HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-19-82 CCMPublic Informational Meeting on Jaycees Proposal for West Sunfish Park
January 19, 1982
Arlyn Christ briefly explained the Jaycee proposal.
Public Comments:
Jane McNaught
8989 Lk Jane Tr. - lives across from West Sunfish Park - concerned
about the number of cars and traffic. Would like to see something
done that would be an asset to the children in the neighborhood.
Bill Best
8895 42nd St. - this is a start in providing a place for kids to
go during the day. Positive start.
Arlyn Christ - this will have playground facilities and picnic
areas in the future
Linda Schneider
469 Cimarron - does not feel this will generate any serious problems
that cannot be handled or policed by the Jaycees. Have sponsored
many events over the years without serious problems.
Jim Dellis
6787 15th St. Ct.- Jaycees plan to put in a permanent sanitary facility
Will start in summer of 82 - completed spring 83
Mike Wagner - Opposes the proposal
Jim Wright
3524 Lake Elmo Ave- Wildlife will not be bothered by the ball diamonds.
Wildlife lived there when the area was used as a dump.
Arlyn Christ - No intention of going close to the wooded area.
Mayor Eder - When County proposed the landfill the long range
use that was proposed was more passive than this proposal. Asked
for a response on this more intensified use.
Jane McNaught - strongly concerned about the number of cars, and
lights in a residential area. Should be developed without any
complications to the residents living in the area.
Councillor Mottaz no plan has been developed or presented to the
Council on this park. All City parks have had a master plan
developed first. Plan should be done first, then see if this fits in.
Mike Mazarra - a private entity is offering to go in and do some-
thing productive. Because of economics the property will most
likely remain undeveloped for many years. Proposing to use only
15 acres to a greater extent. Feel this proposal would be of
benefit to the City and a reasonable use.
Jim Wright - if against from a planning standpoint - how long
before a plan will be developed to see if this proposal is
compatible or can be improved on.
January 19, 1982 -2-
JAYCEE PROPOSAL:
Jim Wright - Good plan for 15 acres out of 400 acres.' Development
is gratis to the City.
Mayor Eder - City was not involved in this until December.
All parks in the City have a plan and are developed according
to the plan. Some problem in that people were told this area
would be a passive use. No problem with one ballfield. Problem
in finding a total benefit in having four fields. Why are the
ballfields in Stillwater not being used more or up graded to make
more useable,
Jim Dellis - Fields in Stillwater have been fixed up but are
not being maintained by the City. Jaycees have done maintenance
on the Stillwater fields but the City has not followed up on the
maintenance. Can lower the speed limit in the area, berm the area
for noise, wildlife will keep its distance from people ample area
for wildlife and ballfields.
Jane McNaught - questioned campers - motorcyclists using the park.
Response - This is a City park and will be govereried by the
the same rules as other City parks.
Bill Best - people can be controlled by the rules that are
set down and enforced from the beginning.
Mayor Eder - Pebble Park need a field developed - VFW field
not intensely used.
Bill Best - these are designed for Little League.
Mayor Eder - over the past several years the amount spent on
youth is nil compared to what has been spent on adult activities.
Arlyn Christ Requested the City Council to table any action on
the Jaycess proposal for West Sunfish and suggested the City
Council and the Jaycees work together on developing a plan, as
suggested by Councillor Mottaz. Nothing other than good faith
was intended or put into this proposal.
Three residents expressed opposition to the proposal.
Kathy Hemen, representing the Jaycee Women, requested the use of the old
Council Chambers in the Fire Hall for the Jaycee Women. They would like
the hall the first Tuesday of each month on a yearly basis.
--Mottaz - before approving future use of the facility the Council should
establish policies for future use, as there may be many requests.
--Fraser - this is an appropriate and favorable use; but, agrees this
is a good time to establish a policy.
--Whittaker suggested if they need a meeting place�on a one night
basis, they should call the City Office to see if the hall is available
and not being used by the Fire Department.
C14
d
614 v A)I—I A /I
Fr-oppl eA-r PAP C?
