HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-11-91 Special CCMSPECIAL MEETING
APRIL 11, 1991
Mayor Johnson called. the special meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. in the
City Council chambers. Present: Mayor Jonnson, Dick Johnson, Mottaz,
Williams, Planner P1ike Black, Rob Tautges, Auditor, Bill King, Chair
of Economic Advisory Board, and City Administrator Kueffner, Finance
Director Banister. Absent: Councilman Hunt.
M/S/P 11OTTAZ/DAVE JOHNSON - to instruct the Planning Commission to
hold a public hearing at their earliest possible date, to be
determined by staff when all the work is done to hold such a hearing,
for the purpose of considering changing the comprehensive plan by
extending the DIUSA to a maximum of a 1/2 mile East of County Road 19
and a 1/2 mile North of the Freeway with the cost of the study for
expansion of the MUSA Line to be taken out of the $17,000 Sewer
Reserve, but not to exceed $10,000. (Motion carried 4-0).
ADJOURN
7ShG(,6(J R
S P E C I
A L
M E
E T I N G
LAKE
EL140
CITY
COUNCIL
April 11, 1991
5:00 n.m.
5:00 p.m. 14EETING CONVENES
1. I-94•Development Plans
2. Economics & Development Committee
3. "Eggs & Issues"
4. Adjourn
C
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Meeting Date April 11, 1991
AG( N DA SECTION
ITEM: I-94 Development Plan
1YI.'�
1.
ORIGINATING -
DEPARTMENT.
BY:
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA BY:
The City has received an inquiry from Northland Investment,
the owner of approximately 180 acres which borders County Road
13 and I-94. '
In an very preliminary. way, this property is under consideration
for a 300,000 to 350,000 sq.ft. building, strictly for office use.
Not unlike what West Publishing had in mind,'this company (which
has yet to be made public) is looking for a minimum of 50 acres
so its development would have a campus -type setting.
( To accommodate a development of this nature, the City would have
to petition for an expansion of the MUSA. This would require a
major amendment to our Comprehensive Plan.
Before the landowner will proceed with pursuing this with the
company:that is looking for a site; he would Pike a favorable
commitment from the Council that it would indeed favor a MUSA
expansion.
Mayor Johnson has invited a representative from the League of
Minnesota Cities to talk to the Council about different
financing options that are available.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL.ACTION
Meeting Date April 11, 1991
Ali N DA SECTION
ITEM:
Economics and Development Committee
NU•
2.
ORIGINATING -
DEPARTMENT:
BY:
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA BY:
Mayor•Johnson would like to discuss his proposed Economic and
Development Committee with the Council.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Meeting Date April 11, 1991
A ("N OA SECTION
ITEM:
"Eggs &Issues"
O: ORIGINATING
3 DEPARTMENT;
BY:
APPROVED FOR
AGENDA BY:
"Eggs & Issues" is scheduled for April 17, 1991 from 7:30 to 9:30 a.m.
at the Lake Elmo Inn. The guest speaker will be Gerald L. Olson,
,,.President of the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce. Fie will speak
on Workers' Compensation and Property Tax Issue.
Any council member who wishes to attend should let me know.at this
special meeting so I can make the necessary reservations.
�j
City to Study for MUSA Extension
In response to a request from a property owner on I-94, the City Council directed the staff to study an area bound by County
Road 13 on the West, 1/2 mile East of County Road 19 on the West and North 1/2 mile,for a possible extension of the
Municipal Urban Service Area (MUSA). Upon completion of the study, the Council has directed that a- public hearing be
held, and that formal application be made to the Metropolitan Council for a MUSA extension. If this request is approved by
the Met. Council and the plan is accepted by the City Council, it would enable the City to accommodate a higher density. of
commercial development on 1-94. This proposal is in the early preliminary stages, but residents are asked to watch for future
updates and public hearing dates.
6 _
b v 8 U
o �
32 O 1 3 34 /35 W 36
�'
Proposed Extension
Area x m
I s
/11 I_94
MAY - 3 1991
JAMES R. HILL, INC.
PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS
2500 WEST COUNTY ROAD 42, SUITE 120, BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 55337 (612) 890-6044 FAX 890-6244
Lu0'��G_►� u
TO: Mayor, City Council, Administrator
City of Lake Elmo
FROM: Mike Black
DATE: April 29, 1991
RE: MUSA LINE AMENDMENT REPORT UPDATE
At a special meeting of the Lake Elmo City Council on April 11, 1991,
the following motion was made by Councilmember Mottaz, seconded by
Mayor Johnson, and upon a vote taken it passed 4 ayes to 0 nays.
