HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-05-01 CCMMINUTES APPROVED: June 19, 2001
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
June 5, 2001
L AGENDA
2. MINUTES: May 15, 2001
3. CLAIMS
4. PUBLIC INOUIRIESANFORMATIONAL:
A. Public Inquiries
B. Water Ski Show:Tri Lakes Assoc:Joe Kiesling
C. "Children Playing" signs request by Parkview Homeowner's Assoc.
5. NEW BUSINESS:
6. CONSENT AGENDA:
7. MAINTENANCE/PARK/FIRE/BUILDING•
A. Brush Removal Program: Dan Olinger
B. Safety Netting for Lions Park
8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT:
A. CSAH 13 and 0' Street/Hudson Blvd. N. Signal Project (draft)
B. Street Lighting Policy
C. Hill Trail Road Improvement
D. Watershed Boundary Change Petition
E. Escrow Reduction:Carriage Station
9. _ PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING:
A. Public Hearing:Appeal of Variances:Joe Kiesling, 9359 Jane Road
B. PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, Site Plan: Carriage
Station
C. Planning Commission Old Village Special Projects — Work Plan
Priorities:POSTPONED until June 19
D. Final Plat and Development Contract — Lake Elmo Vista
E. Low Impact Non-Ag Conditional Use Permit:Siverson
10. CITY ATTORNEY' S REPORT:
I I. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:
12.UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
13. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
A. Resignation of Animal Control Officer
B. Recommendation for Finance Director
Mayor Hunt called the Council meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council
chambers.PRESENT: Siedow, Dunn (arrived at 7:05), Hunt (departed at
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 5, 2001
8:55), Armstrong (arrived at 7:05), DeLapp, City Attorney Filla, City
Engineer Prew, Parks Supervisor Mike Bouthilet, Planner Dillerud, and
Administrator Kueffner.
L AGENDA
M/S/P DeLapp/Siedow — to approve the June 5, 2001 City Council agenda,
as amended. (Motion passed 3-0.)
2. MINUTES
M/S/P Siedow/Armstrong — to approve the May 15, 2001 City Council
minutes, as amended. (Motion passed 4-0- 1 Abstain:DeLapp)
3. CLAIMS
It was noted that $22,385.24 out of the total amount of $59,374.84 was for
the purchase of the new Konica digital copier.
M/S/P DeLapp/Dunn — to adopt Resolution No. 2001-037, approving claim
number 18769 through 18821 in the amount of $59,374.84. (Motion passed
5-0).
4. PUBLIC INQUIRIESANFORMATIONAL
Gloria Knoblauch, 918131 St. N., asked when is the Council going to meet
in a workshop with business owners to settle differences? City Planner
Dillerud responded he is not ready and will be bringing the architectural
guidelines for the Old Village to a future meeting.
William Cheney, 2632 Lisbon Ave. Ct. N., voiced his concern on road safety
in Heritage Farms and provided pictures of cars parked on both sides of the
road. When cars are parked along both sides of these narrow roads, vehicles
cannot make it through, nor could emergency vehicles. It is a dangerous
situation because you would not be able to see children running out between
cars. The green areas have been used as parking lots. The Council pointed
out parking on the common ground would be discussed with the
Homeowners Association.
Administrator Kueffner stated it was the intent to limit the parking because
of the narrow roads in the OP developments, but it was not done. Staff
could draft a resolution restricting parking on one side of the street. A
committee was appointed to look into curbs, cul-de-sacs, and width of
streets.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 5, 2001 2
Administrator Kueffner will look into the records to see if parking
restrictions were intended in Open Space developments and will notify the
HOA when this will be on a Council agenda. A "no parking" resolution will
be provided for the June 19s' agenda.
B. Water Ski Show: Tri-Lakes Association — Joe Kiesling
Joe Kiesling, Tri-Lakes Assoc., requested Council approval of a Water
Surface Use Permit for the Annual Water Ski Show on Lake Jane on August
18, 2001 from 1-5 p.m. The Tri-Lakes Assoc. has secured appropriate
insurance coverage and the Sheriff's Department has signed off on the
permit pending Council approval. The Fire Dept, has been contacted and
will provide an emergency vehicle.
M/S/P DeLapp/Dunn - to approve the permit request of Joe Kiesling, on
behalf of the Tri-Lakes Association, to hold a water ski show on Lake Jane,
August 18, 2001, from 1-5 p.m., based on the submittal of the appropriate
information and on past favorable reports. (Motion passed 5-0.)
C. "Children Playing" signs request by Parkview Homeowner's
Association
The City received a letter from Melissa Bearth, Director of the Parkview
Estates Homeowners Association, requesting placement of "Children
Playing" signs at two entrances to the subdivision. The reason for the
request is the increase of construction traffic through Parkview Estates.
Administrator Kueffner understood the concern of these residents, but
historically the City has declined similar requests. If speeding is the
problem, then it is an enforcement problem where the City can notify the
Washington County Deputies to pay particular attention to this specific area.
M/S/P Dump/DeLapp — to direct the staff to place a temporary "No
Construction Traffic" sign at 16`h Street entrance into Parkview Estates and
at the corner of Inwood and Ivory, place a temporary "Children Playing"
sign in Parkview Estates and look into ways to divert traffic. (Motion
passed 5-0)
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 5, 2001
7. MAINTENANCE/PARK/FIREBUILDING:
A. Brush Removal Program: Dan Olinger
Administrator Kueffner and Maintenance Supervisor, Dan Olinger were
unable to complete a recommendation for a long-term permanent program.
Reasons for this, one being an interest by a private contractor to set up a
compost site in the City. This idea will be on the July agenda of the
Environmental Committee. Many residents have already put brush curbside
expecting the program to continue this year. Staff proposed a one time pick
up of brush the week of June 18-22 (estimated cost $6,000) with work to be
done by Precision Tree Service and that the brush be taken directly to
Buberl's compost/brush site for chipping (estimated cost $4,000). A
citywide flyer advising the residents of this pickup will be mailed at a cost of
$500.
The Council asked that the residents be clearly made aware of the change in
the brush program. The brush removal program was started for people
devastated from storms. The City never budgeted for this program.
M/S/P Armstrong/Dunn — to approve the one-time brush pick up to be
completed the week of June 18-22 (estimated cost $6,000) with work to be
done by Precision Tree Service and that the brush be taken directly to
Buberl's compost/brush site for chipping (estimated cost $4,000) and send
out a citywide notice (estimated cost of $500, if needed) advising residents
of this pickup. (Motion passed 5-0.)
