Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-07-87 CCMSince we do not have time to discuss every point presented, it may seem that decisions are preconceived. However, background information is provided for the City Council on each agenda item in advance from City Staff and appointed Commissions; and decisions are based on this information and past experiences. In addition, some items may also have been discussed at previous Council meetings. If you are aware of information that hasn't been discussed, please fill out a "Request to Appear Before the City Council" slip; or, if you came late, raise your hand to be recognized. Comments that are pertinent are appreciated. Items requiring excessive time may be continued to another meeting. 7:00 p.m. 7:05 p.m. AGENDA LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL JULY 7, 1987 MEETING CONVENES 1. Agenda 2. Minutes: June 16, 1987 June 22, 1987 3. Claims 4. Landfill Citizens Committee Update 7:15 p.m. 5. Public Inquiries A. Water Level on Lake Elmo 7:30 p.m. 6. PUBLIC HEARING: Legion Pond Pumping Project and Water Elevation 8:15 p.m. 7. PLANNING, LAND USE AND ZONING A. Final Plat Approval: Lake Elmo Heights 2nd Addition, B. Resolution on Illegal Subdivisions C. Shoreland Permit -- George Everitt, 4460 Jack Pine Trail N. 8:30 p.m. 8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT A. 201 Program: Time Extension for Widmer, Inc. B. MSA Project Feasibility Study: 47th Street 9:00 P.M .----------------B R E A K ------------------------------ 9:05 p.m. 9. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Planning Commission Chairperson 10. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT A. 198b AudiAUdit Recommendations 11. Adjourn LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTESLd�9'd?�� JULY 7, 1987 Mayor Christ called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. Present were Christ, Graves, Moe, Johnson (arrived 7:07), Armstrong (arrived 7: 10). Also present were City Administrator Oberby, City Engineer Bohrer, City Attorney Knaak and Finance Director Banister (arrived 9:00). 1. Agenda M/S/P Graves/Moe - To approve the agenda as presented. (Motion carried 3-0) 2. Minutes: June 16, 1987 June 22, 1987 M/S/P Graves/Moe - To approve the minutes of the June 16, 1987 City Council meeting as presented. (Motion carried 3-0) M/S/P Graves/Moe - To approve the minutes of the June 22, 1987 special City Council meeting as presented. (Motion carried 3-0). 3. Claims: M/S/P Moe/Graves To approve Claims 88928 thru 89009 in the amount of $70,003.99 (which includes the addition of the City Administrator's June expenses in the amount of $63.40). (Motion carried 4-0) 4. Landfill Citizens Committee Update Dan Novak representing the Landfill Citizens Committee advised the council that the expenses incurred by the Committee to date amount to $1038.47. Novak also noted that the Committee received a quote from George Crocker of the North American Water Association in the amount of $40 per hour. Mr. Crocker would perform the following tasks for this fee: (1) Establish a network between Lake Elmo's Landfill Citizens Committee and similar committees throughout the Metro area; (2) Provide technical EAW input, and would be able to provide this data on a very short time basis; (3) Provide landfill alternatives; (4) Provide political opposition strategy. Novak also advised the council that the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) began July 7, 1987. This worksheet takes 25 days and proceeds the Environmental Impact Statement. Novak feels that Crocker would be able to provide data that he has already compiled that would have to be addressed in the Environmental Impact Statement. Novak doesn't feel that the Landfill Committee nor our attorney would be male to sempile this information within the 25 days that is allowed for the EAW. Lake Elmo City Council Minutes for July 7, 1987 Page 2 Novak also advised the council that a meeting is scheduled with Willard Munger for Thursday, July 16, 1987 at 9:00 a.m. in Room 400 of the State Office Building. The purpose of this meeting is to rebut the response from the MPCA regarding the questions relating to the siting process of the Lake Elmo Landfill. Novak also advised the council that County Commissioner, Russ Larkin has prepared a resolution that he will present to the County Board in which he asks the County Board to take the position that they will not break the covenants and will oppose any effort by the Met Council to redefine or alter the covenants to permit a landfill in the Regional Park. The Landfill Committee will also have a booth at the Washington County Fair in which they intend to get a petition signed by residents in Washington County (outside of the immediate Lake Elmo area) tc oppose bre'.;inr t.le covenants that could allow the landfill in the Regional Park. Funds for this will come out of the $1500 that has been allotted to the Landfill Committee. Novak also stated tIio; 1. C-. (,;_ " ' Elmo needs to establish, household recycling program (, ther than the compost site). 