Laserfiche WebLink
One way to decrease the total impervious surface area for Alternate 4 would be to swing the <br />sidewalk out from the back of the curb for a distance of at least 200'. This would eliminate 1500 <br />SF of impervious surface (200'x7.5'), which would result in a stormwater permit not being re- <br />quired. The resultant sidewalk adjacent to a 5' vegetative boulevard would not count towards <br />the total impervious area. <br />A 7.5' wide sidewalk with a 5' boulevard can be constructed between stations 3+40 and 5+40 <br />without the need for any retaining walls or temporary easements from the property owner <br />(Brandychase). This would bring the total project impervious area just below the 10,000 SF <br />threshold. <br />The City Engineer recommends bringing the project under 10,000 square feet of impervious surface <br />to avoid the need for a watershed district stormwater permit. A five foot grassy boulevard would be <br />constructed for approximately 200 feet on the Brandychase block. This is possible to do without <br />Brandychase's consent to a temporary construction easement agreement. The City Engineer doesn't <br />expect the change to make a difference in the price and may even lower the overall cost as there <br />would be less concrete through the area in question. They are confirming this with Concrete Ideas <br />and I should know by the meeting. <br />The alternative would be to try to convince the watershed district that their rules don't literally say <br />what they are requiring of the City. They may not be swayed by this logic and debating with them <br />may slow down the project or push construction to next year. In the end this isn't a big change but I <br />wanted to run it by the Council. The grassy area will also provide space for signage, some area for <br />snow storage, and space for a City monument/sign in the future. Let me know what you think. <br />