Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02-21-91 CCM
DATE APPROVED: 3/5/91 DATE ISSUED: 3./15/91 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 21, 1991 Mayor Johnson called the City Council meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. in the City Council chambers. Present: Mayor Johnson, Dick Johnson, Mottaz, Williams, City Engineers Bohrer and Prew, City Attorney Filla and Administrator Kueffner. �Nboeiit: ITunt. 1. AGENDA. Add: 5C. Request by the DNR for a Joint meeting between CC and PZ tc discuss shoreland regulations, 8C(1.) Creation of Parks Department, C(2.) Rental Property Update, 9F. Annual_ Municipal Clerks Conference. M/S/P Williams/Mottaz - to approve the February 21, 1991 city council agenda as amended. (Motion carried 4-0). 2. MINUTES: January 19, 1991 M/S/P Dick Johnson/Williams - to approve the January 19, 1991 minutes as presented. (Motion carried. 4-0). MINUTES: February 5, 1991 M/S/P Williams/Dick Johnson - to approve the February 5, 1991 City Council minutes as amended.. (Motion carried 4-0). 3. CLAIMS M/S/P Dick Johnson/Mottaz - to approve the February 21, 1991 claims #94436 thr.0 #94500 as presented. (Motion carried 4-0). 4. REAPP REPORT A. Contract with Colle & McVoy B. Contract with Pat Forciea M/S/P Williams/Dave Johnson - to direct the City Staff to send a letter to KSTP, to be signed by the Mayor, expressing our appreciation for their donation of the helicopter and pilot time for filming the video tape. (Motion carried 4-0). City Attorney, Jerry Filla, reported that Chris Naylor of Colle & McVoy indicated they would be happy to work with Pat Forciea, and Pat Forciea indicated he would be happy to work as their sub -contractor. Therefore, care would have one agreement with Colle & McVoy and they would. designate, the lobbyist to be Pat Forciea who would work through them and be part (approx. 812,000) of the $57,000. Filla voiced his concern that the Contract was not complete because Exhibit A (Budget for Public Relations Services) was missing from the proposed agreement. Colle & McVoy will have Exhibit A by March 5th. This agreement is retroactive to January 1, 1991. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 21, 1991 PAGE 2 The Council asked that Colle & McVoy update them at a Council meeting at a time when it would be beneficial or upon Council request. Attorney Filla will send out the draft contract incorporating the Council's changes to Colle & McVoy on Friday, February 22nd. M/S/P Williams/Mottaz - to postpone consideration of contract until March 5th Council meeting or until such time we receive Exhibit A. (Motion carried 4-0). 5. PLANNING/LAND USE AND ZONING: A. Comprehensive Plan Mike Black reported in his memo, dated February 15, 1.991, that on Thursday, February 14, 1991, the Metropolitan Council approved the Lake Elmo 1990-2010 Comprehensive Plan. During the Metro Council review process, the City Council did authorize staff to make certain text and map changes. Those final changes should now be incorporated into final print copies. The staff will request copies of plan that have been distributed in order to update them. M/S/P Dick Johnson/Williams - to direct the staff to print 50 final copies of the 1990-2010 Comprehensive Plan incorporating all final text and map changes. (Motion carried 4-0). B. Proposal to move house into city: Tony Collette Tony Collette, 1125 Roselawn Avenue, Roseville, has applied to move a single family structure into Lake Elmo. The house is currently located at 1075 Hadley Avenue N. in Oakdale and is proposed to be moved to Lot 7, Block .1 of Midland Meadows. Mr. Collette stated there are no covenants on the property according to River Estates and no variances are required. The Building Inspector and Councilman Mottaz have looked at the house and stated it appeared in excellent shape and should transport without major problems. At their February 11, 1991 meeting, the Planning Commission found this structure compatible with other development in the area and recommended the Council approve the moving of this house into the City. M/S/P Dick Johnson/Mottaz - to approve the request of Anthony and Jodi Collette to move the house and garage at 1075 Hadley Avenue in Oakdale to Lot 7 Block 1, Midland Meadows in Lake Elmo providing that the completed building meets all building and zoning codes and that the applicant is held responsible for any damages to city roads or other property caused. by the move. (Motion carried 4-0). C. Request by DNR Joint Meeting with CC and PZ to discuss Shoreland regulations. Councilman Johnson, Mike Black, Wyn John, Jim McNamara and. Administrator Kueffner will attend a seminar on new state shoreland management laws, March 1st at the Days Inn. Obi Sieum, DNR, requested LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 21, 1991 PAGE 3 an hour of the Council's and Planninq Commission's meeting time to go over the process for updating the shoreland regulations. M/S/P Williams/Dave Johnson - to call a special joint meeting at 7:30 p.m. between the City Council and Planning Commission for Monday, March 11, 1991 to discuss updating DNR shoreland regulations. (Motion carried 4-0). 6. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: A. Old Village Drainage City Engineer, Tom Prew, reported that at the February 5th Council meeting there was discussion on the possibility of constructing a detention pond on the VFW Ballfield. site. The Engineer was asked at that time to prepare a cost estimate for that option. The Council received preliminary assessment rolls for all four storm sewer options including the preliminary street assessments. B. Diversion of Water to Sunfish Lake Tom Prew explained the city discussed investigating the feasibility of diverting runoff from Schiltgen's Farm fields north of TH5 and west of CSAH 17. Instead of the drainage from these fields flowing through the Old Village, the City would like to divert the water into Sunfish Lake. (see Tom Prew's letter to Karen Chandler, VBWD Enq. 2/12/91). Prew reported he talked to Karen Chandler who stated she would bring this proposal to the VBWD Board, but could not recommend it for the following reasons: the project would double the size of the drainage area going to Sunfish Lake, concern on water quality, cost of acquiring easements, and Sunfish Lake has no outlet. Karen Chandler will be sending a letter incorporating these reasons. The Council indicated the desire to pursue the diversion of water to Sunfish Lake. Therefore, the following motion was made: M/S/P Mottaz/Williams to send letters to all propertyowners on Sunfish Lake explaining the proposal and asking them if they have any objections or if they would like to approach the Council to discuss this proposal. (Motion carried 4-0). Mike Ziniel, 3265 Kraft Cirlcle N., submitted a picture showing water ponding (approx. 10" deep) on his driveway and causing damage to the driveway. This is his fourth winter at this residence and the water problem has increased since he moved in. City Engineer reported this is the first time he became aware of a drainage problem in that area and noted the City has not done any improvements to the street. M/S/P Williams/Dick Johnson - to direct the Building Official and Maintenance Foreman to inspect this problem and report back to the City Council. (Motion carried 4-0). LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 21, 1991 PAGE 4 C. Easement Appraisals - SW1 Watermains Larry Bohrer reported we are now in the easement acquisition phase of the SW-1 Watermain project. There are two utility easements which need to be acquired and. appraisals are necessary before an offer for the easements can be made. Bill Schwab, Pennfield, Inc. has estimated appraisal fees at $500.00 per easement. Both the appraisal fee and. the easement cost will be reimbursed by Washington County. M/S/P Williams/Dick Johnson - to hire Bill Schwab, Pennfield, Inc. to appraise the two utility easements that are required for installation of the SW1 Watermain, with said appraisal fee not to exceed $1,000 and that these costs be reimbursed by Washington and Ramsey Counties in accordance with our agreement for this project. (Motion carried 3-1: Mottaz:There is no such thing as the County paying for this --we are paying for it, anyway. I think Mr. Schwab is overcharging the City.) 7. Appointment of Planning Commission Members Each City Council member recommended candidates for two Planning Commission appointments, First Alternate and Second Alternate. Because Ray Salus and Karin Schubert were the only candidates recommended by all the City Council members, Councilman Williams made the following motion: M/No Second. Williams/No Second - to appoint Ray Salus as First Alternate and Karin Schubert as Second Alternate to the Lake Elmo Planning Commission. In the spirit of co-operation, the following motion was made: M/S/P Mottaz/Dick Johnson - to appoint Jim Mcleod, 2.543 Lake Elmo Avenue N., as First Alternate and to appoint Karin Schubert, 5222 Keats Avenue N., as Second Alternate to the Lake Elmo Planning Commission. (Motion carried 4-0). Parks Commission Appointment: M/S/P Dick Johnson/Williams - to bring back the motion of February 5th to the table. (Motion carried 4-0). Councilman Johnson noted he has interviewed both applicants and would be in favor of appointing Randy Thoreson who is a Planner for Short, Elliot and Henderson and has prior experience with Parks. In the spirit of cooperation, the following motion was made: M/S/P Williams/Hunt - to appoint Randy Thoreson, 4141 Irish Court P.T., as Second Alternate to the Lake Elmo Parks Commission. (Motion carried 4-0). 8. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: A. Compost Update - Councilman Johnson LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 21, 1991 PAGE 5 The County is proposing to end County funding of the yard waste composting sites after 1991. The 1991 funding for the seven County yard waste composting sites will remain the same as in 1990 with the exception of additional funds provided for site maintenance. The County will continue to provide technical assistance on yard waste composting to cities. The County will assist in notifying the public of the changes in yard waste management planned for 1992. The following options were given cities in 1992: --The cities may continue to operate the compost sites without County funds. -- The Cities may lease or sell the compost sites to private companies which will operate them. --The Cities may close the site and encourage the private sector to establish sites. --The Cities may close the sites and encourage waste haulers to collect yard waste. Councilman Johnson explained this was discussed at the Solid Waste Advisory Committee and the majority of members favored the city continuing to operate the compost site with a gate charge. The Solid. Waste Advisory Committee also reviewed the draft form of the Request for Proposal for Organized Collection within the City. An agreed upon version will be submitted to the City Administrator for typing and then proceed. to the City Council at a later date. Councilman Williams indicated he was in favor of keeping the compost site and operating it on a fee basis, perhaps graduated fee, where Lake Elmo residents pay less than non -Lake Elmo residents as long as the city recovers the operating costs. Williams asked, that the Solid Waste Advisory Committee come back with a proposal. The consensus of the Council was to continue to operate the site and develop a gate charge. Administrator Kueffner indicated the proposed RFP for organized collection deals with collection of all solid waste, and she suggested the Council wait until the proposals are received.. B. Roberts Rules of Order - Councilman Williams Councilman Williams asked this item be postponed until the next Council meeting. M/S/P Williams/Mottaz - to postpone consideration until the March 5th Council meeting. (Motion carried 4-0). C. 1. Creation of Parks Department - Councilman Johnson Councilman Johnson indicated he felt it was time for .placing more LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 21, 1991 PAGE 6 importance on the Parks and Recreation for the City. The Parks Commission, unanimously, recommended a separate Parks and Recreation Dept. be instituted for the City. M/No Second Dick Johnson/No Second - to direct the City Administrator to establish a separate Parks & Recreation Dept. with a supervisor that will report directly to the City Administrator. In order for them to make a decision, the Council asked for the following information: --to direct the City Administrator to contact interested renters and ask them if the City uses the garage, would they still be interested in renting the remainder of the building. --to direct staff (Maintenance Dept., City Admin., Parks Commission) to look at the current way they are doing things and see if some administrative shuffling of time could devote more staff resources to the park without creating a formal department. --to obtain an idea of what this would cost the city to set up this Dept. in terms of replacing Mike, if he gets the job, salary expected for admin. position. Assuming we set up this dept. in 1992, what figure would have to be put in budget. --to consider the option of Parks Dept. being a division within the Public Works. M/S/P Mottaz/Williams - to postpone consideration until these action items can be discussed. (Motion carried 4-0). 2. Rental Property Update The City Administrator reported the former tenant has vacated the building at the city's request and has also made arrangements for a payment schedule. To -date, half of the past due rent has been paid, and we should have the remainder by the end of April. D. Budget - Mayor Johnson In light of the recent proposal by the Governor, Mayor Johnson explained $17,OOO will be cut in state remittance to the City in July, 1991. There will be cuts from LGA, tax equalization aid and HACA. Johnson added the message we are getting is not to rely on state aid, but to rely on our taxing capacity. Johnson felt the City should tell residents in the Newsletter that we are facing a serious deficit problem that may require some tax increases. Mayor Johnson indicated we should look seriously at commercial development along the I-94 frontage to the very maximum extent it can be developed. This may mean requesting the extention of the MUSA to County Road 19 and perhaps a 1/2 mile beyond and to do mirror zoning with Woodbury. Oakdale has told him that they would actively support extention of the MUSA along I-94. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 21, 1991 PAGE 7 Along the line of cost reduction, Councilman Johnson suggested the City should continue to encourage volunteer activity in the City. The residents have a great history of volunteer work for the City. Johnson referred to a proposal he made at an earlier meeting to establish a Maintenance Advisory Committee with the function of looking for cost reduction within the maintenance dept. and to advise the Council of major purchases. At the next meeting, Councilman Johnson will bring a recommendation on the function of the Maintenance Advisory Committee. The CIP committee will look into options for a Fire Dept. such as looking at a county -wide fire dept. E. "Coffee Break" - Mayor Johnson The Stillwater Area Chamber of Commerce and Lake Elmo City Council will hold a "Coffee Break" on Tuesday, February 26th, 8:00-9:00 a.m. at City Hall. 9. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. Furnace for Maintenance Bldg. (Cont.) The Maintenance Dept. received three bids for a 90% efficient gas furnace. The bids received. are: Apollo Heating - $2895.00 Hoffman Heating - $3050.00 Schwantes Heating - $2807.00 M/S/P Williams/Dave Johnson - to award. the bid to the low bidder, Schwantes Heating in the amount of $2807.00 to be taken out of the 1991 Equipment, Parts & Repairs Budget as recommended by the Finance Director, for a 90% efficient gas furnance for the Maintenance Building. (Motion carried 3-0-1 Abstain: Mottaz). B. Word Processor for Maintenance Dept. The Maintenance Dept. has requested permission to purchase a Brother WP-75 (approx. $500) word processor. The Maintenance Dept. feels they could keep better records of its inventory, the 201 maintenance, water records, equipment repair and maintenance. M/No Second Mottaz/No Second - to authorize the Maintenance Dept. to purchase the Brother WP-75 word processor up to the amount of $500. Councilman Williams asked that this request be remanded to the CIP Committee to investigate if a word processor over the long term would be the right purchase or would a personal computer be a better investment. M/S/P Dick Johnson/Williams - to remand this request for study to the CIP Committee as they are in the process of considering computer purchase for City office. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 21, 1991 PAGE 8 The City Administrator will set up a meeting to discuss this request with the CIP Committee, the City Admin. and Maintenance Foreman (or designee) as soon as possible. C. West Sunfish (Landfill Park) Update The City Administrator and City Attorney have met with Washington County staff regarding a request by the City that the County buy back the 100 acres that the City purchased for park land after the closing of the Sanitary Landfill No. 1. The County is willing to buy back the 100 acres at the price we paid ($75,000) less whatever the city wants to keep; i.e., public works site, fire station #2, compost site and the existing park trails. Councilman Mottaz requested more information on this item before any Council decision is made. Mottaz felt this landfill situation has to be cleaned up. At some time this is going to be an ideal piece of property and he would rather it be an ideal piece of Lake Elmo property rather than owned by Washington County. Mottaz added that both Ramsey and Washington County have walked all over Lake Elmo from the very beginning. Now, they are giving us a gift by offering $680 an acre. The Counties should have come in and put in the entire water system, and it should have been Lake Elmo's rather than now we have our development in that area controlled by Oakdale. Councilman Johnson noted he shared Councilman Mottaz's feelings, but asked what legal advantage does the City have to hold onto this portion of the site that has the buried waste. He does see these funds as helning with our budget constraints or applied to a new narks dept. Councilman Williams explained the MCPA tells the County whether or not they have to clean up the landfill (that is physically dig up the trash). The PCA has said they are not going to do that as long as the air stripping operation and barrier wells contain the plume. Williams suggested. we get our money back with interest because the residents have paid interest on that money thru their park bonding. Williams asked that the City tell the County, "we want all our money back plus interest, plus we want the land for our maintenance building as compensation for the amount of heartache and hardship the residents of this City have gone through. Williams did not see any advantage to our keeping the land under which is leaking waste. Williams stated "no one in this room will live to see the day the landfill is cleaned up". T1/S/P Mottaz/Dick Johnson - to postpone discussion until the Parch 5th meeting for the purpose of evaluating the economic or legal rationale for holding onto this property. (Motion carried 4-0). The Council acknowledged the amount of work and recognized the efffort the City Administrator has done to get to this point in negotiating with the county in this matter. D. Resolution No. 91-8, A Resolution prohibiting the transfer of real estate within the city of Lake Elmo without City approval LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUAR.Y 21, 1991 PAGE 9 The City received a letter from Washington County relating to subdivisons. In 1983, the City had requested in letter form that the County not accept for recording any subdivisions that did, not have city approval. Without a formally adopted and record.ed resolution, the county would accept such a record. In 1987 the City adopted such a resolution for Lanes DeMontreville; therefore, we no longer have a problem with illegal subdivisions occuring. M/S/P Williams/Dick Johnson - to adopt Resolution No. 91-e prohibiting the subdivision of Real Estate within the City of Lake Elmo without approval, by resolution, of the Lake Elmo City Council. Further, that the staff is directed to record resolution 91-8 with the County recorder. (Motion carried 4-0). E. Request to cut trees down on city property: Jess Mottaz Councilman Mottaz has requested permission from the City to remove two dead oak trees from the city -owned, unimproved 60 foot road easement. M/S/ Dave Johnson/Dick Johnson - to grant the authority to Jess Mottaz to cut down two oak trees on city -owned property; contingent on Mr. Mottaz providing to the City a waiver of liability. M/No Second -Williams/No Second - to amend the motion to include approval is contingent on an agreement of the location and condition of trees between Mr. Mottaz and the city code enforcement officer. M/S/P Dave Johnson/Dick Johnson - to grant authority to Jess Mottaz to cut down two oak trees on city -owned property; contingent on Mr. Mottaz providing to the City a waiver of liability. (Motion carried. 2-1-1: Abstain: Mottaz, Williams: He was not opposed to the removal of the trees by Mr. Mottaz, but felt this should be subject to an agreement by the city code enforcement officer of the location and condition of the trees.) Councilman Mottaz indicated he would inform the code enforcement officer of the location and condition of the trees. F. Clerks Conference The Administrator and Deputy Clerk requested. Council approval to attend the Municipal Clerks and Finance Officers Annual Conference held on March 19-22, 1991 at the Sunwood Inn in St. Cloud at a cost, which has been budgeted, of $396. M/S/P Mottaz/Williams - to authorize Mary Kueffner and Sharon Lumby to attend the Municipal Clerks Conference, March 19-22, 1991, at the Sunwood. Inn in St. Cloud, MN in the amount of $396. M/S/P Mottaz/Williams - to adjourn the City Council meeting at 10:40 p.m. (Motion carried 4-0). ------------------------ Resolution No. 91-8 Prohibiting the subdivision of real estate within the City without approval, by resolution, of the Lake Elmo City Council, CITY OF LAKE iliELMO 1. DPRA: a,!_ -s l City ®f Lake Elmo 777-5510 3800 Laverne Avenue North /-Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042 AGENDA MEMO FOR MARCH 5, 1991 Attached is a progress report from DPRA for EIS review regarding the proposed dump. 2. Comprehensive Plan: Attached is a letter from Mary Anderson, Chair of the Met. Council indicating approval of our Comp. Plan. As indicated by Mike Black at the last meeting, and as stated in the letter, this approval excludes our policy opposing the proposed landfill in the park. 3. Highway 5 Discharge Outlet: Attached is the most recent report submitted by Wenck Associates, Inc. to Washington County. Please note that because the sample results exceeded the NPDES prevention level, testing will be done once a week rather than once a month. I feel that we must closely watch the levels of contaminents that -are leaving the site, and I will keep you posted as the information becomes available. 4. MSA Funds Attached is a memo from MN/DOT regarding MSA Fund Balances. This memo reinforces our City Engineer's past comments that if the City does not proceed with some sort of MSA project, it will indeed loose the funding. FEB 2 2 1991 01 m. �' �= `� 2A �` E1500 First National February 21, 1991 Ms. Mary Kueffner, City Administrator City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 St. Paul. Minnesota 55101 Telephone 612-227-6500 Fax 612 227-5522 Subject: EIS Review for Proposed Landfill Site in Lake Elmo Dear Mary: Enclosed is a progress report and invoice for professional services from November 26, 1990 through January 25, 1991. In the enclosed table, I have estimated our project expenditures (in hours) by contract task as well as estimated the project team's expected requirements to complete the EIS review. With this invoice, 51% of the budgeted hours and 45% of the dollars have been expended. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, � x Christopher J. Lough Vice President CJL/sa Encl. cc: 5175.001 200 Research Drive P.O. Box 727 Manhattan. Kansas 66502 Telephone 913-539-3565 Fax 913539-5353 Telex 704314 Other offices: Washington, D.C., St. Paul. Chicago, Denver. Daltas. Kansas City. Oak Ridge. Kisumu, Kenya PROGRESS REPORT Project: EIS Review for Proposed Landfill Site G in Lake Elmo Project #: 5175.001 Date: February 21, 1991 Reporting Period: 11/26/90 - 1/25/91 Activities Undertaken During the Reporting Period During the reporting period (November 26 to January 25) DPRA reviewed the "Engineering Design Concept Technical Memorandum", November 1990, to obtain values for the input parameters to DPRA's Municipal Landfill Failure and Release Model. DPRA also began reviewing the literature to determine "typical" municipal landfill leachate constituents for use in landfill release and groundwater modelling. Subcontractor labor and expenses for September, October and November are included on this invoice. During that period, Geraghty and Miller staff continued their modelling analysis of Site G, initially using a single layer analytic element model. Activities Anticipated Next Month During the next reporting period, DPRA will identify "typical" organic and inorganic leachate constituents, their concentrations, and how those con- centrations change over time. This will be incorporated in our source term model to assess constituent release rates and concentration profiles for input in Geraghty and Miller's groundwater model. Fletcher Driscoll will provide expert testimony on Site G hydrogeologic conditions through a video being produced on the Lake Elmo landfill siting process. Changes in Personnel and Schedule No changes in personnel are anticipated. A project meeting with Kelton Barr of Geraghty & Miller is scheduled for Monday, February 25, 1991 to discuss progress on the groundwater modelling task. AD AD E-1500 First National Bank Building. St, Paul, Minnesota 55101 Telephone 612-227.6500 Fax 612.227-5522 INVOICE Ms. Mary Kueffner, City Administrator Date: February 15, 1991 City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North Invoice Number: 5175.001 VR10 Lake Elmo, MN 55042 DPRA Project.Number: 5175.001 Subject: EIS Review for Proposed Landfill Site G in Lake Elmo Professional Services from 11/26/90 through 1/25/91: CURRENT CUMULATIVE REMAINING Hours Dollars Hours Do al rs Hours Dollars 1. DPRA Labor o Professional 20.5 1,250.53 335.0 21,848.51 347.0 19,613.49 o Clerical/Accounting 3.5 173.29 47.0 1,552.27 -2.0 0.73 24.0 1,423.82 382.0 23,400.78 345.0 19,614.22 2. Geraghty & Miller Subcontract labor and Expenses* 9.0 952.40 222.5 18,068.84 240.5 30,766.16 3. Other Direct Costs o Computer/Word Proc. o Copies o Telephone/Postage o Mileage, Misc. 12.00 63.50 - 41.88 10.50 - 46.60 12.00 162.48 4. Totals** 33.0_ 2,388.22 604.5 41,633.10 585.5 50,217.90 Total Amount Due This Invoice . . . . . . . . .$ 25388.22 * This represents work completed from September 1 - December 1, 1990. ** Based on a budget (excluding contingency) of $91,850.00 200 Research Drive P.O. Box 727 Manhattan. Kansas 66502 Telephone 913-539-3565 Fax 913-539.5353 Telex 704314 Other ollil Washington. D.C., St. Paul. Chicago, Denver, Dallas, Kansas City, Oak Ridge, Kisumu. Kenya CUMULATIVE AND EXPECTED EXPENDITURES FOR SITE G EIS REVIEW Contract Task A. Data Collection and Visual Site Inspection B. Data Logging and Data Reduction C(1). Data Analysis and Interpretation C(2). Data Analysis and Interpretation D. Review Rejected Sites Located Within County E. Review and Prepare a Response to Weston's comments on Site G EIS F. Computer Modeling - Groundwater G. Computer Modeling - Air Emissions** H. Reporting of Results and Project Management/Administration I. Meetings, Presentations, and Expert Testimony Totals Percent -HOURS- Budget Expended* Remaining Expected 12 12 0 0 56 70 -14 30 117 120 -3 30 136 4 132 80 48 50 -2 0 56 16 40 40 339 161.5 177.5 150 52 0 52 50 180 107 73 90 194 64 130 120 1190 604.5 585.5 590 51% 49% * Reflects DPRA's billings through January 1991 and Geraghty & Miller's billings through November 1990. **This task has been placed on indefinite hold until further notice. PE9 2 1 1991 (f METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, MN. 55101 612 291-6359 February 19, 1991 Ms. Mary Kueffner City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 RE: City of Lake Elmo Comprehensive plan Amendment Review Complete Update of Comprehensive Plan Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 15238-1 Dear Ms. Kueffner: At its meeting on February 14, 1991, the Metropolitan Council considered the city of Lake Elmo's comprehensive plan amendment. This consideration was based on a report of the Metropolitan and Community Development Committee, Referral Report No. 91-13. A copy of this report is attached. The Council approved the following recommendations contained in the above report: 1. That the Council adopt the staff report and findings as stated above as part of these recommendations. 2. That the Metropolitan Council approve the 1990-2010 Comprehensive Plan for Lake Elmo with the exception of the city's policy in opposition to the potential landfill in Lake Elmo Park Reserve, since this is inconsistent with the Council's Solid Waste Policy Plan and Minn. Stat. 473.811 and 473.823. Sincerely, f e Mary E. derson Chair MEA:ly Attachment cc: R.A. Odde, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Richard Thompson, Metropolitan Council Staff 2. Changes in language and additional information requested by the staff with regard ta on -site septic systems and clustered systems are satisfactory. 4 3. Adequate capacity exists in the WONE Interceptor to serve the wastewater [lows as shown in the plan, provided the approved flows from the city of Oakdale are not increased. 4. The plan's transportation goals and policies are consistent with those of the Council. 5. The Aviation text of the plan does not indicate if the runway safety zoning and airspace hazard zoning over the entire community is covered under a joint MAC/Community zoning board. If the joint board is operative, it should be referenced in the system text, goals and policies and implementation section. 6. If a joint zoning board has not been established or an airport zoning ordinance implemented, the city and MAC should create a joint zoning board. This is important in 1991 since the airport comprehensive plan is being prepared by MAC. 7. The Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan properly identifies the location of the Lake .= Elmo Park Reserve. However, the plan does not accept the possibility of a landfill in the park. The city should recognize that state law may have precedence over local and Council policies. 8, The plan contains a policy opposing construction of a landfill in the Lake Elmo Regional Park Reserve. This is inconsistent with Council policy. 9. The plan provides a thorough summary and analysis of the current housing stock in Lake Elmo. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. That the Council adopt the staff report and findings as stated above as part of these recommendations. 