Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/24/2020LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 7:00 P.M. TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2020 Due to the coronavirus, the city council is holding meetings by teleconference. The public may view the meeting on Lauderdale's public access channel 16 for cable subscribers or online at https://www.ctvnorthsuburbs.org/your-city/lauderdale/. The public may join the meeting using the login instructions at the end of the agenda. The City Council is meeting as a legislative body to conduct the business of the City according to Robert's Rules of Order and the Standing Rules of Order and Business of the City Council. Unless so ordered by the Mayor, citizen participation is limited to the times indicated and always within the prescribed rules of conduct for public input at meetings. 1. CALL TO ORDER THE LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVALS a. Agenda b. Minutes of the November 10, 2020 City Council Meeting c. Minutes of the November 12, 2020 Canvassing Board Meeting d. Claims Totaling $31,203.82 4. CONSENT a. October Financial Report 5. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS/RECOGNITIONS/PROCLAMATIONS 6. INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS / REPORTS a. City Council Updates 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public hearings are conducted so that the public affected by a proposal may have input into the decision. During hearings all affected residents will be given an opportunity to speak pursuant to the Robert's Rules of Order and the standing rules of order and business of the City Council. a. Alley Vacation at 1795 Eustis Street b. Variance Request for 1847 Fulham Street 8. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM a. Real Estate Equities Final PUD Application for a Senior Development at 1795 Eustis Street — Development Agreement b. Tobacco Ordinance Revisions c. 2020-2021 Skating Rink Hires d. 2021 Preliminary Fund Budgets and Utility Rates 9. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 10. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 11. SET AGENDA FOR NEXT MEETING a. Public Hearing 2021 Budget and Levy b. Findings of Fact Resolution for 1847 Fulham Street Variance Request c. Real Estate Equities Final PUD Application for a Senior Development at 1795 Eustis Street d. Tobacco Ordinance Public Hearing (January 12) 12. WORK SESSION a. Community Development Update b. Opportunity for the Public to Address the City Council Any member of the public may speak at this time on any item not on the agenda. In consideration for the public attending the meeting, this portion of the meeting will be limited to fifteen (15) minutes. Individuals are requested to limit their comments to four (4) minutes or less. If the majority of the Council determines that additional time on a specific issue is warranted, then discussion on that issue shall be continued at the end of the agenda. Before addressing the City Council, members of the public are asked to step up to the microphone, give their name, address, and state the subject to be discussed. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to any member thereof. No person other than members of the Council and the person having the floor shall be permitted to enter any discussion without permission of the presiding officer. Your participation, as prescribed by the Robert's Rules of Order and the standing rules of order and business of the City Council, is welcomed and your cooperation is greatly appreciated. 13. ADJOURNMENT Login Instructions: You are invited to a Zoom webinar. When: Nov 24, 2020 07:00 PM Central Time (US and Canada) Topic: November 24, 2020 City Council Webinar Please click the link below to join the webinar: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82048274100?pwd=UW9OZWVmRHBSTnVZTUpoOFVZc3Fndz09 Passcode: 352808 Or iPhone one -tap : US: +13017158592„82048274100# or +13126266799„82048274100# Or Telephone: Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 646 558 8656 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 669 900 9128 or 833 548 0276 (Toll Free) or 833 548 0282 (Toll Free) or 877 853 5247 (Toll Free) or 888 788 0099 (Toll Free) Webinar ID: 820 4827 4100 International numbers available: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kPUOtDV4 LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES HELD REMOTELY VIA TELECONFERENCE Page 1 of 3 November 10, 2020 Call to Order Mayor Gaasch called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. Roll Call Councilors present: Andi Moffatt, Jeff Dains, Roxanne Grove, Kelly Dolphin, and Mayor Mary Gaasch. Councilors absent: None. Staff present: Heather Butkowski, City Administrator; Jim Bownik, Assistant to the City Administrator; and Miles Cline, Deputy City Clerk. Approvals Mayor Gaasch asked if there were any additions to the meeting agenda. There being none, Councilor Dains moved and seconded by Councilor Grove to approve the agenda. Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote. Mayor Gaasch asked if there were any corrections to the minutes of the October 27, 2020 city council meeting. There being none, Councilor Grove moved and seconded by Councilor Dains to approve the minutes of the October 27, 2020 city council meeting. Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote. Mayor Gaasch asked if there were any questions on the claims. There being none, Councilor Moffatt moved and seconded by Councilor Grove to approve the claims totaling $127,133.08. Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote. Consent Councilor Grove moved and seconded by Councilor Moffatt to approve the Consent Agenda thereby approving Resolution No. 111020A — Designating Polling Places for 2021 Elections and Resolution No. 111020B — Levying Special Assessments. Informational Presentations/Reports A. City Council Updates Councilor Dains said Doug Cook, the Outreach Coordinator for Metro Transit, could attend the December 8 Council meeting alongside the City's Metropolitan Council Representative, Peter Lindstrom. Dains thanked those who administered the election and organized the Halloween event. Councilor Moffatt echoed the sentiments of Councilor Dains in regards to the election and Halloween. Mayor Gaasch attended the Regional Council of Mayors' event on the topic of mental health. Discussion/Action Item A. Tobacco Ordinance Revisions and Presentation by Katie Engman of Association for Nonsmokers -MN LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES HELD REMOTELY VIA TELECONFERENCE Page 2 of 3 November 10, 2020 In January, the Council adopted an interim ordinance to put a pause on the issuance of new tobacco licenses in order to update city code to reflect the new federal and state regulations. The Council invited Katie Engman of the Association of Nonsmokers -Minnesota to the meeting for a refresher on issues surrounding tobacco. Butkowski addressed the draft ordinance in the packet. The revisions match new federal and state regulations. Also proposed was eliminating the provision allowing tobacco shops to sell flavored tobacco. The Council planned to discuss again at the next meeting. Before adoption, staff will send the draft ordinance to the licensed tobacco holders. The City is required to provide them a 30 -day notice of a public hearing on the matter. Mayor Gaasch called a five-minute recess before proceeding to the next discussion item. B. Real Estate Equities Final PUD Application for a Senior Development at 1795 Eustis Street Jennifer Haskamp of Swanson-Haskamp Consulting and Patrick Ostrom from Real Estate Equities were at the meeting to discuss the submittals for the final Planned Unit Development (PUD) application prepared by Real Estate Equities. Jennifer provided an overview of whether the final PUD application addressed the conditions and requirements adopted by the City Council by resolution in July 2019. Staff said the public hearing on the alley vacation was scheduled for November 24 with notices being mailed to affected residents. C. Resolution No. 111020C — Allocating the City's CARES Act Funds Butkowski said staff was implementing the small business grant program authorized by the Council to spend a portion of the $181,419 in CARES Act funds. Staff totaled costs attributable to October and reported them to MMB last week. That amount totaled $9,743.40 to acquire equipment for teleconferencing city council meetings, staffing costs, and PPE. To date, staff reported $30,196 in expenses to MMB leaving $151,223 unspent. For November, staff will report costs for a new website and the small-business grant program with the remainder being allocated to public safety costs. Councilor Grove made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 111020C Approving Allocations of the City of Lauderdale's CARES Act Funds. This was seconded by Councilor Dains and carried unanimously on a roll call vote. Set Agenda for Next Meeting The November 10 Council meeting may include the variance request for 1847 Fulham Street, 2021 preliminary fund budgets and utility rates, tobacco ordinance study and revisions, and a public hearing for alley vacation at 1795 Eustis Street. Work Session A. Community Development Update Butkowski stated that she and Mayor Gaasch met with Rosehill Townhomes about storm water LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES HELD REMOTELY VIA TELECONFERENCE Page 3 of 3 November 10, 2020 improvements behind their homes and other city business. Butkowski mentioned that staff were looking into excavating Gasperre Pond this winter since it is dry. B. Opportunity for the Public to Address the City Council Mayor Gaasch opened up the floor to anyone in attendance interested in addressing the Council. Josh Dirksen, 1815 Lake Street, stated that Real Estate Equities proposal at 1795 Eustis Street was aesthetically unpleasing and out of character in the neighborhood. He continued to say that he would like more information on both sides of the tobacco issue. There being no additional people interested in speaking, Mayor Gaasch closed the floor. C. 2021 Preliminary Fund Budgets Butkowski did a verbal overview of anticipated capital improvement program (CIP) items for 2021. The CIP and proposed rates will be ready by the next council meeting. Adj ournment Councilor Dains moved and seconded by Councilor Mofatt to adjourn the meeting at 9:34 p.m. Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote. Respectfully submitted, 4 LAG Miles Cline Deputy City Clerk LAUDERDALE CANVASSING BOARD MEETING MINUTES HELD REMOTELY VIA TELECONFERENCE Page 1 of 1 November 12, 2020 Call to Order The Lauderdale Canvassing Board meeting was called to order at 5:41 p.m. Roll Call Canvassing members present: Andi Moffatt, Jeff Dains, Kelly Dolphin, and Mayor Mary Gaasch. Canvassing member absent: Roxanne Grove. Staff present: Heather Butkowski, City Administrator, and Jim Bownik, Assistant to the City Administrator. Discussion/Action Item A. Resolution 111220A – Certifying the Election Returns of the November 3, 2020, General Municipal Election Butkowski explained that the governing body of a city acts as the canvassing board, canvasses the returns, and declares the results of the election within three to ten days after a general election. The canvass includes the write-in candidates for city offices. Councilor Moffatt made a motion to adopt Resolution 111220A—A Resolution Certifying the Election Returns of the November 3, 2020, General Municipal Election. This was seconded by Councilor Dolphin and carried unanimously on a roll call vote. Adj ournment Councilor Moffatt moved and seconded by Councilor Dains to adjourn the meeting at 5:45 p.m. Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote. Respectfully submitted, *14 Cit Miles Cline Deputy City Clerk CITY OF LAUDERDALE LAUDERDALE CITY HALL 1 891 WALNUT STREET LAUDERDALE, MN 55113 651-792-7650 651-631-2066 FAX Request for Council Action To: Mayor and City Council From: City Administrator Meeting Date: November 24, 2020 Subject: List of Claims . The claims totaling $31,203.82 are provided for City Council review and approval that includes check numbers 27189 to 27208. Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date User: Printed: MILES.CLINE 11/19/2020 3:22 PM Check No Vendor No Invoice No Vendor Name Description Check Date Reference Check Amount ACH 43 Public Employees Retirement Association PR Batch 52300.11.2020 PERA Coordinated PR Batch 52300.11.2020 PERA Coordinated 11/13/2020 PR Batch 52300.11.2020 PER PR Batch 52300.11.2020 PER Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 43: ACI -I 44 Minnesota Department of Revenue PR Batch 52300.11.2020 State Income Tax ACH 45 ACH 46 ACH 47 27189 72 SBGrant 27190 324 SBGrant 27191 65 17178053 27192 184 11/13/2020 PR Batch 52300.11.2020 Stat< Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 44: ICMA Retirement Corporation PR Batch 52300.11.2020 Deferred Comp PR Batch 52300.11.2020 Deferred Comp 11/13/2020 PR Batch 52300.11.2020 Defe PR Batch 52300.11.2020 Def( Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 45: Internal Revenue Service PR Batch 52300.11.2020 FICA Employee Portio PR Batch 52300.11.2020 Medicare Employee Pc PR Batch 52300.11.2020 FICA Employer Portia PR Batch 52300.11.2020 Federal Income Tax PR Batch 52300.11.2020 Medicare Employer Po 11/13/2020 PR Batch 52300.11.2020 FIC, PR Batch 52300.11.2020 Med PR Batch 52300.11.2020 FIC, PR Batch 52300.11.2020 Fe& PR Batch 52300.11.2020 Med Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 46: Public Employees Insurance Program PR Batch 52300.11.2020 Health Insurance PR Batch 52300.11.2020 Dental Justin Francis LLC CARES Small Business Grant Rebuilding Together Twin Cities CARES Small Business Grant Allstream Inc. Fax Line Cintas 11/13/2020 PR Batch 52300.11.2020 Heal PR Batch 52300.11.2020 Den Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 47: 11/13/2020 Total for Check Number 27189: 11/13/2020 Total for Check Number 27190: Total for 11/13/2020: 11/24/2020 Total for Check Nurnber 27191: 11/24/2020 1,198.66 1,038.85 2,237.51 665.62 665.62 1,075.99 1,758.68 2,834.67 1,074.70 251.33 1,074.70 1,726.66 251.33 4,378.72 2,212.80 116.10 2,328.90 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 22,445.42 52.90 52.90 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/19/2020 3:22 PM) Page 1 Check No Vendor No Invoice No Vendor Name Description Check Date Reference Check Amount 4066745550 4067405854 27193 192 111268310 27194 25 EMCOM-008848 EMCOM-008848 EMCOM-008848 27195 19 85150 27196 9 86370 27197 134 00106 27198 31 157950 157950 November Uniforms November Uniforms Comcast Holdings Corporation September -November Internet County of Ramsey October CAD Services October 911 Dispatch Services October Fleet Support Ehlers and Associates Inc Financial Consulting Genuine Parts Company Inc Truck Parts Katrina Joseph October Legal Services Kennedy & Graven Chartered General Legal Advice Bond Consultation Total for Check Number 27192: 11/24/2020 Total for Check Number 27193: 11/24/2020 Total for Check Number 27194: 11/24/2020 Total for Check Number 27195: 11/24/2020 Total for Check Number 27196: 11/24/2020 Total for Check Number 27197: 11/24/2020 Total for Check Number 27198: 27199 185 Lauderdale Certified Auto Repair Inc 11/24/2020 112020 October Fuel 112020 October Fuel 112020 October Fuel 27200 291 2020-10 27201 12 2020-210 2020-210 2020-210 27202 5 619861-10-20 27203 102 MKC Inc Davis -Bacon Consulting Services North Suburban Access Corporation October Webstreaming & Archiving October Virtual Meeting Charges October Virtual Meeting Production Premium Waters Inc October Water Bottles SHI International Corp Total for Check Number 27199: 11/24/2020 Total for Check Number 27200: 11/24/2020 Total for Check Number 27201: 11/24/2020 Total for Check Number 27202: 11/24/2020 11.03 11.03 22.06 1,060.03 1,060.03 205.40 1,060.57 6.24 1,272.21 663.75 663.75 29.47 29.47 925.00 925.00 1,047.50 125.00 1,172.50 47.86 223.33 47.86 319.05 585.00 585.00 278.83 150.00 346.00 774.83 15.99 15.99 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/19/2020 3:22 PM) Page 2 Check No Vendor No Invoice No Vendor Name Description Check Date Reference Check Amount 1312160518 27204 135 1020572525 Microsoft Office License - HB 268.00 Total for Check Number 27203: 268.00 St Paul Pioneer Press 11/24/2020 Election Notices 65.60 Total for Check Number 27204: 65.60 27205 26 Stantec Consulting Services Inc 11/24/2020 1720158 Gen Eng Services 414.25 27206 90 Verizon Wireless 9866044425 October Cell Phone 9866044425 October Cell Phone 9866044425 October Cell Phone 27207 7 8706607-0500-1 Total for Check Number 27205: 414.25 11/24/2020 33.17 16.59 16.59 Total for Check Number 27206: 66.35 Waste Management Inc 11/24/2020 November Public Works 501.00 27208 74 Xcel Energy 707237765 October Street Lighting 707599420 1917 Walnut Street 707599420 1917 Walnut Street 707599420 1885 Fulham Street 707599420 1885 Fulham Street Total for Check Number 27207: 501.00 11/24/2020 424.04 33.99 34.70 29.85 27.83 Total for Check Number 27208: 550.41 Total for 11/24/2020: 8,758.40 Report Total (25 checks): 31,203.82 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (11/19/2020 3:22 PM) Page 3 LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent X Public Hearing Discussion Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date November 24, 2020 ITEM NUMBER STAFF INITIAL October Financial Report APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Every month, staff provide the Council with an updated copy of the city's finances. Follow- ing are the revenue, expense, and cash balance reports for October 2020. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: By approving the consent agenda, the Council acknowledges the city's financial report for October 2020. General Ledger Cash Balances User: heather.butkowski Printed: 11/20/2020 4:24:31 PM Period 10 - 10 Fiscal Year 2020 Description Account Beg Bal MTD Debit MTD Credit Current Balance Cash 101-00000-000-10100 -2,981,610.39 346,133.92 209,014.42 -2,844,490.89 Change Fund 101-00000-000-10300 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 Cash 226-00000-000-10100 13,235.18 4,259.74 2,700.35 14,794.57 Cash 227-00000-000-10100 69,860.15 98.97 5,910.93 64,048.19 Cash 305-00000-000-10100 311.76 0.00 0.00 311.76 Cash 306-00000-000-10100 113,288.92 12,777.55 0.00 126,066.47 Cash 401-00000-000-10100 158,990.25 246.05 0.00 159,236.30 Cash 403-00000-000-10100 498,739.75 746.88 16,122.22 483,364.41 Cash 404-00000-000-10100 322,929.98 290.87 134,976.00 188,244.85 Cash 414-00000-000-10100 391,817.75 606.36 0.00 392,424.11 Cash 416-00000-000-10100 94,494.02 0.00 0.00 94,494.02 Cash 602-00000-000-10100 1,069,016.51 13,323.37 25,307.04 1,057,032.84 Cash 603-00000-000-10100 423,960.47 4,277.89 8,626.58 419,611.78 Current Assets 175,134.35 382,761.60 402,657.54 155,238.41 Petty Cash 101-00000-000-10200 300.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 Petty Cash 300.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 Investments - Fair Value 101-00000-000-10410 3,718,803.18 5,345.47 325,000.00 3,399,148.65 Adj Investments 3,718,803.18 5,345.47 325,000.00 3,399,148.65 Grand Total 3,894,237.53 388,107.07 727,657.54 3,554,687.06 GL - Cash Balances (11/20/2020 - 04:24 PM) Page 1 rn 3 d' YO O p N • O O ON ;C_, c0) O .0 b Cd y 0 •O 0 aaw YTD Balanc Current Period Gr" u 0) unt Number U O\ID O NN d' OI O CD ClCD pI t- O ONO ONM v1 O '-I MDQ O p t- vD vO M0v 6 p �-+d' O p co, co; vl N co t- VD N VD 00 00 co 00 M tr)S O v1 VD CD O Cr, O N VD O O N h (0) d' '.D p O c v1 O p d•• M00C 00 7 O\ - (M p O 0 en N 0 N 00 VD cn( N e - N vn O vo d' O O( 1..-1 0 00 d' O N 00 0 O d: VD O v) V- 00 O �(V d'VD v1M p M d' O c 0 co oN. in r - N 00 �� [�• Mv1 - a d' - d' d' d' 01 M 00 0000 rV 0' 000 O N OOO O O d' OI 'cF co c00D O pi N M O 1 -OO v1O O N MM v1O O N O n1O O n)m O 00 v) 0000 O O M Cr, in v. -) et OWN O 0 ri M m 0 N d d' 00 00 H H O 0 0 0 0 0 p O O O O O p O O O 0 0 0 0 0 p O O O O O p co! d' 00000 p 7v6 6006 p 7 O 0O VD O M O O 00 O M 00 O 00 O � -a-.1-dLei' ci z' C. 1- 000 --0 \.60000 00 v1 rYd' O V▪ ' H r-+ H 0 C04 C i-, O N N I) a 0 c) N E ai U O • yOy .4 N up v3 q C 4. 'y Qi CO N (0 ^C Py U) N N �, O h ,, "r"ny' 5 CEC" L) O O U ,fid ,j i� O w 0 Cd 0 •> y G7:1C C y N> n ° NN O c • 4 n = Da) c4) Iii = ai o " pPa. aaid▪ gl L7• R E SUw0R WacnOUO W General Fund 00 GL - Revenue vs Expense (11/20/2020 - 04:25 PM) YTD Balance \ _ 00 %c0c 0 « } \/\ # § § 3\\@ N \�\k 6 ' ,...r.1 Vi 2 § 2/\@ § 3 \\ Q /'2 © \ R ©s a o /� Q ® © V. t @@ \6 M. &5\@| % m @ ®6G6 \ K Cl.,\ _ m # - - 4 2 cccc \ RRRR CD x666 f 0 CD CD C' V CD a m< GL - Revenue vs Expense (11/20/2020 - 04:25 PM) cn M ti N k O O O N N O O O o:) N .o 'd .b ^moi N 0 .0�., U U r r a, Q+ c14 N N YTD Balance Current Period 0 OO ,0 N NI d.•pp O 'Cr p M to O\ O M p 00 Vj oo r ti oro N 0 co oro C o\0 p a CO O O\ N O hl p t7 7 el N opo inn, cam) r --+ ' m r N '-+ ln 00 --1 N p CD M p l ,,-1 O N c 0000 p p � ~ 0O O v) Le O r N a\ CO N m 7 N ON Ori O O l0 I C 0 o0 00 000 p O H N 60 © O O O V) OON ,--1 M N N CO r-+ N m rn 7 N M © © N N M oo M ti 'O a) N a o0 > .0 ao) U R' a� > -d A 4'") a U > o to o - • d � c,s U b U w O 0.tiN 66) U D On R. U gP4 g W wcOU W F4 GL - Revenue vs Expense (11/20/2020 - 04:25 PM) YTD Balance N Op N O p 000 0000 N O fV O p ri M O O -i O O\0 t 00 O 00 O b b 'd' rt O Op l O in O (V t N O Op l CD CD O p O O p O O p O O O Op l CD O p 0 O M v N 00 X r-1 O N cn a) "C1 bD 0 2 w a L,) O 0 0 P4 bA R% 0 p s-, > i.,±1, C a u g C V) g V F y 8 t y d a> y O ai.` ai a� ami x' w A (..x o x w01 w 3 4 o N N E .0 OOO Z N = '[; U OV V1 a.aa Q M M GO TIF Revenue Bonds 2018A GL - Revenue vs Expense (11/20/2020 - 04:25 PM) CD a 0 b1J kN W d I) N „ N .O 2O Q) Y y O cd 0 0 U O\ on CCS O N YTD Balanc Current Period ount Numb 0 op Ln N lfJ O p Q\ ,--i r O p ON V) 00 O O O Vim' O N 00 O N 'n H N Vr N N N O pp 0 in d 0000 dam' O0O CP N 00 c ON 0 M 'd N 111 O p O � r O O o t` N N cV H O p O O p o iri M M o ti 00 On 00 c•I cg N O O 000 O N rn '0 ,n 0 00 O U d y O U E O E N C) 0' (l bA RS O E.> N Q, G 7 ti a 0c/] C d v 0 d N as'i 0 C4 w 0 Q Gii 2019A Improvement Bonds GL - Revenue vs Expense (11/20/2020 - 04:25 PM) end/Collect } \ Account N CD \ 6 \ 6 6 6� \ 3mc r 336 e _ /\5) q /35 3/3 / 3/a \ \\ \) G \\ep \ \ 0 cc3 © 11) 0 1-1 5\\) $ 55\) \ @ 0od 2 336 c 3 (-1 /\@ 0 //@ 0 2 60 ? 60 } } y % g o m - ` « ¥en ® « f \ ) §[go \ \ /A a // i) ) cal Eo Sƒ ©)�) )///.\) �\ &g / ag m\g §&{w \ 3t k\\ $ ]3/3 $ General Capital Projects GL - Revenue vs Expense (11/20/2020 - 04:25 PM) /R@ 2 5/@ @ = 3a d| 3 333 e w Q S 0c 7 \55 K 7 2 60 © S / / f % ▪ '1-, / \ 9 9 YTD Balance urrent Period \ ■ $ \ Account Numbe 0 7 @| 7 / @) 00 3 d/3 g /33 / / 6 w « ¥ c g f 0 00 @| 00 N 0 \1 i § 0•71 -cd 4 Nod ] & » m / - 0 0 / 0 0 /� @ @ 0 o d d and e e @ @ @ « ¥ ( ( g� (o �o o \0a % LI 0 F., g fA,/.e ®,fii ±5%«\ ) m2z\ ) cu /t).®/ t \/\/ mga/3 ■ kuQo ƒ \ Street Capital Projects \ GL - Revenue vs Expense (11/20/2020 - 04:25 PM) O I �-I O N I O N N N p N OceiO N N N N N ti N N N p I O O O I O 00 VO p O O p O M O O \O V1 t!1 N NN 00 00 - N i � Nt Op rI 0 0 OO M n O r O ',1-O et CT O O VO Dtil 00 00 N I--- eo H 0000 Op l 0000 0 0 O 0 rM-I 66 O O b o N N OA CV AD 4 4 rt M M M 0 O I 0 0 0 pp l 0 O 0 O O p 0 O O O O O O O O b cA CA O P4 by U) C >, c C' U 0 d d 4. N et 0) O g Wr4UO W Park Capital Projects 71. 0 ct O O rt 71' GL - Revenue vs Expense (11/20/2020 - 04:25 PM) cD CID p ;-i 0 0 CD bQSao N ti 4 00 6ti F-11 CD Y O ,n �. N r- ,; 0 00 CC$ N N z O 0 N ;. o o O U0 O 0( O OO O O O O O O O O 6) 0 0 I 0 0 I 0 0 O O O 0 o 0 0 O p o p 0 0 0 YTD Balance 0 0l 0I 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0l 0 00 I o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0CD 0 0I 0 0 O 0 0 O o 0 Rosehill Tax Increment 0 GL - Revenue vs Expense (11/20/2020 - 04:25 PM) r M YTD Balance Current Period • U CN d OCI a) O • O O NO c0- rbc. _ a) .4 7r au z OnOI CD H 0 0 O Cr) O� O Ct' [� r. 00 r� p O O 0, M 4' r- d 00 b 00 VD N [: O I h m p l r rF V "CD VD 00 O 000 N ON O), O O 00 0,1 M O M O O O M O O O O O C O O 06 o � O O crir et u, a) bs--A, a) N QU .. a U a) o 0c c Ri bA ct y , 0 � Uq 0 pO : vC% v' d dy yd i Fr 1, ai et •^0) X y k AP4 O g WOU W Development O 00 GL - Revenue vs Expense (11/20/2020 - 04:25 PM) YTD Balance urrent Period Account Number 5 @ @ / @ @ 3a s 3c 3 3 / @| / 5� @ @ 00 £ 3 3 3 3 a 5 \| \ / / \ \ ac o a3 c c 5cp \ 5/� \ \ ao 0 33 0 0 / @ o @ \ o cc 3 c3 o \ {) bb f f t/ \ ( j & \ w 0 [ •'c a th0g.) a)•(\ 3§5\ ) m/5 m \\\\ / ƒ\L P4 \ Housing Redevelopment GL - Revenue vs Expense (11/20/2020 - 04:25 PM) Account Number 00cp 00/| 0 0 666 3 666 c o @ \ /I f0 0 \� @ f d 66 3 6c 3 00 0&@| 00 00 c) 0 7 O 0d 0 0 0 d 3 2 00 Ci 00\ 0 0 O 0 d 0 0 o d £ £ 0 0 /) @ 0 0 / \ © 666 a 0 0 d = d cn \ 9 ( / 6)C \ \ / x f () 0 , \g (/ m ©\f/ 5 § , 5 ; § m ; % , \/\\\ / )\/\ W4 TIF District No. 1-2 GL - Revenue vs Expense (11/20/2020 - 04:25 PM) Fiscal Year 2020 ONv�I. O AMO NcMn �t0 O 00 0-1 N 00 V O GOO A0 O o \O 00 0 r N U' YTD Balance Current Period U O V OBD N p M 'O V7 MO p 'Tr rl OhM p .-i d'Md'O p N I -I p N vi O 0OOO O vD0MoO Oro l - t� 'cY 0) U O O\ et d M C -'1-r N O N'0 0 000 V) in Vr1ci , 0 O W N cci O 00 'd O\ � O O N N d d 06 0. r vi 00 M 4 vO vO N N — O N N O M co, \0 v) O\ ooscnM 000 0 O 6-0 X00 M en '0 f ti O -r000 d M O d, 00 h vl ti 1--I ,-1 N 1-1 O O O O O 0( O O ,4 Lei N 0 000 0 O C D s N vi M O 00 >O O N O\d O M — M 0) N 0 bD G s.., > 0) 0) N ti y o U •..._9N to cn "ti O 0) it C bA dN N U 44 qEq cn �+ U (11t� O 0 Ct (j > N 0) .,.N bbAU dO 00.0 0) 5. 1.-, =.� a) a'y (nF4-U O g Ww000UO W Sanitary Sewer GL - Revenue vs Expense (11/20/2020 - 04:25 PM) +' c- Nt M p �O Q\ N Q\ O p 00 In SO N O p M L N 000 O t- 0000 \O 00 O O 'Tr r71 a) O N v1 p l N kr) Vc M O p) V N U 0/t-- O N t�MMO p rY N gl OO �� p0o 4� '4 N O VD To' v1.N M NNN 0 NCI 00 N N 0`00 CN r YTD Balance U O In N O0 I 00r� V) C D Cot O N O N O C C O p N p O VD N r r '[Y ,t d M H OM0 M Oro N co 4:1•N 0 CT N M r M p cn p O O� r 0(3 O Or\ O t O Vim' Vim' s,0 N • d p M 0 0 0 p 1 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O p 0 O O oen ti 0 O Iinp rM0M r en v-) 00 \ONTO t., O. d' M cn N vi D N 0 r~ -t VO N 00 N b N 0) O a) 0) 00 a) N • o 0 A oa U N a� 0 > d No of) v at d C>0) • ct: U c O a, at > p a�a�"� 0 iO� CO O N k+ 0 o c3 N c� r-+ rn p d �_' d p i. GL C1.... CL ri1C4SU 0 a' d51. aciOUO W Storm Water GL - Revenue vs Expense (11/20/2020 - 04:25 PM) U O O O I O O O O O p I O O O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 X YTD Balance U Account Nu O O O I O O O O O O I O O O O p O O O O O p O O O O 0 O O O O O 0 O O OO pI O OOOO pI O O O O p O O O O O p O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O OO CD CDC) 00 pI O 00 0 O 00 00 p O O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 p O O 00 01 CD OOpp oI 0 0 CD CD O 0 0000 0 0 0 00 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0) O U O � N O 0 0 UbA .fi o b bA O 0 N0 C U 0 t . N 4.) cJ • E a ti cG O O N N a) C"i N t-. Com+ L: G N cd U]CD ID) C, 4) m a� k a) d a) k a wrxHo x wao�Qo w w GL - Revenue vs Expense (11/20/2020 - 04:25 PM) P-� C'1 3 4 0 • CD p�� • O N 0 5 z 71 71 O 0 CCS HtA Fy" d H O cu Ua ca GL - Revenue vs Expense (11/20/2020 - 04:25 PM) LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing X Discussion X Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date November 10, 2020 ITEM NUMBER 1795 Eustis Street Alley PH STAFF INITIAL HB APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Jennifer Haskamp of Swanson-Haskamp Consulting and Patrick Ostrom from Real Estate Equi- ties will participate in the meeting. Please see the following memo and supporting documents from Jennifer regarding the alley vacation request. The purpose of tonight's meeting is to take public comment on the alley reorganization proposal. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: JL 1r MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council Date: November 20, 2020 CC: Heather Butkowski, City RE: Application to vacate public right - Administrator of -way and landscape easement at 1795 Eustis Street Application and Process Summary The Applicant, Real Estate Equities (REE), on behalf of the City of Lauderdale (Owner), has applied to vacate a public right-of-way and landscape easement on the subject property. The Applicant is working through a Planned Unit Development (PUD) process to redevelop the site at 1795 Eustis Street with an affordable senior apartment project (Project). The Applicant received Development Stage PUD approval in July of 2019 with conditions as noted in Resolution #070919B. Conditions #3 and 4 in the resolution state that an application to vacate the easement must be made, and that any approval of the Final PUD and Rezoning must be conditioned on the approved vacation. A duly noticed public hearing has been scheduled for the regular City Council meeting on November 24, 2020. The purpose of the hearing is to solicit public testimony regarding the proposed request to vacate the easement as identified in the Attachments to this staff report. The following staff report is provided for your review and consideration. Application Summary The Applicant, on behalf of the Owner, has requested approval to vacate a right-of-way and landscape easement on the southwestern edge of the subject property located at 1795 Eustis Street. The current site configuration connects the east -west alley along the southwestern edge to the north -south alley which runs parallel to Eustis Street and connects to Ione Street to the south. The existing configuration allow both ingress and egress to all single-family properties and the subject site to either Malvern Street or Ione Street (i.e. it is a through -alley). This application proposes to swap the current ingress/egress easement from its current location extending from the north -south alley west to Malvern Street, and replacing it with a new east -west easement to provide ingress/egress to Eustis Street that will be provided through the main access driveway on the Project site when developed. (See Attachment A: Vacation & Easement Location Key) The following list of attachments are provided to assist in your review of the following staff report and analysis: • Attachment A: Vacation &Easement Location Key • Attachment B: Alley Vacation Application and Exhibit 1 JLU ir: Application to Vacate Alley The existing right-of-way and landscape easement area is currently developed with an approximately 10 -foot traveled surface that connects from Malvern Street to the perpendicular north -south alleyway that runs north - south connecting to Ione Street. The existing configuration allows for through -access to all properties on this block which is generally bound by Ione Street on the south, Malvern Street on the West, Spring Street on the north and Eustis Street on the south. The application materials submitted in Attachment B identify 1) the portion of easement to be vacated, and 2) a new public right-of-way easement for access to be dedicated if the proposed Project is approved. The Applicant proposes to "swap" the east -west alley easement area from ingress/egress from Malvern to ingress/egress to Eustis Street. The "swap" will result in a new easement dedicated for public use through the proposed Project site to align with the newly developed main access into the site from Eustis. This swap will protect the through -access for all residents on this block but will alter their route from Malvern to Eustis Street. This exchange or swap was shown on the Concept Plan and in the Development Stage PUD process. In concept this configuration was approved, but a formal application and consideration of the vacation is required per MN State Statute. When considering a request to vacate a public right-of-way easement the City Council must consider MN State Statute 412.851 which states, "No vacation shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so..." Analysis and Review The reconfiguration and redevelopment of the site necessitates changing the public right-of-way easement on the subject Property. Swapping the access easements results in generally the same ingress/egress to the properties on this block and maintains through -access for residents and emergency vehicles. The reconfiguration of the site is acceptable, and staff believes that the proposed vacation is in the interest of the public provided an alternate access location to Eustis Street is granted as depicted in Attachment B. As noted in the Final PUD review process, site construction activities will include demolition of all structures and improvements on the subject property. Staff has discussed with the Applicant the need to maintain the existing alleyway to Malvern Street until such time that the new access to Eustis Street is constructed and operational. Staff suggests including a condition of approval that the demolition of the existing alleyway may not be completed until the new easement access to Eustis Street is constructed and open for public use. As noted at the November 10, 2020 City Council meeting, staff suggests consideration of the following addition conditions to be included in the resolution granting approval of the requested vacation: • The vacation is approved conditioned on the successful closing on the subject property by the Applicant and that they become the fee title owner. • The new right-of-way easement to Eustis Street shall be drafted to ensure the public right to use the driveway for ingress and egress is perpetual. Such easement language shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. • The vacation may not be recorded until the Final PUD and Development Agreement are executed. 