HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-07-81 CCMLAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL, JULY 7, 1981
Mayor Eder called the meeting to order at 6:21 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Fraser, Morgan, Mottaz, and Novak. Also, Administrator
Whittaker was present.
AGENDA: Whittaker requested the Council add the Friend easement,
the Legion Avenue Sewers, and Kroy Industry to items to
be considered under the Engineer's report. Legion Ave-
nue would, then, be eliminated under Old Business. He
asked the Council to consider hiring temporary employees
under the Administrator's report; and said he also had
an announcement. Morgan asked to add consideration of
the Lake Jane Access and the Lion's Park Tennis courts
under Council Reports.
Fraser moved, seconded by Morgan, to approve the Agenda
as amended. Motion carried 5-0.
MINUTES:. June 16, 1981 ..
Fraser asked that the minutes reflect the discussion
about salary range for paragraph A on the top of page
6. They should read, "The salary range established for
the position was $19,500 to $23,500. The Committee
expects a good candidate can be tired for $20,000 to
$20,500".
Fraser moved, seconded by Mottaz, to approve the
minutes as amended. Motion carried 4--0-1. Morgan was
absent at that meeting and abstained.
June 2, 1981 -
Novak moved, seconded by Morgan, to approve the minutes
of the June 2, 1981, City Council meeting. Motion
carried 5-0.
CLAIMS: Whittaker explained that the fuel tanks at the new
garage had to be moved because of high water table; and
that the additional cost of installing the tanks was due
largely to this.
Morgan moved, seconded by Mottaz, to approve Claims #81507
through #81560. Motion carried 5-0.
OFFICE PLANS: Mottaz said, that while another alternative had come up
since the Building Committee met, he wanted to present
the recommendation of the Committee; and he wanted the
Memo on the Committee's report to reflect that the Memo
was from the Committee and had been approved by both
Committee members before it was sent to the Council by
the Administrator.
Mottaz summarized the recommendation to build a new City
Office in Lion's Park. Mottaz moved to adopt the Lion's
Park proposal. Eder seconded the motion to allow for
discussion. Morgan said he had expressed his concerns
about the Lion's Park proposal to everyone on the City
Council. He is opposed to the use of Lion's Park for
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL, JULY 7, '1981 12-
the City Office because he feels the park should remain
an active area for younger children and because there
have been many improvments in the park in the past few
years. He opposes the move, too:.;, because it would cost
a lot of money to move the ballfields; and, though the
Park Commission had talked about creating a ballfield
complex in West Sunfish Park, they had no definite plans
for the improvements at this time. The park shelter would
not serve the purposes it was designed for.
Novak said this area had been historically a park; and
that the proposal would not really expand park facilities.
She said children use the park extensively in fall and
winter; and, she wanted to preserve the park for this use.
She also said she does not want to sell the present office
because she has seen too many fire halls hemmed in when
City's have sold off property they did not think they
would need.
Fraser said she could not go along with this alternative
even though she would like to see a resolution of the
issue. She said moving the ,facilities would cost too
much and residents want the park where it is with the
facilities it has in it.
Morgan said the Park Commissioners he had talked with
were very negative on the idea. Eder suggested the "
Council consider a citizens committee to deal with al-
ternatives. The Council said they had probably con-
sidered most alternatives already; and that the Council
must resolve this themselves.
Mottaz withdrew the motion and Eder withdrew the second.
Morgan suggested the Council reconsider remodeling the
City Office, spend whatever it takes to provide adequate
facilities for the employees, and consider tearing off
the old garage if that is necessary to make an attractive,
functional office.
Fraser said the Council would have another alternative
if they would consider using it's power of eminent domain
to acquire the old Town Hall site. She said everyone had
agreed that this site was the.best location for the office.
It would cost a little more; but, some other proposals
have been expensive. It is continuous to the present
site; and, would have ---room to expand on that site.
The Council agreed that they needed a work session to
find a solution to the office problems; and scheduled
a special City Council meeting for July 14, 1981, from
7:00 to 9:00 p.m. They suggested the Administrator try
to summarize the pros and cons of each site in graph form
for that meeting.
COIN BOXES, TENNIS COURT LIGHTS: Whittaker advised the Council that
replacing coin boxes on the Pebble Park Tennis Courts
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL, JULY 7, 1981
-3-
lights was costing more than the City is collecting
for use of the lights. The Council also discussed
revising the hours the lights could be used so that
they more closely follow park hours. This was refer-
red to the Park Commission for recommendation.