2. That the Metropolitan Council approve the 1990-,2010 Comprehensive Plan for Lake Elmo with the exception of the city's policy in opposition to the potential landfill in Lake Elmo Park Reserve, since this is inconsistent with the Council's Solid Waste Policy Plan and Minn. Stat. 473.811 and 473.823. Respectfully submitted, Gertrude Ulrich, Chair Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area Mears Park Centre, 230 E. 5th St. St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612.291-6359/1'DD 291-0904 DATE: February 1, 1991 TO: Metropolitan and Community Development Committee FROM: Richard Thompson, Research and Long Range Planning SUBJECT: City of Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan Amendment Complete Update of Comprehensive Plan Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 15238-1 Metropolitan Council District No. 16 INTRODUCTION The city of Lake Elmo has submitted a complete update of the 1979 Comprehensive Plan for the years 1990 to 2010 as a major plan amendment. The planning effort concentrated on two objectives: 1) To reflect accurately the city of Lake Elmo's current policies regarding planning, land use, zoning and development; and 2) To provide a basis for guiding Lake Elmo into the 1990's and beyond. AUTHORITY TO REVIEW The Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act of 1976 requires that amendments to local comprehensive plans be prepared, submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and adopted in the same manner as the original plans (Minn. Stat. 473.864, subd. 2, 1978). Guidelines adopted pursuant to Minn. Stat. 473.864 for reviewing proposed amendments provide a 90-day review period for amendments potentially affecting one or more of the metropolitan systems, and a 60- day review period for amendments that do not have a potential impact on metropolitan systems. The city of Lake Elmo initially submitted its proposed comprehensive plan amendment on September 28, 1990. That initial amendment was deemed incomplete whereupon the city submitted additional information on November 21, 1990. On December 5, 1990, the Chair determined that the amendment presented a potential impact on the metropolitan sewer system. Therefore, the 90-day review period applies and will conclude on February 25, 1991. Documents submitted in support of this plan amendment included: 1. Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan, 1990--2010. 2. Revised pages 45-50 of the plan (Changes requested at meeting of October 25, 1990) ANALYSIS METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK The plan contains a discussion of future population, households and employment for the city of Lake Elmo. The Metropolitan Council forecasts a population of 6,200 in 1990 (final census counts for Lake Elmo in 1990 are 5,903 people) and a population of 6,600 in 2000. The plan states, however, that "if the number of new residents per year remains stable, the population will be close to 7,500 by the year 2000." The city's plan forecasts a population of 8,210 in 2010. The Metropolitan Council forecasts 2,100 households for the city of Lake Elmo in 1990. (The preliminary 1990 census indicates there were 1,967 households in Lake Elmo in 1990). The city's plan indicates 2,095 households in 1990 and 2,551 households in 2000. The Metropolitan Council forecasts fewer households (2,300) in 2000. The city's plan forecasts 2,800 households in 2010. The plan records 1990 employment of 970 in Lake Elmo, while the Metropolitan Council forecasts 1,400. Both the Council and the plan forecast 1,500 employment in 2000, while the plan forecasts employment of 1,800 in 2010. The plan states (p. 22) that "People move to Lake Elmo because the community offers an alternative to standardized suburban communities. Lake Elmo offers a wide variety of lifestyles...." The plan indicates that "further development at one house or business per 1.5 acres is inconsistent with regional planning policies and is inconsistent with Lake Elmo's desire to maintain an attractive, uncrowed atmosphere." It also states that "the Metro Council's recommendation of one house per 10 acres seems overly restrictive, especially in light of existing development densities of nearby communities." The plan goes on to settle on a compromise density of 3 units per 10 acres with a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres. This is inconsistent with the Metropolitan Council's rural area policy of 1/10 on a 40 acre basis. NATURAL RESOURCES (Frost) Sanitary sewer is available only in two small portions of Lake Elmo. Approximately one square mile located in the southwest comer of Lake Elmo is inside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and is served by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission WONE Interceptor. (A substantial portion of this land has been annexed to Oakdale). The other system is a privately owned and operated collection system and treatment plant serving Cimarron, a mobile home park. The remaining residences and businesses rely on private on -site septic systems, some with joint drainfields designed under the 201 program. After the initial submission, the natural resources staff had concerns about several areas that were not addressed in the plan. The plan needed additional information on private wastewater systems, group on -site systems, and policies on infiltration and inflow. Subsequent to the initial review, the staff met with representatives of the city and outlined specific needs. Following the meeting the city submitted specific information which analyzed individual on -site and cluster septic systems and packaged treatment plants and goals and policies for individual on -site and cluster septic systems and packaged treatment plants. The city also submitted maps showing the Tri-lakes Area Off -site and Cluster Septic Systems as well as the Old Village Area Off -site and Cluster Septic Systems. In reference to the individual on -site and cluster septic systems and packaged treatment plants, the plan states that the city participated in the 201 program to correct private septic systems. It states: "Over 100 residences and businesses received new individual systems or were connected to new cluster systems." The plan further states that "A dedicated area of 20,000 square feet of land suitable for an on -site trench system is required for each new residential lot in the city." The plan also quotes city codes (Section 707.050) which lay out requirements for cluster septic systems. In the Goals and Policies section of the plan, the plan states the policy "to require that the design and construction of any public sanitary sewer eliminate excessive infiltration and inflow and be in compliance with current acceptable engneering standards and those set by the Minnesota PCA." The goal in regard to "Individual On -site and Cluster Septic Systems and Packaged Treatment Plants" is "to allow properly designed cluster treatment systems for multiple properties only where existing individual systems have failed." and "to prohibit private package treatment systems for new development." Under the policies section, the plan states: "To assure proper functioning of on - site individual systems by requiring proper site location, system design, installation, inspection, and maintainence of each system." The staff of the Natural Resources Division is satisfied with the changes as proposed by the city. There will be no regional impact from flows as projected in the plan since there is adequate capacity in the WONE Interceptor to serve the wastewater flows as shown, provided the approved flows from the city of Oakdale are not increased. TRANSPORTATION (Braden) The city's transportation goals and policies are consistent with those of the Council. However, Lake Elmo's population/household forecasts are higher than those of the Council. Distribution of population/households/employment by TAZ is different than that of the Council, in part because the city uses higher numbers but also because the proportionate distribution is different. The Council has no information indicating that the city responded to the Council's request to review TAZ distributions. The functional classification of the city does not match that adopted by the Transportation Advisory Board. Specifically, the city shows several roads identified as collectors that are designated minor arterials on the TAB map. If the city wishes to change the designation of some of these roads, it should submit a- request to the Transportation Advisory Board to make any other necessary changes to classification of specific roadways. The city of Lake Elmo should be aware that the city of Woodbury is proposing an extension of Bielenberg Drive as a minor arterial (connection to Helmo Avenue) into Lake Elmo. The plan describes existing transit service, but it does not elaborate on potential needs such as services for the elderly/disabled. The city should add information to its public transit discussion. Additional comments regarding transit from the Metropolitan Transit Board are contained in Attachment A. AIRPORTS (Case) The Lake Elmo amendment appears to cover the main points dealing with land use compatibility between the community and the Lake Elmo airport. This is accomplished through control of future land uses in the airport runway approaches by recognizing the land use safety zones of MnDOT Aeronautics, and density controls on development outside the MUSA. However, the Aviation text on page 34 of the Plan does not indicate if the runway safety zoning and airspace hazard zoning over the entire community is covered under a joint MAC/Community zoning board. If the joint board is operative, it should be referenced in the system text, goals and policies, and implementation section. These matters were likely addressed in the original comprehensive plan, but should be repeated in the revised plan to ensure the control of airspace obstructions, public airport investments and safety of both aircraft operations and persons on the ground. In the event that a joint zoning board has not been established or an airport zoning ordinance implemented, all effort on the part of the Community and the MAC should be undertaken to put both into effect. This is especially important in 1991 since the Lake Elmo airport comprehensive plan is being prepared by MAC and any changes taken into account. PARKS (Stefferud) The Lake Ehno Comprehensive Plan properly identifies the regional park reserve. The plan, however, states on page 39: "Washington County has proposed to the Metropolitan Council that a landfill occupy 300 acres on the western border within the park [Lake Elmo Regional Park Reserve]. The city of Lake Elmo continues to oppose this landfill." While the Council does not suggest that any part of the regional park reserve be automatically converted to any other use, the city should be aware that state law regarding the siting of solid waste facilities precludes exempting any land from the search areas for sites for solid waste facilities. The Council also has responsibilities for siting or providing for a number of regional services. For these reasons, the Parks and Open Space Plan contains a policy allowing for park land conversion when a higher public interest is served. The Council would take into consideration Lake Elmo's views and views of any other interested parties before making a determination about whether to convert some parkland to another use; however, the final determination is to be made by the Council. Policy 21: The conversion of regional recreation open space areas to other uses shall be allowed only when it is in the public interest and no alternative exists. Such a conversion shall be allowed only upon joint agreement under terms developed jointly by the implementing agency and the Metropolitan Council. Application of policy 21 directs the Council to consider whether there is an alternative site for the landfill outside Lake Elmo Regional Park Reserve. If no such alternative exists, then the Council and Washington County (the park implementing agency in this case) would have to jointly develop and agree on terms for converting part of the park reserve to a landfill. Such terms would need to address protecting the rest of the park reserve and its visitors from any potential negative impacts of the landfill. Once those terms were developed and agreed upon, the Council would then have the basis for removing the restrictive covenant on that portion of the park reserve hosting the landfill SOLID WASTE (Smith) The comprehensive plan states on page 41 the city's policy of "continuing to resist the construction of a landfill in the Lake Elmo Regional Park Reserve." This policy is preceded by text on pages 38-40 that describes the city's efforts to oppose the candidate site. . This policy is inconsistent with the Landfill Development Schedule in the Solid Waste Mannement Development Guide/Policy Plan that directs Washington County to develop 2,494 acre-feet of landfill capacity by 1993. Moreover, Guide criterion 4a states: Solid waste facilities should be compatible, to the extent possible, with Council land use policies. The Council will consider county and local comprehensive land use plans. Lack of compatibility with land use policies and plans shall not preclude Council approval of a waste facility, if waste management policy considerations must take precedence. The text of the Guide states: Waste facilities rarely meet local land use planning requirements. Override of local vetoes may be necessary in some circumstances. The Waste Management Act gives counties the authority to override local vetoes to establish waste processing and land disposal facilities (Minn. Stat., sec 473.811, subd. 4a and sec. 473.823, subd. 5) The Council must approve the override. The city should revise its plan to delete its policy opposing the landfill. HOUSING (Dougherty) The plan amendment provides a thorough summary and analysis of the current housing stock in Lake Elmo. It notes that 71 percent of the current housing stock of 2,037 units are single family, 25 percent are manufactured housing units and 4 percent are a combination of multifamily and townhouse units. Ninety one percent of the homes in Lake Elmo are owner -occupied. The plan identifies the existing mix of residential land uses and the potential land available for housing, as well as the density proposed for each. The official controls in Lake Elmo permit the construction of a range of housing sizes and types. Because the city wants to maintain its rural character, lot sizes have been established based on the need to keep further development at a low rural density and avoid the need for extension of urban services. The community feels lot sizes of at least 2-1/2 acres are desirable in order to achieve these environmental goals. The plan notes that Cimmaron manufactured housing park is an exception to the zoning ordinance, as it was permitted prior to the current zoning ordinance. The park provides the city with low and modest cost housing and makes up nearly 25 percent of the housing units in the city. The park occupies nearly 200 acres and has about 500 occupied manufactured housing units, and its own water and sewer system. The city's Rural Residential category permits housing on land with at least 10 acres and allows cluster development of up to four housing per 40 acres on lots of 5-7 acres each, a policy consistent with Council policies established for the rural area. Another classification is being proposed that would allow three units per 10 acres. This density is not consistent with current Council policies for the rural area. Goals and policies identified in the plan state the importance of restricting residential development to densities that will avoid the extension of services outside the presently defined MUSA boundary. In support of this, the city proposes that there be no more R-1 zoning (1.5 acres per house) allowed in the city. However, establishing a new zoning category for residential development with a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres per unit and maximum density of 3 units per 10 acres is contrary to Council policies. Additional housing policies indicate that urban residential development at medium to high density will be permitted only in areas within the MUSA and served with central sewer and other necessary public services and utilities. As the plan notes that nearly 60 percent of the city's housing units were built between 1960 and 1980, they may soon be reaching an age where they need some maintenance. The city may want to identify goals and policies that would address property and code enforcement to encourage this. FINDINGS 1. The policy of the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan of allowing a density of three units per 10 acres with a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres per unit is not consistent with the Council's rural area policies. 