HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-01-92 CCMMI141JTES APPnr.)7- : 10-6-92.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 1, 1992
Mayor Johnson called the council meeting to order at 7:03
p.m. in the council chambers. PRESENT: Mayor Johnson,
Hunt, Mottaz, Williams, City Engineer Prew, City Attorney
Filla and Administrator Kueffner. ABSENT: Councilman
Johnson
1. AGENDA
ADD: 6A. Mike Black's comments on Exceptions to Platting,
6C. Hidden Valley Dev., 8B. Letter from Woodbury regarding
CGRW.
M/S/P Hunt/Williams - to approve the September 1, 1992 City
Council agenda as amended. (Motion carried 4-0).
2. MINUTES: August 18, 1992
M/S/P Williams/Hunt - to approve the August 18, 1992 city
council minutes as amended. (Motion carried 4-0).
3. CLAIMS
M/S/P Mottaz/Hunt - to approve the September 1, 1992 Claims
#855 thru #892 as presented. (Motion carried 4-0).
4. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL
A. Public Inquiries
Gloria Knoblauch, 9181 31st St. N., questioned the Fire
Department's proposed budget for 1993 because she heard they
were talking about building a new fire hall and purchasing a
new, expensive fire truck. The Council noted that Budget
figures are opened to the public and a Budget Workshop is
scheduled for September 8th at City Hall.
Wyn John, 8883 Jane Road N., stated he attended the budget
workshop and found it difficult to understand the discussion
because the public didn't have copies of the DRAFT budget.
Steve DeLapp, 8468.Lake Jane Trail, reported that Schafer
Mining has reactivated their pit and are starting work
around 6:00 a.m. and ending after 7:00 p.m. They have
dumped dirt all over the street at their entrance to Jamaca
Avenue. DeLapp suggested looking at their CUP and check.if
they are in compliance with their hours of operation. He
also felt Schafer Mining had an obligation to clean up the
street.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 1, 1992 2
Sue Dunn asked if Mayor Johnson could bring to the public
and apprise the rest of the Council of the dealings he is
making for Lake Elmo such as a community center with an
historical museum. Mayor Johnson explained he would like to
see a senior center along with a historical museum and this
was made as a comment to the Heritage Preservation
Commission. He has not negotiated with anybody to come up
with such a proposal.
Rita Conlin, 8560 Ironwood Trail, commented on the August
4th Council minutes where a motion was made as to whether or
not the landfill referendum funds could be used for street
improvements. Conlin indicated she would be outraged if the
landfill referendum funds were used for anything other than
what they were designated for. There will be another siting
process put into effect and Lake Elmo needs to be on guard.
Mayor Johnson explained at that time they discussed street
improvements, but it was one of any number of things that
those funds could be used for. At a budget workshop meeting
the Council decided that these funds are going to stay there
until we are certain that this Lake Elmo siting is over.
Margaret Carlson, 8735 24th St. N., stated with the approval
of the Met Council for the MUSA extension, Lake Elmo will
probably expect commercial development along I-94. It is
important for the city to respond effectively and fairly to
these development proposals. In the article she read in the
newspaper Mayor Johnson made a comment concerning a phantom
developer. Carlson felt it was a lot to expect for a
council to be able to approve development plans unless they
are brought first to the planning commission and then
brought before the council. Mayor Johnson stated we are not
certain of the firms identity and in any case we have been
asked not to reveal any names even if we knew it.
B. Gordon Moosbrugger, VBWD
Mr. Gordon Moosbrugger indicated he was interested in
continuing to serve on the Valley Branch Watershed District
and thanked the Council for inviting him to the meeting.
M/S/P Mottaz/Hunt - that the city council endorses Gordon
Moosbrugger to another term on the Valley Branch Watershed
District. (Motion carried 4-0).
5. OLD BUSINESS•
A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Update
B. Limited Business - Business Park
Councilman Williams explained that the primary justification
for extension of the MUSA to the proposed area has from the
beginning been the possibility of having a large, valuable
office building built on the site. The fact that the site
would be owned and controlled by one, financially stable
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 1, 1992 3
landowner has been part of the attractiveness of the whole
proposal. It has been rumored in the press that this
potential developer is a "large insurance firm". However so
far this potential developer has remained a "phantom
developer" to this Council as a body.
