The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05/28/2019LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 7:30 P.M. TUESDAY, MAY 28, 2019 LAUDERDALE CITY HALL, 1891 WALNUT STREET The City Council is meeting as a legislative body to conduct the business of the City according to Robert's Rules of Order and the Standing Rules of Order and Business of the City Council. Unless so ordered by the Mayor, citizen participation is limited to the times indicated and always within the prescribed rules of conduct for public input at meetings. I. CALL TO ORDER THE LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVALS a. Agenda b. Minutes of the May 14, 2019 City Council Meeting c. Claims Totaling $21,364.21 4. CONSENT a. April Financial Report b. Lauderdale Community Park Reservation Application c. Recreation Agreement with City of Falcon Heights d. Resolution No. 052819A Assigning House Number to 1703 Eustis Street 5. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS/RECOGNITIONS/PROCLAMATIONS 6. INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS / REPORTS a. Annual Recycling Program Update by Eureka! Recycling b. 2019 Infrastructure Improvement Project Update c. City Council Updates 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public hearings are conducted so that the public affected by a proposal may have input into the decision. During hearings all affected residents will be given an opportunity to speak pursuant to the Robert's Rules of Order and the standing rules of order and business of the City Council. 8. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM a. Discussion of Real Estate Equities Planned Unit Development Application Public Hearing Comments 9. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 10. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 11. SET AGENDA FOR NEXT MEETING a. Post Issuance Compliance Policy Update 12. WORK SESSION a. Opportunity for the Public to Address the City Council Any member of the public may speak at this time on any item not on the agenda. In consideration for the public attending the meeting, this portion of the meeting will be limited to fifteen (15) minutes. Individuals are requested to limit their comments to four (4) minutes or less. If the majority of the Council determines that additional time on a specific issue is warranted, then discussion on that issue shall be continued at the end of the agenda. Before addressing the City Council, members of the public are asked to step up to the microphone, give their name, address, and state the subject to be discussed. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to any member thereof. No person other than members of the Council and the person having the floor shall be permitted to enter any discussion without permission of the presiding officer. Your participation, as prescribed by the Robert's Rules of Order and the standing rules of order and business of the City Council, is welcomed and your cooperation is greatly appreciated. b. Community Park Parking Concerns with Affected Neighbors c. Community Development Update 13. ADJOURNMENT LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Lauderdale City Hall 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 Page 1 of 6 May 14, 2019 Call to Order Mayor Gaasch called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. Roll Call Councilors present: Roxanne Grove, Andi Moffatt, Jeff Dains, Kelly Dolphin, and Mayor Mary Gaasch. Councilors absent: None. Staff present: Heather Butkowski, City Administrator and Jim Bownik, Assistant to the City Administrator. Approvals Mayor Gaasch asked if there were any additions to the meeting agenda. There being none, Councilor Dains moved and seconded by Councilor Grove to approve the agenda. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Gaasch asked if there were any corrections to the meeting minutes. There being none, Councilor Mofatt moved and seconded by Councilor Dolphin to approve the minutes of the April 23, 2019 city council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Gaasch asked if there were any questions on the claims. There being none, Councilor Dains moved and seconded by Councilor Grove to approve the claims totaling $101,951.16. Motion carried unanimously. Consent Councilor Moffatt moved and seconded by Councilor Dains to approve the Consent Agenda thereby acknowledging the First Quarter Investment Report and approving the Performance Agreement with Dawn Tanner and Adam Granger. Informational Presentations/Reports A. City Council Updates Assistant to the City Administrator Bownik gave an update on the city wide garage sale taking place on May 18. Administrator Butkowski gave an update on the Eustis Street and Roselawn Avenue construction project. Councilor Dains stated that he was appointed to the Metropolitan Council Transportation Accessibility Committee. He will be working with mass transit to provide services to those with disabilities. Mayor Gaasch added that she heard a presentation by the Red Cross at the Regional Council of Mayors meeting. Among their breadth of services is in-home smoke alarm inspections and installations. LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Lauderdale City Hall 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 Page 2 of 6 May 14, 2019 Public Hearings A. Real Estate Equities Planned Unit Development Application Staff determined that Real Estate Equities' (REE) Development Stage Planned Unit Development (PUD) application was complete. Thereafter, notice of the public hearing was published in the Roseville Review and mailed to neighboring property owners. The purpose of the public hearing was to take feedback from the community on the proposal. Mayor Gaasch provided an overview of the City's reasons for purchasing 1795 Eustis Street and the goal to redevelop the site into a community asset. Jennifer Haskamp of Swanson Haskamp Consulting, Stacie Kvilvang, of Ehlers and Associates, and Patrick Ostrom of Real Estate Equities addressed the Council and community to provide an overview of the land use entitlement process, a financial overview, and a project description before opening the public hearing. Mayor Gaasch opened the floor to anyone in attendance that wanted to speak on the issue. Daniel Sherman, 1808 Eustis Street, expressed concern that the proposed building would cast a shadow over the solar panels at 1801 Eustis Street. Bev Powell, 1819 Eustis Street, stated that she likes the idea of senior housing but does not like the size of the project due to traffic concerns and the loss of the oak trees. Lezlie Antoncich, 1806 Walnut Street, asked how the pedestrian entry and drop off areas on Spring Street would be constructed. She was informed this was just going to be a door, not a drop off area. She was glad the project would not cost the city tax payers. Monika Davis, 1791 Malvern Street, explained why she believes the building proposal is too big for the given space. She also asked questions about the construction process and sent her comments via email to staff. Kimberly Stuart, 1783 Malvern Street, stated that she believes the proposed building is too large for the space provided. Grace Dyrud, 1767 Malvern Street, believes that the proposed building is too big for the community and puts the surrounding property owners at a disadvantage. Josh Houser, 1778 Eustis Street, stated that the project will add too much traffic congestion to the area. He also is concerned about environmental aspects of the building proposal and questioned the amount of affordable housing being created in Lauderdale. LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Lauderdale City Hall 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 Page 3 of 6 May 14, 2019 Heather Brian, 1778 Eustis Street, explained her concerns about the size of the project and how it will impact multiple aspects of the community including on -street parking if the apartment residents don't pay for the underground parking. Raymond Shogren, 1763 Carl Street, stated his concerns over the asbestos issues that could arise from the demolition of the current building. Victor Cruz, 1765 Eustis Street, expressed his concerns over how he could continue to access his garage if the Malvern Street alley was vacated. He was informed the development agreement would require access to the alley via Eustis Street. John Murray, 1750 Eustis Street, wanted to know how far back the new building would be from the street. He questioned the Council's decision to purchase the building. Steve Merrill, 1794 Eustis Street, believed that the height of the building would affect the value of his property. He expressed concerns about losing the character of the City. Glen Grindahl, 1847 Eustis, inquired about the zoning restrictions regarding senior housing and if that could be changed down the line. Haskamp responded that the length of the senior housing designation would be in the development agreement and could not be changed. Chris Chookiatsirichai, Minneapolis resident, believes that the size of the structure is too big and would destroy the character of Lauderdale. Mayor Gaasch closed the public hearing at 9:25 p.m. She called for a five minute recess. The meeting resumed at 9:33 p.m. Discussion/Action Items A. Resolution No. 051419A Providing for the Sale of $1,000,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds for the 2019 Improvement Project Stacie Kvilvang of Ehlers was at the meeting to discuss bonding for the portion of the 2019 Infrastructure Improvement Project not covered by Ramsey County or St. Paul Regional Water. The bond includes borrowing for the portion of the project that is being paid by adjacent homeowners via special assessments as the City will receive that money incrementally over the ten-year repayment period. The information put together by Ehlers details the anticipated debt service schedule and interest rate based upon the City's AA bond rating. Those numbers may fluctuate based on the outcome of the sale and any rate changes that happen in the market before the sale happens. The financial LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Lauderdale City Hall 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 Page 4 of 6 May 14, 2019 modeling showed the anticipated interest rate that would be charged to property owners that do not prepay their special assessments. In order to proceed with a bond sale, the City Council must pass the resolution allowing Ehlers to advertise the bond sale and bring back the results to the June 11 city council meeting for final consideration. Councilor Moffatt made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 051419A—A Resolution Providing for the Sale of the $1,000,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2019A. The motion was seconded by Councilor Dolphin and carried unanimously. B. Resolution No. 051419B Restricting Parking during the 2019 Infrastructure Improvement Project Butkowski said parking restrictions will be needed during the 2019 infrastructure improvement project. The proposed resolution prohibited parking on Eustis Street and provided the city engineer with the authority to establish no parking zones as necessary to complete the infrastructure improvement project. Vehicles, trailers, dumpsters, etc. in the prohibited areas will be ticketed and towed as necessary to prevent delays in the construction process. Councilor Dolphin made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 051419B—A Resolution Restricting Parking during the 2019 Infrastructure Improvement Project. The motion was seconded by Councilor Moffatt and carried unanimously. C. Petition and Waiver Agreements for the Installation of Sanitary Sewer Service Lines and Water Service Lines during the 2019 Infrastructure Improvement Project Butkowski said property owners along Eustis Street have inquired about replacing sanitary sewer and water services in the right-of-way as part of the 2019 Infrastructure Improvement Project. This is possible with the consent of the City Council