The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12-20-94 CCMSince the City Council does not have time to discuss every point presented, it may appear that decisions are preconceived. However, staff provides background information to the City Council on each agenda item in advance; and decisions are based on this information and experiences. In addition, some items may have been discussed at previous council meetings. If you are aware of information that has not been discussed, please fill out a "Request to Appear Before the City Council" form; or, if you came late, raise your hand to be recognized. Comments that are pertinent are appreciated. Items may be continued to a future meeting if additional time is needed before a decision can be made. AGENDA LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 20, 1994 7:00 p.m. Meeting Convenes Pledge of Allegiance 1. Agenda 2. Minutes: December 6, 1994 3. Claims 4, Old Business 5. Planning, Land Use & Zoning A. Resolution 94- Michels Minor Subdivision 8740 Stillwater Blvd. B. Request from Thomas G. Armstrong for approval of Petition for Annexation C. Request to Withdraw Genie Arabians, Inc. request for Rezoning and Conditional Use Permit D. Request to Withdraw Driscoll & Daughter's request for Conditional Use Permit for Recording Studio. E. Other 6. City Engineer's Report A. Woodbury's Comprehensive Sewer Plan Amendment B. County Road 13 ( DeMontreville Trail) and 50th Street C. Other 7. City Attorney's Report 8. City Council Reports A. Mayor John B. Council Member Conlin C. Council Member Johnson D. Council Member Johnston E. Council Member Mottaz 3 9. Administration A. Agreement for Audition/Accounting Services B. Cable Meeting January 5, 1994 C. Fire Department: Purchase of Air Compressor D. Reschedule Volunteer Appreciation Party E. Other Memo To: Mayor and City Council From: Mary Kueffner Date: December 20, 1994 Subject: Proposal to Oakdale to resolve Section 32/33 Issues There has been direction to contact the Municipal Board and request that it initiate on its own behalf annexation of all of the land south of and including the MN/DOT right-of-way. The Municipal Board first required that I identify all of the parcels that we have stated are in error (according to the analysis done by Bruce Folz) by their legal descriptions (they were referenced in Bruce Folz' letter by plate and parcel. The MMB wanted this so they could send it on to MN/DOT for verification. Then the MMB changed their mind, and sent a letter to all involved in the detachment/annexation proceedings asking for comments to our proposal. One of the litigants (and I believe it was Mark Vierling who represented the property owners involved) asked for more time to respond; the City of Oakdale has responded that the "appeal" period is over and there is nothing for the Municipal Board to consider. The bottom line is, we have not received a response -- favorable or unfavorable from the MMB. I have spoken with Craig Waldron about how we could amicably resolve these issues without either City having to spend more money in the courts fighting each other. I believe the figure Lake Elmo has spent fighting annexation issues is near the $100,000 mark. Do we want to continue spending money fighting this or do we want to resolve the issue conclusively? If there is a desire to settle outside the courtroom, I would propose that we present the following offer to Oakdale for their consideration: Oakdale has approximately 25,000 gpd that it could permanently give to Lake Elmo. This excess capacity is the result of the proposed golf course instead of all residential development. There is approximately 285,000 gpd of unallocated capacity that would become available in the WONE Interceptor with upgrades in two specific areas downstream. 000 Oakdale has approximately 384 gpd allocated to them in the WONE Interceptor. Oakdale estimates that it may be ten years before they need the entire amount of allocation. If Oakdale would lend us the capacity that they don't need on a temporary basis, Lake Elmo would be able to expand it's MUSA and makes the construction of the infrastructure more cost effective. Lake Elmo and Oakdale would then jointly apply to the Metropolitan Council for the needed upgrade downstream. Once that upgrade is completed, the amount of capacity lent to us by Oakdale would be returned to Oakdale, and the remainder would go to Lake Elmo for further MUSA extension. Oakdale would agree to join Lake Elmo in notifying the Metropolitan Council that the capacity that Woodbury "borrowed" on a temporary basis until it was needed by Lake Elmo and Oakdale, would have to be returned. This would result in Woodbury having to parallel some pipes that are already in place, but is something they agreed to do when the capacity was needed /] Woodbury stated at a meeting last week that they did not feel the upgrade they have agreed to would be needed until about 1998. We must stress that the upgrade will be needed in 1995. �{ ill�llrl.ar`� Co(vv,rtW�c-1��5 Proposal to Oakdale to resolve Section 32/33 Issues 12/20/94Page 2 Oakdale and Lake Elmo would agree to a joint construction project for the sewer pipes with the cost of the project to be fairly and equitably distributed. Both Cities will look at the feasibility of one pump station to serve both communities. Lake Elmo will look at the feasibility of purchasing water from Oakdale for its area within the MUSA. If the area to be entire area to be served is greater than can be handled by the Oakdale water system, Oakdale would agree to a temporary use of their water facility until Lake Elmo can install their own system. Lake Elmo and Oakdale will, by joint resolution, notify the Municipal Board that the dividing line between the two cities will be (County Road 13) Ideal Avenue (from I-94 to County Road 10). DECEMBER 20, 1994 LAKE ELMO COUNCIL MEETING List of Claims for Approval t For the period 12J16J94 to 12/ /94 12/16/94 .CLAIM TOTAL ACCOUNT ACCOUNT TO WHOM PAID " FOR WHAT PURPOSE ' DATE 'NUMBER CLAIM NUMBER AMOUNT PKINKO'S NATIONAL ACCOUNTS REC. NEWSLETTER PRINTING 12116194 3317 291.38 =100-41500-354 291.38 Y LINEN, SUPPLY ie snuurud'.a nu 00 NAINT ; 's ,DISPLAY SALES CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS EXPENSE MENARDS CHRISTMAS LIGHTS & MAINT DEPT SUP, MARONEY'S SERVICE INC OFFICE & MAINT DUMPSTERS 0 3318 51 34 111-41500-400 51.34 3319 37.28 106-41411-203 ' 66.58 fit i " ,110-41501-400 20.70 3321 63.25 lei-41300-216 53.25 3321 122.76 LID-41300-216 67.35 100-43100-223 65.41 3322 - 121.52 100-41500-410 60.76 ,111-43111-223 60.76i. .. . -TKOA OCTOBER ENGINEERING 12116J94 3331 PETERSON FRAN & BERGMAN NOVEMBER LEGAL FEES 12J16J94'3332 LEONARD, STREET & 9EINARD LEGISLATIVE LOBBYING 6 OLSON LK PO 12116/94 3333 MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSN.' ' ' FIRE BEPT,MEMBERSHIP DUES ,12116J94 3334 .- RICHARD COIEMIER `i FIRE DEPT DUES -MUTUAL AID ASSN :,-12J16J94,3335 ROAD JtESCUE`INC FIRE -DEPT SUPPLIES 12116194 3336 LAKEVIEW HOSPITAL "FIRE DEPT 1ST RESPONDER COURSES 12J16J94 3337 THT 1NC ' FIRE DEPT TRUCK REPAIR 12J16J94 3338 �NES SACNS SEPT & OCT RUN REPORTS 12J16194 3339 KATN HEATING = FIR ESTATION 1 1 DEPAIR %12J16J94, 3341 ELMOLS LUMBER & PLYWOOD FIRE ,FURNACE i PARKS SUPPLIES 12 16J94 3341 GENEX INC An IS TOOTS INC..`. A-1 HYDRAULIC SALES & SE CARLSON-EQUIPMENT CO. 60PHER BEARING CO. MILLER EXCAVATING T.R. SCHIFSKY & SONS to 00' 1 -43188-380 93160-3,80 .84 110-43260-318 .1 1333.60 , 803-43204-318 1,141.20 65 300-41930-300 '. 857.31 402-41930-350 ' 538.35 , 601-41930-300 527.17 883-419.31-310 866,76 .64 110-41600-310 5,894.64 1A 100-41600-300 - .2,099,10 ' 307-41600-300 90,00 .00 100-4220@-433 91.00 ±' .10 440-42200-433 75.00 28 i116-42261-217 01 , 110-42200-217 728.10 ` .71 ,I10-42200-220 192_.71 .25 100-42290-208 92.25 .10 ,AI-42201-4I1� 84.10 30 ,10D-42266-401 'I 21.85 100-45200-219 31.46 - NAINT DEPT CLOTHING ALLOW ;-� 12116 94 3343 34 99 .-101-43110-218 '. 84.49 MAINT UEPT SUPPLIES 12/16/44 3344 '' 30.94 100-43101-223 36.94 NAINT DEPT NOVEMBER PAGER EXPENSE " 12116/94 3346 131.41 ,110-43100-320 131.41 NAINT DEPT SUPPLIES 12JL6J94 33d 32.16 111-43100-223 32.16 ICE MAINT DEPT TRUCK REPAIR 12116/94 3341 -: 21.64 '100-43101-221 21.64 MAINT DEPT TRUCK REPAIR - 12/16194 3348 .. 290.75 '100-43118-221 290.75 NAINT DEPT EQUIPMENT REPAIR 12/16194 3349 337.75 180-43108-221 337.76 GRAVEL FOR STREETS 12116/94 3351 361.46 140-4310E-228 361.46 BLACK TOP PATCHING 12116/94 3351 183.71 111-43100-407 183.71 DECEMBER 20th -,Page 2 , List of Claims for Approval r , For Che period 12(16(94 to 12(16/94 12 16 (,( 94 / a. CLAIM TOTAL ACCOUNT ACCOUNT TO WHOMrPAIDf, FOR WNAT�PURPOS OATE NUMBER CLAIM NUMBER AMOUNT rNDTDN M11ITv-TDrA ..+. ,,'.fAITISANR IC'BAARTNR ROARS r....,.,:12It9194 3352 464.26 %1100-43110-229 iFNAINT DE PT SOP,PLIE$ r ��r� ��>2(16�99 3,355 '135 20 100-43100-224 136.20 4BD COTTON "PRODUCTS NAINT DEPT SUP'PLTES 12(16f44 3366 144.0 �360-43100-223 I44.S7 4ESABI, INC SNOW PLOW BLADES 12(16(99 3357 997 62 100 43100 221 997 82 '$ POGER EQUIPMENT PARKS DEPT CHAIN SAW 12(Ib(94 3368 412.00 100 45201 223 492.00 Zi SWIM. s,4 M. >3� (, PARK SIGNS psi 2- e;r tAj O { { jF12(1 94 x3359 28 19 s100 95200 219 ky `; 28 19 i RRTNENT QF A6RICULTUAE "' M,.4,PESTICIOE APPLICATOR'S LICENSE RENE t%16 94 3368 vil 11 ,110,45200 219 ,ra 10 10 E `CITY DF ", y � ` , �' a NOyEM8ER OATEN PBRCNASEO ,�'� �� 12(16(94 V61 � .696.13 1`601"g9400 250 ��'b4b 13 � Uf" LYALL Al`�-!, ffl ?90' ILT C'ONTRQL,(.6RANT) 32(16j94 3362 160 11 803 -05210 225 fry/ 150 00 E 6� EISEL t tf,ACCT 3 �REFUNO bf AL�SH iIARIANCE 'ESCROW _< q 2(I6r9433363 fi 130 10 6803 43300 228 250 80 � ,� v 3 - -`i r � E x29 43fi 51 " kt+i 9Y ' 29 436 51 + t¢x r, f xl I" t ,A 2 �t I tt -z�* 5 R zdi aV4• L�; ; +; A�!' e+=' F 3 q ll.. _rya txyk„ F�.. G -�„"!tr kr r"i 4'r-' tSM"........Y '. a 4 q�� .4 E d� x TIT 4 _