�"a4hy-�Ie�wen
6,,�33 M,,,,71a.nc
r r�
� 97o J� /67
2- Z-
30
r, no
-7
J%IYVA t>U-L\ S
10-7%-1 IWO
?W000
X� ;7, A-,
AF
X,
ET V at [UVAAA
JQ, �JCL
(tS
6,k)
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, JANUARY 19, 1982
Mayor Eder called the meeting to order at .7:41 p.m.
Councillors in attendance: Mottaz, Fraser. and Novak. Morgan absent.
1. AGENDA: Additions: Administrator's Report - 7 G. Rink Maintenance
and 7 H. Comments on the Jaycee Plan.
M/S/P Fraser/Mottaz to accept the agenda, as amended.
2. MINUTES: January 5, 1982 and January 9, 1982, Special Meeting.
M/S/P Mottaz/Fraser to approve the minutes of January 5, 1982.
M/S/P Fraser/Eder to approve the minutes of January 9, 1982.
Motion carried 2-0-2 Mottaz and Novak abstained - not present,.
at this meeting.
3. CLAIMS:
M/S/P Fraser/Novak to consider Claim 82105 - LaFayette Co.
separately.
M/S/P Fraser/Novak to approve Claims 82088-82136, exclusive
of Claim 82105.
A. Appraisal Bill , LaFayette Company
The Council reviewed the breakdown of the bill.
Whittaker obtained two alternate bids on the recommendation
of Bob LaFayette. One was from Ray Kirchner for $400; the
other from Eldon Robey & Assoc. for $500. Iie also called
a State appraisal group whose estimate was $800. Mr. LaFayette
said he would accept the low bid as his fee.
M/S/P Mottaz/Fraser to pay Bob LaFayette, Claim 82105, $400
for his appraisal fee.
4. OLD BUSINESS:
A. CUP - Cimarron Golf Course -
Stephen Taylor and Mike Ahrens were present to address the
complaints on noise and liability for damage to private residences
around the golf course, raised by the homeowners.
Noise -
Mr. -,Ahrens - it is common practice for courses to do maintenance
of the course prior to 7:30 a.m. Based on the MPCA standards
their equipment is within the allowable sound decibles for the
type of equipment used. He outlined the procedure they use for
mowing - starting at the furthest point of the course, away from
the home, and working towards the homes after the hours indicated
in the ordinance (7:30 a.m.). They...begin work at sunrise. They
endeavor to keep the decible sound,set by the ordinance, to within
the perimeter of the golf course. Have had only one complaint
raised by a nearby resident.
--Mottaz - loudness is not the concern; but, the nuisance effect
of the noise. Suggested modifying the equipment to further
muffle the sound. Mr. Ahrens said this would be looked into.
---Ahrens - Not practical to let golfers on later other alternative
would be to,mow:while people are golfing.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, JANUARY 19, 1982
-2-
Cimarron Golf Course -
Golf balls going onto private property around course -
Mr. Taylor addressed the question of insurance coverage
by Cimarron to cover damage to homes.
Mr. Tayor - do have insurance - General Liability clause
covers damage if the management is liable. Gave the back-
ground of the course and its design. Been operating basically
unchanged for 10 years. Procedure for damages in the past
referred the damaged individual to the golf course's insurance
company. Insurance companies say that the golfer, not the golf
course, is the liable party and people who live around a course
assume a greater degree of risk. Based on this position of the
insurance company,-Ciffiarroh'-ncw advises a complainant to contact
the golfer. Recognizes this is not always possible, but if,,the
liable party is not found, Homeowners Insurance,covers damage
from an errant golf ball. Recognizes many policies have $100
deductible, is a problem, not sure that this speaks to the
liability question.
--Eder - suggested Cimarron consider carrying additional
coverage and pass the extra cost onto the golfers through the
green fees.
--Mottaz - this is a serious problem with golf courses -
recommended looking into redesigning or relocating some of the
holes. Believes, in this facility, first liability is to the
people who rent space.
--Taylor - emphasised the question of liability
--Mottaz - creating, with the golf course, an attractive nuisance.
Owner as well as the offender has a liability.
--Taylor - as part of an over-all updating of recreational
facilities Cimarron is having the original architect review
and make--reiaommendations on the layout of the course for
improving the safety and playing of the course.
