Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-17-81 CCMLAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 17, 1981 Acting Mayor Morgan called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. Councillors in attendance: Novak, Fraser, Mottaz (7:10) and Eder (7:09). Also, Administrator Whittaker AGENDA: Additions: County HRA Representative, Tom Helgesen; Kroy Industries Sewer Route; Battle Creek Assessment; Well #2; Sewer License for John Janetta. Novak moved, seconded by Fraser, to approve the Agenda as amended. Motion carried 3-0. MINUTES: March 3, 1981 - Corrections Page 1, Brookfield II, add to the end of paragraph 1. The number of parking spaces was reduced to 69 for the first building, parking space size will be 9' x 20' with 24 ft. aisles, and the planting islands will be at the end of the aisles. Page 2, Patti Homes..... they would assume responsibility for the leasing party and they would require the leasee to .. ..Page 5, Office Remodeling paragraph 4, insert after 1981, so that fiscal 1982 funds could be used. Mottaz moved, seconded by Fraser, to approve the minutes of March 3, 1981, as amended. Motion carried 5--0. CLAIMS: Administrator Whittaker added the following claims: Community Association Dues for,, Lake Elmo Business Association $25.00 Cimarron Homeowners Association 5.00 Tri-Lakes Association 10.00 Nancy Prince - Reid Park Meetings 7.12 Mottaz moved, seconded by Morgan, to approve Claims 81231 thru 81278, including the additions. Motion carried 5-0. FIRE DEPARTMENT RADIO BIDS: Administrator Whittaker reviewed the bid sheet with the Council. The Fire Chief recommended purchasing chargers. The department does not need holsters for the radios. Mottaz moved, seconded by Morgan, to accept the low bid from Motorola, for Mintor Radios with the $20 per unit chargers at a total cost of $2700. Motion carried 5-0. HRA - Tom Helgesen: Mr. Tom Helgesen, the new director of the County's Iiousing and Redevelopment Authority, explained the rent assistance program. He requested that the Council adopt a resolution approving the application for and provisions of a housing assistance program by the Washington County HRA. He stated that the City would be under no financial or administrative obligation by adopting the resolution. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 17, 1981 -2- HRA: The Council supported the assistance program; but had several questions they would like answered before passing ( the resolution. The Council dad not want to attest to the need for this program; and did not want to be required to monitor it. Mr. Helgesen said he will get the answers for the Council and come back on April 7. Mottaz moved, seconded by Fraser, to table any action on the HRA resolution until April 7. Motion carried 5-0. ASSESSMENTS: A. Irvin Court - Administrator Whittaker asked if the Council had any remaining questions on the project or the assessment. Morgan expressed serious reservations about the assessments to residents whose home have been in the area 15 to 20 years, long before Irvin Court and Lake Jane Hills. He did not feel these homes contribute to or benefit from the project. He alsd did not think the residents in Lake Jane Hills should bear the total assessment. It is his opinion that the City is partially responsible for this project. The Council discussed the homes immediately affected by the Lake Jane Hills development. Morgan proposed that the City assume half the obligation and assess the remaining amount. Morgan moved, seconded by Mottaz, to adopt 1t-81-13,to approve payment of the easement cost,,,by the Citv, for .the.Irvin Ct. Project for $2;,00(1. The remaining-$1,831.24 to he assessed to the properties per -the Engineer's Assessment Roster. Discussion: Fraser asked that the motion be clarified. Morgan -explained his proposal, -outlined -the -background -of -the -area, - and explained why he feels there is an inequity to those being assessed. The motion, if passed, would "leave $1,831.24 to be assessed. Fraser asked what implicatuns this would have on assessing other areas, In support of this action, Eder said some of the problem was caused by the construction of Lake Jane Trail in 1960. Adequate drainage was not provided, thus, this is an error the Community has to live with. Novak asked the difference between Irvin Court and Beutel Pond. Morgan said the residents in the Irvin Court area had their own sub -watershed that drained into Lake Jane; and, only after development up stream did this sukr=u�atershed,:ch:an,ge. The water f residents in the.Aeutel Pond watershed drains to 3eutel Pond whereas this -is -.not the case with many of the residents being assessed for the Irvin Court project, The development of Lake Jane Hills is the primary cause of the Irvin Court Project. Motion carried 3-2. Novak and Fraser o,pposed... ( B. Little Sunfish Lake- The Council reviewed the Administrator's memo indicating that part of several parcels belong to cdn/DOT. These were not listed as being owned by Mn/DOT on the tax books available to the Citv. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 17, 1981 -3- LITTLE SUNFISH: The Administrator recommended sending -a- -- letter to Mn/DOT to explain their share of the assessment and to give them an opportunity to respond. The Council agreed. Morgan moved, seconded by Novak, to accept the report listing the parcels that are owned by Mn/DOT and hold a public hearing on April 7, 1981, at 8 P.M. on the revised assessments. Motion carried 5-0. C. Legion Pond - There were no changes or additional cor- respondence on this assessment. Mottaz moved, seconded by Eder to adopt R-81-19,, to adopt the assessment roster and assessment for Legion Pond, as presented. Motion carried 5-0. D. Beutel Pond - The Administrator reviewed the revised assessment roster and indicated that adjacent parcels had been combined. The Engineer checked the Chlebeck property and determined that only a portion of that parcel (1/2 acre) should be included in the assessment area. The revised roster will be sent with the hearing notice. The hearing will be April 7, 1981 at 7:30 p.m. WATER MAIN FEASIBILITY HEARING: Engineer Bohrer reviewed the proposal and distributed copies of the Feasibility Report. Earl Goerss, Gene Peltier and Clarence Urtel petitioned the City to extend the existing watermain on Lake Elmo Avenue to serve their properties. The Engineer estimated the cost for the project at $74,640. The estimated assessment rates would be $41.25 per foot plus a $680 hook-up charge. The estimated cost would be the same for running the line along the east or the west side of Lake Elmo Avenue. Audience Comments: Gene Peltier - asked if there would be any benefit in using the shoulder on the west side of Lake Elmo Avenue until it was necessary to go into the road right-of-way. Engineer Bohrer said this would create a considerable jog in the line, easements would be necessary, and would not result in any savings. Earl Goerss - expressed surprise at the estimated cost. He does not feel it is fair that the residents on the east side of Lake Elmo Avenue should be assessed double, since the land on the west side of the street is unbuildable. He feels the City should share in the cost. He questioned whether the railroad paid for half of the assessment when a line was put down 33rd Street. If residents put in water, why should they assume the entire cost. CITY OF LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 17, 1981 -4- -WATERLINE-EXTENSION: Administrator Whittaker asked who else benefits and noted that the residents on the east side of Lake Elmo Avenue own the property on the west, too. Earl Goerss - said that the residents are the only ones who benefit, but normally there are property owners on the other side of the line who would share the cost. He contends that the railroad was not assessed. He also said that the property on the west side of the street cannot be developed. Administrator Whittaker suggested putting the waterline on the back of the properties, so that it could serve future development. Residents would still pay for both sides now; but could recover part of their investment in the future if the property were developed. Mr. Goerss asked on which side of the road the waterstop will be on. Engineer Bohrer said it will be on the east side and that the service would be augered under Lake Elmo Avenue. This would avoid disruption the east side of the street. He said the cost is double because there are no properties served on the west side of the road. Dr. Lundholm stated that the fact remains,that because residents have lake frontage they are taxed extra and are penalized now because there are no homes on the lake side. Engineer Bohrer said this is a unique situation in that the road divides the lake and the homes. Mayor Eder asked the Engineer how(.ff.ar'the line can be extended to the south. Engineer Bohrer said that the Peltier property would be the recommended limit unless the existing piece of 6" pipe is strengthened or replaced. The 6" pipe is the limiting factor. Bruce Folz asked if the County has approved tearing up the road without requiring a:complete overlay. Engineer Bohrer has contacted the County and they approve the proposal, as presented. fie explained the loop being considered, for the future, that would handle the fire flow pressure Cal Bartly asked why the watermain wasn't extended when it was put in. Mayor Eder said the City boundary, at that time, was the controlling factor. Cal Bartly suggested replacing all the 6" pipe with 8" pipe and extend the line to the end of the lake. A'`n- t3os LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 17, 1981 -5- Engineer Bohrer said this is not the current proposal. Dr. Lundholm asked what the City's long range planning is , and if the line is extended further, will the per foot cost be