Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-16-93 CCMMINUTES APPROVED: 4-6-93 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES l MARCH 16, 1993 Mayor John called the council meeting to order at 7:03 p.m, in the council chambers. PRESENT: John, Conlin, Johnson, City Engineer Bohrer, City Attorney Filla and Administrator Kueffner. ABSENT: Mottaz, Johnston. 1. AGENDA ADD: 10F. Letter from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 10G. April 13th meeting to discuss concept plans for annexation area. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to approve the March 16, 1993 City Council agenda as amended. (Motion carried 3-0). 2. MINUTES: March 2, 1993 M/S/P Johnson/John - to approve the March 2, 1993 City Council minutes as amended. (Motion carried 2-0-1: Abstain: Conlin). MINUTES: March 11, 1993 M/S/P Conlin/Johnson - to approve the March 11, 1993 Emergency Council meeting minutes as amended. (Motion carried 3-0). 3. CLAIMS: Regarding Claim #1439, Councilman Johnson complimented the Maintenance Dept, on a fantastic job of upgrading the used trailer they purchased. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to approve the March 16, 1993 Claims #1405 thru #1448 as presented. (Motion carried 3-0). 4. PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL: A. Washington County's Request to install methane gas monitoring vent on city property Doug Ryan, Environment and Land Use Division Manager, Washington County, is requesting the city's permission to enter on, construct and maintain three methane detection wells on city -owned property. (the property we know as Lake Jane Hills Park). LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 16, 1993 2 The Council amended the submitted agreement as follows: First Paragraph Amended to read as follows: The City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota (hereinafter "City") hereby grants to Washington County the right to enter on, construct and maintain three methane detection wells in the northeast corner of Parcel 0115 in the locations as approved by the City, Parks Supervisor or his delegate, and with minimal damage to trees. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to approve an agreement, as amended, between Washington County and the City of Lake Elmo for the installation of methane gas monitoring wells on city owned property; contingent upon Washington County entering into an indemnification and hold harmless agreement approved by our City Attorney. (Motion carried 3-0). 5. OLD BUSINESS: None 6. PLANNING/LAND USE & ZONING: A. Petition for rezoning from R1 to RE The City received a petition from five of the seven property owners within the R1 portion and one property owner in the RR portion of Midland Meadows requesting a rezoning from R1 to RED. The property owners have stated that they were told by the Realtor that the lots could not be zoned R1 which allows for a minimum lot size of 1-1/2 acres. Tony Collette, property owner in the R1 portion on 4.09 acres, has applied for a minor subdivision which is scheduled to go before the Planning Commission on March 22, 1993, Dave Richter and Terry Erickson explained they bought these lots with the understanding they would remain rural and could not be subdivided. Richter also questioned driveway access for the Collette property. Mike Lukin felt it's a benefit to the Lake Elmo community that the propertyowners rezone up and protect the land around them. Since the Planning Commission is going to look at the Comp Plan for possible zoning changes to the bordering properties of Lake Elmo, Denise Richter asked if they could look at their area at the same time? Tony Collette reported when he purchased his property, it was zoned R1 and bought it with the intention of doing a minor subdivision. He placed his house in an appropriate place for when the time came to split it this opportunity was available to him. He checked with the City for what, was required and has met all the requirements of the Minor Subdivision Ordinance: survey, perk tests, paid an application fee. Lot 7, Block 1 has two driveway easements, LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 16, 1993 3 and according to his attorney, that easement runs with the land regardless of whether or not it remains a single parcel or is split. Joe Lux, Washington County, informed him that all he had to do was apply for a driveway permit and the County had no problem issuing the driveway permit. Attorney Filla explained if the city feels that changing the Comprehensive Plan and the corresponding rezoning for the area is in the best interest of the city, the council has the right to do that including Lot 7. Even if you conclude that you want to allow these things to continue on concurrent tracks, his recommendation would be to continue to include the collette property in this new zoning. This means that the collette property will become a non- conforming use. He would not recommend that the council carve out a parcel of R1 land surrounded by some other designation. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to accept the petition from the residents for a rezoning from R1 to RED, (Comprehensive Plan Amendment) and direct the staff to prepare a resolution suitable to cover this matter for review at the April 6th council meeting. Items included in Resolution: refer this area to Planning Commission for study and direction and at the same time the PZ set a public hearing for a Development Moratorium for area affected to be determined by consultants and PZ. (Motion carried 3-0). The Planning Commission is reviewing the Ordinance on moving buildings into the city. B. Land Surveyor's Certificate Correction to Midland Meadows, Lot 7, block 1 M/S/P Conlin/Johnson - to approve the request for a Land Surveyor's Certificate of Correction of Plat, as it relates to Lot 7, Block 1, Midland Meadows whereby the distance along the south side of the drainage easement which is shown as 210.00 feet be correct to show the actual dimension of 410.00 feet. (Motion carried 3-0. C. Petition for the Establishment of the Cottage Grove Watershed District The City received a copy of the draft petition for the establishment of the Cottage Grove Ravine Watershed District. Both Woodbury and Oakdale have approved this petition. Attorney Filla reviewed the petition and reported he had no concerns with the content of the petition. M/S/P Conlin/Johnson - to approve the petition for the establishment of the Cottage Grove Watershed District. (Motion carried 3-0). LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 16, 1993 4 7. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: 1 A. Update on 1993 MSA Feasibility Study Larry Bohrer presented the need for street improvements, proposed street design, trail, estimated costs, funding, assessments and project schedule. At their March 15th meeting, it was the consensus of the Parks Commission to not pursue a detached trail along these streets if construction is ordered, but to look into an alternative to a trailway in that area in the future. Councilman Johnson indicated he was not in favor of the separated trail, but was in favor of the proposed assessment plan. Bohrer explained it was his intent that the assessment does not establish the road improvement fund. The assessment is levied to provide for the benefit that this road improvement provides to the adjacent property. By making an assessment, you are able to utilize some of the state aid funds that would be eligible for this project, but are not necessary. It is the state aid funds that go to establish the local road improvement fund. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to call a Public Hearing for 1993 MSA Improvements, Jamaca Avenue and Lake Jane Trail, for Tuesday, April 6th at 7:40 p.m. and direct the staff to place on the March 30th agenda for the Surface Water Management Utility Information meeting an item to receive the feasibility report. (Motion carried 3-0). B. Update on Olson Lake Estates Larry Bohrer submitted the following status report on the condition of the Olson Lake Estates Pond as of March 10, 1993: Present Pond Elevation 954.9 Volume at Present Elevation 16.4 ACFt Water Content of Snow 0.7" Pond Elevation if all ran off 957.2 Critical Elevation 962+/- Elevation of Olson Lake at overflow Surface Area of Olson Lake 100 Ac Volume of Olson Lake 1,200 ACFt At the last council meeting, the staff was directed to prepare a resolution stating the position of the City regarding discharge of water from Olson Lake Estates Pond. Attorney Filla prepared the resolution and Larry Bohrer has reviewed it. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 16, 1993 5 M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to approve Resolution No. 93-12, A Resolution relating to the discharge of water from Olson Lake Estates Pond. (Motion carried 3-0). C. Preparation for Surface Water Utility Larry Bohrer asked for comments from the Council for his presentation at the Surface Water Utility informational meeting scheduled for March 30th. **Proposed fees for mobile home parks: Because the streets in the park are privately owned, he included that as part of the impervious surface of the park. Whereas, the streets when they are on public rights -of -way, are exempt. The council requested Bohrer consider the streets in Cimarron as we do our city streets and prepare a calculation in relation to the land area occupied by a mobile home. **Expected revenue and expected expenditures. Expected revenues versus expenditures has not been done. The council asked that this be estimated. **Clarify the difference between paying VBWD versus this fund. 8. CITY ATTORNEYS REPORT: None 9. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: Mayor John reported he met a number of the landowners in Sections 32 & 33 to assess their current attitudes toward Lake Elmo and their interest in returning to Lake Elmo if the City were to provide a sewer in the area. Mayor John provided notes on the meeting with State Representatives and Oakdale Council members on March 12, 1993 at 1:00 p.m. in the State offices. After some discussion it was agreed that the respective city staffs would identify the real costs of: a. increasing the sewer capacity to meet the needs of the Business Park District and then the MUSA extension and b. extension of the sewer from the NE corner of Guardian Angels Church property to the east of CSAH 13, In addition a date for the start of the project (the 4th street main stem) would be established. Larry Bohrer indicated these costs could be provided by the end of this week. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 16, 1993 j At Mayor Ted Bearth's suggestion, a joint session of the two l councils was tentatively agreed for March 22 at Oakdale City Hall. This would be confirmed following the March 16th Lake Elmo Council meeting. It was the consensus of the Council to support a meeting with the Oakdale City Council on March 22nd to discuss common interests. On Saturday March 13 two teams drawn from the Council, Administrative staff and the Planning Commission entered in the Annual Leukemia Bowl-A-Thon sponsored by the City of Oak Park Heights. On Monday March 15, he met with the Metro Regional Supervisor of the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources, Bruce Sandstrom, Board Conservationist Barbara Ohman and Al Dornfeld, Chair of the Valley Branch Watershed District. This was in response to a letter he had written them on his concerns over the authorities and responsibilities of the Watershed districts. With the council's agreement, Mayor John will call an informational meeting for the citizens of Lake Elmo tentatively for April 14th to be attended by representatives of the Met Council, PCA, DNR, Board of Water & Soil Resources and the VBWD and the City of Oakdale. On Monday, March 15th he attended the meeting of the State Committee on Local Government and Metropolitan Affairs investigating the status of the Metropolitan Council held at the Washington County Commission's offices in Stillwater. Council member Conlin reported she attended a cable commission meeting on March 11th held at the Birchwood City Hall. In the future there will be funds available for possible cable casting of our Planning Commission and Parks Commission meetings. 10. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. League Conference Administrator Kueffner asked that the Council notify her if they plan on attending the June 8-11th League Conference in St. Cloud. B. Resignation of Parks Commission Member The City has received a letter of resignation from Gary Lee from the Parks Commission. M/S/P Conlin/Johnson - to accept Gary Lee's resignation and appoint Steve Peterson (first alternate) to serve out his term. The second alternate, Kevin Heichel should be moved up to first alternate and solicit applications for the second alternate vacancy in the City's newsletter. (Motion carried 3-0). LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 16, 1993 7 Resignation of MAC member The City has received a letter of resignation from Jim Peterson from the Maintenance Advisory Commission. With Mr. Peterson's resignation, there are four members on the committee. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to accept Jim Peterson's resignation from the MAC and advertise the vacancy for the Maintenance Advisory Commission. (Motion carried 3-0). C. St. Croix Animal Shelter's Request for a "Community Support Agreement" M/S/P Conlin/Johnson - to table this item until the April 6th council meeting. (Motion carried 3-0). D. Pay Increase Request by A.C.O. Agreement for Services M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to table this item until the April 6th council meeting. (Motion carried 3-0). E. Employees Pay Increase M/S/P Conlin/Johnson - to approve the pay increases as proposed retroactive to January 1, 1993. (Motion carried 3- 0) . F. Letter from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency The City received a letter from Todd A. Cayer, Chief, Water Compliance Branch Disputes Decision Official, regarding certain costs incurred by the city for land acquisitions are allowable for Federal Grant funding under the provision of the Treatment Works Grant. G. April 13th meeting to discuss concept plans The city received an invitation to attend a meeting at the Oakdale City Hall, Tuesday, April 13, 1993 at 5:00 p.m. where the city council will review the two proposed concept plans for the annexation area. The City of Oakdale will send copies of the proposed plans to the City Administrator as soon as they receive them. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to adjourn the city council meeting at 11:15 p.m. (Motion carried 3-0). ----------------- Resolution No. 93-12, A Resolution relating to the discharge of water from Olson Lake Estates Pond UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 5 77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 REPLY TO THE ATTENTION OF: WCT-15J MAR 1 0 1993 CERTIFIED MAIL P250 801 247 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mary Kueffner, City Administrator City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042 Subject: Treatment Works Grant Step 2+3, C271411-02 Dear Ms. Kueffner: This is in reference to your request that we review the June 13, 1990 determination rendered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), that the budget period for the subject grant could not be extended and that certain costs incurred by the City for land acquisition are not allowable for Federal grant funding under the provisions of the subject grant. We have completed review of the information accompanying your request, the official Federal grant project files, the Federal laws including implementing regulations applicable to the issues, as well as applicable policy and guidance in effect on September 2, 1983, the date of grant award. Based on this review, we find nothing precluding the extension of a grant budget period after its expiration. Further, we find that all the disputed cost of acquiring land, even though the magnitude of that cost was not known until after the end of the budget period, was effectively,.legally incurred when the City of Lake Elmo exercised its right of eminent domain, which was well within the existing approved budget period. Consequently, the matter of a budget period extension is moot. Correspondingly, based on an