2. Changes in language and additional information requested by the staff with regard to on -site septic systems and clustered systems are satisfactory. 3. Adequate capacity exists in the WONE Interceptor to serve the wastewater flows as shown in the plan, provided the approved flows from the city of Oakdale are not increased. 4. The plan's transportation goals and policies are consistent with those of the Council. 5. The Aviation text of the plan does not indicate if the runway safety zoning and airspace hazard zoning over the entire community is covered under a joint MAC/Community zoning board. If the joint board is operative, it should be referenced in the system text, goals and policies and implementation section. 6. If a joint zoning board has not been established or an airport zoning ordinance implemented, the city and MAC should create a joint zoning board. This is important in 1991 since the airport comprehensive plan is being prepared by MAC. 7. The Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan properly identifies the location of the Lake Elmo Park Reserve. However, the plan does not accept the possibility of a landfill in the park. The city should recognize that state law may have precedence over local and Council policies. 8. The plan contains a policy opposing construction of a landfill in the Lake Elmo Regional Park Reserve. This is inconsistent with Council policy. 9. The plan provides a thorough summary and analysis of the current housing stock in Lake Elmo. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. That the Council adopt the staff report and findings as stated above as part of these recommendations. 2. That the Metropolitan Council approve the 1990--2010 Comprehensive Plan for Lake Elmo with the exception of the city's policy in opposition to the potential landfill in Lake Elmo Park Reserve, since this is inconsistent with the Council's Solid Waste Policy Plan and Minn. Stat. 473.811 and 473.823. ATTACHMENT A REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612/292-8789 DATE: October 8, 1990 TO: Richard Thompson, Metropolitan Council FROM: Garneth Peterson, Regional Transit Board SUBJECT: Lake Elmo Comp, Plan Amendment The Regional Transit Board has no major comments on the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan. We would suggest that they add some additional information to their public transit discussion. The plan should state that special transportation for"elderly and disabled persons in Lake Elmo Is provided by Metro Mobility, with additional transportation service provided by the Human Services, Inc. "Transporter" of Washington County. Because of the low population density in Lake Elmo, these services are an important addition to the regular route and express service currently supplied by MTC. FEB 2 6 1991 W.ASHINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH GOVERNMENT CENTER 14900 61ST STREET NORTH, P.O. BOX 6 • STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082-0006 Office (612) 436-6655 Facsimile Machine (612) 430-6730 February 22, 1991 Mary Kueffner, City Administrator City of Lake Elmo 3800 LaVerne Avenue N. Lake Elmo, MN . 55042 Dear Ms. Kueffner: Mary Luth Public Health Director Rose Green Office Manager Doug Ryan EnvironmenVLand Use Division Manager Karen Zeleznak Community Health Division Manager Enclosed please find the January sampling report on the Highway 5 discharge outlet. The attached letter from Wenck Associates explains that the Recommended Allowable Limits .(RALs) are newly established for this months sampling. The sample results exceeded the NPDES prevention level for total phenols. Weekly sampling at the Highway 5 outfall is.being conducted, and I will advise you of the results. Samples continue to be collected and analyzed on a monthly basis at the Highway 5 outlet. Feel free to call me if you have any questions about these results. Sincerely, a ✓1 Doug Ryan Environment and Land Use Division Manager cc: Mary Luth, Public Health Director Richard Ragan, Ramsey County Environmental Health Paul Josephson, Wenck Associates, Inc. OOTOM EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 'rinted on Recycled Paper IL A fAL ■ f NINNIL ■ ■ir—IL■ _ 'Wenck Associates. inc February 15, 1991 Mr. Doug Ryan, Environment and Consulting Engineers band Use Division Manager (612) 479-4200 Washington County Public Health Department 14900 North 61st Street, P.O. Box 6 Stillwater, MN 55082 Re: Washington County Sanitary Landfill No. 1 Dear Mr. Ryan: The laboratory results of the offsite discharge of water from gradient control well GCl are enclosed. Water samples were collected at the Highway 5 outfall on January 28, 1991. Along with the results, the NPDES Preventative Levels and the Minnesota Department of Health Recommended Allowable Limits (RALs) are listed. The listed RALs are newly established (January 1991) and therefore supersede those referred to in the past. Of the parameters analyzed, only total phenols exceeded a preventative level. Due to this exceedance, weekly sampling at the Highway 5 outfall has commenced and will continue for three weeks as per the NPDES permit. You will be advised of these results when the analyses are complete. Samples will continue to be collected and analyzed on a monthly basis at the Highway 5 outfall for volatile organic compounds, total phenols and total lead. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. Christopher D. Mosentine, P.E. Geological Engineer CDM/cah Enclosure cc: Dick Ragan, Ramsey County Dave Douglas, MPCA Regulatory Compliance 'cCO ?Icree' -rac_, Zr `danie °'a!r �,*i 4 "SB Section. Division of Water Quality, MPCA WASHINGTON COUNTY SANITARY LANDFILL NO.1 Laboratory Analytical Results (Concentrations, ug/L) HWY5 RAL Parameter 28—Jan-91 NPDES Jan-91 Laboratory ARC Vinyl chloride <0.02 2.2 0.1 cis —1,2—Dichloroethylene BPQL<0.1 299 70. trans-1,2—Dichloroethylene BPQL<0.1 299 70 Trichloroethylene <0.02 82 30 Tetrachloroethylene . <0.008 6 7 Chloroethane <0.02 -- -- 1,1—Dichloroethane BPQL<0.1 -- 70 1,2—Dichloroethane <0.01 95 4, 1,2—Dichioropropane BPQL<0.1 95 5 Benzene <0.2 25 10 Toluene <03 45 1000 Etbylbenzene <0.5 117 700 Total xylene <2.5 28 10000 Total phenols 9 7 -- Other Parameters Ethylether BPQL<10 -- 1000 Tetrahydrofuran 3.0 -- 100 TotalLead* 3 63* 20 Note: HWY 5 is the Tri—Lakes Outlet at Highway 5. NPDES is the Preventative Level speed in the NPDES permit. RAL is the Recommended Allowable Limit for drinking water. BPQL = Below Practical Quantitation Limit (the compound detected at a concentration above the Method Detection Limit but below the PQL). * = Preventative Level not specified in NPDES permit; calculated based on hardness of Eagle Point Lake. FEB 2 6 1991 ��NNE�Tq m° 20 a a 3 0Q7 Ftir 5Q OF TFP February 21, 1991 Minnesota Department of Transportation Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155 (612) 296-1662 In reply refer to: Notice of Unencumbered Construction Fund Balance Dear �;� , � The present Screening Board Directive states that whenever a municipality's construction fund balance available as of September 1, of the current year, not including the current year's allotment, exceeds $300,000 or two times their annual construction allotment (whichever is greater), shall receive an adjustment to their money needs. Our records show that as of February 1, 1991 you have a balance Of $_ 333, A70 available for construction, not including he 1991 allotment. Recent project submittals for i payment were not deducted from the construction fund balance. �99� According to the guidelines set forth by the Screening Board Resolution, you have an excess balance of $ 3. ,� U This excess must be reduced by September 1, 199to avoid an adjustment to the money needs. Any excess above the specified limits will result in $ (� /.cc--�� /U loss of money needs. The effect of this lossh�r�the 1992 apportionment,based on the 1991 apportionment, will be approximatley $ �� ��a3�"CgrfE A�5,,-InO .dOol-cl /Ose �/7,5 /IV 1W.1, Jam' u/,� O'e4 'f ,o01-ehPea° GU/7// SO//k" A copy of this notice was also sent to the Municipal clerk when Consulting Engineer is retained. If there are any questions regarding your fund balance, please feel free to call -me at the above number. Sincerely, J Kenneth Straus Municipal State Aid Needs Manager rY-� or a ,W517 TENTATIVE EXCESS UNENCUMBERED BALANCE ADJUSTMENT The guidelines setforth in the resolution will affect the city's apportionment the fotlowing year by approximately the amount of (F) if the balance is not reduced to the allowable balance (C) by September 1,1991. See attached resolution. (A) (8) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (2xB) *** Balance 1991 Amount * (B-C) (Negative) Estimated Column B As Of (-) Construction (_) Available (-? Allowable (_) Excess Adjustment Of Loss Of 1992 Divided By Municipality 02-01-91 Allotment 02-01-91 ga lance Balance Needs Apportionment Cot u n A ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Albert Lea $1,617,977 S546,195 $1,071,782 $1,092,390 ($20,608) s0 $0 1.96 Alexandria 538,239 281,413 256,826 562,826 (306,000) 0 0 0.91 Andover 620,593 419,084 201,509 838,168 (636,659) 0 0 0.48 Anoka 715,197 341,799 "� 373,398 683,598 (310,200) 0 0 1.09 Apple Valley 1,009,260 822,681 186,579 1,645,362 (1,458,783) 0 0 0.23 Arden Hills 238,550 184,508 54,042 369,016 (314,974) 0 0 0.29 Austin 2,349,351 823,818 1,525,533 1,647,636 (122,103) 0 0 1.85 Bemidji 1,117,041 411,327 705,714 822,654 (116,940). 0 0 1.72 Blaine 1,535,212 855,880 679,332 1,711,760 (1,032,428) 0 0 0.79 Bloomington 4,414,457 2,225,659 2,188,798 4,451,318 (2,262,520) 0 0 0.98 Brainerd 784,T68 274,137 510,631 548,274 (37,643) 0 0 L86 Brooklyn Center 2,368,335 829,821 1,538,514 1,659,642 (121,128) 0 0 1.85 Brooklyn Park 3,986,854 1,078,848 2,908,006 2,157,696 750,310 5,816,012 186,752 2.70 Buffalo 737,816 217,738 520,078 435,476 84,602 1, 040,156 33,399 2.39 Burnsville 1,130,685 870,653 260,032 1,741,306 (1,481,274) 0 0 0.30 Champlin 728,357 - 270,805 457,552 541,610 (84,058) 0 0 1.69 Chanhassen 434,217 260,563 173,654 521,126 (347,472) 0 0 0.67 Chaska 886,109 261,227 624,882 522,454 102,428 1,249,764 40,130 2.39 Chisholm 283,776 212,379 71,397 424,758 (353,361) 0 0 0-34 Cloquet 1,449,951 379,056 1,070,895 758,112 312,783 2,141,790 68,773 2-83 Columbia Heights 1,067,648 393,589 674,059 787,178 (113,119) 0 0 1.71 Coon Rapids 1,517,073 927,385 589,688 1,854,770 (1,265,082) 0 0 0.64 Corcoran 197,840 197,839 1 395,678 (395,677) 0 0 0.00 Cottage Grove 760,285 652,488 107,797 1,304,976 (1,197,179) 0 0 0.17 Crookston 966,373 312,541 653,832 625,082 28,750 1,307,664 41,989 2.09 Crystal � 1,909,960 539,769 1,370,191 1,079,538 290,653 2,740,382 87,994 2.54 Detroit Lakes 531,504 216,699 314,805 433,398 (118,593) 0 0 1.45 (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (2xB) *** Balance 1991 Amount * (B-C) (Negative) Estimated column B As Of (-) Construction (_) AvaiLable (-) Allowable (_) Excess Adjustment Of Loss Of 1992 Divided By Municipality 02-01-91 Allotment 02-01-91 Balance Balance Needs -------------------------------- Apportionment CoLu n A ________ ______________________________________________________________________._--_________-_-__-_---________--____-_-_-_________ Duluth $3,262,136 $2,529,263 $732,873 $5,058,526 ($4,325,653) s0 so 0.29 Eagan 932,833 917,604 15,229 1,835,208 (1,819,979) 0 0 0.02 East Bethel 148,772 178,618 (29,846) 357,236 (387,082) 0 0 -0.17 East Grand Forks 297,269 223,666 73,603 447,332 (373,729) 0 0 0.33 Eden Prairie 2,730,061 1,019,870 1,710,191 2,039,740 (329,549) 0 0 1.68 Edina 2,911,521 1,125,380 1,786,141 2,250,760 (464,619) 0 0 1.59 Elk River 379,074 346,706 32,368 693,412 (661,044) 0 0 1.0.00 Eveleth 0 176,169 (176,169) 352,338 (528,507) 0 0 - Fairmont 1,477,382 537,198 940,184 1,074,396 (134,212) 0 0 1.75 Falcon Heights 375,959 92,894 283,065 300,000 (16,935) 0 0 3.05 Faribault 875,900 413,851 462,049 827,702 (365,653) 0 0 1.12 Farmington 297,067 263,361 33,7G6 526,722 (493,016) 0 0 0.13 Fergus Falls 1,135,842 396,636 739,206 793,272 (54,066) 0 0 1.86 Forest Lake 269,926 119,560 150,366 300,000 (149,634) 0 0 1.26 Fridley 2,270,303 558,833 1,711,470 1,117,666 593,804 3,422,940 109,911 3.06 Golden valley 1,848,406 771,053 1,077,353 1,542,106 (464,753) 0 0 1.40 Grand Rapids 460,171 287.687 172,484 575,374 (402,890) 0 0 0.60 Ham Lake 616,669 193,136 423,533 386,272 37,261 847,066 27,199 2.19 Hastings 682,152 321,054 361,098 642,108 (281,010) 0 0 1.12 Hermantown 1,102,406 114,498 987,908 300,000 687,908 2,963,724 95,165 8.63 Hibbing 899,153 743,800 155,353 1,487,600 (1,332,247) 0 0 0.21 Hopkins 681,162 384,590 296,572 769,180 (472,608) 0 0 0.77 Hutchinson 734,487 274,992 459,495 549,984 (90,489) 0 0 1.67 Internationa L,Falls 1,012,981 252,386 760,595 504,772 255,823 1,521,190 48,845 3.01 Inver Grove Heights 636,370 382,379 253,991 764,758 (510,767) 0 0 0•66 Lake Elmo 454,677 121,407 333,270 300,000 33,270 666,540 21,403 2.75 Lakeville 483,062 727,348 (244,286) 1,454,696 (1,698,982) 0 0 -0.34 Lino lakes 912,591 298,721 613,870 597,442 16,428 1,227,740 16,428 ** 2.05 ., Litchfield 770,588 185,868 584,720 371,736 212,984 1,169,440 37,551 3.15 . Litt-''anada 336,639 75,758 260,881 /\ 300,000 (39,119) 0 0 -.� 3.44 (A) ,.. r (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (2xB) *** Balance 1991 Amount * (B-C) (Negative) Estimated Cotu n B As Of (-) Construction (=) Available (-) Allowable (_) Excess Adjustment Of Loss Of 1992 Divided By Municipality 02-01-91 Allotment 02-01-91 Balance Balance Needs Apportionment Column A --------------------___-_______-_------------------------------------_-_._____---------.--.._._-_.----------------------------------------------_----------- Little Falls $676,738 $316,053 $366,685 $632,106 (S271;421) SO SO 1.14 Mankato 983,000 848,932 134,068 1,697,864 (1,563,796) 0 0 0.16 Maple Grove 874,502 759,888 114,614 1,519,776 (1,405,162) 0 0 0.15 Maplewood 2,555,498 512,672 2,042;826 1,025,344 1,017,482 4,085,652 131,190 3.98 Marshall 623,252 269,195 354:057 538,390 (184,333) 0 0 1.32 Mendota Heights 730,709 214,481 516,228 428,962 87,266 1,032,456 33,152 2.41 Minneapolis 23,914,506 8,144,140 15,770,366 16,288,280 (517,914) 0 0 1.94 Minnetonka 4,228,257 1,165,247 3,063,010 2,330,494 732,516 6,126,020 196,707 2.63 Montevideo 429,149 173,373 255,776 346,746 (90,970) 0 0 1.48 Moorhead 2,280,826 786,243 1,494,583 1,572,486 (77,903) 0 0 1.90 Morris 271,478 149,579 121,899 300,000 (178,101) 0 0 0.81 Mound 650,007 191,960 458,047 383,920 74,127 916,094 29,416 2.39 Mounds View 805,587 240,824 564,763 481,648 83,115 1,129,526 36,269 2.35 New Brighton 919,532 391,624 527,908 783,248 (255,340) 0 0 1_35 New Hope 258,197 449,329 (191,132) 898,658 (1,089,790). 