Novak moved, seconded by Morgan, to take out the coin
boxes in Pebble Park; and replace them with timed
switches. Motion carried 5-0.
AFTON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Council said they had no reservations
or objections to the Afton Comprehensive Plan; but,
asked the City Administrator to see if the Village
Historic designation had any special importance for
funding or zoning,
LICENSES: Eder moved, seconded by Novak, to approve a Temporary
Non -intoxicating Malt Liquor License for Schanno
Transportation, Inc. at Green Acres, and a Sewer In-
staller license for Hatch Excavating, Inc. Route'1,
Box 1, Princeton, Minnesota. Motion carried 5-0.
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES: Morgan moved, seconded by Mottaz, to
authorize the Administrator to buy a saddle gasoline
tank for the portable pump and a gas powered weed
cutter for trimming in the parks. Motion carried 5-0
FORM TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL: Morgan moved, seconded by Mottaz, to
approve the Form to Address the Council, to be used
for those wishing to speak to the City Council at
meetings. Motion carried 5-0.
TEMPORARY HELP, MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT: Whittaker explained that
Mr. Richert's illness and pending retirement had left
the Maintenance Department very short of help; and
that temporary help could be hired within the budget,
to assist through July and August. Mottaz moved,
seconded by Morgan, to authorize the Administrator to
hire temporary help for the months of July and August
for the Maintenance Department. .Motion carried 5-0.
TEMPORARY HELP, RECORDING SECRETARY: Whittaker explained that
Kathy Crombie was off in July and part of August; and
that he would like to hire a temporary help to take
minutes at meetings. Fraser suggested that a person .
be hired to do the minutes and that another person be
used to handle the other typing. Mottaz moved, seconded
by Morgan, that the Administrator be authorized to
hire temporary help for recording secretary. Motion
carried 5-0.
LEVY LIMIT SEMINAR: Eder moved, seconded by Mottaz, that the City
pay the registration fee for Council members who
wanted to attend the Levy Limit Seminar sponsored by
the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, July
30, 1981, Motion carried 5-0.
OLINGER MINING /,NUISANCES: Eder said he had asked Dan Olinger to
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL,'JULY 7, 1981 -4-
attend the meeting to resolve the questions about his
father's mining permit and his efforts to buffer the
nuisances on the property from neighbors. Whittaker
advised the Council that he had discussed this with
Carl Olinger, also. Neither Olinger appeared before
the Council.
Eder suggested that the City Council authorize the
City Engineer to provide the necessary contours and
land elevations at Mr. Olinger's expense. Mottaz moved,
seconded by Morgan, to authorize the City Engineer to
provide this data at Olinger's expense. Motion carried
4-0-1, Fraser absent.
PUBLIC INQUIRIES, DEMONTREVILLE LAKE ACCESS: Greg Foucks and Dave
Garloff, who live near the lake access, asked that the
end of 53rd Street be posted "No Parking" as drivers
are ignoring the signs posted down the street. They
asked that the City consider installing posts along the
no parking zones on Demontreville trail, as drivers often
ignorethose signs too. And, they asked that the access
ramp be improved as those lauching their boats were
getting stuck.
The City Council instructed the' -City Administrator to
post the necessary signs; to order signs indicating
the lake access is open the same hours as other parks
in the City and that ,liquor and littering are prohibited;
to contact the County Highway Department about putting
posts and cable along the No Parking zones.
Morgan expressed concern that the Lake Jane access is
also being over -used. There are often more cars in the
parking lot at the public access than it is designed
for. Whittaker said the DNR had promised signs on the
limits of the parking area; and that he would remind
them of that assurance.
Mottaz moved, seconded by Morgan, to instruct the City
Attorney to draft an Ordinance establishing tow -away
zones along Demontreville Trail, Lake Jane Trail, and
Klondike Avenue. Motion carried 4-0-1. Fraser absent.
KLATKE MINOR SUBDIVISION / VARIANCES: Mr. Klatke explained his
request for a Simple Lot division to build and earth -
sheltered home on the back of his property, Lot 3,
Huppert Add. on Jamaca Avenue. He explained that the
lot is ideally suited to an earth -sheltered home; and each
has two- drainfield sites; he would build a road to City
standards and dedicate to the City, if required; and,
he would pay for all improvements.
