Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09/08/2020
The City Council is meeting as a legislative body to conduct the business of the City according to Robert's Rules of Order and the Standing Rules of Order and Business of the City Council. Unless so ordered by the Mayor, citizen participation is limited to the times indicated and always within the prescribed rules of conduct for public input at meetings. 1. CALL TO ORDER THE LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVALS a. Agenda b. Minutes of the August 25, 2020 City Council Meeting c. Claims Totaling $87,987.00 4. CONSENT 5. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS/RECOGNITIONS/PROCLAMATIONS 6. INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS / REPORTS a. City Council Updates 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public hearings are conducted so that the public affected by a proposal may have input into the decision. During hearings all affected residents will be given an opportunity to speak pursuant to the Robert's Rules of Order and the standing rules of order and business of the City Council. a. Revisions Title 9, Chapter 7 Regulating Fences and Retaining Walls 8. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM a. 2021 Budget and Levy b. Resolution No. 090820A — Approving Allocations of the City's CARES Act Funds LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 7:30 P.M. TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2020 Due to the coronavirus, the city council will hold meetings remotely until the City Council rescinds the emergency declaration. The public may monitor the meeting on Lauderdale's public access channel 16 for cable subscribers or online at https://www.ctvnorthsuburbs.org/your- city/lauderdale/. To make public comment during the meeting, use https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88392840023?pwd—MmxPcUtNOXhySGQ2U klkTDVQb29Cdz09 with Passcode: 352808 or call 1-301-715-8592 with webinar ID: 883 9284 0023. The City Council is meeting as a legislative body to conduct the business of the City according to Robert's Rules of Order and the Standing Rules of Order and Business of the City Council. Unless so ordered by the Mayor, citizen participation is limited to the times indicated and always within the prescribed rules of conduct for public input at meetings. 1. CALL TO ORDER THE LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVALS a. Agenda b. Minutes of the August 25, 2020 City Council Meeting c. Claims Totaling $87,987.00 4. CONSENT 5. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS/RECOGNITIONS/PROCLAMATIONS 6. INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS / REPORTS a. City Council Updates 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public hearings are conducted so that the public affected by a proposal may have input into the decision. During hearings all affected residents will be given an opportunity to speak pursuant to the Robert's Rules of Order and the standing rules of order and business of the City Council. a. Revisions Title 9, Chapter 7 Regulating Fences and Retaining Walls 8. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM a. 2021 Budget and Levy b. Resolution No. 090820A — Approving Allocations of the City's CARES Act Funds c. State of Minnesota 2020 CARES Act Grant County — Municipality Agreement d. 1795 Eustis Street Update e. Planning for Halloween During a Pandemic f. Social Media Policy 9. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 10. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 11. SET AGENDA FOR NEXT MEETING a. Adoption of 2021 Preliminary Budget and Levy b. Nuisance Abatements c. Website Proposals d. Warming House Plans e. MWMO Update in October 12. WORK SESSION a. Process for Handling Requests for Deviations from City Code b. Coronavirus Impacts Update c. Community Development Update d. Opportunity for the Public to Address the City Council Any member of the public may speak at this time on any item not on the agenda. In consideration for the public attending the meeting, this portion of the meeting will be limited to fifteen (15) minutes. Individuals are requested to limit their comments to four (4) minutes or less. If the majority of the Council determines that additional time on a specific issue is warranted, then discussion on that issue shall be continued at the end of the agenda. Before addressing the City Council, members of the public are asked to step up to the microphone, give their name, address, and state the subject to be discussed. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to any member thereof. No person other than members of the Council and the person having the floor shall be permitted to enter any discussion without permission of the presiding officer. Your participation, as prescribed by the Robert's Rules of Order and the standing rules of order and business of the City Council, is welcomed and your cooperation is greatly appreciated. 13. ADJOURNMENT LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES HELD REMOTELY VIA TELECONFERENCE Page 1 of 4 August 25, 2020 Call to Order Mayor Gaasch called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 7:37 p.m. Roll Call Councilors present: Andi Moffatt, Jeff Dains, Roxanne Grove, Kelly Dolphin, and Mayor Mary Gaasch. Councilors absent: None. Staff present: Heather Butkowski, City Administrator; Jim Bownik, Assistant to the City Administrator; and Miles Cline, Deputy City Clerk. Approvals Mayor Gaasch asked if there were any additions to the meeting agenda. There being none, Councilor Dains moved and seconded by Councilor Moffatt to approve the agenda. Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote. Mayor Gaasch asked if there were any corrections to the minutes of the August 18, 2020 city council meeting. There being none, Councilor Moffatt moved and seconded by Councilor Dains to approve the minutes of the August 18, 2020 city council meeting. Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote. Mayor Gaasch asked if there were any questions on the claims. There being none, Councilor Grove moved and seconded by Councilor Moffatt to approve the claims totaling $20,829.50. Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote. Consent Councilor Moffatt moved and seconded by Councilor Dains to approve the Consent Agenda thereby approving the amended North Suburban Communications Commission Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the Administration of the Cable Communication Franchise. Informational Presentations/Reports A. City Council Updates Councilor Dains said that the Mississippi Watershed Management Organization planned to attend an October council meeting to present on storm water topics and the Adopt -a -Drain program. Mayor Gaasch shared that cities have been collaborating with school districts to make difficult decisions on how to operate schools safely this upcoming year. Gaasch added that she would like input from the public on how the City can support families and students in need of assistance. LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES HELD REMOTELY VIA TELECONFERENCE Page 2 of 4 August 25, 2020 Discussion/Action Item A. Draft Fence Ordinance Revisions Over the past year, the Council has been improving the fence ordinance to address areas where residents have requested to deviate from the current standards, especially front yard fences. During the meeting, the Council discussed safety standards at alley egress and site lines at intersections as well as aesthetic standards. Staff will revise the draft for the next meeting and advertise a public hearing on the issue to get community feedback prior to adoption by the end of September B. Request for a Fence in the Right -of -Way at 2445 Summer Street — Resolution No. 082520A Zack and Claire Zehrer, 2445 Summer Street, requested the City Council grant an exception to city code to allow them to construct a fence in the right-of-way of Summer Street, on the east side of the alley between Malvern Street and Walnut Street. The Summer Street boulevard is approximately eleven feet wide, plus there is a one -foot setback requirement for corner houses. Thus, the minimum setback from Summer Street for the fence is twelve feet. They proposed to locate the fence six feet from Summer Street, which would be an encroachment of five feet. Councilor Dolphin made a motion to approve Resolution No. 082520A as presented. The motion was seconded by Councilor Dains and failed on a 3-2 roll call vote with Councilors Dolphin and Dains voting yea, and Councilors Grove, Moffatt, and Mayor Gaasch voting nay. C. Capitol Region Watershed District Cooperative Agreement with the City of Lauderdale for Construction and Maintenance of Gasperre Ravine Improvements Butkowski spoke to the ravine erosion on the north side of the trolley tracks near Rosehill Townhomes. This erosion expanded quickly after the Japanese knotweed treatments were successful and left bare soils. Capital Regions Watershed District (CRWD) and City staff have been working on a plan to fix the erosion with the support of Rosehill Townhomes. Their association board signed temporary and permanent easement agreements to allow for the repairs. The work was bid with the Luther Seminary Pond Project improvements to get the best pricing. CRWD paid for all costs to engineer a solution and bid the project. The cost of the repairs was anticipated to be around $60,000. Lauderdale was responsible for the construction costs and future maintenance. The construction costs were paid to CRWD over three years from the storm water improvement fund. Councilor Moffatt made a motion to approve the Capitol Region Watershed District Cooperative Agreement with the City of Lauderdale for Construction and Maintenance of Gasperre Ravine Improvements. This was seconded by Councilor Grove and carried unanimously on a roll call vote. D. Capitol Region Watershed District Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Lauderdale and Falcon Heights for Construction and Maintenance of Fowell/Fulham Outfall Improvements LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES HELD REMOTELY VIA TELECONFERENCE Page 3 of 4 August 25, 2020 Butkowski explained that there was a storm water pipe that started at the corner of Folwell Avenue and Fulham Street on the Lauderdale / Falcon Heights border. The pipe went down a steep embankment on Falcon Heights' property to the ravine on the south side of the trolley tracks in Lauderdale. The volume of water through this pipe washed out the area at the bottom of the pipe multiple times. This project would move the storm water from the top of the pipe to the ravine through a series of grade changes to dissipate the energy of the flow to prevent further erosion of the ravine. Lauderdale and Falcon Heights were cooperating on the project with Capital Regions Watershed District (CRWD). CRWD paid for costs to engineer a solution and bid the project. The cost of the repairs was anticipated to be $100,000. Falcon Heights was responsible for the construction costs and future maintenance, while Lauderdale allowed the infrastructure on city owned property. Councilor Moffatt made a motion to approve the Capitol Region Watershed District Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Lauderdale and Falcon Heights for Construction and Maintenance of Fowell/Fulham Outfall Improvements. This was seconded by Councilor Dains and carried unanimously. E. Capitol Region Watershed District Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Lauderdale, Falcon Heights, Ramsey County, and University of Minnesota for Construction and Maintenance of Seminary Pond Improvements Butkowski noted that the City, in partnership with Capitol Region Watershed District (CRWD), Ramsey County, Luther Seminary, and Greenway Village Apartments, began looking at water rate and quality issues around Seminary Pond over four years ago. The efforts resulted in a project to improve the pond the City installed on Luther Seminary property in the 1980s. The project required the cooperation of the original partners, Falcon Heights, and the University of Minnesota to bring to fruition. CRWD secured grants and committed the resources needed to make the project affordable to the partners. Lauderdale's anticipated contribution was $96,000. The total project cost with engineering and construction was expected to exceed $1,000,000. Councilor Dolphin made a motion to approve the Capitol Region Watershed District Cooperative Agreement with the Cities of Lauderdale, Falcon Heights, Ramsey County, and University of Minnesota for Construction and Maintenance of Seminary Pond Improvements. This was seconded by Councilor Dains and carried unanimously. Set Agenda for Next Meeting Administrator Butkowski stated that the September 8 council meeting may include the 2021 budget and levy and Halloween ideas. Work Session A. Coronavirus Impacts Update Butkowski stated that staff was accounting for the amount of CARES funding spent to date, and determining a plan for Council consideration of what to do with the remaining funds. LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES HELD REMOTELY VIA TELECONFERENCE Page 4 of 4 August 25, 2020 Butkowski asked the Council if they needed additional technology to participate in the remote Council meetings. The City may receive a small allocation of CARES funding specifically for elections; however, the funds come with red tape. Staff will bring forth an agenda item to have the money remitted to Ramsey County Elections to pay for costs they incurred on behalf of the City. B. Community Development Update Butkowski stated that letters were sent regarding diseased ash trees. Goodmanson Construction planned to start the excavation process at Skyview Park with the plan of installing new playground equipment the third week of September. Staff was working with the police department to address this summer's street racing concerns. The Adopt -a -Drain program encouraged people to sign up online. For participating, they would receive a State Fair bag. C. Opportunity for the Public to Address the City Council Mayor Gaasch opened up the floor to anyone in attendance interested in addressing the Council. Josh Dirksen, 1815 Lake Street, stated his concerns about the three-foot front yard fence guidelines. He asked what traffic and accident data was used to develop the sightline regulations. There being no additional people interested in speaking, Mayor Gaasch closed the floor. Adj ournment Councilor Dains moved and seconded by Councilor Grove to adjourn the meeting at 9:31 p.m. Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote. Respectfully submitted, 6 6/7k6 Heather Butkowski City Administrator CITY OF LAUDERDALE LAUDERDALE CITY HALL 1891 WALNUT STREET LAUDERDALE, MN 55113 651-792-7650 651-631-2066 FAx Request for Council Action To: Mayor and City Council From: City Administrator Meeting Date: September 8, 2020 Subject: List of Claims The claims totaling $87,987.00 are provided for City Council review and approval that includes check numbers 27059 to 27073. Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date User: Printed: heather.butkowski 9/4/2020 1:27 PM Check No Vendor No Invoice No Vendor Name Description Check Date Reference Check Amount ACH 43 ACH 44 ACH 45 ACH 46 ACH 47 27059 15 64796 27060 184 4058883548 4059512979 27061 29 3972 Public Employees Retirement Association PR Batch 51800.09.2020 PERA Coordinated PR Batch 51800.09.2020 PERA Coordinated 09/04/2020 PR Batch 51800.09.2020 PER PR Batch 51800.09.2020 PER Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 43: Minnesota Department of Revenue PR Batch 51800.09.2020 State Income Tax 09/04/2020 PR Batch 51800.09.2020 Stat Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 44: ICMA Retirement Corporation PR Batch 51800.09.2020 Deferred Comp PR Batch 51800.09.2020 Deferred Comp 09/04/2020 PR Batch 51800.09.2020 Def.( PR Batch 51800.09.2020 Deft Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 45: Internal Revenue Service PR Batch 51800.09.2020 Medicare Employee Pc PR Batch 51800.09.2020 Medicare Employer Po PR Batch 51800.09.2020 FICA Employer Portio PR Batch 51800.09.2020 Federal Income Tax PR Batch 51800.09.2020 FICA Employee Portio 09/04/2020 PR Batch 51800.09.2020 Mec PR Batch 51800.09.2020 Mec PR Batch 51800.09.2020 FIC, PR Batch 51800.09.2020 Fed( PR Batch 51800.09.2020 FIC. Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 46: Public Employees Insurance Program PR Batch 51800.09.2020 Dental PR Batch 51800.09.2020 Health Insurance 09/04/2020 PR Batch 51800.09.2020 Den PR Batch 51800.09.2020 FIea Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 47: Total for 9/4/2020: Be There Pest Control LLC 09/08/2020 3Q20 Quarterly Pest Control Total for Check Number 27059: Cintas August Uniforms August Uniforms City of St Anthony September Police Services 09/08/2020 Total for Check Number 27060: 09/08/2020 Total for Check Number 27061: 1,170.76 1,014.66 2,185.42 641.96 641.96 1,758.68 1,075.99 2,834.67 245.93 245.93 1,051.63 1,658.46 1,051.63 4,253.58 116.10 2,212.80 2,328.90 12,244.53 100.00 100.00 11.03 11.03 22.06 62,255.92 62,255.92 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (9/4/2020 1:27 PM) Page 1 Check No Vendor No Invoice No Vendor Name Description Check Date Reference Check Amount 27062 25 County of Ramsey 09/08/2020 092020 Second Half Property Taxes - 1795 Eustis Street 2,042.65 27063 223 10417872013 Total for Check Number 27062: 2,042.65 Dell Marketing LP 09/08/2020 HB - Computer 724.41 Total for Check Number 27063: 724.41 27064 61 Gopher State One Call 09/08/2020 0080529 August 2020 Locates 60.75 27065 31 Kennedy & Graven Chartered 156409 1795 Eustis Project 156409 July Legal Services Total for Check Number 27064: 60.75 09/08/2020 925.00 726.25 Total for Check Number 27065: 1,651.25 27066 30 League of Minnesota Cities 09/08/2020 327099 Annual Membership Dues 2,772.00 Total for Check Number 27066: 2,772.00 27067 28 Mike McPhillips Inc 09/08/2020 51746 Street Sweeping 1,377.50 Total for Check Number 27067: 1,377.50 27068 103 Minnesota Mayors Association 09/08/2020 092020 Annual Dues 30.00 Total for Check Number 27068: 30.00 27069 84 North Star Bank Cardmember Services 09/08/2020 092020 Park Signs 410.14 092020 Office Supplies 85.31 092020 JB Printer 288.83 092020 Election Food 61.31 092020 Pioneer Press 10.00 092020 Election Food 105.50 092020 Certified Code Enforcement Letters 13.90 Total for Check Number 27069: 974.99 27070 4 The Neighborhood Recycling Company Inc 09/08/2020 19092 August Multi -Family Recycling Unit 19092 August Single Unit Dwelling 27071 3 422620484 27072 7 8634009-0500-7 397.44 2,862.72 Total for Check Number 27070: 3,260.16 US National Equipment Finance Inc 09/08/2020 Copier Contract 176.00 Total for Check Number 27071: 176.00 Waste Management Inc 09/08/2020 City Hall Refuse 248.35 Total for Check Number 27072: 248.35 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (9/4/2020 1:27 PM) Page 2 Check No Vendor• No Invoice No Vendor Nanie Description Check Date Reference Check Amount 27073 74 Xcel Energy 698622126 Larpenteur Bridge Lights 698660149 2430 Larpenteur Avenue W 09/08/2020 26.09 20.34 Total for Check Number 27073: 46.43 Total for 9/8/2020: 75,742.47 Report Total (20 checks): 87,987.00 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (9/4/2020 1:27 PM) Page 3 LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing X Discussion X Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date August 25, 2020 ITEM NUMBER Fence Ordinance Revisions STAFF INITIAL APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Based on the discussion from the last meeting, staff revised the draft ordinance and the city engineer created images that matched the changes. The draft addresses the purpose of the moratorium, deciding whether to allow front yard fences, and if so, with what regulations. Through the process, the Council looked at ordinances from neighboring cities (Roseville, Falcon Heights, St. Anthony, Minneapolis, and St. Paul) for perspective on how other cities regulate fences. Part of that was looking at how other cities address safety concerns. The more nuanced piece was looking at how cities reflect community aesthetic standards in their fence ordinance. The general consensus of the Council was to allow front yard fences with conversations around heights, materials, and concerns unique to corner lots. The draft ordinance addresses each of these and focuses on using pictures and less technical jargon to explain what is al- lowed. In response to the previous council discussions and community feedback, staff propose sim- plifying the language to allow up to four foot fences in the front yard and then focusing on the fence materials the Council will allow. Due to safety concerns at corner lots, the draft limits front yard fences to those that are less than 50% opaque or see-through. The draft limits front yard fence materials to those that are aesthetic in character (non -chain link). That is something the Council will need to discuss during the meeting for the final draft. If corner lots are required to be see-through, it wouldn't be necessary to establish a site line triangle for front yards. The graphic shows the 15' site triangle on alleys. The change to a site triangle eliminates the requirement to be one -foot off the property line the entire length of the fence on a corner lot. No change was proposed to the rear yard setback. A couple of houses in town were not built to the front yard setback which left an area of their front yard not within the bounds of setback regulations. This was addressed by not de- fining the locations of fences in relation to setbacks but based on whether they are located in the front yard, side yard, or rear year. DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Through these revisions the Council can remove the language that allows residents to re- quest exceptions to the fence ordinance by replacing that with standards that apply to every- one to avoid arbitrary decision making processes. This doesn't prevent property owners from asking for variances from code, but the revisions should limit them. Prior to opening the meeting for public comment, staff will walk through the changes high- lighting the areas for discussion. After the Council completes their discussion, the public hearing may be opened. Between the September 8 and September 22 council meetings, the city attorney will review the draft Final changes and adoption will be considered at the September 22 meeting. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: CHAPTER 7 FENCES AND RETAINING WALLS SECTION: 9-7-1: Definitions 9-7-2: Scope 9-7-3: Permits 9-7-4: Regulations 9-7-5: Boundary Fence Materials 9-7-6: Variancc Heights and Setbacks 9-7-7: Sight Lines 9-7-48: Conformance 9-7-49: Penalty 9-7-1: DEFINITIONS: Boundary Fcncc: A fcncc parallcl to thc property linc. Decorative Fence: A stylized, non -chain link metal fence. Fence: Any partition, structure, wall, gate, or other object erected as a divider marker, physical or visual barrier, or enclosure located along thc boundary,a property line or within a yard. Fence Opacity or Opacity: The degree to which light or views are not able to be seen through a fence; not transparent. Support Il-- Fence section -t"! I I 11111111111111 More than 50% o )aque 50% opaque Less than 50% opaque 1 Picket Fence: A wooden fence built such that it is 50% or less opaque. Privacy Fence: A fence more than 50% opaque used for screening of outdoor living areas and for enclosures where restricted visibility or protection is required or desired. Retaining Wall: A structure constructed to hold back or support an earthen bank. 9-7-2: SCOPE: The provisions of this Chapter are intended to supplement the provisions of Title 10 of this Code relating to fences and retaining walls. 9-7-3: PERMITS: A. Residential Properties: The construction of fences over six feet above grade are not allowed. The construction of fences six feet above grade or less shall require a fence permit. B. Commercial And Industrial Properties: Fences in commercial and industrial areas may be erected to a height of six feet plus two feet for a security (barbed wire or other) arm. The construction of fences six feet above grade or less require a fence permit unless otherwise required by the state building code. C. Fence or building permits are required for fence modifications that expand the length or height of an existing fence on any property. D. Fence permits are required for all boundary _fences except non -property line fences that do not exceed three feet in height and are secured by posts no deeper than six inches in the ground. E. Permits are not required for maintenance which includes: painting; replacing up to one section not exceeding eight feet in length; and replacing up to two posts in any calendar year. Maintenance does not include increasing the height of the fence. F. Pcrmits arc not rcquircd for non boundary fcnccs that do not cxcccd thrcc fcct in hcight and arc sccurcd by posts no dccper than six inchcs into the ground. 2 F. The construction of all retaining walls over four feet in height shall require a building permit. The construction of retaining walls four feet in height or less shall require a retaining wall permit. Retaining walls are measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall. 9-7-4: REGULATIONS: A. Maintenance: All fences and retaining walls shall be regularly maintained and kept in good repair. Vegetation surrounding the fence or retaining wall shall be trimmed and well maintained. B. Sctback: In thc event a fcncc or retaining wall is adjacent to and parallel with thc front lot linc (or side lot linc on thc street side of a corncr lot), such fcncc or retaining wall shall bc set back at 1 ast one foot from thc street right of way or property linc. In the event a fcncc or retaining wall is adjacent to and parallel with a platted alley, such fcncc or rctaining wall shall bc sct back at least two fcct from thc alley right of way or property linc. GB. Face of Fences: That side of the fence considered to be the face (finished side as opposed to structural supports) shall face abutting property. DC. Public Rights Of Way: No fences or retaining walls shall bcare permitted on public rights of way without approval f thc City Council. D. Unimproved Alleys: Fences may be constructed in unimproved alley rights-of-way or vacated rights-of-way with utility easements upon completion of an encroachment agreement between the City and property owner. E. Abutment To Property Lines: Fences and retaining walls may be permitted along property lines subject to the following: 1. Physical Damages: Fences and retaining walls may abut property lines provided no physical damage -a of any kind results to abutting property. 2. Certificate Of Survey: Where the property line is not clearly dcfincd delineated by survey markers or pins, a certificate of survey may bc required by thc Building Official or Zoning Administrator to establish thc property lincwill be required. 3 3. Front Sctback Arca: No fcncc or retaining wall along or within thc front setback arca shall be permitted without thc approval of thc City C uncil. 43. Adjusting for Contours and Grade: At no point may fence panels exceed six feet in height nor shall fence posts exceed six and one-half feet in height from grade. 9-7-5: BOUNDARY FENCE MATERIALS: A. Privacy fences shall be made from cedar, redwood, or other decay resistant wood,—; vinyl,—; or composite material designed for fence applications. Privacy fences in residential areas shall not be made from chain link or metal fencing with slats. B. All other fences shall be made from cedar, redwood, or other decay resistant wood; vinyl; decorative steel, aluminum, or wrought iron; or chain link designed for fence applications. C. Materials that may not be used include garden and utility fencing or fabric. These materials are commonly referred to as snow or safety fencing; chicken wire; poultry fencing; hardware cloth; lawn fencing; rope, cabling, railroad ties, landscape timbers, utility poles, and lattice. In residentially zoned areas, security fencing is not allowed included barbed or razor wire and electric fencing. 9 7 6: VARIANCE: Any person wishing to erect or construct a fcncc or retaining wall in a manncr contrary to this Chaptcr shall first obtain permission for thc City Council. Any person wishing to crcct or construct a fcncc in a manncr contrary to Title 10 of this Codc shall first obtain a variancc from thc City Council for that purpose. 9-7-6: HEIGHTS AND SETBACKS A. Lot Types: 4 Lot type examples w Through lot Interior lot j I Corner lot Street l C a- 1. Interior lots share side lot lines with adjacent property owners. They may or may not be on an improved or platted alley. 2. Corner lots share a side lot line with one adjacent property owner with the opposite side yard along a public right-of-way. They may or may not be on an improved or platted alley. 3. Through lots extend from one street to another other. Through lots may be interior or corner lots. B. Interior Lots: Fence Height 6 ft 2 ft Setback Interior Lot Fence Height E ft Fence Height O ft I --- r Rear Yard I el go to Interior Side Yard Deck Dwelling Interior Side Yard Front Yard —Point of Intersection Fence Height 6 ft - — Fence Height 4 ft Fence Height 4 ft - 1 ft Setback Property Line -a e o Fence Location (with Setback) 5 1. Front Yard. a. Fences located in the front yard shall not exceed four feet in height and shall be 50% or less opaque. b. Fences shall be set back at least one foot from the front property line. c. Fences are required to have at least one gate no less than three feet in width. 2. Side Yard. Side yard fences shall not exceed six feet in height. 3. Rear Yard. a. Fences in the rear yard shall not exceed six feet in height. b. Fences and retaining walls on a platted alley shall be set back at least two feet from the alley right-of-way / rear property line. c. Fences and retaining walls not on a platted alley may be built on the rear property line. D. Corner Lots: Fence Heght Eft 2 ft Setback Corner Lot Fence Height 6 R f Fence Height O ft I— P L Rear Yard Interior Side Yard Point of— Intersection Comer Side Yard Front Yard Fence Height 6 ft Fence Height 4 R Fence Height 4 ft 1 ft Setback Property Line Fence Location (with Setback) 1. Front Yard. a. Fences shall not exceed four feet in height. 6 b. Fences shall be decorative (non -wood) and less than 50% opaque. 2. Side Yard. a. Fences abutting public right-of-way shall not exceed four in height. b. Fences located in the interior side yard shall not exceed six feet in height. 3. Rear Yard. a. Fences in the rear yard shall not exceed six feet in height. The rear yard begins at the corner of the rear wall of the principal structure to the rear lot line exclusive of area reserved for site lines. Open decks and porches shall not be considered part of the principal structure. b. Fences and retaining walls on a platted alley shall be set back at least two feet from the alley right-of-way / rear property line. c. Fences and retaining walls not on a platted alley may be built on the rear property line. 9-7-7: ALLEY SITE LINES Clear View Triangle at Alleys - PROPERTY LINE - - ROADWAY 1s•-0' Clear view/ triangle 15-0' 11 ALLEY }- 1s• -o• -4- BOULEVARD 7 1 A fence may not be constructed in a rear -yard sight visibility triangle along an improved alley (measured 15 feet along the edge of the alley and 15 feet along the street at the back edge of the curb to a third line connecting the sides). 9-7-48: CONFORMANCE Nothing herein is intended or shall be deemed to make legal or conforming any fence constructed prior to April 19, 2016 which was not constructed in full compliance with the terms of the ordinance then in effect. 9-7-49: PENALTY: Violations of this Chapter shall constitute a misdemeanor. Each day that a violation remains shall constitute a separate offense. The City may also take additional enforcement action it finds appropriate. In case any fence or retaining wall is, or is proposed to be, erected, constructed, reconstructed, altered, maintained, or used in violation of this Chapter, the City Council may institute in the name of the City any appropriate action or proceeding to prevent, restrain, correct, or abate such fence, structure, or retaining wall constituting a violation. Adopted by the Lauderdale City Council the 22nd day of September, 2020. Published in summary in the Pioneer Press the 24th day of September, 2020. 8 LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date September 8, 2020 ITEM NUMBER STAFF INITIAL 2021 Budget and Levy APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: In July, the Council reviewed a first draft of the general fund budget for 2021. Since then the local government aid (LGA) number was finalized and the fiscal disparities amounts were released. The fiscal disparities amount carne in at $7,805 more than last year. Staff made minor revisions to the budget based on cost trends. Staff also eliminated the annual transfer to the development fund. This was something discussed while developing the City's financial plan to off -set an anticipate increase in fire service costs. To balance the budget required an increase of $46,291 resulting in an overall general fund increase of 1.6%. Staff used these numbers to run the tax impacts. The county assessor determined the price of median value home in Lauderdale went up 6.5% over the past year. That increase plus the value of improvements including $900,000 in new home construction pushed the total value of Lauderdale real estate up 13.7%. Those increases drove down the tax rate 1.854% over last year. In short, Lauderdale residents will see a reduction in their property taxes if their home value stays the same. The tax on a median valued home would go up $4.96 be- cause of the increase in value year -over -year. Not all of the value of the new houses have been factored in so next year there will be additional property value coming on-line to share the tax levy among. Staff can walk through the budget and tax impacts in greater detail during the meeting. The preliminary levy will be set at the September 22 meeting. That sets the threshold for the levy for 2021; the Council can reduce the levy amount but not increase it. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: CITY OF LAUDERDALE GENERAL FUND REVENUES 2021 2019 2020 2021 Account Number Account Description Actual Adopted Proposed 101-00000-410-31010 CURRENT AD VALOREM TAXES $ 667,521 $ 707,094 $ 753,385 101-00000-410-31020 DELINQUENT AD VALOREM TAXES $ 5,322 $ - $ - 101-00000-410-31400 FISCAL DISPARITIES $ 139,873 $ 138,520 $ 146,325 101-00000-410-31055 EXCESS TAX INCREMENT $ $ - $ - 101-00000-410-31900 PENALTIES AND INTEREST TAXES $ 363 $ $ - TAXES $ 813,080 $ 845,614 $ 899,710 101-00000-410-32110 LIQUOR LICENSES $ 150 $ 150 $ 150 101-00000-410-32180 TOBACCO LICENSES $ 600 $ 400 $ 400 101-00000-410-32190 OTHER BUSINESS LICENSES $ 2,350 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 101-00000-410-32192 HVAC CONTRACTOR LICENSES $ 1,150 $ 1,500 $ 1,100 101-00000-410-32240 ANIMAL LICENSES $ 86 $ 100 $ 100 101-00000-420-32210 BUILDING PERMITS $ 24,420 $ 25,000 $ 24,000 101-00000-420-32230 PLUMBING & HEATING PERMITS $ 4,941 $ 8,000 $ 5,000 101-00000-420-32270 RENTAL HOUSING LICENSES $ 9,078 $ 3,500 $ 5,000 101-00000-430-32261 EXCAVATING PERMITS $ - $ - $ - PERMITS & LICENSES $ 42,774 $ 40,650 $ 37,750 101-00000-410-33401 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID $ 539,622 $ 547,872 $ 524,591 101-00000-410-33422 OTHER STATE GRANTS & AIDS $ 1,198 $ 1,198 $ 1,198 101-00000-410-33423 OTHER GRANTS & AIDS $ - $ - $ - INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE $ 540,820 $ 549,070 $ 525,789 101-00000-410-34101 CITY HALL RENT $ 3,886 $ 4,750 $ 1,000 101-00000-410-34103 ZONING & SUBDIVISION FEES $ 1,750 $ 1,000 $ 1,500 101-00000-420-34104 PLAN REVIEW FEES $ 9,193 $ 5,000 $ 7,000 101-00000-410-34105 SALE OF MAPS & PUBLICATIONS $ 29 $ - $ - 101-00000-410-34108 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES $ 437 $ $ - 101-00000-420-34202 SPECIAL FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES $ 1,210 $ 1,000 $ - 101-00000-420-34206 MOWING & GARBAGE CLEANUP $ - $ - $ 101-00000-430-34303 SNOW REMOVAL CHARGES $ - $ - $ - 101-00000-450-34780 PARK SHELTER FEES $ 250 $ 200 $ 200 101-00000-450-34920 MERCHANDISE SALES $ 450 $ 400 $ 400 CHARGES FOR SERVICES $ 17,205 $ 12,350 $ 10,100 2019 2020 2020 Account Number Account Description Actual Adopted Proposed 101-00000-420-35101 COURT FINES & ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES $ 29,977 $ 27,000 $ 27,000 101-00000-420-35200 FORFEITED & SEIZED ASSETS $ $ $ - FINES & FORFEITS $ 29,977 $ 27,000 $ 27,000 101-00000-410-36101 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS - COUNTY $ 2,303 $ $ - 101-00000-410-36102 PENALTIES & INTEREST $ - $ - $ - 101-00000-410-36200 OTHER MISCELLEANOUS REVENUE $ 1,378 $ - $ - 101-00000-410-36210 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS $ 30,294 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 101-00000-410-36215 OTHER FEES (CREDIT CARD) $ 370 $ 500 $ 500 101-00000-410-36230 CONTRIBUTIONS & DONATIONS (NON COMM EN $ - $ $ 101-00000-450-36230 CONTRIBUTIONS & DONATIONS (COMM EVENT $ 2,159 $ 2,500 $ - 101-00000-420-36260 SURCHARGES COLLECTED $ 1,246 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ 37,750 $ 10,000 $ 7,500 101-00000-410-39101 SALE OF CAPITAL ASSETS $ - $ - $ 101-00000-410-39200 TRANSFER IN $ - $ $ OTHER SOURCES $ $ $ TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE $ 1,481,605 $ 1,484,684 $ 1,507,849 REVENUES OVER/UNDER EXPENDITURES $ - $ - $ FUND BALANCE - January 1 FUND BALANCE - December 31 $ 735,673 $ 780,967 $ 780,967 $ 780,967 $ 780,967 $ 780,967 CITY OF LAUDERDALE GENERAL FUND EXPENSE SUMMARY 2021 2019 2020 2021 Department Number Title Actual Adopted Proposed 41110 LEGISLATIVE $ 26,280 $ 26,423 $ 23,853 41320 CITY ADMINISTRATION $ 233,714 $ 235,810 $ 242,209 41410 ELECTIONS $ 18,062 $ 24,930 $ 19,035 41610 LEGAL $ 30,523 $ 28,500 $ 31,000 41910 PLANNING $ 32,929 $ 37,427 $ 36,107 41940 GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS $ 29,121 $ 34,400 $ 31,600 GENERAL GOVERNMENT $ 370,628 $ 387,490 $ 383,804 42100 PUBLIC SAFETY $ 771,270 $ 796,463 $ 861,021 42400 BUILDING INSPECTIONS $ 51,389 $ 50,082 $ 51,418 PUBLIC SAFETY $ 822,659 $ 846,545 $ 912,439 43121 PUBLIC WORKS $ 105,393 $ 100,148 $ 101,487 43160 STREET LIGHTING $ 6,124 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 PUBLIC WORKS $ 111,518 $ 106,148 $ 107,487 45200 PARKS & RECREATION $ 92,865 $ 93,501 $ 92,119 46500 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT $ 1,225 $ 5,000 $ 4,000 49200 MISCELLANEOUS UNALLOCATED EXPENSES $ $ 8,000 $ 8,000 49300 OTHER FINANCING USES $ 38,000 $ 38,000 $ OTHER $ 132,090 $ 144,501 $ 104,119 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 1,436,895 $ 1,484,684 $ 1,507,849 CITY OF LAUDERDALE LEGISLATIVE 2021 2019 2020 2021 Account Number Account Description Actual Adopted Proposed 101-41110-410-41030 PART TIME EMPLOYEES $ 16,500 $ 16,500 $ 16,500 101-41110-410-41220 FICA $ 1,023 $ 1,023 $ 1,023 101-41110-410-41225 MEDICARE $ 240 $ 239 $ 239 101-41110-410-41510 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE $ 44 $ 41 $ 41 PERSONNEL $ 17,806 $ 17,803 $ 17,803 101-41110-410-42010 OFFICE SUPPLIES $ - $ $ - 101-41110-410-42110 GENERAL SUPPLIES $ - $ 50 $ 50 101-41110-410-42115 MEETINGS $ - $ 200 $ 200 101-41110-410-42410 MINOR TOOLS & EQUIPMENT $ - $ $ - SUPPLIES $ - $ 250 $ 250 101-41110-410-43140 TRAINING & EDUCATION $ 1,810 $ 2,000 $ 500 101-41110-410-43310 TRAVEL EXPENSE $ 1,974 $ 1,300 $ 500 101-41110-410-43510 LEGAL NOTICES & PUBLISHING $ 475 $ 500 $ 500 101-41110-410-43610 INSURANCE & BONDS $ 122 $ 270 $ 200 101-41110-410-44330 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS $ 4,092 $ 4,300 $ 4,100 OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES $ 8,474 $ 8,370 $ 5,800 101-41110-410-45700 OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ - $ $ $ $ 26,280 $ 26,423 $ 23,853 NOTES: Dues include Metro Cities, League of Minnesota Cities, Mayor's Association and Suburban Rate Authority CITY OF LAUDERDALE CITY ADMINISTRATION 2021 2019 2020 2021 Account Number Account Description Actual Adopted Proposed 101-41320-410-41010 FULL TIME EMPLOYEES $ 129,019 $ 133,017 $ 137,008 101-41320-410-41020 OVERTIME $ - $ - $ - 101-41320-410-41040 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES $ - $ $ - 101-41320-410-41210 PERA $ 9,637 $ 9,976 $ 10,276 101-41320-410-41220 FICA $ 8,163 $ 8,247 $ 8,494 101-41320-410-41225 MEDICARE $ 1,909 $ 1,929 $ 1,987 101-41320-410-41250 DEFERRED COMPENSATION $ 2,006 $ 1,700 $ 2,000 101-41320-410-41310 HEALTH INSURANCE $ 18,161 $ 17,417 $ 18,141 101-41320-410-41320 DENTAL INSURANCE $ 395 $ 350 $ 400 101-41320-410-41330 LIFE INSURANCE $ 840 $ 860 $ 850 101-41320-410-41340 DISABILITY INSURANCE $ 636 $ 800 $ 650 101-41320-410-41420 UNEMPLOYMENT $ - $ $ 101-41320-410-41510 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE $ 1,086 $ 1,064 $ 1,096 PERSONNEL $ 171,852 $ 175,360 $ 180,902 101-41320-410-42010 OFFICE SUPPLIES $ 592 $ 700 $ 700 101-41320-410-42020 COMPUTER SUPPLIES $ - $ 650 $ 650 101-41320-410-42030 PRINTED FORMS $ 3,034 $ 2,500 $ 3,100 101-41320-410-42110 GENERAL SUPPLIES $ - $ 700 $ 400 101-41320-410-42115 MEETINGS $ 37 $ $ 101-41320-410-42410 MINOR EQUIPMENT & TOOLS $ - $ $ 101-41320-410-42420 MINOR COMPUTER EQUIPMENT $ 3,876 $ 500 $ 1,000 SUPPLIES $ 7,539 $ 5,050 $ 5,850 101-41320-410-43030 AUDITING & ACCOUNTING SERVICES $ 18,384 $ 14,000 $ 18,500 101-41320-410-43090 EXPERT & PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (IT) $ 17,881 $ 20,000 $ 19,057 101-41320-410-43140 TRAINING & EDUCATION $ 670 $ 1,700 $ 1,000 101-41320-410-43220 POSTAGE $ 2,010 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 101-41320-410-43250 OTHER COMMUNICATIONS $ $ - $ 101-41320-410-43310 TRAVEL EXPENSE $ 1,512 $ 1,500 $ 500 101-41320-410-43510 LEGAL NOTICES & PUBLISHING $ 402 $ 800 $ 500 101-41320-410-43610 INSURANCE & BONDS $ 1,572 $ 3,200 $ 1,700 101-41320-410-44040 VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS $ $ $ 101-41320-410-44160 RENTS & LEASES $ 2,962 $ 2,800 $ 3,000 101-41320-410-44325 BANK FEES & CHARGES $ 1,666 $ 2,400 $ 1,900 101-41320-410-44330 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS $ 6,245 $ 5,700 $ 6,200 101-41320-410-44370 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $ 1,018 $ 1,300 $ 1,100 OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES $ 54,323 $ 55,400 $ 55,457 101-41320-410-45700 OFFICE EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE $ - $ - $ CAPITAL OUTLAY $ - $ - $ TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 233,714 $ 235,810 $ 242,209 NOTES Dues includes MCFOA, MAMA, MN GFOA, IMCA, MCMA, Press, Notary, RC GIS CITY OF LAUDERDALE ELECTIONS 2021 Account Number 101-41410-410-41010 101-41410-410-41040 101-41410-410-41210 101-41410-410-41220 101-41410-410-41225 101-41410-410-41250 101-41410-410-41310 101-41410-410-41320 101-41410-410-41330 101-41410-410-41340 101-41410-410-41510 101-41410-410-42010 101-41410-410-42110 101-41410-410-42410 101-41410-410-43510 101-41410-410-44370 101-41410-410-45700 Account Description FULL TIME EMPLOYEES TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES PERA FICA MEDICARE DEFERRED COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE PERSONNEL OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES MINOR EQUIPMENT & TOOLS SUPPLIES LEGAL NOTICES PUBLISHING MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES (AB VOTING) OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES OFFICE EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE CAPITAL OUTLAY 2019 2020 2021 Actual Adopted Proposed $ 11,450 $ 11,891 $ 12,248 $ - $ 5,000 $ - $ 855 $ 892 $ 919 $ 724 $ 737 $ 759 $ 169 $ 172 $ 178 $ 211 $ 160 $ 200 $ 1,693 $ 1,700 $ 1,758 $ 46 $ 50 $ 50 $ 55 $ 60 $ 60 $ 59 $ 73 $ 65 $ 96 $ 95 $ 98 $ 15,359 $ 20,830 $ 16,335 $ - $ 100 $ 100 $ 45 $ 500 $ 100 $ 2,658 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 $ 2,703 $ 3,100 $ 2,700 $ $ 1,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,000 $ TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 18,062 $ 24,930 $ 19,035 CITY OF LAUDERDALE LEGAL 2021 Account Number 101-41610-410-43040 101-41610-410-43045 Account Description LEGAL SERVICES - CIVIL PROCESS LEGAL SERVICES - PROSECUTION OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 2019 Actual $ 19,276 $ 11,247 $ 30,523 $ $ $ 2020 Adopted 17,000 11,500 28,500 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 30,523 $ 28,500 2021 Proposed $ 19,000 $ 12,000 $ 31,000 $ 31,000 CITY OF LAUDERDALE PLANNING, ZONING & INSPECTIONS 2021 2019 2020 2021 Account Number Account Description Actual Adopted Proposed 101-41910-410-41010 FULL TIME EMPLOYEES $ 15,753 $ 16,108 $ 16,591 101-41910-410-41210 PERA $ 1,173 $ 1,208 $ 1,244 100-41910-410-41220 FICA $ 996 $ 999 $ 1,029 101-41910-410-41225 MEDICARE $ 233 $ 234 $ 241 101-41910-410-41250 DEFERRED COMPENSATION $ 242 $ 200 $ 225 101-41910-410-41310 HEALTH INSURANCE $ 2,394 $ 2,234 $ 2,379 101-41910-410-41320 DENTAL INSURANCE $ 70 $ 100 $ 80 101-41910-410-41330 LIFE INSURANCE $ 107 $ 90 $ 110 101-41910-410-41340 DISABILITIY INSURANCE $ 76 $ 100 $ 50 101-41910-410-41510 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE $ 132 $ 129 $ 133 PERSONNEL $ 21,176 $ 21,402 $ 22,082 101-41910-410-42010 OFFICE SUPPLIES $ $ - $ 101-41910-410-42030 PRINTED FORMS $ $ - $ 101-41910-410-42110 GENERAL SUPPLIES $ $ - $ SUPPLIES $ $ $ 101-41910-410-43090 EXPERT & PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 11,347 $ 15,000 $ 13,000 101-41910-410-43140 TRAINING & EDUCATION $ $ $ 101-41910-410-43220 POSTAGE $ 14 $ 450 $ 450 101-41910-410-43610 INSURANCE & BONDS $ 173 $ 425 $ 425 101-41910-410-44330 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS $ 219 $ 150 $ 150 OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES $ 11,753 $ 16,025 $ 14,025 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 32,929 $ 37,427 $ 36,107 CITY OF LAUDERDALE GENERAL GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS 2021 Account Number 101-41940-410-42110 101-41940-410-42230 101-41940-410-42410 101-41940-410-43090 101-41940-410-43210 101-41940-410-43250 101-41940-410-43610 101-41940-410-43810 101-41940-410-43820 101-41940-410-43830 101-41940-410-43840 101-41940-410-43850 101-41940-410-44010 101-41940-410-44040 101-41940-410-44160 101-41940-410-45700 Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES MINOR EQUIPMENT & TOOLS SUPPLIES EXPERT & PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH OTHER COMMUNICATIONS (INTERNET) INSURANCE & BONDS ELECTRIC UTILITIES WATER UTILITIES GAS UTILITIES REFUSE DISPOSAL SEWER UTILITIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS RENTS & LEASES OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY 2019 2020 2021 Actual Adopted Proposed $ 1,128 $ 1,500 $ 1,200 $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ 1,128 $ 1,500 $ 1,200 $ - $ - $ $ 2,014 $ 2,300 $ 2,200 $ 5,849 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 8,182 $ 6,500 $ 8,500 $ 2,472 $ 4,400 $ 3,000 $ 46 $ 900 $ 500 $ 2,784 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 5,981 $ 6,300 $ 6,200 $ - $ - $ $ 665 $ 3,500 $ 1,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ 27,992 $ 32,900 $ 30,400 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 29,121 $ 34,400 $ 31,600 CITY OF LAUDERDALE PUBLIC SAFETY 2021 2019 2020 2021 Account Number Account Description Actual Adopted Proposed 101-42100-420-43100 DISPATCH $ 15,670 $ 15,192 $ 12,350 101-42100-420-43110 POLICE CONTRACT $ 713,204 $ 747,071 $ 773,471 101-42100-420-44370 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $ 189 $ 200 $ 200 101-42220-420-43120 FIRE CONTRACT $ 21,458 $ 21,000 $ 75,000 101-42220-420-43125 FIRE CALLS & INSPECTIONS $ 20,749 $ 13,000 $ 101-42200-420-44370 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $ - $ - $ - OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES $ 771,270 $ 796,463 $ 861,021 101-42220-420-45400 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY $ - $ TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 771,270 $ 796,463 $ 861,021 CITY OF LAUDERDALE BUILDING INSPECTIONS 2021 2019 2020 2021 Account Number Account Description Actual Adopted Proposed 101-42400-420-41010 FULL TIME EMPLOYEES $ 32,903 $ 33,828 $ 34,678 101-42400-420-42010 OVERTIME $ 233 $ $ - 101-42400-420-41210 PERA $ 2,478 $ 1,801 $ 1,843 101-42400-420-41220 FICA $ 2,301 $ 1,489 $ 1,523 101-42400-420-41225 MEDICARE $ 538 $ 348 $ 356 101-42400-420-41250 DEFERRED COMPENSATION $ 2,855 $ 2,448 $ 3,000 101-42400-420-41310 HEALTH INSURANCE $ 1,836 $ 2,000 $ 1,878 101-42400-420-41320 DENTAL INSURANCE $ 186 $ 200 $ 185 101-42400-420-41330 LIFE INSURANCE $ 510 $ 600 $ 510 101-42400-420-41340 DISABILITY INSURANCE $ 111 $ 200 $ 115 101-42400-420-41510 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE $ 1,129 $ 1,068 $ 1,130 PERSONNEL $ 45,079 $ 43,982 $ 45,218 101-42400-420-42030 PRINTED FORMS $ - $ - $ 101-42400-420-42110 GENERAL SUPPLIES $ - $ - $ SUPPLIES $ - $ $ 101-42400-420-43090 EXPERT & PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 2,119 $ 3,000 $ 2,500 101-42400-420-43140 TRAINING & EDUCATION $ 1,300 $ 600 $ 1,000 101-42400-420-43220 POSTAGE $ 371 $ 300 $ 350 101-42400-420-43310 TRAVEL EXPENSES $ - $ - $ 101-42400-420-43510 LEGAL NOTICES PUBLISHING $ - $ - $ 101-42400-420-43610 INSURANCE & BONDS $ 231 $ 350 $ 250 101-42400-420-44330 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS $ - $ 100 $ 100 101-42400-420-44370 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $ 1,320 $ 750 $ 1,000 101-42400-420-44380 BUILDING PERMIT SURCHARGES $ 969 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES $ 6,311 $ 6,100 $ 6,200 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 51,389 $ 50,082 $ 51,418 CITY OF LAUDERDALE PUBLIC WORKS 2021 2019 2020 2021 Account Number Account Description Actual Adopted Proposed 101-43121-430-41010 FULL TIME EMPLOYEES $ 36,867 $ 35,817 $ 37,002 101-43121-430-41020 OVERTIME $ 839 $ $ - 101-43121-430-41040 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES $ - $ 6,000 $ 6,000 101-43121-430-41210 PERA $ 2,670 $ 3,136 $ 3,225 101-43121-430-41220 FICA $ 2,754 $ 2,593 $ 2,666 101-43131-430-41225 MEDICARE $ 644 $ 606 $ 624 101-43121-430-41250 DEFERRED COMPENSATION $ 5,235 $ 5,300 $ 5,195 101-43121-430-41310 HEALTH INSURANCE $ 499 $ 125 $ 500 101-43121-430-41320 DENTAL INSURANCE $ 93 $ 125 $ 94 101-43121-430-41330 LIFE INSURANCE $ 458 $ 379 $ 460 101-43121-430-41340 DISABILITY INSURANCE $ 149 $ 200 $ 150 101-43121-430-41510 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE $ 1,809 $ 1,867 $ 1,921 PERSONNEL $ 52,016 $ 56,148 $ 57,837 101-43121-430-42110 GENERAL SUPPLIES $ 821 $ 1,500 $ 1,000 101-43121-430-42120 MOTOR FUELS $ 3,169 $ 3,500 $ 3,100 101-43121-430-42130 LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES $ - $ 100 $ 100 101-43121-430-42160 CHEMICALS & CHEMICAL PRODUCTS $ - $ - $ 101-43121-430-42170 SAFETY EQUIPMENT $ - $ $ - 101-43121-430-42210 VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT PARTS $ 428 $ 500 $ 500 101-43121-430-42220 TIRES $ - $ - $ 101-43121-430-42240 STREET MAINTENANCE MATERIALS $ 191 $ - $ - 101-43121-430-42410 MINOR EQUIPMENT & TOOLS $ $ 500 $ 500 101-43121-430-42420 MINOR COMPUTER EQUIPMENT $ - $ 750 $ - SUPPLIES $ 4,610 $ 6,850 $ 5,200 101-43121-430-43030 ENGINEERING $ 14,892 $ 7,200 $ 5,000 101-43121-430-43090 EXPERT & PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (SNOW) $ 22,845 $ 17,000 $ 20,000 101-43121-430-43095 TREE TRIMMING AND REMOVAL $ 8,025 $ 9,000 $ 10,000 101-43121-430-43140 TRAINING & EDUCATION $ 430 $ 500 $ 500 101-43121-430-43210 TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH $ - $ - $ 101-43121-430-43310 TRAVEL EXPENSE $ - $ - $ - 101-43121-430-43610 INSURANCE & BONDS $ 784 $ 1,400 $ 900 101-43121-430-44010 BUILDING MAINTENANCE $ - $ - $ - 101-43121-430-44040 VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS $ 1,793 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 101-43121-430-44160 RENTS & LEASES $ - $ - $ - 101-43121-430-44330 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS $ $ - $ 101-43121-430-44390 TAXES & LICENSES $ - $ 50 $ 50 OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES $ 48,768 $ 37,150 $ 38,450 101-43121-430-45400 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 105,393 $ 100,148 $ 101,487 CITY OF LAUDERDALE STREET LIGHTING 2021 Account Number 101-43160-430-43810 101-43160-430-44040 TOTAL EXPENDITURES Account Description ELECTRIC UTILITIES VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 2019 Actual $ 6,124 $ $ 6,124 $ 6,124 $ $ $ 2020 Adopted 2021 Proposed 6,000 $ 6,000 - $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 CITY OF LAUDERDALE PARKS & RECREATION 2021 2019 2020 2021 Account Number Account Description Actual Adopted Proposed 101-45200-450-41010 FULL TIME EMPLOYEES $ 52,457 $ 50,419 $ 52,157 101-45200-450-41020 OVERTIME $ 1,102 $ $ 101-45200-450-41040 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES $ 7,665 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 101-45200-450-41210 PERA $ 3,717 $ 4,231 $ 4,362 101-45200-450-41220 FICA $ 4,119 $ 3,870 $ 3,978 101-45200-450-41225 MEDICARE $ 963 $ 905 $ 930 101-45200-450-41250 DEFERRED COMPENSATION $ 5,204 $ 5,600 $ 5,250 101-45200-450-41310 HEALTH INSURANCE $ 3,879 $ 3,009 $ 3,900 101-45200-450-41320 DENTAL INSURANCE $ 186 $ 200 $ 187 101-45200-450-41330 LIFE INSURANCE $ 366 $ 400 $ 367 101-45200-450-41340 DISABILITY INSURANCE $ 247 $ 325 $ 250 101-45200-450-41420 UNEMPLOYMENT $ - $ - $ 101-45200-450-41510 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE $ 1,654 $ 1,542 $ 1,588 PERSONNEL $ 81,559 $ 82,501 $ 84,969 101-45200-450-42030 PRINTED FORMS $ - $ - $ 101-45200-450-42110 GENERAL SUPPLIES $ 1,029 $ 600 $ 1,000 101-45200-450-42115 MEETINGS $ - $ - $ 101-45200-450-42120 MOTOR FUELS $ - $ - $ 101-45200-450-42160 CHEMICALS & CHEMICAL PRODUCTS $ $ - $ 101-45200-450-42210 VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT PARTS $ - $ - $ 101-45200-450-42220 TIRES $ $ - $ 101-45200-450-42230 BUILDING REPAIR SUPPLIES $ - $ - $ 101-45200-450-42410 MINOR EQUIPMENT & TOOLS $ $ - $ SUPPLIES $ 1,029 $ 600 $ 1,000 101-45200-450-43090 EXPERT & PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 470 $ - $ 101-45200-450-43130 COMMUNITY EVENTS $ 4,049 $ 3,500 $ 500 101-45200-450-43140 TRAINING & EDUCATION $ - $ - $ 101-45200-450-43210 TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH $ $ - $ - 101-45200-450-43310 TRAVEL EXPENSE $ - $ - $ 101-45200-450-43610 INSURANCE & BONDS $ 432 $ 800 $ 500 101-45200-450-43810 ELECTRIC UTILITIES $ 497 $ 600 $ 550 101-45200-450-43820 WATER UTILITIES $ 765 $ 500 $ 800 101-45200-450-43830 GAS UTILITIES $ 497 $ 700 $ 600 101-45200-450-43840 REFUSE DISPOSAL $ - $ - $ 101-45200-450-44010 BUILDING MAINTENANCE $ $ - $ 101-45200-450-44040 VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE $ - $ - $ 101-45200-450-44160 RENTS & LEASES (PORTABLE RESTROOM) $ 1,643 $ 1,800 $ 1,700 101-45200-450-44382 RECREATION PROGRAMS $ 1,924 $ 2,500 $ 1,500 OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES $ 10,277 $ 10,400 $ 6,150 101-45200-450-45200 BUILDING & IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL OUTLAY $ $ $ $ TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 92,865 $ 93,501 $ 92,119 CITY OF LAUDERDALE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2021 Account Number 101-46500-462-43090 101-46500-462-44370 TOTAL EXPENDITURES Account Description CONSULTING FEES MISCELLANEOUS OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 2019 Actual $ 1,225 $ $ 1,225 $ 1,225 2020 Adopted 2021 Proposed $ 5,000 $ 4,000 $ - $ $ 5,000 $ 4,000 $ 5,000 $ 4,000 CITY OF LAUDERDALE MISCELLANEOUS UNALLOCATED EXPENDITURES 2021 Account Number 2019 2020 2021 Account Description Actual Adopted Proposed 101-49200-410-48100 CONTINGENCY OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES $ - $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ $ 8,000 $ 8,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ $ 8,000 $ 8,000 CITY OF LAUDERDALE OTHER FINANCING USES 2021 2019 2020 2021 Account Number Account Description Actual Adopted Proposed 101-49300-410-47200 TRANSFER OUT $ 38,000 $ 38,000 $ TRANSFERS $ 38,000 $ 38,000 $ TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 38,000 $ 38,000 $ 0 Taxable Value x Tax % x Tax Rate = City Tax on $126,000 Home 2020-5.5% $100,100 1% 0.2930 Total Tax $293.27 2021-6.5% $100,100 1% 0.2744 Total Tax $274.71 DIFFERENCE ($18.56) -6 2021 PROPOSED LEVY IMPACTS ON LAUDERDALE HOMES City City City City City Total Levy Fiscal Disparities Net Local Levy Tax Capacity Tax Rate 2020-5.5% $845,614 $138,520 $707,094 $2,413,452 29.298% 2021-6.5% $899,710 $146,325 $753,385 $2,745,184 27.444% Median Value 2018 $189,100 Median Value 2019 $206,300 Median Value 2020 $218,300 Median Value 2021 $232,400 Taxable Value x Tax % 2020-5.5% $200,707 1% 2021-6.5% $216,076 1% x Tax Rate = City Tax on Median Lauderdale Ho 0.2930 Total Tax $588.03 0.2744 Total Tax $593.00 DIFFERENCE $4.96 .33% me .84% Taxable Value x Tax % x Tax Rate = City Tax on $300,000 Home 2020-5.5% $289,760 1% 0.2930 Total Tax $848.94 2021-6.5% $289,760 1% 0.2744 Total Tax $795.21 DIFFERENCE ($53.73) -6.33% Impact on Median Value Single Family Homes by City and School District Z 0 U >- w It Estimated Change From 2020 Total Tax <O N- N FRre T i N to co (D O O O < e t0 in t- r / I O `r Q ti' Q) - C)^ 00 M i- -236 -211 < Z N MNZa,0o O O N Q to (O e to O CO Estimated % Change in Tax on Median Valued Home County City School Other Total 0 o M '1 '1 a 1� M o N r a 'cl. N o o T CO N N a ( 0 ti' N 01 O 7 0 01 1 0 a CO Z N 0 0 O 'd' 7 O e to p -5.9% -5.4% Q Z o a 1 O N tr) "4 a Z 0 ' T CO N N ( CO N o 4-- vi 0 0 r r i 0 CO (h 0 1_ (`') <I -CO 9 I -0.4% -0.4% 0 0 0 CO (O O O O 0 to 7 1.2% 1.2% 2.9% 2.9% 0 (h10 c- 0 00 10 N (.V Q Z to O 0 0 r r N N Q Z 0 0 N i -- r- 0 -0.4% 0 (`.) 0 0 0)0303000303-01N.4.co .f M 0 M 0 p 0 O 0 0 N N 0 0 0 7 00 1 Z N 0 0', 7 O N 0 0 to 1 Q Z 0 7 0 0 to 1 z 0 0 ('j 7 -2.0% 0 (n 1 0 0 O O i i 0 O 7 0 0) Y ( CO 9 0 .c CrV 1- 1- 0 0 CO CO CO 9 •0 •0 -3.1 % 0 0 0 O (? (7 0 0 c} .4- N N 0 CO O - 6.8% -6.8% Q Z 0 N 0 0 O 0 M (? Q Z -2.8% - 2.8% 0 .- C7 0 V' N 0 0 O O tn 45 -5.3% 0 CO O -2.1% -3.4% - 3.4% 0 0 0 Lo to to N N N 0 CO 1 0 0 N N N N 0 0 to 1.0 7 7 0 x-- 7 -5.8% - 5.8% 0 O 7 0 'U O 0 0 O O ttj 4;5 0 N 00 0 0 N N th th 0 to M 0 N- (O Payable 2020 Payable 2021 % Change City Median City Median in Median City School Estimated Value Estimated Value Value 0 = 4 0 r.— M 0 CO 0 to co 5.5% N= = ( co 0( O 'ci CO = (O 0 O= N. 8-9, M ti '81- N= C) 0 O N - 8.0% 3.1% 0 0) O 0 1� = to 0 CO to 0 0) N 0 0 too CO 314,600 335,850 0 co N 0 Om) N 260,700 250,750 299,300 651,800 230,000 280,600 0 10 oo03 M CO 215,800 336,450 245,800 310, 000 256,000 295,400 O 0 a co (fl o LO co 310,600 218,300 277,800 O 0 _ N 241,000 280,650 609,400 214,300 272,000 308,550 0 00 Q01 326,300 243,700 293,200 243,100 287,000 Arden Hills r 621 ' 623 'Falcon Heights ' 623 IGem Lake ' 624 'Lauderdale ' 623 Little Canada ' 623 ✓ 624 Maplewood ' 622 ' 623 • 624 'Mounds View ' 621 New Brighton ' 282 ' 621 North Oaks ' 621 ✓ 624 'North St. Paul ' 622 Roseville ' 621 ' 623 St. Anthony ' 282 St. Paul ' 625 Shoreview ' 621 • 623 'Spring Lake Park ' 621 Vadnais Heights ' 621 ' 624 'White Bear Lake ' 624 White Bear Town ' 624 VALUE FOR FISCAL DISP. TAX INCREMENT PERSONAL J LU DISTRIBUTION LOCAL RATE CONTRIBUTION TAX CAPACITY TAX CAPACITY PROPERTY PROPERTY GOVERNMENTAL UNIT o cr rn 11)- al Cr 00 to N O 0LO Ln CO 00 LO UD M Ln Ln 291,735,298 O ri CO N N Ln 0 0 LD i/} r-1 r-1 m .-1 c -I N LD CO CO O m to m N N. an m m Ln Ln co Ln O1 � m Ln m 0 0 al u1 LD m N cI dr" Lr al m 0 0 Ch 00 0 CO N 0 N 01 0 ul LD LD CO 00 0 Cr al LO 00 0 0 O 1.0 0o u) d' m N in r-1 r-1 lD tD N. Lt.) LO al r-1 Ln LO N 0 m r-1 N� LD 0 Cr Cr CO 0 Ct u) 00 t0 r-1 c--1 Ln dr" 00 LD r-1 N 00 c-1 Cr N' Ct N m al lD N N N Ct m al u") N m r m al L- 0 CI" CO N- 00 0 m N r-1 Ln I al (-4 Ct un r-1 r-1 NI' r Ct Ni Ln m r-1 c' r-1 a).' CO 01 CO N N LO CJ1 d' 00 d' e-1 LA. ri N Ln Ln N m N O LIl O Ln N r-1 N 0 al ri al m m CO 00 Ln Ct Ln N Q1 N N ri Ln CO Cr O CO o LI) m Ct in N 0 N 00 00 01 e-1 N LA N 00 N LD N LO N N ▪ ri N� 00 C o 00 cI N L0 Ln al N m N� N al O Cr 00 CO al N 0 r-1 c-1 N al CNN LD r-1 Ct N r-1 Ln r-1 c-1 al Lr) Cf' .4 O N ri N \-1 00 al al m N O LC) Ln m N 00 ri u7 v -I N Ln LD tD ri N CD al 00 01 m N 00 Ln e-1 ri u1 lD CO ST. PAUL (Airport Only) 345,322,507 ct o Ln m r-1 .4 N 0 0o ri r-1 rn o m 00 Lf) ▪ N N ri N oo 0 Lf1 oo Ln lD lD N ri N� N 00 LD cr CO o m Ln m m m If) O N CO 00 CO N N UD e-1 lD N ri M Lr1 CO CO CO CO O a1 ri Ln Ln CO Ln m 00 00 n ul N • rn O ri O N N al Ln N u-) O l0 ri l0 ri -1 0 0 ei ri M Ct ri 00 Lf1 M al 0 ni o0 M O N m CI- LO ttO m Lr) ri N CO CO N N CO Ln N r\ 00 0 01 CT) Ln r-1 r i N al O in Ql N m O N N 0 O Ql Ln N ri M rN i c1 O to N. ct N ri tD m ri N N 0 CO N LID Ln Lr) N m m cI rn d- r -1 O 00 Ln al 0 0 LD Ln N tO m Ct c I Ln 0o N al m 0 C m m al NCt O l0 00 00 NLr) lD N Ct 00 m ci m ro Ct al Ct lD ct ▪ 00 al r I N m O o0 N� O al 00 N. in ri O m N m r -I CD Ct m ri al LD CO l0 al N CY ri O Ct N Ln Lfl N (0 c --I c -i Ln N m u) 00 Ln c -I m r-1 r-1 h t N m r -I c -I c -I m '71' CY al LID CD N 40 00 N Q1 01 00 O .71 -al u) m al Ln Ct 0o al N O N O Ln -1 r-1 L0 N N m O ce 00 m al N 0000 r_1.4 rNI O m N m N Ln ri CO N 0 Cr CO ri Ct l0 Ln 0 O N CD N c I N al 0 r-1 00 N N LD al m CO t 0 0l N Ln N m tll N O N l0 N 0 N. t 00 m 'c1' l0 N CO N N m 00 r al N N 00 N Lri (. l0 O N c-1 N 00 O O 00 LD m Ql N al N Cr O co Ln Ct L1) o CO al CO LO CO O CD m 0 Ln Ln al Ln c -I LfI c -I lD Ln 0o ri c-1 r-1 lO N 0 00 c I 111 c I N Lf) Lr) t0 N 1p -1 O Ln N NCt 00 r-1 r-1 Ln c -I m c--1 r-1 N N no r-1 ;DI FALCON HEIGHTS GEM LAKE LAUDERDALE LITTLE CANADA NEW BRIGHTON NORTH OAKS NORTH ST. PAUL ROSEVILLE SPRING LAKE PK.