Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/14/2021The City Council is meeting as a legislative body to conduct the business of the City according to Robert's Rules of Order and the Standing Rules of Order and Business of the City Council. Unless so ordered by the Mayoi, citizen participation is limited to the times indicated and always within the prescribed rules of conduct for public input at meetings. CALL TO ORDER THE LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVALS a. Agenda b. Minutes of the August 27, 2021 City Council Meeting c. Claims Totaling $99,637.64 4. CONSENT a. July Financial Report b. Pay Request No. 1 for the 2021 Seal Coat Project c. Performance. Agieement with Roseville Community Band 5. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS/RECOGNITIONS/PROCLAMATIONS 6. INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS / REPORTS a. Patricia Hoffman from the Roseville Area League of Women Voters b. September 20 Roseville Community Band Concert c. City Council Updates 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public hearings are conducted so that the public affected by a proposal may have input into the decision. During hearings all affected residents will be given an opportunity to speak pursuant to the Robert's Rules of Order and the standing rules of order and business of the City Council. 8. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM a. Waiver Request for Fences at 2367 Larpenteur Avenue b. Selection of a New Building Official c. 2022 Preliminary Levy and General Fund Budget 9. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 7:00 P.M. TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2021 Due to the coronavirus the city council is holding meetings by teleconference. The public may view the meeting on Lauderdale's public access channel 16 for cable subscribers or online at https://www.ctvnorthsuburbs.org/your-city/lauderdale/. The public may join the meeting using the login Instructions at the end of the agenda. The City Council is meeting as a legislative body to conduct the business of the City according to Robert's Rules of Order and the Standing Rules of Order and Business of the City Council. Unless so ordered by the Mayoi, citizen participation is limited to the times indicated and always within the prescribed rules of conduct for public input at meetings. CALL TO ORDER THE LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVALS a. Agenda b. Minutes of the August 27, 2021 City Council Meeting c. Claims Totaling $99,637.64 4. CONSENT a. July Financial Report b. Pay Request No. 1 for the 2021 Seal Coat Project c. Performance. Agieement with Roseville Community Band 5. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS/RECOGNITIONS/PROCLAMATIONS 6. INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS / REPORTS a. Patricia Hoffman from the Roseville Area League of Women Voters b. September 20 Roseville Community Band Concert c. City Council Updates 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public hearings are conducted so that the public affected by a proposal may have input into the decision. During hearings all affected residents will be given an opportunity to speak pursuant to the Robert's Rules of Order and the standing rules of order and business of the City Council. 8. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM a. Waiver Request for Fences at 2367 Larpenteur Avenue b. Selection of a New Building Official c. 2022 Preliminary Levy and General Fund Budget 9. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 10. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 11. SET AGENDA FOR NEXT MEETING a. Presentation by RAHS Assistant Superintendent, Melissa Sonnelc b. Steve Schwanke of Inland Development Group Regarding Development of Luther Seminary Property c. Set 2022 Preliminary Levy and Budgets 12. WORK SESSION a. Community Development Update b. Opportunity for the Public to Address the City Council Any member of the public may speak at this time on any item not on the agenda. In consideration for the public attending the meeting, this portion of the meeting will be limited to fifteen (15) minutes. Individuals are requested to limit their comments to four (4) minutes or less If the majority of the Council determines that additional time on a specific issue is warranted, then discussion on that issue shall be continued at the end of the agenda. Before addressing the City Council, members of the public are asked to step up to the microphone, give their name, address, and state the subject to be discussed. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to any member thereof. No person other than members of the Council and the person having the floor shall be permitted to entei any discussion without permission of the presiding officer. Your participation, as prescribed by the Robert's Rules of Order and the standing rules of order and business of the City Council, is welcomed and your cooperation is greatly appreciated. 13. ADJOURNMENT Meeting Login Instructions: You are invited to a Zoom webinar. When: Sep 14, 2021 07:00 PM Central Time (US and Canada) Topic: September 14, 2021 City Council Webinar Please click the link below to join the webinar: https://us02web zoom.us/J/89588851649?pwd=emNwQIRoWnewL3VJSWdSVVFkRiYvOTO9 Passcode 655715 Or One tap mobile : US +13126266799„89588851649# or +16465588656„89588851649# Or Telephone: Dial(foi higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): TTS: +1 312 626 6799 or +1 646 558 8656 or +1 301 715 8592 01 +1 346 248 7799 or +1 669 900 9128 or +1 253 215 8782 or 888 788 0099 (Toll Free) or 833 548 0276 (Toll Free) or 833 548 0282 (Toll Free) or 877 853 5247 (Toll Free) Webinar ID: 895 8885 1649 International numbers available: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kdBxIDbbIW LAUDERDALFF; CITY COUNCIL MH -,TING MINUTES H Fi,LD IN -P hRS ON AT LAUD hRDAL Fi; CITY HALL Page 1 of 3 August 24, 2021 Call to Order Mayor Gaasch called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. Roll Call Councilors present: Roxanne Grove, Andi Moffatt, Duane Pulford, and Mayor Mary Gaasch. Councilor absent: Jeff Dains. Staff present: Heather Butkowski, City Administrator; Jim Bownik, Assistant to the City Administrator; and Miles Cline, Deputy City Clerk. Approvals Mayor Gaasch asked if there were any additions or corrections to the meeting agenda. Butkowski stated that Inland Development Partners would no longer be presenting and added a discussion of protocols for futuie city council meetings. Councilor Moffatt moved and seconded by Councilor Grove to approve the agenda as amended. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Gaasch asked if there were any corrections to the July 27, 2021 city council meeting minutes. There being none, Councilor Grove moved and seconded by Councilor Pulford to approve the minutes of the July 27, 2021 city council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Gaasch asked if there were any questions on the claims. There being none, Councilor Moffatt moved and seconded by Councilor Grove to approve the claims totaling $168,136.05. Motion carried unanimously. Consent Councilor Pulford moved and seconded by Councilor Grove to approve the Consent Agenda thereby approving the city park application for group use, the 2021 engagement letter with Abdo, hick, and Meyers for auditing services, and the contract with Valley -Rich Company, Inc. for repairs of the storm sewer pipe. Informational Presentations/Reports B. Tara Jebens-Singh from Northeast Youth and Family Services As the City looks for ways to support community mental health and offer tools to our police department, the Council asked staff to bring Tara Jebens-Singh, Executive Director of NYFS, to the meeting to discuss the benefits of becoming a partner of NYFS She explained that Northeast Youth & Family Services (NYFS) is a nonprofit, community-based and trauma -informed mental health and community services organization that has been serving the northeastern suburbs since 1976. The City was previously a partner but stopped supporting them for financial reasons many years ago. Some in the City benefit from their services such as the senior chore program and their school-based therapy services through their partnership with Roseville Area Schools. The St. Anthony Police Department is working closely with NYFS as they have a youth LAUD FRDAL F? CITY COUNCIL MF{,hTING MINI_TTh,S HELD IN-PhRSON AT LAUD I I,RDALE CITY HALL Page 2 of 3 August 24, 2021 diversion program and a new community advocate program. Officers call on NYFS when they encounter people whose needs cannot be addressed by law enforcement alone. This includes: mental health issues, family instability, medical care, and other needs. Addressing these underlying issues reduces the need for law enforcement intervention in the future. The Council discussed the merits of being a partner to allow residents to access NYFS services and be a member of the steering committee that sets priorities. Staff will work with Jebens- Singh on the membership agreement. Butkowski said that if the City becomes a partner, the cost will be budgeted undei public safety in the General Fund. B . City Council Updates Mayor Gaasch stated that she and Councilor Pulford attended a League of Minnesota Cities Policy Committee meeting on the topic of public safety. Gaasch continued by thanking the L auderdale residents planning the Halloween party this year. She mentioned they are looking for additional volunteers. Councilor Grove said she will attend a Ramsey County League of Local Governments meeting in September on the topic of mental health Lastly, Councilor Pulford mentioned that NineNorth was having an open house from 3-6 pm on September 30. D iscussion/Action Item A. 2022 General Fund Budget Butkowski previewed the draft of the 2022 budget with the Council. The discussion centered on some of the projected revenue and expenses shifts the City will experience in 2022 with the retirement of the residential and commercial building officials and hiring of a contracted building official The budget is incomplete until the City if notified of fiscal disparities numbers. Those ate expected shortly and a more complete draft of the budget will be available by the next meeting. B . Addition: Protocols for Future City Council Meetings When the Mayor ended virtual City council meetings with the termination of the Governor's Executive Authority in July, the world had yet to deal with the extent of the Delta Variant. The guards were coming down for those that were vaccinated, but that has changed in recent weeks. The spread is high and vaccinated people are sometimes transmitters. The public health guidance is to remain vigilant and follow the same protocols for social distancing and mask wearing we adhered to prior to vaccinations. B utkowski mentioned it is difficult to adhere to the most basic guidance due to the size of the council chambers. Staff asked the City attorney if he had other clients in the same situation and what options are piovided by state statute. As he has been here many times, he said it is not practical or prudent to hold in-person council meetings at Lauderdale City Hall as we do not have enough space to allow all who want to attend meetings to do so effectively and safely. The City attorney said the Mayor may determine that in-person meetings are not practical or prudent as the pandemic surges. The technology updates that will happen in the next few months LAUD hRDAL h; CITY COUNCIL MH,Fi,TING MINUTFLS HELD INT hRS ON AT LAUD Fi;RDAL E CITY HALL Page 3 of 3 August 24, 2021 may offer alternative solutions, but for now, the options are either all in-person meetings or all persons meeting virtually. teach council member expressed disappointment over the inability to meet in person but agreed that it is not practical to host in-person meetings at this time due to the Delta variant and the size of the Council chambers. Councilors mentioned that the development of 1795 Fustis Street and Luther Seminary's land in Lauderdale will bring more residents to meetings over the upcoming weeks than the council chambers can safely hold. The city attorney will draft a declaration to return to virtual meetings for the Mayor's consideration. Set Agenda for Next Meeting The next Council meeting may include representatives from Inland Development Group regarding development of Luther Seminary s property in Lauderdale, Patricia Hoffman of the Roseville Area League of Women Voters, the 2022 general fund budget, designation of a new building official, and the July financial report. Work Session A. Community Development Update Butkowski revisited the community meeting Inland Development Group held at City Hall on August 18, seal coating of the streets was done on August 20, and staff met with Pat Cook from NineNorth to discuss Council chamber upgrades. B. Opportunity for the Public to Address the City Council Mayor Gaasch opened up the floor to anyone in attendance interested in addressing the Council. There being no people interested in speaking, Mayor Gaasch closed the floor. Adjournment Councilor Pulford moved and seconded by Councilor Moffatt to adjourn the meeting at 8:42 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Heather Butkowski City Administrator To: From: Meeting Date: Subject: CITY OF LAUDERDALE LAUDERDALE CITY HALL 189 1 WALNUT STREET LAUDERDALE, MN 55113 651-792-7650 651-631-2066 FAX Request for Council Action Mayor and City Council City Administrator September 14, 2021 List of Claims The claims totaling $99,637.64 are provided for City Council review and approval that includes check numbers 27586 to 27612. Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date User: Printed: heather.butkowski 9/10/2021 1:53 PM Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Invoice No Description Check Date Reference Check Amount ACH 43 Public Employees Retirement Association PR Batch 51800.09.2021 PERA Coordinated PR Batch 51800.09.2021 PERA Coordinated Total ACH 44 Minnesota Department of Revenue PR Batch 51800.09.2021 State Income Tax ACH 45 ACH 46 ACH 47 27586 239 INV -024780 27587 217 076-082621 C 27588 52 092021 27589 184 09/03/2021 PR Batch 51800.09.2021 PER PR Batch 51800.09.2021 PER for this ACH Check for Vendor 43: 09/03/2021 PR Batch 51800.09.2021 Statc Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 44: ICMA Retirement Corporation PR Batch 51800.09.2021 Deferred Comp PR Batch 51800.09.2021 Deferred Comp 09/03/2021 PR Batch 51800.09.2021 Defi PR Batch 51800.09.2021 Deft Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 45: Internal Revenue Service PR Batch 51800.09.2021 FICA Employee Portio PR Batch 51800.09.2021 Medicare Employer Po PR Batch 51800.09.2021 Medicare Employee Pc PR Batch 51800.09.2021 FICA Employer Portio. PR Batch 51800.09.2021 Federal Income Tax 09/03/2021 PR Batch 51800.09.2021 FIC. PR Batch 51800.09.2021 Mec PR Batch 51800.09.2021 Mec PR Batch 51800.09.2021 FIC. PR Batch 51800.09.2021 Fedi Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 46: Public Employees Insurance Program PR Batch 51800.09.2021 Health Insurance PR Batch 51800.09.2021 Dental 09/03/2021 PR Batch 51800.09.2021 Hea PR Batch 51800.09.2021 Den Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 47: Total for 9/3/2021: American Engineering Testing Inc 09/14/2021 Seal Coat Ptoject Total for Check Number 27586: Association for Nonsmokers -Minnesota North Suburban Tobacco Compliance Project Bluechip Tree Company Inc Tice Removal Cintas 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27587: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27588: 09/14/2021 1,056.10 1,218.58 2,274.68 706.41 706.41 1,103.88 1,795.31 2,899.19 1,105.08 258.45 258.45 1,105.08 1,645.54 4,372.60 2,429.66 120.48 2,550.14 12,803.02 289.00 289.00 116.00 116.00 5,490.00 5,490.00 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (9/10/2021 1:53 PM) Page 1 Check No Vendor No Invoice No Vendor Name Description Check Date Check Amount Reference 4093663236 4094332278 27590 25 092021 27591 25 092021 27592 31 162613 162613 August Uniforms August Uniforms County of Ramsey Recording Fees- Morgan/Taylor County of Ramsey Recording Fees - Gaasch/Koncar Kennedy & Graven Chartered July Legal Services - TIF District July Legal Services Total for Check Number 27589: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27590: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27591: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27592: 27593 84 North Star Bank Cardmember Services 09/14/2021 092021 Paper Towels - Costco 092021 Certified Letters - USPS 092021 Pioneer Press Subscription 092021 Pioneer Press Subscription 27594 346 092021 Roseville Conununity Band Music for September Park Event Total for Check Number 27593: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27594: 27595 162 Swanson Haskamp Consulting, LLC 09/14/2021 1064 1795 Eustis Project - July 1065 Seminary Project - July 1066 General Planning Services - June/July 27596 7 8942000-0500-3 27597 36 0230321 27598 29 4109 27599 25 09142021 27600 348 Waste Management Inc City Hall Refuse City of Roseville September IT Ser vices City of St Anthony September Police Services County of Ramsey Recording Fee - Brumm Tree ESRI PW Software Subscription Total for Check Number 27595: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27596: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27597: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27598: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27599: 09/14/2021 12.07 12.07 24.14 46.00 46.00 46.00 46.00 925.00 378.00 1,303.00 56.15 24.70 10.00 10.00 100.85 250.00 250.00 270.00 202.50 1,766.00 2,238.50 278.95 278.95 1,633.15 1,633.15 64,434.83 64,434.83 46.00 46.00 800.00 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (9/10/2021 1:53 PM) Page 2 Check No Vendor No Invoice No Vendor Name Description Check Date Reference Check Amount 27601 349 02466799-00 27602 61 1080530 27603 30 2021-2022 27604 103 092021 27605 347 10588 27606 5 619861-08-21 27607 135 0821572525 27608 4 S1001857 27609 3 451705677 27610 90 9887429278 9887429278 9887429278 27611 7 8952304-0500-6 27612 74 746027338 746115062 Goodin Company Plumbing Fitting Gopher State One Call August Locates League of Minnesota Cities 2021-2022 LMC Dues Minnesota Mayors Association 2021-2022 Membership Premier Tree Service Inc 1930 Carl Petition and Waiver Tree Premium Waters Inc 9/21 Water Delivery St Paul Pioneer Press 2021 TIF Disclosure Total for Check Number 27600: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27601: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27602: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27603: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27604: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27605: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27606: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27607: The Neighborhood Recycling Company Inc 09/14/2021 August Recycling Service US National Equipment Finance Inc September Copier Lease Verizon Wireless August Cell Phone August Cell Phone August Cell Phone Waste Management Inc September PW Dumpster Xcel Energy August Larpenteur Avenue Bridge Lights August 2430 Larpenteur Avenue Total for Check Number 27608: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27609: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27610: 09/14/2021 Total for Check Number 27611: 09/14/2021 800.00 45.41 45.41 21.60 21.60 2,665.00 2,665.00 30.00 30.00 2,147.50 2,147.50 24.99 24.99 141.75 141.75 3,322.42 3,322.42 176.00 176.00 58.65 29.33 29.32 117.30 517.19 517.19 34.17 13.34 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (9/10/2021 1:53 PM) Page 3 Check No Vendor• No Invoice No Vendor• Name Description Check Date Reference Check Amount 746421452 746875817 August Larpenteur Pedestrian Lighting August Street Lighting Total for Check Number 27612: Total for 9/14/2021: Report Total (32 checks): 43.11 438.42 529.04 86,834.62 99,637.64 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (9/10/2021 1:53 PM) Page 4 LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent X Public Hearing Discussion Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date September 14, 2021 ITEM NUMBER July Financial Report STAFF INITIAL l APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Every month, staff provide the Council with an updated copy of the city's finances. Follow- ing are the revenue expense, and cash balance reports for July 2021. This includes the new fund for tracking the American Recovery Plan Act funds. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: By approving the consent agenda, the Council acknowledges the city's financial report for July 2021. General Ledger Cash Balances User: heather.butkowski Printed: 8/27/2021 11:49:25 AM Period 07 - 07 Fiscal Year 2021 Description Account Beg Bal MTD Debit MTD Credit Current Balance Cash Change Fund Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Current Assets Petty Cash Petty Cash 101-00000-000-10100 101-00000-000-10300 226-00000-000-10100 227-00000-000-10100 228-00000-000-10100 305-00000-000-10100 306-00000-000-10100 401-00000-000-10100 403-00000-000-10100 404 00000-000-10100 414-00000-000-10100 416-00000-000-10100 602-00000-000-10100 603-00000-000-10100 101-00000-000-10200 Investments - Fair Value 101-00000-000-10410 Adj Investments Grand Total -2,764,088.99 100.00 10,364.45 73,123.41 0.00 9,767.13 123,864.00 149,567.74 523,892.38 352,814.64 366,913.77 93,964.51 1,027,140.49 432,876.30 400,299.83 300.00 300.00 3,182,614.84 3,182,614.84 3,583,214.67 788,143.21 0.00 4,394.03 41.71 133,464.30 6.00 76.09 91.88 19,042.33 216.74 225.40 0.00 14,819.63 5,759.40 966,280.72 0.00 0.00 402,463.30 402,463.30 1,368,744.02 813,124.10 0.00 3,198.33 5,230.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,595.21 5,154.66 845,302.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 845,302.79 -2,789,069.88 100.00 11,560.15 67,934.63 133,464.30 9,773.13 123,940.09 149,659.62 542,934.71 353,031.38 367,139.17 93,964.51 1,023,364.91 433,481.04 521,277.76 300.00 300.00 3,585,078.14 3,585,078.14 4,106,655.90 GL - Cash Balances (08/27/2021 1:49 AM) Page 1 ExpendCollect YTD Balance Current Period C.) Pit OP Account Number rrrnrnO\' M b W d, O\ d\ M Vl Q\ V v) d' M V7 0 O O V) CD, co - O\ V1 M et O\\O M r. vo N • VO O • CV In oodtri en cnN O --+ co N\O et N co el - O ri Nzzt - oo O N GO VD et VD � co N M OD CT VD \O N' el et V1 M C\ p l� M p N o O1 M rti O O N [� co ✓ O OO 1-1 v- d ei 6 p N f r o O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 00\000 v) DO O O O N• . l n\D O V1 0\ t ---V1 O N- l� O M N r-+ 00 O O O rei 00 W O r N O ry r r 01 r O Ne‘ 00 cr O ep 00 O In O\ \O M M O\O\O N vi C3 C5 v5 v-) �t v) co O\ O t • ---\D O p oo• ON\OO d' \r0 cO10 00 x0 0\ 00 r,v-4 In r \D N N O p • N M O p trio M 0 r [� M 0c M o O r D 06 M M N hl kn • � CD m oo CN CD cD I O O O v O 0 N c-- 0 O O O O O O O O O O dam' O N rr-1 N O in 1-41 V' V c \0 CN 00 rai O General Fund GL - Revenue vs Expense (08/27/2021 - 11:51 AM) N 0) N a bur) DC t W QD CC$ : I 0 P4 0 % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period Description VD o ofl C O or) CD O\ O O O 00 CD O O p O O 0 O -4 O1 1 Revenues 0 C C N o a C U o 0 U j cCd N bet 0S2 (11 0 cri cT N letb 00 VC 00 00 CN t O N o V) O M O 4 o • O co 0 N O M 0 00 O V) 0 N Oo 0 O h V o d N I M O00 N O M o M O V) O M 00 t� d' O O\ 0 N O V1 d O v N N a) i) • v) cd N (/� O O 0 0)) d O ~ aaO g W (] !/DOU remi CT C1/4 1/40 Net M 00 e1/41 00 N N H � M N O O rN-1 00 00 00 r-1 0 u d ul= v Ni 0 GL - Revenue vs Expense (08/27/2021 - 11:51 AM) o ti a) E `)) aN) Or ›-I g ami c.0 cd u )(14 n, [T Q % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period • o el iv D N O a) N O N 00 0\ vn vD vD un O O O O Izt o O p CD CyR • co • o.1 d on �000 ~-i a or V) 00 1/440 cr) VDh4 o CN on Ci M O M O O I, cN M N O M o M M �O v p M 1CN Oo\Oc�n O N vn Q\ CN rt M Q\ N 00'1 OI Aty' O O N O CN,.. M .-1 cn CD CD cD CD O O O O p CN C O CS caC un O V1 co M Lin d1 0\ rmil N 00 GO c? 00 Immil O N CN Ili N e' to VD N M V• ' N M 0000 N � cD CD O O 00 H 00 O ▪ CN VD N OU U rIO En 0 a) cy N T N .1 a) V) H bU a) a) Tici O a) O Q] 0 a) a) O P. y ; N 6>) k N 0•." d k 67 C4 W A. v) O U W A GL - Revenue vs Expense (08/27/2021 - 11:51 AM) pallop/puadxa % YTD Balance Current Period O 0I o 0 o O o 0 M • C\ N CO CO M M 4-4 00 CD 0 O OI O p 00 N O O O O O O O can Rescue Plan Act 6) AtC N N GL - Revenue vs Expense (08/27/2021 - 11:51 AM) 0 0 0 Y N N O O N N 'Oc7i 00 OH o cd G '� ao w % Expend/Collect YTD Balance b Current Pe bL G4 Account Number GO TIF Revenue Bonds 2018A O M O 0 00 N -1,365,000.00 1,365,000.00 273,010.52 O O O O O 10 0 1O O 0 0 001 CD 0 O 0 p o6 cii tri O vs) V] V1 d' el IdN N Ln N N M \ 0 00 GO V) M '-i N M t ‘O V1 cY Net' O V1 ti M H O O O D CO 00 O O 0 N Inj V) N N 0 be) Ce 0 .0 1-1 U 0 a9 0 q CG bq ce N 0 N 0 0 >U> U 0 Q L '> 0cO I) C0 p 751 _1 0 Cao c H y A' D vUi _r a) P1 -0 !i^C g O 2; W O Q W GO TIF Revenue Bonds 2018A GL - Revenue vs Expense (08/27/2021 - 11:51 AM) 0 0 Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period Description 0 E 6) 0 F" E H g romi N \O M 0 O M M d ON 0 O OI � O O 0 O O No M N e-1 103,689.22 00 N M 00g, L1 O N O M b Inn N r -I 0 0 N co 0 O OI O O O p O 0 In 6 N' O N 00 H O O H 00 00 CN t O O 41:4; 6) 64) a WOQ W spuog tuauianoidurl Fi6TOZ C0 O GL - Revenue vs Expense (08/27/2021 - 11:51 AM) 0 1 0 N 441 N 9 O O N OI 1.0 aCLD a w % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period o c1 0 O 71- p N O O d 0o CD 00 00001 0 0 CN o 0001 00o O int N U r.+ G (n CO U Pk CL > 0 w C C40.0 ti C O 0T\ n Q. > CCI C •t 0z w bot ,- Ca 0 Y N .S Account Number a M C N H Itt 00 00 00 00 00 00 ON 0 0 0 o C\ 0 O DR o O 1 O N rr 0 00 01 O O O 0 en M O N 00 Icrt N O a 00 a\ 0 � o 1-4 0\ General Capital Projects GL - Revenue vs Expense (08/27/2021 - 11:51 AM) 0 0 0' eq O O N O N N G N N c) O 'iZ rJ Cd 0 0 t O �aww % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period O r- OI0 0 0 d1,' o rn 0 NO o0o o0 V] 00 0 t 0 D DD co 00 0 e-- 0 o M p O M h M 00 O c 0 00 cV -102,674.44 ti M gmrOA 0 0 0 1 0 O O 0 o0o O N hl1-4 coo 0 cd O O O O 0 0 0 O O p 0 0 0 O O p 00 00 N temewl O O O tn 4 Tet rt V) O\ O O O Street Capital Projects M irr GL - Revenue vs Expense (08/27/2021 - 11:51 AM) 0 Vit, 0 O N N N i0' N o N b � • N cnaau laalloD/Puadxa °h OM O1 O o O1/49 U 000 N N O CC 00 N en M Cd A Rw it bL C4 Pcs G N a 0 0 O Ir 0)04 0 0 o 7.,:jcn a G LY g 11 • o 1 O U 0 y a;i G w o x Pm^6� A v N A axSo z 0 0 U YTD Balance Current Period O O O o h O 1/46 p 4-44 000 000 0 O 0 r-1 171* N H 00 1/40N r-1 rti N 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 O 1/40 000 0001 O 0 O 0 N a N 00 N ti -126,560.00 0 0 0 0 0 tn N Q a w mer 00 M 00 CO 00 00 N M 00 00 00 en„, M rel Park Capital Projects O GL - Revenue vs Expense (08/27/2021 - 11:51 AM) O 0 0~ O N N O N O N 44 -al GO cS N C •C cd U baa w % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period 00l 0 0 O p O 0 0 0 O O 0 0l 0 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0l 0 0l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0l o of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CU 0 o) 0 0l 0 0 Pt O O o d o 0 A4 Description Account Number 0 bf) 0 N N d C U •C 0a U N 0� 0 P4 i'mag p,1 0 C a) E( O d 0 :P 0 a c ' F Z 8 it tcri vg xa50 a w0 w I Rosehill Tax Increment GL - Revenue vs Expense (08/27/2021 - 11:51 AM) % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period Ca) rLi Description Account Number N OO N O 0 600 O of p ONO O 0 (1.4 cV CN 0 0 CN 0 CD 06 O r U O 'M-1 M ct ODI O 00Ifer CNO vNl O M N N Q\i O1 M M •--i rim( ti CD DI 7DDIO *T NO O O N N N N N DDI o 00 O p O O \p o o 4 rF t� O O t O� Q� N M V ti U b7..0, O N • a 0 0 ami b M bo d r vn • v U d O , Go E CI) 1 cu O y C ti G g ti G ")(C Uc1.4 N U as o a woo w Development rak GL - Revenue vs Expense (08/27/2021 - 11:51 AM) a) a) 'CS cu CC3 i-1 u) a 0 R4 Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period Account Number 0 2I O o 0 2I O O 0 O 0 00 O 0 tn 0 O 0 0 O O 0 O O0 0 0 co O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a) ftfl ek. Housing Redevelopment GL - Revenue vs Expense (08/27/2021 - 11:51 AM) paj o3 fpuadxa v% YTD Balance Current Period Account Number 0 0 O 06 0 0 cp 6 O O 0 O O 0 O O O O 0 O O 0 0) O N G F. N -t vi Ri bA • 0 4-4 0 0ci" N O 0 O O O O 0 0 0 1 0 0 000 0 0 00 0 O O O 0 O O p O O 0 O O 0 0 0 O O O O TIF District No. 1-2 1/40 0 GL - Revenue vs Expense (08/27/2021 - 11:51 AM) O 0 tn O r" T• C -C41 N '9N 0 N cl N ate) O 411 rti �' j O N ch a ?. [T % Expend/Collect ......._...... _ YTD Balance Current Period Description Account Number O ONO OI O on M'd-O OI VD M O -a t O M M ON O\ O O N N O00N O t�I1 tin 00 0 O co M O lin d' OI ON on VD MO OT N O M v) OGO VD Ln Cl O O d' O Md' 0 00 V'0o00C CD CS CO Ci CS O 0rmi 0 CO M oo 'd' co O N a\.-� ti M t -O N r -t i -t --+ N - 110,837.53 O v)\D 0 .--i NIctNO O 00 M O VD NJ: O ri M V t- O O IIIto OIt CD 0000 V O M Vn,-4 OMOO O ttt) 00 M N \D VO M VD VD O\ \D d' O M N �D M Nd ti O VD CO OI r VD OOI Cl let O Cl CO O OM VD vi CO00O O O N M \O Q) 00 N I [ 4••:t• LA' N 00 M O O O 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O V' 00 1 1 O O N O O en Or r~O v) co in O 00 V� 1 N t� OO 00 N~ M �(�+ 7 0 0 N bb U U N g4 1,1 a)a) c 0 O "al - U+ N c to p F>. Ki b4 U zil 5 c...) 'OU > a) w..0 on E o ° > 14 :4 -cu `' ani D 4 V ani 0 o �, y ani ciDix4U0 R.' WwcnOUO W - 106,857.00 Sanitary Sewer GL - Revenue vs Expense (08/27/2021 - 11:51 AM) % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period bA O v) O 0 O 00 00 0 0 6 O N .tt trVD iIn O O I el M VD Ttt V0 d' Cg O O 00 ri OHO OI "Cr V1 V000 OI rimml r O N M O 60 00 V7 0 0 M O o\ 1/46 0 v1 <- co t O O M o o M �dM'VDO M CA tri C4 00 00 v)O M 4 M M N ' 00 Ori O Od�'•� OI ti ,�id�'JO OI " 7 O 0o c� N 00 --' - 0 M 00 M .-' V) N ti 00 \O VO 00 V' --i 00 00 N .--1 M r--4 V) h O\ N 00 N N M N '0 O CO 000 r-1 00 d' V) O 0 I-.-'7 O00 0 O NN C---- CD O N [� O CN1 VS 0 N o\ V0 C O 0 r O Cl1,0 r a ti in tin d to 0 O O 0 I O 0000 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O 00000 O O O M 0 0 M \O O) On O O b N M v1 00 N N ' O �O 00 Q\ 'ct M v) 4 O O O ti VD N 00 Nrmi V) cn 0 V) o bA N U N 0 Z ti G U P4 c40 N O (y b-0 0 al ti N N c 0 N a) EV] U 1 U N C • 0 O N cd N > O N > ca;ril. �� ' ~i°'°o i a c M1a OUof• A c aU O P4 n cO W O 0 0'" ShN O N N N 0 N t` O N fa C i O N G •� �aaw Account Number Storm Water CC CC GL - Revenue vs Expense (08/27/2021 - 11:51 AM) Acc 0 v. N O N eO ctl rb 00 O rclC ami C N • �a CL( w" % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period 0 0 O O p 0 0 0 O O p 0 0 O O � 0 0 p O O p 0 0 0 O O p w4H O 0 0 Att 0 O O O O O O O O O 00 0 0 0 OO I 0 0 O O O O p O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O p 0 0 0 0 p O O O 0 0 O O O O p 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 O p O O O O p O O O O 0 0(1000 O O O O p U b O cd >U_ 1/1 0 L N 51 U U •U- 0 U U�N 7 N N O$ CA O 0Cip �0' N U O y N s04 C4 Wa00444. 00 O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 GL - Revenue vs Expense (08/27/2021 - 11:51 AM) % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period Description Account Number OV e-1 00 N O N O Vj V) r-1 h M 000004 1/40 'Nowt NY 1.40 V1 O 0\ r-1 N t-- O N V1 V' 00 t•-• t 10 a ' C\ \O d• O M ON 00 00 Ns. • N O O O O O O vi CN G \C O • "lel. C\ 00 00 M N 00 em 7 N N N Revenue Total O 42 oE d rts a� GL - Revenue vs Expense (08/27/2021 - 11:51 AM) LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent X Public Hearing Discussion Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date September 14, 2021 ITEM NUMB hR STAFF INITIAL APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR Allied Blacktop Pay Req. #1 DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Allied Blacktop Company has submitted their first pay request for the seal coating project. The request is for a payment of 5128 846 93. A second pay request will cover the street sweeping and then the project will be done. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: By approving the Consent Agenda, the Council approve pay request No. 1 for the 2021 Seal Coat Project payable to Allied Blacktop Company in the amount of $128,846.93. Sta ntec CITY OF LAUDERDALE 1891 WALNUT STREET LAUDERDALE, MN 55113 Contract Number: 193805301 Pay Request Number: 1 Page 1 of 2 Client Project Number: Payment Number: 1 Stantec Project Number Project Description 193805301 Lauderdale 2021 Seal Coat Project Contractor: Allied Blacktop Company 10503 89th Avenue No. Maple Grove, MN 55369 Up To Date: 09/03/2021 Contract Amount Funds Encumbered Original Contract $150,887.50 Original $150,887,50 Contract Changes $0.00 Additional N/A Revised Contract $150,887.50 Total $150,887.50 Work Certified To Date Base Bid Items Contract Changes Material On Hand Total $135,628.35 $0.00 $135,628.35 Work Certified This Request Work Certified To Date Less Amount Retained Less Previous Payments Amount Paid This Request Total Amount Paid To Date $135,628.35 $135,628.35 $6,781.42 $0.00 $128,846.93 $128,846.93 Percent: Retained: 5% Percent Complete: 89 89% I hereby certify that all items and amounts shown are correct for the work completed to date. Contractor: Allied Blacktop Company Approved by: Date: i The Work on this project and application has been reviewed and the amount shown is recommended for payment. Stantec Engineer: Kellie Schlegel Approved by: Digitally signed by Kellie Schlegel Date: 2021.09.09 09:21:57 -05'00' Date: Approved for Payment by Owner: CITY OF LAUDERDALE Approved by: Date: Stantec CITY OF LAUDERDALE 1891 WALNUT STREET LAUDERDALE, MN 55113 Page 2 of 2 Client Project Number: Payment Number. 1 Payment Summary No. Up To Date Work Certified Per Request Amount Retained Per Request Amount Paid Per Request 1 2021-09-03 135,628.35 6,781.42 128,846.93 Funding Category Name Funding Category Number Work Certified to Date Less Amount Retained Less Previous Payments Amount Paid this Request Total Amount Paid to Date 1 128,846.93 135,628.35 6,781.42 0.00 128,846.93 128,846.93 Accounting Number Funding Source Amount Paid this Request Revised Contract Amount Funds Encumbered to Date Paid Contractor to Date 1 City Funds 128,846.93 Amount This Request 0.00 128,846.93 Contract Item Status Line Item Description Units Unit Price Contract Quantity Quantity This Request Amount This Request Quantity To Date Amount To Date 1 2021.501/ MOBILIZATION LS 7,200.00 1 1 7,200.00 1 7,200.00 00010 2 2563.601/ TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 6,000.00 1 1 6,000.00 1 6,000.00 00010 3 2356.505/ 00010 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR SEAL COAT GAL 4.50 19500 17667 79,501.50 17667 79,501.50 4 9990.2581 ROUTE AND SEAL LB 1.95 10000 7346 14,324.70 7346 14,324.70 5 2785.0007 SEAL COAT AGGREGATE TN 1.00 950 624 624.00 624 624.00 6 2232.604/ 00460 33.50 100 78.9 2,643.15 78.9 2,643.15 MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - 2" Sy 7 2232.604/ PATCH BITUMINOUS TN 282.50 75 78 22,035.00 78 22,035.00 00011 PAVEMENT 8 9990.0950 0 REMOVE AND REPLACE CATCH BASIN ADJUSTMENT EA 825.00 6 4 3,300.00 4 3,300.00 RINGS Base Bid Totals: $135,628.35 $135,628.35 Contract Total $135,628.35 LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent X Public Hearing Discussion Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date September 14, 2021 ITEM NUMBER September Community Event STAFF INITIAL Jim APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Staff is asking the city council to consider approving the attached performance agreement with the Roseville Community Concert Band for September music at a cost of $250. The September event is scheduled from 6:00-7:30 p.m. on Monday, September 20. We are asking people to bring their own chairs or blankets to sit on. OPTIONS: Approve by adopting the consent agenda or remove for discussion. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: By approving the consent agenda, the city council is approving the attached performance agreement with the Roseville Community Concert Band. City of Lauderdale Performance Agreement Event: Community Band Concert Date Monday, September 20, 2021 Performance Time: 6-7:30 p.m. Location: Lauderdale Community Park, 1885 Fulham Street ARTIST or GROUP INFORMATION Artist or Group Name: Roseville Community Band Artist/Group Leader: Dan Kuch: 612-363-4564 Daytime Phone: 612-363-4564 CeII Phone: Richard Baldinelli: Contact person and Director: 612-759-0351 Email Address: rcbdirectorri,gmail.com Website Address (if applicable): www.RosevilleCommunityBand.org Electricity: yes Extension cord: yes # Chairs Needed: 45 PAYMENT INFORMATION Performance Fee: $250.00 Name & Address of Individual or Group for Payment of Fee: PERFORMANCE PROVISIONS Roseville Community Band 2660 Civic Center Drive Roseville, MN 55113 1) The Artist or Group is considered an independent contractor and is responsible for all appropriate insurance and income taxes. 