HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-26-90 PZMThe Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council.
One of the. Commission's. functions is to hold public. hearings and make
recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final
decisions on these matters.
Lake Elmo Ordinances require that certain documents and information
be included in applications. The Planning Commission may postpone
consideration of an application that is incomplete and may for other
reasons postpone final action on an application.
For each item, the Commission will receive reports prepared by the
City Staff, open the hearing to the public, and discuss and act on the
application. If you are aware of information that hasn't been discussed,
please fill out a "Request to Appear Before the Planning Commission"
slip; or, if you came late, raise your hand to be recognized.
Comments that are pertinent are appreciated.
AGENDA
LAKE ELMO PLANNING COMMISSION
November 26, 1990
7:30 p.m. Meeting Convenes
1. Agenda
2, Minutes --October 22, 1990
300 Public Hearing (continuation)
Arabian Hills - Rezone & Preliminary Plat
4. Concept: R1 Preliminary Plat - Clifford Atkins
5. Limited Business: Update from Workshop with
City Council, Planning Commission, Sub -Committee,
and property owners/business people.
6. Other
7. Adjourn
3ti. PC777-70n1 %U Ame-Nb Coro e6 Lit/J b O sc .27,, Jo
Tel � C-0141 R, P(4 6.3
1N
Date Approved: 11-26-90
Date Issued: 12-14-90
LAKE ELMO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
October 22, 1990
Chairman DeLapp called the Planning Commission meeting to order at.
7:35 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Present: DeLapp, Conlin, Arkell,
Dick Johnson, Johnston, Stevens, Bucheck, Enes (arrived 8:45),
Administrator Kueffner, City Planner Black. Absent: Wilfong, Thomas,
John.
1. AGENDA
M/S/P Stevens/Arkell - to approve the October 22, 1990 Planning
Commission Agenda as presented. (Motion carried 7-0.)
2. MINUTES: October 8, 1990
M/S/P Johnston/Stevens - to approve the October 8, 1990 Planning
Commission minutes as amended. (Motion carried 7-0.)
3. Residential Estates Ordinance (Update)
At the last City Council meeting, the Council directed the Planning
Commission to review the City Engineer's, Building Official's and City
Planner's rationale and make a recommendation for adequate septic
drainfield site.
Administrator Kueffner questioned the rationale in requiring one (1)
dedicated acre for drainfields, or sewage treatment. Chairman DeLapp
stated that it was the Council's interpretation of the code.
Administrator Kueffner talked with surrounding communities and
Washington County and her research shows the standard for drainfields
is 5,000 square feet on an existing platted lot, and 10,000 square
feet on all new subdivisions. Also, the City Building Official
reported to the Administrator the largest drainfield he has seen in
Lake Elmo was 1,300 square feet. (The City Engineer and the City
Planner have already indicated their rationale on drainfield
requirements.) The Commission discussed .5 acre would allow for four
separate drainfields (5,000 square feet each). It was brought up some
existing homes have two separate drainfields so they can periodically
switch off to maintain the system. It was discussed the building code
would force larger septic systems if needed to support, for example,
group homes.
Roger Kolstad stated he has talked with Pete Ganzel at Washington
County, and he stated the County's requirements for septic drainfields
is 10,000 square feet. The County's reasoning is 5,000 square feet
should last a minimum of 20 years, then a person can switch over to
the second 5,000 square feet and use this until it fails, and then
switch back to the first drainfield after 5 to 10 years of resting and
that drainfield will work again.
LAKE ELMO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
October 22, 1990 Page 2
Steve Korhel, 5540 Keats Ave., asked why the Commission was downsizing
septic systems. Chairman DeLapp reiterated the Commission's
discussion. City Planner Black stated they are not downsizing septic
systems.
Administrator Kueffner suggested as food for thought (for existing
houses) any house that is more than 50% destroyed, such as by fire,
would have to rebuild to present code, and would 20,000 square feet be
reasonable for existing houses.
M/S/P Johnson/Johnston - the Planning Commission recommend to the City
Council that the septic drainfield regulation be modified to read: a
minimum of 20,000 contiguous square feet of land to be dedicated for
septic use system, and a minimum of one (1) acre of land be required
for a building site above the flood plain and free of any easements,
and the 20,000 square feet set aside for the septic system can be part
of the one (1) acre building site. (Motion carried 7-1, against:
Conlin - would favor 15,000 square feet.)
City Planner Black suggested the motion expand the wording of "flood
plain" to include swamps, wetland, lowlands, bogs, etc. Commissioner
Johnson suggested Black's comments be brought to City Council's
attention for consideration.
4. Residential Estates Support Ordinance (Update)
Chairman DeLapp stated he talked to 3M's traffic engineer, and if over
120 to 150 cars per hour, typically translated to 800 to 1,000 cars
per day, it is suggested at this point to have streets wider than two
12 foot lanes. This engineer thought that anything under 800 cars per
day did not warrant larger streets, the odds for conflict are
miniscule. According to MDOT, a 12 foot lane is all that's required
for a semi -traitor.
Administrator Kueffner asked Chairman DeLapp to please bring comments
from outside experts in writing, and also asked why he does not talk
to the City Engineer? Chairman DeLapp responded "The City does not
have a traffic engineer, we have a civil engineer. 3M's traffic
engineer does not design septic systems. It's a totally different
situation."
Commissioner Johnson stated that staff is making a recommendation to
the City Council, the Commission still has differences of opinion, and
suggests that if the Chairman or Commission want to make a motion or
specific comment with regard to staff's recommendation to do so.
M/S/P Stevens/Bucheck - to stand by the Commission's prior
recommendation of 24 foot roads with 4 foot gravel shoulders. (Motion
carried 5-3, against: Conlin - in favor of 28', Johnston - in favor of
28', Johnson - in favor of 28'.)
The Commission's consensus on cul-de-sacs was to leave it at 800 feet.
The Commission discussed the minimum requirement of 150' between
driveways. Administrator Kueffner demonstrated a flaw in this
requirement.
LAKE ELMO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
October 22, 1990 Page 3
M/S/P Enes/Conlin - to eliminate the minimum requirement of 150 feet
between driveways. (Motion carried 8-0.)
M/S/P Enes/Stevens - to require a minimum distance of fifteen feet
(15') from the edge of a property line to the nearest edge of the
driveway in the Residential Estates Zoning District. (Motion carried
8-0.)
5. Arabian Hills: Rezoning and Preliminary Plat
Atthe request of the applicant, this application has been postponed
until further notice.
