Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-19-84 CCMCLAIMS TO BE APPROVED AT JUNE 19, 1984 LAKE ELMO COUNCIL MEETING 84956 Washington County Treasurer - 262 sandbags $ 125.00 84957 TKDA - General Engineering $ 721.62 M.S.A. 3,902.15 Step 2 - 201 Sewer 13,187.02 Jane Road 944.41 18,755.20 84958 Planning & Development Services - Genera—T­PTarming 105.00 84959 Mary Meyer - 6/12/84 Newsletter 200.00 84960 Lillie Suburban Newspapers - legal publications 29.57 84961 Assn. of Metropolitan Municipalities - Dues 998.00 84962 Junker Sanitation 84.00 84963 Wood Specialist - plaques for fire dept.resolution 19.50 84964 Laurie Waterman - newspaper 5.40 84965 Stillwater Book & Stationery - office supplies 72.38 84966 Richard Murray - V.B.W.D. 437.87 84967 David Keane - V.B.W.D. 73.04 84968 The Croixside Press - Printing of building permit forms 177.60 84969 The Village Treadle - Fire Dept. EMS - blankets cleaned 28.10 84970 Brookman Motor Sales - Fire Dept truck repair 219.57 84971 Communications Specialists - Fire Dept.radio capital outlay 540.00 84972 Kunz Oil Co. - Fire Dept. gas 54.41 84973 Lake Elmo Oil - Fire Dept. - $ 82.94 Maint. Dept. 1,935.84 2,018.78 84974 BBT Equip., Inc. - Maint. Dept arts 26.98 84975 T.A. Schifsky - MC mix 199.76 84976 Moelter Construction Co. - Maint. Dept. limestone 45.28 84977 Norm's Tire Sales - Maint. Dept. backhoe tire 139.00 84978 Griffith Landscaping - Park Tractor 2,800.00 84979 M & R Repair - Park Tractor parts 63.31 84980 LPD Electric - Installation of softball net in Lions 315.00 84981 thru 84993 June 22nd payroll 6,100.00 $ 33,632.75 ADDITIONS TO 6/19/84 CLAIMS LIST 84994 Gerhard & Linda Schmidt - per 6/5/84 motion - easement 104.00 84995 Maynard Eder - 1st 1/2 Mayor Salary' 1,000.00 84996 Laura Fraser - 1st 1/2 Council Salary 750.00 84997 David Morgan - lst 1/2 Council Salary 750.00 84998 Bruce Dunn - 1st 1/2 Council Salary 750.00 84999 Michael Mazzara - 1st 1/2 Council Salary 750.00 New Total $ 37,736.75 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 19, 1984 Mayor Eder called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers. Present: Dunn, Fraser, Mazzara, Morgan (arrived 7:10) and City Engineer, Larry Bohrer. 1. Agenda M/S/P Fraser/Mazzara - To adopt the agenda as amended. (Delete 6B - Bruce Beutel and add 7A Drainage - Mike Mazzara) (Motion carried 4-0) Minutes M/S/P Dunn/Fraser - To approve the minutes of the June 5, 1984 City Council meeting as presented. (Motion carried 4-0) Claims M/S/P Dunn/Fraser - To approve claims 84956 thru 84999 as presented. (Motion carried 4-0) Waste -To -Energy Update Doug Wood, Project Manager for the Ramsey/Washington County Waste -To -Energy Project stated that on June 12th the project board, which consists of three County Commissioners from Ramsey County, two County Commissioners from Washington County (-Artie chae-fer- and -Wes Scheel), and one representative from Lake Elmo (Mike Mazzara) authorized the staff and consultants to proceed with the preparation of a "Request For Proposal" to issue to potential vendors that have been qualified. The two counties, during the request for qualifications process, identified twenty-two firms that are interested in participating in the construction of a Waste -To -Energy facility. This list was narrowed down to eleven firms. When the project first started, there was concentration on the technology termed "mass burn". A "mass burn" facility takes municipal solid waste, puts it into a combustion unit, burns the solid waste at around 1800 degrees and produces some form of energy. It was the intention at that time to sell that energy to the 3M corporation. The board has signed a two year agreement of intent with 3M stating that 3M is willing to buy energy from the counties for a period of twenty-five years. Also included in the eleven vendors that are qualified is a second technology called "Refuse Derived Fuel". This RDF facility alone does not produce energy, but produces a fuel. That fuel can be transported to another facility where it is burned. Because of these two technologies, the County had to go thru a process to address each of these technologies. At the June 12th meeting, the project board decided to go thru a staged procurement process whereby the first Request For Proposal they issue will be to Refuse Derived Fuel vendors. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 19, 1984 PAGE 2 In the next eight to ten weeks, the board is going to put together a Request For Proposal which will be approved by the County Boards, and issued to the RDF vendors. Because of the second technology, (RDF) and the fact that the initial EIS was for a mass burn facility, the EIS will be changed to include a RDF facility. The Met Council has started that work. Regarding land acquisition in Lake Elmo, Mr. Wood stated that several months ago two land appraisals were done and they were reviewed by Briggs and Morgan, the Counties legal firm. They requested that one more land appraisal be done because there were some disparities in a couple of the appraisals. The Counties have hired another appraiser and that process is underway. At the same time, the attorney is putting together legal documents that will be necessary for the counties to enter into negotiations with the landowners in that area. The Waste -To -Energy staff has authorization from the project board to proceed with negotiations for land acquisition. Regarding what areas will be acquired for the project, Mr. Wood stated that they have previously gone on the basis that they would enter into negotiations for the parcels that they initially appraised. They have since decided that there is one parcel that probably will not be needed (the far south of the total section). Right now the areas that will probably be negotiated will include the Dreher, Hildebrandt, Brochman and part of Enright property. Another area that Mr. Wood suggested be addressed by the counties in the near future is the water, sewer and water runoff issue. This type of study would probably take three to four months of intensive work by TKDA, and would be paid for by the Waste To Energy Project. Mr. Joe Schilli, Consulting Engineer with Henningson, Durham and Richardson, (HDR) made a slide presentation of a RFD facility in Ames, Iowa that was constructed in 1975 and has been operating since that time. In Ames, Iowa, they take the RDF and mix it with coal to burn in their City Park land to produce electricity. Mr. Schilli stated that the RDF facility would receive the same garbage and trash that would go to a mass burn facility. Of the residue that is produced, approximately 25% of the solid waste that goes to a RDF facility will be rejects that have to go to a landfill; where mass burn facilities generally run 20% by weight that have to go to a landfill. In a mass burn facility, the rejects that go to a landfill would be ash that comes out of the combustion chamber. In the RDF facility the rejects that go to the landfill are basically those components of the solid waste that are non-combustible. The entire purpose of a RDF process facility is to separate the non-combustible from the combustible material. Mr. Wood stated that there may be opportunity to economically separate some of the non-combustible materials, and that option will be looked at. However, because of the volatile markets on ferrous metal and glass and other types of material of that nature, you cannot count on that as a major protion of your income when you are looking at the f LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 19, 1984 PAGE 3 financial feasibility of the facility. So a portion of the estimated 25% rejects may be pulled out, if the ferrous market is good. Otherwise they would be discarded. The counties are participating in recycling programs that do not make money, but are participating to ( keep materials out of landfills. So the possibility exists that the county would consider pulling out the ferrous metals, even on a break-even basis. If the RDF facility is located in Lake Elmo, it is anticipated that the RDF would be produced here and transported by truck to Red Wing. Fraser asked what the advantage was to having the RDF facility in Lake Elmo if the RDF would have to be trucked to Red Wing. Wouldn't there be other sites that would be more advantageous? Mr. Wood stated that the EIS looked at several locations and also identified several issues that had to be addressed relating to solid waste processing facilities. There could be other locations for a RDF facility, but they would be no better than the one in Lake Elmo. Fraser stated that one of the big advantages in talking "mass burn" was the proximity to 3M, and if 3M is no longer a consideration, and if it is going to Red Wing, someplace closer to Red Wing would be more advantageous. Mr. Schelli stated that the power plant at Red Wing can only handle about 900 tons per day of RDF. If at some point, the RDF processing plant produces more RDF than that, there conceivably could be built on the Lake Elmo site a boiler to burn RDF and produce steam to sell to 3M. That is an advantage to the Lake Elmo site. The RDF facility is totally enclosed.. There is dust collecting equipment throughout the facility so there is no dust going outside of the facility. All of the equipment is inside the building so that reduces the noise potential. Mr. Wood stated that the best way for the