Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJanuary 3, 2006 CCP-/=- I L E Mayan: Dean Johnston Lake Elmo City Council Council members: Rita Conlin Tuesday Steve DcLapp Liz Johnson J,anuary 3' 2006 Anne Smith 3500 Laverne Avenue No. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 777-5510 777-9615(fax) Please read: Since the City Council does not have time to discuss every point presented, it may appear that decisions are preconceived. However, staff provides background information to the City Council on each agenda item in advance; and decisions are based on this information and experience. In addition, some items may have been discussed at previous council meetings. If you are aware of information that has not been discussed, please fill out a "Request to Appear Before the City Council form; or, if you came late, raise your hand to be recognized. Comments that are pertinent are appreciated. Items may be continued to a future meeting if additional time is needed before a decision can be made. Agenda City Council Meeting Convenes 7:00 PM Pledge of Allegiance 1. Agenda 2. Minutes: December 20, 2005 3. PUBLIC INOUIRIESANFORMATIONAL: Public Inquiries/Informational is an opportunity for citizens to bring the Council's attention any items not currently on the A. PUBLIC INQUIRIES: agenda. In addressing the Council, please state your name and B. PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL: address for the record, and a brief summary of the specific item being addressed to the Council. To allow adequate time for (1) Lake Elmo Jaycees Proclamation each person wishing to address the Council, we ask that (2) 2006 Board of Appeal and individuals limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written Equalization Meeting documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting or as bench copies, to allow a more timely presentation. 4. CONSENT AGENDA Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to A. Resolution No. 2006-OO1:Authorizing be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no Signature for Payments of Funds From the Lake separate discussion of these items unless a Council member so Elmo Bank requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the B. Resolution No. 2006-002:Approving general order of business and considered separately in its normal claims sequence on the agenda. 5. ORGANIZATIONAL ME, STING: A. Election of Acting Mayor B. Designation of Legal Newspaper C. Designation of Official Depositories for 2006 D. Appointment of City Engineer E. Appointment of City Attorney (Civil and Criminal) Lake Elmo City Council Agenda January 3, 2006 Pape 2 F. Appointment of Financial Advisor G. Appointment of Auditing Firm H. Cable Operator:Steven Press I. IT:Next Genesis J. Animal Control K. Change Council Committees to Council Workshops: Resolution No. 2006-006 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Employee and Volunteer Recognition Party 7. MAINTENANCEIPARK/FIREBUILDING: A. Update on Fire Department: Chief Malmquist 8. CITY ENGINE,ER'S REPORT: Tom Prew A. 9. PLANNING. LAND USE & ZONING: C. Dillerud A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Trails Guide Plan:Resolution No. 2006-003 B. 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendments:Resolution No. 2006-004 C. 2006-2010 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) Resolution No. 2006-005 D. Metropolitan Council System Statement - Verbal 10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: A. 11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. 12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: A. Mayor Johnston B. Council Member Conlin C. Council Member DeLapp D. Council Member Johnson E. Council Member Smith MAY�CE LAKE ELMO JAYCEES 1(�QP.O. BOX 1J(J - MINNES OTA .l A YC E P..SLake Elmo, MN 55042 I Dear Mayor John-Zn, Enclosed is the proclamation for Jaycee Week for the Lake Elmo Jaycees. There are two copies, one for you and one for our records. Also I would like to introduce myself. My name is Josh Ackerman, and I will be the President for the Lake Elmo Jaycees this year. I have been a Lake Elmo Jaycee for five years now, and am excited to take the helm for the chapter this next year. We are getting set to have a big year. As you know we hold Huff - N - Puff , and it will be our 30 year this year. We also have some big events that are also in the works. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your time, Josh Ackerman Lake Elmo President 2006 %4p'.` . LAKE EI.MO JAYCEES MI P.O. Box 198 NNESOJnPC� " LMtfO aM" Lake Elmo, MN 5504-2 JAYCEE,S Whereas, the Lake Elmo Junior Chamber has actively involved itself in the life of our community for the future development of community leaders as an organization, nationally, and in the State of Minnesota for the past 34 years; and Whereas, the Lake Elmo Junior Chamber has contributed humanitarian projects such as Adopt -A -Highway, Adopt -A Park, and Easter Egg Hunt; and Whereas, the Lake Elmo Junior Chamber has adopted the basic tenets of purpose of brotherhood, free enterprise, government of laws, human personality, and service to humanity; Now Therefore, I, Dean Johnston, Mayor of the City of Lake Elmo, do hereby proclaim the week of January 15th, 2006, as Lake Elmo Junior Chamber week in the City of Lake Elmo and urge all city citizens to recognize the importance of community service to all of its citizens. Done at the City Hail, in the City of l.,ake Elmo, this 3rd day of January, in the Year of Our Lord, 2006. Signed: Lake Elmo Agenda Section: ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING No. 5B. City Council January 3, 2006 Agenda Item: Designation of Legal Newspaper Background Information for January 3, 2006: Attached are quotes from the Lake Elmo Leader and Lillie Suburban Newspapers, Inc. for legal newspaper services for 2006. In 2005, the Lake Elmo Leader, which has an office in the City, was designated as the City's legal newspaper. Although the newspaper only publishes on Friday, the staff has had to work around the deadlines for submission of public hearing notices. The following motion is offered for your consideration: Action Items: Person responsible: Motion , Second , to designate the Lake Elmo S. Lumby Leader as the City's Legal newspaper for 2006. Attachments 1. Letter from Lake Elmo Leader Time Allocated: 2. Letter from Lillie Suburban Newspapers, Inc. Lake Elmo LEADER RECEIVED 3880 Laverne Avenue, Suite I I I Lake Elmo, MN 55042 p: 651-777-3830 f: 651-777-3836 December 16, 2005 City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Dear Lake Elmo Mayor and City Council, We would like to take this opportunity to thank the City of Lake Elmo for designating the Lake Elmo Leader as the legal and offical publication for the past year. Once again, we look forward to partnering with the City of Lake Elmo to bring residents of the Lake Elmo area legal notices in the years to come. The fol- lowing is the Lake Elmo Leader's 2006 rate for publication of legal notices, effective with the January 6, 2006 edition: $4.53 per column inch All legal notices will be posted on-line at www.lakeelmoleader.com. Deadlines for legals will be 12 p.m. the Friday prior to publication. We encourage the submission of legal notices via e-mail. Please send your legal notices to legals@lakeelmoleader.com. Include an insertion order with your notice containing the dates of requested publication, the name of the paper you wish to publish in, and a contact naive and number, in case of questions. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any further questions, please call (651) 439-4366. Sincerely, Koryn Warner Legal Coordinator Lillie Suburban Newspapers, Inc. Chuck Dillerud City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Ave. N. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Dear Mr. Dillerud: 2515 E. Seventh Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55109 (661)777.8800 November 29, 2005 Thank you for the opportunity to bid on public notice publication services for the City of Lake Elmo. The Oakdale -Lake Elmo Review has been serving the needs of the Lake Elmo area for 34 years, and is pleased to provide ongoing coverage of city government and school issues and community events. Lillie Suburban Newspapers is the oldest weekly newspaper company in the St. Paul area. It was founded in 1938 by the late T. R. Lillie. His grandsons, Jeffery Enright and Ted H. Lillie, are continuing the family tradition of publishing award -winning community newspapers in the St. Paul suburbs. It is our sincere desire to provide the best possible local news coverage in the Lake Elmo area. Our experienced news staff provides readers with a well-balanced, lively and informative product each week. We realize that Lake Elmo area residents look to us as one of their primary sources of information about city activities and meetings, and we will continue to publish the city's press releases and photos. Lillie Suburban Newspapers has the official designation of the neighboring communities of North St. Paul, Maplewood and Oakdale, to name a few, as well as the North St. -Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale School. District. 3 P.M. Friday is the deadline each week for submitting public notices to our office. Public notices should be directed to Brenda Boogren, Lillie Suburban Newspapers, 2515 E. Seventh Ave., North St. Paul, MN 55109. Our fax number is 651n77-8288. Notices may also be sent via e-mail to: legals@lillienews.com Legal publication rates for minutes, advertisements for bids and other notices are as follows: $2.10 per column inch for a one-time .publication $1.99 per column inch for each additional publication Thank you for considering the Oakdale -Lake Elmo Review as the official legal newspaper for the City of Lake Elmo for 2006, If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to call us_ Sin y, Jeffery Enright Publisher Ramsey County Review + Maplewood Review + Oakdale -Lake Elmo Review e Review Perspectives LittNEWTS New Brighton Bulletin a Shoreview Bulletin + St. Anthony Bulletin South-West Review Roseville -Little Canada Review + Woodbury -South Maplewood Review + East Side Review Depositories Lake Elmo Agenda Section: ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING No 5C. City Council January 3, 2006 Agenda Item: Appointment of Depositories for 2006 Background Information for January 3.2006 The staff recommends the designation of the following as official depositories for the City: Lake Elmo Bank, Wachovia Securities, Smith Barney Citigroup, and Northland Securities. Person responsible: Action Items: Tom Bouthilet Motion Second , to designate Lake Elmo Bank, Wachovia Securities, Smith Barney Citigroup, and Northland Securities for the 2006 Depositories. CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO.2006-001 A Resolution Authorizing Signatures for Payment of Funds from Lake Elmo Bank WHEREAS, on January 3, 2006 the City designated the Lake Elmo Bank as the official depository for the funds of the City of Lake Elmo; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lake Elmo City Council hereby approves the following: 1. Mayor Dean Johnston and either Martin Rafferty, Charles Dillerud, Thomas Bouthilet shall sign all checks and order for payment of money and withdraw funds on deposit with the Lake Elmo Bank. 2. Mayor Dean Johnston's facsimile signature may be used to endorse all checks and orders for the payment of money and to withdraw funds on deposit with the Lake Elmo Bank. 3. This resolution shall continue to have effect until expressed written notice of its rescission or modification has been received and recorded by the Lake Elmo Bank. ADOPTED by the Lake Elmo City Council this 3rd day of January, 2006. ATTEST: Martin J. Rafferty, City Administrator Dean A. Johnston, Mayor L' a �Mti"s �1.'L'V�n.1.•.n `' C ' M''L\:4Z•\Mt.1Ah'�7y�a1AN ,yt - v 145, CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2006-002 RESOLUTION APPROVING CLAIMS BE IT RESOLVED THAT Claim Numbers 299, 300, DD594 through DD603, 28448 through 28463, were used for Staff Payroll dated December 20`h, 2005; claims 301, 28464 through 28494, in the total amount of $357,039.78 are hereby approved. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 3ra day of January, 2006. Dean A. Johnston Mayor ATTEST: Martin J. Rafferty City Administrator Z m ►o N 0 z b m W U d I z z z z z z z b O G W q W x q W x q W b W q W q W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 dd O G ti qY U O q N q d0' d O api O q O � O � N '� 0 \ ❑ N � vNi � 0 7 � O O U .ti O O O O N N N N N N N O O O O O O M O O O O O O}} O x �v/ ° n 3 p rnF � i. F+ xU c°, F .m H o po o �'Sno o d �lU �aU qqU 6UU ¢�'aU CJ�U qU V is G N N a z z z z z z z z C4 d 6 6 d 6 6 d d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 ti� mao v�o N - N N N N N Vl Vl M 'A' N N M M M M M M � D\ q .. � O q .. q .-� •-. q N '� d' = P N N 7 .-. N 6 N N N M vi Z U)O hO l�00'0 !nO MOO �O N V V]00000 0 d A b m m m m b m b m m m m m m q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M-M M M M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C� l� r b m M M tv� M O 00 00 O O O O m o0 M V U b 00 b m q O C N U ^ r0 'y t/�yin cy�gy d � OO O o b Ca d > N U a o q q Q A o- '� 3 x o a �diuLlmwa. o d o o G q o O o v� m o rn rn o ._. •i F" o f "� � F `o v�F 0 � F . N F 'T:2, F U '� � � F h A wv°UtiS q'U aagJ �aU z3U zUUZUUUV 0 F. a z � z M M M M M M O W x N q � '�000000 7 O b � b O •d �' •O W 'd o0 W b vmi b � 'Od � T ON1 ON1 � � v Iti 'JN �%F-i ,M �✓ F �.+.. r%M >fZrrrrr 6 z z z z z z z z 0 d V U U U U U U U 55 0 o�n000�n o 0 0 o 0 0 0 O 000000 ^O �O N M N� NOD O N O d qo ad00000 o qo o ao qo �o qo spy q M q �D �O O O 1p �O O T a M a M q N a 0 a M a Q\ v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C t�h r-�rn N�O�h ao m m as o0 W Q v o0 �" H qo y x ppa �'°gUA e �C��A� .0 m a •� o ..q C si �v o .tea o q ,q a �wu o.dU3UUdL) U aaU �UU aUU a MN U O W H Wz U V1 O U Eel Q � a"i > - d' R z U Q G a J m W z z z z z z w w w w w 5w5 0 000 0 0 0 0 00000000000000 O O 00 N O N.-i N N N.-. m y-�} 000000 0000 O O yOq' Nv N N M M M M \O �D M M M M M M M M M M M M �N (ryy d0 OO M'+OOO [� m 00000 6 � �o rna riia ri���oocoba000�vv �i !xJ 1 1 U U Vj U U O� O� i 811111,T11111111 U O M M O_ O � 0 0 0 U O� O O =7 O �= 0 0 0 0 0 •--� O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000000000 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 00000000000000 N� 00 b h CT b� O O Vl V1 W O o0 O O d' 01 1� O lD �D V V1 NN Mbr�vi MbN'cYbN �nN FJ N `4 01 Vl M W U � �✓ o 0 0 � o O U N x M N O a ao h i❑s d' i❑s n iqs � N M ❑ b d .y 90 � 0 7vai W +2 U S � bA Q � pp•� N 4x N w d� 7 O FL� C1U 0 a w U U P. H'za m Mmvo m o0 00 00 00 00 0o m m o0 00 0o ao rn v �a�aa�rvv vvvav D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `d N N N N NN N N N N N N N N o o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >00000000000000 8 A z U 'o a r-i x U N b9 a x o � p Q ti DG'�U FN N RRP CITY OF LAKE ELMO 2005 BILLING SUMMARY MONTH 11135 Administration 11140 I Criminal Pros 1 11145 Public Imp, Prot 11150 Community Dev 11155 Civil Litigation 11161 Auto Forfeiture TOTAL Jan $4,443.11 $3,456.17 $66.00 $673.71 $210.00 $464.00 $9,312.99 Feb $2,439.99 $2,868.68 $644.36 $198.00 $94.50 $6,145.53 March $3,375.41 $3,562.62 $1,956.61 $99.00 $318.50 $9,312.14 April $1,979.81 $3,328.76 $77.00 $2,753.61 $954.77 $307.00 $9,400.95 May $3,779.92 $3,329.95 $297.00 $390.50 $354.32 $518.00 $8,669.69 June $3,795.88 $3,777.44 $165.86 $363.00 $1,261.00 $40.50 $9,403.68 July $3,690.32 $3,349.44 $333.50 $132.54 $40.50 $7,546.30 Aug $2,602.10 $4,550.31 $352.00 $865.07 $590.61 $8,960.09 Sept $1,178.61 $3,745.10 $121.00 $929.61 $723.46 $1,508.50 $8,206.28 Oct $2,193.21 $3,433.08 $154.00 $665.03 $203.78 $94.50 $6,743.60 Nov $3,027.11 $3,469.90 $132.00 $712.63 $279.54 $207.00 $7,828.08 Dec $0.00 Totals $32,505.47 $38,871.45 $1,567.22 $9,328,10 $5,083.48 $4,183.61 $91,529.33 12/15/2005 Suite 300 50 Flfth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101.1.197 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo MN 55042 r FEES 11135-DOODOS Comp. Plan Update 2000-2020 99.00 11135-040010 VACATION OF 55TH STREET 151.50 11135-920001 Administration 2,114.00 2,364.50 ACCOUNT NO EXPENSES ADVANCES (651) 291 8955 (651) 228.1753 facsimile Federal Tau ID #41.0991098 Page: 1 11/30/2005 11135M BALANCE 0.00 0.00 $99.00 3.10 655.55 $810.15 3.96 0.00 $2,117.96 7.06 655.55 $3,027.11 THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF rHHE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTHH•S STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT. Suite 300 50 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101-1197 - 1 1 T"I''U,:N�. (651) 291-8955 (651) 228.1753 facsimile Federal Tax ID 941-099I098 Page: 1 CITY OF LAKE ELMO, 11/30/2005 3800 Laverne Avenue North ACCOUNT NO. 11140M Lake Elmo MN 55042 FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES BALANCE 11140-030001 Misc Prosecutions 2,860.00 24.29 0.00 $2,BB4.29 11140-040038.SACQUES, LARRY PATRICK - Traffic Violations 67.50 0.00 0.00 $67.50 1114D-050028 Perkins, Carol Kozatt dog bite/dog at large 0.00 0.00 17.50 $17.50 11140-050066 Gallmeier, Ryan Lee 3rd degree DUI, 3rd degree .10 300.00 0.00 0.00 $300.00 11140-050083 Phernetton, Myron domestic assault 0.00 0.00 39.00 $39.00 11140-050122 Love, Orbin DAR 5.00 0.00 0.00 $5.00 11140-050162 Estebo, Larry Lee 3rd degree DUI, fail to stop, no insurance 10.00 0.00 0.00 $10.00 11140-050194 Foerster, Ryan Steven DAR 5.00 1.61 0.00 $6.61 THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED To THE NEXT MONTHS STATEMENT. PL EASE R 'LURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT. Suite 300 j ERSON - (65P)291-8955 tFifth Street. Paul, MN 55E01t 1197 FROM 'BERGMAN Fed(erallT xB-1753 ID #41f09910' St98 e ® a Page: 2 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 11/30/2005 ACCOUNT NO. 11140M FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES BALANCE 11140-050203 Carey, Brian Lee DAS 5.00 0.00 0.00 $5.00 11140-050238 Will, Timothy - GM-DAC-IPS - 10.00 0.00 0.00 $10.00 11140-050240 Beasley, Linda K. park on grass 5.00 0.00 0.00 $5.00 11140-050242 Wason, Scott Spencer abandon vehicle on roadway 5.00 0.00 0.00 $5.00 11140-050247 Flores, Michael J. 3rd degree DUI, 3rd degree .08, DAR 10.00 0.00 0.00 $10.00 11140-050248 Aamold, Wayne Keith _ 3rd degree DUI, 3rd degree .08 10.00 0.00 0.00 $10.00 11140-050249 Meissner, Chad E. GM -no insurance, DAS 65.00 0.00 0.00 $65.00 11140-050250 Vetter, David speed 68/55 10.00 0.00 0.00 $10.00 11140-050251 Ryder, Steven Roger 3rd degree DUI, 3rd degree .08 . 10.00 0.00 0.00 $10.00 THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL HE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPS' OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT. Suite 300 50 Paul Street East � BERG � � � T St, Paul, MN 55101.1197 r1��1 �""�l'� j�lj[-'1(�J o a e a CITY OF LAKE ELMO FEES EXPENSES 11140-050252 Pinkston, Keith Antonio DAC 10.00 J, JO I. DV I lI 25.90 (651)291.8955 (651) 228.1753 facsimile Federal Tax ID #41.0991098 Page: 3 11/30/2005 ACCOUNT NO. 11140m ADVANCES BALANCE 0.00 $10.00 56.50 $3,469.90 THIS STATEMENT IS DUDE AND PAYABLE TO THE ENO OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTHS STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT. iP ERSON, Suite 300 (b5q 291-8955 St Fifth aul Street East101- p��,ry A- p /( Bj3ES �"j� /( ]� T 7 16511 228.1753 facsimile St. Paul, MN 55101-I 1.97 j l �,'�l�/1 jJ 1V ,h Federal Tax ID #41.0991098 / 1 1 tl Page: 1 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 11/30/2005 3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH ACCOUNT NO. 11145M LAKE ELMO MN 55042 FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES BALANCE 11145-040003 WATER SYSTEMS CONNECTION 8B.00 0.00 0.00 $88.00 11145-050001 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 44.00 0.00 0.00 $44.00 132.00 0.00 0.00 $132.00 TRES STATEMENT ➢S DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECE➢ PO AFTER THE LAST DAY OF TH➢E MONTH WILL BE CRED➢TEND TO T➢HE NEXT MONTH's STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OIL STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT. Suite 300 50 Fifth Street East St, Paul, MN 55101.3 197 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo MN 55042 r= UFn.A` :S.SitCS'A?tlol';, ACCOUNT NO FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES 11150-050002 LE PROFESSIONAL CENTER C/O J. MCDONALD VARIANCE 70.00 0.00 0.60 (651)291.8955 (651) 228.1753 facsimile Federal Tax ID N41 0991098 Page: 1 11/30/2005 11150M BALANCE $70.00 11150-050004 FARMS OF LAKE ELMO O.P. DEVELOPMENT 99.00 0.00 0.00 $99.00 11150-050006 DISCOVERY CROSSING OP DEVELOPMENT 88.00 1.82 0.00 $89.82 11150-,050007 LAKE ELMO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - OP 286.00 3.21 0.00 $289.21 11150-050009 PLAT, REZONING AND COMP PLAN - PARK MEADOWS 44.00 0.00 0.00 $44.00 11150-990006 Carriage Homes Development 120.50 0.00 0.00 $120.50 707.50 5.03 0.00 $712.53 THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE. LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT. Suite 300 50 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101 ^ 1197 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH LAKE ELMO MN 55042 FEES 11155-040002 ZIERTMAN/SESSING PROPERTY 279.00 O'N9i EXPENSES 0.54 (651) 291.8955 (651) 228.1753 Facsimile Federal Tax ID 041. 