2) The Artist or Group will supply their own sound system and the following items as needed: music stands, stage etc. 3) The City will provide chairs, electricity and an extension cord if needed. 4) Cancellation/Inclement Weather Policy: • If the performance is cancelled by the City before Noon the day of the performance, the City will pay 50% of the agreed performance fee as compensation. • If the performance is cancelled by the City after Noon the day of the performance, the City will pay 100% of the agreed performance fee as compensation. 5) Sale of promotional merchandise is allowed at the concert site. 6) Payment Information: The City will make every effort to present payment to the Artist or Group the day of the performance, but may mail payment within 2 weeks after performance date. 7) Indemnification: The Artist or Group agrees to defend and indemnify the City, and its employees, officials, volunteers and agents from and against all claims, actions, damages, losses and expenses arising out of the Artist or Group's performance or failure to perform its duties under this Agreement. Signature of Artist/Group Leader: r' ' Le-4- ;ez' , .�• Date: September 2, 2021 Mary Gaasch, Mayor Date Heather Butkowski, City Administrator Date LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date September 14, 2021 ITEM NUMBER League of WV Presentation d STAFF INITIAL APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Patricia Hoffman and Megan Gunnar from the League of Women Voters will be at the meet- ing to share their recent research on equitable representation on city boards and commis- sions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: September 9, 2021 To: Lauderdale City Council Members From: League of Women Voters — Roseville Area [includes Falcon Heights, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Maplewood, Roseville] Re: 2020-2021 Equitable Representation Study on Appointed City Boards and Commissions Enclosed please find the report of our study on the equitable representation on city boards and commissions. We hope this is of use to you as you continue your work to increase the diversity of voices contributing to city governance. In November 2020, we sent out 116 surveys to current and some former city -appointed commissioners with response rates varying from 19% to 73% across cities of Falcon Heights, Little Canada, Maplewood and Roseville. Lauderdale currently has no active commissions. Because numbers of commissions vary by city and numbers of commissioners responding also varied, we are not providing city -specific feedback. With these caveats in mind, we hope you might glean useful information from the study. Certain themes ran across all four cities such as commissioners' pride in their work, the respect shown for one another and willingness to work together. Across all four cities, commissioners also wanted more diversity of views represented, but recognized the challenge of encouraging community members to get involved in city governance. We look forward to hearing from you and learning with you about ways in which we can reach a broader and more diverse segment of our population and successfully encourage more residents to become involved in city governance. League of Women Voters Roseville Area 2020-2021 Equitable Representation Study on Appointed City Boards and Commissions INTRODUCTION Just prior to the League of Women Voters (LWV) Roseville Area chapter annual meeting in June 2020, the City of Minneapolis became yet another City where inequality reached a boiling point. The death of an African American, George Floyd, while he was being arrested, became an agonizing plea for racial justice here and now. This occurred during a devastating pandemic that was already exposing inequities in housing, health care, education, and in public life. LWV Roseville Area members advocated undertaking a study to look at equitable representation in our own backyard—in the five cities represented in our chapter. It was a small step, but nevertheless, something that we could do to bring awareness to the current state of diversity and equity on City appointed Boards and Commissions. Serving on a commission can be a step toward becoming more involved in politics, and thus is an important gateway to more equal representation in local, state, and national governance. With demand for City services such as low-cost housing and green space continuing to grow, residents and cities alike welcome sound management and a range of voices contributing to public discussion of city needs and priorities. The study team chose to define diversity broadly, to include race/ethnicity, age, socio-economic status, disabilities, and sexual orientation. The spirit of this report is to focus on what is working well, emphasizing equity strengths that can be shared across the cities. This aligns with positions of LWV and City leaders to foster opportunity for efficient, effective City boards and commissions including resident participation. STUDY GOAL The purpose of this study was to identify the current status and highlight respondents' recommendations for best practices in equitable representation for Boards and Commissions appointed by the City Councils of Falcon Heights, Lauderdale, Little Canada, Maplewood, and Roseville. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The study team collected the following information which informs the current situation with appointed Boards and Commissions in the five cities: • Email requests to City clerks or managers for current and former commission member e- mail contact information, details such as purpose of the various commissions, term lengths, commissioner qualifications, and recruitment and onboarding. Information from City websites was also used. • Online anonymous survey to 116 current commissioners in Falcon Heights, Little Canada, Maplewood and Roseville (Lauderdale currently has no commissions) with a response rate ranging from 19-73 percent (median=61 percent). Note that since Roseville has the most 2 commissions, they had the most survey responses. Results have not been summarized by City to ensure confidentiality. • Phone calls with survey respondents who requested a follow-up conversation. Suggestions were then drawn from the information collected. We acknowledge that the survey was subjective in nature, representing respondents' views and raises topics for the Cities' consideration. Subjective data relies on participant awareness; that is, we don't know what we don't know. Personal bias is inevitable and enters into responses. On-going data collection and reflection help create more personal awareness and recognition of one's own biases and perspectives. City demographic snapshot The Cities are generally similar, except for population and differences such as Roseville having a little less racial diversity, Maplewood having more people under age 18, and Lauderdale having the highest percentage of people below poverty levels. Population data adapted from 2010 US Census and 2019 American Community Survey 3 Falcon Heights Lauderdale Little Canada Maplewood Roseville Age Median/middle 32.9 33.2 43.8 38.1 40 percent under 18 18% 13% 18% 22% 19% percent 18 64 66 70 65 62 60 percent65+ 15 17 17 16 21 Gender Male 47% 48% 49% 49% 47% Female 53% 52% 51% 51% 53% Ethnicity White 71% 70.72% 66% 64% 76% Black 8 11 10 9 8 Native 0 1 0 0.3 0.5 Asian 15 12 15 15 8 Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 0 Hispanic 2 3 5 9 4 other 1 1. 0 3 0 two + 3 2 3 3 4 Income median $72,660 $50,909 $51,500 $66,758 $68,300 Below poverty 12% 16% 8.7% 9.8% 9.7% 100-149 percent poverty 5.3 5.9 10 8.7 5.7 150 184 percent poverty 6 7.2 7.7 5.5 4.4 Population 5,446 2,442 10,580 41,738 36,644 Population data adapted from 2010 US Census and 2019 American Community Survey 3 City commissions snapshot As the chart of the commissions shows, the types of commissions vary in each city. Lauderdale currently has no commissions, as previously mentioned. Similarities in commissions Few commissions reported having required qualifications other than being a resident. There are some exceptions, such as the Finance Commission requiring that three members have professional financial experience. The average number of commissioners per commission is 6.5 and the range is from 3 to 11. All commissioners are appointed by City Councils and/or Mayors. The only commissions that the Cities have in common are Planning and Parks & Recreation. There is also similarity between Maplewood's Environment & Natural Resources and Roseville's Public Works/Environment & Transportation, and Roseville's Human Rights, Inclusion & Engagement and Falcon Height's Community Engagement. Meetings are held in the evening in all cities, and during the COVID-19 pandemic, were held online via Zoom. How long have your served on your specific board or commission? Falcon Heights Little Canada Maplewood Roseville Commission 36 I am serving my second term. 22 Planning X X X X Parks & Recreation X X X X Environment (& Natural Resources) X X Public Transportation Works/Environment & X Community Engagement X Human Rights, Inclusion & Engagement X Community Design Review Board X Heritage Preservation X Housing/Economic Development X Ethics X Finance X Police/Civil Service X Variance (overlaps with Planning) X Similarities in commissions Few commissions reported having required qualifications other than being a resident. There are some exceptions, such as the Finance Commission requiring that three members have professional financial experience. The average number of commissioners per commission is 6.5 and the range is from 3 to 11. All commissioners are appointed by City Councils and/or Mayors. The only commissions that the Cities have in common are Planning and Parks & Recreation. There is also similarity between Maplewood's Environment & Natural Resources and Roseville's Public Works/Environment & Transportation, and Roseville's Human Rights, Inclusion & Engagement and Falcon Height's Community Engagement. Meetings are held in the evening in all cities, and during the COVID-19 pandemic, were held online via Zoom. How long have your served on your specific board or commission? 4 Responses Percent I am currently serving my first term. 21 36 I am serving my second term. 22 37 I am serving now and have also served in the past. 11 19 Other 5 8 4 Total 59 100 Most respondents were serving on their first or second terms. Some were serving now and had served in the past. Differences in commissions Of note to this study is that in 2017 the City of Roseville combined its Human Rights and Community Engagement Commissions to create a Human Rights, Inclusion and Engagement Commission. The purpose is to evaluate the City's outreach and inclusion efforts and advise on strategies to improve them. Roseville also has two voting youth (high school) commissioners on two commissions and Falcon Heights has a youth commission which encourages teens to serve on several of their commissions. Maplewood previously had a Human Rights Commission and may possibly create a similar new Commission Except for Maplewood, the cities each have term limits for commissioners. These differences are noted as they impact obtaining more diversity in commissioners. STUDY FINDINGS Pride in accomplishments We asked commissioners what they were most proud of in their work: • Most common answer of 42 responses was full participation by members, equal opportunity to speak, without intimidation from other board members and getting input from the public to make positive changes. "Good collaboration, city seeks and takes input/feedback.' • Second most common answer was working from a master plan for their commission • Other common responses, some specific to type of commission included. improving park facilities; develop a primer for orientation of new commission members and ongoing resource for all commission members about important topics and aspects of work on the commission; engagement toolkit; hiring of diversity and inclusion consultant by the City as a result of our recommendation; solar power and water rates; work on utility rates and organic composting What works well with your Commission? The following comments were the most frequently mentioned of 42 responses: • Having a comprehensive plan was mentioned by the most people with comments such as, 'We developed a master plan and we reference it when making recommendations" being typical (comments about the comprehensive plan are likely from Planning Commission members, who have a role to play in the cities' development of the statutorily -mandated Comprehensive Plan) 5 • Having positive relationships was mentioned next most frequently with comments such as, 'Being open to all opinions and showing a willingness to listen" and "Respect for each other s opinions. • The next most common response was the importance of having an engaged staff or a City Council member who worked with the commission, such as, "We are helping to promote more active engagement in building a vibrant City atmosphere." Similar comments include "city staff is well informed on issues," and "competent staff liaison " • Actively seeking feedback was mentioned by a number of respondents, "Input from the community,' and "improved outreach and inclusion for underrepresented communities." • Several people also cited making positive change/adaptations toward progressive environmental policies as an important accomplishment. • Several people mentioned how COVID-19 has affected their commission. Most have adjusted to online meetings with somewhat mixed results, though more made positive rather than negative comments about online meetings. "We are starting to think "outside of the box" due to the pandemic restrictions." "The online dynamic is working well." What could improve your Commission? • The most common response of 39 who answered this question was needing more feedback from the public such as, "More local interest and involvement, including with students. Have more commission recommendations approved or supported by City Council. Consider ways to reach out to various stakeholders in community, (for example) solicit input on goals or identify areas of concern or interest." • The next most common response involved clarification of their role, including clear guidance and more defined role for commissioners, wanting a more clearly defined mission, regular progress updates, better access to central data, better onboarding or training for new commissioners, better cohesiveness between City Council and the commission and better communication. • Several people mentioned problems presented by COVID-19 and they felt they were being more reactive than previously. ' Even before COVID, the number of meetings per year was too few." ' Looking forward to in-person meetings. Hard to do all our work through Zoom." Existing orientation and training • Only half of respondents reported receiving an orientation. Of those, 92 percent said it was useful: o nearly all want training in policies and procedures and the City's strategic plan o next highest request was history of past practices o less than half said training in building consensus and communication skills was necessary, though we respectfully indicate that this may increase in importance as diversity of experiences increases • On the need for orientation, we asked commissioners to rate the importance of an orientation on a scale from 1 to 100. Respondents' ratings averaged 70 out of 100 on the importance, with 66 percent scoring it over 50. '(Need) improved onboarding for new commissioners, clear guidance from City Council.' "(Need) roles and responsibilities of a 6 commission, especially as it relates to city government/budget process, to city staff, to other commissions, to City Council.' "Need new commissioner training....". • Maplewood and Roseville have a handbook which is provided/reviewed with new commissioners Barriers to participating • Small numbers of respondents said hearing or vision issues (2), day or time of meeting conflict (3), childcare needs (3) or technology issues (2). "Conflict with work engagement." • One each cited barriers such as mobility/access, personal work/travel schedule, meetings get rescheduled and conflict with calendar, no in person meetings because of COVID-19. 'Frequent out -of -area travel." This information may not reflect potential commissioner barriers, as there is no method for obtaining it from persons who, by definition, have not applied or been appointed. Diversity of respondents We do not have demographics for all members of the commissions. However, to the extent that we obtained a representative sample, the responses suggest limited diversity among those serving on these commissions. • Respondents were largely male (62 percent) • Income levels were high, with 42.6 percent reporting incomes of higher than $120,000. Only 17 percent reported incomes of under $80,000, with 3.8 percent below $20,000. Eight people did not respond to the income question • 83 percent of respondents were White, Asian/Pacific Islander constituted 8 percent of respondents. One respondent reported that they were Black and 1 indicated multi- racial. Why commissioners serve and recruitment sources When asked the reasons they chose to serve, 82 percent wanted to serve their City and make a difference 36 percent "had needed expertise", 25 percent "make needed change" (25 percent), 'fix a problem' (12 percent), and "other" (4 percent). How did you find out about this commission? 7 Responses Percent City newsletter 24 40 City website 14 24 Current commissioner, City official 9 15 Other (inquired with City, etc.) 8 14 Social media 4 7 Total 59 100 7 Heard about openings on commission: • 70 percent learned of opening from City newsletter, website, or social media • 15 percent were solicited by someone already involved in government and a similar number inquired with the City or received an email from an organization. 