--Mottaz - would like Cimarron's insurance company verifying
if this type of coverage is available--aad•if it can be passed_ ,
on through the -green fee%t
--Taylor - happy to approach the insurance company. Feel
doing a responsible job in running the golf course, have a
good golf course and are taking as much responsibility in the
case of claims as any other golf course. The precedent for
liability has been set in court cases.
--Eder - is there any signing that notifies players of their
responsibilities.
--Taylor - no signs to this effect; but this could be done. Signs
posted stating no trespassing on private property.
Public Comments:
--Don Moe, 61 Cimarron - presented grievances from residents
within the park, on noise and trespass problems, damages and
losses. Believe the golf'course should be liable for any
damage done to.•bomes along that property. People who live
along the course pay premium rent. 75-80 homes affected -
no one there to enforce rules. Recommended that before a CUP
is issued to Cimarron Golf Course management ;show that they
have procured some type of insurance that will protect the
people who live around the course.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, JANUARY 19, 1982
-3-
Cimarron Golf Course _CUP -
Public Comments -
-Stephen J. Palfe - 124 Cimarron -
Related problems experienced with broken windows - Lives near
5th green. Would like to see golfers leave name if homeowner
is not home and make golfers aware they are liable for damage.
-Betty Bell — Does not live on the course - equipment very loud
noise terrible. Does not feel one should be awakened every
morning at 5 a.m. Has talked to several residents in the area
and all have the same concern. Should do something to muffle
the noise.
-Charles M. Clausen - 63 Cimarron - Asked about past damages -
insurance rider for additional coverage excellent idea for
future damages; but past damages have to be addressed.
Recommended that the Council review the past claims and write
something into the Conditional Use Permit that Cimarron Park
would have to process the past claims. If people who live on
the course can produce a bill for a broken window, management
should pay at least 1/2 - this should be retro-active back to
1977 when Mr. Taylor took over the park.
-Tom Guindon - 503 Cimarron -.Insurance Agent - in reference to
the alternatives - relocating the holes - too expensive;
lower deductible for homeowners - very expensive 30-40o more;
golfer liability - no practical from enforcement standpoint.
Expensive for kanagement to carry additional insurance -
premium based on projected loss - high for a golf course.
Specific coverage is available in a package that deals only
with golf courses.
Mottaz-- would like Cimarron -to.. -provide statements from
insurance companies regarding coverage for damage from golf balls.
Council agreed. Need positive assurance to the homeowners that
if a golfer breaks the+ir_window someone is going to replace it.
--Taylor - not sure can get insurance if admit liability when
not legally liable. Will discuss this with his attorney and
insurance agent.
--Fraser - unique operation when owner rents space and runs the
golf course.
--Eder - if this suggestion proves totally unreasonable and can
be documented as such then may have to explore other alternatives.
Requesting Cimarron to respond at this time.
B'.: IRB - Final,'Resolution ConnCo
Dave Johnson said ConEio wirl be using Lake Elmo as their
address.
Whittaker reported that the City Attorney has reviewed the
material and all the documents are in order.
M/S/P Mottaz/Fraser to adopt R-82-1, A Resolution providing for
the issuance and sale of Industrial Development Revenue Bonds
pursuant to Chap. 474, Mn Statutes to provide funds to be loaned to
Conn -Co Shoes, Inc, for Industrial Development Project.
C. Green Acres - Beer License and After Tours parties -
Howard Spring orn met with -the Council and explained his
operation and the facilities. He said not all the parties
using the facilities after 10:30 request a beer license.
--Mottaz - for the benefit of the City,andithe owners the
limits of the permit should be defined and documented.
--Springborn - all the events are chaperoned. He reviewed the
interior facilities of the chalet.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, JANUARY 19, 1982
Green Acres-
--Whittaker-outlined what is adlowbdc,:i under the present permit.
Hours are not defined.
--Springborn - currently close at 10:00 p.m. Sun-Thur and
10:30 Fri -Sat. He hires an off -duty deputy for Friday and
Saturday night.
--Mottaz - as a close neighbor, no problems now; but it is
:important to set limits on the extent of expansion. Also,
have to consider that this is a residential neighborhood and
someday this use may not be compatible with the area, should
set parameters now.
Administrator Whittaker will meet with Mr. Springborn to
work out a proposal setting limits on hours and use.