6. Freeway Business Zoning District (I-94)
Administrator Kueffner stated it was suggested, after the election so
as not to become a political issue, that a couple Council members and
a couple Planning Commission members meet with some members of the
business community for an informal "jam" session to discuss uses and
where the City is going and exchange some ideas.
Chairman DeLapp stated he is not convinced that the 10 or so
businesses that Lake Elmo has have people in the community who would
be representative of the kinds of businesses we're talking about to
bring into town and that proffessional assistance such as Mike Black,
Opus, Ryan Const., etc. would be more helpful.
Administrator Kueffner stated there are more than 10 businesses in
Lake Elmo and asked what is wrong with a couple Council members, and a
couple Planning Commission members sitting down and exchanging ideas?
We want the grassroots of it right now.
Chairman DeLapp stated that the people in the business community right
now already are here.
Administrator Kueffner responded not necessarily, property owners on
I-94 are potential business owners.
Chairman DeLapp responded they are zoned RR and they're going to sell
their land to some developer.
Administrator Kueffner stated that (they intend to sell their land) is
not a fact. We should give these people the courtesy of sitting down
and talking with them face to face. Administrator Kueffner is
suggesting a couple business people from the old district, a couple
business people on I-94, and a couple propety owners on I-94 that are
within the the future land use designated commercial. These people
have a stake in what will be allowed in the Freeway Business District.
M/S/P Buchec]c/Johnston - to table dicussion of the Freeway Business
Zoning District until further direction from City Council. (Motion
carried 8-0.)
LAKE ELMO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 22, 1990 Page 4
As a point of discussion, Commissioner Conlin stated perhaps time
would have been saved if. this "jam" session would have taken place
before this point in time.
7. Woodbury's Major Comp Plan Amendment
City Planner Mike Black reviewed the Comp. Plan amendment proposed by
Woodbury and gave the Commission an update. Woodbury is requesting
Met. Council include approximately 2,522 acres be included in the
MUSA. This expansion will be done with no impact on Metro line
systems namely transportation, open space, roads, or sewers. The
three interceptors that serve Woodbury now would be used to handle the
additional sewer needed for the proposed area. The Commission decided
to review the amendment and if there are any issues raised to bring
them up before the next meeting, and they appreciate staff and Mike
Black bringing this to the Commission's attention.
8. Request from Everett Beaubien
Mr. Beaubien, 3691 Kelvin, has requested a concept review of a
proposed subdivision and variance to frontage on a public improved
street. The Planning Commission received a drawing indicating the
request for another homesite allowed off of the private road, without
the required frontage on a public improved street. Mr. Beaubien has
also proposed donating to the City approximately three acres of land
across Sunfish Lake from his home so it can be combined with Sunfish
Park.
Commissioner Conlin stated she had visted Mr. Beaubien at the proposed
area, and gave the Commission an overview of the drawing. Some of the
Commissioners decided they needed to go out to the site and look at
the area before making a decision. The Commission could not come to a
consensus on this proposal.
M/S/P Johnston/Enes - to get additional information and visit the site
before making a decision, and then write a letter to Mr. Beaubien with
the Planning Commission's recommendation. (Motion carried 7-1,
against: Conlin - believes the Commissioner's had plenty of time to
visit the site before the meeting.)
M/S/P Enes/Arkell - to Adjourn the Planning Commission meeting at
10:25 p.m. (Motion carried 8-0.)
Commissioner Enes gave the Commission two FYI's: on 10th Street and
Manning Avenue in Afton there is a development for sale of five acre
lots with a brand new road, showing this is feasible. Also, for new
members, that haven't received any GTS (Government Training Centers)
in the mail, they offer some totally awesome seminars on planning and
land use. Suggested for new members is "Annual Planning Institute:
the Basics". The City will pay for these seminars.
Minutes 10-22-90
i
(
301.070 D.
4. Residential Estates
A. Permitted Uses and Structures
(1) One single family detached dwelling per lot within planned
subdivisions of at least 20 acres, nominal.
B. Accessory Uses and Structures
(1) Uses and structures which are customarily accessory and
clearly incidental and subordinate to permitted uses and
structures, see Section 301.130 C. ACCESSORY USES AND
STRUCTURES.
(a) No more than two detached accessory structures
with a combined total not to exceed 1200 square
feet.
(b) Accessary structure shall be architecturally
compatable with principal structure.
(c) Accessory Structures for the sole use by occupants
of the principal structure.
(d) Home Occupations as set forth in Section 301.040 (65)
of this code.
C. Minimum District Requirements
(1) Lot Size
2 1/2 minimum (108,750 sq.ft.) to 10
acres (435,600 sq.ft.).
(2) Subdivision Density 3.33 acre average. No out -lots to
remain within subdivision.
(3) Configuration:
Lots must be configured to contain
a circle with a diameter of 250 feet
minimum. The ratio of lot length
to width shall be a maximum of 3:1.
Flag lots are prohibited. (a
definition of a flag lot to be
typed here).
(4) Area of Building Site: A minimum of one (1) acre of land
above the flood plain* and free of
any easements.
* City Planner suggests expand wording of "flood plain" to include
swamps, wetland, lowlands, bogs, ect.
Minutes 10-22-90
(
(5) Principal Building Setbacks from Property Lines:
(a) Front 100 feet minimum
(b) Side (interior) 50 feet minimum
(c) Side (corner) 80 feet minimum
(d) Rear 100 feet minimum
(e) Collector/Arterial Street 150 feet minimum
(6) Frontage on Public Roadway
(7) Parking
150 feet minimum except 70 feet
at the end of cul-de-sacs.
2 enclosed spaces minimum (200 s.f.
minimum per space). 2 exterior
spaces with minimum setback of 50
feet from any property line.
(8) Hardsurface coverage 15% maximum.
(9) Septic Drainfield Regulation
(a) All newly subdivided lots shall have a minimum of
20,000 contiguous square feet of land to be dedicated
for septic system use and can be part of the one acre
building site.
(b) Placement of the second required drainfield between
the trenches of the first drainfield is prohibited.
L1 T l eC-c.\)eA
NGV 1 5 1990
11/9/90
A PETITION REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
LAKE ELMO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Dated May 30, 1990
THE AMENDMENT:
On page 30 of the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan, dated 5/30/90,
is the cities Future Land Use Map. On this map we are
requesting that the "DIP" area (please see attachment for
definition) be removed from the "RED" zoned section, that
borders the south side of Highway 36, and be put back into
an "RAD" zoning classification.
