HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-18-84 CCMLAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
DECEMBER 18, 1984 lu � t'AUU Ij
Mayor Eder called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers. Present: Dunn, Fraser, Mazzara, Morgan,
Administrator Klaers, Engineer Bohrer.
1. Agenda
M/S/P Fraser/Morgan - To adopt the agenda as amended: Add 7B -
Charles Dayton representing the property owners on Sunfish Lake.
(Motion carried 5-0)
2. Minutes
M/S/P Morgan/Fraser - To approve the minutes of the 12-4-84 City
Council meeting as presented. (Motion carried 5-0)
3. Claims
M%S/P Morgan/Mazzara - To approve claims 85584 thru 85632 as
presented. (Motion carried 5-0)
Mazzara questioned claim #85604 to Eckberg, Lammers & Briggs in the
amount of $465.00 for legal fees. The Administrator responded this
fee was for services that could not be handled by our City Attorney
because of a potential conflict of interest.
,4. Presentation by Mike Ayers, Washington County Community Health
Services, on the final report of the Washington/Ramsey County Sanitary
Landfill Committee.
Mr. Ayers presented the Ramsey/Washington County Sanitary Landfill
Advisory Committee Report (which is on file at the City office for
public review) and stated that the purpose of the advisory committee
was to evaluate all the alternatives of supplying a safe source of
drinking water to the residents that have been adversely affected by
the migration of contaminants from the landfill as well as those
residents that could potentially be affected if the conditions
continue to digress in the area.
This report was presented to the Washington County Board by the
Committee on 12-18-84 with no action or no response requested from the
County Board at this time. The next step the County Board has
authorized the advisory staff to do is to present the findings of this
report in a public meeting for the citizens of Lake Elmo. The purpose
of the public meeting is to give the citizens an opportunity to get a
copy of the report and present their positions on the findings from
the committee. The Washington/Ramsey County Boards will be asked to
be present at this public meeting to listen to the position of the
people. Following that, the Washington County Administrator will
contact the Ramsey County Administrator for the purposes of setting up
a workshop between both Board's to decide what alternative they would
�_ be willing to proceed with, and give direction to the staff.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 12-18-84 PAGE 2
The public meeting has been tentatively set for Tuesday, January 15,
1985 at the Lake Elmo Elementary School from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
The County's Consultant will prepare a 1984 year-end summary on what
work has been done at the landfill site. The residents of the area
will be given an opportunity to understand the current Consent Order
By Response that the County has entered into with the State of
Minnesota.
Ayers stated that it is anticipated that the Counties will make a
decision before the end of January, 1985. After the public meeting,
and after Lake Elmo has heard input from the citizens, if the City
would like to take a position and express that position to the
respective Commissioner's and Board's, that would be appropriate.
5. Presentation by the Fire Chief, Fran Pott, on the proposed Fire
Department Bylaw changes.
The Council was uncertain as to what changes were actually made in the
bylaws as they did not have the previous bylaws available for
comparison.
M/S/P Fraser/Dunn - To table a recommendation on the proposed Fire
Department Bylaw changes until a better understanding of what these
changes consist of is provided for Council review. (Motion carried
5-0)
M/S/P Eder/Dunn - To instruct the City Administrator to write Bruce
Kuettner apologizing for the City's neglect in not taking action on
his resignation at the appropriate time, to acknowledge his service to
the Fire Department, and to formally accept his resignation from the
Fire Department. (Motion carried 4-1 <Fraser?)
Fraser stated that at the time the resignation was submitted, the
letter raised a number of questions, and some of the questions pertain
to the safety of the City with regard to the Fire Department. That
subject has never been publicly discussed. To accept the resignation
is to put something to rest that shouldn't be put to rest. It would
be better to defer accepting this resignation until these things have
been looked at. The letter of resignation seemed to indicate a
difference of opinion between the person who is resigning and the
present administration of the department. When someone has given very
good service for many years, and then choses to submit a resignation
for those sorts of reasons, the body that has the responsibility (the
City Council) needs to look at those reasons. Additionally, by
accepting that resignation the persons entitlement to the retirement
benefit would be eliminated.
