Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-04-86 CCM.( Since we do not have time to discuss every point presented, it may seem that decisions are preconceived. However, background information is provided for the City Council on each agenda item in advance from City Staff and appointed Commissions; and decisions are based on this information and past experiences. In addition, some items may also have been discussed at previous Council meetings. If you are aware of information that hasn't been discussed, please fill out a "Request to Appear Before the City Council" slip; or, if you came late, raise your hand to be recognized. Comments that are pertinent are appreciated. Items requiring excessive time may be continued to another meeting. AGENDA LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 4, 1986 7:00 p.m. Meeting Convenes 1. Agenda 2. Minutes: January 21, 1986 3. Claims 4. Public Inquiries 5. Parks & Planning Commission - Candidate Interviews 6. PLANNING AND LAND USE 7:30 p.m. A. Public Hearing: Road Frontage Variance Request - Patricia Anderson B. Zoning District Amendment - A.M. and Paul Paulzer C. Land Use - Zoning Inquiry: Business Use in an Agricultural Zone 7. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT A. Office Space Project - Work Assignments B. Request for Variance from Spring Road Restrictions - Bellaire Sanitation C. Manning Avenue Maintenance Agreement with Baytown Township. D. Street Signs in Tri-Lakes Association E. Proposed Schedule for Section 32 Improvement Hearing ------------------------B R E A X ------------------------------- 8. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT A. Metro Council Development & Investment Framework B. Development Moratorium C. Assessor Service Contract for Lake Elmo D. Employee Health Plans E. Composting and Recycling F. Minnesota Natural Resources & Outdoor Recreation G. Brown's Creek Water Management Organization 9. Adjourn LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 4, 1986 Mayor Morgan called the City Council meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. Present: Armstrong,, Dunn, Mazzara, Christ, City Administrator Overby, City Engineer Bohrer and City Attorney Knaak. 1. Agenda Add: City Attorney's Report, 7F. Partial Payment for Emergency Septic Tanks Contract, 8H. League of City Legislative Conference, and 9A. North Star Ski Club. M/S/P Dunn/Morgan - to approve the agenda for the February 4, 1986 City Council Meeting as amended. (Motion carried 5-0). 2. Minutes: January 21, 1986 M/S/P Christ/Dunn - to approve the January 21, 1986 City Council Minutes as presented.. (Motion carried 5-0). 3. Claims City Administrator Overby added Claim No. 87030 - $8,500 Payment to Lee's Construction Company (Emergency Septic Systems) and Claim No. 87031 - $575 Boy Scout Troop #162 Composting. The $575 is what the City agreed on for full payment for a specified number of weekends. The City was shorted one weekend, but the Boy Scouts would be willing to pick up an extra weekend on spring cleanup. M/S/P Dunn/Mazzara - to approve the February 4, 1986 claims 86969 through 87031 as presented. (Motion carried 5-0). 4. Publtc Inquiries Sandy Nazarian stated that when the Office Space Report was presented, Ed Nielson mentioned that their first recommendation was to buy the present space on a condominium basis and the second recommendation was the re -leasing of this office space. I am wondering why you are talking about possibly going ahead and building especially when Harriet McPherson and Gary Laidig were here telling you that city aid will be cut. Therefore, you would have problems with tax increases. Mayor Morgan replied that building our own building on our own land was the cheapest option in their study. Sandy Nazarian didn't recall this being said in the report. Councilman Christ clarified that the Building Committee had to start off with some basis and one was that we needed 4,000 sq.ft. of building space. The present office has 2,300 sq.ft. If you LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 4, 1986 Page 2 look at what they were comparing, leasing of present office space versus building a 11,000 sq.ft building, the two did not turn out very well. Especially, when you were to pay $40,000-$50,000 for land to go with it. If you were to build on your own land, it is conceivable that it would be significantly cheaper than continuing to lease this space or to buy this office space. Therefore, these options are being looked at. If it is better to lease, we will lease; or if it is better to buy, we will buy. It is the taxpayers money that we are saving here, and we will do the best job we can. Mayor Morgan stated that it was not our intentions to increase the mill rate in any way. We are going to do the most economical thing that we can. 5. Parks & Planning Commission - Candidate Interviews Ronald Ramirez, 8840 27th St. Ct. No. - I consider Lake Elmo to have a very good city parks system. When I was first interviewd I made some negative comments on my neigborhood park, Tablyn Park, but I don't find anything