Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-04-80 CCMLAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 4, 1980 Mayor Armstrong convened the meeting at 5:30 p.m. Councillors in attendance: Mottaz, Morgan, Novak, and Pott. Also Administrator Whittaker and Building Inspector Rosenau. AGENDA: Miscellaneous addition — Typewriter, Ridgeway Drive, NSP gas line, and Park Shelter. Morgan moved, seconded by Armstrong, to approve the Agenda as amended. Motion carried 5-0- MINUTES: Mottaz moved, seconded by Novak, to approve the minutes of February 14, 1980, as written. Motion carried 5-0. February 19, 1980 — Corrections — Motion on the February 19, 1980, minutes to reflect Morgan abstained on approval of the February 5, 1980 minutes. Add motion approving the Claims — Morgan moved, seconded by Mottaz, to approve Claims 80014 through 80057. Motion carried 5-0. Claim 50058, Jim Schultz, approved later that evening. Morgan moved, seconded by Armstrong, to approve the minutes of February 19, 1980, as amended. Motion carried 5-0. CLAIMS: Claim 80066 will be held until the final design of the Maintenance Building is set. The Administrator will check why the amount of the NSP claim is so high this month, claim 80070, — are the electric pump charges being billed to the City from Valley Branch? Morgan moved, seconded by Novak, to approve Claims 80059 through 80094, with the exception of the above. Motion carried 5-0. BUILDING PLAN/CAPITAL PLAN: Mottaz and Whittaker attended a meeting at the F.I.R.E. Center at the University to gain information on Fire Department planning. Also contacted was Mr. Mooers of the ISO, the City Administrator of Apple Valley, and the Fire Chief in Edina, who does consulting work. The Administrator advised the Council to further consider all alternatives for improving fire protection; then, adopt an overall plan for buildings, equipment, and man— power needs for the future. Administrator Whittaker and Councilman Mottaz recommended the Council form a committee to look into the over—all Fire Department planning before buying a truck or building another fire hall. Members of the committee would include two Council members, two firemen, three residents from various sections of the City and the City Administrator. Mottaz moved, seconded by Armstrong, to authorize the Administrator to set up a seven member study group to review and consider alternatives br improving fire protection, and building, equipment and manpower needs for the City. The group will report their findings to the Council within three months. Motion carried 5-0. Pott and Mottaz will serve as Council representatives. Maintenance Building Alternatives — The Council reviewed the alternatives and discussed costs and the need to centralize the Maintenance Department. The Administrator urged the Council to make a decision as there is an immediate need for this building. The Council will hold a special meeting March 12, 1980, to decide which alternative will be built. DINNER BREAK: Bens Elmo Inn P ORDINANCE NO. 7905 CITY OF TAKE E:LMO WASHI:NGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1300 Or THE 1979 MUNICIPAL CODE OP LAKE; ELMO. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo ordains: Section 1. Amendment. Section 1300 of the 1979 Municipal Code of the City of Lake Elmo is hereby amended by adding Section 1303 thereof to read as follows: 1303.030 Purpose. It is the purpose of this Ordinance to preclude trapping except where specifically approved by the landowner. 1303.020 Violations. It shall be unlawful to: a. Set traps within the City of Lake Elmo without the written permission of the fee owner or contract purchaser of the real property upon which the traps are to be set. Permission from a tenant or person holding any other interest in the real property is not valid. b. To set:, traps in any park or other public property except for public purposes upon order of: the governmental body responsible for or owning the real property. c. To place any trap within five hundred (500) feet of a building occupied by human beings, livestock or domestic animals, without permission of the owner of said building. d. To place traps within two hundred (200) feet of a public right-of-way for roads. e. To set or place traps which do not have the trapper's name and either his address or his driver's license I number etched onto the trap or onto a metal tag which is welded, brazed or soldered to the trap or affixed to the trap with a tightly twisted wire or solid metal ring. f. To set or place traps within fifty (50) feet of the shoreline of any lake, swamp, stream or other public water. 1303.030. Permission. The written permission must contain a statement alf-o-w-I-Ag-"the trapper to place his traps, and a. be signed by the fee owner or contract purchaser, b. dated within six (6) months, and C. contain a drawing map or diagram showing the boundaries of the landowner's real property. 