Eder stated the Administrator could verify it, but does not think that
once a fire department member reaches ten years of service, they would
not lose their retirement benefits. Also, there was extensive
discussion between the City Administrator, Fire Chief, Mr. Kuettner
and others. All of the questions have not been resolved, but at least
there has been discussion of the issues and it is up to the new
Council to look forward as to what degree of emphasis should be put on
this. They also have the recommendation that they should restudy the
Fire Department procedures.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 12-18-84 PAGE 3
Fraser stated she very strongly brought this issue to the attention of
the City Administrator, who in her judgement looked at this very
slowly over a considerable period of time, and while the door, y:not
be closed, there was no inclination to really deal with the is .:
She is not aware of anyone else on the Council making much -:push to
deal with the issue, and it is something that needs to be addressed.
6. City Engineer's Report
A. Public Hearing for the vacation of the right--of-way relating
to the 1984 MSA Project.
Pursuant to published notice, this public hearing was opened at 7:47
p.m. in the City Council chambers.
The Engineer stated that the 1984 MSA project realigned the roads of
47th, Julep and 45th because of requirements on the type of curves
that are allowed on an MSA street. Now that the street has been
realigned, some previously acquired right-of-way is no longer
required. The purpose of this hearing is to officially vacate this
right-of-way and return the property to the owners. The property
owners affected are Mr. and Mrs. Berchens (approximately .657 acres),
and Mrs. Myrtle Eder (approximately .674 acres).
The Engineer further pointed out there is a small piece of land (that
would be returned to Mrs. Eder) that is odd -shaped and the terrain is
hilly. He would ask the owner (if she was present) if she would like
to have that piece of property returned or not. It may not be useful
to the property owner, but it would add to the gross land area, and
would be a decision made by the property owner.
There were no residents present to offer comments for or against this
proposal, and the public hearing was closed at 7.57 p.m.
M/S/P Morgan/Mazzara - To adopt Resolution 84-77 authorizing the
vacation of the unused portion of the right-of-way along 45th, Julep
and 47th relating to the road realignment of the 1984 MSA project.
(Motion carried 4-0-1 <Eder>)
Eder acknowledged that his mother is Myrtle E. Eder, and that in the
last half of 1984 he has had some economic interest in the products of
the land, but has no ownership in the land.
B. Loetscher/Dickhausen simple lot subdivision and zoning code
lot size variance at 3063 Jamley Avenue.
The Administrator stated that the Building Official has indicated that
the well is substantially completed, so the conditions requested by
the Planning Commission and City Engineer have been met. The quit
claim deeds are in the City Attorney's office.
M/S/P Mazzara/Morgan - To adopt Resolution 84-78 approving the simple
lot subdivision and zoning code lot size variance for Daniel
Dickhausen at 3053 Jamley Avenue North and 9051 31st Street North.
( (Motion carried 5-0)
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 12-18-84 PAGE 4
C. Escrow release for Teal Pass Estates
The Engineer reported that a final inspection of Jasper Way within
Teal Pass Estates was performed and finds it ready for final
acceptance by the City. The Maintenance Foreman has also inspected
the street and has no concerns regarding acceptance of this street.
As -built drawings and certification of conformance have been received,
and all of the conditions of the developers agreement have been met,
and.recommended that the final remaining escrow be released.
M/S/P Morgan/Mazzara - To adopt Resolution 84-79 accepting Jasper Way
within Teal Pass Estates as a public street in Lake Elmo. (Motion
carried 5-0)
M/S/P Mazzara/Morgan - To release the final escrow in the amount of
$8,331.25 to Ken Neudahl, Teal Pass Estates, as the street (Jasper
Way) has been constructed to City standards, was inspected, and met
with the approval of the City Engineer. (Motion carried 5-0)
D. Other (None)
7. Presentations
A. Dick Herold and Don Wisniewski from the Washington County
Public Works Department regarding the Regional Park entrance from I-94
to loth Street.
Mr. Herold and Mr. Wisniewski made a slide presentation on the
preliminary layout of County Road 19B, between I-94 and 10th Street.
(A copy of this plan is on file at the City Office for public review).
Mr. Wisniewski stated this is proposed to be a 1986 construction
project, so if the primary parts of the final design can be completed
this winter, they would be able to pruchase right-of-way, and in late
fall of 1985 and spring of 1986 let the contract for this
construction.