Novak asked about
and 36th Street.
he had expressed
hearing.
the location of his neighbor's house
Gary Paulsen reiterated the concerns
to the Planning Commission at the public
Klatke reiterated his response to those concerns; and
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCILr JULY 7, 1981 -5-
added that Mr. Paulsen would not have a problem if
he had not planted trees on the road easement.
Eder explained that the easement had not been dedi-
cated to the public when the plat was filed. It was
intended to be an easement for a private driveway
only. Novak expressed concern over the private road
given current assessment problems. Mottaz said that
granting these Variances might result in a prolifer-
ation of short private streets that serve very few
properties, cannot be extended, do not fit into any
over-all street plan, and make it difficult to pro-
vide City services. He also said that, if we allow
Klatke to do this, the other property owners in the
plat should be able to; and that the City could end
up with two or three short streets very close together;
and several undersized lots.
Eder suggested all the neighboring property owners
get together and develope an'.over-all street plan and
plat for the vacant land. This would prevent many of
the problems that concern the City Council.
Mottaz moved, seconded by Novak, to deny the request
for Minor Subdivision of Lot 3, Huppert Add., and all
Variances requested. Motion carried 4-0-1. Fraser
abstained,
FAIRVIEW SIGN, CUP FOR ADVERTISING SIGN: After a brief discussion,
Eder moved, seconded by Morgan, to refer this request
back to the Planning Commission so that the Commission
might state the reasons it considered in recommending
the Variance from the minimum distance between signs
requirements. Motion carried 5-0.
GROBNER VARIANCE: Mr. Richard Grobner, 10867-33rd St. No., re-
quested a Variance from the requirement that previously
platted lots meet 60% of the required lot size for the
?Zoning Districtras he has two adequate drainfield sites,
has over 100% of the average lot size in the neighbor-
hood, and meets all requirements of the City Code ex-
cept the lot area rdquirement. He explained that the
lot had been surveyed in 1962; and been a parcel of
record at least since that time.
Mottaz moved, seconded by Morgan, to adopt RESOLUTION
81-47, "A Resolution granting a Variance from the 60%
rule for lot area for Tract 4 of Lot 4, Block 3, Lake
Elmo Park". In discussion, the Council assured Mr.
Alex Kovulchuck that the sewer would be inspected to
insure the fluent does not run down the Bill into the
Lake or neighboring property. Motion carried 5-0.
RENATE PAULSEN, CIVIL DEFENSE PLAN: Mrs. Paulsen presented the
( draft Civil Defense Plan to the City Council. She
said the draft included only the basic elements of a
Civil Defense plan required by the State; and that
"annex" plans need to be developed for each specific
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL, JULY 7, 1981 -$-
area of responsibility under the plan. She said she
had secured volunteers for some positions but that many
more were needed.
Mrs. Paulsen said the plan needed Council support; and
that a budget and much more work are needed to make the
plan useful.
Fraser asked if City staff wouldn't be responsible for
many of these functions in an emergency; and, if they
would ignore Civil Defense staff. Paulsen said she
believes a separate Civi-1 Defense staff is necessary;
and that City staff would serve in some capacities
under the plan.
She said the new Director needs to be a good leader and
manager. She had no person to recommend. She said some
key areas have not been filled: Radiological defense,
hazardous wastes, and transportation chief. She also
said the Fire Department should be trained in these areas;
and have expressed a willingness to take training if it
can be offered at regular meetings in the Fire Ball.
She said we have an inadequate communication system and
transportation plans.
The Council discussed the need for & "likelihood of en-
listing volunteers with Paulsen. They agreed to refer
the plan to the Fire Department'fOr review and comment.
Morgan moved, seconded by Mottaz, to adopt RESOLUTION
81-48, thanking Mrs. Paulsen for her exceptional efforts
and accepting the draft plan as a basis for future
planning. Motion carried 5-0.
BREAK: 9:05
RECONVENE: 9:15
ENGINEER`S REPORT:
A. 1981 MSA STREET PROJECT: The Council reviewed the
project briefly with the City Engineer, Larry Bohrer.:'
He explained that the extremely long grade needed to
realign Keats Avenue near the Raleigh property could be
almost entirely eliminated if the road were moved to the
west. This would eliminate the impact on the Raleigh
property, which was most affected by the realignment.
The Council agreed that the project should be aligned
so as to have the least effect on the adjoining property.