wrong with the system as a whole. I ,just saw some opportunities to improve Tablyn Park. My family uses Tablyn Park daily in the summertime. My intent to being on the Park Commission is to provide some assistance in deciding how to develop parks and help improve the park system. Gloria Knobla.uch, 9181 31st St. N. - I have kind of a vested interest in what happens to Lake Jane and to the water quality in the wells around the landfill area because I live just south of there. I would like to see more business encouraged to expand our tax base, but would like it clustered in this area and not, all over Lake Elmo. We have a good quality of life here. We have Sunfish Park where we can go snowmobiling, cross-country skiing or hiking on the trails. Barbara Haacke, 9280 55th St. N. - I just recently moved to the area, but had a desire to become involved with the City. I have enjoyed what I've seen and would like to see continued quality planned development in the area. Robert Haacke Jr., 9280 55th St. N. - I like the park system and the town and would like to become involved with government. I use the parks and could give some good input to maintain the quality of the parks. I believe there should be a balance met between motorized and non -motorized use. M/S/P Dunn/Christ - to appoint Ron Ramirez for one term on the Lake Elmo Parks Commission. (Motion carried 5-0). M/S/P Dunn/Morgan - to appoint Barbara Haacke as Second. Alternate on the Lake Elmo Planning Commission. (Motion carried 5-0). M/S/P Dunn/Armstrong - to table the second appointment on the Parks Commission until Scotty Lyall has been interviewed. (Motion carried 5-0). LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 4, 1986 Page 3 M/S/P Christ/Dunn - to accept Merle Olson's letter of resignation from the Parks Commission and send him a letter of appreciation for his service on the Commission. (Motion carried 5-0). 6. PLANNING AND LAND USE A. Public Hearing: Road Frontage Variance Request - Patricia Anderson Mayor Morgan opened up the public hearing at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council chambers. This is a public hearing to consider the request of Patricia Anderson for a variance to the required road frontage and a simple lot subdivision. City records show that only the variance was approved on Lot 41, contingent upon a 50 foot road easement and an easement to Lot 42 for the septic system proposed under the 201 Program. Councilman Dunn asked Bill Eder what the status was on these contigencies. Bill answered that it will be on the deed when it gets straightened out at the court house. Since last August, Bill Eder's father has passed away and Bill purchased the house on Lot 42. Bill also has purchased the former Schultz property. Lot 41 is now in the Eder estate and Pat Anderson is the executor of the estate. The total size of the portion of Lot 41 under consideration is 1.54 acres. Of that area, 0.61 acres would need to be put into an easement for future roadway use. This would leave 0.94 acres in the remainder of the site for residential development. Nancy Prince - The Planning Commission had to decide in whether we wanted to allow one more house on the private road. In the past we would allow somebody to put a road back to a house, but we will not allow them to subdivide a piece of property on a private road. However, there are already houses using the private road which is a difference from what we have one in the past. Because of houses already using a private road, we didn't feel that one more house on a private road would be that much more of a. problem. As long as the road easments are on all the deeds so that everyone can use the road, the City would have no advantage to owning that because of the Moris house in the way. The public hearing was closed at 7:53 p.m. Councilwoman Armstrong asked City Engineer Bohrer if the new lot would be buildable and he answered yes, but they would still have to apply for a building permit and have perk tests and submit the required data. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 4,, 1986 Page 4 M/S/P Christ/Morgan - to adopt Resolution 86-18 approving a simple lot subdivision for Lot 41 that which is on record in the City office to Patricia Anderson. (Motion carried 5-0). M/S/P Dunn/Morgan - to adopt Resolution 86-19 approving the road frontage variance contingent on a survey showing the 50 foot road easement and a "Hold Harmless" statement absolving the City of any responsibility for the maintenance of the existing private road. (Motion carried 5-0). B. Zoning District Amendment - A.M. and Paul Palzer The applicants propose to rezone 40 acres of land from Agricultural to Rural Residential. Palzer - We would like to parcel it off so we can get a few homes on there. Most of it is pasture right now. Interested in a cluster where you are allowed seven homes on a. forty. Nancy Prince - The following are the reasons the Planning Commissioners voted for the rezoning: In the land use planning map and Comprehensive Plan this area is indicated for general rural use and low