HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-23-71 PZMHighlights of planning Commission meeting
August 23, l 9?1
1) Public Hearing for Subdivision proposed by ~ lmer Haase. No
one appeared for or against. Commission recommends approval
subject to following:
A) 15' walkway easement should be a tract dedicated to
public --should not be an easement.
B) Walkway area would be removed from lot l and that lot
would then be less than one acre. Therefore, lot line
between lots 4 and 5 should be adjusted so lot 4 has one
acre of area.
C) If Standard Oil will not allow utility easements on their
easement, then additional 10 foot easement should he
required ( a long pipeline easement) for utilities.
D) Park area (Outlot A and Walkwav) is in excess of the
required ?%. The amount in excess of 7% should be credited
to future subdivision of the remaining land owned by Mr. Haase.
2) Public Hearing for Eder Pine Ridge Acres Subdivision.
Maynard Eder was only interested party. Coin scion recommends
approval. Vote was unanimous except for on`bstention-Mr. Eder.
Village should accept monetary contribution in lieu of parkland acreage.
3) Mr. Reiss appeared regarding proposed dog kennel, at his resi dence
at 3861 Stillwater Rd. He would like to build 5 runs to breed and
sell Great Danes. He was advised t3at'kennels are not nermitted in
residental acres. He was also advis:d that 2 dogs would be permitted
by the Ordinances if the pups were/bold within six months after birth.
Dog houses and fences for same would be subject to a building permit
if the market value exceeded $200.0O.
!) William Hagberg appeared regarding proposed Supermarket on the
Peter Nielson property (2.9,acres) East of Juniper and South of 212.
He was advised:
A) Zoning is "Industrial Park" - would permit a supermarket.
B) 2 access driveways off of 212 are okay subject to review by Village Engr.
C) Metal bldg. with brick front (A.^: Butler Building) is generally
satisfactory.
D) "City Water" is available to the site - subject to annroval by Village Engr.
E) No anparent problems at this time with the proposed improvement.
No lot plan or building plan submitted.
5) Richard Lambert a geared regarding expansion of kennels at "Animal Inn"
south of New 212 and west of Take Jane Drive. He now has 58 runs and would
like to add 6I:
re.
He wanted to
A) Was there changes in zoning or building code since he built the
originalsture? He was advised that he should coriply with the
new State bldg. code which will be inef'fect when he builds next summer.
B) What procedures are necessary for building permit?
He was advised that a public hearing would be required.
C) He advised the Planning Commission that there is a need for an
animal cemetery in this area and he would be requesting a permit
for same on his property in 3 or 4 months.
6) Brief discussion of ordinance requiring undergroung utilities --
Village Attorney and Engineer should deter i ne feasibility of
such an ordinance at this time. If feasible, it should be implemented.
7) Ben Friedrich appeared re:'arding a foundation built by Mr. Thomas Hilpisch
(Rose Ave. & 212). No permit was obtained for this construction and it
appears that it is about 25 feet into the State Highway easement. Notions
Recommend that Village Council contact Mr. Hilptsch by letter advising
him that horses shall not be permitted on tracts under 20 acres (excent
by Special Use Perrit) and that he re»ove the concrete block footing
and restore the land to its former condition.
8) Ben Friedrich requested clarificaton of Building requirements on lake
shore lots. A prospective buyer of a lot on the north end of Lake Jane
adjacent to Berachen's Shores Addition wanted to know if the lot was
buildable. Ben was advised that the drainfield mustbe 4 feet above the
"928" level and any filing must coreply with the Water Shed District
requirements. Next step wo';ld be to have the people furnish a contour
map of the lot.
9) Don Raleigh advised Sill Lundquist that J. Lenz had no legal right to
register hie proposed sub -standard subdivision. Commission recommends
that Counsel Raleigh send letter to Mr. Lenz explaining this.
10) The Hoffman variance request was again discussed briefly. B. Folz
said that the former owner of the substandard lot (Earl Friedrich)
had made it very clear to Mr. Hoffman that the lot was "not buildable".
The sale price of the lot (about $350 to $400) would tend to substantiate
this fact,
11) The secretary was requested to remind the Village Clerk that the
Planning Commission still needs maps for all the plats in the Village.
12) The hearing on the Rezoning of "The Corridor" and updating of the
Village Zoning Ordinance was discussed. It was recommended that the
public hearing be held on September 20.
Eight members present at adjournment. (11 di3 p.m.)
Resnectfu} ly Submitted,
F. J. Pott