Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-04-90 CCMDATE APPROVED: 9-18-90 DATE ISSUED: 9-28-90 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 Mayor Dunn called the City Council meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council chambers. Present: Dunn, Hunt, Williams, Graves, Armstrong, City Engineer Larry Bohrer, City Attorney Knaak and Administrator Kueffner. 1. AGENDA Add: 8B. Update on Washington County Official's Meeting, 9B. Request from Youth Service Bureau, 9C. Request from Maintenance Foreman. Delete: 5. Reapp Report, Referendum Question M/S/P Graves/Hunt - to approve the September 4, 1990 City Council agenda as amended. (Motion carried 5-0). 2. MINUTES: August 21, 1990 M/S/P Williams/Hunt - to approve the August 21, 1990 City Council minutes as amended. (Motion carried 5-0). 3. CLAIMS M/S/P Armstrong/Graves - to approve the September 4, 1990 claims #93720 to #93781 as presented. (Motion carried 5-0). 4. PUBLIC INQUIRIES: There were no public inquiries. 5. REAPP REPORT: Referendum Questions Todd Williams requested the referendum question be postponed until the September 18th Council meeting. 6. PLANNING/LAND USE AND ZONING: A. Shoreland Permit: William Park, 4589 Birch Bark Trail N. William Park, 4589 Birch Bark Trail N., has applied for a shoreland permit to construct a 4-season porch (18' x 16') over an existing patio area. The porch is to be constructed on approved post footings. The elevation will be approximately 18' above the Ordinary High Water Mark. Building Official Jim McNamara reported in his review no variances were needed and verbal approval was given by Molly Shodeen of DNR. .' q LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 PAGE 2 M/S/P Armstrong/Hunt - to approve a shoreland permit to William Park, 4589 Birch Bark Trail, to construct a 4-season porch (18' x 16') over an existing patio area based on the fact no variances are needed and DNR has given their approval. (Motion carried 5-0). 7. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: A. Speed Complaint on 24th Street At the August 7th meeting, the Council received some complaints of excessive speed on 24th Street between Lake Elmo Avenue and Legion Avenue, particularly in the vicinity of 24th Street Court. Some residents suggested a 3-way stop at that intersection. This matter was referred to the Engineer for his review and recommendation. The Council acknowledged a 1eM r from Kendre Schwabel, 11365 24th St. Court, stating her concerns on speed of vehicles using 24th Street and requesting placement of proper signage to slow traffic down. City Engineer, Larry Bohrer reported on August 30th a drive -over inspection at varying speeds was made with the Maintenance Foreman. The following observations were made: 1. The street has three horizontal curves (two west of 24th St. Ct. and one east) which have a 200' centerline radius. These curves feel uncomfortable to the average driver at speeds over 30 mph due to outward centrifugal force. 2. The sight distance from 24th St. Court intersection is good looking either east or west along 24th Street. 3. The traffic counts are low and will remain so because the road only serves Packard Park and a portion of Eden Park. 4. Stop signs should not be erected at the intersection because the traffic does not warrant it and stop signs should not be used for speed control. Based on these observations, the Engineer and Maintenance Foreman made the following recommendations: 1. Place a YIELD sign on 24th Street Court at 24th Street to show that the cul-de-sac traffic must yield right-of-way to the through street. 2. For eastbound traffic, a Reverse Turn Sign (W1-4R) with a 25 mph Advisory Speed Plate (W13-1) should be used. The City on its own initiative cannot post speed limits lower than 30 mph except for advisory speed on curves. 3. For westbound traffic, a Left Turn Sign (WI-2L) with a 25 mph Advisory Speed Plate (W13-1) should be used. 4. After the curves, 30 mph speed limit signs could be used. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 PAGE 3 ` M/S/P Hunt/Graves - to direct City staff to implement the (4) recommendations stated in Larry Bohrer's letter, August 31, 1990, and to contact the Deputies to set up speed monitoring on 24th Street. (Motion carried 5-0). If the speeding problem on 24th Street has not been resolved in two months, the Council asked the residents to come back to the City Council. The Council recommended an article written in the City Newsletter stating the city is aware of the excessive speeding problem and patrolling will be increased. B. Receive Bids and Consider Award for 1990 Overlay Projects: Lampert Avenue and 31st Street City Engineer Bohrer reported (6) bids were received for contract for 31st Street Overlay between Stillwater Blvd. and Hwy 5, Lampert Avenue Patch and Overlay, and maintenance overlays (includes 70' of driveway by maintenance garage off of Jamaca Avenue) budgeted for each year. The lowest bidder was Bituminous Consulting and Contracting of Minneapolis, and the bid was lower than what the Engineer estimated in the feasibility hearing. Bohrer indicated this was a favorable bid and recommended the contract be awarded to Bituminous Cont. M/S/P Hunt/Williams - to award contract for 1990 Street Patching and Overlay Projects to Bituminous Consulting & Contr. in the amount of $47,470.75. (Motion carried 5-0). C. Set Assessment Hearing for 1990 Overlay Projects Larry Bohrer requested the Council set an Assessment Hearing for the 1990 Overlay Projects for October 2, 1990. M/S/P Graves/Williams - to set an Assessment Hearing Date for October 2, 1990 for the 1990 Overlay Projects. (Motion carried 5-0). 8. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: A. Set up Budget Workshop Dates with Personnel Committee and C.I.P. Committee Todd Williams reported the Budget Committee met with the Finance Director, went over the budget, and proposed enough cuts to balance the budget. The Committee felt the Council needed to hear justification from the Dept. Heads for their particular proposed budget items. The Council set up a budget workshop with each Dept. Head of the Maintenance Dept. and Fire Dept. for September 13th at 4:45 p.m, at City Hall. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 PAGE 4 The City Administrator will present an evaluation of each employee and salary recommendation to the Personnel Committee. Then the Personnel Committee (Lee Hunt and Chuck Graves) will bring the salary recommendations to the Council. The Administrator asked for her evaluation from the Council at this time. B. Update on Washington County Official's Meeting Lee Hunt reported he went to the Washington County meeting on the Geological Atlas. Professor Kelvin Alexander, Univ. of Minnesota, presented information that thought would be helpful in the City's fight against the landfill. Hunt will contact the Administrator with details for obtaining the tape of his presentation. 9. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor License: Guardian Angels Church Guardian Angels Church has applied for an on -sale non -intoxicating malt liquor license for its annual Fall Festival to be held September 15 and 16, 1990. M/S/P Williams/Graves - to approve an on -sale non -intoxicating malt liquor license for Guardian Angels Fall Festival, September 15 and 16, 1990; contingent upon certificate of insurance submitted and favorable recommendation from the County Attorney and Sheriff. (Motion carried 5-0). B. Youth Service Bureau The Youth Service Bureau requested the Council authorize a contribution for services rendered by this organization to the City of Lake Elmo. A provision for this expenditure was not made in the budget. The Council recognized the Youth Service Bureau made a valuable contribution to the community, but at this time the City was unable to make a donation. C. Maintenance Dept Request Maintenance Foreman, Dan Olinger requested Council approval to attend the loth Annual Snow and Ice Conference in Greely, Colorado in October at a total cost of $414.00. M/S/P Hunt/Graves - to authorize Dan Olinger to attend the loth Annual Snow and Ice Conference in Greeley, Colorado at a total cost of $414.00; contingent on Finance Director finding funds available in budget and a brief report (written'or verbal) be submitted to the Council. (Motion carried 5-0). Jim McNamara will be attending the Annual Building Official's Conference held on September 8-14, 1990 in Colorado. The Council asked the Building Official to submit a brief summary of the conference. M/S/P Graves/Huht - to adjourn the City Council meeting at 8:12 p.m. (Motion carried 5-0). 911 police • Fire • Medical EMERGENCY James R. Trudeau Sheriff WASHINGTON COUNTY yden Kenneth hiefDeputy Donald W. McGlothlin OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF Captain - Administration GOVERNMENT CENTER Thomas Greene 14900 61ST STREET NORTH, P.O. BOX 6 • STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082.0006 Captain - Patrol Facsimile Machine: 612M9-4708 Richard D. Backer Captain - Jell September 7, 1990 Dale W. Fuerstenberg Captain - Investigations Telephone: Non -Emergency (612) 439.9381 Mayor Susan Dunn & Lake Elmo City Council Members City Hall 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Re: Speeding Complaints by Richard Acres County Road 17 Between 20th Street North & Highway 5 Dear Mayor Dunn and City Council Members: It appears that Mr. Richard Acres has been misinformed or erred in several statements made to you by letters on August 9 and August 22, 1990. I think we all know that court cases regarding speed are not thrown out of court because they were issued for speeds under 40 mph. I also think that we know that the statement that "cases are not prosecuted due to the expenses involved" is not true. The statement that "citations will not be issued for speeders under 9 mph over the speed limit" is not true either. As explained at the Council Meeting on August 21, 1990, each case is taken separately. It is this Deputy's opinion that Mr. Acree's complaints are exaggerated in that he has no basis for his opinion other than the visual observations he has made on County Road 17. In a phone conversation with Mr. Acree, he stated to me that to prove cars were speeding on County Road 17 he had his wife drive up and down County Road 17 at different speeds so now he knows what a speeding car looks like. I have watched cars do this at different speeds for 15 years and cannot estimate their speeds to the point where I would feel comfortable writing a citation to somebody. During this phone conversation, I invited Mr. Acree to sit in our squads with us while running radar which he said that he would like to do, and of the many times we have been doing this on County Road 17 within k mile north or south of his house he has never taken the opportunity. Washington County does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age or handicapped status In employment or the provision of services. 7: t In regards to his complaints on the way the survey was run, I will respond to them in order: #1 - The use of a fully marked squad car: The Lake Elmo City Contract with the Sheriff's Department includes one police car. Obviously the most practical car to get is one fully loaded with equipment enabling us to respond to emergencies in a safe and quick manner and allowing us to stop vehicles, thus the red lights and markings on the squads are essential. Officers driving unmarked squads I'm sure will tell you that it is at times very difficult to get from point A to point B in an emergency because their cars are not noticable enough, however, the markings on the squads made no difference on checking and clocking speeds on County Road 17. Mr. Acree says that our survey was faulted by placing the vehicles in a clear and obvious position on Lake Elmo Avenue that was clearly visible to drivers from both directions at great distances. The place- ment of those squad cars when running the radar didn't make a difference as the range of the radar greatly exceeds the length of the section of road on which the radar was used. This allows us to get the speed of the vehicle as they rounded the corner long before the driver seen the squads, therefore, the driver of the vehicle had no time to slow before his speed was clocked. #2 - The use of a one-way radar gun: The issue of this is correct, however, this was done several times using two squads. One pointing north with a radar and the other pointing south with a radar, thus radar was used at the same time in both directions on several occasions. This is not possible all the time as there are other problems to deal with requiring our attention. #3 - As for Mr. Acree's statement that the radar only clocks the first car ! when the cars behind the first car could have been speeders had they been the first car in line, I feel that it is hard to respond or argue with that kind of logic. It is true that there are more important problems than running radar and if an alarm goes off (for one example) we will respond to the alarm. I can only imagine Mr. Acree's response if I told him I was sorry his house was burglarized because when his alarm went off I was running radar and I couldn't leave before another squad took my place. I do not think the mechanics of our speed survey were poor by any means. All Officers involved in this survey gave it a good an effort as possible using the best radars available. Mr. Acree is commenting on something he knows nothing about and I think at times he has been misinformed. Mr. Acree has also made several comments as to the amount of service given the City of Lake Elmo by the Sheriff's Office, specifically the Contract Officers. It appears that Mr. Acree thinks there are no problems in Lake Elmo requiring our services other than speeders on County Road 17. I would like Mr. Acree to know the number of calls handled in Lake Elmo by the Sheriff's Department, not only by the Contract Officers but by the Sheriff's Department. I believe this will be addressed to the Council by the City Administrator. - 2 The City contracts for two Police Officers at 40 hours a week each which works t out to 4,160 hours per year. Our contract also calls for vacation and sick time allowed which, if used, the contract hours are covered by the other members of the Sheriff's Department. This Deputy is also a citizen of Lake Elmo. I am very familiar and satisfied with the coverage that Lake Elmo gets from the Sheriff's Department. There are usually two and sometimes three Deputies in the Contract Area at all times not including the Contract Officers. Each of these Officers working 8-hour shift. In conclusion, I feel Mr. Acree's complaints could have been satisfied had he taken my invitation to sit with us when running radar. He did not. Any of his questions could have been answered at that time. I would tell Mr. Acree that we have been working radar on County Road 17 and other roads in Lake Elmo years before he moved into town and if we have felt that there was a problem we have taken action to correct it. I would also like Mr. Acres to know that his concerns along with the concerns of the other petitioners are appreciated as without information and complaints from citizens our job is close to impossible. In this instance, however, I think Mr. Acres's complaint has been given the proper and sufficient attention. Respectfully, D