5. ENGINEER'S REPORT:
A. 201 Study Report - Engineer Bohrer referenced the 201 Study Report
outlining Phase I ,I 'ideritifying the septic needs -i:n-the community,
that was sent to the Council for their review and comment.
He introduced Bob Callery,_.201 Project Manager, and Loren Braun,
who explained the field work, how needs were.determined and
the procedure that will be followed at the public meeting.
Comments are to be directed to Mr. Callery or Mr. Braun before
the public hearing, January 26.
B. MSA Variance or Change Plan -
Engineer Bohrer presented a map indicating the alignment of
the 30 mph curve and the 40 mph curve. 1.2 acres would be
\ required for the 40 mph curve. Discussion included road
alignment, curves, "T" intersections, and extensions of Julep
and 45th St.
--Eder - get the property owners together to discuss alternative
alignments. Concerned about preserving ag land.
--Mottaz - may regret constructYng a 30 mph curve. Would prefer
extending 45th Street and using a "T." intersection at 45th
and Keats, provided this is economically feasible.
The Engineer and Administrator will approach Mn/DOT about
endorsing a "T" intersection. Bohrer will compile cost figures
for extending 45th for future road plan consideration.
C. Jamaca Avenue Paving -
Bohrer referr d'his letter of October 27, regarding --the
completion of Jamaca Avenue, and recommended increasing the
tennis --.court parking lot contract to include this work.
--Eder - suggested asking Schifsky to either share in the cost
or do the work for cost. Eder and Whittaker will approach him.
--Whittaker - this is not budgeted. Monies would have to be
taken out of the Emergency Road Maintenance Reserve.
--Bohrer - would like to bid the parking lot in February -
encouraged to make a decision by then.
This will be on -the February 2, agenda.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, JANUARY 19, 1982
-5-
ENGINEER'S REPORT:
( D. State Wetlands Survey -
t Bohrer reviewed is letter of December 23 regarding protected
waters and wetlands,within Washington County. The Engineer
had no comments on the designations made by the DNR in Lake
Elmo; but, suggested adding the West Lakeland Storage Site and
the Horseshoe Lake Outlet, as the City has an interest in keeping
these areas open and flowing.
M/S/P Novak/Eder to request the DNR to designate the Horseshoe Lake
Outlet and the West Lakeland Storage Site as a protected watercourse
and a protected wetland in the "Preliminary Designation of Protected
Waters and Wetlands within Washington County; Minnesota".
E. Highway 36 Improvements -
The Council reviewed the Engineer's letter of recommendation
to approve Mn/DOT's construction of turning lanes at Highway
36 and Demontreville Trail.
M/S/P Mottaz/Novak to adopt R•-82-2, A Resolution approving the
preliminary layout for the improvement of a part of Trunk Highway
36, within the corporate limits of the City of Lake Elmo, from
600 ft. west to 600 ft. east of County Road 13 (Demontreville Tr. N.).
BREAK
,6. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT:
A. Amending 'Zoning Ordinance to provide for Nominal 10's & 40's -
The Council reviewed the -Planning Commission recommendation to—
provide for nominal 10's and 4"01s. Discussion included density,
ag preservation, cluster development and review of the Administrator's
comments (January 14, Memo'- Nominal 10's and 40's).
--Novak - large tracts should be looked at individually to see if
they can conform. Hardships of the land should also be considered
individually.
--Whittaker - few parcels over 400 acres - Ifyouu had less than
400 acres, you would end up with a lot less than-10.acres requiring
a variance for the sub -standard lot. Ordinance permits clustering
7 lots per 40 acres - higher density.
--Novak - intent of the ordinance is to perserve ag land, if
developed,..: want to keep services at a minimum through clustering.
Acreage is not what is important in the intent of the ordinance,,
ag.,preservation is.`
--Eder - either going to encourage retention of ag land or forget
preserving ag land and consider density.
--Whittaker - does not feel this will have an effect on ag land.
If want to preserve ag land should zone this land ag with 40 acre
minimums. Could not build on 40 acres in ag because would not
meet the minimum lot size exclusive of road right-of-way.
--Eder - no problem with nominal 40's but does not agree with nominal
10's. -
�, --Mottaz - at some point will have to make a concession for land
given up for right-of-way that is less than 10 acres.