The County would like comments from the City of Lake Elmo, before the
end of January, regarding this proposal so that it can proceed with
the final design.
Dorothy Lyons had several questions on this proposal. Mayor Eder
suggested that she put her concerns with this proposal in writing so
that they can be addressed by the new City Council.
B. Charles Dayton representing the property owners on Sunfish
Lake.
Mr. Dayton stated he is before the Council because of the long
standing problem with water levels on Sunfish Lake resulting in part
from the pumping out of Lake Jane into City Park Pond. Mr. Dayton
acknowledged the proposed 509 Plan, but feels that it could be years
before the Plan is actually agreed upon, and years more before such a
plan could be implemented.
Mr. Dayton pointed out that there is an immediate problem on Sunfish
Lake, which gets worse every year. The water level is now at a point
where trees of the age of 170 years old are inundated and dying, and
there is no certainty as to the level which the lake will ultimately
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 12-18-84 PAGE 5
reach. His purpose in appearing before the Council is not to discuss
the damages for loss of land or damages for loss of trees. That is
another matter that will be addressed separately. The concern of the
property owners is the lack of certainty on what the lake level might
be. It creates a particular problem when attempting to sell a piece
of property on Sunfish because there is no assurance that any
landowner can give to perspective purchasers that the lake will stop
rising at any particular point.
Mr. Dayton noted that when the DNR permit was first issued to pump
from Lake Jane to City Park Pond, it provided for the pumping of 800
acre feet. It was amended one year later to increase that to 1600
acre feet, with an emergency provision for an addiional 800 acre feet.
When the permit was first issued, it provided for a maximum level in
City Park Pond of 903. The reason that City Park Pond's level is
important is that it creates a head of water which as it goes down,
flows thru the glacial sands and gravel and into Sunfish Lake. This
was proven by boring tests and a geological - hydrological analysist
that was done. Therefore, the level that was established in the
permit for City Park Pond had a reason, and that was to limit the
amount of water going into City Park Pond so there would be some
control on the amount of water going into Sunfish Lake. In 1983, that
was amended whereby the level now in the permit was increased from 903
to 908. The City amended its permission to the VBWD first to 908 and
then to 913 for City Park Pond. As a result, the level of Sunfish
Lake has continued to rise.
It was agreed between the residents of Sunfish Lake and the City
Council back in the mid -seventies, that the pumping would stop when
the level of Sunfish Lake reached the level of 8911 feet. There has
been no determination by DNR of the OHWM of Sunfish Lake. There is
one that will commence shortly. There is an informal determination by
DNR that the OHWM of Sunfish Lake is 896.4. The present level of
Sunfish Lake is about four feet higher than that. The City Park Pond
permit level is 908 feet in the DNR permit. Last summer, the level of
City Park Pond exceeded that by two feet, so the VBWD is in violation
of its DNR permit.
Mr. Dayton pointed out that if he was to commence a lawsuit on behalf
of the residents on Sunfish Lake before April 1, 1985, he would have
to start a lawsuit about February 15, 1985. He does not want to start
a lawsuit, but would like to propose to the City Council, VBWD, DNR
and to the Tri-Lake group, establishing a working committee to meet
during the month of January to see if there is an opportunity to come
up with an agreement which would be satisfactory to the residents on
Sunfish Lake. The Sunfish Lake residents realize that there are some
problems upstream, and that a lot of people have water problems, and
they understand that there may have to be some compromise from the
level they thought they had back in 1976 of 894, but they do want some
certainty as to what the levels will be. It is not acceptable to the
residents on Sunfish Lake to watch the levels continue to rise a foot
or two every year, with no end in sight.
Mr. Dayton proposed that the City Council (and will make the same
proposal to the other bodies involved) designate a staff member, and
perhaps a member of the City Council to participate in a discussion of
this type commencing in mid -January.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 12-18-84 PAGE 6
Mr. Dayton will put his proposal in a written form to all parties
involved. The desire of the residents on Sunfish Lake is to establish
an agreement that would control the level on Sunfish Lake; however,
there may be a number of other benefits that could flow from such a
committee. The desired goal is to avoid the expense of litigation for
all of the parties involved.