OUR REASONS:
1. "spot zoning" is illegal. The inclusion of the dip area
in the Highway 36 "RED" zone, breaks the horizontal boundary
of this section. We are concerned that not only does this
appear to be an example of spot zoning, but that its existence
may encourage other similar zoning attempts in our area.
2. A new bridge in the Stillwater area is considered by many
to be a reality. If it does happen, Highway 36 will become a
FREEWAY and access to Keats avenue may be denied. This would
cause all those living in and around the "DIP" area to find
alternative routes of exit.
3. Including the "dip" area in the Highway 36 "RED" zone,
does not seem consistent with the manner in which the other
zones were drawn. The "DIP" appears to have been included
to favor one particular landowner. None of the adjoining
landowners approve of this zoning decision.
4. Although the city tried to notify everyone affected, and
certianly exceeded its notification requirement. There was
almost "complete surprise" by the residents that live in
and around the "DIP" area, when the reality of the future land
use map decision was realized.
We are asking that you restore what we had, and change the
"DIP" area back to an "RAD" zoning classification.
11/9/90
* date *
A PETITION REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
LAKE ELMO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Dated May 30, 1990
name
address
page 2
* age
&«.- /at ,SS5t /4 4( and 5-1. > /S
a„,`0 W) •3390 '.tats a u.r S . 7 /er
4 «� -5s/5 �s' e X , 7 /
Jlu u-a..) �. ..5159s
eve g Igg?v act-, N Y3
Ire
£re've-(af % e.. sysr4ati 7 /I
y- 90
s/P.3%6 ad4-/0,: 7/b'
•
/9'-7a ;, sip3 kJ):, /8'
/mod/-9oC. .- �� - / rG, 7/
//-/4[1- /90 /Q Saa 2 ,(Q,t. men/ 7 if ./77-117�
dry l
//-/9-96 5
1/-/y-7° y L/ T6
i
itermi 49-Seel
• /
�. -Ca Seelr�rvaa ezor. 7(.
JAL' ✓ ktz n-rs at), N'o 7 /3
7/P
--7
"
r,
:7/S
S�I3i 4# ^�- ,
. 3Y3r r< 4uJ
�e iC
.i . .) J .,.t
- 1/
1N
9&90
Notice of Public Hearing
The Lake Elmo Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on
Monday, December 17, 1990 at 7:30 p.m., at City Hall, 3800 Laverne
Avenue, to consider a petition presented to the City for an amendment
to the Comprehensive Plan. Said petition requests that the property,
located in the Southeast 1/4 of Section 3, T29N, R21W, with designated
Future Land Use of RED, Rural Estates Density, be amended to a Future
Land Use of RAD, Rural Agricultural Density.
All persons who wish to speak regarding this proposed amendment to the
1990 Comprehensive Plan will be given that opportunity at this public
hearing.
Mary Kueffner
City Administrator
November 27, 1990
Published St. Croix Valley Press December 5, 1990
{
Norcott Investment Co.
Attn: Larry Lisle
5926 Bass Lake Rd.
Crystal, MN 55429
Don Richie
9393 55th St. N.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Jerry Dreis
9480 53rd St. N.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
William Horwath
9440 53rd St. N.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Richard Rengstorf
9400 53rd St. N.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Russell W. Wegwerth
9377 53rd St. N.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Rolf Schubert
5222 Keats Avenue N.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Pete & Pam Eggen
5250 Keats Avenue N.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Steve & Nancy Korhel
5540 Keats Avenue N.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Thomas Hermanson
5545 Keats Avenue N.
.Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Keith Raleigh
5435 Keats Avenue N.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
John & Helen Regenold
626 W. Cottage Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55117
David & Cynthia Sterholm
5240 Keats Avenue
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
George Dege
5193 Keats Ave. N.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Catherine Crocker
5093 Keats Ave. N.
Lake Elmo, NIIhi 55042
Mary Kane
5010 Keats Ave. N,
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Arlene Meyer
11601 Capri Dr.
Sun City, AZ 85351
Robert & Marie Meyer
5220 Keats Ave. N.
Lake ,Elmo, MN 55042
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
Meeting Date:
AGENDA TOFIC: Public Hearing (continuation) Arabian
Hills Rezoning & Preliminary Plat.
Nnvc.nhar 9f. 1 P9 _
ITEM
NO. 3.
At the request of the applicant, this application was postponed until
the Residential Estates and supporting ordinances were adopted by the
city council. This has now been done, and the applicant has asked that
the application be put back on the table.
I should point out that the city council will consider a petition from
residents in the area of this proposed R.E. development asking that
the "dip" be removed from the Future Land Use Map (as potential R.E.
development) and that it revert back to RAD. I will update you at the
table on the actions taken by the city council on November 20th.
Mike Black is in the process of reviewing this Arabian Hills revised
plan (revised to meet the standards adopted for the RE Zoning
District).
Since the city office closed on Friday, if Mike's review is not
included in this packet, it will be sent to you directly, under
separate cover.
As usual, feel free to call me if you have any questions or concerns
you would like to address prior to the meeting.
DAMES R. HILL, iNC.
PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS
f 1
i
r 9401 JAMES AVE. So., SUITE 140, 9looMItGYON, MN 55431 612/864.3029 FAX BB4.9518
MFMORAND UM
TO: Lake Elmo Planning Commission
FROM: Michael J. Black
DATE: November 20, 1990
Re: Zoning and Preliminary Plat Review
ARABIAN HILLS
Mr. Roger Kolstad, Northern Lakes Diversified, Inc., has requested
further review and a recommendation by the Planning Commission on the
rezoning and preliminary plat of Arabian Hills. A public hearing was
opened at the September 24, 1990 meeting and continued to the October 8,
1990 meeting. The applicant requested tabling again on October 8th and
on October 22nd until complete plans, as required by City Ordinance,
could be prepared and delivered to the City for further review and
consideration.
The following new exhibits/plans have been provided by the applicant:
1. Soils Overlay Map,
2. Preliminary Plat dated November 13, 1990
3. Drainage Plan.
4. Grading Plan.
5. Road Profile and Street Section.
6. Stormwater Report/Calculations.
7. Sail Borings and Percolation Tests,
REV3EW AND COMMENTS
The subject property consists of 63.92 acres and is located in the south
half of Section 3 between the temporary cul-de-sac of 53rd Street North
and Keats Avenue North. The property is designated RED Rural Estate
Density on the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The property is currently
zoned R-R Rural Residential.
