Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05-16-89 CCM
CLAIMS TO BE APPROVED AT MAX 16, 1989 LAKE ELMO COUNCIL•MEETING (all claims are within budget unless otherwise noted) 91746 Cleaning - Office =' "=" - $ _ µ36.58 91747 Cleaning - Fire Hall `26.95 91748 Diesel Contracting - approved 5/2/89 council meeting (MSA) 8,395.62 91749 Best Buy - Jim McNamara camera ``-" -' 219 97 91750 t_hru :. 91752 Compost workers 91753 -Leslie's Floor Decor -:Office bldg maintenance - 91754 Bellaire Sanitation - Office dumpster 91755 Hagberg's Country Market="Office supplies (cleaning) 91756 Four Seasons - Cup inserts and coffee 91757.:Walter S. Booth - Office supplies - --91758---American Typewriter - Office supplies 91759 Gazette - Garage Sale ad . _$ 46.00 91760,;The Courier - Garage sale ad -91761 =-Bulletin Publishing - Garage sale ad 91762 Star Tribune - Garage sale'ad 91763 St. Paul Pioneer Press -Garage sale ad .91764 TKDA - engineering invoices attached General $ 3,456.43 Pass xhru �1, 272.68 rZSA 6690 , .71 •N,91765 'Rauenhorst Carlson & Knaak."-.;General Fund 1_320?T .Pass Thru 12.80 ' 201 Sealer 2,133.50 91766 Voto, Tautges - invoice attached ' - '91767 :City of North St. Paul =`animal control vehicle - 91768 Hardware Hank - Fire Dept. supplies 91769 Stillwater Motor --Fire Dept. -truck repair 91770 E1mo's Plywood & Lbr.`- Fire Dept. Bldg maint. 91771 Minn. Conway_Fire & Safety - Fire Dept. supplies * ,_91772 .Firemen's 1st 1/2 1989 compensation Thru 91795 91796 Lake Elmo Oil - Fire Dept.. $ 260.90 Bldg. Insp., 137.45 Maint. Dept. 7.08 91797 Vern's GTC Auto Parts - Maint. Dept. truck repair 91798 Lakeland Ford Truck - Maint. Dept. truck repair 91799 Kremer Spring & Alignment - Maint. Dept. truck repair 91800 Garelick Steel Co. - Maint. Dept. 91801 Interstate Diesel Products - Maint. Dept. truck repair 91802 General. Tire - Maint. Dept. truck parts & repair 91803 T.J. Auto Parts - Maint. Dept. truck repair 91804 Polfus Implement - Maint. Dept. truck repair 91805 Valley Auto Supply - Maint, Dept. truck repair 91806 Warning Lites of Minn. - Maint. Dept, supplies 91807 T. A. Schifsky - MC mix 91808 Thompson Hardware - Maint. Dept. supplies 91809 AT & T - Maint. Dept, long distance 91810 Glenwood - Maint. Dept. water 91811 Junker Sanitation - Maint. Dept. dumpster 91812 Wear Guard - Maint. Dept. clothing allowance 86.64 60.00 53.82 -34.24 30.60 13.72 55.69 46.00 3.75 10.12 20.00 35.00 11,419 82 T 3,766.7l 1,037.50 165.00 11.34 -35.38 104.67 72.78 8,527.10 405.43 35.55 448.20 312.68 161.50 529.96 77.67 123.55 22.37 48.89 107.50 47.71 127.59 6.30 28.20 50.00 79.42 (over) MAY:.16th CLAIMS continued 91813 Safety-Kleen Corp. - Maint. Dept, supplies $ 53.53 91814 Gopher State One -Call - Maint dept. w '67:50 91815 TEAM Laboratory - Maint. Dept. supplies 537.20 91816,.Parker Cleaning Products - Maint..Dept.-supplies 156.26 s 91817 Zack's Omdistroa; Cleaning supplies Maint. Dept.- 224.95 91818 Midwest Wire & Steel - Parks Dept. _._ :186.43 91819 Lamperts Lbr. - Reid Park - reimbursed by Jaycees _ . 1,056.10 91820 BCI Burke Co, - Reid Park - reimbursed by Jaycees 1,005.37 .91821 Metro Waste Control Com - sewer service charges. 81.33 91822 Layne Minnesota = Water fund pump repair - 11,650.50 91823 thru 91837 May 19th payroll - 9,388.49 7 pt 1 bx!, o rt, cs' :$ '6'1.2g1.1II , 3l7zjti- ,,., Par s"tea o 3Ei aaoatt x atim"q tA,,c j?. .r.n aol�aerrr x't ,.:'s .,. .'•Y1G'' .:..:, aq -;M ksa, •.*,� c +t: nEss ! rw t t. i Al1Ct {.N ur j • 1- YC i' iJs u. t sdt 6"��- � - .�.T,4 Ixc f r� .Y.: vri ��; .l "S.u`C NCH.°l'1) °:t a, C.f`c:.i$ q r, cr ,6U .3 4411 U.. •s_ ,_.tee d \1-i r. ).` Ay �tr'{:i �' 7 � y �__ V+ ,.3 r i F � to t o•.i 2 LL ..I rY. 3' "` •_j Fn • .} .y Rd I•�►L• Mi KL fy ANDTOLA. KING, DUVALL. RPOR TE -jl ii. ii AND ASKING. DUV INCORPORATED ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 65101.1693 612/292-4400 - FAX 012/292.000 City of Iake Elmo P.O. Box J Take Elmo, MN 55042 Date: April 26, 1989 Commission Number: 9150-989 For Professional Services in connection with Attendance at City Meetings for March, 1989. Agreement dated February 2, 1988. March 71 1989 L. Bohrer - Council Meeting 50.00 March 21, 1989 L. Bohrer - Council Meeting - 50.00 AMOUNT DM ................. $ 100.00 State of Minnesota) ss County of Ramsey ) Ray A. Andrews, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing account is just and true; and the services therein charged were actually rendered and of the value therein charged, that the expenses incurred were paid by the affiant and no part of the same has been paid. Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public, this 26th day of Apri 98 LINOA E. SCHOREY NOTARY PUSIIC-MIN�lE50TA RAMSEY COUNTI MY COMM. EXPIRE,`' MG. 10, 19fl9 YIWWWW~NWWWVVVVY • •« �. ••..•. • oI• WA -r Li i TALTZ, KING, DUVALL. ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED 31NEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS - 25O0 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 65101-1893 612/292."W FAX 612/292-0083 City of lake Elmo P. O. Box J Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Date: April 28, 1989 commission Number: 9150-009 i For General Engineering Services as listed below, for March, 1989. Authorization dated February 2, 1988. 1. Sullwold Laxcle Lot Subdivision: Bohrer, L. 2.00 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 46.46 x 2.75 = 127.77 2. Kenridae Heights - Preliminary Plat Review: Bohrer, L. 12.00 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 278.76 x 2.75 = 766.59 3. Palecek Simple Lot Subdivision: t Bohrer, L. 2.00 Hrs. @ 23.23 46.46 x 2.75 4. Lake Elmo State Bank - Site Plan Review: ..Bchrer, L. . . 0.50 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 11.62 x 2.75 a 127.77 n = 31.96 �✓4V 5. Broolnman 3rd Addition - 39th Street: Bohrer, L. 0.50 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 11.62 Prew, T. 3.00 Hrs. @ 16.16 = 48.48 60.10 x 2.75 = 165.28 Expenses: Curtis 1000 - Printing Bid Tabs (Inv. copy attached) 5.37 6. Gritzmaker Shoreland Permit: Bohrer, L. 0.25 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 5.81 x 2.75 = 15.98 7. Engstrom PRO Bohrer, L. 0.50 HrS. @ 23.23 = 11.62 x 2.75 = 31.96 I Page 2 INVOICE Camnission No. 9150-009 8. 33rd Street and Klondike Avenue project: Bohrer, L. 8.00 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 185.84 x 2.75 = 511.06 9. Layton Avenue and 36th Street - Feasibility Study Prew, T. 13.00 Hrs. @ 16.16 = 210.08 x 2.75 = 577.72 10. Section 32 Annexation: Rohrer, L. 2.00 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 46.46 x 2.75 = 127.77 11. Washington County SW-1 Crossing Agreement Bohrer, L. 6.50 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 151.00 x 2.75 = 415.25 Expenses: L. Bohrer - Travel 7.20 12. Well Pump Repair: Bohrer, L. Johnson, K. 10.00 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 232.30 1.00 Hrs. @ 20.63 = 20.63 252.93 1. X 2.75 _ 695.56 13. Landfill EIS - Review Engineering Proposals Kirk, J.T. 2.00 Hrs. @ 30.00 = 60.00 x 2.75 = 165.00 14. Oakdale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review: Bohrer, L. 4.00 Hrs. @ 23.23 92.92 x 2.75 = 255.53 IS. Surface Water Problems - March 27-29• ..Bohrer, L. 9.00 Hrs. @ 23.23 = .209.07 x 2.75 = 574.94 Expenses: L. Bohrer - Travel 26.40 AMOUNT ffiJE ........................... $ 4,629.11 State of Minnesota ) ss County of Ramsey ) Ray A. Andrus, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing account is just and true; and the services therein charged were actually rendered and of the value therein charged, that the expenses incurred were paid by the affiant and no part of the same has been paid. Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public, this 28th day of Apr' , 1989: r 55 LINOA E. SCNOREY Si°{;.� ,'+,•;: NOTARY PUBLIC-M48.1;c50,A )" RAMSEY COUNTY +� 1%' COMM. EXPIRB AUG. TO, } 989 r: ....,rug.--,vvrr.w•.•v,�nvnnwwv 0I MAY ? INVOICE 1989 l/ ANDERSON CKDA. AND SSOCIATTES,AINCORPORATED 3INEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 1893 612/292 4400 FAX 612/292 0083 City of In Elmo P. O. Box J Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Date:. April 26, 1989 Commission Number: 9325-02 For Professional Services in connection with the 1989 MSA Improvements - 43rd and Kimbro for March, 1989. Authorization approved at City Council Meeting on June 21, 1988. CONSTRUCPION PHASE: Personnel: Classification: Billing Rate: Prew, T. Graduate Engineer 9.00 Hrs. @ 44.44 = "399.96 Ray A. Andrews, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing account is just and true, and the services therein changed were actually rendered and of the value therein charged, that the expenses incurred were paid by the affiant and no part of the same has been paid. Subscribed and sworn to before me, TOIZ'Z, KING, DWALL, ANDERSON a notary public, this 26th day of AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED Apri. , 1989: / MM z 5Z a 41NDA E. SCI{OBEY NOTARY PUBLIC—MINNESOTA 25 4's RAMSEY COUNTY �.' IAY COMM, EXPIRES AUG, 10, 1A 199 P INVOICE /I�' ` KDA. TOLTZ. KING. DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL DANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-1993 612/292-4400 FAX 612/292-0083 City of In Elmo P. O. Box J Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Date: April 26, 1989 Commission Number: 9492-01 For Professional Services in connection with the 1989 NSA lmProvements - 15th Street from CSAH 13 to West City Limits (Grading, Gravel Base, Drainage and Bituminous Surfacing) for March, 1989. Verbal Authorization to Proceed received from the City Council on January 17, 1989. FEASIBILITY REPORT: Personnel: Classification: Brewster, C. Technician Bohrer, L. Davidson, Senior Engineer LT. Senior Engineer Dinndorf, R. Senior Technician Garr, G. Technician Prew, T. Graduate Engineer _ Rylander, C. Technician Tucker, T. Technician BilliW Rate: 3.00 Hrs. @ 33.69 = 8.00 Hrs. @ 63.88 = 0.50 Hrs. @ 82.50 = '"29.00 Hrs. @ 46.42 = 8.50 Hrs, @ 29.37 = 10.00 Hrs. @ 44.44 = ..21.00 Hrs. @ 32.37 = 8.00 Hrs. @ 25.80 = 101.07 511.04 41.25 1,346.18 249.65 444.40 679.77 206.40 Reimbursable Expenses: R. Dinxiorf - Travel 87.08 THDA Computer Service Fee (Mar) 26.11 AMCUNTDUE .................................... $ 3,692.95 State of Minnesota) se County of Ramsey ) Ray A. Andrews, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing account is just and true; and the services therein changed were actually rendered and of the value therein changed, that the expenses incurred were paid by the affiant and no part of the same has been paid. Subscribed and sworn to before me, a n public, this 26th day of Apri , 989: r r * LINDA C. SCHOREY NOTARY PUBLIC—MlNNESOTA p RAMSEY COUNTY *"S MY COMM. EXPIRES AUG. 10, 1909 5 ■ • 111 n� - D m• • �.�/ d M9 �L Q1► [ St r 1 POOR IN KTj A VOICE MAY 2 . f98g ANDERSON CKDA AND ASSOCIATTES,TOLTZ KING,AINCORPORATED ICINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 56101-1893 612/292.4400 FAX 612/292 0083 City of Lake Elmo P. O. Box J Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Date: April 26, 1989 Commission Number: 9325-01 For Professional services in connection with the 1989 NSA Improvements - 43rd aril Kimbro for March, 1989. Authorization approved at City Council Meeting on June 21, 1988. PLANS PHASE: Personnel: Classification: Billing Rate: Bchrer, L. Senior Engineer 25.00 Hrs. @ 63.88 = 1,597.00 Davidson, J. Senior Engineer 0.50 Hrs. @ 82.50 = 41.25 Prew, T. Graduate Engineer 8.00 His, @ 44.44 = 355.52 Weiszel,'D. Senior Technician 12.50 Hrs. @ 34.90 = 436.25 Reimbursable Expenses: Curtis 1000 (Tnv. copy attached) 150.94 TKOA Computer Service Fee (Mar) 16.84 AMOUNTDUE ............................... $ 2,597.80 State of Minnesota) ss County of Ramsey ) Ray A. Andrews, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing account is just and true; and the services therein changed were actually rendered and of the value therein charged, that the expenses incurred were paid by the affiant and no part of the same has been paid. Subscribed and sworn to before me, TOUZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON a notary publio7, this 26th day of AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED Apr' : ,1989:���5�-�.c���-�� i NDA E. SCIJOREY NOTARY PW3 IC-VINMESOTA 4'x RAMSEY COUNTY - ' MY COMM. EXPIRES AUO. 10, 1909 W M r 04/05/89 04/12/89 04/14/89 04/17/89 04/18/89 04/18/89 04/18/89 RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK ATTORNEYS AT LAW ROSEDALE CORPORATE PLAZA 2565 LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 (512) 631.1080 April 26, 1989 City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Attention: Marilyn (F) .25 Phone conference - client (SPC) .25 Phone conference - client (SPC) .50 Phone conference - S. Dunn (SPC) .50 Phone conference - Mayor re agenda items (FWK) .50 Phone conference - L. Hunt; Memo to file (SPC) 1.00 Draft Deeds for 1989 MSA Street Improvisions (SPC) .75 Letter to attorney; Letter to client (FWK) .*r City of Lake Elmo - General �\ s April 26, 1989 Page Two 04/18/89 .75 Review packet; Office conference with SPC re update on misc matters 04/19/89 .25 Review correspondence (SPC) 04/24/89 .25 Phone conference - P. Morrison (SPC) 04/25/89 .25 Letter to L. Bohrer re 1989 MSA Street Imp (SPC) _ Retainer received 04/06/89 for March services -500.00 Hours Covered by Retainer: ,Attorney a General legal services "' 5 25 Other (Council meetings, etc.) _ 6.50 s " Attorney Fees Not Covered by Retainer: ` sE Document drafting & opinions 135.00 x Costs & disbursements .00 Retainer for April 500.00 i "1 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 635.00 - I declare, under the penalties of law, Nderic above account, claim or demand is true and correct. maW. Knaak i t � Ae::i `.:..: "i i Mz}'V 4'-F} i.y k4 S'x•'i 1 'o.irt '..5:: '}.-. X'.Y :`.a �}ti � �'J... _ ;�: J kU{.'_i ,i VS{:y f�H '^Y ✓f"'-- : }.. y1 i t 4.fi`'\. .4i t�»t. Y�'+kNJ�'Jl.(ek�.Y41 R,\\Nj Vlsi::: da.? v1.. r� J!_/s_. �. ��*-�t`s'. j i RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK ATTORNEYS AT LAW ROSEDALE CORPORATE PLAZA 2665 LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 (612) 631.1080 April 26, 1989 City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 (S) Attention: Marilyn Re: ' Lake Jane Landfill FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED - DATE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION TM, 03/27/89 30.00 Phone conference - M. Kaufner (SPC) 03/29/89 120.00 Phone conference - L.'Bohrer; Draft legal opinion (S) 30.00 - Revise legal opinion (SPC) ' 03/30/89 150.00 Meeting at City Hall; Conference with Co Reps (SPC) 03/31/89 45.00 Phone conference - client; Review draft of agreement) - Phone conference - County Attorney's office (SPC) 30.00 Client conference re agreement; Submit to client (S) 04/03/89 15.00 File review (SPC) 04/05/89 30.00 Phone conference - client, M. Luth, N. Nelson (SPC) 04/07/89 15.00 Phone conference - client (SPC) 04/10/89 30.00 Execute Agreement; Letter to County Attorney (SPC) City of Lake Elmo Lake Jane Landfill April 26, 1989 Page Two BALANCE OUTSTANDING 270.00 Payment Received — Thank You —270.00 # Total Lawyers' Services 495.00 "Total Paralegal Services .00 .00 Co is & Disbursements Word Processing Services .00, 95 400 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE , r- i I declare, under the penalties of law, that the above account, claim or i TM { demand is true and correct. 11 n RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK ATTORNEYS AT LAW ROSEDALE CORPORATE PLAZA 2655 LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 (612) 631.1080 April 26, 1989 City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 (F) Attention: Marilyn Re: Derrick FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED :.. DATE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 04/11/89 223.41 Paid Rasmussen & Carl for Depositions BALANCE OUTSTANDING 7 5. 00 Payment Received - Thank You —75.00 Total Lawyers' Services .00 Total Paralegal Services .00 Costs & Disbursements 223.41 Ward Processing Services .00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 223.41 I declare, under the penalties of law, t t the above account, claim or demand is true and correct. Frederic W. Knaak RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK ATTORNEYS AT LAW ROSEDALE CORPORATE PLAZA 2565 LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 (612) 631.1080 April 26, 1989 City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 (S) Attention: Marilyn Re: Severin VSA FORPROPESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED - DATE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 04/19/89 15.00 File review (SPC) BALANCE OUTSTANDING 45.00 Payment Received — Thank You 45 00 :. Total Lawyers' Services 15.06 Total Paralegal Services .00 Costs & Disbursements .00 Word Processing Services .00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 15.00 I declare, under the penalties of law, that the above account, claim or demand is true and correct. reds is W. Knaak RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK ATTORNEYS AT LAW ROSEDALE CORPORATE PLAZA 2665 LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 (612) 631.1080 April 26, 1989 City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 (S) Attention: Marilyn j Re: Federal Land -:.-FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED -DATE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 04/24/89 15.00 -Notice of Depositions (SPC) Total Lawyers' Services 15.00 Total Paralegal Services I!, .00 Costs & Disbursements ,00 Word Processing Services .00 I TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 15.00 C i i I declare, under the penalties of law, that the above account, claim or demand is true and correct. Frederic . Knaak RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK ' - ATMANEYS AT LAW ROSEDALE CORPORATE PLAZA 2555 LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE, M INNESOTA 55113 .... a9 ...;'., (812) 831-1080 April 26, 1989 City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 (S) Attention: Marilyn Re: Section 32, Petition #2 O VM S FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED DATE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 89 T5-."6U- Phone con erence — M. Kaufner (SPC) 03/29/89 45.00 Draft Resolution (SPC) 15.00 Revise Resolution (SPC) , i r?11� 30.00 Word Processing 04/03/89 15.00 File review (SPC) ,+ y 04/04/89 15.00 :Word Processing F `, BALANCE OUTSTANDING 60.00 Payment Received — Thank You —60.00 Total Lawyers' Services 90.00 Total Paralegal Services .00 Costs & Disbursements .00 Word Processing Services 45.00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 135.00 I declare, under the penalties of law, that the above account, claim or demand is true and correct. Frederic W. Knaak MnAiv�fx� :1 RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK ATTORNEYS AT LAW ROSEDALE CORPORATE PLAZA 2885 LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 _ (612) 631.1080 April 26, 1989 City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North La ke Elmo, MN 55042 (g) Attention: Marilyn Total Lawyers` Services Total Paralegal Services Costs & Disbursements Word Processing Services TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 15.00 .00 62.00 25.00 102.00 I declare, under the penalties of law, that the above account, claim or demand is true and correct. F e eric Knask �...: lam.. 4�r i VOTO, TAUTGES, REDPATH & CO., LTD. V ttq4JiiiW CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Birch Lake Professional Building • 1310 E. Hwy. 96 • White Bear Lake, MN 55110 • Phone 426-3263 ROBERT I. VOTO, CPA ROBERT G. TAUTGES, CPA TAMES S. REDPATH, CPA D. KENNETH GEORGE, CPA DAVID 1. MOL, CPA April 30, 1989 City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 For professional services rendered: Assistance to the City in evaluating computer options. PARTNER: _. Robert G. Tautges 8-1/4 Hours @ $74.00 $ 610.50 SENIOR: David C. Palma 24 Hours @ $46.00 1,104.00 STATISTICAL TYPISTS AND REPORT PROCESSORS 1-1/2 Hours @$19.00 28.50 Total $ 1,743.00 Less: Billed March 31, 1989 (705.50) BALANCE DUE $ 1,037.50 I hereby certify that the above claim is just and correct and that no part of it has been previously paid. obert G. Taut es, Vice Presiden * PRIVATE MEMBERS OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE E OF CERTIFIE OIFIEDTYPOFLIC CERTI IEOD UNTANTSPUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS COMPANIES PRACTICE SECTwN GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 0 MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BUSINESS OFFICIALS ASSESSOR RECOMMENDATION To ASHINGTON'COUNTY BOARDS OF REVIEW YEAR 1989 AREA Lake Elmo CASE # NAME/ADDRESS PID ORIGINAL ASSESSOR BOARD ASSESSOR ENV RECOM ACTION COMMENTS: 1 Donald Durand 37024- L:`t70,000 x NO CHNG Mr. Durand concerned about 2901 Lake Elmo Ave. 0165 B.104,000 REDUC OF commercial/seasonal Lake Elmo, 55042 1d` _ TO classification and questions T.174,000 L. were answered. marKe c V w B . T 2 Thomas Skalbeck 37009- L. 80,000 NO CHNG 8879 Jane Rd. N. 0070 B. 76,2 00 x REDUC OF Mr. Skalbeck had questions Lake Elmo 6,200 TO about market value. He T. 156,200 L. 80,000 will get appraisal and give B. 70,000 to county. T 150,000 Recieved appraisal on May 15. Appraisal for 150,000. 