'The membership of commissions is appointed from the pool of those who are interested in working on city issues and then apply for membership on a commission. This is where an effort must be made to encourage more interest in working on a commission. There could be a way to reach folks who do not use any of these resources by advertising directly to certain groups. Comprehensive Plans How does your board or commission's work fit into your City's comprehensive plan? • We asked commissioners to rate their familiarity with their City's comprehensive plan on a scale from 1 to 100. Although a few indicated lack of knowledge, the mean score was 67 and 66 percent scored between 50 and 94, indicating that most were at least somewhat familiar with the plan. • When asked how their work fit into their City's comprehensive plan, responses included providing advice, responding to specific information requests, and providing valuable information to inform work with the comprehensive plan. "Alignment with the comprehensive plan.' Impacts on effectiveness of commissioners • While the majority think everyone has an equal voice, several people disagreed • When the response was, "Sometimes Equal Voice", comments as to when that happen included: o ' Format can break down with 1 or 2 members dialoguing unless other member is very forceful that they have something to add. Meeting importance and formality breaks down at times during the meeting. This has negative impact on board function to community and devalues the work being done.' o 'All are heard but some don't attend so they can't be heard" o 'It takes some time for new commissioners to feel that they have an equal voice" • There was a strong endorsement for their recommendations being adopted by City Councils. Sixty-six percent scored their response above 50 percent (on scale of 100). 8 Responses Percent We provide advice and opinions. 48 43 We respond to specific requests for information and advice. 32 29 We provide essential information that is important for some decision making. 27 24 Other 4 4 Total *111 100 Note: * Respondents could check more than one category. • We asked commissioners to rate their familiarity with their City's comprehensive plan on a scale from 1 to 100. Although a few indicated lack of knowledge, the mean score was 67 and 66 percent scored between 50 and 94, indicating that most were at least somewhat familiar with the plan. • When asked how their work fit into their City's comprehensive plan, responses included providing advice, responding to specific information requests, and providing valuable information to inform work with the comprehensive plan. "Alignment with the comprehensive plan.' Impacts on effectiveness of commissioners • While the majority think everyone has an equal voice, several people disagreed • When the response was, "Sometimes Equal Voice", comments as to when that happen included: o ' Format can break down with 1 or 2 members dialoguing unless other member is very forceful that they have something to add. Meeting importance and formality breaks down at times during the meeting. This has negative impact on board function to community and devalues the work being done.' o 'All are heard but some don't attend so they can't be heard" o 'It takes some time for new commissioners to feel that they have an equal voice" • There was a strong endorsement for their recommendations being adopted by City Councils. Sixty-six percent scored their response above 50 percent (on scale of 100). 8 ' Commission views and suggestions are well received by City Council." Another view differed: "The City Council could listen more to our advice...". Missing voices When we asked whose voices needed more representation, 70 percent responded that some groups were missing a voice. (We assume that those who did not answer felt no voices were missing.) Among those who did respond, the most endorsed "missing voices' category was different races and ethnicities. When asked to rate from 1 to 100 how they were doing on obtaining input from people of different races and incomes, the mean was about 50. "Input from all community stakeholders, not just from residents that are directly affected by certain situations or issues." Identify stakeholders whose voices you think are missing when your specific board or commission does its work. Commissioner comments about equity What could be done to make this board or commission and its work/recommendations more inclusive of needs of diverse stakeholders in the city? Responses Percent No voices missing 26 19 30 Persons from different races/ethnicities 18 9 15 Homeless Other 7 11 Low income 4 7 11 Renters 11 5 8 Homeowners 4 7 Other 4 7 Persons with different abilities 3 5 Senior citizens 1 2 Persons with different sexual orientation 1 2 Youth 1. 2 Total 61 100 Commissioner comments about equity What could be done to make this board or commission and its work/recommendations more inclusive of needs of diverse stakeholders in the city? 9 Responses Percent Recruit and appoint more members from diverse backgrounds 26 43 Routinely survey a representative sample of the community 11 18 Personally consult with more diverse constituents 8 13 Other 5 8 Nothing, we are quite inclusive 4 6 No response 7 11 Total 61 100 9 • "Commissioners are selected by City Council, which itself does not represent the diversity of the community." • "How we can be more intentional in incorporating equity principles and practices in our work; whether as a commission and even as a City, what internal work do we need to do ourselves to assess where we are at, be on the same page about equity definitions, goals and vision, while also creating systemic changes that are more equitable for the community." • "The membership of commissions is appointed from the pool of those who are interested in working on City issues and then apply for membership on a commission. This is where an effort must be made to encourage more interest in working on a commission. Some Cities advertise widely for commission openings on a variety of City platforms (City newsletter City website, Nextdoor, Facebook etc.). There could be a way to reach folks who do not use any of these resources by advertising directly to certain groups." • "We need more ethnic diversity representation. It is difficult to get other cultures involved.' • 'Too many people are appointed to a board or commission for the sake of diversity, even though they have no expertise that is relevant to the board or commission." This is a dissenting perspective and not supported by survey responses. • Conduct a survey of representative diverse communities for their input SUGGESTIONS FROM CURRENT COMMISSIONERS We heard that numerous aspects of commissions are working well and commissioners believe they are serving an important role. As with any group, there is room for continuous improvement. The following areas and resources are suggested for City Council discussion and possible action. • Appoint a City staff liaison member to all commissions. • Improve equitable representation by broadening recruitment to target and reach more diverse groups. Ideally, reach out to relevant groups in advance of openings to build relationships and inform community members about the commissions. • Develop an orientation / handbook and ensure training is conducted for all commissioners to provide a contextual understanding of the commission and City governance. • As soon as safely possible, consider a balance of online meetings using Zoom or similar tool and in-person meetings While Zoom is convenient and can remove transportation and possibly childcare barriers, it may be less personal, making it more difficult to speak up and harder to get to know others. OTHER BEST PRACTICE RESOURCES • League of Minnesota Cities — Collaboration of commissioners with other City commissioners in similar situations often offers the best path to effectiveness and 10 efficiency. While this group has no resources specific to boards and commissions, their Manager of Policy Analysis suggests, "There are many cities in MN, especially in the metro area, that are working to advance race equity in their communities. They are making changes to their HR practices as well as their commissions. I would suggest that you reach out to cities you have connections with.' • Institute for Local Government — See their publication, Beyond the Usuals Ideas to Encourage Broader Public Engagement in Community Decision Making ® GROUNDWORK USA —See their publication, Best Practices for Meaningful Community Engagement o University of Minnesota Extension Services — Leadership and Civic Engagement Extension. This program provides teams to help cities become more welcoming communities. EQUITABLE REPRESENTATION STUDY COMMITTEE Co-chairs: Patricia Hoffman, Barb Luck Members: Megan Dahlberg, Rita Mills, Karen Schaffer Contributor: Julie Strahan 11 LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action X Resolution Work Session Meeting Date September 14, 2021 ITEM NUMBS 2367 Larpenteur Fence Waiver STAFF INITIAL Jim APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: In May, Chapter 7 of the Code of Ordinances regarding fences and retaining walls was amended to allow for a waiver process for property owners that propose to deviate from city code if the Council finds that the requirement is not necessary for the pi otection of public health, safety or welfare. Misty Meier, 2367 Larpenteur Avenue, has applied for a fence permit. Misty's property is located at the coiner of Larpenteur Avenue and Pleasant Street. Thus, the fence requirements foi corner lots apply. Misty is proposing to remove and replace the existing fencing on her property. The attached site plan shows her proposed plan. There are 3 parts of her proposal that would require a waives from the City Council, which are indicated on her site plan. Misty's lot has a unique circumstance in that her house is set way back on her property. The waiver process was designed for unique situations like this. If approved, conditions can still be placed on the approval. Conditions to consider include: 1) All portions of fence will meet the setback regulations of 0' side yard and 2' rear yard. 2) The fence will be constructed with approved materials foi privacy fences 3) The finished side will face abutting property and right-of-way. Similar to the consideration of variances, the Council should indicate their reasons for approval or denial though the decision making process. With variances, the Council's decisions are memorial- ized by resolution. With waivers, staff plan to include the reasons for approval or denial in the minutes of the meeting to create a permanent record. OPTIONS: 1) Approve, with or without conditions. 2) Deny. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff does not think the waives request has any negative impact to public health, safety and welfare. Thus we recommend a motion to approve the fence waiver request for 2367 Larpenteur Avenue with the conditions listed above. 411111111111 N 4.LLL 1 1) Wants 6' tall in the front yard instead of 4' tall 2) Wants privacy fence (more than 50% opaque) Instead of less than 50% opaque W • t -tel _ 6k RAGE Misty Mu ar P? Ln•pnI a Aa I ::(6.1.41:2,141:75114 rAT 10 tio L4&PLNmWS AVSsac. bk IVaal • 3) Wants 6' tall instead of 4' tall for the corner side yard 1 PLEASANT$T 1 LeoeJvD tHs *STAKE LOT -0'x 13C''= h CtODstr WAIVER APPLICATION Fees $100 Waiver Application $50 County Recording Fee Type of Waiver Request Fence Retaining Wall Driveway Parking Pad City of Lauderdale Lauderdale City Hall 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 651-792-7650 651-631-2066 Fax Pate: ea avai Property Owner Information Name: isTY %Pr Address: 3 City/State/Zip: 1a friG(strofsalP, Phone: (0,51. &)00. Email: ill ., ��: � � GL,Lf . 09-741,_ 4vaW Signature: Review Timeline: All applications must be complete before being formally reviewed. Conditions: If a waiver is granted, the City Council may impose conditions. Submittals: Site plan drawn to scale that shows: V Property corners (locate property stakes or submit a Certificate of Survey). Pertinent site information such as lot lines, street names, locations and dimensions of existing or proposed buildings, setback distances, parking areas, and percentage of lot covered by roofed structures. Please provide a narrative describing your request: S !. .ter cetA k . / pie S4 ,A 4sraf -1-situt-ce el -44 4 biFT: ortt A hani..4., Reietrize. For Office Use Only Date of Complete Application: PIN#: Receipt #: /1)� r Meeting/Public Hearing Date: Approved/Denied: Conditions: City of Lauderdale 1891 Walnut Street, Lauderdale, Minnesota 55113 Telephone: (651) 792-7650 Fax: (651) 631-2066 DRIVEWAY, PARKING PAD, FENCE, SIDEWALK, RETAINING WALL & SWIMMING POOL PERMIT APPLICATION $50.00 Property Owner: Address: • Home Telephone: I9.57 koo ai3a lP Contractor Name: leadm 55/13 State Zip code Work Telephone: 1,57 (,00 a 3 � ZTozy Fncray Address: lG404.5' tipple h( iafh $ f S 5regoiX Beack MN sso43 Street City State Zip codc Business Telephone: 6251 an ¥353 Fax: Type of Construction Driveway Parking Pad Fence (6' hei : ht & under) * Sidewalk in public right-of-way Retaining Wall (4' height & under) Swimming Pool Please check appropriate box -A Attach Description of Request (attach site drawing, including location of property lines) .ST/4/9r—It' Pr w41v ER per5iM. (3pwN<<< APPRovAt,c+ Gin( cvonf I understand and hereby agree that the work for which the permit is issued shall be performed according to the following: 1) The conditions of the permit; 2) The approved plans and specifications; 3) The application City approvals, ordinances, and codes; 4) The State Building Code. I also understand that I am responsible for ensuring that all required inspectio : are requested in conformance with the State Building Code. Ap nt Signature /'lisry Print Aplicant Name 5. q• aoAt Date Date of Permit: Permit No. Receipt No. .Z Approvals p pp s Needed: o Ramsey County Permit Needed for Driveway? ❑ City Council Approval Required for Fence? If so, date of approval o Variance Necessary? If so, date of City Council approval Inspection Types: o Final Date: Time: Comments: Initials: ❑ Other Date: Time: Comments: Initials: * Deadline for Fence Permits needing City Council approval is ten (10) days before the next regular City Council meeting Lauderdale\DeputyClerk\Permits & License\Driveway permit.doc LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action Resolution Work Session X Meeting Date September 14, 2021 ITEM NUMBER Selection of Building Official STAFF INITIAL APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: In early July, the City began looking for a firm to serve as the City's building official and to provide supplemental fire code, rental housing, and code enforcement services. Three com- panies responded. They were interviewed by Council Members Dains and Pulford and Ad- ministiator Butkowski. In the packet are copies of the Request for Proposals, a summary of the responses fiom the three companies, and their full responses to the RFP We followed up with each fiim regarding their COVID-19 protocols and those e-mail responses are also in the packet. The interview committee believes that each firm would represent the City well but recom- mends hiring Rum River Construction Consultants. The two primary drivers of this recom- mendation are their expanded inspection hours, which include Saturdays, and their fee struc- ture. The next step is to negotiate a contract with the firm the Council would like to hire. Staff have been in contact with the city attorney Ideally, the contract development process will go quickly so the Council can take a final vote on September 28. The transition from in- house inspections to the new firm is expected to happen in December 2021. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion directing staff to negotiate a contract with services. for building official CITY OF LAUDERDALE, MINNESOTA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL, BUILDING AND FIRE CODE INSPECTIONS, BUILDING AND FIRE CODE PLAN REVIEW, FIRE MARSHAL SERVICES, RENTAL HOUSING INSPECTIONS, AND CODE ENFORCEMENT SERVICES SECTION 1. REOUEST FOR PROPOSALS The City of Lauderdale is requesting proposals from firms to serve as the City s building official due to the retirements of the City's long-standing commercial and residential building officials. The firm will serve as the City's building official providing building and fire code inspection, building and fire code plan reviews, fire mat shal services rental housing inspections, and code enforcement services as needed for hazardous buildings and other significant life safety issues. SECTION 2. GENERAL INFORMATION The City of Lauderdale is a fully developed first -ring suburb of 2,500 located in the heart of the Twin Cities. Lauderdale operates as a Statutory Plan A City. The City is governed by a five -member City Council which includes four members elected at -large, and a mayor elected at -large. Lauderdale has five full-time staff and contracted public safety. St. Anthony Village provides policing services and St. Paul provides fire and EMS services. Lauderdale s charm is its small-town feel in the midst of the metro. We have many long-standing residents but also welcome new -comers who appreciate Lauderdale's affordable housing, low -crime, and great schools as part of the Roseville Area School District. While our land use is predominantly residential, we have significant industrial businesses that border Minneapolis' Mid -City Industrial neighborhood. The City places a high value on relationships and being responsive to community needs. In 2020, the City issued 95 building permits of which 3 were for new homes. The City issued an additional 71 plumbing/HVAC permits The total valuation added was $2.3 million. The City owns and operates the sanitary and storm sewer systems. St. Paul Regional Water owns and operates the water system There are no septic systems. 1 SECTION 3. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS AND TIMETABLE A. Direct all questions and correspondence should be directed to Heather Butkowski, City Administrator (651-792-7657 or heather.butkowski@lauderdalemn.org). 