r Jesse W. Kurtz ashington County Sheriff's Department /rs - 3 - TON 3ej 2�.e G1 SO ��45)flY. PPO4PESS WASHINGTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER OFFICE OF AUDITOR -TREASURER 14900 61 ST STREET NORTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082 6121779-5408 R. H. Stafford Auditor -Treasurer Pam Mattila, CPA Finance Manager October 8, 1990 Clerk, City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Ave N Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Mary Lou Larson Executive Assistant Gary Poser Tax -Elections Manager RE: Application on property number 37032-3852 T. R. Greedier Asst, Auditor -Treasurer Nancy McPherson License -Records -Manager An application for abatement of taxes and/or penalties and/or interest has been requested on the above referenced property. The request has been approved by the Washington County Assessor and the Washington County Auditor -Treasurer. The result of this request would be a reduction in the amount due of over $10,000.00 Before the county board may take action on this request, M.S. 375.192 requires that the school district and municipality be given a 20 day notice of the proposed reduction. Please refer to the enclosed copy of request and the proposed reduction. If you object to the granting of this reduction, please respond within 20 days of the date of this notice to this office. If you object, the request will be forwarded to the county board for their recommendation. If the county board approves the request, the request will then be sent to the commissioner of revenue for the final determination of the approval or denial of the request. T—f you' d_c riot 3b';,C4- I - respond to this notice to the county board fo R.H. Stafford Auditor-Treasus r yy A. Poser Tax Division Mgr G t- granting Jf this reductioi: oi: yol.:i uv no'C within 20 days, the request will be forwarded r final approval or denial of the request. Washington County does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age and handicapped status in employment or the provision of services. f� _N O O �.0 Q w O N M � E c c V Z V Z V Commissioner of Revenue Abatement Form 2 (Rev. 6/89 APPLICATION FOR REDUCTION IN VALUATION 1 OF REAL ESTATE AND/OR REFUND OF TAXES PAID (M.S. 270.07, 375.192) For Taxes Levied in 19 `Z9 and Payable in 19= Please print or type. Complete In duplicate. If tax reduction exceeds $5,000, complete in triplicate. tppficant'sNameQW,.-J. `=NC- Applicant's Mailing Address, 0w-,T-Z�,C- elaphone (work) -( ) %J� l U3� I -76CO i NGtp Soli $L"—( elephone(home) ( ) `13�7—,'� `/4f� L✓�KE' ,�Lrl9o, ^V. 65Dy 2- DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Property I.D. or Parcel Number: .3 70 3 ,z _ 3 S s treetAdndreys�s (if differs(rIjtthan above) City or Township • School Dist rict No. /'7 F1U hLflLL.,7i0 (L'ZZ .egal Description of Property: kSSESSOR'S ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE: � JCr .and $ " Structures $ =V otal APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF FACTS: believe an error in assessment occurred for the following reason(s): Owner's Estimate of Market Value: Class CAe mw 11 Land S o2217 .3v o Structures S / o,70 70 D Total $ / 300, 000 What do you ass t is -value esttiimate on? Explain. %u� �//C� �L(1-GGeC. CI.�O.�,�yOza.- ✓�C�l7�r�z�f �'r�. - Date Property Acquired rl I U5 Type of instrument used to convey title: Cost of additions and Improvements since purchase $ __ Purchase Price S I (n a APPLICANT'S REQUEST 4pplicant affirms no proceedings of any kind for correction oft he assessment against said property are now pending in any court. Applicant believes that th property is assessed higher than property in the same class and of the same value in this assessment district and herefore requests that the assessed va Iuatio tax capacity be reduced and that the market value of said property for said year be reduced to and fixed at S If3 CD . This statement is a true and full statement of all facts known to the applicant relative to this matter. I i C lfi(Ni-1 �(/ i L°� cam— l ICE Z� Applicant's Signat a Da NOTE: Minnesota Statutes 1988, Section 609.41,'Whoever, in making any statement, oral or written, w fch is required or authorized by law to be made as basis of imposing, reducing, or abating any tax or assessment, intentionally makes any statement as to any material matter which the maker of this stateme, knows is false may be sentenced, unless otherwise provided by law, to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than S3,000, or both.' 1EPORT OF COUNTY ASSESSOR'S INVESTIGATION (City Assessor in certain cities) hereby report that i have examined and carefully investigated the statements made in the foregoing application and Itgd the facts to be as fof I ows:4 .q� �.;-�—rr7�� y _c�YGrlfr i U 7--4 1 — K r, . _ 1/ V _ 7i assessor's Recommendation ignature The following accurately reflects both existing and proposed amounts. Date ;-�7I �? Local Tax Rate i ) - —Tax Is Paid Date �i 18,L/...�^-•'--/���Q Tax Is Not Paid i h r 1 /" Y ASSESSOR'S RECOMMENDATION (County assessor or city assessor in certain cities) Pp A roved El � Assessor's Signature ......... .......... COUNTY AUDITOR'S RFr0OMMEykYA l0N., Approved ❑ Denied ... ....... ................... ......... .... _........................ .......... ..... .... ...... ............, ......:.....:....... COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONER'S ACTION (To be completed by county auditor) Approved ❑ Denied rtify that at a meeting held 19 the County board, took the above official action on this tement. This action was duly adopted and entered upon the minutes of its proceedings as a public record, showing the names of Layers, other concerned persons and the amounts involved. for approved abatements) ther certify that the approval of this abatement has resulted in the following changes: uction Of Tax uctlon Of Penalty uction Of Interest d Reduction/Refund it Payable Signature of County Auditor ante 0 NOTICE The Valley Branch Watershed District Board of Managers have scheduled a public hearing on their Rules and Regulations. WHEN: 8:00 P.M. October 11, 1990. WHERE: Lake Elmo City Council Chambers. 3800 Laverne Ave. No. WHY: To hear comments on the proposed.changes to the Districts' Rules & Regulations. All parties will have an opportunity to comment. ENCLOSED: Changes and additions to the Rules & Regulations. Valley Branch Watershed District Allen Dornfeld,Pr.esident ALLEN DORNFELD RUSSELL KIRBY GORDON C. MOOSSRUGGER RAY BRENNER WILLIAM ROHRER VALLEY BRANCH WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. BOX 838 LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA 55042•0538 PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF VALLEY BRANCH WATERSHED DISTRICT SEPTEMBER 24 1990 VERSION SECTION III. DEFINITIONS ADD the following definitions: Subd. 8 Minimum Building Elevation is the elevation of the lowest floor of the building. Subd. 12 Protected Waters are those waters listed in the Minnesota -Department -of--Natural- -Resources'- State -Protected- Waters Inventory, according to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 105.391. RENUMBER the remaining definitions in alphabetical order. SECTION IV. LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY Subd 3 Standards for Water Management Plans ADD the following section: \ G. The local governmental unit's permitting process for land and wetland alteration work shall be outlined in its plan. Although the District will not be the permitting authority, all land and wetland alteration plans shall be submitted to the District for review and comment. The District reserves the right to appeal approval of a project which the District considers to be inconsistent with the local unit's plan. All zoning changes shall be submitted to the District for review, along with evidence that such a change is in compliance with the local water management plan. SECTION V. FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT Subd. 3 Standards CHANGE part A. 100-year Flood Level Determination to read: (1) Unchanged (2) Major waterways and protected waters -- flood levels shall be determined by the District Engineer. 