1303.040. Penalty . Any person, firm or corporation violating the provisioR"if-this Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. 1303.050. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and Fe-'Uh—F-F&J-7-rom and after its passage and publication, as provided by law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo this 4th day of March, 1980. ATTEST: LaurenceFT—.Whittaker City Administrator 4om-as G. Armstrong, May - or --,— -2- ORDINANCL' NO. 7906 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHI'NGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES. Section 1. The following described lands classified on the Zoning District map as set forth in Section 301.070 c (1) as A (Agriculture) are hereafter classified as R-1 (one family residential) for zoning purposes and shall be subject to all zoning regulations applicable to a one family residential district: That part of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter. of Section 4, Township 29 North, Range 2.1 West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter.; thence South 88 degrees, 25 minutes, 35 seconds West, bearing oriented to the Washington County Coordinate System, South Zone, along the north line: of said South half of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 418.44 feet to the point beginning; thence South 23 degrees, 33 minutes, 24 seconds West. 617.30 feet to the centerline of 55th Street as described in Document No. 387380 as recorded in the Office of the County Recorder., Washington County, Minnesota; thence North 66 degrees, 36 minutes, 36 seconds West, along said center line, a distance of 353.22 feet; thence northwesterly along said center line and a tangential curve, concave to the northeast, having a radius of 500.00 feet and a central angle of 44 degrees, 56 minutes, 21 seconds a distance of 392.17 feet; thence North 21 degrees, 40 minutes, 15 seconds West., along tangent and along said center line, a distance of 50.00 feet; thence northwesterly along said center lane and a tangential curve, concave to the southwest:, having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 17 degrees, 50 minutes, 5& seconds, a distance of 93.46 feet to a point on the north line of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence North 88 degrees, 25 minutes, 35 seconds East, along said north line, a distance of 4.62 feet to the northwest- corner of the Southeast quarter of the North- east Quarter of said Section 4; thence continue North 88 degrees, 25 minutes, 35 seconds East., along said north line, a distance of 898.55 feet to the point of beginning, containing 7.14 acres, more or less. Subject to a 30 foot wide permanent road easement adjoining the southerly, southwesterly, and westerly lines of said tract as described in Document No. 387380. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be enforced from and after its passage and publication according to law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo this 4th day of: March _, 1980. Thomas G. Armstrong, Mayor. ATTEST: ."C \.f -V' (.1 -( �..�.... .1 Z� Z.i t.,._... Laurance E. Oh.i.t;taker - City Adm.i-nistrator - 2 -- LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 4, 1980 —2— TRAPPING ORDINANCE: Mayor Armstrong referenced Ed Nielsen"s proposed ordinance dated February 28, 1980 and read his alternative proposal. Ed Nielsen stated he felt Armstrong's proposal contained more than what is required. He sug— gested deleting number 5, Insurance Requirement, item 2. c., Trapping within 500 ft. of a building, and 2. d., Trapping witnin 200 ft. of road right—of—way. Mayor Armstrong defended the insurance provision stating that the $5,000 bond would insure that trappers would be responsible for injury to a person or animal if they violate the ordinance. Lloyd Knutson, DNR, disagreed with 2. c., and stated a landowner has the right to protect his own property. He feels an ordinance should protect the rights of landowners in keeping unwanted trespassers off their land, but, also allow these activities if the landowner so desires. Minnesota State Trespass Law covers many of the items included in this ordinance. Councilman Mottaz disagreed that leg —hold traps and trapping are the only effective way to control animal population and nuisance animals. Council discussion — Mottaz rejects all other proposals and proposes the original ordinance of banning all spring jawed steel traps. Morgan feels the ordinance, as proposed, is a reasonable compromise, but feels the insurance bond unnecessary. Also, provision should be made to prohibit setting of traps on or in beach areas withat permission or knowledge of the property owner. Armstrong proposed wording to the effect no traps will be set within 50" of the water line of property adjoining lakes, streams, swamps or other water areas without landowners permission. The legality of this provision will be verified by the City Attorney. Novak felt the insurance provision unnecessary, and suggested rewording 2. b., to limit permission only to persons working under the direction of the governing body to handle a nuisance problem. Pott questioned the necessity of item 4 and 5. General agreement was to delete 4 and 5. Armstrong moved, seconded by Morgan, to prepare a final document containing the following changes: 22b., To set traps in any park or other public property except for public p poses upon the order of the governmental body responsible for or owning the real property. 