Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-04-91 CCMMINUTES APPROVED: 6-18-91 MINUTES ISSUED: 6-28-91 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTFS JUNE 4, 1991 Mayor Johnson called the city council meeting to order at 7:0 p.m. in the City Council chambers. Present: Mayor Johnson, Hunt, Dick Johnson, Mottaz, Williams, City Attorney Filla, City Engineer Prew and Administrator Kueffner. 1. AGENDA Table ReAPP Resolutions of Appreciation until the next Council meeting, Move 7D. Bachman Variance to 12G. Add: RC. Amended contract for the Simplifying Council Minutes, 12H. S11-1 Watermain, 10B. Follow-up on Met Council Breakfast, M/S/P Willians/Hunt - to approve the June 6, 1991 City Council agenda as amended. (Motion carried 5-01. 2. MINUTES: May 21, 1991 M/S/P Hunt/Dick Johnson - to approve the May 21, 1991 City Council minutes as amended.. (Motion carried. 5-0). 3. CLAI.MS I1/S/P Dick Johnson/Hunt - to approve the June 6, 1991 clams #9d'956 thru #94g92 as presented. (Motion carried 5-0). 4. PUBLIC INQUIRIES Gloria Knoblauch, 9191 31st St. N., asked what the status was on the storm sewer project for the Old Villaqe area. The City Administrator answered the staff was workina with the city engineer and the auditor on a surface water plan and a city-wide storm water utility district. 5. REAPP REPORT a. Resolutions of Appreciation will be handed out at the next Council meeting. Rita Conlin reported that John Rafferty, Met Council, stated legislation goes into law the day after the Governor signs the bill. As of right now, the Met Council sent down word to the Counties that they are to immediately suspend the EIS Process and box up the paperwork. Rafferty stated the Inter -County Co-ordination Board will come up with a new siting process. This Board. consists of County Commissioners and will be assisted. by a technical consultation firm called Richardson and Rickter. Rafferty also stated he does not know if the Board will take into consideration the Net Council's resolution to drop parks as landfill sites. According to Judy Ar.ends, the County is complying with the Met Council.'s wishes and are not expecte(2 to take further action. ReAPP met June 2nd and made the following recommendations to the City LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 4, 1991 PAGE 2 Council. (1) Retain Ellen Sampson to monitor the progress and content of a new landfill siting .process that is to be developed and report to the city, (2) Continue to collect referendum monies funding the landfill fight based on the fact that the existing landfill search is still in a state of moratorium and a chance still exists that it could be resumed in a year from now, (3) Requests authorization to negotiate with DPRA and Colle & McVoy in regard to the future use of their services and to make a recommendation to the Council. The City Administrator has tentatively invited. Ellen Sampson to attend the next Council meeting and update the Council on where we are at and what we should watch out for. M/S/P Williams/Mottaz - that the representatives from ReAPP be authorized by the City Council to contact DRPA and Colle & McVoy to decide what their future role should be and to come back to the Council at a future meeting with a recommendation. (Motion carried. 5-0). M/S/P Dick Johnson/Williams - to direct the City Administrator to contact DPRA and Colle & McVoy and instruct them for the time being to suspend any activities that would cost the city. (Motion carried 5-0). 6. Resolution No. 91-17: Supporting Washington County's Adoption of Local Option Sales Tax M/.S/P Williams/Hunt - to adopt Resolution No. 91-17, Supporting Washington County's Adoption of the 1/2% "Local Option" Sales Tax. (Motion carried. 5-0). 7. PLANNING/LAND USE & ZONING: A. Rezoning Recommendation from Planning Commission: Clifford Adkins property, Ordinance No. 9045 The City Attorney saw no legal problem to the City in taking action on this. Any land boundary dispute will be resolved by the parties before the land is developed. M/S/P Hunt/Williams - to adopt Ordinance 8045 rezoning the property legally described in said ordinance from Rural Residential (RR) to R1 based upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission, based on the Findings of Fact made part of this motion,. (1) The Lake Elmo City Council initiated this zoning cod.e amendment. (2) The proposed zoning code amendment conforms to the 1990 Comp_ Plan. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 4, 1991 PAGE 3 (3) The soil type descriptions, as shown in the Washington County Soil Survey, are 155D, 49B, 302C & 155B, are attached. A very preliminary review of these soils indicates that most of this land is suitable for development. (4) The property owner would have to prove that the land is suitable for development and meet all the conditions set forth in the Lake Elmo platting ordinance and must receive approval from the VBWD. (5) A map has been provided that shows the general location of the proposed use within the community. (6) A map showing all principal land use within 350 feet of the parcel under consideration has been provided. (7) The property owner has provided a legal description of the property and staff has verified ownership. (8) The property owner has provided a list showing the names and mailing addresses of recorded owners within 350 feet of the property and said owners were notified. and based.on a determination of the City Attorney as to how the disputed 4+ acres should be handled. (Motion carried 5-0). B. Park Land Dedication Ordinance No. R046 Resolution No. 91-18: Establishing Park Dedication Fees for Residential Subdivisions of 3 parcels or less The Council received a revised draft of the Ordinance relating to public use dedications which incorporates the concerns expressed by the City Council on May 7, 1991. In addition, the City Attorney inserted an amendment to Section 105.030(C) which previously indicated that the park land dedication for new lots would be $450.00. M/S/P Williams/Dick Johnson - to adopt Ordinance 8046 as amended, amending Sections 105.030(C), 401.400(A) through 401.400(F); adding Sections 401.400(D)(1) through 401.400(D)(3), and 4:01.450; and repealing Sections 401.400(F)(1) through 401.400(F)(3), 4:01.400(G), 401.400(H), 401.400(I) and its subdivisions, and 401.400(1) and its subdivisions of the Lake Elmo City Code relating to park land dedications. (Motion carried 5-0). The Council reviewed Resolution No. 91-19 establishing park dedication fees ($700.00 for each new residential lot in subdivision) for Residential Subdivisions of three or less parcels. M/S/P Hunt/Dick Johnson - to adopt Resolution No. 91-18 establishing park dedication fees for Residential Subdivisions of three or less parcels. (Motion carried. 5-0.) LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 4, 1991 PAGE 4 C. Request for Amendment to Sign Ordinance The City received a letter from Mike Lukin, 10759 loth St. N., requesting an amendment to our sign ordinance allowing property owners to sell goods grown on their land. The Planning Commission recommended that the Council not change the zoning ordinance in the RR zoning district as it would be hard to regulate and unfair to other zoning districts. The Council concurred with their recommendation that property owners who wish to sell agricultural or horticultural product should think about starting a "Farmers Market". M/S/P Dick Johnson/Hunt - to deny the request for an amendment to the sign ordinance based on the recommendation of the Planning Commission, also noting that a change in the sign ordinance would still not allow an open sales lot in the Rural Residential zoning district. (Motion carried 5-0). D. Bachman Variance: Reconsideration Moved to Agenda Item 12. E. Standards for building size in Residential Zoning Districts (except R3) The intent of the ordinance family residential homes in parks). Discussion followed the structure (excluding th feet". Several council memb they felt the ordinance was and affordable housing. is to set minimum standards for single the City (excluding manufactured home on amendment, "the finished living area of a basement) must be at least 860 square ars were against this amendment because discriminatory against manufactured houses M/S/P Williams/Mottaz - to adopt Ordinance 8047 with the exception of subdivision (g) and relettered accordingly, to adopt Ordinance 8048 with the exception of subdivision (10) and renumbered accordingly, to adopt Ordinance 8049 with the exception of subdivision (9) and renumbered accordingly, and to adopt 8050 with the exception of subdivision (8) and renumbered accordingly, and to adopt Ordinance 8051 with the exception of subdivision (11) and renumbered. accordingly. (Motion carried 5-0) M/S/P Dick Johnson/Hunt to - direct the City Staff to draft an ordinance amending Section 301.130(o), (Page 301-74 and 75) Temporary Farm Dwelling and then send to the PZ for a public hearina. (Motion carried 5-0). 8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: Both Ramsey County and Washington County Boards have agreed to pay for the increased cost of this project. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 4, 1991 PAGE 5 A. Award of bid for Watermain Construction: Resolution No. 91-19 M/S/P Dick Johnson/Williams - to adopt Resolution No. 91-19, accepting bid for construction of the SW-1 Watermain Project, exclusive of well abandonment, to Kenko, Inc. in the amount of $675,331.13. (Motion carried 5-0). B. Award of bid. for Well Abandonment: Resolution No. 91-2.0. M/S/P Dick Johnson/Hunt - to adopt Resolution No. 91-20, accepting bid for SW-1 well abandonment relating to SW-1 watermain project to Keyes Well Drilling in the amount of $49,941.00. (notion carried 5-0). C. Amended Contract with Washington and Ramsey Counties The Council received an amended contract from the Counties. Discussion followed on the County's method of billing not obligating the city in such a manner that they have to pay out-of-pocket expenses before being reimbursed by the County. M/S/P Williams/Dave Johnson - to postpone consideration of contract amendment until the June 18th Council meeting and direct the City Attorney and City Engineer to develop the proper wording to avoid the city having to pay out-of-pocket contractor's fees before getting reimbursed by the County. (Motion carried 5-0). 9. VALLEY BRANCH WATERSHED DISTRICT: Discussion with Managers and Engineer Al Dornfeld, President of VBWD, reported the Oakdale Water Management Plan has been submitted to the VBWD, and they have 60 days to review and respond to the Plan. Concerns discussed included the fact that the Plan shows that water will go thru two outlets into Olson Lake from Oakdale and water coming across Mr. Winkel's property has done damage to his beach. An agreement for restoration is being worked on and restoration is being paid by Oakdale, Carl Peterson, the developer, and Barr Engineering. The Council recommended the VBWD implement a district policy that the surface water management plan of any community within the watershed district be submitted to the adjoining communities for their comments. Councilman Williams noted for the record, historically, no water from that area ran into Olson Lake above ground, but Oakdale's plan calls for water from that area to flow into Olson Lake. The VBWD rules states that no more than 1% increase in water rate shall occur. Therefore, Oakdale's plan is not in conformance with that rule. Williams added, "until this comment has been refuted., I call upon the VBWD to enforce the 1% rate rule" Al Dornfeld will co-ordinate a meeting between Dick Johnson, Lake Elmo's representative, VBWD, and Oakdale to discuss the options with VBWD and City of Oakdale for solving potential problems from any development in Oakdale for water overflow into Olson Lake or the LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 4, 1991 PAGE 6 Tri-Lakes area without any cost to Lake Elmo for control structures. Al Dornfeld handed out copies of the annual report on the watershed district. Dornfeld commented they are considering amending the 509 Plan and addressing the concern of the Downs Lake area and. the 28th and Jamley flooding problem. 10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: A. Resolution No. 91-21: R.J. O'Neil The City received a letter from Briggs and Morgan regarding an error in the legal description of the R.J. O'Neil proprrty, Vali-Hi Drive -In. The City Attorney prepared a resolution which when filed with the County will correct the erroneous legal description. The theater property appears to lie in the South east Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 36-29-21. M/S/P Dick Johnson/Hunt - to adopt Resolution No. 91-21, a resolution correcting the legal description in the resolutions referred to in the May 16th letter to the City from Briggs and Morgan as it relates to the R.J. O'Neil property commonly known as the Vali-Hi Drive In. (Motion carried 5-0). B. Trimming of Minutes There was Council consensus on trimming of Council minutes to include Resolutions, Motions and Findings of Fact and eliminate all the discussion. This procedure will be reviewed periodically. A draft policy will be brought back for Council approval on length of time video tapes of Council meetings are to be stored. 11. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: A. Mayor Johnson Mayor Johnson reported the staff met with a potential commercial developer for property along I-94. Lake Elmo is one out of five sites being considered. B. Councilman Hunt - Computer Councilman Williams - Computer A computer purchasing workshop, consisting of staff, Councilmen Hunt, Johnson, Williams, and representative from Voto, Tautges, Redpath, was set for Monday, June 17, at 7:30 a.m. at City Hall. C. Councilman Johnson - Maintenance Advisory Committee The Maintenance Advisory Committee recommended approval for the Parks & Recreation Dept. to purchase a truck in the amount up to $5,000. M/No Second Dick Johnson/No Second. - to authorize $5,000 to be taken ( out of the Parks Capitol Improvement Budget for the Park & Recreation Dept. to purchase a pick-up truck for purpose of maintenance for the parks in summer. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 4, 1991 PAGE 7 M/S/P Williams/Mottaz - to direct the city staff to consider ways to best utilize the existing city equipment in order to provid.e for adequate transportation needs of the Parks Dept. as well as Maintenance Dept. and to come back to the City Council with a recommendation by the next meeting. (Motion carried 5-0). D. Councilman Mottaz-No Report 12. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. Charitable Gambling License (1) day: 4th District VFW Ladies Auxiliary The 4th District VFW Ladies Auxiliary has requested a one -day gambling license for its annual fund raiser to be held. November 2, 1991 at the Lake Elmo VFW. The Council had no objection to a one -day license such as this and the license will be issued from the State after 30 days. B. "Adopt a Road" in Lake Elmo Joe Morris, Tartan Park, suggested that the City implement a progeam similar to that of the State's "Adopt a Highway" program and has offered to "adopt" 20th Street from Lake Elmo Avenue to County Road 15. The City Administrator will contact Mark Mattson, Washington County-, regarding information on the County's Adopt a Road Program. C. Impound Fee for Cats, Ordinance No. 8052 It was brought to the City's attention by Joan Richert, Executive Director of the St. Croix Animnal Shelter that the City does not have an impound fee for cats such as we do for dogs. M/S/P Hunt/t'iottaz - to adopt Ordinance No. 8052 adding Section 105.090 "Cat Impound Fee" to the Lake Elmo City Code. (Motion carried 5-0). D. Dayton Development Easement The Parks Commission recommended the City take advantage of the offer by Dayton Development for the walkway easement on the rear of the properties fronting the south side of 15th Street between Co.Rd. 13 and CO. Rd. 19. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 4, 1991 PAGE 8 M/S/P Hunt/Williams - to accept the offer from Dayton Development, as recommended by the Parks Commission, for the 30 foot easement on the rear of the properties fronting the south side of 15th Street between Co. Rd. 13 and Co. Rd. 19 for non -motorized access to the entrance to the Lake Elmo Regional Park Reserve. (Motion carried 5-0). E. Parks Commission Recommendation At the direction of the Council, the Parks Commission discussed DeMontreville Park and concurred that the identification signs be put up, a six car parking area be paved at the time Hytrail is overlaid, posts be placed at each corner of the park, but held off on a recommendation for the placement of posts at 500 foot intervals until such time as a survey was provided.. M/S/P Mottaz/Hunt - based on the Parks Commission's recommendation, the Parks & Rec. Dept. be authorized to do the following with expenses taken out of the $37,000 Park Development Fund. (1) Construct two signs of similar design and construction as in other parks in the Lake Elmo system. These signs should include the name of the ,park, i.e., Demontreville Park, a wildlife park. One should be installed at the south and one at the north entrance. (2) Find. survey. The boundaries of the park should be marked with green treated 4x4's with the words "Lake Elmo Park" noted on each post installed at each corner plus each 500' between corner posts. If possible, consider ,posts made out of post consumer recycled plastic. (3) At the north entrance of the park, construct a bituminous surfaced, six car, off-street .parking area to be done in conjunction with the overlay contract of Hytrail Avenue. (4) A fence be constructed around the open area of the north entrance to discourage entrance to the park by motorized vehicles. (Motion carried 5-0). F. Update on Hammes Property Jim McNamara reported, as of May 31st, 1991, he has not received any additional receipts from Bill Hammes concerning the removal of junk vehicles. On Tuesday, May 29th, the severe storm that went through the area (lid. considerable damage to the Hammes' property. M/S/P Williams/Mottaz - the May 31st deadline be extended to June 30th to clean up storm damage as well as make progress on removal of junk vehicles and request the Building Official provide the Council at their next meeting with a revised clean-up schedule. (Motion carried 5-0). LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 4, 1991 PAGE 9 G. Bachman Variance Mr. Bachman indicated to the City Administrator that he was out-of-town at the time his variance request was before the Council and would like to make his presentation with new information and update the Council on how they are working with the DNR. M/S/P Williams/Hunt - to schedule Mr. Bachman to appear before the Council at his convenience, but to convey to Mr. Bachman that the City Council to date has not changed. their mind on allowance of the variance. (Motion carried 5-0). A City council member asked the Building official to check this lot for groundwater problems because of springs found on the lot. H. Piet Council Breakfast Mayor Johnson, City Council members, Mottaz, Williams, Johnson and Administrator Kueffner will attend the Met Council Breakfast at the Lake Elmo Inn on June 19, 1991 at the City's expense. M/S/P Mottaz/Hunt - to adjourn the City Council meeting at 11:40 p.m. (Motion carried 5-0). Resolution No. 91-17: Supporting Washington County's Adoption of Local Option Sales Tax. Resolution No. 91-18: Establishing Park Dedication Fees for Residential Subdivisions of 3 parcels or less Resolution No. 91-19: Award bid for Watermain Construction Resolution No. 91-20: Award of bid for Well Abandonment Resolution No. 91-21: Correcting legal descriptions relating to the R.J. O'Neil property known as Vali-Hi Drive In Ordinance No. 8045: Rezoning Cliff Adkins property from Rural Residential (RR) to R1 Ordinance No. 8046: Park Land Dedication Ordinance No. 8047, 8048, 8049, 8050, 8051: Standards for building size in Residential Zonizzg Districts (except R3) Ordinance No. 8052: Impound Fees for Cats CLAIMS TO BE APPROVED AT JUNE 4, 1991 LAKE ELMO COUNCIL MEETING )4856 94857 94860 94861 94862 94863 94864 94865 94866 94867 94868 94869 94870 94871 (all claims are within budget unless otherwise noted) MN Dept. of Revenue - May State withholding thru Compost Workers Postmaster - postage meter League of MN Cities - June Hosp. premium Allied Group Insurance Trust - June premium MN Benefit Assn. - June premium Michael Smith - May animal control officer Carl Blondin - June legal retainer Frank Langer - assessor D. C. Hey - copy machine maintenance charge Assn. of Metro Municipalities - Elected Officials American Linen - Bldg. Maint. Northern States Power Office $ 147.82 Fire 113.13 Maint. Dept. 67.48 Street Lites 740.35 Parks 138.72 Water Fund 323.76 Sewer Fund 14.29 94872 AT & T Maint Fire 94873 US West 94874 94875 94876 94877 94878 94879 94880 94892 25:83 16.68 Office 226.10 Fire 49.02 Maint. 50.76 Parks 44.25 St. Croix Valley Clinic - Fire Dept. James Sachs - Fire Dept, run reports March & April Oxygen Service Co. - Fire Dept. supplies Safety-K1een - Maint. Dept, supplies Polfus Implement - Parks Dept. supplies Flaghouse - Parks Dept. - 4 tennis nets thru June 14th payroll Total 1,329.00 218.00 400.00 2,504.90 86.86 55. 69 6504�0 1,200.00 188.70 Salary survey 7.00 41.87 1,545.60 42.51 370.13 109.00 81.00 42.84 56.25 81.30 599.50 040.25 $ 20,650..40 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION June 4, 1991 Meeting Date END A SECTION NO: ORIGINATING- 6. DEPARTMENT. BY: 'EM: Resolution No. 91-17: Supporting Washington Count;T's Adoption of"Local Option Sales Tax APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: Attached is a resolution from Washington County requesting that all cities adopt resolutions either enact or rejct the sales tax increase provided in the'1991 Omnibus Tax Bill. I have attached a resolution in support of the increase, along with a comparison of aids lost if the 1/2o sales tax is not adopted versus tax savings. I will have more information at the meeting as to how this will directly affect Lake Elmo. M?fr Z n 1911 WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS GOVERNMENT CENTER 14900 61st STREET NORTH. P.O. BOX 6 • STILLWATER. MINNESOTA 55082.0006 Office: (612) 430-6003 Fax: (612) 430.6017 May 28, 1991 Ms. Mary Rueffner Administrator, City of Lake Elmo 3800 LaVerne Ave. N. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Dear Ms. Rueffner: On May 20, 1991, the Minnesota Legislature passed the Omnibus Tax Bill which provides for an increase in the sales tax from 6% to 6.5% effective July 1, 1991. In addition, the bill provides that unless counties act to enact the sales tax increase by July 1, 1991,the county and all cities and townships within that county will face elimination of all local government aid, homestead and agricultural credit aid and other aids identified in the bill. Such a reduction in state aid would be more than 20 million dollars for Washington County and would present the certainty of both drastic reductions in basic services and substantial property increases. The bill provides that counties must act by July 1, 1991, and that cities and townships may act later, by August 1, 1991. However, the County Board requests (resolution attached) that you act in the form of a resolution before June 19, 1991, so that the County Board may make a decision with the knowledge of the preferences of cities and townships in the county. A sample resolution is attached for your possible use. We find ourselves in a difficult situation and ask for your cooperation in this matter. Please feel free to contact the Office of Administration at 430-6003, or me to discuss this further. We look forward to working with the cities and townships as efficiently as possible to resolve this issue in the interests of the majority of the county's residents. Sincerely, Don Scheel, Chairman Washington County Board of Commissioners /ma Attachment <,aa p,,a, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION Dennis C. Hogberg District 1 Mary Hauser District 2 Sally Even District 3 Phillip R. McMullen District 4 Ocnald G. Scheel District 5/Chairman V,-A5Us .+PARISON OF Alt$ -LOST IF 1/2X SALES TAX NOT ADOPTED I**H=SALES TAX SAYINGS 1991 CITY, 1991 9 PER CAP, RATIO OF COUNTY, TOXIN FROM 1/2'. SALES AID TO 1/2X CCNTY NAME I AID PER CAP, TAX 1N COUNTY SALES TAX Aitkin 106.01 20.22 5.2 117.16 23.36 5.0 iAnoka Rocker 93.00 20.97 4.4 j 8eltrami 81.14 25.60 3.2 Benton 89.36 18.63 4.8 all stoma 326.68 18.01 18.1 Blue Earth 192,92 36.06 5.3 Brown 234.80 26.59 8.8 1 Carlton 209.60 18.16 1115 Carver 114.49 19.79 5.3 Cass 58.43 18.61 3.1 Chfppewa 237.03 23.13 10.2 Chisa90 133.39 14.19 9.4 stay 165.44 18.08 9.2 Clearwater 100,72 15.33 6.4 Cook 145.69 49.01 3.0 Cottonwood 247.96 17.63 14.1 Crcu wing 108.72 39.50 2.8 Oakata 101.05 28.36 3.6 Dodge 234.85 16,84 13.9 bouglaa 135.76 28.73 4.7 Paribautt 238.50 20.05 11.9 Ffllamro 240.13 17.93 13.4 Froeborn 220.99 28.00 7.9 040chue 117.47 21.58 5.4 Grant 214.48 15.89 13.5 Hemmofm 146.39 61.22 2.4 Houston 206.17 10.03 20.6 Hubbard 69.57 21.96 3.2 Isantf 126.38 18.42 6.9 Itasca 162.88' 29.20 5.6 Jackson 253.89 15185 16.0 Kanabee 138.32 17.14 8.1 Kandiyoht 151.13 29.97 5.0 Kfttsan 201.95 15.03 13.4 Koachiching 205.28 31.93 4.4 Lee'Gui. Parle 239.44 24.15 9.9 Lake 266.82 26.74 10.0 Lake of the Woods 149,52 20.60 7.3 Le Sueur 183.91 16.64 11.1 Lincoln 246.30 13.36 18.4 Lyon 192.52 28.95 6.6 Mahncman 184.25 18.71 10,4 Marshall 170.24 10.90 15.6 Martin 213.22 21.44 9.9 Mcleod 201.39 26.56 7.6 Meeker 158,08 17.03 . Mf1Le Lacs 110.60 22.25 5 .0 1991 CITY, 1991 S PER CAA. RATIO OF '.. COUNTY, TOWN FRCTH 1/2X SALES AID TO 1/L COUNTY NAME AID PER CAP, TAX IN OCNTY Sf tA: Harrison 146.03 15.C8 9" Mcwar 249.62 20,28 t2.: Murray 225.91 13.89 16.a Niccllet 197.91 13.62 14 S gables 230.18 33.44 6.9 Norman 235.72 16.60 14,2 Olmsted 152.70 39,38 3.g OttertaiL 146.65 27.15 5,4 Pennington 217.47 79.92 7.a Pine 95.43 15.71 4.1 Pipastena 223.99 19.53 11.5 Palk 218.17 18.46 11.6 Pope 168.27 14.27 , 11.8 Ramsey 201.42 42.81 4.7 Red Lake 27C.19 15.87 17.0 Redwood 233.66 20,40 I1.5 Renville 209.70 13.86 15,1 Rice` 169.34 19,57 8.7 Rock 211.44 11.40 13.7 Roseau 109.33 20.43 5,4 Scott 123.72 28.14 4,4 Sherhurn► 62.52 13.62 4.6 Sfhtey 224.76 9.32 Stearns 168.36 33.41 D Steal# 196.42 27.90 \ 7.0 Stevens 239,96 23.41 10.3 St. Louis 3al.57 23.68 10.5 Sutft bZ 16.79 _ 15.1 Todd 172.41 10.32 16.7 Travarse 296.14 14.66 20.2 Wabasha 176.33 15.68 11.2 wadana 135.10 26.03 S.2 Waseca 206.41 19.30 10.7 Washington 96.4 40 4.T Wetgnwan 112.48 18.39 Wtlkin 279.55 13,19 21.2 wtncm 202.43 20.91 9.7 Wright 17.60 17.41 5.5 Yellow Medicine 245.54 13.81 17.3 3 fl rJ't/".