Eder moved to reconsider the motion on the assessment
formula passed at the last meeting. Motion died for
lack of a second. The Council expressed a desire to
work out the details of the proposed assessment formula
before considering alternatives. Eder then polled the
Council for feelings on the project. Response to the
project was generally favorable if damage to property
owners could be minimized.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL, JULY 7,1981
-7-
Mottaz moved, seconded by Morgan, to adopt RESOLUTION
81-49, ordering plans and specifications for the 1981
MSA project; and authorizing the City Engineer and City
Administrator to take bids on the project. Motion
carried 5-0.
MSA STREET DESIGNATION, 39th STREET: Bohrer explained that he
asked the Council to look at designatinganother one-
half mile as an MSA Street; so that the City could
qualify for additional MSA funds. The partners of the
Brookfield Company had requested that 39th Street from
Laverne to Co. Road 17 be so designated, as it will
become a collector; and may relieve traffic at the
intersection of Co. Road 17 and Highway 5.
The Council felt it was more appropriate to continue
the MSA designation on 50th Street, east of Co. Road 17;
and instructed the Administrator to inquire if the
County had designated Co. Road 15 as a future MSA Street,
50th Street can be designated only if it runs from a
State Aid Street to another MSA Street, a County Road
or a State Highway. Presently, it intersects with Co.
Road 15 as planned; but, it does not meet the other
criteria.
Mottaz moved, seconded by Novak, to instruct the
Administrator to write a letter to Brookfield Company
advising them that another street is being considered
for MSA designation. Motion carried 5-0.
LEGION AVENUE SEWERS: Bohrer advised the Council that TKDA could
study the Legion Avenue sewer problems, in the 201 area,
first; so that the Council would have that information
upon which to make a decision about the Council order to
the residents on Legion to repair their systems by July
1,1981. The residents now claim they have had no
problems since they filled their lots on Legion pond.
The Council decided that, if the sewer systems are
functioning now, they should be considered in the
normal course of the 201 study. Morgan moved, seconded
by Mottaz, to rescind the order requiring improvements
to the sewers on Legion Avenue by July 1,1981. Motion
carried 5-0.
FRIEND EASEMENT: Bohrer reported that a discrepancy on the plat
left the status of the slope easement unclear. He had
suggested that the City vacate the entire 33 foot ease-
ment and require Friend to dedicate (by deed) the 20
foot easement needed for future improvements to 45th
Street near Jane Road North. This will accomplish the
same thing as their original motion to vacate 13 feet
of the existing easement. The Council agreed.
RENAMING
eAmended 7/21/81
Mottaz moved
"'LITTLE SUNFISH LAKE": The Council agreed that the City
should ask the DNR to rename "Little Sunfish" Lake, near
Cimarron, Lake Rose, after Rose Friedrich. *-T'ra-serr moved,
seconded by Eder, to adopt RESOLUTION 81-50, "A Resolu-
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL, JULY 7, 1981 _8_
tion Requesting the Mn / DNR Rename "Little Sunfish"
.Lake, Lake Rose in the inventory of public waters".
*Amended 7/21/81 Motion carried*6-0. 4-0. Fraser abstained.
1006 PRELIMINARY FUND: Fraser moved, seconded by Eder, to adopt
Resolution 81-51.,,A Resolution increasing the City's com-
mitment to the 1006 Preliminary Fund -by $3,OOO,making the
total commitment $9`,000. Motion carried 4-1. Morgan opposed
ICMA DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN: Morgan moved, seconded by Eder
to adopt RESOLUTION 81-52, "A Resolution Establishing
a Deferred Compensation Plan". Motion carried 5-0.
SUNFISH LAKE, BUILDING ELEVATION: The Council reviewed the Planning
Commission recommendations. Mottaz moved, seconded by
Novak, to adopt ORDINANCE 7928, and Ordinance establishing
a Building elevation of 903 for Sunfish Lake. Motion
carried 5-0.
PEPIN REZONING: The Council reviewed the Planning Commission rem
commendation. Morgan moved, seconded by Mottaz, to
adopt ORDINANCE.7929, and Ordinance rezoning Lots 1-4
Block 1, Cloverdale Add. from R1 to I. Motion carried
5-0.
SEWER PROBLEMS, CITY SCHOOLS: The Council expressed concern about
inadequate design of the sewer at Oak -Land School and
inadequate maintenance of the sewer system at Lake
Elmo Elementary School. They instructed the Administrator
to draft a letter of these concerns, asking for a
maintenance plan for the sewers at these schools, for
Council review.