5. Public Inquiries A. Water level on Lake Elmo As stated at prior meetings, Mr. and Mrs. Eisle have concern with the damage done to their property with the lowering of Lake Elmo. In Eisle's conversation with Nels Nelson, Engineer for Valley Branch Watershed District, there has been some dispute or error over the benchmark of the Lake. The permit issued by the DNR was for 884.5 not 884 as proposed by the VBWD. The Eisle's asked the City's assistance in their attempt to have recinded the $2000 assessment to their property for the supposed benefit of the lake being lowered, and support in getting the VBWD to restore their property so they will continue to have lakeshore. The DNR would have to issue a permit to clean-up the area, and there are public hearings and procedures that the DNR must follow before issuing a clean-up permit, and this process takes 45 days. City Attorney Knaak stated that if the City would financially assist in the public enhancement (of the Eisle's private property) without a direct justifiable overall City benefit, the City could expose itself to subsequent actions by acting outside of the scope of the City's authority. There would be no direct benefit to the entire City, and therefore City funds cannot be spent on private enhancement of property. Christ pointed out that he has more sympathy for those people that built 25 years ago when the water level was low who have suffered with water in their homes. The homes on Lake Elmo that have lost lake frontage were recently built and required variances to be built, which shnu l rl nPVPr haves ht-p l a 1 1 nsaPrJ T4P fi] l l y si1ppart s Lake Elmo at its Lake Elmo City Council Minutes for July 7, 1987 Page 3 current level, and would like to see it lowered even more, if possible. M/S/P Graves/Moe - To adopt Resolution 87-31 whereby the City of Lake Elmo will ask the Valley Branch Watershed District to look into the request of the residents of the area on Lake Elmo to see what can be done to ameliorate the situation; either dredging to restore the property or recinding the $2000 assesslf�nt against the property. (Motion carried 5-0) (Copy of resolution attached and made part of these minutes). 6. Public Hearing: Legion Pond Pumping Project and Water Elevation Pursuant to published notice, Mayor Christ called the public hearing to order at 7:53 p.m. City Engineer, Larry Bohrer advised the council that there was an error in the hearing notice. The purpose of this meeting is to consider whether a lower level of Legion Pond should be considered. The DNR regulations say that a body of water (such as Legion Pond) can be lowered 1-1/2 feet below its Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). Legion Pond's present OHWM is 883.5. The DNR will only consider a lower level if (1) a public hearing is held on the proposed lower level to receive input from the public for or against whether a lower level should be approval for Legion Pond. There was no public comment regarding the proposed level of 882.0, although many residents from Legion Pond were present. Mayor Christ closed the public hearing at 7:58 p.m. M/S/P Johnson/Graves - To request that the DNR permit Legion Pond to be lowered to 882.0. (Motion carried 5-0). 7. Planning, Land Use and Zoning A. Final Plat Approval: Lake Elmo Heights 2nd Addition The City Engineer advised the council in his memo dated July 1, 1987 that he reviewed the proposed final plat of Lake Elmo Heights 2nd Addition for conformity to the preliminary plat and Subdivision Code and found that it was in conformity. The surveyor has also supplied the certificate as to the measurement of 153 and 155 soils as mapped by the Soil and Water Conservation District, and the City Engineer recommended approval of the final plat. Dan Novak expressed concern that the applicant knew that preliminary plat approval for Lake Elmo Heights 2nd Addition had not been granted prior to the moritorium. As stated in the City Engineer's report of April 24, 1987, the "temporary" cul-de-sac "could not be extended until sewer was available". Identifying the cul-de-sac as temporary has future implications, Novak feels, and is in direct conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. This is one of the reasons the Planning Commission voted to recommend denial of the preliminary and final plat of Lake Elmo Heights 2nd Addition. By approving this final plat, Lake Elmo City Council Minutes for July 7, 1987 Page 4 Novak felt the council was providing the applicant with future justification for development of the western half of the property and with it the real possibility of sewer. Armstrong stated that she felt the cul-de-sac came in the back door. The motion approving it was without benefit of a public hearing and before Preliminary Plat approval was given. The specific reason for the cluster and the resulting outlot was to retain open space and in permitting this te-mperary cul-de-sac extension to the western boundary of the cluster, the very purpose of the Outlot is defeated. This is entirely contrary to the motion regarding preserving open spaces in the Outlot of this plat voted on by this council on April 7, 1987. The Developer has every intention of filling in this land with dense housing. The soils in the outlot are so very poor as to prevent any development that is not sewered. There is no sewer availability for this land in the forseeable future. The lift station the developer is counting on to provide sewering for this land is intended for and is being paid for by landowners in Oakdale. This should have been platted so that the cluster in the Northeast corner is self-contained and not giving the impression to a future land owner of the outlot that they are entitled to a sewered development simply because the council in 1987 voted yes to something that didn't apply to what was before them. The applicant responded that it would be written in to the developers agreement that only one house would be allowed on this outlot. Also, the reference to future development is for if and when the rules and regulations change and the property is allowed to be developed. Christ stated he has no desire to sewer the outlot, and has no desire to approve septic systems under our existing land use, but perhaps 40 years down the road it would be better that the road is there and has the ability to go on. He feels there may be a definition problem with "temporary" and has no objections to the plat the way it stands, although his intent is not to open it up for future development. Graves concurred with Christ and added that he thought the City was showing some responsibility to our future generations by allowing this street so when the environment does change - when there is a need to develop this outlot, we won't have to tear up someones property to put a road through. It is part of our minutes that our intention is to leave this outlot as open space for the forseeable future - as long as the Comprehensive Plan and our City Ordinances are as they exist. Armstrong felt the council would be hard-pressed to deny a future applicant's contention that by allowing the temporary cul-de-sac the intention of the council was to permit further development when requested. She felt this plat could have been developed in such a way so as to not leave this road hanging in the middle of an outlot. M/S/P Graves/Moe - To adopt Resolution 87-33 grant Final Plat approval to Lake Elmo Heights 2nd Addition subject to the recommendations of the City Engineer and incorporating the conditions of the Preliminary Plat approval given on June 16, 1987, and subject to applicant complying with the recommendations of the Washington Lake Elmo City Council Minutes for July 7, 1987 Page 5 County Public Works Department, and subject to City Attorney's written approval of the developers agreement, and subject to listing the partnership members as required in city code section 401.240 B.l.C., and subject to park dedication fees of $250 per lot. (Motion carried 4-1 <Armstrong>) Johnson reiterated that there be no question remaining that outlot A is to be platted so as to allow nothing more than one single family dwelling. B. Resolution on Illegal Subdivisions in Lanes DeMontreville Country Club. M/S/P Graves/Moe - To adopt Resolution 87-32 prohibiting illegal subdivisions in Lanes DeMontreville Country Club. (Motion carried 5-0) (Copy of resolution attached and made part of these minutes). C. Shoreland Permit: George Everitt, 4460 Jack Pine Trail N. The City Engineer stated there were no variances required with this request, and there were no concerns with the DNR. M/S/P Moe/Graves - To grant a Shoreland permit to George Everitt, 4460 Jack Pine Trail N. for the purpose of constructing a garage. (Motion carried 5-0) 8. City Engineer's Report A. 201 Program: Time Extension Request from Widmer, Inc. Widmer, Inc. has requested a five week extension. Their completion date was June 3, 1987, and the extension request is until July 7, 1987. The reason for the time extension request was the unseasonable wet weather last September that didn't allow them to get a timely start. As of June 3, 1987, all of the systems were in the ground. Most of the landscaping was completed but some of the sodding wasn't completed. The City Engineer stated the time extension did not cause the project to incur any additional costs for construction or inspection, or to property owners, and recommended that there be no penalty assessed by the City to Widmer for going over the contract time. M/S/P Johnson/Moe - To issue a change order to Widmer, Inc. granting an extension of time of completion from June 3, 1987 until July 7, 1987 for work done on the 201 Project with no penalty assessed by the City to Widmer for going over the contract time. (Motion carried 5-0). B. MSA Project Feasbility Study: 47th St. The City Engineer reviewed the upcoming public hearing for the 1987 MSA Project. There are 7 property owners involved. Two of these property owners do not directly abut the property, but via a private road easement, are provided access to this road. In past situations Lake Elmo City Council Minutes for July 7, 1987 Page 6 similar to this, the council felt that having access constituted having a benefit even though their property did not directly abut the street. Past MSA projects have been assessed to each individual lot on the basis of having access to an improved City street. They benefit in the same degree, regardless of lot size or how much frontage they have on the street. The benefit is improved access, not the amout of frontage. The proposal is is assess the project equally into 7 units. The only costs that are not eligible for State Aid reimbursement is if there is some legal fees (right-of-way acquisition) or excess engineering over and above the percentages allowed by the State Aid rules. The Engineer pointed out that there is no platted right-of-way and no dedicated road easements, but the public still has a right to use this road - "a prescriptive right". The road has been in existence for a certain number of years, the public has used it continuously without challenge or interruption and therefore the law says the public has the right to continue using it. A concern raised previously was the preservation of some of the trees along 47th Street, and the City Engineer was instructed to see what could be done to save the trees. The present State Aid rules state that on a rural road, there has to be an area called a "recovery area". It has to be free of obstacles. If a car were to leave the road it would not strike something and cause bodily injury and property damage. The rule for this road would be a recovery area of 20 feet (measured from the edge of the blacktop). The blacktop is 12 feet wide and a recovery area of 20 feet would make a clear zone of about 32 feet either side of the center line of the road. That is the rule that is causing difficulty in trying to save Steven's two large Oak trees. An urban type road (with curb and gutter) has a different standard applied. Basically, with a curb the physical objects only have to be at least 2 feet behind the curb. The object is that the curb provides some type of protection of deflection if a car is getting close to going off of the road. The use of curbs on a rural type road are not automatically approved. It is at the discretion of the District State Aid Engineer, but earlier discussions have indicated that curbs could be used in this manner. The Engineer adivsed the council that he has developed a design that he believes meets the intent of the council. However, there are other trees along the project path that he feels should be given equal treatment (not just the Steven's trees). Graves questioned if this curb proposal is acceptable on a 40 mph speed limit road, and asked if this proposal would be acceptable according to safety standards or are we creating a hazardous situation. Bohrer responded that in his opinion a curb does not prevent someone from leaving the roadway. Even a six-inch curb (which is considered the maximum height) would be easy to get over. Bohrer reiterated that approval of a curb used in this fashion is at the discretion of the District State Aid Engineer. If he recommends that this design be approved, the Central Office of State Aid will go along Lake Elmo City Council Minutes for July 7, 1987 Page 7 with it. There are some guidelines in the design manuals that indicate that it (the curbs) would be a safe situation. Bohrer further stated that moving the road North would require property acquisition from the property owner on the North. If the City choses to go with this proposal, the City should, to clear up the matter of right-of-way, negotiate with the property owners (on the south side) to see if they will dedicate a road easement (about from the fences to the section line). On the north side, there will be some right-of-way acquisitions needed from Mr. Sullwold (approximately 1/2 acre) . It was the consensus of the council to proceed with the proposal as presented by the City Engineer; ie: To proceed with designing the street by moving it 4 feet to the north and using the curb design in an effort to preserve the significant trees, contingent upon approval from the State Engineer, and the City Engineer should prepare for the public hearing based on this proposal. Bohrer also commented that some of the Oak trees will require some trimming of the lower branches, and some of the non -specimen trees will have to be removed. The Mayor called a recess at 8:55 p.m. and the meeting reconvened at 9:05 P.M. 9. City Council Reports A. Alledged Planning Commission Improprieties Council member Moe distributed a letter from Oakdale's City Planner, Brent Brommer, addressed to Steve DeLapp, Planning Commission Chairperson regarding the Federal Land proposal. Council member Moe stated that he recently talked with the Brent Brommer, the City Planner from Oakdale. Brommer mentioned that he had been talking to the Planning Commission Chairman from the City of Lake Elmo in regards to a proposal that he was trying to sell or give to the City of Oakdale that had something to do with the Federal Land Company. Moe said he asked Brommer if he would explain a little more about what he (DeLapp) was doing, and Brommer responded that he had been calling him on the phone, and had stopped into the office and requested a letter be sent in response to his questions to the City of Oakdale._ Moe questioned who gave DeLapp any authority to speak for the City of Lake Elmo. Moe further asked DeLapp if he knew the purpose of the Planning Commission, and asked DeLapp for an explanation of the letter that was sent to him from the City of Oakdale, and asked DeLapp if he did or did not try to sell the Federal Land proposal to Oakdale. DeLapp responded that a $20+ million project is quite significant to the City of Lake Elmo. The proposal to put this project on land that is zoned Rural Residential with a future land use map of farming was a notable item that people should be aware of. DeLapp said he checked the City Ordinance which states that property owners within 350' of Lake Elmo City Council Minutes for July 7, 1987 Page 8 the property in question be notified of the proposed project, and at the discretion of the Planning Commission other persons may be notified. He said his first concern was to notify the (Lake Elmo) Bank, as Federal Land's proposal calls for two banks. Also, the City Ordinance states that when you have a zoning change or possible amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, the City is to notify the Metropolitan Council, if the proposal is of Metropolitan significance. DeLapp stated that what he did, knowing there was a race track being supported by Oakdale, and a variety of things going on in Woodbury, was solicit comment from these adjacent communities. He contacted Woodbury's Planner to advise him of th public hearing on the Federal Land proposal, and asked him if Woodbury would like to comment on this proposal. DeLapp also contacted Oakdale's Planner with the same information. Oakdale's response was this was the type of development Oakdale was looking for as they had land zoned for it. Moe stated that DeLapp should answer whether or not he knows the purpose of the Planning Commission. If he doesn't know the purpose of the Planning Commission, he has gone beyond the bounds as a Commission member by making contact with other communities. DeLapp responded that if the City had a larger staff, perhaps it wouldn't be necessary for the members of the Planning Commission or City Council to share in the volunteer work in this town. Moe responded that the duties of the Planning Commission is to make recommendations on planning, review and recommend applications on subdivisions, look at zoning applications, review PUD's and review site and building plans, as provided by Ordinance. That is what the Planning Commision is mandated to do by State Statute, and that is all they are required to do. Moe further stated that comments have been made to him such as "can't you control your Planning Commission"? Christ stated that the City does not control the Planning Commission, and we better hope that the City never does have that control. When asked for a legal opinion, the City Attorney stated he had not yet heard any specific illegality. Regarding the letter from Oakdale, Knaak added, if there was some representation made that the Chairman of the Planning Commission was in someway acting on behalf of the City, it would be for the Council to decide if it would be cause for any kind0reprimand, removal or guidance. The purpose of the Planning Commission is specified in the City Code. If what Moe is suggesting is that there was representation made that was inappropriate, it is up to the Council to determine whether or not that would constitute just cause for removal. Knaak suggested that the Council very carefully define what it feels would be appropriate or inappropriate behavior, and in this case, make a specific finding of wrong -doing. Because there is no clearly established procedure in the Ordinance, it seems that the solution is if the Council finds there has been a wrong -doing in this particular case, something in the nature of direction as opposed to removal might be more appropriate. DeLapp responded that in talking to the professional staffs that deal with the Planning Commission's of Woodbury and Oakdale, the thought Lake Elmo City Council Minutes for July 7, 1987 Page 9 that they would misunderstand his role did come up, although he made it very clear exactly who he was and what he was and was not capable of doing. These people know, by State Law, what a Planning Commission Chair can or cannot do. However, both cities expressed their thanks for informing them of this proposal. In fact, in a subsequent conversation with Oakdale's Planner he said we acted very responsibly and professionally. Johnson stated that as a former Chairman of the Planning Commission, he would have thought it to be very appropriate to go to another city and tell them about a proposed major development within the City of Lake Elmo and ask for their input. He felt the actions that DeLapp took were totally appropriate. He is chagrined about this inappropriate action taken by Moe. He feels Moe reacted to a piece of information, without consulting with DeLapp as to exactly what he did. Moe has brought this before the Council and Johnson feels at best this is an attempt at character assasination. Johnson said Moe told him in an earlier telephone conversation that it was Moe's feeling that DeLapp has spoke with the City of Oakdale and asked the City of Oakdale to make a favorable response that they would like to have Federal Land Company in their City so it wouldn't end up in Lake Elmo, and that DeLapp had used that in getting the project terminated as far as being located in Lake Elmo. Johnson further stated that he desires to somehow bridge the gap that is developing in this City. Christ stated that he not only supported the actions of DeLapp, but he also applauds these actions. He feels that if other communities were more open with their plans we wouldn't be hearing through the back door about race tracks and tire recycling plants in our neighboring communities or right next to major residential developments in our community. He further stated that Moe is talking about removing from office an individual that has done nothing but tremendous good for this community and has spent countless hours for the betterment of this community and feels Moe is doing this for political reasons - and finds this totally incredible, in fact one of the most incredible things he has every heard and doesn't feel the rest of the people at the meeting need to be subjected to this stupidity. Moe asked that the City Attorney draw up some guidelines as to what he previously stated. Christ responded that that would require a majority vote of the council, and suggested that the City send a letter of apology to DeLapp for the totally inappropriate allegations Moe -kas VVIaAp, Lake Elmo City Council Minutes for July 7, 1987 Page 10 M/ Moe/ That the City Council strongly censor Steve DeLapp for the inappropriate action he has taken without any authority from the City Council. (Motion failed for the lack of a second). M/S/P Armstrong/Christ - To commend Steve DeLapp for the fine work that he has done for the City; that he goes above and beyond the call of duty, and he has done a fine job for the City. (Motion carried 4-1 <Moe> ) Graves stated that he felt it is good to inform our neighboring communities of proposals before the City of Lake Elmo, but has a concern that it is inappropriate (and whether Mr. DeLapp did or did not do this he does not know, and we will probably never know) for anybody to try and sell proposals that are in Lake Elmo to our neighboring communities. Graves feels we can use this issue as guidance in the future, and suggested that the City Administrator be used as a clearing house for this type of inter -community contact. Graves feels we should utilize the City Administrator - that is one of his functions, to act as coordinator of the day-to-day activities of the City. The City Attorney emphasized that if there is to be a lesson learned from this, it is that communications dealing with zoning matters - within the City or outside the City, should be in writing. Armstrong congratulated DeLapp for doing things right and for becomming very effective in the community. She feels he must be doing something right because he has become the subject of another smear tactic - the same type of smear tactic which was used against her husband by Mike Mazzara for an alledged illegal business on their farm, and also by Moe against Bruce Dunn for an allegedly not having a building permit. Trying to discredit people by scurrilous accusations, and threatening to go to the Newspaper with this if it wasn't brought up at the meeting tonight. I think we have said once and for all, this is not going to happen in this City. Dan Novak spoke as a friend of DeLapp's, as a former Planning Commission member and as a concerned citizen. Since DeLapp's appointment to the Planning Commission, he has been a significant contributor as a volunteer in the construction of the new city hall and the revision of the Comprehensive Plan. Novak added that his reaction to Moe's attempt to publically humiliate and intimidate a community volunteer and friend is unethical, unprofessional, inappropriate and unnecessary for a council meeting. He resents this attempt to publicly hang out our dirty laundry without first making an attempt to resolve this issue at the lowest level, and is personally embarrassed for the City for this (Moe's) conduct. The need for a code of conduct for the city was identified 6 to 8 months ago and Novak would like to see that code removed from the back burner and made a priority. This issue reeks of a political nature. Moe stated that when speaking with the Mayor on the telephone, he asked if this issue should be handled administratively or executively. Christ stated that Moe said he wanted to bring it up before the Lake Elmo City Council Minutes for July 7, 1987 Page 11 council, in fact, Christ added that Moe said "Steve DeLapp was a dangerous individual". Moe stated that he still believes that he (DeLapp) is a dangerous individual; not only to the City, but to this council. Steve DeLapp suggested that the City continue the past practice of joint Planning Commission meetings with the City of Oakdale (and surrounding communities). Ann Buc�-ek stated that it is already in the Planning Commission's work plan to meet jointly with surrounding communities. 10. City Administrator's Report A. 1986 Audit Resolutions After discussion with Finance Director Marilyn Banister regarding Interfund Audit Adjustments, the council took the following action: M/S/P Graves/Moe - To adopt the following resolutions; R87-34 - Close Revenue Sharing Fund - Transfer $1207 to General Fund for Police Contract expenditures. R87-35 - Close Equipemtn Certificate Fund - Transfer $5838 from General Fund. R87-36 - Establish a Closed Bond Fund. R87-37 - Close Water Bonds of 1962 - Transfer $62,935 to Water Operating Fund for Maintenance Reserve. R87-38 - Close Sewer Bonds of 1972 - Transfer $80,532 to Street Bonds of 1974 and $11,165 to the Closed Bond Fund. R87-39 - Close Street Bonds of 1974 - The Green Acre special assessments when paid will go directly into the Closed Bond Fund. R87-40 - Close Street Bonds of 1983 - Transfer $34,932 to 1983 Street Improvement Fund and $15,681 to the Closed Bond Fund. R87-41 - Close 1983 Street Improvement Bund. Motion passed 5-0 (copy of resolutions are attached and made part of these minutes). The council called a budget working meeting for August 18, 1987 at 6:00 p.m. in the council chambers. The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m. R87-31. Request VBWD rescind -special assessment to certain R87-32 Prohibiting'illegal subsivisions in Lanes DeMontreville County Club R87-33 Lake Elmo Heights 2nd Addition Final Plat-.Approval -R87-34-41 all relate to Interfund Audit Adjustments