0 O -0.43 New Ulm 884,260 373,303 510,957 746,606 (235,649) 0 0 1.37 Northfield 1,324,145 373,574 950,571 747,148 203,423 1,901,142 61,046 2.54 North Mankato 479,357 233,988 245,369 467,976 (222,607) 0 0 1.05 North St. Paul 363,216 260,282 102,934 520,564 (417,630) 0 0 0.40 Oakdale 485,126 276.761 208,365 553,522 (345,157) 0 0 0.75 Orono 857,167 199,986 657,181 399,972 257,209 1,314,362 42,204 3.29 Otsego 344,397 344,398 0 688,796 (688,796) 0 0 0.00 Owatonna 1,685,224 593,673 1,091,551 1,187,346 (95,795) 0 0 1.84 Ptymouth 2,915,323 965,239 1,950,084 1,930,478 19,606 3,900,168 19,606 ** 2.02 Prior Lake 674,007 325,215 348,792 650,430 (301,638) 0 0 1.07 Ramsey 551,516 417,438 134,078 834,876 (700,798) 0 0 0.32 Red Wing 1,283,998 484,257 799,741 968,514 (168,773) 0 0 1.65 Redwood Falts 286,757 122,654 164,103 300,000 (135,897) 0 0 1.34 Richfield 2,571,009 726,887 1,844,122 1,453,774 390,348 3,688,244 118,430 2.54 RobbinsdaLe 1,090,258 337,218 753,040 674,436 78,604 1,506,080 48,360 2-23 (A) (B) (C) (D) - (E) (2xB) Balance 1991 Amount * (B-C) (Negative) As Of C-> Construction (=) Available (-} Allowable (_) Excess Adjustment Of Municipality 02-01-91 AL(otment 02-01-91 Balance Balance Needs ----------------------------------------------.-_----______------------_-__-____.____-___....___--...___ Rochester $5,265,940 $1,817,135 $3,448,805 $3,634,270 (5185,465) s0 Rosemount 311,355 305,704 5,651 611,408 (605,757) 0 Roseville 1,483,800 779,103 704,697 1,558,206 (853,509) 0 St. Anthony 541,678 139,897 401,781 300,000 101,781 803,562 St. Cloud 2,385,764 927,122 1,459,642 1,854,244 (395,602) 0 St. Louis Park 3,673,027 699,082 2,973,.945 1,398,164 1,575,781 8,921,835 St. Paul 23,392,858 6,238,171- 17,154,687 12,476,342 4,678,345 34,309,374 St. Peter 226,642 226,641 1 453,282 (453,281) 0 Sauk Rapids 673,757 198,940 474,817 397,880 76,937 949,634 Savage 580,584 275,950 304,634 551,900 (247,266) - 0 Shakopee 1,123,568 375,174 748,394 750,348 (1,954) 0 Shoreview 856,042 367,942 488,100 735,884 (247,784) 0 Shorewood 385,594 251,395 134,199 502,790 (368,591) 0 South St. Paul 840,340 431,740 408,600 863,480 (454,880) 0 Spring Lake Park 604,128 89,434 514,694 300,000 214,694 1,544,.082 Stillwater 1,425,843 349,705 1,076,138 699,410 - 376,728 2,152,276 Thief River Falls 390,101 343,286 46,815 686,572 (639,757) 0 Vadmis Heights 537,792 131,860 405,932 300,060 105,932 T 811,864 Virginia 288,422 254,251 34,171 508,502 (474,331) 0 Waseca 594,136 - 164,886 429,250 329,772 99,478 858,500 West St. Paul 1,146,430 416,957 729,473 833,914 (104,441) 0 White Bear Lake 1,588,788 444,838 1,143,950 889,676 254,274 2,287,900 Wit Lmar 1,065,682 408,666 657,016 817,332 (160,316) 0 Winona 1,231,994 502,230 729,764 1,004,460 (274,696) 0 Woodbury 2,548,271 796,067 1,752,204 1,592,134 160,070 3,504,408 Worthington . 944,468 303,049 641,419 606,098 35,321 1,282,838 --------------------------------------------------------------------'_------------------------------- $172,996,989 S66,729,825 $106,267,165 $134,144,568 (S27,877,403) $109,140,425 * The allowable balance in (C) is two times the construction attotment or $300,000 (whichever is greater.) ** The initial adjustment loss in apportionment in (F) cannot exceed excess balance in M. *** r on the 1991 apportionment $1000 of money needs = S32.11 (F) *** Estimated Loss Of 1992 Apport i o ment ------------- $0 0 0 25,802 0 286,480 1,101,674 0 30,493 0 0 0 0 0 49,580 69,110 0 26,069 0 27,566 0 73,464 0 0 112,527 35,321 ** ------------- S3,370,005 (G) Column B Divided By Column A 1.90 0.02 0.90 2.87 1.57 4.25 2.75 0.00 2.39 1.10 1.99 1.33 0.53 0.95 5.76 3.08 0.14 3.08 0.13 2.60 1.75 2.57 1.61 1.45 2-20 2.12 1.59 a CLAIMS TO BE APPROVED AT FEBRUARY 21, 1991 LAKE ELMO COUNCIL MEETING (all claims are within budget unles's otherwise noted) 4436 Postmaster - postage meter $ 400.00 94437 Cleaning Office 18.42 94438 thru 94441 Park Shelter Workers 278.00 94442 League of MN Cities - annual insurance renewal 32,165.00 94443 General Office Products - Office Supplies $ 59.24 Fire Dept, 180.00 139.24 94444 St, Paul Pioneer Press - Ad for sale of copy machine 34.32 94445 Press Publications - Newsletter $ 475.25 Legal Publ, 24.33 4j9.58 94446 Hagberg's Country Mkt. - Bldg. supplies 87.54 94447 Bellaire Sanitation - Bldg, dumpster 65.60 94448 AmeriData - IBM Computer Maint. contract 307.20 94449 American Planning Assn, - Dues 42.00 94450 Leonard, Street & Deinard - Landfill (invoice attached) 504.50 94451 TKDA - General $ 1,277.55 Pass Thru 330.50 SW-1 17,617.03 MSA 64.15 19,289.23 94452 Peterson, Franke & Riac invoice attached) 6,729.95 94453 James R. Hill (invoice attached) 531.00 94454 St. Croix Animal Shelter - January impounding 263,00 94455 Washington Cty Fire Chiefs Assn. - Dues Fire Dept. 10.00 94456 Road Rescue, Inc. - Fire Dept, supplies 190.00 94457 KRS Corp. - Fire Dept. supplies 49.40 4458 Firehouse Expo - Fire Dept. subscrip. 30.00 4459 Lake Elmo Fire Dept. - tools for Fire Dept. 261.55 94460 Motorola Inc, - Fire Dept. radio 1,853.98 94461 Allied Electric - Fire Dept. Siren controls replaced 750.00 94462 NE Int. School Dist. 916 - Fire Dept. training 435.00 94463 Uniforms Unlimited - Fire Dept. 19.95 94464 Minna Conway Fire & Safety - Fire Dept. supplies 537.96 94465 Elmo's Lumber & Plywood - Fire Dept, $ 50.68 Parks Dept. 6.98 .57.66 94466 Ace Hardware - Fire Dept. $ 39.37 Maint. Dept, 44.29 83.66 94467 Lake Elmo Oil - Fire Dept, 247.98 Bldg. Insp, 160.71 Maint. Dept. 2,118o32 2,527001 94468 Washington County Public HealtZi - Haz-Waste License 142.80 94469 F.H. Bathke - Maint. Dept. supplies 4090 94470 Crysteel - Maint, Dept. parts & repair 12.00 94471 Junker Sanitation - Maint. Dept. dumpster 63.60 94472 The American Stores - Maint. Dept. parts & repair 30.54 94473 Little Falls Machine - Maint. Dept, Hitch & push bar 1,761.00 94474 MacQueen Equip. - Maint. Dept, parts & repair 111.88 FEBRUARY 21st CLAIMS (continued) 94475 Lakeland Ford Truck Sales.- Maint. Dept. parts & repair 94476 Blind Custodial Products - Office Bldg. Maint. $ 107.56 Maint. Dept. 147.94 94477 H & L Mesabi Inc. - Maint. Dept. parts & repair 94478 Lees Auto Supply - Maint. Dept. parts & repair 94479 T.J. Auto Parts - Maint. Dept. parts & repair 94480 MB Industrial Supply - Maint. Dept. parts & repair 94481 Gopher State One -Call - Maint. Dept, 94482 Arrow Bldg. Center - Maint. Dept. 94483 Polfus Implement - Parks Dept, parts & repair 94484 On -Site Sanitation - Parks Dept. satelite Sunfish 94485 Dept. of Natural Resources - Water Fund - license 94486 First Trust - Park Bond payment 94487 thru 94500 February 22nd payroll Total 337.9( 255,50 38.95 74..51 174.47 79,95 10.00 16.32 25.00 63.60 50.00 34,09.5.88 10,400.,.88 $ 115,910.47 I I1um 1! g 1991 Law Offices LEONARD, STREET AND DEINARD Professional Association Suite 2300 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 CONFIDENTIAL City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042 Attention: Ms. Mary Kueftner Administrator Invoice Number Invoice Date Client Number Matter Number THIS INVOICE IS PAYABLE UPON RECEIPT For professional services rendered and costs advanced through December 31, 1990 in connection with City of Lake Elmo v. shington County and Metropolitan Council: 6906 01/30/91 12370 11817 Date Aty Hours Value 12/05/90 EGS Attend meeting of Environmental Resource 1.00 125.00 Committee of Met Council. 12/12/90 EGS Review correspondence from County and City; 0.50 62.50 telephone conference with Mary Kueffner. 12/17/90 SLB Attend hearing of Legislative Commission on 2.00 220.00 Waste Management. ATTORNEY TIME SUMMARY: Attorney ------------------------- Hours Rate Value -------------------- Ellen G. ------- Sampson 1.50 at $125 = 187.50 Steven L. Belton 2.00 at $110 = 220.00 TOTAL FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ------------ 407.50 12370 City of Lake Elmo 11817 V. Washington County et al. 30 JAN 1991 Out -of -Pocket Disbursements: Local Travel Expenses Photocopying TOTAL FOR DISBURSEMENTS I Invoice Numbed 6906 Page 2 TOTAL BALANCE DUE UPON RECEIPT 17.60 79.40 DISBURSEMENTS, IF ANY, NOT YET BILLED WILL APPEAR ON A LATER STATEMENT PLEASE RETURN ACCOUNTING COPY WITH YOUR REMITTANCE For questions concerning your invoice call your attorney or the Billing Department at 612-335-1505 Federal I.D. 41-1682773 97.00 ------------ $504.50 INVOICE .1ca 06 1991 r\ ■ / M TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON ...iii... iii.i/iii...iii AND ASSOCIATES, INOORPORATED ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 250C AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55191-1003 810292.4 0 PAX 6IV292-0093 City of Lake Elmo Date: January 31, 1991 P.O. Box J Commission No: 9150-990 Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Invoice No: 014554 Period Ending: 12/31/90 For Professional Services in connection with Attendance at City .Meetings. Agreement dated February 2, 1988. December 4, 1990 L. Bohrer - City Council Meeting 50.00 December 18, 1990 L. Bohrer - City Council Meeting 50.00 AMOUNT DUE $ 100.00 (;4 7 t, .J 7 Z/ ✓!iw'^✓*•'3.�K ` f Vim'" .. mow✓/'�-/ 2 Y -•V� State of Minnesota ) as County of Ramsey ) Ray A. Andrews, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing account is just and true; and the services therein charged were actually rendered and of the value therein charged, that the expenses incurred were paid by the a£fiant and no part of the same has been paid. Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public, on this date Janu y 31, 91. c- - F M F N.N`dA tblM �.'1MH\M4•�r J.h' '. ^.4 ^ d"'A'p*LINDA E. SCHOREY NOTARY PUELIC—MINNE30TA ybt RmISEY CGU^!TY ; PAY Comm. Ex9rc91 Aug 4, 19�5 w `n^nNVVvv\\^ivWWNNWWVVWV\•WV TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED INVOICE �[ TA AND A KING, DUVTES, IN , AR ORSON ATE 1 =1L AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED 7 ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500AMERIOAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101.1803 61212924400 PAX 51 N2924033 City of Lake Elmo Date: January 31, 1991 3800 Laverne Avenue North Commission No: 9150-000 Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Invoice No: 014553 Period Ending: 12/31/90 For General Engineering Services as listed below. Authorization. dated February 2, 1988. 1. The Forest...- Escrow Reduction: L. Bohrer 3.50 Hrs. @ 25.53 = 89.36 x 2.75 = 2. Arabian Hi US - Preliminary Plat Review: L. Bohrer 0.50 Hrs. @ 25.53 = 12.77 x 2.75 = 3. 39tr Stroat within Brookman Addition - Final Estimate: J. Stenerson 0.50 Hrs. @ 10.56 = 5.28 x 2_.75 = 4. Annual MSA Reporting - Annual Maintenance Request and Expenditure Re>ort Certification of Mileage: L. Bohrer 5.00 Hrs. @ 25.53 = 127.65 T. Prew 6.50 Hrs. @ 1'8.03 = 117.20 244.85 x 2.75 = 5. Fred Banister Water Service - Assist in Locating: L. Bohrer 0.50 Hrs. @ 25.53 = 12.77 x 2.75 = 6. 39th Street and TH 5 Street Light ReQxas' L. Bohrer 0.50 Hrs. @ 25.53 = 12.77 x 2.75 = 7. Septic System Pumping - Review Procedures with Licensed Pumpers: L. Bohrer 4.00 Hrs. @ 25.53 = 102.12 x 2.75 = 8. 201 Septic System - Assist Property Owner Trouble Shoot Pump Problem: L. Bohrer 1.00 Hrs. @ 25.53 = 25.53 x 2.75 = 245.74 d�a �> 35.12-"' 14.52 673.34 35.12 35.12 280.83 70.21 Page-2 INVOICE Commission No. 9150-000 9. Limited Business Zone - Suggested Standards L. Bohrer 1.00 Hrs. @ 25.53 = 25.53 x 2.75 = 70.21 10. Prepare for Council Meeting - Review Agenda Packets L. Bohrer 0.50 Hrs. @ 25.53 = 12.77 x 2.75 = 35.12 11. Section 32 Apneal: Expenses: Bechwith, Inc. (Inv. copy attached) 12.72 AMOUNT DUE ......................... $ 1,508.05 State of Minnesota ) ss County of Ramsey ) Ray A. Andrews, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing account is just and true; and the services therein charged were actually rendered and of the value therein charged, that the expenses incurred were paid by the affiant and no part of the same has been paid. Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public, on this date JanuPy 31n991./^ /1 / LINOA E. SCHOREY NOTARY PUBLIC—MINNBSOTA RAMSEY COUNTY My Comm. Expires Aug 4. 1925 TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED TDA INVOICE TOLTZ. KING, DUVAL L, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue No. Lake Elmo, I'm 55042 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 65101.1893 612/292-4400 FAX 612/292-0083 Date: January 31, 1991 Commission No: 9325-02 Invoice No: 014557 Period Ending: 12/31/90 For Professional Services in connection with the 1989 MSA-Improvements - 43rd and Kimbro. Authorization approved at City Council Meeting on June 21, 1989. Construction Phase (9325-02): Personnel: Classification: Billing Rate: L. Bohrer Senior Registered Engin .50 Hrz. @ 70.21 = 35.11 AMOUNT DUE ................................. $ 35.11 State of Minnesota ) ss County of Ramsey Ray A. Andrews, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing account is just and true; and the services therein charged were actually rendered .and of the value therein.charged, that the expenses inourred were paid by the affiant and no part of the same has been paid. Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public, on this date Jan 31, 1991. lB �tg 040A E, SCHOREY Hai NOTARY PUBLIC—MINNESOTA RANISEY COUNTY My cam. Etpirea Aug 4, ISO v �nrMN�'nv^ryrytivvwwww✓�'wu TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED V T A INVOICE (�, r\ ■ / M TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON DA ri AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2600AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 56101-1893 612/292-4400 FAX 612/292 0083 City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue No. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Date: January 31,-1991 Commission No: 9492-03 Invoice No: 014569 Period Ending: 12/31/90 For Professional Services in connection with the 1989 MSAImprovements - 15th Street from CSAH 13 to West City Limits (Grading, Gravel Base, Drainage and Bituminous Surfacing). Authorization approved at City Council Meeting on January 17, 1989. Construction Phase (9492-03): Personnel: Classification: J. Stenerson Technician Billing Rate: 1.00 HrS. @ 29.04 29.04 AMOUNT DUE ................................... $ 29.04 State of Minnesota ) ss County of Ramsey Ray A. Andrews, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing account is just and true; and the services therein charged were actually rendered and of the value therein charged, that the expenses incurred were paid by the affiant and no part of the same has been paid. Subscribed and sworn to before me, a not ry public, on this date Janu 31, 1 1. C AMNAMh'WYMAV W��Mr:,, J.`: - n G! 35r. LINDA E. SCHOREY NOTARY PUBLIC—IALiN:SOTA •�7(d RAMSFY COWITY My Comm. Exp r a Aq d. 1195 y Y y yyhMNyvVWW1NVWWYJWN:.^N` u TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON- AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED FEB 0 6 1991 INVOICE ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS City of Lake Elmo 3800Laverne Avenue No. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL. AN05RSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-1893 612/292-4400 FAX 612/292-0083 Date: January 31, 1991 Commission No: 9821-01 Invoice No: 014589 Period Ending: 12/31/90 For Professional Services in connection with the SW-1 Water System. Authorization approved at Regular City Council Meeting on August 7, 1990. Plans Phase (9821-01): Personnel: Classification: T. Prew Registered Engineer L. Bohrer Senior Registered Engin J. Davidson Senior Registered Engirt R. Dinndorf Senior Technician L. Sorenson Senior Technician C. Rylander Technician C. Rylander Technician J. Stenerson Technician G. Garr Technician S. Olson Technician S. Olson Technician B. Cooper Technician C. Schardin Technician Reimbursable Expenses: Computer Service Fee - Computer Services Richard T. Dinndorf - Travel Thomas D. Prew - Travel Billing Rate• 60.50 Hrs. @ 49.58 - 1.00 Hrs. @ 70.21 - 2.50 Hra. @ 88.00 = 66.00 Hrs. @ 49.20 - 34.00 Hrs. @ 46.01 = 73.50 Hrs. @ 34.13 = 1.00 Hrs. @ 44.00 = .50 Hrs. @ 29.04 = 30.00 Hrs. @ 34.13 = 71.50 Hrs. @ 26.98 = 1.00 Hrs. @ 40.48 = 50.00 Hrs. @ 24.20 = 71.00 Hrs. @ 24.20 = AMOUNT DUE ................................. $ 2,999.59 70.21 220.00 3,247.20 1,564.34 2,508.56 44.00 14.52 1,023.90 1,929.07 40.48 1,210.00 1,718.20 804.60 220.46 3.90 17,617.03 JANIEs R. HILL, INC. PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 9401 Am Am So., Sum 140, BLOOMINGION, MN 55431 612/884.3029 Fax 884-9518 Lake E!me, City B Attn: '`s. Mary ,':.11effner 3800 Laverne ne Ave. No. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 PRCPESSICNAL SERVICES RENDERED: ----------------- CITY :X LAKE ELMC-MIS_./MUNICIPAL WORK (3097P) City planning commission meetings Ctaer, mis_, services for- client Letters, memos, phone conversations, etc. PLANNER I1I R, 0 HRS ;t :$ 54 = 8 531,i?ii JAN 31 5, 31 , 00 JAMES R. HILL, INC. PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS 9401 JAMES AVE. SO., SUITE 140, Bi00MING10N, MN 55431 612/884-3029 FAX 884-9518 JANUARY 1991 City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue Lake Elmo, MN 55042 BREAKDOWN OF MISCELLANEOUS HOURS: -- Planning Commission meeting (1-14-91). 2.00 HRS. @ $59/HR. -- R. Kolstead - Rolling Hills review. 1.00 HRS. @ $59/HR. -- Review of City Park Dedications 1.00 HRS. @ $59/HR. requirements. -- Limited Business zone report and 2.00 HRS. @ $59/HR. research. -- Review of City Shoreland Regulations 2.50 HRS. @ $59/HR. and Wetland Ordinance. Metro Council staff correspondence. 0.50 HRS. @ $59/HR. TOTAL $ 531.00 PETERSON, FRANKE, & RIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 612 City of Lake Elmo 21H.0955 3800 Laverne Avenue Borth Lake Elmo, BB 55042 ACCOUNT N01 PREVIOUS BALANCE FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES 11135-900001 Administrator - Miscellaneous 1,368.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11135-910001 Administration - Miscellaneous 0.00 1,389.00 0.00 0.00 11135-910003 Lake Jane Water Service Area 0.00 45.00 0.00 0.00 11135-910004 Lake Jane Landfill Park - Zavcon 0.00 180.00 0.00 0.00 ---------------- ---- ---- 1,368.00 1,614.00 0.00 0.00 PAYMENTS Page: 1 01/31/91 11135M BALANCE 0.00 $1,368.00 0.00 $1,389.00 ' 1 0.00 $45.00 0.00 $180.00 0.00 $2,982.00 THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE P9109F 'I'O THE END {.;F THE MONTH. PAYMENTS REG EIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH :S STATEEMENT. PE-rERSON, FRANKE, & RIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EAST FIFTH STREET l/ SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 4 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 612 Page: 1 City of Lake Elmo 291-8955 01/31/91 3800 Laverne Avenue North ACCOUNT N0: 11135-910001K Lake Elmo, MN 55042 STATEMENT A0: 1 Administration - Miscellaneous 01/02/91 JPF Review counsel agenda for 1-2-91 JPF Telephone conference with Ada. and mayor re counsel agenda. JPF Prepare for and attend councel meeting. JPF Telephone conference with Mayor re coma. appts. and proceedure for installing new councel members. JPF Research re same. 01/09/91 JPF Telephone conference with L. Hunt re P/C regulations. 01/10/91 JPF Telephone conference with Schosaker APAC re Cimarron Pank and proposed ordinence. JPF Telephone conference with Ada, and Huent re P/C regs. 01/14/91 JPF Review council agenda. JPF Review city regs. and statutues re Pank Coma., planning coma., coup. plan, variances, afg. housing and tale. coaf ads. re same. JPF Attend council meeting. 01/16/91 JPF Telephone conference with U. Johnson re P/C regs, THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND P.AYA8LE PRIOR TO THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYNIENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL SE CREDITED TO THE NEST MON TH'S STATEMENT. City of Lake Elmo PETERSON, FRANKE, & RIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 512 Page: 2 291-8955 - 01 / 31 / 91 ACCOUNT 10: 11135-910001H STATEMENT NO: 1 Administration - Miscellaneous and council parliamentary proceedure. 01/22/91 JPF Telephone conference with Mayor re: council rules of procedure. 01/25/91 JPF Conference with Administrator re: Open Meeting Law. Jerome P. Filla 01/17/91 JKK Telephone call to Mary Kueffner. 1/28191 JMM Telephone conference with Todd Williams. JMM Telephone conference with Todd Williams and Jerry Filla re: counsil proceedures. 01/30/91 JMM Telephone call to Karen Johnston re: Planning Commission. John Michael Miller FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED TOTAL CURRENT WORK BALANCE DUE THIS 3TATF6AENT IS DU -a AND ?/WARL IPHI-R TO T`';F ^li3 OF THE jVIOa�Tl9. 1332.00 57.00 1389.00 1389.00 $1,389.00 PAYMENTS REC'IV ED AFTER THE LAST D4Y OF THE MONTH IVIL. RE CRF[ATED TO THE '4F%T :VIOHTP 3 3TAl'F.MCNT. PETERSON, FRANKE, & FRIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE Citp of Lake Elmo AREA CODE 512 zal-sass 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, NN 55042 ACCOUNT N0: 11135 STATENE Lake Jane Water Service Area 01/22/91 JPF Conference With Administrator re: regs to require hook ups. Jerome P. Filla FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED TOTAL CURRENT WORE BALANCE DUE THIS STATEMENT IS DUE ANr PA`(ASI..E PRIOR TO THE END OF THE MONTH. �.. PAYMEN""S RECEIVFD AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE .MONTH WILL BE CRFDI TED TO THE NEXT MONTH ST4TEMENT. PETERSON, FRANKE, & RIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE City Of Lake Elmo AREA CODE 512 3800 Laverne Avenue North 291-5955 Lake Elmo, HN 55042 ACCOUNT NOR 11135 STATEMS Lake Jane Landfill Park - Lawcon 01/22/91 JPF Conference with Administrator ret Laweon grant conversion, review City files. Jerome P. Fills FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED TOTAL CURRENT WORE BALANCE DUE THIS S'FATEMEN'T IS DUE A.ND PAYA-E1LE CR!O? -1°0 7-4.E END OF THE 7,IONTII, PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH fMILL 9E CPEDITEO TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT. PETERSON, FRANKE, & RIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 612 City of Lake Elmo 291-8955 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MR 55042 ACCOUNT NOs PREVIOUS BALANCE FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES 11155-900002 Brockman -Fraser Annex 363.00 419.00 2.50 0.00 11155-900003 Enright et. al. Annex 236.00 1,350.00 0.00 0.00 11155-906004 Federal Land Co. vs. Lake Elmo 18.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11155-900005 Derrich Land Co. vs. Lake Elmo 180.50 802.50 0.00 0.00 11155-900006 J. Rogers vs. Lake Elmo 461.00 234.00 0.00 0.00 11155-900007 Lake Elmo vs. D. Henning 18.00 263.00 2.50 0.00 11155-900008 Jamie Olson vs. Lake Elmo 441.00 1,206.00 0.00 0.00 PAYMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 THIS STATSNI ENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE PnIOR" TO THE ENt�I. OF THE MONTH. Pages 1 01/31/91 �Q 5M BALANCE $784.50 $1,586.00 $18.00� $983.00 $695.00 $283.50 $1,647.00 P,AW4FNTS RECF_IVFO AFTER'THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL SE CRP DTTEC TO THE NEXT MONTHS STATEMeJT. PETERSON, FRANKE, $ RIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 60 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 612 City of Lake Elmo 291-69E6 ACCOUNT N01 PREVIOUS BALANCE FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES 11155-900009 Lake Elmo Vs. Richert & Downs 18.00 109.25 0.00 0.00 11155-900810 Lake Elmo vs. Hauser 18.00 71.25 0.00 0.00 11155-900011 Hanson vs. Lake Elmo 657.00 189.00 10.20 0.00 11115-900012 Lake Elmo vs. Cozy Cove Motel 148.50 248.25 0.00 0.00 11155-900013 Lake Elmo vs. Grabski 138.50 208.50 0.00 0.00 2,697.50 5,100.75 15.20 0.00 PAYMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.@0 0.00 THIS STPTE..MENT IS DUE ANQ ^A?Yt B!-. PIPIOR "'^ Tu`� F'10 !ter',HP f.100'r`7H. Page, 2 01/31/91 11155 BALANCE $127.25 $89.25 $856.20 $396.75 $347.00 $7,813.45 PAYMENTS r ECSV ED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE •MONTH W ILL BE CREMED TC THE ?+F_%T MONTH'S STATEMENT PETERSON, FRANKE, & PIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 56101 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 612 City of Lake Elmo 291-8956 Lake Elmo, RN ACCOUNT NO: ST Brockman -Fraser Annex PREVIOUS BALANCE 01/14/91 JPF Review pleading and transcripts. Jerome P. Filla 01/28/91 JMM Telephone conference with clerk, court of appeals. JMM Telephone call to Mark Vierling. 01/29/91 JMM Prepare Motion to waive oral argument and arrange for filing and service. JMM Telephone conference with Mark Vierling. 01/30/91 JMM Telephone conference with Mary Eueffner. John Michael Miller 01/29/91 CAB Telephone conference with Atty. Raschke re: Appellate oral argument. FAX him Motion papers re: same. Carol A. Bertram F THIS ST;.TFNIENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE P("2ICR TO THE c-ND OF ME MC'NTI.1, PAYMENTS RECEIVED .AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE ?AONTH WILL BE f.R EDITFD TO T:9E NEXT MCINT H'S STATEMENT PETERSON, FRANKE, & PIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 512 Page: 2 City of Lake Elao 291-8955 01/31/91 ACCOUNT N0: 11155-900002N STATEMENT NO: 3 Brockman -Fraser Annex FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED 419.00 Fax Charge 2.50 TOTAL EXPENSES THRU 01/31/91 2.50 TOTAL CURRENT WORE 421..50 BALANCE DUE $784.50 acvvev THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR T O THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS HEGC -VED AFTEP THE LASTDAY OF THE MONTH'NILL 3E COEDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'$STATEMENT. PETERSON, FRANKE, & RIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 612 Paget 1 City of Lake Elio 291-8955 01/31/91 Lake Elmo, MN ACCOUNT NO: 11155-900003M STATEMENT NO: 3 Enright et. al. Annex PREVIOUS BALANCE $236.00 01/08/91 JPF Prepare for deposition. 01/09/91 JPF Prepare and serve pet. memo opposing AG motion to dismis. 01/11/91 JPF Prepare for and attend hearing, Nash. Cty. Ct., conf. atty. gen. Ratscke re status and motions to enterence. 01/16/91 JPF Review notice to intervene filed by Oakdale. JPF Prepare and serve obj. to intervention. 01/24/91 JPF Review property owner petition to intervene, correspondence to Atty Vierling objecting to Intervention. Jerome P. Filla 1350.00 FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED 1350.00 TOTAL CURRENT BORE 1350.00 A THIS STATEIYIENT IS DUE AND PAYAPLE P?109 M THE rNL OF THE WN'TH. PA.Y.NIRNTS RECF!VED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL 5F CREDITED TO THE. .V EXT MONTH STATEMENT. PETERSON, FRANKE, & RIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EA5T FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 City of Lake Elmo Enright et. al. Annex BALANCE DUE TELEPHONE AREA CODE 612 Pages 2 291-5955 0 1/ 3 1/ 9 1 ACCOUNT NOs 11155-900003H STATEMENT NOs 3 THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE PPIOM TO THC END OF THE MONTH. $1,586.00 PAYMENTS RECEIVEO AFTER THE LAST DAY OF "rHE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT. City of Lake Elmo Lake Blmo, MN PETERSON, FRANKE, & RIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 60 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 612 Pages 1 291-8e55 01 / 31 / 91 ACCOUNT no, 11155-900005M STATEMENT NOs 3 Derrich Land Co. vs. Lake Elmo PREVIOUS BALANCE 01/14/91 JPF Review city file and pleadings in prep for app. ct. hearing. 01/17/91 JPF prep for attend, app. ct. hearing, conf. atty Rodis, tele conf. ad*. re status. Jerome P. Fills. 01/17/91 JMM Review ordinance ret expiration of permits. John Michael Miller FOR CURRENT SERVICES REE➢BRED TOTAL CURRENT WORE BALANCE DUE THIS STATF)AENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE END OF THE MONTH. $180.50 774.00 28.50 802.50 802.50 $983.00 PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL. BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT. PETERSON, FRANKE, & RIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL SUILDINO 60 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 612 Page: 1 City of Lake Elmo 291-6955 01/31/91 Lake Elio, MR ACCOUNT NO: 11155-900006K STATEMENT NO: 3 J. Rogers vs. Lake Elmo PREVIOUS BALANCE $461.00 @1/18/91 JPF Conference with adz. re facts for trial and rev. city files. JPF Conference with atty Radec re status of litigation. 01/23/91 JPF Telephone conference with Atty. Radio re: zoning regs and status of lawsuit. JPF Telephone conference with Atty Radio re: status App. review; review deposition of Bohren. Jerome P. Filla 234.00 FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED 234.00 TOTAL CURRENT WORK 234.00 BALANCE DUE $695.00 a avavv THIS :STAY-MlFfAT IS OUE- AND PAY IIAMi PRIOR TO THE E ID OF THE WMTH. RAYMFNT6 .RFGEIVF.O AFTER THE LAST OAY OF TH..E .MONTH "'ILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH :S .STATEMENT PETERSON, FRANKE, & RIACH PROFESSIONAL, ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 City of Lake Elmo Lake Elmo, MN Lake Elmo vs. D. Henning PREVIOUS BALANCE TELEPHONE AREA C00E 612 Pages 1 291-8955 01 / 31 / 9 1 ACCOUNT NOe 11155-900007H STATEMENT NOs 2 01/02/91 JMM Review file and prepare complaint. 01/03/91 JMM Review file and prepare summons and complaint. 01/08/91 JMM Review file and prepare complaint. 01/11/91 JMM Telephone conference with Mary Kueffner and complete the notice of eviction and letter to Mary Kaeffner. JMM Telephone call to Mary Kueffner. 01/30/91 JMM Telephone conference with Mary Kueffner. John Michael Miller FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED Fax Charge TOTAL EXPENSES THRU 01/31/91 THIS STATE"IIENT IS DUE ANC PAYARLF: PRIOR TO THE END OF THE MONTH. $18.00 263.00 263.00 2.50 2.50 PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAV OFTHF. MONTH WILL BE CREOITEDT0 THE NEXT M.ONTH'S STATEMENT. City of Lake Elmo PETERSON, FRANKE, & RIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 65101 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 612 P a c 291-9955 ACCOUNT NO. 11155-90E STATEMENT 1 Lake Elio vs. D. Henning TOTAL CURRENT WORK 2E1 BALANCE DUE $2EI THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PA`1A6L=- 7091OR TO THE END 7F THE YIOWTH, PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH `NILL 9F CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'.S STA1EINIENT. PETERSON, FRANKE, & RIAC9H PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE AREA C009 612 Page: 1 City of Lake Elmo 291-6956 01/31/91 3800 Laverne Avenue North ACCOUNT NOv 11155-900008M Lake Elmo, MN 55042 STATEMENT NO: 2 Jamie Olson vs. Lake Elmo PREVIOUS BALANCE 01/10/91 JPF Review code and pleadings in prep for trial. 01/11/91 JPF Telephone conference with Atty Horton and ads. re facts. JPF Review city file re facts and changes to zoning regs. 01/16/91 JPF Conference with atty Banton re facts and Minn. Dot. condemnation. 01/17/91 JPF Review code and pleadings in prep for trial. JPF Conference with atty Manton re sign regs. 01/18/91 JPF Conference with Adm. re facts for trial and rev. of city files. JPF Review code and pleadings in prep for trial. JPF Conference with Atty Horton re condemnation proceeding, witnesses, discovery. 