1 01J (3) Unchanged (4) Unchanged CHANGE part B. Minimum Building Elevations to read: Delete parts (1) and (2) and replace with the following: For lots adjacent to the waters of the District, the Managers shall set the minimum building elevation at least one foot above the 100- year flood elevation. CHANGE part C. Flood Plain Preservation and Uses to read: (1) Flood plains adjacent to existing and future waters and waterways shall be preserved by dedication and/or perpetual easement to the community in which they are located. These easements shall cover those portions of the property which are adjacent to the water or waterway and which lie below the minimum building elevation. (2) Unchanged (3) Unchanged (4) Uses of Flood Plain Adjacent to Waters and Waterways (Remainder of Part (4) unchanged) (5) DELETE By referring to all waters and waterways in Part (4) above, instead of Major Waterways and Public Waters, Part (5) becomes obsolete. SECTION VI. SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL Subd. 3 Standards B. Standards for Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plans 1 1. The Board of Water & Soil Resources and the Association of Metropolitan Soil and Water Conservation Districts' "Minnesota Construction Site Erosion and Sediment Control Planning Handbook" and the Soil Conservation Service's "Fact Sheets" shall serve as the minimum guidelines for erosion control measures. P7 Renumber remainder of items and CHANGE 4. to read: ow 4. All erosion and sediment control measures shall be installed prior to alteration and maintained until turf is established. The District Engineer shall be notified prior to commencement of grading to schedule an inspection of the project's erosion controls. The erosion controls must be in place and properly installed before grading will be allowed to commence. 5. All construction -related sediment shall be removed from ponding areas upon completion of construction. 6. The local governmental unit shall be responsible for all 11 detention pond maintenance with n the d ainage easement. bryrer ; \f N` k �ip n� NNe -A-6 a `4V1-3 l - - -SECTION-IX.__WETLANDS SSANAG_EMENT__ Subd 1. Policy To achieve a no net loss of existing wetlands, as shown on the current United States Fish & Wildlife Service's National Wetland Inventory Maps, and the Water Resources Inventories prepared by Washington Soil and Water Conservation District dated September, 1982. The District finds that wetlands provide public value by conserving surface waters, maintaining and improving water quality by reducing the stormwater sediment load, preserving recreational opportunities, reducing the rate of stormwater runoff through floodwater retention, reducing stream sedimentation, contributing to improved subsurface moisture, and enhancing the natural beauty of the landscape; and that it is in the public interest to promote comprehensive water management by regulating activities that destroy or diminish wetlands. Subd. 2. Wetlands Definition Wetlands are lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table is usually at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water. An undisturbed wetland has the following three attributes: 1. At least periodically, the land supports predominantly wetland vegetation. Wetland vegetation are listed in "National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: North Central (Region 3)", Fish and Wildlife Service, May 1988. 2. The substrate is predominantly undrained hydric soil. Hydric soils are those which have been exposed to water for long enough periods C 3 of time to experience oxygen depletion. Hydric soils are listed in "Hydric Soils of the United States 1985", Soil Conservation Service, October, 1985. 3. The area is saturated with or covered by shallow water at some time during the growing season of each year, The Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineatine Jurisdictional Wetlands, an Interagency Cooperative Publication, January 10, 1989, shall be used for guidance regarding the delineation of wetlands. The District shall require each permit applicant to specify on the permit application whether or not the proposed site contains wetlands. Wetland location and size shall be clearly marked on the plans which accompany the permit application. If the District has grounds to believe the site contains wetlands not identified in the permit application, the District shall: 1. Require the applicant to submit additional information such as soil analyses, topographic surveys, surveys of vegetation, and engineering or hydrologic data, all certified by competent professionals, to aid in the determination, and/or 2. Conduct a site inspection and evaluation; and/or 3. Use any other reasonable method to determine if the site contains wetlands. The applicant shall provide copies of the application and supporting documents to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), the United States 'Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), and the Washington or Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District. It is the responsibility of the av_��t to l(c r determine if permits from the Corps, the DNR and/or other governmental agencies are required. Sho rt A) Subd. 3. Regulationsfi Q0B(5( The following uses shall be permitted in wetlands: 1. Recreational trails 2. Objects or improvements made in conjunction with and necessary to parks, nature and wildlife preserves No permit is required for agricultural uses, provided the use does not result in the filling, excavation, or drainage of a wetland or the removal of trees from a wetland (See Subd. 4). The District shall impose any requirements or conditions they deem necessary on permits of permitted uses to insure the standards and purposes of this section are carried out. 4 Subd. 4. Standards Dredging, ditching, excavating, the placement of fill, the placement of a structure or any other activity which results in a change in the rate of water drainage from the wetland or negatively impacts the character of the wetland, shall be permitted by the District only if all of the following conditions are met: 1. The applicant demonstrates a need for the alteration. A demonstrated need is the ability to acquire a reasonable profit from the property when taking into consideration the applicable wetland regulation in force at the time of purchase. 2. The applicant demonstrates the absence of reasonable alternatives for the alteration. A reasonable alternative is one which has fewer adverse impacts upon the wetland and would not result in other significant adverse environmental consequences. 3-.-- The alteration --will _not -increase_- the -rater_ temperature of a - receiving trout stream. 4. The alteration will not reduce the existing storage volume in the immediate watershed. Storage volume will be determined as stated elsewhere in these Rules and Regulations. 