Williams added now it is time for this Council, acting as a
body, not just one individual, to make decisions which will
have long lasting and very significant effects on this city
and listed his concerns if we'proceed with extending the
MUSA and extending services to this area, but do not get
this phantom development or it is not as valuable or big as
we heard. Councilman Williams' entire explanation is made
part of these minutes.
Mayor Johnson responded that we have already stated that we
are not going to upfront anything, but we are going to
insist on one or a combination of financial mechanisms
required for this project and felt that Councilman Williams,
concerns were unfounded.
M/S/F Williams/Hunt - that consideration of this resolution
approving the Comprehensive Plan amendment be postponed
until there exists a developers' contract, signed by the
landowner, and acceptable to this City Council, which
commits the landowner to building a structure of a certain
value within the proposed MUSA area by a certain date to be
determined, and which specifies how the utilities to the
area, especially sewer and water, will be financed,
Furthermore, the city staff is directed to transmit this
decision to the landowner with the request for prompt action
in arranging a meeting between the proposed developer and
this City Council to begin negotiating this contract. In
addition the resolution should be remanded to the PZ for
their comments on how its provision will impact the city at
large. (Motion failed: 2-2 Mayor Johnson: He agreed with the
general comment to have the developer in and solicit the
needed information, but not demand a developers agreement
before we get on with substantial work, Mottaz).
M/S/P Mottaz/Hunt - to invite United Properties, the
developer, and PZ to a joint meeting with the City Council
on September 29th and that they be prepared to answer any
questions of the Council and that the PZ look at the
Resolution and Limited Business Ordinance and have their
comments returned to the council by October 6th and direct
the city staff to address questions raised as to
interpretation of conditions in the proposed resolution.
(Motion carried 4-0).
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 1, 1992
C. Rezoning from RR to AG: Soderberg, etal,
Ordinance 8070
D. CUP - Thomas Soderberg, etal, Resolution No 92-19
MIS/ Mottaz/Mayor Johnson - to adopt Resolution No. 92-19
approving the CUP for Thomas Soderberg for an Equestrian
Center
The Council discussed the CUP and changed the following
conditions:
M/S/F Williams/Hunt - to amend the motion to include the
following wording for Condition No. 5:
5. The maximum number of horses to be allowed on the site
at one time shall not exceed 50. After three years the
operator can petition for an amendment to the CUP. After
finding that the operation has fulfilled and complied with
all of the conditions of the permit, the city council may
grant an increase in the horse population up to 20 horses
per year to an absolute maximum of 140 horses. (Motion
failed 2-2: Mayor Johnson, Mottaz: The city has to come to a
decision on an ordinance controlling the number of horses we
will allow on any such facility and this is a good start.
The City.has to determine what is a reasonable number of
horses to allow on a piece of property.)
6. The City Council, if it finds that the existing use,
is detrimental to health, safety, convenience, morals or
general welfare of the community; or is causing serious
traffic congestion or hazards or is seriously depreciating
surrounding property values; or that such maximum use is no
longer in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the
City of Lake Elmo's Development Regulations and
Comprehensive Plan, may impose greater restrictions on the
number of horses allowed.
7. Liability Insurance - No commercial stable shall
operate unless there is in force and effect a liability
insurance policy in the amount of at least $500,000.
8. All non-residential buildings shall meet the following
setbacks from property lines:
a. front 100 ft.
b. side 50 ft.
C. to street side 100 ft.
d. any existing 250 ft.
residential structure
9. b. Buildings for housing horses should be constructed
of nonflammable material where possible. Other
material shall be treated with a flame retardant
material acceptable by the Code Enforcement
Officer and the Fire Chief.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 1, 1992 5
C. Stalls shall measure at least 10, x 10t, except
for in the lesson facility.
g. It shall be the policy that smoking shall not be
allowed in stables and all stables shall be posted
"no smoking".
10. d. Because the feces of horses are the primary
source of infestation of internal parasites,
horse manure shall not be spread on pastures
currently grazed by horses.
12. Grass cover shall be maintained in all paddock areas
except as identified on landscape plan dated September 1,
1992. This shall be done by best management practices
including keeping grazing pressure to a minimum and rotating
use of the paddocks.
