Laserfiche WebLink
channels <br />no information about upcoming programs on the CTV channels. <br />8. Drawing upon Talmey-Drake's misleading interpretation of its survey results, <br />Comcast proposes tosignificantlyreduce thenumber of access <br />in the NSCC franchise area (saying that this "strengthens" them). Actually, a <br />,/_fir•• pluralityof - -surveyrespondents•:thatComcast should <br />-the current numberofcommunity <br />more) -- as • <br />compared •• • • • who • to back • <br />of the r - -surveyrespondentssupporteda reduction• <br />community access channels as proposed by Comcast.1 <br />9. Talmey-Drake repeatedly asserts r! responses <br />• • <br />its survey questions show <br />that cable subscribers are not inclined to support local programming financially. <br />However, Talmey-Drake's questions imply (or state outright) that customers <br />must pay all of Comcast's PEG access -related costs, since that is allowed by <br />federal law. It should be •ted that just because the federal allows to • • <br />something, this does not mean that it must be done. <br />10. I m - - carefully words description of various• of programming <br />attemptsservices, as it to i(measure" the importance of receiving these services <br />in high-definition (HD). A purposely -vague and boring definition of community <br />access programming <br />•r•, included, <br />• r i only one <br />example: <br />. , e _ 1 <br />responses lead Talmey-Drake to conclude that having the community access <br />L <br />nnels offered in HD is the "least important." A follow-up question regardingthe acceptable amount to pay for these channels in HD is also very misleading, <br />since it implies r <br />t HD channels are purchased on a per -channel basis. <br />1. Finally, <br />community- programming <br />n <br />statementoption with this loaded wording: your local government <br />require the <br />cable company to set aside additional capacity so that you can also watch past <br />meetings of your local city govemment ... " The bias is compounded with a <br />mean fewer channels will be available for watching other types of regular, non - <br />access cable programming or movies On Demand...." This is simply not true. <br />The Talmey-Drake critique also dismisses the legitimacy of the contributions from <br />those who participated in the other community needs ascertainment activities that TBG <br />conducted (five focus groups, an on-line survey of area residents, and small group <br />interviews with PEG access and I -Net stakeholders). A variety of methods were used to <br />invite the public to participate in these activities, <br />residents and stakeholders, press releases to area media outlets, flyers posted at locations <br />throughout the franchise area, and newspaper advertisements. <br />1 Talmey-Drake only asked a question about the desired number of community access channels, willfully <br />deciding not to ask a question about the desired number of channels dedicated to any other type of <br />programming (e.g., sports programming, which currently occupies 44 channels on Comcast's line-up). <br />