5. The alteration meets all other requirements of the District rules and regulations. Subd. 5. Criteria The functional values and acreage lost as a result of a wetland alteration shall be replaced according to the following criteria: 1. Replaceme etlands shall be created in upland areas at a rate 1.5 i es the ar a of. the original wetland. U3 en " J:1 Ck 6 c v me rb,v1 2. Replacement wetlands shall be of equal or greater public value in terms of water retention, water quality enhancement, wildlife habitat, recreation, aesthetic quality and educational value. Water quality enhancement value of the wetland will be measured according to a model acceptable to the District. Water retention, wildlife habitat and aesthetic value will be measured according to "The Minnesota Wetland Evaluation Methodology For The North Central United States", prepared by the Corps, in conjunction with the Minnesota Environmental Quality board, September, 1988. 3. Replacement wetlands shall be located within the District. 5 C 4. Replacement wetland shall be completed and approved by the District before alteration of the existing wetland. If this criteria cannot be met, the applicant shall post a performance bond equivalent to at least 150% of the estimated construction cost of the replacement wetland, as determined by the District. Additional bonding will be required based upon t�(80� conditions imposed on the applicant. C5 Subd. 6. Variances o ' y� 1'V c�ca��i Gi ey.:l1' Variances shall permit activities only to the minimal extent necessary and shall be issued only upon the showing of hardship. Variances shall be issued only in accordance with detailed plans approved by the District. Wetland delineation and replacement disputes shall be resolved by a panel consisting of, but not limited to, a technical professional employee of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, a technical professional employee of the Washington or Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District, and the Valley Branch Watershed District engineer. This panel shall prepare a written recommendation to the Managers of Valley Branch Watershed District. The Managers shall make their decision within 30 days after receipt of the panel's recommendation. Subd. 7. Permit Fees All costs associated with the permitting process, including wetland delineation, shall be borne by the applicant. SECTION X. PERFORMANCE BONDS CHANGE Subd. l and Subd. 2 to read: Subd. 1 To assure compliance with these Rules and Regulations, the Managers may require the posting of a performance bond or other securities where it is shown to be reasonable and necessary under the particular circumstances of any permit application filed with the District. Subd. 2 Where a municipality or other governmental agency includes in its requirements that the applicant furnish a performance bond or other securities, the District may require an additional performance bond from the applicant. RENUMBER the remaining sections. DATE APPROVED: 9-18-90 DATE ISSUED: 9-28-90 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 Mayor Dunn called the City Council meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council chambers. Present: Dunn, Hunt, Williams, Graves, Armstrong, City Engineer Larry Bohrer, City Attorney Knaak and Administrator Kueffner. 1. AGENDA Add: 8B. Update on Washington County Official's Meeting, 9B. Request from Youth Service Bureau, 9C. Request from Maintenance Foreman. Delete: 5. Reapp Report, Referendum Question M/S/P Graves/Hunt - to approve the September 4, 1990 City Council agenda as amended. (Motion carried 5-0). 2. MINUTES: August 21, 1990 M/S/P Williams/Hunt - to approve the August 21, 1990 City Council minutes as amended. (Motion carried 5-0). 3. CLAIMS M/S/P Armstrong/Graves - to approve the September 4, 1990 claims #93720 to #93781 as presented. (Motion carried 5-0). 4. PUBLIC INQUIRIES: There were no public inquiries. 5. REAPP REPORT: Referendum Questions Todd Williams requested the referendum question be postponed until the September 18th Council meeting. 6. PLANNING/LAND USE AND ZONING: A. Shoreland Permit: William Park, 4589 Birch Bark Trail N. William Park, 4589 Birch Bark Trail N., has applied for a shoreland permit to construct a 4-season porch (18' x 16') over an existing patio area. The porch is to be constructed on approved post footings. The elevation will be approximately 18' above the Ordinary High Water Mark. Building Official Jim McNamara reported in his review no variances were needed and verbal approval was given by Molly Shodeen of DNR. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 PAGE 2 M/S/P Armstrong/Hunt - to approve a shoreland permit to William Park, 4589 Birch Bark Trail, to construct a. 4-season porch (18' x 16') over an existing patio area based on the fact no variances are needed and DNR has given their approval. (Motion carried 5-0). 7. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: A. Speed Complaint on 24th Street At the August 7th meeting, the Council received some complaints of excessive speed on 24th Street between Lake Elmo Avenue and Legion Avenue, particularly in the vicinity of 24th Street Court. Some residents suggested a 3-way stop at that intersection. This matter was referred to the Engineer for his review and recommendation. The Council acknowledged a letter from Kendre Schwabel, 11365 24th St. Court, stating her concerns on speed of vehicles using 24th Street and requesting placement of proper signage to slow traffic down. City Engineer, Larry Bohrer reported on August 30th a drive -over inspection at varying speeds was made with the Maintenance Foreman. The following observations were made: 1. The street has three horizontal curves (two west of 24th St. Ct. and on.e east) which have a 200' centerline radius. These curves feel uncomfortable to the average driver at speeds over 30 mph due to outward centrifugal force. 2. The sight distance from 24th St. Court intersection is good looking either east or west along 24th Street. 3. The traffic counts are low and will remain so because the road only serves Packard Park and a portion of Eden Park. 4. Stop signs should not be erected at the intersection because the traffic does not warrant it and stop signs should not be used for speed control. Based on these observations, the Engineer and Maintenance Foreman made the following recommendations: 1. Place a YIELD sign on 24th Street Court at 24th Street to show that the cul-de-sac traffic must yield right -of. -way to the through street. 2. For eastbound traffic, a Reverse Turn Sign (W1-4R) with a 2.5 mph Advisory Speed Plate (W13-1) should be used. The City on its own initiative cannot post speed limits lower than 30 mph except for advisory speed on curves. 3. For westbound traffic, a Left Turn Sign (W1-2L) with a 25 mph Advisory Speed Plate (W13-1) should be used. 4. After the curves, 30 mph speed limit signs could be used. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 4, 1.990 PAGE 3 M/S/P Hunt/Graves - to direct City staff to implement the (4) recommendations stated in Larry Bohrer's letter, August 31, 1990, and to contact the Deputies to set up speed monitoring on 24th Street. (Motion carried 5-0). If the speeding problem on 24th Street has not been resolved in two months, the Council asked the residents to come back to the City Council. The Council recommended an article written in the City Newsletter stating the city is aware of the excessive speeding problem and patrolling will be increased. B. Receive Bids and Consider Award for 1990 Overlay Projects: Lampert Avenue and 31st Street City Engineer Bohrer reported (6) bids were received for contract for 31st Street Overlay between Stillwater Blvd. and Hwy 5, Lampert Avenue Patch and Overlay, and maintenance overlays (includes 70' of driveway by maintenance garage off of Jamaca Avenue) budgeted for each year. The lowest bidder was Bituminous Consulting and Contracting of Minneapolis, and the bid was lower than what the Engineer' estimated in the feasibility hearing. Bohrer indicated this was a favorable bid and recommended the contract be awarded to Bituminous Cont. M/S/P Hunt/Williams - to award contract for 1990 Street Patching and Overlay Projects to Bituminous Consulting & Contr. in the amount of $47,470.75. (Motion carried 5-0). C. Set Assessment Hearing for 1990 Overlay Projects Larry Bohrer requested the Council set an Assessment Hearing for the 1990 Overlay Projects for October 2, 1990. M/S/P Graves/Williams - to set an Assessment Hearing Date for October 2, 1990 for the 1990 Overlay Projects. (Motion carried 5-0). B. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: A. Set up Budget Workshop Dates with Personnel Committee and C.I.P. Committee Todd Williams reported the Budget Committee met with the Finance Director, went over the budget, and proposed enough cuts to balance the budget. The Committee felt the Council needed to hear justification from the Dept. Heads for their particular proposed budget items. The Council set up a budget workshop with each Dept. Head of the Maintenance Dept. and Fire Dept. for September 13th at 4:45 p.m. at City Hall. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 PAGE 4 The City Administrator will present an evaluation of: each employee and salary recommendation to the Personnel Committee. Then the Personnel i Committee (Lee Hunt and Chuck Graves) will bring the salary recommendations to the Council. The Administrator asked for her evaluation from the Council at this time. B. Update on Washington County Official's Meeting Lee Hunt reported he went to the Washington County meeting on the Geological Atlas. Professor Kelvin Alexander, Univ. of Minnesota, presented information that thought would be helpful in the City's fight against the landfill. Hunt will contact the Administrator with details for obtaining the tape of his presentation. 9. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor License: Guardian Angels Church Guardian Angels Church has applied for an on -sale non -intoxicating malt liquor license for its annual Fall Festival to be held September 15 and 16, 1990. M/S/P Williams/Graves - to approve an on -sale non -intoxicating malt liquor license for Guardian Angels Fall Festival, September 15 and 16, 1990; contingent upon certificate of insurance submitted and favorable recommendation from the County Attorney and Sheriff. (Motion carried 5-0). B. Youth Service Bureau The Youth Service Bureau requested the Council authorize a contribution for services rendered by this organization to the City of Lake Elmo. A provision for this expenditure was not made in the budget. The Council recognized the Youth Service Bureau made a valuable contribution to the community, but, at this time the City was unable to make a donation. C. Maintenance Dept Request Maintenance Foreman, Dan Olinger requested Council approval to attend the 10th Annual Snow and Ice Conference in Greely, Colorado in October at a total cost of $414.00. M/S/P Hunt/Graves - to authorize Dan Olinger to attend the loth Annual Snow and Ice Conference in Greeley, Colorado at a total cost of $414.00; contingent on Finance Director finding funds available in budget and a brief report (written'or verbal) be submitted to the Council. (Motion carried 5-0). Jim McNamara will be attending the Annual Building Official's Conference held on September 8-14, 1990 in Colorado. The Council asked the Building Official to submit a brief summary of the conference. M/S/P Graves/Huht - to adjourn the City Council meeting at 8:12 p.m. (Motion carried 5-0), 93720 93721 93722 93723 93728 93729 93730 93731 93732 93733 93734 93735 93736 93737 93738 93739 93740 93741 93742 )3743 93744 93745 93746 93747 93748 93749 93750 93751 93752 93753 93754 93755 93756 93757 93758 93759 93760 93761 CLAIMS TO BE APPROVED AT SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 LAKE ELMO COUNCIL MEETING (all claims are within budget unless otherwise noted) T.Ao Schifsky - 15th St. MSA (approved at 8/21/90 mtg,) $ 86,369.90 Commissioner of Revenue - July State Withholding 935,00 Commissioner of Revenue - August,State Withholding 907000 thru Compost workers 224.00 Cleaning - Fire $ 11a55 - Office $ 11.55 23,10 Kohl's - new computer desk 95,39 Frank Langer - Assessor 1,200.00 Carl Blondin - legal retainer 900000 Rauenhorst Carlson & Knaak (invoices attached) 1,084.68 Leonard, Street & Deinard - Landfill (invoices attached) 2,128.65 L.M.C.I.T. - Sept. Hospo premium 2$358061 Allied Group Insurance Trust - Sept, premium 65.26 Minn. Benefit Assn. - Sept. insurance premium 151.48 American Typewriter - Office supplies 17.50 D.C. Hey - Copier maintenance agreement 134.94 Four Seasons Services - coffee & supplies 7.45 Moody's Investors Service - Bond rating charges 3,000,00 Northern States Power - Office $ 177.87 Fire'Dept, 146.13 Mainto Dept. 28,09 Street Lites 959067 Parks 144.26 Water 410.26 Sewer 19.30 1,885.58 U S West - Office $ 170,09 Fire Dept. 87,83 Mainto Dept, 54,46 Parks Dept. 15.07 327.45 AT & T - Office telephone 66.95 AT & T - Fire Dept. $ 16.68 Mainto Dept. 25,83 42.51 Michael Smith - August animal control officer 439.00 Northwest Airlines - Jim McNamara Bldg. conference 2990.00 Marriott City Center - Bldg. Inspo conference 492,80 Oxygen Service Co. - Fire Dept. supplies 32.50 Into School Dist. 916 - Fire Dept. education & training 125.00 Chase/Clark Credit Co. - Maint, Dept. loader pmto 1,556a00 Battery & Tire Warehouse - Maint, Dept. parts & repair 48,39 MB Industrial Supply - Mainto Dept. supplies 40.15 Harmon Glass - Mainto Dept. parts & repair 84.32 The American Stores - Maint, Dept, parts & repair 30.37 Northern Gases - Maint, Dept, supplies 24.00 Truck Utilities - Mainto Dept. parts & repair 27,12 General Communications - Mainto Dept, supplies 41,60 Snap -on Tools - Mainto Dept. Vixe Grips 54.95 Routson Motors, Inc. - Mainto Dept. parts & repair 1,43 Vern's GTC Auto Parts - Mainto Dept. parts & repair 6.82 (over) 4 T SEPTEMBER 4th CLAIMS (continued) 93762 Washington County Treas. - Seal Coat project $ 980.39 Parks -Trail Groom,' 164.35 93763 Polfus Implement - post hole digger and others 93764 Menards - Mainto Dept. 93765 TMT Recycling Inc, August recycling 93766 Green Stuff - Parks spraying 93767 Tri-State - Sewer Fund maint. & repairs 93768 thru 93781 September 7th payroll Total $ 1,144.74 367e92 81.48 2$669.57 140.00 275.33 .. .1.0.,28.2.97 $ 120,190.91 Rauenhorst Carlson & Knaak Suite #200 2665 Long Lake Road Roseville, Minnesota 55113 CITY OF LAKE ELMO ATTENTION: MARILYN 3880 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH LAKE ELMO MN 55042 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE BALANCE FORWARD Interest Due PAYMENTS RECEIVED SINCE 07/31/90 CREDITS ISSUED SINCE 07/31/90 RETAINER BALANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES August 28, 1990 FILE # 1608 PAGE ------------------ AUC 3 0 1990 1 --------------- # 2744 General 500.00 # 2745 Section 32 Petition, Chapter 429 441.50 # 2746 Ordinances, Opinions & Other 30.00 it 2747 Federal Land 90.00 t i 2748 Section 32, Petition #2 23.18 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE END OF STATEMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK $2,922.50 $0.00 $2,922.50 $0.00 $0.00 1,084.68 $1,084.68 Rauenhorst Carlson & Knaak Suite #200 2665 Long Lake Road Roseville, Minnesota 55113 CITY OF LAKE ELMO ATTENTION: MARILYN 3880 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH LAKE ELMO MN 55042 ---------------------------------------------------- ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE BALANCE FORWARD Interest Due PAYMENTS RECEIVED SINCE 07/31/90 CREDITS ISSUED SINCE 07/31/90 RETAINER BALANCE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED STATEMENT # 2744 August 28, 1990 FILE # 1608-0001 