0991098 Page: 1 11/30/2005 ACCOUNT NO. 11155M ADVANCES BALANCE 0.00 $279.54 THIS STATEMENT IS WALE AND PAYABLE TO THE ENO OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH W➢LL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT. Suite 300 50 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101.1197 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH LAKE ELMO MN 55042 FEES 11161-050003 Kleinvachter, Robert Michael vehicle forfeiture 73.50 11161-050006 Remmen, Howard Lester vehicle forfeiture 73.50 11161-050007 Skoglund, Jon Michael vehicle forfeiture 207.00 (6511291.8955 (651) 228-1753 facsimile Federal Tax ID 441.0991098 Page: 1 11/30/2005 ACCOUNT NO. 11161M EXPENSES ADVANCES BALANCE 0.00 0.00 $73.50 0.00 0.00 $73.50 0.00 0.00 $60.00 0.00 0.00 $207.00 THIS STATEMENT HB DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE ENO OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE (NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT. Lake Elmo Agenda Section: ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING No 5A. City Council January 3, 2006 Agenda Item: Election of Acting Mayor Background Information for January 3.2006 The Council must select an Acting Mayor to act on the City's behalf if Mayor Johnston is unable to attend a meeting, sign an agreement, or attend functions on behalf of the City. Any member of the Council is eligible for this position. The following motion is offered for your consideration. Person responsible: Action Items• Motion Second , to approve Council Member as Acting Mayor for 2006. Lake Elmo Agenda Section: ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING No. 5D. City Council January 3, 2006 Agenda Item: Appointment of City Engineer Background Information for January 3, 2006: Attached is a letter from Tom Prew expressing interest in reappointment as the City Engineer. Tom has provided a new schedule of billing rates. Enclosed is a copy of last year's rates. Should the Council consider going out for an RFP for the City Engineer appointment, staff suggests appointing Tom Pre/TKDA as the City Engineer for 90 days and direct staff to submit an RFP for the City Engineer appointment. The following motions are offered for your consideration: Action Items: Person responsible: Motion , Second , to appoint Tom Prew/TKDA as the City Engineer for 2006. OR To appoint Tom Prew/TKDA as the City Engineer for 90 days and direct staff to submit an RFP for the City Engineer appointment. Attachments- 1. Letter from Tom Prew Time Allocated: TKDA ENGINEERS - ARCHITEM — PLANNERS December 9, 2005 Mr. Martin Rafferty City Administrator City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042-9629 Re: General Agreement for Continuing Services Dear Mr. Rafferty: 1500 Piper Jeff ray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101-2140 (651)292.4400 (651) 202-0063 Fax www.Ikda.com Enclosed herewith is an updated Billing Rate Schedule dated January 1, 2006, for use with our Agreement dated February 2, 1988. This Schedule replaces the previous schedule that has been in effect since January 1, 2005. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the City of Lake Elmo. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 651/292-4463. Sincerely, Thomas D. Prew, P.E. Project Manager TDP:adh Enclosure cc: Richard Thompson, TKDA An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity TKDA ENGINEERS-ARCHITECTS•PLANNERS December 9, 2005 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042 Re: Reappointanent of City Engineer City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota TKDA Project No. 0013267.000 Dear Mayor and City Council: RECEIVE 0 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street DEC 16 2005 Sant Paul, MN 55101.2140 (651)292-4400 (651) 292-0063 Fax www.tkda.com At this time of year we like to review some of the items we have worked on with the City and projects we look forward to working on in the next year. In 2005, we assisted the City with: • Design of the Public Works Building. • Planning and Design of Water Tower No. 2. • Water System Interconnection Project. • Inspection Services for five new Subdivisions. • Assistance on the Comprehensive Plan. In 2006, we are looking forward to: • Design of a new City Hall. • Water System Improvements. • Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan. • Street Improvement Projects. City Council Action Requested • Reappoint TKDA as the City Engineer for 2006. Sincerely, Thomas D. Prew, P.E. Consulting City Engineer TDP:adh An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity TOLTZ, ICING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS SCHEDULE OF BILLING RATES Classification Senior Registered Engineer, Architect, or Planner Engineering or Architectural Specialist II Engineering or Architectural Specialist I Registered Engineer, Architect, Land Surveyor, Planner, or Interior Designer Graduate Engineer, Architect, or Planner Technician III Technician lI Technician I ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA JANUARY 1, 2006 Ranee of Hourly Billing Rates* $ 99.00 to $ 201.00 $ 90.00 to $ 146.00 $ 60.00 to $ 116.00 $ 63.00 to $ 132.00 $ 46.00 to $ 99.00 $ 52.00 to $ 80.00 ** $ 41.00 to $ 64.00 ** $ 27.00 to $ 47.00 ** In addition to the hourly charges, TKDA shall be reimbursed at cost for the following direct expenses when incurred in the performance of the work: 1. Travel and subsistence. (Mileage at current IRS Standard Rate per mile.) 2. Computer services. (Currently at $12.00 per hour of logged -on time.) 3. Outside professional and technical services with costs defined as the amount billed TKDA plus 10%. 4. Identifiable reproduction and reprographic costs. * Rates effective until December 31, 2006. ** For hours worked over 8 hours per day or 40 hours per week, whichever is greater, individuals will be paid one and one-half times the above rates where required by Local, State and/or Federal Government Wage and Hour Regulations, Schedule 2750-S75 TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, .ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS SCHEDULE OF BILLING RATES Classification Director, Senior Registered Engineer, Architect, or Planner Engineering or Architectural Specialist 11 Engineering or Architectural Specialist I Registered Engineer, Architect, Land Surveyor, Planner, or Interior Designer Graduate Engineer, Architect, or Planner Technician III Technician 11 Technician I ST. P JANUARY 1, 2005 Range of Hourly Billing Rates* $ 99.00 to $ 190.00 $ 90.00 to $ 138.00 $ 60.00 to $ 110.00 $ 63.00 to $ 124.00 $ 46.00 to $ 94.00 $ 52.00 to $ 75.00 ** $ 41.00 to $ 58.00 ** $ 27.00 to $ 44.00 ** In addition to the hourly charges, TKDA shall be reimbursed at cost for the following direct expenses when incurred in the performance of the work: 1. Travel and subsistence. (Mileage at current IRS Standard Rate per mile.) 2. Computer services. (Currently at $12.00 per hour of logged -on time.) 3. Outside professional and technical services with costs defined as the amount billed TKDA plus 10%. 4. Identifiable reproduction and reprographic costs. * Rates effective until December 31, 2005. * * For hours worked over 8 hours per day or 40 hours per week, whichever is greater, individuals will be paid one and one-half times the above rates where required by Local, State and/or Federal Government Wage and Hour Regulations. Schedule 2750-575 Lake Elmo Agenda Section: ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING No. 5E. City Council January 3, 2006 Agenda Item: Appointment of City Attorney: (Civil and Criminal) Backjjround Information for January 3, 2006: The City has received verbal confirmation by Jerry Filla, Peterson, Fram & Bergman, for reappointment as the City Attorney for Civil and Criminal matters. Should the Council consider going out for an RFP for the City Attorney (Criminal or Civil) appointment, staff suggests appointing Jerry Filla/Peterson, Fram & Bergman as the City Attorney for 90 days and direct staff to submit an RFP for the City Attorney appointment. The following motions are offered for your consideration: Action Items: Person responsible: Motion , Second , to appoint Jerry Filla, Peterson, Fram & Bergman as the City Attorney, both for Criminal and Civil matters for 2006 OR To appoint Jerry Filla, Peterson, Fram & Bergman, as the City Attorney, both for Criminal and Civil matters, for 90 days and direct staff to submit an RFP for the City Attorney appointment. Attachments: Time Allocated: Lake Elmo Agenda Section: ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING No 5F. City Council January 3, 2006 Agenda Item: Appointment of Financial Advisor Background Information for January 3, 2006 Paul Donna, Northland Public Finance Group, has been the City's Financial Advisor for 2005. Should the Council consider going out for an RFP for the Financial Advisor appointment, staff suggests appointing Paul Donna/Northland Public Finance Group, as the City's Financial Advisor for 90 days and direct staff to submit an RFP for the Financial Advisor appointment. Person responsible: Action Items: Tom Bouthilet Motion Second , to appoint Paul Donna, Northland Public Finance Group, as the City's Financial Advisor for 2006 OR To appoint Paul Donna, Northland Public Finance Group, as the City's Financial Advisor for 90 days and direct staff to submit an RFP for the City's Financial Advisor appointment. Lake Elmo Agenda Section: ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING No 5G. City Council January 3, 2006 Agenda Item: Appointment of Auditing Firm Background Information for January 3, 2006 The City has received verbal confirmation from Steven R. McDonald, CPA; Abdo, Eick & Meyers, LLP, for their reappointment as the City's Auditing Firm for 2006. Should the Council consider going out for an RFP for the City's Auditing Firm, staff suggests appointing Steven McDonald, Abdo, Eick & Meyers, LLP, as the City's Auditing Firm for 90 days and direct staff to submit an RFP for the City's Auditing Firm. Person responsible: Action Items: Torn Bouthilet Motion Second , to appoint Steven R. McDonald, CPA, Abdo, Eick & Meyers, LLP as the City's Auditing Firm for 2006 OR To appoint Steven R. McDonald, CPA, Abdo, Eick & Meyers, LLP as the City's Auditing Firm for 90 days and direct staff to submit an RFP for the City's Auditing Firm. Lake Elmo Agenda Section: ORGANIZATIONAL No. 5H.,I.,J City Council January 3, 2006 Agenda Item: H. Cable Operator:Steven Press I: IT:Next Genesis J. Animal Control:Kathi Pelnar Background Information for January 3, 2006: H. Cable Operator: Steven Press Staff recommends the re -appointment of Steven Press as the City's Part -Time Cable Operator. M/S/ to approve the reappointment of Steven Press as the City's Part -Time cable -operator at $13.90 for taping and broadcasting City meetings. I. IT:Next Genesis Staff recommends the re -appointment of Next Genesis as the City's computer service contractor. M/S to approve he reappointment of the compute service contract between the City and Next Genesis (Ryan Mansanz). J. Animal Control:Kathi Pelnar Kathi Pelnar has been serving as our Animal Control Officer for 2004 and 2005. Her contract is good until December 3 l , 2005. At its December 20, 2005 meeting, the Council asked staff to go out for a Request for Proposal for Animal Control Services. Council direction requested. Action Items: Person responsible: S. Lumby Attachments Contract with Steven Press Time Allocated: Contract with Next Genesis INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF LAKE ELMO AND STEVEN PRESS 1.0 PARTIES. THIS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT (this "Contract") is dated the 3rd day of January, 2006, and is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF LAKE ELMO, a Minnesota statutory city (the "City") and STEVEN PRESS ("Press"). 2.0 CABLE EQUIPMENT. The City is the owner or lessee of certain cable equipment described on Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated (the "Cable Equipment"). 3.0 SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED. The City cable casts its regular City Council and Planning Commission meetings and on occasions, additional meetings of the City Council and Planning Commission. Press agrees to operate the cable Equipment in order to facilitate the cable cast of the City's meetings. 4.0 FEES. The City agrees to pay Press the sum of $13.90 per hour and agrees to guaranty a minimum of 4.0 hours per City Council, Planning Commission or other City meeting, which is cable cast. Payments will be made to Press within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice for such services. 5.0 TERM AND TERMINATION OF CONTRACT. This Contract is effective beginning the 3rd day of January, 2006, and shall remain in effect until it is terminated. Either party may cancel this Contract upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other. 6.0 INDEPENDENT CONTACTOR. Press agrees to act as an independent contractor in the performance of his duties under this Contract. Accordingly, Press shall be responsible for the payment of all taxes, including federal, state and local taxes arise out of Press's activities in accordance with this Contract, including by way of illustration, but not limitation, federal and state income tax, social security tax, unemployment insurance taxes and any other taxes or business license fees, as required. 7.0 ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Contract represents the entire agreement between the parties and is not subject to change or modification, except by written agreement signed by both parties. Dated: Dated: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands. CITY OF LAKE ELMO LA Dean Johnston, Mayor By: Steven Press INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN CITY OF LAKE ELMO AND NEXT GENESIS 1.0 PARTIES. THIS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT (this "Contract") is dated the 3rd day of January, 2006 and is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF LAKE ELMO, a Minnesota statutory city (the "City") and NEXT GENESIS. 2.0 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT. The City is the owner or lessee of certain computer equipment described on Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated ("Computer Equipment"). 3.0 SERVICES TO PROVIDED. NEXT GENESIS agrees to provide maintenance service for the Computer Equipment during the term of this Contract. The maintenance service includes: A. Regular preventive maintenance as required, but not less than once every (3) Three Months. B. Unscheduled service calls, as required; and C. Repairs or replacement of maintenance parts as required to keep the Computer Equipment in good working order. 4.0 EXCLUSIONS. The maintenance service provided in accordance with this Contract shall not include: A. Work external to the computer; B. Service, repair or replacement of parts caused by the City's negligent, accident, misuse or movement of the computer, including power failures, environmental conditions or other causes not attributed to the Computer Equipment itself; C. Moving, modifying or attaching other devices to the Computer Equipment; D. Replacement of consumable items, such as ribbons, paper, and disks; E. Service required due to attachments of other devices to the Computer Equipment; and F. Service required due to the use of devices or materials which are not suitable for use with the Computer Equipment. 5.0 CITY RESPONSIBILITIES. The City shall: A. Provide a clean operating environment of suitable temperature and humidity for the Computer Equipment; B. Use only attachments and supplies which are compatible and suitable for use with the Computer Equipment; C. Notify NEXT GENESIS of any computer malfunction requiring service; D. Allow NEXT GENESIS to have free and full access to the Computer Equipment in order to provide service; and E. Arrange to have a City representative present while the Computer Equipment is being serviced. 6.0 FEES. The City agrees to pay NEXT GENESIS the sum of $75.00 per 1/Hour services provided in this Contract. The payments will be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice from NEXT GENESIS. 7.0 TIME FOR SERVICE. NEXT GENESIS agrees to provide service in accordance with this Contract during normal working hours. 8.0 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. NEXT GENESIS' liability shall be limited to servicing the Computer Equipment in accordance with this Contract. NEXT GENESIS will not be liable for any consequential or special damages. 9.0 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR, NEXT GENESIS shall act as an independent contractor in the performance of his duties under this Contract. Accordingly, NEXT GENESIS shall be responsible for payment of all taxes, including federal, state and local taxes arising out of services rendered by NEXT GENESIS pursuant to this Contract, including by way of illustration, but not limitation, federal and state income tax, social security tax, unemployment insurance taxes and any other taxes or business license fees as required. 10.0 TERM AND TERMINATION OF CONTRACT. This Contract is effective beginning the 3rd day of January, 2006, and shall remain in effect until it is terminated. Either party may cancel this Contract upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other. 11.0 ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Contract represents the entire agreement between the parties and is not subject to change or modification, except by written agreement signed by both parties. Dated: Dated: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands. CITY OF LAKE ELMO En Dean Johnston, Mayor RYAN MASANZ, NEXT GENESIS LIST OF COMPUTER EQUIPMENT Lake Elmo Agenda Section: ORGANIZATIONAL No. 5K. City Council January 3, 2006 Agenda Item: Change Council Committees to Council Workshops At the December 20"' meeting, the City Council authorized the City Administrator to change the Council Committee structure to a Council Workshop to be held the second Tuesday of each month beginning at 6 pm. The motion failed to televise the monthly Council Workshops. Attached for your review is a resolution rescinding the Council Committee meetings and establishing Council Workshops. Person responsible: Action items: Motion Second . To adopt Resolution No. 2006-006 Rescinding Resolution No. 2004-074 and Establishing City Council Workshops. Attachments: Time Allocated: Resolution No. 2006-006 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2006-00 c�j A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION 2004-074 AND ESTABLISHING CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOPS WHEREAS, at its December 20, 2005 meeting, the City Administrator recommended that Council Committees be restructured and that the City Council meet at a workshop on a regular basis. WHEREAS, at its December 20, 2005 meeting, the City Council determined that it would be in the public interest to conduct regularly scheduled Council Workshops which would eliminate the necessity for the Public Health and Safety Council Committee meetings; Public Works Council Committee meetings; and Finance, Legal, Legislative, Personnel Council Committee meetings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby establish regularly scheduled Council Workshop meeting dates for the second Tuesday of each month commencing at 6 p.m., as shown on the colored 2006 meeting calendar. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Resolution No. 2004-074 Establishing City Council Committees is hereby rescinded. ADOPTED by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 3rd day of January, 2006. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin J. Rafferty, City Administrator Lake Elmo Agenda Section: NEW BUSINESS No. 6A. City Council January 3, 2006 Agenda Item: Employee and Volunteer Recognition Party Background Information for January 3, 2006: In 2004 and 2005 the Lake Elmo Jaycees designated funds for the City's Employee and Volunteer Recognition Party. Per the Finance Director, funding sources have not yet been identified for a 2006 party. The 2005 Recognition party was held at the Wildwood Lodge at an expense of approximately $5,000. The City Attorney can advise the Council as to how City Funds can be used for these types of expenditures. Staff is looking for direction this year. Does the Council wish to hold a recognition party or Council members may have other suggestions. Action Items: Person responsible: Motion , Second , to direct staff on how to S. Lumby proceed. Attachments: Chapter 10 of Handbook for Minnesota Cities Time Allocated: CHAPTER 10 38 U.S.C. §§ 4301 to 4333. The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act The USERRA is enforced by (USERRA) requires service members, reservists, and National Guard members the Department ofLabor's returning to civilian employment after a period of active duty be re-employed Veterans' Employment and in the same jobs or similar ones with the status, pay, and benefits they would Training Service. Their web page contains an interactive have attained if the had never been absent for military service. The law also Y arY computer program developed protects pension rights and health benefits to acquaint employers, veterans, reservists, and National Guard members with the rights protected by the USERRA. 8. Employee recognition A.G. Op. 59a-22, (Nov. 23, Employee recognition programs are not authorized by statute. Cities can 1966). expend money only for public purposes. Recognition dinners, awards, and A.G. op. 107-A-3 (Jan.22, other similar recognition of public employee service may go beyond the 1980). general authority of cities to employ persons and fix compensation and may not A.G. letter opinion to City of be permitted. Cities should consult the city attorney or auditor before making Champlin (Feb 6, 1999). these types of expenditures. See Aug, 1, 2002, LMC In 2002, the Office of the State Auditor issued a report questioning various memo Issues Related to osn Report to City ofBrooktyn spending Practices of the city of Brooklyn Park, including spending on Park. Public purpose ofcity employee recognition events. The League has historically taken the position Expenditures, that cities can sponsor and pay for employee recognition programs if they are structured so that they constitute part of an overall employee compensation program. m�- 9. Service on state boards by employees Minn. sort. § 15.0575, subd. Public employees may serve on state boards and councils, but they are 3'Prohibited from receiving any daily payment (per diem) for activities that occur Minn. Stat. § 15.059, subd. 3. .during working hours for which they are compensated by the city. This Minn, star. § 214,09, subd. includes service on any state licensing and examining board. A public 3(b). employee may receive the daily payment if the employee uses vacation time for board activities. B. Vacation and leaves The law does not require cities to establish paid vacation or sick leave benefits. HANDBOOK FOR Mimr=TA Cirms This chapter last revised 12/15/2004 10-15 Lake Elmo Agenda Section: Planning, Land Use and Zoning No. 9A City Council January 3, 2006 Agenda Item: Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Trails Guide Plan Background Information for January 3, 2006: On December 12, 2005 the Planning Commission considered the revisions to the Trail Plan prepared by the Park Commission an its consultant (Dated November 29, 2005) and adopted a Motion (7-2, Schneider and Lyzenga opposed) to recommend adoption of the Plan as an element of the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan. The Plan had first been presented to the Planning Commission and a Public Hearing conducted by the Commission on July 11, 2005. Work by the Park Commission on the Plan was initiated in mid-2004 responsive to the 2004-2008 Capital Improvements Program, which included the Plan as a work item for 2004. The two commissioners voting in opposition to the Trail Guide Plan were either opposed to City trails and the Plan in general as being unnecessary; and/or, the Plan being too invasive on property rights - particularly where the Plan suggests a need to convert some existing private (HOA) trails to public trails. Consideration for adoption of this document as an official Comprehensive Plan element is respectfully requested. A copy of the Plan was transmitted to the Council with the December 12 Planning Commission agenda packet. Person responsible: Action items: .003 Motion to adopt Resolution 2006- adopting the November 29, City jlnner--'' 2005 "Comprehensive Trail Guide Plan" as recommended by the Park Commission and the Planning Commission as an element of the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan. Attachments: .003 Time Allocated: 1. Draft Resolution 200k - Adopting Plan 2. Draft Planning Commission Minutes of December 12 3. Staff Memo of December 8, 2005 4. Park Commission Minutes of November 3, 2005 5. Public Hearing Record of July 11, 2005 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2006-003 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE NOVEMBER 29, 2005 "COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL GUIDE PLAN" WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Parks Commission, following months of work with its consultant (SEH), presented a proposed Trails System Plan to the Planning Commmission as a Comprehensive Plan Amendment in July, 2005. WHEREAS, at its July 11, 2005 meeting, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Plan Element and at the conclusion of the hearing tabled consideration of the Plan Element pending a workshop with the Parks Commission on August 9, 2005. WHEREAS, following the Hearing and Workshop the Park Commission worked with its consultant (SEH) to address issues raised and directed the consultant to incorporate the modifications in the November 29, 2005, Plan Element. WHEREAS, at its December 12, 2005 meeting, the Planning Commission considered the revisions to the Trail Plan prepared by the Park Commission and its consultant (dated November 29, 2005) and recommended adoption of the Plan as an element of the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan. WHEREAS, the November 29, 2005 "Comprehensive Trail Guide Plan" was presented to the City Council on December 20, 2005 and January 3, 2006, as recommended by the Park Commission and the Planning Commission as an element of the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council for the City of Lake Elmo does hereby approve and accept the November 29, 2005 "Comprehensive Trail Guide Plan" as an element of the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 3rd day of January, 2006. Dean Johnston, Mayor Martin J. Rafferty, City Administrator Resol Comp Trail Guide Plan DRAFT Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Comprehensive Trail Guide Plan The Planner explained that the Trail Guide Plan presented is the result of changes recommended by the Planning Commission during their joint workshop with the Parks Commission. The Plan has been refined, legends on maps have been expanded, text has been expanded, and the result is a plan that staff recommends be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan for 2030. The City Planner asked the Planning Commission to discuss what they have before them and add any modifications, which will be brought forward to the City Council. Commissioner Deziel asked if there was anything new on the trail going through the Lake Elmo Park Reserve. The City Planner responded that the County Parks Staff has seen this plan and the three trail points at Klondike Avenue, 15a' Street, Keats Avenue will be permitted. Commissioner Van Zandt stated the plan shows the trail going up Ideal Avenue and he didn't feel it was wide enough to be safe. Commissioner Schneider asked what sort of maintenance would be done by the City. The Planner responded that an occassional resurfacing, and the day will come that the City would make sure the weeds are controlled on the shoulders. He said the City anticipates plowing some trails in the future and that the trails in the four new developments are being built to be plowed. The City will have to purchase special equipment when we have to plow trails. Commissioner Schneider asked, referring to Page 35, how will the City control people from going from public trails to private trails. The Planner said you clearly sign it, "Private Trail". This signage will not keep everyone out, but it would deter most people. Commissioner Fliflet asked if there is a timeline to connect all trails. The Planner answered it will take some time, but it will be up to the Parks Commission to develop priorities. Commissioner Schneider asked how do you keep bikes out of Sunfish Park where the three trails terminate. Planner Dillerud said it has to be more than just a sign, but the Parks Commission, with the assistance of Mike Bouthilet, will have to make a decision. Commissioner Fliflet stated the trail users along 50`" Street N. would use an existing off -road trail and then would have to use a proposed on -road trail in the new Old Village, and Lake Elmo Avenue which passes the elementary school which has cars parked on the street often when there are activities at the school. She would like to see more off -road trails there. The Planner said the City will try to avoid too many transitions from trails and routes. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2005 DRAFT M/S/P Roth, Deziel Recommendation to the City Council with the suggestion that the City consider fewer transitions from off -road to on -road trails where possible. Motion passed 6-1- 2:Scluieider:Abstain—Lyzenga, Ptacek. Commissioner Schneider asked where was the goundswell support for this trail plan. Variance Update: 1094132"d Street North The applicants have reque ed that their application for a variance for the parcel located at 10941 32"d Street North be placedIlon hold." M/S/P Deziel, Helwig To tale the Hutton application off the table, VOTE 9-0. The City Planner explained th's concept is "on hold" and will not comply to the 60 day rule and he recommended a motion to Aeny with findings consistant with staff report. Commissioner Sedro asked submit a specific request to Commissioner Deziel agreed showed up at the meeting. M/S/P Deziel, Roth To recomme stated in the staff report. VOTE: the applicants would have to do differently. Planner answered - the 60 day requirement. on the vagueness of their letter and the applicants have not denial of the Hutton variance request based on the .findings Update: Comprehensive Plan S ecial Meeting Dec. 19, 2005 The Planner explained the necessi y for another Public Hearing for the Comprehensive Plan. He said it was not his intent to open u discussion on the Comprehesnive Plan That hearing will take place on December 19 at 6:0 p.m. until 7 p.m. because the Parks Commission has a meeting at 7 p.m. The Planner haj ded out materials addressing the proposed amendments. Planner Dillerud said he will draftla statement reference resolution and concept that does not intend to be a penalty, we will m e every effort to comply with it. Commissioner Sedro asked wheth r these different clauses behnd schedulee 2030 remain the same populaiton and rees. The Ph er explained wifs are not negotiable. The Planner said if we do not meet our fomula, we arc required to increase the density and this is what he does not like. Dillerud said Lake Elmo is th first City to be required to do this. Commissioner Sedro asked if the s hedule laid out,. severe enough, is it likely we would have to accept developments we don't like. Dille answered he didn't think so. He said one advantage we are a high demand cause we are so close to the core city. He said even if the densities are higher, you can tell them to take a hike because there will be another better development behind them. Commissioner Deziel said 240 rec units a year is a steady pace. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of December 12, 2005 - MEMO (December 8, 2005 for the Meeting of December 1.2, 2005) To: Lake Elmo aiming Commission From: u erud Subject:Comprehensive Trail Guide Plan The Lake Elmo Park Commission, following months of work with its consultant (SEH), presented a proposed Trails System Plan to the Planning Commission as a Comprehensive Plan Amendment in July, 2005. As required by State Statute the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing on the proposed Plan Element on July 11, 2005. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing the Planning Commission tabled consideration of the Plan Element pending a Workshop with the Parks Commission. The Workshop was held on August 9, 2005. Following the Hearing and Workshop the Park Commission has worked with its consultant to address many of the issues raised by the Public and the Planning Commission. Beyond a collection of editorial modifications the Commission directed and the consultant has accomplished the following modifications to the Plan Element Hearing draft which are incorporated in the November 29, 2005 Plan Element draft enclosed herewith: 1. The title of the document has been modified to "Comprehensive Trail Guide Plan" (from "Trails System Master Plan"). The purpose of the modified document name is to communicate that the document is not a "cast in stone" implementation piece, but rather a guide subject to future details as to precise locations etc. 2. The section "What is a Comprehensive Trail Guide Plan?" (Page 4) has been added for similar reasons as 01 above. 3. A section has been added clearly distinguishing "Route" from "Trail" (Page 17) , and the map legends have been modified to that end as well. 4. The Legion Lane route has been moved west to the Legion Avenue (extended) center line and then east (as a trail) to connect with the existing Heritage corridor in response to the issues raised by Legion Lane residents at the Hearing — and elsewhere. 5. Trails through Sunfish Park have been eliminated. Designated trails do terminate at the Park in three locations, but trail character changes at those entrance points (no longer a paved trail) and bikes of any type remain prohibited within the park. 6. The earlier "Draft Trail Plan" maps remain in the Appendix section, but are labeled in the Legends differently to (hopefully) distinguish them from the maps in the Plan main body. 7. Expanded text addressing the Washington County Linear Park Plan and its relationship to the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Trail Guide Plan and the Regional Trail Corridor linking Big Marine and Lake Elmo Regional Parks has been added. (Page 29) Other modifications were made by the Park Commission from the July draft, but those are the most significant. On November 21, 2005 the Park Commission completed its review of the consultant's Guide Plan modifications and unanimously adopted a Motion transmitting the Guide Plan back to the Planning Commission for its recommendation to the City Council. I do not believe any of the modifications to the Guide Plan are of a magnitude to cause the need for another Public Hearing. I suggest the Commission send the Guide Plan to the City Council with its recommendation for approval as a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. r DRAFT Lake Di Park Commission Minutes of the Special,iijleeting November 3, 2005 Chairman Schumacher called the Special Parks Commission meeting to order at 6:00 PM. ' COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Schumacher, Steele, Iierof£, Terry Bouthilet, Ratters, Larson, Wagner, Ames, Bruchu, and. Nalipinsid. STAFF PRESENT: City Administrator Rafferty, Public � Finance Director Tom City Planner l VorksSuperinteenMieonCouncil Member Smith and. Trail Plan Consultant Glen ALSO PRESENT: Mayor VanWormer. ,Agenda M/S/P Ames/Nalipinski to approve the Agenda as published, 9: minutes No prior meeting Minutes were presented for approval. Trails System Guide Plan Consultant VanWormer presented. the Commission a revised Plan draft incorporating the revisions that had been previously directed by the Commission. The primary revisions included the following: 1. Elimination of a designated System trail though Sunfish Park. 2. Relocation of the Legion route luck from 20"' 30 Street to Street to center on Legion north h from 20111 to the vacant parcel north of 251b Street Nort. 3. Text and map legend clarification of the terms/symbols related to on -road and off -road trails. 4. Text additions related to accommodating the County and Metropolitan Council Regional Trail route from Big Marina Park through Lake Elmo to the Lake Elmo Regional Park Reserve. ibing the purpose and function of a "Trails Guide Plan. 5. Additional text clearly descr Several Commissioners noted that horses are now permitted at ceitain times of the year on all public trails and in Sunfish Park. The consultant was advised by Commission consensus to modify Plan text to so specify. Commissioner Larson asked whether the Plan. provides enough means and flexibility to allow the blic and private trails City and neighborhoods to protect�vate trails signage acid szunilar means me is a mix of ight safety be required o preserve within the neighborhood. He suggested safety and resident security in those instances. Mr. VanWormer and the City Planner suggested that sufficient flexibility to address those concerns is implied in the Plan such that detail matters of this nature can be addressed on a case -by -case basis in the future. Commissioner Steele observed that the words "should", "could", "would" and "wile' appear o be used interchangeably in the Plan text. He suggested that the text should be carefully analyzed, to assure the proper words are used based on the context of the subject matter addressed. Cormnissioner Steele suggested a need to paginate the Appendix of the Plan. earinin the Appendix still appeared to conflict Administrator Rafferty observed thest the tha maps as he undersood the pu po e of the Appendix maps, the with the maps in the Plan. He sugg 1 Lake Elmo Parks Commission Workshop Minutes of November 3, 2005 APPROVED: 11121/05 labeling of those maps created confusion, He suggested that the Appendix maps be relabeled in a manner that better distinguishes those maps from the final Plan maps. He suggested that removal of the label strip along the bottom of the maps may solve the problem. The City Planner also noted that the Land Use Map appearing in the Appendix is now out of date, and the new (2030) Land Use Plan map should be. substituted. Commissioners then advised Mr.VanWormer of some misspelled names and related editorial corrections that are necessary in the Plan. M/S/P Steele/Bouthilet to approve the Trails Plan modifications presented by the consultant; direct the Trails Plan consultant and City Staff to complete the Plan modifications noted by the Commission, and transmit the Plan back to the Planning Commission with the sum of those modifications incorporated. VOTE: 9-0. Mr. Van Wormer then addressed matters of Plan inside and outside Plan review and adoption by the City together with the importance of establishing plan execution priorities. The City Planner advised that once the Planning Commission has completed its review and recommendation on the Plan in early December, the Park Commission's Plan and any Planning Commission recommendations will be forwarded to the City Council for adoption as a legal element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Following the City Council's action, the Plan will be distributed to the surrounding governmental units and the Metropolitan Council for comment, as required by State Statute. Once the Metropolitan Council acts to allow the Plan to go into effect, it will become an official part of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2006-2010 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Public Works Superintendent M. Bouthilet presented the Commission the City Staff recommendation regarding the 2006 — 2010 Capital Improvements Program for parks and trails. Finance Director Tom Bouthilet, Administrator Rafferty, and the City Planner also provided the Commission information regarding the purpose/function of a CIP and the Park Dedication Fund. Anne Smith, speaking as a resident of the Carriage Station neighborhood, requested the Commission assign a high and immediate priority on the improvements to the Carriage Station Park that have been proposed by the neighborhood. She noted that Carriage Station is the home to a significant population of children that do not have access to a full service neighborhood park without crossing a major roadway. Commissioners assured Ms. Smith that the Commission would duly consider the Carriage Station Park improvement requests in the context of the capital improvement needs of the entire City park system consistent with their City-wide park responsibilities. It was the consensus of the Commission that Members should review CIP materials presented by staff and the public, and be prepared to discuss the 2006-2010 Parks/Trails CIP — and complete recommendations to the City Council — at the November 21, 2005 Park Commission meeting. Seeing no further business before the Commission the Chair adjourned the meeting at 8:00 p.m. Charles E. Dillerud Acting Recording Secretary Lake Elmo Parks Commission Workshop Minutes of November 3, 2005 2 AMEN i APPROVED: 07/25/05 City of Lake Elmo .Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 11, 2006 Chairman Hely ig called to order the meeting of the Lake Elmo Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Van Zandt, Lyzenga, Sedro, Roth, Schneider, Flifiet, and Armstrong (7:04), Deziel (7:08). STAFF PRESENT: Administrator Rafferty, Planner Dillerud, Superintendent Bouthilet, and Recording Secretary Schaffel. ALSO PRESENT: Mayor Johnston, Councilmembers Johnson, Smith and Conlin (7:22). Agenda M/S/P, Sedro/Lyzenga, to accept the Agenda as presented. VOTE: 7:0. Minutes M/S/P, Sedro/Lyzenga, to accept the Minutes of June 27, 2005 as presented. VOTE: 7:0. Commissioner Armstrong arrived at 7:04 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING: Amend Comprehensive Plan —Trails System Plan The Planner explained that the Planning Commission will review the Trails System Plan for two reasons: staff did not know when the Comprehensive Plan hearing would. take place and the Parks Comnussion spent over one year developing this plan. State Statute requires every Comprehensive Plan Amendment must be heard by the Planning Commission. A Trails System Plan was done several years ago that was not adopted. Numerous changes have occurred since then that have a bearing on the Trails System Plan. The Trails Plan designates links of neighborhoods to destinations. The CIP has had funds for it but no trails were planned. The general corridors have been sited within the Trails System Plan but the actual locations will not be determined until those segments are selected for further consideration and/or construction. Superintendent Bouthilet said there were two changes to the trail alignments within the Trails Plan as presented that include the segment from 20s' Street to 30a' Street along Legion so the trail would not go through the Eden Park neighborhood instead will go up along the right-of-way when that area is developed. Another trail link was removed from Sunfish Lake Park Commissioner Deziel arrived at 7:08 p.m. Commissioner Sedro asked whether the City removed those sections from the Trails Plan and would there be a gap in the trail in those locations. She said that segment should not be on the plan because of bikes going through anyway. She asked if the city is creating an enforcement issue by not including that segment. The Superintendent said they just removed the graphics. The trails are already constructed. He said there are accesses to Sunfish from the parking lot entrance, the trail from Tapestry, the trail from Hamlet on Sunfish, and from the Public Works site. He said there is already an enforcement issue. Parks Commissioner Larson said he had formatting and editing suggestions including that appendices should be numbered. He suggested adding a paragraph he drafted to identify safety issues. Commissioner Schneider.asked which map was most recent. The map dated April 18, 2005 is most recent. THE CHAIILMAN OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:21 P.M. Linda Bernier Ms. Bernier said that based on their comments, staff is not prepared for the meeting. Legion Avenue is not even depicted as a trail on the map; Lisbon was a few months ago. Legion Park is an older, Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 11, 2005 1 AMENS - n APPi OVECD: 07125/66 established development that has no need for bike trails. Lake Elmo Avenue is wide enough and near _ enough for biking. She said she does not want the trail in a private neighborhood. Scott Johnson Mr. Johnson said he agrees with Ms. Bernier. He does not need or want a trail in their neighborhood, He said the map does not even show where the trail is proposed, Ann Bucheck, 2301 Legion avenue Ms. Bucheck asked for an "off-street" versus "on -street" definition. She told the commission that a petition was presented to the Parks Commission saying she and her neighbors did not want a trail in their neighborhood. New neighborhoods pay for the trail system and expect to move in near one. She said it should be a private trail system or the liability will be on the city. The consultant must not have walked the land in her neighborhood because the east side has drainage ditches and on the west side are wetlands and ultimately a pond. The trail should not go down 206 Street next to an archery range. The northern portion drops off considerably. She said it is not a good place for a trail. Rolf Larson Parks Commissioner Larson explained that the Trails Plan is an open document not written in stone. It night be 15 to 20 years to build it. The plan tries to connect destinations. This is very much a concept, and in developed areas it will be agreeable to neighbors. Linda Wagner The Parks Commission looked at destinations and where residents wanted to go. Of all the destinations, Sunfish should be a destination. It does not have to be a thoroughfare. That should be a consideration for someone wanting to walls a dog or take a bike ride to have Sunfish as a destination. All the trails that are in Lake Ehno are not yet on the map such as Reid Park and Sunfish Park, she said that those trails could still be added. Gay Van Pelt Mrs. Van Pelt said her husband rides on his bike all over the City. She said trails on streets are not for kids. Lake Elmo Avenue and Manning Avenue are nice for teens and adults. She said she does not want trails to cut through established neighborhoods. She Iives on Lisbon. 5 homes on Legion have setbacks of 35 feet or less. She asked if off -road means snowmobiles. Joan Durand Ms. Durand said she has a home on 20d` and Legion Avenue and'wants nobody on her property. She is also concerned for liability. Don Mattison, 2359 Legion Mr. Mattison said they have a water problem in his neighborhood. They have always had a water problem there. He does not want a trail 30+/- feet from his house. Mary Kloetzke, 2415 Lisbon Avenue North Ms. Kloetzke is concerned for traffic. She is against the trail in her neighborhood. Susan Dunn, 11018 Upper 33rd Street Mrs. Dunn said she is against having a paved trail in Sunfish Lake Park. There should be no thoroughfare through Sunfish Lake Park. It should be preserved and protected from bikes and ATVs. Dennis Kelly, 4233 Kindred Way Mr. Kelly said there is a major flaw in the concept of the trail system. He said it is all local traffic in his neighborhood. The trail system puts thoroughfares through people's neighborhoods. There should be just a few arteries. Security is a concern for him. Lake Elmo Planning Connnission Meeting Minutes of July 11, 2005 AMEN, APPROVED: 07/25/06 Tim Mandel, 2479 Lisbon Avenue Mr. Mandel said he looked at some of the plans because nobody told him and his neighbors that there were changes. Eden Park 1"Addition bad a petition they brought forth to the Parks Commission. He said he would like the Planning Commission to make sure the trail segment in his neighborhood is deleted from the plan by making a motion. He said the City residents keep fighting to keep it a rural community. They did not move here for people to be walking through their yards, He said the City should have polled neighborhoods. Oakdale has a sea of privacy fences due to their trail plan. Trails belong in parks. Trails are public and we do not want the public in our backyard. This is not for Lake Elmo. 10 to 15 years ago, people came to the City and said what they wanted for Lake Elmo. None of those things were done except the welcome sign that was put in by the Jaycees. Judith Blackford, 9765 45t" Street North Ms. Blackford presented a letter (attached) to the Planning Commission, She said she was willing to answer questions about the Parks Commission recommendation. She was a commissioner for seven years in the past. She wants to preserve the jewel of the community —Sunfish Park She is concerned for all the feeder trails into Sunfish Park. Todd Williams, 3025 Lake (Elmo Avenue He, said he understands the desire for a unified Trails Plan. He thoroughly endorses a walking trail. connection from the Old Village to Lake Elmo Park Reserve. He emphasized walking only. The plan should not include additional trails into existing neighborhoods. New neighborhoods would be great. Existing streets can serve as walling and biking trails. No additional trails should be added. He said he uses Sunfish Park all year. The City should restrict access to walking only from other neighborhoods. There should be no paving in Sunfish Park, Ann Bucheck, 2301 Legion Avenue She said she found out about this meeting on Saturday. This trail system would be a major change to our City. THE CHAIRMAN CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 8:03 P.M. Superintended Boutbilet explained that the segment on Legion Avenue would be on the road right of way as the trail link Conunissioner Roth said that he had a hard time identifying new off -road trails. The Planner suggested that the Legend could have more specificity. He said the Trail System Plan is more than the map on the wall. The trails are basically where they are because they are points of origin and destination links. He said that is a very sound basis for a Trails Plan. LEPR are considering points of entry once we have a Trails Plan. They are in the loop through this process. Washington County will allow limited points of entry. One neighborhood does not want the trail at all no matter where it is. This type of Trails Plan only gets done once every 10 to 20 years. Chairman Helwig asked if it would be appropriate to have a combined workshop with Parks. Administrator Rafferty said the Parks Commission worked very hard and with good rationale to formulate the Trails Plan. There are not a lot of trails on specific streets. That is not what the work was about. There is good science here and a good foundation for this plan. The Parks Commission suggested the Planning Commission review it and give direction, it would be expensive to incorporate those changes into the graphics immediately. All the changes should be made at once. Commissioner Lyzenga thanked the Parks Commission. She said it is a wonderful plan for an urban setting. She said residents in Lake Elmo do not need to be connected or have anyone in their backyard. The Trails Plan is too ambitious and over the top. She said the City should have a limited system connecting major thoroughfares to major destinations. There is no need for this plan; it is not appropriate. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 11, 2005 3 AMEN. .. 'APPROVED: 07/25105 No need to spend money on it. OP neighborhoods put in trails to move kids to the neighbor's house. This is not what the City wants or needs. She said too much time and money have already been put into this Trails Plan, and we should stop before more is spent, and not put it into the Comprehensive Plan. We do not need to do this now. Commissioner Van Zandt said he disagreed, He said he got terribly excited about the Trails Plan because gas is expensive, there are front porches again, and people are on bicycles again. The Trails Plan is for people who live hereto use it. This is a plan for twenty years from now. He said we have serenity on the lakes, and the beauty is here due to efforts by past Parks, Planning Commissions and'City Councils. He said this plan helps to rebuild neighborhoods and it is a plan for the future. He said he lives on Hidden Bay Trail, and he cannot ride a bike there. He has to drive his 14 year old to a safe bike trail before he can ride his bicycle. Commissioner Armstrong said our number one goal is to preserve privacy, He thanked Parks for a comprehensive and thorough job. He said the Draft Plan scares him due to the level of detail. He said it was not researched enough. The plan should incorporate existing on street routes only when in existing neighborhoods. He said we should not be acquiring private trail systems in OP developments. He said it is a bad idea to evaluate the off-street private tres.for implementation onto the Trails System. He said the off -road frail depicted on 15a' Street and on Co, 13 would be an incredible waste of money. He asked to Table the Trails System Plan for a joint meeting with the Parks Commission, M/S/P, Ainistrong/Selmeider, To table the Trails System Plan. VOTE: 8:1 Commissioner Deziel said there is no plan at all for motorized vehicles on our trails. ` Commissioner Fliflet thinks a workshop is in order due to the money involved in preparing the drafts.. She asked the audience if they are still opposed to the changed trail in the Eden Park neighborhood. Fliflet, money involved in preparing the drafts. Chairman Helwig asked about handicapped access for these trails. Commissioner Deziel asked about dead end points of some of the trails. He expressed concern for trails on streets when high speed on our streets would be difficult to navigate safely. Staff will bring the request for a joint workshop to the Parks Commission, Section 620 Site Plan — Link Recreational, 9200 Hudson Boulevard Kurt Dvorak Mr. Dvorak submitted a new site plan and said the new plan defines the way the site will be used behind the structures.. He said that drainage goes through rear of the lot and they will not disturb that land, and that existing screening will remain. Commissioner Schneider asked about access control. Mr. Dvorak said there will be a swinging gate in the back. The sliding gate in the front area keeps the general public from driving into the Service Area and protects boats in for service. There are a series of gates that provide screening on the parking lot and again behind the buildings.. He said he will comply with Watershed drainage issues and the lighting ordinance. Chairman Holwig polled commissioners as to whether any additional recommendations would be required beyond those that had previously been adopted by the Commission regarding this site plan. It appeared to be the consensus of commissioners that no further Commission action was required. The Chairman recessed for ten minutes and reconvened the meeting at 8:33 p.m. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 11, 2005 4 Lake Elmo Agenda Section: Planning, Land Use and Zoning No. 9B City Council January 3, 2006 Agenda Item: 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Background Information for January 3.2006: In September the City submitted its 2030 Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council as substantially modified from earlier versions by the Memorandum of Agreement between the City and the Metropolitan Council. A Public Hearing had been conducted by the Planning Commission regarding the modified Plan and the City Council had adopted the Plan, subject to Metropolitan Council review and endorsement. On September 28, 2005 the City received a letter from the Metropolitan Council staff requesting the City to submit certain modifications and factual/technical corrections/amplifications to the Plan. The factual/technical materials have been submitted (and do not require a Hearing) but the two significant modifications to the Plan requested by the Metropolitan Council do require a new Hearing which was Noticed for 6:00 PM to 7:00 PM, December 19, 2005. I have attached the referenced September letter from the Metropolitan Council and the Hearing Draft of the two modifications that are to be considered at the Hearing, as follow: 1. Replacement text for the second to last paragraph on Page 111-11 addressing future remedial actions by the City responsive to Metropolitan Council Resolution #2005-20. (the METC Resolution is attached to the September letter). That Resolution would then be included in the Appendix to the Plan. 2. Text regarding the Village Area Plan, as prepared by the City's Village Area Plan consultant, that would be inserted following Page 111-9 of the Plan. Staff will report the Council as to the outcome (if any) of the December 19 Hearing and subsequent Planning Commissions recommendations regarding those modifications. A Draft Resolution has been attached that is structured presuming that the Commission recommends affirmatively on the modifications, and the Council concurs. Person responsible: Action items: oo i Motion to adopt Resolution #200G - amending the 2030 City P r er Comprehensive Plan regarding the Village Area, and regarding City compliance with Metropolitan Council Resolution #2005-20. Attachments: Time Allocated: 1. Draft Resolution 200 6 — 0 0 q 2. Hearing Drafts 3. September, 2005 Metropolitan Council Letter to City CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2006-004 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, in September, 2005, the City of Lake Elmo submitted its 2030 Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council as substantially modified from earlier versions by the Memorandum of Agreement between Lake Elmo and the Metropolitan Council. WHEREAS, at its August 8`h meeting, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the modified Plan and the City Council had adopted the Plan, subject to Metropolitan Council review and endorsement. WHEREAS, on September 28, 2005, Lake Elmo received a letter from the Metropolitan Council staff requesting the City to submit certain modifications and factual/technical corrections/amplifications to the Plan. WHEREAS, at its December 19`h meeting, the Planning Commission held a new Hearing on the two modifications to the Plan. WHEREAS, at its January 3, 2006 meeting, the Lake Elmo City Council reviewed the two plan modifications as follows: Replacement text for the second to last paragraph on Page 111-11 addressing future remedial actions by the City responsive to Metropolitan Council Resolution No. 2005-20. 2. Text regarding the Village Area Plan, as prepared by the City's Village Area Plan consultant, that would be inserted following Page 111-9 of the Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council for the City of Lake Elmo does hereby approve amending the 2030 Comprehensive Plan regarding the Village Area and regarding compliance with Metropolitan Council Resolution No. 2005- 20. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 3rd day of January, 2006. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin J. Rafferty, City Administrator Should the periodic review reveal the City has not attained the projected population and the projected use of REC units, the City will implement the remedial measures outlined by Metropolitan Council Resolution 2005-20 in a manner which is proportional to the shortfall. In no case, however, will the implementation of those remedial measures result in year 2030 projections of sewered dwelling units, sewered employment, total dwelling units or population in excess of those agreed to by the City and the Metropolitan Council by the 2005 Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the metropolitan Council. 4a Lake Elmo Old Village Master Plan Section One — Introduction Background: In the summer of 2005, the City of Lake Elmo retained a team led by Robert Engstrom Companies to prepare a master plan to guide anticipated development in and around the historic Old Village. Fresh from an agreement with the Metropolitan Council, the City focused on the need to preserve the character of the Old Village as it prepared to accept 440 units of new housing, with a bonus system to allow an increase to 600 units. With the extension of sanitary sewer into the Old Village as part of the agreement with Met Council, it became apparent that the amount of land poised for new housing could — if Improperly developed — dramatically alter the landscape of the Old Village, forever compromising Its unique scale and charm. The design team, which also included Jerry Mazzara of Design Forum and Bob Close and Bruce Jacobson of Close Landscape Architecture, was charged with two areas of focus —1) to prepare a physical plan with associated guidelines and 2) to provide a strategy for determining the number of units that should be allotted to each land owner/developer. This two -pronged approach, the City posited, could conceivably unite developer and City interests, resulting in a development pattern that would relate to — and strengthen — the community character. IIfft7_N Political Context: The City of Lake Elmo, including the Council, Planning Commission, Parks Commission and Staff, has maintained firm resolve about controlling new development in their community. The directive that resulted from the Metropolitan Council's 2030 Regional Development Framework, which projects an additional million residents in the seven county area over the next two decades, was for each suburban community to shoulder a portion of the development burden. Much of the focus in Lake Elmo was along the Interstate 94 corridor, which borders the south edge of the City. Following a period of disagreement about the amount and type of development the City should accept and where it should occur, the Met Council and City reached accord. With the political issues behind them, the City shifted Its focus to the important issue of how development should behave to reinforce the qualities that make Lake Elmo a distinctive village. Phvsical Context: Located east of downtown Saint Paul, Lake Elmo is a surprisingly rural community. Like European towns, the edges of the (.Old Village are clearly defined; one can literally walk into a cornfield from the outfield of the local ball diamond — a real -fife example from Field of Dreams and a highly unusual model in the suburban metropolitan area. The town includes a small historic Main Street — not glamorous but containing several lovely buildings and an intimate scale. Highway 5, also known as Stillwater Boulevard, is currently under state auspices and runs east -west through the community, connecting to Stillwater to the east and Interstate 694 to the west. The highway has a rural section, with ditches, culverts and large setbacks to buildings. Approximately 12,000 cars traverse the road a day, most coming during the morning and evening rush hours. The City has expressed interest in having the roadway turned over from the State to the City. There are no signalized intersections or stop signs on Highway 5 in the Old Village, only stop signs from side streets. Crossing during rush hours can be extremely difficult. County Road 17, Lake Elmo Avenue, runs north -south through the heart of the Old Village (it is the historic Main Street), linking north to Highway 36 and south to the 1-94 frontage road. The road jogs about a block to the east at Highway 5, which is both confusing and — during rush hours — hard to negotiate. County Road 15, Manning Trail, runs north -south on the east side of the Old Village, connecting Stillwater Boulevard to 1-94. This is a preferred route for many commuters; others choose to go through the Old Village to link up to 1-694. Two significant lakes and associated parks contribute to the quality of life in the Old Village: Lake Elmo and Lake Elmo Regional Park are located on the southwest side of the community, and Sunfish Lake and Sunfish Lake Park are to the west; both are beautiful amenities for community residents and other visitors. The Lake Elmo airport is immediately east of Manning