and agreement by the property owners to pay for the costs of the service. Property owners will have the option to reimburse the City for the cost by November 1, 2019 or have the costs spread out over a term of years subject to a six percent interest rate. In addition to approving this agreement, staff asked the Council to authorize the mayor and clerk to sign future agreements. Councilor Mofatt made a motion to approve the Petition and Waiver Agreement as presented and authorize the mayor and clerk to sign future agreements. This was seconded by Councilor Grove and carried unanimously. D. Resolution No. 051419C Accepting Donations for Improvements to the Lauderdale Dog Park Dog Park users have noted that the drainage system installed in and around the Dog Park is working and they would like to reestablish wood chips in the area that doesn't grow grass due to heavy use. They previously raised money for wood chips but the vendor donated the chips so LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Lauderdale City Hall 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 Page 5 of 6 May 14, 2019 that money remains available. By approving the resolution, the Council is permitting the delivery of wood chips to be paid by the donations received. Other users would like to donate the money to purchase a screen like the one attached to the memo. They proposed installing it on the north side of the fence from the east side of the gate to the corner. They believe the screen would minimize noise. Due to the late hour, the Council decided to move the dog park screen conversation to a later date. Councilor Dolphin made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 051419C A Resolution Accepting Donations for Improvements to the Lauderdale Dog Park. This was seconded by Councilor Dains and carried unanimously. Set Agenda for Next Meeting Administrator Butkowski stated that the May 28 council meeting may include the Annual Recycling Program Update by Eureka! Recycling and the Post Issuance Compliance Policy Update. Work Session A. Opportunity for the Public to Address the City Council Mayor Gaasch opened the floor to anyone in attendance that wanted to address the Council at 9:46 p.m. Josh Houser, 1778 Eustis Street, wanted to know how the general obligation bonds work. He also wondered when the no parking signs were going to be put up. Sherry Mills, 1856 Malvern Street, expressed that she does not want the alley. She is concerned about her plants, trees, and loss of privacy. John Holsinger, 1856 Malvern Street, stated that he is concerned about loss of privacy and an increase in crime from extending the alley. Craig Zbacnik, 1837 Eustis Street, expressed that he does not want the alley and has support of the majority of his neighbors. He presented the Council with petitions from affected neighbors asking for an alley vacation. Glen Grindahl, 1847 Eustis Street, stated that he does not support the alley improvements. He is concerned with crime and the costs associated with extending it. LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Lauderdale City Hall 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 Page 6 of 6 May 14, 2019 Artis Black, 1848 Malvern Street, echoed many of the same sentiments as the previous speakers. She is not in favor of improving the alleyway. B. Community Event Planning This is a follow-up to the April 23 city council meeting regarding setting a date for Day in the Park. Assistant to the City Administrator Bownik met with the Day in the Park Planning Committee on May 13. They determined it was best to move the event to July and avoid a scheduling conflict with band and orchestra students of various grades. Mayor Gaasch stated that she was one of the affected orchestra parents and really wants to be in attendance in order to speak to community members about the various projects going on right now. The Council decided to move Day in the Park to July 18 and extend the event by 1 hour. C. Community Development Update Butkowski mentioned the City received the completed DNR Natural Heritage Review. The Comp Plan is ready for resubmittal except the sewer portion as the Metropolitan Council has been unresponsive to the city engineer. The developers of Luther Seminary's land will be presenting at the St. Anthony Park Council meeting in July. Adjournment Councilor Grove moved and seconded by Councilor Mofatt to adjourn the meeting at 10:10 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, *tLeWt Miles Cline Deputy City Clerk CITY OF LAUDERDALE LAUDERDALE CITY HALL 1891 WALNUT STREET LAUDERDALE, MN 55113 651-792-7650 651-631-2066 FAX Request for Council Action To: Mayor and City Council From: City Administrator Meeting Date: May 28, 2019 Subject: List of Claims The claims totaling $21,364.21 are provided for City Council review and approval that includes check numbers 26414 to 26430. Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date User: Printed: MILES.CLINE 5/24/2019 2:38 PM Check No Vendor No Invoice No Vendor Name Description Check Date Reference Check Amount ACH 43 Public Employees Retirement Association PR Batch 51000.05.2019 PERA Coordinated PR Batch 51000.05.2019 PERA Coordinated 05/17/2019 PR Batch 51000.05.2019 PER PR Batch 51000.05.2019 PER Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 43: ACH 44 Minnesota Department of Revenue PR Batch 51000.05.2019 State Income Tax ACH 45 ACH 46 26414 34 26415 65 16136772 26416 15 58862 26417 2 1N34463 26418 25 05/17/2019 PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Stat( Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 44: ICMA Retirement Corporation PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Deferred Comp PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Deferred Comp 05/17/2019 PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Defi PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Defi Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 45: Internal Revenue Service 05/17/2019 PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Medicare Employer Po PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Mec PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Federal Income Tax PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Fed( PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Medicare Employee Pc PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Mec PR Batch 51000.05.2019 FICA Employer Portio: PR Batch 51000.05.2019 FIC. PR Batch 51000.05.2019 FICA Employee Portio PR Batch 51000.05.2019 FIC. Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 46: Total for 5/17/2019: AFSCME MN Council 5 05/28/2019 PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Union Dues PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Uni( Allstream Inc. Fax Line Total for Check Number 26414: 05/28/2019 Total for Check Number 26415: Be There Pest Control LLC 05/28/2019 Quarterly Pest Control City of St Paul Street Light Repair Total for Check Number 26416: 05/28/2019 Total for Check Number 26417: County of Ramsey 05/28/2019 PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Short Term Disability PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Ship] 977.21 1,127.54 2,104.75 651.45 651.45 1,638.63 1,008.18 2,646.81 256.56 1,477.38 256.56 1,096.95 1,096.95 4,184.40 9,587.41 204.64 204.64 51.61 51.61 100.00 100.00 23.38 23.38 61.76 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (5/24/2019 2:38 PM) Page 1 Check No Vendor No Invoice No Vendor Name Description Check Date Reference Check A►nount RISK -001986 PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Long Term Disability PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Lon. PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Life Insurance PR Batch 51000.05.2019 Life Insurance Processing Fee 88.99 303.53 25.00 Total for Check Number 26418: 479.28 26419 19 Ehlers and Associates Inc 05/28/2019 80085 1795 Eustis Redevelopment 516.25 Total for Check Number 26419: 516.25 26420 134 Katrina Joseph 05/28/2019 0088 April Legal Services 925.00 26421 31 Kennedy & Graven Chartered 148382 April Legal Services 148382 TIF District 1-2 Total for Check Number 26420: 925.00 05/28/2019 1,094.50 550.00 Total for Check Number 26421: 1,644.50 26422 28 Mike McPhillips Inc 05/28/2019 50076 Street Sweeping 4,050.00 Total for Check Number 26422: 4,050.00 26423 12 North Suburban Access Corporation 05/28/2019 2019-060 April Webstreaming & Archiving 271.57 26424 10 0000756879 26425 5 Total for Check Number 26423: 271.57 On Site Sanitation Inc 05/28/2019 05/18/2019 - 06/14/2019 Park Portable Restroon 237.62 Total for Check Number 26424: 237.62 Premium Waters Inc 05/28/2019 619861-04-19 April Water Bottles 41.41 Total for Check Number 26425: 41.41 26426 240 Rocks Dirt Mulch and More Inc O5/28/2019 126056 Dog Park Mulch 625.00 Total for Check Number 26426: 625.00 26427 162 Swanson Haskamp Consulting, LLC 05/28/2019 765 Eustis Redevelopment 687.75 766 Comprehensive Plan Pay 19 917.00 767 General Planning Services 229.25 Total for Check Number 26427: 1,834.00 26428 165 Dawn Tanner 05/28/2019 052019 Fanners Market Music 200.00 26429 7 8237871-0500-1 Total for Check Number 26428: 200.00 Waste Management Inc 05/28/2019 City Hall Refuse 207.66 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (5/24/2019 2:38 PM) Page 2 Check No Vendor No Invoice No Vendor Name Description Check Date Reference Check Amount 26430 74 Xcel Energy 637035399 1917 Walnut Street 637035399 1917 Walnut Street 637035399 1885 Fulham Street 637035399 1885 Fulham Street 637037117 1891 Walnut Street 637037117 1891 Walnut Street Total for Check Number 26429: 207.66 05/28/2019 31.24 47.13 32.23 13.74 144.64 95.90 Total for Check Number 26430: 364.88 Total for 5/28/2019: 11,776.80 Report Total (21 checks): 21,364.21 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (5/24/2019 2:38 PM) Page 3 LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent X Public Hearing Discussion Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date May 28, 2019 ITEM NUMBER April Financial Report STAFF INITIAL APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Every month, staff provide the Council with an updated copy of the city's finances. Follow- ing are the revenue, expense, and cash balance reports for April 2019. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: By approving the consent agenda, the Council acknowledges the city's financial report for April 2019. General Ledger Cash Balances User: heather.butkowski Printed: 5/20/2019 3:57:37 PM Period 04 - 04 Fiscal Year 2019 Description Account Cash l01-00000-000-10100 Change Fund 101-00000-000-10300 Cash 226-00000-000-10100 Cash 227-00000-000-10100 Cash 305-00000-000-10100 Cash 401-00000-000-10100 Cash 403-00000-000-10100 Cash 404-00000-000-10100 Cash 414-00000-000-10100 Cash 416-00000-000-10100 Cash 602-00000-000-10100 Cash 603-00000-000-10100 Current Assets Petty Cash Petty Cash 101-00000-000-10200 Investments - Fair Value101-00000-000-10410 Adj Investments Grand Total Beg Bal -3,412,034.49 100.00 12,928.82 90,152.99 38,171.87 123,582.76 1,238,738.16 272,327.81 259,807.89 94,995.42 983,167.29 395,383.17 97,321.69 300.00 300.00 3,851,397.19 3,851,397.19 3,949,018.88 MTD Debit MTD Credit Current Balance 233,787.44 139,111.07 0.00 0.00 4,485.85 957.52 200.46 4,975.05 89.83 0.00 290.84 0.00 2,760.88 65,607.61 640.90 0.00 607.78 1,556.04 221.80 750.00 13,764,73 18,935.09 3,325.23 4,705.98 260,175.74 236,598.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,854.05 210,000.00 8,854.05 210,000.00 269,029.79 446,598.36 -3,317,358.12 100.00 16,457.15 85,378.40 38,261.70 123,873.60 1,175,891.43 272,968.71 258,859.63 94,467.22 977,996.93 394,002.42 120,899.07 300.00 300.00 3,650,251.24 3,650,251.24 3,771,450.31 GL - Cash Balances (05/20/2019 - 03:57 PM) Page 1 00 YTD Balance General Fund O MC t t- \D OI VD d'NOOI V) O ON CD ,t Ncn p r in CD p o 0 00000 "M Vii 0 N M c n M 0 p M O v-) CD 00N p 4 fid- CN o O 00 00 CCO00. '4 CD p M In hC p h V) O4O - Dn 0O O 00 O0000O 0 4 00 CA fl) 000lnco vD 00 CT oo p<71 O 00 O QA 00 V) 00 M CO c07-1 VD 00 �) Vim') ' M c) CN Cs- ,--i VD CD 0 d' ti O v) ON 00-+ (DI 00 v) VD * O CI N vD 0 ON 0 �-, V) O p b 4 V) N O p N p 0.