The preliminary plat of Arabian Hills is in general compliance with the
RE zoning standards and later in this report, I will recommend approval
of the zoning subject to certain conditions.
The plat includes 19 single family lots, 1 outlot and park land
consisting of 4.3 acres to be dedicated to the City. The total of 19
single family lot does conform to the RE density standard of 3.33 acres
per lot. However, the maximum density allowed in the RE zone can only
be achieved if all other performance standards of the RE zoning
regulations can be met.
Lake Elmo Planning Commission
November 20, 1990
Page 2
All the lots do conform to the minimum lot area requirement of 2,5 acres
and they all have a minimum frontage of 150 feet on a public roadway.
The applicant has not clearly demonstrated compliance with the following
standards:
!'. (1) Configuration: Lots must be configured to contain a circle
with a diameter of 250 feet minimum.
C. (4) Area of R„ildinn Rica; A minimum of 1.25 acres of land
above the floodplain and free of any drainage easements.
f. (91 Sentic arainfiplrl Rpau]atiQn. All newly subdivided lots
shall have a minimum of 20,000 square feet of land to be dedicated
for septic system use and suitable for that use. This land may
comprise up to two separate areas each of which is contiguous to
the 1.25 acre building site or contained within it and each of
which contains at least 10,000 contiguous square feet.
These standards affect Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 3 in the following ways:
Lot 1, Block 3: A 250 diameter circle does not fit on this lot.
Also, it would be impossible to have a driveway without crossing
the "dedicated" 20,000 square feet drainfield area.
J.ot 2. alnnk a; The building site area is less than 1.25 acres
and the secondary drainfield area is not contiguous to the
building site.
Lot 3, Block 3: The building site area is less than 1.25 acres
and the secondary drainfield area is not contiguous to the
building site.
All other lots do meet the minimum building site and drainfield area
requirements. The applicant has not however provided additional soil
and percolation tests for the expansion of 20,000 square feet drainfield
areas on lots within severe limitations for on -site sewer systems (Lots
5 and 9, Block 1, Lot 7, Block 2 and Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 3).
ftTTLOT A At the October 8, 1990 Planning Commission meeting, it was
recommended that no outlots be allowed in a subdivision plat. It is the
intention of the applicant to deed Outlot A to the abutting property
owner to the west. I do not see a problem with this provided that
Outlot A and the adjacent property are consolidated at the County as one
parcel of land. However, I also recognize that the inclusion of an
outlot is contrary to the Planning Commission's recommendation.
Lake Elmo Planning Commission
November 20, 1990
Page 3
?ARKLAND The applicant intends to satisfy the park dedication
requirement by dedicating 4.3 acres (6.7% of 62.92 total area) parkland
to the City. It is my understanding that the City's Park Commission has
recommended the land dedication. I point out that access to the
"parkland" is different than what was originally shown. Also, most of
the "parkland" will be below the 100 year flood elevation of 957.
$TTF CRADINC Minimal grading will be done to construct 53rd Street
North and to facilitate proper site drainage. The grading plan
submitted does not include plans for erosion control or reseeding
details for all disturbed areas. Site drainage will be routed into five
ponds on the subject property. Culverts and outlet structures will be
constructed as recommended by the City Engineer.
STREET D SIGN. The plans submitted do include a proposed street section
and street grades which appear to be acceptable. The steepest grade is
slightly over 6% between Lot 6, Block 2 and Lot 5, Block 1.
The distance of surface drainage in the street to proposed storm sewer
catch basins seems to be excessive (greater than 500 feet). The City
Engineer will comment on this,
A comment was made at the public hearing that there is poor sight
distance at the proposed intersection with Keats Avenue. I drove the
area and do not agree that the intersection will be a problem.
LAIgp,SCAPINC. A site landscaping plan has not been submitted.
BF,COM!€NDAT I ON
I recommend that the Planning Commission pass a motion recommending to
the City Council approval of the rezoning from RR Rural Residential to
RE Residential Estate for the following reasons:
1. The property is designated as RED on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Plan.
2. The residential development and density of the RE zone will be
compatible with adjacent properties.
3. The RE zone will not be a negative impact on adjacent properties.
and that this recommendation be subject to:
1. The redraft of the plat of Arabian Hills so all minimum
( performance standards are complied with and,
2. The approval of the preliminary plat of Arabian Hills.
Lake Elmo Planning Commission
November 20, 1990
Page 4
I also recommend to the Planning Commission that you table action on the
preliminary plat, if the ann1irpnt requeatG that yQ: do go, in order to
reconfigure Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 3 to meet all performance standards.
This may require the elimination of a lot.
If the applicant does not request to be tables, than I recommend denial
of the preliminary plat of Arabian Hills for the following reasons:
1. Lot 1, Biock 3 does not conform to the 250 feet circle
configuration.
2. Access to Lot 1, Block 3 is not possible without crossing the
dedicated drainfield area.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
B.
Lot 2, Block 3 does not meet the minimum
1.25 acres.
Lot 2, Block 2 does not have the minimum
contiguous to the building site.
Access to Lot 2, Block 3 is not possible
dedicated drainfield area.
Lot 3, Block 3 does not meet the
1.25 acres.
Lot 3, Block 3 does not have the
contiguous to the building site.
Additional soil and percolation tests have not been provided for
the expanded 20,000 square foot drainfield areas on Lots 5 and 9,
Block 1 and Lot 7, Block 2 and Lots 1, 2, and 3, Biock 3.
building site area of
drainfield area
without crossing the
minimum building site area of
minimum drainfield area
QKW
QUENTIN K. WOOD & ASSOC. INC.
Civil Consulting Engineers
270 Sylvan Lane • Fridley, MN 55432 • (612) 574-0454
Mr. Mike Black
James R. Hill, Inc.
9401 James Ave. So
Bloomington, Mn. 55431
Re: ARABIAN HILLS, Lake Elmo
Dear Mike;
November 16, 1990
We are submitting another set of preliminary development plans
for Arabian Hills to the City of Lake Elmo. The plans follow
your recommendations of your October 18, memorandum tho the
Planning Commission.
I am requesting on behalf of the developer - Nelson Properties.
and myself, that you not require the erosion control details,
landscaping plan and other construction related details until the
development concept is approved. We will be vary happy to design
and present them for the record and for your approval as soon as
we know what the approved development plan is. We have no
argument that these items are necessary. Mr. Nelson, the
developer, would be requiring these items to protect his
investment, even if they were not required by the city and the
watershed district.
We have already compiled the preliminary general specifications
for all construction work involved and will be sending this data
to you as soon as we can relate it and modify if to the specifics
of this development.
All details of this project will be submitted to you and to Barr
Engineering when they can be generated based on an officially
approved concept development plan.
Your review was vary thorough and professional. Nice work!
Thank you for your concideration on this matter.
Sincerely,
Quentin K. Wood PE,
QUENTIN K. WOOD & ASSOCIATES INC.
CC: Nelson properties
Roger Kolstad
Caren Chandler, Barr Engineering
Larry Bohrer, TKDA
ARABIAN\CPLANNER.LTR
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
AGENDA TOPIC:
Proposed R1 Concept
Meeting Date:
November 26, 1990
ITEM
NO.
4.
Attached is a (very rough) concept for a R1 subdivision submitted by
Cliff Atkins, 2227 Lake Elmo Avenue N.
The current zoning map shows very clearly that both of Mr Atkins' lots
on Lake Elmo Ave. (0510 and 0560) are in the R1 zoning district. With
that in mind, it appears to me that the lot in back (0520) should be
connected to one of the lots in the front (it makes no difference
which one).
The Future Land Use Map shows this property to be SRD - which I'm sure
you know is R1..
Mr. Atkins is looking for direction from the Planning Commission to
proceed with this rezoning and preliminary plat.
-
w
i
—--...,.. __
i ,---'-'. fr " ------iPari-----, - - -1'--.73".
\ .4 ) P7--
1 li Lso Ac.
61.01
3 .:::::,- %....-
_r_.;
,..7'.. ...- .-r
..51.c... 2
-- 2-: • 1, ., .7 : ,L 5 "'-':
2 9n a
pz•El....7 i' r ..., ,
. e.
p — • 1 7.2 Ix
i.' --_• ':.-_ -_-Arr: ;i-iii€,V_-1,m ::::::_74 i 1 i .-4,i. -2--:;,-„,...whe. 7: •••
:I f • .1 •,•••••1•-• •11,65.5: 2
1
Al •-„,zi .r. B LO C K F1:1!
g
t-i- ;,,..., 2 1.521C., ..... -
. . 35 • 04-Li
-
••• I-1'd.; al : " G•65-5. I I' " 6. ".......7,7".-Y. T., ..., ,.....,=3. 4
rci .., ...s-
.:_4_,Irren.a.- .. ...,,
-
AlsliCAY017/2111471Z--iSC7------- —.If .
.1. / "
• .-.,.......„
, ...:
A:7 '
017 .7
- - — Isj 1. - -L-- - - - - "86:1 / r .5.•,ru-
.--. r ''
tinr.5,66 • 1
u;.4 2 4 H I ;!`"1:•7
1 1.70 AC.•
!2•Ig C/
•;,1"." """15.1,C• 1Le re
' • I rt. Xre /ter j4:7
L •
•-=-% til 6.---41gern-Ten I
> 0500 14,70,,
Eemprorr
419 0490 ad.V.A9-11%;....- •
u „
a Ja. •••
04§0
.29
v Se ,397
0450 1*Qvse-
C4N11
1 k,
•m
/01,1 cActk,7,,$.
0510
r
C520
056,0
—
)5,
0520 -
0430 60.2k- s_s • e
,
BLOCK 2 , .4,4,
, --,
.e. 1.50
'') .1 ‘r
• --,, . 0 . \
IP IP \ i
1.50 AC* O"--
. V., ...,,. ..,6,11., \ •
<51c44 el
• -.0 %,1&"5 ‘‘Ite
• '''' -SOUTH LNIE
PALK•1,0 6,061
- -r,
4})
- 1.58 AC*
fY
)::.•
‘▪ ...:.A6P
6 • .:41
d 1.55 AC* "7•4. 13
i .505 AC*
gag., N. sar.roo•27.4. ,noo:
5119.00 :15.1
Waal, 161E
PACKARO ?MU
N B9'00' 2 E
2
'•°,,:it"1",11,1.7 1.5s AC±
F-
r-`'arrr 1.51 AC±
e
0460
17 0,
3200
I 3 3
PR? Oa
0"3
N. ]
'4 V
4
1.52 A*
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
AGENDA TOPIC:
Limited Business
Meeting Date: November 26, 1990
ITEM
NO. 5.
As you know, we had a workshop with the Commission's Limited Business
subcommittee, two members of the City Council, several members of the
business community, and two City Council -elects.
The consensus from that meeting was to have Mike Black put together an
ordinance for the freeway, based on comments made at the workshop.
Mike Black's proposed draft ordinance is attached for your review.
NUV-cl- 7U ItltU lU: V7 ti); JHI't P'. HILL 1I9.- ICL I IU.OS . oo.+-=JlO
(
JAMES R. HILL, INC.
PLANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS
9401 JAMEs An. So., SuiTE 140, BEOOMINOTON, MN 55431 612/884-3029 FAX 884-9518
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Mike Black
DATE: November 20, 1990
RE: Limited Business District Standards
Attached to this memorandum is another draft of the proposed LB - Limited
Business Zoning District. This draft is the result of a meeting held at
City Hall on Saturday, November 17, 1990. Others present at the meeting
were Mayor Sue Dunn, Councilman Todd Williams, Planning Commissioners
Rita Conlin, Wyn John, Dick Johnson (Councilman -elect), and Ed Stevens,
Dave Johnson (Mayor -elect), Mary Kueffner, Kelly Brockman, Gene Peltier
and Mike Mazzara. The purpose of the meeting was to seek input for the
final draft of the LB zoning district standards.
The meeting was worthwhile because many view points were expressed as
to the type of land uses which should be allowed in the LB zone. And,
I believe the meeting ended with a positive note. However, we did at
times "wonder off" the subject of LB permitted uses and standards to
discuss the idea of serving the area with sanitary sewer and how that
future planning for sewer may change the land use regulations. In fact,
opinions were expressed that the discussion of the future sanitary sewer
to the area was not "wondering off" the subject but should bra the
subject and should be openly discussed.
The purpose of this memorandum is to suggest to you that prior to
discussion of the proposed LB zoning standards I strongly advise that
you again review the policies for Commercial Development written in the
Comprehensive Plan (pages 27 and 28). The zoning standards should be
written to carry out these policies. I also point out that on page 47
of the Comprehensive Plan and under paragraph d on that page it states:
"There are no plans to extend public sewer beyond the current MUSA
line".
The attached draft of the LB zoning regulations includes permitted,
accessory and conditional land uses. The permitted use listed are I
believe those uses which the majority feel should be allowed in the LB
zone. The list of conditional uses and especially the limited retail
land uses should be carefully considered. As drafted, it is the
intention that the limited retail land uses would be supportive to and
subordinate to the permitted land uses in the district.
It is important to be clear in our district purpose and to write precise
standards to implement that purpose.
LIMITED_ _BUSINESS ELSI'RICT
(A) Purpose
The purpose of the Limited Business District is to establish
a comprehensive planned framework for development along I-94.
The City has determined that it is in the best interest of
the City and the region to responsibly manage growth in this
district. Specific development goals within the district
include the following:
(1) To encourage a high quality development standard for
structures within the district properties, which are
among the most visible in the City.
(2) To protect the natural environment, in accordance with
City Ordinances.
(3) To limit development to comply with the capacity of
regional and local road systems.
(4) To limit development by Setting stringent requirements
for on -site sewer systems in order to avoid a pre -mature
expansion of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area line
and sanitary sewer facilities.
(5) To establish permitted, accessory and conditional uses
in order to stimulate local economic prosperity along
the interstate corridor and within the Metropolitan
Rural Service Area while closely monitoring the
magnitude of development so not to prematurely demand
the expansion of local governmental services.
(B) permitted t7Ggs Permitted uses are as follows:
(1) Clinics for human care including medical, dental,
osteopathic, chiropractic and optometric offices.
(2) Finance, insurance, real estates, and investment
offices.
(3) General offices including administrative, executive, and
corporate headquarters.
(4) Professional offices providing services such as legal,
engineering, architectual, accounting, auditing and
bookkeeping.
(5) Travel and employment agencies.
1
(C) Conditional Use_5 Conditional Uses are as follows:
(1) Banks and financial services with drive -up windows.
(2) Exterior storage yard (not allowed in front yard and
subject to screening requirements).
(3) Health clubs including tennis, racketball, aerobics,
weight lifting, swimming, weight loss clinic (all
facilities to be housed inside).
(4) Limited retail uses including:
(a) retail sales clearly accessory to the principal use
of the land such as the compounding, dispensing or
sale or drugs, prescription items, patient or
proprietary medicine, sick room supplies,
prosthetic devices or items relating to any of the
foregoing when conducted in the building occupied
primarily by medical, dental, osteopathic,
chiropractic or optometric offices.
(b) The retail sale of commodities marketed to the
local sub -regional such as:
(1) Greenhouses and nurseries, landscaping
services, flowers and floral accessories.
(2) Art sale and gallery.
(3) Furniture, home furnishings and related
equipment.
(4) Vineyard and winery produce and sale.
(5) Sporting goods, skiing, bicycles, motorcycles,
snowmobiles, boats and clothing.
(c) Other retail sales marketed toward the automobile
traffic and of a impulse nature such as gasoline
sales, convenience store and deli foods may be
allowed as part of the overall larger development
and where said use is clearly subordinate to other
permitted land uses.
(5) Full service restaurants where food is served to a
customer and consumed while seated at a counter or table
and not including fast-food service, drive -through
service or take-out orders.
2
(D) permitted Accessory (ilea
Permitted accessory uses shall include required off-street
parking, loading areas and signs as regulated in this
ordinance. Only accessory structures which are clearly
incidental and subordinate to the business will be permitted.
(E) Minimum niatrirt Rpcmirpman$-e
(1) Lot Area: 3.5 acres
(2) Minimum Lot Width: 300 feet
(3) Minimum Lot Depth: 400 feet
(4) Building setback from property lines:
(a) Front 100 feet
(b) Side 50 feet
(c) Side (street) 100 feet
(d) Rear 50 feet
(e) any line adjacent to
a residential zone 100 feet
(5) Parking setback from property lines:
(a) Front 50 feet
(b) Side 50 feet
(c) Side (Street) 50 feet
(d) Rear 50 feet
(e) any line adjacent to
a residential zone 100 feet
(6) Maximum Building Heights: 35 feet
(7) Maximum Lot Coverage by
all structures: 25%
(8) Maximum Total Lot Coverage
of all impervious surface: 50%
(9) Sewer Discharge: No sewer discharge shall exceed a
ratio of 3.0 SAC units per 3.5 acres. SAC units shall
be determined according to Section 309 h. and i.
(F) Snpria1 Diatrirt Requirements,.
Due to the high visibility of the Limited Business zone, the
following architectual, parking, landscaping, lighting and
glare standards shall be in addition to other existing
standards in the zoning code relating to the same:
3
(1) Architectural Standards
(a) It is not the intent of the City to restrict design
freedom unduly when reviewing project architecture
in connection with a site and building plan.
However, it is in the best interest of the City to
promote high standards of architectual design and
compatibility with surrounding structures and
neighborhoods. New building proposals shall
include architectual plans prepared by a registered
architect and shall show the following:
(1) Elevations of all sides of the buildings.
(2) Type and color of exterior building materials.
(3) Typical general floor plans.
(4) Dimensions of all structures.
(5) Location of trash containers and of heating,
cooling and ventilation equipment and systems.
(b) Unadorned prestressed concrete panels, concrete
block and unfinished metal shall not be permitted
as exterior materials. The City may at its sole
discretion allow architecturally enhanced block or
concrete panels.
(c) All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment
and exterior trash storage areas shall be enclosed
with materials compatible with the principal
structure.
(2) Parking
All drives and parking lots shall be constructed with
blacktop, and concrete curb and gutters. Where
appropriate, sidewalks may be required.
Parking lot landscape areas, including landscape islands
shall be reasonably distributed throughout the parking
lot area so as to break up expanses of paved areas.
(3) Landscaping
All yard areas shall either be landscaped green areas or
open and left in a natural state. Yards to be
landscaped shall be landscaped attractively with lawn,
trees, shrubs in accordance with a plan prepared by a
landscape architect. Areas left in a natural state
shall be kept free of liter, debris and noxious weeds.
Yards adjoining any residential zone shall contain a
buffer area consisting of berming, landscaping and/or
fencing for the purpose of screening noise, sight, sound
and glare. A reasonable attempt shall be made to
preserve as many existing trees as is practical and to
incorporate them into the site plan.
4
IVUV-mil- 7U WC!) 1tj.1J LL•Jr111LJ IC I11LL lit'
Where areas abut residential districts, a buffer area
of a minimum depth of 75 feet will be required. Such a
buffer area shall be completely constructed and approved
by the City prior to all final City inspections for con-
struction on site. Prior to the issuance of a building
permit or commencement of any improvements on site, the
owner shall provide the City with a financial security,
approved by the City Attorney, to assure construction of
the buffer area.