B. Safety Netting for Lions Park
The Fire Department and the Lake Elmo Baseball Association have reported
a problem with baseballs going over the backstop. Two possible solutions
were explored. Extending the current backstop or netting running from the
light poles to the backstop creating a protective hood. The staff and Park
Commission determined that netting would offer more protection.
Staff received two quotes for this netting.
Earl F. Anderson $2,476.20 (Materials only)
First Quality Fence $2,700.00 (Used net on backstop, new outfield,
both installed)
First Quality Fence $3,200.00 (New net on backstop, new outfield,
both installed)
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DUNE 5, 2001 4
Because the used netting was removed from a golf course under an
insurance claim and is still in new condition, Mike Bouthilet recommended
to contract with First Quality Fence to install the used net on the backstop
and new in the outfield.
This was not a specific line item in the 2001 Budget, but there is approx.
$300,000 in the Parks CIP. Staff recommended transferring the money to
fund this project from the CIP Fund to the Parks Repair and Maintenance
Fund.
M/S/P DeLapp/Dunn — to approve the quote from First Quality Fence to
install the used safety net on the backstop and new safety net in the outfield,
for a total cost of $2700, based on a favorable recommendation from the
Parks Commission and Parks Supervisor. (Motion passed 5-0.)
M/S/P DeLapp/Dunn - to move item 9A. for people in attendance. (Motion
passed 5-0).
9. PLANNING. LAND USE & ZONING•
A. Variance Appeal - Kiesling
On May 17, 2001, within the 5 day Appeal window provided for by the City
Code, City Administrator Kueffner appealed the decision of the Planning
Commission regarding the Kiesling variances. The basis for the appeal is
insufficient Findings by the Planning Commission to support the variance
approval decision. The May 10 Planning Staff Report had recommended
denial of the variances and included Findings in support of denial. The
Planning Commission made a singular Finding that the variance standards of
Section 300.06 Subd 3A were complied with by the Kiesling application.
Mr. Kiesling has been officially notified of this Appeal Hearing before the
City Council, acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, as prescribed
by the Zoning Ordinance.
Attorney Filla advised that the Council could affirm Planning Commission's
decision or reverse their decision and deny the variance based on findings or
modify the action of the Commission.
Joe Kiesling passed out a summary of his interpretation of variances granted
for neighbors on both sides of his property, Golish and Johnson. He stated
based on the site plan he is the farthest one from the water and would not
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 5, 2001 5
encroach further onto the lake with his proposed additions. He said he had
met with the Planner who gave him a list of questions on which to base his
findings of fact. He used the same Findings of Fact as Johnson and Dillion
used for their variances. When he came in to apply for the building permit,
he was told the City would hold the permit application because there was
going to be an appeal on it because the Planning Commission did not present
Findings for their decision to approve the variance. He asked why this is an
appeal with the Council rather than sending the application back to the
Planning Commission asking for findings of fact.
Mayor Hunt explained that the City code states the Planning Commission is
responsible for acting on variance requests, and if appealed, the appeal goes
to the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, which is the Council.
Planner Dillerud stated there were findings of fact attached to the staff
report, which was in the form of a resolution for potential denial.
Marls Deziel, 8036 50`1' Street, Second Alternate on the Planning
Commission, stated he was the one that came up with the Findings of Fact
that were handed out to the Council tonight. He stated that he made the
Planning Commission motion to approve the variance; and he reviewed the
tape of the meeting to hear the discussion. He stated that most of the
findings he submitted are identical to the findings made for approval on the
Golish property next door. The nature of the Hardship is the land and the
depth of the land compared to the OHWM. He stated that the nature of a
hardship has to do with the lay of the land. The two parcels are identical as
to the nature of the Hardship. To find one parcel has a Hardship and the
other parcel doesn't have a Hardship is a huge contradiction. It would be
very hard not to be arbitrary and caprecious when such findings are found
and asked the Council to correct the technicality. He stated that he has asked
if aside from the shoreland provisions, would the applicant even need to
make a variance application. The answer was, no. It was the findings of the
Commission for both of the properties that reasonable improvements and
remodeling is a right enjoyed by other property owners in the area. Many
sites were pointed out at the meeting. There was only one vote against the
motion, and it would be his guess today that Commissioner would change
his vote in favor. If there is a technicality because we went through without
writing Findings of Fact there is an administrative mistake of doing things in
the City; and, maybe, Findings of Fact should be stated in favor of the
applicant.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DUNE 5, 2001 6
Council member DeLapp asked Mr. Deziel if he was representing the
Planning Commission or speaking as a Tri-Lakes propertyowner. DeLapp
pointed out that State law requires there have to be unique conditions to
grant a variance.
Planner Dillerud pointed out there was no mistake on the part of the staff to
recommend approval of one case and denial of the other. The argument
went to issues such as scale of resulting residential unit in terms of average
in neighborhood, which was discussed by the Planning Commission. The
Planning Commission said approval of the variance was based on the fact
the variance request meets the variance standards of the code. We believe
there were two distinctly different issues here even though the properties, in
terms of the lot, may be comparable. He suggested the City needed to define
"reasonable", and staff recommended that the "line" be drawn with the
Kiesling scale of lot development. He did receive a FAX from Molly
Shodeen, DNR, voicing DNR's opposition to the variance request.
Mayor Hunt stated it is the Planner's job to take the shoreland ordinance,
interpret it, and make his opinion. If the Council wants to interpret the
ordinance differently, they can. If the Council wants him to just lay the facts
out, Planner Dillerud said he would be happy to do it.
Mr. Deziel responded the Planning Commission determined what is normal
and reasonable. We could either have livable modern homes or shacks down
by the lake. The Commission was advised it could go forward without
findings. In the future, he suggested that the planner not take either side in
his staff report. Mayor Hunt stated this could be brought up at the Planning
Commission for their input.
Molly Shodeen, DNR waters, stated DNR's opposition to issuing this
variance. She stated that some of the comments presented are not correct.
The DNR did not raise the water level of Lake Jane, mother nature did.
There were many homes built in the 50's on lake bed. These houses flooded
in the 70's when the water level rose. The DNR established OHW
elevations in the mid 70's for Lake Jane. This,home is in the flood plain. In
1988 DNR issued a permit to the previous homeowner, to raise the structure.
We gave him 15' around the house and allowed him to encroach beyond the
OHW level by 2'. Also when the structure was raised he could not put on
any decks. That permit was not completed by this propertyowner. The
permit was transferred to Mr. Kiesling when he purchased the home with a
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 5, 2001 7
letter stating 15', no decks and 2'waterward. Mr. Kiesling decided to fill 79'
out into the lake and the lot next to him, The DNR asked him to remove
restoration, and we talked about the deck situation. Mr. Kiesling had put in
patio doors on the lakeside of the house. The DNR told him he could have a
small walkway for egress. We are opposed to deck on lakeside.