13. All proposals must be received by mail or in-person at the City offices (1891 Walnut Street, Lauderdale, MN 55113) or email (heather.butkowskr a,lauderdalemn.org) no later than 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 20, 2021. C. Staff and council members will review proposals in late July with virtual interviews with one or more firms shortly thereafter. D. The effective date of inspection services will be negotiated but is expected to happen during the fourth quarter of 2020. E. The contract is anticipated to be for an initial two-year term with the option to continue the relationship, subject to ongoing review and evaluation by the City. SECTION 4. REOIJIRED CONTENTS FOR PROPOSALS Please provide the following information. A. Name of the proposer s firm, address, telephone number, e-mail address, owner, contact person if different than owner, and the date proposal submitted. B. Describe your firm's background and history, including the number of years in business and the number of personnel that are certified building officials (CBO), limited building officials (LBO), accessibility specialists, and non -licensed inspectors. Describe the training and experience (including years) of the persons who will be providing inspection services in Lauderdale. C. Provide information about the firm's experience performing the following: • Building and fire code inspections • Building and fire code plan reviews • Commercial plumbing/sprinkler plan reviews • Delegation agreements you have with the State Fire Marshal • Fire marshal services • Rental housing inspections • Code enforcement services D. Describe your firm's operations from the perspective of a property owner. • What days of the week and times of day are inspections available? • How far in advance must inspection be scheduled? • What is the turnaround time on typical residential plan reviews? • What is the turnaround time on commercial plan reviews? • By what methods can applicants submit permit applications (in person, online, mail, fax, email...)? • Will property owner have opportunities to ask questions on code requirements in advance of submitting permits? 2 E. Basis for Compensation Provide your compensation requirements for the following: • Fees for residential and commercial building permits • Fees for residential HVAC/plumbing permits • Fees for residential and commercial plan reviews • Fees for fire code inspections and fire marshal services • Fees for commercial plumbing and sprinkler plan reviews • Fees for rental housing inspections • Fees for code enforcement • Additional costs not included above F. List of References, Potential Conflicts, and Claims • Provide five references from public clients. • State any potential conflicts of interest (i.e. real estate developers, other units of government, etc.) that your firm may have in providing services as outlined in this RFP. • Provide a statement of any insurance claims and/or ethics complaints against the firm or firm's officials over the last five years and the status or outcomes of such actions. Please indicate whether the action is pending or is currently under review by the State Ethics Board SECTION 5. SCOPE OF WORK The City of Lauderdale seeks a firm that will provide a wide range of professional services. The general work elements ate outlined below. The selected firm is expected to provide all of the following. If you are unable to meet any of these elements, please identify which and why you are unable. • Serve as the City's Building Official, under the general direction of the City Administrator. • Plan, program, direct and participate in all building service activities associated with setting and ensuring compliance with building standards. • Perform, plan, organize, direct, and r eview the operations and activities of building inspections. • Review building plans for conformance with the code provisions and approve plans/specifications as necessary, perform plan checks for energy, plumbing, mechanical, accessibility, and other codes. • Advise homeowners, builders, architects, contractors, residents and others concerning the building code and construction methods including minimum standards of construction and materials As needed, meet with property owners regarding building codes before an application is submitted • Assist staff in resolving technical questions relating to code requirements. • Explain city polices to the public, developers, and builders. • Establish and maintain relationships with appropriate government bodies, private firms, organizations, or individuals to assist in achieving City objectives and ensuring compliance with appropriate laws and development standards. • Assist in resolving disputes between the City and contractors. • Provide highly responsive customer service to permittees staff, and the general public. • Advise the city administrator on building services activities. • Perform all manner of inspections for residential, commercial, and institutional projects. • Consult with state and federal agencies having jut isdictional authority over projects as warranted. • Document inspection findings accurately. Submit completed permits to the City for records retention. • Provide fire code inspections and fire marshal services as needed. • Conduct rental housing inspections. Currently, half of the licenses are up for renewal each year. • Perform code enforcement activities, including, inspections, letter writing, follow up inspections, reporting, as needed for hazardous buildings and other significant life safety issues. The firm would provide testimony at court as necessary. 3 • Attend staff and city council meeting as requested. This is expected to happen rarely. ,SECTION 6. PROPOSAL EVALUATION: The City intends to retain the services of the firm evaluated to be the best qualified to perform the work for the City based on experience, compatibility, cost, and other peifoimance factors. A committee of city staff and council members will evaluate the applications. The committee will produce a list of finalists who are Judged to be the most responsive and responsible proposer for the services requested. Interviews will be conducted to finalize the selection. The committee will make a recommendation to the City Council for formal approval. The City reserves the right to request additional information from any and all proposers for purposes of clarification. The City shall not be liable for any expenses incurred by the proposer including, but not limited to, expenses associated with the preparation and submission of the proposal, attendance at interviews, or final contract negotiations. SECTION 7. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: A. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals or to negotiate a contract that is in the best interest of the City at the absolute and sole discretion of the City Council. B. The contract for services will require that the firm selected maintain general liability, automobile, worker's compensation, and errors and omissions insurance. The contract will also contain provisions requiring the selected firm to indemnify the City. The firm serves at the will of the City Council and the City Council has the right to terminate the agreement, at its sole discretion, upon the provision of notice. C. The contract for services will require the firm provide all equipment necessary to perform the functions of the job, including cell phones, mobile computers vehicles, and office equipment. SECTION R. REOUEST FOR PROPOSALS AND SELECTION SCHEDULE Advertise and Distribute RFP: RFP Submittal Deadline: Review of Proposals: Interviews: Award: Start Date: July 6, 2021 July 20 2021 Late July 2021 Late July or early August 2021 August 24, 2021 Fourth quarter 2021 4 Building Official Comparison MNSpect, LLC V c c 0 V a Q N Rum River Construction Consultants a N 0 N a C N ai c a Q a c 0) a a U O N r -I c -i 23306 Cree St NW, Suite 103, St. Francis, Rosemount. MN 55068 MN 55070 888-446-1801/952-442-7520 800-322-6153/ 651-322-6626 763-331-7722 Phone Number www.inspectroninc.com N a c (b E 0 C E E o o U U U U i 0 > > L E E L L \ \ E \-....„ N No a N .�C >a- _C C a tn a Handouts Available? Monday -Friday 8 am - 4:30 pm Monday - Friday 9 am - 4 pm Monday -Friday 7 am - 5 pm Scheduled Inspection Times Saturday 8 am - noon hour notice Advance Notice for Inspections 444 CZ 0 s nz c c (0 N .O O E aj @ Oa 0 CO v -a OU 0 a L a) E E c O _ '6 ii..) ) 0 -0C 0) c a s 0)a 4-1 44T1 a a) a }' a 4-E c -o O E +� a) 73 •_ o �' a N v a) 75% of permit fee 70% of permit fee Permit Fees ri a 0 ro U 0o 3 ai Ql Ol _ c -i U 0 W o v (n ("a (° m w a) 42 a a c (a • a ha O N o U L a O a O as(a C -o O a) as 0 4-1 ra a) U (0 U a 4a - a a c (0 a 0 0 O N Plan Review Fees Calculated based on valuation like other Maintenance Permits N o N -c L Ll a oo a in. furnace and water heater 0 N t/} (n c E U O L (64-1 Cra N Q] 4.., by U CI) (p O �O 0 a N.�.00 a N to Rental Housing Inspection Fee Code Enforcement / Nuisance Abatement a 4-1 4-0 (J) o O O t O t1} N c -i 0 .. a aL L O C to O C (o \ -i 000 7 in- op L O O L • O t/} o 4-+ U O • N O n L C in is U a tA a cn 73 >, L C U (t 0 — \ U a) a t00n O w a U_ O c a) c C a) E a (0 E a) a a _ � ▪ c c N . O U • E a U O C >- a a--+ c a E 4-4 a3 a E a a 1) a s U C 0 E a O A a 4-1 c a E >- (0 a E a a a >, ice+ c .-) O u E a) u L C N i-+ (0 4- 0 c v c o v a4-0 n3.� 4 J .Q $ E O 0 O L Q U v) 0) a) C @ F O >C c U >. o O v U N 0 (1) (1) ..0 C N +a y V) U to 0 ..0 a C U 44) n3 v) U U ++ N i v3 C LL Eo L -o a C.4 --)1 Q O 4-+ O bO C CO (O U U v3 c +J ca U I c m Q o o io v LA 4-- N 4-, a E C 0 !DAc CU L.F +, aJ a) N O E C m 41 a) _U a.,-' E U as U O U 0 a C O 0 U_ Q. a 4-1 (a E a) a a) c c 0 Basic Process and Workflow a) bA 0 0 (7 a) a) i c (6 U '0 c m a) 0) U a) O tn d+ U U c O U a) a) 0 0) c (a 4-0E N 0) 0 V U a) O U «3 CL a) mizs O a s.O C 03 u E a) a) U C co c a) c (6 E vi U a) O a a) bA 0 4- (3 V c O L U al a) frj E V) a) a) V v3 L •N N a) C 4-' 0 V U 4-1 t C ice U v7/ > a) 4i O O U 4- WC) ate -+ c U O Ea) ,,_, ON O v -a a c 0 v) (6 C _ L ( L a) N 0 w +-i 4- E E LW C a L a) a+ -I a) V C (O c a) 4-1•cuC E 5.- 0 4-1 E a) a a) c O U a) .c a) O c O asE N l" � lO .c .c (13v > i1 c O v 4-0 v a) L a) O E � . O O v) '� }, C U (a V) 0 O O (7 " O a a) U a) L a) co ca U CO .O NLA as c c O C 1— Can take up to 15 business days Commercial Plan Review O c -23 a) 5 0 a) Turnaround Time 0 c-( a) a) a) 4-3a a) a E O U O m 0 (5 Maintence Permits: Issued Same Day receipt of required info. Decks, additions, basement finishes etc.: Turnaround Time is received. C CO 73 a) C 03 .Q 0 01 C v) OD X2 73 C ,C = N n (O 'O V3 N a) C .Q 0 c -i 0 4-3a Cr.) E 0 L a) 4-1 z bA as H vs :c bA 3 0 v; O To o > E a) O a) a) L U L7 a) O a c > C Ca t tb 0 O z C -o c o J � E 2 L a)a; c (a O a) E n. W a) 2 a J) c O 3 4-1 a QN) E 4-J (13 o. a1 L t _O v) N a 0 C v3 0 C L O 3 �' v F- c a L a (o O EU W i a) cN (O Uaej Q. G C a) v) c _a. c O a Y O to c 0 Y O ccX O L -a -O J C cc — a1 O a) ca cm) E @ .E c u U .2 z 0) .0 Y 0) COLai a) t i-+ 0) a) .c N a�U 0 an C m a) ro C bO 0) 0 U a) E E 0 0 c 0 U .0 an a) C 0 Island Casino, Vermillion C a@-+ a) O 73 73 o v a) _ a c Y o s C J (b ..0 E Y N C N O U v �X o 2 c o LL O O v7 Y U N J 0 O •y_, fB C N O (6c LL J V) EN >1.:s (a a) bO a) cu w > _ 2 'o a) t -c O z N 31-3 bO a) (O 0 c O 2 O bO C E (a LL Andover, East Bethel, Isanti, Monticello, Supplement/Back Up Clients .tom, c O U a) _c -aO O (9 Q) CO -J ..c Clubl C .) N Shorewood Rum River Construction Consultants City of Lauderdale, Minnesota equest for Proposal Response For B uilding Official B uilding and Fire Code Inspections B uilding and Fire Code Plan Review Fire Marshal Services Rental Housing Inspections Code Enforcement Services July 20, 2021 Rum River Construction Consultants Andy Schreder, Owner & Chief Building Official 23306 Cree Street, Suite 103 St. Francis, MN 55070 763.331.7722, Office 763.291.3704, Cell andv@rumrivercc.com www.rumrivercc.com Accuracy - Efficiency - Uniformity 1 Rum River Construction Consuitants July 20, 2021 City of Lauderdale Heather Butkowski City Administrator 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 Dear Ms. Butkowski, Please refer to the enclosed proposal as advertised on the City of Lauderdale website. The following documents will provide you with the data needed to make an informed decision on services for building, fire, housing, and property maintenance code enforcement services. The interpretation and application of the Minnesota State Building Code, along with the enforcement of local o rdinances is our specialty. Rum River has the experience you can rely on when it comes to skilled inspection and enforcement services for residential, commercial, fire, industrial, institutional, plumbing, mechanical, housing, and property maintenance. In addition to our superb customer service, we promote voluntary compliance through education. Rum River is proud of our foundational values of accuracy efficiency, and uniformity We would love to bring this service-oriented approach to the City of Lauderdale. Our team of code officials, inspectors, and administrative personnel has pioneered a responsive approach which has proven to result in successful and consistent outcomes. This is not only true for building projects of all types and sizes, but also when it comes to e nforcement of the fire, zoning, and nuisance codes. We look forward to the possibility of a long-lasting relationship with the City of Lauderdale after you have had the opportunity to review and discuss this proposal with the City Council. I can assure you that Lauderdale property owners, business partners, and construction firms will receive responsive and respectful service from o ur firm and its employees. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal and I look forward to hearing from you soon. If you have any questions following the review of this proposal, please don t hesitate to contact me. Kind Regards, Andy Schreder, CBO Owner Accuracy - Efficiency - Uniformity 2 Rum River Construction Consultants Table of Contents Introductory Letter Table of Contents History of Rum River Construction Consultants Meet our Staff Scope of Work Compensation References Accuracy - Efficiency - Uniformity 2 3 4 6 9 11 3 Rum River Construction Consultants ging depth code dr's: built en+ History of Rum River Construction Consultants We are very proud of the accomplishments of Rum River Construction Consultants (commonly known as RRCC). Cooperation and collaboration can not be overstated in the building of relationships with residents, staff and elected officials. Code education and consultation became our main focus in 2009. We have continued to expand with offering continuing education requirements to code officials and inspectors, typically teaching over twenty sessions each year. In the past, we have traveled from International Falls down to Austin over to Montevideo and many places in between to present our "Building Blocks" courses, many of which are now available online due to the recent pandemic considerations. Realizing the public benefit of building code administration, combined with the flexibility and performance of a privately held company, we have been expanding our offering of building, fire, property maintenance, and housing inspection services. We have found this to be the most effective means to provide services for jurisdictions, residents, property owners, and contractors. RRCC currently serves as the Designated Building Official to six communities, both township and incorporated cities, in addition to providing supplemental services to seven other jurisdictions. We continue to grow, both in the communities we serve, as well as the team members that make up our Rum River family. We currently have a total of 11 professional and dedicated personnel that have qualifications ranging from permit technicians to licensed code officials and plans examiners who have worked in municipal settings for multiple years. The combined life experiences our employees bring to RRCC from the municipal code world, education sector, construction environment, home inspection and code consultation services, in addition to their excellent customer service relations, certainly bring an aspect that compliments each other. A fresh perspective reveals a need for new ideas to streamline the permitting process which helps both the applicant and the jurisdiction be more responsive to their inspection needs. Rum River has implemented the most efficient use of technology in our field allowing electronic plan submittal and remote communication with contractors, suppliers, and residents. Each inspector has smart phone technology and computer tablets in the inspection vehicles which allows a level of efficiency needed in today's construction environment. This focus on time management allows us to dedicate more time to the customer, aiding them with the navigation and implementation of local and state standards. Additionally, once an inspection is completed, the inspector can email the applicant the updated inspection record with any notes and an indication if the inspection has passed while still on-site. This is extremely helpful for general contractors that are likely off-site managing other projects. 