WETLANDS INVENTORY: Whittaker reported that the Washington County
Soil and Water Conservation District is still willing
to conduct an inventory of City wetlands at a low price
if the City requests it now. The survey would identify
wetlands that are critical wildlife habitat, play an
important part in surface water management, or are im-
portant areas of ground water recharge. The Council
agreed the survey would be very useful; but was con-
cerned about financing it.
Mottaz moved, seconded by Novak, to order the inventory
if the Administrator assured the Council that there are
adequate funds for it. Motion carried 5-0.
NEWSLETTER DISTRIBUTION: Based on the Administrator's recommendation
in the Agenda Memo, Morgan moved, seconded by Mottaz, to
distribute the City Newsletter through the Lillie Shopper
and pay for postage,to Cimarron residents. Motion carried
5-0.
CIVIL DEFENSE DIRECTOR"S EXPENSES: Morgan moved, seconded by Mottaz,
to authorize $74.00 to cover the final expenses of out-
going Civil Defense Director, Renate Paulsen. Motion
carried 5-0.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL, JULY 7, 1981 1 -9-
AMM BOARD: Mayor Eder explained that through his nomination,
Laura Fraser has been appointed as a Director of
the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities.
LI'ON'S PARK TENNIS COURTS: Morgan said that, in his opinion,
the tennis courts in Lion's Park should be resur-
faced and repaired if the City Office was not being
.built there, He said the project bid out last
month was suppose to repair the longterm problems
with the courts.
Morgan moved, seconded by Novak, to repair the courts
as specified if the low bid for the project was still
good and if the repairs will solve the basic problem
which causes the break-up of the courts. Motion
carried 5-0.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m. on a motion
by Mottaz, seconded by Morgan.
RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED:
81-47 Grobner Variance
81-48 Thanking Renate Paulsen
81-49 Ordering plans and specifications for 1981
MSA project and authorize bids
81-50 Renaming Little Sunfish Lake to Lake Rose
81-51 1006 Preliminary Fund increase
81-52 ICMA Deferred Compensation Plan
ORDINANCES ADOPTED:
7928 Sunfish Lake Building Elevation
7929 Pepin Rezoning
R-81-50
RESOLUTION
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE RENAMING OF LITTLE SUNFISH LAKE
IN THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO TO LAKE ROSE.
WHEREAS, the Department of Natural Resources is conducting
an inventory of public waters in the State of Minnesota;and,
WHEREAS, the Department of Natural Resources has solicited
the cooperation of the City of Lake Elmo in identifying and
naming public waters with in the corporate .limits of the City
of Lake Elmo; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo has two lakes named Sunfish
Lake;and,
WHEREAS, the name Sunfish Lake has no historical significance
with respect to the lake numbered 112 W in sections 25 and 36 in
t-he City of Lake Elmo; and,
WHEREAS, the land surrounding this lake was historically a
part of the Freidrich family holdings and the mother in this
family was named Rose;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of
the City of Lake Elmo,
THAT, the City of Lake Elmo hereby rdquests that the name
of i(Little) Sunfish Lake in sections 25 and 36 of the City of
Lake Elmo be changed to Lake Rose; and,
THAT, the final public waters inventory for Washington
County reflect that Lake 112 W in sections 25 and 36 of the
City of Lake Elmo is called Lake Rose.
Adopted, this the 7th day of July, 1981, by the City Council
City of Lake Elmo, Washington County, Minnesota.
SIGNED:
Mayn� �—`or
Eder,Mayor
ATTEST:
Laurence E. Whittaker, City Administrator
R-81-48
i
RESOL'UTI,ON
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY MIN'NESOTA
A RESOLUTION THANKING RENATE PAULSEN FOR HER WORK AS CIVIL
DEFENSE DIRECTOR.
WHEREAS, Renate Paulsen accepted the responsibilities
Of Civil Defense Director without compensation; and,
WHEREAS, Mrs. Paulsen developed the basic elements of
a Civil Defense Plan for the City of Lake Elmo; and,
WHEREAS, this plan has been accepted by the City Council
as the basis for a future Civil Defense Plan; and,
WHEREAS, this plan was developed over a very short period
of time with .little financial or other assistance from the
City Council and staff;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED „ by the City Council of
the City of Lake Elmo, Washington County, Minnesota
THAT, Renate Paulsen is hereby offered the sincere appre-
ciatibn•and:.thanks of the City of .Lake Elmo for her efforts
as Civil Defense Director; and,
THAT, the City of Lake Elmo accepts the draft Civil Defense
Plan for developing a future Civil Defense Program in the City
of Lake Elmo.