City Council and staff to judge this type of facility would be to see it first-hand. Mr. Wood offered to arrange a visit to either the plant in Madison, Wisconsin or Ames, Iowa for the Council. The reason that RDF is being considered is that NSP has recently expressed interest in participating in the combustion of RDF. They may have some motives for pursuing that, but the economic analysis to date indicates that that may be the best way to go. Although Mr. Wood could not give a precise figure on the price differnce between a RDF facility and mass burning facility, he has seen figues in the St. Paul paper indicating a RDF facility would cost from 16 to 22 million dollars and a mass burning facility would cost from 45 to 60 million dollars. A meeting was scheduled for July 10, 1984 at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers for the Section 32 landowners and the Waste -To -Energy staff. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 19, 1984 PAGE 4 5. Donna Kuehn - Huff & Puff Days (Tabled) 6. Engineer's Report: A. Public Hearing - Eleanor Danielson's application for a large lot subdivision and lot size variance at the NE corner of 50th Street and Lake Elmo Avenue. Pursuant to published notice this public hearing was opened at 7:50 p.m. in the council chambers. Mark Fedder, real estate agent representing Mrs. Danielson, reviewed for the council how they arrived at the lot lines that are proposed in this large lot subdivision. Bernie Danielson (Mrs. Danielson's son) stated that there are two hardships surrounding this request. If they try to redo the proposed lot lines it would create a hardship physically on how the land would be laid out. It also creates a hardship for Mrs. Danielson who has taken care of this property since 1939, and now finds that she is somewhat deminished in her ability to sell that property and use the proceeds as she has looked forward to all of these years. There is no other land to add to this 52 acres to conform to the city code. The were no adjacent property owners present for or against this proposal. The public hearing was closed at 8:05 p.m. Fraser stated in reviewing the action taken in 1981, the concept of nonimal 10's and nominal 40's could in certain circumstances make sense. By granting this application, we would not have far more houses built on the property, it is just a matter that the lots would be technically slightly undersized. Eder stated his concerns are the surveyors or landowners that include the right-of-way in the value of the property. Pursuant to review of the Engineer's report of May 23, 1984, the following action was taken. M/S/P Morgan/Fraser - To adopt Resolution 84-37 granting a large lot subdivision to Eleanor Danielson at the NE corner of CSAH 17 and 50th Street which includes a park donation of $175 per lot. (Motion carried 5-0). M/S/P Mazzara/Fraser - To adopt ordinance 7960 amending Section 301-32 of the 1979 Lake Elmo Municipal Code permitting all 10 acre lot size requirements be inclusive of the right-of-way in the RR districts as recommended by the Planning Commission. (Motion carried 5-0). Eder stated he had no problem with nominal 10's if somehow we could communicate to the land surveyors and residents that they take into consideration permanent easements when they do their preliminary work; so they can get as close to the required 10 acres as reasonably possible. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 19, 1984 PAGE 5 B. Bruce Buetel - Application for side yard and rear yard •setbacks variances. (Application withdrawn) C. Public Hearing - Richard Moris' application for rezoning from R1 to GB at the SE corner of CSAH 17 and the rail- road tracks. Pursuant to published notice, this public hearing was opened at 8:15 p.m. in the council chambers. Mr. Moris reviewed his plans for an antique store at this location. John Schiltz, adjacent property owner, stated that he could not think of a better business to bring into town. The Engineer stated his concerns were the use of the septic system. If it is just a business, there would be very little use of the system. Mr. Moris stated his proposed hours are from 10:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m., Wednesday thru Sunday. The Planning Commission indicated at their meeting that they were concerned about the lack of control over future business at this location if the antique shop was not successful. Fraser stated that her concerns were future control of the site should Mr. Moris sell. Because of that, she would look more positively towards a CUP. Eder stated that in this case, the council is not primarily opposed to the rezoning; the only reason we would not rezone it is so