This item will be on the January 8, 1985 City Council agenda. The
representatives from VBWD will be invited to this meeting.
8. City Council Report
A. Laura Fraser - Public availability of City Council Packets.
M/S/P Fraser/Mazzara - That a copy of the entire City Council agenda
packet, which is sent out to the Council members prior to each
meeting, be made available for public inspection at the -City Office at
the time which packets are sent out to the entire Council. (Motion
carried 5-0)
Morgan pointed out that at times these packets contain confidential or
sensative material, and that the staff should be careful as to what
information is included in these packets.
B. Mike Mazzara - Waste -to -Energy Update
Mazzara informed the Council that the mass -burn Waste -To -Energy Plant
will not be located in Lake Elmo. The technology will be different it will be an RDF Plant and will be located in Newport, and the
proposed vendor is NSP. The Counties will be guaranteeing at least
900 tons of trash per day to this plant in Newport.
Originally, the mass -burn plant was proposed to cost between $60 and
$100 million. This proposed RDF plant, including the bonding issue,
financing and the building of the plant is going to cost about $25
million. The tipping fee that the haulers will have to pay at the
plant will be about $25 per ton. Right now, the tipping fee at Pine
Bend is right around $12 per ton. To actually finance, or make up
that difference, it still has not been decided whether to charge the
homeowners at the point of delivery, or whether it is used as a taxing
system. The point is, the cost to the trash hauler is doubled.
This does not eliminate the need for a future landfill in Washington
County, but Mazzara estimates that it will not be in Lake Elmo.
Dunn pointed out that when this Waste -To -Energy plant was first
proposed, a lot of citizens and certain Council members were so sure
that this was going in that one member even suggested that the City
put up front money to investigate and study the impact on the area and
look at the best development. The lesson to be learned, is that we
should not be to eager to spend money, even when something looks like
a sure thing, until it is a sure thing.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 12-18-84 PAGE 7
C. "Light Up Lake Elmo Resolution"
M/S/P Eder/Morgan - To adopt Resolution 84-80 expressing the
appreciation and thanks of the City Council for the efforts of the
"Light Up Lake Elmo" committee, and chairperson Carol Kuettner in
obtaining the new Christmas decorations in the downtown area. (Motion
carried 5-0)
D. Other
Eder advised the Council that the Cable Commission extended the time
to make a decision on the extension requested by Group W. They did
not complete the maps for Lake Elmo, but is one thing that he will
make sure the members of the Council get, along with his comments.
9. City Administrator's Report
A. Hanson Rockin "L" Cup renewal
The Council reviewed the Hanson's application and their 1984 CUP. The
Administrator noted that everything is in order for the renewal of
this CUP, and the staff has had no complaints about the operation of
the Rockin "L" Trailer Sales.
M/S/P Dunn/Morgan - To adopt Resolution 84-81 renewing the Hanson
Conditional Use Permit for the operation of the Rockin "L" Trailer
Sales for 1985 at 10824 Hudson Boulevard. (Motion carried 5-0).
B. Commission vacancies
The Administrator made reference to the section of the City Code which
states that "No member may serve more than two consecutive three year
terms unless the average years of service for all the Commission
members is less than four years". He stated that the average length
of service on the Planning Commission is more than four years, but
feels that it is very important to have some consistancy in enforcing
the Code, and also some knowledge of the Code, and recommends that
this phrase either be deleted from the Planning Commission code, or
that this condition be waived for the 1985 appointments.
Consensus of the Council is to defer this item until the new City
Council meets in January of 1985.
C. Other
The Administrator advised the Council that Community Education is
looking for a location to hold some classes during the first- few
months of 1985. They are not specifically indicated as one of the
approved agencies to use government buildings in Lake Elmo (they
charge a fee and our policy indicates that it should not be used by
anybody that charges a fee for their services). Community Education
has indicated their desire to donate $50 to the Lake Elmo Fire
Department.
M/S/P Frasr/Morgan - To allow Community Education the use of the Lake
Elmo Fire Hall for various classes to be held the first few months of
1985. (Motion carried 4-1 <Dunn>).