01/22/91 JPF Conference with Building Inspector re: sign permits. THIS SI-A-TENIENT IS DUE AND PAYADLE PRIOR TO THE END OFT HE UIONTH. $441.00 C PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OR THE .MONTH WILL. BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH .STATEMENT. PETERSON, FRANKE, & RIAOH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 612 Page: 2 City of Lake Elmo 291-0955 01/31/91 ACCOUNT N0: 11155-900008M STATEMENT 10: 2 Jamie Olson vs. Lake Elmo 01/25/91 JPF Conference with Building Inspector re: sign permits for Vali Hi, Trans City, and Lehman Mushroom. Jerome P. Fills, FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED TOTAL CURRENT WORE BALANCE DUE THIS STATFINIENT IS DUE ANC ?AYABLE PP.I01FI TC THE NC OF THE i'AON I N. 1206.00 1206.00 1206.00 $1,647.00 PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAYOFTHE MONTH WILL BE CRECITEDTOTHE>IE%T MONTH.'S STATEMENT. PETERSON, FRANKE, & RIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 612 City of Lake Elno 291-6965 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55642 Lake Elmo vs. Richert & Downs PREVIOUS BALANCE 01/18/91 JMM Review file and summarize status. John Michael Miller FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED TOTAL CURRENT WORE C ACCOUNT 10: 1115 STAT&N C BALANCE DUE THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST BAY OF THE 'AG NTH WILL DE CREDITED TO THE NEXT rAGNTH'S STATEMENT PETERSON, FRANKE, & RIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 30D MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 60 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE Page AREA CODE 612 51 / 3 1 . City of Lake Elao 291-8966 ACCOUNT H0: 11155-9000 i 3800 Laverne Avenue North STATEMENT RO Lake E110, NH 55042 Lake ZIRO vs. Hauser $18 1 PREVIOUS BALANCE 01/18/91 JKM Review file and susmarize status. -- 7' John Michael Killer - 7 FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED TOTAL CURRENT WORK 71 i S� BALANCE DUE THIS STATE.1vIEN?" IS DUF. AND PA.YA51—` `qI 9 TC T"r! e 1)F THE f1jjotlTH. PAYMENTS PECEN ED AFTER'rHE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WLI. 3E CREDf'ED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT. PETERSON, iFRANKE, & RIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIO W EST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 612 City of Lake Elmo 291-6056 3800 Laverne Avenue Worth ACCOUNT N01 1115! Lake Elmo, HE 55042 STATER[ Hanson vs. Lake Elmo PREVIOUS BALANCE 01/08/91 JPF Telephone conference with atty Gleekel re hearing. 01/09/91 JPF Telephone conference with Atty GLeekel and Judge Eggelston re PT, JT, disovery. 01/10/91 JPF Telephone conference with Atty. Gleekal re PT-JT dates. 01/18/91 JPF Conference with ads. re facts for trial and rev. of city file. Jerome P. Filla FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED Photo copies Paz Charge TOTAL EXPENSES THRD 01/31/91 TOTAL CURRENT YORE THIS STATUAENT 1S DUE .AND PAYAeLa PRIOR TO THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE C.REITFD TO THE NEXT MONTWS STATFMFNT PETERSON, FRANKE, & RIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 612 City of Lake Elmo 291-8968 ACCOUNT No, 1 $V Hanson vs. Lake Elmo BALANCE DUE THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE END OF THE �,IONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TOTHE NE%TMONTH'S SIATEMEN' PETERSON, FRANKE, & RIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 1\ TELEPHONE AREA CODE. 612 City of Lake Elso 291-8955 3800 Laverne Avenue Borth ACCOUNT 101 11 Lake BIRO, MN 55042 STA7 Lake Elmo vs. Cozy Cove Hotel PREVIOUS BALANCE 01/03/91 JMH File review and organization re, detersining appropriate course of action. 01/08/91 JHH Review file. 01/14/91 JHH Review file. 01/17/91 JHH Review file and call to his McBasara. JHH Letter to Jis HnNasara. 01/18/91 JHH Telephone conference with Jim McHasara. John Michael Hiller FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED TOTAL CURRENT YORE BALANCE DUE THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE END Or THE 7"ONTH, PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE ^AONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEM`.NT. PETERSON, FRANKE, & RIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING 50 EAST FIFTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 551G1 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 512 Citp of Lake Elmo 291-8955 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, KM 55042 Lake Elmo vs. Grahski PREVIOUS BALANCE ACCOUNT NO: 1115E STATENI 01/03/91 JMM File review and organization re: determining appropriate course of action. 01/08/91 JMM Review file. 61/14/91 JMM Telephone conference with Jim McNamara. 01/17/91 JMM Review file and call to him McNamara. John Michael Miller FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED TOTAL CURRENT MORN BALANCE DUE THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR 'ro THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL. 9E CREDITED TO THE NEXT NIONIH'S STATEP.IENT. RE -QUEST FOR COUNCIL.AC T ION Meeting Date February 21, 1991 GEN DA SECTION City Council Reports T EM : Creation of Parks Department 4NC: 3C DE=ARTMEN T EY: APPROVED* FCR AGENDA EY: Councilman Johnson proposed this to the council earlier this year, and I do not believe there was any comment, at that time, from the council. The Parks Commission discussed this at its February 11 meeting, and its 'recommendation is, attached. From the staff's point of view, I never looked at this in terms of creating a new department, but rather splitting a larger existing department. With the number of parks that we have, and the pride the City has taken in maintaining these parks, along with t! the fact that.we now have the opportunity to use a city -owned building for city -related purposes, I thought it the onn.ortune time to look at this option. Just as. important is the fact that we have about 50 miles of city streets, with more to come with the passing of our Comprehensive Plan and RE zoning district. Street maintenance, such as Patching is a summertime job which keeps our maintenance forman busy. The majority of parks maintenance is also done in the summer (except for the maintenance of skating . rinks) so we have two very time-consuming projects, both demanding an equal amount of time. In the winter time, the number one priority of both'of these departments should be to keep our roads cleared and sanded. For those of you that have not been over to the building, I would suggest that you do check it out. There is a pretty good sized bay area that could hold most, if not all, of the parks equipment. There is a very nice "meeting room" area that could be used by not only the Parks Department, but possibly ReAPP (we still have the old copy machine that could be moved over there), and also by the VBWD (they could use our council chambers if they ever need more room for such things as public hearings etc.) as could ReAPP. (OVER) File cabinets that are stored here at the city office for both ReAPP and VBWD could also be moved over there, as there is a room that would be ideal for storage. On the downside, the City would lose potential income from rental property, but keep in mind, if we do rent to the private sector, we lose tax exempt status on the property. Therefore, we would be taxed at a commercial rate (Twill have an estimate on that figure at the meeting). As noted in the Parks Commission's recommendation, the only capital outlay would be a small truck for hauling parks equipment (cost was estimated between $5,000 and $10,000), furniture, telephone and tools at an esimate of $1,000. Yc. Lake Elmo Parks Commission Minutes February 11, 1991 Page 2 S. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT The Parks Commission recommends that a separate Park Department be instituted for the City of Lake Elmo. Further that the job of Tree Inspector be added to the new parks department and further that the parks department be physically located in the city owned vacant building at 11194 Upper 33rd Street. The Parks Commission members have offered to help locate furnishings for the new department: desk, table, chairs. The City needs to purchase: one vehicle to pull equipment, $1,000 for small tools, install a telephone. The Parks Commission will hold their meetigs in the new facility. The City Hall kitchen is really not adequate for meetings which fall on the same night as a council or planning commission meeting. M/S/P Lee/Simpson - to request a separate Parks & Recreation Department which includes the recommendations stated above. (Motion carried.) REQUEST FOR COUNCIL.AC T ION Meeting Date February U, 1991 _EN CA S ECT1oN City Administrator's Report un11riC:- CE?; STI'll ENT. BY: Request to remove dead trees from city -owner property APPROVED FCR AGENDA BY: Councilman Mottaz has requested Permission from the City to remove some dead trees from the city -owned, unimporved 60 foot road easement as shown on the attached man. The' City has had similar requests in the past, such as in Reid and Sunfish Parks and the only thing the city has ever required was a waiver of liability. SEG. 4 --- � - — HWY - - 13 3 Is e rrao�s� BLO Kul transmission — l r _ 2 V5. IT �EASEHE'wii ,s k,cWle r M easement w 638.06 �- N88°23'55"l' (!or �0sC,`. -2250 og�39 �_ \ Q'64062 ar�atae 14,lt 1 a z �b a 21 use box " 1 '>> 16a2.DA t3ob 1 Xlari l y'1 �Isoh Z h O 3 h b� ,n14Soanne a (� M easement (nC G,/, re BL CK l o5D N Bd'25 35 E ABd.55 4.62 La ,v di"_515d. I a_vl " - T i REQUEST FOR COUNCIL.ACTIGN February 21, 1991 GEN OA SECTION City Engineer's Report T E,"A; (A) 01d Village Drainage (B) Diversion of Water to Sunfish Lake NO: JOR1G.1NAT1N(:�--- 6A &B. DEPRTMENT: BY: APPROVED FCR AGENDA BY: Attached are staff reports from Tom Prew relative to the direction given by the Council at its last meeting. Tom and Larry will be at the meeting to discuss these items in detail. FEB 15 '91 10:05 T.K.D.A. & ASSOC. Q,.12MJv February 14, 1991 Honorable Mayor and City Council Lake Elmo, Minnesota Re: Old Village Drainage Improvements Lake Elmo, Minnesota Cmmnission No, 9270-01 Dear Mayor and Council Members: P.2 TOLTZ, XINQ, DUVALL, ANOGASON AM Axxnnu.-. ,..--____.___ 0000 AMBRIDAN NATIONAL DANK GUILDINQ SAINT PAUL. MINNR$OTA 40101.10P} 010/M-4400 PAX 01e/C0Q•0000 At tine February .5, 1991 City Council meeting, we discussed the possibility of constructing a detention pond on the VFW Ballfield site, We were asked at that time to prepare a cgst estimate for that option. Attached are Preliminary assessment rolls for all four storm sewer options Including the preliminary street assessments, VFW Balifleld - Pond Option Proposed Improvement storm sewer for the VFW 13011field Pond option would be constructed along ,Route C. However, a detention pond would be excavated at the Ballfield site to reduce discharge rates and to provide storm water storage, The bailfield and fences wotdd be replaced on the bottom of the pond. The bottom of the Pond would be graded t© d1•811t the field dry, A low flow diversion would be constructed so that ponding would occur only during heavy runoff events. A 30" outlet pipe would be constructed fxom the pond to the railroad culvert, PEE 15 '91 10:06 T.K.D.R. & RSSOC. P.3 Honorable Mayor and City Council Lake Elmo, Minnesota February 14, 1991 Page Two 2. Estimated Project Cost A. &= Estimated Construction Cost $146,700 $ 0 $146,700 Estimated Engineering (18%*) 26,300 2,700 29,000 EsthuuW Right-of.way 5,0000 5 Total Estimated Streets $178,000 $2,700 $180,700 B. Route C -with VFW B Igleld Pond Alley to Laverne $ 0 $10,200 $10,200 33rd and Laverne - Txunk 22,450 22,450 44,900 33rd and Laverne - Catch. Basis 12,900 0 12,900 Laverne to RR Culvert 80,750 242,250 323,000 CSAH 17 Crossing 0 16,400 1.6,400 36th and Layton 0 6,500 6,500 Old Village Bitching 0 11,600 11,600 Total Cost Route C wit}] Pond 118 6Q(! MUM 435 500 Total Street, Drainage and Ponding $296,600 $319,660 $616,200 3. Preliminary ]Financing Plan - Storm Sewer Route C - with VFW Ballfield Street Construction $146,700 Storm Sewer - Route C - with Pond 279,600 Engineering, Legal, Administrative 84,900 Easements 15,000 Right-of-way 2= Total Project Cost 616,200 Less MSA Construction Funds-296,600 Less MSA Maintenance Funds .42 IM Amount to be Assessed $277,300 FEB 15 '91 10:06 T.K.D.A. & ASSOC. P.4 Honorable Mayor and City Council Lake Elmo, Minnesota February 14, 1991 Page Three 4. Preliminary Assessment Rates Street Improvements = $20,00/FF x 2747,09' Drainage improvements = $0,1196/SF x 1,858,451 SF = 5. Preliminary Cost Estimate Route C - with VFW Balifield Pond 1 Remove headwall 2 42" .Metal Pita $54,942,00 $222,358.00 1.0 LS $500.00 $500,00 150.0 LF 40.00 6,000.00 7,700,00 * 10% Contingencies 800.00 * 20% Engineering and Administrative Costs 1-200.00 $10,200.00 1 42" RCP 250.0 LF 60.00 15,000.00 2 18" RCP 800.0 LF 18.00 14,400.00 3 6' Diameter Manhole 3.0 EA 1,200.00 3,600.00 4 4' Diameter Manhuie t 0 EA 1,000.00 00 nn 34,000.00 * 10% Contingencies 3,400.00 * 20% Engineering and Administrative Costs 3 500,00 .3- 9z7n FEB 15 '91 10:07 T.K.D.R. & ASSOC. P.5 Honorable Mayor and City Council Lake Bingo, Minnesota February 14, 1991 Page Four WJT 1 4' Diameter Catch Basins 7.0 EA 1,000,00 7,000.00 2 12" RCP 180.0 LE 1500 2,700.00 9,700.00 + 10% Contingencies 1,000.00 + 20% Engineering and Administrative Costs 2,200.00 Laverne to RR Culvert $12,900,00 1 30" CFP Pipe 1,820.0 LF 27,00 49,140.00 2 42" RCP 500.0 LF 60.00 30,000.00 3 6' Diameter Manhole 4.0 EA 1,200,00 4,800.00 4 30" Apron 1.0 EA 500.00 $00.00 4 Rip Rap 6010 CY 20.00 1,200.00 5 Ditch Cleaning 300.0 LF 5.00 1,500,00 6 Class 5 Gravel 150,0 TN 6.00 900.00 7 Restoration $_ Common_ Excavation 1,0 LS 17 000 U CY 12,000,00 mil 12,000.00 176,540.00 + 10% Contingencies 17,660.00 + 20% Engineering and Administrative Costs 38,800,00 + VFW Ballfleld Property, 3 AC @ $30,000/AC gQx= $413,000.00 I 18" RCP - Jacked 100.0 LF 100,00 10,000.00 2 Catch Basin 2.0 EA 1,000.00 2,000,00 3 12" RCP 30.0 LF 15.00 450 {10 12,450.00 + 10% Contingencies 1,250.00 + 20% Engineering and Administrative Costs 2,700.00 $16,400.00 -4- 9270 FEB 15 '91 10:77 T.K.D.A. & ASSOC. P.6 Honorable Mayor and City Council Lake Elmo, Minnesota February 14, 1991 Page Five 1 4' Dimnoter Catch l3asin 4.0 EA 1,000.00 r. t� t 4,900,00 + 10% Contingencies 500.00 + 20% Engineering and Adtnutistrative Costs 1,100.00 $6,500.00 1 Ditching 1,700.0 LF 4.00 61800.00 Restoration t .n i A o. nnn nn o nnn nn 8,800.00 + 10% Contingencies 900,00 + 20%n Engineering and Administrative Costs T.9nn.nn $11,600,00 6. Conclusion (liven the price of the VFW property, and the cost of excavation, we feel the VFW Sallfield-Pond option is too expensive. Sincerely yours, Thomas D. hew, P.B. TDP;j Attachments '5- 9270 338D sates 3M 7AvM= aR12= CWT=sr a OPTICW a 0PT3M C c@TIM D Pan= H0. lOTflLO=faDB12IfH CNffi (80.0365/SP 1$0.0"sisr (0.05061sr ($0.3195/0F Pew ]8tL& {$20_00/1PF} +$2D.00/Pp) +$20.00/!P) +$20.001i7) 1-4, 1, Cloverdale 5-7, 1, Cloverdale 3n®a 7. War 67_03 7290.00 1619.40 1684.20 1720, 92 8-14, 1, Cloverdale H. eeotol 60.00 7200.00 1462_90 1527.60 1564.32 2261.12 15-18, 1, Cloverdale V. Tboeg4on 140.00 '80.00 16800.00 3413.20 3564_40 3650. 08 4809.28 1¢24, 1, Cloverdale A. Kier 120.DO 9604.00 14400_00 1950_40 2036_80 2085_76 2748.16 25-29, 1, Claveidala 4�e1� 300.00 12000_00 2925_60 2438_00 3055.20 3726_64 4322.24 30-36, 1, Cayez glohr 60_d0 7200_00 1462.80 2546_08 2607.20 4435_20 33-36, 1, Cloverdale le Dncter 64.00 7200.00 1462.80 3527.60 1564.32 2061_12 2, Clavar3ale Paltler 100_00 1470D.00 2536.53 1527.60 1564.32 2061.12 3-7, 2, ©nv� gjexks 100.00 14700.00 2536_55 2668.85 2743_02 3758.22 9-9, 2, Cloverdale Garen Bv.Lutb_Ch. 40.00 $884_4* 1014.68 2668_85 2743.42 3758.12 Co_ and. 46 G.:rwaa Ev.iatS.Ch, 95.00 27930_04 2919_44 1967_54 1D97_S3 1503_25 Pt: Pt 40, Gb_ aod_ 40 it¢a RSSnta Tatrar0 210_00 Y4700_00 4736_53 3170.82 3313_26 5240_43 3-3, 3, Cloverdale Heal 60_00 8820.00 1522.93 4868.85 4943.02 5958_12 4-9, 3, CLoverdale Sgnadrlto 120_00 176".00 3043. 86 1601.31 1646.29 2254.87 IO-13, 3, Cl�le doe Bsgora 90.00 13.760.00 2029_2d 3202_42 3292_5a 4509.74 14-15, 3, Cle rdale Lake Nla CUet- { 3d 40.00 5886.00 2135_98 2195_06 06_50 36-30, 3, Cloverdale 60.00 1014.62 1067_54 1097_53 1503_25 19-38, 3, r&ad. -.tote (lire statisa3 40.00 8820_00 5600_04 1521_9i3 160133 1646_23 2254_87 37-38, Co_ 3[cd. 40 �� 6y MUM etatin 136.00 22573.00 1014.62 3544.10 1067_54 1097.53 1503_2S 1-4, 4, CLovardaIa Hjn is 80.00 9600.00 1950.40 3147.30 3862.45 5420.33 5-21, 4, Clwerdalo City (Linea Rarl) 350_OQ 40200.00 8467.30 2036.80 20SS-76 2748_16 1, Cloverdale L8 Berdwod L>mber 93_26 10775.00 2256.66 2029.10 9034_12 Y1807_92 1-2 1-2' ` EIm park , 1 StIllbaY• n"- 100.00 20000.00 2365_00 2333.19 2407_88 3147.9i 3-4, 1, S7ao Park B==W-tto 100.00 1000.00 2365_00 2455_00 205_00 2506_00 3196_00 1, M- Pak C1ty (Old City O£Pic) DO 355. 