(PART) VADNAIS HEIGHTS LO ei O ri M O M LD H Ln N 0 00 m r-1 c-1 i -i 00 N r -I m Ct N CT) al LD N 00 r-1 m Ln c -I ci al N m ct CO O N� CO O t0 Cr) i LC) 00 rI 0 m ri N a) Lc, N r -i m Lr C1 in} c-1 t/} c -I N 00 0 m 108,151,973 $612,599,386 $730,526,386 SUBURBAN TOTAL $716,197,278 COUNTY TOTAL % Change From 2020 \ 0 N C7CO \ 0 N- \ 0 0 O \ 0 CO c61 \ 0 CO r r \ \ 0 0 CO 0) LO 'Cr \ 0 0 CO \ 0 CO O \ 0 CO Lo \ 0 CO O \ 0 CO CO \ 0 r r \ 0 r CO \ 0 0) CO \ 0 r N 0.8% 7.4% 6.2% 7.3% \ 0 O 4 Change From 2020 CO co Co (or 12,335 0 -13,127 1,556 7,805 22,661 253,905 -6,098 75,731 co- ' O ONO CO r N -11,729 1,282,851 24,197 145 33,496 50,890 22,042 CD In co - (o CO EST. Pay 2021 FD Distribution $'s $53,601,501 345,797 0 382,921 14,735 146,325 480,948 3,447,368 1,034,849 1,499,646 40,249 1,114,215 2,036,926 366,192 34,441,416 1,167, 262 18,367 484,639 873,531 325,928 48, 221, 314 Actual Pay 2020 FD Distribution $'s $51,934,898 333,462 0 396,048 0) r O 19 N r 3,193,463 1,040,947 1,423,915 36,720 1,221,634 1,823,106 377,921 33,158, 565 1,143, 065 18,222 451,143 822,641 303,886 46, 354, 724 Taxing Authority Ramsey County City or Town Arden Hills Blaine Falcon Heights Gem Lake Lauderdale Little Canada Maplewood Mounds View New Brighton North Oaks North St. Paul Roseville St. Anthony St. Paul Shoreview Spring Lake Park Vadnais Heights White Bear Lake Town of White Bear Total City & Town Z 0 U w Q ce le cm c ■ *71 a) a) a)2 ea u) la L o ta) 6- E61• >:(-1 a) c.) 2 i N m c %- •— 0 N >% G) c U) = U) O < 0 o >% N ao cn N E ca W Luis Rosario Ramsey County Assessor O N O CN 00 T- V) 0) Q 2020 Mid -Year Update 0 U W (C �a 0 O O>, , E It) 0 0 co 0 N I N N 0" N ma) qt tG I N Q al 00 ~ N aN O Q.O v (» co M °r° Trn 0 d4 N Q N p CU N- TCO oj O N O °o Q $56, O O N � N N ,>, O ~ O O T� W 2 0 O N Q N 0 ) O O ti Na) O T N O O O Z 0) M N N = Q w O °) NI' (13 ILO EA d- LO LOV d o o 0 o CO as ' N Q N (p o as M ,- ■� v T L a) O O (0 O O M N �NE M o rn N CO i 0 O n~j �- N �N I a)d :16;- O OU O ao N (0 (inN = Rf N N .._ Q N (B M O T. M c0 (0 , Q O o a) O N QN Ca t O >, Q nj 6) 0 LL 0N- 0 0 al N d N �N E o Olill \\ N t( M/) .0 (13 VgoO > O o O QO (p '0 \ vr 69 -CO CO CT) o N N •� 0 >111 N.- il d o OOO 0 E Np) 0 Q O Mj (O d N N 0 >, M O c a) cri (fT o O> O 0 0 0r-- •1- co 1,... QO EL ti N N a)+ Q d (» N (() coctl4- E d O O TO O O O N N LL1 co a) $4 $36,963,2, O 1-0 3 3 (v 0_N > X N COill u) T• 0 Q0 CO ON NE > o - o ) N o E o o 0 o 0 0 o E o o o 0 0 0 0 o Q o o o o o o o W Ct 1, to to Ea IA co <0 $65,000,000,000 $60,000,000,000 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 Lil!M) sidlo.l AW2 3 2020 Mid -Year Update 'KO CI cl f`l q-1) 'LR3 I 1 4—• CD (spi ■ a) E Residentia N 0 V) N N (r) (a 1--r D C M•]iiiui it.*4 C.C. (a L 0 0 2020 Mid -Year Update z D 0 U w ce le 2020 Assemer Aggregate changes in 2020 assessed value by property class 0 N + 0 O O N + 0 O O + 0 O 6 + 0 to co + 0 O O + 0 O O + 0 O 6 + co 6 + c co > .- N 12 as CO 0 M 6 + 0 00 + 0) 0 d' 2020 Mid -Year Update z 0 U> - It 0) .. u) a) u) Z ) - +*/ O Q cis >+ • N N Q a)ga.-oEcao CD po = c ca • o E �' O c? 6 Ql� �% O (Ti L- E CO ci CO +� N W > > O O N _ �o c N c) ( - ,,,_ ) . : L- - i, .713 0 me - 2 3 o i :/a).) 9 _ O 73 • O= U 0 W 0 7U) co''0_>oID ��It 2o2�E v,i� R2g E 10O • •• O D O —9 @1_ Li EL._:.,__, i a c 0 0 N m 0 0 c oCAI� • O O 10 2020 Mid -Year Update O urs -6) CD \1 � `L) (^/' `) . W co co Q Total active petitions 2 w N ca Li 0 _u) ® N u Q) ° 6 O (0 Ca c N +, O Q E uoCI cc O O O � M � U C6 O — a (U 2020 Mid -Year Update 2020 Marken Summary U) a) .' E . O TO s= > > O Q To U Q a) � c O 0) P a) a) rD Q L Q a) a) co Q) a) • o SS (1) 'oy C3 0h N w > CO 0 a) E • o Strength continues .7orr res©]entia 0 0 0 — Impact of widespread teleworking on office market. 1• E — The acceleration of e-commerce and its impact on the rretai Potential impact of high unemployment on apartment market. N 0) c O 0 0 (a 0 •1 N 0 m 0 0 0 (/) 0 Q � C E O (9) O � ▪ O U c N 3 LH c 4O i • >, s -76 N z U z' C N 15 N O U N X u (l) c 4- c4 O s .N N C • o U O Q >, Z 0 U w Q z D 0 U w Q W Ir nformation Appendix - Additiona CD 2020 Mid -Year Update N C 4- O (la L >>, -c 4-O (11 (6 •+-• .171 O Q o i?"1 o (15 a)-0 ._ C O I O Q O L eL g E N O a.) > c 00 L -0 — c -0 U O -0 L O <0 Assessment — The assessor's estimated market value as of January 2nd of the assessment year. `+- O O O O O L -c 4— Un O CO (n -O O -0 LL - L W +� O C (a O > ' O N N O c O_ U+� -.-' u) cr (5 75 6 O> C 2 U .Q co O C-0 i O Q C (N (a t6 O n E O (s Q co •� O Q (6 (a O U X O O O D O .- O > (� _ O o- >>U) 2, al -)0 CDS U) L _ co O a) LO O CD (a _a M o c O -�L f6 O (f} .4. O O O L > c6 O (f). -L Q (1.) 0 (6 +� O 4- o O ca o Q a) (73 L O _c .0 o_ a) Oo-O •- ao ( L0 QCO O Q •`E. O 4- ' 73 (6 (f} O C (s fn a C O N o > +� (B 4 a) w O O m �, c� O co To O c O O —• — O D aEj �� ci .0 L O U (� ala)) O O `o O Q a) > co C'> O O +� L-I�-7-tr 1 4— o _c u) O O a)(6 OC) cn O O c L O U)U ARD Q a/ W 'Y i O (B O a--� > it • � /�` L_ /� c W O >1 r�> lV V/ c (V g O O O >'- 0 0- a) O O '+- O O (a '�' D> E a) 4- O dO' a) co03 D 0 cCO 4 wO O O _ L C O 09- a) f} c c6 '~ N (a O °vi O _0 N U L -r-+ .� CO73 / 1 L L Q C O> U �>'! Q Q u)= (a O (a (6 O o Q O Hill n i °, Estimated Market Va 2020 Mid-Year Update 0 U O U) co O) c 0 — co TD a)co .O ( a) (6 Q a) a -c a-• 0 >E -0 O N c C N -0 -O • C CO C3 >1 O O Q- ><- 1) ) c a)}' x- (7) (1) 73 • •E Q I L a) 8) C • U) 'a 'y z a U co O a) cou) (0 a) c -oN (6 a) Q O A E 4) 0) (1) A a) O L 0. 0) a) .05 LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action X Resolution X Work Session Meeting Date September 8, 2020 ITEM NUMBER 2020 CARES Fund Expenses STAFF INITIAL APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: City staff are working with local partners to allocate our $181,419 in CARES Act funds. Be- cause funds have been received by the City, we are now required to report monthly expenses to the Department of Management and Budget, and all funds must be expended by Novem- ber 15, 2020. Staff totaled funds spent through August 31 that will be reported to Minnesota Management and Budget shortly. That amount totals $13,591 to acquire the necessary equipment for tele- working, teleconferencing city council meetings, purchasing PPE and cleaning supplies, and staffing costs. Staff have been identifying other items necessary for the city to better serve residents through the rest of the year. These include elections supplies, technology for council mem- bers, and a website that will allow for better communication. That list is developing but cur- rently totals $26,000. Current Allocation of Funds Park $102 PPE $720 Personnel Expense $8,846 Office Equipment / Teleworking $1.447 Election Equipment $244 Virtual City Council Meetings $2,232 Proposed Allocation of Funds Election Equipment $1,000 Website and Communications System: $10,000 Personnel $5,000 City Council Technology $5,000 PPE $1,000 Park $1,000 Virtual City Council Meetings $3,000 DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: The City Council also may allocate funds to support area schools, hospitals, public safety, and Ramsey County programs that support Lauderdale residents and businesses. Staff will provide more information on this during the meeting. OPTIONS: By approving the resolution, the Council acknowledges how the funds were spent to date. We will continue to identify internal needs for the money and options to support community businesses and organizations with remaining funds. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to adopt Resolution No. 090820A Approving Allocations of the City of Lauder- dale's CARES Act Funds. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE COUNTY CITY TOTAL PINE SANDSTONE CITY $202,289 PINE STURGEON LAKE CITY $32,170 PINE WILLOW RIVER CITY $29,759 PINE ROCK CREEK CITY $123,106 PIPESTONE EDGERTON CITY $84,532 PIPESTONE HATFIELD CITY $0 PIPESTONE HOLLAND CITY $0 PIPESTONE IHLEN CITY $0 PIPESTONE PIPESTONE CITY $312,662 PIPESTONE RUTHTON CITY $15,972 PIPESTONE TROSKY CITY $0 PIPESTONE WOODSTOCK CITY $0 PIPESTONE JASPER CITY $44,827 POLK BELTRAMI CITY $0 POLK CLIMAX CITY $20,116 POLK CROOKSTON CITY $604,304 POLK EAST GRAND FORKS CITY $668,645 POLK ERSKINE CITY $37,067 POLK FERTILE CITY $63,889 POLK FISHER CITY $32,321 POLK FOSSTON CITY $112,182 POLK GULLY CITY $0 POLK LENGBY CITY $0 POLK MCINTOSH CITY $46,108 POLK MENTOR CITY $0 POLK NIELSVILLE CITY $0 POLK TRAIL CITY $0 POLK WINGER CITY $16,198 POPE CYRUS CITY $21,773 POPE FARWELL CITY $0 POPE GLENWOOD CITY $193,850 POPE LONG BEACH CITY $26,068 POPE LOWRY CITY $23,355 POPE SEDAN CITY $0 POPE STARBUCK CITY $97,189 POPE VILLARD CITY $19,136 POPE WESTPORT CITY $0 RAMSEY NEW BRIGHTON CITY $1,741,791 RAMSEY NORTH ST. PAUL CITY $916,062 RAMSEY ROSEVILLE CITY $2,732,742 RAMSEY FALCON HEIGHTS CITY $412,789 RAMSEY LAUDERDALE CITY $181,419 RAMSEY ARDEN HILLS CITY $745,040 RAMSEY LITTLE CANADA CITY $782,484 RAMSEY NORTH OAKS CITY $399,605 RAMSEY MAPLEWOOD CITY $3,067,102 06/25/2020 RESOLUTION NO. 090820A CITY OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING ALLOCATIONS OF THE CITY OF LAUDERDALE'S CARES ACT FUNDS WHEREAS, the spread of COVID-19 in the United States and Minnesota has raised serious public health concerns and resulted in a great deal of uncertainty, and much remains unknown about the virus and how it spreads; and WHEREAS, On March 13, 2020, Governor Tim Walz issued Emergency Executive Order 20- 01 declaring a state of peacetime emergency to address the COVID-19 pandemic in Minnesota, which triggered activation of the emergency management plan of the City and enabled the City to exercise its emergency powers; and WHEREAS, The Governor has subsequently issued additional Executive Orders to combat the impacts of COVID-19 within the State of Minnesota, which include closures of schools, bars, restaurants, and other places of public accommodation, and directing Minnesotans to stay at home (with exceptions for obtaining necessary supplies, healthcare and similar needs) unless they are engaged in critical sector work; and WHEREAS, On March 24, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 032420A, declaring a local emergency and directing City staff to take appropriate action to facilitate the directives of the Council and authorizing City staff to take actions deemed necessary to protect the public health and safety; and WHEREAS, the City has received Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act ("CARES Act") funds totaling $181,419 from the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, CARES Act funds may be used to cover eligible expenses incurred by local govermnents and its partners in responding to the COVID-19 health pandemic; and WHEREAS, unspent CARES Act funds must be remitted to Regions Hospital or another hospital in Ramsey County; and WHEREAS, the City Council is prepared to authorize and report the following allocations to support these described purposes. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Lauderdale City Council that the City shall utilize $13,591 for eligible expenses associated directly with the City's response to the public health crisis, including acquisition of personal protective equipment, sanitizing products, expenses to facilitate or improve teleworking capabilities, and expenses for the teleconference of city council meetings. ADOPTED by the City Council of Lauderdale this 8th' day of September, 2020. Mary Gaasch, Mayor ATTEST: Heather Butkowski, City Clerk -Administrator LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action Resolution Work Session X Meeting Date September 8, 2020 ITEM NUMBER STAFF INITIAL 2020 CARES Election Funds APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Each political subdivision in the state that administers elections received an allocation from the CARES Act funds. Lauderdale's allocation is $1,389.48 (page 16). Ramsey County incurred significant costs to provide the City of Lauderdale with PPE and other safety sup- plies to run our 2020 elections. As such, staff recommends that the City's allocation be re- mitted to Ramsey County Elections. Any supplies the City would like to purchase for the elections can come out of the City's larger CARES Act allocation. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve the State of Minnesota 2020 CARES Act Grant County—Municipality Agreement. STATE OF MINNESOTA 2020 CARES ACT GRANT COUNTY - MUNICIPALITYAGREEMENT This Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement") is made between Ramsey County, ("Grantee"), and the city of Lauderdale, ("Municipality") Recitals 1 Under Minnesota Laws 2020, Chapter 77, section 4, Grantee applied for and received funds as requested in the grant application. Grantee entered into a Grant Agreement, which is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated into this Agreement as described in paragraph 1.3 below. 2 Grantee represented that it is duly qualified and agreed to perform all services described in that Agreement to the satisfaction of the State and in accordance with all federal and state laws authorizing these expenditures. Pursuant to Minn.Stat.§ 16B.98, Subd.1, Grantee and Municipality agree to minimize administrative costs as a condition of this grant. 3 Federal funds for this agreement are provided pursuant to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, Public Law 116-136, hereinafter the CARES Act. 4. Grantee is responsible for elections within its county and Municipality operates polling places within its jurisdiction. Both are in need of funds to take the necessary steps to respond to coronavirus, domestically or internationally, for the 2020 election cycle.in a complete manner. 5. Municipality represents that it has insufficient resources to respond in a complete manner without the grant amount provided pursuant to this agreement. Agreement 1 Effectiveness of Agreement 1.1 Effective date: September 8, 2020, or the date all required signatures, have been affixed to the agreement by Grantee and Municipality, whichever is later. No payments will be made to Grantee until this Agreement is fully approved and executed. 1.2 Expiration date: December 31, 2020, or when all funds applied for and provided to Municipality by Grantee have been expended, or returned to Grantee for transmission to the State pursuant to paragraph 4.4 of the Agreement between Grantee and State, whichever occurs first. 1.3 Application of Terms. Municipality agrees to be subject to the obligations applicable to Grantee in the Grant Agreement set forth in Exhibit A in the following paragraphs of that Agreement: paragraphs 1 through 5; and 7 through 16. 2 Municipality's Duties Municipality hereby declines the $1,389.48 in funds provided by State to Grantee in the Grant Agreement set forth in Exhibit A, and allocates the fund to Ramsey County to cover costs in preparations for and the necessary events connected with the primary election to be held August 11, 2020 and the general election to be held November 3, 2020, at which federal offices are on the ballot. Grantee shall submit, by November 10, 2020, a financial reporting form to the Grantee in the form Grantee must use to report grant expenditures to the State of Minnesota, stating the amount spent from this grant in calendar year 2020 for authorized expenses or electronic roster systems, a description of each expense or purchase, and how much of the grant award is unexpended and is being returned, if any, and the total of the proportionate match required by Minnesota Laws 2020, Chapter 77, section 4. 1 3. Authorized Representative Grantee's Authorized Representative is: Heather Bestler Deputy Director 90 W Plato Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55107 651-266-2005 Heather.bestler@co.ramsey.mn.us. Municipality's Authorized Representative is: Heather Butkowski City Administrator 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 651-792-7650 Heather.butkowski@auderdalemn.org. If either Authorized Representative changes at any time before the funds provided for in this Agreement are fully expended, parties must notify each other of the change. GRANTEE (County) Grantee certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the Agreement on behalf of Grantee as required by applicable resolutions or ordinances. By: Signed: Title: Date: MUNICIPALITY Jurisdiction: City of Lauderdale By: Title: Mayor Date: September 8, 2020 By: Title: City Administrator Date: September 8, 2020 2 Distribution: Grantee Municipality CARES Act Grant Application In accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Laws 2020, Chapter 77 Minnesota Secretary,of State Steve Simon Contents A. Background and General Instructions — Page 1 B. County Application — Page 3 C. County Certification — Page 5 D. Reporting Requirements — Page 6 E. County Allocation — Page 7 F. Allocation Formula — Page 9 G. Default Municipal Allocation — Page 10 Section A. Background and General Instructions The Office of the Secretary of State (OSS) received funding through the 2020 CARES Act "to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, domestically or internationally, for the 2020 Federal election cycle." Minnesota Laws 2020, Chapter 77, authorized the use of these funds within Minnesota, including allowing for distributing these funds to local governments for use consistent with the state and federal requirements. A work group including members of the OSS staff, county representatives, and city representatives was tasked with determining a fair, equitable, and efficient way to allocate these funds to local governments through a grant -making process. The work group focused on allocation with these goals in mind: 1. Getting funds to counties/cities/towns directly to help with costs 2. Minimizing the complexity of the disbursement/reimbursement process 3. Sending out funds with direction on how to use and how to report back on use (and 20% match), avoiding a "reimbursement" process 4. Ensuring the state, counties, cities, and towns benefits equitably The work group recommended, and the OSS adopted, a grant -making structure that provides a block -grant to Counties, with the instruction that Counties work with their municipalities to determine a fair, equitable, and mutually agreeable method for allocating the funds within the County and between municipalities. However, if a County and its encompassed municipalities cannot come to a mutual agreement, a default allocation mechanism is provided. Both the distribution of funds to Counties, and the default municipality distribution, are based on a formula using various election -related factors (see Section F for the allocation formula factors). Application Process The OSS has divided the CARES Act funding based on a variety of election -related factors. In order for a County to receive the CARES Act funding allocation, the County must do the following: 1. Complete and return the following materials to the OSS via email and hard copy: a. County Application Information (Section B) 1 b. County Certification (Section C) c. A County Resolution Authorizing the Acceptance of Resources 2. Complete and return the grant agreement (the OSS will send this once application materials are received). Distribution of Funds within the County Once a County receives the CARES Act funding, the County must work with the municipalities within the County to determine a fair, equitable, and mutually agreeable method for allocating the funds within the County and between municipalities. If an agreement cannot be reached by September 8, 2020, the County must distribute the funds based on the default allocation (See Section G). All Counties receiving CARES Act funds under this agreement must report the allocation of local funding within the County to the OSS by September 15, 2020. At the time of this report, Counties must also certify that they have written agreements with municipalities on the distribution, or that the County has utilized the default allocation. Authorized Uses of the CARES Act Funding The use of the CARES Act funds is restricted by both Federal and State law. State law outlines the broad categories for which the funds can be used, including: (1) ensuring the health and safety of election officials and in-person voters, including the purchase of sanitation and disinfectant supplies; (2) public outreach and preparations for implementing social distancing guidelines related to voting, including additional signs and staff; (3) facilitation, support, and preparation for increased absentee voting, including voter education materials, printing, and postage; (4) preparation of training materials and administration of additional training of local election officials; (5) preparation of new polling place locations; and (6) purchasing an electronic roster system meeting the technology requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 201.225, subdivision 2, along with equipment necessary to support the system. The enabling legislation also specifies that a political subdivision is eligible to use the funds for no more than 75 percent of the total cost of purchasing an electronic roster system and necessary support equipment, and no more than 80 percent of the total cost of any other authorized activities. The OSS will be providing an FAQ on authorized uses of these funds, and any jurisdictions with questions about an authorized use should contact Julie Strother (julie.strother@state.mn.us). Reporting Requirements Counties must report on the use of the funds allocated to the County, including the distribution and use by municipalities within the County by November 16, 2020 (see reporting materials, Section D). 