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 12-18-84 PAGE 8
Dunn's objection is that there is valuable equipment in the fire hall,
and no measures have been taken to secure the fire equipment from the
meeting room. Several years ago,.we had very tight controls over use
of City property, now all of a sudden we are going to open it up, and
would like more information before he could vote in favor of a
proposal such as this.
Fraser stated that several years ago when there were some concerns,
quite a bit of effort was made by the fire fighters and Council
members in working out a procedure that would be workable. She sees
this request as falling within the requirements that were determined
at that time.
10. Oath of Office for new 1985 City Council members
According to State Law and in concurrance with past practices in Lake
Elmo, newly elected local officials are required to take oath of
office before the first of the year. The City Clerk administered the
oath of office to Mayor Elect Morgan, Councillor's Elect Armstrong and
Christ.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
Resolution 84-77 - 1984 MSA vacation of right-of-way
84-78 - Loetscher/Dickhausen simple lot subdivision
84-79 - Teal Pass Estates - Accept Jasper Way as
City Street
84-80 - Light Up Lake Elmo
84-81 - CUP Rockin "L" Trailer Sales
Since we do not have time to discuss every point presented, it may
seem that decisions are preconceived. However, background information
is provided for the City Council on each agenda item in advance from
City Staff and appointed Commissions; and decisions are based on this
( information and past experiences. In addition, some items may also
have been discussed at previous Council meetings. If you are aware of
information that hasn't been discussed, please fill out a "Request to
Appear Before the City Council" slip; or, if you came late, raise your
hand to be recognized. Comments that are pertinent are appreciated.
Items requiring excessive time may be continued to another meeting.
AGENDA
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 18, 1984
7:00 p.m. Meetings Convenes
1. Agenda
2. Minutes: December 4, 1984
3• Claims
4. Presentation by Mike Ayers, Washington County
Community Health Services, on the final report
of the Washington/Ramsey Councils Sanitary
Landfill Committee.
5. Presentation by the Fire Chief, Fran Pott,
on the proposed Fire Department Bylaw changes.
6. City Engineer's Report
7:30 p.m. A. Public Hearing for the vacation of the
right-of-way relating to the 1984 MSA Project
B. Loetscher Simple Lot Subdivision and zoning
code lot size variance at 3063 Jamley Ave.
C. Escrow release for Teal Pass Estates
D. Other
--- BREAK -------------------------
8:00 p.m. 7. Presentation by Dick Herold and Don
Wisn.iewski from the Washington County
Public Works Department regarding the
Regional Park entrance from I-94 to loth St.
8. City Council Reports
A. Laura Fraser - Public availability of
City Council packets.
B. Mike Mazzara - Waste -To -Energy Project
update.
C. Maynard Eder: "Light Up Lake Elmo"
Committee resolution.
D. Other
g. City Administrator's Report
A. Hanson - Rockin 'L'" Sales CUP renewal.
B. Commission vacancies.
C. Other
10. Oath of Off -ice for new 1985 City Council
members.
MGMO
December 13v 1984
/
�
TO: City Council
FR: Patrick D. Klaers, City Administrator
RE: Informational Material forDecember 18, 1984, Council Meeting
I must regretfully inform the City Council of some personal bad news
which has been received by the Dave Wisdorf family. Dave contacted me
last Sunday morning and informed me that his father had passed away"
Dave/s father died of a massive heart attack at age 71; but, he had been
ill for some time. City Council regards have been sent by the staff to
Dave's family in Litchfield, Minnesota"
1" Attached for your information is the most recent City Newsletter
dated December 11, 1984" This newsletter edition highlights articles on
the Building Officials Contract, the Lions Park Shelter Workers and the
Fire Department CIP and By-laws"
2. The Planning Commission will be discussing its work plan in January,
1985. This work plan will be discussed at the first few meetings in
1985, and, a formulated work plan will be presented to the City Council
for its adoption in March, 1985. The Planning CommissioK is soliciting
the City Council's input on what the Council desires the Planning
Commission to review and examine in 1985" Any comments from the current
or future City Council members regarding ideas or concepts which should
be discussed and evaluated by the Planning Commission in 1985, should be
forwarded to myself" I will then'pass on these comments to the Planning
Commission in January"
3. Attached for your information are the monthly reports for November
from the Washington County Sheriff's Department and the Lake Elmo
"alunte,er Fire Department"
The police monthly report contains a typical number of miles driven,
complaints received and citiations issued; and, the Fire Department
report continues to indicate a high number of firefighters responding to
each call, with most of the incidents having over 10 individuals
responding,
4^ At the
last City
Council meeting/when
the park
shelter workers were
hired, the
staff was
requested to find out
how much
was paid during the
Nst 06asom
to these -workers.