PAGE 1 $500.00 $0.00 $500.00- $0.00 $0.00 RE: General PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 08/01/90 SPC Phone conference - client - Oakdale 0.50 11.c, Water Agreement 08/01/90 wp Word processing 2.00 1.90 08/02/90 SPC Revise letter to client 0.25 5.95 08/03/90 SPC Phone conference - client 0.50 11,90 08/06/90 SPC Phone conference - opposing attorney, S. 0.25 5.95 Caswell O8/06/90 FWK Phone conference - client 0.25 5.95 08/07/90 SPC Phone conference - client 0.25 5.95 O8/07/90 SPC Review documents - Amended Water 0.50 11.90 Agreement 08/07/90 SPC Memo to file 0.25 5.95 08/07/90 SPC Letter to client - Litigation Report 0.50 11.90 08/07/90 FWK Prepare for and attend City Council 5.25 124.90 Meeting O8/07/90 wp Word processing 2.00 1.92 08/07/90 cc Carbon copy/client 2.00 1.33 08/08/90 FWK File review re Council meeting notes 0.50 11.90 O8/09/90 FWK File review; Review correspondence; 1.25 29.74 Research; Phone conference - client x 2 08/10/90 FWK Review documents; Phone conference - MK; 0.75 17.84 Review correspondence from client 08/14/90 SPC Phone conference - client - T. Williams 0.25 5.95 08/14/90 SPC Phone conference - client 0.50 11.90 08/14/90 FWK Research re gift issue & tax question; 0.75 17.84 Review correspondence - J. Kirby 08/15/90 SPC Phone conference - client 0.25 5.`�� 08/15/90 FWK Phone conference - MK 0.25 5.95 08/16/90 SPC Phone conference - client 0.25 5.95 roNT T NTTT?T CITY OF LAKE ELMO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES STATEMENT # 2744 PAGE 2 ----------------------------- 08/16/90 SPC Phone conference - S. Johnson 0.50 11.90 08/16/90 SPC Phone conference - client 0.50 11.90 08/17/90 SPC Phone conference - client 0.25 5.95 08/17/90 SPC Memo to file 0.25 5.95 08/20/90 FWK Review documents - Council packet; 1.00 23.79 Research 08/20/90 wp Word processing - N/C 1.00 0.02 08/21/90 SPC Phone conference - client 0.25 5.95 08/21/90 SPC Review documents - Worker Comp. matter 0.25 5.95 08/21/90 SPC Memo to file 0.25 5.95 08/21/90 FWK Review documents; Phone conference - 0.75 17.84 Councilman Hunt; Research 08/22/90 FWK Review client correspondence; Research 0.50 11.90 08/23/90 SPC Review documents - Land Registration 0.25 5.95 Petition 08/23/90 SPC Phone conference - opposing attorney, L. 0.25 5.95 Walker, Rogers Reg. 08/23/90 SPC Phone conference - client 0..25 5.95 08/23/90 SPC Memo to file 0.25 5.95 08/23/90 SPC Review documents - Oakdale Water 0.50 11.82 Agreement 08/24/90 wp Word processing n/c 1.00 0.02 08/27/90 FWK File review; Review correspondence 0.50 11.88 Word processing 6,00 Carlson, Steven P. 8.00 Carbon copy/client 2.00 Knaak, Frederic W. 11.75 TOTAL HOURS 27.75 TOTAL FEES 475.00 DISBURSEMENTS 08/06/90 Facsimile Charges - Incoming 5.00 08/07/90 Facsimile Charges - Incoming 5.00 08/16/90 Facsimile Charges - Incoming 5.00 08/21/90 Facsimile Charges - Incoming 5.00 re Wier 08/22/90 Facsimile Charges - Incomingg 5.00 Mary TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS MONTHLY TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I declare under the penalties of law that account, claim or demand is tru_j9Jand Gorr END OF STATEMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT 25.00 $500.00 $500.00 abov 1 RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK Rauenhorst Carlson & Knaak Suite #200 2665 Long Lake Road Roseville, Minnesota 55113 CITY OF LAKE ELMO STATEMENT # 274D ATTENTION: MARILYN August 28, 1990 3880 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH FILE # 1608-0010 LAKE ELMO MN 55042 PAGE 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE BALANCE FORWARD $525.50 Interest Due $0.00 PAYMENTS RECEIVED SINCE 07/31/90 $525.50- CREDITS ISSUED SINCE 07/31/90 $0.00 RETAINER BALANCE $0.00 FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED RE: Section 32 Petition, Chapter 429 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 08/01/90 SPC Review correspondence from court - 0.25 15,(_ Notice of Filing & court of Appeals 08/01/90 SPC Phone conference - G. Koelln 0.25 15.00 08/01/90 SPC Letter to Washington Co. Court 0.25 15.00 08/01/90 SPC Draft Certificate as to Transcript 0.50 30,00 08/01/90 SPC Phone conference - Judge Maas 0.25 15.00 08/03/90 SPC Review correspondence/opposing attorney 0,25 15.00 - M. Vierling 08/03/90 SPC Review documents - Notice of Review & 0.50 30,00 Statement of Case 08/06/90 SPC Phone conference - Prof. Court Reporters 0.25 15.00 08/06/90 SPC Letter to K. Krska 0.25 15.00 O8/07/90 wp Word processing 4.00 20.00 08/07/90 cc Carbon copy/client 2.00 7.00 08/14/90 SPC Letter to court reporter -transcript 0,25 15.00 08/14/90 SPC Review documents - executed certified 0.25 15.00 transcript 08/14/90 wp Word processing 1.00 5.00 08/14/90 cc Carbon copy/client 1.00 3.50 08/15/90 SPC Review documents - receipt of certified 0.25 15.00 transcript 08/15/90 SPC Letter to court 0.25 15.00 08/15/90 SPC Letter to opposing attorney 0.25 15.00 08/15/90 SPC Letter to trial court 0.25 15.00 08/20/90 wp Word processing 11.00 55.00 08/20/90 cc Carbon copy/client 6.00 21 Word processing 16.00 80.00 Carlson, Steven P. 4.25 255.00 Carbon copy/client 9.00 31.50 TOTAL HOURS 29.25 (-r)UTTNiI171 CITY OF LAKE ELMO STATEMENT # 2745 PAGE 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ( PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TOTAL FEES DISBURSEMENTS 08/14/90 Down payment on transcript TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS MONTHLY TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I declare, under the account, claim or de; END OF STATEMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT es of true , e I rederic W. RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK 366.50 75.00 75.00 $441.50 $441.50 , th* the above CITY OF LAKE ELMO ATTENTION: MARILYN 3680 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH LAKE ELMO MN 55042 Rauenhorst Carlson & Knaak Suite #200 2665 Long Lake Road Roseville, Minnesota 55113 STATEMENT # 274� August 28, 1990 FILE # 1608-0016 PAGE 1 ----------------------------------- ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE BALANCE FORWARD Interest Due PAYMENTS RECEIVED SINCE 07/31/90 CREDITS ISSUED SINCE 07/31/90 RETAINER BALANCE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED RE: Ordinances, Opinions & Other PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 08/16/90 SPC Review documents - Ordinance 08/17/90 SPC Review documents - Ordinance Carlson, Steven P. 0.50 TOTAL HOURS TOTAL FEES MONTHLY TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I declare, under the penal account, claim or demand,{ END OF STATEMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK 30.00 of is W. $60.00 $0.00 $60.00- $0.00 $0.00 0.25 15. 0.25 15.00 0.50 30.00 $30.00 $30.00 Rauenhorst Carlson & Knaak Suite #200 2665 Long Lake Road Roseville, Minnesota 55113 CITY OF LAKE ELMO STATEMENT # 2747 ATTENTION: MARILYN August 28, 1990 3880 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH FILE # 1608-0021 LAKE ELMO MN 55042 PAGE 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE BALANCE FORWARD Interest Due PAYMENTS RECEIVED SINCE 07/31/90 CREDITS ISSUED SINCE 07/31/90 RETAINER BALANCE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED RE: Federal Land PROFESSIONAL SERVICES J8/03/90 SPC Phone conference - opposing attorney - B. Bells office 08/06/90 SPC Phone conference - opposing attorney, B. Bell 08/14/90 SPC Review correspondence/opposing attorney, B. Bell 08/23/90 SPC Review correspondence/opposing attorney, B. Bell 08/24/90 SPC Phone conference - opposing attorney, B. Bell 08/24/90 SPC File review Carlson, Steven P. 1.50 90.00 TOTAL HOURS TOTAL FEES MONTHLY TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT DUE 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.50 S declare, under the penaltiat of law, that the account, claim or demand a and rrectEND OF STATEMENT)UE UPON RECEIPT Knaak RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK $1,560.00 $0.00 $1,560.00- $0.00 $0.