� i :* J7•I 3 ,� a F� U "d u BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 1-0 DATE May 28, 1991 BY COMMISSIONER Evert DEPARTMENT Administration SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER McMullen Sales Tax Resolution WHEREAS, The 1991 Minnesota Legislature passed the Omnibus Tax Bill which provides for an increase in the sales tax from 6.0% to 6.5% effective.July 1, 1991, and WHEREAS, the bill provides that unless each county acts to enact the sales tax increase by July 1, 1991, the county and all cities and townships with the county will face elimination of all local government aid, homestead and agricultural credit aid, and other aids identified in the bill, and WHEREAS, the Washington County Board of Commissioners wish to make a decision based on the knowledge of the preferences of the cities and townships in the county, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Washington County Board of Commissioners requests that all city councils and township boards vote by resolution by June 19, 1991, requesting that the County Board enact or reject this sales tax increase as provided in the 1991 Omnibus Tax Bill. ATTEST z 9 4�'e� YES NO ( COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR EVERT X HAUSER X HEGBERG X MCMULLEN X CHAIRMAN, COUNTY BOARD SCHEEL X RESOLUTION NO. 91-17 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION URGING WASHINGTON COUNTY TO ADOPT LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX WHEREAS, the adoption of the 1/20 local option sales tax by Washington County would maintain aids to the county and the cities and townships within the county, and WHEREAS, failure of Washington County to adopt the local option sales tax would result in the loss of all county, city and township aids within the county, amounting to an aid loss of about 95.88 (use ratio for your county shown on attached list) times as much as the county revenues from the 1/2% sales-(ax, and WHEREAS, the failure of Washington County to adopt the tax would result in the aids currently being received by the local governments in Washington County instead being re -distributed as a windfall to the counties which adopt the tax, and WHEREAS, failure to adopt the tax would greatly increase property taxes in Washington County, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lake Elmo City Council urges the Washington County Board of Commissioners to adopt the 1/2% local option sales tax prior to the July 1 deadline for such adoption. ADOPTED by the Lake Elmo City Council this 4th day of June, 1991. Signed: David Johnson, Mayor ATTEST: Mary Kueffner, City Administrator �C GTON i 7 ASHIN'l3TON COUNTY i YTS •:'-.'.p2\: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH 1' ENVIRONMENT AND LAND USE DIVISION Serving the community with programs in Building Inspection, Eme,gency Services, Food Protection, Land Use Planning, On -Site Sewage, Public Health Nuisance, Solid and Hazardous Waste, and Water Quality Protection. May 30, 1991 Mary Luth Public Health Director Doug Ryan Division Manager Ms. Mary KueffTtcr Mr. Larry D. Bohrer, P.E. City Administrator TKDA, Inc. City of Lake Elmo '2500 American Nat, Bank Bldg. 3800 Laverne Ave. N St. Paul MN 55101.-1893 Lake Elmo MN 55042 Dear Ms. Kueffner and Mr. Bohrer: I am writing on behalf of myself and Dick Ragan from Rafa:;ey County concerning the bids for the public water supply to serve the residents in the Lake ,Jane area. We have reviewed the bid from Kenko, Inc. for construction of the public, water supply, .Ind from Keys Well Drilling Company for well sealing. Our review was performed in conjunction with the provisions of the Tune 26, 1990 agreement between the Cities and Counties involved, and the recently approved rego.lutions by both County Boards to increase to costs allocable for the. .water system. These bids are acceptable to the Counties. Upon compl.etion of the enclosed contract arre:ndment auth,ori.zi.ng an increa:;e :i.n the tote? cost: of the water system, wm have no objection to the C-tv Council awarding contracts for completion of the s}-stern. The awarding of bids has taken longer than original.i-• At this point it would be helpful to have an upda't:ed prc. eict timetable so that we ma;. reg:ort back to The Pollution Contzc•1 Agency. Thank you for all your efforts in this mat.I:er. ?,e look r'o'c°;aIn! cempler:ian oi' :.he> w:.te_^ s -r�tr— Sincerely, Ei:v..ronmcnt and L,.nd Use. D:iV.l.Siort tm2i.ag'e* "oar Lu'..t:, n b'__ Health Di.tn -ctor Dick Ragan, Ramses, Coun- =r: i.rcnme:.:s.l health Roo Fulton, n:amse`, Cocnt,: Public Fa::_..;.!:Yt Direr_tor• GOVERNMENT CENTER 14900 61ST STREET NORTH, P.O. BOX 6 • STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55082-0006 Facsimile Machine (612) 430-6730 (612) 430.6655 Solid Waste, Hazardous Waste and Emergency Services (612) 430.6656 Community Sanitation, Building Inspection and Land Use Planning EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION lii L Printed on Recycled Paper AMENDMENT This amendment is entered into by and between the Elmo, Ramsey County, and Washington County collectively referred to as the "Counties"), on this day of , 1991. City of Lake (hereafter WHEREAS the Counties have entered into an agreement, dated June 26, 1990 with the City of Lake Elmo and the City of Oakdale for installation of a public water supply to serve residents in the area of the former Lake Jane Landfill; and WHEREAS the anticipated cost for construction of the water system stated in the agreement will exceed the cost stipulated in the agreement; and WHEREAS the Counties have each obtained authorization from their. respective Boards to increase the amount of the contract and adjust individual line item amounts in order to insure completion of the water system; NOW, THEREFORE, the original agreement is hereby amended by inserting the following language in lieu of the existing, identically numbered sections; IV. COUNTIES' OBLIGATIONS A. The Counties will contribute a maximum of $902,796 to the cost of constructing the water supply system, hooking up existing residences to the system, well abandonment and related costs, as more specifically described in the TkDA project manuals dated :larch 1, 1991 and April 15, 1991 for completion of the water system and well abandonment. A payment schedule shall be determined, based on the payment schedules required by the bid awards. The amount stated is the capital costs and engineering design estimates provided in the Memorandum dated May 20, 1991 from TDKA Engineers concerning the review of anticipated costs for the project. The actual amount to be paid will be the actual cost of the system as designed in the project manuals and outlined in the TADA Memorandum noted in this paragraph. Ramsey County will pay two-thirds of the actual amount and Washington County will pay one-third of the actual amount, pursuant to the 1980 agreement entitled "Sanitary Landfill Termination Agreement Between Washington County and Ramsey County" B. In consideration for Lake Elmo assuming the responsibility for operation and maintenance of the water supply system, the Counties will make a one-time payment of $25,000 to Lake Elmo to establish a fund for operation, maintenance and replacement purposes. This payment shall be the total and entire limit of the 1 WASHI Counties' obligations for the future operation, maintenance and/or replacement of the system. . In addition, the Counties agree to pay $41,500 to the City of Lake Elmo for the City of Oakdale's water access charge for the 83 existing residences in the Service Area. Approved as to form Assi tent Ramsey Count ey M stra o fo Assistant Washington County .attorney CITY OF LAKE ELMO By Mayor M City Administrator ARE AVAILABLE- fimsO ec ,-11, Accounting (y TKDM �i TOLTZ. KING. DUVALL. ANOERSON AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED r ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS SHOO AMERICAN NATIONAL SANK SURDNN l SAINT PAUL. MINNeSOTA55Iw.gn3 61YltOp-IA00 FAXOW42a MEMORANDUM To: Doug Ryan Dick Ragan Reference: SW-1 Watenmain Protect Copies To: Paul Josephson Lake Elmo, NN From: —Tom Prew /T Date:__ May 20. 1991 Review of anticipated cost for this project: Water Access Charge * O&M and Depreciation Construction Watermain Fittings Services Restoration Plumbing Well Abandonment Estimated Construction Cost Indirect Costs Easements and Appraisals Preliminary Engineering Estimated Construction Engineering Estimated Legal Estimated Indirect Costs Contingencies of Construction - 5% Commission No. 9821 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST = * 83 Connections @ $500.00 Each "I'DP/Inha $340,211.36 70,688.65 90,944.46 141,579.33 31,907.33 49,941.00 $9,260.00 80,000.00 50,000.00 2,000.00 $41,500.00 $25,000.00 $725,272.13 $141,260.00 36 263.61 $969,295.74 91I1J1Y s/uv REQUEST FOR COUNCIL.ACTION Meeting Date LG M. OA SECTION June 4, 1991 PLANNING & ZONING I T ,11A : REQUEST FOR A 1ENDMENT TO SIGN ORDINANCE 1Y T ORICiNATIN(Z-' DEP4RTMEN-1 BY: APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: The letter attached requesting an amendment to our sign ordinance was considered by the Planning Commission at its May•l3th meeting. Although it was pointed out that our code allows for "temporary" or "Seasonal" signs which can be placed on a lot or parcel of land for a period not to exceed 30 days, out of any 12 month period, my opinion is that that ordinance.does not apply to open sales lots. Open sales lots are specifically allowed as an accessory use in the Agricultural zoning district, and as a primary use in the General Business zoning district, On a 6-1-1 vote, the Commission recommends that the Council not change the sign ordinance in the RR zoning district as it would be hard to regulate and unfair to other zoning districts. The Commissioner Voting against this motion felt the request was reasonable to help supplement the taxes on large lots. Staff concurs with .the recommendation of the Planning Commission, adding only that perhaps those residents that wish to sell agricultural or horticultural products should think about starting a "Farmers Market", such as is done in many of our surrounding communities (Stillwater has a•market every Saturday morning in the parking lot of one of its banks). I believe there is more than enough Ag land in Lake Elmo that could accommodate something like this, Getting back to the request before you, I offer the following motion for your consideration: Motion )\4 , Second to deny the request for an amendment to the sign ordinance, based on the recommendation of the Planning Commission, also noting that a change in the sign ordinance would still not allow an open sales lot in the Rural Residential zoning district. APR 4 1991 Mary Kueffners City of Lake Elmo 380 Laverne Ave. N Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Dear Ms Kueffners, April 2,1991 I am a resident of Lake Elmo and would like to request that the City looks into the sign ordnance Section 505 on Rual/Residential property. I have been happy with the efforts the city has put into long range planning of our community, this has helped maintained our rual atmosphere. In keeping with the long range goals, I would like to recommend that signs be allowed for selling of seasonal goods. By allowing property owners to sell goods grown on their land would help cover the rising property taxes, thus assuring our community keeps the rual setting. Items grown on the land such as strawberrys, sweet corn, pumkins, and trees only add to our rual atmosphere. The new ordnance could be written in such a way to allow the signs to be posted for a maxium time period of two months, and would restrict the size and type (no back —lighting) of the sign. Please consider my request and if you need anything further, in the way of help or information, please call me at 436-6445. Regar s, %/ i ichael W. 'n ` Michael W. Lukin 10759 loth St. N Lake Elmo, MN 55042 (Home) 436-6445 (Work) 536-3612 Meeting Date GEVOA SECTION T E xvi REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION June 4, 1991 i PLANNING/LAND USE & ZONING Rezoning from Rural Residential to R1 NQ: 7 A 0RIGiNATIr4C- DEPARTMENT: BY: APPROVED FCR AGENDA BY: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this Council initiated rezoning at its May 1, 1991 meeting: One resident, Jimm Burns, 11140 20th St. Court stated that he had been contacted by a Planning Commission member (Ann Bucheck) wro told him that there had been a mistake on the Future Land Use Map; that this property should he platted as RE, and that the property owner. should not get the benefit of a mistake. Staff pointed out that the Planning Commission had held a public hearing for a Coma Plan amendment to designat-. this -land. as RED, but the recommendation of the Commission, and the suhseauent action of the council deened this property to remain elqible for Rl development. The City also received a letter from Don Durand., whose mother owns the property adjacent to the Adkins, stating that there is a dispute over 4 acres of land (both the Durand.s and Adkins lay claim to the property). However, the leaal-descriation Drovirled by the Adkins, anr' verified with Washington County indicate the oropert-T belonas to the Adkins. The Durands say this same 4 acres shows uD on their legal description, but staff has not been able to verify this. Our attorney will have to give us an opinion on how this is handled, but that aside, the Planning Commission recommended, on a ';-1-2 vote, that the property be rezoned from RR to R1, based on the following Findings of Fact. Findings of Fact: 1. The Lake Elmo City Council initiated this zoning code amendments. 2. The proposed zoning code amendment conforms to the 1990 Comp Plan. 3. The Soil type description, as shown in the Washington County Soil Survey are 155D, 49B, 302C, & 155B, are attached. A very preliminary review of these soils indicate that most of this land is suitable for development. 4. The property owner would have to prove that the land is suitable for development and meet all the conditions set for in the Lake Elmo platting ordinance, and must receive approval from the VBWD. 5. A map has been provided that shows the general location of the proposed use within the community. 6. A map showing all principal land use within 350 feet of the parcel under consideration has been provided. 7. The property owner has provided a legal description of the property and staff has verified ownership. 