--Eder—should encourage some areas to stay ag. Worst thing is
to split 40's into 10 acre lots - this permits economic out for 40 A
tracts.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, JANUARY 19, 1982
-6-
Nominal 10's and 40's -
--wh tta Ar -'ideal solution is platting 7 per 40 to keep large
areas open.
--Novak - lack of planning by permitting nominal 10's.
4-Mottaz - need to allow nominal 10's or disallow 10 acre lots.
--Novak - require full 10 acres until 10 acres cannot be met -
then allow the nominal 10 or grant a variance. Encourage property
owners with 40 acres to plan the parcel, and plat 7 per 40.
Nominal 10's takes the incentive away to plan the 7 per 40:.
-Mike Mazarra, Planning Commission — Planning Commission felt
that Nominal 10's did not encourage development,of-ag land only
made it easier for a property owner to divide a 40 acre parcel.
--Whittaker =recommendedamending the subdivision ordinance to
require an over-all plan for remaining acreageafterone 10 acre
split is made.
M/S/P Eder/Novak to accept the recommendation of the Planning
Commission for nominal 40's and defer action on nominal 10's.
Discussion - --
--Mottaz - if allow nominal 40's automatically create nominal 10's
--Fraser - would like to see both approved. "
--Eder with approval from Novak withdrew his motion. Prefers
to see clustering; `
M/S/ Mottaz/Eder to table further discussion until February 5.
Motion carried 3-1 Fraser opposed would like to see action taken.
B. Amend Zoning Ordinance to Permit Truck Repair by CUP in GB The Council reviewed the Planninq Commission recommendation.
Whittaker advised the Council -that this amendment would not
effect ConnCo, who are operating as a -permitted non -conforming
use. The Councildiscussedadding another conditional' use.
Mottaz- against Xnother coriditiohAr use either allow or disallow.
The Council agteed`o ith "I46ttaz's -po. it on and f61t" this a'reasonabie
permitted use in Gl3'in areas adq'acent to industrial'.manfacturinq or
warehousing:
M/S/P Mottaz/rraser'to refer the'amendmeht'back-to the 'Planning
Comin'i:'ssion for recommendation to permit` truck" repaif,'i.n' GB
proviaod the area is adjacent to industrial, manfacturing or
warehousing.
C. Bruce Hill - Simple Lot Division
The Council discussed -the Planning Commission recommendation,
right-of-way dedication, and the future alignment of Co. i3.
--Whittaker Hill is willing to dedicate Jane Road right-of-way
the parcel is planned R71.
--Mottaz - how will this subdivision affect the proposed North/
South alignment of County 13`along the powerline. "Road alignment
critical.
-Novak - need some idea of future subdivision of the entire parcel
and access to the property.
M/S/P Eder/Novak to refer the request to the City Engineer and
back to the Planning Commission.
D. Baytown Comp Plan -
M/S/P Mottaz/Novak to approve the Baytown Comp Plan with the exception
of the section on airports. Whittaker will send the same response to
Baytown and Met Council that was sent on the Ccuntv':s Plan re airnnrtc_
CITY COUNCIL MEETING; JA14UARY 19, 1982
-7-
7. ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
A. Resolution - No passing in 40 mph Zone on Highway 5 -
/ M/S/P Eder/Fraser to adept ResT won 82-3, A Resolution requesting
t the formal creation of and posting of a "No Passing" zone on
State Highway 5 from County Road 17 to Layton Avenue North.
MEETING EXTENSION:
M/S/P Nova%/Mottaz to extend the meeting to 10:45
B. Changing Permit Year for Mining CUP's -
Whittaker informed the Council that the Code does not set a specific
date for mining permit renewal. I He recommended notifying
the permittees that the renewal date will be changed to September 1,
and the fee for 1982 pro -rated.
M/S/P Novak/Mottaz to renew mining permits September 1 of each
year, starting September 1, 1982, and pro -rating the permit fees
for 1982.
C. office Improvements -
IF Table Tops
M/S/Mottaz/Fraser to purchase the table tops, per the sample
from Lake Elmo Hardwood Lumber.
Discussion -
,-Fraser - recommended purchasing a wedge shaped section that
would permit the tables to be placed in a curved formation.