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 90.00 $90.00 $90.00 Rauenhorst Carlson & Knaak Suite #200 2665 Long Lake Road Roseville, Minnesota 55113 CITY OF LAKE ELMO STATEMENT # 27 ATTENTION: MARILYN August 28, 1990 3880 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH FILE # 1608-0027 LAKE ELMO MN 55042 PAGE 1 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE BALANCE FORWARD Interest Due PAYMENTS RECEIVED SINCE 07/31/90 CREDITS ISSUED SINCE 07/31/90 RETAINER BALANCE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED RE: Section 32, Petition #2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 08/01/90 SPC Review correspondence - Muni Board Carlson, Steven P. 0.25 15.00 TOTAL HOURS TOTAL FEES DISBURSEMENTS 07/23/90 Dependable Courier - Delivery TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS MONTHLY TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $277.00 $0.00 $277.00- $0.00 $0.00 0.25 15.(- 0.25 I declare, under the penalties of law, that account, claim or demand is 'prue and urrec END OF STATEMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT RAUENHORST CARLSON & KNAAK 15.00 8.18 8.18 $23.18 $23.18 above LAW OFFICES LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS SUITE 2300 I 150 SOUTH FIFTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 CONFIDENTIAL City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042 Attention: Ms. Mary Kueftner Administrator AUG 1 7 1990 Invoice Number 861 Invoice Date 08/16/90 Client Number 12370 Matter Number 11817 THIS INVOICE IS PAYABLE UPON RECEIPT For professional services rendered and costs advanced through July 31, 1990 in connection with City of Lake Elmo v. Washington County and Metropolitan Council: Date Aty Hours Value 06/04/90 CKD Office conference and conference with Dakota 0.25 31.25 County Staff. EGS Meet with Judy Arends to review legal issues 1.50 165.00 part of EIS. 06/05/90 EGS Begin preparation of strategy memorandum. 1.00 110.00 06/06/90 EGS Legal research regarding strategy memorandum. 1.00 110.00 06/29/90 CKD Return telephone calls to Congressman 0.25 31.25 Sikorsky's office. 07/03/90 CKD Telephone conference with Congressman 0.25 31.25 Sikorski's staff. 07/09/90 EGS Telephone conference with Judy Arends 0.25 27.50 regarding map issues. 07/12/90 CKD Office conference regarding requests from 0.25 31.25 Congressman Sikorski's office for information. LAW OFFICES LEONARD,.STREET AND DEINARD A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS SUITE 2300 150SOUTH FIFTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 CONFIDENTIAL 12370 City of Lake Elmo 11817 V. Washington County et al. 16 AUG 1990 Invoice Number Page 2 Date Aty ------ --- EGS office conference; review file; attempted telephone conference with Todd Williams. 07/19/90 EGS Prepare correspondence to Congressman Sikorski's office; telephone conference with Judy Arends. 07/25/90 EGS Meet with Judy Arends to review legal issues; telephone conference with Todd Williams. 07/31/90 CKD Office conference regarding strategy with County. EGS Telephone conference with Todd Williams regarding EIS issues. ATTORNEY TIME SUMMARY: Attorney ---------------------- Charles K. Dayton Ellen G. Sampson Hours Rate --------------- 1 25 at $125 = 10.50 at $110 = TOTAL FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Out -of -Pocket Disbursements: Photocopying Facsimile Charges TOTAL FOR DISBURSEMENTS TOTAL AMOUNT OF THIS INVOICE PRIOR BALANCE DUE Value 156.25 1,155.00 Hours 1.00 1.00 3.25 0.25 1.50 2.40 10.00 861 Value 110.00 110.00 357.50 31.25 165. Q- 1,311.25 12.40 $1,323.65 $805.00 C LAW OFFICES LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONA4 CORPORATIONS SUITE 2300 I 150 SOUTH FIFTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5540E CONFIDENTIAL 12370 City of Lake Elmo Invoice Number 861 11817 v. Washington County et al. Page 3 16 AUG 1990 ------------ TOTAL BALANCE DUE UPON RECEIPT $2,128 65 DISBURSEMENTS, IF ANY, NOT YET BILLED WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT PLEASE RETURN ACCOUNTING COPY WITH YOUR REMITTANCE For questions concerning your invoice call your attorney or the Billing Department at 612-335-1505 Federal I.D. 41-1431093 LAW OFFICES LEONARO, STREET AND DEINARO A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS SUITE 2300 150 SOUTH FIFTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 CONFIDENTIAL City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042 Attention: Ms. Mary Kueftner Administrator Invoice Number 861 Invoice Date 08/16/90 Client Number 12370 THIS INVOICE IS PAYABLE UPON RECEIPT For professional services rendered through July 31, 1990: Prior Accounts Receivable Balance: 805.00 Current Invoice Services: 1,311.25 Disbursements: 12.40 TOTAL BALANCE DUE: 2,128.65 DISBURSEMENTS, IF ANY, NOT YET BILLED WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT PLEASE RETURN ACCOUNTING COPY WITH YOUR REMITTANCE For questions concerning your invoice call your attorney or the Billing Department at 612-335-1505 Federal I.D. 41-1431093 nc� �a{ v7 August 23, 1990 Dear Mayor Dunn, ' 3 As a resident of 24th Street Court , I have become concerned by the speed of vehicles using the new through street, 24th Street. Since at this time there are few homes on the street, I believe drivers are unaware of the dangers to children living in our area who bike and walk on this road. Because of this, I am writing you to request your consideration of the placement of proper signage on 24th Street that would slow down traffic and make drivers aware of the presence of children in the neighborhood. Since this Is a new road, I urge you to act quickly before "bad habits" are established. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Q schw-�b�1 LAKE ELMO SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 1990 8:00 P.M. The purpose of the meeting is to attend a ReAPP meeting to hear Frank Hornsteen of Clean Water Action Project discuss Public Awareness and Influencing Local Officials. Since we do not have time to discuss every point presented, it may seem that decisions are preconceived. However, background information is provided for the City Council on each agenda item in advance from City Staff and appointed Commissions; and decisions are based on this information and past experiences. In addition, some items may also have been discussed at previous Council meetings. if you are aware of information that hasn't been discussed., please fill out a "Request to Appear Before the City Council" slip; or, if you came late, raise your hand to be recognized. Comments that are pertinent are appreciated. Items requiring excessive time may be continued to another meeting. AGENDA LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 7:00 P.M. MEETING CONVENES 1. AGENDA 2. MINUTES: August 21, 1990 3. CLAIMS 4. PUBLIC INQUIRIES. 5. REAPP REPORT Referendum Questions 6. PLANNING/LAND USE AND ZONING: A. Shoreland Permit: William Park, 4589 Birch Bark Trail. N. 7. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: A. Speed Complaint on 24th Street B. Receive Bids and Consider Award for 1990 Overlay Projects: Lampert Avenue and 31st Street C. Set Assessment Hearing for 1990 Overlay Projects D. Other B. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: A. Set up Budget Workshop Dates with Personnel Committee and C.I.P. Committee B. Other 9. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor License: Guardian Angels Church B. Other 10. Adjourn