-1 Q") 000000 p O. 000N 00 C 141 4 M GO O ,--� 0D l� D\ 00 ,-. 0D 0 O N .-+ ChM v -i h 00 0O --+ ,-+ Cr) N 7 O M71. OO O 0DO O d, CD DO O 4 0 4 0 t CC M M M -+ p ,--r Cc O M e�-.1 0D p 0 N4CA p N O C O M O 00 CN CC 0-00 V) 0G N co -i O - - O C C C C C p o O C C C p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 pO O O O O O cc., rr00000d c 0-66 o O- W co co,, O O V) 00 d' M O r O � C M dO - o o 00 CC* N 00 M 00 V) 7 M O) V' u, a) 0) 0 U 0 L) a N U a) 0) P. ani ani c 1.-1O w CUN U U y a) W b C aJa) N 4) y NA n y O� P. N •• N 0) ) AU N 04 C4 E. I�Uw oC4 44P,v)000 W General Fund 0 0 Pa GL - Revenue vs Expense (05/20/2019 - 03:59 PM) oN cl a.) O 0) a si N M O N U d cd oca Lw U Account Number C cr) cn VD 0 ,1-i 00 N OM O 'pct O ONO N M O O M M tV O b O h O b6 co CN 00 co In CT •Itt Vl O H 00 In N »° 00 O 0 1Nn M cn tea' 00 S O 0 tN/) d: •cr o 0 0 o p 0 000 0 0 000 0 o CT o 0 N Go M M 0 0 N 00 00 H v, a) bs-�q, N0 0 .r', 0) U 0) i '4 0 o N 0 4E upa) u ° Z ` p m ti vvi 0 y " °� 0) 6.) 0" 0 a) U UN Q. N ... (3.o ()gH g Wp.,cnOU W U GL - Revenue vs Expense (05/20/2019 - 03:59 PM) a ▪ W o M r~ �� o AC .,.4YN<73 0 1-. z .co >" p a) 2o o 1,-- el Qp P4 N0aawc 01 U YTD Balance Current Period 'LS Pat .� U CD I O N O 0 O 3 CD p O r4 O O N O I N O O p N MCD O OM p Y 0000 O O O M 00 an \Q N LO VO'Or- pI CD 'rt. C '• fid' O Cr/ O M In ON tn 1,11 Ci - vi O p \D O O O d' ee O O` O O O NOl� O ON 0- C ous Revenue O O O )Uri et O Cr t- t - CN O 0 0 0 p O 1 CD O O \O O O O 7 3 V M 00C M N N 00 H Q\ Lf1 N M \O GL - Revenue vs Expense (05/20/2019 - 03:59 PM) 0) U M O I M .--i `O p c NO Current Period •.r O O 000 O 00 N 00 00 M r-1 00 V) 00 O O H e -i M00 00 00 00 YN O, ON H H CO 0 00 of o CO CO p 00 p O 00 CO00O 0 0 00 C 00 g 0 N � (Iy F N U y a A C.7 g 0 00 d V 3c,; -;' (y .O ON p ❑ Q o N y N z C 't1 O 'b M M U O O 00 0.0 0 U 0 M O 4) U .; O 0 g1 W Q W GO TIF Revenue Bonds 2018A GL - Revenue vs Expense (05/20/2019 - 03:59 PM) YTD Balance Current Period \ _ } \ @/@) 6 \// apa H caa \ \ m \ @ S @ 7 2 00 0 W / .\ k \ F % / / 7 / I 7 5 / / @ 7 apa p a36 d / > N t- 57/) 7 55c @ 3 ci e 3a3 £ & CN A A @ \ @ /1 @ @ 0 Q©d © © \ \ \ © 60 4 E © \ ( 1 . >Ao g w \( \ a \/0 Q a ()\ / cd © p/.e ��/) 7)Eg\ ) m\g/ § m/§a2 ( &gig & r o ■ ]3/3 f General Capital Projects GL - Revenue vs Expense (05/20/2019 - 03:59 PM) Cl O O O N &1 kr) 0 a)o • 5.,bb� • 'G' ..'f4 v M M YTD Balance Current Period ii ti z O 4 0I 0 0 O en O N O N O p O O M p l M ‘.O O I 0 M O 0 p \D M p M l: O 0 O O O p O NON [� N M M V� N N O O O O h e -ti CD O 0 0 \q en 0 M en O O O O O O O ON [� L M M V� [� N N N d O O O O 00 p 00 v:)p O oo O 0 O 0 O vz N N Ln 1n el 40 0 b O O O p O O O 00 p OO O p O C O O O N 0 G cn U O a) a) 0 I. .-a4 a) O 0.4a) V) ytr4 au C C..3 .0 cz a) C.) 0 G a) C 0J 0i y rn 04 4 0 d a U. a) dO N aa) a4) ti 0 LO O a ww Street Capital Projects GL - Revenue vs Expense (05/20/2019 - 03:59 PM) Current Period \ count Number \ 0) \ ® CD 0 CD ON�� - 3 3 9 \ /� $ 5 1.0 @| § & , 3 w 3 E 3 w « \ / \ N G @ 111 % 2 01 0| l".1 4 2� §®� Q / x w \ s - cc + QD @ 7 3c a 666 e = 7 3 3 @/| @ 000 © @ GO \ d k \6 k k s a 0 a 4 ✓ n / % / 0 j( ƒ /% y A.( 2 g ., ct ©\\ \C4 u §=4 ) \/%/ ; j \\\ / W7/o. \ f Park Capital Projects GL - Revenue vs Expense (05/20/2019 - 03:59 PM) U O p l O O O O U Q O pO p O O U O p I O p O O O p O p O O Account Numb Rosehill Tax Increment C> p l pp O l O O O p O p O © p p l O p l O O O O O p © © O p O O O O p O p O O Rosehill Tax Increment GL - Revenue vs Expense (05/20/2019 - 03:59 PM) U 0) 7.1 cts YTD Balance Current Period O CO N p N M 00 O rp r 01 VD l a' OO I M O� 60 N cei r O 7 M d., rF 00 co GO O\ M .-. e-1 e-1 h) OO I N O OO I H N O N O - — P r I r O p l O N O O O O vz 7 �O �O Lel 111 O� O OI O O O O p O O OO O O - p N N ti N ct CU 0 WO G ti .4 a) a U 0 1x 01) cz �+ 0) ai 0 c3 > v' 0. �"�1.4O I. VD oG 0 a U N U Ny aJ,4., k� k y Pi, A g 0 g W O O W A CN an M c. CT 0) No N c s O N 0 •U U U D' 'C o .� rt rt GL - Revenue vs Expense (05/20/2019 - 03:59 PM) U O O O O p I O O O p O O O O U 0 o10 0 p I 0 0 O O o O O O o Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aS Current Period • CD p) 0 pI o 0 O O O O p O O p p I O O p O O O O O O O O O O p O O p O O O p O O p O O ti bA EU CU c4 a) O o > v • bD ct d N 7:1 6) Uct p U C O-(.1, 'g va Cl 0 V y N y t> •a-+ at y 0 C4 WOU W '=• g Housing Redevelopment Lr' 3 m O O O 1) a) C N • N Utf) 11-1 a Q v GL - Revenue vs Expense (05/20/2019 - 03:59 PM) U @3| 2 /5cD 7 3/0 / 333 £ § 8 \\@ @ @@@ @ 6 023% V / § YTD Balance Current Period / \ ; TIF District No. 1-2 /%/ @@@ 0 0 fir) \ < w > 50 \ 0 0 @| 0 0 a-3 £33 3 co Q § & N 7 \\\ @ 0c) 0 @ 0od e cod 3 3 % & & cn cn \ (( / \ 0 \ 0 ') ) ƒ / /( .( \ /(5\ /, mg/ \tI« /gHO g ]33 / TIF District No. 1-2 GL - Revenue vs Expense (05/20/2019 - 03:59 PM) YTD Balance Current Period 0) U E z z Ci O U U O N S pl N N N 0 p 0 0 Q O M N N (4)O 00 O N V, p 1 00 c) 'c- N O O O‘ .--1 O <t 'cf. O 00 cc1 Cr) N O p 00 O O D M p N: 6 6 6 p [� 00 00 dO' 1V‘,0 p ; O, M r M c. (- O\ �D N - NN O 00 d' OI N N 00000 OI' -1 1-1 O Vi 147 O .--I ,D 02) C --O p - O 0t 0 O M 0 0000 t 0 0 000 d' O l!1 O .-. O M 1-1 .OV N N 400 0O 00 0, N 00 00 O N d' OI .-1 N VD d'O 0 0 0 N p M M00 O p O 0 p 00 O 00 O O p 1.0 V1 N 00 V1 -4 N M V1 m .-. 1--I .-. O O O D\ 00 00 O O O O O O O O epi 0 06 6 000 v, •C+1G0N in. Vi N a rn N O hl N 0 0) a) 0) by y 0 (-) c h t O O ai .O y C� 'G ).i O ti �i lob O ct CI) N N .n 0 O>. v� 0> � v) a • V it •U 6J �czt O O U N 6) NL�CCCO g) 730 L+ Oo o— /]c v)GGoEIU O 4 44acn000 W Sanitary Sewer ct GL - Revenue vs Expense (05/20/2019 - 03:59 PM) ++ CD N t/l O 'tet D\ M O p l N CD d'M p V) N0000 O t 'c7 C3 4 1 O 00 Cr 06 1 0 O N fir!) O O Ln O p I V) t` et VD O O C.) OOd' O V' OMOO O Cr" O O\ t O K) vi O 00 0 p CC O\ in V) N,, M O O l� O GO O O p 1 N N t N v p YTD Balance Current Period Account Numb N rri 00 CD p• pl un tt/ C\VD�0 O) M N CD to O O CNet O 'fid' vD0000-0 OCD N 1 -- or) M V 00 VD „ CT 00 O\ N N 00 tei M N N M „ N CD p N 0000000 p 'e r O v• O N p .1. M 00 MO O N 0000 rt CN M VD r M N M d' et ti O O O O O O O O O p pCN0 O OT d' O O0 O ci p v, sO 00 N ,. O p OM. .~ti rri 1v O 0 O a O N 0) O cn 00 I-' .O 0.4 N • ; a U • C4 0.0 N 0) 0)) d) N1. C '0 . C U H U — O N (U C/) y y0A bA U N d d 0 ^� 18 .� N 0)) 1.... N ,O' d 'iC N a y c� y a cnC�U0 04 WP vn000 W Storm Water GL - Revenue vs Expense (05/20/2019 - 03:59 PM) rn 0 cq0 N r>" 0 O O 01 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O p O O O O O O O p O 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 O O CU o0 01 0 0000 01 o 0 0 0 0 0 O 6 0 0 6 p O o 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o 0 0 0 •r:', Account Number 0 o o .K 0 0 01 o 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 C o p O o 0 0 0 p O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o 0 00 c, 0 000001 0 0 006 O 00000 0 0 66 01 o 0000 01 0 0 O O p O O O O O p O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o p o o eous Revenue ancing Sources 0n X c 0 4 H/C N 0 bL U .d U cz .> ' > 80 v) ti 'j y d O O v. +-C up aa)i no g wwOUQo w w GL - Revenue vs Expense (05/20/2019 - 03:59 PM) U ~-i M 00 ON M Cl C M O YTD Balance Current Period Account Number 0 rP LI) l� M 'et t!) \C rh © M M M O M r-1 Cf• '-i O N 00 M •71" N D 7 00 N C! 00 GO O - M N 00 O N h GL - Revenue vs Expense (05/20/2019 - 03:59 PM) LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent X Public Hearing Discussion Action Resolution Work Session X Meeting Date May 28, 2019 ITEM NUMBER City Park Application STAFF INITIAL MC APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: The City received an application for use of the Community Park on Saturday, September 7 from 9:00 am to 4:00 pm. Since the group is larger than 50 people, per city ordinance, coun- cil approval is required. Paul Winkelaar, Lauderdale resident, plans to organize the event. The application is attached for your review. OPTIONS: A) Approve the request to use the park. B) Approve the request with conditions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: By approving the application, the Council approves of the September 7 park use by Paul Winkelaar. COUNCIL ACTION: City of Lauderdale rdaIe 1891 Walnut Street • Lauderdale 0 Minnesota 55113 Phone: (651) 792-7650 Fax: (651) 631-2066 RESIDENT APPLICATION FOR USE OF COMMUNITY PARK APPLICANT INFORM TION: Name: Pat't (a -a / /0 ke KAddress: /7ef7 "lve.� S� �S� /3 Telephone No.: 467 V zr 1006 ILLCity: Lauderdale State: MN Zip:p B BeetiZalTbc,t.rvtaw / Name of Organization (if applicable): PARK USE INFORMATION: Date of Picnic Shelter Use: Se 1 7 Hours Used: * Number attending: , (001— * Note: Groups of 50 or more musf receive council aproval c}_ cfi L. Other park facilities may be reserved (circle all that apply): r 1 e, ((+�L) ec- be,5 c.(\ Ball Field / East or West Tennis Court am : asketball Court / Hours Used: 9'. - Volleyball - Volleyball Court / Paved Hockey Rink (Summer) / Ice Skating Rink (Winter) Hours Used: (Winter Skating Rinks can only be reserved from 9-10 p.m. when open skating ends at 9 p.m.) BY SIGNING THIS APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT AGREES TO THE FOLLOWING: • The applicant will clean up the area after the event has occurred. Please bring your own garbage bags and take garbage with you when you go. • The park facilities may not be used for advertisement of products, goods, or services, or for personal profit. • The proposed event may not unreasonably interfere with the general public use of the park, or with the safe and orderly movement of traffic on streets surrounding the park. • The applicant is aware of a parking lot on Roselawn Avenue which includes spaces for peoplewith disabilities. The applicant understands that the park opens at 8 a.m. and closes at 10 p.m. • The applicant can consume 3.2% and intoxicating liquor which they bring to park and keep possession of. • The applicant agrees to carry a copy of the approved application form with them as proof of reservation. • If the applicant experiences problems with the facilities, the applicant shall contact City Hall during office hours, or Ramsey County Dispatch after hours at 651-767-0640. • The applicant understands that the renter/users of Lauderdale park facilities at all times indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Lauderdale, Minnesota, its officers, employees, and contractors from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, and expenses of whatever nature, including attorney fees, in any manner connected with, related to, or as a result of any actions or inaction associated with the usage of rental of Lauderdale facilities. Furthermore, renter/users may be required to provide a certificate of insurance nayniryg the City as an additional insured. PcOIvr e(// a.r M,4Y (%, 2o(`� Applicant's Signature Applicant's Printed Name Date FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Application Received: 0 S / h' / 1 o 1 9 Approved By: Fees Received: Check #: Receipt #: Damage Deposit Check #: Temporary Non -Intoxicating Liquor License Granted? If so, date Council granted: LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent X Public Hearing Discussion Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date May 28, 2019 ITEM NUMBER Recreation Agreement STAFF INITIAL APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Falcon Heights would like to continue our recreation programs relationship. In the past they used our facilities for some of their offerings such as Tai Kwan Do and yoga and may do that again. The agreement also provides for Lauderdale covering the cost between the resi- dent and non-resident rate when Lauderdale residents participate in their programs. Following is the updated agreement for 2019. The agreement clarifies expectations and ad- dresses issues of liability. If the Council would like to discuss or amend the agreement, it may be removed from the Consent Agenda. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: By approving the Consent Agenda, the Council approves the Recreation Agreement with the City of Falcon Heights as presented. COUNCIL ACTION: City of Falcon Heights City of Lauderdale Recreation Agreement THIS AGREEMENT is effective April 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019, by and between the City of Lauderdale, 1891 Walnut Street — Lauderdale, MN 55113, and the City of Falcon Heights, 2077 W. Larpenteur Ave — Falcon Heights, Minnesota 55113. Falcon Heights agrees to provide recreation programs within the City of Lauderdale. Lauderdale agrees to provide facility space for the programs. The Cities of Lauderdale and Falcon Heights agree to the following obligations: 1. Falcon Heights agrees to: ® Provide recreation programs and experiences to Lauderdale residents for the same fee as paid by Falcon Heights' residents. Lauderdale will reimburse Falcon Heights the difference between the resident and non- resident rate for recreation programs and experiences held at Falcon Heights' facilities. Lauderdale will not reimburse Falcon Heights if the programs are held at Lauderdale facilities. • Coordinate registration, supervision, and program curriculum appropriate for the recreation program. • Hold recreation programs at Lauderdale City Hall and at Lauderdale Community Park as needs and interest warrant. ® Provide program staff, program supplies and equipment, and program maintenance support for the agreed upon recreation program. 2. Lauderdale agrees to: ® Provide program space at Lauderdale City Hall and at Lauderdale Community Park. The City of Lauderdale agrees to provide regular facility and park maintenance such as sweeping the floor and supplying tables requested by Falcon Heights. ® Provide facilities access and keys to Falcon Heights Park and Recreation Staff. Liability Falcon Heights shall defend and indemnify Lauderdale and it employees, officers, volunteers and agents for any claims against Lauderdale arising from Falcon Heights's performance or failure to perform its duties under this Agreement. Page 1 of 2 Lauderdale shall defend and indemnify Falcon Heights and it employees, officers, volunteers and agents for any claims against Falcon Heights arising from Lauderdale's performance or failure to perform its duties under this Agreement. Under no circumstances, however, shall a party, be required to pay on behalf of itself and the other party, any amounts in excess of the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 applicable to any one party. The limits of liability for the parties may not be added together to determine the maximum amount of liability for any party. Employees of Falcon Heights and Lauderdale shall remain employees of their respective cities regardless of where services are provided under this Agreement. Each party shall be responsible for injuries to or death of its own personnel. Each party will maintain workers' compensation insurance or self-insurance coverage, covering its own personnel while they are providing services pursuant to this Agreement. Each party waives the right to sue the other party for any workers' compensation benefits paid to its own employees or their dependants, even if the injuries were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of the other party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement effective as of the date first above written. City of Falcon Heights Mayor Rant Gustaa son City of Lauderdale Mayor Mary Gaasch Date: -5-- % Date: City Administrator City Administrator Sack Thongvanh Heather Butkowski Date: •- -® Date: Page 2 of 2 LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent X Public Hearing Discussion Action Resolution Work Session X Meeting Date May 28, 2019 ITEM NUMBER Address Assignment: 1703 Eustis STAFF INITIAL JB APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR BACKGROUND The attached resolution assigns a house number and street address to the vacant, buildable lot between 1699 and 1707 Eustis Street. The lot is owned by Roland and Paula Karjalahti. After adoption, the Postmaster and Ramsey County Emergency ser- vices will be notified of the new address. OPTIONS 1) Approve as part of the consent agenda 2) Remove from consent agenda for discussion. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 052819A as part of the consent agenda. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LAUDERDALE RESOLUTION NO. 052819A RESOLUTION ASSIGNING HOUSE NUMBER TO 1703 EUSTIS STREET WHEREAS, on November 12, 2002 the Lauderdale City Council adopted Resolution 111202A — A Resolution Supporting the Application for the Division of Two Previously Consolidated Residential Parcels of Land Located at 1707 Eustis Street; and WHEREAS, a vacant, buildable lot was created and is now legally described as Lot 10, Manuel's Addition, Ramsey County, Minnesota. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the city of Lauderdale, Minnesota that the above referenced property shall be assigned the following address: 1703 Eustis Street, Lauderdale, MN 55113. Dated: September 28, 2019 Mary Gaasch, Mayor Attest: Heather Butkowski, City Administrator -Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed. (SEAL) LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date May 28, 2019 ITEM NUMBER Year -End Recycling Report STAFF INITIAL Jim APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Dave Weidenfeller from Eureka! Recycling will present information on the recycling pro- gram for 2018, the last year of the previous contract. Attached is the following: • 2018 Year -End Recycling Report • 2018 Tonnage & Revenue Report • Appendix A: Customer Service Calls from Residents • Appendix B: Composition Method • Appendix C: Participation Methodology • Appendix D: Log of Contamination Reports OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: c ^Q W 0) CO 0W 0 N Education Summary for Curbside and Multifamily Programs Total m O co cI `-1 .T -i Requests for Printed Materials 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 I 0 I 0 Q Ol N O �N-1 O 12 Z t o Sep 11l o in Aug N 0 N Jul Ln N 1--• Jun c-1 e -i N c-1 May CO 0 CO O O Q .'-1 Mar O o o Feb 14 0 14 Jan Ill M 00 LAU DERDALE Curbside Calls Multi -family Calls N (o 0 (D 0 I— FtiE W a (0 V) rO U (11 0 0 2 ■ Multi -family Calls ■ Curbside Calls - - ■ l0 d' N 0 00 LO cr N O e--1 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju Total number of stops Amount stored, by recyclable material No materials have been stored at our facility longer than needed to generate enough quantity to ship. Participation Trend Study Report CO 0 N 0 rn 0 rn n 0 N d U) in N 0 Participation Trends Set Out Rate Participation Rate represent a full (statistically significant) representation of the actual participation level city-wide and year-round. a, C 0 Q_ CC1 ..0 i-+ L E a) Q_ 0. a] a) L Q_ 0) a) a) N 0 4-, a) c 0 U 0 0 a)U Q X a) U a) i--. 5 .0 N 0 as Q_ (a U (a —4-- C a) 0 E a) t LL LL and pricing for both paper and plastics. lower plastic pricing so we expect those commodities to depress a bit. Metals markets were thrown into chaos the fall of 2018, and we expect to see that volatility continue in 2019 and likely get even worse. This depression was caused by a few different factors including: E C • E v E a) 4-+ 0 0 1- 0 CD CD U 4- bA 0 U (a C (a E 0 U(a E 0 E (a .CT 4- 0 a) 0 0 a) U 0 4-, bU U Y 0 L bA (0 0 E E U c (a Q a) (a 0 . E ca -0 E (a a) 4-1 4 C 0 *' CU C (a 0 • a) S7- 0 0 U and the decreased production in the auto market which has historically been a large purchaser of recycled steel and aluminum. a) L (a ) L aJ 1- rC a) tin C 0 C a) Q 0_ 4- 0 a) C a) 0 (a L a) a) ..0 4- 0 by C 0 0 a) -Q a) ..c ..0 bD 0 L co (a a) 4-, (a a) (13 a) U a) 0 4 a) C Q 0 U 0 a) (a E 0) v E a) U a) 0- X • a) a) in the current market environment. The current policies in place in China and the flooded domestic markets have created an industry -wide focus on reducing the contamination in our recycling stream, and the focus is now on "recycling better" rather than simply "recycling more". C.) IV 0 C) ice+ c 0 E Q 2 tQ E N c 1- c a) U 0 O) m N V N E 2 M N N c C 3 FO - Single Stream Composition O 00 (a .c v a) .c 00 0 In (0 a) v 0) 'O t O N 2 m 0 n a 0 0 M Efl O O) O 0 v0 L 010 00 x 40 x 0 V 0 co 0 CL O tn O 0 03 4 N co O 'O 0 v A 0 O 00 (0 L U 0) 0 00 x 0Y x o. CO X m 0 a. a co EA 0 u3 m O (4 M V v O. a) a) X 0 00 m L 0 0) 00 t 00 d 30 01 COX co 0 a 0 0 69 0 0 O O O 0 w m 0 O ro m 0 0) 0 N L 00 x V 30 ro 0 X m 0 a. a a 0 03 0 0 03 O 0 O O O Phone Books G .(0 Q O O 0 0 co O O co 7;1 - 0 0 0 N Aluminum Cans La La 0 ffl 0 N0 0 N Eft (O M ( L a.� O 4- 0 O (0 0 0 J 0 O -J c 0 .670 0) K 0) 3 v 0 V v vi a) .14 00 V T a) 0) cc 0) 0) N 0 O 03 CO 03 M 10N r 4 HDPE NAT c C O O T (0 O J O J (0 O 00 0) cc3 O 0O CO v vi 0) ro ao c cc U 0) 0) 0 (, M H3 O 0 03 W O 4 O O 0 W a 0 x r c C O O T (0 O (0 J O J CO O .1D 0) 0) 3 0 OO CO a) v4 a") is 00 CL c V 0) co 0 N (A 0 M d3 W r- (.6 0 O M F- W a Market Price r O V N (f3 0 N O Tubs and Lids Market Price 0 0 69 0 (47 M M (A O O O Thermoform Market Price O 116 10 13 (v 03 0 V' O N N a) Market Price -Tetra Pak h- 69 O 0 M69 m N O co O Milk Cartons/Juice Boxes N 000 69 rn co 0 O M a) v v 0 M 0 O v: O 0' 04 0) z 2018 Annual Customer Service Calls from Lauderdale Residents Date/Time Case Reason Address Status Resolution 3 -Jan -18 A8: Cleanup request COURTESY (before next collection day) 1721 Pleasant Street ,Lauderdale Closed - Completed MoLau101: lone: Alley: COURTESY for 1/3 or 1/4. Late set out 4 -Jan -18 A7: Cleanup request- MISS (before next collection day) 1770 Carl Street ,Lauderdale Closed Completed MoLau101: Iona: Curb: They had extra material. Please pick up the extra from this Lauderdale address. For 1/4 8 -Jan -18 A7: Cleanup request- MISS (before next collection day) 1770 Carl Street ,Lauderdale Closed Completed MoLau101: Spring: Curb: CLEAN-UP. We tipped cart but did not take extra. In LD we take extra. 24 -Jan -18 A8: Cleanup request- COURTESY (before next collection day) 1609 Pleasant St ,Lauderdale Closed Completed MoLauRLD: Larpenteur: City Gables: Key (2 keys).Carts and Dumpsters. COURTESY for 1/24 or 1/25, Was inaccessible due to snow. 9 -Feb -18 A7: Cleanup request- MISS (before next collection day) 1609 Pleasant St ,Lauderdale Closed - Completed Mo LauRld : larpenteur : 2-2yds and 7 carts missed on Monday please pick up before noon 02/09 Key 13 -Feb -18 A8: Cleanup request - COURTESY (before next collection day) 1796 Pleasant Street ,Lauderdale Closed - Completed MoLau101: Spring Street: Curb: COURTESY for 2/13 or 2/14 WUP from Spring St by garage 20 -Feb -18 A7: Cleanup request- MISS (before next collection day) 1752 Carl Street ,Lauderdale Closed - Completed MoLau101: lone: Alley: MISS. Missed west side of this alley. 20 -Feb -18 A8: Cleanup request- COURTESY (before next collection day) 1953 Malvern Street ,Lauderdale Closed Completed MoLau101: Ryan: Curb: COURTESY Resident hasnt been picked up in two weeks- has been inaccessible due to snow but has fixed placement issues pick up 2/20 or 2/21. Update - driver was unable to collect on cleanup because cart is up against garage in snow and frozen to the ground. Called resident to follow up. 21 Feb 18 21-Feb-18 A6 Cleanup request- equest- INVESTIGATE (before next collection day) 2311 Ione Street ,Lauderdale Closed - Completed MoLau101: Carl: alley: half of alley missed cleanup 2/21 or 2/22. 26 -Feb -18 A8: Cleanup request COURTESY (before next collection day) 1888 Walnut Street ,Lauderdale Closed - Completed MoLau101: summer curb:courtsey at the curb 02/26 2018-03- 20T11:09:06. 96 A6 Cleanup request - INVESTIGATE (before next collection day) 1808 Carl Street1808 Closed - Completed moLau101: Spring: Alley: INVESTIGATE for 3/20 or 3/21 resident was not picked up on 3/19 2018-03- 27T12:25:16. 623 A6 Cleanup request- INVESTIGATE (before next collection day) 1744 Walnut Street1744 Closed Completed MoLau101: lone: Alley: INVESTIGATE for 3/27 or 3/28 church hasnt been picked up for past two weeks 2018-04- 17T07:56:00. 