to address mechanical issues in the terminals due to age and deterioration of the
existing systems or modifications necessary for improved reliability.
Terminal Miscellaneous Modifications
An ongoing program to update and remodel areas within the terminals to keep abreast with changing
requirements. This may be accomplished through a series of small individual projects to meet the
requirements of the various tenants or may be consolidated into a single project.
Humphrey Terminal & MSP Campus Modifications
An ongoing program to modify or remodel areas within the West Terminal Complex, the Humphrey
Terminal and other facilities around the MSP Campus to meet the needs of the various tenants/general
public/MAC departments utilizing the facilities
*Historically, projects have been defined for each of these five categories. With reduced dollars
available to fund non -revenue generating projects, a total dollar allocation of $2,000,000 has been
allocated to fund the highest priority projects within any of these project categories.
Reliever Airport Program
Anoka County — Blaine
Building Area Development — West Annex $850,000 **
This project provides for the construction of two alleyways for eight storage hangars and three corporate
hangars, sanitary sewer and water main and accommodation of storm water drainage.
**Funding for this project to be provided by others.
Crystal
Alleyway Rehabilitation $320,000
An ongoing program to rehabilitate aircraft operational areas (runways, taxiways, aprons) through
bituminous overlays, seal coats, or in some instances, reconstruction, to restore the surfaces to a smooth,
even. condition and improve overall operating conditions. This year's project will include the reconstruction
of taxilanes in the west and south building areas. The project will also include any necessary airfield
pavement crack repairs.
Runway 14L/32R Reconstruction $2,000,000
This project provides for the reconstruction of Runway 141_/32R with new bituminous pavement and
subgrade correction.
Flying Cloud
Runway 10L/28R Extension $900,000
This project is the first phase of the airport expansion and includes the extension of the north parallel
runway from 3,600 to 3,900 feet.
South Building Area Development $7,000,000 **
This project will provide for the first phase in the construction of the new South Building Area and will
include site grading and sanitary sewer and water main installation.
**Funding for this project is to be provided by others.
12/14/06
Lake Elmo
Pavement Rehabilitation $300,000
An ongoing program to rehabilitate aircraft operational areas (runways, taxiways, aprons) through
bituminous overlays, seal coats, or in some instances, reconstruction, to restore the surfaces to a smooth,
even condition and improve overall operating conditions. This year's project will include the rehabilitation of
taxiway connectors to Runway 14/32.
St. Paul
Joint and Crack Repairs $100,000
The pavement subgrade at the St. Paul Downtown Airport is extremely poor. An annual pavement joint
and crack repair program will therefore be initiated to maintain pavement strength and pavement life.
MAC Building Maintenance $100,000
An ongoing program to provide for facility modifications to ensure continued efficient operation of buildings
or modifications necessary to meet the requirements of the tenants.
Runway Safety Area $8,800,000
This project is the third and final stage of safety area improvements at St. Paul. This year's project
includes the installation of an Engineered Material Arresting System (EMAS) at both ends of Runway
14/32, the relocation of the Runway 32 localizer antenna and minor modifications to the approach lighting
system.
Pavement Rehabilitation $850,000
An ongoing program to rehabilitate aircraft operational areas (runways, taxiways, aprons) through
bituminous overlays, seal coats, or in some instances, reconstruction, to restore the surfaces to a smooth,
even condition and improve overall operating conditions. This year's project will include the reconstruction
of pavement and subbase for Taxiways D, W and a portion of N.
Reliever Airports Utility Extension Program
Flying Cloud
Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Extensions $3,600,000
In accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement with the City of Eden Prairie and the requirement by the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to close all private well and septic systems at the airport, staff proposes
to complete the installation of sanitary sewer and water along Pioneer Trail to serve the FBOs and interested
tenants in the north building areas. in addition, the project will include construction of a restroom facility for
tenants who do not or cannot connect to the new utilities (many are in a non -service area) and a plane wash
facility:
Miscellaneous Field and Runway Program
Miscellaneous Construction $400,000
An ongoing program to consolidate various incidental items beyond the capabilities of the maintenance
personnel, projects too small to be accomplished independently or to handle airside problems requiring
repair which come up unexpectedly.
New Projects Program
Lindbergh Terminal Sprinkler System $3,500,000
Changes in the state building code require that the terminals be fully sprinkled. The Lindbergh Terminal
will be sprinkled as renovation work is completed.
