HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-14-78 PZMAGENDA -^PLANNING -ZONING COMMISSION
City of Lake Elmo, Minn. 55042
MEETING TO BE HELD TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1978,
7:30 P.M. -- Meeting convenes
Roll Call
Approval of Minutes
Washington County Special Use Permit
for utilizing a single family residential
structure on a temporary basis as a juvenile
day treatment center.
8300 P.M. -- HEARING to consider the application of.
Lake Elmo Baptist Church for a Special Use
Permit to construct a church buil-ling on
Ideal Ave., Section 16.
8:45 P.M. -- County -State Aid Highway 13
9:00 P.M. -- HEARING,:on:theproposed:.plat of
Brockman Addition
Please note: Due to the precinct caucus, the Planning -Zoning
Commission regular :scheduled meeting for February 27,
1978, will not, be held, -
i
CITY OF LAKE ELM)
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 114, 1978
The meeting was called to order at 7:140 by Chariman Grace.
Roll Call: Crumble, Michels, Lundquist, Grace, Moris, Novak, Cunningham, Sovereign
D. Lyons, Council, Phil Haney, Midwest Planning
Minutes: No approval, not all members had received copies.
Juvenile Day Treatment Center: Special Use Permit
Mr. Bill Schwab and Mr. Bodo Suemnig presented the request for a
Special Use Permit to use an existing structure within the County
Park for a Juvenile Day Treatment Center.
This program is a pilot project whioh will only run as long as the
services do not exceed the course capacity or until the s•t'ruoture used
will be needed for the park.
The structure is a two story farm house. Remodeling will include
a new sewer system, new heating plant, two additions along with
general upgrading of the structure. The estimated cost is $35,000
to $140,000. Its use is estimated from 3 to 5 years.
The program is for young people who have committed property offenses
and are in the court system for the first time. They will attend the
treatment for 15 days, Monday thru Friday during the day. There will
be 12 juveniles at a time attending. Funding will be obtained for
two counselors and bne SLEB teacher. This is only for County junvehiles.
If approval is granted construction is proposed to begin in April with
May occupancy. This program was proposed by Judge Albertson and Mr.
Suemnig,
A Public Hearing has been set for March 14, 1978 at 8 PM.
Hearing: Special Use Permit for construction of the Lake Elmo Baptist Church.
Section 16, Ideal Avenue.
Bill Hargus, Co—Chariman of the Building Committee and Bob Joann,
Architect present the request for the Special Use Permit.
The property for the proposed church is 8A and was purchased in 1973.
There are presently about 1140 members in the congregation and they are
now meeting in the Lake Elmo School. They are proposing to have the
church used as a multi —purpose building, thus the design of it. Well
and septic are proposed. Preliminary contact has been made with the
VBWS to see what their requirements are. No soil tests have been done,
thus no location for septic and well have been determined. Mr; Barges
feels the church will have a positive effect on the community and that
it is a permitted use in the SFU zone.
Audiences
Q. How much of the parking lot will be put in?
A. 170 space area.
Q. Mr, G. Wulfing — Where will traffic go if 3M cuts off Ideal Avenue
as proposed?
A. Mr. Hargus — 3M has never indicated doing this in their conversations
with them.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
—2— PIIBRUARY 14, 1978
Hearing Cont'd: *Q. Mr. S. Fisher — Mr. Fisher has raised Shepard dogs for the
past 20 years and feels this proposal wi].1 pause problems with
His dogs barking and also with the other dogs in the area. Mr.
Fishers property is adjacent to the ohurch property.
Also questioned is the water and well. Where will the water table
go? ylXaffic,tboie will be increased, also lighting for evening
activities are felt will pause enviromental problems.
*Mr. L. Leider — Would like to see area remain for SFU,
*Mr. D. Moris — Has no objection to a church, but a multi —use, no.
*Mr. L. Kosheimer — Has no objection to the church, other uses,
evening activities, no. Sunday only fine.
*Mr, G. Warnbr — Bought his home for the tranquility and prefers it
to stay SFU,
*J. Hillstrom — Traffic is a problem now, a larger facility will
generate more.
*L. Kosheimer — 3M proposed to have a buffer zone around their
facility.
* H. Fisher — on 20 A with a buffer, no objection, but does not
want it in the middle of a residential area.
*H. Reibe — has no objection to the church.
*L. R21be — they waited and sold the property to the church, rather
than for homes. They felt a church was more desirable than seven
homes and seven septic systems.
*R. Nelson — In 1972 discussion of preliminary plans for a future
church were held with the City.
*J. Moris — does not want 350 cars in his back yard. Where will
the water run—off go? A. This will have to be worked out before
any decision can be made.
*Chairman — the question is whether this is a desirable special
use for this property. It is a permitted use in this zone.
*D. Wulfing — does it matter if the residents object? A. Yes
Objects to a large facility and to the traffic that it will generate.
*J. Merrill — Thought this was going to be a small church, such as
the one at HWY 120 and County B.
*S. Fisher — When area was paved all the residents objected, but
it was paved. Keep out this large complex and keep it single
family residential — leave us alone.
*H. Fisher — this proposal will depreciate some of their property
if they chose to sell.
*M. Lancaster — five years is a short time for full capacity,
would rather drive to St. Paul to church and return to a quiet
home.
*Q. D.'Wulfing — What does this group have. to do in order to stop
this request? Feels pollution generated by this request.
A. All final decisions rest with the City Council.
*Q. S. Fisher — Why is a gym proposed?
A. It is a place for the young to congregate.
*Commissioner Cunningham — What is a definition of a church?
A. A place of worship.
*Mr. ? — What about the people there?
*Mr. ? — Will the facility be open for all of the community?
A, Yes.
*Richard Webb, Pastor — The church will be open to all. They desire
to meet the needs of all the community. Time restrictions would
be made—en—eeme—fae#l-itioc. They want to —make. gog±tire impeet
on the community.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FWBURARY 14, 1978
Ilearing Conttd: Commissioner Crombie - lives near a religious community. If
properly done such 'org'aniza.tione -cad be ah asset rather than a
detriment. Would switching the parking area along with a buffer
around the property make it any more desirable?
*Mr. ? - How many would want a facility like this in their back yard?
*S. Forster - Between this stags and before it goes to the City
Council, will there be answers to the questions posed before the
City Council gives their answer? A. Yes.
*C. Burnish-AChurch is necessary but feels people should have the
choice. The people are here and the church is coming in - feelings
are better for a church if a church is first and the people choose
to live near it.
*G. Steiner - Q. Whobe going to benefit from this?
*Q. Will it cause taxes to go up? A. It is absorbed throughout the
County.
Co. 13:
Hearing:
Hearing closed at 9:37 PM
A map for the propbsedrrouting of County 13 was distributed. The first
meeting on this willbe held in March.
Brookman Addition
Bruce Folz presented the proposal for the Brookman Addition. The'pro-
posal was shown on a contour map with no changes.
Pete Schiltgen read Section 201, Sub. 13 frgp the new Zoning Ordinance.
"This is an economically viable piece of landT and he objects to the
proposal due to the land use.
Hearing closed at 11:05 PM
Special. Meeting: Monday, February 27, 1978 the PZC will hold a Special Zoning Ordinance
Meeting. No regular meeting will be held.
Adjournment: 11:15 PM
Respectfully submitted,
Kathleen Crombie, Recording Secretary
1, c. I, • ,
Cc 2
,/P11
rt--A_
(1.-11,4i14
/52, /(.71 Vi5 L2,2
.(D
41/
gilo
sg
'-'
" •
iZe.,7'f/r
A
e( J
s.2,4/1 33t1si&)
(tv
1290 0 r
3 7 e
r.
zx'3.0
)7:41p
gi 2 2) 1
/aa7,--
e:)/114.2k
•
_11 .)
t
77 /
6e04/te)a-
`3evir A-74,444-cA;:= C,4eele":
)
'7?
4-2-0X 1SP c
'r-0
///aa 7Z-2