11750DO 35 363f_63 2506_00 3196.005-7, 9 + 8 7.4' of 8, 1, _26.eB 3691_55 4505.30 >�m Raric L8 0+adpood Lamer 100.00 5740.00 2209.51 2261.17 2290.44 2996.50 2747.09 338903.00 67311_76 70361_89 72090_29 95474.60 1 O D 20 N Q n CW VrCI4s > nERC86 NO. 7Grfffic x/Aw13ids1 01� MTXM h OPz10x H OP'SFCIS 0 aP2a [$0.D365fsP} {;D_Og55f87y {¢CFOMOWp6fSPr Pt_ 1, Co_ End. #8 TA 8E 34 {1E 1--.ta.71 Ed Goraao I40tdte Hat} 197600_00 191664_00 7212_40 8990_00 22523-01 Pt_ 1, Co. End. #e H. D#nni, 6995.74 8720.71 9r49998_56 21797-90 Pt. 1, Co. �. #a 14949.00 S45.64 680.18 756-20 756-Z9 Pt_ 1, End_ #6 [83tr 0} 34650-00 1753.29 4144.14 an 2r Co_ and. #8 H_ Dun, u-D 2250.44 2475.44 2805.35 2592.41 3119. 79 374.06 7374.06 3, Co. End. #a S. a as 13020.00 13020. 00 4T5.23 592. d1 658.0D i, Ca_ of #6 L. BalAGn uaj 25000.80 1S000.OD 112.50 1137.50 1759.00 2990L557.00 x 161• of s, Ca. W. #8 10000_00 Sa7.50 682.50 7s9.00 1794.00 179d.00 Pt. of 5, Co. End. #8 J. iits J. Sc l- 19140_00 365.00 455_00 596.00 2286•14 6, Co. ami_ #6 2167-00 698.A 870.87 966_4e 2269.34 7, Co, and. #4 16542.00 79.10 98.60 109_65 259.1T a, co. J- Schiltz 50D0.00 603_78 752. 66 837_p3 1978-42 9r Co. aad. #8 S. P6ar 10845.00 162.50 227.50 253-00 596.00 I0, 02. and. #B 1L HAirlaor 11119_80 395.84 493.45 518_76 1297.06 11 F 22, Co. Eod. #6 405_8i 505.91 562.62 1325. 83 13, Co. aixl_ #8 8�m 12135_00 442-93 552_14 614.03 1451.35 14, Co. End. #8 0oct.d9rf 9156.00 8400.00 334.19 416_60 46329 . 1095_06 35-16, Co, and- #B S_ Gov 29544.00 306-6p 382.20 425.D4 1004.64 17, Co_ End_ #8 X. i�u 23982.00 2078.36 2344_25 1494.93 3533_46 13, Co. and. 18 8_ Arndt 873.34 1991_18 1213.49 2868_25 19r Co. had. T. 1"46. 00 607.58 757.39 842.29 2290.86 20-22, Os_ ]Ind- #8 d. Lob y- yo.'k, 35700.00 39864.00 1303.05 1806.42 4269_72 � R. 7lwak 11005.00 1455.04 402.69 IB13-31 1613_81 2017.12 4767.73 1, 24, E3an B. Ho ->•at 10000_00 500.73 S56.85 3316.20 25- Co. and_ #8 piste., 365.00 45$-00 1196.00 25-26, Ca. aad. #8 - wQo3a 25050.00 914_33 1339_77 7267_53 267-33 2995.98 27 13230.00 18375.00 492.90 601.96 669_44 1S82.31 28 X. Cmbtzoa 14700_00 670_69 536.55 336.0fi 929_78 29-30 ' - Hank 29914.00 1091.86 668_e5 743_82 1758-63 1758_12 31 Mod Pt_ 32 a-.10ogiois 11 2.40 1361.09 IS13-65 3577_71 Pt. 32 1300_00 449.75 560.65 623.49 1473.71 Pt_ 32 J a:zo9dar 2600_00 47_45 94_90 59.15 SS_78 155.a8 Pt- 32 T' slgaof� 5850.00 213.52 229.30 131.56 310.96 33-3i S. HaB.�trot 21315.00 778.00 266.17 296.01 6 G. Iq9 - 31540.00 421_21 969.83 1078_53 49.66 36 1-3r 2, Park -. ro 8100. 00 295_65 525.07 368.55 533.92 409. 66 1380.18 1380.ie 4, 2, 1:Is- P Part - H. HaWt 15400.60 547_50 632.50 759.00 968.76 1596.00 2, 87ao Park 5000.08 182_5B 598.p0 7-9, 7-9, 2, !vm Park tinyf� 1p000.00 365. DD 455.00 455.00 $06.00 506.00 3196.00 1A-12 & 8 112 of 33, 2, 15000.00 547.50 682_50 759.00 1794_00 �- 1 112 13, 34-]5, 2, 14 8_ iavak 17500_00 0.00 633.75 0.00 790_00 0-00 eeU_� 0_00 , Hlno Part H. Dmn 0.00 2043_00 0_00 16, 2, 51ao ParF Zta,.c.._,.c 12500.00 456.25 568.75 1495_00 37013-2268 R. ��t 5835.00 212.98 265_49 295.25 y5.75 697_87 37013-2285 a. Peg9rs 3750_00 15i2A0 136. 98 17D.63 169_75 448_50 55.19 68.80 76.51 160_84 5P D 03 O n 37013-2270 37013-21= IM Bt u 1500.00 5d.75 58.25 75.90 179./0 37013-2124 5375.00 196_32 244.56 271.97 642.85 14 22' 1' E3>t° park D_ iMla 7.E gazdmoOg I+sbas 3125.00 65050_Go 114.06 142.19 ]58.13 373_75 Pt. 40, Co. Eod. 40 city ml a Park) 84000_00 2374.33 3065.00 2959_77 3291_53 7779_98 Pt- 40, Co. End' ;e IX Sardwood I=yr 384667_00 6740.35 3322.00 4250_40 10046.40 1-2, 1, IA.BpsmW a Hilda_ City 4Lia Park) 12000.00 433.00 8402.35 43d1.15 22a66_I7 1-2, 2, l3pach•a Edda. lraarlay 32000.00 438.00 546.W1 607.20 1435.20 1, Edda. Z. Ditwra 12000.00 436_00 546.00 607.20 1435_20 5-6, 5-6, 1, Busch•a Haa�•n Edda. ili�ala 32000.00 546_00 607.20 1435.Zo 7-8, 1, Buaeh•s Eddn. 5r3�i1 t4oa 12000.00 436_00 $l6_00 0 1435_20 9-10, 3, emdi'a ddda. Stza�B 12000.00 434.00 d38.00 516.00 6W7i. 1435_20 37013-2000 � R. tr 825.,�. 0.00 301.13 546.00 607.20 1435.20 37013-21SO 37013-2100 E. ff'g't 11250.00 110_Si 375.38 511.86 427.45 564.25 485J0 370I4-2 Fa¢ 9150.00 333_97 416.33 462_99 1345.50 1094.34 37014-20500 P. Sehiltgy P. Sohlltgsn 0.08 8.00 0_00 0_00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ZOMIAW 1519544.00 55463.36 69139.25 76888.93 161737.46 ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS February 12, 1991 Ms. Karen Chandler Valley Branch Watershed Engineer Barr Engineering 803 Glenroy Road Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 Re: Diversion of Water to Sunfish Lake Lake Elmo, Minnesota Connnission No. 9150-001 Dear Ms. Chandler: TOLTZ. KING, DUVALL. ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED 2500 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101.1 B03 612/202-"00 FAX 6122024063 As we have discussed, the City ofLake Elmo would like to investigate the feasibility of diverting runoff from Schiltgen's Farm fields north of TH 5 and west of CSAH 17, Instead of the drainage from these fields flowing through the Old Village, the City would like to divert tine water into Sunfish Lake. Our proposal would be to intercept the culverts crossing TH 5 and divert the water via ditches and culverts along the south side of TH 5. The water would discharge to a low area west of Klondike Avenue, between the railroad tracks and TH 5. An overflow from the low area to Sunfish Lake would be constructed. (See Sketch Plan) We, of course, realize that this proposal conflicts with some of the Watershed Rules; however, we feel that for reasons listed below, the proposal should be seriously considered by the Watershed District. Diversion of the runoff from these fields will significantly reduce flooding problems in the Old Village area. 2. This project would reduce the amount of water flowing to Downs Lake. 3. This project would create additional pond'ung and wetland area in the City. 4. Additional runoff to Sunfish Lake would help to maintain the lake level; thus reducing the potential for winter kill of fish. 5. We feel the available storage in Sunfish Lake (760 Ac. Ft.) is sufficient to contain the proposed total 100-year runoff event (350 Ac. Ft.). Ms. Karen Chandler February 12, 1991 Page 2 The City of Lake Elmo would like to know what information the Watershed District wlll need to review a permit application and vttriance request. Please contact me at 292-4463 to discuss this matter. Sincerely, Thomas D. Prew, P.E. TDP/r ha cc: Lake Elmo City Council Members ol- 1T" It% Alr"t l'—'l 7 3 tiyi 12 AMR FED 15 "31 10: 0-4 T. K. D. A. & ASSOC. P.1 TKDATOLTZ, KINa, DUVALL, ANOERSom AND A88001ATES, INOORPORAT80 ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2000AMSPIOANNAT1oNAL9ANK3VLDINQ SAINT PAUL, M I NN 980TA 95101.1 M03 $12i292-"00 February 14, 1991 FAX GIV202.0083 Honorable Mayor and City Council Lake Elmo, Minnesota Re: Easement Appraisals SW-1 Watermain Lake Elmo, Minnesota Commission No. 9821 Dear Mayor and Council Members: We are now ita the easement acquisition phase of the referenced project. There are two utility easements in Lake Elmo which need to be acquired. Appraisals are necessary before all offer for the easements can be made, $ill Schawb, Pennfield, Inc, has estimated appraisal fees at $500.00 per easement, Both the appraisal fee and the easement cost will be reunbursed by Washington County, We recommend that .Bill Schawb be hired at a cost not to exceed $1,000.00 to prepare the easement appraisals. Sincerely, Thomas D. Prew, RE. City Engineer cc: Doug Ryan, Washington County Public Health Bill Schawb, Peruiiield, Inc. UCZ� ► -:;H, Q,UUNI.,lL.AU.1 1 U P 4 ote__j. q rate FEBRUARY 21. 1991 iiU= G�1lL:iiii1 ,EVC.. Sc..iZCN _N • CITY ADMINISTR9A ADMINISTRATOR REPORT CE=;,n ►b1` . EY: FURNACE FOR MAINTENANCE BUILDING QCENCA EY: In December, 1989, it was determined by Oakland Heating that repairing the electric furnace in the lunchroom and bathroom at the maintenance building was just not feasible. Since that time, these two areas have been heated with 2 plug-in electric.heaters. The maintenance department got.three bids for a 90% efficient gas furnance. This has extra capacity to cover any future expansion at the site. (There are plans on file that show expansion to•include an office and lunchroom at some point in time). Regardless of whether we ever expand the site, I feel we should provide a cost-effective means of providing heat to the areas. The bids received are: Apollo Heating - $2895.00 Hoffman Heating - $3050.00 Schwantes Heating - $2807.00 . Staff, therefore, recommends that the bid be awarded to the low bidder - There is money in the 1991 Equipment, Parts & Repairs budget, and our finance director suggests taking the money from there, or from the public works reserve budget. IT --'r - D.0 1 G 1990 APOLLO HEATING & VENTILATING CORP. 6510 N. HWY. 36 BLVD. OAKDALE, MINNESOTA 55109 Phone 770-0603 I PRurOSAL SUBMITTED TO PHONE DATE Lake Elmo City Hall 770-2537 12-11-90 STREET JOB NAME 3800 Laverne Avenue North CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE JOB LOCATION Lake Elmo Minnesota 55042 ARCHITECT DATE OF PLANS JOB PHONE We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: 1 - Carrier 58SXA040-GG gas furnace; 92% efficiency, 44,000 BTU input, 41,000 BTU output Venting Ductwork Gas piping Labor and materials to install Permits to city One year parts and labor warranty $2,895.00 �I it II We p, ropLI- t? hereby to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: Two thousand Eight hundred Ninety -Five and no/1001s--------- dollars($ 2,895.00 �. Payment to be made as follows: 25% down, balance due upon completion All materialanteetl to be as sPeubed. All work to be <omplefetl In a wpfkmdnbke �Authorizedmanner o standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specific.. Lpns Inva costs will be executetl only upon wntten orders, antl will become an Slgnatu re - /or extra chad above the esh mate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents f , / // �' delaysur control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance. Note: This plopiosafmay be ��Ourworky covered by workmen's Compensation Insurance. withdrawn by us if not accepted withm days. 'krrrptaurr Af VrnvA5tt1 —The above prices, specifications dnd conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized Signature to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date of Acceptance: Signature as. mi gays. / FORM Ila-3 COPYRIGHT 1960- Available from rNn4iP71nc., Groton. Mass 01450 SCH�NANTES HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING, INC. 6080 OREN AVENUE NORTH STILLWATER, NIINNESOTA 55082 PHONE (612) 439-333I • • 6IIfMw PROPOSAL ® C i t O SUBMITTED TO y f Lake Elmo Jan. 25, 1991 ADDRESS CITY STATE AND ZIP CODE JOB NAME AND LOCATION PHONE Maintenance Raraze - Att: Dan Olinger This is a proposal to furnish and install a Trane No. TUC040B130A model XL90, super high efficiency, 40,000 BTU's, natural gas -fired furnace, complete and including the following items: -new unit installed with one supply air outlet to bathroom, 2 supply air to office, 1 supply air for future use and one return for office -all necessary gas piping -all necessary electrical wiring -p.v.c. venting of intake and exhaust air through sidewall or roof -condensate drain line installed -required permit -start up and adjustments -one year's free service -manufacturer's equipment warranties Total price installed complete ------------------------------- $2,807.00 to furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: MECHANICS' LIEN NOTICE PERSONS OR COMPANIES FURNISHING LA60R OR MATERIALS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF REAL PROPERTY MAY ENFORCE A LIEN UPON THE IMPROVED LAND IF THEY ARE NOT PAID FOR BY THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS, EVEN IF SUCH PARTIES HAVE NO DIRECT CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH THE OWNER. MINNESOTA LAW PERMITS THE OWNER TO WITHHOLD FROM HIS CONTRACTOR SO MUCH OF THE CONTRACT PRICE AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO MEET THE DEMANDS OF ALL OTHER LIEN CLAIMANTS, PAY DIRECTLY SUCH LIENS AND DEDUCT THE COST THEREOF FROM THE CONTRACT PRICE, OR WITHHOLD AMOUNTS FROM HIS CONTRACTOR UNTIL THE EXPIRATION OF 90 DAYS FROM THE COMPLETION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENT UNLESS THE CONTRACTOR FUR- NISHED TO THE OWNER WAIVERS OF CLAIMS FOR MECHANICS' LIENS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT AND WHO PROVIDED OWNER WITH TIMELY NOTICE. I hereby admit service of and receipt for that certain 'Notice to Owner' required by Chapter 247 of Laws 1973 as above printed. ^^,e,,;,'•„ ,; ii`<:.;^,;iL, — The above prices, specifications, nditions, and mechanics' lien notice are satisfactory and ore hereby ,ccepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date of .�• I "1A 11 Payment to be made: nn compl F'_Yl or (� SCHWANTES byL'�u.a . ^— �`/jNote: This prosal Jam y J,6 oung ba withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. Signature Payment due on completion - 1.5% finance charge added monthly to all past due balances. N 0 T I C E O F C I T Y C 0 U N C I L M E E T I N G S THE CITY COUNCIL CALLED A SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING FOR METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION LAKE ELMO AIRPORT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING FEBRUARY 19, 1991 6:30 P.M. OAK -LAND JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 820 MANNING AVENUE SOUTH ---------`------------------------------------------------------- THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED CITY COUNCIL MEETING (FEBRUARY 19, 1991) IS POSTPONED TO THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1991 7:OO P.M. CITY HALL Since we do not have time to discuss every point presented, it may seem that decisions are preconceived. However, background information is provided for the City Council on each agenda item in advance from City Staff and appointed Commissions; and decisions are based on this information and past experiences. In addition, some items may also have been discussed at previous Council meetings. If you are aware of information that hasn't been discussed, please fill out a "Request to Appear Before the City Council" slip; or, if you came late, raise your hand to be recognized. Comments that are pertinent are appreciated. Items requiring excessive time may be continued to another meeting. AGENDA LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 21, 1991 7:00 p.m. MEETING CONVENES 1. AGENDA 2. MINUTES: January 19, 1991 February 5, 1991 3. CLAIMS 4. REAPP REPORT A. Contract with Colle & McVoy B. Contract with Pat Forciea C. Other 5. PLANNING/LAND USE AND ZONING: A. Comprehensive Plan B. Proposal to move house into city: Tony Collette C. Other 6. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: A. Old Village Drainage B. Diversion of Water to Sunfish Lake C. Easement Appraisals - SW1 Watermains D. Other 7. Appointment of Planning Commission Members (over) B. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: A. Compost Update - Councilman Johnson B. Roberts Rules of Order - Councilman Williams C. Creation of Parks Department - Councilman Johnson D. Budget - Mayor Johnson E. "Coffee Break" - Mayor Johnson 9. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. Furnace for Maintenance Bldg. (Cont.) B. Word Processor for Maintenance Dept. C. West Sunfish (Landfill Park) update D. Resolution No. 91-8, A Resolution prohibiting the transfer of real estate within the city of Lake Elmo without City approval E. Request to cut trees down on city property: Jess Mottaz F. Rental Property Update G. Other 10. ADJOURN