HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-29-80 CCMSPECIAL LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, OCTOBER 29, 1980
Councilman Pott called the meeting to order at 6;30 p.m.
Councillors in attendance: Novak, Morgan, Mottaz (7:05) and Mayor
Armstrong (6:35)
PARK TRAIL BIDS: The Council reviewed the bid tab sheet for the park
trails. The lowest total bid was that of Ridge Blacktop, Inc.,
for $11,400. However, the unit price per lineal foot was written
out consistantly as,$12,60, this would amount to $114,000 extended.
This bid was to be awarded on the unit costs. So, the $11,400,
although the lowest total bid, was not a responsible bid.
Armstrong moved, seconded by Morgan, to award the bid for park
trails to the lowest responsible bidder, Mogren Bros. Although
Ridge Blacktop, Inc, appeared to be the low bidder the Council
determined this was not the lowest responsible bid because of
the discrepency in the unit and the total price. Motion carried
4-0. Mottaz absent.
Morgan will walk the trails with the contractor. The contractor
will furnish the staking material, as stated in the bid.
Engineering time will be billed against the grant money,
JAMACA GATE: The Engineer distributed the final design for the
Jamaca Gate. He received two bids to construct and install
the gate. Both bids were in excess of $1,900, which exceeds the
cost limitation set for the project.
Pott moved, seconded by Novak, to reject all bids and table
this matter. Motion carried 4-0.
The Administrator will give the proposed plan to the Maintenance
Foreman and see if the maintenance crew can construct and install
a similar structure,
GARAGE LANDSCAPING: The Engineer talked to Mr. Mogren and he indicated
he cannot do this work until after November 5.
CITY OFFICE ROOF: The Council reviewed the bids. The Building Inspector
recommended the City accept the bid from Curran J. Nielsen, Co.,
the highest bidder. His recommendation was based on the durability
and 10 year guarantee on more substantial material than was
specified in the bid.
Morgan moved, seconded by Pott, to accept the low bid for reroofing
the City Office roof, only, from Ettel & Franz. Motion carried
4-0. The Council decided to delay reroofing the upper roof. That
will be done when the City Office remodeling is done.
BROOK'S NON INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE: The Administrator
reported that the Sheriff has no objection to licensing Brooks;
the State does not license them; and it is a City decision.
Armstrong moved, seconded by Pott, to grant an Off -Sale Non -
Intoxicating Malt Liquor License to Brook's Superette. Motion
carried 3-1. Novak opposed.
SPECIAL LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, OCTOBER 29, 1980 -2-
LEGION POND: The Building Inspector has inspected the septic systems
along Legion Avenue that were threatened by the pond. The Code
r states that systems that do not meet the regulations must be
l up -graded within 90 days after.notification.
When the Legion Pond Project was ordered the petitioning residents
were given seven months to bring their systems into compliance; if
it was deemed necessary. The Council agreed the residents should
still be given an.extension.
Morgan moved, seconded by Armstrong, to grant a variance from
the Code requirement that septic systems not complying with the
City Code must be upgraded within 90 days; and extend the repair
time to July 1, 1981 to those systems on Legion Pond that are
functioning and do not pose a health hazard. This extension will
not apply to Jeff Burgoyne, whose system was deemed not functional
and a health hazard by the Building Inspector. Motion carried 4-0-1.
Mottaz arrived at 7:05 and abstained on the vote.
LICENSES: Armstrong moved, seconded by Novak, to approve the following
licenses: Gene Swanson, Pulumbing, 2572 7th St., North St. Paul;
and Spring Heating, 10350 St. Croix Tr., Stillwater. Motion
carried 5-0.
LITTLE SUNFISH: Engineer Bohrer reviewed the petition, the
feasibility study, the potential problems, his recommendations
and Cimarron's action to prevent flooding of the Cimarron
treatment plant. He reviewed the action of the City Council
to lower Little Sunfish; and reported Valley Branch voted to
table any action -on -the City's-permit—application until a joint
meeting was held between all concerned bodies.
The Engineer outlined three proposed pumping projects with varying
time frames including a $15,750, 25 day project to pump the water
along County 70 the the West Lakeland Storage Site #1. The City
has sevured permission from property owners west of County 15 to
place water on their land.
John McPherson, West Lakeland Supervisor, does not think the
storage pit can handle the 60 acre feet of water. Discussion
followed on the water quality of the water going downstream.
Dave Swanson, West Lakeland Board Chairman, said the -people
downstream are going to be flooded out; and if the water is
pumped into Horseshoe it will be diasterous to nearby residents.
Steven Taylor, Cimarron, reitterated his statements on water
quality now vs quality if the plant floods. Cimarron can do
nothing more "today" to prevent flooding in the spring of 1981,
when sewage will mix with Sunfish Lake. The Council offered to
store additional water on Eagle Point to offset the 60 acre feet
proposed to be pumped downstream. This met with mixed reaction.
Mr. Taylor said they have explored additional storage areas on -
site. These can be developed next spring; but will be of no
benefit for the 1981 run-off; also, these sites will not hold
the 60 acre feet necessary to insure the plant will not flood.
Mr. Rosas, Valley Branch, said this answers the Board's question on
what Cimarron can do to store additional water on -site.