M/S/P Fraser/Mottaz, to amend the motion and include the
purchase of a wedged "V" shaped table section, provided it
can be purchased within the original cost. estimate.
Amendment carried 3-0-1 Novak abstained.
Motion, as amended, carried 3-0-1 Novak abstained.
(2) Closing Januarya2`9
whittaker requosted au—tior:ization to hire a moving company to
move a he:office equipment to.the new building,:.As themaintenance
men may be involved with snow'rgmoval. He"recommended closing
the office on moving day and notifying the public through the
Newsletter. Moving day has been set for January 28.
M/S/P Mottaz/Eder to authorize the Administrator to hire a
moving company and close the City Office on moving day,
(3) Disposition of Present Office Building -
M/S/P Mottaz/Fraser to table item (3) until February 2.
D. Guidelines - City Attorney -
Eder suggested inviting Ray Marshall to attend the February 2
meeting to discuss the disposition of the City Attorney. The
Council agreed.
E. �Servheim Resolution Correction -
`. R7S7P Fraser/Mottaz to adopt Resolution 82-4, A Resolution
rescinging R-81-61 to correct a typographical error.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, JANUARY 19, 1982
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
F. Hire Foreman -
The Council discussed the qualifications and experience of the
two applicants.
M/S/ Fraser/Novak to authorize the Administrator to conclude
negotiations with David Wisdorf for the position of Maintenance
Foreman/Superintendent.
Discussion
--Whittaker - recommended probationary salary be set at $20,500.
--Novak - should be offered the same as the previous Foreman, $20,000.
Motion carried 3-0-1 Mottaz abstained.
M/S/ Novak/Eder to offer. David Wisdorf a probationary salary
of $20,000, with a review in six months.
Discussion:
--Fraser - feels the $20,500 recommendation is appropriate because
of the reduction of insurance benefits he will sustain in,;�6osping to
Lake Elmo.
Whittaker � Wisdorf is also being paid more in his present job
than Rolle Maxey was.
--Mottaz - feels $20,000 is fair - will receive the same salary
as the man he is replacing.
Motion carried 3-1. Fraser opposed.
8. COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND REPORTS:
A. Goals and Policies - Park and Planning Commission
B. Appointments - Park and Planning Commission
Because, of the importance to items A & B,the Council felt it
would be beneficial to delay, action until adequate time is
scheduled for discussion.
M/S/P Fraser/Mottaz to schedule Goals and Policies and Appointments
for the Planning Commission and Park Commission for February 5,
immediately after the Claims.
9. LICENSES:
M/S/P Novak/Mottaz to approve
Pumping-;Septic_'Systems:
Morris B. Carlson
A & B Sanitation
5692 Centerville Road
White Bear Mn. 55110
Heating & Air Conditioning:
Hinding Co., Inc.
915 W. 7th St.
St. Paul, Mn. 55102
Outdoor Coin Operated Machine
Hagberg's Country Market
11325 Stillwater Blvd. N.
Lake Elmo, Mn. 55042
the following licenses:
Sewer Installer:
Croixland Excavating
Ken Seefert
10003 Mendel Road N.
Stillwater, Mn. 55082
Lake Elmo Heating & Air
3546 Lake Elmo Avenue
Lake Elmo, Mn. 55042
ADJOURNMENT: M/S/P Mottaz/Fraser to adjourn at 10:55 p.m.
RESOLUTIONS: 82-1 Conn -Co, Industrial Revenue Bonds
Conditioning
82-2 Highway 36 Improvement
82�3 Highway 5 "No Passinq_" lone
82-4 She.rvheim Resolution Correction
CLAIMS TO BE APPROVED AT JANUARY 19, 1982 COUNCIL MEETING
82088
David Eder - Park Shelter Worker
$ 65.10
82089
Jody Eder " "
66.65
82090
Kevin Ritzer it" "
55.80
82091
Barry Weeks IF"
77.50
82092
Wash. Cty. Treas. - Recorders Office
2.00
82093
Document Section - St. of Mn. - Bldg. Code Books
43.10
82094
St. Treas. - Building Surcharge - 4th Quarter
172.46
82095
Wash. Cty. Treas. - Recorders Office - LeMire Deeds
10.00
82096
Lake Elmo Oil - Regular Gas-Maint. Dept. $ 1,304.36
Fire Department 11.85
1,316.21
82097
W. S. Darley & Co. - Fire Dep't E.M.S.
129.64
82098
Stillwater Book - Office Supplies
63.18
82099
State of Minn. - Chart of Accounts Book
10.00
82100
Vern's G.T.C. Auto Supply - Battery fpp Grader
221.53
82101
Virtue Printing - Bldg. Dept supplies
69.39
82102
Metro Waste Control Commission - monthly bill
116.03
82103
American Typewriter C6. - typewriter repair
40.00
82104
Al Zepper - Hockey Goals
325.00
82105
LaFayette Company - City office appraisal6DGP
6sfr E}0
82106
Oakwood Animal Hospital - December
102.00
82107
City of North St. Paul - Animal Control Vehicle
125.00
82108
Junker Sanitation \
42.00
82109
Postmaster - 1982 Bulk mailing Permit Fee
40.00
82110
Mary Meyer - 1/12/82,newsletter
175.00
82111
Lillie Suburban Newspapers - legal publications
64.11
82112
Commissioner of Revenue - 4th Qt. Sales Tax - Water
36.60
82113
Zignegc Agency, Inc. - Public Official Liability
1,065.90
82114
Hejny Rentals - Pump rental - Water Department
54.06
82115
Keller Construction - Water Main break repair
2,514.74
82116
Meyer Cesspool Service - Water_ Main break repair
120.00
82117
Richard Murray - V.B.W.D. - reimbursed
235.80
82118
Lawson,Raleigh & Marshall - General $ 1,009.00
M.S.A. 106.00
Pass Thru 42.00
1,157.00
82119
T K D A General $ 520.33
201 Sewer 6,951.18
M.S.A. 862.28
Pass Thru 201.83
LeMire Septic 135.48
Water Dep't 66.35
Park 45.33
8,782.78
82120
Dick Wier - Work on Water Morin break - 18 hrs.
99.00
82121
Jed Wier - 5 hrs
27.50
82122
thru 82136 (Jan. 22nd payroll - includes park shelter)
4,500.00
22,577.08
R-82-3
RESOLUTION
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE FORMAL CREATION
OF AND POSTING OF A "NO PASSING" ZONE ON
STATE HIGHWAY 5 FROM COUNTY ROAD 17 TO
LAYTON AVENUE NORTH
WHEREAS', there is a high potential traffic safety
hazard on State Highway 5 from the northerly extension
of County Road 17 to Layton Avenue North because:
1. These is a. school zone with two access
to the school property;
2. There are entrances to a .restaurant, gas
station, 2 car dealerships, a bar and several
other businesses;
J. There are two intersections with COUNTY
ROAD 17; and
4. The principal access for;Fire Department
vehicles is along this part of State Highway 5; and,
WHEREAS, there is only one lane improved for traffic
in each direction, no turn lanes, and many drivers are pass-
ing off the pavement or main -traveled portion of the road-
way and passing illegally on the right and left; and,
WHEREAS, the City's efforts to have the speed limit
reduced from 40 miles per hour have not been approved by
the Minnesota Department of Transportation; and,
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation
has the authority to create, designate and post "No Passing"
zones on State Highways;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council
of the City of Lake Elmo, that
The City of Lake Elmo hereby urgently requests the
creation, designation and posting of "No Passing" zones in
both directions along State Highway 5 from the northerly ex-
tension of County Road 17 to Layton Avenue North in the
City of Lake Elmo.
ADOPTED, this the 19th. day of January, 1982 by the
City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, Washington County,
Minnesota.