4 Accuracy - Efficiency - Uniformity We occasionally find residents who prefer paper copies of various information. We have developed a way in which both requests can be honored while still maintaining the most efficient means of processing permits and site inspections. Recognizing health and safety concerns, RRCC has embraced available technology with remote virtual inspections for specific projects. This format acknowledges the desire for physical distancing while increasing efficiency for required inspections. Following formats from the State of Minnesota and International Code Council, assures inspections done in this manner meet all legal criteria. Rum River provides various services including the enforcement and administration of the Minnesota State Building Code, which incorporates accessibility, building, energy, fire, fuel gas, industrialized/modular building, manufactured homes, mechanical, plumbing, and prefabricated buildings. Rum River has also been approved to provide specialized services to our jurisdictions that are traditionally provided by the state, including plan review and inspections on public buildings and state -licensed facilities. Additionally, we can complete plan review and inspections on fire suppression systems and fire alarm systems through our delegation agreement with the MN Fire Marshal's office. These distinctions are important to the City of Lauderdale due to the fact that we are able to keep a local oversight to the projects, work directly with the contractors allowing for smooth progression of the project, in addifion to keeping permit and plan review resources within the jurisdiction. Staff at RRCC has practical experience in the areas of code enforcement and rental licensing programs. Pioneering processes that allow direct accountability for property owners helps maintain property values as well as foster pride in one's community. Amendments to and adoption of property maintenance codes is vitally important to the integrity of programs meant to maintain existing properties. We will work with staff to ensure standards in place are effective and meet the City of Lauderdale's expectations. A customer service-oriented approach is paramount to aid residents and contractors with the application process. Consistent and generous office hours are available, and appointments are always able to be scheduled to meet with property owners and contractors, whether in person or virtually. Rum River staff takes much pride as educators and administrators of the MN State Building Code. Provisions are in place to help ensure safe, durable and energy efficient buildings which protect residents and maintain positive property values for years to come. 5 Accuracy - Efficiency - Uniformity Rum. River Construction Consultants ringing ;insti p cote ana Meet our Staff Andy Schreder - Chief Building Official, Owner Minnesota State Building Official certification #60002536 North Hennepin Community College, Building Inspection Technology Continuing Education Instructor #1644615 MPCA SSTS Certified Inspector #C8772 25+ years in the built -environment industry which includes municipal building inspection experience in multiple jurisdictions with populations ranging from 4,500 to 62,000 in both rural and urban settings. Jeff Pleski - Lead Inspector and Plans Examiner Minnesota State Building Official certification number 60002157 North Hennepin Community College, Building Inspection Technology International Code Council (ICC) Residential Building Inspector ICC Commercial Building Inspector 21+ years as a residential and commercial building Inspector Provides leadership and training to staff and maintains excellent customer service while following Minnesota life safety standards within the code. Brant Schreder - Field Supervisor and Plans Examiner Minnesota State Limited Building Official certification number LB765259 Substantial experience in the construction industry. Dedication specific to building inspections for nearly four years. Lengthy history of customer service roles in the private sector that continue to benefit our clients. Mike Mullen, Field Inspector Minnesota State Licensed Building Official certification number 60720354 North Hennepin Community College, Building Inspection Technology ICC - B1 Residential Building Inspector ICC - 64 Property Maintenance Inspector 25+ years of experience in construction with an emphasis in Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers. Mark Peterson, Building Inspector Minnesota State Limited Building Official certification number LB756022 North Hennepin Community College, Building Inspection Technology 20+ years of construction experience which includes being a crew lead in residential construction 6 Accuracy - Efficiency - Uniformity Dean Becker - Building Inspector and Septic Site Inspections North Hennepin Community College, Building Inspection Technology Completing certification process for Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems 14+ years of experience working with Structurally Insulated Panel (SIPs) systems in residential construction. Adam Barthel - Plans Examiner Minnesota State Building Official certification number BO727034 ICC Certified Residential Building Inspector B1 #8412251 22+ years of construction industry experience which includes residential plan review and material specification Residential truss design and problem -solving work identifying opportunities for design modifications to achieve stated goals and avoidance of common and predictable job site challenges On-site carpentry experience with wood frame residential projects. Ben Polgreen - Plans Examiner, Field Inspector MPCA SSTS Certified Inspector #9228 Extensive experience with on-site wastewater treatment systems which includes design, inspections, and maintenance of basic to advanced systems. Dustin Wiebold - Building Code Compliance Consultant, Building Inspector North Hennepin Community College, Building Inspection Technology Excels in examining the code and how it applies to current technology and applications in today's -built environment. Excellent communicator with a full understanding of the big picture in how individual pieces make up the whole Christina Bass - Administrative Coordinator Organized team member who is the first point of contact for customers requesting inspections Completes maintenance permit processes while preparing documents for field inspectors Schedules training opportunities for staff throughout the state to inform building officials and contractors code specific continuing education information Lori Blomquist - Administrative Assistant St. Cloud State University - Masters in Curriculum and Instruction Secondary Education Instructor for 30 years. Processes permit applications and prepares documents for plans examiners and field inspectors Excellent communication skills while providing superb customer service to residents and contractors throughout their project Dee Zimmerman - Building Permit Technician Professional experience includes 11 years in municipal government positions as a Building Permit Technician and Customer Service Specialist Public sector educational background with a passion for helping people and providing exceptional service to all residents and customers 7 Accuracy - Efficiency - Uniformity Roxanne Schreder - Business Manager, Owner 24+ years of government experience centering on interaction with the public daily. Concentration on development of programs and information presentation with the goal of clear, concise, and effective communication Outstanding customer service relations with a reputation for accuracy and excellent problem -solving abilities 8 Accuracy - Efficiency - Uniformity Rum River Construction Consultants rpngtng in dep . Scope of Work Rum River Construction Consultants, as the City of Lauderdale's Designated Building Official, under the general direction of the City Administrator will provide the following services: • Plan, program, direct, and participate in all building service activities associated with setting and e nsuring compliance with building standards • Perform, plan organize, direct, and review the operations and activities of building inspections • Review building plans for conformance with the code provisions and approve plans/specifications as n ecessary, perform plan checks for energy, plumbing, mechanical, accessibility, and other codes • Advise homeowners, builders, architects, contractors residents, and others concerning the building code and construction methods including minimum standards of construction and materials As n eeded, meet with property owners regarding building codes before an application is submitted • Assist staff in resolving technical questions relating to code requirements • Explain city policies to the public, developers, residents, and builders • Establish and maintain relationships with appropriate government bodies, private firms, organizations, or individuals to assist in achieving City objectives and ensuring compliance with appropriate laws and development standards • Assist in resolving disputes between the City of Lauderdale and contractors • Provide highly responsive customer service to permittees, staff, and the general public • Advise the city administrator on building services activities • Perform all manner of inspections for residential, commercial, and institutional projects • Consult with state and federal agencies having jurisdictional authority over projects as warranted • Document inspection findings accurately and submit completed permits to the City of Lauderdale for records retention • Provide fire code inspections and fire marshal services as needed • Conduct rental housing inspections. • Perform code enforcement activities including inspections, letter writing, follow-up inspections, and reporting as needed for hazardous buildings or other significant life safety issues • Provide testimony at court as necessary • Attend staff and city council meetings as requested Acknowledging the above, we offer the following availability in our proposal: • Office hours are 8:00 am to 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday • Inspection hours are from 7:00 am to 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday and on Saturday from 8:00 am to 12:00 pm, as needed 9 Accuracy - Efficiency - Uniformity • Each inspector has a mobile phone and can be reached via text message, email, and voice. In addition, voicemails can be left for the inspector via their mobile phone or through our main office where they will receive their voicemails while in the field by innovative technology • All meetings with residents or contractors will be at the City of Lauderdale office or at a mutually agreeable location, such as the resident's home or property • Rum River prides itself in building relationships with property owners and residents and are available during our office hours to answer questions related to the permitting process or questions on code requirements • For after-hours emergencies, the Chief Building Official or his designee, are always available Plan Review and Permit Processing • Maintenance permits (such as siding, roofing, window/door, etc.) that do not require a plan review can be processed the same business day • Plan review for decks, additions, basement finishes, etc. take one to three business days • Plan review for accessory buildings take three to five business days • Plan review for new single-family dwellings can take up to ten business days • Plan review for commercial projects can take up to 15 business days Please note that the processing time may vary greatly depending upon the complexity of the project for review. In addition, processing time does not start until all required submittals have been received by RRCC to complete an accurate and thorough review. Inspection Scheduling • All inspections are scheduled through our main office by calling 763-331-7722 or emailing permits@rumrivercc.com • Typically, inspections are scheduled 24 hours in advance • Same day inspections are possible and remote virtual inspections are accommodated if possible Record Management System • Rum River uses the Goggle Workspace Business Platform to allow for ease of sharing documents, correspondence, and collaboration • All documents are stored electronically in the cloud • The City of Lauderdale will have access to permit applications, monthly permit reports, along with completed project documentation for retention purposes that will be saved via .pdf to store on the jurisdiction s server by address (and permit number in case of multiple projects) making it simple, accessible, and organized to transfer to your records management system. • Rum River does not require paper copies of documents for plan review, etc. This saves the applicant money, time, and convenience • Rum River uses an electronic inspection record to update and inform the applicant regarding a pass/fail for an inspection with any needed notations. This is emailed to the applicant once their inspection is completed. The final inspection record would be one of the documents provided electronically for retention purposes to the City of Columbus. 10 Accuracy - Efficiency - Uniformity Rum River Construction Consultants Compensation Fee Schedule If Rum River is selected to be your service provider, we will collaborate with the City of Lauderdale to ensure the administration and enforcement of code related items are fair, reasonable, and consistent with expenses incurred to apply the code accurately, efficiently and uniformly across the jurisdiction. The below percentages are reflected in the above assumption, except for a minimum $50.00 fee for all issued permits. Use of the Minnesota Valuation Table (published annually in May) will be utilized as a minimum valuation. Fees for Service Permits will be processed and inspected with compensation to RRCC at a rate of 70% Permit Fee, with a minimum of $50.00 per permit. Plan review will be compensated to RRCC at a rate of 70% of the Plan Review Fee adopted per the City of Lauderdale Fee Schedule. Plan review is required on all commercial projects as well as residential projects with the exception of maintenance permits (Le. mechanical, roof siding, plumbing, and replacement of windows and doors in existing openings). RRCC will assume responsibility for all communication with permit applicants and prospective applicants with questions regarding construction projects related to conformance with the Minnesota State Building code and Lauderdale City Codes. Full-service plan review, permit processing, field inspections and document retention are considered standards of our service. 90% of special investigation fee, re -inspection fee, license look -up fee (if adopted), site inspection (typically no charge for project development inquiries), master plan review, moved building and pre -moved building inspection, manufactured home connections. On-call and as -needed general building inspection services (special projects) during normal business hours will be billed at a rate of $90.00 per hour at the direction of the City Administrator. Property Maintenance Code enforcement and nuisance abatement will be charged at a rate of $85.00 per hour. This includes preparation for and completion of court testimony. 11 Accuracy - Efficiency - Uniformity Rental licensing will be charged at a rate of 75% of rental licensing costs and inspections per the City of Lauderdale Fee Schedule. Response to emergency situations outside of normal business hours in order to evaluate building integrity and allowances to reoccupy will be done at the direction of the City Administrator at an hourly rate of $120.00 with a 2 -hour minimum. Possible scenarios for this service would be storm related events, or other natural or manmade disasters. No additional charge to attend up to two Lauderdale City Council meetings to update the mayor and council on building inspection services during a calendar year. Additional meetings are charged at a rate of $90 per hour with a minimum of two hours. No additional charge to attend internal staff meetings twice a month. N o additional charge to meet with property owners or developers, either in-person or virtually, regarding building codes in preparation of an impending application for building inspection services. O ptional Reporting Processes. Completion of various monthly & quarterly reports, including, but not limited to the following at a rate of $75.00 per hour. • Monthly permit issued and fees report • US Census Reporting • Dodge Report Transportation Contractor will provide transportation to meetings and site inspections at no cost to the City of Lauderdale Billing and Payment Terms RRCC shall submit periodic invoices (customarily monthly) in a form approved by Lauderdale and are due and payable within 30 days of receipt by the City of Lauderdale. Past due balances shall accrue interest at a rate of 1.0% per month (or the maximum rate of interest permitted by law, if less). Invoices will include permits that have been closed since the last billing period. Additionally, any hourly or special project fees will be included for payment at that time should any have been incurred since the last billing cycle. O ccasionally, applicants are issued a permit, however, do not complete the project within 180 days per state statute. If reasonable significant progress has not been documented within that time, even if a request for an extension to keep the permit open has been received Rum River has the option to invoice the city of Orono for projects that fall within this category, including those that have been expired for inactivity. 