we would be able to look at the next use or occupant of the building. Dunn stated he would be in favor of the rezoning because the site at one time was zoned business, and it is extremely close to the tracks. It is a logical use for the lot. Morgan stated that he feels Mr. Moris' request is a reasonable use of the site, and it does not matter to him whether or not it is done by a CUP or rezoning. Mazzara stated he would like to see it rezoned to GB. He feels that the City would have a lot of recourse if Mr. Moris sold the building. The public hearing was closed at 8:30 p.m. M/S/P Dunn/Mazzara - To adopt ordinance 7961 rezoning the Westerly one hundred thirty-five (135) feet of Lot forty-one (41) in County Auditor's Plat No.'8 (3417 Lake Elmo Avenue) from Rl to GB. (3-2 <Eder, Fraser>) Fraser does not feel this is an appropriate piece of property to rezone to GB. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 19, 1984 PAGE 6 Eder would prefer that the site remain R1 and the antique shop be permitted with a CUP. M/S/P Fraser/Morgan - To recind the previous motion. (Motion carried 5-0) M/S/P Dunn/Mazzara - To adopt ordinance 7961 rezoning the Westerly one hundred thirty-five (135) feet of lot forty-one (41) in County Auditor's Plat No. 8 (3417 Lake Elmo Avenue) from R1 to GB. (Motion carried 5-0). D. MSA Update The Engineer advised the Council that the State Aid Division of Mn/DOT has approved and signed Lake Elmo's plans for the MSA project; and we can now award the bids for this project. M/S/P Morgan/Fraser - To adopt Resolution 84-38 awarding the 1984 MSA Street Improvement contract in the amount of $142,876.76 to Forest Lake Contracting. (Motion carried 4-0-1 <Eder>) E. Jane Road North Project M/S/P Morgan/Fraser - To adopt Resolution 84-39 awarding the Jane Road North Improvement Project (plans and specifications of which were approved and accepted by Resolution 84-31) to Forest Lake Contracting in the amount of $19,806.50. (Motion carried 5-0) The Engineer advised the Council that he has contacted Forest Lake Contracting regarding the paving of Jamaca Avenue (about 300 feet North of Jane Road); and they have agreed to do this work at the contract unit price. M/S/P Morgan/Fraser - To authorize the Engineer to prepare a change order whereby Jamaca Avenue (about 300 feet North of Jane Road) will be paved at the contract unit price as bid by Forest Lake Contracting. (Motion carried 5-0) F. Public Hearing for simple lot division and lot size variance for Howard Springborn at lot 9, block 2 of Springborn's Green Acres (the SE corner of Jamaca Avenue and 55th Street). Pursuant to published notice, this public hearing was opened at 8:45 p.m. in the Council chambers. C Bruce Folz reviewed Mr. Springborn's proposal to eliminate one of the future lots in phase 2 in exchange for this lot split in phase 1. Mr. Folz stated that he had requested the City Attoney to look at the validity of Mr. Springborn's development agreement from 1978 which allowed for twelve lots to be developed in phase 2 and nineteen lots to be developed in phase 1. The overall concept of thirty-one lots would not change; the only change would be eleven lots developed in K LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 19, 1984 PAGE 7 phase 2 and twenty lots developed in phase 1. The attorney's response was that it was a valid contract and should be treated as such. Jim Buggert, adjacent property owner, stated he was very disappointed with this proposed lot split. He purchased his land from a concept that presented to him, and this concept was that the lots would remain large. Mayor Eder pointed out that the area directly north of the proposed lot split could conceivably be rezoned to R1 (1-1/2 acres) in the future as this is allowed for in the comp. plan. Helen Hoffman, adjancent property owner, stated she was opposed to this lot split. If the purpose in splitting this lot is because of the road frontage, the problem of excessive road frontage will not be eliminated by the lot split. Also, she bought her property with the idea that there would be only one house on this lot, and is, therefore, opposed to this proposal. The public hearing was closed at 9:05 p.m. Fraser stated that the only difference with this proposal and Mr. Springborn's proposal in February, 1984, is the creativity of the lot trade; and she is opposed to this lot split for the same reasons she was opposed to the application in February. Morgan stated he had no strong feelings on this proposal. Eder stated it was not clear to him to what degree the developer's agreement relates to the land versus how the zoning ordinance relates to the land. He feels the attorney is being conservative