assessment of the facts against the fundamental grant allowability criteria of necessity, reasonabil- ity and allocability of costs to the grant project, it is my Printed an Recycled Paper -2- determination, as this Agency's authorized Disputes Decision official, that: 1. $86,453.70, the amount determined by the Minnesota State District Court as the amount to be paid as full and just compensation to the respondents in the eminent domain proceedings, is allowable for Federal grant funding; 2. $3,150, the cost of the City's appraiser services to provide additional documentation for the eminent domain appeal process, is allowable; 3. $7,182.91, the cost of legal services associated with the eminent domain process is allowable and $135.00 of legal services was for normalgovernmental operating expenses and, as such is unallowable pursuant to 40 CFR Part 35, Appendix A, Miscellaneous Costs, Item 2(a); and, 4. $3,003.87, the cost for engineering services related to the eminent domain land acquisition is allowable and $589.29 of engineering overhead costs was unnecessary and, therefore, unallowable pursuant to 40 CFR 30.135-3. In summary, $99,790.45 of the $100,514.77 claimed by the City, or $50,190.48 of the $50,914.77 determined unallowable in the MPCA determination, is allowable for Federal grant funding. The determination expressed above is an official disputes decision pursuant to 40 CFR, Part 30, Subpart L, and absent a request from the City for review by registered mail, return receipt requested, within 30 calendar days of the date of this decision will constitute final Agency action. You must file your request for such a review with the Regional Administrator, Mr. Valdas V. Adamkus, at the letterhead address, in accordance with 40 CFR 30 Subpart L, which also contains further information regarding your rights. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me. J,Respectfully, . C ger, Chief Water Compliance Branch Disputes Decision Official cc: Patty Burke, MPCA City of Oakdale, Minnesota 1584 Hadley Avenue North/55128 612/739-5086 FAX 730-2820 March 9, 1993 NOTICE REGARDING ANNEXATION YOU ARE INVITED TO ATTEND a meeting at: OAKDALE CITY HALT, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1584 Hadley Avenue North Tuesday, April 13, 1993 r 5:00 p.m. A R E A where the City Council will review two (2) proposed CONCEPT plans for the annexation area. The plans each propose development of single family dwelling units generally located north of 4th Street and east of Helmo Avenue. Persons wishing to view the plans prior to the meeting may contact Brent Brommer, Community Development Director, at City Hall, 739-5086. CITY OF OAKDALE PLANNING DEPARTMENT tal/LTR.ANN Recyclable Oakdah, dne. net di,verinann[e on the he.,.., of rrrrr, ruler, nnlinnal er(ain, ,Rex, reihtinu. PRIM IfN Wall age rued hnnrlicnp x(alu.R inuntylnvrnrnl ur prm•iaiun uj'si�rrirr'. SOVINK,• Notes on meeting with State Representatives and Oakdale Council ( members on March 12, 1993 at 1.00 p.m. in the State Offices: Pam Neary's office. Present: Pam Neary, State Representative Ted Bearth, Mayor, Oakdale Sheri Timmerman, Oakdale Councillor Wyn John, Mayor, Lake Elmo Rita Conlin, Lake Elmo Councillor Wyn John circulated notes he had made on the March 2 meeting. Pam Neary then summarized her understanding of the position as at the end of the last meeting: 1. That Oakdale and Lake Elmo were agreed on the need to provide a sewer, along 4th Street, in Sections 32 & 33, to be jointly funded by the cities. 2. That sewer capacity would be transferred from the MinDoT land areas to support Lake Elmo's Business Park District. The sewer would be sized to be adequate for this additional capacity, and for potential longer range extension of the MUSA along I-94. The additional costs would be borne by Lake Elmo. 3. The question of land transfer to Oakdale was unresolved. Lake Elmo was reluctant to hand over the land to Oakdale without some recompense for the loss in revenue that this transfer represented. It was agreed that Lake Elmo would approach the landowners to see whether they were still interested in transfer to Oakdale, provided a sewer were made available. This would permit a boundary adjustment between the cities to be considered. Wyn John then reported on the results of contacts with a number of the Section 32 & 33 landowners. This indicated that some did not mind in which city they were located as long as sewer were available at the earliest. Some felt that after being in conflict with Lake Elmo for so long, they did not wish to rejoin the city which had resisted their requests for sewer and water service. Others did not want their land to be within two cities after a boundary relocation. There were some on small lots, who had not petitiuoned in the first place, who wanted to stay in Lake Elmo. From this, Pam Neary tried to see if an agreement could be reached ( whereby the land was transferred to Oakdale, but that Lake Elmo would receive some compensation in relation to sewer costs as an exchange. Both Rita Conlin and Wyn John emphasised that Lake Elmo was interested in ensuring that the sewer reached the East side of CSAH 13 within this project. Also, that it was technically feasible for Lake Elmo to install the sewer along 4th Street to CSAH 13 as a stand alone project, since all the relevant land was still in Lake Elmo. In addition, that Helmo Avenue was still a Lake Elmo street, as all assessments had not been fully paid by the