In response
to this
question, during the
1983/04 Winter
season
approximately $1200
was paid
to the park shelter
irkers for
their services.
This has been
a fairly
standard amount
hoge past
feN seasons
andwe anticipate a
similar
amount to be paid
4hiP UpCo0/ing
season"
~
Info Memo for 12-18-84 Council Meeting Page 2
5, Attached for you information is an article from the 12-5-B4 St"
Croix Valley Press on the Light Up Lake Elmo Committee and newly
purchased Christmas lights. Additionally, you should note that there is
an item on the 12 18 agenda to have the City Council adopt a resolution i ~ �
thanking the Light Up Lake Elmo Committee and its Chairperson, Carol 8
Kuettner, for the effort in obtaining Christmas lights for the downtown
area in Lake Elmo,
6. Wish to p./blically acknowledge that the City engineering consulting
Firm, TKDA, and the City attorney's law firm have each donated $100 to
help cover the expenses of the Lake Elmo Christmas party"
7. Attached for you information is a notice from the AMM that a vacancy
has occured on the Board of Directors because of the results of the
recent City elections. Any City Council member that is interested in
applying for this vacancy on the AMM board should notify me during or
prior to the 12-18 City Council meeting; and, I will then forward this
information to the AMM for their consideration,
S. Attached for your information is a 12~5-84 St" Croix Valley Press
article on the Comparable Worth Program in the school districts. School
District 834 is using a consultant to assist them with the State law
requirements and currently is obtaing questionaires from all the
employees on their work duties and schedule"
It fs becoming apparent to myself and the rest of the staff, that the
City Council does not support the Lake Elmo participation in the MAMA
comparable worth study for metropolitan and out'of-state cities" This
would cost the City approximately $3200/$3300 for a professional,
objective study to comply with the State law. Official action as to '
whether or not the City of Lake Elmo participates in this MAMA study
will be required at the 1-6~85 Council meeting" Detailed information
will be provided the Council prior to that meeting regarding the
requirements of the State law and how the City can meet these
requirements by participating with the MAMA organization or by doing the
study in-house. If, as I now anticipate, we do the study in-house, the
staff is confident that we can meet the requirements of the State law;
but, it should be clearly understood by the City Council that even doing
the study in-house will not be without some cost" An "in-house" study
would also, depending on the results, be subject to criticism from the
public or employees" It is conceivable, that after all the staff time
and City Council committee time involved doing this project in-house,
that we could approach this $3,000 figure" If the Coucil's decision in
to complete the Comparable Worth requirements in-house, then, a Coucil
committee will have to be established to assist in the review and
evaluation process"
9. The City will be running an ad in the Washington County Review for a
recording secretary to take minutes during Planning Commission meetings.