2 Section B. County Application County Name: County Contact Information Ramsey County Name of Individual Submitting Application: David Triplett Title of Individual Submitting Application: Ramsey County Elections Manager Address of Individual 90 Plato Blvd. \/V Submitting Application: St. Paul, MN 55102 `7 E -Mail of Individual Submitting Application: David.Triplett@co.ramsey.mn.us Phone: 651-266-2206 Fax: 651-266-2217 Federal Tax ID of Jurisdiction: 41-6005875 Grant Application Description of the purpose of the grant request, including intended use of the funds and expected COVID-19 election -related costs: - Election Judges; an additional $3/hr incentive payment for election judges working in the 2020 elections. $48,000 for primary election (1000+ election judges in Ramsey County), $67,000 for the general election (1500+ election judges in Ramsey County), $28,000 for ballot board and early voting election judges (85 election judges), $33,000 for election judges to receive and send out vote by mail requests (30 election judges for 46 days preceding the November 3rd general election. - Purchase or lease an additional postage machine to accommodate the current increase of of voters choosing to vote by mail as a safe method to prevent the contraction and spread of COVID-19. This will represent about $30,230 of the total requested funds in the application. -Fund the lease of the Riverview Business Center warehouse for the term of the lease from August 1st 2020 through December 31st 2020 for the purposes of storing election materials related to our COVID-19 response. This will represent about $21,000 of the total requested funds in the application. - Conduct an aggressive communications campaign to inform voters of how to vote in a safe, secure, and convenient manner; encouraging vote by mail and specifically targeting communities who will be most negatively be impacted voting by mail and voting in person as a result of COVID-19. This communications strategy wit include; 1) print advertisements such as countywide residential mailings, 2) social media posts including Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and popular online news outlets such as MinnPost, 3) Radio ads spots and interviews on local stations Radio Rey, KFAI Somali radio, & KMOJ, 4) Production of videos recorded by the Census and Voter Engagement Community Partners in their native languages informing their communities about vote by mail, voting in-person, and what services are available to support their rights to vote. Languages will include Hmong, Somali, Karen, and Spanish. These videos will be distributed via social media through the networks of our Community Partners. This will represent about $76,000 of the total requested funds in the application. - Fund to distributed to local municipalities who conduct their own elections. Based on the default allocations provided by the MN OSS an estimated $58,825.50 will be distributed to municipalities within Ramsey County to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, during the 2020 Federal election cycle. Final allocations to municipalities will be based on actual expenses identified by the municipalities that are authorized for use in Minnesota Laws 2020, Chapter 77. Total Amount of Grant Request (cannot exceed the amount identified in Section F): $ 421, 304.25 3 Total, Registered Voters Per Precinct within the County Please attach a list of the total registered voters per precinct within the County. 4 Section C. Certification I certify that CARES Act Elections Grant funds will be used the County only for the purposes authorized in the federal CARES Act, as further restricted by Minnesota Laws 2020, Chapter 77. I certify that I will work with the municipalities within the County to determine a fair, equitable, and mutually agreeable allocation of the funds within the County and between municipalities, and if an agreement cannot be reached, the funds will be distributed pursuant to the OSS identified default allocation. I further certify that all information provided in this application is true and accurate. County Name: Ramsey County Printed Name of Individual Submitting Application: David Triplett Title of Applicant: Information & Public Records Manager- Election Services Signature: Triplett, David Digitally signed by Triplett, David Date: 2020.08.0610:12:29 -05'00' Date: 8/6/2020 Please send the original application via mail and send an electronic copy. Our office will send you confirmation of receipt of your electronic application or paper application, whichever arrives to the OSS first. Mail original applications to: MN Secretary of State Attention: Jenny Kurz Retirement Systems of Minnesota Building 60 Empire Dr., Suite 100 Saint Paul, MN 55103 Email a copy of the application to: Christine.Nelson@state.mn.us 5 Section D. Reporting Requirements Reports must be submitted by November 16, 2020 to elections.dept@state.mn.us Progress Narrative The CARES Act requires that states submit a report after each primary and general election that includes a "full accounting of the State's uses of the payments and an explanation of how such uses allowed the State to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus." Please provide a narrative report that describes how you and the municipalities within your county used the funds to address the pandemic, the challenges you faced in responding to it, and how you are meeting the requirement of a local 20% funding match, or 25% local funding match for electronic rosters. Describe the major issues you and the municipalities within your county faced in dealing with the pandemic in the election cycle. Amount Expended and Unliquidated Obligations Grant Funds Local Match Voting Process Expenses: Including additional costs for printing and mailing ballots, ballot tracking software, high speed scanners and letter opening equipment, hardware and software associated with absentee ballot administration. Staffing: Additional poll workers, election office staff diverted to pandemic response, temporary staff. Security and Training: Security for additional absentee materials, pre- and post-election cleaning of polling places, staff and poll worker training on prevention processes. Communications: Notifying public of changes in registration, ballot request options, precautions, or voting procedures. Supplies: Additional supplies required in the polling place, absentee voting locations, cleaning supplies, masks, or other election -related and pandemic related supplies. Other (describe): Other (describe): TOTAL: 6 Section E. County Allocation County Formula Alloc Amt for County/MCD Share per Agreement w/ MCD Formula Amt to be Shared with MCDs in County if no Agreement w/ MCD Resulting Amt for County Use Totals $ 4,990,039.20 $ 2,875,164.04 $ 2,114,875.16 Aitkin $ 20,588.95 $ 8,159.76 $ 12,429.19 Anoka $ 272,782.08 $ 182,066.65 $ 90,715.43 Becker $ 36,098.76 $ 19,563.75 $ 16,535.01 Beltrami $ 39,429.43 $ 18,781.02 $ 20,648.41 Benton $ 26,454.30 $ 14,048.43 $ 12,405.87 Big Stone $ 6,198.30 $ 1,036.54 $ 5,161.76 Blue Earth $ 51,708.65 $ 23,331.77 $ 28,376.87 Brown $ 24,047.33 $ 10,647.14 $ 13,400.18 Carlton $ 31,684.30 $ 15,395.00 $ 16,289.31 Carver $ 85,912.07 $ 45,179.39 $ 40,732.68 Cass $ 27,765.02 $ 9,552.78 $ 18,212.24 Chippewa $ 12,198.49 $ 5,241.51 $ 6,956.98 Chisago $ 44,761,39 $ 24,579.00 $ 20,182.39 Clay $ 51,591.75 $ 27,484.98 $ 24,106.77 Clearwater $ 17,270.62 $ 10,327.36 $ 6,943.26 Cook $ 6,977.14 $ 1,199.37 $ 5,777.77 Cottonwood $ 21,166.29 $ 13,159.41 $ 8,006.88 Crow Wing $ 59,755.75 $ 25,763.02 $ 33,992.73 Dakota $ 354,248.62 $ 195,877.54 $ 158,371.09 Dodge $ 22,728.44 $ 13,246.11 $ 9,482.32 Douglas $ 39,495.29 $ 17,775.21 $ 21,720.08 Faribault $ 20,267.25 $ 11,052.27 $ 9,214.98 Fillmore $ 26,343,06 $ 14,901.84 $ 11,441.23 Freeborn $ 24,827.45 $ 9,208.41 $ 15,619.04 Goodhue $ 49,377.93 $ 28,289.98 $ 21,087.94 Grant $ 6,212.66 $ 705.30 $ 5,507.36 Hennepin $ 1,117,423.48 $ 731,920.00 $ 385,503.48 Houston $ 22,610.25 $ 11,771.54 $ 10,838.71 Hubbard $ 25,195.46 $ 11,182.14 $ 14,013.32 Isanti $ 32,936.36 $ 18,095.40 $ 14,840.96 Itasca $ 44,284.32 $ 19,927,23 $ 24,357.09 Jackson $ 13,125.04 $ 5,978.60 $ 7,146.44 Kanabec $ 19,642.65 $ 11,491.78 $ 8,150.87 Kandiyohi $ 47,074.65 $ 26,652.58 $ 20,422.07 Kittson $ 6,284.58 $ 1,240.30 $ 5,044.28 Koochiching $ 13,587.64 $ 4,312.75 $ 9,274.89 Lac Qui Parle $ 8,877.61 $ 3,046.35 $ 5,831.26 Lake $ 17,602.37 $ 9,206.07 $ 8,396.30 Lake Of The Woods $ 5,241.70 $ 676.15 $ 4,565.56 Le Sueur $ 22,089.68 $ 9,852.85 $ 12,236.83 Lincoln $ 14,820.62 $ 9,165.02 $ 5,655.60 Lyon $ 17,971.64 $ 6,956.92 $ 11,014.72 County Formula Alloc Amt for County/MCD Share per Agreement w/ MCD Formula Amt to be Shared with MCDs in County if no Agreement w/ MCD Resulting Amt for County Use Mahnomen $ 7,024.54 $ 2,422.60 $ 4,601.93 Marshall $ 8,624.73 $ 1,150.82 $ 7,473.91 Martin $ 23,352.21 $ 12,272,85 $ 11,079.36 Mcleod $ 26,596.10 $ 13,042.99 $ 13,553.10 Meeker $ 24,368.48 $ 12,867.67 $ 11,500.81 Mille Lacs $ 24,978.51 $ 13,354.72 $ 11,623.78 Morrison $ 29,758.17 $ 13,292.64 $ 16,465.53 Mower $ 32,217.34 $ 16,069.02 $ 16,148.32 Murray $ 13,821.12 $ 6,812.62 $ 7,008.50 Nicollet $ 27,493.79 $ 11,444.68 $ 16,049.11 Nobles $ 20,463.30 $ 9,424.18 $ 11,039.12 Norman $ 6,624.22 $ 1,131.25 $ 5,492.97 Olmsted $ 139,222.61 $ 71,385.62 $ 67,836.99 Otter Tail $ 78,904.02 $ 49,305.95 $ 29,598.06 Pennington $ 17,529.56 $ 9,422.18 $ 8,107.39 Pine $ 29,607.74 $ 16,363.81 $ 13,243.93 Pipestone $ 8,320.52 $ 2,753.16 $ 5,567.36 Polk $ 27,112.57 $ 12,109.67 $ 15,002.90 Pope $ 17,194.81 $ 9,061.40 $ 8,133.41 Ramsey $ 421,304.25 $ 281,413.28 $ 139,890.97 Red Lake $ 6,575.01 $ 2,219.57 $ 4,355.43 Redwood $ 31,316.28 $ 20,436.40 $ 10,879.88 Renville $ 25,067.80 $ 15,630.05 $ 9,437.75 Rice $ 54,515.92 $ 32,082.42 $ 22,433.50 Rock $ 9,537.43 $ 3,538.67 $ 5,998.75 Roseau $ 12,218.49 $ 2,975.74 $ 9,242.74 Scott $ 108,479.69 $ 68,568.25 $ 39,911.44 Sherburne $ 62,746.80 $ 37,008.98 $ 25,737.82 Sibley $ 13,689.12 $ 5,168.39 $ 8,520.73 St. Louis $ 192,765.61 $ 123,660.78 $ 69,104.83 Stearns $ 124,273.40 $ 74,877.58 $ 49,395.82 Steele $ 33,438.05 $ 18,301.40 $ 15,136.65 Stevens $ 10,055.93 $ 3,455.74 $ 6,600.19 Swift $ 10,013.59 $ 3,479.61 $ 6,533.98 Todd $ 32,668.95 $ 20,840.27 $ 11,828.68 Traverse $ 6,016.40 $ 1,888,49 $ 4,127.92 Wabasha $ 27,595.38 $ 15,720.18 $ 11,875.20 Wadena $ 18,927.29 $ 11,078.82 $ 7,848.47 Waseca $ 19,678.29 $ 10,724.65 $ 8,953.64 Washington $ 218,118.00 $ 106,273.26 $ 111,844.74 Watonwan $ 9,039.28 $ 2,935.37 $ 6,103.91 Wilkin $ 7,922.44 $ 2,658.62 $ 5,263.82 Winona $ 48,460.08 $ 28,827.42 $ 19,632,66 Wright $ 98,281.35 $ 61,661.97 $ 36,619.38 Yellow Medicine $ 15,460.67 $ 8,001.08 $ 7,459.59 Section F. Allocation Formula County Block Grant Amount and City/Town Point -of -Reference Amount Factors This is a high-level review of the calculation and factors considered by the work group in determining the county block grant amount and the city and town point -of -reference amounts. The concept is for the county block grant amount to be distributed by mutual agreement between the county and all the cities/townships within that county. • $8.32 million in CARES Act funding o 40% allocated to the OSS = $3.33 million o 60% allocated to counties (and cities and townships) = $4.99 million • Of the $4.99 million allocated to the counties (and cities and townships), it is distributed as follows and based on per-unit rates: o 2.5% is based on base allocation equally divided to each county = $1,433.9193 o 25.0% based on 2018 voter (Primary and General) count = $0.3527 per voter o 20.0% based on 2018 General Absentee Voter count = $1.7777 per voter o 20.0% is based on May 1 registered voter counts = $0.2942 per voter o 20.0% is based on number of polling places = $347.6168 per polling place o 2.5% is based on 2018 population = $0.0222 per person o Precinct -based allocations equate to $166.2221 per polling place precinct and $27.3321 per mail ballot precinct ■ 10.0% is based on number of total precincts = $121.4121 per precinct ■ 2.5% is based on number of polling place precincts = $44.8100 additional per polling place precinct • -2.5% is based on number of mail ballot precincts = reduction of $94.08 per mail ballot polling place This results in a range of county block grants of $5,241.70 to $1,117,423.48. Median is $24,827.45 and average is $57,356.77. • Of the $4.99 million allocated to the counties (and cities and townships), the work group recommends the counties and their cities and townships work to distribute the county's block grant funding. If agreement cannot be reached, then the work group provides point -of -reference amounts for each city/township that operates an election day polling place. This totals $2.875 million. o The original 60% county block allocation is split 20% county and 40% cities/townships. The county receives the funding for mail ballot precincts and for absentee voting (if they complete those tasks for the jurisdiction) the under this formula as well. o The same factors listed above apply. This results in a range of distributions of $30.82 to $237,630,19. Median is $589.66 and average is $1,999.42. After reducing the county block grant amount by the point -of -reference amounts as listed, the county remaining portions (totaling $2.1 million) result in a range of $4,127.92 to $385,503.48. Median is $11,623.78 and average is $24,308.91. 9 Section G. Default Municipal Allocation To be used if a mutual agreement between the cities and counties cannot be reached. MCDs $ Formula AIIoc Amt Totals $ $ 2,875,164.04 Aastad township $ 440.35 Acoma township $ 720.70 Acton township $ 485.86 Ada city $ 1,131.25 Adams city $ 596.22 Adams township $ 532.17 Adrian city $ 639.11 Afton city $ 2,552.93 Agram township $ 550.63 Aitkin city $ 913.81 Akeley city $ 482.18 Akron township $ 425.98 Alango township $ 456.27 Alaska township $ 441.49 Albany city $ 1,150.62 Albany township $ 636.47 Albert Lea city $ 7,189.89 Alberta township $ 588.17 Albertville city $ 3,369.74 Albion township $ 769.19 Alborn township $ 527.42 Alden township $ 448.21 Aldrich township $ 507.26 Alexandria city $ 6,119.55 Alta Vista township $ 438.19 Alton township $ 500.51 Altura city $ 492.44 Amador township $ 656.32 Amboy township $ 424.13 Amherst township $ 463.41 Amo township $ 419.21 Amor township $ 550.22 Andover city $ 16,327.55 Angora township $ 462.98 Ann Lake township $ 494.00 Ann township $ 433.28 Annandale city $ 1,237.07 Anoka city $ 9,180.31 Apple Valley city $ 31,456.38 Appleton city $ 705.58 Arbo township $ 666.22 Arco city $ 406.21 Arden Hills city $ 5,624.79 Arendahl township $ 477.30 Arlington city $ 924.58 10 Arlone township $ 476.51 Arna township $ 410.77 Arrowhead township $ 437.85 Arthur township $ 882.66 Ash Lake township $ 434.74 Ashland township $ 478.55 Ashley township $ 444.23 Athens township $ 951.73 Atkinson township $ 510.39 Atwater city $ 656.13 Audubon city $ 498.95 Audubon township $ 556.44 Ault township $ 422.61 Aurdal township $ 865.10 Aurora city $ 1,051.49 Aurora township $ 529.78 Austin city $ 7,777.36 Automba township $ 424.01 Avon city $ 923.49 Avon township $ 1,386.48 Babbitt city $ 1,002.89 Bagley city $ 646.80 Baldwin township $ 2,548.97 Balkan township $ 651.41 Balsam township $ 600.38 Bandon township $ 420.19 Barnesville city $ 1,795.18 Barnum township $ 742.42 Barry township $ 522.34 Bartlett township $ 483.90 Bassett township $ 397.01 Battle Lake city $ 645.04 Baudette city $ 676.15 Baxter city $ 4,073.40 Bayport city $ 1,143.57 Baytown township $ 1,095.04 Bear Creek township $ 421.52 Beatty township $ 559.67 Beaver Bay city $ 420.50 Beaver Bay township $ 912.36 Beaver Falls township $ 429.75 Beaver township $ 454.99 Becker city $ 1,495.11 Becker township $ 1,785.36 Bejou city $ 406,12 Belfast township $ 442,97 Belle Creek township $ 541.86 Belle Plaine city $ 2,155.32 Belle Plaine township $ 666.55 Belle Prairie township $ 568.42 Bellevue township $ 715.27 Beltrami Co. Unorganized $ 1,417.55 Belvidere township $ 522.57 Belview city $ 460.56 Bemidji city $ 5,437.90 Bemidji township $ 1,161.96 Bennington township $ 424.03 Benson city $ 1,694.43 Benton township $ 614.87 Benville township $ 404.78 Bertha city $ 492.35 Bertha township $ 460.69 Bethel city $ 512.27 Big Lake city $ 3,647.75 Big Lake township $ 3,663.34 Bingham Lake city $ 421.22 Birch Cooley township $ 442.94 Birchdale township $ 627.76 Birchwood Village city $ 726.82 Bird Island city $ 648.65 Bird Island township $ 438.83 Biwabik city $ 762.54 Biwabik township $ 692.37 Black Hammer township $ 463.65 Blackberry township $ 652.30 Blackduck city $ 530.27 Blackhoof township $ 696.05 Blaine city $ 35,022.48 Blakeley township $ 525.74 Blomkest city $ 436.47 Blooming Grove township $ 566.02 Blooming Prairie city $ 892.94 Blooming Prairie township $ 504.81 Bloomington city $ 41,902.17 Blowers township $ 447.49 Blue Earth city $ 1,915.80 Blue Earth City township $ 505.37 Blue Hill township $ 972.36 Blue Mounds township $ 438.97 Blueberry township $ 611.38 Bluffton city $ 435.34 Bluffton township $ 497.70 Bogus Brook township $ 765.09 Bondin township $ 472.49 Boon Lake township $ 479.09 Borgholm township $ 835.58 Bovey city $ 595.05 Bradford township $ 1,349.17 Braham city $ 1,131.31 Brainerd city $ 6,339.08 Brandon city $ 521.77 Breckenridge city $ 1,791.83 Breezy Point city $ 1,223.64 11 Breitung township $ 599.77 Bremen township $ 452.24 Brevator township $ 708.55 Bricelyn city $ 473.92 Bridgewater township $ 1,029.28 Bristol township $ 455.33 Brockway township $ 1,228.08 Brook Park township $ 486.20 Brookfield township $ 423.96 Brooklyn Center city $ 19,827.07 Brooklyn Park city $ 32,545.26 Brooks city $ 412.21 Brookston city $ 400.82 Brookville township $ 433.39 Brooten city $ 278.61 Browerville city $ 539.36 Brownsdale city $ 563.63 Brownton city $ 551.32 Bruce township $ 523.54 Brunswick township $ 738.78 Brush Creek township $ 439.90 Buffalo city $ 6,753.26 Buffalo Lake city $ 507.91 Buffalo township $ 977.32 Buhl city $ 703.49 Bullard township $ 437.57 Burbank township $ 524.77 Burleene township $ 468.56 Burlington township $ 805.31 Burnhamville township $ 588.48 Burnsville city $ 23,006.37 Burton township $ 424.94 Burtrum city $ 405.61 Buse township $ 523.69 Butler township $ 460.89 Byron city $ 960.30 Byron township $ 447.05 Cairo township $ 438.54 Caledonia city $ 1,411.20 Cambridge city $ 3,047.06 Cambridge township $ 1,106.38 Camden township $ 651.08 Cameron township $ 413.31 Camp 5 township $ 393.32 Camp Release township $ 461.17 Camp township $ 436.84 Canby city $ 775.48 Candor township $ 572.31 Canisteo township $ 578.24 Cannon City township $ 732.78 Cannon Falls city $ 1,964.17 Cannon Falls township $ 729.59 Canosia township $ 1,089.23 Carimona township $ 479.17 Carlisle township $ 430.81 Carlos city $ 513.71 Carlos township $ 1,101.10 Carlton city $ 660.84 Carrolton township $ 496.66 Carson township $ 467.60 Carsonville township $ 445.71 Carver city $ 1,687.62 Cascade township $ 2,349.16 Cass Lake city $ 556.12 Castle Rock township $ 794.72 Cedar Lake township $ 1,321.36 Cedar Valley township $ 447.52 Center City city $ 603.14 Center Creek township $ 438.28 Centerville city $ 2,036.85 Ceylon city $ 471.61 Champlin city $ 9,186.03 Chandler city $ 447.36 Chanhassen city $ 11,220.45 Charlestown township $ 431.58 Chaska city $ 8,621.84 Chatfield city $ 1,455.41 Chatfield township $ 539.13 Chatham township $ 822.68 Chengwatana township $ 633.90 Cherry Grove township $ 486.47 Cherry township $ 646.77 Chester township $ 489.91 Chisago City city $ 2,017.63 Chisago Lake township $ 2,285.79 Chisholm city $ 2,118.13 Circle Pines city $ 2,990.83 Clara City city $ 759.41 Claremont city $ 478.68 Claremont township $ 504.50 