2 JLU 1r Next Steps After public testimony and discussion, Staff requests direction to prepare a resolution of approval with conditions, or denial with findings to be presented at the regular December 8, 2020 City Council meeting. 3 Attachment A: Vacation & Easement Location Key across uld.autad ally of tb• Sou. line of lot 6 end si t Z T. .5 n ci €L a9 Po i 1 Sa g 1 1Jll1.i 1ili ifi Ili il 400 91 HM _ !1 ! la a k3:11." C771"'lTheii� i .€ Fa €g €a € = € s 3 I I I I I I I I 1 L ji 1 tie e$1e i? I 1 sxi5o € 1 &g NOLiGGV _ _ (1 4s xro 111) 0948 egen.� 1 1 e e e 1-+i e—e i i� ice+—i i t=t< 31 l 1 1 I'• 0 // !G� all nl e{) 1i R 1111{111111i I os9i 1ii —.1,—co—I111111111 pa4g WOIVUN I e el ii ) r 1 . :....... 'ii:, V , e t V3 E v -0D--f8- to > S,TflyflAkilly7 ATTACHMENT B EASEMENT VACATION October 29, 2020 A perpetual easement for public right-of-way, landscaping and other purposes over, under, across and through the South 22.5 feet of Lot 23, Block 10, Lauderdale's East Side Addition to Minneapolis. O • U) a) cn (13 O w O E--2- -a) D To O_73 I a) i - O �; ; n Helly [0008] OZ 08 191,04;0S 0 I-----s*Zz--- CO -13 0 u Li I J .Q m Z(/) • r• .; P O -0N < O J Q O` O > N (0 z 3 a) Z w o ° � 0 c N / / W u • �_ N \/ � i.� W L p Q u n I `\� W _0 cn ` 1 I J o a (1) I -�J s O) ui % -I- • Cn3 l J a) -- -0 C `1— 1 (0 � 1 - a -I • I-- ti / -- a) C L \ Q O �J Q 0 Q % `1- 1 - - J SII III III O N easement for SCALE IN FEET • • • 95 8l£' M„OZ, SZ,ON J9949 uJanleW • 0 N rn N 0 icense No. 48988 Max L. Stanislowski - P DVA HX3-bb98LS\saI!d 1,99L -IS 6nn10\,3AJnS\'dlda aaVD\tib98L\8LOZ\ M INGRESS & EGRESS EASEMENT ATTACHMENT B October 28, 2020 g a of 2 Sheets { ƒ {/ }\ c cu !\ \\ CL[ /\ 13 }/ ƒ§ \) 0 \• \ \(N G License No. 48988 DVA HX -1717 98LS\ 9dea7 6mP ygAN n«d vo oevD\17179 e[7 3Z\a 62aaqS >100 a>1J) ,19949 spsn3 l'egV17,1 LL '6FZ 3„ I5, JS OOS l\"IW , L1 1 r^ J b \ �1 1 0 JL�O, 1 J e ° ` I J O '\X\' -. J Cri1 •-QCr)�j 144 r'\ I Z LTJ Ili/O L "",n O I ' I ."- L�JcJJ r-• zo L.4....I _ -. plz II-- 1 J� \ k� I`06 \\ �\1` 4i� _�/ IL 11 1r,\ t\I` 30 11 I \'- 1 11 1I I -�� 1\\ -0'91- -1—L_t_ O / 1 l/ ' , 1 / I ./ AJ / 1 �` r� <11 SII II 11I III II ofri� 0 O N L O N oci co Loucks Project No. 18644 0 icense No. 48988 Max L. Stanislo DVA HX3-17b986S\SOI! 1 -331 -IS 6MP \A AH(1S\VIVEI GCVO \tib98L\860ZVM LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing X Discussion X Action X Resolution Work Session Meeting Date November 24, 2020 ITEM NUMBE 1847 Fulham Deck Variance STAFF INITIAL Jim APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: See attached memo. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: MEMO DATE: NOVEMBER 24, 2020 TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: JIM BOWNIK RE: VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR 1847 FULHAM STREET Applicant/Owner/Location: Eric & Alyssa McIntosh, 1847 Fulham St, Lauderdale, MN 55113 Proposal: The applicant reconstructed a deck that is attached to the rear of the house. The previous deck was located two feet from the north side property line. The reconstructed deck was built to the north side property line and follows that line for a distance of twelve feet. Zoning regulations require a side yard setback of five feet. Thus, the applicant is requesting a five-foot variance to build to the north property line for a zero - foot setback for the reconstructed deck. POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR VARIANCE APPROVAL In reviewing this variance request, the Council should consider the Zoning Ordinance requirements as well as relevant State Statutes. These requirements are outlined on the attached Variance Checklist. Here is the general order of procedure. 1) Staff presentation. • Apply the Practical Difficulties Test 3) Public Hearing. 4) Approve or deny the variance, adding any conditions as necessary. PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY TEST The municipal variance standard requires the City to apply a three -factor test for "practical difficulties" consisting of (1) reasonableness, (2) uniqueness, and (3) essential character. A variance should be granted if strict enforcement of the municipal variance standard as applied to a particular piece of property would cause the landowner a "practical difficulty." The landowner is generally entitled to the variance if and only if the applicant meets the statutory three -factor test for practical difficulty. If the applicant does not meet all three factors of the statutory test, then a variance should not be granted. ESTABLISHING THE FINDINGS OF FACT (Based on Answers to Questions on the Variance Checklist) The applicant has described the proposed project and why a variance is requested in the attached letter and provided answers to the questions in the Variance Checklist: A) How does the proposal put your property to use in a reasonable manner? B) What are the unique circumstances to the property not created by the landowner? C) How will a variance, if granted, not alter the essential character of the locality? D) How is granting of a variance in harmony with the purposes and intent of the Zoning Ordinance? E) How are the terms of a variance consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? STAFF REVIEW The previous deck was located two feet from the north side property line. The required setback is five feet from the side property line. Thus, the previous deck was considered a non -conforming structure, which could remain, but if rebuilt needs to meet the current five- foot setback with the following exception: 10-11-3: DAMAGE: Any nonconforming structure damaged by fire, flood, explosion, or other casualty may be reconstructed and used as before if such reconstruction is performed within twelve (12) months of such casualty, and if the restored structure has no greater coverage and contains no greater cubic content than before such casualty. The City Council has not granted a zero -foot setback before, to my knowledge, and granting it would set an unwelcome precedent. The applicant did not discuss the project with staff or apply for the required zoning and building permits before proceeding with the reconstruction and expansion of the nonconforming structure. If the applicant would have talked to staff, we would have let them know an approved variance would be needed before they could apply for a building permit. Granting this request would set another unwelcome precedent where property owners build whatever they want, wherever they want and expect leniency from the Council if it doesn't meet code. This request is an example of a back -end request previously discussed with Council that involves staff trying to get a property owner to comply with regulations after -the -fact. In the first paragraph of their application, the applicants claim the house foundation has a zero -foot setback. Staff disagrees because the small area that comes to the north line is just an egress for the house. The house's foundation is two feet from the side property line. The previous deck lined up with the edge of the house's foundation at the two -foot distance from the line. Staff believe there are no unique circumstances involved with the property. A fence also was reconstructed along the north side property line. Again, the applicant did not discuss the fence with staff and a permit was not applied for. The fence and deck were separate structures before both were reconstructed. After reconstruction, the two structures are now interconnected. We requested the applicants apply for a second back- end variance for the fence so the two variances could be processed together, but we have not received the second variance application. Due to the 60 -day rule on land use applications, staff had to proceed with processing the deck variance alone. The fence and deck are interconnected because the north end of the deck attaches to the fence and because the fence acts as a railing. The shorter part of the fence is over the maximum height of six feet allowed by city code. Here are some things to consider when deciding on approval or denial of this variance request: • The City Council is not required to approve requests where a property owner has constructed something without permits or land use approvals. • Zoning variances run with the land, so this property would always have a deck zero feet from the north side property line. The applicant feels the variance is warranted because their house does not meet the current five-foot setback requirement. There are many legally non-conforming homes in Lauderdale; what standard would apply to them? • The Council must determine whether you will allow them to apply for a building permit for a fence taller than six feet. Since the design is comingled, if the applicants are required to reduce the fence height, it will require additional changes in the deck design. • If the City Council is inclined to approve the side yard variance request, conditions can be attached to the approval. Staff recommend these conditions be completed before the variance is valid. The city attorney may recommend others. If any of these conditions are not met, the variance would not be valid. o The property owners must complete the building permit application process and qualify for a building permit. Typically, this requires the submittal of a site plan, construction plans, and materials list for the Building Official to review. As it is unknown if the deck as constructed meets code, so the deck would need to be inspected by the Building Official. Typically decks require footing and framing inspections before completion. If deck components are not visible, the deck may need to be partially deconstructed or footings unearthed to verify it meets code. o The property owners must complete the fence permit application process and quality for a fence permit if the fence is six feet or under. Thereafter, the applicants would need to bring the fence up to code which includes reducing the height of the fence to no more than six feet for the entire length, including the portion by the deck, agreeing to the conditions of an encroachment agreement for that portion built over the utility easement, and having the "finished" side face the neighbors. o If the property owners receive Council permission to build a fence to some height taller than six feet, they must qualify for a building permit which requires submission of a fence designed by an engineer. Thereafter, the applicants would need to bring the fence up to code at the not-to-exceed height granted by the Council for the entire length, including the portion by the deck, agreeing to the conditions of an encroachment agreement for that portion built over the utility easement, and having the "finished" side face the neighbors. o The property owners must remove the retaining wall they built on the backyard neighbor's property. If the applicant would like to build a retaining wall, they would need to complete the retaining wall permit application process and quality for a retaining wall permit before starting construction. This is not an item they can ask the Council to grant leniency as the Council has no authority to permit someone to build on another's property o Pay for any legal or engineering fees incurred by the City in assisting the property owner in meeting the conditions of the variance. • If the request is denied, the rationale for the denial must be included in the motion. • If the request is denied, staff suggests July 1, 2021 as a date the property owner would be given to bring the property into compliance by removing any unpermitted structures. ENCLOSURES A) Variance application, site plan, and variance checklist. PUBLIC HEARING Adjacent property owners received notice of tonight's public hearing. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1) Motion to direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial for the next meeting because the applicant did not meet all three factors of the practical difficulties test CITY OF LAUDERDALE VARIANCE CHECKLIST The following requirements must be met in order for your variance application to be considered complete: 1) Have a pre -application meeting with city staff before submitting a variance application. Please bring the completed application and all required documents to this meeting. 2) Submit the following: A) Variance application and fee. B) Site Plan: • Drawn to scale. • Delineating your property lines (by locating property stakes, submitting a Certificate of Survey, or other means). • Showing lot lines, street names, locations and dimensions of all existing or proposed buildings, setback distances, parking areas, lot coverage percentage (as defined by structures covered by a roof) and any other pertinent site information. 3) Describe your proposed project and why you are requesting a variance. 