2;c., To place any trap within five hundred (500) feet of a building occupied by human beings, livestock, or domestic animals without first notifying the owner. 2. f., To set traps within 50 ft. of the beach line of property adjoining lakes, streams, swamps, or other meandered water areas without the landowners permission. Delete items 4 and 5. Item 6 to become 4 and item 7 to become 5. The opinion of the City Attorney will be secured, and if necessary any DNR attorney. The final ordinance (7905) to be considered at the March 18 or April 1, 1980 meeting. Discussion: Mottaz stated his oppositon to the revised ordinance, reitterated his position on why leg —hold traps should be banned and refuted many of the statements supporting their use. Pott recommended amending the motion to include adoption of the ordinance in its final form if it is legally appropriate. Morgan agreed. The City has recieved 18 letters opposing the use of leg —hold traps, and supporting an ordinance banning their use. Petitions containing 86 signatures were presented to the Mayor upholding the right to trap and the use of leg —hold traps. Lloyd Knutson stated if the City desires the DNR will make courses available on trapping in the fall. Armstrong amended the original motion that Ordinance 7905 be adopted subject to approval of the City Attorney as to legality. Morgan seconded. Motion carried 4-1. Mottaz opposed. Novak recommended the work "Trapping" be included on the "Hunting" signs in the City. The Council agreed. LAKE ELMO TRAPPING ORDINANCE An ordinance regulating trapping within the City of Lake Elmo. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO ORDAINS: 1. Purpose. It is the purpose of this ordinance to preclude trapping except where specifically approved by the landowner.. 2. Violations. It shall be unlawful to: a. Set traps within the City of Lake Elmo without the written dated permission of the fee owner or contract purchaser of the real. property upon which the traps are to be set. Per- mission from a tenant or person holding any other interest in the real property is not valid. '' I b. To set traps in any park or other public property S+itirocrt-" teY C �t ¢'2 > he -written and-d � ,,.--,� �siad-..pe,rmissi�n of the governmental body responsible for or owning the real property. C. To place any trap within five hundred (500) feet of a building occupied by human beings, livestock or domestic an imalcss�9.--U� j "Pp n,r v. J'-"A.u,.-, cs1 { H..e 6,-t vv �a.. � d � s" d. Toplace traps within two hundred (200) feet of a public right-of-way for roads. e. To set or place traps which do not have the trapper's name and either his address or his driver's license number etched onto the trap or onto a metal tag which is welded, brazed or soldered to the trap or afixed to the trap with a tightly twisted wire or solid metal ring. f." To a'l:Yow-txraps�Att-aet er pi�eed when_ -a prepping- season is_aot _-e€ferts--•-� `,wa 3. Permission. The wr n ra ss on st con a n A b�tateme t 6l. _ o � ing the trapper to place his traps, and a. be signed by the fee owner or contract purchaser, aa(�1 +• b. dated within six (6) months, and .c, contain a drawing map or diagram showing the boundaries of the landowner's real. property. 4. Eistration. I A1.l pars register with the City Offic., giving and driver's licenne number, if any./ 5. Insurance. An the City of Lake Elmo shall that person, flem or corpora 6Yess than Five Thousand ($5, damage which might arie ou lawful activity invol.vin pe alternative, any person, I ox Five Thousand ($4,000.00 Dollar (rapping within the City shall it name, address, telephone number rAon, firm or corporation, trapping within lsh proof upon registration with the City, that has liability insurance in an amount of not 00) Dollars for personal injury and property the placing or setting of any traps or any un- ng within the City of Lake Elmo. In the \corporation may post: a bond in the amount of 6. penalty. Any person, firm or corporation violating the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage and publication, as provided by law. Adopted by the City Council, City of Lake Elmo, this 4th day of March, 1980. Thomas C. Armstrong Mayor ATTEST: Laurence E. Wl:ittaker��T���� Clerk 4 4 Lake Elmo Tr.apaing Ordinance t The purpose of the ordinance is -to provide protection to private landowners from unwanted trespass, while allowing For the regulated harvest