Attorney Filla advised that the Kiesling property is in the shoreline area,
therefore, if the shoreland regs conflict with zoning regs, the more restrictive
regulations apply. Shoreland property is more sensitive than other kinds of
variances in the City. Hardship standards for granting a variance under
shoreland regs are in the same manner as under 462 in State Statutes. Even
if there are 5 or 6 statements in the code, it boils down to three. 1. Does the
property owner have reasonable use of property unless the variance is
granted? 2. Is the hardship self created? 3. Will the variance change the
character of the neighborhood? It is the Council's j ob to decide if they want
to grant the variance, and if so, add findings. Since the DNR is opposed to
this request, and have indicated so, you have to provide the DNR a summary
if you grant the variance.
Council member Dunn asked how large is the house now because it looks
over 3,000 sq.ft. with an addition of 1,200 sq.ft., creating a 4,200 sq.ft.
home. This is not a hovel. This lot has.been made artificially bigger
because of the fill brought in.
Mr. Kiesling stated that the Council is singling him out. He pointed other
neighbors who have similar square footage in the area.
Council member Armstrong responded to Mr. Deziel's comment that the
City does not act in an arbitrary and capricious manner. Armstrong advised
she was on the Council when this area had serious flooding problems. With
all due respect to the Planning Commission, it does not have the history of
what the City had done to help the residents. The Shoreland district is very
sensitive and has to be protected.
Molly Shodeen stated that when a permit was issued to raise the structure
there was to be no further encroachment lakeward of the structure. Mr.
Kiesling has filled out into the lake and established more yard than there
would have been. Kiesling removed some of the fill and the DNR allowed
him to keep most of the fill as part of a package deal. This property is not
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 5, 2001 8
like every other property on the lake. This property had problems as the
house is in the lakebed and needed a variance just to raise the structure.
M/S/P Dunn/Armstrong — to direct the staff to draft a resolution with
specific findings discussed at the Council meeting and findings stated in the
staff report to reverse the decision of the Planning Commission regarding the
Kiesling zoning variance for consideration and adoption for the next council
meeting. (Motion passed 3-2:Siedow: The City granted variances to other
ropertyowners, What is proposed will not have much of an impact on water
quality; Hunt:He agreed with the Planning Commission there were unique
conditions to grant the variance which were provided tonight.)
Mayor Hunt stated at a planning seminar he learned if you grant too many
variances for a specific area, this tells you your zoning code needs to be
changed.
Dillerud reported the Planning Commission would be reviewing the
shoreland ordinance for modifications. The City is required by state to
follow the DNR regs.
Molly stated she is not opposed to decks, but decks have a way of becoming
enclosed and becoming living space, and then they add on another deck.
Administrator Kueffner stated the Tri Lakes Assoc. requested a copy of the
City code, and we would waive the purchase cost. Mayor Hunt thought all
Homeowner Associations in the City should have codebooks.
M/S/P Dunn/DeLapp - to direct the staff to make a copy of the City code for
any Homeowners Association (HOA) in the City, for the Tri-Lakes Assoc.
and waive the fee for purchase of code books. (Motion passed 5-0.)
Mayor Hunt left the meeting at 8:55 p.m.
8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT:
A. CSAH13 and 4tn St./Hudson Blvd N. Signal Project (draft)
The City staff met with representatives of Washington County regarding this
project. Administrator Kueffner stated she reiterated to the County the
City's intent to approve a design that was consistent with our philosophical
and previously stated criteria. As shown in the draft, the County has
respected the City's desire to minimize the designation of this road, with one
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 5, 2001 9
very small change. They have proposed to add a right turn lane (paved) as
the gravel shoulder is now constantly used for that purpose. The County
commented that this might cause an inconvenience for vehicular traffic
turning left onto CR13 from Lake Elmo. The lights at this intersection will
be synchronized with the lighting system along Radio Drive. The County
will not modify the timing of this entire corridor in order to provide extra
time to turn from this one location.
Council member DeLapp asked the County to have shielded lights meeting
City code on both sides of the road.
Administrator Kueffner suggested the City date and sign this "draft layout"
so that when the decision does come in, there will be no question as to what
was approved.
M/S/P Armstrong/DeLapp — to approve the draft plan from Washington
County regarding CSAH13 and 4' Street/Hudson Blvd N. Signal Project, to
date and sign this "draft layout" with the minor change proposed, that is the
paving of the right gravel shoulder an improved right turn lane. The
approved layout has 3 lanes on the Lake Elmo side of the intersection.
(Motion passed 4-0).
B. Street Lighting Policy
Tom Prew reported he has prepared a map of areas in the City that he feels
warrant street light consideration. Administrator Kueffner reported that
Staff was directed to provide that analysis and to update the City's policy on
streetlights. The Council had directed the street lighting policy be sent to the
Planning Commission first for review and recommendation, which will be
done as soon as possible.
C. Hill Trail Road Improvement
Tom Prew has completed the survey of the area. After the survey was
completed, the Council asked to have a meeting with the residents in the
area to hear their concerns on drainage and runoff. The Council asked that
an informational meeting be held first between staff and residents and ask
residents to make written comments if they cannot attend this meeting.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DUNE 5, 2001 10
l
D. Watershed Boundary Change Petition
The BCWD and LSCWD have filed a joint petition to correct the legal
boundary between the two organizations. The City received a copy of the
petition, map, letter of support from OPH and the associated Property
Identification Numbers for the individual parcels. The boundary change is
intended to adjust the legal boundary to match as closely as possible with the
hydrologic boundary.
M/S/P Armstrong/DeLapp — to direct staff to send a letter approving this
Watershed Boundary Change as indicated. (Motion passed 4-0.)
E. Escrow Reduction - Carriage Station
Tom Prow reported the developer of Carriage Station has completed the
grading, watermain, storm sewer, and street construction except for the final
wearing course. Turf establishment and landscaping remain. Prow
recommended reduction of the escrow to the following amounts:
Site Grading/Turf Establishment
Watermain
Storm Sewer
Streets
Street Signs
Landscaping
Subtotal
125% Security
$288,300.00 $ 50,000
$218,300.00 $
5,000
$149,200.00
5,000
$365,400.00 $
75,000
$ 1,000.00 $
1,000
$ 86,000.00 $
86,000
$1,108.200.00 $ 222,000
$1,385,250.00 $ 277,500
M/S/P Armstrong/Siedow - to reduce the escrow amount held by the City for
the Carriage Station subdivision from $1,385,250 to $277,500, as
recommended by the City Engineer by the letter dated May 31, 2001.