85 A6 Cleanup request- INVESTIGATE (before next collection day) 1805 Fulham Street1805 Closed - Completed MoLau101: spring curb walk up spi box of recycling please investigate why not collected 04/17 2018-04- 17T10:34:11. 177 A7: Cleanup request- MISS (before next collection day) 1820 Lake Street1820 Closed - Completed MoLau101: Spring: Curb: MISS for 4/17 or 4/18. 2018 Annual Customer Service Calls from Lauderdale Residents Date/Time Case Reason Address Status Resolution 2018-04- A6 Cleanup request - 1867 Malvern Closed - MoLau101: summer: alley: pleae investigate 24T09:34:43. INVESTIGATE (before next Street1867 Completed why not picked up 217 collection day) 2018-04- A6 Cleanup request - 1795 Carl Closed - Molau101: summer alley: please investigate 24T14:42:06. INVESTIGATE (before next Street1795 Completed why not pu 36 collection day) MoLau101: lone: alley: resident from this address reported to the city that the driver caused some damage to their garage yesterday. I just reviewed the video and can see that the 2018 -06 -claw of the truck did cause some damage to the 1763 Carl Closed - corner of the garage right by the cart. I am 12T12:58:57. R1 Property Damage 97 Street1763 Completed asking the city to help us get in touch with the resident so we can coordinate repairs and also will be bringing this to the fleet so they can address this with the driver. UPDATE: repair is complete and issue has been addressed with the driver. 2018-06- A8: Cleanup request - 19T09:22:43. COURTESY (before next 1646 Rosehill Closed - MoLau101: pleasent: curb: May have been a Circle1646 Completed late set out. Please go back 06/19 69 collection day) 2018-10- A6 Cleanup request 1721 Pleasant Closed - MoLau101: ione: alley: INVESTIGATE for 10/16. 16T09:09:35. INVESTIGATE (before next Street1721 Completed Resident said out night before. 923 collection day) MoLau101: Carl: Alley: INVESTIGATE for 11/6. A6 Cleanup request- 2387 Larpenteur INVESTIGATE (before next Avenue Closed - Completed They and their neighbors report no collection on their side of the alley. Reported 6 carts still out. collection day) ,Lauderdale Check whole alley on south side. 5 -Nov -18 A6 Cleanup request - INVESTIGATE (before next 1809 Malvern Closed - MoLau101: Spring: Curb: MISS. this is a walk up. Street ,Lauderdale Completed up by driveway. collect 11/12 or 11/13 12 -Nov -18 collection day) A6 Cleanup request - INVESTIGATE (before next 1823 Carl Street Closed - MoLau101: Spring: Curb: INVESTIGATE for Completed 11/13. 12 -Nov -18 collection day) ,Lauderdale A8: Cleanup request - COURTESY (before next 1709 Eustis Street Closed - MoLau101: Larpenteur: Alley: COURTESY for ,Lauderdale Completed 11/27 or 11/28. 27 -Nov -18 collection day) Eureka Recycling Composition Analysis Methodology Eureka Recycling collects materials in a single sort collection system with all paper, cardboard, metal and plastic, steel, aluminum and glass containers combined by residents into one cart. Each year we conduct an annual composition study of the single sort material to determine the percentage each material represents in the overall composition. (651) 222 -SORT (7678) www.eurekarecycling.org Our mission is to reduce waste today through Composition by Commodity innovative resource of Each Recycling Stream management and to reach During the composition study we weigh a waste -free tomorrow each truck before and after to determine by demonstrating that waste the weight of the material. Each truck is preventable, not inevitable. has a stored weight that is updated regularly for accuracy. This process allows us to determine the initial weight of the material set out by residents during the period being analyzed. The composition study starts with Eureka Recycling storing all of the materials collected in the city during a one-week period. These materials are stored in a separate bunker from all other materials at the facility. We sort the material separately from all other recycling at the facility. _The sorted materials are then baled or put into a hopper and transported with a forklift to the truck scale to be weighed. Finally, we weigh the total amount of each sorted material grade including the, non -recyclable material (residual) to establish the percentage of the total tonnage that each material type represents in the overall composition. An affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. Printed on 100% postconsumer recycled paper that was processed without the use of chlorine. Appendix C Participation Trend Analysis Methodology Eureka Recycling conducts an annual participation study in which both set -out and participation rates are analyzed and documented. The set -out rate is the average number of households that set materials out for recycling collection on a given day. Not every household sets out their recycling each week. If they are out of town, forget or simply don't have very much in their cart they may not have a cart out for collection on their day. The Set -Out number is the average across all weeks reported of percentage of households that set -out material in any given week. The participation rate is the number of households who set materials out for recycling collection at least once over the period of the study. (651) 222 -SORT (7678) www.eurekarecycling.org Our mission is to reduce waste today through innovative resource management and to reach a waste -free tomorrow by demonstrating that waste is preventable, not inevitable. The participation rate is a better indication of overall recycling participation because it includes households that recycle at least once over the course of a month, recognizing that some households may not set -out recycling every week. It more accurately indicates how many households are participating in the recycling program overall, as opposed to the number of participants on a specific day. Summary of Process The study spans one month of collections. Over a four-week period, Eureka Recycling tallies the exact number of households that set out recycling for collection in the morning of their collection day, before the driver services the section. These tallies are then used to determine what percentage of the city sets out recycling on any given week (set -out rate) and what percentage of the city sets out recycling at least once over the study period (participation rate). An affirmative action, equal opportunity employer. ® Printed on 100% postconsumer recycled paper that was processed without the use of chlorine. _C p L dA Q. a--) a) co N 4-- a) O (6 C p - -0O a) L n 4-, (a 0 a) a) c' _ U ( -13 La N i-� n L C !n L U a) O •- 0 a) 0q as ice-+ E > 4- bCA W (o O Ov ON O a) -0 - O O N 4--+ L1 N N Q) C t 4p - a) —ct, 0 4-,n n C -C n 4 v) 0.1 L i� L7 a) COp 4 - s— = _C � cs �q� O 0 p 0 _ W pp U a) C (� + E v ( (obi) U 4-' a) CO 4-, a) -0 CD t CD n a--, O � o = d = O N 4-,p O .® .F to a) —2 > 0 v - la 4-, L ns (0 L //.' � O (0 C •4-N C > ,v)O v E° L • L (a Ca O a) p a) OA1:3-O to t C C a) O = ++ O o) +, /y o v @ 22 3 is U eLY cu "1 ), ax) bp O (o a a) . = 3 +- ,� 3 E m a) CU L •E `° p O c ® C N n p to CL 2 C ' U D ( Citi co of L N N NW C OL 0 C cc a-+ O E � (6 i-+ to U N .0 ++ 0 Q "a (p O U E V C O — 3 N E O to - O Q i-+ Q C vs a O O C N O U �= a) OO O toil m E a) L uO Q co U C L c C '# O UN>n o to L+-,C(6a C vO a) 4— a t'_'iC(0 CO®.0 N u O a) i tli)to + o — = E a) ® a1 L to > CT) O a J v 4 CU a -0 a) -0 O (a +-, C -O O a) (o v �o _o 4c `+- (1) -p = O O 0.00 3 CU C N (E C .0- a)(1) Na) @ a) m 3 0.)'' ) .a E N 0 • +-, -Q v information by mail. Driver's notes Collection Location REC CURB REC CURB REC CURB REC ALLEY REC WALK UP ALLEY REC CURB REC CURB REC WALK UP ALLEY REC WALK UP ALLEY REC CURB REC SPI CURB REC CURB Service Status CONTAMINATED (TRASH) CONTAMINATED (TRASH) CONTAMINATED (TRASH) CONTAMINATED (TRASH) CONTAMINATED (TRASH) CONTAMINATED (TRASH) CONTAMINATED (TRASH) CONTAMINATED (TRASH) CONTAMINATED (TRASH) CONTAMINATED (TRASH) CONTAMINATED (TRASH) CONTAMINATED (TRASH) Time Stamp 11/26/2018 13:09 11/26/2018 9:32 11/26/2018 10:09 11/26/2018 9:40 11/26/2018 9:39 9/24/2018 14:32 9/24/2018 9:05 N 00 0 N c-1 tD 6/11/2018 9:42 6/18/2018 11:25 4/2/2018 8:35 4/9/2018 9:33 Customer Address 11869 CARL STREET 1703 MALVERN STREET 2401 LARPENTEUR AVENUE 1810 WALNUT STREET 11846 WALNUT ST 1937 CARL STREET 1706 MALVERN STREET 1846 WALNUT ST 1846 WALNUT ST 1699 MALVERN STREET 11885 FULHAM STREET 1855 FULHAM STREET LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date May 28, 2019 ITEM NUMBER Follow Up to 1795 Eustis PH STAFF INITIAL APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: At the May 14 their meeting, the City Council took public comment on the Planned Unit Development (PUD) application submitted by Real Estate Equities (REE). One of the ques- tions raised during the meeting was the financial difference between the construction of sen- ior apartments as proposed and single family homes. Stacie Kvilvang, the City's financial advisor, prepared financial models to explain the difference. Staff summarized the infor- mation further to explain the up front and long-term financial differences between the two types of projects. Land Sale Proceeds: The estimated demolition cost of the school is $300,000 inclusive of almost $100,000 in asbestos abatement costs. Assuming the City sells the site as is, it is ex- pected that single-family homes would generate $300,000 compared to the $1,295,000 REE has agreed to. The single-family home value is derived from the lots being valued at $50,000 per lot before factoring the price reduction for the buyer taking on the demolition costs. This is a difference of $995,000. Park Dedication Fee: Earlier this year the City Council adopted a Park Dedication Ordi- nance that requires developers to contribute land or money to improve the City's park sys- tem. Single-family homes would generate $36,000 for these improvements; REE's project would generate $342,000. This is a difference of $306,000. Conduit Bond Fee: To create affordable housing, REE has asked the City to be the conduit for the bonds that will be sold to private investors. The City receives a .9% fee for provid- ing this service that would net $126,000. The City would not receive a fee in a single- family home project. Total Up Front Fees: Upon the sale of the property, the City would receive $336,000 from the buyer for the creation of single-family homes. In the REE scenario, the City will receive $1,763,000. In the single-family home scenario, the City will need to refinance the debt from the purchase of the property. In the REE scenario, the bond would be repaid and the City would receive $468,000 at closing to apply to park projects and repayment of the bonds for the Eustis/Roselawn Project. DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Bond Refinancing: If the City Council elects to refinance the bonds to support the creation of single-family homes, the outstanding costs would be structured into a new bond issue and the old bond retired. Staff asked the financial advisor to run a scenario where the bonds were paid over ten years. Page 1 of the Estimated Tax Impact report shows the annual cost to homeowners based on the value of their home. This amount would be included in residents taxes each year for ten years. The owner of an average priced home price in Lauderdale ($225,000) would pay ap- proximately $1,459 over ten years. *Long -Term Tax Generation: In the single-family home scenario, the City would receive an estimated $12,124 starting the year after the homes are completed. In the REE deal, the City would receive an estimated $4,000 (25% of the base value taxes of $11,867) starting the year after the apartment is completed. The TIF districted is estimated to last 16 years. Start- ing year 17, the City would receive $48,590 in tax revenue. Over the first sixteen years, the single-family homes will generate $193,984 in taxes compared to $64,000 by the apartments as the remaining taxes paid by the developer will be used to help finance the project. Over the next sixteen years, the single-family homes will generate $193,984 in taxes compared to $777,440. All totaled over the first 32 years, the homes will generate $387,968 in taxes compared to $841,440 by the apartments. * These numbers reflect current tax generation which will vary over the years as property values increase. Next Steps: Jennifer Haskamp prepared a memo for the Council highlighting the concerns of those that spoke at the meeting. She will be at the meeting to discuss her comments with the Council. 