Adopted, this the 7th day of July, 1581, by the City
Council of the City of Lake Elmo, Washington County, Minnesota.
ATTEST:
SIGNED:
Mayn d Eder, Mayor
1" 2
R-81- .)
RESOLUTION
CITY OF LAKE'ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA.
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A DEFERRED
COMPENSATION PLAN
WHEREAS, the'City of Lake Elmo has in its employ
certain personnel.; and,
WHEREAS, said employees are and will be render-
ing valuable services to the City of Lake Elmo; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo has considered the
establishment of a Deferred Compensation Plan for the
said employees made available to the City and to said
employees by the International City Management Associa-
tion Retirement Corporation; and
WHEREAS, said employees often are unable to ac-
quire retirement security under other existing and avail-
able retirement plans due to the contingencies of employ-
ment mobility; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo receives benefits
under said plans by being able to assure reasonable re-
tirement security to said employees, by being more able
to attract competent personnel to its service, and by in-
creasing its flexibility in personnel management through
elimination of the need for continued employment for the
sole purpose of allowing an employee to qualify for retire-
ment benefits;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of
Lake Elmo establish said Deferred Compensation Plan for
said employees and hereby authorizes its Mayor to execute
the Deferred Compensation Plan with the International City
Management Association Retirement Corporation, attached
hereto as Appendix A; and,
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Administrator,
may, on behalf of the City of Lake Elmo, execute all Joinder
Agreements with said employees and other eligible officials
and officers, which are necessary for said persons partici-
pation in the Plan, an example of which appears at Appendix
B, except that any Joinder Agreement for said designated
official shall be executed by the Mayor.
ADOPTED this the 7th. day of July, 1981, by the
City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, Washington County
Minnesota
SIGNED:
ATTEST: Mayna er, Mayo.r
CLAIMS TO BE APPROVED AT JULY 7, 1981 COUNCIL MEETING
81507
Commissioner of Revenue - June State withholding $
593.20
81508
State Bank of Lake Elmo- June Federal withholding
1,745.90
81509
State Treas. - Soc.Sec. for June
1,419.16
81510
Washington National Ins. Co.
458.43
81511
Minn. Benefit Ass'n
26.40
81512
Allied Group Insurance Trust
123.99
81513
Bahls Motor & Impl. - Truck parts
5.76
81514
Oxygen Service Co. - Fire Department
49.35
81515
Fireap Assoc., Inc. - Sirens
4,546.00
81516
Minn. Fire, Inc. - 3 wire cord reel -fire dep't
64.78
81517
Tool Supply Inc. - Fire Dep't - EMS funds
138.02
81518
Advance Ambulance & Equip. - Fire Dep't EMS
460.21
81519
Minn. Fire Inst. Assn - Dues
5.00
81520
Bruce Kuettner - fire dep't convention reimbursement
134.32
81521
Capitol Electronics - radio repair fire dep't
253.42
81522
Laurence Whittaker - July Expense
50.00
81523
Kathleen Crombie - 1 PZC meeting
25.00
81524
Bruce Rosenau - June Mileage
126.00
81525
George Ringwelski - Park gate 4/20 thru 6/30
140.00
81526
T. A. Schifsky & Sons - Blacktop
574.20
81527
Buettner Welding - oxygen maintenance dep't
14.60
81528
Roy's Shop - refinish & reglue chairs (council)
317.80
81529
Junker Sanitation
42.00
81530
Mollie Hedges - 6/23 & 6/30 newsletters
350.00
81531
Gerald Dahlberg - June animal control
281.25
81532
Lillie Suburban Newspapers - legal publications
68.98
81533
Three M. - address labels
30.36
81534
Stillwater Book & Stationery - office supplies
50.40
81535
Oakwood Animal Hospital -June
209.00
81536
Elmer Richert - hospitalization, deductible
100.00
81537
Edna Beers - hospitalization, deductible
100.00
81538
James Steele Construction - final on maint. gar.