(Motion passed 3-0. Council member DeLapp stepped out of the meeting
and did not vote.)
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DUNE 5, 2001 11
9. PLANNING. LAND USE, AND ZONING•
B. PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat/Site Plan - Carriage
Station
Planner Dillerud reported that at its May 14 meeting, the Planning
Commission conducted a public hearing and adopted a recommendation
regarding these several concurrent applications to develop Lot 15, Block 1,
Carriage Station as a 4 building office complex, totaling 25,000 sq.ft. of
structures. The sum structure area proposed complies with the conditions of
the original Carriage Station PUD Plan as to use and scale for Lot 15. The
Commission recommended denial of the PUD Development Stage Plan,
which makes the Preliminary Plat and Site Plan applications non -conforming
and invalid. The Commission was of the opinion that the number and degree
of departures from LB zoning district standards proposed was excessive. Of
particular concern was the proximity of non-residential structures and
parking to future residential development that would result from the PUD
Plan proposed. The applicant's decision to propose 4 separate structures to
accommodate the allowable 25,000 sq.ft. of floor area continues to this
perceived conflict.
The Planning Staff Report of May 8 recommended approval of the PUD
plan and resulting Preliminary Plat/Site Plan. The basis for that
recommendation was the probability that a reduction in the number of
structures would result in few structures of greater height and mass than now
proposed.
The lights proposed do not meet the code stated Council member DeLapp,
and he will check into high security lights.
Mr. Arkell stated he was under the impression the Council would like to
have smaller buildings, not two-story buildings. Siedowliked more of the
smaller buildings than larger two-story buildings. Council members Dunn
and Armstrong didn't like the fourth building. DeLapp suggested the site
have minimal parking, but reserve green space in case we need it. If he could
have less parking and keep the maximum 25,000 sq.ft, Mr. Arkell stated he
would consider a three building plan and would eliminate building 4 and add
onto building 3 as an alternative.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 5, 2001 12
M/S/P Armstrong/DeLapp - to table the Carriage Station PUD until June 19
for submittal of drawings per discussion. Council member DeLapp will get
back on security lighting. (Motion passed 4-0.)
C. Planning Commission Old Village Special Projects — Work Plan
Priorities - POSTPONE UNTIL THE JUNE 19the Council meeting
D. Final Plat and Development Contract - Lake Elmo Vista
The Council approved the Preliminary Plat of this RE plat for 11 single
family detached building lots on a site of 35 acres on April 3, 2001. Also
approved was a variance to reduce the right-of-way width of one of the
public streets by 1.09 feet. Tom Steffens presented the Final Plat, provided
construction drawings and cost estimates; and, the Forestation Plan for the
site. The City Attorney prepared a development agreement covering the
infrastructure improvements. An appraisal of the pre -development value of
the site has been completed by Scott Renne (at the applicant's expense) and
the Park Dedication fees payable before plat release is $46,130 (7% of the
appraised site market value).
There was Council discussion on if the code requires for every existing tree
to be identified. Mr. Steffens explained the developer is proposing to provide
100 new trees and will have 6 trees per acre.
Administrator Kueffner cautioned the Council with the planting problem in
Arabian Hills when the residents wanted the City to plant trees because the
developer did not. Attorney Filla had problems with not being specific
enough as to what kinds of trees, the size of the trees, and asked the
developer to provide a plan. Dillerud acknowledged the City has an escrow
for $27,000 and does have a forestation plan. The Council asked that the
distribution of trees be interspersed in equal amounts on each lot as a
condition added to the resolution. Council member DeLapp encouraged side
loading garages even if it is not required by code.
Administrator Kueffner suggested the individual builders provide escrow to
cover placement of the silt fencing because they are the guilty party. It's not
the developers neglecting to install the silt fencing for erosion control.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 5, 2001 13
M/S/P Armstrong/Siedow - to adopt Resolution 2001-038, approving the
Final Plat of Lake Elmo Vista and to adopt Resolution 2001-039 setting
conditions of Final Plat approval to include Condition No. 4. The landscape
plan dated February 9, 2001 shall be amended to reflect the 104 trees
proposed to be added to the site (in addition to boulevard trees) be located in
such a manner as to be evenly distributed upon the 8 lots on which no
existing trees are now located — 13 new trees per lot. (Motion passed 4-0).
9E. Low Impact NonAg Conditional Use Permit Siverson
Neil and Susan Siverson have made application for Low Impact Ag Use of a
nominal 40-acre parcel adjacent and east of Cardinal Ridge that would
include a 16,000 sq.ft., public storage structure, and, an area of unimproved
outside storage for items allowable within the definition of Low Impact Ag.
The application complied with the mandatory design standards of the Low
Impact Ag Section of the Zoning Ordinance.
Planner Dillerud reported the applicant requested reconsideration of the
condition as to hours of opening time to 7 a.m. versus the 8 a.m. opening
time. The legal description of CUP area will be provided with a site plan.
Council member DeLapp indicated this public storage structure is not an Ag
building. The tax assessor will not look at it as an Ag building, but as
commercial operation that meets commercial standards. This building will
have to be sprinkled.
M/S/P Siedow/DeLapp- to adopt Resolution 2001-040, A Resolution
Granting A Conditional Use Permit for a Non -Agricultural Low Impact Use
for Neil Siverson and Susan Otto-Siverson with Condition 18. Opening
Hours of Operation shall be 7 a.m. to be reviewed at annual CUP review and
changed to 8:00 a.m., if there is a problem. Lights proposed are for security.
DeLapp encourage them to use motion sensor lights. (Motion passed 4-0).
11. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:
Council member Dunn asked the status of the Tower Ordinance. Planner
Dillerud will review and report back.
12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 5, 2001 14
13. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
A. Resignation of Animal Control Officer
Administrator Kueffner reported the Council has received a copy of Mike
Smith's resignation as Animal Control Officer and a copy of her response
letter to him. The Council all agreed that Mr. Smith did a good job with
animal control and was very thoughtful and responsible. The ACO sent an e-
mail advising her as of June 7th dog owners, who do not have their dogs
licensed, will be cited. Kueffiier has been talking to other companies that
provide this service.
M/S/P DeLapp/Siedow - to accept the resignation of Animal Control
Officer, Mike Smith with regrets. (Motion passed 4-0.)
B. Recommendation for Finance Director
Administrator Kueffner met with three of the Finance Director candidates
that were selected during the May 22 workshop. Kueffner recommended
Terry Berg, who was well qualified and someone that would fit well in our
office. When determined what the needs are going to be for a future office
position, one of these applicants would be a good asset. The 2001 pay plan
was provided. Administrator suggested Ms. Berg start at Step 1 Finance
Director.