13. Hours of operation for outside activities shall be
from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
conditions are to be renumbered properly.
M/S/P Mottaz/Hunt - to amend the motion to include Condition
No. 29 to allow a maximum of 50 horses to run unrestrained
in areas outside the stables. (Motion carried 4-0).
29. A maximum of 50 horses shall be allowed to run
unrestrained in areas outside the stables.
Attorney Filla reported that the Dayton Hudson Company
reserved easements on a number of parcels, some of which had
time limits. In this particular case, the reservation had
to be conveyed to the city by September 1, 1992. The other
problem with this parcel is that Dayton Hudson incorrectly
described the area they were talking about. The easement
that Dayton Hudson reserved goes through the middle of this
property not to the north 20 feet and would not have lined
up with the trail to the west. Filla recommended including
the easement as conditioned to the approval and also subject
to the rezoning.
M/S/P Hunt/Mottaz - to amend the motion to include that this
CUP will be conditioned upon: (1) the applicant conveying an
easement as described by the city planner in his memo to the
city dated July 1, 1992, and (2) the rezoning of this plat
from RR to AG and under no circumstances was requirement for
dedication of a trail a guarantee on the part of the city
that it would be improved in the future. (Motion carried 4-
0) .
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 1, 1992
Mayor Johnson stated in doing this it is not conveying in
any way the impression that the city is committed to
developing an equestrian trail; and Washington County parks,
upon the approval of the County Board, would not accept an
entrance thru the park unless it is maintained by the city.
M/S/P Mottaz/Mayor Johnson - to approve Resolution No. 92-
19, as amended, A Resolution granting a CUP to Genie
Arabians, Inc. d/b/a St. Croix Equestrian Center for the
Operation of a stable and an equestrian boarding and
training center; conditioned upon: (1) the applicant
conveying an easement as described by the city planner in
his memo to the city dated July 1, 1992 and (2) the rezoning
of this property from Rural Residential to Agriculture; and
under no circumstances was requirement for dedication of a
trail a guarantee on the part of the city that it would be
improved in the future. (Motion carried 4-0).
Tom Soderberg asked that the rezoning of the land be
contingent upon their purchasing of the land.
M/S/P Williams/Hunt - to adopt Ordinance 8070, An Ordinance
amending Section 301.070C of the 1979 Lake Elmo Municipal
Code at it relates to the zoning district map by changing
the zoning from Rural Residential (RR) to Agricultural (A)
of said property contingent upon the applicant, Genie
Arabians Inc. d/b/a St. Croix Equestrian Center purchasing
the property. (Motion carried 4-0).
6. PLANNING/LAND-USE & ZONING:
A. Lot Consolidation, Ordinance No. 80
In Mike Black's letter to the Council, he suggested that
Section 401.042 Exceptions to Platting, be rewritten to
include the following:
The City Council may waive all or a portion of the
platting requirements for a simple lot division IN THE
AGRICULTURE OR ANY RESIDENTIAL ZONE.
Black also suggested rewording of Paragraph B.4.:
4. A land survey prepared by and signed by a registered
land surveyor describing the simple lot division showing all
buildings, driveways, easements, setbacks and other
pertinent information and including new legal descriptions
for all resulting parcels.
After reviewing the proposed ordinance, the Council
eliminated A.(2) and asked criteria (3) and (4) refer to
appropriate code sections. Attorney Filla will incorporate
the criteria needed in the ordinance to deal with submission
requirements in Section 401.260.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 1, 1992
M/S/P Hunt/Mottaz - to direct the staff to draft an
ordinance for the next meeting incorporating the concerns of
the city council. (Motion carried 4-0).
B. Request for blacktopped bike path from DNR access on
Gateway Trail to the corner of 59th St. & Hytrail
On August 17th the Lake Elmo Parks Commission voted
unanimously to construct a blacktop bike path from the DNR
access on the Gateway Trail, up to the corner of 59th Street
and Hytrail Avenue (385 feet).
Parks Supervisor Mike Bouthilet recommended we use Buberl
Landscaping ($1,280) for the trail preparation work and
Brockman Blacktopping ($2,000) for the 2" lift of asphalt.
M/S/P Mottaz/Williams - to direct the staff to prepare a
resolution authorizing the blacktopping of a bike path from
DNR Access on the Gateway Trail to the corner of 59th Street
and Hytrail Avenue. (Motion carried 4-0).
C. Hidden Valley Development
The City received a copy of a letter from Heritage
Development to the Met Council indicated for reasons beyond
the control of Heritage Dev., they will not be continuing
with the proposed platting of the Hidden Valley subdivision
in Oakdale. Heritage Dev. has requested that the Met
Council withdraw the Hidden Valley residential development
from metropolitan significance review prompted by the City
of Lake Elmo and an agreement was provided for the City to
sign.
M/S/P Williams/Hunt - to accept the agreement to withdraw
Hidden Valley Residential Development in the City of Oakdale
from Metropolitan Significance review and authorize the city
administrator to sign it. (Motion carried 3-1: Mayor
Johnson: we should insist on continuing the evaluation
process to prevent any development of this density from even
getting started. In so doing we prevent being forced to
fight a battle of specifics, but rather one of managing the
whole question of development density that is detrimental to
the interest of the city).
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
1, 1992 8
7. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT:
A. Award contract for 1992 Street Maintenance
(Parking lots at DeMontreville Park and
Fire Station No. 2)
City Engineer Tom Prew recommended that a contract be
awarded to the low bidder, Tower Asphalt in the amount of
their low bid of $37,067.50.
Maintenance Work $14,725.00
DeMontreville Park $14,415.00
Fire Station No. 2 $ 7,927.50
M/S/P Hunt/Williams - to award the contract for 1992 Street
Maintenance and Parking Lots at DeMontreville Park and Fire
Station No. 2 in the amount of $37,067.50. (Motion carried
4-0) .
B. Septic System Upgrades
Building official Jim McNamara reported that septic systems
located at 9393/9395 Jane Road N. and 8066 Hill Trail N. are
in need of repair and that the lots are too small or too low
to accommodate new drainfields.
Councilman Williams asked if a mound system could be placed
on these lots because he believes these problems should be
handled on -site if at all possible.
The council requested the City Engineer and Building
Official discuss what the best solution would be, a mound
system or connecting the failing septic systems to off -site
systems on city -owned land, and comeback with a
recommendation and costs associated and this information
will be communicated to the property owners.
C. Request for Reimbursement for landscaping
Jerry Dreis, 9480 53rd St. N., requested reimbursement from
the escrow fund that the city is holding from the developer
of Arabian Hills in the amount of $428.92 to repair their
property back to the way it was prior to the extension of
53rd Street and the resulting utility work.
Tom Prew reported he received a bill from Bill Horwath for
$499.50 for restoration costs.
M/S/P Hunt/Mottaz - to direct the staff to contact the
developer of Arabian Hills and give him the option of
reimbursing these costs of $428.92 and $499.50 to the
propertyowners or in the alternative, if he choses not to,
then direct the city administrator to advise the bank that
the terms of the development contract have not been
satisfied and therefore demand payment for restoration
costs. (Motion carried 4-0).
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 11 1992 9
8. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:
A. Lawsuit regarding Hadley/Highway 36 Intersection
Attorney Filla reported he was served with a motion for Writ
of Mandamus which would have prevented the highway
department from doing certain things at the Intersection of
Highway 36 and Hadley. Judge Maas made the decision that
MnDOT cannot reconfigure without going thru the appropriate
process, but that in the interim Oakdale within three weeks
must install signals and must provide law enforcement
personnel adequate to enforce the speed zoning. If they
cannot do that within that period of time, then MnDOT can
proceed.
B. Letter from the City of Woodbury regarding the
Cottage Grove Ravine Watershed
The City received a letter from Woodbury City Administrator,
Barry Johnson, informing us that at its September 9th
meeting it will be considering action to withdraw from the
Cottage Grove Ravine Water Management Organization and
initiate a process toward formation of a watershed district.
M/S/P Williams/Hunt - to direct the City Administrator to
send a letter to Woodbury thanking them for their August
28th letter and informing them we stand by our insistence on
a 4/5th majority vote in those areas as indicated. (Motion
carried 4-0).
9. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: No council reports
10. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
A. 1993 Budget Update
The next scheduled budget workshop is Tuesday, September 8th
at 7:00 p.m. in City Hall.
B. Employee Evaluations
Employee Evaluations will be conducted on Tuesday, September
22nd at 6:00 p.m. in the City Hall.
M/S/P Mottaz/Williams - to adjourn the city council meeting
at 11:35 p.m. (Motion carried 4-0).
-------------------
Resolution No. 92-19: A Resolution granting a CUP to Genie
Arabians, Inc. d/b/a St. Croix Equestrian Center for the
operation of a stable and an equestrian boarding and
training center.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 1, 1992 10
ORDINANCE 8070,
the 1979 Lake El
zoning district
Residential (RR)
contingent upon
Croix Equestrian
An ordinance amending Section 301.070C of
mo Municipal Code as it relates to the
map by changing the zoning from Rural
to Agricultural (A) of said property
the applicant, Genie Arabians Inc. d/b/a St.
Center purchasing the property.
The primary justification for extension of the MUSA to the proposed area has from the beginning been
the possibility of having a large, valuable office building built on the site. The fact that the site would
be owned and controlled by one, financially stable landowner has been part of the attractiveness of the
whole proposal. It has been rumored in the press that this potential developer is a "large insurance
firm". However, so far this potential developer has remained a "phantom developer" to this Council as
a body. We as a Council, myself included, have been willing to go along with this "phantom" for quite
a while.
However, now it is time for this Council, acting as a body, not just one individual, to make decisions
which will have long lasting and very significant effects on this City. Now it is time for this Council to
contemplate paying up front at least part of the costs of providing the utilities to this land, in the
expectation that future taxes from the phantom development will more than pay the City back. I
contend that it is plain wrong for this Council to be making these decisions on the basis of a "phantom"
These decisions should be made only when we have a developer's agreement which assures us that the
City of Lake Elmo and its general taxpayers will not have to finance those utility costs indefinitely.
We all know that the costs to provide water and sewer to the proposed MUSA area will be very large.
Perhaps Oakdale will help pay for them because they could service their own property as well, but
perhaps not. Perhaps the phantom developer will pay all the costs up front without blinking, but
perhaps not. Perhaps the phantom developer will pay the costs with a program of deferred
reimbursement as other, intervening properties hook up, but perhaps not. Such details of providing
utilities to this area should be worked out before we proceed. It is good planning. It is good stewardship
of our taxpayers' money.
What might happen if we proceed with extending the MUSA and extending services to this area, but
we do not get this phantom development or it is not as valuable or big as we have heard? The
landowner will have had his land rezoned for commercial use and utilities will have been provided.
What uses might appear? Will we get another large, valuable proposal? Or will we get another strip
mall? The metro area does not need another mall or any more sewered, general office space, with
vacancy rates already running in the 20% range. No, either the "phantom development" becomes a
REAL development, or there should be no MUSA extension.
I am not one to simply sit back and "just say no". I try to make constructive suggestions as to how to
proceed. I am about to make one of those suggestions now. But before I do, I will state that my mind is
very firm as to what has to be done before I will vote favorably on this MUSA extension and
Comprehensive Plan amendment. My position has been stated up front, publicly, and I emphasize
concisely. If other Council members feel the need to launch into lengthy discourses on this subject, I
cannot stop them, but it will only serve to prolong our meeting unnecessarily.
I move that consideration of this Comprehensive Plan amendment be postponed until there exists a
develo ers'�° s'f � t, signed by the landowner, and acceptable to this City Council, which commits
P
the landowner to building a structure of a certain value within the proposed MUSA area by a certain
date to be determined, and which specifies how the utilities to the area, especially sewer and water,
will be financed. Furthermore, the City staff is directed to transmit this decision to the landowner with
the request for prompt action in arranging a meeting between the proposed developer and this City
Councilk .,h!' (�j- _ "" , . ' I
i� CIA 1.
I
L,) b � s,L- n� car
mmnnnm
WASHINGTON COUNTY
OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR -TREASURER
PAYABLE 1993 TRUTH IN TAXATION
CERTIFICATION FORM FOR CITIES/TOWNS
District Name: CITY OF LAKE ELHO
Public Hearing Date: Tuesday, December 1. 1992
Time of meeting: 7: 30 P.11,
Place of meeting: Lake Elmo Council Chambers
3800 Laverne Ave. No. -Lake Elmo TIN
Continuation Date: December 9, 1992
The "Notice of Proposed Property Tax" sent to each taxpayer no longer contains
information about where to send comments and/or review a copy of your proposed
budget. Please provide us with a contact name and phone number to whom
we may refer specific taxpayer questions.
Name or Title: Marilyn Banister
Address: 3300 Laverne Ave -No.
Lake Elmo, TIN 55042
Phone number: 777_ ssIf)
Proposed Pay 1993 Levy: Debt Levy* 100,228 - CO Equin Bond
(*please provide detail of debt levy by bond on an additional sheet)
Mkt Value Levy 941 974
Other Levy 50,000 - Landfill Referendum
Total Levy $ 1,092,202
Signature of person
completing this form: x ,J/.y �•
Title:
Finance Director
Phone number: 777-5510
Date: Sentenh-gr 11 1992
SEPTEMBER
1, 1992 LAKE ELMO COUNCIL MEETING
List of Claiis for
Approval
For the period 08128/92 to
09/02192
08/28/92
f
CLAIM
TOTAL
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
TO WHOM PAID
FOR WHAT PURPOSE
DATE
NUNBEB
CLAIN
NUMBER
AMOUNT
RADIO SHACK
VIDEO TAPES • C'_4,e-ll,--.
09/01/92
855
7.96
100-41300-331
7.96
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
SEPT INSURANCE PREMIUM
09161/92
856
2,684.39
100-41500-130
1,406.13
106-42400-130
373.31
100-43100-130
904.95
ALLIED GROUP INSURANCE TRUST
SEPT INSURANCE PREMIUM
09101192
857
61.26
100-41500-130
28.66
100-42400-130
14.10
100-43100-130
18.50
MINN. BENEFIT ASSI.
SEPT INSURANCE PREMIUM
09/01/92
858
582.30
106-41500-130
72.12
100-43100-130
510.18
SOUTHAM ROSINESS COMMUNICATIONS
CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN BIDS
09/01/92
859
157.94
100-41500-351
157.94
PRESS PUBLICANOIS
LEGAL PUBLICATIONS
09/01/92
$60
46.17
100-41500-351
46.17
BILLAIRI SANITATION
OFFICE ➢UMPSTIR
69/61/92
$61
65.91
106-41500-400
65.91
MINUTEMAN PRESS
NEWSLETTER PRINTING
69141192
862
781.20
100-41500-354
781.20
D.C. HEY CO.
COPY MACHIRE HAINT.
19/01/92
863
209.75
100-41500-200
209.75
T & R TRADERS, LTD.
LATER PRINTER CARTRIDGES
09101192
864
107.90
100-41500-200
107.90
MICHAEL SMITH
AUGUST ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER
09/01/92
861
560.00
100-42700-110
560.00
ST CROII ANIMAL SHELTER
JULY IMPOUNDING
09/01/92
866
349.24
100-4270A-418
349.24
CITY OF NORTH ST PAUL
JULY ANIMAL CONTROL VEHICLE
09/01/92
867
165.00
100-42700-415
165.00
F.I.L., INC.
ASSESSOR NOITHLT PAYMENT
09/01/92
868
1,110.00
100-41550-300
1,100.00
FRIEDRICH, BE]
COMPOST WORKER - JULY & AUG
09101/92
869
75.00
100-43200-317
75.00
TACKS, CARL
COMPOST WORKER JULY & AUG
09101192
870
100.00
100-43200-317
100.00
ASPEN HILLS
FIRE DEFT -UNIFORM, NEW MEMBER
69101/92
871
39.95
100-42200-218
39.95
CELLULAR 019
FIRE DEPT CELLULAR PHONE
49/01/92
872
10.92
100-42206-320
10.92
V! TIER FIRIM&N'S 81I9FIS ASSI.
FIRE DIP? INSURANCE BUIS
69101192
873
109.00
100-42206-433
108.00
Ce«..,f COMMUNICATIONS CO.
TIRE OKPT-PAGIRS FOR 3 111 MEMBERS
0910119Z
874
1,479.29
100-42200-430
1,479.29
HI DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
FIRE DEPT CLOTHING
69/01192
875
247.19
100-42200-218
247.19
JANIS SACHS
MTG & MILEAGE-JUVERILE YIRESITTIR
09/01192
876
27.60
100-42200-207
21.60
SADERGASKI, JOHI
JUVENILE YIRESITTER PROGRAM
09/01/92
877
15.00
100-42200-207
15.00
U. S. WEST
TELEPHONE
09/01/92
878
426.60
100.41500-320i
f 223.91
100-42200-326
89.39
100-43100-320
" ' 53.90
100-45200-320
59.40
A T & T
OFFICE TELEPHONE MAINI
09/01/92
879
59.96
100 4150A 320
59.96
A T & T
IIRB & MAINT PHONES
09/01/92
880
48.63
109-42200-326
19.55
7y
100-43100-320
29.08
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
POWER
09101/92
881
1,755.87
100-41500-380
44� 160.85
100-42200-380
142.46
100-43100-380
r 173.45
190-43160-3800JA
784.73
100-45200-3N
125.42
601-49400-380
349.76
602-49450-380"V`
19.20
ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO.
CHIPPER RENTAL - 1 MONTH
09/01/92
882
1,491.00
100-43100-224
1,491.00
T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS
BLACKTOP PATCHING
09/01/92
883
366.34
100-43100-407
366.34
BATTERY & TIRE WAREHOUSE
MAIRT.DEPT-YILTERS FO 1990 IRK
09101/92
884
84.59
100-43100-221
84.59
SLMIR'S REPAIR
MAIIT DEPT SAW REPAIR
09/01/92
885
46.82
100-43100-224
46.82
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS
LIME ROCK
09101/92
886
133.15
100-43100-228
133.15
HILEIA CHEMICAL CO.
VIED KILLER FOR STREETS
09101/92
888
317.89
100-43100-224
317.89
SPORTS WORLD -GSA
PARKS DEPT - VOLLEYBALL NETS
09/01/92
889
81.90
100-45200-219
81.50
F{ ' IMPLEMENT
PARKS DBPT - TORO REPAIR
09101192
890
98.21
100-45200-221
98.21
YRinaRICH, JONI I & MARLENE
WATER MAIN SASENENT- COUNTY
09101192
891
5,000.00
411-41600-300
5,000.00
CATHODIC PROTECTION SERVICES CO.
ANNUAL SERVICE WATER TOWKR
09/01/92
892
648.00
601-49400-430
648.00
TOTAL FOR MONTH 19,540.93
19,540.93
Since we do not have time to discuss every point presented, it
(f may seem that decisions are preconceived. However, background
information is provided for the City Council on each agenda item in
advance from City Staff and appointed Commissions; and decisions are
based on this information and past experiences. In addition, some
items may also have been discussed at previous Council meetings.
If you are aware of information that hasn't been discussed,
please fill out a "Request to Appear Before the City Council" slip;
or, if you came late, raise your hand to be recognized. Comments that
are pertinent are appreciated. Items requiring excessive time may be
continued to another meeting.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
SEPTEMBER 1, 1992
7:00 P.M. MEETING CONVENES
1. AGENDA
2. MINUTES: August 18, 1992
3. CLAIMS
4. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL
A. Public Inquiries
B. Gordon Moosbrugger, VBWD
5. OLD BUSINESS:
A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment -Update
B. Limited Business - Business Park
C. Rezoning from RR to Ag:
Soderberg, etal, Ordinance 80
D. CUP - Thomas Soderberg, etal,
Resolution No. 92-
E. Other
6. PLANNINGMAND USE & ZONING•
A. Lot Consolidation - Ordinance No. 80
B. Request for blacktopped bike path from
DNR access on Gateway Trail to the
corner of 59th St. & Hytrail
C. Other
7. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT:
A. Award of contract for 1992 Street Maintenance
(Parking lots at DeMontreville Park and
Fire Station No 2)
B. Septic System Upgrades
C. Request for Reimbursement for landscaping
D. Other
8. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:
A. Lawsuit regarding Hadley/Highway 36
Intersection
B. Other
9. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:
Mayor Johnson
Councilman Hunt
it Johnson
Mottaz
" Williams
10. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
A. 1993 Budget Update
B. Employee Evaluations
C. Other
11. Adjourn