in saying a variance is required. Does the zoning ordinance take precedent over the developer's agreement? Mazzara feels the lot trade would be in the City's best interest because the size of some of the lots in phase 2 would be larger, and would conform more closely to the city code. M/S/P Eder/Fraser - To table a decision on this application until the City Attorney clarifies the validity of the developer's agreement of 1978. (Motion carried 5-0) G. Application for a shoreland permit and variances for the construction of a new house on lot 2, block 1 of Ruth's First Addition (10825 32nd Street) by Jerry Kromschroeder The City Engineer reviewed his letter of June 14, 1984 in which he addresses his concerns on the discrepancy regarding the high flood elevation of Lake Elmo. Ruth's lst Addition was approved based upon a high flood elevation of 889. This also agrees with the federal Flood Insurance Study. The VBWD calculates the high flood to be elevation 891. If 889 is used, a variance is required for the alternate drainfield only of 60 feet where 75 feet is required. If elevation 891 is used, a variance is necessary for both primary and alternate drainfields. The setback for the primary would be 50 feet and the LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 19, 1984 PAGE 8 alternate would be 30 feet where 75 feet is required. Both primary and alternate systems can meet the required building elevation. The Engineer further recommended that if the Council views this application favorably, one variance would be required for septic system setback from the high flood mark. The degree of variance would be determined by which elevation was used for the high flood. He feels the VBWD elevation of 891 to be more accurate. The Engineer further indicated the the platted lot size exceeds 1.5 acres and the area above the OHW mark is .96 acres. The application understated the drainfield area required. A three bedroom home of 9 mpi average pert rate will require 600 gal x 1.27 SF/gal = Sf of treatment area; or 254 LF of trench. All other requirements of the Shoreland Regulations and Septic System Ordinance can be met. The DNR made no objection to this application. M/S/P Fraser/Morgan - To approve the Shoreland Permit and septic system variance setback from the OHM for Mr. Kromschroeder on Lot 2, Block 1 Ruth's 1st Addition for the construction of a new home contingent upon the applicant complying with City Engineer's recommendation in his letter of June 14, 1984. (Motion carried 5-0) H. Application for a shoreland permit and variance for the construction of a house on lot 6, Krause's Addition by David Krause. The City Engineer reviewed his letter of June 14, 1984 in which he addresses (1) Lot size - the platted area consists of .92 acres of which .78 acres is above the OHW mark where 1.5 acres are required. Since the platted lot size exceeds 60% of that required, a variance from the zoning code is not required. This was a pre-existing lot prior to the adoption of the Shoreland Ordinance and no additional land is available. (2) Structure Setback from Water - The house is proposed to be a minimum of 80 feet from the OHW mark (elev. 924) where 100 feet is required. The house is proposed to be somewhat closer to the water than the neighboring houses because the septic system is on the road side of the lot, not the lake side. A deck is also shown as optional and being 50 feet from the OHW mark where 100 feet is required. All other conditions of the Shoreland and Septic System Ordinances can be met. The Engineer recommended that the deck be located where it would not require a variance. Mr. Krause stated that he changed his plans and the deck will be located on the east side of the house. M/S/P Morgan/Dunn - To approve the Shoreland Permit and lot size and structure setback variances for David Krause at Lot 6, Krause's Addition contingent upon applicant complying with recommendations of the City Engineer in his letter of June 14, 1984. (Motion carried 5-0) Lake Jane Association The DNR suggested that the City pass a motion requesting the DNR to LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 19, 1984 PAGE 9 post Lakes Jane, Olson and DeMontreville as prohibiting power boats or heavy boats during the flooding period. M/S/P Morgan/Fraser - To adopt Resolution 84-40 requesting the DNR to (" restrict the use of motor boats on Lakes Jane, Olson and DeMontreville when the lake levels exceed 924,930 and 930, respectively; and to instruct the City Administrator to proceed with drafting an ordinance making these restrictions a permanent part of the city code. (Motion carried 5-0) The VBWD requested permission to pump from Lake Jane to City Park