Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-13-72 PZMVILLAGE OF LAKE ELMO PLA!NTNG & ZONING CO"MISSION MP.T"TES OF THE YEETIP•,G OF JTJNE 13, 1972. The meeting was called to order at 7:45 P.Y.. Those present were Chairman Lundquist, D. Lyons, F. Pott, and L. Raleigh.. The public hearing was opened, and Mr. A. 7'riedr ch explained the plans for the multiple dwellings that Lead Inc. plans to construct on 3^th. St. No... Mr. Friedrich explained that these units were not apartments, =gut rather two level--3 bedroom condominium. Lead Inc. had chosen to build these units instead of six individual homes for business reasons. Also discussed was: the impact of these unite on the school district, adequate sewerage, who will pay for the water main installation, and who would maintain the lawn and harking area. The :rain complaints from those present were increased noise and traffic and the loss of a hill presently used for sliding in the wintertime. The hearing was closed at R:2f P.M. F. Pott advised that he had been contacted by Mr. Vitale regarding the sub-di.vis;on of some 10 acres on the SGT corner of County AO and County 6. Mr. Vitale was told that this was a permitted use (SFT1 Zoning) and the Village subdivision regulations provide the necessary details. L. Kleis, A. Kleis and Clarence Lein appeared regarding the subdivision of a 5 3/4 acre parcel north of La' e Jane. The subdivision would result in two very long and narrow lots which right become a problem when the surrounding land was subdivided. They were advised to talk to the Village Council at their next meeting. Mr. Curtis Wenzel appeared regarding a Special Use Permit for a swimming pool. He presented a petition signed by surrounding landowners that this be permitted. A,motion was made and seconded that the Planning & Zoning ;ommission recommends that this Special Use Permit be approved subject to the following considerations: 1.) the pool.must be set back at least 10 feet from all lot lines, it must be enclosed by a 4 ft. non-climable fence, and no rower lines may pass over the pool area. 2.) the intent of the proposed Swimming Pool Ordinance rust be complied with. 3.) the letter presented is acceptable as a substitute for the public hearing requirement. The motion was seconded and carried unanimously. B. Folz arrived at 9:30 P.M. Mr. R. W. Nelson who was on the adjenda did rot aonear. A motion was made, seconded and carried to arnrove the minutes o*' the previous meeting w th the following correction: the word "building" should he deleted from line 3, paragraph 2, to clarify the {'act that "joint verture" is not necessarily a 50-50 split of costs between the two parties. The Lead Inc. Condoniriurns were again discussed. Since no serious ob i ecti. ons were raised during the public haring, the Planning Zoning ,ommiss-i on reiterated its previous notion for arnroval of this development. The meeting was ad;ourned at 10:35 P.M. Resnectfull• Submitted, F. J. Pott, Secretary