Chilled Water Distribution Improvements $2,500,000
Concourses E, F and the south end of the Lindbergh Terminal experience warm conditions during the
summer months due to bottlenecks in the chilled water system that serve these areas. This project
provides for increasing the size of existing chilled water piping and replacing four existing chilled water coils
in order to increase the capacity of chilled water distribution system.
Upgrade Mezzanine Restrooms to meet ADA Code $600,000
The restrooms located on the mezzanine level of the Lindbergh Terminal do not meet the current ADA
Code. A project to upgrade these bathrooms to meet the current code is being studied.
12/14/06
Undberah Terminal Carpet Replacement $3,300,000
The carpet in the Lindbergh Terminal was replaced in phases starting in 1998. Some areas are showing
excessive wear and a phased program to replace the carpet is being proposed to start in 2008.
Fuel Farm Lease Extinguishment $5,000,000
These costs are for payment of the unamortized portion of the existing fuel farm lease when the facilities
are demolished and the loading rack relocated adjacent to the Humphrey remote apron.
Humphrey Fuel Facility Relocation $4,900,000
This project will provide for the demolition of the Humphrey fuel farm and construction of replacement load
islands for Jet -A, diesel and unleaded fuel adjacent to the north end of the Humphrey remote apron.
Completion of this project will provide for reduced operating expenses of the fuel hydrant system by the
MSP Fuel Committee.
MSP Fuel Consortium Modifications $270,000
The MSP Fuel Consortium operates the airline fuel system that was installed by the MAC. The Consortium
has requested that upgrades to the system are required over the next several years. Projects that have
been requested include the second phase in the program to upgrade its emergency generator. The Fuel
Consortium will reimburse MAC for these costs.
New Projects Allowance
An allowance has been established for new projects that have been requested.
Terminal Backlit Sign Replacements $1,600,000
Many of the illuminated way finding signs in both the Lindbergh and Humphrey Terminals have
neon lamps that are burned out. These lamps are difficult and costly to replace and have limited
longevity. A Signage Management and Maintenance Work Group (SMMWG) reviewed options
ranging from replacing the existing lamps to replacing the illumination units. The SMMWG is
recommending that the unit be replaced with a single row of LED units. The LEDs are easy to
maintain, have an extended life (7 years), and are comparable in cost to a new fluorescent sign
that has a two year bulb life. A phased four year program to retrofit the, illuminated signs in both
the Lindbergh and Humphrey Terminals is proposed to start in 2008.
Commission Chambers Upgrade $700,000
The MAC Commission Chambers/Grieve Conference Center has been in use for the last ten years
without substantial modification. This project will include upgrades to the audio, video, video-
conferencing and technology presentation equipment and interfaces in the Commission Chambers
and three conference rooms. The project will also provide new carpeting and furniture and
additional way finding signage. The project will be phased over two years with upgrades to the
audio technology proposed for 2007.
Tug Drive Floor Repair $1,900,000
The membrane waterproofing system on the tug drive floor is deteriorating and coming apart in
various areas or has been damaged allowing water to leak into work areas, electrical vault rooms,
the valet garage and other operational areas. The membrane system is nearing the end of its
designated life of 5 years and must therefore be replaced in a phased program. The first phase
was completed in 2007.
Food Courts Upgrade/Remodel $175,000
The Food Court projects include updating and remodeling fixtures, furnishings, and equipment at
the A, F, C, and E Concourses food courts. This project is being implemented in conjunction with
significant tenant funded leasehold improvements initiated with the Concessions Transition Project.
The project will be phased over two years, with the E and F Concourse Food Courts scheduled in
2007 and the A and C Food Courts scheduled in 2008.
12/14/06 10
Communications Center Expansion $1,900,000
The existing Communications Center space is inadequate to meet the needs of the current staff as
well as future staffing needs. Existing equipment has not been upgraded since 1995 and there is a
need to make strategic investments in new electronic technology to maximize productivity.
Currently, the Communications Center and Operations Center are located together on Concourse
E. Both departments are in need of additional operational space. A proposal to move both
departments to a common location is under study. .The Communications Department would be
moved in 2007 with the Operations Department moving Into the vacated space on an interim basis.
Remodeling of the space for Operations would be required and once Communications has
relocated. This project will be phased over two years. The facility build -out will occur in 2007 and
the equipment installation will be in 2008.