SPECIAL LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, OCTOBER 29, 1980 -3-
LITTLE SUNFISH: Lee Richert, West Lakeland resident, stated the
storage site is a very critical area. Should the site not be
adequate (overflow) wells and septic systems in that area will
be damaged or polluted. Morgan,again, stressed the storage of
water on Eagle Point. Engineer Bohrer explained how the dike
on Eagle Point works; water can be stored here and released when
it can be handled downstream. Kent Lokkesmoe, DNR, said the
main problem would be that if the City should store this additional
60 acre feet, this is 60 acre feet less available storage next
spring. The Council feels Eagle Point is capable of holding more
water than the permit allows.
Pott proposed the following:
1. pumping be limited to 60 acre feet from Little Sunfish into
Horseshoe Lake;
2. during the pumping period the water level of the storage site
would not rise more than 8";
3. the City of Lake Elmo will agree to store 75 acre feet of
water on Eagle Point Lake until May 15, 1981, or until Valley
Branch, West Lakeland and Lake Elmo agree it should be released;
4. the rate of flow out of Horseshoe Lake will be maintained
at a safe level, 211;
5. monitor the storage site to prevent any possibility of
water breaking through.
George Hedges, Valley Branch, said the water should get to the
storage site as quickly as possible to permit immediate seepage
SO that the water will not interfere with the spring run-off.
Mr. Al Lehman, 3M, indicated that from the bottom of the storage
pit to the over -flow the total capacity is 61 acre feet. Mr. Rosas
said the higher the head the quicker the water is driven into
the ground. Residents said that any large volume of
water (4") flowing to the storage site will causeflooding to
some residents. George Hedges said; based on what has been heard,
the County 70 route may be the best alternative.
Armstrong moved, seconded by Mottaz, to adopt Resolution 80-62,
repealing Resolution 80-61, and ordering the following; pumping
along County 70 to the West Lakeland Storage Site; pump a
maximum of 60 acre feet; the water will be kept l foot below the
overflow of the storage site; frequent monitoring of the site
will be done; Lake Elmo will store an additional 75 acre feet
of water on Eagle Point Lake until an agreement, within one year,
between Lake Elmo, West Lakeland and Valley Branch is made to
release this water downstream; Lake Elmo will meet with Valley
Branch, West Lakeland, Oakdale, and Cimarron to work on additional
storage sites.
Motion carried 5-0.
Verbal easements have been received. Documents are being drafted
for easements to pump along County right-of-way where the
pipeline will be laid. All necessary permits will be applied for.
ADJOURNMENT 9:10 p.m.
R-80-62
RESOLUTION
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION R-80-61 AND ORDERING
A PUMPING PROJECT FROM LITTLE SUNFISH LAKE ALONG COUNTY
ROAD 70 TO A SITE IN WEST LAKELAND TOWNSHIP.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of hake Elmo
did on October 21, 1980, adopt. a Resolution for a pumping
project from Little Sunfish Lake to horseshoe Lake; and
WHEREAS, additional. evidence brought. to the attention
of the City Council. indicates an alternative method exists
to pump the excess surface water along County Highway 70 to
an area known as the West Lakeland storage site.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of
the City of Lake Elmo as follows, to -wit:
1. Resolution R-80-61 adopted October 21, 1980, is hereby
t ' rescinded.
2. The City Council hereby directs the City Engineer
to commence pumping a maximum of 60 acre feet of excess storm
wager from Little Sunfish Lake along County Highway 70 to
the West Lakeland storage site.
3. At all times during said project, the water being
pumped into the West Lakeland storage site will be kept at
least one (1) foot below the overflow level of the storage
site.
9. The City will frequently monitor the site to determine
the elevation of the pumping into the site.
5. The City of Lake Elmo will store an additional 75 acre
feet of surface water on Eagle Point Lake until an agreement
is reached between the City of Lake Elmo, the Valley Branch
Watershed District and the Town of West Lakel.and,to allow for
9
the release of this water downstream and that hopefully, said
agreement can be reached within one (1) year from the date
hereof.
6. The City of Lake Elmo will meet with the Valley Branch
Watershed District, the Town of West Lakeland, the City of
Oakdale and the residents of Cimarron to work on additional
storage sites and their acquisition.
Adopted by the City Council this 29th day of. October,
1980, of the City of Lake Elmo, Washington County, Minnesota.
ATTEST
Laurence Whittaker
City Administrator
( ;
Thomas G. Armstrong, Mayor
-2-
R-80-63
RESOLUTION
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION TO ESTABLISH SPEED ZONES ON CERTAIN
STREETS WITIiIN SAID CITY.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo is
concerned about vehicular traffic on its streets and that
said vehicular traffic should travel at speeds which are not
excessive; and
WHEREAS, it has come to the attention of the City Council
that there currently is vehicular traffic on certain streets
in the City which is traveling at excessive speeds;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of
the City of Lake Elmo as follows, to -wit:
1. The City Council hereby requests the Minnesota
` Department of Transportation to establish a thirty (30) mile
per hour speed zone for a portion of Lake Jane Trail between
Ideal and Jamaca.
2. The City Council requests the Minnesota Department
of Transportation to establish a thirty-five (35) mile per
hour speed zone on a portion of Jamaca between Jane Road North
and 45th Street North.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo,
Washington County, Minnesota, this 29th day of October, 1980.
Thomas G. Armstrong, Mayor
ATTEST:
Laurence Whittaker
City Administrator