Signed;
Maynat4 L. Eder, Mayor
A test:
Laurence E. W ittii - a%er -
City Administrator
R-82-3
RESOLUTION
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE FORMAL CREATION
OF AND POSTING OF A "NO PASSING" ZONE ON
STATE HIGHWAY 5 FROM COUNTY ROAD 17 TO
LAYTON AVENUE NORTH
WHEREAS, there is a high potential traffic safety
hazard on State Highway 5 from the northerly extension
of County Road 17 to Layton Avenue North because:
1. There is a. school zone with two access
to the school property;
2. There are entrances to a restaurant, gas
station, 2 car dealerships, a bar and several
other businesses;
J. There are two intersections with COUNTY
ROAD 17; and
4. The principal access for,Fire Department
vehicles is along this part of State Highway 5; and,
WHEREAS, there is only one lane improved for traffic
in each direction, no turn lanes, and many drivers are pass-
ing off the pavement or main -traveled portion of the road-
way and passing illegally on the right and left; and,
WHEREAS, the City's efforts to have the speed limit .
reduced: from 40 miles per hour have not been approved by
the Minnesota Department of Transportation; and,
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation
has the authority to create, designate and post "No Passing"
zones on State Highways;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council
of the City of Lake Elmo, that
. The City of Lake Elmo hereby urgently requests the
creation, designation and posting of. "No Passing" zones in
both directions along State Highway 5 from the northerly ex-
tension of County Road 17 to Layton Avenue North in the
City of Lake Elmo.
ADOPTED, this the 19th. day of January, 1982 by the
City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, Washington County,
Minnesota.
Signed:
Maynath L. Eder, Mayor
Laurence E. Whittaker
i ttaker
City Administrator
A RESOLUTION
A TYPOGRAPIII
WHEREAS, there
and,
WHEREAS, the
reflect adoption
ror; and,
R-82-p
la
i
RESOLUTION !
CITY OV, T 'r- El
gGTON 'COUNTY/ ,. MINN SOTA
i
C�'NDING 'Rj1SOLUT'ONi R-81-61. TO CORRECT
ERRCl_
i
s a typo,graphic�l error in Resolution 81.-61;
i I
minutes of the September. 1, 1981, City Council
of Resolution 81-61 with said typographical. er-
WHEREAS, the rising level. of the water on Lake Elmo Lake in
this City has impacted by flooding, certain platted reparian lots
on said lake reducing the area remaining above the minimum eleva-
tion to less than the amount currently required for granting a
residential building permit thereon;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of -Lake Elmo
THAT, Resolution 81-61, adopted by the City Council on Sep-
tember 1, 1981, is hereby rescinded; and,
THAT, the City Administrator is hereby directed to indicate
on the official - copy of the minutes of the September. 1, 1.981,
City Council meeting that said Resolution 81--61 is repealed; and,
THAT, Lots Five (5) and Six (6) in Ruth's 'First Addition to
Lake Elmo, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in
the office of the Washington County Rccorcler, be and the same
hereby are declared to be currently unbuildable and that said lots
are expected to remain so until the elevation of the water of:
Lake Elmo Lake is permanently lowered or until permission is
sought and received from the City of'Lake Elmo to add suffi_ciant
fill to permit- construction to proceed in full, compliance with
existing rules governing set -back, well and sewer locations.
ADOPTED, this the. 19th day of January, 1982, by the City
Council of the City of Lake Elmo.
r'n Maynr L. ar9/L. Ede
er, Mayor
ATTEST:
Laurence E. Whittaker, Administrator
4
V 412i
office of County Recorder u ;3 :`drom GCr_*rty, hii:MrMta
a 1 Certify that the w!ithir; hrstrtrmenY
was filed 6; ibis at Stil!water for record on the
77`, ca-y o! darriary A.D., 74r,_.
'. at 9 : 00 £dock _.t- K, and was duty recorded
m Was a-'gtac fount'.. Recor0.c
s
D� F427736 JORNA.FRANZSM
! � �1 RecorderBy
r
4 y
Ret= To:
City of Lake Elm
F.O. Box J
Lake Elmo, IN 55042
f
� M?' 716
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY FO WASHINGTON ) ss.
CITY OF LAKE )
I hereby certify that I have compared the attached copy of Reso-
lution R-82-4 with the original thereof in the records of my,
office and I find said copy to be a true, correct and complete
copy of the Resolution adopted January 19, 1982 by the City
Council, City of Lake Elmo.
Laurence r.. Wh taker
City Administrator
D$\ted a
r--- .(seal)
,
EN TRAI'T.'PER RECORD
%'ASHINCrI'ON (IoTrj ,.� y , 11117i°TESOTF
TF i( ,
L
Dr"_PUT'v
-2-