4) Answer the following questions: A) How does the proposal put your property to use in a reasonable manner? B) What are the unique circumstances to the property not created by the landowner? C) How will a variance, if granted, not alter the essential character of the locality? D) How is granting of a variance in harmony with the purposes and intent of the Zoning Ordinance (Lauderdale's Zoning Ordinance can be found online at www.ci.lauderdale.mn.us)? E) How are the terms of a variance consistent with the Comprehensive Plan (Lauderdale's Comprehensive Plan can be found online at www.ci.lauderdale.mn.us)? Information You Should Know • The municipal variance standard requires the city to apply a three -factor test for "practical difficulties" consisting of (1) reasonableness, (2) uniqueness, and (3) essential character. • Thus, the city is required to adopt findings based on the questions above. • Conditions may be imposed on granting of variances if those conditions are directly related to and bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. Oh" alre ,ezwixofr;(14/vA JAW 0 USE APPUC°T IoN Fee Escrow Type of Request MAIN 651-792-7650 Date: Description of Request $100 $0 of Consolidation/Division $150 $ 0 Variance $200 $ 0 Conditional Use $500 $1,000 Zoning Amendment $500 $1,000 Subdivision $500 $1,000 PUD Applicant Information Owner Information (if different) Name: 0_�C(�(_. t (,11,of k Name: 01/04-)Q Address: /q7- ru/ka.uvt. (c751". Address: C, s, z: LaUde A i M 0 5-57/ 3 C, s, Z: Phone: 65 - 23�-627-Z Phone: Email: ' C Gi +O i 1 ��;, d. (OM Email: - r Signature:,— -,nim - Signature: By signing above, the applicant agrees to pay the application fee and deposit an escrow fee to cover the city's consultants' costs associated with reviewing the associated request. Prior to having the request considered by the city, the applicant must deposit an escrow fee in an amount that is estimated to cover the city's consultants' costs as determined by the city administrator. If the city's consultants' costs exceed the initial escrow deposited by the applicant, an additional escrow fee will be required to cover the additional costs. The city shall use the applicant's fees to cover the city's actual consultants' costs in reviewing the request regardless of the city's action on the applicant's request. If the applicant's escrow fees exceed the city's actual consultants' costs for reviewing the request, the remaining escrow fees shall be refunded to the applicant. Review Timeline: All applications, other than concept plans, must be complete before being formally reviewed. Minnesota Statute provides 15 days to determine the application's completeness. Completeness depends on whether or not the checklist items are fulfilled. Checklist: Please review the checklist for the type of application you are applying for. For Office Use Only PIN#: Date of Complete Application: Amount Paid: Receipt #: Escrow Fee Paid: Receipt # Date Escrow Returned: PC Recommendation: (approve/deny) Meeting Date: Public Hearing Date: CC Action: (approved/denied) Meeting Date: Conditions? Lauderdale Zoning Committee, We are writing to seek a deck variance for our single-family home at 1847 Fulham Street. Current zoning rules state that decks built within 5 feet of the property line must apply for a variance. However, our house foundation directly lies on the property line. Our rebuilt deck as planned will be attached to the rear of the house and would border the property line for twelve (12) feet on the northside of our property and will be in line with the fence which is also on the north side property line. From an external view and there would be no distinction between the deck and fence as they would have the same look. Also, we now understand that the application for a variance should have been submitted prior to the project being started and we desire to meet city rules and ordinances, and hope to work with the city to achieve the best outcome for all. When we purchased this property in 2018 the deck was very old and rotting with loose deck boards and railings. Not safe or usable. The old deck came within two feet from the property line. We have a unique situation with the age of our house that the foundation of it directly abuts the northern property line. As such, there was a 2 foot gap between the edge of the deck and the fence (which sits on the property line) which was unusable, and diminished the aesthetics of the property. We sought to replace the footprint of the old deck and extend it to the north by two feet to utilize the space, and present the most aesthetically pleasing design as possible. This makes sense functionally for us and future owners as well. Also this deck would be within the foundation footprint of our house. Since our house was built in 1886 it predates the other houses in the area and so when the property lines were established for the other properties it was well known that the property line came directly to the foundation of our house. While we understand that there may be some concern as to having space between the properties for such things as rain runoff, snow accumulation etc. I would point out that prior to our deck plans there was already a privacy fence in the same location, so should our request for a variance be approved it would in no way impact the space, look, or feel of the property from an external view. In fact, in discussing this with our neighbors, Terry and Leslie Knapp, they have spoken about how much the addition of the deck, with the privacy "wall", has improved the look and feel of their property and added much needed privacy, as to no deck or fence being present. And they are very happy with the changes we have been making. Regards, Eric & Alyssa McIntosh 1847 Fulham St. Lauderdale, MN 55113 VARIANCE CHECKLIST Question 114 A. How does the proposal put your property to use in a reasonable manner? Response: Without this variance the deck location would cause an awkward, unattractive, uncharacteristic and an unusable section of the back yard for us and any future owners. Our proposal allows for the best possible functionality of the space and also provides the most visually pleasing option for the area. B. What are the unique circumstances to the property not created by the landowner? Response: We have a unique situation with the age and property line of our house. Our house was built in 1886 and predates the neighboring houses in the area. When the property lines were established the foundation of our house was placed directly on the northern property line. C. How will a variance, if granted, not alter the essential character of the locality? Response: The replacement of the old, rotted and unsafe deck with a new properly designed, positioned and visually pleasing deck will not only unalter the character of the area, but will greatly enhance the look and feel of the yard, as well as, provide greater privacy to the neighbors and any future owners of the house. D. How is granting of a variance in harmony with the purposes and intent of the Zoning Ordinance. Response: The current deck ordinance which states that decks should have a setback of 5 ft from a side property line assumes that the house, as per building code, is also setback 5 ft. Current building code presumes to be written allowing alignment of the deck with the house foundation. Given that our house was built on the property line and grandfathered in to the 5ft setback, then granting this variance would bring our deck into the purpose and intent of the deck building code. E. How are the terms of a variance consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Response: Our investing in a properly designed and visually pleasing deck greatly enhances the look and feel of the property. This produces a better visual condition of the property, which in turn increases the value of the property and neighboring properties and also reduces maintenance efforts for any future owner. As such this aligns with the 2030 comprehensive plan to improve the overall health of the housing community. Design ID: 318153846781 Estimate ID: 67341 ONLINE DECK STORE Privacy Railing 6ft (Not actual wall) Illustration intended to show general deck size and shape. Some options may not be shown for picture clarity. Layout dimension sheets are intended as a construction aid. Not all options selected are shown. Final design should be performed by a registered professional engineer to ensure all applicable building codes and regulations are met. This is an estimate. It is only for general price information. This is not an offer and there can be no legally binding contract between the parties based on this estimate. The prices stated herein are subject to change depending upon the market conditions. The prices stated on this estimate are not firm for any time period unless specifically written otherwise on this form. The availability of materials is subject to inventory conditions. MENARDS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY LOSS INCURRED BY THE GUEST WHO RELIES ON PRICES SET FORTH HEREIN OR ON THE AVAILABILITY OF ANY MATERIALS STATED HEREIN. All information on this form, other than price, has been provided by the guest. Menards is not responsible for any errors in the infomiation on this estimate, including but not limited to quantity, dimension and quality. Please examine this estimate carefully. MENARDS MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS, ORAL, WRITTEN OR OTHERWISE THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED ARE SUITABLE FOR ANY PURPOSE BEING CONSIDERED BY THE GUEST. BECAUSE OF THE WIDE VARIATIONS IN CODES, THERE ARE NO REPRESENTATIONS THAT THE MAIERIALS LISTED HEREIN MEET YOUR CODE REQUIREMENTS. 1/12 5/12/2020 Design ID: 318153846781 Estimate ID: 67341 12' 6' 25'0' 25' 0' 6' Cr 7'0' i' GK STORE Illustration intended to show general deck size and shape. Some options may not be shown for picture clarity. 2/12 5/12/2020 Design ID: 318153846781 Estimate ID: 67341 Oli'r'll� �III�?'ll� )1► .��_' I< i._;I1(L)) Illustration intended to show general deck size and shape. Some options may not be shown for picture clarity. 3/12 5/12/2020 Design ID: 318153846781 Estimate ID: 67341 Dimensions Height off the ground: 4' 0" Width: 25' 0" Depth: 12' 0" Additional Options Deck Flashing: No Deck Flashing Lattice: Treated Jumbo Panel Underdecking: No Underdecking Decking Deck Board Material Type: UltraDeck Rustic Deck Board: Cedar Deck Board Fastener: UltraDeck T -Clip Framing Framing Material Type: AC2 Green Treated Joist: 2x10 Joist Spacing: 12" On Center Beam: 2x8 Framing Post: 4x4 Framing Post Framing Fastener Type: Galvanized Framing Fastener Footing: 12" Poured Footing Footing Depth: 48" Footing Depth Joist Hanger Type: Galvanized Joist Hanger Joist Hanger Fastener Type: Joist Hanger Fastener Nail Cladding: Cladding Railing Railing Material Type: Rustic Railing Railing Style: Cedar Spindle: 32" Cedar Handrail: Cedar RusticT"' Handrail Graspable Handrail: No Graspable Handrail Railing Post: 4x4 post insert Post Sleeve: Cedar RusticT"' Post Sleeve Post Top: Cedar Post Cap Base Ring: Cedar Base Ring Mounting Style: Joist Mount ONLINE DECK STORE 4/12 5/12/2020 Design ID: 318153846781 Estimate ID: 67341 ONLINE DECK STORE 1,1 - Posts and Footings b to 1 Li Dimensions displayed are from center of post to center of post. • 5/12 5/12/2020 Design ID: 318153846781 Estimate ID: 67341 Lumber: 2 x 8 AC2 Label A B ONLINE DECK STORE Ll - Beams 1016 10 1 0'10 w A Li PA fB Length Count 12' 2" 3 12'1" 1 6/12 5/12/2020 Design ID: 318153846781 Estimate ID: 67341 Lumber: 2 x 10 AC2 Joist Spacing: 12" on center ONLINE DECK STORE 1,1 - Joists A B B B B B B B B B B B R F E E E E E E E E E E E Label Length Count Usage A 16' 11" 2 Rim Joist B 16' 11" 12 Internal Joist C 12' 1" 1 Rim Joist D 12' 0" 1 Ledger Joist E 7' 11" 12 Internal Joist F 7' 11" 2 Rim Joist 7/12 5/12/2020 Design ID: 318153846781 Estimate ID: 67341 Li Label Count E 2 L 4 C 1 E 2 IL1 � Illtirr11g IE —4 Y—It— 4 2 It 4 2' (0) IIS I1� (\ ,(,c2 II x_)11-.1; Illustration does not represent all available railing post placement options. Railing post dimensions are on center. S1 Label Count E 2 8/12 5/12/2020 Design ID: 318153846781 Estimate ID: 67341 1(a )) Deck ©aids and ` ffC2 d 5 1, 6686666666866866886666886 8b 66866866668 866886666666888k ". 88�,i 81.1.1.61, M N 8NNNN NN.6-MN6h�i 1.N MN NNNN N NNNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNtI ; °ec STORF The lengths and dimensions displayed are provided as a general guide and are not intended for actual construction. Confirm all of the actual dimensions of your project prior to cutting. Deck Board Length 12' 0" Count 58 Tread Length Count 6 9/12 5/12/2020 Design ID: 318153846781 Estimate ID: 67341 ONLIN!J, Li Strfingercs �II cJ ---_Mi=-rpm i--4' 10/12 ,61E 1634 0 10 2011 Replacement Deck 1651 16+7 1643 Fulham u III11 r _CI • u� Illi,u� �'rV�ui IIIII'/ / LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date November 24, 2020 ITEM NUMBER 1795 Eustis Street PUD App. STAFF INITIAL HB APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Please see attached memo from Jennifer Haskamp of Swanson-Haskamp Consulting. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: JLU ir: MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and City Council Date: November 20, 2020 CC: Heather Butkowski, City RE: Application for Final PUD of Administrator Affordable Senior Housing project at 1795 Eustis Street Application Summary The Applicant, Real Estate Equities (REE), submitted an application for a Final PUD to allow for the construction and operations of an affordable senior housing project on property located at 1795 Eustis Street. The proposed Project received Development Stage PUD approval in July of 2019. At the regular November 20, 2020 meeting staff presented the Final PUD application materials submitted by the Applicant. Staff's review indicated that the conditions stated in Resolution #070919B were generally met, with some conditions to be addressed prior to Final PUD approval. The Purchase and Development Agreement was noted in the conditions as an important component of the Final PUD review process, which is generally drafted by the City Staff with input from the Applicant. At the November 10, 2020 meeting staff indicated that a full draft of the Purchase and Development Agreement would be presented at the November 24, 2020 meeting. Due to the complexity of the application, drafting of the Purchase and Development Agreement is taking longer than anticipated so a full draft has not yet been reviewed by the City Attorney. To begin reviewing the contents of the agreement staff prepared a Draft Outline of the Purchase and Development Agreement with annotations for your review and consideration. Please review the outline provided as Attachment 1 to this staff report. If you have questions, modifications, or additions we can address them on November 24th and incorporate your suggestions into the full draft agreement. Notes and Considerations As you review the Draft Outline of the Purchase and Development Agreement please reference your staff report and Attachments from the November 10, 2020 meeting which summarizes the Applicant's Final PUD submittal. Please note within the annotations provided that several items will include placeholders because final costs will not be known until REE knows which funding cycle they receive the bond allocation. As a result, the Purchase and Development Agreement, and subsequently Final PUD and rezoning, will be conditionally approved as part of this process. Next Steps A full draft of the Purchase and Development Agreement, with placeholders as noted, will be presented at the December 8, 2020 City Council meeting. 1 Purchase and Development Agreement Between the City of Lauderdale, MN and Real Estate Equities DRAFT Outline with Annotations The annotations provided are identified in italics to clarify or highlight 1) specific items related to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) land use approval process, or 2) items specifically noted by residents during the PUD review process. ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Section 1.1 Definitions ARTICLE II REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES Section 2.1 Representations and Warranties of the City Section 2.2. Representations and Warranties of the Developer ARTICLE III UNDERTAKINGS BY CITY AND DEVELOPER Section 3.1 Total Development Costs and Public Costs This section will identify the total development costs and public costs as calculated by Ehlers in coordination with the Developer. This section will be completed after the January cycle for affordable housing bonds, if awarded to REE. Section 3.2 TIF Note Section 3.3 Income and Rent Restrictions This section will define the intended occupancy of the proposed project as affordable senior housing and will require occupancy consistent with the TIF agreement as well as the requirements as stated within the Conditional Use Permit. Section 3.4 Section 3.5 Section 3.6 Developer to Pay City's Fees and Expenses Execution of Assessment Agreement Compliance with Environmental Requirements This section will require the Developer to comply with all applicable environmental laws, and to obtain all necessary permits, licenses, approvals, and reviews. This section will address and note the required approval and permit process for the demolition of the existing structure and associated improvements on the project site. Draft Outline for Purchase and Development Agreement with REE 1 Section 3.7 Construction Plans This section will address the development and delivery of final construction documents that are consistent with the Architectural and Civil Plan Sets approved as part of the PUD land use approval process. All construction plans must be reviewed and approved by the appropriate City Staff prior to issuance of any associated/applicable permits. Section 3.8 Site Development and Construction Activities This section will address the construction site activities including (but not limited to) hours of construction, construction parking, haul routes, etc. Section 3.9 Commencement and Completion of Construction Section 3.10 Certificate of Completion Section 3.11 Additional Responsibilities of the Developer This section will address miscellaneous responsibilities of the Developer including that any damage done to public utilities or facilities during construction shall be repaired and/or replaced at the cost of the Developer. This section will also address specific conditions of the Development Stage PUD including: Escrow establishment for landscaping at 1778 Eustis; and payment as established for decrease in productivity of solar panels at 1801 Eustis Street. Section 3.12 Encumbrances of the Development Property Section 3.13 Business Subsidy Act Section 3.14 Right to Collect Delinquent Taxes Section 3.15 Review of Taxes ARTICLE IV ACQUISITION AND CONVEYANCE OF DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY Section 4.1 Purchase and Sale of Development Property, Purchase Price This section will identify the purchase price of the development property. This section will be completed after the January cycle of the affordable housing bonds, if awarded to REE. Section 4.2 As Is Conveyance Section 4.3 Payment of Purchase Price Section 4.4 Contingencies to Closing on Development Property Section 4.5 Closing Section 4.6 Closing Costs Section 4.7 Title Section 4.8 Environmental Remediation Draft Outline for Purchase and Development Agreement with REE 2 Section 4.9 Developer's Right to Inspect Section 4.10 Conveyance Subject to Right of Re-entry ARTICLE V EVENTS OF DEFAULT Section 5.1 Events of Default Defined This section will address certain events that may be deemed "default" of the Developer under the agreement. For example, a start date for construction will be identified, and if site work has not commenced, may be deemed as a default by the Developer. Section 5.2 Section 5.3 Section 5.4 Section 5.5 Section 5.6 Remedies on Default No Remedy Exclusive No Implied Waiver Indemnification of City Reimbursement of Attorney's Fees ARTICLE VI ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS Section 6.1 Restrictions on use This section will require the property to be used for senior affordable housing until, at least, the TIF District is terminated or the TIF note is paid in full. At the termination of either of these events, any owner/operator may request an amendment to the CUP which may, or may not, be approved for a different use. Section 6.2 Reports Section 6.3 Limitations on Transfer and Assignment Section 6.4 Conflicts of Interest Section 6.5 Titles of Articles and Sections Section 6.6 Notices and Demands Section 6.7 No Additional Waiver Implied by One Waiver Section 6.8 Counterparts Section 6.9 Law Governing Section 6.10 Term; Termination Section 6.11 Provisions Surviving Rescission, Expiration or Termination Section 6.12 Superseding Effect Section 6.13 Relationship of Parties Section 6.14 Venue Draft Outline for Purchase and Development Agreement with REE 3 LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date November 24, 2020 ITEM NUMBER STAFF INITIAL APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR Tobacco Ordinance Update_ DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: In January, the Council adopted an interim ordinance to put a pause on the issuance of new tobacco licenses in order to update city code to reflect the new federal and state regulations and to consider the interest of existing tobacco license holders to open tobacco shops to sell a broader selection of flavored tobacco products. Recently, the Council received an update on tobacco legislation from the Association of Non -Smokers Minnesota and feedback from the two licensed tobacco holders on their decrease in sales since the City began restricting the sale of flavored tobacco in 2019. The Council adopted the ordinance restricting the sale of flavored tobacco in response to residents' con- cerns over the increase in tobacco use among young people. While the tobacco license hold- ers would open tobacco shops, they stated their preference would be to resume sales of mint and menthol flavored tobacco products out of their existing convenience stores. The Council has three options with regard to the ordinance: 1. Update the draft to include the federal and state law changes but leave the remaining or- dinance intact. This would prohibit the tobacco license sellers from selling flavored to- bacco products unless they open tobacco shops. 2. Update the draft to include the federal and state law changes and allow for the sale of some flavored tobacco products (mint and menthol) as requested by the tobacco license holders. 3. Update the draft to include the federal and state law changes and revise the ordinance to prohibit the sale of all flavored tobacco products in the City. This would limit the likeli- hood of anyone opening a stand-alone tobacco shop as they would only be able to sell tobacco flavored products just like our current convenience stores. Based on the direction of the Council, the ordinance will be revised and sent to existing li- censed tobacco holders. The City is required to provide them 30 -days notice of a public hearing on the matter. That public hearing would be held January 12, 2021. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1CHAPTER 6l TOBACCO, TOBACCO PRODUCTS, TOBACCO -RELATED DEVICES, NICOTINE OR LOBELIA DELIVERY IDEVICESPRODUCTS1, AND ELECTRONIC DELIVERY DEVICES SECTION: 3-6-1: Purpose 3-6-2: Definitions 3-6-3: License Required 3-6-4: Basis for Denial of License 3-6-5: Prohibited Sales 3-6-6: Self -Service Sales 3-6-7: Responsibility 3-6-8: Compliance Checks and Inspections 3-6-9: Exceptions and Defenses 3-6-10: Violations and Penalties 3-6-11: Severability 3-6-1: PURPOSE: The City recognizes that marketing and public health research and tobacco industry documents reveal that tobacco companies have used fruit, candy, mint, menthol, land alcohol flavors as a way to target youth and young adults and that the presence of flavors in tobacco products can make it more difficult for youth, young adult, and adult tobacco users to quit. The City further recognizes that young people are particularly susceptible to the addictive properties of commercial tobacco products, and are particularly likely to become lifelong users. National data show that roughly 95 percent of adult smokers begin smoking before they turn 21 years of age. The ages of 18 to 21 are a critical period when many smokers move from experimental smoking to regular, daily use. Tobacco use has been shown to be the cause of several serious health problems which subsequently place a financial burden on all levels of government. The purpose of this ordinance is to regulate the sale of tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco -related devices, nicotine or lobelia delivery devicc.,products, and electronic delivery devices for the purpose of enforcing and furthering existing laws, to protect adolescents against the serious effects associated with the use of tobacco, tobacco products, tobacco -related devices, nicotine or lobelia delivery devieesproducts, and electronic delivery devices, and to further the official public policy of the State of Minnesota in regard to preventing young people from starting to smoke as stated in Minnesota Statutes, section 144.391. 3-6-2: DEFINITIONS: The following words and phrases, as used in this Chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them. CHILD -RESISTANT PACKAGING: Packaging that meets the effectiveness specifications set 536406v1 DTA LA135-3 Commented [PHLC1]: This sample language provides state and federal law updates, removal of the exception to allow flavored products to be sold at 21+ tobacco shops (this will prohibit all sales of flavored tobacco products at all retailers), and other miscellaneous corrects and updates as noted in the comments. Commented [PHLC2]: The term used in state law is "products" so I changed this throughout. Commented [PHLC3]: This reference to mint and menthol was added to note that the flavor provision already addresses the sale of mint/menthol products, which are the most frequently used flavored products used by youth. forth in Code of Federal Regulations, title 16, section 1700.15(b) and that was tested in accordance with the method described in Code of Federal Regulations, title 16, section 1700.20. COMPLIANCE CHECKS: The system the City uses to investigate and ensure that those authorized to sell regulated products are following and complying with the requirements of this ordinance. Compliance checks shall involve the use of persons under the age of 21, which may include !persons under the age of 18-miner4 as authorized by this ordinance. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY DEVICES: Any product containing or delivering nicotine, lobelia, or any other substance, whether natural or synthetic, intended for human consumption that can be . ' through the inhalation of aerosol or vapor from the product. Electronic delivery device shall include any component part of such a product whether or not sold separately. Electronic delivery device shall not include any nicotine cessation product that has been authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to be marketed and for sale as "drugs," "devices." or "combination products," as defined in the Federal Food, Drug. and Cosmetic Act. FLAVORED PRODUCT: Any regulated product that contains a taste or smell, other than the taste or smell of tobacco, that is distinguishable by an ordinary consumer either prior to or during the consumption of the product, including, but not limited to, any taste or smell relating to chocolate, cocoa, menthol, mint, wintergreen, vanilla, honey, fruit, or any candy, dessert, alcoholic beverage, herb, or spice. A public statement or claim, whether express or implied, made or disseminated by the manufacturer of a regulated product, or by any person authorized or permitted by the manufacturer to make or disseminate public statements concerning such products, that a product has or produces a taste or smell other than tobacco will constitute presumptive evidence that the product is a flavored product. INDOOR AREA: All space between a floor and a ceiling that is bounded by walls, doorways, or windows, whether open or closed, covering more than 50 percent of the combined surface area of the vertical planes constituting the perimeter of the area. A wall includes any retractable divider, garage door, or other physical barrier, whether temporary or permanent. LOOSIES: The common term used to refer to a single cigarette or any other tobacco product that has been removed from its packaging and sold individually. �. . MOVABLE PLACES OF BUSINESS: Any form of business operated out of a kiosk, truck, van, automobile, or other type of vehicle or transportable shelter and not a fixed address store front or other permanent type of structure authorized for sales transactions. NICOTINE OR LOBELIA DELIVERY DEVICEPRODUCT: Any product containing or 536406v1 DTA LA135-3 Commented [PHLC4]: To avoid confusion, the term "minor" is removed and replaced with a reference to the specific age. See note below where definition of "minor" is removed. Commented [PHLC5]: updated to align with state definition changes. Commented [PHLC6]: To avoid confusion with the new required minimum legal sales age, this definition of minor could be removed and the specific ages intended could be named in the provisions where this term is used. I have made those changes here and throughout. Commented [PHLC8]: This updated definition of smoking addresses the use of a range of devices, products, and substances to better capture any emerging new products. Commented [PHLC9]: Defined terms should define a single term to avoid any confusion. delivering nicotine or lobelia, whether natural or synthetic, intended for human consumption, or any part of such a product, that is not tobacco or an electronic delivery device as defined in this section, not including any nicotine cessation product that has been authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to be marketed and for sale as "drugs," "devices," or "combination products," as defined in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. REGULATED PRODUCTS: The term that collectively refers to any tobacco, tobacco -related device, nicotine or lobelia delivery devieeproduct, or electronic delivery device. RETAIL ESTABLISHMENT: Any place of business where regulated products are available for sale to the general public. SALE: Any transfer of goods for money, trade, barter, or other consideration. SMOKING: Inhaling, exhaling, burning, or carrying any lighted or heated cigar, cigarette, or pipe, or any other lighted or heated product containing, made, or derived from nicotine, tobacco, marijuana, or other plant, whether natural or synthetic, that is intended for inhalation. SMOKING also includes carrying or using an activated electronic delivery device. TOBACCO 'or TOBACCO PRODUCTS': Tobacco includes cigarettes and any product containing, made, or derived from tobacco that is intended for human consumption, whether chewed, smoked, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other means, or any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product including, but not limited to; cigars; cheroots; stogies; perique; granulated, plug cut, crimp cut, ready rubbed, and other smoking tobacco; snuff; snuff flour; cavendish; plug and twist tobacco; fine cut and other chewing tobaccos; shorts; refuse scraps, clippings, cuttings and sweepings of tobacco; and other kinds and forms of tobacco. Tobacco excludes any 'nicotine cessation product that has been authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to be marketed and for sale as "drugs," "devices," or "combination products," as defined in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. TOBACCO -RELATED DEVICES. Tobacco -related devices includes any tobacco product as well as a pipe, wraps, rolling papers, ashtray, or other device intentionally designed or intended to be used in a manner which enables the chewing, sniffing, smoking or vaping of tobacco or tobacco products. Tobacco -related devices shall include components of tobacco -related devices, which may be marketed or sold separately. Tobacco -related devices may or may not contain tobacco. 536406v1 DTA LA135-3 Commented [PHLC7]: Updated to align with state definition changes. Commented [PHLC10]: Updated to align with state definition changes. VENDING MACHINE. Any electric or electronic mechanical device which dispenses regulated products upon the insertion of money, tokens, or other form of payment directly into the machine by the person seeking to purchase the regulated products. 