M/S/P Armstrong/ DeLapp - to offer the job of Finance Director to Terry
Berg at the rate of Step 1 Finance Director, 2 weeks vacation, with review
time under 6 months. (Motion passed 4-0.)
Council Adjourn meeting at 10:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by Sharon Lumby, Deputy Cleric
Resolution No. 2001-037 Approve claims 18769-18821 in the amount of
$59,374.84
Resolution No. 2001-038 Approve the Final Plat of Lake Elmo Vista
Resolution No. 2001-039 Setting conditions of Final Plat approval for Lake
Elmo Vista
Resolution No. 2001-040 Granting a Conditional Use Permit for a Non-Ag
Low Impact Use for Neil Siverson and Susan Otto-Siverson
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 5, 2001 15
J05EPH P. KIE5LING
9359 JANE ROAD NORTH
LAKE ELMO, MINNE50TA 55042
1=601mrsilild
IN THE MONTH OF FEBUARY THIS YEAR THE TRI LAKES ASSOCIATION
HELD ITS ANNUAL MEETING. THE GUEST SPEAKERS AT THAT
MEETING WERE MAYOR LEE HUNT AND KEVIN HERBER. THE
QUESTION ASKED OF THESE SPEAKERS INVOLVED BUILDING CODE
AND ORDINANCES AND HOW THEY RELATE TO HOMEOWNERS
SEEKING TO CHANGE THEIR EXISTING HOMES. ANOTHER QUESTION
THAT AROSE FROM THIS DISCUSSION WAS WHAT THE PEOPLE IN THE
TRI LAKES AREA NEEDED TO DO TO CHANGE EXISTING CODES.
EVERYONE LIVING ON THE LAKES IN THE TRI LAKES AREA WISHING
TO REMODEL .IS STILL REQUIRED TO APPLY FOR VARIANCES TO
EXISTING CODES.
MAYOR LEE HUNT WANTED TO KNOW IF IT WOULD 5E 1`0551BLE TO
PUT TOGETHER A STUDY GROUP TO REVIEW THESE ORDINANCES
AND ZONING AND PERHAPS MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS.
THE TRI LAKES A550CIATION CONTACTED THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO.
WE AT THAT TIME REQUESTED THE CITY BULIDING CODES AND
ORDINANCES. TO THIS DATE WE HAVE YET TO RECEIVE THESE
COPIES.
IN JUNE OF THIS YEAR I MADE A FORMAL REQUEST TO THE LAKE
ELMO Cn✓ Y COUNCIL FOR THE DOCUMENTS THAT. MARY FAILED TO
GIVE TO ME OR THE TRI LAKES ASSOCIATION. THE CITY COUNCIL AT
THAT MEETING DIRECTED MARY TO SEND ME A COPY OF THE
f ago 1 of 5
ORDINANCES AND BUILDING CODE. THESE DOCUMENTS WERE TO BE
USED BY THE TRI LAKES A550CIATION FOR THEIR REVIEW. TO DATE I
HAVE YET TO RECEIVE THE REQUESTED DOCUMENTS. DOES THE CITY
ADMINISTRATOR HAVE THE POWER TO OVER RIDE THE CITY COUNCIL?
OR IS THI5 A NOTHER ADJENDA AT WORK HEAkgCOULD TH15 BE JUST
ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR OPERATING AT
HER OWN WHIM?
AT THIS SAME MEETING, MARY MADE A COMMENT ABOUT MY
APEAL OF VARIANCES IN REGARD TO MY REMODELING PROJECT.
HER STATEMENT WAS " I HAVE NOTHING AGAINST MR KIESLING, I'M
ONLY DOING MY JOB. " GIVEN HER APPARENT AGENDA HOW DOES
THI5 FIT WITH HER DOING THE JOB SHE WAS HIRED TO DO?
I ATTENDED ANOTHER MEETING ON THE 23KD OF OCTOBER OF THI5
YEAR. I AGAIN ADDRE55ED"'TH;E" 1ZEQUE5' MADE BY ME FOR THE
BUILDING CODES AND ORDINANCES. HOW MUCH TIME DOES THE CITY
ADMINISTRATOR NEED TO PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION TO THE TRI
LAKES ASSOCIATION? 15 THIS A PLOY TO KEEP THE PEOPLE IN THE
TRI LAKES AREA IN THE DARK AS TO THEIR OPTIONS REGARDING
CODES AND ZONING. IT 15 MY BELIEF THAT THE PEOPLE DIRECTLY
EFFECTED BY THESE ORDINANCES SHOULD HAVE A VOICE IN HOW
THESE REGULATIONS SHOULD BE WRITTEN. GOING BACK TO THE
ANNUAL TRI LAKES MEETING, MAYOR HUNT ATTEMPED TO DEVELOP
A PARTNERSHIP WITH THE TRI LAKES ASSOCIATION. HOW WILL THIS
EFFECT THAT PARTNERSHIP?
THIS 15 MY QUESTION TO THE CITY COUNCIL, JUST WHAT 15 THE CITY
COUNCIL DOING TO RIGHT THI5 MATTER? IT 15 MY OPINION THAT
MARY 1S NOT DOING THE JOB SHE WAS HIRED TO PERFORM. DOES
SHE NOT WORK FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO? IF THAT STATEMENT 15
CORRECT, SHE THEN WORKS
FOR THE TAXPAYERS OF
THIS
CITY
UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL. IT 15 HIGH
TIME
FOR
Page 2 of 5
1
THE CITY COUNCIL TO REVIEW HER PERFORMANCE OR THE LACK
THEREOF. IF 5HE 15 FOUND NOT DOING HER JOB IN A TIMLEY MANER,
IT 5HOULD 5E TIME TO REPLACE HER WITH 50MEONE WITHOUT A
PER50NAL AGEN PA.
AFTER ALL THE BOUNCING AROUND, I COULD DRAW THE
CONCLU55ION THAT THE ONLY VALID REA50N THE CITY WON'T MAKE
THESE ORDINANCE5 AVAILABLE 15 50 THEY CAN BE CHANGED
WITHOUT THE PEOPLE REALIZING WHAT THEY WERE BEING FORCED
TO GIVE UP.
AGAIN, I WANT TO A5K THE CITY COUNCIL, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO
DO ABOUT MARY NOT DOING THE JOB YOU DIRECTED HER TO DO?