1795 Eustis Development Scenarios City of Lauderdale Single -Family Scenario A Single -Family Scenario F Apartment Number of Units 12 114 Units Per Acre 7 67 Land Sale Proceeds $ 300,000 $ 1,295,000 Park Dedication Fees ($3,000/Unit) $ 36,000 $ 342,000 Conduit Bond Fee ($14M Par) $ - $ 126 000 TOTAL UP FRONT FEES $ 336,000 q' 1,71,7 0 Taxable Market Value $ 4,131,120 s $ 18,240,000 Estimated Market Value Per Unit $ 350,000 $ 160,000 Taxable Market Value Per Unit $ 344,260 $ 160,000 Long -Term Annual City Tax Potential $ 12,124Cr--- 48,590 (Land Sale Price Per Unit Single -Family $ 25,000 Apartments $ 11,360 Parcel Information PID Number 17-29-23-33-0001 Acres 1.69 City of Lauderdale, Minnesota Estimated Tax Impact May 23, 2019 BOND ISSUANCE INFORMATION Type of Property Bond Issue Amount $1,360,000 Number of Years 10 Average Interest Rate 2.09% Estimated Bond Rating S&P $ 75,000 AA PROPERTY TAX INFORMATION $ 450 Actual Net Tax Capacity - Payable 2019 $2,283,807 Debt Levy @ 105% - Average 160,201 Estimated Tax Capacity Rate: 28,240 Payable - 2019 Without Proposed Bonds 29.347% Payable - 2019 With Proposed Bonds 36.362% Estimated Tax Rate Increase 7.015% TAX IMPACT ANALYSIS Type of Property Estimated Market Value Market Value Exclusion Taxable Market Value Net Tax Capacity Current City Tax Proposed Tax Increase* Proposed City Tax $ 75,000 $ 30,000 $ 45,000 $ 450 $ 132.06 $ 31.57 $ 163.63 100,000 28,240 71,760 718 210.59 50.34 260.93 125,000 25,990 99,010 990 290.56 69.45 360.02 150,000 23,740 126,260 1,263 370.54 88.57 459.10 Residential 175,000 21,490 153,510 1,535 450.51 107.68 558.19 Homestead 200,000 19,240 180,760 1,808 530.48 126.80 657.27 225,000 16,990 208,010 2,080 610.45 145.91 756.36 250,000 14,740 235,260 2,353 690.42 165.03 855.44 300,000 10,240 289,760 2,898 850.36 203.26 1,053.62 350,000 5,740 344,260 3,443 1,010.30 241.49 1,251.79 * The figures in the table are based on taxes for new bonded debt only, and do not include tax levies for other purposes. Tax increases shown above are gross increases, not including the impact of the state Property Tax Refund ("Circuit Breaker') program. Many owners of homestead property will qualify for a refund, based on their income and total property taxes. This will decrease the net tax effect of the bond issue for many property owners. Prepared by Ehlers 5/23/2019 EHLERS enoees iri F 1,,,NCE Lauderdale, Minnesota $1,360,000 General Obligation TIF Refunding Bonds, December 1, 2019 Proposed Current Ref of TIF Bonds, Series 2018A Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates Sources & Uses Dated 12/01/20191 Delivered 12/01/2019 Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds Total Sources Uses Of Funds $1,360,000.00 $1,360,000.00 Total Underwriter's Discount (1.200%) Costs of Issuance Deposit to Current Refunding Fund Rounding Amount 16,320.00 39,000.00 1,303,417.50 1,262.50 Total Uses $1,360,000.00 Proposed CR 2018A GO TIF 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 5/23/2019 1 2:05 PM g.it, EHLERS, Lauderdale, Minnesota $1,360,000 General Obligation TIF Refunding Bonds, December 1, 2019 Proposed Current Ref of TIF Bonds, Series 2018A Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 12/01/2019 - - - - 08/01/2020 - - 17,856.67 17,856.67 02/01/2021 120,000.00 1.650% 13,392.50 133,392.50 151,249.17 08/01/2021 - - 12,402.50 12,402.50 - 02/01/2022 130,000.00 1.700% 12,402.50 142,402.50 154,805.00 08/01/2022 - - 11,297.50 11,297.50 02/01/2023 130,000.00 1.750% 11,297.50 141,297.50 152,595.00 08/01/2023 - - 10,160.00 10,160.00 02/01/2024 130,000.00 1.800% 10,160.00 140,160.00 150,320.00 08/01/2024 - 8,990.00 8,990.00 02/01/2025 135,000.00 1.850% 8,990.00 143,990.00 152,980.00 08/01/2025 - 7,741.25 7,741.25 02/01/2026 135,000.00 1.950% 7,741.25 142,741.25 150,482.50 08/01/2026 - 6,425.00 6,425.00 - 02/01/2027 140,000.00 2.050% 6,425.00 146,425.00 152,850.00 08/01/2027 - - 4,990.00 4,990.00 02/01/2028 145,000.00 2.150% 4,990.00 149,990.00 154,980.00 08/01/2028 - - 3,431.25 3,431.25 02/01/2029 145,000.00 2.250% 3,431.25 148,431.25 151,862.50 08/01/2029 - 1,800.00 1,800.00 02/01/2030 150,000.00 2.400% 1,800.00 151,800.00 153,600.00 Total 81,360,000.00 - $165,724.17 81,525,724.17 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars Average Life Average Coupon Net Interest Cost (NIC) True Interest Cost (TIC) Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes All Inclusive Cost (AIC) IRS Form 8038 $7,946.67 5.843 Years 2.0854552% 2.2908243% 2.3029499% 2.0795179% 2.8523154% Net Interest Cost Weighted Average Maturity Proposed CR 2018A GO TIF 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 5/23/2019 1 2:05 PM 2.0854552% 5.843 Years 1mEHLERS Lauderdale, Minnesota $1,360,000 General Obligation TIF Refunding Bonds, December 1, 2019 Proposed Current Ref of TIF Bonds, Series 2018A Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates Debt Service Comparison Date 02/01/2020 02/01/2021 02/01/2022 02/01/2023 02/01/2024 02/01/2025 02/01/2026 02/01/2027 02/01/2028 02/01/2029 02/01/2030 Total P+I 151,249.17 154,805.00 152,595.00 150,320.00 152,980.00 150,482.50 152,850.00 154,980.00 151,862.50 153,600.00 Net New D/S 151,249.17 154,805.00 152,595.00 150,320.00 152,980.00 150,482.50 152,850.00 154,980.00 151,862.50 153,600.00 Old Net D/S 1,307,626.25 Savings 1,156,377.08 (154,805.00) (152,595.00) (150,320.00) (152,980.00) (150,482.50) (152,850.00) (154,980.00) (151,862.50) (153,600.00) Total $1,525,724.17 $1,525,724.17 $1,307,626.25 (218,097.92) PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings Effects of changes in CIF Investments Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 2.852%(AIC) Contingency or Rounding Amount Net Present Value Loss Net PV Loss / $1,301,479.59 PV Refunded Debt Service Net PV Loss / $1,295,000 Refunded Principal... Net PV Loss / $1,360,000 Refunding Principal.. Refunding Bond Information (14,597.38) (24,956.88) (39,554.26) 1,262.50 $(38,291.76) (2.942%) (2.957%) (2.816%) Refunding Dated Date 12/01/2019 Refunding Delivery Date 12/01/2019 Proposed CR 2018A GO TIF 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 5/23/2019 1 2:05 PM EHLERB Lauderdale, Minnesota $1,360,000 General Obligation TIF Refunding Bonds, December 1, 2019 Proposed Current Ref of TIF Bonds, Series 2018A Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates Current Refunding Escrow Date Rate Receipts Disbursements Cash Balance 12/01/2019 - 1,303,417.50 1,303,417.50 - Total $1,303,417.50 $1,303,417.50 Investment Parameters Investment Model [PV, GIC, or Securities] Default investment yield target Cash Deposit Total Cost of hrvestments Target Cost of Investments at bond yield Yield to Receipt Yield for Arbitrage Purposes Proposed CR 2018A GO TIF 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 5/23/2019 1 2:05 PM Securities Unrestricted 1,303,417.50 $1,303,417.50 $1,303,417.50 2.0795179% g,sEHLERS LEADERS .1,1111C r./.1, Lauderdale, Minnesota $1,295,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, Series 2018A Prior Original Debt Service Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 08/01/2019 - - - 02/01 /2020 - 12,626.25 12,626.25 12,626.25 08/01/2020 - 12,626.25 12,626.25 02/01/2021 1,295,000.00 1.950% 12,626.25 1,307,626.25 1,320,252.50 Total $1,295,000.00 $37,878.75 $1,332,878.75 Yield Statistics Base date for Avg. Life & Avg. Coupon Calculation Average Life Average Coupon Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) Weighted Average Maturity (Original Price Basis) Refunding Bond Information 12/01/2019 1.167 Years 1.9500000% 1.167 Years 1.167 Years Refunding Dated Date 12/01/2019 Refunding Delivery Date 12/01/2019 Series 2018A GO TIF Bonds 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 5/23/2019 1 2:05 PM g:EHLERS Lauderdale, Minnesota $1,295,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, Series 2018A Debt Service To Maturity And To Cali Refunded Refunded Refunded Date Bonds Interest D/S To Call Principal Coupon Interest D/S 12/01/2019 1,295,000.00 8,417.50 1,303,417.50 - - - 02/01 /2020 - 12,626.25 12,626.25 08/01/2020 - - - - - 12,626.25 12,626.25 02/01/2021 - 1,295,000.00 1.950% 12,626.25 1,307,626.25 Total 51,295,000.00 $8,417.50 51,303,417.50 $1,295,000.00 $37,878.75 $1,332,878.75 Yield Statistics Base date for Avg. Life & Avg. Coupon Calculation 12/01/2019 Average Life 1.167 Years Average Coupon 19500000% Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) 1.167 Years Weighted Average Maturity (Original Price Basis) 1.167 Years Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 12/01/2019 Refunding Delivery Date 12/01/2019 Series 2018A GO TIF Bonds 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 5/23/2019 1 2:05 PM 6:EHLERS Lauderdale, Minnesota $1,360,000 General Obligation TIF Refunding Bonds, December 1, 2019 Proposed Current Ref of TIF Bonds, Series 2018A Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates Debt Service Schedule Date 105% Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Overlevy 02/01/2020 - - - - 02/01/2021 120,000.00 1.650% 31,249.17 151,249.17 158,811.63 02/01/2022 130,000.00 1.700% 24,805.00 154,805.00 162,545.25 02/01/2023 130,000.00 1.750% 22,595.00 152,595.00 160,224.75 02/01/2024 130,000.00 1.800% 20,320.00 150,320.00 157,836.00 02/01/2025 135,000.00 1.850% 17,980.00 152,980.00 160,629.00 02/01/2026 135,000.00 1.950% 15,482.50 150,482.50 158,006.63 02/01/2027 140,000.00 2.050% 12,850.00 152,850.00 160,492.50 02/01/2028 145,000.00 2.150% 9,980.00 154,980.00 162,729.00 02/01/2029 145,000.00 2.250% 6,862.50 151,862.50 159,455.63 02/01/2030 150,000.00 2.400% 3,600.00 153,600.00 161,280.00 Total $1,360,000.00 $165,724.17 $1,525,724.17 $1,602,010.38 Significant Dates Dated First Coupon Date Yield Statistics 12/01/2019 8/01/2020 Bond Year Dollars Average Life Average Coupon Net Interest Cost (NIC) True Interest Cost (TIC) Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes All Inclusive Cost (AIC) IRS Form 8038 $7,946.67 5.843 Years 2.0854552% 2.2908243% 2.3029499% 2.0795179% 2.8523154% Net Interest Cost Weighted Average Maturity Proposed CR 2018A GO TIF 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 5/23/2019 1 2;05 PM 2.0854552% 5.843 Years EHLERS JLu 1r MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council CC: Heather Butkowski, City Administrator Date: May 24, 2019 RE: Real Estate Equities Development Stage PUD application for a Senior Development at 1795 Eustis Street Public Hearing Summary On May 14, 2019 the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request of Real Estate Equities to construct and operate a Senior Building on the site located at 1795 Eustis Street. The public hearing was well attended and many residents provided public testimony. The following summary regarding the testimony is provided for reference and discussion and is not meant to be exhaustive of all testimony (the full record can be found in the meeting minutes). Much of the public testimony focused on the following themes: 1. Residents are concerned about the height of the structure and how it will affect the character of the community and immediate neighborhood. 2. Residents are concerned about the density and number of units in the project. This comment is most directly correlated with the massing of the building — that is, how big it will feel on the site. 3. Residents are concerned about the traffic and the parking based on the number of units 4. Residents are concerned about the demolition of the existing school and the potential environmental impacts since the structure contains lead and other penitential hazardous materials. In addition to the consistent testimony related to the themes identified above, other testimony that requires some discussion includes the following: 5. Impact of the proposed building to the solar panels located on the detached garage on the northwest corner of Spring Street and Eustis Street. 