Clarissa city $ 534.99 Clark township $ 423.03 Clarkfield city $ 572.36 Clear Lake city $ 518.00 Clear Lake township $ 918.14 Clearbrook city $ 505.31 Clearwater city $ 1,178.13 Clearwater township $ 811.12 Clements city $ 416.50 Cleveland city $ 639.11 Cleveland township $ 676.01 Clinton Falls township $ 508.62 Clinton township $ 661.21 Clitherall city $ 399.90 Clitherall township $ 562.39 Cloquet city $ 5,497.64 Clover township $ 1,348.83 Cohasset city $ 1,321.83 Cokato city $ 1,084.16 Cokato township $ 772.70 12 Cold Spring city $ 1,719.74 Coleraine city $ 953.85 Colfax township $ 561.12 Collegeville township $ 662.02 Collinwood township $ 729.41 Cologne city $ 892.42 Columbia Heights city $ 10,783.90 Columbia township $ 503.97 Columbus city $ 2,400.40 Colvin township $ 494.89 Comfort township $ 681.57 Comfrey city $ 844.39 Compton township $ 555.43 Concord township $ 549.50 Cook city $ 601.97 Coon Rapids city $ 31,526.82 Copley township $ 600.11 Corcoran city $ 6,118.87 Corinna township $ 1,214.60 Corliss township $ 542.61 Cormorant township $ 725.53 Cottage Grove city $ 12,788.41 Cotton township $ 552.31 Cottonwood city $ 689.60 Courtland city $ 585.53 Crane Lake township $ 425.42 Credit River township $ 2,069.10 Crooked Creek township $ 451.93 Crooks township $ 436.60 Crookston city $ 3,660.33 Crosby city $ 1,002.43 Crosby township $ 409.69 Crosslake city $ 1,238.56 Crow Wing township $ 1,306.07 Crystal city $ 11,093.33 Culver township $ 452.53 Daggett Brook township $ 539.43 Dahlgren township $ 1,132.41 Dailey township $ 439.13 Dakota city $ 474.29 Dalbo township $ 589.89 Dale township $ 426.40 Dalton city $ 452.90 Dane Prairie township $ 685.97 Darwin city $ 471.08 Dassel city $ 768.75 Dassel township $ 854.46 Dawson city $ 827.94 Dayton city $ 3,538.11 Dead Lake township $ 537.58 Decoria township $ 715.73 Deephaven city $ 14,823.03 Deer Creek city $ 452.87 Deer Creek township $ 473.81 Deer River city $ 951.56 Deer River township $ 943.75 Deerfield township $ 540.72 Deerwood township $ 862.41 Delafield township $ 457.07 Delano city $ 3,031.21 Delavan city $ 428.04 Delavan township $ 474.35 Delhi city $ 396.41 Delhi township $ 461.92 Dell Grove township $ 586.41 Dellwood city $ 792.88 Denmark township $ 976.14 Dennison city $ 227.62 Dent city $ 425.70 Des Moines River township $ 423.80 Des Moines township $ 458.72 Detroit Lakes city $ 3,471.12 Detroit township $ 1,654.76 Dewald township $ 468.90 Dexter city $ 472.95 Dexter township $ 465.94 Diamond Lake township $ 426.55 Dilworth city $ 1,466.54 Dodge Center city $ 1,331.82 Dora township $ 621.13 Douglas township $ 603.70 Dover city $ 569.27 Dover township $ 491.05 Dovray township $ 430.41 Dovre township $ 1,105.05 Drammen township $ 408.58 Dresbach township $ 534.39 Dryden township $ 468.48 Duluth city $ 45,027.34 Duluth township $ 1,080.15 Dunbar township $ 448.97 Dundas city $ 837.87 Dunn township $ 671.46 Dunnell city $ 419.82 Eagan city $ 27,764.93 Eagle Bend city $ 500.28 Eagle Lake city $ 1,165.94 Eagle Lake township $ 518.37 Eagle Valley township $ 487.04 East Bethel city $ 5,128.27 East Grand Forks city $ 4,407.91 East Gull Lake city $ 977.57 East Lake Lillian township $ 429.63 East Side township $ 594.42 Eastern township $ 458.42 Echo city $ 441.77 Eckles township $ 767.23 Eddy township $ 468.48 Eden Lake township $ 825.61 Eden Prairie city $ 40,291.20 13 Eden Valley city $ 959.72 Edgerton city $ 712.64 Edina city $ 25,822.31 Edna township $ 668.79 Edwards township $ 458.97 Effington township $ 457.23 Eglon township $ 561.54 Eitzen city $ 455.37 Elba city $ 421.21 Elba township $ 477.95 Elbow Lake city $ 705.30 Elgin city $ 645.34 Elgin township $ 581.50 Elizabeth city $ 422.71 Elizabeth township $ 631.49 Elk River city $ 12,339.97 Elko New Market city $ 1,560.38 Elkton township $ 474.29 Ellington township $ 454.90 Ellsburg township $ 457.16 Elmdale township $ 649.26 Elmer township $ 420.66 Elmira township $ 492.46 Elmo township $ 459.54 Elmore township $ 433.38 Elmwood township $ 498.43 Ely city $ 1,907.59 Elysian city $ 310.88 Elysian township $ 743.82 Embarrass township $ 595.77 Emerald township $ 453.60 Emily city $ 683.55 Empire township $ 1,195.51 Erhard city $ 411.69 Erhards Grove township $ 509.15 Ericson township $ 441.44 Erie township $ 895.90 Erin township $ 645.69 Eureka township $ 841.31 Evansville city $ 543.75 Evansville township $ 453.63 Eveleth city $ 1,923.18 Everts township $ 668.84 Excelsior city $ 6,341.63 Eyota city $ 896.87 Eyota township $ 532.03 Fahlun township $ 493.57 Fair Haven township $ 830.33 Fairbanks township $ 413.55 Fairfax city $ 660.32 Fairmont city $ 5,262.33 Fairview township $ 670.73 Falcon Heights city $ 3,126.37 Falk township $ 434.22 Fall Lake township $ 646.40 Farden township $ 1,039.52 Faribault city $ 6,247.18 Farm Island township $ 768.50 Farmington city $ 7,828.00 Farmington township $ 505.94 Fawn Lake township $ 522.20 Fayal township $ 1,107.05 Featherstone township $ 641.82 Felton city $ 430.08 Fergus Falls city $ 6,805.14 Fergus Falls township $ 588.78 Fern township $ 463.92 Fertile city $ 582.46 Field township $ 501.78 Fifty Lakes city $ 567.98 Fillmore township $ 525.59 Fine Lakes township $ 424.56 Finlayson township $ 501.31 Fish Lake township $ 1,046.12 Fleming township $ 500.22 Flora township $ 438.59 Florence township $ 903.94 Florida township $ 413.53 Flowing township $ 408.01 Folden township $ 463.84 Foley city $ 940.44 Forada city $ 438.36 Ford township $ 441.07 Forest Lake city $ 7,478.80 Forest Prairie township $ 626.02 Forest township $ 797.92 Foreston city $ 499.67 Forestville township $ 492.22 Fort Ripley township $ 680.48 Fort Snelling Unorganized $ 449.85 Fortier township $ 404.23 Fosston city $ 719.09 Foster township $ 458.08 Franconia township $ 930.75 Franklin city $ 481.39 Franklin township $ 1,272.97 Frazee city $ 654.96 Fredenberg township $ 901.36 Freedom township $ 481.44 Freeman township $ 523.89 Freeport city $ 558.25 Fremont township $ 474.66 French Lake township $ 739.55 French township $ 604.83 Friberg township $ 620.54 Fridley city $ 14,192.74 Friendship township $ 446.61 Frohn township $ 839.90 Frost city $ 431,61 Fulda city $ 769.33 14 Gales township $ 418.07 Garfield city $ 457.80 Garrison township $ 665.77 Gaylord city $ 896.18 Gem Lake city $ 586.68 Gennessee township $ 502.52 Georgetown township $ 416.75 Germania township $ 468.19 Germantown township $ 782.93 Gibbon city $ 570.71 Gilbert city $ 1,051.86 Gillford township $ 513.32 Gilmanton township $ 618.39 Girard township $ 653.59 Glasgow township $ 453.50 Glencoe city $ 2,742.34 Glendorado township $ 601.00 Glenwood city $ 1,422.22 Glenwood township $ 721.71 Glyndon city $ 679.40 Glyndon township $ 476.44 Gnesen township $ 980.58 Golden Valley city $ 11,544.26 Gonvick city $ 453.33 Goodhue city $ 668.49 Goodhue township $ 543.28 Goodland township $ 537.28 Goodview city $ 2,111.43 Gordon township $ 577.63 Gorman township $ 517.98 Graceville city $ 556.28 Graham township $ 542.54 Granada city $ 453.74 Grand Lake township $ 1,246.11 Grand Marais city $ 1,199.37 Grand Meadow city $ 655.85 Grand Rapids city $ 4,431.35 Granite Falls city $ 1,449.55 Granite Falls township $ 802.07 Granite Ledge township $ 588.37 Granite Rock township $ 435.44 Granite township $ 511.25 Grant city $ 1,842.45 Grant Valley township $ 934.24 Grass Lake township $ 637.56 Grasston city $ 414.33 Great Bend township $ 479.09 Great Scott township $ 518.11 Green Lake township $ 914.49 Green Valley township $ 481.51 Greenbush city $ 598.10 Greenbush township $ 713.18 Greenfield city $ 1,435.91 Greenfield township $ 803.94 Greenleaf township $ 595,80 Greenvale township $ 647.19 Greenwood city $ 671.15 Greenwood township $ 1,164.86 Grey Cloud Island township $ 481.71 Grey Eagle city $ 463.41 Grey Eagle township $ 569.46 Grove City city $ 512.79 Grove Lake township $ 461.47 Guthrie township $ 539.59 Hagali township $ 480.10 Halden township $ 422.99 Hallock city $ 659.29 Ham Lake city $ 8,754.94 Hamburg city $ 526.70 Hammer township $ 433.57 Hampton city $ 540.96 Hampton township $ 651.04 Hancock township $ 480.53 Hanover city $ 1,896.25 Hansonville township $ 406.69 Harmony city $ 678.36 Harmony township $ 468.13 Harris city $ 700.42 Harris township $ 1,492.33 Harrison township $ 562.15 Hart Lake township $ 878.03 Hart township $ 463.69 Hartford township $ 534.43 Hastings city $ 14,337.21 Havana township $ 553.65 Haven township $ 1,002.83 Haverhill township $ 881.16 Hawk Creek township $ 444.92 Hawley city $ 904.52 Hay Brook township $ 449.68 Hay Creek township $ 688.76 Hayfield city $ 700.13 Hayfield township $ 520.21 Hayward township $ 495.36 Hector city $ 621.08 Height of Land township $ 572.62 Helena township $ 940.96 Henderson city $ 646.28 Hendricks city $ 538.14 Hendricks township $ 441.98 Henning city $ 595.09 Henning township $ 490.29 Henrietta township $ 853.27 Henryville township $ 429.37 Hermantown city $ 5,144.23 Heron Lake city $ 525.79 Hewitt city $ 440.10 Hibbing city $ 8,247.89 Hickory township $ 404.93 High Forest township $ 688.06 15 Highland township $ 508.17 Highlanding township $ 428.58 Highwater township $ 429.53 Hillman township $ 505.51 Hills city $ 522.96 Hillsdale township $ 528.86 Hilltop city $ 511.49 Hinckley city $ 727.43 Hinckley township $ 584.36 Hines township $ 567.37 Hobart township $ 646.66 Hokah city $ 537.70 Hokah township $ 535.38 Holden township $ 521.60 Holding township $ 723.59 Holdingford city $ 577.39 Holland township $ 490.42 Hollywood township $ 695.10 Holmes City township $ 654.89 Holmesville township $ 544.37 Hoist township $ 478.78 Holt township $ 467.92 Homer township $ 804.07 Homestead township $ 474.88 Honner township $ 396.90 Hope township $ 453.50 Hopkins city $ 10,081,79 Hornet township $ 433.54 Houston city $ 628.71 Houston township $ 508.66 Howard Lake city $ 866.88 Hoyt Lakes city $ 1,172.98 Hubbard township $ 616.42 Hugo city $ 6,129.66 Huntersville township $ 413,66 Hutchinson city $ 5,753.69 Ideal township $ 817.79 Independence city $ 2,229.54 Industrial township $ 594.59 Inman township $ 449.87 International Falls city $ 2,487.72 Inver Grove Heights city $ 22,295.64 Iona city $ 428.87 Iona township $ 459.97 Iosco township $ 568.06 Ironton city $ 529.05 Irving township $ 712.20 Isanti city $ 2,243.34 Isanti township $ 1,051.99 Isle city $ 611.11 Isle Harbor township $ 539.86 Itasca township $ 425.67 Ivanhoe city $ 549.76 Jackson city $ 1,641.29 Jackson township $ 703.88 Janesville city $ 1,003.53 Janesville township $ 547.73 Jeffers city $ 452.68 Jefferson township $ 412.24 Jevne township $ 472.18 Johnsonville township $ 408.12 Jordan city $ 2,616.88 Jordan township $ 481.74 Kabetogama township $ 433.90 Kalmar township $ 728.77 Kanabec township $ 596.25 Kandiyohi city $ 528.47 Kandiyohi township $ 570.46 Kandota township $ 604.04 Karlstad city $ 581.01 Kasota city $ 544.13 Kasson city $ 2,694.65 Kathio township $ 720.52 Keewatin city $ 679.24 Kellogg city $ 522.08 Kelsey township $ 424.05 Kensington city $ 455.49 Kenyon city $ 891.19 Kenyon township $ 491.62 Kerkhoven city $ 564.90 Kiester city $ 523.95 Kiester township $ 448.56 Kilkenny township $ 502.56 Kimball city $ 566.43 Kingman township $ 432.91 Kingston township $ 735.40 Kinney city $ 416.23 Kintire township $ 431.20 Knife Lake township $ 729.53 Koochiching Co. Unorganized $ 929.00 Kragnes township $ 464.00 Krain township $ 626.22 Kroschel township $ 443.92 Kugler township $ 440.94 La Crescent city $ 1,959.23 La Crescent township $ 782.86 La Garde township $ 426.48 La Prairie city $ 578.18 La Prairie township $ 445.66 Lake Andrew township $ 766.89 Lake Benton city $ 549.86 Lake Benton township $ 436.95 Lake City city $ 3,021.51 Lake Co. Unorganized $ 2,188.92 Lake Crystal city $ 1,039.52 Lake Elizabeth township $ 437.19 Lake Elmo city $ 4,014.39 Lake Eunice township $ 842.37 Lake Fremont township $ 433.03 Lake George township $ 507.71 16 Lake Hattie township $ 436.08 Lake Lillian township $ 435.67 Lake Mary township $ 767.49 Lake Park city $ 543.11 Lake Park township $ 518.08 Lake Sarah township $ 513.05 Lake Shore city $ 1,017.23 Lake St. Croix Beach city $ 749.89 Lake Stay township $ 423.99 Lake township $ 516.35 Lake View township $ 899.53 Lake Wilson city $ 466.01 Lakefield city $ 1,146.99 Lakeland city $ 976.91 Lakeland Shores city $ 495.88 Lakeport township $ 1,001.29 Lakeside township $ 1,007.18 Laketown township $ 945.72 Lakeville city $ 24,826.21 Lakewood township $ 1,130.29 Lakin township $ 494.20 Lamberton city $ 586.83 Lamberton township $ 437.63 Landfall city $ 502.07 Lanesboro city $ 658.63 Lauderdale city $ 1,389.48 Lavell township $ 470.49 Le Center city $ 921.27 Le Ray township $ 598.36 Le Roy city $ 629.87 Le Roy township $ 478.37 Le Sauk township $ 863.29 Le Sueur city $ 1,699.06 Leaf Lake township $ 559.36 Leaf Mountain township $ 471.43 Leaf River township $ 851.82 Leaf Valley township $ 540.13 Lee township $ 397.99 Leiding township $ 504.94 Lemond township $ 529.42 Lengby city $ 406.52 Lent township $ 1,319.34 Leon township $ 1,155.71 Leslie township $ 563.19 Lester Prairie city $ 812.20 Leven township $ 556.34 Lewiston city $ 749.85 Lexington city $ 980.55 Lexington township $ 623.79 Liberty township $ 582.82 Lida township $ 645.74 Lilydale city $ 814.51 Limestone township $ 427.36 Linden Grove township $ 419.15 Lindstrom city $ 1,828.54 Lino Lakes city $ 11,220.30 Linwood township $ 3,056.24 Lismore city $ 433.91 Lismore township $ 416.16 Litchfield city $ 3,344.30 Litchfield township $ 637.83 Little Canada city $ 5,685.42 Little Elk township $ 457.26 Little Falls city $ 3,297.38 Little Falls township $ 873.34 Little Sauk township $ 590.82 Livonia township $ 2,739.16 Lodi township $ 451.88 Lone Pine township $ 552.11 Long Beach city $ 510.62 Long Lake city $ 1,168.46 Long Prairie city $ 969.29 Long Prairie township $ 618.36 Lonsdale city $ 1,394.37 Loretto city $ 682.65 Louisville township $ 791.46 Lowry city $ 465.00 Lucan city $ 431,41 Luverne city $ 2,534.15 Lyle city $ 509.93 Lyle township $ 482.48 Lynden township $ 945.07 Lyons township $ 435.19 Mabel city $ 552.59 Macville township $ 430.32 Madelia city $ 848.99 Madison city $ 842.90 Madison Lake city $ 723.95 Mahnomen city $ 651.70 Mahtomedi city $ 3,436.59 Maine Prairie township $ 931.97 Maine township $ 613.17 Malmo township $ 494.96 Manannah township $ 520.06 Mankato city $ 16,172,46 Mantorville city $ 709.14 Mantorville township $ 940.10 Maple Grove city $ 40,466.78 Maple Grove township $ 1,090.94 Maple Lake city $ 954.21 Maple Lake township $ 1,417.25 Maple Plain city $ 1,151.61 Maple Ridge township $ 610.37 Maple township $ 488.10 Mapleton city $ 812.70 Maplewood city $ 20,552.90 Maplewood township $ 469.25 Marble township $ 423,25 Marcell township $ 536.54 Marine on St. Croix city $ 683.57 17 Marion township $ 1,929.61 Marsh Creek township $ 420.20 Marshall city $ 4,189.31 Marshan township $ 741.36 Marshfield township $ 440.72 Martin township $ 481.57 Martinsburg township $ 421.44 Marysville township $ 957.67 Maxwell township $ 431.29 May township $ 2,039.43 Mayer city $ 950.10 Mayhew Lake township $ 615.58 Maynard city $ 481.02 Mayville township $ 475.08 Maywood township $ 635.55 Mazeppa city $ 599.97 Mazeppa township $ 608.51 McDavitt township $ 532.22 McGregor township $ 409.95 Meadowlands city $ 406.76 Meadowlands township $ 480.41 Medford city $ 694.65 Medford township $ 531.69 Medicine Lake city $ 525,74 Medina city $ 4,062.54 Melrose city $ 1,387.22 Melville township $ 434.86 Menahga city $ 722.43 Mendota city $ 441.62 Mendota Heights city $ 6,281.41 Meriden township $ 559.76 Merton township $ 484.05 Middletown township $ 439.94 Middleville township $ 680.30 Midway township $ 1,316.06 Milaca city $ 1,131.65 Milaca township $ 820.51 Millerville township $ 491.21 Millwood township $ 673.57 Milo township $ 774.66 Milroy city $ 433.75 Milton township $ 600.05 Miltona city $ 488.50 Miltona township $ 676.37 Minden township $ 1,208.60 Minerva township $ 447.94 Minneapolis city $ 237,630.19 Minneola township $ 587.84 Minneota city $ 744.12 Minneota township $ 458.09 Minnesota Lake city $ 292.90 Minnesota Lake township $ 433.94 Minnetonka Beach city $ 778.28 Minnetonka city $ 40,203.27 Minnetrista city $ 5,357.81 Minnewaska township $ 548.76 Mission Creek township $ 519.08 Mission township $ 679.16 Money Creek township $ 557.23 Montevideo city $ 2,072.07 Montgomery city $ 1,159.24 Monticello city $ 5,247.87 Monticello township $ 1,313.69 Montrose city $ 1,203.53 Moorhead city $ 15,085.43 Moose Creek township $ 456.97 Moose Lake city $ 809.44 Moose Lake township $ 677.24 Mora city $ 1,218.25 Moran township $ 534.87 Moranville township $ 608.64 Morcom township $ 407.83 Morgan city $ 589.40 Morgan township $ 444.41 Morken township $ 439.97 Morrill township $ 539.27 Morris city $ 3,455.74 Morristown city $ 631,87 Morristown township $ 568.60 Morse township $ 1,794.12 Morton city $ 466.61 Motley city $ 272.46 Mound city $ 5,698.68 Mounds View city $ 6,033.09 Mount Pleasant township $ 501.02 Mountain Iron city $ 1,912.65 Mountain Lake city $ 916.43 Mountain Lake township $ 458.92 Mud Lake Unorganized $ 380.75 Munch township $ 457.51 Nashwauk city $ 657.80 Nashwauk township (balance) $ 608.93 Nelson city $ 424.08 Nerstrand city $ 472.67 Nessel township $ 1,003.44 New Avon township $ 433.99 New Brighton city $ 14,095.19 New Germany city $ 488.47 New Hartford township $ 631.32 New Haven township $ 783.66 New Hope city $ 11,728.74 New Independence township $ 478.67 New London city $ 753.56 New London township $ 1,365.40 New Market township $ 1,531.49 New Prague city $ 2,792.44 New Richland city $ 678.81 New Ulm city $ 6,909.94 New York Mills city $ 636.55 Newport city $ 1,313.75 18 Newry township $ 488.78 Newton township $ 600.84 Nicollet city $ 681.22 Nidaros township $ 506.70 Nininger township $ 665.96 Nisswa city $ 1,115,27 Nokay Lake township $ 644.12 Nora township $ 940.61 Norden township $ 481.48 Nordland township $ 746.45 Norman township $ 451.48 Normanna township $ 633.45 North Branch city $ 3,752.56 North Branch township $ 916.61 North Germany township $ 458.07 North Hero township $ 422.42 North Mankato city $ 5,781.55 North Oaks city $ 3,931.48 North St. Paul city $ 5,682.47 North Star township $ 466.89 North township $ 552.82 Northern township $ 1,824.61 Northfield city $ 12,415.20 Northfield township $ 656.40 Northland township $ 436.80 Northrop city $ 436.56 Norton township $ 519.60 Norway Lake township $ 481.22 Norway township $ 480.48 Norwegian Grove township $ 473.95 Norwood Young America city $ 1,340.41 Nowthen city $ 2,547.89 Oak Grove city $ 5,072.59 Oak Park Heights city $ 10,300.67 Oak Valley township $ 462.55 Oakdale city $ 2,148.09 Ogema township $ 459.26 Ogilvie city $ 467.20 Olivia city $ 986.44 Omro township $ 413.54 Onamia city $ 551.31 Onamia township $ 518.31 Orange township $ 476.39 Orion township $ 541.83 Orono city $ 6,259.91 Oronoco city $ 841.03 Oronoco township $ 1,086.46 Orr city $ 459.00 Orrock township $ 1,359.12 Orton township $ 433.79 Ortonville city $ 480.27 Orwell township $ 435.47 Osage township $ 597.04 Osakis city $ 1,162.42 Osakis township $ 568.29 Osceola township $ 419.83 Oshkosh township $ 442.28 Osseo city $ 1,518.25 Otsego city $ 6,719.94 Otter Tail township $ 582.61 Ottertail city $ 575.11 Otto township $ 549.08 Owatonna city $ 10,290.18 Owatonna township $ 582.08 Oxford township $ 672.85 Paddock township $ 466.92 Page township $ 581.82 Palmer township $ 1,124.08 Palmyra township $ 441.69 Park Rapids city $ 1,690.92 Parke township $ 545.79 Parkers Prairie city $ 631.72 Parkers Prairie township $ 494.68 Partridge township $ 565.02 Paxton township $ 532.19 Paynesville city $ 1,143.43 Paynesville township $ 823.47 Peace township $ 658.15 Pease city $ 437.26 Pelican Rapids city $ 826.89 Pelican township $ 571.05 Pembina township $ 518.10 Penn township $ 468.89 Pennock city $ 491.64 Pepin township $ 505.33 Pequaywan township $ 449.21 Pequot Lakes city $ 1,060.85 Perch Lake township $ 670.37 Perham city $ 1,127.31 Perham township $ 651.31 Petersburg township $ 450.15 Pierz city $ 723.71 Pike Bay township $ 738.09 Pike Creek township $ 672.59 Pike township $ 527.23 Pillager city $ 30.82 Pilot Mound township $ 486.08 Pine City city $ 1,088.69 Pine City township $ 762.87 Pine Island city $ 1,651.65 Pine Island township $ 559.13 Pine Lake township $ 1,628.21 Pine Point township $ 427.13 Pine River city $ 639.83 Pine River township $ 657.62 Pine Springs city $ 1,722.70 Pipestone city $ 1,633.94 Plainview city $ 1,557.38 Plainview township $ 509.97 Pleasant Grove township $ 615.58 19 Pleasant Hill township $ 527.45 Pleasant Prairie township $ 445.08 Plymouth city $ 51,398.10 Pokegama township $ 1,152.06 Polk Centre township $ 397.64 Pomroy township $ 491.74 Poplar River township $ 408.86 Popple township $ 519.48 Port Hope township $ 606.39 Portage township $ 439.09 Prairie View township $ 440.80 Preston city $ 742.98 Preston Lake township $ 448.16 Princeton city $ 763.35 Princeton township $ 977.70 Prinsburg city $ 557.84 Prior Lake city $ 13,304.06 Proctor city $ 1,297.62 Quamba city $ 409.01 Queen township $ 448.20 Quincy township $ 469.09 Racine city $ 488.77 Racine township $ 512.04 Ramsey city $ 12,834.20 Randall city $ 532.21 Randolph city $ 511.32 Randolph township $ 614.43 Ranier city $ 896.03 Rapidan township $ 735.01 Ravenna township $ 1,108.66 Raymond city $ 592.38 Red Eye township $ 517.45 Red Lake Falls city $ 1,398.51 Red Rock township $ 604.33 Red Wing city $ 7,715.28 Redwood Falls city $ 2,615.76 Redwood Falls township $ 436.27 Regal city $ 393.04 Reno township $ 515.63 Renville city $ 648.48 Revere city $ 396.58 Reynolds township $ 526.77 Rice city $ 804.02 Rice Lake city $ 2,045.89 Riceland township $ 510.49 Richfield city $ 18,919.98 Richmond city $ 766.63 Richmond township $ 586.51 Richville city $ 397.99 Richwood township $ 563.37 Ripley township $ 429.06 Riverside township $ 483.05 Riverton township $ 511.53 Robbinsdale city $ 8,080.67 Rochester city $ 50,068.08 Rochester township $ 2,094.65 Rock Creek city $ 800.07 Rock Dell township $ 590.72 Rockford city $ 1,860.36 Rockford township $ 1,423.78 Rocksbury township $ 1,023.44 Rockville city $ 1,105.82 Rockwood township $ 1,007.25 Rogers city $ 6,711.76 Rolling Forks township $ 421.48 Rolling Green township $ 457.29 Rollingstone city $ 592.86 Rollingstone township $ 582.89 Roosevelt township $ 1,004.61 Roscoe township $ 615.27 Rose Hill township $ 422.58 Roseau city $ 1,021.10 Rosemount city $ 9,592.83 Roseville city $ 22,123.80 Roseville township $ 538.36 Rosewood township $ 492.28 Round Lake city $ 460.95 Round Prairie township $ 541.62 Royal township $ 424.26 Royalton city $ 335.35 Royalton township $ 692.70 Runeberg township $ 498.67 Rush City city $ 915.40 Rush Lake township $ 700.72 Rushford city $ 857.28 Rushford Village city $ 634.89 Rushmore city $ 484.82 Rushseba township $ 624.31 Russell city $ 473.36 Rutledge city $ 425.92 Sabin city $ 517.93 Sacred Heart city $ 496.30 Sacred Heart township $ 459.51 Salem township $ 725.23 San Francisco township $ 669.13 Sanborn city $ 465.06 Sand Creek township $ 855.73 Sanders township $ 461.62 Sandstone city $ 697.82 Sandstone township $ 584.11 Sandy township $ 502.31 Santiago township $ 850.11 Sartell city $ 8,948.73 Sauk Centre city $ 1,650.65 Sauk Rapids city $ 4,322.29 Sauk Rapids township $ 556.20 Savage city $ 15,377.48 Scambler township $ 542.97 Scandia city $ 2,822.36 Scandia Valley township $ 840.78 20 Scanlon city $ 668.21 Sciota township $ 523.99 Seaforth city $ 396.18 Sebeka city $ 548.24 Seely township $ 434.93 Selma township $ 433.42 Severance township $ 448.81 Shafer city $ 640.38 Shafer township $ 1,085.11 Shakopee city $ 19,288.61 Shamrock township $ 768.67 Shaokatan township $ 441,75 Sharon township $ 587.84 Sheldon township $ 464.05 Shell Lake township $ 472.39 Sherburn city $ 661.16 Sheridan township $ 429.83 Sherman township $ 459.99 Shetek township $ 485.54 Shevlin city $ 415.79 Shevlin township $ 497.42 Shieldsville township $ 717.17 Shingobee township $ 1,240.81 Shoreview city $ 17,102.51 Shorewood city $ 5,966.52 Silver Bay city $ 1,313.17 Silver Creek township $ 1,972.91 Silver Lake city $ 581.63 Silver Lake township $ 540.07 Silver Leaf township $ 500.69 Silver township $ 512.14 Silverton township $ 428.24 Sinclair township $ 429.46 Sioux Agency township $ 446.50 Skelton township $ 503.14 Skree township $ 441.60 Slayton city $ 1,021.45 Slayton township $ 498.01 Sleepy Eye city $ 1,612.15 Sletten township $ 421.40 Smiley township $ 528.67 Solem township $ 453.86 Solway township $ 1,005.68 Somerset township $ 603.31 South Bend township $ 768.75 South Branch township $ 457.37 South Fork township $ 592.71 South Harbor township $ 611.63 South St. Paul city $ 7,356.35 Southbrook township $ 404.96 Southside township $ 843.81 Sparta township $ 634.65 Spencer Brook township $ 877.75 Spicer city $ 730.19 Spring Grove city $ 696.05 Spring Lake Park city $ 4,002.18 Spring Lake township $ 1,514.17 Spring Park city $ 1,445.21 Spring Prairie township $ 450.69 Spring Valley city $ 1,030.34 Spring Valley township $ 541.19 Springdale township $ 430.92 Springfield city $ 1,280.67 Springfield township $ 419.00 Springvale township $ 837.21 Spruce Grove township $ 473.31 St. Anthony city $ 6,065.75 St. Augusta city $ 1,649.09 St. Bonifacius city $ 1,363.55 St. Charles city $ 1,361.21 St. Charles township $ 527.16 St. Clair city $ 599.35 St. Cloud city $ 31,627.65 St. Francis city $ 2,983.83 St. George township $ 716.52 St. James city $ 1,629.01 St. Johns township $ 496.95 St. Joseph city $ 2,948.41 St. Joseph township $ 732.89 St. Lawrence township $ 552.63 St. Leo city $ 405.64 St. Louis Co. Unorganized $ 1,309.17 St. Louis Park city $ 31,357.81 St. Marys Point city $ 524.04 St. Mathias township $ 565.81 St. Michael city $ 8,161.31 St. Olaf township $ 496.43 St. Paul city $ 147,379.70 St. Paul Park city $ 598.54 St. Peter city $ 4,396.37 St. Stephen city $ 631.13 St. Wendel township $ 1,080.02 Stacy city $ 763.60 Stanchfield township $ 717.15 Stanford township $ 1,058.49 Stanton township $ 739.24 Staples city $ 1,373.41 Staples township $ 538.67 Star Lake township $ 523.20 Star township $ 410.21 Starbuck city $ 712.38 Stewart city $ 494.38 Stewartville city $ 1,988.00 Stillwater city $ 8,777.88 Stillwater township $ 1,119.80 Stockholm township $ 651.59 Stockton city $ 577.05 Stoney Brook township $ 460.67 Stony River township $ 445.84 Storden city $ 451.97 21 Storden township $ 437.80 Stowe Prairie township $ 504.13 Straight River township $ 593.42 Sturgeon township $ 431.28 Sugar Bush township $ 524.12 Sullivan township $ 420.69 Summit Lake township $ 498.18 Summit township $ 958.95 Sunburg city $ 415.56 Sundown township $ 427.34 Sunfish Lake city $ 584.48 Sunrise township $ 987.69 Sverdrup township $ 604.77 Swan River township $ 591.66 Swanville township $ 521.61 Swede Grove township $ 472.64 Swedes Forest township $ 417.81 Sylvan township $ 311.72 Taconite city $ 931.59 Taylors Falls city $ 696.87 Ten Lake township $ 635.22 Thief River Falls city $ 4,304.54 Thomastown township $ 626.81 Thomson township $ 1,956.90 Three Lakes township $ 424.79 Tintah city $ 397.37 Tintah township $ 391.42 Todd township $ 1,127.84 Toivola township $ 441.63 Tonka Bay city $ 1,305.70 Tordenskjold township $ 547.97 Torning township $ 514.70 Tower city $ 918.02 Tracy city $ 860.53 Transit township $ 454.83 Trelipe township $ 442.79 Trimont city $ 578.05 Trondhjem township $ 435.43 Trosky city $ 406.57 Trout Lake township $ 752.90 Troy township $ 457.92 Truman city $ 662.64 Tumuli township $ 523.86 Turtle Creek township $ 465.28 Turtle Lake township $ 804.21 Twin Lakes township $ 1,066.20 Two Harbors city $ 2,484.86 Two Inlets township $ 463.14 Two Rivers township $ 603.24 Tyler city $ 680.69 Ulen city $ 496.17 Ulen township $ 420.68 Underwood city $ 490.44 Underwood township $ 435.23 Union Grove township $ 565.10 Urness township $ 466.41 Utica city $ 448.84 Utica township $ 532.20 Vadnais Heights city $ 7,329.79 Vail township $ 443.68 Vasa township $ 671.89 Verdi township $ 411,85 Vergas city $ 479.98 Vermilion Lake township $ 498.76 Vermillion city $ 514.74 Vermillion township $ 738.13 Verndale city $ 512.25 Vernon township $ 577.09 Vesta city $ 442.50 Vesta township $ 432.00 Victor township $ 711.18 Victoria city $ 4,121.96 Villard city $ 446.73 Villard township $ 555.00 Vining city $ 402.28 Viola township $ 556.62 Virginia city $ 4,678.88 Waasa township $ 467.14 Wabana township $ 575.43 Wabasha city $ 1,834.72 Wabasso city $ 554.10 Waconia city $ 6,429.73 Waconia township $ 778.69 Wacouta township $ 542.36 Wadena city $ 2,369.24 Wadena township $ 637.88 Wagner township $ 475.27 Wahkon city $ 467.96 Waite Park city $ 3,831.00 Walcott township $ 674.14 Walden township $ 426.35 Waldorf city $ 436.61 Walker city $ 670.18 Walnut Grove city $ 528.66 Walters city $ 398.41 Waltham city $ 423.19 Wanamingo city $ 668.83 Wanamingo township $ 526.76 Wanda city $ 403.56 Wang township $ 460.63 Ward township $ 515.85 Warren city $ 770.07 Warren township $ 553.36 Warroad city $ 747.90 Warsaw township $ 1,366.52 Waseca city $ 4,211.51 Wasioja township $ 626.10 Watab township $ 1,310.75 Waterbury township $ 429.41 Waterford township $ 551.48 22 Watertown city $ 1,549.75 Watertown township $ 786.45 Waterville city $ 843.24 Waterville township $ 601.91 Watkins city $ 588.45 Watopa township $ 450.98 Waverly city $ 814.59 Waverly township $ 439.77 Wayzata city $ 3,515.09 Webster township $ 1,315.00 Welch township $ 621.56 Welcome city $ 573.44 Wellington township $ 434.90 Wells city $ 946.05 Wells township $ 847.15 West Albany township $ 488.96 West Concord city $ 571.24 West Lakeland township $ 1,745.68 West St. Paul city $ 8,047.10 West Union city $ 403.77 West Union township $ 458.08 Westbrook city $ 589.43 Westbrook township $ 454.19 Westfield township $ 502.16 Westline township $ 428.33 Westport township $ 445.76 Wheatland township $ 759.03 Wheaton city $ 1,099.70 Wheeling township $ 556.33 White Bear Lake city $ 13,708.05 White Bear Lake township $ 523.62 White Bear township $ 7,061.56 White Pine township $ 393.13 White township (balance) $ 1,318.86 Whited township $ 639.86 Whitefield township $ 531.99 Whitewater township $ 437.41 Wilder city $ 400.55 Wilkinson township $ 487.30 Willernie city $ 525.36 Williams township $ 420.26 Willmar city $ 8,196.10 Willmar township $ 522.17 Willow Lake township $ 436.28 Wilma township $ 406.03 Wilmington township $ 497.60 Wilson township $ 722.28 Wilton township $ 487.85 Windemere township $ 913.66 Windom city $ 2,501.62 Wing River township $ 502.91 Winnebago city $ 677.84 Winnebago City township $ 432.64 Winnebago township $ 444.70 Winona city $ 12,196.65 Winsor township $ 408.16 Winsted city $ 917.85 Winthrop city $ 758.52 Winton city $ 435.04 Wiscoy township $ 497.80 Wolf Lake township $ 454.47 Wood Lake city $ 479.60 Woodbury city $ 26,391.15 Woodland city $ 655.43 Woodland township $ 725.17 Woodside township $ 984.44 Woodville township $ 795.52 Worthington city $ 6,022.16 23 Wuori township $ 571.93 Wyanett township $ 934.10 Wykeham township $ 471.91 Wykoff city $ 515.10 Wyoming city $ 2,721.59 York township $ 466.94 Young America township $ 595.96 Yucatan township $ 489.90 Zimmerman city $ 2,044.69 Zumbro township $ 607.72 Zumbrota city $ 1,738.44 Zumbrota township $ 573.20 LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date September 8, 2020 ITEM NUMBER Real Estate Equities Update STAFF INITIAL HB APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Please review the following memo from the City's planning consultant regarding the redevelop- ment of 1795 Eustis Street. A copy of Resolution No. 070919B is included for reference. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: STAFF MEMO To: Mayor and City Council Heather Butkowski, City Administrator From: Jennifer Haskamp Consulting City Planner Progress/Project Update Date: September 4, 2020 RE: 1795 Eustis Street Redevelopment - Update Earlier this year Real Estate Equities ("Applicant") provided an update to the City Council regarding their efforts to secure financing for redevelopment of the property at 1795 Eustis Street. The presentation occurred prior to the pandemic, and therefore the requests made during that presentation are no longer being considered by the Applicant. Their original plan for a fully affordable senior building has been restored and is the likely path forward at this time. Given the effects of the pandemic on nearly all businesses, but specifically within the real estate, lending and development market the Applicant's redevelopment efforts have been paused over the past six months. Recently, the city staff and Applicant resumed talks about the development timeline, and specifically the timeline regarding an application for the Final Stage PUD given the City's financial obligations for the subject property. Since it has been awhile since the proposed development was considered, staff provides the following summary of the current status of the process for background and information as talks are resumed: • Concept Plan Stage PUD (Complete): The Applicant submitted a Concept Plan for the subject project in January 2019 and the City Council considered the proposed project at their meeting in February 2019. Feedback and suggestions were provided to the Applicant regarding the proposed project for inclusion in the Development Stage PUD application materials. (Non-binding) • Development Stage PUD (Complete): The Applicant submitted the Development Stage PUD application that included a full set of architectural and preliminary engineering plans. The Application included a detailed narrative regarding the proposed project that included unit counts, estimated rents, etc. A public hearing was held and public testimony regarding the proposed project was heard. On July 9, 2019 the City Councill approved the Development Stage PUD by Resolution No. 070919B which included 33 conditions of approval. The action of Development Stage of Approval is Binding. This means that provided the Applicant meets the 1 JL 117 conditions of approval, the project must be approved. The conditions include the required Final PUD, Development Agreement, CUP, vacation of alley right-of-way, among other requirements. • Final PUD (To -be Completed): The Final PUD stage has not been completed and an application has not been submitted. To obtain Final PUD approval the Applicant must meet and comply with the 33 conditions identified within Resolution No. 070919B. I will be available at the City Council meeting to answer any questions regarding the land use review process as summarized herein and the process and timeline given the City's financial obligations on the property. 2 Council Member Moffatt introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 070919B CITY OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AT 1795 EUSTIS STREET TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A SENIOR MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING PROJECT A. WHEREAS, the City of Lauderdale is the owner of the property located at 1795 Eustis Street, Lauderdale, Minnesota; and B. WHEREAS, the City Council solicited informal proposals from parties interested in redeveloping the subject site with senior housing to meet the goals and objectives of the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan; and C. WHEREAS, Real Estate Equities ("Applicant") prepared and presented a Concept Plan to redevelop the subject site with a 1 14 -unit Senior Housing building on February 26, 2019; and D. WHEREAS, on March 19, 2019 the Applicant held an Open House to solicit feedback from the community before submitting their formal Development Stage PUD application; and E. WHEREAS, the City Council considered feedback from the Open House and provided comments that were subsequently incorporated into the Development Stage PUD application; and F. WHEREAS, on April 24, 2019 the Applicant submitted a complete Development Stage PUD application seeking conditional approval to rezone the subject property to PUD and to preliminarily approve the proposed Senior Housing project; and G. WHEREAS, on May 14, 2019 the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing for the subject Project; and H. WHEREAS, on May 28, 2019, June 11, 2019 and July 9, 2019 the City Council considered the public testimony and the Development Stage Planned Unit Development; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lauderdale, Minnesota, that it does hereby approve the request of Real Estate Equities for Development Stage Planned Unit Development provided that the following conditions are met: 1. The Plans submitted by the Applicant on April 24, 2019 are conditionally approved with the changes and updates as noted herein. 2. The proposed Project, as detailed and described within the Narrative submitted by the Applicant on April 24, 2019 requesting that Subject Property be rezoned to Planned Unit Development (PUD), is conditionally approved with the conditions as noted herein. 3. The Applicant shall submit an application to vacate that portion of the alley running east -to - west along the southern property line and connecting to Malvern Street with the Final PUD application. 4. Approval of the Final PUD and Rezoning shall be conditioned on the approval of vacating that portion of the alley as described in Condition #3. 5, A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) may be drafted to support the rezoning to PUD and such CUP shall be recorded against the subject property. The CUP may incorporate operational conditions and site conditions that will continue beyond the construction period, which may be noted within the Development Agreement, and such conditions shall be consistent. 6. In conjunction with the requirements of the Development Agreement, the CUP may be drafted to permit the PUD for a Senior Housing use and no other use shall be permitted without an application to amend the CUP. 7. Prior to Final PUD plan approval and rezoning, the Applicant shall provide additional details regarding trash removal. All waste and recycling receptacles are required to be fully enclosed on site, and it is unclear how long the trash and recycling bins are proposed to be un-enclosed on the denoted concrete pad near the parking bay. Details must be provided and documented within an Operations Management Plan which must be reviewed by City Staff to ensure compliance with the City's ordinances. 8. The Development Agreement, and Operations Management Plan, shall provide details regarding snow removal on site. This language shall be reviewed and approved by the City Staff prior to execution of the Development Agreement. 9. The Applicant shall prepare a Parking Plan that shall be incorporated into the CUP and the Development Agreement. The Parking Plan shall describe a process to address the management of resident parking and usage of onsite parking. The Parking Plan shall address how management will respond if the majority of residents are consistently parking on City Streets and not paying for use of the underground parking stalls. The Parking Plan, as well as process to amend it, shall be provided to the City's staff, including City Attorney, who shall review and approve the Parking Plan prior to execution of the Development Agreement. 10. The Applicant shall provide additional detail regarding the monument/entrance sign including proposed lighting. This information shall be submitted with Final PUD application materials. 11. The Applicant shall submit and provide all proposed wall signage, entry signage, or any other proposed naming as part of the Final PUD submittal. 12. The Applicant shall submit and provide a sample board that shows proposed colors and exterior building materials with the Final PUD application materials. 13. The Applicant shall work cooperatively with the City to determine appropriate compensation to the property owner at 1801 Eustis Street. The compensation shall provide monetary relief for the reduction in solar productivity at the winter solstice as a result of the proposed Project. Such agreement and analysis shall be completed and incorporated into the Development Agreement. 14. The Applicant shall update the Landscape Plan to include additional boulevard trees along the north frontage (Spring Street) and the west frontage (Malvern Street). Spacing between trees shall be consistent with the spacing as denoted along Eustis Street that is approximately 45- feet on center. Tree species as denoted including Boulevard Linden and Skyline Honeylocust are acceptable, and based on sheet L1-1 result in approximately 8-10 additional trees added to the landscape plan. Sheet L1-1 shall be updated and submitted with the Final PUD application for review and approval, 15. The Applicant shall update the Landscape Plan to incorporate deciduous trees along the south-west edge which is adjacent to an existing residential property. A minimum of three deciduous trees, Maple or Lindens shall be incorporated. Sheet L1-1 shall be updated and submitted with the Final PUD application for review and approval. 16, The proposed privacy fence along the south edge of the property which provides screening to adjacent single -family uses, shall be revised to a 6-foot cedar privacy fence (board on board) to achieve 100% opacity and screening between uses. The Applicant shall work with City Staff to identify the location of the fence which shall screen, to the extent possible, the adjacent neighbors. The fence shall be maintained as detailed in the CUP and Development Agreement. 