Page 3 of 5
CLAIMS TO BE APPROVED AT JUNE 5, 2001 LAKE EL110 COUNCIL 11EETING
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP4007 AP TRANSACTIONS BY VENDOR
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
ACCOUNT NUMBER
BAT TRN
AMOUNT
100
4130
44330
T6/5 28
55.00
MACHINE CHECKS
55.00
100
4130
42160
T6/5 18
228.98
MACHINE CHECKS
228.98
100
4310
44330
T6/5 73
500.00
MACHINE CHECKS
500.00
100
4150
42000
T6/5 8
30.30
MACHINE CHECKS
30.30
100
4220
42200
T6/5 7
36.25
MACHINE CHECKS
36.25
100
4220
42070
T6/5 26
420.00
100
4220
42070
T6/5 52
1,280.00
MACHINE CHECKS
1,700.00
309
0000
46100
T6/5 70
10,500.00
MACHINE CHECKS
10,500.00
100
4520
42250
T6/5 51
345.39
MACHINE CHECKS
345.39
100
4220
44330
T6/5 71
49.97
MACHINE CHECKS
49.97
803
0000
22995
T6/5 31
500.00
MACHINE CHECKS
500.00
100
4220
43200
T6/5 66
58.90
100
4310
43200
T6/5 67
36.21
MACHINE CHECKS
95.11
100
4150
43510
T6/5 2
16.00
12.32PM 05/30/01
PAGE 1
VENDOR
NUMBER VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION
&00008 LEAGUE OF MN HUMAN RIGHTS HUMAN RIGHTS 2001 DUES
&00041 AMERICAN FLAGPOLE & FLAG 4 NEW FLAGS FOR STREETS
&00080 ST OF MN - CPV PROGRAM RENEWAL COOP PURCHASING
&00117 QUICKSILVER FILLA +TKDA DELIVERY
&00153 GRAFIX SHOPPE FIRE DEPT EQUIPMENT PARTS
&00174 ANOKA-HENNEPIN TECH COLLE FIRE SCHOOL -BASIC PUMP
00174 ANOKA-FMHAWIN TECH COLLE HAZ MAT -CHEMICAL TRAINING
&00189 US BANK
&00211 LESCO, INC.
&00236 FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE
&00252 SENN & YOUNGDAHL,INC
&00276 METROCALL
&00276 METROCALL
&00289 COURIER NEWS
INTEREST ON TEMPORARY BOND
PARK SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT SUBSCRIPTION
ROAD DEPOSIT RETURN-4622 LILAC
FIRE DEPT PAGERS
PUBLIC VORKS PAGERS
PART-TIME SUMMER HELP
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE
- AP4007
CITY OF
LAKE ELMO
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
BAT TRN
AMOUNT
MACHINE CBECKS
16.00
100
4150
42070
T6/5 30
35.00
MACHINE CHECKS
35.00
100
4220
43060
T6/5 36
407.50
MACHINE CHECKS
407.50
100
4220
44330
T6/5 22
550.00
MACHINE CHECKS
550.00
100
4150
41300
T6/5 13
197.90
100
4191
41000
T6/5 14
26.85
100
4240
41300
T6/5 15
72.10
100
4310
41300
T6/5 16
125.80
100
4520
41010
T6/5 17
72.10
MACHINE CHECKS
494.75
100
4220
42000
T6/5 12
15.50
MACHINE CHECKS
15.50
100
4310
42230
T6/5 6
233.49
MACHINE CHECKS
233.49
100
4220
42190
T6/5 24
593.67
MACHINE CHECKS
593.67
100
4520
42250
T6/5 54
442.00
MACHINE CHECKS
442.00
100
4520
42210
T6/5 59
160.84
MACHINE CHECKS
160.84
410
0000
45700
T6/5 75
22,385.24
AP TRANSACTIONS BY VENDOR
VENDOR
NUMBER VENDOR NAME
12:32PM 05/30/01
PAGE 2
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
&00308 MCFOA
CYNTHIA YOUNG MEMBERSHIP
&00324 WORKWELL OCCUP.HEALTH
FIREFIGHTERS EKAM + VACCINE
r00332 NFPA
FIRE CODE SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE
&00357 DELTA DENTAL
OFFICE PREMIUM
&00357 DELTA DENTAL
PLANNING PREMIUM
00357 DELTA DENTAL
ELDG INSP PREMIUM
&00357 DELTA DENTAL
PUBLIC WORKS PREMIUM
&00357 DELTA DENTAL
PARKS PREMIUM
&00360 AMEC, INC
FIRE DEPT OFFICE SUPPLIES
&00395 GOLDEN WEST INDUSTRIAL
CRDLESS DRILL KIT
&00414 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY,INC
BAK-MAT CENTER -FIRE DEPT
&00415 B.&E. FENCE CO.
CHAIN LINK FENCE AT BALLFIELD
&00416 GREENIMAGE
PARKS PARTS & REPAIR
&00417 COPY IMAGES, INC. NEW KONICA COPY MACHINE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP4007
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
ACCOUNT NUMBER
BAT TRN
AMOUNT
MACHINE CHECKS
22,385.24
100
4150
44000
T6/5 25
59.84
MACHINE CHECKS
59.84
100
4130
42160
T6/5 72
43.79
MACHINE CHECKS
43.79
100
4155
43000
T6/5 49
1,500.00
MACHINE CHECKS
1,500.00
100
4310
42240
T6/5 29
376.00
MACHINE CHECKS
376.00
100
4310
42230
T6/5 20
67.20
MACHINE CHECKS
67.20
100
4150
41300
T6/5 46
74.61
100
4310
41300
T6/5 47
520.02
100
4520
41010
T6/5 48
198.57
MACHINE CHECKS
793.20
100
0000
32261
T6/5 53
190.00
MACHINE CHECKS
190.00
601
4940
42500
T6/5 35
1,739.50
MACHINE CHECKS
1,739.50
100
4150
42000
T6/5 45
106.00
MACHINE CHECKS
106.00
100
4160
43000
T6/5 43
1,534.42
100
4160
43200
T6/5 44
427.24
MACHINE CHECKS
1,961.66
100
4270
41100
T6/5 56
895.00
AP TRANSACTIONS BY VENDOR
VENDOR
NUMBER VENDOR NAME
000006 AMERI PRIDE
000040 FOUR SEASONS SERVICE
000042 F.X.L.
000046 GARELICK STEEL COMPANY
000048 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL
12:32PM 05/30/01
PAGE 3
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
CITY BALL BLDG MAINTENANCE
BUILDING SUPPLIES
MONTHLY ASSESSOR PAYMENT
PUBLIC WORKS STREET SUPPLIES
PUBLIC WORKS MISC
000081 MINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSN. OFFICE PREMIUM
000081 MINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSN. PUBLIC WORKS PREMIUM
000081 MINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSN. PARKS PREMIUM
000092 GREG MALMQUIST
000113 OAKDALE
000120 PITNEY BOWES
BURNING PERMITS TBRU 5/25/01
APRIL WATER PURCHASED
POSTAGE METER
000129 PETERSON FRAM & BERGMAN APRIL LEGAL
000129 PETERSON FRAM & BERGMAN DEVELOPERS APRIL LEGAL
000139 MICHAEL SMITH ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP4007 AP TRANSACTIONS BY VENDOR 12.32PM 05/30/01
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
PAGE 4
ACCOUNT NUMBER
BAT TRN
AMOUNT
100
4270
44150
T6/5 57
175.00
MACHINE CHECKS
1,070.00
602
4945
43000
T6/5 42
41.18
MACHINE CHECKS
41.18
100
4220
42180
T6/5 33
306.84
MACHINE CHECKS
306.84
100
4220
43200
TG/5 68
19.55
100
4520
43200
T6/5 69
29.08
MACHINE CHECKS
48.63
100
4220
42000
T6/5 21
234.28
MACHINE CHECKS
234.28
100
4310
43840
T6/5 32
3,123.00
MACHINE CHECKS
3,123.00
100
4150
41300
T6/5 37
2,113.40
100
4191
41000
T6/5 38
364.70
100
4240
41300
T6/5 39
729.40
100
4310
41300
T6/5 40
968.80
100
4520
41010
T6/5 41
187.03
MACHINE CHECKS
4,363.33
100
4150
41300
T6/5 60
211.33
100
4191
41000
T6/5 61
61.40
100
4240
41300
T6/5 62
57.12
100
4310
41300
T6/5 63
149.81
100
4520
41010
T6/5 64
54.44
MACHINE CHECKS
534.10
100
4220
43200
TG/5 5
39.37
VENDOR
NUMBER VENDOR NAME
000139 MICHAEL SMITH
000183 QWEST
000204 ASPEN MILLS INC.
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
VESICLE ACO
HUDSON RD LIFT STATION
FIRE DEPT UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
000232 AT&T CONSUMER LEASE SERV FIRE DEPT PHONES
000232 AT&T CONSUMER LEASE SERV PARRS DEPT PHONES
000440 HOWARD, CHRIS
000501 ARCA RECYCLING
000589 MEDICA
000589 MEDICA
000599 MEDICA
000589 MEDICA
000589 MEDICA
000590 UNITED WISCONSIN GROUP
000590 UNITED WISCONSIN GROUP
000590 UNITED WISCONSIN GROUP
000590 UNITED WISCONSIN GROUP
000590 UNITED WISCONSIN GROUP
000592 AT & T WIRELESS
COMPUSA COMPUTER REPAIR
CLEAN-UP DAY/APPLIANCE RECYCLE
OFFICE PREMIUM
PLANNING PREMIUM
BLDG INSP PREMIUM
PUBLIC WORKS PREMIUM
PARKS PREMIUM
OFFICE PREMIUM
PLANNING PREMIUM
BUILDING INSP PREMIUM
PUBLIC WORKS PREMIUM
PARKS PREMIUM
FIRE DEPT CELLULARS
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP4007 AP TRANSACTIONS BY VENDOR 12:32PM 05/30/01
CITY OF LAKE =0
PAGE 5
VENDOR
ACCOUNT NUMBER
BAT TRN
AMOUNT
NUMBER
VENDOR NAME
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
MACHINE CHECKS
39.37
100
4150
42000
T6/5 11
140.37
000603
ST.CROIX OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
100
4150
42000
T6/5 55
262.11
000603
ST.CROIX OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MACHINE CHECKS
402.48
100
4220
42000
T6/5 50
80.30
000607
HERITAGE
FIRE DEPT BUSINESS CARDS
MACHINE CHECKS
80.30
100
4520
43860
T6/5 1
692.56
000611
BIFFS, INC.
PARK SATELITES
MACHINE CHECKS
692.56
100
4150
43200
T6/5 65
160.13
000613
AVAYA, INC.
OFFICE PHONES
MACHINE CHECKS
160.13
601
4940
42400
T6/5 10
172.31
000617
US FILTER DISTRIBUTION
WATER FUND 1" METER
MACHINE CHECKS
172.31
100
4220
42180
T6/5 19
373.25
000710
FIRE EQUIP.SPECIALTIES
FIREFIGHTER BOOTS ETC
MACHINE CHECKS
373.25
100
4150
42000
TG/5 34
400.00
000727
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV
POSTAGE FOR METER
MACHINE CHECKS
400.00
100
4310
42240
T6/5 27
75.53
000731
NORTHERN
PUBLIC WORKS STREET SUPPLIES
100
4310
42240
T6/5 58
165.05
000731
NORTHERN
PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIES
100
4310
42180
T6/5 74
24.48
000731
NORTHERN
PUBLIC WORKS RAINSUIT
MACHINE CHECKS
265.06
100
4220
43230
T6/5 9
165.00
000777
BEAR COM
FIRE DEPT RADIO SERVICE
MACHINE CHECKS
165.00
100
4150
41300
T6/5 3
12.00
000783
566200-NCPERS GROUP LIFE
OFFICE PREMIUM
100
4310
41300
T6/5 4
12.00
000783
566200-NCPERS GROUP LIFE
PUBLIC WORKS PREMIUM
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - AP4007 AP TRANSACTIONS BY VENDOR 12:32PM O5/30/01
CITY OF LAKE ELMO PAGE 6
ACCOUNT NUMBER
100 4520 42210
BAT TRN AMOUNT
MACHINE CHECKS 24.00
T6/5 23 666.84
MACHINE CHECKS 666.84
MANUAL CHECKS 0.00
MACHINE CHECKS 59,374.84
FINAL TOTAL 59,374.84
VENDOR
NUMBER VENDOR NAME
000791 FARM PLAN
INVOICE DESCRIPTION
PARRS TRACTOR REPAIR
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
2001 BILLING SUMMARY
MONTH
11136
Administration
11140
Criminal Pros
11146
Public Imp. Proj
11150
Community Dev
11166
Civil Litigation
11161
Auto Forfelture
TOTAL
Jan
$1,576.43
$142.50
$322.06
$2,040.99
Feb
$943.92
$478.21
$1,422.13
March
$1,030.39
$104.50
$400.61
$1,535.50
April
$1,534.42
$427.24
$1,961.66
May
$0.00
June
$0.00
July
$0.00
Aug
$0.00
Sept
$0.00
Oct
$0.00
Nov
$0.00
Dec
$0.00
Totals
$5,085.16
$0.00
$247.00
$1,628.12
$0.00
$0.00
$6,960.28
5/11/01
Suite P (ERSON
50 Eastt Fifth Street �
St. Paul, MN 55 101.1 197 FRAM BERGVIAN
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
3800 Laverne Avenue North
Lake Elmo MN 55042
Administration
(651) 291.8955
(651) 228.1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID #41-0991098
Page: 1
04/30/01
ACCOUNT NO: 11135-920001M
STATEMENT NO: 112
HOURS
04/02/01 JPF Review council agenda; tele planner; prep for.
meeting. 1.10 104.50
04/03/01 JPF Attend council meeting. 4.50 427.50
JPF Telephone conference with adm re: council agenda,
items. 0.50 47.50
04/06/01 JPF
Review clean up day lease; tele clerk; prep auth to
burn for fire dept.