3 C. J. Brookman C/O Brookman Motor 37013-2200 L. 37013-3150 B- x NO C1114G Mr. Brookman had questions Lake Elmo 37100-2250 _ REDUC OF TO on the % of increase. County reviewed and T. L. recommended no change. B. T 4 Danny Collyard 375050- L'- 25,000 x NO CHNG Mr. Collyard said the house 8896 Jane Rd. N. B- 20,000 230Q — REDUC OF is not structurally sound, Lake Elmo TO and is in litigation with T. 45,000 L. Natl. Flood Ins. Hse next B. door sold for 42,000 in 88. T 5 Danny Collyard 37009- L. 34,000 NO CHNG 8896 Jane Rd. N. 0090 B.13 _ x REDUC OF Mr. Collyards pool does not Lake Elmo _ 6,000 TO work and is in litigation. g T. 171,700 L. 34,000 Recommend lowering value B. 13l,700— 6,000 for pool. T 165,700 ASSESSOR RECOMMENDATION TO WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARDS OF REVIEW YEAR 1989 AREA Lake Elmo CASE # NAME/ADDRESS PID ORIGINAL ASSESSOR BOARD ASSESSOR ENV RECOM ACTION COMMENTS: " L. 23,000 x NO CHNG Mr. Olenchak will get 6 Don Olenchak 37027- B. 44,100 _ REDUC OF market analysis and send 9032 loth St. N. 2350 TO to county. Lake Elmo, 55042 T. 67,100 L. B. T L_ 65,000 NO CHNG Interior inspection on 7 Clifford Adkins 37024- B_ 42,300 _ x REDUC OF 5-5-89, lower bldg. value 2227 Lake Elmo Ave 0510 13,800 TO to 40,500 and land value Lake Elmo T. 107,300 L. 53,000 to 53,000. B: 40,500 T 93,500 L_ 23,000 No CIRI; Mr. Grundhauser will get 8 Art Grundhauser 37444- B_ 88,900 _ REDUC OF 2 market analysis and give 8949 42nd St. 2100 TO to county. Lake Elmo T. 111,900 L. B. T L. 31,400 x NO CHNG Mr. Leier will get market 9 Frank Leier 37004- B_ 77,600 REDUC OF analysis and contact Frank 8490 Demontrevill 2500 _ TO or county. Tr. N. T. 109,000 L. Lake Elmo B. T 10 Herbert Rrongard 37013- L. 21,500 44,600 _ NO CHNGB_ REDUC OF Butch Taylor increased 11057 N. 33rd St. 2060 x 5 400 TO depreciation on house and Lake Elmo, T. 66,100 L. ,40 21,500 recommends lowering bldg. value to 39,200. B. 00 T 60,700 ASSESSOR RECOMMENDATION TO WASL_JGTON COUNTY BOARDS OF REVIEW YEA1989 AREA 7.ake Elmo CASE # NAME/ADDRESS PID ORIGINAL ASSESSOR ENV RECOM 11 Lawrence Kleis 37003- L. _ NO CHNG 9241 60th St. 2450 B. x REDUC OF Lake Elmo, 55042 Class chffik T. L. to Av. B. Hmst, T 1,200 L. 43,000 NO CHNG 12 David Moris 37240- B_ 67�,400 x REDUC OF 9060 Jane Rd. N. 3750 11,200 TO Lake Elmo T_ 210,400 L. 43,006 B.156,200 T 199,200 13 Arlyn Christ 37406- L- 18,900 x NO CHNG 8928 36th St. 2200 B. 134,800 _ R£DUC'OF Lake Elmo TO T. 153,700 L. B. T L. 23,000 x NO CHNG 14 Gerald Wulfing 37095- B. REDUC OF 8196 38th St. 4200 _ TO Lake Elmo T. 99,800 L- B. T 15 Robert Schmidt 2296 Manning Ave. Lake Elmo 37024- B. 2500 45,000 NO CHNG I4700— _ REDUC OF TO IT. 159,700 L. B. e BOARD ACTION ASSESSOR changing class to Ag. Hmst. and ref.- to 37003-2600. Change value to 1200. IInterior inspection on 5-5-89 and revalued Mr. Christ has trace contaminits in his water and built a new house. Reviewed with county and recommend -no change. Mr. Wulfing had questions on market value and they were answered. Mr. Schmidt will get market analysis and send to county. ASSESSOR RECOMMENDATION TO WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARDS OF REVIEW YEAR 1989 AREA Lake Elmo CASE # NAME/ADDRESS PID ORIGINAL ASSESSOR BOARD ASSESSOR EMV RECOM ACTION COMMENTS: L. 23,100 — x NO CHNG Owner will get market 16 Lavonne Richert 37016- B. 7T, _ REDUC OF analysis and may contact 3812 Jamaca Ave. 2700 TO county. Lake Elmo, 55042 T. 81,700 L. B. T 17 Glen Peterson 37444- L. 23,000 x NO CHNG 4260 Ivy Ct. 3000 B-U— _ REDUC OF Owner had questions on % Lake Elmo TO of increase. He may get T- 115,100 L. IT a market analysis and B. send to county. 18 Jess Mottaz 37004- L_ B. 45,000 97,700 _ NO C1114G x REDUC OF Interior inspection on 8770 Demontreville 2255 11,400 TO 5-5-89 and revalued. N. T. 142,700 L�5,6bb Lake Elmo B T 131,300 19 Norman Lyall 37546- L. 60,000 x NO CHNG Mr. Lyall had questions 4515 Birchback Tr 2800 B- 78,000 _ REDUC OF and they were answered. Lake Elmo TO T. 138,000 L. B- T 20 Mary Leslie 37024- L. 26,000 x NO CHNG Mrs. Leslie had questions 11546 20th St. N. 2700 B. 69,500- REDUC OF on her market value Lake Elmo _ TO and board of review T. 95,500 L. procedures. B. T CASE # 21 22 ASSESSOR RECOMMENDATION TO WASL .GTON COUNTY BOARDS OF REVIEW YEAR 1989 AREA Lake Elmo NAME/ADDRESS I PID I ORIGINAL I ASSESSOR ESSO f Theodore Buchholtz 3597 Kelvin Ave. N Lake Elmo, 55042 Jerry Kromschr 10823 32nd St. Lake Elmo 23 Lake Elmo Hts. L. 4 E 4th St. St. Paul, Mn. 55101 24 John Bodey 8155 15th St. N. Lake Elmo L. 23,000 x NO CHNG 37014- B- _ REDUC OF 3300 TO T. 88,900 L. B- IT L_ 60,000 x NO CHNG 21000- B_ 131,900 _ REDUC OF 100 TO T_ 191,900 IL- B_ L 186,200 x NO CHNG 2000 37436 B_ _ REDUC OF T. 186,200 L. TO B_ T L. 40,000 _ NO CHNG 37028- B.123,900 x REDUC OF 2640 2,000 TO T.163,900 L. B.121,900 IT 161.900 25 1 Susan Endries 1 37015- 3023 Jamley Ave.N 2900 Lake Elmo L- 23,000 B. 41,400 IT. 64,400 x NO CHUG REDUC OF TO L. B. T BOARD ACTION ASSESSOR COMMENTS: Interior inspection on 5-5-89 and recommend no change. IOwner may get market analysis and send to county. Questions on Market Value. Land is being valued consistently with other farm land. No cement floor in garage - reduce 2,000 Owner had questions and they were answered. ASSESSOR RECOMMENDATION TO WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARDS OF REVIEW VFAR 1989 AREA Lake Elmo NAME/ADDRESS PID ORIGINAL ENV ASSESSOR RECOM BOARD ACTION ASSESSOR COMMENTS: CASE # 180,000 27 N.H.D. CimarronPar Assoc 45 S. 7th St. 3010 Plaza VII T Minneapolis, 37036- 2450 L. 87,000 BA,144,900 T. 4,411,900 x NO CHNG _ REDUC OF TO Sold for 8,050,000 in. 1985. The board has the option of increasing the value to achieve equalization with the sales ratios of other property. L_ B. T 55402 28 Morris Pederson 9585 60th St. Lake Elmo 55042 37003- 2150 L. 29,000 B_ 69,600 T. 98,600 x NO CHNG _ REDUC OF TO Owner had question and they were answered. L- B. T Don Eliason 8017 50th St. N. 37445- 7150 L_ 50,000 x NO C1324G _ REDUC OF TO Owner had question on vacated beach and they were answered. 29 B_ 23,300 Lake Elmo T. 73,300 L. B. T 30 A Maurice McCollar 3607 white Bear Ave. white Bear Lake, 55110 37445- 4540 L. 50.000 B_ 36,200 _ NO CHNG x REDUC OF 15,000 TO L.36,200 City will not let owner sell without as 1 bldg. sitteo . Value and change to non-hmst. aac set\ v'owr acz` ES�� T. 86,200 B.3,00 T 71,200 Maurice McCollar 13761 Elmcrest Ave. N. White Bear Lake, 55110 374450 6580 L. 54,500 NO CHNG REDUC OF 15,000 TO L. 39,500 B'$b�— T 69,300 City will not let owner sel without 4,540. Value as 1 bldg. site. 30 B B•'4�)' t;u— T. 84,300 0 CASE ¢ 31 32 33 34 ASSESSOR RECOMMENDATION TO WASh AGTON COUNTY BOARDS OF REVIEW YEAR 1989 AREA Lake Elmo NAME/ADDRESS PID ORIGINAL ASSESSOR BOARD ASSESSOR EMV RECOM ACTION COMMENTS: Robert ' Charbonneau 645- L. 80,000 x NO CHNG Owner had questions on 7821 Demontreville 2660 B. 76,900 — REDUC OF taxes and they were answered. Tr. T. 156,900 L. TO Lake Elmo, 55042 B- T Joel Coleman 38125- L. x NO CHNG 217 Cimarron 0217 B- 7— ' 000 REDUC OF Owner had questions on Lake Elmo _ TO manufactured home and T- 7,900 L- they were answered. B_ T Mike Groetsch 37161- L. 30,000 B.�.�� _ NO CHNG x REDUC OF Butch Taylor lowered value 5675 Highlands Tr. 2050 4,800 TO to sale price of 130,000 N. T. 134,800 L. 3 in 1987. Lake Elmo B_100,000 T TT9, UUD— Grant Nelson 37546- L. 48,500 _ NO CHNG No lake access - lower 8549 Cherrywood T 2600 B. 106,700 REDUC OF x land value 10,000. N. 10,000T0 Lake Elmo T. 155,200 L. 38,500 B.106,700 T 145,200 35 Heidi Morgan 37546- 4563 Birchbark 2900 Tr. N. Lake Elmo L. 55,000 B. 82,700 IT. 137,700 x_ NO CHNG _ REDUC OF TO L. B. m Mrs. Morgan had concerns about taxes and her ability to stay in her home. ASSESSOR RECOMMENDATION TO WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARDS OF REVIEW YEAR 1989 AREA Lake Elmo CASE # NAME/ADDRESS PID ORIGINAL ASSESSOR BOARD ASSESSOR EMV RECOM ACTION COMMENTS: Thomas Brown 37547- L. 38,500 x NO CHNG Owner concerned about 36 8265 Hidden Bay Tr. 3350 B. 87,000 _ REDUC OF water problems - reviewed N. TO and recommend no change. L. Lake Elmo, 55042 T. 125;500 B. T 37 Dennis Conlin 37750- L. 22,000 x NO CHNG owner had questions and 8560 Ironwood Tr. 2900 B. 100,400 _ .REDUC OF they were answered. N. TO L. Lake Elmo T. 122,400 B. T L. 40,000 x NO CIiNG owner left and will contact 38 Paul Huot 37240- B. 88,400 _ REDUC OF county for appt. to county 4955 Jamaca Ave.N. 3850 TO board of review. Lake Elmo T.128,400 L. B- T L. 89,600 x NO CHNG Owner had question on 39 Earl Goerss Earl 37024- B. 19800 REDUC OF Market Value. Reviewed 2Lake Elmo Av 0380 _ TO by Frank. N. T. 209,400 L. Lake Elmo B. T 40 Richard Huntley 37024- L. 23,000 _ NO CHNG Interior inspection on 11397 30th St. N. 0260 B. 53,100 x REDUC OF 5-5-89 and revalued. Lake Elmo 4,700 TO T. 76,100 L. B.48,400 T ASSESSOR RECOMMENDATION TO WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARDS OF REVIEW YEAR 1.989 AREA Lake Elmo CASE # NAME/ADDRESS PID ORIGINAL ASSESSOR ENV RECOM L. 22,100 NO CHNG 41 Jeff Downs 37015- x REDUC OF B. 72,600' 3793 Jamaca Ave. 5660 -55,000 TO Lake Elmo 55042 T. 94,700 L. 11,000 B. 28,700 T 39,700 42 Jeff Post 37546- L. 48,500 _ NO CHNG 8603 Cherrywood 2650 B. 86,900 x- REDUC OF Tr. 10,000TO' Lake Elmo T. 135,400 L. 38,500 B. 86,900 T 125,400 43 Denis Bakke 37546- L. 48,500 NO CHNG 8509 Cherrywood 2550 B- 63,000 x REDUC OF Tr. N. 10,000 TO Lake Elmo T. 111,500 B. 63,000 T 101,500 L. 55,000 x NO CHNG 44 Jack Johnson 37024- B. 103,100 REDUC OF 2715 Lake Elmo 0372 _ TO Ave. N. T. 158,100 Lake Elmo B. T 45 Emily Brenegen 37547- l+• 38,500 x NO CHNG 8260 Deerpond Tr. 3100 B. 92,000 - REDUC OF Lake Elmo TO T. 141,900 L. B. T BOARD I ASSESSOR ACTION COMMENTS: Mr. Downs water is contaminated. Suggest discounting to other properties with same problem. No lake access - reduce 10,000. No lake access - reduce 10,000. Questions on market value and they were answered. Owner left. Suggest contacting county for further consideration. ASSESSOR RECOMMENDATION TO WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARDS OF REVIEW YEAR AREA CASE # NAME/ADDRESS PID ORIGINAL ASSESSOR BOARD ASSESSOR ENV RECOM ACTION COMMENTS: 46 Donald Delander + 9148 31st St. Lake Elmo, NN. 55042 7015-4000 L. 93,000 B. 55,000 T. 78.0oo _ NO CHNG X REDUC OF 2.700 TO Water in Bsmt. for 6 years sugges additional 5% depreciation. L. 23,000 g, 52,300 T 5,TG—O L. 14,000 NO CHNG Lower land on Lots 1 thru 6 by 47 Charles Rent 37209-2300 B. 42,100 X REDUC OF 3000 each. 3060 Lisbon Ave. N. 3,000 TO L. 11,000 B. 42,100 Lake Elmo, MN. 55042 T. 56,100 T 53,100 L. 26,000 X NO CHNG Owner had questions on market val 48 Larry Weiss 37015-4760 _ REDUC OF and they were answered. B_ 71,300 9302 Stillwater Blvd. TO Lake Elmo, MN. 55042 T. 97,300 L. B. T 49 John Tumulty 37181-2400 L. 34,000 NO CHNG X REDUC OF Interior inspection on 5-5-89 anc revalued. B. 163,200 11933 21st N. - 3,100 TO Lake Elmo, NN. 55042 T. 197,200 L.34,000 B. 160,100 T 194,100 L. 70,000 �X NO CHNG Questions on market value,may get 50 Harry Zabrok, Jr. 37445-6070 B. 29,400 _ REDUC OF market analysis and give to count 8120 Hill Trail Lake Elmo, NN. 55042 T. 99.400 TO L• B. T ASSESSOR RECOMMENDATION TO WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARDS OF REVIEW YEAR 1989 AREA Lake Elmo CASE # NAME/ADDRESS PID ORIGINAL ASSESSOR BOARD ASSESSOR EMV RECOM ACTION COMMENTS: 56 Timothy Zilles 8890 36th St. N. Lake Elmo, 55042 37406- 2250 L. 18,900 B. 88,000 T_106,900 x NO CHNG _ REDUC OF TO Owner -had questions on market value and they were answered. L. B. T 57 David Caliguire 928 Lake Elmo Ave. Lake Elmo 748 374850 L. 31,000 B.156,900 T_187,900 x NO CHNG _ REDUC OF TO owner had question on market value. He may get market analysis and L. B_ send to county. T L_ _ NO CHNG B. 58 Missing _ REDUC OF TO T. L. B_ T NO CHNG 59 Missing B. _ REDUC OF TO T. L. B. T 60 Patrick Scovill 8056 PatrickScoail Lake Elmo 37445- 6460 L. 60,000 B. 72,000 T. 132,000 x NO CHNG _ REDUC OF TO 1„ owner had questions on value and they were answered. . B. T ASSESSOR RECOMMENDATION TO WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARDS OF REVIEW YEAR].989 AREA L ka Rlmn CASE # NAME/ADDRESS PID ORIGINAL ASSESSOR BOARD ASSESSOR EMV RECOM ACTION COMMENTS: 51 Willard Griffin + 7024-0040 L. 50,000 % NO CHNG Owner does not agree with taxes ai 2835 Lake Elmo B. 71,700 REDUC OF expressed concern to Board-Recomme Lake Elmo, MN. 55042 _ TO No Change. T. 121,700 L. B. T 52 Norman Davis 37209-2250 L 14,000 _ NO CHNG Lower land value 3,000. 3050 Lisbon B. 40,500 X REDUC OF Lake Elmo, MN. 55042 3,000 TO L.11,000 T. 54,500 B.40,500 T 51,500 53 Manley Marcellus 37546-3000 4611 Birchbark Tr. N. L. B. 50,000 64,800 % NO CHNG REDUC OF — TO Owner had concerns on market value Reviewed by Frank and recommend no Lake Elmo, MN. 55042 T. 114,800'- L. change. B. T 54 Jan Kiefner 37008-0190 8001 50th St. N. Lake Elmo, MN. 55042 L. B. T. 75,000 91,700 166,700 _ NO CHNG % REDUC OF 4.200 TO L. 75,000 House needs rewiring and new bath- room tile. Lower to sale price on 6-87. B. 87.500 T 162,500 55 Richard Paquin 37180-2600 2333 Legion Ln. Lake Elmo L. B. T. 50,000 67,400 117,400 % NO CHNG _ REDUC OF TO L. Mr. Paquin left. B. T Ld and ASSESSOR RECOMMENDATION TO WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARDS OF REVIEW YEAR 1989 AREA Lake Elmo CASE # NAME/ADDRESS - PID ORIGINAL ASSESSOR BOARD ASSESSOR EMV RECOM ACTION COMMENTS: 66 Steven Delapp 8468 Lake Jane Tr. 37760- 2350 L. 38,500 B. 53,700 x NO CHNG REDUC OF — TO Interior inspection on 5-5-89 and recommend no change. Lake Elmo, 55042 T. 92,200 L. B. T 67 Betty Mahon 8785 27th St. N. Lake Elmo, 7751- 2700 L. 24,000. B 57,600 T. 81,600 x NO CHNG REDUC OF — TO 4 uestions on value and they were answered. L. B. T 68 Gerald Hartman 37011- L. 28,000 x NO CHNG Interior inspection on B. 78,800 10015 47th St. 2750 _ REDUC OF 5-5-89 and recommend T.106,800 Lake Elmo TO L. no change. B. T 69 Louis LeMire 8084 Hill Trail N. Lake Elmo 37445- 4930- L. 60,000 NO CHNG x MM OF — change TO L. Reference 37445- to 37445-4930 as part of Hmst. Purchased 4-87. e��-CQ4 `to B. 60,400 T. 120,400 B. T 70 Patrick Sinclair 8164 Hill Trail N. Lake Elmo 37445- 5800 L. 85,000 B. 153,100 T. 238,1100 x NO CHNG — REDUC OF TO L. Owner had questions on value. He may call count y y to check on other values in his area. B. T ASSESSOR RECOMMENDATION TO WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARDS OF REVIEW YEAR 1989 AREA Lake Elmo CASE # NAME/ADDRESS PID ORIGINAL ASSESSOR BOARD ASSESSOR ENV RECOM ACTION COMMENTS: L. 23,000 x NO CHNG Owner had questions on 61 Thomas Insley 37460- B,-Tr,7UU — — REDUC OF value and they were 1985 Manning Tr. 2000 — TO answered. Lake Elmo, 55042 T. 87,700 L. B. T 62 Thomas Regan 37751- L. 24,000 x NO CHNG Owner may get market 8875 27th St. N. 2850 B. REDUC OF analysis and send to Lake Elmo T.113,900 TO county. L. B. T L. 23,000 x NO CHNG Owner had questions on 63 Jeffrey Ylinen 37091- B. 59,700 _ REDUC OF taxes and they were 9401 Lake Jane 2150 TO answered. L. Tr. N. T. 82,700 Lake. Elmo B. T L. 70,000 x NO CHNG Owner had questions on 64 Donald Butler 37545- B.T06buu — REDUC OF value and they were 8416 Hidden Bay Ti. 2300 — TO answered. N. T. 176,600 L. Lake Elmo B. T 65 Rodney Toft 37505- L. 25,000 x NO CHNG Owner had questions on value. Suggest gettingmarket 11350 12th St. N. 2450 B. 36,500 _ REDUC OF analysis and sending Lake Elmo T. 61,500 L. TO to county. B. T CASE I 71 ASSESSOR RECOMMENDATION TO WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARDS OF REVIEW YEAR 1989 AREA Lake Elmo NAME/ADDRESS PID ORIGINAL ASSESSOR BOARD ASSESSOR EMV RECOM ACTION COMMENTS: L. 70,000 x NO CHNG Mr. Magnuson sent letter. Paul Magnuson 37700- B. 84� REDUC OF Reviewed by Frank and Scott 3047 Klondike Ave. .2450 — TO Recommend no change. Lake Elmo 55042 T,154,200 L. L_ I_ NO CHNG B. _ REDUC OF TO T. L. B. IT L_ _ NO CHNG B. _ REDUC OF TO T. L. B. T L. _ NO CHNG B_ _ REDUC OF TO T. L. B. T L. _ NO CHNG B. _ REDUC OF TO T. L. B. T w,9 SARAH E ARENDT KATHLEEN K. RALIENHORST FREDERIC W, KNAAK MELISSA A MILLER STEVEN P. CARLSON May 9, 1989 Pat Morrison City Administrator 3800 Laverne Avenue Lake Elmo, Minnesota RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK ATTORNEYS AT LAW , ROSEDALE CORPORATE PLAZA 2665 LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 55042 Re: Ed Gorman, White Hat Restaurant Fill Permit Dear Pat: TELEPHONE: (612)631.1080 FAX: (612) 631-1631 The purpose of this memorandum is in response to the Council's request at the meeting on May 2, 1989 for legal opinion regarding the reasonableness of Council action taken on April 18, 1989 wherein Council directed staff to notify Mr. Gorman that fill operations would be suspended until a site plan had been considered and approved by the Council based on two specific findings as enumerated in those minutes of April 18, 1989. I have had an opportunity to review those minutes together with the minutes from the September 20, 1988 meeting in which the Council granted a fill permit to Mr. Gorman for 20,000 cubic yards of fill on the property of the White Hat Restaurant. It appears from the minutes of September 20, 1988 that Mr. Gorman was requesting a renewal of his fill permit which was originally granted on September 4, 1987 for an "unstated" amount of fill in order for him to proceed with his Phase I Development. It also appears from those minutes that Mr. Gorman's architect had felt 20,000 to 30,000 yards of fill was needed in order to accomplish this result. It also appears from those minutes that Mr. Bohrer, the City Engineer, had some concern about too much fill being brought in to that location. Notwithstanding Mr. Bohrer's concern, the Council granted a fill permit for Mr. Gorman for the White Hat Restaurant for 20,000 cubic yards with further review again in the spring. It further provides that the granting of the fill permit does not grant approval to add buildings on this site and it was to be assured that no rerouting of the drainage would occur. It appears from the minutes, however, that the granting of the permit, nevertheless, was subject to the review and approval by the City Engineer. The issue of Mr. Gorman's fill permit was apparently placed on the agenda of the April 18, 1989 meeting as a result of the Council and staff having received inquiries on the status of the fill pile south of the White Hat Restaurant. The minutes from that meeting clearly provide that Mr. Bohrer said the fill was not blocking the drainage, which was specifically a condition of the permit as issued from the meeting on September 20, 1988. Mr. Bohrer further went on to say, however, that he felt that if the full 20,000 cubic yards were brought in, there would be much greater likelihood of interference with the drainage, dirt and dust uses, and erosion. It was his opinion, Pat Morrison May 9, 1989 Page 2 according to the minutes, that until such time a site plan and building appli- cation were coordinated in conjunction with the filling permit, that the City should suspend the fill operations. Based on those statements, the Council directed the City staff and attorney to notify Mr. Gorman that fill operations would be suspended until the site plan had been considered and approved by the Council. Ultimately, the question of whether or not the Council was reasonable in suspending these operations will hinge on how the proviso from the September 20, 1988 motion that it all be subject to review on approval by the City Engineer is interpreted. Clearly, Mr. Gorman was granted a permit for 20,000 cubic yards and the only actual limitation was that there be no rerouting of the drainage. There does not appear to be any connection between the initial 20,000 yards that was granted and the site plan or building permit. Clearly, from the minutes of the September 20, 1988, the only relationship between the site plan and the fill permit was review with regard to whether or not the additional 10,000 yards would be permitted in the spring of 1989. Therefore, the suspension of the fill operations on the basis that there is no site plan would be deemed to be arbitrary and capricious. Notwithstanding,Af Mr. Gorman was given notice that even the initial 20,000 yards was subject to review and approval by the City Engineer, the fact that the engineer has now expressed concern over those initial 20,000 yards and that there is a factual finding by the Council as to what, specifically, those concerns are, there is sufficient basis for suspension of the permit until it can be determined what, in fact the likelihood of interference with drainage is, whether or not there is, in fact, a danger from dirt and windblown dust, and if in fact there is a slight hazard created. All of these factors must be viewed in light of the Council's police power and its charge to protect the heath,thelfactsthatytherewisfaneof its "unattractiveens. itnuisance's'hshouldenottenterointorthat and the Council's consideration. In conclusion it is appropriate to request a site plan here for Mr. Gorman how the fill is to be utilized. However, to suspend the fill operation and the initial 20,000 cubic yards solely on the basis of the site plan not having been filed, the Council is in substantial danger of having its actions being found arbitrary and capricious and, therefore, liable to Mr. Gorman for dama- ges he sustains as a result of that action. However, if Mr. Gorman knew or Pat Morrison May 9, 1989 Page 3 reasonably should have known that the original 20,000 yards was subject to review and approval by the City Engineer, and that the City Engineer has now had an opportunity to review these conditions, and there is sufficient evi— dence to support the City Engineer's concerns, Mr. Gorman can not now be heard to complain. If I can be of further assistance in this matter, please feel free to call. Sincerely, UEN RST CARLSON & KNAAK Steven P. Carlson SPC:jlm Enclosures White Hat. Restaurants® es R. Hill MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Susan Dunn, Council Members Charles Graves, Lee Hunt, Donald Moe and Todd Williams; and City Administrator Patricia Morrison FROM: Michael J. Black, James R. Hill, Inc. DATE: May 11, 1989 RE: MUSA Area - Section 32 and part of Section 33. On April 10, 1989, a meeting was held at the Lake Elmo City Hall to discuss and plan appropriate actions needed to be taken by the City in order to assist the land owners within the MUSA line in facilitating development activities. Those in attendance were Council member Chuck Graves, Council member Lee Hunt, Planning Commission Chairman Rob Enes, Larry Bohrer of TKDA and myself. Two assignments were given to James R. Hill, Inc. at this meeting. The first was to interview property owners in Section 32 in order to get their opinion of what action should be taken by them or the City to accommodate development. The second was to review the Land Use Concept Plan for the MUSA area and recommend changes if appropriate. On Friday, April 21, 1989, and during the week of April 24, 1989, I interviewed five property owners or representatives in Section 32 and 33. (See also attached ownership map.) They included: Bob and Loj s Dreher. Mr. and Mrs. Dreher live in Lake Elmo at 7515 North 10th Street. They currently own land south of 10th Street on the east and west side of Helmo Avenue North. Kit Richardson. Mr. Richardson is a real estate broker with Griffin Real Estates Company. He offered comments on behalf of Mr. Clarence Enright who owns approximately 160 acres in the MUSA area. Doug DeCoster. Mr. DeCoster owns approximately 55 acres within the MUSA area. He also owns the properties adjacent to or near the MUSA line. Dan Dolan. Mr. Dolan is a real estate broker who has represented the sale of properties owned by R. Fraser, H. Brockman, and L. Kirvida. David Johnson. Mr. Johnson is the owner of ConnCo Shoes and other properties in the south area of Section 32. 1 9401 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH • BLOOMINGTON • MINNESOTA 9 55431 • 612-884-3029 The following are the responses received from those interviewed. The answer are given in no particular order. 1. What problems have you had and why has your property not been developed? * There has been strong interest but without sanitary sewer and municipal water and with this annexation issue - no one is willing to wait for a plan for development by Lake Elmo. The location is prime and ready, but people do not want to wait. * We cannot sell property without sewer and water. There is not enough time to get municipal water and keep the potential interested parties. No one is willing to wait. * The perception in the market is that Lake Elmo is anti - development and that is reality since people were elected on "anti -development" campaigns. * The City's attitude towards development and the lack of cooperation for financial help. * Obviously the need for sewer and water. It is no secret Lake Elmo's attitude towards development. Persons interested in development do not want to get involved. 2. How can the City of Lake Elmo assist the property owners in Section 32 in developing the land. * I don't think they can. No confidence that they could help and no credibility. The City is not set up to consider, review, approve and service urban development. Lake Elmo should agree to the annexation of all MUSA property to Oakdale and negotiate the best deal possible. * Lake Elmo needs to work more cooperatively with the land owners. The major concern is that the majority of the City Council will not support development activity and a cooperative financing plan. * The City has to change it's attitude. They should hire professional help and show a real commitment toward progress. * Get sewer and water in or at least to a point where it can be easily extended. * Allowing the annexation to Oakdale is the best way to see the land be developed. 2 James R. Hill, inc. 3. Is your property for sale and what price are you asking? * Yes, $25,000/acre. * Yes, very soft market without sanitary sewer and municipal water. * Yes, land price is negotiable. Freeway frontage is approximately $40,000/acre. * Yes, varies depending on land use and offer. * Yes, as a whole or portions. 4. What are your intentions or thoughts for the type of development on your land? * The property is highly visible and is a vocal point location. A corporate headquarters with an employment base. * Office showroom - more industrial employment and less retail. Housing to the northeast. * Commercial west of Helmo and residential east of Helmo Avenue. Maybe commercial east of Helmo. * Mixed uses - PUD - City should be flexible. * Highway business near County Road 13. 5. What is your schedule and do you have any buyers or interested parties now? * Would like to sell as soon as possible but no interest because of no sewer and water. * Immediately and yes. * To move forward for annexation. Yes, people are interested but not in working with the City of Lake Elmo. * As soon as possible and yes, with qualifications. Buyers are not interested if the land remains in Lake Elmo because they do not have a development plan. * Yes, some interest in office showroom. 6. What do you believe is a reasonable absorption rate for the area? 3 Jdf r 1e5 K. r111I, Ir1C. * Difficult to answer, there has been some interest for office and multiple family residential but conditions must change. * It may take 30 years to develop all the properties in the MUSA area. * If attitudes changed to become market competitive, a lot could happen. But things will not change hence nothing will happen. * With existing circumstances, 20 years or beyond before completely developed. * Ten to twenty acres a year. However, if things changed, it could happen very quick. 7. What do you believe is your time frame for selling your land? * The property near County Road 13 would move very quickly but nothing will happen without a plan for installing sewer and water. * Land is for sale now but is not encouraging. * Whenever - maybe the next five years. * Would like to sell immediately. * If land is annexed to Oakdale, an option may occur in 1989. 8. Have your reviewed the Feasibility Report prepared by TKDA for serving the area with sanitary sewer, storm sewer and municipal water? And, are you aware of the estimated related costs? * Yes, Yes. * Yes, yes and not unreasonable cost but difficult to take on debt without a buyer or user. * Yes, but not interested in doing it because of the cost of the water system. Yes, assessments are substantial without a financing plan. * Yes, yes and we have tried to ask the City for a financing plan to do the work. E! Jdf l 1e5 K. F111I1 111C.;. * Yes, yes, but it makes no sense not to use water from Oakdale. The proposal is not the most economical way to extend water to the area. 9. Have you considered petitioning for improvements or any other financing options? * No, because hope has been given up in working with Lake Elmo. Attention is focusing on working a financing plan with Oakdale. * We have tried to ask Lake Elmo for a financing plan. Property owners are concerned that the City Council will not accept any plan or agreement other than 100o payment by the land owners. * Yes, would be interested in petitioning for improvements but land owners must get off of green acres. It is desirable to use tax increment financing or deferred assessments. * No, because land owners are sellers not land developers. We are already paying area assessments without any benefit. * Why bother - the City has stated that 1000 of the cost will go back to the property owners. If you have a development waiting - okay, but what about land owners who do not. Tax increment financing should be used. We are not looking for personal advantage but if you want something you must be competitive. 10. Are you aware of the City's Land Use Plan designations for the area and do you agree with it? Do you suggest any changes and/or modifications? * Yes, in fact property owners in the area help prepare the plan. No, but the City should be flexible - it is only a guide. * Yes. Yes, office showroom and employment base near the freeway and retail near loth Street. It is possible for the whole area to be developed as an office park. plan should not be cast in stone. * Yes, would suggest retail near loth Street and Helmo Avenue. * Yes, maybe expand commercial north of 4th Street. 5 Jdl t ICS N. "111, Il 1C.. * Yes, retail near loth Street and multiple family east of Helmo and south of loth Street. 11. Would you be interested in meeting with the City Council at which time we could consider: various development scenarios, phasing plans for public improvements and options for financing of public improvements? * Yes, but not optimist - the annexation should be approved in June. Lake Elmo City Council cannot agree among themselves and that where it has to all begin. * Always interested in hearing and listening. Something has to change and so property owners are committed to the annexation process. Concern that the Lake Elmo City Council does not have enough votes to change. People were elected to the City Council on a no -development platform. * A petition for annexation into Oakdale has been signed and progress is being made - no desire to look back. If the City has something, put it in writing and we will consider it. * Cannot be optimistic - it is hopeless - the Lake Elmo City Council cannot agree among themselves. Property owners have invested time and money to the annexation process. Progress will be made without help of Lake Elmo. If the City has new information, mail it and it will be look at. 12. What specific actions do you expect the City to take which you believe would help with your long range plans for your property? * Negotiate the best deal possible with the City of Oakdale and do not object to the annexation. The land should go to Oakdale. Section 32 can then be developed and Lake Elmo can remain rural. We are not shutting our doors on Lake Elmo and hope they do not shut their doors on us, but we have to move ahead and we are doing what is the best prudent business decision. * One, allow the properties to be annexed to Oakdale. If not, two, provide a financing plan for sewer and water which may include a joint powers agreement with Oakdale. And, third, change fundamental attitudes towards development. * Determine what benefits the City of Lake Elmo would have in developing Section 32. 6 James R. Hill, inc. * The City should consider a financing plan by which the City takes on some risk or burden of the assessment. * Lake Elmo must make a 180 degree turn. 13. What do you see as your role in the pursuit of these actions? * No part at this time; it is up to the Lake Elmo City Council. * Listen and consider any suggestions that may come from a cooperative City Council. * Willing to meet with the City Council to work out a plan. * Act quickly - no one likes the existing situation. Potential buyers are not patient enough to work it out. * Nothing, Oakdale is better suited for development activities. The property owners within the MUSA line believe that the City of Lake Elmo does not want the land developed and hence they have no choice but to approach the City of Oakdale. They are frustrated that Lake Elmo cannot view the MUSA area as different than that of the rest of rural Lake Elmo. They have invested time and money into the annexation application and plan to carry it out. They are not optimistic but they would listen if the City put together a financing plan for infrastructure. Although all who were inter- viewed said they have reviewed the Feasibility Report prepared for the area, some still believe it would be better to receive water from Oakdale. When in fact, the supplement report estimates the Oakdale's supply a higher cost than a Lake Elmo system. The key to any land use plan is remain flexible and willing to accept change or amendments as a market may dictate. Some flexibility has been taken away in that the WONE interceptor does have a limited capacity. Once development activities begin in the area, further refinement of the Land Use Plan may be necessary to stay within the capacity limits of the WONE sewer pipe. Attached is a copy of the existing Land Use Plan for the MUSA area and a copy James R. Hill, inc. showing an alternate recommendation. The term "commercial" on the existing plan is confusing. I do not believe that commercial is intended to be "retail sales" in all places. The area south of 4th Street and north of I-94 and west of Ideal Avenue is more suitable for office/corporate headquarters with a large employment base than it is for retail commercial uses. Although the area is accessible, it is not convenient to access. Commercial retail uses may be appropriate near County Road 13 and I-94 and in the northerly area along I-694 and 10th Street and Helmo Avenue. Residential land uses are appropriate east of Helmo Avenue and south of the loth Street. The balance of the area should be planned for corporate headquarter, offices and limited industrial park. City Council Action I do not believe it is too late for the City to work with the property owners within the MUSA line. The following action is recommended: 1. The City Council has to agree to work together with the property owners. A two-thirds majority vote of the City Council will be necessary for development to occur. 2. The Land Use Concept Plan for the MUSA area should be amended to allow greater flexibility. 3. The City should work with a financial consultant to consider financing alternatives for infrastructure including but not limited to tax increment financing and deferred assessments. This plan may also include a phasing plan extending sewer, water and storm sewer over some period of time. 4. The City should call a meeting with the property owners in the MUSA area to: a. Review the Land Concept Plan. b. Review a infrastructure phasing plan. C. Review a financing plan. 8 James R. Hill, inc. i 1 Co. Road 70 LOWS TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL RETAIL & OFFICE OFFICE SHOWROOM/ OFFICE SHOWROOM/ \\\ LIGHT IND. PARK LIGHT IND. PARK I I I 1 I 1 f 1 I I 1 IZ fly 1 I I h Street '— d MEDIUM TO HIGH CORPORATE OFFICE > RESIDENTIAL 1st Street son BI HIGHWAY COMM. 0 V ,James R. Hill, inc. �.� FP�NvERs/EwcINEERs/SURVEYOS 9901jAME6AVENUES. a BLOOMINGTON,MN55937 � 6R-04-30PROPOSED LAND USE CONCEPT North 0 1 800FT. 1 Co. Road 70 DREHER BROCKMAN FRASER I IEN FRASER CONNCO DeCOSTER ai INGEBRAND a UARDIAI MN/DOT 1st Street ANGEL /om t CHURCH ,James R. Hill., inc. -Lj PLANNERS/ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS 9401JAMES"ENUES. • SLOOMINGTOMMNS5431 612-BM-3029 North 0 80OFT. DeCOSTER 0 U DeCOSTER DeCOSTER LAND USE I CONCEPT PLAN - SECTION 32 AND WEST 1/4 SECTION 133 -_.., Ih STREET C SAH 7Q ---- ------ V.I MEDIUPI to HIGH ' LOW to MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL ' / M.U.S.A. i. RES . w AC. - LINE i 17- J ` OFFICE I SCALE:OFFICE I & COMM.11 1 �= 800� I i OMMERCIAL I MEDIUt4 to HIGI i ' "- 44 AC. I - A\ RESIDENTIAL I I 45 JANUARY 1983 Q REVISED 4/85 �. - -.--. ---- ------ ( -- - --- REVISED 10/85 OFFICE & COMMERCIAL R VISED 11/85 i C01114ERCIAL y 40 AC. 55 AC. ^ "41h STREET CO? II IERCIAL 120 AC. N I-94 MEDIUM to HIGH RESIDENTIAL =^ I 1.i 55 ;AC. TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENG INEERS-ARCH ITECTS-PLANNERS SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY 2, 1989 ( I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Larry IA. M rer, P. E. Registration No. 12120 -1- 9492 Introduction This report is written to determine the feasibility of reconstructing 15th Street North between Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) and the Oakdale City Limits. 15th Street North Is a paved 2-lane street. The pavement is in poor condition due to Inadequate subgrade strength. Also, the sight distances are insufficient. 15th Street North is a municipal state aid route, and is eligible for construction, engineering and right-of-way funds. Proposed Improvement The street would be constructed to State Aid Standards for a rural road. Like 47th Street, 15th Street would have two 12 foot driving lanes and 4 foot wide paved shoulders. Poor soil would be removed from the roadbed and would be replaced with suitable material. Driveways would be paved from the edge of the shoulder to property line. The ditches would be graded, and new culverts installed. The road will be designed for 40 mph speeds. Statement oft..Feasibility The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint. This project was Initiated at the request of the Lake Elmo City Council as part of the City's 5-year WA Construction Program. Because assessments are anticipated, a 4/5 vote of the Council is required to order the project. RlRlaht--of-of-way-way There is no platted right-of-way for 15th Street. ,:Because 15th Street has been maintained by the City for a number of'years, _and the existing road Is properly cnetered on the section line, it Is expected that the abutting property owners will donate the required 66'feet of permanent easement. -2- 9492 Same additional slope easements and temporary construction easements will be required to properly match existing driveways and property. A permit is required from the Cottage Grove Ravine Water Management Organization and the Valley Branch Watershed District. Plan approval Is required from the State Aid Division of MnDOT. The fol lowing I ist shows the property owners abutting on or benefitting from the street. The list also shows area of each parcel and the number of lots it could be subdivided into under present zoning. It has been the City's policy on other State Aid streets to assess only those costs which are not eligible for State Aid reimbursement. The only items not eligible for State Aid reimbursement are legal fees for land acquisition, engineering costs in excess of 18% of the construction cost and City administrative costs. The estimated assessable cost is $7,000. Listed below are assessment alternatives for the Council's consideration. The alternative methods are: 1. Benef itted Front 'Foot Method This method assumes'fhat each parcel benefits from the improvement in proportion to the lot frontage abutting on the improvement. in this method, the owner of a small or interior lot generally pays less than the owner of a large or corner lot. The rationale is that is costs more to pave across the frontage of a large lot than it does to pave across the frontage of a small lot. For the purpose of this example, benef fitted frontage is def fined as the frontage which abuts the Improvement. For lots with more than one sided frontage, the benefltted frontage is the sum of the short side and 112 the length of the long side. 2. Unit Charge This method assumes that each parcel benefits equally from the -- Improvement In this method, all property owners pay equal ly regardless of their lot size. The rational is that the benefit ( derived from a street improvement is improved access to the property. Since all are provided equal access, all benefit equally. -3- 9492 f 3. This method assumes that each parcel benefits partially in proportion to its frontage and partially on a unit basis. For the purpose of this example 1/2 of the cost will be spread on a unit basis and 1/2 wit I be spread on a frontage basis. Project Schedule Council Receives Feast biIIty Report Council Holds Public Hearing Orders Plans and Specifications Advertisement for Bids in Legal Newspaper Advertisement for Bids in Construction Bulletin Bids Opened Council Receives Bids and Orders Project Contractor Begins Construction Contractor Completes Construction May 2, 1989 May 16, 1989 June 21 $ 28, 1989 June 23 $ 30, 1989 July 11, 1989 July 18, 1989 August 1, 1989 October 31, 1989 -4- 9492 Estimated A_�__ sse agent Rol I - Unit Method No. of Estimate$ Parcel No. Owner Area Zoning Possible Lof5i Asseqsma7p, 2700 Armstrong 160 Acres A 2 $2,000 2600 Armstrong 72 Acres A 1 1,000 2605 Armstrong 20 Acres A 1 1,000 2655 Pierre 1.3 Acres RR 1 1,000 2645 2640 Olson Bodey 11.8 Acres 11.8 Acres RR 1 RR 1 1,000 1 000 Total 7 Lots $7,000 Estimated Assessment Roll - Front Foot Method Estimated Parcel No. Owner Erontana 2700 Armstrong 2553.861 $3,500 2600 Armstrong 890.001 1,220 2605 Armstrong 723.661 992 2655 Pierre 160.001 ?-19- 2645 Olson 389.941 534 2640 Bodey 390,061 535 Total 5107.52 Estimated Assessnent Rol I- Combination Method $7,000 Parcel No. Owner Unit Portion @_$500/lot FF Portion $0 685 Estimated Assessment 2700': Armstrong $1,000 $1,750 $2,750 2600 Armstrong 500 610 1,110 2605 Armstrong 500 496 996 2655 Pierre 500 110 6-10 2645 2640 Olson Bodey 500 500 267 26+7 767 767 Total $3,500 $3,500 $70000 -5- 9492 Included in this report is a detailed cost estimate of construction costs for road improvements. Total estimated price Includes 10% for contingencies and 20% for engineering, legal and administrative costs. Estimates and contracts are prepared on a unit price basis. The contractor wiI I be paid only for the work completed. The estimated project cost Is $158,000. 15th Street North SAP 206-110-01 Lake Elmo, Minnesota Commission No. 9492 Item No. Description Quanfltv Price Amount 1 Clear and Grub Trees 7 EA $ 200.00 $ 1,400.00 2 Remove/Dispose of Bit. Pavement 6,350 SY $ 1.00 $ 6,350.00 3 Salvage Culverts 210 LF $ 5.00 $ 1,050.00 j 4 Remove/Replace Fence 200 LF $ 3.00 $ 600.00 5 Common Excavation 4,800 CY $ 2.50 $ 12,000.00 6 Subgrade Excavation 4,300 CY $ 2.50 $ 10,750.00 7 Granular Borrow 2,000 CY $ 5.00 $ 10,000.00 8 Class 5 Gravel 5,860 TN $ 5.00 $ 29,300.00 9 Bituminous Binder (2331) 850 TN $ 12.00 $ 10,200.00 10 Bituminous Wear (2341) 1,130 TN $ 14.00 $ 15,820.00 11 Bituminous Material for Mix 110. TN $ 140.00 _ _$ 15,400.00 12 13 CMP Culverts -Seedi'ng 250 2.0 LF AQ $ $1,200.00 18.00 $ $ 4,500.00 2„400.00 Subtotal $119,770.00 + 10% Contingencies $ 11,900.00 Total Estimated Construction Cost $131,750.00 + 20% Engineering, Legal, Administrative $ 26, 50.00 -6- 9492 s. �I 1 - � Y , ( I I I s. I � - I 2J90 I 1, 15 Ih STI✓F1 ' r \1 13fi'3l 2P' 1 1 I � I I I 1 ZpJO iV0 to JI I[SeM 1pl 10 Ih STRIC i.' I J.10 I � � I I I I I 1 I lIK). 4 OF/2 R / 8282 (94`392) 902 ptAT 12950 cl, ZlJO PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTE 429.031 Subdivision 1. WHEREAS, the petitioners are property owners of more than 35 percent of the real property abutting on 15th Street west of County Road 13 and east of the Oakdale border, and WHEREAS, the petitioners have reviewed a copy of the Feasibility Report dated May 2, 1989 and entitled "Feasibility Report, 15th Street North, SAP 206-110-01, Lake Elmo, Minnesota., Commission No. 949211, and WHEREAS, the petitioners know that 15th Street North in its present condition constitutes a safety hazard because of the following facts: 1. The road has no shoulders. There are many adults and children walking, jogging and biking on 15th Street. Petitioners have witnessed several incidents where accidents almost occured because these pedestrians were on the travelled portion of the roadway. The proposed paved shoulder would solve this problem. 2. The sight distances at the driveway and field entrance at 8281 - 15th Street are inadequate and dangerous. The two Coppin boys, aged 5 and 8 years, wait for their school bus at this driveway and cross 15th Street to and from the bus. A vehicle coming from the east cannot see „_- them until the last seconds. The Coppin boys and any person attempting to come on to 15th Street from the driveway or field entrance cannot see traffic coming from the east. In the summer months,'cars belonging to .'50 families of Hmong gardeners exit from this same field entrance. .'During winter storms countless cars have gone off the road at this spot avoiding oncoming traffic not seen until it is too late. In 1966, when 15th Street was blacktopped, Raleigh Armstrong requested that the grading be changed to give a proper sight distance. The proposed plan will finally solve this safety problem. The present roadbed is in very bad condition. It consists of dirt with a few inches of gravel and blacktop. This is inadequate for the school busses and traffic to and from Eagle Point School. The reason the road was originally blacktopped was to serve Eagle Point School. WHEREAS, the petitioners have witnessed a steady increase in traffic due to rapid development in Oakdale and that this increase combined with the present safety hazards constitute a serious accident just waiting to happen. NOW THEREFORE, the petitioners request the City of Lake Elmo, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.031 et seq. to pass a resolution ordering the improvement project as outlined in the feasibility study of May 2, 1989. Re-aTo lly�mitte��ry sG. Armstrong Rosemary E. mstrong 61 S - / 9?61` n TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS -ARCHITECTS -PLANNERS SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY 2, 1989 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Larry,D. 66hrer, P.E. Registration No. 12120 9150-009 r" Introduction 38th and 39th Streets North in Bordner's Gardner Farmettes was studied in 1983 for a patch and overlay project. At that time the streets were crack Ing, but the pavement had not yet broken loose. Today the streets are In worse condition; the pavement has broken loose in many areas, and there is additional cracking. Improvement It is proposed to cut out the broken up areas and patch those spots with bituminous. A 211 thick overlay will then be placed over the entire street to strengthen the road and to seal off the cracks. Two culverts would be installed to improve drainage. Crushed rock would be added along the shoulders and at driveways as needed. Feast hiII±y ( The project Is feasible. initiation This project was initiated by the City Council. Ordering the project will require a four -fifth majority of the Council. -2- 9150-009 r Item Unit 1. 4" Full Depth Patch 1,900 Sy $ 10.00 $19000 2. Tack Coat 600 GAL $ 1.25 $ 750 3. 2" Overlay (2341) 1,400 TN $ 14.00 $19,600 4. Bituminous Material for Mix 85 TN $ 140.00 $11,900 5. Crushed Rock Shouldering 100 TN $ 10.00 $ 1,000 6. 15" CMP Culverts 85 FT $ 16.00 $ 1,360 7. 8. 15" Aprons Catch Best 4 1 EA A $ $1,000,00 100.00 $ 400 $ 1,000 $55,010 + 10% Contingency 5,490 Estimated Construction Cost $60,500 + Engineering and Administration $ 6,050 Total Estimated Project Cost $66,550 It is proposed that the entire cost of the project be assessed to abutting property. Listed below are the assessment alternatfves for the Council's consi derati on. The Unit Method gives a per lot rate of $1,386.46 The Frontage.Method gives a rate of $6.665/FF for a range of assessments from $ 833,.00 to $3,006.00 The Conbination Method gives a range of assessments from $1,110.00 to $2,196.00 -3- 9150-009 r Lot i. Owner ESTIMATED ASSESSMENTS - UNIT METHOD No. of Lgts Estimated Assessment 1 $1,386.46 D. Johnson 2. G. Hakkinen i $1,386.46 3. G. Warner 1 $1,386.46 4. L. Gehloff i $1,386.46 5. S. Blossom 1 $1,386.46 6. H. Gleason 1 $1,386.46 .7. L. Parsons 1 $1,386.46 8. R. Petersen 1 $1,386.46 9. D. Amundson 1 $1,386.46 10. D. Lau 1 $1,386.46 ii. T. Brockman 1 $1,386.46 ( 12. H. Jackie 1 $1,386.46 Pt.13 J. Demko i $1,386.46 Pt.13 C. Running 1 $1,386.46 Pt.13 G. Hillstrom 1 $1,386.46 14. W. Haffely T $10386.46 15, B. Brehelm 1 $1,386.46 i6. J. Kurtz 1 $1,386.46 17. T. Brehelm 1 $1,386.46 18. B. Curtis 1 $1,386.46 19. H. Beach 1 $1,386.46 20. M. Soderberg 1 $1,386.46 21. D. Miller 1 $1,386.46 22. _ M. Ffsher 1 $1,386.46 -4- 9150-009 r Lot Owner No of Lots Estimated Assessment 23. M. Fisher 1 $1,386.46 25. R. Marts 1 $1,386.46 26. D. Oftedahl 1 $1,386.46 W 1/2 28. M. Aherns 1 $1,386.46 E 1/2 28. L. Anderson 1 $1,386.46 29. Glantz & Caspers 1 $1,386.46 30. J. Merkuson 1 $1,386.46 31. A. Schmitt 1 $1,386.46 32. F. Whitaker 1 $1,386.46 33. G. Wright 1 $1,386.46 34. D. Wilkes 1 $1,386.46 35. L. Taney i $1,386.46 36. W. Pieper 1 $1,386.46 37. J. Adams 1 $1,386.46 38. G. Peterson i $1,386.46 39. B. Ferderer 1 $1,386.46 40. G. Hoff 1 $1,386.46 41. D. Landucci 1 $1,3864.46 42. R. Anderson 1 $1,386.46 43. J. Utermoehi 1 $1,386.46 44. G. Wulfing 1 $1,386.46 45. M. Lancaster 1 $1,386.46 46. L. Letder 1 $1,386.46 47. L. Kasheimer L $1,386.46 48 Lots $66,550.00 -5- 9150-009 r� ESTIMATED ASSESSMENTS - FRONTAGE METHOD Lot Owner Frontage, Estimated Assessment $6.665/FF 1. D. Johnson 3301 at $2,199.31 2. G. Hakkinen 1501 $ 999.69 3. G. Warner 1501 $ 999.69 4. L. Gehloff 150f $ 999.69 5. S. Blossom 1501 $ 999.69 6. H. Gleasen 1551 $1,033.01 7. L. Parsons 2451 $1,632.82 8. R. Petersen 2101 $1,399.57 9. D. Amundson 2101 $1,399.57 10. D. Lau 2101 $1,399.57 11. T. Breckman 2101 $1,399.57 12. H. Jackle 189.91 $1,265.61 Pt.13. J. Demko 145f $ 966.36 Pt.13. C. Running 1251 $ 833.07 Pt.13. G. Hillstrom 1701 $1,132.98 14. , W. Haffely 174.91 $1,165.64 15. B. Breheim 2101 $1,399.57 16. J. Kurtz 2101 $1,399.57 17. T. Breheim 2101 $1,399.57 18. B. Curtis 2101 $1,399.57 19. H. Beach 2101 $1,399.57 20. M. Soderberg 2101 $1,399.57 21. D. Miller 210' $1,399.57 22.- M. Fisher. 2101 $1,399.57 -6- 9150-009 r� Owner Frontage Estimated Assessment Lot 23. M. Fisher 2101 at $6.665/FF $1,399.57 25. R. Meris 330t $2,199*31 26. D. Oftedahl 3301 $2,199.31 W 1/2 28. M. Aherns 1651 $1,099.66 E 1/2 28. L. Anderson 1651 $1,099.66 29. Glantz & Caspers 1800 $1,199.63 .30. J. Merkuson 1801 $1,199.63 31. A. Schmitt 1801 $1,199.63 32. F. Whitaker 2101 $1,399.57 33. G. Wright 2801 $1,866.09 34. D. Wilkes 168.21 $1,120.98 ( 35. L. Taney 140.61 $ 937.04 36. W. Pieper 2851 $1,999.41 ' 37. J. Adams 4511 $3,005.73 38. G. Peterson 4511 $3,005.73 39. B. Ferderer 1451 $ 966.36 40. G. Hoff 1401 $ 933.04 41. D. Landucci 1451 $ 966.36 42. R. Anderson 1401 $ 933.04 43. J. Utermoehl 3151 $2,099.35 44. G. Wulfing 1801 $1,199.63 45. M. Lancaster 1801 $1,199.63 46. L. Lelder 1801 $1,199.63 47. L. Kashelmer 180, $1,199.63 9,985.6 $66,550.00 -7- 9150-009 A - ESTIMATED ASSESSMENTS - COMBINATION METHOD Unit Frontage Portion Estimated Assessment lot 1. Owner D. Johnson Portion $693.23 $1,099.65 $1,792.88 2. G. Hakkinen $693.23 $ 499.85 $1,193.08 3. G. Warner $693.23 $ 499.85 $1,193.08 4. L. Gehloff $693.23 $ 499.85 $1,193.08 5. S. Blossom $693.23 $ 499.85 $1,193.08 6. H. Gleasen $693.23 $ 516.50 $1,209.73 7. L. Parsons $693.23 $ 816.41 $1,509.64 8. R. Petersen $693.23 $ 699.78, $1,393.01 9. D. Amundson $693.23 $ 699.78 $1,393.01 10. -D. Lau $693.23 $ 699.78 $1,393.01 11. T. Breckman $693.23 $ 699.78 $1,393.01 12. H. Jackie $693.23 $ 632.81 $1,326.04 Pt.13. J. Demko $693.23 $ 483.18 $i,t76.41 ' Pt.13. C. Running $693.23 $ 416.54 $1,109.77 Pt.i3. G. Hillstrom $693.23 $ 566.49 $1,259.72 14. W. Haffely $693.23 $ 582.82 $1,276.05 15. B. Breheim $693.23 $ 699.78 $1,0393.01 16. J. Kurtz $693.23 $ 699.78 $1,393.01 17. T. Breheim $693.23 $ 699.78 $1,393.01 18. B. 'Curtis $693.23 $ 699.78 $1,393.01 19. H. Beach $693.23 $ 699.78 $1,393.01 20. M. Soderberg $693.23 $ 699.78 $1,393.01 21. D. Miller' $693.23 $ 699.78 $1,393.01 22. M Fisher. $693.23 $ 699.78 $1,393.01 23. M. Fisher $693.23 $ 699.78 $1,393.01 25. R. Maris $693.23 $1,099.65 $1,792.88 -8- 9150-009 r Unit Frontage Portion Estimated Assessment Lot 26. Owner Portion $1,792.88 D. Oftedahl $693.23 $1,099.65 W 1/2 28. M.' Aherns $693.23 $ 549.83 $1,243.06 E 1/2 28. L. Anderson $693.23 $ 549.83 $1,243.06 29. Glantz & Caspers _$693.23 $ 599.82 $1,293.05 30. J. Merkuson $693.23 $ 599.82 $1,293.05 31. A. Schmitt $693.23 $ 599.82 $1,293.05 32. F. Whitaker $693.23 $ 699.78 $1,393.01 33. G. Wright $693.23 $ 933.05, $1,626.28 34. D. Wilkes $693.23 $ 560.49 $1,253.72 35. L. Taney $693.23 $ 468.52 $1,161.75 36. W. Pieper $693.23 $ 949.71 $1,642.94 ( 37. J. Adams $693.23 $1,502.86 $2,196.09 38. G. Peterson $693.23 $1,502.86 $2,196.09 ' 39. B. Ferderer $693.23 $ 483.18 $1,176.41 40. G. Hoff $693.23 $ 466.52 $1,159.75 41. D. Landuccl $693.23 $ 483.18 $1,176.41 42. R. Anderson $693.23 $ 466.52 $1,159.75 43. J. Utermoehl $693.23 $1,049.68 $10742.91 44. G. Wulfing $693.23 $ 599.82 $1,293.05 45. M. 'Lancaster $693.23 $ 599.82 $1,293.05 46. L. Leader $693.23 $ 599.82 $1,293.05 47. L. Kasheimer $693.23 $ 599.82 $1,293.05 $33,275.00 $33,275.00 $66,550.00 -9- 9150-009 t,00 x.j xcw xaoo • . � , •�•,� .. WmOBREAK O t000 � z oom =no zoo N5O G>71•E'awElvr tOr 2 am ` ^ a>o� �- rt>ow cw • =mo ' _ - _ cov[.»c., ,o, . 1 p saoo ,ow DEER r10RT tr00 • 2= tl0 ttb � ' Q ,> c 22 = ztw • STREET •• J / tl00 .WRE uop uN [f!0 t600 ^rk>H zaw „ ti t=00 i[!O t•00 • Q� il�Q , ]000 ] t•SO I[,fF ,�wi =.00 ]m fJ> r200 tlo0 3- d,e _� � t ew — nw . cw e•ao noo Luo O.>O eao [eo — ma rzw coo :•oo t•w two reao Tt T IF Q I'l ]10o T60 ]w>O ]flw Lew b �,>�p > uw a]oo •zwy •mo t' ' ♦.wl moo .ow +000 awo ]too 1 \ t „ t>OO ,m � OE- T095 1 ].w ].00 sow taoo z{n ztoo FpR =.w t.00 =>w t„uo 1 =>w 37to STREET w , ,ri] \ x•oo A. x >0 2[wo w (Xy7136-3]•OS' SWO iwo \ zwo T A ' rrw7t`�. t>oop 3zaso :aao :sw xsw Ij\ I \ \ I,000 \ 136.370 - 1 cw tmo 3411, STREET RDRTX \ STATE XIGRW]Y wD 717 TwnRu ewe I' ,\r..o - T,e^ I I I \ t!M) ------- V»ao rzso =too =^" r.w I ee.o Sou •, \ S i >,00 �_ TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS -ARCHITECTS -PLANNERS SAINT,PAUL, MINNESOTA MAY,2, 1989 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Larry D. Boh rerP , P. E.`J Registration No. 12120 9150-009 20th Street North from CSAH 17 to Manning Trail is being considered in this report for an overlay. 20th Street North is an MSA route and is eligible for maintenance funds to offset the total cost of the project. 20th Street has been patched and had spot overlays done over the past few years; however, the road surface continues to breakup due to Inadequate subgrade strength. It Is recommended that a 20 overlay be placed over the street to increase the strength of the road and to seal off the cracks. Gravel would be added to the shoulders to bring than up to finished grade. Existing driveways will not be altered. each entrance. A tapered edge will be raked out at The project Is feasible and should best be made as proposed. u. ZT81111MO _ Included is a detailed cost estimate. Estimates and contracts are prepared on a unit price basis. The contractor will only be paid for work completed. For estimating purposes, 10% contingencies and 20% for engineering, legal and administration are Included. Item Unit No. De5crjption Quantity Price Amount _ 1 Bituminous Mixture (2341) 1,460 TN $ 14.00 $20,440.00 2 Bituminous Material for Mixture 88 TN $ 130.00 $11,440.00 3 Tack Coat 400 GA $ 1.20 $ 480.00 4 Crushed Rock 409 TN $ 12.00 $ 4-800.00 Subtotal $37,160.00 + 10% Contingencies $ 3,720.00 Total Estimated Construction Cost $40,880.00 + 20,% Engineering, Legal, Administration $ 8,120.00 Total Estimated Project Cost $49,000.00 -2- 9150-009 The City will receive $44,099 -this year for MSA Maintenance Funds. It is anticipated that these funds will be used for both 33rd Street North and 20th Street North. The amount of 1989 MSA Maintenance Funds remaining after 33rd Street is completed is estimated at $24,500. The difference between the $49,000 estimated project cost and the $24,500 of MSA funds is $24,500 and would be assessed to the abutting properties. It is assumed that Tartan Park would pick up one-half of the assessment. The remaining portion would be spl It up on an equivalent lot basis. Amount to be Assessed $24,500 Tartan Park (1/2) -Al2= Remaining Assessed to Residents $12,250 Estimated -Assessments - Unit Method Number of Lot or Parcels under Estimated Parcel No. Addition Zoning Current Zonin9_,Assgssment Lot i Schwartz-Martineo R-1 1 $ 720.00 Lot 5 Schwartz -Marti neo R-i 1 $ 720.00 ( Lot 4 Schw artz- Marti neo R-1 1 $ 720.00 0600 RR 1 $ 720.00 3200 RR 4 $ 2,880.00 2700 R-1 1 $ 720.00 Lot 22 Eden Park R-1 1 $ 720.00 Lot 23 Eden Park R-1 1 $ 720.00 Lot 24 Eden Park R-1 2 $ 1,440.00 2370 R-1 1 $ 720.00 Lot 6 Eden Park 2nd R-1 1 $ 720.00 Lot 7 Eden Park 2nd R-1 1 $ 720.00 2450 R-1 1 $ 720.00 2500 Lake Elmo Foundation PF $ 6,125.00 2100 Lake Elmo Foundation PF * $ 6,125.00 Total 17 $24,500.00 * There is no minimum lot size in the PF zone. -3- 9150-009 stt matedAssessments - Frontage Method Estimated Lot or Assessmen P_ar_cel No. Addition Frontarn 0 12.566/ Lot i Schwartz-Martineo 140.43 $ 360.00 Lot 5 Schwartz-Martineo 373.25 $ 958.00 Lot 4 Schwartz-Martineo 142.89 $ 367.00 0600 560.00 $ 1,437.00 3200 1280.00 $ 3,284.00 2700 310.00 $ 795.00 Lot 22 Eden Park 175.00 $ 449.00 Lot 23 Eden Park 196.73 $ 505.00 Lot 24 Eden Park 591.03 $ 1,516.00 2370 330.00 $ 847.00 Lot 6 Eden Park 2nd, 176.00 $ 452.00 Lot 7 Eden Park 2nd . 176.00 $ 452.00 2450 250.00 $ 641.00 2500. Lake Eimo Foundation 2607.00 $ 6,689.00 Total 9548.33 $24,500.00 Estimated Assessments - GombloAtl.on Method Unit FF Estimated Lot or Portion Portion Assessment Parcej No. AcjJdjtton @360/Lot 8 R1 283/FF Frontage Lot 1 Schwartz- Marti neo $ 360 $ 180 $ 540 Lot 5 Schwartz -Marti neo $ 360 $ 479 $ 839 Lot 4 Schwartz -Martino $ 360 $ 184 $ 544 0600 $ 360 $ 718 $ 1,078 3200 $ 1,440 $ 1,642 $ 3,082 2700 1 360 $ 398 $ 758 Lot 22 Eden Park $ 360 $ 225 $ 585 Lot 23 Eden Park $ 360 $ 252 $ 612 Lot 24 Eden Park $ 720 $ 758 $ 1,478 2370 $ 360 $ 423 $ 783 Lot 6 Eden Park 2nd $ 360 $ 226 $ 586 Lot 7 Eden Park 2nd $ 360 $ 226 $ 586 2450 $ 360 $ 320 $ 680 2500 2100 Lake Elmo Foundation Lake Elmo Foundation $ $ 3,062 3,063 $ $ 3,344 2,874 $ S 6,406 5,237 Total $12,250 $12,250 $24,500 -4- 9150-009 PrQJect Schedule Council Receives Feasibility Report Schedules Public Hearing Council Holds Public Hearing Council Orders Project Advertisement for Bids in Legal Newspaper Advertisement for Bids in Construction Bulletin Open Bids Contractor Completes Construction May 2, 1989 May 16, 1980 May 31, 1989 June`2, 1989 June 20, 1989 August 1, 1989 -5- 9150-009 ewe..,+e.z ear t I T 9 .300 o0o y zsw � - osm aso g I G�JY' UNS LAKE a J s o� ]sso s so 9r_� 9KE °>° lo r-------------- - - - - - - EL MO d s0 J z u 1 \ ]z]o w[vn u ¢ mso ]63 »IX os>a eerm.,rrz w.--�------ [a,a ol- fto ]mo > I� zzso »so »oo - t J z osoo t, ro I J >so zmo © :no zzoo i I z.so s w z 20 [n Ssz1EE* zgNiH a I �R Izno 1 , oxo i r r r r � t.>o r � 25f36'3102 I tx]o I CCrcE i+JO I r H30 !>00 r d>c r VOTO, TAUTGES, REDPATH & CO., LTD.2 - 198� CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Birch Lake Professional Building • 1310 E. Hwy. 96 • White Bear Lake, MN 55110 • Phone 426-3263 April 28, 1989 ROBERT I. VOTO, CPA ROB ERT G. TAUTGES, CPA TAMES S. REDPATH, CPA D. KENNE I H GEORGE, CPA Marilyn Bannister, Finance Director DAVID I MOL, CPA City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042 Dear Marilyn: We have defined the City's current data processing capabilities and also have projected the City's data processing requirements for the next few years. This letter summarizes our findings and recommendations which will allow the City to obtain its current objectives for data processing and adapt to future requirements that may be placed on City's processing abilities. CITY'S CURRENT DATA PROCESSING CAPABILITIES The City currently has three Apple H computers and three printers. The City currently uses the computers for word processing and for utility billings. The City had purchased the Apple H computers with the intention of implementing a general ledger system including receipting and processing of accounts payable. Implementation of the software was not completed for a variety of reasons, including the elimination of support for the software by the vendor of the software. It is the City's objective to obtain new general ledger software. General ledger software includes the functions of receipting, accounts payable, and a general report writer. The City must also retain or improve its word processing and utility billing automated capabilities. With the limited number of employees, payroll software is not a high priority at this time. If however, a cost effective payroll software is available, the City would consider adding this software also. City personnel have experience on Apple based microcomputer systems. You have indicated that you prefer to stay with an Apple microcomputer system. You have also indicated that there may be advantages to having the computers connected through a local area network. The cost of such a system at this time may be prohibitive, however, the ability to expand is a priority. Our understanding of the City's priorities is as follows: 1) Obtain general ledger micro -based system(software and hardware) which includes automated accounts payable and receipting features. 2) Replace some or all existing microcomputers (current units are approximately 5 years old). 3) Replace utility billing software which is not currently supported by the software vendor. MEMBERS OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS • PRIVATE COMPANIES PRACTICE SECTION MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION • MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BUSINESS OFFICIALS City of Lake Elmo. EDP Recommendation Page 2 4) Replace word processing software to match capabilities of new hardware purchased. 5) Network computers to facilitate efficient file and printer sharing. 6) Expand the number of office microcomputers. ANALYSIS OF CITY'S REQUIREMENTS Software The computer software selected will determine to a large extent what hardware is required. The City's first priority as stated above is to obtain general ledger software suitable for processing the City's financial transactions. The City's accounting system is structured significantly different to the majority of enterprises (i.e. fund accounting). Therefore the number of suitable software alternatives for a City such as Lake Elmo is relatively small. The major alternatives are as follows: -Obtain an off -the -shelf software package that is written and supported locally. -Obtain an off -the -shelf software package that is nationally distributed. -Purchase and than have customized a relational database manager program. Naturally each alternative has advantages and disadvantages. Off -the -shelf software packages are generally less expensive than customized programming however greater flexibility may be realized by using the database program. Support availability becomes a deciding factor between off -the -shelf software packages. We have reviewed a few off -the -shelf packages all of them suitable for processing the City of Lake Elmo's needs. Of the ones packages reviewed, the Banyon Software package is written and supported locally in this area. Other advantages of this package are that the product has been around for several years and has been well tested during this time. Our firm has also had experience in implementing this package with two other City clients. We are also familiar with this software package when assisting the City during the annual audit. An alternative to a an off -the -shelf software package is to customize a relational database program. This would allow the City to have the program written to their own specifications. This alternative would provide the City with greater flexibility in meeting future requirements by allowing the City to add to its database program when it is deemed warranted. We have recently been involved in an engagement such as this using a customized database application. Programmers are available locally for these packages and the cost of implementing these systems is within reason for the product that is received. With regards to other software applications required by the City, there are numerous standard word processing packages and spreadsheet programs that would adequately meet the City's needs for these applications providing more capabilities than the City is currently using. Support and training for these packages may be obtained through numerous sources including classes, seminars, and books. City of Lake Elmo. EDP Recommendation Page 3 Hardware Once the software to be used is determined, the City's decision for hardware to be purchased is likewise determined to a great extent. City personnel indicated that they preferred to stay with Apple computers. However, because of the domination of IBM in the business computer marketplace we were unable to locate suitable off -the -shelf general ledger software that would run on an Apple computer. This is not to say that a suitable program to process the City's financial transactions on a Apple computer will never be available, but currently an appropriate package is not obtainable. If the City determines that a customized relational database program is desirable than either an IBM compatible microcomputer or an Apple Macintosh computer could be used. The City's current utility billing system is available for IBM compatible computers. We have not located a canned utility billing package that it is suitable for an Apple Macintosh computer. The same relational database program could likewise be used for the utility billing application at an additional cost for the programming. This could be programmed for either type of hardware environment. A single microcomputer should be capable of processing the City's current and foreseeable financial data. We do not foresee the City requiring a local area network (LAN) for their financial data processing needs. However, other applications the City may wish to implement such as word processing or spreadsheets may necessitate a LAN at some point to use these applications to their potential, Computers that are networked require a larger investment for both hardware and software. Additionally, larger systems are generally more complex which increases orientation and training costs. However, this investment decreases marginally for each computer added (i.e., the second computer costs more than the third which is more than the fourth, etc.) At this time we do not feel it would be cost effective or efficient to have to network the computers. However, our recommendation does provide for this feature to be implemented at a later date. If the City determines to implement an off -the -shelf general ledger package we would recommend purchasing an IBM compatible (MSDOS) computer with an internal hard disk storage device. The computer we have listed on the attached letter is one example of this type of computer. There are several options available to you for manufacturers of IBM compatible computers. The computer we have listed is designed to be flexible. Larger storage devices, extra memory and multiple printers may be added at a later date. All prices listed are estimated prices based on information received from a computer dealer. If the City determines that a customized relational database programed to meet their requirements should be implemented than either a IBM compatible computer or a Apple Macintosh computer could be used. The Apple Macintosh computer we recommend also is flexible allowing similar devices to be added comparable to the IBM compatible computer. Having both IBM compatible computers and Apple Macintosh computers on the same network is also a possibility. Recent product developments that allow both types of operating environments to be on the same network have been introduced. We are looking at this option for our own office at this time. However, these developments are too new to have been adequately evaluated at this time. When the City deems a network is appropriate these may be a viable alternative. City of Lake Elmo. EDP Recommendation Page 4 SUPPORT Technical support for hardware and software is extremely important. Support agreements provide comfort while you are automating a system. We recommend purchasing a hardware support agreement for all equipment purchased for a minimum of one year. After the first year the cost/benefit of this coverage on the equipment may warrant the equipment not be covered by a service agreement. Quite often, problems with the hardware occur within the first year. A source for software support should also be obtained when the software is purchased. Software support will be required during the period the software is first being installed and setup. Subsequently, support may be required to answer questions that arise when actual processing begins. This support may be purchased directly from the software company or from a private source that specializes in the software that you have purchased. We recommend using a local support person for the initial installation and training on the software. Depending on the program implemented continued support may usually be purchased on a per call basis or on annual support agreement from this same local source or from the software vendor directly. Support prices may vary considerably depending on the source used for the service. Average hardware support prices experienced are listed on the attached schedule. Software support cost cannot be estimated to any degree of accuracy. The actual cost will vary based on the source of the support and the number of times problems requiring support are experienced. An estimate of the cost for installation and initial training on the software is included on the attached schedule. This is an average based on other client's experiences. This cost will also vary depending on your specific requirements. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Summary The City's main decision for upgrading its computer processing abilities is dependent on what type of program the City intends to implement for processing its financial transactions. If speed is of the essence for implementing a new system then an off -the - shelf general ledger program such as the one available from Banyon Software with an IBM compatible computer is a prudent purchase for the City. If the City desires greater flexibility for its general ledger processing a relational database management program may be implemented. Either type of computer hardware may be purchased with these programs. This would also allow City personnel already familiar with Apple Macintosh computers to continue using them. The City's main objective to implement new general ledger software could be done currently on a IBM compatible computer. When the City officials determine that other computer systems must be replaced the possibility of implementing and sharing data between both hardware environments may be a feasible and prudent alternative for increasing productivity of City personnel. City of Lake Elmo. EDP Recommendation Page 5 Preferred Option Based on our discussions with you and Pat Morrison on April 27, 1989, your preference at this time is to obtain the following configuration plus the initial supplies (diskettes, pre- printed check forms, computer paper, etc.) to make the system ready for implementation: Estimated Description Cost Banyon Data Systems: General Ledger Software (Level 2) $ 3,000 Software Support 600 Initial Training on Application 600 Electronic Spreadsheet Program: Microsoft Excel 250 Word Processing Program: Microsoft Word 250 Total Software Estimated Cost 4,700 Total IBM Compatible Computer System 4,250 Total estimated system cost $ 8,950 Financing You had also discussed the use of equipment certificates for the computer acquisition. You indicated that the City anticipates the issuance of an equipment certificate in 1990. The use of equipment certificates for computer equipment is allowable pursuant to MS 412.301. The City may establish the Equipment Purchase Capital Project Fund prior to issuance of the certificates. This fund would incur a temporary deficit prior to bonding. Your fiscal consultant should include capitalized interest in the bond issue from the date of the computer equipment is purchased, our fees and other included costs related to the acquisition would also qualify for bonding. You may wish to also include the cost of the utility software which the City may purchase by the end of 1990. if this purchase is not made, the excess bond proceeds could be transferred to the debt service fund. This report and the attachment must be discussed prior to any final decision. Please call us to make arrangements to meet with us for such discussion after you have had a chance to study this material. Sincerely, VOTTO, TAUTGES, REDPATH & CO., LTD. Robert G. Tautges, CPA City of Lake Elmo. EDP Recommendation Page 6 SYSTEM COST (estimated) Hardware (single workstation) IBM Compatible Computer Wyse PC 286 includes: 40 Megabyte hard disk 1 Megabyte of RAM 12.5 Mhz processor speed Monochrome monitor 102 key enhanced keyboard MSDOS (latest version) $2,575 Okidata 391 printer with cable 1,175 Hardware Support 500 Total IBM Compatible Computer hardware system $4,250 Apple Macintosh Computer Apple SE includes: 40 Megabyte hard disk 2 Megabyte of RAM 7.83 Mhz processor speed Monochrome monitor 102 key extended keyboard System software (latest version) $3,500 Apple Imagewriter LQ printer with cables 950 Hardware Support 500 Total IBM Compatible Computer hardware system $4,950 City of Lake Elmo. EDP Recommendation Page 7 SYSTEM COST (estimated) Software Banyon Data Systems General Ledger Software (Level 2) includes: receipt system accounts payable system general report writer $3,000 Utility Billing System (Base level) 900 Payroll System 2,000 Software Support ($600 per application) 1,200 Initial Training on applications ($300 per day) 1,500 Total Banyon Data System $8,600 Relational Database Manager Macintosh- 4th Dimension $550 IBM Dbase IV 475 Customized programming for database 10,000 Total Relational Database Application $5,550 to 10,550 Electronic Spread Sheet (IBM or Macintosh) Microsoft Excel 250 Lotus 123 (IBM only) 325 Word Processing (IBM or Macintosh) Microsoft Word 250 Word Perfect 280 City of Lake Elmo. EDP Recommendation Page 8 SYSTEM COST (estimated) Future City Requirements Techmar 125E tape back-up unit Laser Printer Apple Laser Writer NTX Hewlet Packard Laser Jet Series II Local Area Network $2,000 $3,800 $2,000 Apple Macintosh network File server with applicable cabling and system software 6,825 Additional cost per workstation 4,500 IBM Compatible network File server with applicable cabling and system software $5,000 to $8,000 Additional cost per workstation 4,200 La-&L 5�p9l91 a s116/j� 8 Toe City Council From: Parks Commission Re. Flooding in Tablyn Park Date: April 24, 1989 Today we started the annual walkthrough of all our parks. At Tablyn Park we viewed the aftermath of the flooding from this spring's melt. We saw that the outfield of the ballfield is littered with debris left after the water, which had been up to the infield, receded. What is left of the fence at the edge of the streambed of the Valleybranch project is also full of debris. Last year I talked with Al Dornfeld of the Valleybranch about this problem which not only occurs every spring, but after every major rainfall. This causes a lot of maintenance on our part and unsafe conditions for those who use the facilities of the park. I met with Mr. Dornfeld and another gentleman who I believe was an engineer for Valley Branch and we looked over the site. They thought that a realignment of the streambed would be the proper remedy for the situation and we tentatively mapped out the new location. This realignment would send the water on a straighter path and improvements would be made to the entire bed to increase it's capacity. We would also benefit with an increase in the size of the playing field in right field, as it is now it is too short and is dangerous to older players who run into or over the fence and risk injury. This is a great potential liability to the City. Valley Branch later backed out of this proposal. They apparently did not think it was cost effective. They opted to merely clean out the streambed which was not effective. I ask that our Council request Valley Branch to realign the streambed as they initially proposed, and also ask them to install a new fence. Thank You. <kar,Fc._ LMta Park Commission Vice Chairmen CITY OF LAKE ELMO City of Lake Elmo 777-5510 3800 Laverne Avenue North / Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042 May 9, 1989 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Pat Morrison, City Administrator Roger Williams, facilitator with the State Planning Agency, called and suggested the Council may want to direct me to write a letter to the Municipal Board (Terrence Merritt) requesting they delay scheduling a meeting on the pending annexation/petition of Sunburrow until the end of June, to advance the negotiating efforts of Lake Elmo/Oakdale. He has suggested Oakdale do the same. If you you like this to be accomplished, please direct me to do so at the May 16th Council meeting. CITY OF LAKE ELMO City of Lake Elmo May 19, 1989 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Pat Morrison, City RE: Informational Memo Police Service Contract: 777-5510 3800 Laverne Avenue North / Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042 Administrator *I -- The 1988 actual cost figures for police contract services were received this week from the County. The City budgeted $90,000 in 1988 for police services. The Sheriff's Department estimates of 1988 costs were $84,050.89; the actual costs were $89,649.76 (6.6% over estimate). The 1988 average cost per hour, per Deputy, (including benefits) was $21.45. The City budgeted $97,000 for police services in 1989. The 1989 Sheriff's Department estimate for 1989 is $95,031.40 (or an increase of $5,381.64 over the 1988 actual). The 1989 average cost per hour, per Deputy, (including benefits) is $22.74. This information may be helpful for you during our budget workshop (which we hope to hold within the first or second week in July.) Proposed Work Schedule: - Comp Plan: The enclosed schedule was drafted to organize completion of the Comp Plan. The schedule has been placed on the June 22nd agenda of the Planning Commission for their consideration and review. Their comments and the schedule will be submitted to you for consideration at the June 6th meeting. Concurrent Detachment/Annexation: As per Council direction, a letter was sent to the Municipal Board requesting delay of Board action until after June 30th, on any concurrent detachment/annexation affecting properties of Lake Elmo or Oakdale. Fritz Knaak was contacted before the letter was sent to verify that the letter would have no detrimental affect on our later efforts; he gave full support to the action. Although Mayor Leo Hudalla, of Oakdale, fully supported their submission of a like letter, his efforts were not supported by the majority of the Oakdale Council. Also, Terry Merritt, Exec. Dir. of the Municipal Board, called this week (prior to receipt of the letter) to ask if our Resolution re:Sunburrow was to serve as the official request for detachment/annexation. I advise him that it was not, as the Resolution only accepted the petition and that the propertyowners would be the responsible party for submission of the Petition. He further advised: Brockman/Fraser: Board has yet to meet to review the evidence in view of the remand. No time limit for response was indicated in Judge Maas' decision. We will be notified when the matter comes up. Section 32 Petition: Has been submitted by propertyowners, but not scheduled. I-94 Petition: Not yet submitted to the Municipal. Board. Current three Board Members are: Chair: Shirley Mihelich Vice Chair: John Carey Commissioner: Ken Sette All members are from out -state Street Sweeping: Street Sweeping will commence Monday, May 22nd. Site G: Socio/Economic: The attached letter will be sent to all residents in the well advisory area (Wash. Co. Landfill #1), and to persons in the Tri-Lake Area. We were able to view the questionnaire, but will have no further access to it until after the interviews. ci r House. 162 Charles Avenue St. Paul. Minnesota 55103 ° 612-222-0206 May 19, 1989 Dear Lake Elmo Homeowner, Our firm is part of a research team which has been contracted by Washington County to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the landfill inventory site in Lake Elmo. Please see the enclosed map. Washington County is required to have the EIS prepared. One aspect of this study is to interview homeowners near the landfill by Lake Jane. We want to understand the effects of this earlier landfill before projecting the effect of a landfill at Site G. All interviews will be by phone. We will use a prepared set of questions which have been reviewed by representatives of the city of Lake Elmo, Washington County, and ReaPP. The main topics we will cover in the interview are: 1. Perceptions you have about your neighborhood and the neighborhood near Site G. 2. Effects of the Lake Jane landfill and its cleanup on your family and neighborhood: a. Time spent b. Nuisances caused C. Satisfaction with outcome d. Relationship with city and county. 3. Your current plans for your own property. 4. Changes to your plans which may have occurred because of the existing landfill at Lake Jane. 5. Potential impacts on these plans you expect if the landfill at Site G is built. Interviews will be conducted during late May and early June. If you feel the interview should be directed to someone other than yourself, please refer us to that individual when we call. Data that could identify you or your parcel will be kept by the consultant only. This includes names :and any responses associated with those names. Neither you nor your parcel will be specifically tied to responses in the EIS. Only overall trends will be reported in the EIS. If you need to talk to someone at Wa in to County about this survey, please contact Tack Hansen at 779-5445� Cil ,,. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, John Genereux John and Michele 6anereux research consultants in the social sciences _n,..:� ........yam.. . nr, Ja/✓::a l... LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 16, 1,989 ,r'h y n �+,. ✓� di , Mayor Dunn called the continuation of the Board of Review to order at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council chambers. Present: Dunn, Williams, Hunt, Graves, Moe (arrived 7:05 p.m.), Frank Langer and Scott Renee. Lake Elmo Assessor, Frank Langer, presented a list of Assessor recommendations to the Lake Elmo Board of Review and additional information was given to the Mayor on the Cimarron Mobile Home Park. Mary Leslie, 11546 20th St. N, asked to see the sales certificates and had a number of questions on how her property was assessed.. Scott Renee, County Assessor, suggested she present her questions to the County Board of Equalization where they can be personally addressed. Ron Zymanski, Attorney representing Cimarron Park, submitted additional documentation on appealing Cimarron Park's January 2, 1989 valuation. M/S/P Graves/Moe - to accept the Lake Elmo assessor's recommendations to the Lake Elmo Board of Review as altered for 1989 and close out the Lake Elmo Board of Review. (Motion carried 5-0). Mayor Dunn called the City Council meeting to order at 7:15 p.m. in the City Council chambers. Present: Dunn, Hunt, Williams, Graves, Moe, City Engineer Bohrer, Attorney Carlson and City Administrator Morrison. 1. AGENDA M/S/P Graves/Williams - to approve the May 16, 1989 City Council agenda as presented. (Motion carried 5-0). 2. MINUTES: May 2, 1989 M/S/P Williams/Graves - to approve the May 2, 1989 City Council Minutes as amended. (Motion carried 4-0-1: Abstain: Hunt) 3. CLAIMS M/S/P Graves/Moe - to approve the May as presented. (Motion carried 5-0). 4. REAPP REPORT 16, 1989 Claims #91746 thru #91837 Todd Williams reported that the Waste Management Act has passed the Senate floor with the amendment in tack to stop the siting process and remove all the inventory sites. It is anticipated that the full House will not pass the bill in that form; therefore, it will go to conference committee. REAPP requested the City to authorize expenditure of up to $1000 to have a professional attorney lobby the seven members of the conference committee in the House to try and get them to leave that particular clause in. There would not be any lobbying until we know who the members are. (We failed in this effort last year by one vote.) LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 16, 1989 PAGE 2 Attorneys Dayton and Sampson have declined based on their work schedule, but they have given Todd the names of two attorneys they recommended that are well known in the Legislature and knowledgable about waste management issues. REAPP has indicated it would be willing to kick in some money, if it is required, if the final bill was over a $1000. This $1000 will be taken out of the $200,000 allocated by the voters. M/S/P Graves/Hunt - to authorize expenditure of up to $1000 for lobbying efforts on the Solid Waste Management Act that is being considered by the 1.989 Legislature with the attorney to be identified by REAPP. (Motion carried 5-0). 5. IMPROVEMENT HEARINGS: City Engineer Larry Bohrer provided assessment alternatives for the Council's consideration. The alternative methods are: Benefitted Front Foot Method, Unit Charge, and Combination Method. Lists were provided showing the property owners abutting on or benefitting from the street improvement. A. 15th Street, Inwood Avenue to West City Limits, Resolution 89-28 Mayor Dunn opened up the public hearing at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council chambers. Proposed Improvement: The street would be constructed to Municipal State Aid Standards for a rural road. 15th Street would have two 12 foot driving lanes and 4 foot wide paved shoulders. Poor soils would be removed from the roadbed and would be replaced with suitable material. Driveways would be paved from the edge of the shoulder to property line. The ditches would be graded and new culverts installed. The road will be designed for 40 mph speeds. The estimated project cost is $158,000. It has been the City's policy on other State Aid streets to assess only those costs which are not eligible for State Aid reimbursement. The only items not eligible for State Aid reimbursement are legal fees for an acquisition, engineering costs in excess of 18% of the construction cost and City administrative costs. The estimated assessable cost is $7,000. John Bodey, 8155 15th St. N., asked if Oakdale had plans to upgrade their section of 15th St. Bohrer answered that 15th Street was not presently in Oakdale's 5-year plan. Bodey asked if the new road would be sufficient to handle the amount of truck travel. Bohrer answered this road would be designed for 9-ton minimum axle load all year around. Leo Pierre, speaking for his father living at 8167 15th St. N., stated he believes the road should be rebuilt, but the assessment was too large for the small parcel (1.3 acres) his father owns. He would like a maximum speed of 40 mph. Rob Pierre, 8167 15th St. N., asked, if more property is needed for the road and the shoulder, would he be compensated for this .land or the two big trees that might be taken down. Bohrer explained they have done some preliminary surveys, but they would know within the next 2-3 weeks if they LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 16, 1.989 PAGE 3 ' need more property. If property is needed from Mr. Pierre, he would be entitled to compensation for that strip of land, and trees, which are considered. part of that value. Pierre responded that if he got something out of it, then he could afford to pay a little assessment. Thomas and Rosemary Armstrong submitted a petition, of which the petitioners are property owners of more than 35 percent of the real property abutting on 15th Street west of County Road 13 and east of the Oakdale border, requesting the City to pass a resolution ordering the improvement project as outlined in the feasibility study of May 2, 1989. Tom Armstrong, 8291 15th St. N., stated that normally the City has used the "unit assessment method", for people that live on cul-de-sacs who have narrow frontages and other people that have wide frontages, because it is the only fair thing to do is charge everybody equally. In this particular street, there are no people with corner lots or who own a lot with narrow frontage on it. Armstrong stated he was in favor of this project and was willing to use a "front foot assessment method" because in this particular project it is the fairest way to do it. Steve DeLapp, 8468 Lake Jane Trail, requested consideration by the City Engineer on all the street projects, especially when there is a straight road going through farmland, that they try to make a little "squiggle" so they can save the trees that are worth something, rather than bulldoze these trees just for the sake of a. State law. Bohrer responded that the trees are on the high point of the hill and the hill has to be lowered to improve the site distance. When you lower the grade, this makes the slopes go out farther. Mayor Dunn closed the public hearing at 7:55 p.m. in Resolution 89-29, Councilman Hunt suggested adding a paragraph stating: WHEREAS, a petition has been received by the City of Lake of more than 35 percent of the front footage property owners M/S/P Hunt/Graves - to adopt Resolution 89-2.8, as amended, ordering Improvement and Preparation of plans for 15th Street from Inwood Avenue to West City Limits. (Motion carried 5-0). B. 20th Street, Lake Elmo Avenue to Manning Trail, Resolution 89-29 Mayor Dunn opened, up the public hearing at 8:00 p.m. in the City Council chambers. Proposed Improvement: 20th Street has been patched and had spot overlays done over the past few years; however, the road surface continues to break up due to inadequate subgrade strength. It is recommended that a 2" overlay be placed over the street to increase the strength of the road and to seal off the cracks. Gravel would be added to the shoulders to bring them up to finished grade. Existing driveways will not be altered. A tapered edge will be raked out at each entrance. The total estimated project cost is $49,000. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 16, 1989 PAGE 4 The amount of 1989 MSA Maintenance Funds ($44,099) remaining after 33rd Street is completed is estimated at $24,500. The difference between the $49,000 estimated project cost and the $24,500 of MSA funds is $24,500 and would be assessed to the abutting properties, and it is assumed that Tartan Park would pick up one-half of the assessment. The remaining portion would be split on an equivalent lot basis. Amount to be Assessed $24,500 Tartan Park (1/2)-$12,250 Remaining Assessed to Residents $12,2.50 Allen Kierhafer, 2040 Manning Trail, because of the cars turning onto 20th St. from Manning Trail they have cut into his yard, asked about a curb placed on the corner of his side. Bohrer preferred not to because it causes problems for snowplowing. Speaking for her dad, Peter Durand, Jean Durand stated 20th Street is used by people to get into their houses at Eden Park and Peltier's addition, and 90% of the traffic is for Tartan Park. Therefore, they should have to pay for this. In the early '60s they were told they only had to pay for road improvements once and this should be stated somewhere in our city records. Ed Bruno, Manager of Rec. Services for 3M, stated they do have a lot of traffic that uses Tartan Park and felt the road has started to deteriorate and if it is not repaired now, it will end up being very expensive to repair. Tartan was certainly willing to pay their share. M. Erickson, 11588 20th St., stated, she can't prove it, but she was sure that Tartan Park has more than 50% of the traffic on this road. Mary Leslie, 11546 20th St., felt the Eden Park and Packard Park residents were benefitting propertyowners because this is the only road for exit/entrances to their homes. She asked the Engineer to consider a reflector showing the street doesn't continue through at the end of Manning and 20th Street. Mayor Dunn closed the public hearing at 8:15 p.m. M/S/P Williams/Graves - to adopt Resolution 89-29 Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans for 20th Street from Lake Elmo Avenue to Manning Trail. (Motion carried, 5-0). C. 38th Street, 39th Street, Innsdale Avenue, East of Ideal Avenue Resolution 89-30 Mayor Dunn opened up the public hearing at 8:2.0 p.m. in the City Council chambers. Proposed Improvement It is proposed to cut out the broken up areas and patch those spots with bituminous. A 2" thick overlay will then be placed over the entire street to strengthen the road and to seal off the cracks. Two culverts would be installed to improve drainage. Crushed rock would be added along the shoulders and at driveways as needed. The total estimated project cost is LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL, MINUTES MAY 16, 1989 PAGE 5 $66,550. It was proposed that the entire cost of the project be assessed, i to abutting properties. Harvey Gleason, 8311 Lake Jane Trail, explained his back property abuts 30th St. and his driveway is on Lake Jane Trail and asked if he would pay the same assessment. Bohrer answered this was a unique situation, it was not a corner lot, but it was a lot that had more than one side fronting on a road. The Engineer advised he would review this situation. Gary Wright, 8225 39th St., favored the project, but felt the road was in this condition because of lack of maintenance in the past and asked. the City Engineer to address this situation. Bohrer responded that normal city maintenance is a program where most streets are sealcoated every 6 years. When he first studied these streets in 1983 they had gone beyound the point that a sealcoat would help --it would not glue back the broken pieces. The patches were of such an extent that it was beyond the capabilties of the three man crew we have for maintenance. Based on the fact that maintenance was not done, Wright asked if there was any funding to help with this project. Realizing there were spots in the road that could not have been saved, Jim Demko, 3929 Innsdale Avenue N., felt in 1983 even a sealcoat would have helped the rest of the road. Demko had not decided if he was in favor of a project or not. Kathy Landucci, 8312 38th St. N., stated she was in favor of the street project, but would like a maintenance plan. Councilman Hunt asked the engineer what was the expected life of a road surface. Bohrer answered this type of a patch and overlay is a lower cost alternative than rebuilding a complete road. He did not know what was under the road nor how it was constructed many years ago. Based on past practice, since 1983, they have done streets like this and these streets are in the 6 year maintenance program, Bohrer would predict a surface life of about 10 years. Mayor Dunn closed the public hearing at 8:40 p.m. M/S/P Graves/Williams - to adopt Resolution 89-30 Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans for 38th Street, 39th Street, and Innsdale Avenue East of Ideal. Avenue. (Motion carried 5-0). 6. PLANNING/LAND USE/ZONING: A. Resolution 89-31: Approving Future Land Use Map, Setting a Moratorium, Directing Amendment to Comprehensive Plan Councilman Williams requested the property north of Eden Park thru Section 13 be kept as RR for the following reasons: airport safety zone and, primarily, until the City and the VBWD can come to some solution on the surface water problems. Planning Commission member, Steve DeLapp, indicated area. affected with "Post SWMP", i.e., storm water management plan. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 16, 1989 PAGE 6 Larry Bohrer pointed out that during development you are given the opportunity to define drainage, ponding and right-of-way easements and the City is in a very good position to impose these costs on a developer. Otherwise, to improve that area with the types of ponding or other needs, the City would have to purchase the land or condemn it. Under watershed law, Bohrer explained the City has to have a drainage plan within the local plan for that part of the City that lies in the VBWD. According to Bohrer, since the VBWD Managers were amending their basic plan, Karen Chandler of Barr Eng., lead him to believe that our deadline for a Water Management Plan was not to come in the upcoming year; therefore, the City did not budget for it. Bohrer felt it would be better for the City to have a drainage plan in place when a developer comes in with an application. The City can either adopt the VBWD Plan as our plan or develop their own that would follow their basic guidelines. If the City adopts their plan, that is expedient and cheap, but it doesn't address our individual problems. In his opinion the most immediate need is the •wia�lvillage area, north of the railroad tracks. Cletus Tauer, 5270 Keats Avenue, requested consideration for RE zoning on his 40+ acres (South of Hwy 36, abutting Foxfire Estates on the West which has a 66 ft. wide road easment off of Keats Avenue). Tauer stated he has no immediate plans, but he had talked to Bruce Folz and was aware of the plan for connecting the street. Based on the health, safety and welfare issue and the possibility of the road being connected without the City incurring any expense, Councilman Hunt would support the RE zoning for the Tauer property. In trying to bring some overall criteria for RE 2 1/2 acre versus 5 acre, Councilman Williams suggested RE 5 acres rather than the proposed 2 1/2 acre of the tabletop farmland on the southside, 1/2 mile to the east of Cty Road 13B and for the area west of Cty Rd. 15 by the Oakland Jr. High School. (Planning Commission member Steve DeLapp indicated area by lining with 5 acre color code). Councilman Graves stated he would be comfortable with 5 acre RE, but with the realization that it is a Comp Plan and it can be changed if people come in and request 2 1/2 acre RE. Councilman Hunt had no problem supporting this area as 5 acre RE because he felt loth Street has become a very busy street and 2 1/2 acres of flat land is not as promising as 5 acres. neXt to Cty. Rd.15 Based on conversations he has had with these propertyowners,n Moe felt they would not be interested in developing 5 acre parcels. Councilman Williams submitted a revised Resolution for Council consideration. Williams stated "In the past he has gone on record as ( saying he is not convinced that commercial development on I-94 is necessarily in the best interest of the City. However, if the Council adopts this Future Land Use Map as a workable document, then he is committed to making that zone work as best that we can." LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 16, 1989 PAGE 7 ( Planning Commission member Ed Stevens explained at the last meeting, the PZ decided they didn't have to specifically state what businessess should or should not be qualified for along 1-94, that it would just be understood. After later consideration, it seemed to some of the PZ members that it would be better to let the Council know their recommendations. For this purpose, Ed polled the PZ members, who signed and submitted their recommendations to the Council. M/S/P Graves/Hunt - to amend the Future Land Use Map to include the Cletus Tauer property (42.75 acres) as 2 1/2 acre RE Zoning; the two parcels north of Eden park indicated by Councilman Williams with surface water problems remain Rural Residential, but would be available for RE development (Upper parcel proposed as 5 acre RE, Bottom parcel proposed as 2 1/2 acre RE) post completion of the I.990 Surface Water Management Plan; area east of Cty. Rd 13B, South of loth Street for 3/4 mile be changed to 5 acre RE from 2 1/2 RE shown at present, areas by 15th Street, South of Oakland Jr. High School be changed to 5 acre RE. (Motion carred 4-1 Moe: He was not in favor of the zoning change to 5 acre RE for the property on Manning and 1-94). The revised resolution that Williams provided was discussed and changed as follows: the moratorium was elimina d,� n^terstate Freeway Business Development will be an interimMg&Wi - rc gcry along I-94 corridor, and amend the text of the 1989 Comp Plan to reflect the intent of the FLUMap as amended by consensus on May 16, 1989. (See Resolution 89-31) M/S/P Williams/Hunt - to adopt Resolution 89-31 approving the Future Land Use Map Concept, as amended by consensus of the Council on May 16, 1989 and directing an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Future Land Use Map. (Motion carried 5-0). B. Rezoning: Packard Park, 3rd Addn. (Gene Peltier) Now that the Council has reached a consensus on a future land use map, the Council reconsidered the zoning application from Gene Peltier. Councilman Williams questioned the Council's action to adopt the Future Land. Use Map before the Public Hearing was held and made the following motion. M/S/ Williams/Hunt - to adopt Ordinance 8024 amending the 1979 Municipal Code, Section 301.070C, to wit: rezone the parcel described as THAT PART OF THE NORTH 44.5 ACRES OF THE SOUTH 57.89 ACRES OF GOVERNMENT LOT 3, SECTION 24, T29N, R21W, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA LYING WEST OF THE EAST 1090 FEET; EXCEPT THE TRACTS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 96 OF DEEDS, PAGE 98; AND BOOK 96 OF DEEDS, PAGE 99 AND BOOK 105 OF DEEDS, PAGE 240 from Rural Residential. to Rl, based on its conformance with the proposed future land use map, and based on a favorable recommendation from the Planning Commission; contingent on the rezoning to be effective after formal adoption by the City Council of the Future Land Use Map which showed this land as R1. Councilman Graves stated he has every intent to move ahead with this plan. He pointed out tht once again at this meeting, the Council by majority LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 16, 1989 PAGE 8 ( vote, has approve the Future Land Use map. By approving the rezoning in Peltier's case, we are amending the Comp Plan. The Forest is not an actual rezoning request. Councilman Hunt agreed with Councilman Graves in that he has seen a 4/5th majority of Council vote on the FLUMap and was prepared at this time to vote favorably on the rezoning as he did not see anything to stop this City from concluding the draft, just agreed upon, will be our FLUMap. Hunt did agree with Williams that the City should look at rezoning for the entire city and was not in favor of piecemeal zoning. There was discussion on procedure; could the Future Land use Map be adopted by the Council with the enabling ordinances to follow. Admin. Morrison will contact Ann Hurlburt, Met Council, for the correct procedure. M/S/P Graves/Moe - to amend the motion by deleting the contigency. (Motion carried 4-1: Williams: the rezoning not to be effective until the map is legally adopted). M/S/P Williams/Hunt - to adopt Ordinance 8024 amending the 1979 Municipal Code, Section 301.070C, to wit: rezone the parcel described as THAT PART OF THE NORTH 44.5 ACRES OF THE SOUTH 57.89 ACRES OF GOVERNMENT LOT 3, SECTION 24, T29N, R21W, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA LYING WEST OF THE EAST 1090 FEET; EXCEPT THE TRACTS DESCRIBED IN ,BOOK 96 OF DEEDS, PAGE 98; AND BOOK 96 OF DEEDS, PAGE 99 AND BOOK 105 OF DEEDS, PAGE 240, from Rural Residential to R1, based on its conformance with the proposed future land use map, and based on a favorable recommendation from the Planning Commission. (Motion carried 5-0). C. General Concept Plan, The Forest (Morton/Engstrom) The Council had postponed granting General Concept Approval for "The Forest" until a consensus was reached on our future land use map. Now this has been completed. Councilman Graves voiced his concern on the road width conforming to our City guidelines and advised he was in favor of the concept but wanted road widths to conform to current standards. MIS/ Graves/Moe - to adopt Resolution 89-32 granting General Concept Approval to "The Forest" in Lake Elmo, which was submitted as an RI Planned Residential Development. However, General Concept Approval is contingent upon applicant accepting the RE zoning classification upon RE's completion and implementation into the Lake Elmo Municipal Code and the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan, as The Forest has made every effort to meet the minimum requirments suggested in the preliminary standards set forth for the RE zoning district. M/S/P Williams/Bunt - to amend motion to include wording "completion of the RE Zoning ordinance" in place of "RE's completion". (Motion carried 5-0). M/S/P Graves/Moe - to adopt Resolution 89-32 granting General Concept Approval to The Forest in Lake Elmo, which was submitted as an R1 Planned LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 16, 1989 PAGE 9 ( Residential Development. However, General Concept Approval is contingent upon applicant accepting the RE zoning classification upon completion of the RE Zoning Ordinance and implementation into the Lake Elmo Municipal Code and the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan, as The Forest has made every effort to meet the minimum requirements suggested in the preliminary standards setforth for the RE zoning district. (Motion carried 5-0). 7. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: A. Report on White Hat Fill Permit M/S/P Graves/Williams - to bring back for reconsideration Ed Gorman's fill permit. (Motion carried 5-0). Ed Gorman, owner of the White Hat Restaurant, submitted a letter to the Council proposing to submit a site plan showing existing and proposed land elevations in 2-foot contours, drainage provisions, drainfield locations, holding pond location and. a. general. concept plan for proposed expansion to the City by December 1, 1989. Larry Bohrer advised the Council that the City needs more detailed perameters for fill applications than what the City has now when Mr. Gorman was issued a fill permit. Limitations suggested were: 0-100 cu.yds. application be administratively granted., 101-500 cu.yds. requires site plan, over 500 cu.yds. requires a full grading plan with contours. Bohrer added he would not want the fill graded out and spread over a larger area just for the sole purpose of stabilizing it until a plan is forthcoming because this amount of fill will compact the natural soils underneath it and may render it unuseable for drainfield purposes. Initial assumptions are being made here, Bohrer stated, that this is going to prove suitable for a drainfield. These responsibilities are Mr. Gorman's not the City's. Because of the volume of fill. brought in without any specific grading or site plan Mayor Dunn voiced her concern with the drainage in this area. Ed Gorman responded that Mr. Schiltgen's topsoil has been running across his drainfield for the nine years he has been there. Councilman Moe stated there are other people in that same area that contribute water, or that have land that sits vacant 6-7 months out of the year. if we are going to pose restrictions we should look at the broad issue. Bohrer answered there are guidelines for Ag land put out by the soil conservation service on soil loss limits to water erosion, wind erosion, etc. MIS/ Graves/Moe - to reinstate the current White Hat Fill Permit to Ed Gorman, for up to a maximum of 20,000 cu.yds. which expires Sept. 20, 1989 with the understanding that no further consideration of extension of the fill permit will be granted unless all the requirements as stated in our ordinances for concept plan approval such as: contours, grading and site plan, drainfield location, building location, are submitted and approved by the Council. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 16, 1989 PAGE 10 j M/S/P Williams/Graves - to amend the motion to include; whereas the City Council received a letter dated May 15, 1989 from Ed Gorman proposing submittal of a general concept plan to the City by December 1, 1989. (Motion carried. 5-0). M/S/P Graves/Moe - Whereas the City Council has received a letter dated May 15, 1989 from Ed Gorman proposing submittal of a site plan showing existing and proposed land elevations in 2-foot contours, drainage provisions, drainfield, locations, holding pond location and a General Concept Plan for proposed expansion to the City by December 1, 1989, and he agrees that any part of the fill that was brought onto the site that cannot be incorporated into a plan approved by the City will be removed from the site at his expense; The City Council approved reinstatement of the current fill permit for the White Hat Restaurant to Ed Gorman for up to a maximum of 20,000 cu.yds. which expires September 20, 1989, with the understanding that any further consideration for extension of the fill permit will not be considered until all the requirements as stated in our ordinances for concept plan approval such as: contours, grading and site plan, drainfield location, building location are submitted and approved by the City Council. When the 20,000 cu.yds. of fill have been reached, City Engineer, Larry Bohrer will submit his comments. (Motion carried 4-1: Dunn: This amount of fill should not have been granted without a grading and site plan submitted first to address any drainage concerns. This is too intense of a use for that specific parcel of land without a grading and site plan submitted first). B. Discussion: Close -Out, 201 Grant As we have come under budget with our grant expenditures, City Engineer, Larry Bohrer and Administrator Morrison asked Kathy Sather, MPCA, if we can now use some of those funds toward payment of possible extended legal fees. Ms. Sather checked into the EPA regulations and was unable to come up with anything that would permit extension of the grant period. M/S/P Graves/Williams - to direct the staff, City Administrator and City Engineer, administrativelylubmit all the necessary paperwork, but attached a letter statingjjw are providing this information under protest, f4t'hat we have been advised there is no other alternative,-hewever, (3)bg filing this we are not acquiescing to the MPCA statement, "that the budget period cannot be extended" because these are circumstances completely beyond our control.(4')Had these costs been able to be determined during the budget period, there is no question about the legality --it is merely the date. (Motion carried 5-0). M/S/P Graves/Hunt - to direct the staff, City Administrator and City Engineer, prepare a letter from the City Council to the State Senators, local Representatives and Director of the EPA outlining our situation and requesting agreement by the MPCA to a. budget period extension where all these costs would be automatically eligible. (Motion carried 5-0). B. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. Maintenance Agreement: VBWD & City of Lake Elmo LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 16, 1989 PAGE 11 The City Attorney provided a Maintenance Agreement between the VBWD and the City of Lake Elmo for use of City employees to perform minor maintenance work within the City of Lake Elmo. The City Administrator proposed two additions in the paragraph, THEREFORE IT IS AGREED,....... to perform minor maintenance work within the City of Lake Elmo for the.... A. .....District as and approved by ifically requested by the President of the VBWD �ve Flmn r,r„ u�ro;nistrator or desianatee. M/S/P Hunt/Graves - to approve the agreement, as amended, between the Valley Branch Watershed District and the City of Lake Elmo for Use of City Employees to perform minor maintenance work within the City of Lake Elmo. (Motion carried 5-0). B. Discussion: Future Park Areas (Councilman Williams) When the proposed future land use map was approved on May 4, 1989, Councilman Williams explained there was discussion on identifying suitable areas in the City where future park dedication should, take place so the City would have some control with selection of areas that would be accessible to residents and take into consideration natural amenities. Williams was not advocating developing new parks, but the city should identify park parcels to be set aside. M/S/P Williams/Graves - to direct the Parks Commission to survey the City and make recommendations relative to the Future Land Use Map as to where future park land dedication should be located. (Motion carried 5-0). C. Planning Commission's 1989 Work Plan The City Council prioritized the'Planning Commission's 1989 Work Plan. D. Report from Voto, Tautges, Redpath & Co: Computer Useage A report from Voto, Tautges, Redpath & Co. was reviewed by the Council on the City's need to computerize our accounting system. It was noted by a Councilmember that the IBM Compatible Computer, Wyse PC 286Amake-good computer$* but_ of o strong financial footing. is a "at tie Wyse Co. is An exact proposal will be requested for the budget workshop in July in order to consider options of off -shelf versus custom programming and consider if there is on -going training and updating provided. E. Request from Mark Busta re: Tablyn Park Mark Busta, Park Commission Vice Chairman, submitted a request to the Council, dated April. 24, 1989, for realignment of the streambed to remedy the flooding in Tablyn Park. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 16, 1989 PAGE 12 i The Council determined this was worth consideration, but suggested waiting until we see what the VBWD has planned for 1990 when they can consider the entire package. Councilmen Graves and Williams noted they were not in agreement on straightening out streambeds. F. Section 32 Report: Mike Black City Administrator Morrison recommended having our financial consultants come up with financing alternatives before the Administrator and City Engineer meet with Scott Renee and Frank Langer to analyze the tax impact consequence of varying land uses of properties within the MUSA line. Councilman Williams stated his concern of spending money on such a small amount of propertyowners that don't even live here. If there was a specific project to put a sewer line in, we could throw those financial costs into the project. -Co rrc i-l-nr&rr -Hunt -not i-n- -f-&� o-f-speai-a-1- � .gx ou a s_ -t.a axLvest -a7rotirer` y 3i?00 .- - t� ri o- err t it�ul ar- s tom,- -money ems- beem-pJz=1ed- �nxth t �Or �ortstzl n a ,- anel £- t-pnopez-t4y-o�u-rex-s..ar-e- -not Kci l c 7 tea. 4anrat wirtir as,- tlris�s the cmcl o-f- it.- '(Amended 6-6-89) Councilman Graves felt we needed to know what financing was available to make this take place. If we actively pursue this, we would need an update of our feasibility report. The developers and propertyowners need to know what the cost would be and, based on all that the City is doing, would only strengthen the City's position M/S/P Graves/Hunt - to authorize expenditures of $400 maximum for the City Engineer to update the 1985 sewer and water feasibility plan and authorization for spending up to $3000 for the financial consultants to work with the staff on financial altern es; based on: this is the only area that has sewer capacity within they= bixas-(D-f- %-3,1-an -par-t -0-f--3e,c k=-3-3•; that the City Council has already spent $25,000 on various studies in the past; and the City Council considers this as a good faith effort. (Motion carried 5-0). M/S/P Williams/Hunt - to direct the City Administrator to write a letter to the Municipal. Board requesting they delay scheduling a meeting on the pending annexiation/petition of Sunburrow until the end of June to advance the negotiating efforts of Lake Elmo/Oakdale. (Motion carried 5-0). M/S/P Graves/Moe - to adjourn the City Council meeting at 11:30 p.m. (Motion carried 5-0). "'Amended 6-6-89 Paragraph replaced with the following: Councilman Hunt was not in favor of spending $3,000 on special interest ABut at this particular stage however, the monext has beenbu.dgeted for consultants and if the propertyowners are not willing to work with us, this is the end of it. -------------------------- Resolution No. 89-28 Ordering Improvemeztsfor 15th St. 89-29 Ordering Improvements for 20th St. 89-30 Ordering Improvements for 38th St., 39th St., Innsdale 89-31 Approving Future Land Use ?lap, Direct Amend. to Comp Plan 89-32 Grant General Concept Plan, The Forest Ordinance No. 8024 Amend the 1979 Municipal Code, Sect. 301.070C RESOLUTION NO. 89-31 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION APPROVING FUTURE LAND USE MAP CONCEPT AND DIRECTING AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, a consensus of the City Council was reached for approval of a Future Land Use Plan as indicated by the zoning district map, dated May 4, 1989, and as signed by Mayor Dunn and Councilmembers Charles Graves, Donald Moe, and Todd Williams (Councilmember Lee Hunt having been excused from the meeting); and, WHEREAS, said map indicates areas eligible for future R-1 (1-1/2 acre) development, Residential Estates (2-1/2 and 5 acre) development, and (as an interim name) Interstate Freeway Business development (along I-94 corridor); and, WHEREAS, the Council finds that Lake Elmo currently faces numerous proposals for RE -type development; and, WHEREAS, the Council deems it necessary to amend the text of the updated Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the philosophy and direction of the Council, as outlined in the Future Land Use Map, as approved by consensus of the Council on May 4, 1989, and as amended by consensus on May 16, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT the City Council hereby directs the Planning Commission and City staff to: 1. Amend the text of the 1989 Comprehensive Plan to reflect the intent of the Future Land Use Map; as adopted May 4 and amended May 16, 1989; 2. Present the revised Comprehensive Plan to the Council for review, after which the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan Amendments, including the Future Land Use Map; 3. Present to the Council for review the proposed ordinances, including standards, establishingthe new RE-2.5 and RE-5 acre zoning categories, after which the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on this new zoning ordinance; 4. Present to the Council for review the proposed ordinance, including standards, establishing the (as an interim name) Interstate Freeway Business zoning category, after which the Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on this zoning ordinance. ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 1989, by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, Washington Cou inneso n Dunn, Mayor THIS WAS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL AT THEIR MAY 16, 1989 CITY COUNCIL MEETING BY PZ MEMBER ED STEVENS. Statement by the Members of the Lake Elmo Planning and Zoning Commission When I voted for accepting the new Lake Elmo Zoning Map which includes 2.5 and 5 acre lots, and a business district along I-94, I did this with the understanding that the current ordi- nance of allowed businesses would be altered so that only desirable businesses would qualify. l I accept the new Lake Elmo Zoning Map which includes 2.5 and 5 acre lots and a business district along I-94, with the understanding that the Planning and Zoning Commission will work on re -draft# ing the highway ordinance to fit within our rural atmosphere. CLAIMS TO BE APPROVED AT MAY 16, 1989 LAKE ELMO COUNCIL -MEETING (all claims are within budget unless otherwise noted) 91746 Cleaning - Office •'- - .- 91747 Cleaning - Fire Hall . 91748 Dresel Contracting - approved•5/2/89 council meeting 91749 Best Buy - Jim McNamara camera 91750 t_hru . 91752 _Compost workers = - (91753 Leslie's Floor Decor Office bldg maintenance 91754 Bellaire Sanitation - Office dumpster 91755 --Hagberg's Country Market - Office supplies (cleaning) 91756 Four Seasons - Cup inserts and coffee 91757 Walter S. Booth - Office supplies -91758 American Typewriter - Office supplies 91759 Gazette - Garage Sale ad $ 46.00 91760.-rThe Courier - Garage sale ad 91761-aBulletin Publishing - Garage sale ad 91762 Star Tribune - Garage sale ad (VISA) 91763 St. Paul Pioneer Press - Garage sale ad 91764 TKDA - engineering invoices attached General $ 3,456.43 Pass Thru 1,272.68 MSA 6,-690.`71 91765 Rauenhorst Carlson & Knaak General Fund 1,620.41 Pass Thru 12.80 201 Sewer 2,133.50 91766 Voto, Tautges - invoice attached 91767 City of North St. Paul - animal control vehicle )1768 Hardware Hank - Fire Dept. supplies 91769 Stillwater Motor - Fire Dept. truck repair 91770 Elmo's Plywood & Lbr. - Fire Dept. bldg maint. 91771 Minn. Conway Fire & Safety - Fire Dept. supplies 91772 Firemen's lst 1/2 1989 compensation thru 91795 91796 Lake Elmo Oil - Fire Dept. $ 260.90 rrr 36.58 26.95 8,395.62 219.97 86.64 60.00 53.82 34.24 30.60 13.72 55.69 46.00 3.75 10.12 20.00 35.00 11,419.82 3,766.71 1,037.50 165.00 11.34 35.38 104.67 72.78 8,527.10 Bldg. Insp. 137.45 Maint. Dept.' 7.08 405-. 43 91797 Vern's GTC Auto Parts - Maint. Dept. truck repair 35.55 91798 Lakeland Ford Truck - Maint. Dept. truck repair 448.20 91799 Kremer Spring & Alignment - Maint. Dent. truck repair 312.68 91800 Garelick Steel Co. - Maint. Dept. 161.50 91801 Interstate Diesel Products - Maint. Dept. truck repair 529.96 91802 General Tire - Maint. Dept. truck parts & repair 77.67 91803 T.J. Auto Parts - Maint. Dept. truck repair 123.55 91804 Polfus Implement - Maint. Dept. truck repair 22.37 91805 Valley Auto Supply - Maint. Dept. truck repair 48.89 91806 Warning Lites of Minn. - Maint. Dept. supplies 107.50 91807 T. A. Schifsky - MC mix 47.71 91808 Thompson Hardware - Maint. Dept. supplies 127.59 91809 AT & T - Maint. Dept. long distance 6.30 91810 Glenwood - Maint. Dept. water 28.20 91811 Junker Sanitation - Maint. Dept. dumpster 50.00 91812 Wear Guard - Maint. Dept. clothing allowance 79.42 (over) MAY-16th CLAIMS continued 91813 Safety-Kleen Corp. - Maint. Dept, supplies $ 53.53gi 91814 Gopher State One -Call - Maint dept. '67.50 91815 TEAM Laboratory - Maint. Dept. supplies 537.20 91816 .Parker Cleaning Products - Maint. Dept. supplies 156,26 91817 Zack's Omdistroa; Cleaning supplies - Maint. Dept. 224.95 k, 91818 Midwest Wire & Steel - Parks Dept, 186.43 ; 91819 Lamperts Lbr, - Reid Part: - reimbursed by Jaycees - ,,.. _ 1,056.10 91820 BCI Burke Co. - Reid Park - reimbursed by Jaycees - ' 1,005.37 :91821 Metro Waste Control Com - sewer service charges 8133 91822 Layne Minnesota - Water fund pump repair _' 11,650:50 91823 thru 91837 May 19th payroll 9,388.49 Total - _ $:61,281.18 t ' l �,, Z na"P.r .fx.. _"_'i,i,�ci.CT a i , INVOICE. TALTZ. KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON ��� AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101.1893 612/292.4400 FAX 612/292-0083 City of Lake Elmo P.O. Box IT Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Date: April 26, 1989 Commission Number: 9150-989 For Professional Services in connection with Attendance at City Meetings for March, 1989. Agreement dated February 2, 1988. March 7, 1989 L. Bohrer _ Council Meeting 50.00 I March 21, 1989 L. Bohrer - Council Meeting 50.00 AMOUNT DUE .. $ 100.00 lisp. y State of Minnesota) ss County of Ramsey ) Ray A. Andrews, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing account is just and true; and the services therein charged were actually rendered and of the value therein Charged, that the expenses incurred were paid by the affiant and no part of the same has been paid. Subscribed and sworn to before me, TOLTZ, a notary public, this 26th day of AND AS Apri.., 989: 22 LINDA E. SCI OREY Sy NOTARY PUBLIC—MINNESOTA z �. RAfASEY COU?li7 $ MY COMM. ESPIftES I:UG...... n i INVOICE � KDi i AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED - 31NEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 65101.1893 612/292-4400 FAX 612/292-0083 City of Take Elmo P. O. Box J Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Date: April 28, 1989 Commission Number: 9150-009 For General Engineering services as listed below, for March,'1989. Authorization dated February 2, 1988. IIi 1. Sullwold Larne Tat Subdivision: Bohrer, L. 2.00 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 46.46 x 2.75 = 127.77 2. Kenridge Heights - Preliminary Plat Review: -- Bohrer, L. 12.00 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 278.76 x 2.75 = 766.59 3. Palecek Simple Lot Subdivision: Bohrer, L. 2.00 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 46.46 x 2.75 = 127.77 4. Lake Elmo State Bank - Site Plan Review: Bohrer, L. - 0.50 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 11.62 x 2.75 = 31.96 �V 5. Brockman 3r`1 Addition - 39th Street: Bohrer, L. 0.50 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 11.62 Prew, T. 3.00 Hrs. @ 16.16 = 48.48 60.16 x 2.75 = 165.28 Expenses: Curtis 1000 - Printing Bid Tabs (Inv. copy attached) 5.37 6. Gritzmaker shoreland Permit: Bohrer, L. 0.25 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 5.81 x 2.75 = 15.98 7. Engstrom PRD: Bohrer, L. 0.50 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 11.62 x 2.75 - 31.96 Page 2 n=ICE-C=nission No. 9150-009 8. 33rd Street and Klondike Avenue Protect: Bohrer, L. 8.00 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 185.84 x 2.75 = 511.06 9. Layton Avenue and 36th Street - Feasibility Study Prew, T. 13.00 Hrs. @ 16.16 = 210.08 x 2.75 = 577.72 10. Section 32 Annexation: Bohrer, L. 2.00 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 46.46 x 2.75 = 127.77 11. Washington County SW-1 Crossing Agreement: Bohrer, L. 6.50 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 151.00 x 2.75 = 415.25 Expenses: L. Bohrer - Travel 7.20 12. Well Pump Repair: Bohrer, L. 10.00 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 232.30 Johnson, K. 1.00 Hrs. @ 20.63 = 20.63 252.93 x 2.75 = 695.56 13. Landfill EIS - Review Engineering Proposals Kirk, J.T. 2.00 Hrs. @ 30.00 = 60.00 x 2.75 = 165.00 14. 0akdale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review: Bohrer, L. - 4.00 Hrs. @ 23.23 92.92 x 2.75 - 255.53 15. Surface Water Problems - March 27-29 Bohrer, L. 9.00 Hrs. @ 23.23 = 209.07 x 2.75 Expenses: L. Bohrer - Travel 26.40 S. AMOUNTDUE ........................... $ 4,629.11 i State of Minnesota) ss County of Ramsey ) Ray A. Andrews, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that the account is true, foregoing just and and the services therein charged were actually rendered and of the value therein charged, that the expenses incurred were paid by the affiant and no part of the same has been paid. Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public, this 28th day of Apr' , 1989: LINOA E. SCNOREY t'[E;,'- '•..; NOTARY PUBLIC-F1iYP1c501A it �� .• RANMY COUNT; �A'Y COM .1. EXPIUS AUG. 10, 1989 • I o • •all• •11 •w •/ Go. a., • r r P MAY 2 . INVOICE igQ4 T.OLTZ. DUVALL.ANOERSONNLH ANDASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED NRTE ? 31NEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 25M AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-1893 612/292-44W FAX 612/292-0083 City of Lake Elmo P. 0. Box J Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Date: April 26, 1989 Commission Number: 9325-02 For Professional Services in connection with the 1989 MA Improvements - 43rtd and Kimbro for March, 1989. Authorization approved at City Council Meeting on June 21, 1988. CONSTRUCTION PHASE: Personnel: Classification: Billing Rate: Prew, T. Graduate Engineer 9.00 Hrs. @ 44.44 = 399.96 AMOUNTDOE ..................................... $ 399.96 State of Minnesota ) ss County of Ramsey ) Ray A. Andrews, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing account is just and true, and the services therein charged were actually rendered and of the value therein charged, that the expenses incurred were paid by the affiant and no part of the same has been paid. Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public, this 26th day of ,�,�,�s•,r�LINDA E. SCHOREY Ow NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNES01A RAMStY COUI{TY �'"� MY COMM. EXPIRES AUG. 70, 1969 i M i I 1 • DI• • • •I • ••..•.. DID K INVOICE TOLTZ.KING, DUVALL.ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS 2600 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101.1093 612/292.4400 FAX 612/292-0083 City of Take Elmo P. O. Box J Take Elmo, MN 55042 Camnission April 26, 1989 Number: 9492-01 For Professional Services in connection with the 1989 NSA Improvements - 15th Street from CSAH 13 to West City Limits (Grading, Gravel Base, Drainage and BitLmdnous Surfacing) for March, 1989. Verbal Authorization to Proceed received from the City Council on January 17, 1989. EFMIB11XN REPORT: Personnel: Classification: Brewster, C. Technician Bohrer, L. Davidson, Senior Engineer LT. Senior Engineer Dinndcrf, R. Senior Technician Garr, G. Technician Prw, T. Rylander, C. Graduate Engineer Technician Tucker, T. Technician BilljW Rate: 3.00 Hrs. @ 33.69 = 8.00 Hrs. @ 63.88 = 0.50 Hrs. @ 82.50 = 29.00 Hrs. @ 46.42 = -8.50 Hrs. @ 29.37 = 10.00 Hrs. @ 44.44 = 21.00 Hrs. @ 32.37 = 8.00 Hrs. @ 25.80 = 101.07 511.04 41.25 1,346.18 249.65 444.40 679.77 206.40 Reimbursable Expenses: R. Dinndorf - Travel TER Computer Service Fee (Mar) 87.08 26.11 AMOUNTLATE .................................... $ 3,692.95 State of Minnesota) ss County of Ramsey ) Ray A. Andrews, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing account is just and true; and the services therein Charged were actually rendered and of the value therein Charged, that the expenses incurred were paid by the affiant and no part of the same has been paid. Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notz7 public, this 26th day of M LINDA E. SCHOREY q's°-,?•; NOTARY PUBLIC—MINNESOTA RAMSEY COUNTY MY COMM. EY.PIRES AUG. 16, 1909 as v rI • • m• • T A INVOICE MAY 2 . 1969 �L/,.� T.OLTZ, KING. DUVALL. ANDERSON J.i AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED GINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 66101-1893 612/292 4400 FAX 612/292 0083 City of Lake Elmo P. O. Box J Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Date: April 26, 1989 Commission Number: 9325-01 For Professional Services in connection with the 1989 NSA Improvements - 43rd and Kimbro for March, 1989. Authorization approved at City Council Meeting on June 21, 1988. PLANS PHASE: Personnel: Classification: Bchrer, L. Davidson, J. Senior Engineer Senior Engineer Prew, T. Graduate Engineer Weiszel,'D. Senior Technician Reimbursable Expenses: Curtis 1000 (Inv. copy attached) TKDA Computer Service Fee (Mar) Billing Rate: 25.00 Hrs. @ 63.88 = 1,597.00 0.50 Hrs. @ 82.50 = 41.25 8.00 Hrs. @ 44.44 = 355.52 12.50 Hrs. @ 34.90 = 436.25 150.94 16.84 AMOUNT DUE .................................... $ 2,597.80 State of Minnesota ) ss County of Ramsey ) Ray A. Andrews, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing account is just and true; and the services therein charged were actually rendered and of the value therein charged, that the expenses incurred were paid by the affiant and no part of the same has been paid. Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public, this 26th day of Apr , 1989: `I LIND, E. SCHOREY NOTARY PUBLIC-MIFlNESOTA \7 RAMSEY COUNTY MYCOMM . EXPIRES AUG. 10, 1989 y y • 1 •1 61 • wvlz ••..•.. au IN � RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK ATTORNEYS AT LAW ROSEDALE CORPORATE PLAZA 2665 LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 (612) 631.1080 April 26, 1989 City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 (F) Attention: Marilyn ® - FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED DATE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 03/27/89 1.25 Various opinion letters (FWK) 04/03/89 .50 -Conference with FWK (SPC) 04/04/89 1.50 Prep for Council meeting (SPC) 04/04/89 .50 Revise litigation report (SPC) i 04/04/89 5.00 Attend city council meeting (SPC) 04/05/89 .25 Phone conference - client (SPC) 04/12/89 04/14/89 04/17/89 04/18/89 04/18/89 04/18/89 .25 Phone conference - client (SPC) .50 Phone conference - S. Dunn (SPC) .50 Phone conference - Mayor re agenda items (FWK) .50 Phone conference - L. Hunt; Memo to file (SPC) 1.00 .75 Draft Deeds for 1989 MSA Street Improvisions (SPC) Letter to attorney; Letter to client (FWK) K City of Lake Elmo - General April 26, 1989 Page Two 04/18/89 .75 Review packet; Office conference with SPC re update on misc matters 04/19/89 .25 Review correspondence (SPC) 04/24/89 .25 Phone conference - P. Morrison (SPC) 04/25/89 .25 Letter to L. Bohrer re 1989 MSA Street Imp (SPC) Retainer received-04/06/89 for March services -500.00 Attorney Hours Covered by Retainer: `zm f rrI General legal services 5.29 Other (Council meetings, etc.) 6.50 11.75 + Attorney Fees Not Covered by Retainer: �s$ ' •�' x, - Document drafting & opinions - - - 135.00 Costs & disbursements .00 Retainer for April 500.00 ".:{ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 635.00 RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK ATTORNEYS AT LAW ROSEDALE CORPORATE PLAZA 2885 LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 (612) 631.1080 April 26, 1989 City of Lake Elmo I 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 (S) Attention: Marilyn II Re: Lake Jane Landfill �■ o FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED i DATE AMOUNT 'DESCRIPTION 03/27/89 30.00 Phone conference — M. Kaufner (SPC) 03/29/89 120.00 Phone conference - L. Bohrer; Draft legal opinion (S) 30.00 Revise legal opinion (SPC) 03/30/89 150.00 Meeting at City Hall; Conference with Co Reps (SPC) 03/31/89 45.00 Phone conference — client; Review draft of agreement; Phone conference — County Attorney's office (SPC) 30.00 Client conference re agreement; Submit to client (S) 04/03/89 15.00 File review (SPC) 04/05/89 30.00 Phone conference — client, M. Luth, N. Nelson (SPC) 04/07/89 15.00 Phone conference — client (SPC) 04/10/89 30.00 Execute Agreement; Letter to County Attorney (SPC) yc2z.���bp,3 City of Lake Elmo = Lake Jane Landfill April 26, 1989 Page Two BALANCE OUTSTANDING 270.00 Payment Received — Thank You —270.00 Total Lawyers' Services 495.00 = Total Paralegal Services .00.00 Costs & Disbursements -'Word Processing Services .00 4 RFC4. TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 495.00 I declare, under the penalties of law, that the above account, claim or 4Y J demand is true and correct. Frederic W. Knaak RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK ATTORNEYS AT LAW ROSEDALE CORPORATE PLAZA 2665 LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 (612) 631.1080 April 26, 1989 City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 (F) Attention: Marilyn Re: DerrickVM FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED DATE =_AMOUNT DESCRIPTION - 04/11/89 223.41 Paid Rasmussen & Carl for Depositions I BALANCE OUTSTANDING 75.00 Payment Received — Thank You —75.00 Total Lawyers' Services .00 Total Paralegal Services .00 Costs & Disbursements 223.41 Word Processing Services .00 'TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 223.41 I declare, under the penalties of law, t t the above account, claim or demand is true and correct. Frederic W. Knaak RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK ATTORNEYS AT LAW ROSEDALE CORPORATE PLAZA 2665 LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 (612) 631-1080 . April 26, 1989 City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Attention: Marilyn (S) Re: Severin fOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED DATE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION - 04/19/89 15.00 Pile review (SPC) BALANCE OUTSTANDING 45.00 Payment Received - Thank You-45.00;. �. Total Lawyers' Services 15.00 Total Paralegal Services .00 .00 Costs & Disbursements .00 Word Processing Services TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 15.00 f I declare, under the penalties of law, that the above account, claim or demand is true and correct. 4redeaicWLftaak,- RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK ATTORNEYS AT LAW ROSEDALE CORPORATE PLAZA 2665 LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 66113 (612) 631.1080 April 26, 1989 City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, M 55042 (S) Attention: Marilyn Re: Federal Land FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED DATE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 04/24/89 Notice of Depositions (SPC) Total Lawyers' Services 15.00 Total Paralegal Services .00 Costs & Disbursements .00 Word Processing Services .00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 15.00 I declare, under the penalties of law, that the above account, claim or demand is true and correct. & Frederic VKjnaak—Z�—= satai�?t,S RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK ATTORNEYS AT LAW ROSEDALE CORPORATE PLAZA 2665 LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 (612) 631.1080 April 26, 1989 City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 (S) Attention: Marilyn Re: Section 32, Petition #2 r44� ::-- - FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED DATE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION MT77/89 73—.W P on-e con-erenca - M. Kaufner (SPC) 03/29/89 45.00 Draft Resolution (SPC) 15.00 Revise Resolution (SPC) 30.00 Word Processing 04/03/89 15.00 File review (SPC) 04/04/89 15.00 Word Processing BALANCE OUTSTANDING 60.00 Payment Received — Thank You —60.00 Total Lawyers' Services 90.00 Total Paralegal Services .00 Costs & Disbursements .00 Word Processing Services 45.00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 135.00 I declare, under the penalties of law, that the above account, claim or demand is true and correct. = r—IN FrecTeiic W. Knaak aAY��te RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK ATTORNEYS AT LAW ROSEDALE CORPORATE PLAZA 2565 LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 65113 (812) 631.1080 April 26, 1989 Total Lawyers' Services Total Paralegal Services Costs & Disbursements Word Processing Services TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 15.00 .00 62.00 25.00 102.00 I declare, under the penalties of law, that the above account, claim or demand is true and correct. F e e is Knaak RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK ATTORNEYS AT LAW ROSEDALE CORPORATE PLAZA 2665 LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 (612) 631.1080 April 26, 1989 City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 (F) Attention: Marilyn Re; Kenridge Heights (Christ) r FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED _ DATE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 03/21/89 12.80 Paid Dependable Courier for Delivery BALANCE OUTSTANDING 225.00 -.Payment Received ^.Thank You 225.00 Total Lawyers' Services .00 .00 Total Paralegal Services Costs & Disbursements 12.80 Word Processing Services .00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 12.80 I declare, under the penalties of law, that the above account, claim or demand is true and correct. Frederic W. Knaak RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK ATTORNEYS AT LAW ROSEDALE CORPORATE PLAZA 2665 LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 (612) 631.1080 April 26, 1989 City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 (S) Attention: Marilyn -Re: •201 Condemnation FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED DATE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 03/27/89 15.00 Phone conference - M. Andrewson (SPC) 03/29/89 15.00 Phone conference — L. Bohrer (SPC) 03/30/89 15.00 Phone conference — B. Schwab (SPC) 03/31/89 90.00 Phone conference — T. Okoneski; Review file for 7 r pretrial (SPC) z 03/31/89 90.00 Attend pretrial conference 04/03/89 30.00 Phone conference — client; Letters to Schwab, Bohrer and Andrewson (SPC) 04/04/89 30.00 Phone conference — B. Schwab (SPC) 04/07/89 15.00 Phone conference — B. Schwab (SPC) 04/07/89 15.00 Phone conference — client (SPC) 04/10/89 60.00 File review (SPC) 04/11/89 330.00 Trial prep at city hall (SPC) t` t110 City of Lake Elmo 201 Condemnation <- April 26, 1989 Page Two 04/12/89 210.00 Phone conference — T. Okoneski; Research for Trial Brief; Phone conference — L. Bohrer; Review documents (SPC) 04/13/89 210.00 Draft Trial Brief; Phone conference — T. Okoneski, M. i;.. Andrewson (SPC) 04/13/89 40.00 Word Processing 04/14/89 135.00 Revise Brief; Draft Jury Instructions (SPC) 04/14/89 .45.00 Review final draft Trial Brief (SPC) a rf^ 04/14/89 :.150.00 Final drafts Jury Instructions, Special Verdict; Conference with T. Okoneski (SPC) 75.00 Word Processing l- 04/15/89 180.00 Trial Prep (SPC) 04/17/89 210.00 Attend Trial (SPC) 04/17/89 15.00 Phone conference — M. Andrewson (SPC) 04/17/89 15.00 Phone conference — S. Dunn (SPC) 04/17/89 15.00 Phone conference — T. Okoneski (SPC) 04/18/89 15.00 Reschedule notice to witnesses (SPC) 04/18/89 15.00 Word Processing 04/18/89 3.50 Copy of Letter to Client 04/19/89 50.00 Word Processing 04/25/89 45.00 Phone conference — T. Okoneski, B. Schwab, court; Letter to District Court (SPC) �. .. ,. <4^ •`�.. ..e ...."n 1..:� .. .. -•..-..:':% ..:off• i 3 City of Lake Elmo 201 Condemnation April 26, 1989 - Page Three .'/}(xereeJZ-s� G &Joe V- �3,3—, 6,zl 3.�/ 13 267, 00 C:2"CIO �;7,v,41/ 3, V1rtqlV141W ROBERT I. VOTO, CPA ROBERT G. TAUTGES, CPA IWES 5. REDPATH, CPA D. KENNETH GEORGE, CPA DAVID I. MOL, CPA V/OTO, TAUTGES, REDPATH & CO., LTD. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Birch Lake Professional Building • 1310 E. Hwy. 96 • White Bear Lake, MN 55110 • Phone 426-3263 April 30, 1989 City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Total $ 1,743.00 Less: Billed March 31, 1989 (705.50) BALANCE DUE $ 1,037.50 I hereby certify that the above claim is just and correct and that no part of it has been previously paid. Xobert. Taut es, Vice Presiden MEMBERS OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS • PRIVATE COMPANIES PRACHCt Dtl-I IUN MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION • MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION Of SCHOOL BUSINESS OFFICIALS Since we do not have time to discuss every point presented, it may seem that decisions are preconceived. However, background information is provided for the City Council on each agenda item in advance from City Staff and appointed Commissions; and decisions are based on this information and past experiences. In addition, some items may also have been discussed at previous Council meetings. If you are aware of information that hasn't been discussed, please fill out a "Request to Appear Before the City Council" slip; or, if you came late, raise your hand to be recognized. Comments that are pertinent are appreciated. Items requiring excessive time may be continued to another meeting. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 16,. 1989 6:30 - 7:00 p.m. BOARD OF REVIEW 7:00 p.m. MEETING CONVENES 1. AGENDA 2. MINUTES: May 2,.1989 3. CLAIMS 4, REA,PP REPORT ( 5. IMPROVEMENT! HEARINGS: A, 7..30-7:45.p.m.. 15th.Street, Inwood ,(avenue to West City Limits, Resolution 89-27 B. 7,45-8:15 p.m. 20th Street, Lake Elmo Avenue to Manning Trai.l., Resolution 89-28 C. 8:15-8:30 p.m, 38th.Street, 39th Street, Innsdale Avenue, East of Ideal Avenue Resolution 89-29 6. PLANNING/LAND USE/ZONING: A. Resolution 89-30; Approving Future Land Use Map, Setting a Moratorium, Directing Amendment to Comprehensive Plan. B. R,ezoning: Packard Park, 3rd Add.n, (G, Peltier) C. General Concept Plan, The.Forest (kjprton/Engstrom) a 7. CITY ENGINEER'SREPORT: A. Report on White Hat Fill Permit B. Discussion: Close -Out, 201 Grant 8. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. Maintenance Agreement: VB14D & City of Lake Elmo B. Discussion: Future Park Areas (Councilman Williams) C. Planning Commission's 1989 Work Plan D. Report from Voto, Tautges, Redvath & Co: Computer Useage E. Request from Mark Busta re: Tablyn Park F. Section 32 Report: Mike Black FUTURE MEETINGS: May 31 7:00 p.m. Special Council Meeting APPENDI). A Comparison of Candidate Engineering Firms for Landfill EIS Review Hoagberg and Associates: Committee Comments: Plus: Lots of experience with hydrogeology and fighting landfill proposals in Minnesota, so he knows how things are done. Hoagberg currently working with Corcoran to fight landfill site. there proposed by Hennepin County. Hoagberg recognized by some as top hydrogeologist in Minn. Atty. Dayton knows Hoagberg and David Braslau as expert witnesses. Recognized value of graphics to convince non -technical political decision makers. The small size of firm probably means we will get good value for our money. Minus: No direct experience with landfill designs. No computer modeling capability at present; would have to purchase the software. TKDA Comments: 1. Presentation of proposal exudes experience, but team's fragmentation is cause for concern about coordination of work. 2. Liked the position they take: Lake Elmo is opposed to the landfill and needs a team of experts to help. 3.. Work plan is well done. 4. Work for City of Corcoran is similar and experience will help. i DPRA and Geraghty and Miller: Committee Comments: -Plus: Fletcher Driscoll is recognized by some as the best hydrogeologist in the country. He literally wrote the book on wells and groundwater contamination. Geraghty and Miller is largest hydrogeology firm in country. DPRA has lots of experience with hazardous waste landfills working with EPA. Bill Rohrer of Lake Elmo is an officer of DPRA but will not be directly involved because of appearance of conflict of interest. Atty. Dayton has used Driscoll many times as expert witness. Kelton Barr (G & M) was project manager for Hennepin County's landfill EIS, so he knows the ropes. G & M currently hired by Winnebago Co., Wisc., to monitor landfill EIS being done there by Donahue. Driscoll working for Greenfield -Independence to fight the landfill site there proposed by Hennepin County G & M has in-house computer modeling capability. Minus: The larger size of these firms probably means more money goes for overhead. TKDA Comments: 1. Personnel listed in proposal have lots of background and experience 2. Will those listed actually be involved? (Yes.) 3. Both DPRA and G & M are experienced in this type of work. 4. Experience of Chris Lough (DPRA project manager) in risk assessment could be plus or minus depending on his outlook.