(4) Lighting and Glare
Plans for new developments shall include a lighting plan
denoting the location, type and height of lighting
fixtures and the illumination patterns shown on a site
plan. Glare whether direot or reflected, Such as from
floodlights or high temperature processes, and as
differentiated from general illumination, shall not be
visible at any property line.
5
Notice of Public Hearing
The Lake Elmo Planning Commission will hold a public Hearing on
Monday, December 17, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. at City Hall, 3800 Laverne Ave.
N. to receive public comment and pass on to the City Council a
recommendation on the proposed Limited Business (LB) Zoning district.
The proposed LB ordinance will affect property along the I-94
corridor, as defined in the 1990 Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan,
including the Future Land Use Map.
LB - Limited Business District
(A) Purpose
The purpose of the Limited Business District is to establish a
comprehensive planned framework for development along I-94.
The City has determined that it is in the best interest of the
City and the region to responsibly manage growth in this district.
It is the intent of this district to promote a high quality of
business design and development that produces a positive visual
image and minimizes adverse impacts from traffic congestion,
noise, odor, glare and similar problems. Specific development
goals within the district include the following:
(1) To encourage a high quality development standard for
structures within the district properties, which are
among the most visible in the City.
(2) To protect the natural environment, in accordance with
City Ordinances.
(3) To limit development to comply with the capacity of
regional and local road systems.
(4) To limit development by setting stringent requirements
for on -site sewer systems in order to avoid a need for
expansion of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area line
and sanitary sewer facilities.
To establish permitted, accessory and conditional uses
in order to stimulate local economic prosperity along the
interstate corridor and within the Metropolitan Rural
Service Area while closely monitoring the magnitude of
development so not to prematurely demand the expansion
of local governmental services.
(B) Permitted Uses Permitted uses are as follows:
(1) Clinics for human care including medical, dental,
osteopathic, chiropractic and optometric offices.
(5)
(2) Finance, insurance, real estates, investment offices
banks (with no drive -up windows).
(3) General offices including administrative, executive,
and corporate headquarters.
(4) Professional offices providing services such as legal,
engineering, architectural, accounting, auditing and
bookkeeping.
(5) Travel and empolyment agencies.
(C) Conditional Uses Conditional Uses are as follows:
(1) Banks and financial services with drive -up windows.
(2) Health clubs including tennis, racketball, aerobics,
weight lifting, swimming, weight loss clinics (all
facilities to be housed inside).
(3) Limited retail uses including:
(a) retail sales clearly accessory to the permitted
principal use of the land, for example: the
compounding, dispensing or sale of drugs,
prescription items, patient or proprietary
medicine, sick room supplies, prosthetic devices
or items relating to any of the foregoing when
conducted in the building occupied primarily by
medical, dental, osteopathic, chiropractic or
optometric offices.
(b) The retail sale of commodities marketed to the local
area such as:
(1) Greenhouses and nurseries, landscaping services,
flowers and floral accessories.
(2) Art sale and gallery.
(3) Furniture, home furnishings and related equipment.
(4) Vineyard and winery produce and sale.
(5) Sporting goods, skiing, bicycles, motorcycles,
snowmobiles, boats and fishing gear (all storage
restricted to inside).
(5) Full service restaurants where food is served to a customer
and consumed while seated at a counter or table.
(6) Golf courses, Club houses, Golf sales, Driving ranges.
(D) Permitted Accessory Uses
Permitted accessory uses shall include required off-street
parking, loading areas and signs as regulated in this ordinance.
Only accessory structures which are clearly incidental and
subordinate to the business will be permitted.
(E) Minimum District Requirements
(1) Lot Area: 3.5 acres
(2) Minimum Lot Width: 300 feet
(3) Minimum Lot Depth: 400 feet
(4) Building setback from property lines:
(a) Front 100 feet
(b) Side 50 feet
(c) Side (street) 100 feet
(d) Rear 50 feet
(e) any line adjacent to
a residential zone 150 feet
(5) Parking setback from property lines:
(a) Front 50 feet
(b) Side 50 feet
(c) Side (street) 50 feet
(d) Rear 50 feet
(e) any line adjacent to
a residential zone 100 feet
(6) Maximum Building Heights: 35 feet
(7) Maximum Lot Coverage by
all structures: 25%
(8) Maximum area to be covered by buildings, parking lots,
driveways and other hard surfaces:
Lot size Covered Area
Up to 4 acres 45% of lot size
Larger than 4 acres
to 8 acres 35% of lot size
Larger than 8 acres 25% of lot size
(9) Sewer Discharge: No sewer discharge shall exceed a ratio
of 3.0 SAC units per 3.5 acres. SAC units shall be
determined according to Section 309 h. and i.
(10) Minimum Building Floor Size: 4,000 square feet
(F) Special District Requirements
Due to the high visibility of the Limited Business zone, the
following architectural, parking, landscaping, lighting and glare
standards shall be in addition to other existing standards in the
zoning code relating to the same:
(1) Architectural Standards
(a) It is not the intent of the City to restrict design
freedom unduly when reviewing project architecture in
connection with a site and building plan. However, it
is in the best interest of the City to promote high
standards of architectural design and compatibility with
surrounding structures and neighborhoods. New building
proposals shall include architectural plans prepared by
a registered architect and shall show the following:
(1) Elevations of all sides of the buildings.
(2) Type and color of exterior building materials.
(3) Typical general floor plans.
(4) Dimensions of all structures.
(5) Location of trash containers and of heating,
cooling and ventilation equipment and systems.
(b) Unadorned prestressed concrete panels, concrete block
and unfinished metal shall not be permitted as exterior
materials. The City may at its sole discretion allow
architecturally enhanced block or concrete panels.
(c) All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment and
exterior trash storage areas shall be enclosed with
materials compatible with the principal structure.
(2) Parking
All drives and parking lots shall be constructed with
concrete or blacktop, and with concrete curb and gutters.
Where appropriate, sidewalks may be required.
Parking lot landscape areas, including landscape islands
shall be reasonably distributed throughout the parking lot
area so as to break up expanses of paved areas.
(3) Landscaping
All yard area shall either be landscaped green areas or open
and left in a natural state. Yards to be landscaped shall
be landscaped attractively with lawn, trees and shrubs in
accordance with a plan prepared by a landscape architect.