Pond to the level pumped to in 1983. VBWD declared an emergency condition on Lake Jane, and assuming the City Council would approvetheir request to pump, are preparing to put the diesel pump into use. M/S/P Morgan/Mazzara To allow VBWD to install a diesel pump on Lake Jane and pump water at the rate and to the level that they did in 1983. (Motion carried 5-0). Fraser reminded the Council and the residents that we are creating problems downstream when we initiate this pumping. Jim Weyer, on behalf of the Lake Jane Association, requested that the City Engineer visit the flood site and make any recommendation he feels would minimize the damage being done by this flood to the effected residents. M/S/P Morgan/Mazzara - To instruct the City Engineer to visit the homes that are being flooded and make a recommendation, if he has one, as to how sandbagging, etc., could be done more efficiently. (Motion carried 5-0) An additional request from a few citizens relates to the City obtaining satelite bathrooms. Their septic systems are under water and either functioning at a limited capacity or if functioning, are contributing to pollution of the lakes. M/S/P Morgan/Dunn - To instruct the City Engineer to examine the possibility of getting a group rate for portable sanitary facilities for the residents unable to use their septic systems. (Motion carried 5-0) Morgan stated that he has asked VBWD to look for other percolation sites, for emergency situations, that would take the pressure off of Sunfish and City Park Pond. We should be able to find another place to get temporary easements in which to percolate this water down into the ground water table. It is an effective way to eliminate excess surface water. Until we have a route to the river, it is the only route that we have and if we start now with the seeking of sites and the holding of hearings, we might have another route if we have another six-inch week rain. Morgan further stated he would be willing to vote for a petition if he knew what this up -front cost is going to be. Dick Murray stated that he would present this request to the VBWD at ( their June 28th meeting. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 19, 1984 PAGE 10 Morgan stated that there have been requests to have sanitary bathroom facilities at the DNR access. The Council instructed the Administrator to make this request to the DNR. 7. City Council Reports A. Drainage of culvert under Lake Elmo Avenue. Mazzara stated there is a lot of debris in the culvert under County Road 17. The Council instructed the City Engineer to contact Washington County regarding this problem. 8. Administrator's Report A. Assessor's recommendation from the 5-22-84 Board of Review meeting. M/S/P Fraser/Eder - To approve the changes in property valuation as recommended by the County Assessor (excluding the Landfill residents). (Motion carried 5-0) M/S/P Fraser/Morgan - To remove Mr. McLeod's name from the list of thirty-five landfill residents that have had -their property valuation decreased; and consider Mr. McLeod's request separately. (Motion carried 5-0) M/S/P Fraser/Morgan - To accept the changes in property valuation as recommended by the County Assessor for thirty-four properties in the Lake Elmo landfill area. (Motion carried 5-0) M/S/P Morgan/Fraser - To change the value of Mr. McLeod's property to $76,700 (a 20% decrease instead of 10%). (Motion carried 5-0) B. Quotations for the old city hall table. The bids for the library table were as follows: Lee and Roanne Axdahl - $227.01; Gisela Lee - $240.00; Michael Burress - $235.00; Bruce Dunn - $250.00 (with a buy-back option for one year at the same price). M/S/P Fraser/Morgan - To accept the highest bid received for the library table (Bruce Dunn - $250.00). (Motion carried 4-0-1 <Dunn>). C. Old City Access regarding landscaping, parking and the existing shoulder. M/S/P Eder/Morgan - To retain the paved area of the old City acccess at the present time, as it protects the road and shoulder and can be used for emergency parking; and request the County to install "no, signs at this location. (Motion carried 5-0). Greg Fouks stated he felt it would be a mistake not to remove the paved shoulder as it will make it too easy and too convenient for people to park there if it is not removed. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 19, 1984 PAGE 11 Dave Garloff requested the Council confer with the DNR and do what is possible to complete the landscaping around the old access. The f Council instructed the City Administrator to check with the DNR regarding this landscaping. D. Self -reading water meter cards. (Deferred) The Meeting adjourned at 10:25 P.M. Resolution 84-37 Danielson large lot subdivision Resolution 84-38 MSA awarding of bid Resolution 84-39 Jane Road North awarding of bid Resolution 84-40 No wake on Lakes Jane, Olson and DeMontreville Ordinance 7960 Nominal -10J s Ordinance 7961 Moris rezoning Since we do not have time to discuss every point presented, it may seem that decisions are preconceived. However, background information is provided for the City Council on each agenda item in advance from City Staff and appointed Commissions; and decisions are based on this information and past experiences. In addition, some items may also have been discussed at previous Council meetings. If you are aware of information that hasn't been discussed, please fill out a "Request to Appear Before the City Council" slip; or, if you came late, raise your hand to be recognized. Comments that are pertinent are appreciated. Items requiring excessive time may be continued to another meeting. AGENDA LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL JUNE 19, 1984 7:00 P.M. Meetings Convenes 1. Agenda 2. Minutes: June 5, 1984 3. Claims 7:10 p.m. 4. Waste -to -Energy Project update by Doug Wood 5. Donna Kuehn to discuss Huff & Puff Days 6. Engineer's Report 7:45 p.m. A. Public Hearing for Eleanor Danielson's application for large lot subdivision and lot size variance(s) at the NE corner of 50th Street and Lake Elmo Avenue. B. Application from Bruce Beutal for side yard setback and rear yard setback variances for the construction of an addition to the existing garage at 3590 Laverne Avenue North. 8:15 p.m. C. Public Hearing for a rezoning application from R1 to GB for one lot at the SE corner of CSAH 17 and the railroad tracks - requested by Richard W. Moris. D. MSA Update E. Jane Road North bids BREAK------- 8:45 P.M. F. Public Hearing for simple lot division and lot size variance for Howard Springborn at lot 9, block 2 of Springborn's Green Acres (the SE corner of Jamaca Avenue and 55th St) G. Application for a Shoreland Permit and Variance(s) for the construction of a new house on Lot 2, Block 1 of Ruth's First Addition (10825 32nd Street) by Jerry Kromschneider. H. Application for a Shoreland Permit and Variance(s) for the construction of a house on Lot 6, Krause's Addition by David Krause. 9:15 p.m. I. Lake Jane Association to discuss the water level on Lake Jane. J. Other 7. City Council Reports 8. Administrator's Report A. Assessor's recommendation from the 5-22-84 Board of Review meeting. B. Quotations for the old city hall table that is currently stored at the fire hall. C. Discussion of the old City access regarding landscaping, parking, and the existing shoulder. D. Discussion on converting to self -reading water meter cards. JUNE 14, 1984 TO: CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM; PATRICK D. KLAERS, CITY ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: INFORMATIONAL MATERIAL FOR JUNE 19, 1984 MEETING 1" Attached for your information is the most recent City NOV111ttIC dated 6~12-84, which highlights articles on the City Audit and the Park Commission Work Plan" 2" Wish to remind everyone that I am on ygggtign the week of June 18" If any Council action requires further staff in. - put at the 6-19 meeting the agenda item can be tabled until the next meeting for further staff response. 3. Wish to remind everyone that the ggUt City Cggnqil Mggti[!Q is scheduled for Tuesday, July 3" As you know, July 4 is a legal holiday and the City Office will be closed. Unless I hear otherwise, we will proceed with the July 3 meeting. If vacations are planned and there is going to be a problem achieving a quorum, this should be brought up at the 6-19 meeting" 4 The most recent �g�thl� ���g�t f�g� the W��hiogtgo Cggnty " . ` 5hoCiff.0 QRMCQg0t for May activities is attached" 5" Attached is the Mly Mgnthly ElpgEt QgM Mgi[ltgolngg FgEjWg!,1 QM0 Wi10gCf describing road, water, building/equipment and park related activities" 6" Attached for your information is a memo from the MetCgaglitan CgMogil Chairperson, Sandra Gardebring. Ms Gardebring is the new chairperson for the Met Council and is holding a gMUMCOl i[lfgCMatignal M@gting for Washington County on Friday, June 22, at the White Hat ReStIMEMOt beginning at 7930 a.m. I will be out of town; but, I believe, it would he appropriate to have a representative from the City attend this meeting., PLEASE NOTE THE LOCATION OF THIS MEETING IS AT THE WHITE HAT RESTAURANT, NOT BEN"S ELMO INN AS INDICATED IN THE LETTER FROM THE MET COUNCIL" 7, Attached for your information is the first page of a memo I sent to the City Attorney in March, and his response dated 6-1-84^ This memo relates to applications for 11MQ11 lot dimilig[lm that gComto two 000mgnfgming lgA"