landowners. Consequently, another portion of the Oakdale sewer project could not proceed without Lake Elmo approval. Ted Bearth would not agree to any support of sewer costs, as he felt that the benefitting parties should pay their share of the project. He did not see that enabling the project to proceed in a timely manner, saving the costs of litigation to order the land into Oakdale, or having land transferred into Oakdale with the potential of additional tax capacity, were benefits for Oakdale. He felt that the bill had been submitted and that the legislative action should take its course. After some discussion, it was agreed that the respective City Staffs.would identify the real costs of: a) increasing the sewer capacity to meet the needs of the Business Park District, and then the MUSA extension and b) extension of the sewer from the NE corner of Guardian Angels Church property to the east of CSAH 13 In addition, a date for the start of the project (the 4th Street main stem) would be established. At Ted Bearth's suggestion, a joint session of the two councils was tentatively agreed for March 22 at Oakdale City Hall. This would be confirmed following the March 16 Lake Elmo Council meeting. Mayor's report March 16, 1993 Since the last council meeting, I met a number of the landowners in Sections 32 & 33 to assess their current attitudes towards Lake Elmo, and their interests in returning to Lake Elmo if the City were to provide a sewer in the area. Understandably, their response was mixed, but it did give me some background to help in our further discussions with Oakdale, which took place on March 12. I have made notes of our meeting at the State Offices, which can form part of the minutes. On Saturday March 13, two teams drawn from the Council, Administrative staff, and the Planning Commission, entered in the Annual Leukemia Bowl- A-Thon sponsored by the City of Oak Park Heights. We were not as successful as we had hoped, but the Leukemia Society benefited by $ which was donated by our teams' sponsors. On Monday March 15, I met with the Metro Regional Supervisor of the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources, Bruce Sandstrom, Board Conservationist Barbara Ohman, and Al Dornfeld, Chair of the Valley Branch Watershed District. This was in response to a letter I had written them on my concerns over the authorities and responsibilities of the Watershed districts. We had a constructive discussion, resulting in my agreeing to call an informational meeting for the citizens of Lake Elmo, tentatively for April 14, to be attended by representatives of the Met Council, PCA, DNR, Board of Water & Soil Resources, and the Valley Branch Watershed District and the City of Oakdale. This will discuss surface water issues as well as the implications of the 509 Water Management Project. With the council's agreement tonight, I will call this meeting for April 14, 1993. Last night, my wife and I attended the meeting of the State Committee on Local Government and Metropolitan Affairs investigating the status of the Metropolitan Council. This was held at the Washington County Commission's offices in Stillwater. There were many presentations, some of which were in support of the Met Council, others in support of bills which modified its function, structure and responsibilities. I was impressed by the smooth way the procedures were conducted, and the way the meeting was structured to give a degree of automatic formality. We left before proceedings had finished, but this subject is one which will go on for some' time before recommendations are made. 2 To: Mayor and City Council From: Mary Kueffner Date: March 15, 1993 Re: Lake Elmo Municipal Water Supply Routine Inspection Report Attached is a copy of the above referenced report from the Minnesota Department of Public Health. Please note that the first recommendation of the Health Department is that the City consider constructing another well to serve as an emergency standby. Since there has been some discussion, at least by the Planning Commission, of an extension of the "Old Village", I think it would be prudent for the City to consider this additional well in those plans. If those plans go no where, the Council should still consider this recommendation in the not -to -distant future. There was a "Water Study Committee" a few years ago. If anyone in interested in seeing that report, or would like this issue put on the Council agenda for discussion, please let me know, The chlorination issue has also been brought up before by the Health Department, but according to our maintenance foreman, who has looked into this for previous councils, chlorinating now could reek havoc on our system and could be very expensive. We would have to retrofit our well house to accommodate a separate room for the chlorination equipment and probably have to replace at least some of the watermains because the buildup of residue now in the pipes would be loosened by the chlorination and could cause plugging of meters and weakening of the pipes (Dan says this has been the case in other cities). The costs involved should not be a reason to not chlorinate, but the council should be aware of the costs involved. Any new well that would be instructed has to have chlorination, but as of yet they have not made that law retroactive to existing wells. I suppose we should also be prepared for that possibility. Additional or on -going training is offered to our staff, and we will continue to encourage the staff to attend these classes. Minnesota Department of Health Division of Environmental Health 925 Delbware Street Southeast P.O. Box 59040 Minneapolis, MN 55459.0040 (612) 627.5100 FEB 19m3 Lake Elmo City Council c/o Ms. Sharon Lumby, Deputy Clerk City Hall 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake'Elmo, Minnesota 55042 Dear Council Members: 'Pea P 4 1993 Subject: Lake Elmo Municpal Water Supply, City of Lake Elmo, Washington We are enclosing a copy of the report of our district office covering a routine inspection of your community water supply. If you have any questions concerning the information contained in this report, please contact Mr. Bassam Banat, Public Health Engineer at 612/627-5173. Also, enclosed for your information is a copy of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's fact sheet on the new Lead and Copper Rule. Please familiarize yourself with the rule because you will be responsible for selecting the sample sites and collecting the samples. Sincerely, Richard D. Clark, P.E., Supervisor Public Water Supply Unit Section of Water Supply and Well Management RDC:BHB:sls Enclosure cc: Lake Elmo Water Superintendent Washington County Community Health Services An Equal Opportunity Employer MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH REPORT ON INVESTIGATION OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY Name of Water Supply PWS ID Number Lake Elmo Municipal Water Supply 1820009 Street Telephone Numbers: 3800 Laverne Avenue City: City State Zip Code Lake Elmo MN 55042 Operator: Engineer: County District Washington Metropolitan Otnar: Water Superintendent Classification Plant Classification Owner Type Dan Olinger D D Municipal Other Operators Classification Plant Type Plumbing Permits and u� Inspections ❑ Community Required yk4 es No Mike Bouthilet C Date of Previous Survey Date of Survey Mike Buckles D Richard Gustafson N.C. 09-10-91 12-21-92 City Engineer Tom Prew SERVICE AREA CHARACTERISTICS: Aa Municipai ❑ School or College ❑ Recreation Area ❑ Mobile Home Park ❑ Hotel/Motel ❑ Campground ❑ Company Town ❑ Resort ❑ Housing Development ❑ Institution ❑ Restaurant ❑ Other Population Served Service Connections Storage Capacity: 800 246 (List Separately) 75,000-gallon elevated Design Capacity (gal/day) Average Daily Production (gal/day) 740,000 50,000 Emergency Capacity (gal/day) Highest Daily Production (gal/day) 1 150,000 Total: 75,000 gallons TREATMENT WELL DATA G G c m c a c 2 a d 5 y II u O d C n C G rh O m J O - 5 E o` a c c ; S E u 3 a Source Name o y Q "' O v Q a U v N = 11 `o : 84 `c N W f E Q 2 LL c O v Y '� ,� u "'S E U Vl 3 tpLL N O y 1/208448 G P Va 1961 20 277 805 Franconie Hinckley 102 40 VT 500 Remarks: AMPLING SITES: Surveyedby: RaccaM Ranat 1 City Hall 2 Fire Hal 1 Approved by: H E•008Q-02 Lake Elmo Municipal Water Supply December 21, 1992 PWSID 1820009 Recommendations: 1. The city of Lake Elmo should consider constructing an additional well to serve as a standby or emergency water source. 2. The city of Lake Elmo should consider installing permanent chlorination equipment and maintaining a free chlorine residual of at least 0.2 to 0.6 milligrams per liter on all points of the distribution system. 3. The opportunity for additional training in water supply work should be made available to the operator(s). Attendance at the annual waterworks operators seminar, held in the area, is a valuable experience for anyone engaged in this field. Bassam H. Banat, P.E. Public Health Engineer Section of Water Supply and Well Management i; 502.4 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH - CHEMICAL LABORATORY 1 .` VOLATILE HYDROCARBONS (code 465) r,a t F t'jSAMPLED: 12/21/92 LAB SAMPLE #: 9227698 A" ANALYZED: 01/01/93 tt.JREPORTED: 01/04/93 FIELD BLANK #: NONE kREPORTING AMOUNT REPORTING AMOUNT LIMIT FOUND - LIMIT FOUND COMPOUND (UG/L) (UG/L) COMPOUND (UG/L) (UG/L) aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamaaaaasaaamaaaaamaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaagaaamaaaaaamsaaaamaaa Df6 hlorodifluoromethane< 1.0 11122-Tetrachloroethane< 0.2 Chloromethane < 2.0 1123-Trichloropropane < 0.5 Vinyl Chloride < 1.0 lBromobenzene < 0.2 Btomomethane < 2.0 12-Chlorotoluene < 0.5 Clloroethane < 1.0 14-Chlorotoluene < 0.5 D2chloroflueromethane < 1.0 11,3-Dichlorobenzene < 0.2 Tri.chlorofluoromethane < 2.0 1,4-Dichlorobenzene < 0.2 Trichloro- 1,2-Dichlorobenzene < 0.2 11 trifluoroethane < 0.2 11,2-Dibromo- 11-Dichloroethene < 0.5 1 3-Chloropropane < 2.0 Allyl Chloride < 0.5 1124-Trichlorobenzene < 0.5 Methylene Chloride < 0.5 IHexachlorobutadiene < 0.5 t-,1,2-Dichloroethene < 0.1 1123-Trichlorobenzene < 0.5 1,1-Dichloroethane < 0.2 jEthyl Ether < 2.0 2t27dichloropropane < 0.5 jAcetone < 20 c"1,2, Dichloroethene < 0.2 (Methyl tertiary - Chloroform < 0.1 1 Butyl Ether < 2.0 BFomochloromethane < 0.5 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 10 1',A ,'S-Trichloroethane < 0.2 Tetrahydrofuran < 10 11-Dichloropropene < 0.2 (Benzene < 0.2 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 (Methyl Isobutyl Ketone< 5.0 102-Dichloroethane < 0.2 (Toluene < 0.2 T4ichloroethene < 0.1 jEthyl Benzene < 0.2 1)'2-Dichloropropane < 0.2 lm+p-Xylene < 0.2 BAomodichloromethane < 0.2 o-Xylene < 0.2 Dibromomethane < 1.0 Styrene < 0.5 < 0.2 1Isopropyl Benzene < 0.5 J"1,3-Dichloropropene 1,3-Dichloropropene < 0.2 In-Propyl Benzene < 0.5 1�1,2-Trichloroethane < 0.2 1135-Trimethylbenzene < 0.5 1.3-Dichloropropane < 0.2 Itert-Butyl Benzene < 0.5 Tetrachloroethene < 0.2 1124-Trimethylbenzene < 0.5 C'icrodibromomethane < 0.5 sec-Butylbenzene < 0.5 1-Dibromoethane < 1.0 1p-Isopropyltoluene < 0.5 dH orobenzene < 0.2 In-Butylbenzene < 0.5 41 2-Tetrachloroethane < 0.2 Naphthalene < 0.5 BrQmoform < 1.0 1 T"T------------------------- .---------------------------.------------------- ,.COMMENTS: Lakes!.bmo Municipal Water Supply, Well No. 1, PWSID 1820009, Date Sampled: 12-21-92 Legend: t; < = less than PP = peak present j :a # Fi Lake Elmo Municipal Water Supply, Well No. 1, PWSID 1820009, Date Sampled: 12-21-92 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PROGRAM: HC CHEMICAL LABORATORY SAMPLE: 9227691 PAGE: 1 ( REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS DATE RECEIVED: 12/21/92 FINAL REPORT — CLIENT COPY DATE GENERATED: 12/22/92 PROGRAM NAME: COMM WATER SUPPLIES (SAN.) DATE REPORTED: ANALYSIS/COMMENTS RESULT UNIT: BACTICHEM 327 PA TOTAL COLIFORM—DW (COLILERT) A /100 ml Absent Lake Elmo Municipal Water Supply, Parks Bldg., PWSID 1820009, Date Sampled: 12-21-92 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PROGRAM: HC CHEMICAL LABORATORY SAMPLE: 9227692 PAGE: 1 ( REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS DATE RECEIVED: 12/21/92 FINAL REPORT - CLIENT COPY DATE GENERATED: 12/22/92 PROGRAM NAME: COMM WATER SUPPLIES (SAN.) DATE REPORTED: ANALYSIS/COMMENTS RESULT UNIT: BACTICHEM 327 PA TOTAL COLIFORM-DW (COLILERT) A Absent /100 m1 Lake Elmo Municipal Water Supply, Lake Elmo Elementary School, PWSID 1820009, Date' Sampled: 12-21-92 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PROGRAM: HC CHEMICAL LABORATORY SAMPLE: 9227692 PAGE: 1 REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS DATE RECEIVED: 12/21/92 FINAL REPORT — CLIENT COPY DATE GENERATED: 12/22/92 PROGRAM NAME: COMM WATER SUPPLIES (SAN.) DATE REPORTED:. ANALYSIS/COMMENTS RESULT BACTICHEM — UNIT 327 PA TOTAL COLIFORM—DW (COLILERT) A /100 m1 Absent Lake Elmo Municipal Water Supply, City Hall, PWSID 1820009, Date Sampled: 12-21-92 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH PROGRAM: CHEMICAL LABORATORY SAMPLE: PAGE: REPORT OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS DATE RECEIVED: FINAL REPORT — CLIENT COPY DATE GENERATED PROGRAM NAME: COMM WATER SUPPLIES (SAN.) DATE REPORTED: ANALYSIS/COMMENTS RESULT -------------------------------------------- ------ UNIT: DACTICHEM 327 PA TOTAL COLIFORM—DW (COLILERT) A Absent HC 9227694 1 12/21/92 12/22/92 /100 m1 "Lead may leach into the water from some kinds of home plumbing." United States Office of Water Environmental Protection WHS50A Agency EPA 570/19.91-400 June1991 Lead avind Coper Rule The Lead and Copper Rule was published in the Federal Register on June 7, 1991. It becomes effective on November 7, 1992. This rule requires treatment when lead and/or copper in drinking water exceeds certain levels: Lead enters drinking water mainly from the corrosion of lead -containing house- hold plumbing. Since lead.and capper contamination generally occurs after water has left the public water system, the best way for the water system operator to find out if customer water is contaminated is to test water that has come from a household faucet. This type of contamination can be prevented by controlling the corrosiveness of the water supply. If corrosion wntrol is not sufficient, lead - containing materials may have to be replaced. Water Quality Standards Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLG): Water systems should try to supply water which is free of lead and has no more than 1.3 milligrams of copper per liter. This is a non -enforceable health goal. ' '' ' Action Levels: When the concentration of lead or copper reaches the MCLG Action Level action level in ten percent of the total number of required samples, the (mg1L) (mgrL) water system is required to carry out the water treatment requirements of Lead 0 0.015 the rule. These enforceable treatment requirements are described below.. Copper 1.3 1.3 Monitoring Requirements Lead/copper monitoring at high -risk homes. Water systems must complete a materials evaluation of their distribution system. and/or review other information to target homes that are at high risk of lead/copper contamination. Monitoring is to be conducted at the tap in these homes, with the number of tap -sampling sites based on the population served. One sample is required at each site. • Number of Initial Sampling Sites # at home System taps for size Pb/Cu 9 within dist. for other factors >100,000 100 50 10,001-100,000 60 10 3,301-10,000 40 3 501.3,300 20 2 101-500 10 1 5100 5 1 Additional monitoring for other factors affecting corrosion is required to optimize treatment and determine compliance with State lead/copper standards. Two types of systems must perform this monitoring under the following conditions: • Large systems serving more than 50,000 Dermas, regardless of the lead/copper levels in tap samples. • Smaller systems serving less than 50,000 persons, if the action levels are exceeded in tap samples. Two types of sampling sites are specified for this purpose: • Within the distribution system, with the number of sites based on population served (sites may be same as for coli-f- orm sampling). Two samples are required from each site. • One sample at each entry point to the distribution system. `..Pii6GcEdiicvtiortFaelSfieet5erirs� Monitoring Frequencies. Initially, small and medium systems must collect home tap amples for lead and copper analysis every six months. Samples 'or other factors must be taken from within the distribution ystem every six months, and from entry points to the distribu- ion system every two weeks. Both the number of'sampling sites aid the frequency may be reduced if, for three years, the action evel is met or the system maintains optimal treatment. Water Treatment Requirements • Frequency of Sampling t4 Monitoring Home within at entry Period taps dist. to dist. Initial 6 mo. 6 mo. i .6 mo. After corrosions fi mo. 6 mo. 1 2 wk- treatment Reduced —Conditional #- 1 yr. 6 mo. 2 wk. —Final 3 yr. 3 yr. i 2 wk. Four types of action are required to remedy high lead/ opper levels. Once a system finds that more than 10 percent of all tap monitoring -isults exceed the action levels, the system must begin to carry out the first three ..ctions. O Corrosion control treatment. Depending on its size, a system may be required to first monitor as described above and/or recommend a corrosion control treatment to. the State. Upon the approval of the State, treatment is to be installed and demonstrated to be effective according to criteria set by the State. Treatment options are: pH and alkalinity adjustment, calcium adjust- ment, and silica or phosphate -based corrosion inhibition. 9 Source Water Treatment. Systems must first monitor their source water for the presence of lead/copper, and, if necessary, recommend a treatment to the State. Treatment options are: ion exchange, lime softening, reverse osmosis, and coagulation/filtx-ation. Once the State approves a treatment, systems will have 2 years to install it and 1 more year to conduct follow-up monitoring. If treatment is not required, or if the treated water does not exceed the maxi- mum lead/copper levels permitted by the State, source water monitoring will be synchronized with the system's other monitoring schedules. ® Public Education. Public education materials developed by EPA will inform customers about the health effects of lead, and explain what they can do at home to reduce their exposure. ate s5 ntem must begin delivering the materials within 60 days of the lead Compliance Deadlines action level exceedance. The materials include public NOTE: assumes action levels exceeded in initial monitoring service announcements to be submitted periodically to television and radio stations, and other pamphlets to be delivered directly to customers, newspapers, hospi- Large Medium Small tals, etc. Action >50K 3,300.50K 53,300 LF a system continues to exceed the lead action level after installing optimal corrosion control and source water treatment, the fourth action must be taken: O Lead Service Line Replacement. Lead service lines that contribute more than 0.015 mg/L to tap water lead levels must be replaced. A system must replace seven percent of its lead lines each year, and must replace all lines within 15 years. For More Information Call the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at:1-800-426.4791. Lead Copper pH alkalinity Calcium Conductivity Orthophosphate Silica Temperatcue Begin monitoring Jan92 I Ju192 Ju193 Complete treatment study Ju194. i Ju195 Ju196 (if required by State) Recommend treatment to State • study not required- N/A Jan93 Jan94 • study required- ' Ju194 Ju195 i Ju196 Complete treatment installation i i • study not required- N/A Ju196 i JaK • study required- Jan97 Jan98 ! Jams I Complete follow-up monitoring i • study not required- N/A Ju197 Jan99 • study required- Jan98 '. Jan99 Jan2000 Since we do not have time to discuss every point presented, it may seem that decisions are preconceived. However, background information is provided for the City Council on each agenda item in advance from City Staff and appointed Commissions; and decisions are based on this information and past experiences. In addition, some items may also have been discussed at previous Council meetings. If you are aware of information that hasn't been discussed, please fill out a "Request to Appear Before the City Council', slip; or, if you came late, raise your hand to be recognized. Comments that are pertinent are appreciated. Items requiring excessive time may be continued to another meeting. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 16, 1993 7:00 P.M. MEETING CONVENES 1. AGENDA 2. MINUTES: March 2, 1993 March 11, 1993 Emergency Meeting 3. CLAIMS 4. PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL A. Washington County's Request to install methane gas monitoring vent on city property B. Other 5. OLD BUSINESS: 6. PLANNING/LAND USE & ZONING: A. Petition for rezoning from R1 to RE B. Land Surveyor's Certificate of Correction to Midland Meadows, Lot 7, Block 1 C. Petition for the Establishment of the Cottage Grove Watershed District D. Other 7. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: A. Update on 1993 MSA Feasibility Study B. Update on Olson Lake Estates C. Preparation for Surface Water Utility (over) LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA March 16, 1993 2 8. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: 9. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: A. Mayor John B. Council Member Conlin C. Johnson D. Johnston E. Mottaz 10. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. League Conference B. Resignation of Parks Commission Member Resignation of MAC member C. St. Croix Animal Shelter's Request for a "Community Support Agreement" D. Pay Increase Request by A.C.O. Agreement for services E. Employees Pay Increase E. Other 11. ADJOURN C