8. The property owner has provided.a list showing the names an mailing addresses of recorded own�rs within 350 feet of the pro erty. Th following motion is offered for�'Your consideration: Motion V1"� Second 1, A`1 , to adopt Ordinance 801/5 rezoning the property legally described. in said ordinace based upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission, based on the Findings of Fact, 1 thru 8, made part of this motion by reference, and based on a determination of the City Attorney as to how the disputed 4+ acres should be handled. S A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Lake Elmo Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Monday, May 13, 1991 at 7:30 p.m. at City Mall, 3R00 Laverne Avenue N., Lake .Elmo, Minnesota to consider rezoning parcel owned by Clifford and Marian Adkins from Rural Residential (RR) to One Family Residential (R-1), legally described in part, as Part of Government Lot 3 and 4, Part of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, Section'24, R29, R21. This parcel consists of amcroximately 12 acres and is commonly known as 2227.Lake Elmo Avenue N. All persons who wish to be heard regarding this proposed rezoning will be given the opportunity at this public hearing. Written comments are welcomed and will be accepted until the closing of the public hearing. By Order of the Lake Elmo City Council April 15, 1991 Mary Kueffner, City Administrator Published in the St. Croix Vallev Press on May j, 1991 Donald & Ardis 2069 Lake Elmo Lake Elmo, MN Leroy & Judith 2119 Lake Elmo Lake Elmo, MN Wright Ave. N. 55042 Howe11 Ave. N. 55042 Richard & Norrine Travers 2151 Lake Elmo Ave. N. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Paul & Louise Swan 2197 Lake Elmo Ave. N. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Dorothy O'Toole & Lawrence 2211 Lake Elmo Ave. N. i Lake Elmo,- MN 55042 Clifford & Marian Adkins 2227 Lake Elmo Ave. N. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Dorothy Sherburne 2313 Lake Elmo Ave. N. Lake Elmo, MPi 55042 Edward & Marguer Schiltgen 2337 Lake Elmo Ave. N. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Gene & Ann Peltier 10376 Hudson Blvd. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Jerome & Sandra Junker 11130 20th St. Ct. N. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 James & Beth Burns 11140 20th St. Ct. N. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Diane Morgan-Trudeau 13780 N. Manning Tr. Stillwater, MN 55082 Pete &.Bernadine & Mary Jean Durand 11332 20th St. N. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Mary Jean Durand 11332 20th St. N. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Christopher 733 Tatum St. Paul, MN & Karen Cook 55104 Raymond & Vickie Johnston 2410 Lansing Ave. N. Lake Elmo,MN 55042 will Stenzel Nachtwey 412 Birchwood Ct. White Bear Lake, MN 55110 I C F t� z�f9 ( 9 0450 we se.2 0430 -r>l Ev ant �• G�ovr a - :srsr --------------- r�(�)7 �� MIf•J 7� E iir 2167 •i , 1 �w�s.ii :ri � �r-- ...:.i•i•'i :.isnil } t" ,ZTJ� T �'�' � \� � 1/ J BLOCK ' ri Mrs •� _ a• . '�i ^� 9 43 I.7 •C• JI IS.- AC av• ',�; �% \'L/•- ` `• �'. V I 1 --- -- t .j ----' :-= r - .r .w b7'—_- _-_ r3 w S / ;. �::-iii�. I '�,tti :. .� JI(, !::n"rd r.S1,c 1i3 n °� +o .h .101 Irl M r- s ` • •BSI ,C J .Ins r. a,.: �: � '_-___-_!.tw .� �_-i•T!il �-.a is --l.--�._. s�.• ,!o.., `� v,�, ,b .9 WN Sw �!r`1`II at is . •.,L 112C2 ••;. E10'' 9�` �`�'..�:' • �� 7 SS i+A -I'•.d: ; n ,'t0•t' ,=�! dl 5 �' 1J j•� "✓ r I �•1s \ t� 0 � t (1 (1 1r�T �°1., # �t�;.�•� ,'ry 'r )o �r SO,t.. ��'�', I, y:s• 1 i a�n t''� "�rw s:+' r �.r i : It 3• f�;J'°,: - 19 1 •6 IS S. `o o i; �'.. aaw•°w•i. Si K • •'��".•.` •.., s,) . a . • ' r ��.' i A jp� n. r;i� r4 �R•'•i' p �: ` (771! ...-..n yr• n v - 1. J ' ...rdi '•; �tis `"• n0 1 __ �.._._ .A !+•• yr d a 1X` Q 3 �wtrrrnr_.r..t?' `'' :._ri 11 % I, `KA Q �33 ( 0500 8 fs's'• ---�- ST1tF.tt-��C:'.r z �• A .rfr. Ilo usr� sass a is ./; • �•!; 3 •.• = 1 - •10lI 0490 0 , r,•:' �1-••"r...... r,•. ` .r = so.e • Q1 6 5 y31 S'©0480 (1e+s P� 't�re•a I ^.u�S�.....Z Illj3 sStat I'i.\'• �• I :` >7 She rbslr a ::: AC. 1.14ses• ie'n O CLF�ardlMan� 0510 '�"� >. 0520 0460 o � Pe<( ter 1 f3trn�dli,e � / 0560 J c (T 1 / sF �4 2Z'rJS50D"•! •!f r + 0540 tiY,:°' 0520 i ^ Pi •�' �° ,' 217 -7530s'•i a 1 �Q r' 05 3200 90 oy �"sx ( I Bic�J. ��Qrh�drr�C IJ�YQ w n,,• r o II a 11 a eC7 40 j5,4 F �a.wat}� rw WY191,j 7 1 2 -, 1�05 •. / �Q � aM �.111LIO 0600 G)u ra mck • R iwvt � �"`• x ;..•.wit ^ ` t 4 I d rl 51 „ Ilo.lo :v:,.... 'so Its3Z - - - - —'— 20 th -- -.. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes March 11, 1991 Page 2 3. Chairman John opened the Public Hearing at 8:30 p.m. The Public Hearing notice was published in the St. Croix Valley Press February 27, 1991 and all property owners within 350 feet were notified. City Planner Mike Black offered some general information regarding this application and what is being considered. The property is designated on the Future Land Use Map, which the City has recently adopted, as SRD. The question is whether the City should consider amending this designation to RED. SRO designation equals R1 zoning (1.5 acres). The City has adopted the Comp. Plan which states there will be no more new development at the R1 zone. Paul Wolff, representing Mr. & Mrs. Adkins, stated approximately 12 acres is being discussed, and the Future Land Use Map is contained in the Comprehensive Plan which has been adopted by the City, and., classifies the future land use for this property as SRO. The Adkins were of' the impression they would be able to develop under the R1 zone. Mr. 'Wolff requested the Planning Commission recommend to the city Council the Future Land Use Map not be amended and SRD designation be maintained. Chairman John closed the•Pubblic Hearing at 8:45 p.m. Commissioner DeLapp stated the printer made the error on the map concerning this property. Commissioner Bucheck stated this property is in the flood plain. Commissioner Mcleod stated this property is surrounded by R1 development, therefore SRO would be consistent. Also, permits to build would not be issued if in the flood plain. M/S/F DeLapg/Stevens - to recommend the City Council amending the Future Land Use Map designation of this property from SRD to RED. (Motion failed 2-5-1, against: Bucheck, Conlin, John, Mcleod, Johnston, abstain: Schubert, reasons: Bucheck: voted against Durand change to RED; Conlin, Johnston & Mcleod: should follow the Future Land Use Map; John: property owner would be held hostage). M/S/P Conlin/Mcleod - to recommend to City Council that Adkins land stay as designated on the Future Land Use Map as SRD. (Motion carried 4-3-1, abstain: Schubert). 4. ARABIAN HILLS (continuation) Rezoning from RR to RE and Preliminary Plat Chairman John re -opened the public hearing at 9:15 p.m. All property owners within 350 feet were re -notified. Roger Kolstad, developer of Arabian Hills, presented the most recent preliminary plat. The park was removed from the plat to accomodate some lots within the 100 year flood plain and were hoping to give a park dedication fee in lieu of land dedication. Also, the road connection to the existing 53rd street was altered slightly. i A' 1.:.... ; I — SHEET NUMBER 41 1538 t538 1 1538 26a 1 456 155C / 1-.w. .--. 171 Pons sneer X SOIL SURVE" I Froure 7—Harvesting sod on Anugo_-Ot loam. 0 to 2 percent siooes. trolled. Control can be accomplished by spraying, cutting, or girdling the trees and by cultivation. This soil has fair suitaoility as building sites and poor suitability for most sanitary facilities. Soil strength is low in the silty mantle but is high in the underlying sandy material. Susceptibility to frost heave is moderate. Spe- cial precautions may be needed when installing roads. streets. sidewalks, and parking areas to prevent damage from frost heave. Sidewalls in the sandy underlying ma- terial have poor stability and may cave in during excavat- ing for foundations or installation of underground utilities. This can easily be prevented with temporary retaining walls. Septic tank absorotien fields function well in this soil. They must be specially designed, however, because the underlying material is rapidly permeable and there is E a hazard of pollution of ground water. Lawns, trees, and shrubs are generally easy to establish and maintain. This soil is a good source of sand and gravel for construction. This soil is in capability suoclass lls and woodland suitability group 2o. 498—Antigo silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes. This undulating soil is well drained. It occupies low knolls anc broad undulating flats intermingled with depressions on glacial outwash plains. Mapped areas are 10 to 50 acres and irregular in shape. Typically. the suuace layer is very danc grayish brown silt loam about 9 incnes thick. The subsurface layer +s grayish brown and dark graves.-, brown silt loam about rtSHINGTON ANO RAMSEY COUNTIES, MINNESOTA .nick. The subsoil is about 22 inches thick. The ,per part is brown silt loam. The middle part is reddish own silt loam. The lower part is reddish brown loam. le underlying material is reddish brown and dark red- >h brown gravelly sand and gravelly coarse sand. In ,me delineations slope is less than 2 percent or more an 6 percent. In the southern part of the survey area e surface layer is thicker and darker colored than typi- Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of letek, Rosholt, Cambia, Brill, Poskin, and Barronett ,nswy substratum soils. Chetek and Rosholt soils have is -;fay in the subsoil than the Antigo soil. Campia soils the silty materials to a depth of 60 inches or more. The ietek. Rosholt, and Cambia soils occupy positions on a landscape similar to the Antigo soils and make up 2 5 percent of the delineation. The moderately well ained Brill soils, the somewhat poorly drained Poskin iils, and the poorly drained Barronett soils occupy small ainageways and depressions and make up less than 5 trcent of the delineation. This Antigo soil has moderate permeability in the silty per part of the profile and very rapid permeability in e sandy underlying material. The available water ca- tcity is moderate. Surface runoff is medium. Natural rtility is medium, and the organic matter content is oderate. Most areas of this soil are farmed, but many areas are pi( )eing converted to urban uses. This soil has tod potential for crops and grass and legume hay or isture. It has good potential as building sites. It has for potential for most sanitary facilities. This soil is well suited to corn, soybeans, small grains, id grass and legume hay and pasture. If the soil is titivated, there is a hazard of erosion unless adequate Inservation practices are used. Most areas are too nail or too irregular in shape or slopes are too short for pacing or contour farming. Minimum tillage and forage cps in the rotation also help to control erosion. In drier tars drought may be a problem due to the moderate Bailable water capacity of the soil. This soil is well suited to pasture and hay production. vergrazing should be avoided because it increases the Ik of erosion. Proper stocking, rotation grazing, and sed control will help keep a good vegetative cover on e soil. This soil is well suited to trees, and a few small areas main in woodlots of northern hardwoods. Seedlings id cuttings survive and grow well if competing vegeta- rn is controlled. Control can be accomplished by spray- g, cutting, or girdling trees and by cultivation. This soil has fair suitability as building sites and poor titability for most sanitary facilities. Soil strength is low the silty mantle but is high in the sandy underlying aterial. Susceptibility to frost heave is moderate. Spa - al precautions may be needed when installing roads, rer sidewalks, and parking areas to prevent damage )n )st heave. Sidewalls in the sandy underlying ma- 27 terial have poor stability and may cave in during excava- tion or installation of underground utilities. This can be prevented with temporary retaining walls. Septic tank absorption fields function well in this soil, but unless specially designed systems are installed, there is a hazard of pollution of underground water sup- plies and nearby lakes and streams. Lawns, trees, and shrubs are generally easy to establish and maintain. This soil is a good source of sand and gravel for construction. This soil is in capability subclass Ile and woodland suitability group 2o. 49C—Antigo silt loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes. This gently rolling soil is well drained. It is on crests and sides of hills on pitted outwash plains. Mapped areas are com- monly 15 to 50 acres and irregular in shape. Typically, the surface layer is very dark grayish brown silt loam about 2 inches thick. The subsurface layer is dark grayish brown silt loam about 11 inches thick. The subsoil is about 25 inches thick. The upper part is dark brown silt loam. The lower part is dark brown loamy sand. The underlying material is dark brown gravelly sand. In some areas slope is less than 6 percent or more than 12 percent. In the southern part of the survey area the surface layer is thicker and darker colored than typical. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Chetek, Roshoit, Campia, Brill, Poskin, and Barronett sandy substratum soils. The Chetek soil is excessively drained and has a 12- to 20-inch loamy mantle over reddish brown sand and gravel. The Rosholt soil is well drained and has a 20- to 40-inch loamy mantle over reddish brown sand and gravel. The Cambia soil is well drained and has silty material to a depth of 60 inches or more. The Chetek, Rosholt, and Campia soils occupy positions on the landscape similar to the Antigo soils and make up 2 to 10 percent of the delineations. The moder- ately well drained, less sloping Brill soil occupies lower positions on the landscape. The somewhat poorly drained Poskin soil and the poorly drained Barronett sandy substratum soil occupy small drainageways and depressions. The Brill, Poskin, and Barronett sandy sub- stratum soils make up less than 5 percent of the map unit. This Antigo soil has moderate permeability in the silty upper part of the profile and very rapid permeability in the sandy underlying material. The available water ca- pacity is moderate. Surface runoff is medium to rapid. Natural fertility is medium, and the organic matter con- tent is moderate. Most areas of this soil are farmed, but many areas are developed for urban uses. This soil has good potential for cropland and grass and legume hay and pasture. It has good potential for trees. It has fair potential as building sites. It has poor potential for most sanitary facilities. This soil has fair suitability for all the crops commonly grown in the survey area. It warms early in spring and sti" 1 'CN al RAMSEY COUNTIES, MINNESOTA �ueo vith this soil in mapping are small areas of •,,all drained Freeon soils and well drained `ry ,oils, The Kingsley soils formed entirely in �Y cam till, whereas the Santiago soil formed in ass and the underlying loamy till. Also included are e,.rat poorly drained Freer and poorly drained Au- ld sods which occupy small depressions. ,�rmeatidlty of the Santiago soil is moderately slow. +ace noff is slow. The available water capacity is %Qn natural fertility is medium, and the organic matter ,ent a moderate. Ycst areas of this soil are farmed. This soil has good pyiental tar cultivated crops, hay, pasture, and trees. It r." rag to good potential for most sanitary facilities and good potential for building site development. Yost areas of this soil are used to grow corn and ege..eans. It is well suited to crops. The surface layer rnCs to seal during rains, however, and to crust upon illiryng. Erosion is a • moderate hazard on the steeper gapes, however slopes are generally too short or too �ee5cdar to permit effective contour farming or terracing. yrr,lrnum tillage, returning crop residue to the soil, and a C rp rotation that includes forage crops help to control vcs4ri and maintain the tilth of this sail. Fail plowing pemits freezing and thawing of clods during the winter ena generally helps to provide a well prepared seedbed awl In spring. •firs soil is well suited to pasture and hay production. Proper grazing management and weed control will result a an adequate cover of the more productiveplants. fnterseeding with more desirable and approved species wA relo to Improve yield potential. This sad is well suited to building site development. Sod strength is low in the silty mantle but is high in the uicertying material. Unless property designed, roads, Gncivays, and parking lots may be damaged by frost *=n. The soil has poor trafficability when wet. It has tar suilaolllty for septic tank absorption fields because of ll moderately slow permeability. Enlarging the filter field of septic tanks will help the systems function properly. fil trees, and shrubs are generally easy to establish on this soil. Tills sad is in capability subclass Ile and woodland sutaoddy group 2o. 153C—Santiago silt loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes. ihs gently rolling to hilly soil is well drained. It is on crests and sides of hills on ground moraines. Mapped areas are irregular in shape and are commonly 10 to 30 acres. Typically, the surface layer is very dark grayish brown nit 'oam about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is brown silt loam about 4 inches thick. The subsoil is about 30 inches thick. The upper part is brown and dark brawn silt loam. The lower part is reddish brown fine sanc'+ 'oam. The underlying material is reddish brown Andy loam, In some places the surface layer has eroded and the silty mantle is less than 15 inches thick. 35 In other places the silty mantle is more than 30 inches thick. Slope is less than 6 percent in some mapped areas. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of moderately well drained Freeon soils and well drained Kingsley soils. The Kingsley soils formed entirely in sandy loam till, whereas the Santiago soil formed in loess and loamy till. Also included are somewhat poorly drained Freer soils and poorly drained Auburndale soils in small depressions. Permeability of the Santiago soil is moderately slow. Surface runoff is medium to rapid. The available water capacity is high. Natural fertility is medium, and the or- ganic matter content is moderate. Most areas of this soil are farmed. It has good poten- fiat for crops and for grass and legume hay and pasture. It has good potential for woodland. This soil has fair potential for most sanitary facilities and good potential for building site development. This soil is well suited to all crops commonly grown in the survey area. Most areas are used to grow corn and soybeans. The surface layer of this soil is easily eroded and tends to seal during rains and crust on drying. Ero- sion is a severe hazard. In some places contour strip - cropping can be used to control erosion, but most slopes are too short or too irregular for effective contour farm- ing. Minimum tillage can control erosion in most places, or a rotation can be used that includes forage crops. Fail plowing permits clods to be broken by freezing and thawing during the winter, which improves tilth. The use of this soil for pasture and hay is an effective means of controlling erosion. Proper stocking, rotation grazing, and weed control help to keep the pasture and soil in good condition. Planting pasture and hay may be desirable to improve plant species and potential yield. This soil is well suited to trees. Seedling mortality, equipment limitations, and the hazard of erosion are slight. Clearing, spraying, or other site preparation is needed to eliminate brush and reduce plant competition. This soil is well suited to building site development although slope is a limitation. Soil strength is low in the silty mantle but it is high in the underlying material. Be- cause sidehili seepage occurs where slope is more than 12 percent, tile should be installed around foundations to drain off accumulated water. This sail has fair suitability for septic tank absorption fields because of its moderately slow permeability and the hazard of side slope seepage. Lawns, trees, and shrubs are generally easy to establish. This soil is in capability subclass file and woodland suitability group 20. 1558—Chetek sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes. This nearly level to undulating soil is somewhat exces- sively drained. It is on low hills and knolls on broad outwash plains. Delineations are commonly irregular in shape and range from 5 to 20 acres. Typically, the surface layer is dark grayish brown sandy loam about 8 inches thick, and the subsurface CM layer is brown loam about 6 inches thick. The subsoil is about 8 inches thick. The upper part is dark reddish brown gravelly sandy loam, and the lower part is brown gravelly coarse sand. The underlying material is brown and light brown gravelly sand and gravelly coarse sand. In some places the underlying material contains less than 15 percent coarse fragments. In places the sandy loam mantle is thicker than 20 inches. In other areas the slope is more than 6 percent. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Kingsley and Poskin soils. The Kingsley soils are well drained and formed entirely in loamy glacial till, whereas the Chetek soil formed in a loamy mantle and sandy outwash. The Poskin soils are somewhat poorly drained and have a thick silty surface mantle underlain by gravel- ly sand. They occupy depressions. The Chetek soil has moderately rapid permeability in the sandy loam mantle and rapid permeability in the gravelly sand underlying material. Surface runoff is slow. Natural fertility, available water capacity, and organic matter content are low. Most areas of this soil are woodland or cropland. It has fair to poor potential for cultivated crops, pasture, and hay, It has fair potential for woodland. This soil has poor potential for most sanitary facilities and good poten- tial as building sites. The Chetek soil has fair to poor suitability for crops. The main limitations are low available water capacity and the hazard of erosion. Minimum tillage, crop rotations that include forage crops, and returning crop residues to the soil reduce erosion and improve available water ca- pacity and fertility. This soil is well suited to irrigation. The production of hay crops is limited by low available water capacity. Conservation practices for hayland in- clude planting approved and adapted species, fertilizing, and timely harvesting. When the soil is pastured, proper stocking, rotation grazing, and weed control help to maintain an adequate vegetative cover. Supplemental pasture is usually needed during the dry summer months. This soil has fair suitability for trees. Tree seedlings survive and grow well if competing vegetation is con- trolled. Site preparation, spraying, or clearing are desir- able methods of controlling competing vegetation. This soil is well suited to building site development and is poorly suited to most sanitary facilities. Sidewalls of the underlying sand and gravel have poor stability and may cave in during excavation. This can be prevented with temporary retaining walls. Septic tank absorption fields function well in this soil. Because of the rapidly permeable underlying material, however, they must be specially designed to prevent the pollution of ground water supplies. Revegetating the landscape may be difficult, and additions of water and fertilizer are needed to keep lawns, trees, and shrubs growing vigorously. A loamy topdressing may be desir- able before establishing lawns. This soil is generally a good source of sand for construction. Consideration should be given to this resource before soil for other uses. This soil is in capability subclass Ille suitability group 3s. 155C--Chetek sandy loam, 6 to 12 1 This gently rolling soil is somewhat exec It is on crests and sides of hills on pitted Delineations are irregular in shape and 20 acres. Typically, the surface layer is brown sa 6 inches thick. The subsoil is reddish brc about 12 inches thick. The underlying m brown gravelly sand. In some places the terial contains less than 15 percent coars places the loamy mantle is thicker that thinner than 12 inches. In other pldces tt than 6 percent or more than 12 percent. Included with this soil in mapping are Kingsley and Poskin soils. The Kingsley drained and formed entirely in loamy glac the Chetek soil formed in a loamy mai outwash. The Poskin soils are somewhat and have a thick silty surface mantle undo ly sand. They occupy depressions. The Chetek soil has moderately rapid the sandy loam mantle and rapid pern gravelly sand underlying material. Sur medium, Natural fertility, available water organic matter content are low. Most of this soil is woodland and crople potential for crops and fair potential for pc It has fair potential for woodland. This Potential for most sanitary facilities and gc building sites. This soil is poorly suited to crops bec: available water capacity and susceptibii The main management needs are cant: increasing fertility, and Improving tilth. l residue to the soil improves available ti fertility, and soil tilth. Slopes are generall striperopping or contouring. Minimum tillac to reduce soil erosion and runoff. This s irrigation if an adequate water supply is av This soil has fair suitability for pasture a erly managed. When it is used for pasture. ing, rotation grazing, and weed control maintain good cover. Because of the low , capacity, supplemental pastures usually during the drier summer months. It is imc vent overgrazing of pastures, because tl easily when overgrazed. This soil has fair suitability for trees. See is dependent on available water and can t be high if a dry season follows plantinc from undesired species generally does no the growth of seedlings. The use of harve ng equipment is not restricted by time of WASHINGTON AND RAMSEY COUNTIES, MINNESOTA eQuipmant. Erosion is a problem on this soil. Diversions or grassed waterways may be needed to divert water from higher slopes and prevent erosion. This soil is well suited to building site development although slope is a moderate limitation. It is poorly suited to sanitary facilities due to scope and the rapid perme- ability in the underlying material. If buildings are designed to fit the site, the natural landscape can be preserved, less grading is required, and erosion and sedimentation are reduced. Erosion control may be needed, both during and immediately following construction. Sidewalls have poor stability and may cave in during excavation. This can be prevented with temporary retaining walls. Septic tank absorption fields function well in this soil because of the rapidly permeable underlying material, however, they must be specially designed to prevent pollution of ground water supplies. Ravagetation of dis- turbed areas is difficult. Additions of water and fertilizer are usually needed to keep lawns, trees, and shrubs growing vigorously..This soil is a good source of sand for construction. This soil is in capability subclass IVe and woodland suitability group 3s. 1550—Chetek sandy loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes. This hilly to steep soil is somewhat excessively drained. It is on crests and sides of hills on pitted outwash plains.. Delineations are irregular in shape and range from 5 to 40 acres. Typically, the surface layer is dark grayish brown sandy loam about 6 inches thick. The subsoil is dark yellowish brown sandy loam about 8 inches thick. The underlying material is reddish brown sand and gravel. In some places the underlying material contains less than 15 percent coarse fragments. In places the sandy loam mantle is more than 20 or less than 12 inches thick. In other areas the slope is less than 12 percent or more than 25 percent. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Kingsley and Poskin soils. The Kingsley soils are well drained. They formed entirely in loamy glacial till, where- as the Chetek soil formed in a loamy mantle over sandy outwash. The Poskin soils are somewhat poorly drained and have a thick silty surface mantle underlain by gravel- ly sand. They occupy depressions. The Chetek soil has moderately rapid permeability in the sandy loam mantle and rapid permeability in the gravelly sand underlying material. Surface runoff is rapid to very rapid. Natural fertility, available water capacity, and organic matter content are low. Most areas of this soil are woodland or permanent pasture. Some isolated areas are cropland. This soil has poor potential for crops and fair to poor potential for pasture. It has fair potential for woodland. It has poor potential for sanitary facilities and fair potential as build- ing sites. This soil generally is not suited to crops because of steep slopes, the severe hazard of erosion, and low 37 available water capacity. It is too shallow to sand and gravel and slopes generally are too short and steep for striperopping or contouring. The use of the soil for pasture or hay is effective in controlling erosion, but yields are low due to the low available water capacity. Proper stocking will prevent weeds and the less desirable plant species from invad- ing the pastures. Rotation grazing, fertilization, and weed control are also good management practices. Over- grazed pastures can be helped by reseeding with more productive plant species. This soil erodes easily if over- grazed. This soil has fair suitability for trees. The hazard of erosion is severe. Furrow planting on the contour or planting in existing vegetation reduces erosion and helps to conserve moisture. Grassed waterways and diversions also help prevent erosion. This soil is suited to building site development, al- though slope is a severe limitation. It is poorly suited to most sanitary facilities. Erosion needs to be controlled both during and immediately following construction. If buildings are designed to fit the site, the natural land- scape can be preserved, less grading is required, and erosion and sedimentation are reduced. Sidewalls of the underlying material have poor stability and may cave in. This can be prevented with temporary retaining walls. This soil is poorly suited to septic tank absorption fields because of steep slopes and rapid permeability, which may cause the pollution of ground water, lawns and gardens need repeated watering and fertilizing to grow vigorously. A loamy topdressing may be desirable before establishing lawns. This soil is a good source of sand for construction. Consideration should be given to, this resource before developing the soil for other uses. This soil is in capability subclass As and woodland suitability group 3f. 1583—Zimmerman loamy fine sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes. This level to gently sloping soil is excessively drained. It occupies convex knolls and side slopes on outwash plains and lake plains. Individual areas are irreg- ular in shape and range from 5 to 60 acres. Typically, the surface layer is dark grayish brown loamy fine sand about 9 inches thick. The subsurface layer is grayish brown loamy fine sand about 6 inches thick. The underlying layers are stratified light yellowish brown to dark brown fine sand and thin, discontinuous bands of dark brown loamy fine sand 1/4 to 1 inch thick. Above a depth of 60 inches these bands typically have an aggregate thickness of less than 6 inches. In some delineations these bands have a thickness of more than 6 inches or there are no bands. Strata of medium and coarse sands are in some small areas. In other areas slope is more than 6 percent. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of moderately well drained Lino Variant soils in lower posi- tions on the landscape. Somewhat poorly drained Lino soils and very poorly drained Isanti soils occur in depres- sions and drainageways. yASHINGTCN AND RAMSEY COUNTIES, MINNESOTA Rosholt sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes. this very gently undulating to undulating soil is well "Ined. It is on sides and crests of tow hills on outwash ;utrns. Individual areas range from 5 to 30 acres and are negular in shape. Typically, the surface layer is dark brown sandy loam recut 11 Inches thick. The subsoil is about 20 inches Mk. The upper part is brown sandy loam. The middle part is reddish brown sandy loam. The lower part is eddish brown gravelly loamy coarse sand. The underly- ng material is yellowish red gravelly sand. In some *aces the underlying material lacks coarse fragments. the loamy mantle is less than 20 inches thick in places. n some small areas slope is more than 6 percent. In the Louth and central parts of the survey area the surface Isyer is thicker and darker colored. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Amigo. Barronett sandy substratum, Brill, and Poskin lots. The Antigo soils are well drained and have silt cam surface and subsurface layers over sand and ;ravel. The Barronett sandy substratum soils are poorly *tined and occupy depressions, The Brill soils are mod- erately well drained and are in shallow depressions. They have a silt loam surface layer and subsoil over find and gravel. The Poskin soils are somewhat poorly *coned and occur in depressions. Permeability of the Rosholt soil is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and is very rapid in the wderiving material. Surface runoff is medium. The avail- tW( ter capacity is low. Natural fertility is medium, wW „d organic matter content is low. Most areas of this soil are farmed. It has fair potential W crops, pasture, and woodland. It has poor potential br mast sanitary facilities and good potential as building ores. ,his soil has fair suitability for all crops commonly yyown in the survey area. The main limitation is the low wadable water capacity. Early -maturing crops are well adapted to this soil because they take advantage of eutyseason moisture. Minimum tillage and returnof crop residue to the soil help maintain tilth, increase water wadable for plants, and increase fertility. Crops grown on this soil respond well to irrigation. This soil has only fair suitability for permanent pasture Or hay because yields are limited by the low available "ter capacity. It provides good pasture in spring and fall and fair to poor pasture in summer. Proper stocking, posture rotation, weed control, and timely deferment of Qaang help to keep pasture and soil in good condition. Pannng pasture and hay may be desirable to improve plant species and potential yield. 71ns soil has fair suitability for trees. Seedling mortality t to moderate. Competing vegetation can be con - by spraying or girdling or by mechanical means %Xh as plowing, disking, or bulldozing. There is no re- *Icton to time of year or type of equipment that can be Iaeo. �'s soil is well suited to building site development. I od is moderately susceptible to frost heaving. 53 Roads, streets, and sidewalks are subject to damage unless carefully designed. Sidewalis in the underlying material have poor stability and may cave in during exca- vatlon. This can be prevented with temporary retaining walls. Septic tank absorption fields function well in this soil, but there is a hazard of contamination of underground water supplies unless special systems are installed. It is generally easy to establish lawns, trees, and shrubs on this soil. Additions of water and fertilizer are needed to keep them growing vigorously. This soil is a fair source of sand and gravel for construction. This soil is in capability subclass Its and woodland suitability group 20. 302C—Rosholt sandy loam, 6 to 16 percent slopes. This gently rolling to hilly soil is well drained. It is on sides and crests of hills on pitted outwash plains. Individ- ual areas range from 5 to 40 acres and are irregular in shape. Typically, the surface layer is very dark gray sandy loam about 5 Inches thick. The subsoil is about 29 Inches thick. The upper part is dark brown and very dark grayish brown sandy loam. The lower part is brown loamy sand. The underlying material is brown gravelly sand. In some places the loamy layers are less than 20 inches thick. In some farmed areas the surface layer is eroded and may be lacking. The underlying material lacks coarse fragments in places. In some areas slope is less than 6 percent or more than 15 percent. In the south and central parts of the survey area the surface layer is thicker and darker colored. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Antigo, Barronett sandy substratum, Brill, and Poskin soils. The Amiga soils are well drained and formed in a silty mantle over sand and gravel. The Barronett sandy substratum soils are poorly drained and occupy depres- sions. The Brill soils, which occur in shallow depressions, are moderately well drained and have a silty surface layer and subsoil. The Poskin soils are somewhat poorly drained and occur in depressions and drainageways. Permeability of the Rosholt soil is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very rapid in the under- lying material. Surface runoff is medium to rapid. The available water capacity is low. Natural fertility is medium, and organic matter content is low. Most areas of this soil are farmed or are in woodland. This soil has fair potential for small grains and grass and legume hay and pasture. It has poor potential for corn and soybeans. It has fair potential for woodland. This soil has poor potential for most sanitary facilities and good potential for building site development. This soil has fair to poor suitability for craps. Droughti- ness and the hazard of erosion are the main limitations. It is best suited to early -maturing crops, such as small grains, which take advantage of early -season moisture. Minimum tillage or a crop rotation that contains forage craps helps to control erosion. Erosion control by con- SOIL SURVE 54 tour plowing and striperopping is often difficult on the irregular slopes of this soil. Crops grown on this soil respond well to irrigation although it may erode the steeper areas. This soil has fair suitability for pasture or hay. Using it for hay or pasture reduces erosion. Droughtiness re- duces growth during the summer months, at which time supplemental pasture may be needed. Proper stocking, rotation grazing, and weed control help to keep the pas- ture and may be desll in irableood to improve a plant spec es and potential ure and yield. This soil has fair suitability for trees (fig. 9). Seedling mortality is generally low but depends mainly on availa- bie moisture. Competing vegetation can be controlled by spraying, cutting, or girdling. Erosion can be controlled by mulching during planting or by keeping a protective vegetative cover on the soil. Equipment use is generally not restricted in kind or time of year. This. soil is well suited to building site development. It is moderately susceptible to frost heave. Roads, streets, and sidewalks are subject to frost damage unless care- fully designed. Sidewalls in the underlying material have poor stability and may cave in during excavation for foundations or installation of underground utilities. This can be prevented by temporary retaining walls. Septic tank absorption fields function well in this soil. There is a possibility, however, that they may pollute underground water supplies and nearby lak A ar streams unless specially designed. Lawns, tre� ar shrubs are generally easy to establish and maintain. Th soil is a good source of sand and gravel for construcuc This soil is in capability subclass the and woodlar suitability group 2o. 325—Prebish loam. This is a level, slightly conceiv very poorly drained soil. It is in shallow depressions c the margins of large depressions occupied by orgar soils and on ground moraines. Delineations are 5 to . acre and are irregular in shape. This soil is subject flooding by runoff from adjacent more sloping area Typically, the surface layer is black loam about inches thick. The subsoil is about 31 inches thick. T. upper part is gray, mottled loam. The middle part is oli gray, mottled loam. The lower part is variegated da brown, reddish brown, and dark gray coarse sandy loa The underlying material is reddish brown sandy loam. some areas the surface mantle has up to 15 inches silty material. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas Ronneby, Auburndale, and Cathro soils. The Ronne soils are somewhat poorly drained and occupy positic alrehtly poorllylope m drained. They om shaves a thick Auburndale silty surta mantle and occupy depressionat areas. The Cathro sc Figure g.—Christmas trees on Rosholt sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes. Gale soils are on the steep slopes in me REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Meeting Date June 4, 1991 NO: ORING- 3EN CA SECTION CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT A, 3b DEP iRTMENT-. BY: rEM : A. Award of bid for Watermain Construction APPROVED FOR Resolution No. 91-19 AGENDA BY: B. Award of bid for Well Abandonment Resolution No. 91-20 Attached is a memo from Tom Prew regarding the SW-1 Watermain Project. Both Washington County and Ramsey County have agreed to pay the increased cost. Therfore, the following motions are offered for your cons iderati n. i�VMotion , Second n'� to adopt Resolution No. 91-19, Awarding the SW-1 Watermain Project, exclusive of well abandonment,.to Kenko, Inc., in th amount of $675,331.13. Motion ��Second —� to adopt .P Resolution No. 91-20, AwardinWh Well Abandonment Project relating to SW-1 Watermain Project to well drilling in the amount of $49,941.00. T.AS DA 1 TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2500 AMERIOAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101.1893 May 29, 1991 612/292-4400 FAX 012/292.om Honorable Mayor and City Council Lake Elmo, Minnesota Re: Bid Awards SW-1 Watermain SW-1 Well Abandonment Lake Elmo, Minnesota Commission No. 9821 Dear Mayor and Council Members: Both Ramsey County and Washington County Boards have agreed to pay for the increased cost of this project. We are now clear to award bids on this project. Bid tabulations for these projects are attached. Acti u .Re uested 1. We recommend award of the Watermain Construction Project to Kenko, Inc. in the amount of $675,331,13 2. We recommend award of the Well Abandonment Project to .Keys Well Drilling in the amount of $49,941.00. Sincerely, Thomas D. Prew, P.E. TDP/mha Enclosures SW-1 WELL .