Councilmember Hunt was not present.
A motion to instruct the Planning Commission to hold a public
hearing at their earliest possible date, determined by staff when
all the work is done to hold such a hearing, for the purpose of
considering changing the Comprehensive Plan by extending the MUSA
to a maximum of a half -mile east of County Road 19 and a half -mile
north of I-94.
This direction given to staff by the City Council will require a major
amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan and review by the
Metropolitan Council pursuant to Minnesota Statues 473.854 (1982). A
major amendment is defined as a change in the Metropolitan Urban Service
Area (MUSA Line) involving 40 acres or more. The amendment is subject
to a maximum 90 day review by the Metropolitan Council. The primary
focus of their review is to determine the amendment's impact on the
regional systems - sewers, parks, airports and transportation and its
consistency with other chapters of the Metropolitan Development Guide.
The Metropolitan Council will require the City of Lake Elmo to modify
the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment if it is found to have a
substantial impact on the Metropolitan system plans.
The amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan must be submitted by
Lake Elmo to the Metropolitan Council following action by the Planning
Commission and the City Council whose action must be conditional upon
completion of the Metropolitan Council review and the Metropolitan
Council's determination of regional systems impact.
The City Council's direction to study and consider an expansion of the
MUSA Line in Lake Elmo is in direct conflict with the following public
sewer goal stated in the Comprehensive Plan:
* To prevent the extension of public sewer beyond the current
limits of the M.U.S.A.
Lake Elmo
April 29, 1991
Page 2
A four -fifths vote of the City Council is required to pass an amendment
to the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Other areas of the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan that will require
changes are:
P.
8
- Table 1
TAZ Projects
p.
27
- Commercial
Description and Goals
p.
28
- Limited
Business Description
p.
29A
- Map 10
Future Land Use Map
p.
35
- TAZ Tables
8 and 9
p.
42-45
- Public
Sewer Section
p.
45B
- Map 21
Public and Private Sewers
p.
45C
- Map 22
Sanitary Sewer Systems
p.
45D
- Map 23
Sanitary Sewer Systems
p.
47
- Public
Sewer Analysis
p.
49
- Public
Sewer Goal
STUDY PROGRESS
I have had two meetings with Tom Prew and Larry Bohrer of TKDA and the
following tasks are underway:
James R. Hill, Inc.:
* Base map of the study area.
* Property ownership map.
* Existing land uses.
* Existing zoning map.
* Natural features - soils, topo, wetlands.
* Existing Future Land Use Map.
* Proposed Future Land Use Map changes.
* Estimated area of "buildable" acreage.
TKDA:
* Estimated sewer flows based upon Future Land Use changes.
* Infrastructure planning showing location and timing of
interceptors including possible intercommunity connections to
Woodbury and Oakdale.
* Estimated cost for infrastructure.
Once the above information is complied preliminary discussions will
begin with the Cities of Woodbury and Oakdale, the Metropolitan Waste
Control Commission and the Metropolitan Council staff. An outline of
the report for a MUSA Line amendment and Comprehensive Guide Plan
amendment is:
C
Lake Elmo
April 29, 1991
Page 3
Introduction and
A. Purpose
B. Annexation
C. Orderly and
Background
Issues
Compatible Growth
II. MUSA
Amendment Description
A.
Area Description
B. 'Property
Oversizing
C.
Existing Land Use
D.
Existing Zoning
E.
Natural Features - soil, topo, wetlands
F.
Existing Future Land Use Map Changes
G.
Proposed Future Land Use Map Changes
H.
Estimated Area of Buildable Area
III. Metropolitan System Impact
A. Sewer System
1. Sewer Service Area and Staging through 2010.
2. Plan for Interceptor Location including
Intercommunity Connections and Staging.
3. Projected flows in 2000 and 2010 for Total Area to
be served including Methodology and Assumptions
used in calculating flows.
4. Projected Number of Employees in years 2000 and
2010.
B. Transportation Impact
1. Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) Forecasts and
Adjustments.
C. Park and Open Space Impact
D. Airport System Impacts
IV. Summary