Areas left in a natural state shall be kept free of litter,
debris and noxious weeds. Yards adjoining any residential
zone shall contain a buffer area consisting of berming,
landscaping and/or fencing for the purpose of screening
noise, sight, sound and glare. A reasonable attempt shall
be made to preserve as many existing trees as is practical
and to incorporate them into the site plan.
Where areas abut residential districts, a buffer area of a
minimum depth of 100 feet will be required. Such a buffer
area shall be completely constructed and approved by the
City prior to all final City inspections for construction
on site. Prior to the issuance of a builing permit or
commencement of any improvements on site, the owner shall
provide the City with a financial security for a minimum of
24 months, approved by the City Attorney, to assure
construction of the buffer area.
(4) Lighting and Glare
Plans for new developments shall include a lighting plan
denoting the location, type and height of lighting fixtures
and the illumination patterns shown on a site plan. Glare
whether direct or reflected, such as from floodlights or
high temperature processes, and as differentiated from
general illumination, shall not be visible at any property
line.
(5) Traffic
No use shall be allowed unless the property owner provides a
road plan acceptable to the City, which shall demonstrate,
at a minimum, that the proposed use and resulting traffic
will not adversely affect the then existing traffic of the
City. All private roads must comply with existing City
Ordinances, with construction and maintenance being the sole
responsibility of the property owner.
All persons who wish to be heard regarding approval and adoption of
this proposed zoning district will be given that opportunity at this
public hearing. Written comments will be accepted at the City Office
until 4:30 p.m., December 17, 1990.
Mary Kueffner
City Administrator
November 28, 1990
Published St. Croix Valley Press December 5, 1990
{
Crossroads Collision Center
8910 Hudson Blvd.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Northland Co.
3500 W. 80th St.
Bloomington, MN 55431
MN/DOT
Transportation Bldg.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Steve & Muriel Kopesky
122 Puma Ln.
Mahtomedi, MN 55115
Douglas DeCoster
W. 2074 1st Bank Bldg.
332 Minnesota St.
St. Paul, MN 55101
Roy & Lucille Durow
9120 Hudson Blvd.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Timothy Montgomery & Louis Damiani
12232 Akron Ave.
Rosemount, MN 55068
William Durow
10263 Manning Ave.
Hastings, MN 55033
Gene Peltier
10376 Hudson Blvd
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
John Blomquist
Suite 700
360 N. Robert St.
St. Paul, MN 55101
Leonard & Louanne Hanson
10824 Hudson Blvd.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Bruce Peltier
220 Lake Elmo Ave.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
The Forest in Lake Elmo Partnership
4801 W. 81st Street S.
Bloomington, MN 55437
Dolan Family Partnership
Daniel & Mary Dolan
600 W. Seventh St.
St. Paul, MN 55102
Lampert Bldg.
36 S. Snelling Ave.
St. Paul, MN 55105
James Dovolis
1113 E. Franklin Ave.
Minneapolis, MN 55404
Dale Properties
4825 N. France Ave.
Minneapolis, MN 55429
Countryside Inn Motel
Delores Flatau
9730 Hudson Blvd.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Walter Ebertz
b1-0 S. McKnight Road
St. Paul, MN 55128
Federal Land Co.
3470 Washington Dr.
Eagan, MN 55122
Donald Regan
2866 White Bear Ave.
St. Paul, MN 55128
Robert & Grace O'Neal
2040 Edgecumbe Road
St. Paul, MN 55116
Jeff & Cindy Salus
275 Lake Elmo Ave.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Ray Salus
404 Lake Elmo Ave.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Trans City Inv.
2284 W. 7th St.
St. Paul, MN 55116
Jamie Olson
7715 Robe Manzel Rd
Granite Falls, WA 98252
Secure Properties
2325 S. Buttercup
Mesa, AZ 85208
Dayton Dev.
c/o DHC Property Tax Dept.
777 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, MN 55402
James & Mildred Ryan
944 Pineview Ct.
St. Paul, MN 55128
Lake Elmo Inn
3443 Lake Elmo Ave.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Lake Elmo Hardwood Lbr.
11320 Upper 33rd St.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Gisela's Interiors
3479 Lake Elmo Ave.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Savanna Designs
3511 Lake Elmo Ave.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Lake Elmo Custom Mold
3520 Laverne Ave.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
D.H. Dockendorf
P.O. Box 199
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Lake Elmo Motors
11179 N. Stillwater Blvd.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Lake Elmo Branch Library
3459 Lake Elmo Ave.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Gibbs Lumber
3687 Layton Ave.
Lake Elmo, Mn 55042
Wood Specialists
11090 N. Upper 33rd St.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Micro-Sota
3549 Lake Elmo Ave.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Lake Elmo Barber Shop
3251 Lake ELmo Ave.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Village Hair Care
3517 Lake Elmo Ave.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Salon Elite
3515 Lake Elmo Ave.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Headlines Hair Studio
3476 Lake Elmo Ave.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
4
Lake Elmo Repair
11179 N. Stillwater Blvd.
( Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Lake Elmo Oil
11127 N. Stillwater Blvd.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Hagbergs Country Market
11325 Stillwater Blvd
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Brookman Motors
11144 N. Stillwater Blvd
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Twin Points Tavern
11199 N. Stillwater Blvd.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Leslie's Floor Decor
11227 N. Stillwater Blvd
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Village Upholstery
11074 N. 35th St.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Lake Elmo Feed Mill
11123 Upper 33rd St.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Fireside Antiques
3417 Lake Elmo Ave.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
White Hat Restaurant
Attn: Ed Gorman
11011 Stillwater Blvd.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
C.A. Gerbitz
11299 N. Stillwater Blvd
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
MinnHealth PA
Lake Elmo Clinic
11240 N. Stillwater Blvd
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Lake Elmo Chiropractic Family Practice
3394 Lake Elmo Ave.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Lake Elmo Family Eye Clinic
3394 Lake Elmo Ave.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Mitchell's Fly Shop
3394 Lake Elmo Ave.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Lake Elmo Bank
11465 39th Street N.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Lake Elmo Pharmacy
11240 N. Stillwater Blvd.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Kirk Dahl, D.D.S.
11325 N. Stillwater Blvd.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Jennifer Tschumper
Stillwater Area Chamber of Commerce
c/o Lake Elmo Business Assoc.
Birck Alley Bldg.
423 S. Main Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
FOR NOV. 12, 1990 HAS BEEN CANCELLED
DUE TO VETERAN'S DAY.