3-6-3: LICENSE REQUIRED: A. TOBACCO RETAILER LICENSE REQUIRED: No person shall sell or offer to sell any regulated products without first having obtained a license to do so from the City. B. LICENSE FEE: f The annual license fee shall be as established from time to time by resolution of the City Counci)I. No license shall be issued until the appropriate license fee is paid in full. For periods shorter than one year the license fee shall be the full amount. C. APPLICATION: Every person or business desiring to obtain a license to sell regulated products shall file an application in writing with the City Clerk. The application must state the full name of the applicant, the applicant's residential and business addresses and telephone numbers, the name of the business for which the license is sought, whether such business is that of an individual, sole proprietor, firm, partnership, or corporation and the address where the business is to be conducted. If the City Clerk determines that an application is incomplete, he or she shall return the application to the applicant with notice of the information necessary to make the application complete. Upon receipt of a completed application and the annual license fee, the City Clerk shall forward the application to the City Council. D. INVESTIGATION; ISSUANCE: The City Clerk shall present the application to the City Council and the City Council shall order such investigation as it deems necessary. After the investigation, the City Council shall grant or deny the application. In the event of the application being granted, the City Clerk shall issue the license. If the City Council denies the license, notice of the denial shall be given to the applicant along with notice of the applicant's right to appeal the City Council's decision as provided in 3-6-10. E. TERM OF LICENSE: The license shall expire on December 31 following its issuance. F. SEPARATE LICENSE REQUIRED: A license shall permit the licensee to sell regulated products at the one location specified in said license. A separate license shall be required for each location. G: TRANSFERS: All licenses issued under this section shall be valid only on the premises for which the license was issued and only for the person or business to whom the license was issued. No transfer of any license to another location or person shall be valid, ♦lie Cc cil- H: MOVABLE PLACE OF BUSINESS: No license shall be issued to a moveable place of business. Only fixed location businesses shall be eligible to be licensed under this section. I: DISPLAY OF LICENSE: The license shall be displayed by the licensee in a prominent and 536406v1 DTA LA135-3 Commented [PHLC11]: Fees provide revenue for the administration and enforcement of the ordinance and for retailer and community education. Periodic review and adjustment of licensing fees will ensure that they are sufficient to cover all administration, implementation, and enforcement costs, including compliance checks. Our publication, Retail License Fees, provides more information about retail licensing fees and a license fee checklist. l iii Commented [PHLC12]: The City could require a full application process for every licensee and license issued. State law is silent on this point. conspicuous place at the licensed location. J: REVOCATION OR SUSPENSION: Any license issued under this section may be revoked or suspended as provided in 3-6-10. K: ISSUANCE AS PRIVILEGE AND NOT A RIGHT: The issuance of a license under this section shall be considered a privilege and not an absolute right of the applicant and shall not entitle the holder to an automatic renewal of the license. L: SMOKING PROHIBITED IN TOBACCO RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS: Smoking shall not be permitted and no person shall smoke within the indoor area of any establishment with a tobacco retailer license. Smoking for the purposes of sampling regulated products is prohibited. IM: SAMPLES PROHIBITED: No person shall distribute samples of any licensed product free of charge or at a nominal cost. The distribution of licensed products as a free donation is prohibited) 3-6-4: BASIS FOR DENIAL OF LICENSE: A. Grounds for denying the issuance or renewal of a license under this chapter include but are not limited to the following: i. The applicant is under the age of 21 years. ii. The applicant has been convicted within the past five years of any violation of federal, state, or local laws, ordinance provisions, or other regulation relating to regulated products. iii. The applicant has had a license to sell regulated products suspended or revoked by any issuing authority within the preceding 12 months of the date of the application. iv. The applicant fails to provide any information required on the application, or provides false or misleading information. v. The applicant is prohibited by federal, state, or other local law, ordinance, or other regulation from holding a license. BC. If a license is mistakenly issued or renewed to a person, it shall be revoked upon the discovery that the person was ineligible for the license under this chapter. 3-6-5: PROHIBITED SALES: A. It shall be a violation of this chapter for any person to sell or offer to sell any regulated products. - as follows:. To any person under the age of 21 years.' 536406v1 DTA LAI35-3 5 Commented [PHLC13]:Many jurisdictions in Minnesota go further than state and federal law prohibiting some samples by prohibiting all samples. Commented [PHLC14]: The grounds for denial should be clear and consistently applied. This language is removed because it allows for some discretion in whether to use any or all of these bases for denial to deny the license. Formatted: Indent: First line: 0" Commented [PHLC15]: For readability and to align with state law, this minimum legal sales age provision is moved to its own paragraph below with subparagraphs that provide the new state law requirement for signage and age verification. ii. By means of any type of vending machine. iii. By means of self-service methods whereby the customer does not need to make a verbal or written request to an employee of the licensed retail establishment in order to receive regulated products and whereby there is not a physical exchange of the regulated products between the licensee, or the licensee's employee, and the customer. iiiv. By means of loosies. iv. Containing opium, morphine, jimson weed, bella donna, Strychnos, cocaine, marijuana, or other deleterious, hallucinogenic, toxic, or controlled substances except nicotine and other substances found naturally in tobacco or added as part of an otherwise lawful manufacturing process. It is not the intention of this provision to ban the sale of lawfully manufactured cigarettes or other tobacco products. C. It shall be a violation of this chapter for any person to sell or offer to sell any liquid which is intended for human consumption and use in an electronic delivery device, whether or not such liquid contains nicotine, in packaging that is not child -resistant. Upon request, a licensee shall provide the City with a copy of a certificate of compliance or a full laboratory testing report to verify compliance with this paragraph. D. It shall be a violation of this chapter for any person to sell or offer to sell any flavored products. 536406v1 DTA LA135-3 Commented [PHLC16]: The requirements for age verification and signage in this provision are moved to the new paragraph below regarding minimum legal sales age. The modified language below also complies with these state requirements. " Commented (PHLC21]: This compliance check language conforms to state law. (3) Are only accessible by the public through an exterior door. E. Legal age. No person shall sell any licensed product to any person under the age of 21. i. 'Age verification. Licensees must verify by means of government -issued photographic identification containing the bearer's date of birth that the purchaser is at least 21 years of age. Verification is not required for a person over the age of 30. That the person appeared to be 30 years of age or older does not constitute a defense to a violation of this subsection. ii. Signage. Notice of the legal sales age, age verification requirement, and possible penalties for underage sales must be posted prominently and in plain view at all times at each location where licensed products are offered for sale. The required signage, which will be provided to the licensee by the city, must be posted in a manner that is clearly visible to anyone who is or is considering making a purchase. 1 3-6-6: SELF-SERVICE SALES: All regulated products shall either be stored behind a counter or other area not freely accessible to customers, or in a case or other storage unit not left open and accessible to the general public. This subsection shall not apply to licensed establishments that prohibit persons under 21 from being present or entering at all times and derive at least 90 percent of gross revenues from the sale of licensed products. 3-6-7: RESPONSIBILITY: All licensees under this chapter shall be responsible for the actions of their employees in regard to the sale of regulated products on the licensed premises, and the sale of an item by an employee shall be considered a sale by the license holder. Nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting the City from also subjecting employees to whatever penalties are appropriate under this chapter, state, or federal law, or other applicable law or regulation. 3-6-8: COMPLIANCE CHECKS AND INSPECTIONS: jAll licensed premises must be open to inspection by law enforcement or other authorized city officials during regular business hours. From time to time, but at least it twice Cl per year, the cit will conduct compliance checks. In _ accordance with state law, the city will conduct a compliance check that involves the participation of a person at least 17 years of age, but under the age of 21 to enter the licensed premises to attempt to purchase licensed products. Prior written consent from a parent or guardian is required for any person under the age of 18 to s artici i ate in a com . liance check. Persons used for the ur. ose of compliance checks will be supervised by law enforcement or other designated personnel.All licensed retail establishments shall be open to inspection by the City's contracted police City's contra 536,106v] DTA LA135-3 Commented [PHLC17]: This removes the exception that allowed 21+ tobacco shops to continue to sell flavored products. Jurisdictions with this exception have experienced a significant increase in tobacco shop applications as stores, convenience stores, and gas stations have created "split" stores that essentially function as a single store but sell flavored tobacco products from one section of the store. In addition to improving public health and advancing health equity, complete prohibitions on the sale of flavored tobacco products are clear, easy to understand, and remove much of the guesswork and frustration associated with the tobacco industry's response to exceptions to flavored tobacco sales regulations. Commented [PHLC18]: This age verification and signage requirement aligns with state law. This sample language provides that the city will provide the required signage to ensure that the proper signage is used. Commented [PHLC19]: With removal of this subsection above, I included the 21+ and 90 percent gross revenues requirements for a tobacco shop to allow self-service sales. Commented [PHLC20]: While state law requires only one compliance check, the City may consider requiring at least two checks. the age of 15 years but less than 21 years to enter the licensed retail establishment to attempt to by city dcsignatcd law cnforcement officers or other dcsignatcd city personnel. It - No person used in compliance checks shall attempt to use a false identification misrepresenting the person's age, and all persons lawfully engaged in a compliance check shall truthfully answer all questions about the person's age asked by the licensee or his or her employee and shall produce any identification, if any exists, for which he or she is asked. 3-6-9: EXCEPTIONS AND DEFENSES: Nothing in this chapter shall prevent the providing of regulated--preductstobacco and tobacco -related devices 'to a—any person as part of a lawfully recognized religious, spiritual, or cultural ceremony. It shall be an affirmative defense to the violation of this chapter for a person to have reasonably relied on proof of age as described by state law. 3-6-10: VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES: 'Nothing in this section prohibits the city from seeking prosecution as a misdemeanor for an alleged second violation of this ordinance by a person 21 years of age or older within five years of a previous conviction under the ordinance : . on who The cost of prosecution may be added. A separate offense shall be deemed committed upon each day during which a violation occurs or continues. A. GENERALLY. The license holder shall be responsible for the conduct of its agents or employees while on the licensed premises. Any violation of this article shall be considered an act of the license holder for purposes of imposing a civil penalty, license suspension, or license revocation. Each violation, and every day in which a violation occurs or continues, shall constitute a separate offense B. NOTICE OF VIOLATION. Upon the occurrence of a violation, the police department shall inform the city administrator of the violation. The city administrator shall then send to the license holder a written notice of the civil violation. The notice shall advise the license holder of the penalty and the license holder's right to request a hearing regarding the violation of this article. C. ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL PENALTIES; LICENSEE: Each license issued hereunder shall be subject to suspension or revocation for violation of any provisions of this chapter or the laws of the State of Minnesota as follows: (i) 'First violation: The first violation of this chapter shall be punishable by a civil penalty of $300280.00. 536406v1 DTA LA135-3 Commented [PHLC22]: This sentence is unnecessary because there is no prohibition nor penalty in federal, state, or local law for possession. Commented [PHLC23]: This exception was updated to reflect T21 and to limit the types of products allowed under this exception. Commented [PHLC24]: This provision is updated to align with state penalty changes. However, the state does not require criminal penalties so this provision could be removed. (ii) Second violation: A second violation of this chapter within any twenty feurthirty- six-month period shall be punishable by a civil penalty of $600400.00 and a three- day suspension of the license. (iii) Subsequent violation: A third or subsequent violation of this chapter within any z urthirty-six-month period shall be punishable by revocation of the license for one year plus a civil penalty of $1,000.00800:00. D. ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL PENALTIES; INDIVIDUALS: An individual, age 21 and older, who sells a regulated product to a person under the age of 21 yearsmayIbe charged an administrative penalty of $50. E. HEARING: Following receipt of a notice of a violation and penalty issued under this section, the license holder or individual may pay the penalty or request a hearing before the City Council. A request for a hearing shall be made by the individual or license holder in writing and filed with the city administrator or designee within ten days of the mailing of the notice of the alleged violation. Following receipt of a written request for hearing, the individual or license holder shall be afforded an opportunity for a hearing before the council. F. FINDINGS: If after the hearing the license holder or individual is found in violation of this chapter, the council shall impose a penalty. Based upon the findings, the penalty may be adjusted at the discretion of the council. The decision that a violation has occurred must be in writing. G. DEFAULT: If the individual or license holder has been provided written notice of the violation and if no request for a hearing is filed within the ten-day period, then the civil penalty, suspension or revocation imposed in this chapter shall take immediate effect by default. The city administrator or designee shall mail notice of the fine, suspension, or revocation to the individual or license holder. 3-6-11: SEVERABILITY If any section or provision of this chapter is held invalid, such invalidity will not affect other sections or provisions that can be given force and effect without the invalidated section or provision. Adopted by the Lauderdale City Council this 23rd day of October, 2018. Published by title and summary in the Roseville Review this 20'h day of November, 2018. 536406v1 DTA LAI 35-3 9 Commented [PHLC25]: These updates reflect the state minimum penalties: increased penalties and 36 -month lookback. The state minimum requires a 7 -day suspension of the license upon a third violation so this ordinance is stronger by requiring revocation for a year upon a third violation. Local jurisdictions may have stronger penalties than the state minimums and the City could consider a permanent revocation upon a 4th violation. Commented [PHLC26]: State law does not require a $50 penalty so this provision could be amended to be permissive, instead of required. Page4: [1] Commented [PHLC11] Public Health Law Center 10/30/2020 11:42:00 AM Fees provide revenue for the administration and enforcement of the ordinance and for retailer and community education. Periodic review and adjustment of licensing fees will ensure that they are sufficient to cover all administration, implementation, and enforcement costs, including compliance checks. Our publication, Retail License Fees, provides more information about retail licensing fees and a license fee checklist. LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action X Resolution Work Session Meeting Date November 24, 2020 ITEM NUMBER Skating Rinks COVID-19 Policy & Hiring Seasonal Help STAFF INITIAL Jim APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Staff have been preparing for the winter skating season. As discussed in September, staff propose hiring seasonal staff to flood and maintain the rinks but not open the warming house to the public. The proposed rate of pay for rink maintenance is $15.00 per hour. If that rate doesn't generate applicants, staff request the ability to increase the rate of pay. The City Council asked staff to draft written COVID-19 guidance for all facets of city oper- ations. A draft of the plan for the skating rinks follows. OPTIONS: 1) Approve the Skating Rinks COVID-19 Policy and authorize staff to hire seasonal per- sonnel to flood and maintain the rinks as presented . 2) Amend the Skating Rinks COVID-19 Policy and/or the plan to hire seasonal personnel. 3) Do no approve the Skating Rinks COVID-19 Policy and/or the hiring plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to approve the 2020-2021 Skating Rinks COVID-19 Policy and authorize staff to hire seasonal personnel to flood and maintain the rinks as presented . 2020 — 2021 Skating Rinks COVID-19 Policy The following COVID-19 safety protocols are necessary to enable the opening of the City's skating rinks. The policies are in effect at Lauderdale Community Park until further notice: 1. Staff will recruit and hire temporary, seasonal employees to flood/maintain the rinks and turn on/off the rink lights. 2. The rinks will be open from 8 a.m. until 10 p.m. daily. 3. The warming house will not be open to the public due to social distancing guidelines and restrictions. 4. Staff will set up exterior spaces for people to put their skates on if it can be done safety. 5. Staff will arrange for a portable restroom with at least two cleaning per week by the contractor if the need arises. 6. At -risk persons. All persons who are at risk of severe illness from COVID-19, as defined by Executive Order 20-55, are strongly urged to stay at home or in their place of residence and follow the provisions of Executive Order 20-55. 7. All rink activities will comply with the Governor's Executive Orders, including, but not limited to, Executive Order No. 20-99. Approved: November 24, 2020 By: Mary Gaasch, Mayor By: Heather Butkowski, City Administrator City of Lauderdale 11/24/2020 Warming House COVID Policy LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date November 24, 2020 ITEM NUMBER STAFF INITIAL APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR 2021 Fund Budgets & CIP DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Following is the proposed CIP for 2021. The expenses are reflected in the updated fund budgets. Staff are still working on the proposed utility rates for 2021. Updates will be available before the meeting. Also included are the proposed tax rates and levy impacts for Ramsey County. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: CITY OF LAUDERDALE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2021-2030 Adopted December 8, 2020 CITY OF LAUDERDALE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT SUMMARY BY YEAR AND FUNDING SOURCE LU Lu r 4-1 M 0 ct N 0 LO N N L!) N 0 o O o O 0 0 0 0 0 LA' O l!1 O O .zr m v ,r 1 O O 0 O 0 O ! O N O c -I N N ii -F VT 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O NN d' r�-I d' ars 0 0 0 N _m 0 0 CI- U mU .O m u j 01 @ 01 i— 0) O 'O m 4-' O >, Y0 N O v 0 a o a' ° a It i 01 CO t O C 'gyp N z....-._ ,., C K -(3, O) CO ▪ 0. O a-, Q m U CO -OI— '6 U '6 01 m a) g C i U C C _ K ▪ .2c. m 0 N O C CO p m Le - cc m a ,v 'a -a _0 LL -o -, o n o 00 �' b.0 N O O cN-i O O 40 O ‘,0,,r. a a O °c0 a o 5 a _ C C V) v U N N C ,. ' C J 0) _ 0) m 01 .__I co m 0 O1 U U To E O C 0 t- C S N 'NQ 0 m V. m 0) +'' 0 3 > w m O 01 01 0) 0) 0) Q) U 0 v) � cn (9 U K v) v) cc v) v) N N N N N N N (NI N N Public Works Garage - Roof Replacement 2026 Replace 2016 Ford F350 Truck and Plow 0 0 N 2028 Mill and Overlay City Streets CITY OF LAUDERDALE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY 0 M 0 N m N O N 0 0 O Lt N O N O N rn 0 N N N O N 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 Ln oo 0 0 Loi r; t 0 0 N M h 0 0 LD .-I CO LD m .-1 N t/) tn- in- in- in- in- M. m rn 00 LD t/} co N o O0 O 00 d' LD 0 00 0 N. 0 .-1 Ln 00 .-I LD to tn. m LnN 00 LD 0 CO 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 .--1 0 0 o O dt LD V1 d' O O 0 d' 0 O 0 0 1-1 O In O Irl 00 O N d N LD d' .-1 226 Communications 0 0 uu 0 0 0 Ln Orn o 0 O r` R O O N LD In 00 .-1 t/y t/? t/} t/i t/} General Capital o wzr 403 Street Improvement 404 Park Improvement 414 Development 602 Sanitary Sewer 603 Storm Water to m rn m LD 1f) N m vi N N .-▪ i LD LD t/ - N O .-i 00 O .--I t/} CO r. --1 00 00 t/} m Ln N 1b LD 00 cn ci W Q1 N t/? CO .-▪ I 00 00 m LD N m t/r GRAND TOTAL CITY OF LAUDERDALE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FUND 226 - COMMUNICATIONS 0 M 0 N Ql N 0 N CO N 0 N O N tG N ccO N O N N 0 fV M N O N N 0 N ei O N t/} t/} t/? O 0 O 0 N N Council Chambers Technology CITY OF LAUDERDALE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FUND 401- GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 0 C1) 0 N 01 0 N 00 0 N N fV O N lC re0 N W >- lA N 0 N N 0 N m N O N cV 0 N e -i N 0 N 1— LU - W O a -t1). 0 f)- 0 0 0 N O O O Lf1 ci tf) t/) - t/? O O O th tf? t1} -(1)- O O O O O O O O �VA O O O O O p O a u a C h 0 @ 0 CL U N a) U Lf1 li m (0 it a) pa o ct w 0 LI) Ul a) o `m` a) a) a) a) >° = v 5 -p °° "° > v ° -0 u_ a) a) a) u, a) (o 0 NI.i t V _c _c = (I) c-1 if) 0 in -Q v) v) >` "0 0 i 0 L = L 0 s- :}"' a"' (1) N co N co a co N to 0 a) a) v v a) a) a) a) a) y i C U ! U % U T U >-- Fa' ...1 .0 Q N O N 0 ra N oo 4 O cC cC cC CC cL 1- CITY OF LAUDERDALE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FUND 403 - STREET IMPROVEMENT a, N 0 N W N 0 N N 0 N Lt 0 N N 0 N M N 0 tV fV N 0 N 0 N V W 6 cca N N Eustis/Malvern Street Alley Improvements Roselawn & Eustis Street Reconstruction 0 N c � a) O {J U a) z 73 ) a) o c w @ • (a VI J O Q I - a` )i 0 t/> O O O Lt N e -i CITY OF LAUDERDALE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FUND 404 - PARK IMPROVEMENT 0 0 (NI 0 CO 0 CNI N rJ 0 0 4:t uJ Lt 0 twv 0 eN4 if} 41} if} -V} Skyview Park Improvements Community Park Improvements CITY OF LAUDERDALE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FUND 414 - Development 0 M O N t--- r - M m C1 Ol Q1 N 0 N ttDD LMO N 00 m N Lrl O D N t $ 66,714 $ 65,325 N N O 0 t0 c-1 e -I N N LID LO a W ›- 00 00 Lf) c-1 e -I rq 06' 0 N CD t1:106 Ln - 01 M d' N N N 06 0:ii N LO t0 00 00 cn Q1 M c -I `-1 N O LLD LO N rrf M t f. N (-1 -1 N UD LO Ce l0 Lf) Lf1 r1 Ol 01 (.0 t^O N GO2019A Debt Service Contribution CITY OF LAUDERDALE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FUND 602 - SANITARY SEWER O 0 N O1 N 0 00 N 0 N N 0 N N 0 cc W Lf9 N 0 N Cf N 0 M N 0 N N N 0 a-1 N 0 N th t/} t/} t/} ifY t/} t/} i/)• Sewer Lining Project Sewer Lining Project O O O O -1 CITY OF LAUDERDALE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FUND 603 - STORM WATER 0 M 0 N Ol N 0 N 00 N 0 N N N 0 N tD i cc 0 Q W 111 N 0 N 0 N M [V 0 N N N 0 N N 0 N tn. O O O O d' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O tri O Li) ct m Invasive Species Management Seminary Pond Project Gasperre Pond Dredging t/? t /f th O O O O ct th O O O O O O O O 00 i/? CITY OF LAUDERDALE TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT PLAN 2020-2029 (Department 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Funding Source(s) 0) c i a) o 1 E; V C (L 0) c L a) o 1 O -0 c LL 0) c m a) 0 I O V cc U. 0) c L a) 0 I O 'D (.(_ 0) c i a) 0 I O 'D c U. 0) c m a) 0 i O 0 c (L 0) c iL a) 0 I O 'D c U. 0) c i a) 0 I O "D C U. O O O 0 O O 0 0 N-- 0 O 0 0 O O N- 0 0 0 O 0 O 1.- 0 0 0 0 00 O 0 O O 0 00 O 0) CO J O O 00 O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O 00 O 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O T 0 0 0 0 0 0 O r 0) N N a) -J 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O 0 O O O C- O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 Q O O O . Er E 'D Q _O_ >, 0 L O lL6 ( �_ E 6 "', c ((00 rn (1) Y L > o•o a) 0 L O c o O YY o ..Q : 0_ a) C C a) c N o .y .8 D 0_ N c o U 2 u (0 2 _ T 0 a) (0 U o (6 •U c D O 0 0 U (0 2 > _ 0 O O O O O O O O O N O O O N O O O O O O N -Jw Q W O 0 1— Z Computers are replaced on 4 -year schedule. Copier is leased on 4 -year schedule. CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 2021 2018 2019 2020 Fund Fund Title Actual Adopted Proposed 226 COMMUNICATIONS $ 18,417 $ 20,040 $ 19,100 227 RECYCLING $ 53,861 $ 42,215 $ 42,215 TOTAL REVENUES $ 72,277 $ 62,255 $ 61,315 226 COMMUNICATIONS $ 18,785 $ 18,257 $ 18,212 227 RECYCLING $ 57,011 $ 63,302 $ 64,813 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 75,795 $ 81,559 $ 83,025 CITY OF LAUDERDALE COMMUNICATIONS 2021 Account Number 226-00000-410-31810 226-00000-410-36210 226-49840-410-41010 226-49840-410-41210 226-49840-410-41220 226-49840-410-41225 226-49840-410-41250 226-49840-410-41310 226-49840-410-41320 226-49840-410-41330 226-49840-410-41340 226-49840-410-41510 226-49840-410-42020 226-49840-410-43130 226-49840-410-44160 226-49840-410-44370 226-49840-410-45700 Account Description FRANCHISE TAX INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS TOTAL REVENUES FULL TIME EMPLOYEES PERA FICA MEDICARE DEFERRED COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE PERSONNEL COMPUTER SERVICES (WEBSITE) SUPPLIES SPECIAL PROGRAMS RENTS & LEASES (CABLE COMM FEE) MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES OFFICE EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2019 Actual 2020 Adopted 2021 Proposed $ 18,119 $ 20,000 $ 19,000 $ 298 $ 40 $ 100 $ 18,417 $ 20,040 $ 19,100 $ 6,615 $ 6,857 $ $ 494 $ 514 $ $ 419 $ 425 $ $ 98 $ 99 $ $ 136 $ 100 $ $ 1,132 $ 1,087 $ $ 46 $ 50 $ $ 26 $ 30 $ $ 34 $ 40 $ $ 56 $ 55 $ $ 9,057 $ 9,257 $ $ 650 $ 700 $ 7,063 530 438 102 150 1,157 50 30 35 57 9,612 $ 650 $ 700 $ $ 3,494 $ 3,200 $ $ 4,601 $ 5,000 $ $ 983 $ 100 $ $ 9,078 $ 8,300 $ 3,500 5,000 100 8,600 $ 18,785 $ 18,257 $ 18,212 REVENUES OVER/UNDER EXPENDITURES $ (368) $ 1,783 $ 888 CITY OF LAUDERDALE RECYCLING 2021 Account Number 227-00000-430-33620 227-00000-430-36101 227-00000-430-36102 227-00000-430-36210 227-43245-430-41010 227-43245-430-41210 227-43245-430-41220 227-43245-430-41225 227-43245-430-41250 227-43245-430-41310 227-43245-430-41320 227-43245-430-41330 227-43245-430-41340 227-43245-430-41510 227-43245-430-42110 227-43245-430-42115 227-43245-430-43130 227-43245-430-43430 227-43245-430-44330 Account Description COUNTY GRANTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS -COUNTY PENALTIES & INTEREST INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS TOTAL REVENUES FULL TIME EMPLOYEES PERA FICA MEDICARE DEFERRED COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE PERSONNEL GENERAL SUPPLIES MEETING EXPENSES SUPPLIES RECYCLING CONTRACTOR ADVERTISING - OTHER DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES OVER/UNDER EXPENDITURES 2019 2020 2021 Actual Adopted Proposed $ 5,742 $ 5,900 $ 5,900 $ 46,153 $ 35,115 $ 35,115 $ 103 $ - $ - $ 1,863 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 53,861 $ 42,215 $ 42,215 17,109 $ 1,278 $ 1,086 $ 254 $ 318 $ 6,105 $ 116 $ 87 $ 85 $ 144 $ 26,582 $ $ $ 17,616 $ 18,145 1,321 $ 1,361 1,092 $ 1,125 255 $ 263 250 $ 330 2,845 $ 2,925 120 $ 120 90 $ 90 100 $ 90 141 $ 145 23,830 $ 24,594 - $ $ $ 30,098 $ $ 331 $ 30,429 $ 57,011 $ - $ 39,122 $ 39,869 - $ 350 $ 350 39,472 $ 40,219 63,302 $ 64,813 $ (3,150) $ (21,087) $ (22,598) CITY OF LAUDERDALE DEBT SERVICE FUNDS 2021 2019 2020 2021 Fund Fund Title Actual Adopted Proposed 305 GO TIF REVENUE BONDS 2018A $ 632 $ 500 $ 500 306 GO IMPROVEMENT BONDS 2019A $ 101,597 $ 127,938 $ 126,563 TOTAL REVENUES $ 102,228 $ 128,438 $ 127,063 305 GO TIF REVENUE BONDS 2018A $ 32,041 $ 25,253 $ 25,728 306 GO IMPROVEMENT BONDS 2019A $ $ 23,865 $ 121,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 32,041 $ 49,118 $ 146,728 CITY OF LAUDERDALE DEBT SERVICE - 1795 EUSTIS STREET/ GO TIF REVENUE BONDS 2018A 2021 2019 2020 2021 Account Number Account Description Actual Adopted Proposed 305-00000-462-36210 305-00000-462-39200 305-47000-462-39300 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS TRANSFER IN BONDS PROCEEDS TOTAL REVENUES $ 632 $ 500 $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ $ 632 $ 500 $ 500 500 305-47000-462-43090 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 475 $ - $ 475 305-47000-462-47110 BOND PRINCIPAL $ - $ - $ - 305-47000-462-47210 BOND INTEREST $ 31,566 $ 25,253 $ 25,253 OTHER FINANCING $ 32,041 $ 25,253 $ 25,728 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 32,041 $ 25,253 $ 25,728 REVENUES OVER/UNDER EXPENDITURES $ (31,409) $ (24,753) $ (25,228) CITY OF LAUDERDALE DEBT SERVICE - GO IMPROVEMENT BONDS 2019A 2021 Account Number 306-00000-430-36210 306-00000-450-36101 306-00000-450-36102 306-00000-450-36103 306-00000-462-39200 306-47000-462-39300 306-47000-462-43090 306-47000-462-47110 306-47000-462-47210 Account Description INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT -COUNTY PENALTIES AND INTEREST DELINQUENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS TRANSFER IN BONDS PROCEEDS TOTAL REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BOND PRINCIPAL BOND INTEREST OTHER FINANCING TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES OVER/UNDER EXPENDITURES 2019 Actual 2020 Adopted 2020 Proposed $ 477 $ 100 $ 300 $ 88,130 $ 42,451 $ 42,451 $ - $ 17,617 $ 15,856 $ $ $ $ - $ 67,769 $ 67,956 $ 12,990 $ $ - $ 101,597 $ 127,938 $ 126,563 - $ - $ 475 $ - $ 100,000 $ 23,865 $ 21,000 $ 23,865 $ 121,000 - $ 23,865 $ 121,000 $ 101,597 $ 104,073 $ 5,563 CITY OF LAUDERDALE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS 2021 2019 2020 2021 Fund Fund Title Actual Adopted Proposed 401 GENERAL CAPITAL $ 34,731 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 403 STREET CAPITAL $ 1,786,760 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 404 PARK CAPITAL $ 5,580 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 405 ROSEHILL TAX INCREMENT $ 484 $ - $ - 414 DEVELOPMENT $ 44,704 $ 42,000 $ 4,000 415 HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT $ 10,412 $ - $ - TOTAL REVENUES $ 1,882,670 $ 51,500 $ 13,500 401 GENERAL CAPITAL $ - $ 85,000 $ 20,000 402 STREET CAPITAL $ 2,535,308 $ $ 404 PARK CAPITAL $ 1,232 $ 65,000 $ 7,500 405 ROSEHILL TAX INCREMENT $ 991 $ $ - 414 DEVELOPMENT $ 2,260 $ 67,769 $ 67,956 415 HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT $ 115 $ $ - TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 2,539,906 $ 217,769 $ 95,456 CITY OF LAUDERDALE GENERAL CAPITAL 2021 Account Number 2019 2020 2020 Account Description Actual Adopted Proposed 401-00000-410-33422 OTHER STATE GRANTS & AIDS $ $ $ 401-00000-410-36200 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ $ $ 401-00000-410-36210 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS $ 2,731 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 401-00000-410-39200 TRANSFER IN $ 32,000 $ - $ TOTAL REVENUES $ 34,731 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 401-41940-410-44370 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $ - $ - $ OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES $ $ - $ 401-41940-410-45300 IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDINGS $ - $ 75,000 $ 20,000 401-41940-410-45400 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $ $ 10,000 $ CAPITAL OUTLAY $ $ 85,000 $ 20,000 401-41940-410-47200 TRANSFER OUT $ $ - $ OTHER FINANCING $ - $ - $ TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ - $ 85,000 $ 20,000 REVENUES OVER/UNDER EXPENDITURES $ 34,731 $ (83,500) $ (18,500) CITY OF LAUDERDALE STREET CAPITAL 2021 Account Number 403-00000-430-33422 403-00000-430-36200 403-00000-430-36210 403-00000-430-39200 403-47000-430-39300 403-47000-430-39320 403-43121-430-43030 403-43121-430-45300 403-43121-430-47200 403-47000-430-47600 Account Description OTHER STATE GRANTS & AIDS OTHER MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS TRANSFER IN BOND PROCEEDS BOND PREMIUM TOTAL REVENUES ENGINEERING IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDINGS CAPITAL OUTLAY TRANSFER OUT ISSUANCE COSTS OTHER FINANCING TOTAL EXPENDITURES REVENUES OVER/UNDER EXPENDITURES 2019 Actual $ $ $ 753,332 $ $ 23,086 $ $ - $ $ 987,010 $ $ 23,332 $ $ 1,786,760 $ $ 352,592 $ 2,146,967 $ 2,499,558 2020 Adopted - $ $ 4,000 $ - $ $ - $ 4,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 35,750 $ $ 35,750 $ $ 2,535,308 $ 2021 Proposed 4,000 4,000 $ (748,548) $ 4,000 $ 4,000 CITY OF LAUDERDALE PARK CAPITAL 2021 Account Number 404-00000-450-36200 404-00000-450-36210 404-00000-450-36230 404-00000-450-36250 404-0000-450-39200 404-45200-450-42410 404-45200-450-43030 404-45200-450-45100 404-45200-450-45200 404-45200-450-45300 404-45200-450-45400 404-45200-450-47200 Account Description OTHER MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS CONTRIBUTIONS & DONATIONS PARKLAND FEES TRANSFER IN TOTAL REVENUES MINOR EQUIPMENT & TOOLS OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES ENGINEERING FEES LAND BUILDING & IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDINGS MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT CAPITAL OUTLAY TRANSFER OUT OTHER FINANCING TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2019 Actual 2020 Adopted - $ - $ 5,580 $ 4,000 $ $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ 2020 Proposed 4,000 5,580 $ 4,000 $ $ $ 4,000 $ - $ $ - $ $ 1,232 $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ $ 65,000 $ $ $ - $ $ 1,232 $ 65,000 $ $ $ 7,500 $ $ 7,500 $ - $ $ 1,232 $ 65,000 $ 7,500 REVENUES OVER/UNDER EXPENDITURES $ 4,348 $ (61,000) $ (3,500) CITY OF LAUDERDALE DEVELOPMENT 2021 2019 2020 2020 Account Number Account Description Actual Adopted Proposed 414-00000-462-36200 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE $ 0 $ $ 414-00000-462-36210 INVESTMENT INTEREST $ 6,704 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 414-00000-462-36230 DONATIONS $ $ $ 414-00000-462-39200 TRANSFER IN $ 38,000 $ 38,000 $ TOTAL REVENUES $ 44,704 $ 42,000 $ 4,000 414-46500-462-44370 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $ 1,556 $ - $ 414-46500-462-45300 IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDINGS $ 704 $ - $ 414-46500-462-47200 TRANSFER OUT $ - $ 67,769 $ 67,956 OTHER FINANCING $ 2,260 $ 67,769 $ 67,956 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 2,260 $ 67,769 $ 67,956 REVENUES OVER/UNDER EXPENDITURES $ 42,444 $ (25,769) $ (63,956) CITY OF LAUDERDALE ENTERPRISE FUNDS 2021 2019 2020 2021 Fund Fund Title Actual Adopted Proposed 602 SANITARY SEWER $ 352,033 $ 302,216 $ 302,016 603 STORM WATER $ 119,101 $ 113,838 $ 113,838 TOTAL REVENUES $ 471,134 $ 416,054 $ 415,854 602 SANITARY SEWER $ 342,936 $ 308,971 $ 408,873 603 STORM WATER $ 95,577 $ 176,572 $ 170,663 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 438,513 $ 485,543 $ 579,536 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SANITARY SEWER 2021 Account Number 602-00000-000-33422 602-00000-000-33439 602-00000-000-36210 602-00000-000-37210 602-00000-000-37290 602-00000-000-39101 602-00000-000-39110 602-49410-000-41290 602-49450-000-41010 602-49450-000-41020 602-49450-000-41190 602-49450-000-41195 602-49450-000-41210 602-49450-000-41220 602-49450-000-41225 602-49450-000-41250 602-49450-000-41310 602-49450-000-41320 602-49450-000-41330 602-49450-000-41340 602-49450-000-41510 602-49450-000-42110 602-49450-000-42120 602-49450-000-42130 602-49450-000-42170 602-49450-000-42210 602-49450-000-42220 602-49450-000-42240 602-49450-000-42410 602-49450-000-43010 602-49450-000-43030 602-49450-000-43090 602-49450-000-43140 602-49450-000-43210 602-49450-000-43310 602-49450-000-43430 602-49450-000-43610 602-49450-000-43820 602-49450-000-43850 602-49450-000-44040 602-49450-000-44060 602-49450-000-44160 Account Description OTHER STATE GRANTS & AIDS PERA Pension Other Revenue INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS SEWER CHARGES SEWER ACCESS CHARGES SALE OF CAPITAL ASSETS GAIN ON DISPOSAL TOTAL REVENUES PENSION EXPENSE PENSION FULL TIME EMPLOYEES OVERTIME OTHER PAY COMP ABSENCES/OPEB PERA FICA MEDICARE DEFERRED COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE PERSONNEL GENERAL SUPPLIES MOTOR FUELS LUBRICANTS & ADDITIVES SAFETY EQUIPMENT VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT PARTS TIRES STREET MAINTENANCE MATERIALS MINOR EQUIPMENT & TOOLS SUPPLIES AUDITING & ACCOUNTING SERVICES ENGINEERING EXPERT & PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRAINING & EDUCATION TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH TRAVEL EXPENSE ADVERTISING - OTHER INSURANCE & BONDS WATER UTILITIES SEWER - MET COUNCIL VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS LAUNDRY SERVICES RENTS & LEASES 2019 Actual $ 23,846 $ 96 $ 20,034 $ 308,056 $ - $ $ $ 352,033 2020 Adopted $ - $ 300 $ 16,000 $ 285,916 $ - $ $ $ 302,216 $ 2,256 $ $ 2,256 $ $ 55,910 $ 54,589 $ 886 $ $ - $ $ - $ - $ 4,037 $ 4,094 $ 3,952 $ 3,385 $ 924 $ 792 $ 5,956 $ 5,453 $ 2,268 $ 2,200 $ 139 $ 175 $ 652 $ 775 $ 227 $ 250 $ 3,605 $ 3,317 $ 78,557 $ 75,030 $ 3,939 $ $ 0 $ $ 3,835 $ $ 780 $ $ 195 $ $ $ $ - $ $ 3,711 $ $ 88 $ $ 160,918 $ $ - $ $ 668 $ $ - $ 2021 Proposed $ $ 100 $ 16,000 $ 285,916 $ $ $ $ 302,016 $ $ $ 56,305 $ $ $ $ 4,223 $ 3,491 $ 816 $ 5,883 $ 2,300 $ 150 $ 670 $ 240 $ 3,422 $ 77,500 100 $ 700 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 800 $ 3,000 10,000 7,000 850 250 100 3,000 150 157,691 1,000 700 800 800 4,000 5,000 4,000 800 225 100 4,000 150 150,798 1,000 700 602-49450-000-44200 DEPRECIATION $ 56,573 $ - $ 602-49450-000-44330 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS $ 931 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 602-49450-000-44370 MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES $ 7,772 $ 7,500 $ 7,900 602-49450-000-44390 TAXES & LICENSES $ - $ 700 $ 700 602-49450-000-44450 CLAIMS & DAMAGES $ - $ - $ OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES $ 239,410 $ 193,141 $ 180,573 602-49450-000-45300 IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDINGS $ (0) $ 40,000 $ 150,000 602-49450-000-45500 VEHICLES $ - $ $ CAPITAL OUTLAY $ (0) $ 40,000 $ 150,000 602-49450-000-47200 TRANSFER OUT $ 22,000 $ - $ OTHER FINANCING $ 22,000 $ - $ TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 342,936 $ 308,971 $ 408,873 REVENUES OVER/UNDER EXPENDITURES $ 9,097 $ (6,755) $ (106,857) CITY OF LAUDERDALE STORM WATER 2021 Account Number 603-00000-000-33422 603-00000-000-33439 603-00000-000-36210 603-00000-000-37170 603-00000-000-39200 603-49410-000-41290 603-49500-000-41010 603-49500-000-41020 603-49500-000-41190 603-49500-000-41195 603-49500-000-41210 603-49500-000-41220 603-49500-000-41225 603-49500-000-41250 603-49500-000-41310 603-49500-000-41320 603-49500-000-41330 603-49500-000-41340 603-49500-000-41510 603-49500-000-42110 603-49500-000-42120 603-49500-000-42160 603-49500-000-42170 603-49500-000-42210 603-49500-000-42220 603-49500-000-42410 603-49500-000-43010 603-49500-000-43030 603-49500-000-43090 603-49500-000-43140 603-49450-000-43210 603-49500-000-43310 603-49500-000-43510 603-49500-000-43610 603-49500-000-44040 603-49500-000-44060 603-49500-000-44200 603-49500-000-44330 603-49500-000-44370 Account Description OTHER STATE GRANTS & AIDS PERA PENSION OTHER REVENUE INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS STORM WATER CHARGES TRANSFER IN TOTAL REVENUES PENSION EXPENSE PENSION FULL TIME EMPLOYEES OVERTIME OTHER PAY COMP ABSENCES/OPEB PERA FICA MEDICARE DEFERRED COMPENSATION HEALTH INSURANCE DENTAL INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE DISABILITY INSURANCE WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE PERSONNEL GENERAL SUPPLIES MOTOR FUELS CHEMICALS & CHEMICAL PRODUCTS SAFETY EQUIPMENT VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT PARTS TIRES MINOR EQUIPMENT & TOOLS SUPPLIES AUDITING & ACCOUNTING SERVICES ENGINEERING EXPERT & PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRAINING & EDUCATION TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH TRAVEL EXPENSE LEGAL NOTICES PUBLISHING INSURANCE & BONDS VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT REPAIRS LAUNDRY SERVICES DEPRECIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES 2019 Actual $ $ $ 82 $ $ 8,117 $ $ 110,902 $ $ $ $ 119,101 $ 113,838 2020 Adopted 2020 Proposed - $ 4,500 $ 4,500 109,338 $ 109,338 $ 113,838 $ 1,490 $ - $ $ 1,490 $ - $ $ 47,376 $ 46,465 $ 47,921 $ 709 $ - $ $ $ $ $ $ - $ $ 3,432 $ 3,485 $ 3,594 $ 3,332 $ 2,881 $ 2,971 $ 779 $ 674 $ 695 $ 4,804 $ 4,700 $ 4,900 $ 2,190 $ 1,861 $ 2,046 $ 116 $ 110 $ 125 $ 541 $ 600 $ 550 $ 195 $ 220 $ 200 $ 2,907 $ 2,676 $ 2,761 $ 66,381 $ 63,672 $ 65,763 $ - $ - $ $ 713 $ 750 $ $ - $ - $ $ $ - $ $ - $ $ $ $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ 713 $ 750 $ $ 3,939 $ 3,000 $ $ 39 $ 10,000 $ $ 8,335 $ 7,500 $ $ - $ 300 $ $ 195 $ 300 $ $ $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ 640 $ 1,400 $ $ $ 400 $ $ 668 $ 750 $ $ - $ - $ $ 1,853 $ 2,000 $ $ 1,324 $ 1,500 $ 750 750 4,000 5,000 9,000 300 250 1,000 400 700 2,000 1,500 603-49500-000-44390 TAXES & LICENSES $ $ - $ OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES $ 16,993 $ 27,150 $ 24,150 603-49500-000-45300 IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDINGS $ $ 85,000 $ 80,000 CAPITAL OUTLAY $ $ 85,000 $ 80,000 603-49450-000-47200 TRANSFER OUT $ 10,000 $ - $ OTHER FINANCING $ 10,000 $ - $ TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 95,577 $ 176,572 $ 170,663 REVENUES OVER/UNDER EXPENDITURES $ 23,524 $ (62,734) $ (56,825) Estimated Change From 2020 Total Tax ti 0 v,r" f i i r N N o r. r N 1. t N et 0 7 7 c{ v- 0 r , 1 CO N h co ct 000 a~- ., .,1 134 I ti et 000 O e- CO N ti d' 0; t9 00 M i Estimated % Change in Tax on Median Valued Home County City School Other Total 0 0 M cr C. 7p \ N o 0 \ M 0 0 0 00 7 7 0 0 0 M c}. O O9 7 0 Ce) M 0 0 N t` O 7' 0 \\ CD 06 LO r o o r O "Cr C'..1; \ ' N \0 CO r 0 0 O N c CV 1 0 to l- 0 0 0 M N r 0 Nr l; 0 li 0 o O O �- �- i i 0 (0 M i 3.4% 0 d' 0 1 0 0 N ti 0 0 1 i 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0 W O 0 0 0 0) �- 0 F' r N N 4.7% 0 0 CO CO r `- i i 0 ,- d' 0 N r 0 0 O O N N 0 M �' 0 0 01 'Cr p 0 i 0 f- 0 -3.4% O O h- h- LO O O r- OO d 1.8% o N- C) d 7 1.6% 1.5% - 0.6% 0 f- 0 0) N O M - 2.5% 0.9% o 0) N - 6.6% - 1.7% o v" N O CO id o o () (1.51V. o M CO 0 0 7 O I 0 to N 0 0) CO 0 0 0) 0) CO CO e. co O -3.7% 1.8% -0.8% -0.8% 0 0 0 (0 (0 C0 0 0 0 0 N 0� ° �- r- q O 00 07 0) 00 0p 0 ti 0� (0. (0 7 7 o O 4 0 to. 7, 0 0 to td) N N r 0 0 0) 0) 0 0 0 (0 4 0� Q) 0 0 N. N- I 0 0 tC) 0 t0 O 0 CO r- 0 0 r- r- M M 0 0 0 N N N N N N 0 to I 0 0 0) Cr) r- r- 0 0 N N r- r- 0 CO O 0 0 t0 In U) ti) 0 f-- O 00 r O 0 CO C0 to In 0 0) 1. -2.8% -2.8% 0 r- M1to 0 CO Payable 2020 Payable 2021 % Change City Median City Median in Median City School Estimated Value Estimated Value Value \ 0 r- = V 3.7% \ 0 r• cd o" 0 1() (0 5.5% \ 0 N = = C0 o" 0 O 4 \ 0 (.0 = (0 \ 0 O = f� 7.3% \ 0 N = M \ 0 0) h.: \o 0 0 00 3.1% \ 0 0) O \ 0 N- c to 5.3% 1 \ 0 0) N $387, 500 314,600 OO (0 co 232,400 293,000 1-- _ _ O co N 250,750 o co 0v cs) O 00o LO CO 230,000 280,600 332,850 215,800 336,450 245,800 310,000 O O (0 N O v.to til N O O N = CO M 63 303,450 O co Or M 0 co N 277,800 245,400 241,000 O0 co_ - CO0 N 609,400 214,300 0 O_ - - N 308,550 0 00 0) r 326,300 0 t� CO d' N O N 0)) 0S N 243,100 0 0 CO N r• CO CO (0 0) Z C Q Falcon Heights 623 'Gem Lake 624 CO CO N 2 o -J Little Canada 623 624 Maplewood 622 623 624 'Mounds View 621 New Brighton 282 621 North Oaks 621 624 'North St. Paul 622 r- M CON (0 F > N I N N T C Q (/) (St. Paul 625 Shoreview 621 623 'Spring Lake Park 621 Vadnais Heights 621 624 'White Bear Lake 624 White Bear Town 624 PAYABLE 2021 PROPOSED TAX RATES MUNICIPALITY & SCH. DIST & W/S DIST. CODE CITY OR TOWN (1) COUNTY (2) SCHOOLS (3) MISC (4) TOTAL LOCAL TAX RATE (5) MARKET TAX RATE ARDEN HILLS 621 (R) 2517 25.283% 47.708% 23.865% 7.815% 104.672% 0.25289% ARDEN HILLS 621 (R)(K) 2518 27.947% 47.708% 23.865% 7.815% 107.335% 0.25289% ARDEN HILLS 623 (R) 2537 25.283% 47.708% 31.222% 7.815% 112.028% 0,16867% BLAINE 621 (R) 2917 35.293% 47,708% 23.865% 8.519% 115.386% 0,25289% FAIRGROUNDS 623 (C) 3031 0.000% 47.708% 31.222% 8.576% 87.506% 0.16867% FAIRGROUNDS 625 (C) 3051 0.000% 47.708% 36,715% 8.576% 93.000% 0.17616% FALCON HEIGHTS 623 (C) 3331 37.922% 47.708% 31.222% 8.576% 125.428% 0.16867% FALCON HEIGHTS 623 (R) 3337 37.922% 47.708% 31.222% 7.815% 124.666% 0.16867% GEM LAKE 624 3740 36.446% 47.708% 37.194% 5.993% 127.341% 0.18021% GEM LAKE 624 (M)(NB) 3746 36.446% 47.708% 37.194% 8.952% 130.300% 0.18021% LAUDERDALE 623 (C) 4731 27,730% 47.708% 31.222% 8.576% 115,237% 0.16867% LAUDERDALE 623 (1) 4732 27.730% 47.708% 31.222% 7.110% 113.770% 0.16867% LAUDERDALE 623 (R) 4737 27.730% 47.708% 31.222% 7.815% 114.475% 0.16867% LITTLE CANADA 623 (M)(NB) 5336 24.065% 47.708% 31.222% 8.952% 111.948% 0.16867% LITTLE CANADA 624 (M)(NB) 5346 24,065% 47.708% 37.194% 8.952% 117.920% 0.18021% MAPLEWOOD 622 (M)(BC) 5725 41,988% 47.708% 31.804% 8.952% 130.453% 0.16758% MAPLEWOOD 622 (M)(NB) 5726 41.988% 47.708% 31.804% 8.952% 130.453% 0.16758% MAPLEWOOD 622 (V) 5729 41.988% 47.708% 31.804% 9.666% 131.166% 0,16758% MAPLEWOOD 623 5730 41.988% 47.708% 31.222% 5.993% 126.911% 0.16867% MAPLEWOOD 623 (C) 5731 41.988% 47.708% 31,222% 8.576% 129.495% 0.16867% MAPLEWOOD 623 (M)(NB) 5736 41.988% 47.708% 31,222% 8.952% 129.871% 0.16867% MAPLEWOOD 624 (M)(NB) 5746 41.988% 47.708% 37.194% 8.952% 135.843% 0.18021% MOUNDS VIEW 621 (R) 5917 35.565% 47.708% 23.865% 7.815% 114.954% 0.27743% NEW BRIGHTON 621 (R)(B) 6308 39.569% 47.708% 23,865% 7.815% 118.958% 0.25289% NEW BRIGHTON 621 (R) 6317 34.596% 47.708% 23.865% 7.815% 113.985% 0.25289% NEW BRIGHTON 621 (R)(D) 6318 37.822% 47.708% 23.865% 7,815% 117.211% 0.25289% NEW BRIGHTON 282 (R) 6387 34.596% 47.708% 31.647% 7.815% 121.766% 0.22320% NORTH OAKS 621 6710 11.765% 47.708% 23.865% 5.993% 89.332% 0.25289% NORTH OAKS 624 6740 11.765% 47.708% 37.194% 5.993% 102.660% 0.18021% NORTH ST. PAUL 622 (M)(NB) 6926 38.146% 47.708% 31.804% 11.840% 129.498% 0.20752% NORTH ST. PAUL 622 (V) 6929 38.146% 47.708% 31,804% 12.554% 130.212% 0.20752% ROSEVILLE 621 (R) 7917 37.235% 47.708% 23.865% 7.815% 116.624% 0.25289% ROSEVILLE 623 (M)(NB) 7936 37.235% 47.708% 31.222% 8.952% 125.117% 0.16867% ROSEVILLE 623 (C) 7931 37.235% 47.708% 31.222% 8.576% 124.741% 0.16867% ROSEVILLE 623 (R) 7937 37.235% 47.708% 31.222% 7.815% 123.980% 0.16867% ST. ANTHONY 282 (R) 8187 63.967% 47.708% 31.647% 9.471% 152.793% 0.22320% ST. PAUL (6) 625 (C) 151 45.019% 43.720% 36.603% 10.881% 136.223% 0.17616% ST, PAUL (6) 625 (1) 152 45.019% 43.720% 36.603% 9.414% 134.756% 0,17616% ST. PAUL (6) 625 (L) 154 45.019% 43.720% 36.603% 8.298% 133.640% 0.17616% ST. PAUL (6) 625 (M)(BC) 155 45.019% 43.698% 36.575% 11.257% 136.549% 0.17616% ST. PAUL(6) 625 (M)(NB) 156 45.019% 43.712% 36.595% 11.257% 136.583% 0.17616% ST. PAUL (Airport) 999 (L) 194 0.000% 43.809% 0.000% 8.298% 52,107% -- SHOREVIEW 621 (M)(NB) 8316 32,321% 47.708% 23.865% 9.586% 113.481% 0.25289% SHOREVIEW 621 (R) 8317 32.321% 47.708% 23.865% 8.448% 112,344% 0.25289% SHOREVIEW 623 (M)(NB) 8336 32.321% 47.708% 31.222% 9.586% 120,837% 0.16867% SHOREVIEW 623 (R) 8337 32.321% 47.708% 31.222% 8.448% 119,700% 0.16867% SPRING LAKE PARK 621 (R) 8517 44.925% 47.708% 23.865% 7.815% 124,314% 0.25289% VADNAIS HEIGHTS 621 8910 23.292% 47.708% 23.865% 5.993% 100.859% 0.25289% VADNAIS HEIGHTS 624 8940 23.292% 47.708% 37.194% 5.993% 114.187% 0.18021% VADNAIS HEIGHTS 624 (M)(NB) 8946 23.292% 47.708% 37.194% 8.952% 117,146% 0.18021% WHITE BEAR LAKE 622 (V) 9329 20.320% 47.708% 31.804% 9.666% 109.498% 0.16758% WHITE BEAR LAKE 624 9340 20,320% 47.708% 37.194% 5.993% 111.215% 0.18021% WHITE BEAR LAKE 624 (M)(NB) 9346 20.320% 47.708% 37.194% 8.952% 114.174% 0.18021% WHITE BEAR LAKE 624 (R) 9347 20,320% 47.708% 37.194% 7.815% 113.037% 0.18021% WHITE BEAR LAKE 624 (V) 9349 20.320% 47.708% 37.194% 9.666% 114.888% 0.18021% TOWN OF WHITE BEAR 621 (R) 9717 25,042% 47.708% 23.865% 7.815% 104.431% 0.25289% TOWN OF WHITE BEAR 624 9740 25.042% 47,708% 37.194% 5.993% 115.937% 0.18021% TOWN OF WHITE BEAR 624 (M)(NB) 9746 25.042% 47,708% 37.194% 8,952% 118.896% 0.18021% TOWN OF WHITE BEAR 624 (R) 9747 25.042% 47.708% 37.194% 7,815% 117.759% 0,18021%