and control of wild animals. It will be unlawful to scat or place a trap on any lands within the City of Lake Elmo without written .landowner permission. Permission is to be dated and can be obtained for the trapping season with land- owners approval (signature). Landowner property boundaries are to be identified on a map or drawing and carried on the trapper's person. No trapping is allowed on county or city park property without proper government approval. The State of iiinnesota Trapping rules and regulations will be enforced 4- the city of Lake Elmo. The: Washington County Conservation _lfficer, Mr. Paul Rice (439-7920) will be called if infractions Occur. The city signs could be mocified to say: Hunting and Trapping ordinances will be enforced. The DNR (PSr. Lloyd w. Knud,son, 464-�5200) will work with the Pli.nnescta Trappers Association to conduct a Trapper educa;)sion work- shop in Lake Elmo prior to the 1980 trapping season. Local trappers will be encouraged to attend the: meeting through announcements in the "Lake Elmo Nt;wsle:tter" and the, "Fran Press". Mr. Larry Whittaker will notify the newspapers, of the subject and date through corres- pondence with i'Sr. Knudson. 2/2©/60 a LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 4, 1980 -3- SPRINGBORN - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING AND MINOR SUBDIVISION: j Bruce Folz reviewed the property location. The Planning Commission recom- mended rezoning the 16i14 A tract to R-1, and allowing the parcel to be divided into a 7.14 A parcel and a 9 A parcel. Folz stated the 7.14 A tract would be the minimum building site due to the soil type and area necessary to locate the drainfield. The Planning Commission did not want to leave a non -conforming lot (9.05) in Ag. The surrounding area is R-1, therefore, they recommended rezoning the entire tract thus amending the Comp Plan to include this R-1 area and a minor subdivision on the 7.14 A tract. Armstrong did not feel the City could legally rezone the 9A parcel without the legal description being given in the hearing notice. Zoning to the north and east is RR now. The Comp Plan provides R-1 to the north line of of the property on the east and west. Armstrong moved, seconded by Pott, to approve the Springborn request to amend the Comprehensive Plan, Resolution 80-11, adopting Ordinance 7906, rezoning 7.14 acres, and approving that Minor Subdivision, Resolution 80-12. Motion carried 5-0. This approval allows only one house to be built on the 7.14 A site as only one area meets the one acre drainfield requirement due to the topography of the parcel. The Council did not rezone the remaining parcel (per Planning Commission recommendation) since the legal descr#tion of this piece was not included in the notice sent to surrounding property owners and questioned its legality. HASELEY REZONING: Bruce Folz explained the difficulties in surveying a parcel this time of year. Mr. Hjelmgren submitted the perc tests and requested soil borings. Bob Wier indicated, barring unusual soil conditions, an adequate system could be located on the lot. Don Raleigh said clear title will have to be secured, but the record indicates Haseleyes hold ownership. No notification was sent to the adjacent neighbors, as the Council had agreed. Armstrong moved, seconded by Morgan, to table any action until March 18, 1980. Motion carried 5-0. Bob Wier will review the perc test and soil boring results and verify its compliance with the Ordinance. Any area of non-compliance should be noted for the Council. The title opinion of the City Attorney to become part of this record. DICK HEROLD - WASHINGTON COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT - COUNTY ROAD 6 PLANS: Mr. Herold requested Council approval of plans and a parking agreement for County 6. He reviewed the plans, the drainage problem, the proposed routing of water along County 6, and location and size of culverts along said route. Armstrong moved, seconded by Morgan, to approve Resolution 80-13A, requiring parallel parking on County Road 6; and Resolution 80-13B, plan approval for County Road 6, required to expend State Aid Funds. Motion carried 5-0. ENGINEERING STANDARDS: Larry Bohrer reviewed his draft Engineering Standards. Policy recommendations include grading and preparing utility easements the j same as streets and boulevards, so these easements will be used for their intended purpose. This would provide for an additional 20 ft. of clearing along roads. He does not feel utility easements should be designated unless they are intended to be used. Other standards for consideration is reestablishing turf with no signs of erosion after a development finishes its streets. Also, ponding criteria for commercial and residential areas, and drainage R-80-11 RESOLUTION CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION GRANTING A MINOR SUBDIVISION AND REZONING FOR HOWARD SPRINGBORN. WHEREAS, Howard Spri.ngborn has made application to the City of Lake Elmo for a rezoning and minor subdivision on the following described real estate located in the City of Lake Elmo, Washington County, Minnesota, legally described as follows, to -wit: That part of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 29 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence South 88 degrees, 25 minutes, 35 seconds West, bearing oriented to the Washington County Coordinate System, South Zone, along the North line of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 418.44 feet to the point beginning; thence South 23-degrees, 33 minutes, 24 seconds West 617.30 feet to the centerline of 55th Street as described in Document No. 387380 as recorded in the Office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota; thence North 66 degrees, 36 minutes, 36 seconds West, along said center line, a distance of 353.22 feet; thence northwesterly along said center line and a tangential curve, concave to the northeast, having a radius of. 500.00 feet and a central angle of 44 degrees, 56 minutes, 21. seconds a distance of 392.17 feet; thence North 21 degrees, 40 minutes, 1.5 seconds West, along tangent and along said center line, a distance of 50.00 feet; thence northwesterly along said center line and a tangential curve, concave to the southwest, having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 17 degrees, 50 minutes, 56 seconds, a distance of 93.46 feet to a point on the north line of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence North 88 degrees, 25 minutes, 35 seconds East, along Y a*s said north line, a distance of 4.62 feet to the northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the North- east Quarter of said Section 4; thence continue North 88 degrees, 25 minutes, 35 seconds Fast, along said north line, a distance of 898.55 feet to the point of beginning, containing 7.14 acres, more or less. Subject to a 30 foot wide permanent road easement adjoining the southerly, southwesterly, and westerly lines of said tract as described in Document No. 387380. WHEREAS, it appears that a rezoning is necessary since the above -described real estate is presently zoned A (Agriculture) and the proposed use is permitted only in R-1 (single family residential) districts; and WHEREAS, it appears the above -described land was not at the time of the application a separately described parcel of record; and WHEREAS, there does not appear to be any reason related to the public health, safety and welfare which would require a denial of said rezoning and minor subdivision for said property; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission considered the proposed rezoning and minor subdivision on reb.ruary� 25 , 1980 and recommended the approval thereof; NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo as follows: 1. The application of Howard Springborn for a rezoning and minor subdivision is, hereby granted. Adopted by the City Council. of the City of Lake Elmo this 4th day of March, 1.980. Thomas G. Armstrong, Mayor ATTEST: Laurence E. Whittaker City Administrator -2- R-80-12 -I RESOLUTION CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY OF .LAKE ELMO. WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo adopted a Comprehensive Plan for said City, the most recent revision of which was adopted in 1979, and WHEREAS, Howard Springborn has been granted a rezoning and variance on certain property located in the City of Lake Elmo, County of Washington, legally described as follows: That part of the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 4, Township 29 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter.; thence South 88 degrees, 25 minutes, 35 seconds West, bearing oriented to the Washington County Coordinate System, South Zone, along the north line of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 418.44 feet to the point beginning; thence South 23 degrees, 33 minutes, 24 seconds West 617.30 feet to the centerline of 55th Street as described in Document No. 387380 as recorded in the Office of the County Recorder, Washington County Minnesota; thence North 66 degrees, 36 minutes, 36 seconds West, along said center line, a distance of 353.22 feet; thence northwesterly along said center line and a tangential curve, concave to the northeast, having a radius of 500.00 feet and a central. angle of 44 degrees, 56 minutes, 21 seconds a distance of 392.17 feet; thence North 21 degrees, 40 minutes, 15 seconds West, along tangent and along said center line, a distance of 50.00 feet; thence northwesterly along said center line and a tangential curve, concave to the southwest, having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 17 degrees, 50 minutes, 56 seconds, a distance of 93.46 feet to a point on the north line of said South Half of the Northeast Quarter; thence North 88 degrees, 25 minutes, 35 seconds East, along said north line, a distance of 4.62 feet to the northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the North- east Quarter of said Section 4; thence continue North 88 degrees, 25 minutes, 35 seconds East, along said north line, a distance of 898.55 feet to the point of beginning, containing 7.14 acres, more or less. Subject to a 30 foot wide permanent road easement adjoining the southerly, southwesterly, and westerly lines of said tract as described in Document No. 387380. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo: 1. The Comprehensive Plan of said City is hereby amended to conform with the rezoning and minor subdivision of the Springborn property described above. Adopted by the City Council this 4th day of March, 1980. Thomas G. Armstrong, Mayor ATTEST: \-PC�u.1 CZ , W v�.l t�G� �1( ,. Laurence E. Whittaker City Administrator -2- LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 47 1980 -4- SANITARY SEWER — DEFINITION IN ORDINANCE: The City has a proposal for the property north of Cimarron to develop using a combined on —site system. This proposes development at four houses per acre. The developers feel this on — site system qualifies as a central sewer this permitting 7500 sq. ft. lots with sanitary sewer. The Council raised many questions about alternate drainfield sites, future responsibility should the system fail, density projection in the Comp Plan for this area. Mottaz moved, seconded by Armstrong, to request the Planning Commission hold a public hearing to amend the Zoning Ordinance to define the City's interpretation of Central Sanitary Sewer. Motion carried 5-0. LICENSES: Marty Septic Pumping has not renewed his license. Notice has been sent out without response. The Administrator recommended that legal proceedings be initiated if this license is not secured within 10 days. Morgan moved, seconded by Pott, to approve the following licenses: Septic Pumper: Morris B. Carlson Thomas W. Paledek A. B. Sanitation Pinky's Croixland Sewer Service 5692 Centerville Road 13535 33rd Street S. White Bear Lake, Mn. Afton, Mn. Ronald H. Meyer Meyer Cesspool 5325 Manning Avenue Afton, Mn. 55001 Sewer Installers: Richard and Lowell Vanderhoff 2389 Geneva St. Paul, Mn. COUNCIL REPORTS: Morgan reported that NSP would like a guarantee from the City that the City will not disturb their gas lines after they have been installed in the Tri—Lakes Area. The Council will act on the request after they receive additional information from NSP. Park Shelter — The Park Shelter plans are complete. Bid are ready to be let. MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS: The first meeting in April will be held at Cimarron. TYPEWRITER: Mottaz moved, seconded by Armstrong, to approve the purchase of an IBM Selectric for the City office. Motion carried 5-0. RIDGEWAY DRIVE: Only two of the affected property owners are willing to pay their share of the vacation of Ridgeway Drive. Armstrong recommended filing a notice that the3°o is a lawsuit pending on the title of the property (lis pendens). The City Attorney will verify if this is possible. MAINTENANCE BUILDING: Armstrong moved, seconded by Mottaz, to hold a special meeting March 11, at 4:30 p.m. to discuss the Maintenance Building. Motion carried 5-0. ADJOURNMENT: Armstrong moved, seconded by Mottaz, to adjourn at 10:45 p.m. Motion carried 5-0. R80-13B RESOLUTION CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS FOR COUNTY ROAD 6 WHEREAS, plans for Project No. S.A.P. 82-606-06 CTB showing proposed alignment, profiles, grades and cross -sections for the construction, reconstruction or improvement of County State -Aid highway No. 6 within the limits of the City as a State Aid Project have been prepared and presented to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED , That said plans be in all things approved. ADOPTED, this the 4th day of March, 1980, by the City Council, City of Lake Elmo. SIGNED: 14as G. Armstrong, Mayor ATTEST: Laurence Fi:' W_nx f: aFE i City Administrator R80-13A RESOLUTION CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION REQUIRING PARALLEL PARKING ON COUNTY ROAD 6 WHEREAS, the County of Washington has submitted to the Commissioner of Transportation the plans and speci- fications for the improvement of C.S.A.H. 6 from I-694 to T.H. 212; and, WHEREAS, state -aid funds will be expended on the improvement of said street; and, WIIEREAS, the approved state -aid standards, for reasons of traffic safety and economy, limit and restrict all parking to that which is parallel with the curb. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the: City of Lake Elmo shall. require that the parking of all vehicles within the corporate limits on said County.State-Aid 6 be parallel with the curb in accordance with the State - Aid Standards ADOPTED, this the 4th day of March, 1980, by the City Council, City of Lake Elmo. SIGNEDe laomasCrmstrong, Mayox AT EST: I _�c�'�i.�- ,aurence E. 4 ttaTe_r_ City Administrator