17. The Applicant shall provide a 2-year landscape guarantee for all plants identified on sheet L1-1, and such guarantee shall be included as a condition within the executed Development Agreement. 18. The landscaping and fence along the southern property edge shall be maintained in perpetuity as it provides screening to adjacent single -family uses. If vegetation along the southern edges dies, replacement with the same, or substantially similar vegetative properties shall be planted as soon as possible based on appropriate planting conditions and season. 19. The Applicant shall provide a $2,000.00 landscape escrow to the City which shall be used solely for off-site plantings or fencing along the frontage at 1778 Eustis Street. The property owners shall select planting or fencing materials to mitigate potential glare/impacts from traffic exiting the proposed Project site. 20. Details regarding hardscape materials including all retaining walls shall be submitted for review and approval during the Final PUD application process. 21. The Applicant shall be required to pay all Park Dedication fees due, which shall be calculated and agreed to through the Final PUD process, prior to release of the building permit. 22. The Operations Management Plan, or any other tool which details the onsite management of the Senior Building including waste management, landscape management, and snow removal, shall be provided to the City for review and approval by City Staff prior to Final PUD plan approval and rezoning. 23. The Applicant shall obtain all necessary permits and approvals from the Rice Creek Watershed District. Such approvals and permits shall include, but not be limited to, the stormwater management plan, The Applicant shall provide a copy of the approved permit prior to commencing any site work. 24, The Applicant shall prepare final construction plans acceptable to the City Engineer prior to commencing any site work. 25. The Applicant shall address and meet all conditions as stated within the City Engineer's memo dated May 10, 2019. 26. The Applicant shall obtain appropriate demolition permits from the City, Ramsey County and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), and shall follow all rules, procedures and conditions of such permits. Copies of all approved permits shall be provided to the City prior to any site work commencing on site. 27. The Applicant shall obtain a Building Permit prior to the commencement of any site work. 28. The Applicant shall prepare a Construction Management Plan that includes haul routes, site security/fencing, and parking locations which shall be incorporated into the Development Agreement. Such plan shall be developed in coordination with City Staff and shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to obtaining a Building Permit. 29, The Construction Management Plan shall also detail steps to inventory existing conditions, and to ensure adjacent foundations and structures are not adversely impacted by construction activities. 30, The Applicant shall be required to enter into a Development Agreement which shall be drafted by the City, and its terms generally agreed to by both parties, prior to Final PUD or Rezoning to PUD approval. 31. The Development Agreement shall be required to be executed as a condition of Rezoning to PUD. 32, Rezoning of the subject property to PUD shall be conditioned on the Applicant fulfilling the conditions as noted herein, and upon the approval of the Final PUD and any other instruments including, but not limited to, the TIF agreement. 33. That the Applicant shall replenish and pay all escrow fees and permit fees prior to Final PUD and Rezoning approval. Dated: July 9, 2019 ATTEST: G Heather Butkowski, City Administrator -Clerk Mary Gaasch, Mayor The motion for the adoption of the forgoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Dains and upon vote being taken the following voted in favor thereof: Dains, Grove, Moffatt, and Mayor Gaasch And the following voted against same: none Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed. LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date September 8, 2020 ITEM NUMBER Halloween during Pandemic STAFF INITIAL Jim/Heather APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Lauderdale has many long-standing traditions and the annual Halloween party at City Hall is probably the longest running. Due to all of the City Hall limitations from absentee voting and the pandemic, Halloween needs to be rethought for this year. Staff asked for ideas in the last newsletter and received the following email. It brought forward a lot of creative ideas, some that involve a Halloween event and some that are charitable. Staff's idea so far is to encourage residents to decorate their yards so families can walk around that night and look at them. The City could be involved in creating a map for that much like we do for the annual garage sale. Ultimately, residents will decide for themselves whether they want to participate in any type of activity including the distribution of candy. Presumably, decisions will be based on how controlled the spread of the coronavirus is at that time. Staff looks forward to the conversation and deciding on next steps. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Heather Butkowski From: Sent: To: Subject: Kendra Kauppi <kaup0001@umn.edu> Thursday, July 30, 2020 9:43 AM Heather Butkowski Halloween Ideas Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. Hi Heather A few ideas for the Lauderdale party. In the theme of Halloween. Maybe a mask drive. Corona is scary enough a mask isn't could be the theme. Instead of donating candy, we could have a community food donation drive human/ pet. Do something greater for the community and surrounding areas. Or still have people donate candy and gave a drive by pick up at the park if city hall is unavailable. Hot dogs etc. would need to wait till next time. Maybe drive by haunted ride. Get groups to host a site. Maybe school, park. But would liability if anyone gets hurt? Too spread out? For example, could have a haunted school theme. Or this is just the year it gets cancelled, like everything else? Kendra r LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date September 8, 2020 ITEM NUMBER Social Media Policy Update STAFF INITIAL Jim APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: The League has updated its sample Social Media Policy in light of judicial and advisory opinions. How was this policy changed from the previous one? The following are some of the changes in the policy: • It's shorter. While the policy still seeks to manage expectations of the public in terms of public interactions, they've removed most of the requirements upon staff that are better left to a personnel policies. • The new policy sets out basic standards for use of social media in accordance with the state records retention schedule that virtually eliminates the city's need to retain social media data. • The policy includes an area to list the city's social media accounts. This can help distinguish what social media accounts and accompanying data the city intends to be responsible for, and which it does not. • The policy includes a sample friendly public notice to announce some terms of use and, again, manage expectations. OPTIONS: 1) Adopt as presented. 2) Adopt with proposed changes. 3) Do not adopt. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to adopt the updated social media policy. City of Lauderdale, Minnesota Social Media Policy Purpose Social networking in government serves two primary functions: to communicate and deliver messages directly to citizens and to encourage citizen involvement, interaction, and feedback. Information which is distributed via social networking must be accurate, consistent, and timely and meet the information needs of the City's intended audience. Social media is used for social networking, and this policy seeks to ensure proper administration of the City of Lauderdale's social media sites by its representatives. The City has limited control of social media accounts with third parties (i.e., Facebook, Twitter, etc.). At the same time, there is a general expectation by the public that this City have a social media presence by which to share information about current city projects and city business. For municipal purposes, the City's social media accounts will be used for incidental, non -vital communication and general information only. It is not the purpose of the city's social media accounts to be a medium for transactions of city business. The one exception is in the case of a natural or man-made disaster, if it is determined by the City that the best means of communicating with the public is through the social media account(s). The City of Lauderdale wishes to establish a positive and informative social media presence. City representatives have the responsibility to use the City's social media resources in an efficient, effective, ethical, and lawful manner pursuant to all existing City policies. Policy The City of Lauderdale will determine, at its discretion, how its web -based social media resources will be designed, implemented, and managed as part of its overall communication and information sharing strategy. City of Lauderdale social media accounts are considered a City asset and administrator access to these accounts will be securely administered in accordance with the City's Computer Use Policy. The City reserves the right to shut down any of its social media sites or accounts for any reason without notice. All social media websites created and utilized during the course and scope of an employee's performance of his/her job duties will be identified as belonging to the City of Lauderdale, including a link to the City's official website. The City of Lauderdale does not create or maintain social media accounts for its elected officials. Scope This policy applies to any existing or proposed social media websites sponsored, established, registered, or authorized by the City of Lauderdale. The City's social media accounts are exclusively the following: 1. City of Lauderdale Facebook account. City of Lauderdale: 9/8/2020 Social Media Page 1 City of Lauderdale, Minnesota Social Media Policy 2. City of Lauderdale Farmers Market Facebook account. 3. City of Lauderdale Nextdoor account. The City does not create, collect, disseminate, or regulate use of any other social media accounts, including the personal accounts of its elected officials and staff. Questions regarding the scope of this policy should be directed to the City Administrator. Definition Social media are internet and mobile -based applications, websites, and functions, other than email, for sharing and discussing information, where users can post photos, video, comments, and links to other information to create content on any imaginable topic. This may be referred to as "user -generated content" or "consumer -generated media." Social media includes, but is not limited to: • Social networking sites and apps such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and Nextdoor • Blogs • Social news sites such as Reddit and Buzzfeed • Video and photo sharing sites and apps such as YouTube, Instagram, SnapChat, and Flickr • Wikis, or shared encyclopedias, such as Wikipedia • An ever -emerging list of new web -based platforms generally regarded as social media or having many of the same functions as those listed above As used in this policy, "employees and agents" means all City representatives, including its employees and other agents of the city, such as independent contractors or councilmembers. "Social media manager" means any city employee or agent with administrator access who, when posting or responding to a post, appears to be the City social media account owner. Rules of Use The social media managers (city administrator and assistant to the city administrator) are responsible for managing City social media accounts or websites. Departments wishing to have a new social media presence must submit a request to the City Administrator in order to ensure social media accounts are kept to a sustainable number and policies are followed. All approved sites will be clearly marked as the City of Lauderdale site and will be linked with the official City website https://lauderdalemn.org. No one may establish social media accounts or websites on behalf of the City unless authorized in accordance with this policy. The City's social media page must conspicuously display or link to a public notice that informs the public of the purpose of the social media presence and the terms one agrees to in accessing, using, or posting to the City's social media page. City of Lauderdale: 9/8/2020 Social Media Page 2 City of Lauderdale, Minnesota Social Media Policy Administration of all City social media websites will comply with applicable laws, regulations, and policies as well as proper business etiquette. City social media accounts covered by this policy will not be used by social media managers for private or personal purposes or for the purpose of expressing private or personal views on personal, political, or policy issues or to express personal views or concerns pertaining to City employment relations matters. No City social media account may be used by the City or any social media manager to disclose private or confidential information. No social media website should be used to disclose sensitive information; if there is any question as to whether information is private, confidential, or sensitive, contact the City Administrator. Outside of situations of disaster, no City social media account will be used for transactions of city business. In the event a user initiates a request, application, or question through social media that affects city business or requires another city policy or process to be followed, follow up with that user by phone, email, or other channels. If comments are allowed, in the event of a question of general interest, a response may be given in comments, the initial post may be edited, or a subsequent post may be created to include the information. City of Lauderdale's social media managers will not edit any posted comments. However, comments posted by members of the public may be removed if they fall into at least one of the following categories: • Obscene or pornographic content • Direct threats to persons or property • Material asserted to violate the intellectual property of another person • Private, personal information about a person published without his/her consent • Information that compromises a public safety security system • Statutorily private, confidential, or nonpublic data • Commercial promotions or spam • Hyperlinks to material that falls into one of the foregoing categories A member of the public whose comment is removed may appeal the removal of the comment and seek reconsideration of its removal by contacting the City in writing and explaining how the comment does not fall into one of the categories for removal. A written response should be provided as soon as reasonably possible. A member of the public who disputes the legality of any portion of this policy may dispute the particular portion in writing. The City should acknowledge the claim promptly and, upon consultation of the city attorney, respond to the claim concerning legality of the policy portion as soon as reasonably possible under the circumstances. City of Lauderdale: 9/8/2020 Social Media Page 3 City of Lauderdale, Minnesota Social Media Policy Data Ownership and Retention All communications or messages within social media accounts covered by this policy composed, sent, or received on city or personal equipment are the property of the City and will be subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. This law classifies certain information as available to the public upon request. As no transactions of city business shall be conducted through social media accounts (outside of disasters), in accordance with the City's records retention schedule, the City shall retain all social media messages only until read. City of Lauderdale: 9/8/2020 Social Media Page 4 City of Lauderdale, Minnesota Social Media Policy PUBLIC NOTICE The purpose of the City of Lauderdale's social media presence is to provide members of the community with information in more places and more ways than were traditionally available. All content of this site is public and is subject to disclosure pursuant to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. Please be aware that anything you post may survive deletion, whether by you or others. Do not post sensitive or personally identifiable information, such as social security numbers. Following or "friending" persons or organizations is not an endorsement by the City and is only intended as a means of broadening communication. The City is not responsible for content found at links to third parties, nor the views or opinions expressed by third -party comments. Please be advised that comments falling into the following category or categories may be removed: • Obscene or pornographic content • Direct threats to persons or property • Material asserted to violate the intellectual property of another person • Private, personal information about a person published without his/her consent • Information that endangers the public by compromising a public safety security system • Statutorily private, confidential, or nonpublic data • Commercial promotions or spam • Hyperlinks to material that falls into at least one of the foregoing categories Should your comment be removed by the City and you believe it does not fall into one of the above categories, contact the City Administrator in writing to explain how the comment does not fall into one of these categories. Should you wish to challenge the legality of any portion of this notice or the City's social media policy, you may contact the City Administrator in writing and explain the basis for the challenge in detail. If you have any other questions about the City of Lauderdale's social media page, contact the City Administrator at (651) 792-7650. By accessing, using, or posting to this City of Lauderdale social media page, you acknowledge you have been advised of the foregoing. Thanks for stopping by! City of Lauderdale: 9/8/2020 Social Media Page 5 Approved: September 8, 2020 City of Lauderdale, Minnesota Social Media Policy By: Mary Gaasch, Mayor By: Heather Butkowski, City Administrator City of Lauderdale: 9/8/2020 Social Media Page 6 LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date September 8, 2020 ITEM NUMBER Resident Requests STAFF INITIAL 9 APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Staff are aware of a couple of residents that want to put forward requests to the City Council to deviate from city code for items such as parking pads and fences that were constructed without permits or regard to city code. As we have discussed recently, staff explain the pur- pose behind ordinances to residents but around one in ten want to have the Council consider their request even though it runs contrary to city code. When this happened in the past, staff's didn't accept applications for these requests because we had no way of processing them. We explained to residents that they needed the Council to agree to their request or allow them to put forward an application. They typically have done this by addressing the Council during the open forum at meetings. With Council sup- port, they can put forward an application and staff can prepare a response with regard to how the request deviates from city code and any implications. Staff is looking for feedback on whether to continue this way. The difficulty with this ap- proach is that the Council might not have enough information to decide whether you want to review their request. Another alternative is for staff to accept all applications and bring to the Council those that need special approval. The downside of this approach is that the applicant may put considerable time or money into their request only to find it wasn't some- thing the Council would consider. It also may divert staff and council resources from other time -sensitive matters. Another thought is to put these items on the work session agenda and come up with some guideline for what information the Council wants in advance of hearing the requests. Staff look forward to the conversation to come up with a plan for moving forward. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: