Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-13-89 CCMx'' 1 RA FT ;'",.`•.v�xy!;�:+ The Lake Elmo City Council met in special workshop sessio:yn orY Tuesday, June 13, 1989, at 7:30 a.m. PRESENT: Mayor Dunn, Councilmembers Graves, Hunt, Williams. Absents Moe Also Present: City Attorney Fritz Knaak, City Administrator Pat Morrison Mayor Dunn outlined the purpose of the meeting. The following statements/options were discussed: A. WHAT' IS OUR POSITION ON SECTION 32? 1. Dependent on financial risk. 2. Want stable borders --annexations stopped. a) joint powers b) borders can be redefined/borders not redefined c) preservation of wet lands 3. Do nothing. a) let land go b) continue through courts 4. Continue opposition. 5. Install infrastructure at City expense. 6. Developers pay 100% 7. Split costs. a) with Oakdale b) Developers (% to be defined) 8. Sewer paid by Oakdale --Lake Elmo retains access. a) Oakdale pay entire cost. b) Oakdale charge hook-up to developers 9. Bartar--Section 32 to Oakdale. a) easement b) all, or portion of, (selling/relinquish of rights) c) Land trade (portions?) 10. Joint Development --Section 32 a) sharing of risk/benefits (1) Lake Elmo retains decision making control (2.) Lake Elmo/Oakdale--joint decisions (3) Lake Elmo/Oakdale--form Development Commission 1.1. Lake Elmo pursue annexation of parts of Oakdale. 12. Lake Elmo/Oakdale - Development Commission a) buffer area. along border --compatible transition area 13. Set up tax increment financing authority for Section 32. A. TIMING C. WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? ADJOURN: 8:30 a.m. CITY OF LAKE ELMO City of Lake Elmo 777-5510 3800 Laverne Avenue North / Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042 June 2, 1982 TO: MAYOR and COU14C IL FROM: Pat Morrison, City Administrator RE: Informational Memo HELMO AVENUE: The right-of-way on Helmo Avenue has now been cleaned up. Our Public Works crew went out today to finish the job that Oakdale Public Works had already started, The signs ("No Dumping By Order of Washington County Sheriff's Dept.") have also been posted. I have spoken with Clarence Enright and he has advised he will pay for the clean-up and the signs (will probably cost between $750-$1,000). 15TH STREET: We have received, over the past couple of weeks, several complaints about dust from residents living off 15th Street, east of Inwood. The road bed was not very good to start with, but has been worsened considerably by the recent truck traffic in the area. Zack*Hansen, Larry Bisqu.et (Wash.Co.Public Works Director), Rob Linder, Larry Bohrer,Dan Olinger and I are meeting on Monday, June 5th, to discuss responsibility for correction of the problem. FINANCIAL CONSULTANT: I have asked Kathy Aho to submit a written estimate for costs to compile financial options for Section 32 and for a meeting/workshop with the Council to discuss this matter. This letter will be received next week, and will be forwarded on to you for your consideration (I did not advise Kathy of Council's authorized expenditure for this work). Also, for your information, Larry Bohrer and I are meeting with Frank Langer and Scott Renee to discuss the type of development which our Section 32 Concept Plan Land Uses would produce. CONNIE WICHELMAN: 11s. Wichelman called last week to express concern over a home which had been burned by our Fire Department (according to Fran, approximately five years ago); there is debri and litter in the basement which was left open after the burning. The City now owns the property and she wanted to know if the City would sell it so it could be maintained. Please refer. to Jim McNamara's letter and map. (By "today's standards", the property owner would be responsible for cleaning and sealing the area). If you have any interest in pursuing this sale, please advise me.