Security Improvements
Perimeter Fence/Gate Barrier System $6,400,000
This project is part of a phased program to strengthen the perimeter security fence and
airfield access gates. Proposed work includes the replacement of the existing chain link
fence with a welded wire mesh fence. The new fence will be constructed on a concrete
retaining wall in areas susceptible to vehicle intrusions. Jersey barriers will be placed in
front of gates not in use and a hydraulic crash barrier will be constructed at one gate
location.
C Concourse Elevator to D Street $360,000
Currently, the C Concourse elevator stops at the concourse level. MAC staff has requested that
this elevator be modified to allow for access to D Street. This would allow the MAC trades to get lift
equipment used to change lights and clean high areas to the east end of the C Concourse.
ANOMS System Upgrade $500,000
To ensure continued application of the Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring Systems (ANOMS)
technology, it is necessary to provide for periodic system upgrades. The upgraded system would
consist of three main components: new analysis system software; upgraded analysis system
hardware; and a multilateration flight track acquisition system. The multilateration system would
include installation of 6-9 remote sensors that provide precise aircraft tracking and positional
information by interrogating aircraft transponder signals and triangulating an aircraft's exact
position. The project would include complete installation of all components associated with the
ANOMS central processing system. Modem connectivity would be installed and the system would
be integrated with the existing 39 Remote Monitoring Terminals (RMTs) and integration with all
ANOMS central processing computers.
Concessions Revenue Development/Upgrades $200,000
This project will fund miscellaneous upgrades (finishes, furniture, condiment stations, etc.), signage
and/or modified connections to utilities for the concession programs at the Lindbergh and
Humphrey Terminals.
ARFF Station #2 Roof Replacement $230,000
A roof condition study completed in 2006 indicates that the roof on the old ARFF station has
reached its useful life and is need of replacement.
ADO Modifications $400,000
The MAC Airport Director's Office (ADO) kitchenette and copy area requires modification and
consolidation of functions to accommodate additional offices to support communication and
coordination within the ADO and associated departments. This project will add three offices, a
modified kitchenette, break room, and copy center.
Sanitary Sewer/Manhole Repair — Runway 12L $600,000
The 12-inch sanitary sewer that is located in the approach to Runway 12L was constructed in 1948
utilizing vitrified clay pipe and brick and, mortar manholes. Cleaning of this sewer has been
hindered by blockages in the pipe and this line was televised to determine the condition of the pipe.
The televising report indicated cracked and broken sections of pipe. A complete replacement of
the pipe and manholes is being considered versus repairing only those pipe sections that have
deteriorated.
12/14/06 11
Unallocated Allowance $35,000
A total of $15M has been allocated for new projects in 2008. There is currently $35,000 that has
not been allocated and may be used to fund new work.
2020 Development Program
2010 Projects deferred to 2020 Program
Ground Services Equipment Building Relocation $5,500,000
This project provides for the relocation of the existing ground service equipment (GSE) building to make
way for the expansion of gates at the Humphrey Terminal.
Humphrey Terminal
Humphrey Terminal Expansion $83,000,000
The Humphrey Terminal will be expanded from 10 gates to 22 gates over a three-year period. The
expansion will include the construction of 12 new gates and all associated facilities including ticketing,
baggage claim, baggage make up and in -line baggage screening, road improvements, new aircraft apron
and hydrant fueling at all gates.
Auto Rental Facilities $16,300,000
This project provides for auto rental facilities including counters, back office and ready and return facilities
for all on -airport auto rental providers as well as a new quick -turn -around (QTA) facility to serve vehicles at
the Humphrey Terminal.
12/14/06 12
rn
���gwoN'w
o 2 w
56
w
c�Spe
_w 0
y w ry N
0
d w
w
= o
O <n
o O o
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
y
O IWI
(D O fP A
O O O O
O O O O
Qo
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
O
O O O
p
O
O
O O O
O O O
O
O
O O O
N
3
((qq
A
»
» » » » N N ff»»
y
o
0 0 0
N
o
0 0 0
o
0
0 0 0
0 0 0
w
N
E9
fA fA
.p
»
• » » » N N �
O
O
O O O
O O O
0
o a o
0
0
0 0 0
0 0 0
» » » » » N N
O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
N
? O O A
O O O O
O O O O O
N O O O O
O O O O
O O O O
a
3
m
3
A
en
N
m
aia i9n
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0 0 0
w
6'
O
O
O
O
!T Uri
O O
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
fA
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
69
o
cam»
N
0
O
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
cv
O
V�1
f�T
O
O
O
0
0
0
a
o
0
0
0
0
N
Obi
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
69
f9
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
t
O
N
B
■
Q
-
((/c(/{/
!p,}
(
l�,�
IS
8 8 o
\ /}
\\
Ea
]{
@
\
}
;
k
#®
\
)
&
&
\
\0
\
\
n
0
{«
,
B
i
M
7
/(/
(/(0
°
/\/0o
!E!&2EE
.