This is being done in an effort to obtain these minutes in a more timely'
manner so that the minutes from a Monday meeting will he available to he
included in the City Council packets when they are distributed that
following Friday" We will be running the ad three times and be
accepting applications in City Hall until Friday, January 11. I will
then interview the appropriate candidates for this position and be
�
making a recommendation to the City Council at the January 22 meeting"
�
Info Memo for 12_18-84 Council Meeting Page 3 '
Some questions have surfaced regarding the pay scale and structure for
`this recording secretary" There are a lot of uncertainties as to the
best method for the City to receive these minutes and a lot will depend
, `n n the individual that is selected for recording secretary" I will be
/ ynegotiating the pay for this position with each individual in an effort
` to get the best quality work for the best price for the City` You
should be made aware that when Ilene Johnson substituted for the
recording secretary in 1963, she more often than not received in excess
of $100 per meeting. This cost included the time and expense for
travel, the time for attending meetings and the time and expense of the
equipment for her to transcribe these minutes. I feel that this is too
much to be paying for a recording secretary to take minutes" I do not
believe that a recording secretary should be receiving more per hour
than either Kathy or Mary receive, Both of these office workers will be
receiving $7"45/hr in 1985, I think that at a maximum we should he
offering is up to $6.50 for the recording secretary with payment of up
to a maximum of $80 per meeting"
Gome of the questions and cost factors that surround this position
on
include travel expense and time, where the individual will be working on
these Minutes, either at home or at City hall, and the speed and skill
of the individual in relationship to the pay they are requesting" For
example/ one individual may request $10/hr and if there are 10 pages of
minutes it may only take this individual six hours" Whereas, a less
qualified individual may request only $6"50/hr but to do a 10 page
minute summary may require her to do 15 hours of work" All of these
factors must be considered and after we hire an individual e should
Indicate that the wage for this position will he reviewed along with the
minute taking system after six months,,
'You cap rest assured that I will be attempting to get the best
individual at the best cost for the City"
The Council may want to consider an alternative to hiring a Planning
Commission secretary. This alternative would be to have the Parks and
Planning Commission and City Council minutes only include official
action, i"e" motions, and to keep a*record of what was actually said at
the meetings by retaining the tapes for five years" This would
�eliminate the need for a recording secretary and free up a great deal of
Mary's time for other work.
10" The Planning Commission has been working on an I-94 Plan off and or
for all of 1984. They have now reached a consensus as to the type of
controls that can be implemented to help insure compatible land use,
high quality development and encourage the more intensified development
to take place in Section 32" What is being proposed by the staff and
the Planning Commission is the creation of a new overlay district called
the Interstate Corridob Overlay District"
Briefly, this district will work the same as other overlay districts
that we have in the CitZ.such as the Shoreland District or the
Floodplain District, Any proposed development that would take place
along I-94 would have to request rezoning to a use that is currently in
$he code" The development must then meet all of the conditions that are
, currently in the code plus the conditions of the overlay district" The
\` Overlay district includes performance standards on the type of
development that can take place" This district puts conditions on the
type of building allowed, parking requirements, drainage requirements,
screening and especially the amount of sewage that is allowed to be
generated by the type of development.
° �
�
Info Memo for 12-18,84 Council Meeting Page 4
This last aspect restricts the intensity of development and is the key
factor in the overlay district" This factor relates to how much sewage
can be generated by any type of development and uses the Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission standard of a SAC unit. One SAC unit equals
the amount of sewage typically discharged from a single family
residential home. The minimum lot size in this overlay district is 10
acres with one SAC unit being allowed per 2.5 acres" As we have a l 1/2
acre lot size requirement in residential districts you can tell that the
amount of sewage allowed to be generated by the development along I~94 '
would be less than what is generated from a single family home" This
factor may need some revisions, either by the City Council or to be
recommended to the City Council from the Planning Commission"
The question seems to be whether or not we should allow more intense
development than residential along I~94 or less intense development. We
could'i��clude the provision that indicates one SAC unit for 10 acres
which`�would practically exclude any type of development and would have
all. the land owners up in arms; or, we could he more lenient and include
18, 15 or 20 SAC,units per 10 acre parcel and allow development that is
much more,intense than residential. Clearly the City wants to encourage
the intense sewage generators to develop in Section 32 where sewer is
available.,
' �
The corrido� or overlay district is a simple concept but has many
complex elements in it. Adoption of this corridor overlay district will
� involve close evaluation by the City Council and numerous public
hearings before both the City Council and Planning Commission with the
land owners" The staff believes that this overlay district will meet
with the goals of the City Council,
/ \
\ /
A more detailed comprehensive memo will be sent to the City Council ^
shortly and this item will be discussed at the 1-8_85 Council meeting,
The Planning Commission desires to obtain some input from the City
Council before they go through the time and expense of the public
hearing process" Planning Consultant Rob Chelseth is available to make
a presentation on this concept tothe City Council at any time and has
worked with the Planning Commission on this proposal.
If this overlay corridor concept proceeds through the public hearings at
the planning commission level, I will be having Rob attend the City
Council meeting when this concept is considered"