lower. Engineer Bohrer said the cost would not be lower at this time. If this extension were included in a larger project, then, the unit cost would most likely go down; but both projects would have to be done at the same time. He noted that the City has not defined what the ultimate service area will be in this area. Mayor Eder said that before the City defines the ultimate service area it needs to know where &,second well should be located. Councillor Mottaz noted that a study of a total service area would be very costly, and to date, the City has not budgeted for such a study. Mr. Goeress said the project, as proposed, is too expensive and not feasible at this time. The other residents agreed. Mrs. Lundholm asked if the lot size requirement would change if water became available. Mayor Eder said no. Mayor Eder closed the hearing at 8:45 p.m. Morgan moved, seconded by Mottaz, to terminate the project for the watermain extension,,on the recommendation of the property owners, who determined the cost is prohibitive as determined in the Feasibility Study. Motion carried 4-0-1 Novak abstained. ENGINEER'S REPORT: A. 201 Study Hearing - Novak moved, seconded by Morgan, to set a public hearing on the 201 Study, on April 28, 1981, at 7 P.M., at Oakland Jr. High. Discussion: Eder asked the Administrator to check on the availability of Lake Elmo Elementary fot the hearing. The Council agreed to hold the hearing at Lake Elmo Elementary if it is available. Motion carried 5-0. B. Erosion Control Project - Regional Park - The report is not yet complete. C. Jamaca Gate - The Administrator requested Council authorization to spend up to $1200 for materials to replace the Jamaca Gate. The City maintenance crew will build the gate. r Engineer Bohrer reviewed the background of the gate. Fraser recommended that the Council make a determination on whether .Jamaca should be permanently opened or closed. She :Felt another gate would only be vandalizes: again. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 1,4ARCH 17, 1981 -6- Morgan said that when Foxfire was developed residents on Jane Road did not want Jane Road and Jamaca connected and that position has not changed. He would prefer to close the road permanently and feels the residents on Jane Road share his position. Mottaz moved, seconded by Novak, to authorize up to $1200 for materials to replace the Jamaca Gate. Motion carried 3-1-1. Fraser opposed. Eder abstained. Eder would like to explore other alternatives. ��_ �Q p again, The aed the (deleted when minutes were approved 4/7/81) D. Drainage Control Policy - Brookman Addition - The developers of Brookman Addition and Brookfield II requested that the Council reconsider enforcing the current drainage standard for the lst Addition of Brookman Addition as a requirement for the Brookfield II building. Calculations determined that most of the ponding area planned for the 2nd Addition in Brookman Addition will be necessary to meet the current standard. The ponding provided in the 2nd Addition was designed to serve the entire plat. The developers want to meet the standards under which their plat was approved. Eder stated it was his understanding, that the City would ap- prove a ponding area adequate to serve the Brookfield II building, then, study an overall surface water plan for the entire area. If such a plan would not be developed, the current City standard would prevail for the remainder of the plat. The developers would like a determination from the Council on this question. Bruce Folz said two problems contribute to this situation. First is that 4 of the 5 current councillors are new since the Brookman Plat was approved; and, second, minutes of the meetings do not include the discussion of the proposal or indicate ac- ceptance of the Brookman Addition surface water plan as part of the plat approval. Mr. Folz highlighted his recollection of discussions during the plat review. He stated the Council, at that time, accepted the plait designed by Tom Noyes, Bonostroo and Associates, that provided temporary storage for one 100 yr storm, controlled the rate of run-off, and provided a 13 acre pond in the 2nd Addition, per the standards at that time. The Brookman developers contend that both the City and the developers committed to the construction and completion of the storm water plan submitted by Mr. Noyes. Current standards require that rate and volume must be controlled on -site. City Engineer Bohrer estimated that 18 acre feet of ponding will be necessary to serve the whole development and meet current standards. The Brookman Addition, Phase I, will require a 5 acre ponding area. The developers desire to put in only that ponding necessary to accomodate the proposed development rather than provide ponding in areas not being developed. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 17, 1981 -7- Drainage Control - Folz asked what the policy is regarding agreements made prior to changes in regulations. He asked if the Council feels there would be a safety hazard in following the old rules with the old design? He stated the developers do not think so. He further explained design alternatives for ponding . Mr. Folz asked the Council if they would consider accepting a cash amount ($20,000/$30,000) to study and develop a storage area downstream rather than require the Brookman developers to provide permanent storage in the middle of a commercial area. The developers would provide the temporary storage designed for their plat. A 3 acre temporary storage area would accomodate the lst Addition, and if the rate were restricted this 3 acres would not have to be increased as long as only the lst Addition were developed. Folz noted that an obstruction on the south side of County 5 will need to be removed. Councillor Mottaz favored the suggestion to accept cash and agreed that Brookman Addition should not be used as a permanent storage area. He recommended developing a method of holding back the water longer than what is held back now until a down- stream solution is developed. Folz stated that since a stormwater study was made by the City Engineer (Bonostroo), and since the City approved the plat and permitted the developers to proceed with their development, that the City is bound to permit the developers to continue develop- ment under the regulations in existance at the time the plat was approved. He said the developers would agree to put in the 3 acre feet of temporary storage. The Council discussed temporary storage to accomodate Brookfield II, Phase I, and the degree of temporary and permanent storage adequate to serve the Brookman lst Addition. The Council agreed that any temporary ponding that might be approved would not satisfy current policy and that the developers should be aware they may be required to make revisions until such time as the policy is changed or an overall surface water plan is developed. Engineer Bohrer noted that the City's current standards closely approximate Valley Branch standards, and questioned how Valley Branch will view this matter. Novak stated that she is not ready to make a decision until more specifics are received from the City Engineer. She noted severe problems in this area last spring when there was no additional development. Novak moved, seconded by Morgan, to table further action until the Council has additional data and recommendations from the City Engineer. Motion carried 5-0. This will be on the April 7 agenda. BREAK: 9:35 p.m. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 17, 1981 -8- FITZENBERGER VARIANCE - 5429 Highlands Trail N.: Mr. Fitzenberger is requesting a 6' variance from the 10' side yard lot.;,line requirement. Presently, his home is 4' from the side lot line. The Council must determine if there is a hardship or if there is a healt4 safety, or welefare problem. Administrator Whittaker said Mr. Fitzenberger has two alternatives: 1. move the house, which is not an economical alternative or 2. purchase property from the adjacent property owner. He stated the setback is required so that an emergency vehicle can drive through a 10'wide area. The 10' on each lot provides a cushion area. Mayor Eder asked the impact of the variance on the drainage and utility easement along the side lot. He noted the house is on this easement according to the survey. Ernest Cutting, attorney, said that the restrictions on this property indicate that there will be easement shown on the recorded plat; but the plat does not show any easements on the lot line in question. The Fitzenberger's Certificate of Survey in- cludes drainage and utility easements. The Council reviewed the final plat and verified that these easements are not shown. Bruce Folz concurred,.and said the drainage and utility easements should not be included on the Fitzenberger certificate. Mr. Cutting explained that Mr. Fitzenberger was shown the wrong stakes when he purchased the lot; but that the house does not encroach onto the next lot. After the house was complete it was discovered that it.=was 6' too close to the side lot line. Mr. Bob Sneen, owner of adjacdnt.lot la, said this problem could have been avoided if Fitzenberger had surveyed his lot before building his house; and stated the location of the Fitzenberger house adversely affects his property. Potential buyers of his lot will close,provided they can receive some financial compensation for the loss of value on the property. Mr. Sneen stated he had tried to negotiate with Mr. Fitzenberger until he 'gFitzenberger) decided to apply for a variance. Mr. Sneen requested that the Council deny the variance until he has resolved the problem with Mr. Fitzenberger. He is willing to sell 8800 sq. ft. to Mr. Fitzenberger. He is sure this will leave adequate area on his lot for a septic and well. Mottaz said a similar problem exists across the street; and the City 's position is- to have the adjacent property owners resolve the problem between themselves. He recommended the Council take the same positon in this case. Mr. Fitzenberger said that when he bought the lot, his realtor called the developer's salesman and asked that he identify the corner stakes. The salesman identified 3 of the four corners, and sa d..the:.back corner was in line with the front stake. Because of the angle of the lots, Mr. Fitzenberger measured to the wrong back stake. fie also said lie needed to keep the house to the east side of the lot because of a driveway on the west side of his house. CITY OF LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 17, 1981 -9- FITZENBERGER: Eder noted that there was no testimony citing a health hazard in support of this variance, therefore, he said past City policy should be followed. Mottaz moved, seconded by Morgan, to deny the variance for James Fitzenberger, to permit his home to be within 4'of the side yard lot line. Motion carried 5-0. SLAWSON REZONING: The Council reviewed the Planning Commission recommendation to approve the rezoning of the Slawson property to Ag from Rural Residential. Mottaz moved, seconded by Morgan, to adopt Ordinance 7924, rezoning all that part of the N:_1/2 of. the SE 1/4 of PIE 1/4 of Section 3 to Agriculture from Rural Residential, for Lyle.Slawson. Motion carried 5-0. BRAKEMEIER - CABLE TV: Alan Brakemeier asked the Council to support his application to establish a cable service territory in Cimarron. Mr. Brakemeier recently purchaseld-the cable system that was installed in Cimarron. He intends to proceed through the State Cable Board to obtain a franchise to operate the system. He asked if the City is interested in_establishing a service area. He had prepared two applications, one for . Cimarron only, and one for the entire City; and asked for the Council's comments and direction on the applications. He stated he would like to work with the City in the franchise process. The system (Harborvision) that Mr. Brakemeier purchased was declared illegal by the State Cable Board. The Council previously discussed cable service but decided not to pursue the issue because of little citizen interest and the problems involved with servicing three school districts. Fraser said there is now interest from:i.rosidents in: -,Cimarron and recommended that the Administrator draft an outline of the steps the City can take to study the cable issue, including costs and time frames. She feels this a a critical issue and should be fully studied before any decision is made. The Council discussed the illegal system in Cimarron, and told Mr. Brakemeier that the City is not in a position to pursue a territory or a franchise, as proposed. Mayor Eder stated that the system in Cimarron should remain closed until the Council is convinced a system should be developed, then proper channels should be followed to establish a system and award a franchise. Mr. Don Moe submitted a survey indicating Cimarron's interest in a cable system and asked if the City could issue a temporary permit to Mr. Brakemeier until such time as a territory is established and a franchise granted. The Administrator said that a temporary permit cannot be issued and that the City must meet the State Cable Regulations and go through the process before granting a franchise.. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 17, 1981 -10- CABLE TV: Mottaz moved, seconded by "Morgan, to table the cable issue until further information and study is available l Discussion: Mr. Brakemeier said he would like to submit one of the proposed applications to the Cable Board. Mayor Eder said the issue was tabled, therefore, the City will not be involved with either application. Motion carried 5-0. The Administrator said Mr. Brakemeier can submit his application to the State without City support. He will contact Vicki Long, Minnesota Cable Board, and have additional information available for the April 7 meeting. OFFICE REMODELING: The appraisal for the Meyer property on Lake Elmo Avenue should be ready within the week. Administrator Whittaker suggested that the Building Committee meet before April 7 to discuss the appraisal, size of the building and financing. Morgan opposed any use of Park Reserve Funds to finance the project. He suggested setting a dollar limit on the project before considering any of the options; and opposed additional land acquisition for a new building. Mottaz asked about the time frame concerning the purchase of Equipment Certificates. The Administrator will contact the bond consultants about the time frame. The Council agreed to hold a special meeting on March 31, at 7 p.m., if necessary. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. Warning Tickets - Mottaz moved, seconded by Morgan, to authorize the Administrator to spend $175 for warning tickets for Code violations for the Dog Catcher -.,and Building Inspector. Motion carried 5-0. B. Water School - Elmer Richert asked that Ken Carroll attend Basic Water School and Bob Wier attend Advanced Water School, for certification to run the City Water System. Morgan moved, seconded by Eder, to authorize $45 each, to send Ken Carroll and Bob Wier to Water School. Motion carried 5-0. C. Mn/DOT-SEELER - At the time County 212 was constructed, the County failed to deed a small triangular parcel back to the City; which, in turn, should have deeded it back to the property owner, Richard Seeler. The City Attorney recommended that the City authorize a quit- claim deed to the Seelers;... The Council agreed. Morgan moved, seconded by Mottaz, to authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to sign a Cuit claim deed transferring that portion of parcel 2150 of old Highway 212 right-of-way, back to R. H. Seeler. Mr. Seeler to have the deed drawn up for the Mayor and Administrator's signature. The City will pass -through to Mr. Seeler,any expenses incurred for this transaction. Motion carried 5-0. CITY OF LAKE ELMO COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 17, 1981 -11- ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: D. Civil Defense Sirens - Tri-Lakes Area - Administrator Whittaker said he is in receipt of several signed petitions from residents in the Tri-Lakes area requesting Civil Defense Sirens and agreement to pay 1/2 the cost of same. The Administrator said that on the basis of these petitions the Council could order a feasibility study and hold an assessment hearing. Fraser asked who initiated this proposal and said she would like some assurance that a substantial number of residents desire sirens to justify the expenditure. Renate Paulson, Civil Defense Director, said she visited about 24 homes in the area, and received a positive reaction to installing the sirens and sharing in the cost. ($15 per residence) The Council discussed the circumstances under which a siren would be used, cost estimates and location sites. Molly Hedges said she sent a form out with the Birchback asking interest in a Civil Defense Siren for the Tri-Lakes area. She noted that no response was received. 30 responses were received on a similar questionaire in the Newsletter. The Administrator said he will put an article in the Newsletter requesting petitions for Civil Defense Sirens in the Tri-Lakes area and indicate that assessment costs will be considered at an assessment hearing. The Council agreed. E. MAMA 1"4eeting - No Council interest. F. Dog Training - Regional Park - The Administrator asked if the Council had any objection to the County permitting dog training courses in the Regional Park. Mottaz moved, seconded by Fraser, to send the County a letter stating the City has no objection to this use provided this use is included in the 14% maximum usage of the park. G. Surface Water Use Ordinance - DNR Comments - Action postponed H. Policies & Procedures - Parlc and Planning Commission - Action postponed I. City Engineer - Business Association Meeting - The Council agreed that the City Engineer should attend the next Business Association meeting. J. Licenses: Mottaz moved, seconded by Morgan, to approve the following licenses: Woodbury Mechanical, Inc., Sewer Installer 1988 Stanich Ct., St Paul, and John Jenetta, 4689 Geneva, St. Paul ?Motion carried 5-0 LAKE ELiMO CITY COUNCIL PMEETING, MARCH 17, 1981 -12- ADiMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: K. Well #2 - The Administrator reported that the well will need to be pumped and the water tested before the pump is pulled and televised. He said McCarthy Well estimated the cost at between $800 and $1,000. The Council instructed the Administrator to have the Maintenance Foreman handle the pumping and testing. If technical difficulties arise, then _McCarthy can be called. COUNCIL REPORTS: A. Mayor Eder - 'Metropolitan Governance Bill - The Administrator is waiting receipt of the Bill. B. Battle Creek Assessment - The Administrator reported that a copy of Woodbury's report to Battle Creek is available in the City Office. C. Kroy Industries - The Administrator contacted the City of Oakdale and they indicated that they are not interested in running the sewer line, that will serve Kroy Industries, down to Lar e Elmo. '"hey want the sewei available to serve development that will occur in Oakdale. D. Council Chairs - Mottaz asked if the City will donate one of the straight -back chairs to the North St. Paul Historical Society. They were manufactured in North St. Paul by Luger Lumber. Eder moved, seconded by Morgan, to donate one straight -back chair to the north St. Paul Historical Society. Motion carried 5-0. ADJOURNMENT: 11:02 p.m. RESOLUTIONS: 81-18 - Irvin Court Assessment Project 81-19 - Legion Pond Assessment Project ORDI14ANCE: 7924 - Slawson Rezoning to Ag I R-81- 18 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A R.ESOLUTIONG ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR IRVIN COURT DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the Irvin Court drainage improvements; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council. of Lake Elmo, Minnesota: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be paid on or before October. 