!
§ff!
63
/
-
u`■/
(
.
�\
\
%_
§
.
}
}
§
e
w
!(\
(
!`
co
\
\
}}
7
w
ET
k
(
(
MO
\
77\0
co C�
}\/0
$[#0(m
M
�
m
n
B
J
m o o c c c c
fnCDSTpi D.�O per, O Cn00 T-10-i cn vi O'?I � �. -a pJp � m ti $J$ n
q. H S m
co
O T J O o O S w v an v v � m B 0. 0 3 oy - o o. o c c� w
M c J w w w o m w nl 3 0 3 w w J a, w m 'm c m w
n m Q• y 8 x ff A D m �� o o. c m y. 01 M a: 3 m� o M m �D �
m o. a .� 3 m =� o J• d a m m J m a a �" Si �, -_n 0 d oo y� m D �'. y A� y a 9 N
�50� Om � 3 mm o c�T'�-.m'w < =v a=� O�� o 0 a.° m [mn
—0. ai m m y 7J 0 C m w G7 of m J n= m (� n al m 3 m m 0? 3 v 3 m T w
D 3 (w0 m e A
of v'J o �m5 m l C 9 0 °i• �' n 3 0 3 A
w- 0 o c w o 01 J. a 0 �n v 3 0. o nnw = o :• o �' o
0
m 3 O m �o ,� m o m J a w J 3
o m ,J..m coo a 4?
J
J
m 3 J J
2 y
r N J
N
a
O O f9 H3 fA 49 EA fA bi fA fA 49 N N fA Hi
3 0 0 0 O O Ot O O O O O O o f O O P O Ul
a o 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o
m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a o 0 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o.o 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O
� r
X
O W O O W O 0 0) O O J O p 0 0 0
pp O O O O O O O O UI O O O p O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 o O o 0 0 0 o O o o p o 0 0 0 0
O fn N tO W O O � N V
O fn O U O O O N O O
O O O O O O O 0 p 0 0 O
O O G O O O O 0 0 0 O
O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O
O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O
� fA G9 fA f� bi EA
N P py N yj
O O O O O 0 0 O O
O O O O O O O O O
u,
O O O O O
U A
O W N
p O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
EA fA
U ? Ey
o W N
O o 0
o O o
b b o
0 0 0
0 0 0
3
3
D
o��m ofn a(o� m o 00'�3� ��QomcvNO
n'i_' 8 m o n m r c 5f A a r oT MOO O �' MMMOB
o S -i y b(a E 6.63 (a m m
Q coi V Q m U' m V 3 L4 T m m oE- N m m m 9
m o m 3 s m n o v 3 A a a
-,Q<jg� (� nm o'er w w a• m m oo o =w N of
O^ .T ' -I O N O .�i N j Ci j W N 3
> > 3 N O N< O -O O N C N O o 010
N N< OJ N O N OWt :i - NEl
. O
N O G O t0 O �p'3 0l
N y N O F S
N O N 3 O O CO
N
J N
O
O
O'
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 p o o p 0 o m
0 0 o O o 0 00
0 0 0 0 0 0
22
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
�p 0
A yi N W N j O w N N A A A
O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O
12
O O O O O O O O O O O O O
0 0 o O o 0 0 o O o 0 0 0
0
o b o
O O o
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
O N N O
p o
0 0 0 o N
O o 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 o W
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
N
EtvD 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500
TKDA C G Saint Paul, MN 55101-2140
ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
MEMORANDUM
To: Kelly Matzek
Copies To: George Burkhards
From: Thomas Prew, P. E. f
Date: December 18, 2006
(651)292-4400
(651)292-0083 Fax
www.tkda.com
Reference: Eagle Point 7th Addition
Stream Setback
City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota
Proj. No.: 13593.000
Routing:
In the Eagle Point subdivision, the developer constructed storm water ponds within the streambed to allow
for both storrn water management and to become a landscape amenity.
The City Council has approved allowing the building setback to be measured from the center of the original
streambed, rather than from the shoreline of the newly constructed pond.
I concur and support this decision. I cannot foresee a negative impact on this site from allowing the building
setback to be measured in this manor.
Call me if you have any questions.
An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity