Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-10-71 PZMMINUTES, PLA71ING COMMISSION VILLAGE CF LAKE AUGUST 10, 1971 The meeting was ca' led to order. by Chairman Lendgeist at 7:35 e.... Those members present were: M. EThr, B. Folz, F. Pott. Those absent: L. Karvida, E. aeClair, E. Tomljanovich, and T. Torseth. Chairman Lundquist asked for a motion to approve the minutes of the July 26 meeting as published. Two typeograehlcal errors in the paragraph starting with "Mr. Donal,ry Novak" were noted. The sentence which reads "The Commission m(rnbers requested that the Village Council send a letter to Mrs. J. Stedt advising her that if he sold a portion of Lot 11 to Mr. Novak, that she must retain at least 35 feet in order to maintain the frontage of Lot 10 at 135 feet." should read "The Commissie n members requested that the Village Council send a letter to Lrs. J. Stedt advising her that if she sold a portion of Lot 11 to Mr. Novak, that she must retain at least 35 feet in order to maintain the frontage of Lot 10 at 125 feet." A motioe was made by M. Eder that the minutes be approved with the a..ove corrections. Seconded by B. Folz. Carried 4-0. Curtiss Johnson appeared regarding a building permit for a par- cel of land on County 70 neue Goose Lake in the J\IE e of Seotiol aQs, He was advised that the transfer of title of this parcel without platting was illegal. The Uerrbers of the Commission were of the opinion that the land be platted before a permit is issued. Mr. Johnson was advised that he could appear before the Village Council at their next meeting if he desired. Jamee Schultz cind William Delanex appeared regarding the sub- division of a lot on the NW corner of North Shore Drive and Netet, (SW i of Sec. 13). Two variances wou'.d be required: ) Variance of transfer cf title could be per- mitted based on Subdivision Regulations Sec- tion 12C. This would permit a Certificate of Survey to be filed in the Village Office in lieu of the usual plat. 2) Variance of easement is reasonable because due to topography, access to the S'iJ lot is off of Neneta and now existing there. A motion was made by Le Lder that the P1anninF Commission recommend to the Courci"_ that the variances be granted be- cause the.proposed development is consistent with the adjacent area development. This recommendation is subject to the con- ditions that: 1) The north line of the SW let be moved to the north line of easement and the eaet line of SW lot43e - licit tdrtued to the same north line of eaeement. 2) A permanent 20 foot road easement be included with the title for the Sad lot. The motion was seconded by B. Folz and carried 5-0. ,5 2 Planning Commission, August 10, 1971 Mr. J Lenz and Mr. W.Wacker appeared regarding an addition to a dwelling on a substandard lot at the NE corner of and Third Streets. The present structure is 26 ft. X 2ft. and two stories. Proposed additinn is 16, ft. X 24 ft. Set- backs with addition -:rould be 10 ft. on the North, 22 ft. on the East, and 22 ft. on the Soatb. Lot size is 60 ft. X 120 ft. Due to the existing character of the area and the exist- ing structure in need of repair, and being that the only per- tinent problem is an adequate infiividual sewer e system that would last fnr 10 to 1_5 year. ; a motion sae made by B. Folz that variance be granted upon favorable results of percL1.latien tests to be performed by property owner an presented to Vill- age Council. The motion was seconded oy i bder an] carried unanimously. Mr. and Mrs. F. Hoffman of 1641 Dusty Lane appeared regarding the possibility of getting a building permit for the Sub- standard lot they own adjacent to their present residence. Mr. Hoffman indicated that he wanted to seLi this lot, but if it is not buiida"ie, the sale price .could be adversely affect- ed. B. Folz indicated that the previous owner had sold the lot at a reduced price because it was not buildable and had so advised the Hcffmans at the time they purchased the lot. Mr. Hoffman said he was not so eniviscd. ''Ar. Hoffman then re- quested a certified copy of the r.inute s of this meeting. He was advised that a copy signed by the secretary would be for- warded to him. Also, these minutes would be subject to ap- proval at the next meeting. A certified coey of the minutes would be available only through the Village Office. Mr. Elmer Hasse appeared with a revised preliminary plat because the Village Engineer had advised hire that the original plat was "basically unacceptable". An extended discussion followed during which the following points were raised: 1) The Commission does not anderstand bonestroc's reasons for revising the plat in the manner shown. 2) The Commission di.sa _ proves of Cutlot A be- cause it is isolated ana would fnrce a cap- tive buyer or seller when the adjacent land is subdivided. 3) Outlot A is not suitable for subdivision nor parkland without ingress and egress for residents of Blocks 2 and 3. 4) The existing housing elan the north side of County 70 and in_ediately westerly of this tract presents a future subdivision problem for Outlot A. 5) The Commission fails to Gee an appreciable difference between maintenance of pipeline along a property line compared to through a lot where the buildings are a sufficient distance from the pipeline. Planning Commission, August 10, 1971 6) All lot boundaries must be to the center- line of the pipeline easement and subject to that easement. B. Folz will contact Mr. Bonostroo and the Council and try to resolve this matter by the end of the. week. It was also agreed that B. Folz would contact Counsel Raleigh slid set a public hearing far the subdivision cn August 23rd. There was some discussion of the variance request by Mr. C. Johnson foJ_lowed by a notion by B. Fclz that the Commission recommend to the Vil1 : ;e Council that this variance not be approved. Mr. Johnson has been informed at prior meet- ings dating back over a year of the Village Subdivision Reg- ulations. The Hoffman variance request on. Dusty Lane was again discussed. Since the Planning Commission is about to start an analysis of all plats in the Village, it was decided that this area would be processed first. A recommendation on the Hoffman variance will be postponed until this analysis is completed. MI Eder presented a preliminary plat for Lot 1 Block 1 of Eder Pine Ridge Acres lying in the N; z of Sec. 10. The proposed plat was discussed and B. Folz was directed to have Councel Raleigh publish a notice cf public nearing on this matter for August 23rd. Mr. and Mrs. Vittori did not appear because the final plans for their building are not completed. The Calvin Bartley property lying in the MI '- of Sec. 24 was discussed. The preliminary lot plan that was submitted showed a proposed dwelling on the north half of the 300 ft. lot. There was no objection to the preliminary plan, but a question was raised regarding^ the removal of an existing cabin. Mr. Bartley should be advised by the Village Office that a potential street is located in this area on the Com- prehensive Plan, but is not defined at this time. A motion f-or ad jornrnent was made by F. Pott, seconded by L. Karvida, and carried 5-0 at 12:10 a.rn. pectf ully Submitted, . J. Pott secretary