1, 1981, or it shall be added to the real estate taxes due and payable in the year 1982. 3. On or before October 10, 1981, the Clerk shall transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor so that any portions of this assessment which are unpaid at that time can be extended onto the proper tax lists of the County and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council this 1.7 day of _ March , 1.981. ATTEST: Laurence Whittaker City Administrator Mayna L. Eder, Mayor ASSESSMENT ROLL IRVIN COURT DRAINAGI: IMPROVEMENTS #37444-2850----------- $16.60 437444-2900----------- 83.94 437444-2950--•--------- 78.58 #37444-3200----------- 54.26 #37444-3250----------- 72.71. #37444-3300----------- 57.95 #37444-3350----------- 41.26 #37444-3400----------- 49.23 037444-3450---- ------- 84.45 #37444-3500----------- 10704 #37444-3550----------- 83.94 #37444-3600----------- 83.94 #37444-3650----------- 84.70 #37446-2050------------ 38.32 #37446-2100------------ 37.65 037446-21.50----------- 35.56 037441-2400----------- 84.61. #37441-2450----------- 85.12 #37441-2500----------- 84.11. 03744.1-2550 ----------- 85.87 #37441-2600----------- 89.14 37441-2650----------- 78.16 #37441-2700----------- 89.06 #37441-27.50----------- 90.65 #37441-2800----------- 37.15 #37442-2450---•-------- 9.98 #37443-2000----------- 46.04 #37443-2050----------- 29.10 437443-2100----------- 1.1.40 R-81- 19 RESOLUTION CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR LEGION POND FLOOD RELIEF. WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the Legion Pond Flood Relief Project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ,of Lake Elmo, Minnesotan 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be paid on or before October. 1, 1981, or it shall be added to the real estate taxes due and payable in the year 1982. 3. On or before October. 10, 1981, the Clerk shall transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor so that any portions of this assessment which are unpaid at that time can be extended onto the proper tax lists of the County and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council this l7th day of March , 1981. Mayna. L. Eder, Mayor ATTEST: C�O.I.V�M,Lt � �U�X�-�--.�_ Laurence Whittaker City Administrator. ASSESSMENT R LEGION POND FLOOD RELIEF LAKE .EL -MO, MINNESOTA Assessment Rate = $100.00 Per petitioned lot not abutting pond $493.51 per petitioned lot abutting pond Date of. Resolution: ­ 81_18--March_1.1,J981 Parcel. Assessed Now �ry Supposed Owner -_---Lot Block Addition Amount #}37505-2450 Toft 10 1 Myron E1Lman $ 493.51 #37505-2400 Peterson 9 1 Myron Ellman $ 493.51 #37505-2350 Deck 8 1 Myron Ellman $ 493.51 #37505-2300 Gollyard 7 1 Myron Ellman $ 493.51 #37505-2250 Burgoyne 6 1 Myron ELLman $ 493.50 #37505-2150 Zetterlund 4 1 Myron Ellman $ 100.00 #37505-2050 Gardner 2 1 Myron Ellman $ 100.00 #37505-2500 Thiel 1 2 Myron Ellman $ 100.00 4137505-2800 Shanley 7 2 Myron Ellman $ 100.00 17505r2B5O Cook 8 2 Myron .Ellman $ 100.00 #37505-2900 Kupperschmidt 9 2 Myron .Ellman $ 100. 00 36-37024-0290 Olson $ 100.00 36-37024-2150 I-Senning $ 100.00 36-37024-2200 I-luseboe $ 100.00 36-37024-2250 Stevens $ 100.00 36-37024-2900 �. Friendt _ _ _ _ _ $ 100.00 $3, 567. 54 CLAIMS TO BE APPROVED AT MARCH 17th COUNCIL MEETING 81231 F. H. Bathke - Coffing Trolley (Maintenance Dept) $ 109.66 81232 G. A. Meyer Mercantile - General $ 59.21 Fire Dept (paint)157.41 216.62 81233 Kern's North Star - 375.1 gals. , 482.85 81234 Lake Elmo Oil - General 148.4 Diesel 187.36 130.3 gas 169.00 Fire Dept 49.36 405.72 81235 Oakwood Animal Hospital 104.00 81236 City of North St. Paul - Vehicle Usage Animal Control 125.00 81237 Metro Waste Control Commission Monthly Sewer Charge 125.92 81238 American Water Works Assn - Dues 85.00 81239 Planning & Development Services - Pass Thru 48.50 81240 T.K.D.A. General 323.89 Beutel Pond Assmnt. 144.28 Pass Thru 82.96 551.13 81241 Lawson, Raleigh & Marshall General 7537.00 (Prosecutions 1,116.) Water Fd.-2nd Well 20.00 Pass Thru 90.00 Assessments 120.00 1,767.00 81242 Junker Sanitation 42.00 81243 Mollie Hedges - 3/10/81 newsletter 175.00 81244 Lillie Suburban - Legal Publ. 49.75 81245 Kuehl Electric. - Wire air compressor at Maint.Bldg. 269.52 81246 Stillwater Book 71.78 81247 Zignego Agency - Addition of Maint. Bldg. 192.00 81248 Farm Service Store 1.30 81249 Vern's G.T.C. - Parts for Maint.Dep't 79.19 81250 International Harvester - Hose & ring - Maint.Dep't 135.17 81251 Lampert Bldg. Ctr. Material for hockey boards 271.30 13 checks for 3/20 81 payroll (including Soc.Sec.,State & Fed.pmts.) 8,000.00 10 checks for 4/3 81 pauroll 4,000.00