Trail. Primarily a recreational facility, the flight paths may affect possible development sites on the east side of town. Likewise, a stormwater management plan has been developed for the City, which suggests the need for more aggressive treatment with wetlands or ponds. There may be conflicts between the airport needs and stormwater requirements. A number of new developments lie on the outskirts of the Old Village. In virtually all of them, the City's OP zoning designation guided site design, so major portions of the developments are retained as open space. Trails, existing and proposed, are planned to connect to several of the neighborhoods The Urban Design Framework The proposed urban design frameworkbuilds on the existing strengths of Lake Elmo, including a compact. assemblage of streets and blocks, a distinct edge, an historic main street and good access to parks and open space. The plan extends these qualities to likely new development to the east, north and west. in addition, it proposes engaging the existing residential neighborhood to the south with the village core and new neighborhoods. Several key recommendations underpin the long-range framework plan: • Turn Stillwater Boulevard from a State owned road to a City owned road and change it from a rural to urban section through the Old Village. Bring new mixed - use development to wide sidewalks to create a true "Main Street." • Strengthen historic Main Street by preserving historic buildings, adding carefully integrated and designed infill projects, and replacing or upgrading "soft" properties. • Create a perimeter lane at the edge of the Old Village to (ink existing and new neighborhoods directly together. • Create "gateway roundabouts" into the Old Village where the perimeter lane intersects with Stillwater Boulevard, to provide a transition from the rural to the urban section and calm traffic. • Extend the existing pattern of streets and blocks to the perimeter pedestrian lane, and develop guidelines for a compatible pattern and scale of streets and blocks beyond. • Establish safe, walkable connections from the historic core to the centers of each new neighborhood. • Use new civic or public buildings to anchor one end of the city/neighborhood walking route; anchor the other end with a new neighborhood amenity (park, water, etc.) A series of possible initiatives, such as a new town hall, a combined Family Service Center and YMCA and a new library would, if located strategically, provide a unique opportunity to establish key connections between the core and new neighborhoods. By placing these civic uses near the edge of the Old Village and linking them to new neighborhood centers beyond on landscaped streets that extend from the existing block pattern, the walkable character if the existing village would be enhanced and new development would strongly echo the character of the historic core. III-9A-5 The Diagrams and Initial Studies The attached diagrams describe the evolution of the consultant team's thinking about growth in the Old Village. The first pair of drawings show two approaches to locating new civic uses: the first suggests that public buildings and/or spaces relate more strongly to new neighborhood development, while the second shows a much more compact urban structure, with new development reinforcing the existing core of the Old Village. This second approach was the preferred direction. The following diagram translates the preferred concept into a broader vision, depicting how the combination of new public uses being located close to the core could be augmented by a perimeter lane that would link new neighborhoods together, allowing safe pedestrian and bicycle movement from one new neighborhood to another. The Illustrative New Old Village Master Plan The illustrative plan depicts the long-range vision for growth in the Old Village. Section 3 — Plan Components Overview The Old Village Plan is broken into a series of `layers" that depict the plan componerits: • districts and Land Use — this drawing reflects the overall organization of the expanded core of the Old Village, identifying where new land uses — both single - use and mixed -use — should be located to strengthen the character of. the existing center. • Green and Blue Layers — this drawing shows the location of the system of parks and open space, both existing and proposed. In addition, it addresses the system of water elements — existing lakes, proposed stormwater ponds or watercourses, and features. • Streets and Blocks — this graphic depicts recommendations for extending the community fabric around the immediate core, suggesting how connections to new neighborhoods are best achieved. • Infrastructure III-9A-7 Districts and Land Use The plan recommends locating civic districts close to the center of the Old Village, to provide equally good access form existing and developing portions of the community. North of Stillwater Boulevard, the plan calls for a new City Hall and Library complex in the Municipal District, fronted on the road by a symbolic "village Green" and on axis with Lake Elmo Avenue as one approaches from the south. . Abutting the Municipal District immediately to the west is the proposed Institutional District, encompassing the existing school site with potential expansion room to the west or north. The long-range realignment of Lake Elmo Avenue will allow western expansion of this precinct. To the east of the core, south of Stillwater Boulevard, the plan proposes a new Family/Recreational District, which would include and new Service Center and YMCA. Easily accessed from larger communities to the east, such as Stillwater and Oak Park Heights, the suggested site would front onto Stillwater Boulevard and extend to the south, connection to existing city parks. The Historic District includes Lake Elmo Avenue south of Stillwater Boulevard and the buildings in the immediate vicinity. A mix of uses and building types characterizes the street, but with sensitive restoration and infiil strategies, it has the potential to become a memorable urban space that would reinforce new mixed -use development along Stillwater Boulevard. Beyond the proposed civic districts are the proposed new neighborhoods, each with .a focal point or neighborhood amenity that ties directly back into the Old Village via "green streets" or other pedestrian and bicycle -friendly routes. While the new neighborhoods will be developed privately, guidelines will promote a development pattern that strongly recalls the scale and texture of the historic core. ➢11A.Z] Green and Blue Lavers Lake Elmo is blessed with an array of recreational opportunities, including Lake Elmo Regional Park, Sunfish Lake Park and a system of trails that have been established with the development of recent neighborhoods. The linkages between parks and public open space remain tenuous, however, and the plan suggests a pedestrian "lane," either on existing streets or in new alignments, that would link new perimeter neighborhoods with existing neighborhoods, unifying the entire community. This green system, then, includes both linkages and the spaces to which they connect, such as existing parks in the core and proposed parks and passive open spaces within new neighborhoods. Together, they will form an integrated system that recalls the Minneapolis Park System on a smaller scale. Such a system allows all residents to have easy access to the entire system and the ability to circumnavigate the community on a linear green circuit. A proposed greenbelt will surround the entire community, including new neighborhoods. It will primarily be a passive space, clearly defining the edge of the village.and providing a buffer to surrounding land uses. Trails should be allowed to penetrate the greenbelt, linking to existing neighborhoods and their trail systems, such as those in The Fields of St. Croix. The blue layer refers to the network of water systems that is integrated into the community. Lake Elmo's consultant has prepared a stormwater management plan for the City, designed to handle overland flow and retention requirements. The Master Plan recommends modifying the proposed plan to use the required ponding to create water amenities that integrate with the green system, as opposed to isolating them. There are possible issues related to the operation of the Lake Elmo Airport that may affect the design of the retention ponds. Concerns about waterfowl interfering with the coming and going of aircraft are a foremost concern of the Metropolitan Airports Commission, who regulates the operation of the facility. The use of heavily planted or urban, hard -edged shorelines — as opposed to lawns at the perimeter— are proven strategies for discouraging waterfowl from inhabiting the ponds. LII-9A-9 Streets and Blocks Lake Elmo's Old Village is characterized by a very compact pattern of streets and blocks north of the railroad; blocks measure approximately 300' from.centerline to centerline of bordering streets on the east and west, with varying north -south dimensions. South of the rail line, the blocks become less regular, located more organically in response to landform and water bodies. Both north and south of the railroad, commercial, office and residential buildings are modestly scaled and the general character is remarkably intimate. New developments on the outskirts of the Old Village vary in character, some having very compact street systems and lot sizes, and others assuming a more traditional suburban scale. In most cases, however, recent development has retained large areas of common open space, a signature of the City. The Old Village Master Plan recommends extending the compact fabric of streets and blocks outward toward the new neighborhoods that are planned at its perimeter. Through the use of development guidelines (see Section 4), the plan reinforces the importance of retaining the unique qualities that make the Old Village unique. III-9A-10 Infrastructure Growth and revitalization require new and upgraded infrastructure, and Lake Elmo is embarking on a process that will address the physical things that we see and the support systems that we do not. Sanitary sewer in and around the Old Village, heretofore accommodated through the use of private septic systems, will now be served by a new extension of the regional sanitary sewer system from the south into the Old Village. There will be more than adequate capacity to accommodate the number of housing units proposed under the C4's agreement with the Met Council. Other utilities will also be upgraded as new housing development comes online. While this plan does not address those issues with any specificity, it recognizes that these systems will have to be in place to accept the demands of up to 600 new units of housing in the "new" Old Village. III-9A-11 Section 4 — Policy and Process Overview Without strong leadership and sound policy, the best of plans will be compromised. Through a series of steps, the vision plan should be translated into policy, which provides the "teeth" to ensure that the vision will be realized. This requires the political will and leadership to translate design and development guidelines into zoning criteria, which in turn will give the City the power to control their own destiny. Ill-9A-12 Zoning Code / Overlav District While there are numerous approaches to refining existing zoning codes to address areas that will experience new growth or redevelopment, the process is often arduous. Lake Elmo should consider a two -pronged strategy that could provide the City with the most efficient means to an end. The first aspect of this approach suggests that the Old Village is an entity that should not be treated as a collection of disparate pieces but instead as a whole. Using this assumption, the City could develop an overlay district that would have the flexibility to allow changing uses within the district while preserving its scale and character. Like Grand Avenue, where housing and retail sit side by side — and where housing sometimes becomes retail in the same building (which is, by the way, also the case on Lake Elmo's historic Main Street), it is the preservation of the whole that trumps the single use considerations. The second aspect of this approach directly addresses the urban form of the Old Village. Often referred to as "form -based zoning,' this method of zoning speaks to the architectural character of buildings and relationship to the public realm. An early example is on the Toronto waterfront, where the City was far more concerned with how buildings addressed the street, provided activity at grade, created plentiful fenestration and so forth, than they were with the particular land use within the building. Together, these strategies could provide the City with a simple means to reinforce the character of the Old Village while remaining flexible to accommodate changes in the marketplace. III-9A-t 3 Development Guidelines Architectural Guidelines Public Realm Guidelines Met Council Criteria The City of Lake Elmo and the Met Council have had extensive dialogue about growth in the community. The City has consistently placed high value on retaining the small-town feel of the Old Village and determined.that new housing should relate to and reinforce its character and scale. The City, an early proponent of clustering housing on smaller lots and retaining half of developed land in permanent open space, has steadfastly opposed more typical, large lot suburban expansion. The Met Council has not opposed this goal. 'While the Met Council has encouraged retail development along 1-94 at the south end of the City, it has been flexible about letting the City determine where residential growth should occur and how it should appear. The City is required, however, to submit to the Council Its proposed growth strategy in and around the Old Village as part of its Comprehensive Planning process. LII-9A-14 Given the conflict between stormwater requirements, development rights and airport needs, it appears that compromise will be a necessity, and that two possible approaches should be explored: • Resign a system that minimizes• surface water to discourage bird populations • Store water in ponds that have hard edges or are heavily planted, making access by waterfowl difficult or undesirable III-9A-16 Watershed District Issues As noted on previous pages, the City of Lake Elmo faces serious stormwater management issues, which will be exacerbated with additional housing development. Metropolftan Council Building communities that work September 26, 2005 Charles E. Dillerud, Plamier City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue Lake Elmo, MN 55042 SEP 2 91�5"d RE: Response to Required Comprehensive Plan Modifications City Of Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan -Z030- Metropolitan Council Review File No. 18608-1 Metropolitan Council District 12, Chris Georgacas Dear Mr. Dilleiad: The Metropolitan Council received your application for review of the City of Lake Ebno's Comprehensive Plan. on September 6, 2005. This City-wide comprehensive plan amendment is intended to address the comprehensive plan modifications required by the Metropolitan Council in Resolution 2003-10, the terms of the 2005 Memorandum of Understanding, and Metropolitan Council Resolution 2005-20. Provision 3.(a) of Resolution 2005-20 states among other things that: The City's plan update will not be "complete" for Metropolitan Council review purposes until all adjacent governmental units and affected school districts have either provided continents to the City or failed to provide any responses or cornents to the City within sixty (60) days after the City submitted the plan to the adjacent governmental nut or affected school district, The information form accompanying the comprehensive plan amendment indicates that copies of the plan were sent to adjacent local govermients on August 26, 2005. There was no indication of whether affected school districts were sent copies at the same time. The Council requests that the City confirm the date when copies of the comprehensive plan amendment were sent to affected school districts. While the Council cannot officially begin its review until adjacent local governments and affected school districts have had an opporhulity to review and comment on the amendment, the Council would like to begin a preliminary review dialogue with you. To that end, the enclosure identifies plan components that were found to be incomplete during an initial review of the application. While the 60-day adjacent jurisdiction review is under way, the Council requests that the City provide the supplemental information necessary to ensure the comprehensive plan amendment application is complete for review. w .metmwunctl.org Metm, Info Line 602-1,988 230 $ast T'Ifth Street - St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1626 • (651) 602-1000 • Fax 602-1560 • =291-0904 - An Ggnni Opp.1ttadLL, Employer Page 2 Charles E. Dillerud September 26, 2005 If you need further clarification or guidance about the missing information, please feel free to contact me or Bob Mazanec, Principal Reviewer -Sector. Representative. ssistance Manager cc: Chris Georgacas, Metropolitan Council District 12 Blair Treinere, Connnurity Development Director . Marls Vander Schaaf, Planning and Growth Management Director Bob Mazanec, Sector Representative -Principal Reviewer Cheryl Olsen, Reviews Coordinator VAREVIEWS\Communities\Lake Elmo%L.etters\Lake Elmo 2005 60day letter 050926.doe Enclosure Letter to Charles E. Dillerad September 26, 2005 Initial review by Metropolitan Council staff finds that the City Of Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan -2030- amendment application is incomplete, Continued review of the plan amendment will be dependent upon receipt of the following information: Aviation The comprehensive plan amendment application should include "The Village Land Use Plan", including land use and development staging -timing maps, and the Village Area "Green Belt" strategies and implementation measures should be defined as concerns airport protection. Although Lake Elmo Airport is not located within the City, Lake Elmo is within the airport influence area where planning considerations for airport height and land use safety zoning, aircraft noise compatibility, and infrastructure needs generally apply. In addition, the City is within the region's general airspace that needs to be protected from potential obstructions to air navigation. The surface water of Lake Elmo is designated as a permitted seaplane use area under state rules. Land use safety zones and airport height zoning deal with very discrete boundaries, both horizontally and vertically. Thus, a well defined land use plan and use designation is a necessary condition to determine aviation system compatibility. The Village Area plan and the greenbelt in particular are not included or described in sufficient detail to make determinations on system impacts and protection measures. Sewage Treatment The City Of Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan. -2030- should indicate how many individual sewage treatment systems (ISTS) operate within the City, modify the Community Treatment System infonnation in Table 22 and Figure X to be internally consistent, and incorporate an overview of the City's ISTS management program. Adequate data is provided about collective ISTS systerrs but not about individual ISTS systems. In particular, the number of individual systems is not included. Also, the ordinance in the Appendix indicates that all systems must be pumped at least every two years but does not provide information on the City's maintenance tracking system to insure necessary maintenance is performed by homeowners. The City allows the siting of community wastewater treatment systems that utilize wetland treatment technology, but Figure X and Table 22 provide inconsistent data about the number of existing wetland systems. Page 2 Enclosure Letter to Charles E. Dillerud September 26, 2005 Regional Parks The comprehensive plan amendment is not complete for review until it includes the Washington County Greenway Regional Trail on the "Existing Park and Recreation Facilities" map. Staff recognizes that the City is in the process of updating flie trails system plan component of its comprehensive plan and that it is not complete at this time. However, the Existing Park and Recreation. Facilities reap identifies the location of a regional trail in the far northwest corner of the City, the Gateway State Trail. The Washington County Greenway Regional Trail should be included as well. The City state during the initial 2002 Metropolitan Council review of Lake Elmo's 2020 comprehensive plan update that the omission of this proposed regional trail in its plan map was an oversight. At that time the City stated that it would change its map to show a proposed north -south regional trail that would connect Big Marine Regional Park in the north pail: of the county to Lake Eh -no Regional Park Reserve in the central part of the county to Cottage Grove Ravine Regional Park in the south part of the county. Land Use—Altemative Densities The City Of Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan -2030- amendment application should provide two alternative sets of density ranges for residential land within the 2030 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and reflect the other requirements of Metropolitan Council Resolution 2005-20, provision 3.(i). While the 2030 city plan indicates that in the event growth expectations are not achieved the city will work cooperatively with the Council to devise a remedial plan for the ensuing five years, the plan does not fully reflect the requirements of provision 3.(i) of Metropolitan. Council Resolution 2005-20 (copy attached). Land Use --Village Plan To be complete for review, the land use element of the comprehensive plan amendment application should include the Village Land Use Plan and Green Belt subarea plan. There are numerous references in the city plan application to the effect that all development and redevelopment within the Village Area and Green Belt shall be responsive to the adopted Village Plan. Given the prominence of the Village Area in the City's comprehensive plan, the City needs to include the Village Plan as a more detailed subarea comprehensive plan element, or integrate more Village Plan details into the land use element. The Council has not previously reviewed the Village Plan, and so the comprehensive plan application needs to incorporate enough details to determine its conformance with regional systems and consistency with Council policies. Not only is this necessary as noted in the Page 3 Enclosure Letter to Charles E. Dillerud September 26, 2005, aviation comments above, but the specifics of land use and development staging -timing in the Village and Greenbelt areas are needed to fully evaluate implications for other metro systems and how low- and moderate -cost housing opportunities will be provided. Housirne The City's plan as submitted needs revision and additional information to comply with comprehensive plan requirements regarding low and moderate -income set forth in the Land Planning Act. The city's plan states all the pre-2011 sewered growth will be in Old Village, but it does not delineate any of the residential land uses that will be in place in the Old Village for the balance of this decade. Because of this, the Council cannot fairly assess Whether Lake Elmo is providing the opportunity for the development of new rental or affordable owner -occupied housing through 2010. The Land Planning Act (LPA) requires local governments to address at least two issues regarding low and moderate -income housing needs in preparing their local comprehensive plans. They must identify in their plan their share of the regional need for low and moderate - income housing, and they must prepare an implementation section of the plan that identifies how they will address this share of the regional need. The plan amendment does neither. In employing the same housing goals methodology other communities used in preparing their 1995 comprehensive plan updates, the ! .`bunch exports LOce Elr'no to set g,gg1s cod lstentt wt :t re hquslug enc 1 s idei}t had £or bt er urWnizriig coitn iumitias';n the 1*1bi ie`as st St. Paulslai3rlg'•s gto bb regions: T`lie plan would then identify a sufficient amount of sewei`ed land guided for medium and high density development pre-2011 to accommodate those goals. The Council would expect to see Lake Elmo applying its goals to the new sewered units in the cty's Old Village neighborhood, and thus, guiding land there at a density that could facilitate opportunities for affordable units. The be4011xnar for Laic l is 9 e1Sp pd fo its But the above -noted land use planning deficiency is only a part of the LPA's housing implementation plan responsibilities. The law requires the identification of the programs and fiscal devices the city will use or others may use within Lake Elmo to advance affordable housing pre-2011. The potential role the Washington County HRA can play in helping Lake Elmo work toward its share of the region's needs could be mentioned as could the various programs and development assistance tools from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency or Page 4 Enclosure Letter to Charles E. Dillerud . September 26, 2005 the federal government such as the programs of HUD, tax-exempt revenue bonds, or low- income housing tax credits. Citywide Growth Forecast Comparisons The only discrepancy in growth forecasts is 2020 employment. The city plan shows 2,650 employment, and the 2030 Regional Development Framework revised forecasts show 7,200. Households 2010 2020 2030 MOU na na na Res.2005-20 3619 6324 8727 2030 RDF Rev. 3619 6324 8727 Lake Elmo Plan . 3619 6324 8727 Employment 2010 2020 2030 MOU na na na Res.2005-20 na na na 2030 RDF Rev, 2250 7200 14000 Lake Elmo Plan 2250 2650 14000 Population 2010 2020 2030 MOU TBD TBD 24000 Res.2005-20 9952 18403 24000 2030 RDF Rev. 9952 18403 24000 Lake Elmo Plan 9952 18403 24000 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 EasfFifth Street • Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 RESOLUTION NO.2005-20 GRANTING THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO'S REQUEST TO EXTEND THE TIME WITHIN WHICH THE CITY MUST ADOPT A LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH REQUIRED MODIFICATIONS AND ATTACHING REASONABLE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS TO THE EXTENSION WHEREAS, in February 1997 the Metropolitan Council submitted to the City of Lake Elmo a system statement that advised the City of the Metropolitan Council's recently adopted policy planning documents and metropolitan system plans and identified population projections and other plaiming elements the City should incorporate into its plan as the City fulfilled its decennial review obligations under section 473.864 of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 473.864, subdivision 2 required all metropolitan - area cities to review and, if necessary, amend. their entire comprehensive plans, fiscal devices and official controls by December 31, 1998 to ensure local plans conformed with metropolitan system plans and ensure fiscal devices and official controls did not conflict with local comprehensive plans or permit activities that conflict with metropolitan system plans; and WHEREAS, the City's comprehensive plan update was submitted to the Metropolitan Council on August 24, 2001 and its proposed plan update was deemed complete for Metropolitan Council review purposes in February 2002; and WHEREAS, at its September 11, 2002 regular meeting the Metropolitan Council found that the City's proposed plan update may substantially depart from and may have a substantial impact on metropolitan system plans; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 473.866, the City requested a contested case hearing on the Metropolitan Council's September 11, 2002 decision; and WHEREAS, on March 13, 2003 the administrative law judge concluded the Metropolitan Council has the statutory authority to require modifications to local comprehensive plans that substantially depart from or have a substantial impact on metropolitan system plans and reconnnended the Metropolitan Council require the City of Lake Elmo to modify its comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, on April 9, 2003, the governing body of the Metropolitan Council adopted Resolution No. 2003-10 and made its "final decision" with respect to modifications the Metropolitan Council deemed necessary to ensure the City's proposed plan update did not have a substantial impact on or contain a substantial departure from metropolitan system plans; and WHEREAS, the City appealed the Metropolitan Council's "final decision" to the Minnesota Court of Appeals and ultimately the Minnesota Supreme Court; and WHEREAS, on August 5, 2004 the Minnesota Supreme Court concluded the Metropolitan Council has the statutory authority to require modifications to the City's proposed plan update and affirmed the Metropolitan Council's "final decision," and judgment was entered September 30, 2004; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 473.864, subdivision 1 requires local governmental units to adopt comprehensive plans with required modifications within nine months following a final decision, order, or judgment made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 473.866; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council preferred to engage the City in negotiating an amicable resolution of the issues, rather than strictly imposing the modifications in Resolution No. 2003-10 as authorized by the Supreme Court's order; and WHEREAS, representatives of the City and the Metropolitan Council subsequently met to discuss how the City might modify its proposed plan update to accommodate local and regional issues that were the subject of Metropolitan Council Resolution No. 2003-10 and the Supreme Court's decision; and WHEREAS, on January 27, 2005 the Mayor of Lake Elmo and the Chair of the Metropolitan Council signed a Memorandnrn of Understanding, subsequently ratified by their respective governing bodies, that outlined certain criteria for guiding the City and the Metropolitan Council as the City modified its proposed plan update to ensure conformity with metropolitan system plans; and WHEREAS, Paragraph 8 of the Memorandum of Understanding required the City to complete its plan update modifications by April 15, 2005, submit its plan update to adjacent communities by April 15, 2005, and submit its plan update with required modifications to the Metropolitan Council on or before June 15, 2005 and prior to June 30 when the statutory nine-nnonth plan modification period expired; and WHEREAS, the City did not meet the April 15 and June 15 deadlines stated in the Memorandum of Understanding and did not adopt a plan update with required modifications by the statutory June 30, 2005 deadline; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 473.869 authorizes local governmental units to request that the Metropolitan Council extend the time for fulfilling the requirements of Minnesota Statutes sections 462.355, subdivision 4, 473.175, and 473.851 to 473,871; and WHEREAS, local governmental units requesting an extension under Minnesota Statutes section 473.869 must describe the activities previously undertaken by the local unit in fulfillment of the pertinent planning statutes and explain the reasons necessitating and justifying an extension request; and WHEREAS, on June 27, 2005 the Lake Elmo City Council approved Resolution No. 2005 067 which describes activities the City has undertaken to prepare a modified plan update pursuant to the January 27, 2005 Memorandum of Understanding and states, that it was riot possible for the City to complete its amended comprehensive plan update with required modifications within the statutory nine -month period; and WHEREAS, the City states in Resolution No. 2005-067 that it requests the Metropolitan Council to grant the City an extension from June 30, 2005 to August 31, 2005 for submittal of its proposed plan update to adjacent governmental units and school districts, and an extension from June 30, 2005 to September 30, 2005 for submittal of its updated comprehensive plan to the Metropolitan Council; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 473,869 the Metropolitan Council play "in its discretion" grant by resolution a request for extension upon a finding of "exceptional circmnstances or undue hardship" and "may attach reasonable requirements or conditions to the extension'; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate and necessary to attach certain conditions and requirements to this time extension to ensure the Memorandum of Understanding is successfully implemented over time and ensure costly regional infrastructure is used effectively and efficiently; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 473.175, subdivision 3 authorizes the Metropolitan Council to commence civil proceedings by appropriate legal action in district court to enforce the provisions of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act if a local government does not adopt a plan with modifications required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 473.866 within nine months following a final decision, order, or judgment made pursuant to section 473.866; and WHEREAS, further delay in adopting a plan update with required modifications will cause additional inconveniences and costs, unnecessary expenditures of scarce public resources, and uncertainty for residents of the City and the Metropolitan Council's planning processes for its regional systems; and WHEREAS, it will cost the Metropolitan Council additional time, resources and money if the City does not adopt a plan update with required modifications within a reasonable period of time and the Metropolitan Council must continence civil proceedings in the district court to enforce the provisions of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act and the September 30, 2005 judgment in the Minnesota Supreme Court's August 2005 decision. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 473.869, the Metropolitan Council finds there are exceptional circumstances and undue hardship in this case for the following reasons: (a) Since the 1976 passage of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, the Lake Elmo matter is the first time a local governmental unit and the Metropolitan Council were not able t6 resolve their differences over comprehensive planning matters through discussion and negotiation. Both the City and the Metropolitan Council have found it necessary to devote extra time, resources and effort to this unique plarming process. (b) The plan modifications required. of the City represent, in some cases, significant changes from historical land use patterns and planning practices within the City. (c) Making significant changes to historical land use patters and long-standing planning practices sometimes can be politically difficult and time-consuming. (d) Following the November 2004 city elections, three new members were elected to the Lake Elmo City Council and a new mayor was elected. 2. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 473.869, the Metropolitan Council finds that it is appropriate to grant the City's request for an extension of the time within which the City must adopt a plan update in accordance with the Metropolitan Laird Planning Act and the Minnesota Supreme Court's decision, and consistent with the January 27, 2005 Memorandum of Understanding. Subject to the conditions set forth below, the City's request for an extension is granted as follows: (a) The City must complete its plan update as soon as possible and must submit the proposed plan update to adjacent governmental units and affected school districts no later than August 31, 2005; and (b) The City must submit a plan update with required modifications to the Metropolitan Council for review no'latuT than September 30, 2005. (c) Within thirty (30) days after the Metropolitan Council takes action on the City's plan update the City must finally adopt its plan update with modifications (if any) required by the Metropolitan Council to ensure the plan update is consistent with the Memorandum of Understanding, the requirements and conditions of this time extension, and metropolitan system plans. 3. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 473.869, the following reasonable requirements and conditions are attached to the extension: (a) The City's plan update will not be "complete" for Metropolitan Council review purposes until all adjacent governmental units and affected school districts have either provided comments to the City or failed to provide any responses or comments to the City within sixty (60) days after the City submitted the plan to the adjacent governmental unit or affected school district. (b) The City's plan update must be consistent with the January 27, 2005 Memorandum of Understanding for those items addressed in the Memorandum of Understanding. For those matters that are not expressly addressed in the Memorandum of Understanding, the plan update must be consistent with the Metropolitan Land Planning Act and metropolitan system plans. The Metropolitan Council did not waive any regional land use policies in its regional policy documents or metropolitan system plans regarding land use planning, and the City must comply with and prepare a plan update consistent with the metropolitan system plans. (c) Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 473.865, subdivision 3, within nine (9) months after the adoption of its modified plan update the City must amend all official controls that conflict with its comprehensive plan to ensure City zoning ordinances, subdivision controls, site plan regulations and other official controls and fiscal devices do not conflict with the City's comprehensive plan or permit any activity in conflict with metropolitan system plans. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 473.865, subdivision 1, the City must submit copies of the official controls to the Metropolitan Council. within thirty (30) days following adoption. (d) The City will actively participate in the Metropolitan Council's plat monitoring program. (e) If the City does not prepare and submit by September 30, 2005 a plan update consistent with the Memorandum of Understanding and the requirements and conditions attached to this time extension and if the Metropolitan Council commences an enforcement action pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 473.175, subdivision 3 or other law, the City will pay the Metropolitan Council's costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, and will not contest a judicial action by the Metropolitan Council to compel compliance. (f) This time extension does not constitute a waiver of the Metropolitan Council's right to commence civil proceedings under Minnesota Statutes section 473.175. If the City does not prepare and adopt a plan update with required modifications according to the time schedule stated in this extension, the Metropolitan Council may consider the Memorandum of Understanding terminated and may seek to compel compliance with the original plan modifications that were the subject of the Minnesota Supreme Court's August 5, 2004 decision and September 30, 2004 judgment. (g) The City naust stage its sewered development consistent with Metropolitan Council policy requiring local governmental units to hook up to the regional wastewater disposal system within two (2) years after regional wastewater service is made available. (h) The Metropolitan Council's commitments in the Memorandum of Understanding to make regional sewer service available to the City via the WONE Interceptor (December 2006) said the Cottage Grove Interceptor (Phase I; December 2007) were based on the assumption that the City would submit its proposed plan update by June 15, 2005. Accordingly, the schedules for providing regional sewer service stated in the Memorandum of Understanding will be adjusted as follows to reflect the time extension requested by the City: the Metropolitan Council will plan to have regional sewer service available through the WONE Interceptor within eighteen (18) months after the date the City finally adopts an updated plan consistent with the Memorandum of Understanding and the conditions and requirements of this extension; and will plan to have regional sewer service available through the Cottage Grove Interceptor (Phase I) within thirty (30) months after the date the City finally adopts an updated plan consistent with the Memorandum of Understanding and the conditions and requirements of this extension. (i) The City's updated plan will provide that when the Count of Population and Household data from the 2010 U.S. Census are available, and every five years thereafter through, 2030, the Metropolitan Council will determine whether the population, household and residential equivalent unit (REC) levels in the City meet the City's commitments under the Memorandum of Understanding and reflected in the City's adopted comprehensive plan. Those population, household and REC levels are summarized in the following growth staging table and must be incorporated as part of the City's updated plan submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review by September 30, 2005, as well as the revised or updated plan the City will submit to the Metropolitan Council in connection with the upcoming decennial review under Minnesota Statutes section 473.864: Households Population RECs* 2010 3,619 9,952 515 (allresidential) 2015 5,114 14,064 1,930 (1,650 residential, 280 employment) 2020 6,324 18,403 3,120 (2,500 residential, 620 employment) 2025 7,524 21,895 41310 (3,350 residential, 960 employment) 2030 8,727 24,000 5,500 (4,200 residential, 1,300 employment) * Not counting Cimarron, existing Village, existing Eagles Point The City's updated plan shall state and expressly provide actions required to implement and complete the growth staging specified in the preceding growth staging table shall be implemented automatically without the need for comprehensive plan amendments. For years ending in "0" the determination of households and population will be based on U.S. Census data; for years ending in "5" this determination will be based on official estimates by the Metropolitan Council. If the City's growth falls short of its population commitments, the Metropolitan Council will notify the City regarding the level of the shortfall and the additional housing units needed to make up the shortfall. The City's updated plan will clearly specify the remedial actions, approved by the Metropolitan Council, that will be triggered if the City