9,067.60
81539
TKDA _ Engineering - General 201 3,601 A5 940.89
Pass Thru 33.18
Sealcoating 322.55
MSA 747.49
5,645.66
81540
Briggs & Morgan - Equipment Certificate services
625.00
81541
Planning & Development Services - Rossow
45.00
81542
I.C.M.A, Conference Registration
409.50
81543
I.C.M.A. Hotel registration
50.00
81544
Adventure world - I.C.M.A. air fare
289.00
81545
Copy Duplicating Products - paper
133.56
81546
Northern States Power
803.41
81547
Northwestern Bell
153.96
81548
Meyer Mercantile - General 57.28
Maint Bldg. 187.00
Toro Mower 195.00
Park 43.37
482.65
81549 thru 81558 July loth payroll 4,500.00
$ 34.709.27
CITY OF
LAKE
ELMO
City of Lake Elmo
777-5510
P. 0. Box J / Thirty-third and Laverne Avenue / Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042
MEMO
TO: The City Council cc: Council, Press, Engineer,
FR: Larry Whittaker Attorney, Admin., Sec'y.
DT : July 2, 1981
RE: Items on July %, 1981, City Council Agenda
NOTE: The meeting is scheduled to start at 6:00. The Mayor and I discussed
the number and portent of the many agenda items and decided we would have to
meet early in order to consider the office plans at all. Please come at 6:00 p.m.
Please review the latest Memo on the possibilities for an office in Lion's Park.
OLINGER: The Olingers have apparently decided not to subdivide off the parcel
that Dan Olinger's house is on. They do not see the need for a survey if they
do not intend to subdivide (the Ordinance requires it for a mining permit to
assure us the mining is being done only on the owners property). Carl Olinger
said he could not understand why we would require a bond for haul roads, as
they plan to haul a few loads once in a while. The do not plan large scale
mining or hauling. He thinks this is an excessive requirement. He seemed
to be willing to secure the elevations requested by the City Engineer - to
determine current grade of the land - and final grade after mining. But, he
has not hired anyone to do this yet. He started work on a berm between his
operation and Tschumperlins; but, says he can't complete it without a mining
permit.
then
I recommend we permit him to mine what is needed to complete the berm;vrequire
the elevations as the Engineer suggested, forget the survey if he assures us
that he will complete ALL mining within two years (because I think the haul
road is actually on City property; and I don't think we should permit this
use for any longer period of time). I don't think the bond for haul roads
is too critical. After all required info. is in, we could issue the 2 yr, permit.
I think, whatever position you take, this should be ordered now. We have
been hemming and hawing too long on this.
KLATKE: The Klatk6s--appeared before the Planning Commission last week. The
Commission recommended against the Minor Subdivision because it requires a
Variance from the lot size requirement, street off -set, and frontage on a
public street. The Commission has long been opposed to private roads.
Gary Paulsen, the adjacent property owner expressed concerns about: additional
traffic if their joint driveway is extended to serve Klatke's second lot, having
to shave in the cost of improving the road, losing trees if the road is widened,
risks of future assessment on two frontages if water and sewer go in, and addi-
tional run-off from the improved road, especially if it is extended to the east
line of the property.
Agenda Memo, July 7, 1981, meeting
page two
Mr. Klatke is willing to construct a road to the standards recommended by the
City engineer (241wide blacktop with a T turn -around). He is willing to put
all of the additional pavement on his property; and the Engineer says this is
feasible. The Engineer recommends that the road extend to the second lot only;
and that the approval, if given, clearly indicate that this road would not
be extended to serve property to the east. This overcomes the Engineer's re—
servations about the offset of this road to 36th St., on Jamaca. I£ the road
serves just three homes, the 150 off -set between 36th St. and the Klatke road
will not be critical.
Klatke is willing to dedicate the road to the City to meet the requirement
for frontage on a public street — and avoid a private road. But, that may
cause more problems that it solves. A well built private road will meet our
needs for emergency access. It can be posted private road, dead end; and
that will discourage additional traffic: Mr. Paulsen is not willing to dedicate
his part of the right—of-way; so, the City would not have a full 66, of r—o—w.
Perhaps, an imporved private road with an agreement that the City can take it
over if the owners fail to maintain it for emergency access, is the best approach
to dealing with this.
The lots created would be 1.5 acres and just over an acre — even though he has
a 3.acre parcel._ Part of the 3 acres in r—o--w for Jamaca Avenue (the property
description goes to the center of Jamaca); and part of the lot will have to
be used for the r—o—w--for Klatke's street.
I think Mr..Klatke has made every reasonable attempt to meet`.the requirements
that the -Planning Commission and City Council made when he first applied for
this Minor Subdivision in 1979• The lot sizes are not far short of the lV acres
required. There is adequate area on both lots for 2 drainfields. The improved
road meets our requirements — and would be exactly what we want if Mr. Paulsen
wouldaagree to dedicate the r—o—w under the existing shared di�iveway and shoulder.
Mr. Paulsen will not have to pay any of the costs, will not lose any trees,
will be on a paved driveway essentially, will not have much additional traffic,
and would have access to the back of his lot in the future.
Please review the plan and information in the packet on this application also.
GROEBNER VARIANCE: Mr. Groebner owns a 19,912 sq. ft. on 33rd St. Lane. He
wants to build a house there; but, does not have 60u.::of the required lot size
for previously platted lots. 60% is about 39,000 sq. ft. In the recent past,
the Council adopted a policy of requiring a party to have 100'fo of the average
lot size in the neighborhood in order to get a Variance from the 60J rule. The
person must also have two drainfield sites, adequate public access, and meet
all the setback requirements. Mr. Groebner meets all of these requirements.
The average lot size in his area is 16, 123 sq. ft.
RENATE PAULSEN: Please review the proposed Civil Defense Plan. Renate would
like to discuss it with you; and would like to share her ideas on a new C.D.
director and budget for C.D. Tuesday night. This was distributed at the last
meeting.
MSA: The hour of decision. The Council may order the City Engineer to prepare
plans and specs. and take bids. You may want to have a work session to more
accurately determinethe assessments. Whichever way you chose, it may be difficult
to complete the project this year because we have to get the Variance, secure
the right—of—way, and arrange to finance the inel4gible portions of the project.
If you want to go with this, however, I'd like to go now.
Agenda Memo, July 7, 1981 meeting
page four
NEWSLETTER DISTRIBUTION, CIMARRON: Lillie advised me that they have tried to
get their shopper ( and our Newsletter) to Cimarron by car, carrier, plastic
bag, drop off at the Community Center, and ...everything short of mailing
them. It is not true that they don't want to hit this market. So, I concluded
that the only way to get the Newsletter to Cimarron residents is to mail
them there. If we mail them in the Shopper, Lillie will handle the labeling,
stuffing, and mailing for 140 each. This would cost about $75.00 per issue.
We not pay about $10.00 to mail out each issue to those who've requested it.
We also use our labor and envelopes. We would save these costs. Our net
cost would be $65.00.
The White Bear Press (St. Croix Valley Free Press) will stuff, label and
mail the 550 newletters for 5.8 0 each ($34.65). However, Lillie would
charge about $30.00 to print the extra copies, if they are not distributed
with the Shopper. So, the cost is about the same to have Lillie do it all.
If the Council believes it is important to get the Newsletter to Cimarrron,
I recommend we ask Lillie to mail it with their shopper.
AMM: Please see Maynard's Letter of recommendation.
METERS, HOURS on Lights in Pebble Park: The coin operated meters in Pebble Park
have been destroyed repeatedly. We are paying more to replace the meters than
we are collecting in the coin boxes. Therefore, I have suggested to Dave that
we eliminate the coin boxes; and replace them with metered free switches. The
switches are cheaper and a less attractive nuisance. They will help assure that
the lights are turned on for an hour at a time, only. If we put the lights on
straight meters (timers), they would have to be left on every night whether the
courts are in use or not ... on all courts. With the switches, at least, they
could be turned off when not in use. And, if turned on, they would only run
an hour.
I have a question about the hours for the lights in general. They seem to be
timed now so that someone can use the lights 'til 12:00 midnight. All other
parks close before 10:00p.m. Do you think it is a good idea to have the lights
in this park on after normal closing hours. It could be a nuisance to the
neighborhood.
AFTON PLAN: Please review the excerps from the plan sent to you. If you have
any questions or concerns, we should relay them to the Metro. Council and AFTON.
The Planning Commission had no concerns.
MISC. EQUIPMENT: Elmer will take his sickle sharpened with him if we do not want to
buy it. 1 think we should buy it. We need a weedeater. The crew is using hand 1 mT•-
trimmers. This takes an inordinate amount of time to trim around tennis courts and
the like.
Elmer has lined up a saddle tank (gas tank) for the pump trailer ... $65.00. I
recommmend we buy that, too.
I'll have prices for you Tuesday.
Happy July 4 !