6. Impact of the proposed project on property values if approved as -is. Research and Supplemental Information To assist the City Council with discussion, and potential actions, in response to public testimony Staff has conducted additional research and due diligence regarding the identified concerns. Research/Additional Information #1: He$ht • Because the Zoning Ordinance has not been updated for consistency with the new High - Density Residential land use designation there is not an established maximum height for the proposed use (which is most consistent with the City's R-3 zoning district since the proposed building is not a single-family structure). To assist the Council in determining what would be acceptable staff has done some research of similarly situated Cities (first - ring) experiencing infill development of multi -family structures. Cities fitting this www.swansonhaskamp.com ILu 1r criterion included St. Louis Park, Robbinsdale, Brooklyn Center, Richfield, Mendota Heights, etc. The follow observations regarding codes include the following: o The cities researched identified a range of maximum permitted heights in zoning districts comparable to Lauderdale's R-3. The City of St. Louis Park's R-4 ordinance is an interesting example because it provided a height maximum (40') when abutting an R-1 or R-2 zoning district. However, permits exceptions if a building is proposed to exceed 40' then the side -yard setback must be increased for each foot beyond 40' on the side abutting an R-1 or R-2 zoning district. Other Cities researched provided maximum heights between 4o and 50', with the only outlier of Mendota Heights that provides no maximum. o Staffs Comments — The City Council will have to consider ultimately what the City's R-3 zoning district requires, but that process has not been kicked -off yet. So, at least researching other cities with similar development characteristics provides some guidance as to what is `reasonable' with respect to the requested height. The proposed structure is approximately 47-50' which is consistent with how similarly situated cities would regulate height of a multi -family building. • Staff researched other building types, such as townhomes and rowhomes for comparison since the density range permits a minimum of 12 dwelling units per acre. While sitting in a public hearing last Tuesday, Pulte Group proposed a rowhome/townhome type product in the nearby City of New Brighton. (Staff will bring pictures of this product, and other samples to the May 28 meeting). The proposed townhome structures are a maximum of 46 -feet, with three stories. This product type would fall at the low-end of the City's density range, which demonstrates that when the City's ordinance is updated that the maximum height will likely need to permit heights between 4o and 5o feet to achieve the required density even at the low end of the density range. Research/Additional Information #2: Number of Units/Mass • Staff offers the same analysis as presented in the Staff Report prepared for the May 14, 2019 meeting. The higher density (number of units) is heavily correlated to the dominance of 1 -Bedroom units proposed. If the project were flipped, that is there are 8o% 2 -bedroom units in the project, the density would be brought down by almost half, but it would have no affect on the `massing' or how it feels to adjacent properties. o Further Consideration: The Applicant has indicated that the financing of the project will not work if the number of units is reduced. • As shown in the Pulte Group townhome example, if the site were developed with townhomes, the massing would feel similar and would not significantly change the `feel' of the streetscape or experience of adjacent properties. In some respects, a suburban townhome product could significantly alter the character of the neighborhood. Suburban rowhomes are less consistent with a traditional urban grid pattern than a multi -family building which dot urban neighborhoods throughout the country. www.swansonhaskamp.com JLU ir: Research/Additional Information #3: Traffic and Parking ■ Staff has requested information/data to support the developer's requested parking arrangement. This information has not been provided by the Applicant, and staff continues to request this information. ■ With respect to parking, the City Council could request a condition be included in any approval, and within the Development Agreement that the developer must monitor the parking and if it is not being used/leased that appropriate modifications and adjustments be made to the parking plan acceptable to the City. Research/Additional Information #4: Demolition and potential hazardous materials ■ Staff would note that all demolition activities will require a demolition permit, and that includes a permit and monitoring by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) since the building has known hazardous materials. Staff would recommend that it be placed in the conditions of any approval and that the development agreement include language that the permitting process must be followed and adhered to strictly given the known contamination of the existing building. Research/Additional Information #5: Impact to Solar Panels • Staff has researched the State Statutes and resources provided by the League of Minnesota Cities. First, to Staffs knowledge, there are no recorded air/solar easements recorded against the subject property that benefit the adjacent property with the solar panels. In the absence of an easement, there are no formal, clearly articulated, regulations or rules that would prohibit the construction of a building that shades and or/impacts the efficiency of adjacent solar installations. • While there are no formal requirements, staff does acknowledge and understand that there is a potential impact to the adjacent solar panels. To begin to quantify the potential impact, Staff has requested and obtained the energy output of the system from the resident to aid in determining what, if any, mitigation should be incorporated into any development approvals. • Staff would suggest some discussion regarding this item with the intent of determining whether a condition is necessary to be included in any development approval. Research/Additional Information #6: Impact to Adjacent Property Values • Generally, the industry has concluded that multi -family buildings and senior buildings do not negatively impact adjacent residential property values if buildings are properly developed (i.e. construction and design standards consistent with neighboring properties). ■ Staff would suggest asking the developer if they have any market studies regarding this issue that could be shared to help answer some of the questions posed during the public hearing. (Staff is aware that such studies exist but does not have a current version). www.swansonhaskamp.com JL 11T Discussion Staff recommends discussion and direction from the City Council regarding the following: ■ Is the proposed height acceptable? If yes, are there any other mitigation measures that the Council would request to be incorporated? If no, what is the recommended adjustments/changes? Is the number of units/density/massing acceptable? If no, what is acceptable? ■ Staff has requested additional information regarding parking, does the City Council want additional information? ■ Are there any other considerations that should be discussed from the Public Hearing? ■ Should City staff continue to identify potential mitigation for the adjacent solar panel installation? ■ Is there any additional direction to the Developers regarding any requested changes/modifications to the building or the site? Is there any additional information requested from the developer? ■ Should staff prepare a resolution of approval with conditions or a resolution of denial with findings for the consideration of the City Council to the June 11, 2019 meeting? Next Steps The next step is for the City Staff to prepare a resolution for discussion at a future meeting. If the City Council is generally in agreement that the proposed project should be approved with conditions, staff will prepare draft resolution with conditions for discussion based on the discussion at the May 28, 2019 meeting. www.swansonhaskamp.com LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion Action Resolution Work Session X Meeting Date May 28, 2019 ITEM NUMBER STAFF INITIAL APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR Concerned Pleasant St. Res. DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Over the fall and winter, Council Member Dolphin and staff have been communicating with residents that live on Pleasant Street next to Lauderdale Community Park about their park- ing concerns. They are concerned that allowing parking on both sides of the street creates congestion, may be unsafe for pedestrians / children, inhibits mail delivery, makes it diffi- cult to back out of their driveways, and may inhibit fire trucks, The neighbors will be at the meeting to discuss their concerns with the Council. After our meeting last fall, the police department did a speed study. The information fol- lows along with an email from Captain Spiess on the matter. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: St. Anthony Police Department Case Number: 18007475 Page 1 1900 Block of Pleasant Street Date Start: 11 -Oct -18 Date End: 18 -Oct -18 Combined Date\Speed (MPH) 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 >65 Total 10/11/2018 0 12 13 26 56 16 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 126 10/12/2018 0 16 23 43 77 25 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 10/13/2018 0 14 12 47 63 35 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 174 10/14/2018 0 28 11 22 54 33 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 10/15/2018 0 30 16 54 80 35 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 220 10/16/2018 0 30 9 63 81 26 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 213 10/17/2018 0 13 12 43 81 30 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 187 10/18/2018 0 10 9 12 19 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 Combined Total 0 153 105 310 511 207 28 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 1322 85 percentile = 26 St. Anthony Police Department Case Number: 18007475 Page 1 1900 Block of Pleasant Street Date Start: 11 -Oct -18 Date End: 18 -Oct -18 Combined Date\Speed (MPH) 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 >65 Total 10/11/2018 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14:00 0 0 3 1 10 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 15:00 0 2 2 4 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 16:00 0 3 1 5 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 17:00 0 1 3 2 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 18:00 0 4 2 4 7 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 20 19:00 0 2 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 20:00 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 21:00 0 0 1 6 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 22:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Day Total 0 12 13 26 56 16 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 126 10/12/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 06:00 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 07:00 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 08:00 0 2 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 09:00 0 3 3 2 7 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 10:00 0 3 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 11:00 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 12:00 0 0 1 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 13:00 0 1 0 3 7 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 14:00 0 1 0 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 15:00 0 2 10 6 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 16:00 0 2 5 6 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 17:00 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 18:00 0 0 2 3 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 19:00 0 0 0 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 20:00 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 21:00 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 22:00 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 23:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Day Total 0 16 23 43 77 25 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 St. Anthony Police Department Case Number: 18007475 Page 2 1900 Block of Pleasant Street Date Start: 11 -Oct -18 Date End: 18 -Oct -18 Date\Speed (MPH) 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 >65 Total 10/13/2018 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 03:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 08:00 0 0 0 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 09:00 0 1 0 2 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 10:00 0 0 1 1 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 11:00 0 0 0 2 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12:00 0 0 1 6 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 13:00 0 2 2 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 14:00 0 1 5 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 15:00 0 1 1 4 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 16:00 0 3 1 10 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 17:00 0 3 0 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 18:00 0 1 0 3 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 19:00 0 0 0 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 20:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 21:00 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 22:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 23:00 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Day Total 0 14 12 47 63 35 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 174 10/14/2018 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 07:00 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 08:00 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 09:00 0 4 1 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 10:00 0 4 1 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 11:00 0 1 0 1 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 12:00 0 0 0 2 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 13:00 0 2 0 4 4 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 14:00 0 1 0 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 15:00 0 1 0 0 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 16:00 0 2 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 17:00 0 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 18:00 0 3 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 19:00 0 3 1 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 20:00 0 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 21:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 22:00 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 23:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Day Total 0 28 11 22 54 33 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 St. Anthony Police Department Case Number: 18007475 Page 3 1900 Block of Pleasant Street Date Start: 11 -Oct -18 Date End: 18 -Oct -18 Date\Speed (MPH) 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 >65 Total 10/15/2018 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 01:00 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 02:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 06:00 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 07:00 0 2 1 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 08:00 0 1 3 4 4 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 09:00 0 3 0 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 10:00 0 1 0 2 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 11:00 0 0 0 2 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12:00 0 7 3 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 13:00 0 1 2 2 9 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 14:00 0 1 5 4 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 15:00 0 4 0 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 16:00 0 3 0 7 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 17:00 0 5 1 5 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 18:00 0 1 0 5 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 19:00 0 1 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 20:00 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 21:00 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 22:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 23:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Day Total 0 30 16 54 80 35 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 220 10/16/2018 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 05:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 06:00 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 07:00 0 1 0 4 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 08:00 0 0 1 6 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 09:00 0 3 1 4 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 10:00 0 1 0 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 11:00 0 0 0 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 12:00 0 6 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 13:00 0 2 1 6 11 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 14:00 0 1 0 2 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 15:00 0 1 0 3 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 16:00 0 4 3 7 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 17:00 0 8 3 9 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 18:00 0 2 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 19:00 0 1 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 20:00 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 21:00 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 22:00 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 23:00 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Day Total 0 30 9 63 81 26 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 213 St. Anthony Police Department Case Number: 18007475 Page 4 1900 Block of Pleasant Street Date Start: 11 -Oct -18 Date End: 18 -Oct -18 Date\Speed (MPH) 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 >65 Total 10/17/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 03:00 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 04:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:00 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 06:00 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 07:00 0 0 0 1 2 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 08:00 0 0 1 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 09:00 0 1 2 3 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 10:00 0 3 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 11:00 0 0 1 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12:00 0 0 2 5 5 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 13:00 0 2 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 14:00 0 2 1 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 15:00 0 0 1 2 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 16:00 0 0 1 5 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 17:00 0 3 1 4 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 18:00 0 0 1 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 19:00 0 2 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 20:00 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 21:00 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Day Total 0 13 12 43 81 30 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 187 10/18/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 06:00 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 07:00 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 08:00 0 0 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 09:00 0 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 10:00 0 1 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 11:00 0 5 4 7 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 12:00 0 1 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 13:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Combined Total 0 153 105 310 511 207 28 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 1322 85 percentile = 26 St. Anthony Police Department Case Number: 18007475 Combined Page 1 1900 Block of Pleasant Street Date Start: 11 -Oct -18 Date End: 18 -Oct -18 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 >65 0 153 105 310 511 207 28 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 85 percentile = 26 Heather Butkowski From: Jeff Spiess Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2018 9:48 AM To: Heather Butkowski Subject: RE: Pleasant Street Hi Heather, The following are my responses to their concerns: 1. Access for public safety vehicles especially fire trucks: There is no concern for police vehicles. 2. Elimination of congestion: Parking on one side of the street would eliminate congestion on any street. I asked four patrol officers and was told by three of them (who primarily work dayshift) that there are not congestion issues. The fourth officer (who works a mix of dayshifts and nightshifts) told me that the roadway can see more parking on nice summer evenings, but nothing he would deem a hazard. For Targe events, such as Lauderdale Day in the Park, the roadway can become congested. 3. Safety for pedestrians and especially children crossing the street: More visibility will increase pedestrian safety. I checked our records back to 2011 and there was only one traffic related complaint with our department, which was from 2013 (case number 13007385). In this case, the resident from 1907 Pleasant Street reported that the ribbon and stakes used to block her driveway from Lauderdale Community Park traffic had been removed. 4. Better access for the mail carrier: no opinion. USPS should be able to provide better information. 5. Ability to safely back out of a driveway: Vehicles parked on only one side of any the street would provide more visibility for backing. I know that there are cities that have an ordinance against parking a vehicle across from a driveway, though I do not see one in Lauderdale's city code. I hope this helps. Please let me know if you want any further input or information. Thanks, -Jeff G Jeff Spiess Captain City of St. Anthony Village 3301 Silver Lake RD, St. Anthony, MN 55418 612-782-3370 1 www.savmn.com jeff.spiess@saymn.com From: Heather Butkowski Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 7:03 PM To: Jeff Spiess <jeff.spiess@savmn.com>; Rich Hinrichs <rich.hinrichs@falconheights.org> Cc: Kelly Dolphin <Kelly.Dolphin@lauderdalemn.org> Subject: Pleasant Street Good Afternoon, 1 Council member Kelly Dolphin and I met with residents that live along Pleasant Street by Community Park. In summary, they would like to see the city council approve one sided parking on the west side near the playground and prohibit parking on the residential side of Pleasant Street just across from the Park. They provided the attached documents. Among their top concerns were: 1. Access for public safety vehicles especially fire trucks 2. Elimination of congestion 3. Safety for pedestrians and especially children crossing the street 4. Better access for the mail carrier 5. Ability to safely back out of driveway I am looking for your perspective on the issues relevant to police and fire to share with the neighbors and city council. Thank you, Heather Butkowski City Administrator City of Lauderdale 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 651.792.7657 heather.butkowski@lauderdalemn.org 2