density housing would be appropriate for that use as well as the present agricultural zone. Also in this Comprehensive Plan is a map of soils and this area does not indicate high quality soils. The reasons the Commissioners voted against the rezoning indicated that also in the Comprehensive Plan there is a section that discusses the preservation of Ag land and we should make an attempt to preserve Ag land in the City. The last property owner did request the Ag zoning. The neighbors that are around this property are farming their land. Steve Korhel, 5540 Keats Avenue N. - The previous owner, Mr. Slaussen, seriously contemplated putting the land into corn. The City Council expressed that it was an odd shape parcel and surrounded by people that were engaged in agriculture. Because of the uncertainty of the use, the Council suggested that they could not support this rezoning unless more information was brought in. M/S/P Morgan/Dunn - to table the Palzer Rezoning Request- for two weeks for further consideration. (Motion carried 5-0). C. Land Use - Zoning Inquiry: Business Use in an Agricultural Zone Mr. Mike Mazza.ra brought up a concern regarding an alleged code violation on the Thomas Armstrong farm. Mike Mazzara - In 1985 the Armstrongs purchased and built a 12,320 sq.ft. Butler building on their farm, which is permitted in an Ag zone 6roviding that it is used for Ag purposes. My contention is that this building and some of the surrounding area is not used for Agricultural purposes. I feel they are running a retail LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 4, 1986 Page 5 storage space business in this building, in the old barn and around the old barn in the back. The name of the business is Low Cost Storage which provides storage for boats, motors, trailers, RV's, trucks, cars and motorhomes. The Armstrongs have advertised in the Cimarron Newsletter and have advertisements in the white and yellow pages under Low Cost Storage, outside or inside, RV's, boats, etc. and has the Armstrong's address and phone number. The name Low Cost Storage has been registerd with the Secretary of State, State of MN, and the person that registered the name is Thomas Armstrong. On Monday, February 3rd, a meeting was held, on the request of Mr. Armstrong, to explain some of his points to the City Attorney, City Administrator, Building Inspector and myself. Mr. Armstrong brought up that because the storage space has existed on a farm for years that it is all right to go ahead and build a building, open up a business, advertise, and rent out ninety percent of the new building. Mr. Mazzara read the code that states what uses are permitted in Ag zone and felt that it was stretching it to run an actual for -profit business in an Ag zone. Mr. Armstrong had stated in the meeting that this was a common and customary practice in Lake Elmo in Ag zoning to rent space for people for this use, and he made reference to four farmers, Layhart Friedrich, Steve Raleigh, Gene Peltier and Pete Shiltgen. Mr. Friedrich, Peltier and Shiltgen do not advertise or rent out spaces at their farms, and anything that is stored in those farm buildings are personal belongings, according to Mr. Mazzara. At this point Mr. Armstrong objected to Mr. Mazzara for misquoting him. Mr. Armstrong stated that he would Like as much time as Mr. Mazzara to answer his inaccuracies. Mike Mazzara - If this is defined as a proper use in the Ag zone, my concern if this is allowed this way, we as a City risk that anyone who owns Ag land can go ahead and put up a building of any size and run a business out of there. The City loses control if we don't address the question of running the business out of there. At this point we don't have enough information to make any decisions, but should table this until we can make a decision regarding our code and if we want this to happen in other places. If this is allowed in an Ag zone, it should be qualified and quantified as to how much should be allowed. Tom Armstrong - I object to the procedure that was followed. Mr. Mazzara has had people taking pictures and had contacted the Building Inspector last Fall. I wrote the Building Inspector and answered his questions and heard nothing more. Mr. Mazzara, and other friends of his reported to the City other alleged violations which turned out to be a Soil and Water Conservation District project on my farm. Mr. Mazzara has been making some kind of a witch hunt out of this. Without ever talking to me, Mr. Mazzara put the issue on the Council agenda. The City Administrator contacted my wife to let her know that this issue was on the LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 4, 1986 Page 6 agenda. I called Mr. Mazzara and asked him whether he had anything to discuss with me, and he denied it. I told Mike that I would meet with the City Attorney, Administrator and Building Inspector any time or any place, but he indicated he would not do that. This is not the way the City of Lake Elmo has ever conducted business in the past. What Mr. Mazzara is after is some publicity in his own political motives which we are all aware of. This matter should have been handled by the City Attorney and the Administrator. If there is a problem, they should bring it up to the City. Mr. Mazzara's methods are an abuse of power. I have discussed this with the City Administrator, with the City Attorney present, and have shown him the area. I don't have to go into any great detail, but the use of this property goes back 25 ,years. Yes, there are some advertisements in the phone book. I also asked Mr. Mazzara as to how many other barns have you looked into and I listed more than just those four. The purpose of the new building was twofold; I have a tree farm operation and I needed additional space. I plan, hopefully, in the next seven or eight years to get back into farming the land myself. I have no desire to develop this land, but I am going to make use of whatever buildings I have and will not leave them empty to please Mr. Mazzara. That building was built for a farming purpose. I would like to ask the City Attorney to indicate the opinion he indicated to me and Mr. Mazzara at the close of that Monday meeting. Mayor Morgan stated that in the ten years that he has been on the City Council, this is the first time the Council has ever been used to publicly make an accusation. I would have preferred that this be handled administratively and this was my recommendation. It was not, and I regret that very much because we have so many important worthwhile things that this government should be doing. City Administrator Overby handed out a section of the code from the Ag zone and commercial zone which gives reference to definitions of permitted uses in both districts. We didn't consider this portion which starts on page 301-63, Section 301.130 at the meeting on Monday. Mr. Armstrong stated that this is a farm building and that was the subject of the correspondence that took place with the Building Inspector. The law clearly states in the State Building Code, Section 301B.12, that Ag buildings as defined in MN statutes shall not require a building permit for agricultural buildings. City Attorney Knaak advised the City Council that we are dealing with two versions of what is going on on the same parcel of property. The language of th6 code has an ambiguity as to the definition of a farm building. We did meet on Monday with Mr. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 4, 1986 Page 7 Armstrong and Mr. Mazzara and heard Mr. Armstrong's argument for allowing the use. 301.30 - acceptable uses and structures. It was argued that this is a use which was customarily accessory in the area and clearly incidental and subordinate to permitted uses. Now that is a factual question, as to whether or not that in fact is the practice. Going on the assumption that it is the practice, then in fact the argument is that this would be an allowed use in this instance. On the other hand, it becomes ambiguous in the following clause: "storage buildings for use by occupants of the principal structure", which seems to limit that and so there is some need for clarification. There is some reason for concern about possible expansion of the use with no limitations. As I indicated at the close of the Monday meeting, it is my opinion that as it is currently structured, the City really does not have an enforceable position in terms of tagging Mr. Armstrong. However, there is a policy concern about the expansion of this use in the future. In Section 301.050B dealing with preservation of non -conforming uses, the question is whether the use that was being made of the property was not a conforming use at the time, or is not now. Again, this is a factual question, if this use was being made improperly. Prior to the present time, it is allowed. We cannot prohibit it, but we can certainly limit it. I would be more than willing to look into this and draft an acceptable list of allowed ues, if this is the Council's desire. At this time, it is my belief that we do not have a citable violation here, although, there is a legitimate concern. Tom Armstrong - I agree with the City Attorney's position. This ordinance is not as distinct as it should be. The City's policy has been to preserve Agricultural uses, and I would urge the Planning Commission to study some uses for Agricultural land which would allow economic returns. Mr. Mazzara stated that if a business is allowed, putting up a 12,000 sq.ft. building on an Ag zone and advertising, then I believe that the City is in a position where they would not be able to enforce that and this is the concern. Mayor Morgan agreed that there is an ambiguity in our code. The City Attorney has given us -his opinion that no taggable offense has been committed. The thing to do is to have City Administrator Overby and City Attorney Knaak, along with Mr. Mazzara and Mr. Armstrong if they wish to participate, to see if we cannot establish codes that are more understandable and more enforceable. If you need help from the Planning Commission or the City Planner, then do it. If there is anything we can do to help the farmers without blatantly violating our own codes, I think that we should do it. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 4, 1986 Page 8 7. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT A. Office Space Project - Work Assignments Mayor Morgan and Councilman Dunn met with Mr. Friedrich and he was quite amenable to trade land. We estimated that we needed five acres and he proposed to trade for the farmland, south boundary of the park, a two for one trade. We need to research the legal question if we can trade park land for the frontage land that Mr. Fr,edrich owns. Mr. Friedrich would split the cost of fencing, but we would have to do the surveying. Then if we have our own land and build a smaller building, is it economically feasible to do it. We have all the information in the Office Space Committee report, but we would just have to rework it. Councilman Dunn - I have talked to Frank Langer and asked how he felt on a two for one trade. Langer felt it sounded equitable, but was going to put the values in writing. Other alternatives should be looked into and find out if the bank building would be available. Mayor Morgan - There are three options to be considered: buy this space, build a smaller building on our own land and take a look at the bank. TKDA is interested in working with the City in any capacity that the Council would want and the first step would be some peliminary planning. City Administrator Overby will talk to the people at the bank and get some idea of their plans. B. Request for Variance from Spring Road Restrictions - Bellaire Sanitation Bellaire Sanitation wishes to have their garbage trucks exempted from the spring road weight restrictions. On April 2, 1985, the City Council voted to amend the load limits for the garbage haulers operating within the City of Lake Elmo to 7 tons per axle, acknowledging that the County and State still have the option to ticket the truck if it is overloaded while traveling on a County or State roadway coming to or leaving Lake Elmo. The City Council will work on the problem and get back to the issue at the February 18th City Council meeting. C. Manning Avenue Maintenance Agreement with Baytown Township. This subject was discussed at an earlier City Council meeting where it was decided to inform Baytown Township that the City would only maintain and cover such costs on that portion of the road which is located in the City limits. Councilman Dunn suggests that we get together with the town boards and discuss this problem with road maintenance. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 4, 1986 Page 9 D. Street Signs in Tri-Lakes Association The Tri-Lakes Association has requested the City to install new signs and posts. M/S/P Dunn/Morgan - to approve the estimated cost of $1,386.15 for 30 street signs, 15 four-way bracket signs and 15 posts for the Hidden Bay and 50th St./Hill Trail area. (Motion carried 5-0). E. .Proposed Schedule for Section 32 Improvement Hearing In the Fall of 1985, property owners from the Section 32-33 area of Lake Elmo petitioned the City to conduct a sewer feasibility study for that area of the community. The City Council scheduled a public hearing on requested improvements in Sections 32-33 on Tuesday, February 25th at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council chambers. F.. Partial Payment for Septic Tanks City Engineer Bohrer reported that the three emergency holding tanks were installed and the satellites have been removed from the sites. The work has been acceptable and the total value of the work completed was $8,700. This is $700 less than the contract amount because we dial not have to remove one of the old spetic tanks that he thought was going to be in the way. Bohrer recommends paying Lee's Costruction $8,500 and retaining $200 because there is some clean-up that has to be done in the Spring. 8. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT A. Metro Council Development & Investment Framework The City Council will wait until they receive the Planning Commission's comments on the MDIF information. C. Development Moratorium The City Council and Planning Commission briefly discussed an interim ordinance to hold off all new development at the joint meeting held on 1-13-86. The State Statute allows a 12 month moratorium with a 6 month extension. After some discussion, it was decided to have a 6 month moratorium with the possibility of extending it if the work is not getting done. The public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, March 4th. D. Assessor Service Contract for Lake ELmo Frank Langer has been doing the assessment work in Lake Elmo under contract with Washington County for several years now. Frank intends to leave his county job and work on a free-lance contract basis. Mr. Langer has offered to provide his services for 10 percent less LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 4, 1986 Page 10 than the County's rate. The fee covers any services that is required of an assessor in addition to evaluating the property every year. The costs are as follows: County Rate = $4.40 per parcel minus 10% -0.44 Frank's Rate = T3-.-97 per parcel Mayor Morgan - This is an opportunity to save some money and not lose on the service because Frank has been assessing in Lake Elmo for four years. Councilman Dunn - I am very much impressed with the way Mr. Langer conducts himself at the Board of Review meetings. City Engineer Bohrer asked Mr. Langer if he would be qualified as a real estate appraiser because the City needs to acquire property every so often. Mr. Langer stated he would be qualified, but this would not be part of the assessors duties. Mayor Morgan indicated that the Council would like to retain Mr. Langer's services and asked City Administrator Overby to draw up a contract and bring it for approval to the next meeting. D. Employee Health Plans Some employees are not satisfied with the coverage and/or payment schedule under our League of Minnesota Municipalities health insurance coverage. Other employees are interested in getting dental and/or vision care coverage. The City Council indicated to City Administrator Overby to research available options. E. Composting and Recycling Rick Grooms from Washington County Public Health Department provided an update on Lake Elmo's 1985 composting project. The summary was as follows: Summary Autumn 1987 Number of Vehicle Trips 139 Approx. volume of Yard Waste 389 yd3* Approx. tonnage of Yard Waste 47 tons* Spring Season April -May 1986 Finished Compost Spring 1987 *These numbers may be slightly high since the staff measured the pile after the pile had been snowed on. The city crews carried out the work successfully within a short period of time and within budget limits. The local Lake Elmo Boy Scout Troop and parents ran the site very smoothly. Only LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 4, 1986 Page 11 inclement weather toward the end of the compost season kept the site from operating fully; otherwise, the site's first season was a success. The county is going to implement $1 per household grant program for recycling for cities in the southern part of the county. This money is to be used for recycling. You can apply for the money by filling out a work plan. The money can be used for equipment, leasing land, or costs such as these. The Metropolitan Council has two programs available. One is a 50 cent per household rebate fund. That is, if the city spends money on a recycling program the Council will refund money up to 50 cents per household. This money can be spent toward composting and recycling. The second program is a $4 per ton grant. There are certain restrictions as far as materials and one of them is compost. Only cities and towns can apply for these and both programs require some documentation and a letter of certifi_caton from the City. F. Minnesota Natual Resources & Outdoor Recreation The Legislative Commission on MN Resources is requesting feedback on natural resources opportunities. This has also been referred to the Parks Commission for their review. If the City Council has any suggestions or comments, they are to call Administrator Overby. G. Brown's Creek Water Management Organization The Brown's Creek WMO is requesting $70.64 for Lake Elmo's share of costs relative to development of their plan. They are also requesting $100 as Lake Elmo's organizational fee to help cover start up and administrative costs. This cost cannot be assessed because it isn't a separate tax district, but the City should put together the separate taxing districts. It was suggested to contact the two owners, Bergmann Green Houses and Artie Shafer if they would be interested in being our representative. M/S/P Morgan/Christ - to approve Lake Elmo's share in the Brown's Creek WMO of $170.64. (Motion carried 5-0). H. League of City Legislature Conference City Administrator Overby will be attending this conference on February 5th to cast a vote on behalf of Lake Elmo for keeping the policy on local government aids. 9. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. North Star Ski Club Councilman Dunn suggested adopting a resolution sending them a LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 4, 1986 Page 12 letter of appreciation for the many hard hours they have contributed on the trails in the Park. M/S/P Dunn/Morgan - to adopt Resolution 86-20 thanking the North Star Ski CLub for all the effort and work they have contributed to Sunfish Park. (Motion carried 5-0). B. Appreciation Dinner M/S/P Dunn/Christ - to appoint Rose Armstrong in charge of the appreciation dinner for the retiring commission members. (Motion carried 5-0). 10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT Castle Design City Attorney Knaak informed the City Council that the Court did find for the City, but the other side has 90 days under law to file an appeal. M/S/P Mazzara/Morgan - to adjourn the City Council meeting at 10:15 p.m. (Motion carried 5-0). Resolution 86-18 Simple LOt Subdivision for Patricia Anderson Resolution 86-19 Road Frontage Variance Patricia Anderson Vd-1-IJ Resolution 86-20 North Star Ski Club