fails to meet its committed growth in population or RECs. The plan shall provide that these remedies, once triggered, shall be self-executing without the need for further City Council action other than appropriate and necessary revisions to official controls. Remedies shall include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) Automatic adjustment of the growth staging table to reflect the growth of households, population, and RECs needed to meet the population commitments the City agreed to under the Memorandum of Understanding. The adjusted growth staging table, upon approval of the Metropolitan Council, shall be deemed to be immediately incorporated in the City's comprehensive plan. This remedy includes appropriate and timely modification of official controls, e.g., zoning and subdivision ordinances which are consistent with the comprehensive plan, in accordance with state law, to implement the comprehensive plan. (it) If the City does not meet its population commitment in 2010, its household commitments for 2015, 2020, 2025, and 2030 shall each be adjusted upward by.an amount equal to the difference between the committed population and the actual population in 2010, multiplied by 0.5. This process shall be repeated. in 2015, 2020, 2025, and 2030. Housing units added under this provision shall be added at an average density of at least 3 units per acre. (i'ii) If the City does not meet its REC commitments in 2010, it shall pay to the Metropolitan Council a, "wastewater inefficiency fee" (WIF) to help pay the operation, maintenance, and capital costs of underutilized regional wastewater infrastructure and the costs of providing regional sewer service for development elsewhere in the region that would have occurred within, the City. A determination will be made on the number of deficient RECs by subtracting actual RECs from the committed RECs identified in the adopted comprehensive plan. A WIF' shall be paid for every deficient REC and will be due on the dates specified below: WIF per Each Time Frame Deficient REC Payment Date 2007-2010 t $2,600 January 31, 2011 2010-2015 $4,200 January 31, 2016 2015-2020 $5,200 January 31, 2021 2020-2025 $5,500 January 31, 2026 2025-2030 $5,700 January 31, 2031 If the City achieves the committed number of RECs after a WIF is assessed to the City, a service availability charge (SAC) credit will be granted for each deficient REC for which a WIF was assessed. The SAC credit will be granted at the end of each five-year staging period. In addition, the City's updated plan shall provide that all residential land within its 2030 Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) is guided at two alternative density ranges. The first density range shall be of the City's choosing, provided that: the minimum density is at Ieast three units per acre, consistent with density standards in the metropolitan system plans; and, the totality of residential areas intended for sewered development will accommodate at least 4,200 new residential RECs. The second density range shall be equal to the first range plus at least three additional units per acre. The first density range will be established until April 30, 2011. The Metropolitan Council will notify the City by February 15, 2011regarding the status of the City's REC commitment as of December 31, 2010. If the City achieves its commitment for residential RECs as of December 31, 2010, the first density range automatically will be reestablished in the City's comprehensive plan until April 20, 2016. If the City does not achieve its commitment for residential RECs as of December 31, 201.0, the City may designate one acre for each REC the City is short, to be guided at the second alternative density range. If the City does not act to designate acres to be reguided at the second density range by April 30, 2011, the second density range automatically will be established for all of the residential land in the 2010-2015 staging area of the 2030 MUSA. The same process will be repeated for 2015, 2020 and 2025, and remedial action as described will be taken by April 30 of 2016, 2021 and 2026. (j) The City must comply with the decennial review provisions of Minnesota Statutes section 473.864, subdivision 2 and, after receiving a system statement from the Metropolitan Council, must review and, as necessary, update its local comprehensive plan no later than December 31, 2008. The plan update that is the subject of this extension is not the decennial plan review and update the City must complete by December 31, 2008 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 473.864, subdivision 2. (k) The City must plan for a total citywide population of 24,000 as outlined in the Memorandurn of Understanding and land use planning to accommodate that total population must be timely and consistent with density standards and other provisions of the metropolitan system plans. The City may exercise its judgment about where and how the 24,000 population will be accommodated within the City consistent with the Memorandum of Understanding but the City's plan update must reflect the City's obligation to produce and maintain an average residential density of at least three (3) dwelling units per acre in all sewered areas of the City. (1) The City must timely submit to the Metropolitan Council, as required by Minnesota Statutes section 473.513, copies of applications for permits to alter or improve the City's local sewer system as well as design data and location maps of the projects. (m) The City must cooperatively work with the Metropolitan Council and adjacent governmental units to plan for and implement regional sewer service to support sewered development within the City. (n) Conditions beyond the control of the City, such as a severe reduction in housing construction in the region's Developing Communities, due to a protracted downturn in the economy or a long -tern recession, may adversely affect the City's ability to meet its population, household and REC conmutments. Accordingly, if the City has been unable to meet its population, household, and REC cornnnitnents because of adverse economic conditions, the City may petition the Metropolitan Council for a modification of the growth staging components of the plan and the conditions and requirements of this time extension if, after the end of a five-year staging period, the following circumstance is verified: the City's production of population, households and RECs, as a percentage of the population, household and REC commitments stated in the growth staging table, equals or exceeds the region's Developing Communities' production of population, households and RECs as a percentage of the region's Developing Communities' forecasted population, households and RECs. If the City's right to petition is triggered and the City petitions the Metropolitan Council for modifications, the Metropolitan Council will not unreasonably deny the petition. 4. This time extension is subject to the City's acceptance and compliance with all the requirements and conditions stated in Paragraph 3. It is the Metropolitan Council's expectation that the City's plan update submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review will reflect these conditions and requirements. 5. Metropolitan Council staff will provide to the City appropriate and reasonable technical and advisory assistance to help the City complete its plan update modifications and review processes by August 31, 2005 and submit a modified plan update to the Metropolitan Council on or before September 30, 2005. 6. The Metropolitan Council will work with the City in an effort to resolve these important planning and metropolitan system issues in a cooperative and collaborative manner. Adopted this 27rh day of July, 2005. Peter Bell, Chair LAKEELMOEXTENSIONRESOLUOON Pat Curtiss, Recording Secretary Lake Elmo Agenda Section: Planning, Land Use and Zoning No. 9C City Council January 3, 2006 Agenda Item: 2006-2010 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) Background Information for January 3, 2006: The Council first considered the 2006-2010 CIP as recommended by the staff and the Planning Commission at the December 6 meeting. The matter was tabled on December 6 and referred to the Council Committees for further review. The Finance, Legal et al Committee reviewed the questioned details of the CIP with staff on December 13, and requested the matter be again placed on the City Council Agenda December 20. The adoption 2006-2010 CIP adoption Resolution from the December 6 Agenda is again presented for Council consideration. Person respansible: Action items: 005 Motion to adopt Resolution #200 �-. approving the 2006-2010 City Va 4 Capital Improvements Program Attachments: Time Allocated: 1. Draft Resolution #2006 OCS- Approving the 2006-2010 CIP CITY OF LADE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2006-005 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2006-2010 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM WHEREAS, at its November 21, 2005 meeting, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission held a public hearing on the draft 2006-2010 Capital Improvements Program. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends adoption of the 2006-2010 Capital Improvements Program. WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo City Council reviewed the draft 2006-2010 Capital Improvements Program recommended by the Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Lake Elmo City Council approves the 2006-2010 Capital Improvement Program as the planning guide to capital expenditures. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 3rd January, 2006. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin Rafferty, City Administrator Lake Elmo Agenda Section: Planning, Land Use and Zoning No. 9D City Council January 3, 2006 Agenda Item: Metropolitan Council System Statement — Verbal Report Background Information for January 3, 2006: The Metropolitan Council Land Use Advisory Conu-nittee (LUAC) will conduct a Hearing concerning Lake Elmo's appeal of our System Statement at 2:30 PM, Friday December 30. Jerry Filla and I will be attending to present the City's positions. I have attached the written testimony that we were required to submit on December 23 and December 27. We won't see the METC response until tomorrow (December 29). While I don't expect any "on the spot" decision by LUAC (they have 30 days to decide what to recommend to the METC Board — which then itself has 30 days to decide), I might have some observations as to the flavor of the proceeding to share with the City Council. Person res nsible• Action items: "' None Required. City Plif Attachments: Time Allocated: 1. LUAC Hearing Submission 2. LUAC Scheduling Letter L Y pF LAKE. ELMII City of Lake Elmo 6511777.5510 3800 Laverne Averiue North / Lake Elmo, MN 55042 December 22, 2005 Ann Beckman Metropolitan Council 230 East Fifth Street . St. Paul, MN 55101-1626 Dear Ms. Beckman: Hand Delivered. December 22, 2005 RE: Hearing to Consider Amendments to Metropolitan System Statement City of Lake EImo Enclosed herewith please find the following documents in accordance with December 16, 2005 letter to the City from Tony Pistilli, Chair of the Land Use Advisory Committee: 1. Specific Proposed Amendments to the City of Lake Elmo System Statement 2. Prehearing Memorandum identifying the issues in dispute 3. Witness List 4. Exhibit List The Lake Elmo City Council reviewed and endorsed submission of these documents at its December 20, 2005 Regular City Council Meeting. Sincerely yours, Cit*9905� f Lake EI CC: Jerry Filla, City Attorney 4 printed on*recycled paper Prehearing Memorandum City of Lake Elmo December 30, 2005 System Statement Hearing Metropolitan Council Land Use Advisory Committee The City of Lake Elmo respectfully submits this memorandum to the Metropolitan Council Land Use Advisory Committee to identify the issues in dispute between the Metropolitan Council and the City of Lake Elmo regarding the Lake Elmo System Statement issued by the Metropolitan Council to the City of Lake Elmo on September 12, 2005. Those issues are addressed in brief by Lake Elmo City Council Resolution #2005- 119 (November 1, 2005) by which the City officially requested a Hearing regarding the issues in dispute. The amendments to the Lake Elmo System Statement proposed by the City to resolve the issues noted by that Resolution were communicated to Ms. Beckman, and Mr. Nauen by a December 21, 2005 letter, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 1. The Lake Elmo Systems Statement urges the City to contact our sector representative "...to review and discuss potential issues or concerns." Upon receipt by the City of the System Statement on September 13, 2005, Lake Elmo City Planner promptly advised the Metropolitan Council Sector Representative for Lake Elmo (Mr. Mazanec) that the City would have an issue and concern with a portion the Planning Area designation in the text of the System Statement, and the entire Map W-7 of the System Statement as both were inconsistent with the terms and intent of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the Metropolitan Council dated January 27, 2005, and attached as Exhibit 2. The Lake Elmo City Planner stated that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment that was submitted to the Metropolitan Council by the City in early September, 2005 accurately reflects the MOU in all respects. That Plan includes mapping and text that differs substantially from the Planning Area text and Map W-7 of the System Statement, The Lake Elmo City Planner suggested to Mr. Mazanec that, at a minimum, the System Statement process/time line should be suspended for Lake Elmo pending action by the Metropolitan Council concurring with the City's Comprehensive Plan Amendment responsive to the MOU since, at that point, the System Statement would be in need of amendment as well to coincide with the MOU and the City's Plan. On or about October 18, 2005 the Lake Elmo City Planner received a letter from Metropolitan Council Local Planning Assistance Manager Phyllis Hanson confirming the verbal discussion with Mr. Mazanec regarding the Lake Elmo System Statement, and stating that, "We have concluded that no change to the system statement is warranted at this time...". The Lake Elmo City Planner advised the Lake Elmo City Council of this communication, resulting in Lake Elmo City Council Resolution 2005-119 requesting the System Statement Hearing. Issues in Dispute #1/#2 The issues of PIanning Area designation (tent and Map W-7 of the System Statement) are directly related. The W-7 Map issue extends beyond simple Planning Area designation to the geographic extent. , Page 2, Paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Lake Elmo System Statement (under the heading "Geographic planning area") states that Lake Elmo is partially designated "developing community" and partially as ."diversified rural". The City does not dispute designation of a portion of the City (if, geographically, the correct portion) as "developing community". The City does, however, dispute the System Statement text and Map W-7 designation of the balance of the community as "diversified rural", and requests that area be instead designated "rural residential" based on the following: I. A "Community Role" listed in the Development Framework for "Diversified Rural" planning areas is "Accommodate growth not to exceed forecasts at clustered development not to exceed 1 unit per 10 acres.'* The majority of the existing residential development in geographic areas of the City that will not designated "Developing Community" is at a residential density in excess of I unit per 10 acres; and new residential development over the past 10 years and into the future in those geographic areas responsive to the City's innovative conservation development ordinance ranges 3-4.5 units per 10 acres. 2. The MOU specifically states that "The City will determine the types of housing and businesses to be developed...". The only exception to this statement in the MOU is that regionally sewered housing (within the "Developing Community" portion of the City) must be developed at not less than an average of 3 dwelling units per'acre. The concept of "urban reserve" implied by the 1 unit per 10 acre specification of the diversified rural planning area designation was mutually understood by the parties to the MOU to not be applicable to the geographic areas of Lake Elmo not within the developing community designation. 3. The initial sentence under the heading "Rural Area: Rural Residential Areas" found on Page 25 of the 2030 Development Framework clearly best describes the portion of Lake Elmo not designated "Developing Community": "Rural Residential Areas are immediately adjacent to Developing Areas and have large numbers of individual sewage treatment systems at densities of 2.5 acres or less." Over 6 lineal miles of Developing Community designation will border areas of Lake Elmo not so designated by the City's pending Comprehensive Plan. Within those non -Developing Community areas of the City there are nearly 2,000 individual sewage treatment systems, many at densities of 2.5 acres or less. Map W-7 of the Lake Elmo System Statement also designates a portion of the City Diversified Rural,. which the City contends should be instead designated Rural Residential for the reasons cited above. In addition, the geographic area of Lake Elmo designated Developing Community does not correspond with the terms of the MOU and the 2030 Water Resources System Plan as follows: 1. The 2030 Metropolitan Council Water Resources System Plan specifies that regional sewer service will be provided to the City via the WONE Interceptor and (the majority) by the Cottage Grove Interceptor. Both of those regional sewer service entrance points to the City are located along the City's south border — along Interstate 94. Map. W-7 of the Lake Elmo System Statement, by the geographic location of the Developing Community map designation, clearly assumes regional sewer service to enter the City via the Lake Elmo Interceptor at the City's west border. The Lake Elmo Interceptor is not an element of the 2030 Metropolitan Council Water Resources System Plan as it once was. It is logical for the City's Developing Area designation to be along its south border where the regional sewer will enter the City rather than extending west across the City from its west border where the Lake Elmo Interceptor will no longer provide regional sewer service. 2. The MOU (Paragraph #3) specifically references "..urban (sewered) area south of 10a' Street.", and regional sewer service to the Cimarron neighborhood and the Old Village Neighborhood (Paragraph #7). Both of those geographic areas are located within the south/central area of the City, not the west portion of the City where the Developing Community designation appears on Map W-7 of the System Statement. The Developing Community designation for Lake Elmo should be consistent with the map appearing as Exhibit 3. Issue in Dispute #3 The Lake Elmo System Statement, on Page T-2, paragraph 5, and on Page T-3, paragraph 3 specifies transit facilities that Lake Elmo is expected to address in its Comprehensive Plan including park -and -ride facilities for Metro Transit. The last sentence of the Page T- 3 paragraph states: "Demand for future park -and -ride spaces was identified in the Park - and -Ride Facility Site Location. Plan in the area of I-94 and Keats.". The noted Facility Plan was only prepared and adopted in 2005, but the Metro Transit focus on a facility at Keats and I-94 extends back to 2003 and earlier. The City's concerns with the final location of a park -and -ride in the Keats/1-94 area extend that far back in time as well. A 2003 CMAQ application by Metro Transit proposed a 500 car park -and -ride in Lake Elmo at the northeast corner of I-94 and Keats (between Hudson Blvd, service road and the freeway off -ramp). That CMAQ application specified that the site was MnDOT owned land (which it is), and therefore, would be available to Metro Transit at little or no cost. The CIvIAQ application also stated that the City of Lake Elmo had been contacted had indicated its "preliminary approval" of the park -and -ride plan, CMAQ application, and site. There were two major problems with those statements by Metro Transit in its CMAQ application documentation: 1. The park -and -ride site designated in the CMAQ application in Lake Elmo was (and still is) 99% open water — a MnDOT surface water storage pond. 2. The City was not consulted in any manner prior to the submission of the CMAQ application for the "Lake Elmo Park -and -Ride" to the WO (the Metropolitan Council). Only after that submission did Metro Transit write the City a brief letter seeking the City's support for the project and site. On October 7, 2003 the Lake Elmo City Council directed the City Staff to communicate the Council's objections to locating a Metro Transit Park -and -Ride at Keats/1-94. See Exhibit 5 — the letter addressed to Metro Transit outlining the City's bases for objecting to the Keats/1-94 park -and -ride site then proposed. As far as the City can determine, Metro Transit did not either share that letter with the MPO (Metropolitan Council Transportation Advisory Board, in this case) or include that letter (along with the letters of support from the City of Minneapolis and City of Woodbury) in the CMAQ application documentation. On February 18, 2004 the Lake Elmo City Council directed its staff to submit a letter to the Metropolitan Council Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) Programming Committee again detailing Lake Elmo's objections to the Keats/1-94 park -and -ride site. The Lake Elmo staff did so (see Exhibit 6 for the February 18, 2004 letter), and also attended the February 18, 2004 TAB Programming Committee meeting. During that Programming Committee meeting Nacho Diaz, Metro Transit General Manager, stated to the Programming Committee that if Lake Elmo did not want the park -and -ride in its City, Metro Transit would find another location. The City understands that the Park -anal -Ride Facility Site Location Plan is considered to be a component of the Transportation System Plan, and therefore the reasonableness of the Park -and -Ride Plan can not be questioned by the City. The City notes, however, that no alternative site (to the MnDOT "pond" site) has been identified, and many of the objections by the City to locating such a facility at Keats/1-94 remain valid. Witness List City of Lake Elmo December 30, 2005 System Statement Hearing Metropolitan Council Land Use Advisory Committee 1. Charles E. Dillerad, City Planner/Assistant City Administrator, City of Lake Elmo List of Exhibits City of Lake Elmo December 30, 2005 System Statement Hearing Metropolitan Council Land Use Advisory Committee 1. Specified Proposed Amendments to the City of Lake Elmo System Statement. 2. Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Lake Elmo and the Metropolitan Council dated January 27, 2005. 3. Regionally Sewered Area Map for Lake Elmo (Lake Elmo 2030 Comprehensive Plan). 4. System Statement Map W-7, with location of the former "Lake Elmo Interceptor" noted. 5. City of Lake Elmo letter to Metro Transit dated October 8, 2003. 6. City of Lake Elmo letter to the Metropolitan Council Transportation Advisory Board Programming Committee of February 18, 2004. gk9611 1 Snecifled Proposed Amendments to the City of Lake Elmo System Statement 1. Substitute the term "rural residential" for the term "diversified rural" wherever in the Lake Elmo System Statement the term "diversified rural' now appears. 2. Amend Page 2, Paragraph 4 of the City of Lake Elmo System Statement to delete all, and substitute the following: "Rural residential areas are immediately adjacent to developing areas and have large numbers of individual sewage treatment systems at densities of one dwelling unit per 2.5acres or less. Rural residential areas face challenges in making the transition from rural unsewered development to sewmed development." 3. Amend Map W-7 of the Lake Elmo System Statement to: a. Designate only areas south of lot' Street North, and the defined Old Village area as "Developing Area" b. Designate the balance of the City as "Rural Residential" 4. Amend Page T-3, paragraph 3 of the Lake Elmo System Statement to delete the fourth sentence; and delete any other references to the "Lake Elmo Park and Ride" that may appear in the System Statement. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Lace Elmo / Metropolitan -Council Outline of criteria to be considered in preparation of City Comprehensive PIan The following criteria were developed as the result of discussions among representatives of tlae City of Lake Elmo ("City") and the Metropolitan Council ("Council'). These criteria are intended to provide guidance to the City and to the Met Council as Lake Elmo modifies its local comprellensive plan to ensure conformity with metropolitan system plans as required by state law. 1. The City of Lake Elmo will commit to 6;500 new Residential Equivalent Units ("RECs") of Regional Sewer service by the year 2030, The City will commit to a city-wide population of 24,000 by the year 2030. Performance measures for this agreement will be total population and total utilized RECs in Lake Ehno. Note: The term "REC" shall be defined in Lake Elmo as one residential connection and/or the equivalent of 10 employees for new business operations. 2. The City will implement the population, employment, and RECs in the following manner. Year 2000 2010 2020 203.0 Population 6,863 TBD TBD 24,000 Residential RECs 0 TBD TBD 5,200 Employment RECs 100 TBD TBD 1.,400 Total RECs 100 TBD TBD 6,600 3. The City will determine the types of housing and businesses to be developed and will meet or exceed an average residential density of 3 units per acre or a non-residential density of 40 employees per acre in urbat (sewered) areas u1 the area south of 10a Street. 4. The City will plan for 1,300 new RECs (20% of 6,500) to be used for sewered employment. The City will plan for Regional Sewer service to be provided in the southwest corner of Lake Ehno via the WANE Interceptor, and at Lake Ehno Avenue via the Cottage Grove Interceptor. Sewer capacity will be provided to meet the needs as specified in paragraph 2. It is anticipated at this time that design flows for the Regional Sewer service provided to the City will be made available as follows: To WANE Interceptor - Metro Plant (estimated construction completion: Dec. 2006) To Cottage Grove Interceptor - Eagles Point Plant Phase I (estimated construction completion: Dec. 2007) Phase II (estimated construction completion: Dec. 2010) Total RECs MGDT 1,825 0.50 1,825 0.50 4,675 1.28 8;325 2.28 Page I of 2 Pages 6. The City of Lake Elmo will achieve a city-wide population of 24,000 by 2030. All population will be counted. Lake Elmo will use 6,600 RECs by 2030. All RECs used will be counted. 7. Should the City determine to extend Regional Sewer service to the existing Cimarron manufactured housing neighborhood (500 RECs), existing Old Village housing (up to 500 RECs), and/or new Old Village housing (up to 500 RECs), all utilized RECs shall be counted toward the expected community totals, Up to 1,000 RECs may be used in the Old.Village area of Lake Elmo. It is understood that the average density of the aforementioned Old Village units shall be at least 3 units per acre. 8, The City will complete its required plan modifications by April 15, 2005 and submit its plan to adjacent communities for review by that time. This will allow time for the City to complete its local planning and review processes and submit its required plan modifications to the Council on for before June 15, 2005 and prior to the expiration of the nine -month plan modification period specified in state law. 9. The City's comprehensive plan shall be flexible enough to allow for possible limited post 2030 development, redevelopment, or environmental mitigation utilizing any Regional Sewer capacity (see paragraph 5) that may remain. post 2030. 10. The signatories will present and recommend these guidelines to their respective governing bodies for consideration with the understanding that: (a) the adoption of a modified comprehensive plan ultimately is the responsibility of the full Lake. Elmo City Council; and (b) the full governing body of the Metropolitan Council ultimately is responsible for reviewing the plan submitted by the City and determining whether the modified comprehensive plan conforms with metropolitan system plans. c is . h ' 1,�,,01 Date: �Q /� 2: 1/27/2005 3:02 PM Page 2 of 2 Pages 1-1 MTN &ki6ai ,' October 8, 2003 Scott Thompson Senior Transit Planner Metro Transit 560 Sixth Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55411-4398 Dear Mr. Thompson: RE: CMAQ Grant Application Your Letter of September 23, 2003 Last evening (October 7) I presented your draft "Letter of Support" for the CMAQ application involving a park/ride and related activities at the intersection of CSAH 19 and 1-94 in Lake Elmo to the Lake Elmo City Council. Following a discussion of the proposed letter, the Council unanimously directed me to advise Metro Transit that they could not, at this time, approve such a letter of support. The concern of the City Council for such a facility at that location appears to be twofold: 1. It could result in traffic generation at the CSAH 19/1-94 interchange and frontage roads that will lead to the need for roadway and traffic control improvements at the interchange. The north frontage road to I-94 (Hudson Blvd.) has recently been turned back to the City by MnDOT, and therefore, a portion of the cost of the roadway/traffic control modifications required to adequately service this park/ride facility would become City capital expense. 2. The City Council is concerned that such a facility at this location will function as a magnet for development of the presently undeveloped surrounding lands in Lake Elmo for uses and at development intensities inconsistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Should you have questions regarding what I have here communicated to you, or wish to address this matter further, pleased feel free to contact me at (651) 777-5510. Sincerely yours, City of Lake Elmo Charles E. Dillerud Acting City Administrator xC w February 18, 2004 Chair and Members TAB Programming Committee Metropolitan Council Mears Park Center St. Paul, MN Dear TAB Programming Committee Members: RE: CMAQ/STP Funding Application #CM-11-03 I-94 East Park & Ride Lot At its Regular Meeting February 18, 2004 the Lake Elmo City Council directed the Acting City Administrator to attend the February 18, 2004 TAB Programming Committee meeting to advise the Committee regarding the inaccurate representations of fact made in the subject funding application; the total lack of coordination between the applicant and the proposed host city (Lake Elmo); and, the City's basis for objecting to the project proposed by Metro Transit for CMAQ funding. Inaccurate Application Representations 1. Page 2 of the application, under the heading "Type of Work" fails to identify site acquisition as a project component. We can only assume that this relates to numbered paragraph # 2 on Page 16 of the application where the applicant states that ,"...there is verbal consensus to permit Metro Transit to use Mn/DOT right of way at the park and ride site." We take this to say that a site will be provided to Metro Transit by Mn/DOT at no cost. Please note that the only Mn/DOT right of way at the subject intersection in Lake Elmo of a size sufficient to accommodate a park & ride project of the proposed scale is a storm water holding pond. Any other site that would be substituted at this interchange location (either in Lake Elmo or Woodbury) would be commercially zoned, and valued by the present owner in excess of $150,000 per acre. Land acquisition will be a component of this project, if the project is constructed at this interchange location. How would this added project expense impact "cost effectiveness" reported by the applicant for emissions and congestion reduction — and resultant project ranking score? 2. Page 5 of the application (Paragraph #6) addresses coordination of the application with "affected communities". While the stated definition of such coordination is decidedly lacking in 'substance, we can not find the required "copy of the written communication as a proof of coordination" in the application appendix related to either Lake Elmo or Washington County — the two most affected communities. In fact, the required communication was sent to Lake Elmo by the applicant on September 23, 2003 - a month after the application was submitted to the TAB (August 25, 2003). No communication whatever tools place with Lake Elmo prior to the August 25 date that the application was submitted to TAB. We note, however, that communications to MnDOT, Woodbury and Minneapolis TMO from Metro Transit regarding the project — and endorsing responses from those agencies - are all dated well before the application was submitted — July, 2003. 3. Even though Lake Elmo promptly responded to the September 23, 2003 communication from Metro Transit regarding the project, we see no evidence that this October 8, 2003 letter from the City raising objections to the project is included in the application Appendix AA, as are the letters from Woodbury, MnDOT,.and Minneapolis TMO. 4. On Page 16 of the application, Response Paragraph #3 states that "Preliminary discussions have been held with City of Lake Elmo staff regarding the site." That statement is simply not true. No discussions have been held with City of Lake Elmo staff regarding the site — ever. Had there been such discussions in advance of the application, the siting issue noted in #1 above would have been discovered. 5. On Page 16 of the application the "Approvals needed to implement of the project' are reported by the applicant. There is no reference here to the access permits that would likely be required to City and County Streets, nor the Planning/ZoningBuildirig permits that would be required to be obtained from the City. Coordination/Communications Between Lake Elmo and Metro Transit In addition the applicant/host community (Lake Elmo) communication issues noted above, on January 23, 2004 Lake Elmo sent a letter to Kevin Roggenbuck at the Metropolitan Council noting some of the issues addressed here, and requesting inclusion of that letter and the October 8, 2003 letter from Lake Elmo in the application documentation being reviewed and ranked by TAC/TAB. We requested that Mr. Roggenbuck advise Lake Elmo as to whether it was his intent to do so. As of today (February 18, 2004) we have not had any response to our January 23 letter from Metro Transit or Mr. Roggenbuck. Lake Elmo Basis for Objection to the Project — As Proposed The City of Lake Elmo — by its City Council — offers the following considerations in support of its objections to the proposed siting of the I-94 East Park & Ride in Lake Elmo: 1. Should use of Mn/DOT right of way as the park and ride site be found to be physically impossible — as it appears to be — any other location in Lake Elmo will result in "office" zoned and/or guided private property being purchased for the site. Such a purchase by Metro Transit will remove both the land and the resulting land development from the "Tax Capacity" of Lake Elmo — a significant financial loss to a City that will extend forever. 2. If the facility is located at the proposed interchange — and in Lake Elmo — Hudson Blvd. (the north service road to 1-94) will see an immediate and significant increase in traffic volume. Since Hudson Blvd. was "turned back" by MnDOT to the City recently, all of the accelerated road maintenance expense that result from park and ride customers will fall to the City, either as a drain to the City's MSA maintenance allocation, or directly to City taxpayers. 3. Once a park and ride is operational at this location in Lake Elmo (and maybe even if it is relocated to Woodbury), the intersection of Hudson Blvd. and Keats Avenue will experience a huge increase in week -day peak hour traffic. There is little question that this intersection will approach warrants for signalization rapidly — if not by traffic count, then certainly by accident incidence. Two "legs" of that signalization would become City financial responsibility (and the other two legs would be Washington County) — a certain 6 figure financial issue for the City (and County). 4. The Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan (never mentioned in the CMAQ application — but Woodbury's Plan surely is) does not contemplate a high concentration of high density residential or commercial use in this area of the City. The park and ride proposed would certainly act as a magnet for such use, and result in pressure to modify the Lake Elmo Plan — perhaps that is the entire strategy for this site at Metropolitan Council. The City of Lake Elmo respectfully requests the TAB to disqualify the I-94 East Park and Ride application from this round of CMAQ funding, based not only on the objections of the City; but also based on the irregularities we have pointed out in both the representations of the Metro Transit application, and the flawed local affected community coordination process by Metro Transit. Lake Elmo most certainly is not opposed to the park and ride concept — particularly with the alternative fuel buses here contemplated. We do, however, object to the siting of the facility in Lake Elmo for the reasons here stated. Since Woodbury appears from the application to be the primary benefactor of this facility, the facility should be located in that community. Sincerely yours, City of Lake Elmo Charles E. Dillerud Acting City Administrator/City Planner CC: Mayor & Council Rick Arnebeck Mark Matuska Representative Eric Lipman Senator Brian LeClaire AAA i o poa , ; 02 cic , coca.r,6 l f , IV( eA-r4- y, Ch1A0... Berri December 16, 2005 Mr. Martin Rafferty City Administrator City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 RE: Request for Hearing to Consider Amendments to Metropolitan System Statement Dear Mr. Rafferty: Pursuant to M.S. § 473.857, Subd. 1, the City of Lance Elmo ("the City") has requested a hearing to consider amendments to the Metropolitan System Statement.' This is to inform you that the hearing in this matter will be conducted Friday, December 30, 2005, at 2:30 p.m. The hearing will be conducted by the Metropolitan Council Land Use Advisory Committee ("LUAC"), chaired by the undersigned. The following sets out the schedule, procedures and other information for the upcoming public hearing: 1. On or before December 23, 2005, the City shall submit to LUAC, by providing copies to Ann Beckman and Charles N. Nation, attorney for LUAC, "specified proposed amendments to the System Statement," as required by M.S. § 473.857, 2. On or before December 27, 2005, the City shall deliver to LUAC (with a copy to Metropolitan Council), by providing copies to Ms. Beckman and Mr. Nauen, (1) a Prehearing Memorandum identifying the issues in dispute, (2) a Witness List, (3) a list of all interested persons you are aware of who may wish to testify, and (4) an Exhibit List. Please inform us if you do not intend to call witnesses at the hearing. 1 A total of five municipalities have requested hearings. They are: City of Carver, Town of Hassan, City of Hugo, City of Lance Elmo and City of Shorewood. w .metrocouncfl.org [Metro Info Line 602-1888 230 East Fifth Sheet St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1626 • (651) 602-1000 Fax 602-1550 • TTY 291-0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer City of Lake Elmo RE: Metropolitan System Statement December 16, 2005 Page 2 3. On or before December 29, 2005, Metropolitan Council shall deliver to Ms. Beckman and Mr. Nauen submit (1) a Prehearing Memorandum responding to the issues in dispute, (2) a Witness List, (3) a list of all interested persons it is aware of who may wish to testify, and (4) an Exhibit List. Please inform us if you do not intend to call witnesses at the hearing. 4. As stated, the hearing will be conducted on Friday, December 30, 2005. All testimony, if any, shall be completed by December 31, 2005. LUAC will set limits on the length of testimony. 5. The hearing will be conducted by LUAC and chaired by the undersigned. LUAC will be assisted by Mr. Nauen at the hearing. All submissions to LUAC shall be delivered to (1) Ann Beckman, Metropolitan Council, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55101, and (2) Charles Nauen, 100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 2200, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55401, and received no later than the deadlines set above. 6. LUAC will advise the City of Lake Elmo and Metropolitan Council of the hearing location. 7. A court reporter will transcribe the heating. 8. The issue in the case is whether the Metropolitan System Statement should be amended as requested by the City of Lake Elmo. The LUAC Chair will strictly enforce the limitation on the issues contained in M.S. § 473.857, Subd. 2: "The hearing shall not consider the need for or reasonableness of the Metropolitan System Plans or parts thereof" 9. Post -hearing submissions of proposed findings of fact and conclusions shall be submitted within two weeks of the conclusion of the hearing. Submissions shall be simultaneous. 10. As the one requesting the hearing, the City of Lake Elmo has the burden of proof. . 11. Pursuant to M.S. § 473.857, Subd. 2, the City of Lake Elmo is obligated to pay the costs of the healing, including court reporter expenses, the time and expenses of Mr. Nauen and other hearing costs. Payment of the invoice shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt. 12. The City of Lake Ell -no and the Metropolitan Council are encouraged to attempt to resolve any differences, if resolution_ is reached, please report it immediately to me and submit a copy of the written stipulation to Ms. Beckman and Mr. Nauen. 351621-1 u, ty of Lake Elmo RE: Metropolitan System Statement December 16, 2005 Page 3 If you have any, questions, please contact Charles Nauen at 612-596-4006 (ermauen@locklaw.com) or Ann Beckman at 651-602-1669(ann.becicman(a7,mete.state.mn.us). Thank you. Very truly yours, -fldf Tony Pistilli, Chair Land Use Advisory Committee 763-228-1867 (cell) tony,pistilli@metc.state.mn.us c: Peter Bell, Metropolitan Council, Chair Tom Weaver, Metropolitan Council, Regional Administrator Chris Georgacas, Metropolitan Council Member, District 12 Ann Beckman, Metropolitan Council, Regional Growth Strategy Manager Phyllis Hanson, Metropolitan Council, Local Planning Assistance Manager Charles N. Nauen, Counsel for Metropolitan Council LUAC Metropolitan Council Land Use Advisory Committee 351621-1