0.40
38.00
04/09/01 JPF
Telephone conference with Malmquist; prep Lk Okabera
agreement.
0.60
57.00
JPF
Review PC agenda.
0.40
38.00
04/12/01 JPF
Telephone conference with clerk re: council agenda
and minutes.
0.30
28.50
04/13/01 JPF Review council agenda, Hiner proposal; Cardinal
Ridge variance; prep for meeting. 1.10 104.50
JPF Review memo re: cond. use Erban ppty; county
recorder re: Carriage Homes esmts. 0.40 38.00
04/17/01 JPF Telephone conference with planner re: agenda. 0.30 28.50
JPF Prepare for and attend council meeting. 2.50 237.50
JPF Telephone conference with adm re: agenda; re:
gambling regs; rev state and city regs. 0.90 85.50
04/18/01 JPF Telephone conference with clerk re: Weiner motion. 0.20 19.00
JPF Telephone conference with adm re: gambling regs and
201 system. - 0.50 47.50
04/23/01 JPF Review PC agenda; tele planner re: agenda. 0.40 38.00
04/27/01 JPF Telephone conference with adm re: open burning regs
and revisions to code. 0.30 28.50
THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300 PERSON,_
50 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55101-1197 FRp,M �`BERGMAN
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
Administration
(650 291.8955
(651) 228.1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID #41-0991098
Page: 2
04/30/01
ACCOUNT NO: 11135-920001M
STATEMENT NO: 112
04/30/01 JPF Review council agenda; tele adm re: open burning
rags; research; tele adm re: implementation of OP
rags.
Jerome P. Filla
FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED
Photocopies
Fax Charge - Local
TOTAL EXPENSES THRU 04/30/01
SALES TAX ON EXPENSES
TOTAL CURRENT WORK
BALANCE DUE
HOURS
1.70 161.50
16.10 1,529.50
16.10 1,529.50
1.60
3.00
4.60
0.32
1,534.42
$1,534.42
THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300 P ERSON,
50 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55101I197 F W BERGMAN
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
3600 Laverne Avenue North
Lake Elmo MN 55042
(651)291-8955
(651) 228.1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID #41.0991098
Page: 1
04/30/01
ACCOUNT NO: 11150M
-FEES
EXPENSES
ADVANCES
BALANCE
11150-000001
Tjosvold-Zerher OP Development
114.00
3.85
0.00
$117.85
11150-000003
RECO Property Permits
123.50
0.00
0.00
$123,50
11150-010003
Hiner Development PUD
85.50
0.00
0.00
$85.50
11150-980010
ZINTL OP
28.50
0.00
0.00
$28.50
11150-990006
Carriage Homes Development
25.00
2.89
44.00
$71.89
376.50
6.74
44.00
$427.24
THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEIVED. AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH's STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2001- `�' ",]
A RESOLUTION APPROVING CLAIMS
BE IT RESOLVED THAT Claim Number 18769 through 18821 in
the amount of $59,374.84 are hereby approved.
ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 5th of June, 2001.
Lee Hunt, Mayor
ATTEST:
Mary Kueffner, City Administrator
Lee Hunt
Councilmembers:
Steve DeLapp
Susan Dunn
Rosemary Armstrong
Chuck Siedow
Lake Elmo City Council
Tuesday
JUNE 59 2001
-U /
3800 Laverne Avenue No.
Lake Elmo, AIIN 55042
777-5510 777-9615 (fax)
LakeElmoNW@aol.com
E-Mail
Please read: Since the City Council does not have time to discuss every point presented, it may appear that
decisions are preconceived. However, staff provides background information to the City
Council on each agenda item in advance; and decisions are based on this information and
experience. In addition, some items may have been discussed at previous council meetings.
If you are aware of information that has not been discussed, please fill out a "Request to
Appear Before the City Council form; or, if you came late, raise your hand to be recognized.
Comments that are pertinent are appreciated. Items may be continued to a future meeting if
additional time is needed before a decision can be made.
Agenda
City Council Meeting Convenes 7:00 PM
Pledge of Allegiance
1. Agenda
2. Minutes
May 15, 2001
3. Claims
4. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL:
A. Public Inquiries
B. Water Ski Show:Tri Lakes Assoc.:Joe
Kiesling
l
C. "Children Playing" signs request by
Parkview Homeowner's Assoc.
5. NEW BUSINESS:
6. CONSENT AGENDA:
A.
7. MAINTENANCE/PARK/FIRE/BUILDING
A. Brush Removal Program:Dan Olinger
B. Safety Netting for Lions Park
S. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT
Tom Prew
A. CSAH 13 and 41h Street/Hudson Blvd. N.
Signal Project (draft)
B. Street Lighting Policy
C. HillTrail Road Improvement
D. Watershed Boundary Change Petition
:ake Elmo City Council Agenda
June 5, 2001
9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING:
C. Dillerud
rage t
A. PUBLIC HEARING:Appeal of
Variances: Joe Viesling, 9359 Jane Road
B. PUD Development Stage
Plan/Preliminary Plat, Site
Plan:Carriage Station
C. Planning Commission Old Village
Special Projects -Work Plan Priorities
D. Final Plat and Development Contract —
Lake Elmo Vista
E. Low Impact Non-Ag Conditional Use
Permit:Siverson
10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:
11. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:
A. Mayor Hunt
B. Council Member DeLapp
C. Council Member Dunn
D. Council Member Armstrong
E. Council Member Siedow
12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
13. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
A. Resignation of Animal Control Officer
B. Recommendation for Finance Director
Planning Commission and Special
MAC Commission Meeting,
Wednesday, June 6, 7 p.m.
Fire Station, 3819 Laverne Avenue N.