` -,1.TDONP1ENT LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA COMMISSION NO. 9821 BIDS OPENED: MAY 17, 1991 10:00 AM ITEM PTIQN_ 66.00 EA 1 SURVEY WELL - 10.00 EA 2 GAMMA LOGGING CASING/SEAL AQUIFER 3 PERFORATE 82877.00 LF 4 ABANDON WATER WELL 20.00 HR 5 REMEDIAL ACTION ITEM 1 SURVEY WELL 2 GAMMA LOGGING 3 PERFORATE CASING/SEAL AQUIFER 4 ABANDON WATER WELL 5 REMEDIAL ACTION TABULATION OF BIDS ff. 66.00 EA 10.00 EA 1360.00 LE,. 8287.00 LF''" 20.00 HR ENGINEER ESTIMATE 400.00 26,400.00 300.00 3,000.00 35.00 47,600.00 2.00 16,574.00 250.00 5,000.00 98,574.00 BERGERSON-CASWELL 200.00 13,200.00 200.00 2,000.00 21.00 28,560.00 3.50 29,004.50 135.00 2,700.00 75,464..50 TOLTZ, KING,DUVALL, P,sDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, I1TCOF ;ATED ENGINEERS-ARCHITECTS-P-ANNERS * Denotes error in this line on original bid KEYS WELL DRILLING 200.00 13,200.00 200.00 2,000.00 5.50 7,480.00 3.00 24,861.00 120.00 2,400.00 49,941.00 THEIN WELL CO 310.00 20,460.00 300.00 3,000.00 7.00 9,520.00 4.20 34,805.40 100.00 2,000.00 69,785.40 E H RENNER & SONS MARY J TRAUT WELLS 250.00 16,500.00 270.00 2,700.00 19.00 25,840.00 4.00 33,148.00 195.00 3,900.00 245.00 16,170.00 225.00 2,250.00 29.50 40,120.00 4.40 36,462.80 185.00 3,700.00 98,702.80 �:+STRQOTION OF. SW-1 WATERMAIN CITY OF L ZE ELMO, MINNESOTA CO?-24ISSION No. 9821 BIDS OPEIIED: APRIL 5, 1991 1.-00 PM TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC vr`OF1.S rD EI]GII7EEA5-i.ACE ITBC T_S-?LN�:E:S TABULATION OF BIDS * Denotes error in this lino on original bid ENGINEER ESTIMATE RENKO INC BROWN L CRIS S J LOUIS ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRTCE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION MuT PRICE Ex'PSTOIT DIVISION V - rET rONSTRUCTION S RESTORATION 1 CLEARING 32.00 EA 75.00 2,400.00 2 GRUBBING 32.00 EA _ 75.00 2,400.00 3 REM/DISP EXIST BIT PAVEMENT $008.00 Sy 1.00 5,00S.00 4 REM/DISP CONC DRIVEWAY 2608.00 BF 1.00 '2,608.00 5 BIT DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION 425.00 Sy 4.00 1,700.00 6 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 31.98.00 TH 6.00 19,108.00 7 BIT WEAR COURSE MIX 2331 T31 2283.00 SY 3.5.00 34,245,00 8 BIT WEAR COURSE MIX 2331 T41 751.00 TN 40.00 30,040.00 9 CRS-1 BIT MATERIAL FOP, TACK 100.00 GA 2.00 200.00. 10 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 2608.00 SF .: - 3.00 "7,824.00 11 TOPSOIL BORROW (IV) 2000.00 CY 7.00. 14,000.00 12 SEED MIXTURE NO. 500 220.00 LB 2.00 440.00 13 ROADSIDE SEEDING 5.80 AC 1000.00 5,800.00 14 COMM FERTILIZER 10-10-10 2900.00 LB 0.50 1,450.00 15 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE I 11,60 TN 500.00 5,800.00 16 SODDING 38767.00 BY 2.00 77,534.00 17 FLAGt4EN 490.00 ER 15.00 7,350.00 la TRANSPLANT TREES 42.00 EA 50.00 2,100.00 19 REM/DISP/REPL 4" CONC WALK 400.00 Sr 2.50 1,000.00 20 SEED MIXTURE NO. 800 70.00 LB 2.00 - 140.00 221,227.00 862,335.00 43.21 1,382.72 100.00 3,200.00 53.00 1,696.00 43.21 1,382.72 50.00 1,600.00 53.00 1,696.00 0.80 4,006.40 0.50 2,504.00 3.00 15,024.00 0.50 1,304.00 0.50 1,304.00 0.60 1,564.80 5.27 2,239,75 6.00 2,550.00 4.50 1,912.50 9.05 28,941.90 ., 7.50 -23,985.00 7.00 22,386.00 3.88 8,858.04, ,., ,. 4.00 9,132.00 3.70 8,447.10 28.24 21,20B.24 26.00 19,526.00 27.00 20,277.00 1.54 154.00`.: 1.50 150.00 1.50 150.00 5, 633.283. ;.';; 2.00 5,216.00 2.00 5,216.00 . 4.98 91960.00 - 7.00 -. 14,000.00 8.00 16,000.00 1.44 316.80:. ?;�.;;'. 1.50 330.00 1.50 330,00 210.21 1, 219.22;,^' 200.00 1,160.00 200.00 1,160.00 0.22 638.00:'^ 0,20 580.00 0.25 725.00 127.23 1,475.87 120.00 1,392.00 121.00 1,403.60 1.27 49,234.09 1.20 46,520.40 1.20 46,520.40 1.11 543.90 15.00 7,350.00 23.00 11,270.00 44.25 1,858.50 75.00 3,150.00 58.00 2,436.00- 2.57 1,028.00 0.50 200.00 1.50 600.00 2.77 193.90 """"-"' 3.00 210.00 4.00 280.00 141,579.33 iQ708,189,89 -------""- 144,059.40 ------------ 159,094.40 cv 712,614.90 cv 748,46;.90 TOLTZ, F,114G, uvrww -- AND ASSOCIATESINCORPORATED ENGIliE£RS-ARCHITECTS -P Lk:iIIEP.S COI45TRUCTION OF SW l WAT60 A.IN CITY OF LAKE COMMISSION NO. 9821 BIDS OPENED: APRIL 5, 1991 ITEM SS EOM 1 MOBILIZATION 2 4" DIP CLASS 51 WATERMAIN 3 6" DIP CLASS 51 WATERMAIN 4 12" DIP CLASS 50 WATERMII 5 14" DIA CASING PIPE FOR WM 6 CONN TO EXIST WAT£R14AIN 7 WATER FOR DISINFECTION 1:00 PM TABULATION OF BIDS ENGINEER ESTIMATE -. VFCTON T ION I TT� c AND FITT IIiG ^,x D" n x S SEAT GATE VALVE 1 4 SJ RE 2 6^ MJ FES SEAT GATE VALVE 3 12" MJ RES SEAT BUTTERFLY VLV 6" MJ BU9 HYDRANT 5 4" MJ HUB FLUSHING HYDRANT 6' 6" i;yD EX £N FOR 4" HUB HYD g Tf.T CIP FITTING g L,E 6 VALVE VAULT * Denotes error in this line on original bid S J LOUIS KEIM0 INC BROWN fi CRIS ___.._�.... EXIF11SION maTm PRICE LotIT FRICc- 40, 000.00 12965.77 131087.25 20000.0 10.00 I.00 IS 10045.00 LF 40000.00 10.00 100,450.00 13.05 13.80 ,12,965.71 151, 689.60 „ 11.00 17.00 10992.00 IF 11.00 22.00 120,912.00 40,942.00 20.45 057.45 36, 036�60 90.00 1861.00 IF 60.00 IF 75 00 4,500.00 500.00 100.61 262.195 262.19 2000.75 1.00 EA 500.00 112.50 0.75 112.50- 150.00 MG 0.75 ________ '-34 ___ ____-_ ' 340, 211.36 307,416.50 20,000.00 4500.00 4,500,00 90,405.00 LOD, 450.00 9.00 11.25 123, 660.00 120,912.00 16.00 29 .00 31, 637.00 5,400.00 97.00 ,776776.00 2,000.50 00 400.00 400.00 112.50 112. 0 75 _- __-- -- 280,511.50 254,673.50 1,200.00 295.45 1,090.80 250.00 300.00 7,200.00 7, 200.00 24.00 EA 300.00 350.00 8, 400.00 344.72 9,273.26 41323.90 100.00 4,200.00 24.00 EA EA 1200.00 1,200.00 720.65 12, 672.63 1300.00 11, 100.00 10,800:00 6 .00 9.00 EA 1100.00 9,900.00 700.00 1408.07 1358.79 12,229.11 1200 .00 300.00 1, 500.00 9.00 BA 1300.00 1 1,000.00 161.71 608 .55 808.55 301 00 1"500.00 5 .00 IF 300.00 200 00 1, 000.00 151.71 0.89 7,218 .79 1.00 8,111.00 Zp, 000.00 5.00 LF 8111.00 LB 1.50 12,166.50 00 17263.04 17-263 04 20000. ------------ 1.00 LS 15000.00 15,000 -- 71,011.00 '-- - 70,688.65 74,066.50 ISION III WAT rRVICES.9597 1" g£gVICE TYPE E COPPER TAP ,00 LE . 49.00 EA 1 2 1" CORPORATION STOP 17 SADDLE 31.00 EA 3 1" CORPORATION STOP WITH CUES SOX 80.00 EA 4 1" CURB STOP 1-1/4" TYPE X COPPER TAP 6ERV 1H03i00 EA 5 6 1-1/4" CORPORATION STOP W/CURB BOX 3,00 EA 1 1-1/4" CURB STOP 640.00 Sr 8 2., THICK INSULATION . s WEITANDOT�MFNT AND YLIIM@Sii�66.00 EA.' 1 ABANDON WATER WELL SERV/EX WELL 41.00 EA , I. 2 CONN NEW COPPER 6ERV INTO BSMT 41.DO EA.-- 3 STUB NEW COPPER TYPE I PLUMBING CONNECTION 68.00 EA''.:. 16.00 EA 4 5 TYPE II PLUMBING CONNECTION METER MANHOLE 1.00 EA EA 6 4' DIA WATER TOWA MODEL Y1 1,00 1 1" yARD HYDRANT PERMIT INS? FEES $4.00 EA g PLUMBING 3.0.00 95,970.00 450.00 2,940.00 40.00 1,240.00 80.00 '. 6, 400.00 11.00 3.9,055.00 80.00 240.00 3.00.00 300.00 2.00 11280:00 600.00 200.00 400.00 100.00 1000.00 90D.00 600.00 25.00 128,225.00 39,600.00 _ 8,200.00'" 16,400.00 41,6001.00 16,000.00 ,. 900.00 600.00 2,100.00 131,400.00 7 .14 68,522.58 - 9.00 50.00 86, 373.00 21450.00 41.59 21037.91 789.57 30.09 930.00 25.47 63.34 5, 067.20 30.00 4,000.00 19,855.00 7 .53 13,591.65 11.00 75 00 225.00 fl1.52 24d•56 249.39 80.00 240.00 83, 13 441.60 0.50 320.00 0.69 __ ---90,944.46 114,393.00 310.00 310-00 770.00 1400.00 1200.00 230.00 230.00 1.00 22000.00 1,440.00 E, BE0.00 4, c'_O.00 12,600 .0:. 10,$00.00 1,150.00 1, '-50.00 8, 111.00 22, 000.00 76,75'.00 5.00 41,985.00 48.00 2,252.00 32.00 992.00 66.00 5,280.00 5.00 9,025.00 86.00 258.00 88.00 264.00 2.00 1,260.00 67, 436,00 32, 858.76 550.00 36,160,00 570.00 1100.00 37, 620.00 45,100,00 497 .86 467. 150.00 6,400.00 16, 400.00 1180.00 46,240.00 157.75 58.15 2,384.15 - " 400.00 � 940.00 29, 920.00 680.00 46,240.00 13, 196.93 13,391.24 5,452.16 620.00 9,920.00 $20.00 1230.00 000.00 1, 000.00 340.16 1, 1350.00 1, 350.00 350.00 230.00 230.00 1631.09 225.00 280 9 280,94 350.00 25.00 2, 100.00 25.00 2,"":OO.CO __ _______ 25 .00 2,100 .00 ___________- __ 1JC, 5'_O.CO -'- ------- 102, 640.00 64,766.09 RESOLUTION NO. 91-19 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SW-1 WATERMAIN EXCLUSIVE OF WELL ABANDONMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of the SW-1 Watermain, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Name of Bidder: Kenko, Inc. Brown & Cris S.J. Louis Construction F.F. Jedlicki Casey Excavating Northdale Construction Arcon Construction Richard Knutson, Inc. S.M. Hentges and Sons G.W. Houle, Inc. Hank Weidema Excavating Amount of Bid: $708,189.89 712,614.90 748,464.90 760,185.20 765,060.10 778,332.35 789,946,47 797,230.33 798,570.44 821,946.55 952,303.92 Without Well Abandonment $675,331.13 676,314.90 710,844.90 720,585.20 718,860.10 738,732.35 753,976.47 754,330.33 762,270.44 782,676.55 906,499.92 WHEREAS, it was determined by Washington County, Ramsey County and the City of Lake Elmo that insufficient information had been provided to the bidders relating to Abandonment of Water Wells, and that portion of the bid would be rebid, pursuant to any and all legal requirements; and WHEREAS, it appears that Kenko, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder for the construction of SW-1 watermain, exclusive of Well Abandonment. MN: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE ELMO, 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Kenko, Inc. in the name of the City of Lake Elmo for the construction of SW-1 Watermain according to the plans and specifications therfore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. ADOPTED, by the City Council this 4th day of June, 1991. Signed: ATTEST: David Johnson, 'layor ary ue ner, ity min trtrator RESOLUTION NO. 91-20 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID FOR SW-1 WELL ABANDONMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Well Abandonment portion of the SW-1 Watermain Project, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: NAME OF BIDDER: AMOUNT OF BID: Keys Well Drilling $49,941.00 Thein Well Co. 69,785.40 Bergerson-Caswell 75,464.50 E.H. Renner & Sons 82,088.00 Mark J. Traut Wells 98,702.80 WHEREAS, it appears that Keys Well Drilling is the lowest responsible bidder for for the SW-1 Well Abandonment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MN: 1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Keys Well Drilling in the name of the City of Lake Elmo for the construction of SW-1 Well Abandonment according to the plans and specifications therfore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits to the successful bidder and next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. ADOPTED, by the City Council this 4th day of June, 1991. Signed: David Johnson, Mayor ATTEST: Mary Kueffner, City Administrator REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Meeting Date June 4, 1991 ;La&_N oA 5 ECTICN ITEM: CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT Resolution 91-21: R.J. O'Neil 0-j(0 RIGINATING• 00AEPARTMENT= BY: APPROVED FaR AGENDA BY: Attached is a letter received by the City regarding an error in the legal description of the R.J. O'Neil property (Vali-Hi Drive -In). Our City Attorney has prepared the attached resolution which when filed with the County will correct this problem. Motion (l Second bv \ to adopt Resolution 91-21 a resolution correcting the legal descriptions in the resolutions referenced in Resolution 91- as it relates to the R.J. O'Neil property, commonly known as the Vali-Hi Drive In.. �i i j LAW OFFICES BRIGGS AND MORGAN PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 2400 I D S CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5M402 TELEPHONE (812) 389-0801 TELECOPIER (612) 096-1078 INCLUDING THE FORMER FIRM OF LEVITT, PALMER, BOWEN, ROTMAN & SHARE WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER, 334-8484 May 16, 1991 City Manager City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Dear Sir or Madam: We represent RECO, Inc. which owns undeveloped property on the Northeast quadrant of County Road 17 and Hudson Road, which lies in the Southwest Quarter of Southwest Quarter, Section 36-29-21. The abstractor is showing several recorded conditional use Permits issued by the City to R. J. O'Neil and one to St. Croix Drum Corps which pertain to the drive-in theater property, but which appear to contain an erroneous legal description. The theater property appears to lie in the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 36-29-21. Copies of the abstract entries of these resolutions are enclosed. It would be appreciated if you would record with the County Recorder an affidavit or certificate correcting the erroneous legal description in these resolutions. DJS:ba Eno. 616029 2270 MN WORLD TRADE CL+NTER SAINT PADL, MINNESOTA 65101 (012( 201.121M Very truly yours, 1 � 1 David J. Spencer / 2200 FIRST NATIONAL BANE BUILDING SAINT PAUL MINNESOTA 65101 (612) 201-1216 24 0 I➢S CENTER MINNRAPOMS, MINNIISOTA 55402 1612) 030.0501 MAY 2 3 1* WARREN E. PETERSON PETERSON, FRANKE & RIACH RONALD J. RIACH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION JEROME P. FILL\ DANIEL WITT FRAM 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING GLENN A. BERGMAN 50 EAST FIFTH STREET JOHN KanccKR ST. PAUL' MINNESOTA 55101.1197 W. BEC GARY W. HECKER+: TIMOTHY J. HASSETTt — MICHAEL T. OBERLE (612) 291.8955 CLYDE C. AHLQUIST FAX NO. (6U) 228d753 May 22, 1991 Ms. Sharon Lumby Administrative Aide City of Luke Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 tREAL PROPERTY LAWSPECIALIST 'ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN TALSO ADMITTED IN ILLINOIS, FLORIDA. WASHINGTON D.C. ROSEVILLE OFFICE 200 ROSEDALE TOWERS 1700 WEST HIGHWAY 36 ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55113 (612) 636.6400 FAX NO. (612) 636.7334 OF COUNSEL JEROME E. FRANKE MELVIN J. SILVER Re: Correction of Legal Description for R. J. O'Neil Our File Number: 11135/910001 Sharon: Enclosed is a draft of a Resolution which could be used to correct the problem identified in Mr. Spencer's letter of May 20, 1991. Please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are appropriate. If you have any questions, please contact me. After the correcting Resolution is in an appropriate form, it can be placed on the Council agenda for review. Very truly yours, lla JPF/lcn Enclosure cc: Mary Kueffner STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WASHINGTON CITY OF LAKE ELMO RESOLUTION NO. 91-21 A RESOLUTION CORRECTING PRIOR RESOLUTIONS GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS. WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo has adopted the following described Resolutions relating to the issuance of Conditional Use Permits for R. J. O'Neil: 1. A Resolution adopted January 4, 1983 and recorded on March 22, 1983 as Document No. 442651. 2. A Resolution adopted January 3, 1984 and recorded on February 13, 1984 as Document No. 459692. 3. A Resolution adopted December 4, 1984 and recorded on February 5, 1985 as Document No. 478932. 4. A Resolution adopted January 7, 1986 and recorded on February 20, 1986 as Document No. 502212. S. A Resolution adopted January 6, 1987 and recorded on February 27, 1987 as Document No. 532460. 6. A Resolution adopted January 5, 1988 and recorded on June 11, 1990 as Document No. 632968; and WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo has adopted the following described Resolution relating to the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit for the St. Croix Riverman Drum and Bugle Corp.: 1. A Resolution adopted April 5, 1983 and recorded on April 27, 1983 as Document No. 444347; and WHEREAS, all such Resolutions (herein collectively referred to as "the Resolutions") reference the following described property situated in Washington County, Minnesota to wit: The Southwest ; of the Southwest 4 of Section 36, Township 29, Range 21 except the South 219.5 feet of the East 847.7 feet thereof; and WHEREAS, the Resolutions should have referred to the following described real property situated in Washington County, Minnesota to wit: The Southeast 4 of the Southwest 4 of Section 36, Township 29, Range 21 except the South 219.5 feet of the East 847.7 feet thereof; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to correct the error occurring in the legal description of the property which was subject to the Conditional Use Permits. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Lake Elmo City Council hereby amends the Resolutions by correcting the legal description contained therein to read as follows: The Southeast 4 of the Southwest 4 of Section 36, Township 29, Range 21 except the South 219.5 feet of the East 847.7 feet thereof. AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this correcting Resolution shall be filed with the Washington County Recorder. Dated: ATTEST: Mary Kueffner, City Administrator c\j\1eres91.001 May 22, 1991 2 David Johnson, Mayor REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Meeting Date June 4, 1991 3ENDA SECTION CITY ADMINISTRATORS REPORT I"EM : Impound Fees for Cats. �= ORIGINATING- 12C. DEPARTMENT. BY: APPROVED FOR AGENDA BY: It was brought to my attention by Joan Richert, Executive Director of the St. Croix Animal Shelter, that the City does not have an impound.fee for cats, such as we do for dogs. Cats are not picked up as frequently as dogs, but it does happen on occasion. Therefore, the following recommendation is offered for your consideration: Motion �Second WVZA to adopt Ordinance 80adding Section 105.090 "Impound fees for cat" to the Lake Elmo Municipal Code. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WASHINGTON CITY OF LAKE ELMO ORDINANCE 8165 An Ordinance adding Section 105.090 "Cat Impound Feo" to the Lake Elmo City Code. The Lake Elmo City Council hereby ordains that Section 105.090 is hereby added to the Lake Elmo Code to read as follows: Section 105.090 Gat Impound Fees: The fee for an impounded cat shall.be $25.00 Effective Date This ordinance shall be effective the day following its publication. Adoption Date Passed by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo the 4th day of June, 1991. David Johnson, Mayor Attest: Mary Kueffner, City Administrator Publication Date Published on the . day of 1 1991. hm� �bV tvt 0",00 lei' PLEMENTATION and to limit the cost and establishing standards and agement organizations and subdivision 1. ar required by the adopted o the towns, cities, county, as of subdivisions 7, 8, and with the county groundwa- review in accordance with esources shall review each five years and recommend I by an alleged failure to eview by the board of water for resolving disputes and tented. i, effective July 1, 1992. resources shall adopt rules nization financial reports to other expenditures; accountants, procedures for rm audits as determined tcia A performance audits is to the board, which must received, plan and ordinance nces granted, status of local ents, and financial conditions 1 10 to 19. and 14. As enacted subd. 1 had A management plan is required comprising all minor watershed metropolitan area. For the pur• _ ection a minor watershed unit is i tin the metropolitan area if more t of its area is within the metro - the watershed management plan red, adopted, and implemented in h the requirements of sections 6 1 .205 to 103B.2551." a. 601, § 29 provides that §§ 5 to counties of Anoka, Carver, Dako- _. Ramsey, Scott, and Washington. c. 601, § 31 provides in part that i73.878 (renumbered as subd. 14 of effective July 1, 1992. 73.878. c. 901. art. 3, § 42. ( WATER PLANNING AND PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION § 103B.235 Laws 1987, c. 358, §§ 125, 126. Laws 1984, c. 411, §§ 6 to 9. Laws 1987, c. 207, §§ 7 to 11. Laws 1982, c. 609, § 21. Laws 1986, e. 389, § 1. Cross References Laws 1985, c. 172, § 131, Watershed Law, see § 108D.001 at seq. 103B.235. Local water management plans Subdivision 1. Requirement. (a) After the watershed plan is approved and adopted, or amended, pursuant to section 103B.231, the local government units having land use planning and regulatory responsibility for territory within the watershed shall prepare or cause to be prepared a local water management plan, capital improvement program, and official controls as necessary to bring local water management into conformance with the watershed plan within the time period prescribed in the implementation program of the watershed plan and, as necessary, shall prepare or cause to be prepared amendments to the local comprehensive plan. (b) Each town within the counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Scott, and Washington authorized by general or special law to plan and regulate the use of land under sections 462.351 to 462.364 shall by resolution determine whether to prepare the local water management plan itself or to delegate all or part of the preparation of the plan to the county, (c) Towns within counties that have adopted comprehensive plans applicable to the town must use county preparation of their plan to the maximum extent possible. Subd. 2. Contents. (a) Each local plan, in the degree of detail required in the watershed plan, shall: (1) describe existing and proposed physical environment and land use; (2) define drainage areas and the volumes, rates, and paths of stormwater runoff, (3) identify areas and elevations for stormwater storage adequate to meet performance standards established in the watershed plan; (4) define water quality and water quality protection methods adequate to meet performance standards established in the watershed plan; (5) identify regulated areas; and (6) set forth an implementation program, including a description of official controls and, as appropriate, a capital improvement program. (b) The board of water and soil resources shall adopt rules establishing minimum local plan standards and a model environmental management ordinance for use by local government units in implementing local water plans. The standards apply to plan amendments made to conform to changes in the watershed plans that are adopted under the board rules required by section 10313.231, subdivision 6. Subd. 3. Review. After consideration but before adoption by the governing body, each local unit shall submit its water management plan to the watershed management organization for review for consistency with the watershed plan adopted pursuant to section 103B.231. The organization shall approve or disapprove the local plan or parts of the plan. The organization shall have 60 days to complete its review. If the organization fails to complete its review within the prescribed period, the local plan shall be deemed approved unless an extension is agreed to by the local unit. Subd. 4. Adoption and implementation. After approval of the local plan by the organization, the local government unit shall adopt and implement its plan within 120 days and shall amend its official controls accordingly within 180 days. Subd. 5. Amendments. To the extent and in the manner required by the organization, all amendments to local water management plans shall be submitted to the organization for review and approval in accordance with the provisions of subdivision 3 for the review of plans. Laws 1990, c. 391, art. 2, § 12. Amended by Laws 1990, c, 601, § 21. 79 F. Set Forth an Implementation Program, Official Including a Descri Controls and, as ption of Program Appropriate, a Capital Improvement C. Schedule for Amend ent The City of Oakdale, due to its plans for rapid urban development, must amend its water management plan within 2 Years of ado it conforms to the hydrology fined of this plan in order to assure that plan. gy outlined in this The remaining cities and townships of the District must surface water management plan b adopt a outside the Metropolitan Urban Services 1, 1990, Local governments adopting Area may conform to this g the District plan as the local plan by the community lying within the Valle plan applicable to the portion of y Branch Watershed District, D. Amendment Procedures Notice of public hearing on proposed plan amendments and a description Of the amendments shall be published in at least one legal newspaper in each county having territory within the watershed. Publication shall occur at least 10 days before the hearing. Notice shall also be mailed at 30 days before the hearing to all counties, WSCDs, least home rule charter cities havin towns, and statutory g territory within the watershed, and :1etropolitan Council, DNR, PCA, and Water and to the submit a Resources Board, request to the Water Any person may `o11ow' Resources ing the hearing, nOC later than 10 days g, asking that the proposed amendments ='eViewed in accordance with the provisions of Section 473.878 be fully 6, and 7. The Board of Subdivision ��"endments before the Water Managers shall not approve Resources Board Proposed plan �u11 review has made a decision on in accordance with the whether SU�Idivisions 5, 6, and 7 Provisions of is necessary. Section 743.87g, '�.,'T7/327, 0 VII-3 Since we do not have time to discuss every point presented, it may seem that decisions are preconceived. However, background information is provided for the City Council on each agenda item in advance from City Staff and appointed Commissions; and decisions are based on this information and past experiences. In addition, some items may also have been discussed at previous Council meetings. If you are aware of information that hasn't been discussed, please fill out a "Request to Appear Before the City Council" slip; or, if you came late, raise your hand to be recognized. Comments that are pertinent are appreciated. Items requiring excessive time may be continued to another meeting. AGENDA LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL JUNE 4, 1991 7:00 p.m. MEETING CONVENES 1. AGENDA 2. MINUTES: May 21, 1991 3. CLAIMS 7:15 4. PUBLIC INQUIRIES 5. REAPP REPORT a. Resolutions of Appreciation 6. Resolution No. 91-17: Supporting Washington County's Adoption of Local Option Sales Tax 7:30 7. PLANNING/LAND USE/ZONING: A. Rezoning Recommendation from Planning Commission: Clifford Adkins Property Ordinance No. 8045 B. Park Land Dedication Ordinance No. 8046 Resolution No. 91-18: Establishing Park Dedication Fees for Residential Subdivisions of 3 parcels or less C. Request for Amendment to Sign Ordinance D. Bachman Variance: Reconsideration E. Standards for building size in Residential Zoning Districts (except R3) 8:45 8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: A. Award of bid for Watermain Construction: Resolution No. 91-19 B. Award of bid for Well Abandonment: Resolution No. 91-:20 C. Other 9:00 P.M. 9. VALLEY BRANCH WATERSHED DISTIRCT: Discussion with Managers and Engineer ------------------------------B R E A K ---------------------------------- 9:30 p.m. 10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: A. Resolution No. 91-21: R. J. O'Neil B. Other 11. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: A. Mayor Johnson B. Councilman Hunt - Computer C. Councilman Johnson - Maintenance Advisory Committee D. Councilman Mottaz E. Councilman Williams - Computer 12. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. Charitable Gambling License (1) day 4th District VFW Ladies Auxiliary B. "Adopt a Road" in Lake Elmo C. Impound Fees for Cats Ordinance No. 8047 D. Dayton Development Easement E. Parks Commission Recommendation F. Update on Hammes Property G. Other 13. ADJOURN