12 Accuracy - Efficiency - Uniformity Rum River Construction Consultants Insert references here Jon Sevald, Mounds View Lezlie Sauter, Pine City Ken Jagusch, Anoka County References Accuracy - Efficiency - Uniformity 13 MOUNDS VIEW 2401 Highway 10 • Mounds View, MN 55112-1499 Phone: 763.717 4000 • Fax: 763 717 4019 February 5, 2018 RE: Letter of Recommendation for Rum River Construction Consultants To Whom It May Concern, In 2017, the city's Building Official resigned. We contacted neighboring cities, asking if we could borrow their inspectors until we were able to fill the vacancy, but they were all too busy. The City of New Brighton recommended that we contact Andy Schreder of Rum River Construction Consultants. Andy Schreder served as our Interim Building Official, September thru December, 2017. During this time, significant building projects included the Mounds View Public Works building, a cleanroom for a medical manufacturer, and normal residential and commercial plan reviews and inspections. Andy conducted all plan reviews Andy and/or Jeff Pleski (CBO) from Rum River conducted inspections, and worked from City Hall two or three days per week. When not in City Hall, Andy fielded questions from residents and contractors via phone and email. I was immediately impressed with Andy's professional demeanor and thoroughness in his plan review and documentation. This thoroughness provided an easy transition for our Permit Technician in scheduling inspections and distributing approved permits. Andy and Jeff are very pleasant to work with, and courteous to residents and contractors. In one instance where a homeowner purchased materials and then applied for a permit to construct a canopy over a backyard dancefloor intended for busloads of people, Andy was polite and tactful when explaining to the homeowner that this is a life -safety issue and warranted more thought (structural engineering) into its design than the homeowner anticipated. Additionally, Andy and Jeff took great effort to mentor our Housing/Zoning Inspector, encouraging him to pursue obtaining a Building Official, Limited (BOL) license, which he did during Rum River's tenure During our search for a Building Official, Andy served on the interview panel, and was instrumental at identifying candidates' true experience in plan review and inspection process. We hired a CBO, who started in January, 2018. Andy and Jeff stayed through January to transition the new CBO, following Rum River s plan review and inspection documentation process. Once we saw Rum River's process of doing things we realized how critical their process is in administering permits and inspections. I would not hesitate in using Rum River Construction Consultants as a contracted building inspector Our plan is use Rum River again whenever a complex permit is applied for and to supplement our staff during busy times. I really cannot praise Rum River enough. Respectfully, Jon Sevald, AICP City Planner / Supervisor www.ci.mounds-view.rnn.us Equal Opportunity Employer ine North. Nice and close. January 30, 2020 To Whom it May Concern, The City of Pine City contracted with Rum River Construction Consultants starting in March 2018 after the swift departure of our in-house building official. We had several projects underway within the City, and n eeded the expertise of a licensed building official immediately, to provide permit inspections and construction oversight. Andy Schreder and his team were able to immediately step into the Pine City community, with their superior knowledge of the building code and great customer service mind -set so that no projects e xperienced delays. Mr. Schreder and his team also helped to introduce a more efficient method of processing building permits, eliminating the need for paper almost completely. Over the past two years Rum River Construction Consultants, under the direction of Andy Schreder, has also expanded the knowledge of the Community Development Department here at City Hall. City staff are more comfortable answering questions regarding building permits and are also able to foresee issues of future developments due to the education Andy and his team has provided, because they truly embody collaboration and open communication. The City Council renewed its contract with Rum River Construction Consultants for 2020 due to this o utstanding service, and also because it fiscally makes sense for the size of this community. The permits which are pulled for projects directly pay for the costs the City incurs for hiring Rum River Construction Consultants, rather than paying a static salary each year for a building official at City Hall regardless of how many projects are underway. At this time, the Community Development Department continues to support this continued relationship and wholeheartedly recommends Rum River Construction Consultants for building code enforcement. Sincerely, Lez . Sauter Community Development Director City of Pine City — Community Development Department 315 Main Street South, Suite 100, Pine City, Minnesota 55063-1619 1 Phone 320.629.2575 1 Fax: 320.629.6081 E-mail. Isauter(apinecitygov.com 1 Website pinecity.govoffice.com In accordance with Federal law and U.S. Department of Agriculture policy, this institution is prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, religion, sex, familial status, sexual orientation, and reprisal. An equal opportunity employer/contractor. RE: Letter of Recommendation for Andy Schreder and Rum River Construction Consultants O v w -0 a) -0 N i 0 N ha N C C O fl < Uc U Q C O N m ,GL O C _c O c N ..c 4-0 �O LL U m `-O c :c p c �- N t m O N a c E a .c 0 m O t N 0 •c o _c V) +' Z OA c -a `+-.c C m o on c N :c > 4 -JO t. a) ) t-' m.c CU +.l Q) >. L TJ L) o 5 ro CU N O to u m v -0 a a c > U C m -C + aA — a0 C ci-+ .0 .` -0 2 C O U m a m O N c CO N Ala c -o .L a � 0) OD E '> o OA 3 >- c u m ao p c U N to "O ti0 C T c E N CU •U N (1) 44 C O 0 O -0 CO u E m O u C C lj m ftts CU m C N 1- 0 a .0 m L 4.J m C (1) Ct. c a) E m a) Y a) on N C aD p D N a) N m �6 O U c 0 uU a) a N m c m C 0 u 0) a) aJ L vi v ro 1 -a a a) a) CU O 0 m c N m v L 0 E D a) a m U 0 +-•D N v O 'D 0 O c 0 (1) 0 u CtOal c O v +L+ 0 a a0 c 0 m co 0 U a) 0 r1 CO w 0 a) 0 4-0 v (1) toE QJ m 0 > v N 0 0. N L G .� O O +_ ti c C 0) 4.1:3g sin2 > T Y ON .N c C a� m N " U OU O to 4-'' C cif t= C `o 3 u + o °A E @ a) c N E °Y3E '> N .o v o u v u3�VImva 0 C -- E u a) 0 . t m o a O- U O +-0 `1 a) O L 0 L a) a 44 .c 3 -O ° 3 a) N C vi C ^ a m C 4J :F, i•, t3 0 0 E E a)''+-5 ro E c m" a) C a L O `+- U O Q.1 4°C > O O .c u L a, a 0 3 abb 0 _ a0 cu u O +3 t- O ra d CD p + O C t1A •14>-• C i. c DO E . m p a) v- i Uw. OU '° N O y0 L N N .� m L. .c 0i C 0 0 il.. 1-di vl O O N a) m 'o a € a) -a 0)0'-x l0 m .0 C m 0) tn m :2 La U E m L E a) T L 4.4 aa) 0 '4- CS] .c O _re .1::2 E U 03 U - V C "i a) -O Nm L V a n' c E v01 c ou A a, c ) a N N CU L C v u no aa)) c 3 v) Jr. o 03 10 m C OV C 01 U a Q E a 03 O 0 L a_ c N j' O a� OD N . > a) a O O C C ca E .c a) 41 N •a) N .0 t c C c p y E Q E co T O m C vi a a) a) u E u m o h a ± o L7 U N .0 3 c 0 N N m m u m — O L). S a) (ElE v 33 0 C O C 0- 0 O "1 O U c U CT co O co a) +.+ O u ( E 0 c m u o a) fa O mU E m 3n) c to a) U ca: To u U N E N 3 a) 27: -c T c a 0 U a 4- Q C _ 'L7 11) I .mc aUA"0 c c v p a) a) m t0a 00 p a)Y > C2. CO O +' O U ;1-iO C U N M m V 4-# 4-0 oA +.1 c 'L7 0 ac) ou C m 0 •� m N m O >- c m C U c a) 0) v O C m c O m U �C E E O U c c v O 4-00 6) >- a E E m v .a o c C 5 E U m• > >- CLO Q ken.iaeuschCWco.anoka.mn.us Heather Butkowski From. Sent: To: Subject: Andy Schreder <andy@rumrivercc.com> Tuesday September 7, 2021 9:17 PM Heather Butkowski 9/7 Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. Hello Heather, Thank you for contacting me this morning. In response to the questions regarding Covid provisions: We closely monitor and follow state and federal criteria for distancing and other safety precautions. Gloves, hand sanitizer and disposable masks are provided and readily available for all staff. The current situation with Covid has allowed us to expand our services and utilize practices for live stream inspections. This allows inspections to be completed from a distance, avoiding contact while providing thorough inspection assistance. The Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry and the International Code Council has endorsed the practice of RVI, or Remote Virtual Inspections. This enables permit applicants and Building Inspectors the chance to utilize today's technologies while ensuring a safe, successful project. Live stream connections are made with either Google Duo, or Facetime on Apple devices. RVI can be used in a number of situations but is not a substitute for all personal site inspections. Staff continue to recognize the importance of personal safety and understanding of health concerns. RRCC does not have a policy more restrictive than current recommended guidelines. Thank you for the question. Let me know if you need further information. Andy Schreder Chief Building Official Rum River Construction Consultants 23306 Cree St NW- Suite 103 St Francis MN 55070 Andy©rumrivercc com Office/ Scheduling 763-331-7722 Cell 763-291-3704 2 15120 Chippendale Ave. Suite 202 Rosemount MN 55068 Mission Statement "To deliver cost-effective, professional and comprehensive building inspection, plan review and project management services that ensure safe homes, businesses and communities" roposal for Comprehensive Inspection Services To City of Lauderdale 1891 Walnut St. Lauderdale, MN 55113 July 20, 2021 www.inspectroninc.com Inspectron, Inc. Code Compliance Inspections 15120 Chippendale Ave. Suite 202 Rosemount, MN 55068 Phone 651-322-6626 Toll Free 800-322-6153 Fax 651-322-7580 Company Profile INSPECTRON, INCORPORATED Inspectron Incorporated is a Minnesota S Corporation organized in 1996 and recorded in 1997. Inspectron Inc. is a small privately owned company created to provide quality building inspection services to local units of government and exceptional customer service to its constituents. With offices established at 15120 Chippendale Ave. Suite 202, Rosemount MN and 4 13'1 Ave. Waite Park Minnesota we are readily situated to serve our clients and their constituents. Ron Wasmund, the company president and lead contact is a Minnesota Certified Building Official (Certificate MN903), and a MPCA certified and licensed ISTS Professional (License #1916). The friendly, professional inspection staff of nine is MPCA, ICC and Minnesota certified. Professional liability including Bodily Injury, Property Damage and Personal Injury as well as terrors and Omission insurance with $2,000,000/$4,000,000 coverage is maintained. Workers Compensation Insurance is maintained and renewed annually. A $25,000 license bond is also maintained. Inspectron Inc. has no company vehicles. Inspectron Inc. is represented by the accounting am of Doug Schluter LTD., the law firm of Stephenson and Sanford P.L.C., and the Hartzung Insurance Agency. Inspectron Inc. combined years in public service provides the experience necessary to help identify the needs of the entity and work with the leaders and elected officials to deliver friendly, professional service to the building community. Inspectron Inc. works with the community leaders, property owners, and contractors to ensure the health, safety and welfare of the community is protected. Inspectron, Inc. provides different levels of service to local units of government designed to meet their needs and desires. The service varies fiom full time building department administration including collecting and accounting for permit fees filing surcharge reports, plan reviews and inspections to temporary staffing helping local units of government meet the demands of the peak construction season. Inspectron Inc. has served as interim Building Official for Goodhue County, Rice County, the City of Northfield, the City of Farmington, the City of Rosemount, the City of Waite Park and the City of Ramsey during their search for a qualified full time Building Official. Inspectron, Inc. has 4 facets to our service offering. First, we provide full Building, Fire and Zoning administration through enforcement of the Minnesota State Building Code, Minnesota State Fire Code and local Zoning Ordinance. We are www.inspectroninc.com fully computerized for the issuance of building permits; electronic plan review, scheduling and tracking of inspections; generating monthly, quarterly and annual permit activity reports, state surcharge reports and census reports. This software allows closer tracking of open permits, daily cash receipts, permit activity reports and inspection history while providing consistent form design to those jurisdictions desiring this service. We are set up to function as an entity's Building Department handling everything from permit application through certificate of occupancy, tracking and recording every step in between. Our Fire personnel have served as Fire Marshal and Fire inspectors Zoning administration includes checking all building permit applications for compliance with zoning district standards including peimitted uses, and dimensional standards, when appropriate. We coordinate with and assist the planner and Planning Commission in zoning matters consistent with a building permit review. We also perform maintenance/nuisance enforcement with everything from first notice to court testimony We have a successful track record working with jurisdictions cleaning up junk sites and substandard buildings. The second facet is temporary staffing. We provide building inspectors to jurisdictions with staffing needs resulting from vacations, illness or staff turnover. Our services as interim Building Official and Building Official mentoring have set us apart from other firms. The State Building Codes and Standards Division has recommended Inspectron, Inc. to several jurisdictions requiring this service. The third facet is Rental Housing Inspection. We can manage the entire rental inspection process starting with a kick off meeting with rental property owners including sending inspection notification letters, scheduling and performing inspections, documenting corrections and issuing rental licenses. Our software automates the entire rental inspection process and generates status reports. The fourth facet of our business is on-site Sewage Treatment System review, inspection and approval. We currently have 2 MPCA fully certified and licensed inspectors. Our office is fully integrated, using a local area network. teach inspector utilizes the full Microsoft Office Suite for word processing, electronic spreadsheets and scheduling work assignments, meetings and tasks. Remote access allows the individual inspector to monitor and edit their schedule as well as send and receive email messages off site. We are able to load a jurisdiction's property data into our permit issuance and tracking software thereby fully automating the permit process for that jurisdiction for efficient and effective account management. Our office is staffed with an office assistant and office manager. Our office assistant is responsible for data processing, inspection scheduling, permit processing and record retention. Inspectron currently utilizes "Permit Works" software to generate all permits and inspection records. During the summer of 2021 we are implementing a new software system expanding permitting capabilities to online and shared access. All inspections required for a specific permit are recorded, maintained and tracked in the software system. The results of the inspection, the date and time it was performed and the name of the inspector performing the inspection are all recorded. We can generate reports that show the inspection status for a specific project, the total number of inspections performed for any specified time or inspector and the percentage of inspections that pass or fail. Three-part (NCR) Inspection Reports are used for field documentation of the inspections performed. One copy is left on site informing the permit www.inspectroninc.com holder of the corrective action necessary, if any to pass the inspection The software also allows for tracking and reporting permit activity. The name and address of the property owner, property I.D. number, description of the project, valuation of the project and fees associated with the permit are all recorded. The software is used to accurately report permit activity levels to the Jurisdiction in a timely manner. 1 lectronic Plan Review is performed using a software product titled Bluebeam. This allows applicant to submit PDF copies of their plans to us electronically and we can interact with them as the plan review is being completed. An electronic copy of the plan review comments can be compiled, shared and stored, thus eliminating paper shuffle. Intentionally Blank www.inspectroninc.com Inspectron Inc. has on going agreements with the following list of entities: City of Farmington — Building Official Mentoring, inspection assistance Contact Ken Lewis, Building Official 651-463-1860 City of Kimball - Full Time Building Inspection, Building Department Administration, Rental Housing Inspections. Contact Nicole Pilarski, City Clerk Administrator 320-398-2725 City of Mendota Heights — ISTS review and inspection Contact Ryan Ruzack Public Works Director 651-452-1850 City of Northfield — Special projects, and inspection assistance Contact Mike Morehauser, Building Official 507-645 3008 City of Richmond - Full Time Building Inspection, Building Department Administration Contact Tesa Tomaschett City Administrator 320-597-2075 City of Rockville - Full Time Building Inspection, Building Department Administration, Rental Inspections. Contact Martin Bode City Administrator 320-251-5836 City of St. Joseph — Full Time Building Inspection, Building Department Administration, Zoning Administration, Rental Housing Inspections, and Planning reviews. Contact Therese Haffner, City Administrator 320-363-7201 City of Sunfish Lake — ISTS review and inspection Contact Cathy Iago City Clerk City of Lexington — Full Time Building Inspection, Plan Review and Administration, Property Maintenance and Rental Housing Code Fnfoicement. Contact Bill Petracek City Administrator 763-784-2794 City of Vermillion — Full Time Building Inspection, Plan Review and Administration Contact Rene Voight, Jurisdiction Clerk 651-437-2865 Goodhue County — Building Official Mentoring, Commercial Plan Review Contact Doug Morem, Building Official 651-385-3110 Castle Rock Township - Full time Building Inspection, Plan Review, and Administration; Contact Molly Weber Town Clerk 651-460-2221 Empire Township Full time Building Inspection, Plan review and Administration Contact Charlie, Town Clerk 651-463-4494 Marshan Township— Full time Building Inspection, Plan Review, and Administration Contact Gloria Pinky, Boaid Supervisoi 651-437-5664 Nininger Township - Full time Building Inspection Plan Review, and Administration Contact Bob Rotty, Board Supervisor 651-437-5690 Treasure Island Casino- Special Projects, Code Consultation, Inspections and Plan Review Contact Dairel Breuei, Project Directoi 651-388-2493 Rice County - Full time Building Inspection, Plan review. Contact Julie Runkel, Director of Environmental Services 507- 273-9711 www.inspectroninc.com Major projects that Inspectron Inc. has been engaged to provide complete plan review and inspections include: New $34 million -dollar, 120,000 square foot addition to the Treasure Island Casino for the Prairie Island Indian Community New 7.4 million -dollar, 174,000 square foot, three story Red Wing Fairview Medical Center. New 5 million -dollar Dittman Center for the Arts on the campus of St. Olaf College, Northfield MN New 40 million -dollar 160,000 square foot Science Building campus of St. Olaf College New 3.7 million -dollar 70,000 square foot Central Maintenance Facility for Dakota County. New 5.7 million -dollar 130,000 square foot Elementary School for City of Farmington ISD 192. New 72 -million -dollar addition to the Empire Waste Water Treatment Plant New 1 million -dollar 44 -unit apartment building St. Joseph MN New 4 -million -dollar Mayo Clinic and Supervised Living facility addition to the Kenyon Sunset Nursing Home. New Fairview Clinic in City of Zumbrota New 76,000 Sq. Ft. Manufacturing Facility for Harris Mechanical in the City of Zumbrota. New two wing 300 room, 8 story Hotel, Swimming Pool and Water Park to Treasure Island Resort and Casino 3 - New Multi -Family Apartment Developments adding 350 Dwelling Units to the City of Lexington. www.inspectroninc.com Reference List for Inspectron Inc. This list is provided for your convenience. Please feel free to contact any of the local units of government served by Inspectron Inc. for their reactions Rill Petracek City Administrator City of Lexington 9180 Lexington Ave No. Lexington, MN 55104 PH 763-784-2794 Doug Morem Building Official Goodhue County 509 W. 5th Stieet Red Wing, MN 55066 PH 1-651-385-3110 Therese Haffner City Administrator City of St. Joseph PO Box 668 St. Joseph, MN 56374 PH. 320-363-7201 www.inspectroninc.com Inspectron Inc. constantly works for service improvement and welcomes comments from all clients and permit applicants served to achieve improvement. We employ voice messaging, cellular communication devices and email messaging to assist in availability to the public when we are not able to be in the office. Our toll-free number is available to all customers and permit applicants outside our area code. Regular Office hours are maintained from 8:00 am to 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. We ale open every day except for New Year's Day, Memorial Day, July 4th, Labor Day, 2 days for Thanksgiving and 2 days for Christmas. We use our full complement of inspection staff to provide service to every jurisdiction 5 days per week as needed to cover plan review and requested inspections. We schedule 24 hours in advance. All inspections are scheduled and performed within 24 hours of the time requested. Maintenance style permits for roofing, siding, same size window replacement, water heater replacement and furnace replacement can be issued upon receipt of the permit application Residential permits that require a plan review will be issued within 5-7 days after we receive all of the required information Commercial permits will be issued within 7-10 days of receipt of all information necessary to complete a review. Informational handouts are placed at the local jurisdiction as well in the office of Inspectron Inc. and on line from our website, wwwanspectroninc.com. www.inspectroninc.com Inspectron Inc. Personnel List Ron Wasmund President Minnesota Certified Building Official. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Licensed and Certified Individual Sewage Treatment System Inspector. American Concrete Institute certified, MNDOT registered concrete inspector. Civil Technology graduate of Mankato Technical College. Thirty -nine-year career as an inspector for municipal projects, Jurisdiction ordinance and building code enforcement. Member of International Code Congress, Member of Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Chapter of Building Officials. Past member of Institute of Civil Engineering Technicians. Mark Luostari Lead Supervisor Commercial and Residential Inspector and Plan Reviewer Former Home Builder foi 26 years and project manager for multi -unit dwelling development. MN Certified Building Official, 4 years managing our busy inspections and plan review office. Member of International Code Congress, Member of Minnesota 10,000 Lakes Chapter of Building Officials. Additional Inspection Staff Bill Barber — MN and ICC Certified B.O Commercial and Residential Inspector, Plan Reviewer Julie Praus — MN Certified Limited B.O, Certified Residential Designer Residential Building Inspector and Plan Reviewer Scott T. Jensen — MN Certified B 0 Zoning Nuisance Enforcement Specialist, Residential Building Inspector Harry Jenness — MN Certified B.O Commercial and Residential inspector, Manufactured Home Set-up Specialist Mike Barck - MN Certified 110, ICC Certified Inspector, Commercial and Residential Inspector Steve Kleist — MN Certified Limited B.O Residential Inspector and Certified SSTS Inspector Mike Wallen — MN Certified B.O. Commercial and Residential Inspector, Residential Plan reviewer Greg Karow — MN and ICC Certified B.O. Commercial and Residential Plan Reviewer and Inspector All staff are members of 10,000Lakes Chapter of ICC, Members of ICC and NFPA. Internships Building Inspectors Inspectron Inc. hires and trains Building Inspection Technology students and contractors interested in becoming certified in the field of building code enforcement. These positions are temporary and typically occur during the peak summer months of construction. Interns are selected based on their scholastic achievements and or construction experience and willingness to learn and contribute. Full resumes are available upon request www.inspectroninc.com Inspectron, Inc. Code Compliance Inspections 15120 Chippendale Ave. Suite 202 Rosemount, MN 55068 Phone 651-322-6626 Toll Free 800-322-6153 Fax 651-322-7580 Proposal Building Inspection Scope of Services In compliance with all services outlined in the following proposal to the City of Lauderdale for Building Official, Building and Fiie Code Inspections, Building and Fiie Code Plan Review, Fire Marshal Services, Rental Housing Inspection Service and Code hnforcement Services. Inspectron will provide full administration of these services. This shall include but not be limited to full building department administration, fire code administration, cental housing administration, Nuisance Code enforcement, plan review, permit issuance, field inspections, correction notice issuance, re -inspections certificate of occupancy issuance, monthly, quarterly and annual reports to City Administrator, and outside agencies as required. We will interact with project developers, contractors and general public on specific project issues; complaints; and code questions. We are available by office phone, cell phone, text messages, email and online via our website. Onsite meetings with property owners and contractors will be arranged anytime 5 days per week by owners request. Permit Applications will be accepted in person, or via fax, email, US mail or pick up at Lauderdale City Hall Inspectron Inc. will calculate the project valuation for determination of state surcharge and building permit fees for every valuation -based permit. Residential service shall be considered 1 & 2 family dwelling units. Any structure containing more than 2 dwelling units shall be considered commercial buildings. Permits will be issued for all construction work as required in MN State Building Code Chapter 1300. These permits will include but not be limited to: 1. New construction, addition, alteration, repair, remodel, modification, demolition, or moving of all residential non-residential and accessory structures. 2. Roofing, siding, window replacement. 3. Signs 4. Plumbing new, addition, alteration, remodel, repair 01 modification. 5. Mechanical new, addition, alteration, remodel or modification. 6. Fire Suppression Systems 7. Fire Alarm Systems www.inspectroninc.com The service will also include coordinating with the planning department for review of permit applications with the City's Zoning ordinance and land use compliance. This will involve routing all permit applications to the planners for compliance with setback dimensions, lot coverage limits and minimum lot dimensions. The project will be field inspected by Inspectron Inc. to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance dimensional standards. Inspectron Inc. will work with City staff to develop an over-the-counter permit process for all `Maintenance Permits". The maintenance permits will be defined as roofing, siding, same size window replacement, furnace replacement and plumbing maintenance permits. The average turnaround time for all non -maintenance projects will be 5-7 days after receipt of all necessary information. Project proponents will be encouraged to use handout materials fiom Inspectron's website for completion of pioject plans to avoid delays and "code surprises" upon application for building permit. A plan submittal checklist will be provided to all permit applicants outlining required submittals to accompany the application. Written plan review comments are provided to every applicant when plan review is performed. Our office receptionist will schedule all inspections when the permit holder calls Inspectron's Rosemount office at 1-800-322-6153 or 651-322-6626. A 24-hour notice is required for all inspection. All inspections will be scheduled within 24 hours of the time requested. Computerization Inspectron Inc. utilizes software to track permit and inspection activity. Inspection will create a data base within its software by obtaining a complete property data base download from the City and setting up the permit and inspection sets within the data base. This permit software will be utilized for all residential and non-residential permits issued. Computerized permits and inspection cards will be generated with the approval and release of all building peimits. Computerized permit activity and inspection activity reports will be provided with the monthly billing for City Administrator and Council review. A copy of the monthly permit activity report will be submitted to the County Assessor when requested. Inspectron will prepare the electronic surcharge reports for submittal to the State Treasurer. The City shall forward the report with appropriate fees. Inspectron, Inc will provide effective, efficient and expedient service by utilizing its team of inspectors and plan review staff for inspections and plan reviews. Additional staff will be hired to supplement as needed. Ron Wasmund will serve as the Building Official of Record. Ron Wasmund will also seive as the Project Manager. www.inspectroninc.com Fee Schedule Inspectron Inc. proposes to use the 1997 UBC Table 1-A fee schedule to establish building permit fees. Inspectron Inc. will review the fee schedule with the City Administrator regularly for conformity with the needs of the city. The building permit fee will be calculated on the valuation of the proposed project. The building official will calculate the project valuation using the Construction Cost Data published by the State Building Codes and Standard Division annually around the month of May. A plan review fee of 65% of the building permit fee will be charged for every project which in the sole discretion of the building official requires a plan to be submitted to demonstrate or clarify the project being permitted. In addition to the building permit and plan review fees, the applicant must also pay a surcharge fee in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 16B.70 Separate plumbing and mechanical permits will be required in addition to the building permit for all construction projects that involve installation 01 changes to the plumbing and mechanical systems. Over the Counter Permits Inspectron will develop an over-the-counter permit for the immediate issuance of minor maintenance permits such as roofing, siding, windows, furnace and water heater replacement. Inspectron Inc will authorize and train designated City staff for the issuance of the OTC permits if desired. Costs associated with printing the carbonless reproduction forms shall be the responsibility of the City. Terms Payment for permits will be made by the applicants directly to the city. If authorized Inspectron Inc. will accept the payment for the city with all checks made payable to the City of Lauderdale. Inspectron will have personnel available as needed 5 days per week to cover the inspection services outlined in the Building Inspection Scope of Services. This schedule will be adjusted as necessary to meet the needs of the public and City staff. Inspectron, Inc will provide the services listed in the Building Inspection Scope of Services for 75% of the building permit fee plus 100% of the plan review fee. Services will be billed to the city on a monthly basis. A report of all building permit activity will be provided with the billing. All transportation, communication tools and insurance costs will be the direct responsibility of Inspectron, Inc. All records will be maintained in accordance with the City's adopted record retention schedule, at the office of Inspection, Inc. The records will be available to the www.inspectroninc.com city for examination at any time during normal business hours or any other pre -arranged time. Records for all closed projects will be delivered to the city on a quarterly basis. Inspections requested outside of normal business hours, M -F 8:00 a.m. to 4 30 p.m. will be billed to the contractor at 575.00 per hour in addition to the permit fee. A 1 -hour minimum will apply. Inspectron Inc. will retain 100% of this fee. Additional plan review required by changes, additions 01 revisions to an approved plan will be billed to the contractor at $75.00 per hour in addition to the permit fee. A 1 -hour minimum will apply. Inspectron Inc. will retain 100% of this fee. Minor adjustments of changes to the plan that do not affect the scope or structural elements of the project will not require additional review. Inspectron Inc. at the direction of the City Administratoi will also perform General Nuisance zoning enforcement and assist the city with development of a procedure and necessary forms to carry out this responsibility. This will include any junk and blight sweeps made in residential neighborhoods. Inspectron will bili the city an hourly rate of $75.00 per hour for these services requested by the city. Inspectron Inc. will provide Fire Marshal Services to include but not be limited to Fire Suppression plan review and inspection, Fire Alarm plan review and inspections on all systems that may be required by the Building 01 Fire code. We will do this work as required for the hourly rate of $75.00. The terms of this agreement will be reviewed and adjusted on an annual basis. Reduction in contract fee terms may be sufficient cause for consideration of immediate termination of the service contract at Inspectron's discretion. Respectfully Submitted, mon Zadmarice Ron Wasmund President Inspectron Inc. Office Phone 651-322-6626 Cell Phone 612-719-3370 rwasmund@inspectroninc.com wwwinspectroninc.com Heather Butkowski From. Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Ron Wasmund <RWasmund@inspectroninc.com> Tuesday, September 7, 2021 2:17 PM Heather Butkowski Mark Luostari RE: Follow Up Question Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. Good afternoon Heather, I have provided my responses in red font behind your original emailed questions. Let me know how I can be of further assistance. We are a problem solving team! Ron Ron Wasmund Inspectron Inc. 15120 Chippendale Ave. Suite 202 Rosemount MN 55068 Office 651-322-6626 Toll Free 800-322-6153 Cell 612-719-3370 Fax 651-322-7580 rwasmund©inspectroninc.com From. Heather Butkowski <Heather.Butkowski@lauderdalemn.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2021 10:16 AM Subject: Follow Up Question Good morning, I thought we would be past this by now, but since we are not, please answer the following. What is your policy on employee vaccinations? I have stopped short of mandating a vaccination. We are voluntarily 90% vaccinated with only 1 member that doesn't believe in the vaccination. As the company leader I want everyone to be vaccinated. What is your policy on employee masking? Everybody is required to wear a mask when entering another residence or property where they must be inside. Also if there is anyone in the residence that is coughing or showing other signs of covid symptoms we will not enter. Do you anticipate making any changes to these policies. Not at the present time. I am considering testing for the unvaccinated if the outbreak continues to climb. It would be great to have your answers by the end of the day tomorrow as I am putting the materials together for the council to make a decision at our September 14 meeting. Thank you. Heather Butkowski City Administrator City of Lauderdale 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 651 792.7657 heather.butkowski@lauderdalemn.org 2 CITY OF LAUDERDALE, MINNESOTA Attention: Heather Butkowski 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 PROPOSAL Building Official, Inspections, and Related Services July 20, 2021 SUBMITTED BY: MNSPECT, LLC 235 West First Street Waconia, MN 55387 Office Phone: (952) 442-7520 Toll Free: (888) 446-1801 Fax: (952) 442-7521 E -Mail: scott@mnspect.com 1 LLC July 20, 2021 HELPING YOU COMPL 235 First Street West • Waconia, MN 55387-1302 Ms. Heather Butkowski City Administrator 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 Dear Ms. Butkowski: Enclosed you will find for the City's review and consideration a proposal for Building Official Building and Fire Code Inspections Building and Fire Code Plan Review, Fire Marshal Services, Rental Housing Inspections, and Code Enforcement Services. If you find something in the proposal that you wish to discuss or negotiate, please contact me. I am excited about the opportunity to reengage with the City of Lauderdale. Our professional staff provides building safety services that will exceed the expectations of the City and its citizens. We currently serve 20 communities (21 in August with the addition of Maple Lake I) as the Designated Building Official, and provide supplemental services to 11 additional communities. Our staff of 28 is very familiar with the requirements of the communities we serve. We are certain that the transition will be smooth and easily accomplished. You will find that we complement the existing Building Code Administrations of our client communities, and we encourage you to contact the listed references. I am confident that after reviewing this proposal, especially noting the ways MNSPECT stands out from others in our field, you will recognize our ability to best meet the needs of the City I am aware that we may not be the lowest cost provider of services. However, I guarantee that we provide the best service with the most qualified and diversely trained staff of any private firm in the State. You will not be disappointed by selecting MNSPECT, LLC to be your Designated Building Official. Thank you for your consideration and the opportunity to submit this proposal. Sincerely, Scott Qualle President 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Title Page 1 Introductory Letter 2 Table of Contents 3 B. Describe MNSPECT's Background and History 4 Identification and Qualifications of Personnel 6 C. Provide Information about MNSPECT's Experience: Building and Fire Code Inspections 9 Building and Fire Code Plan Reviews 9 Commercial Plumbing/Sprinkler Plan Reviews 10 Delegation Agreements with State Fire Marshal 10 Fire Marshal Services 10 Rental Housing Inspections 10 Code Enforcement Services 10 D. MNSPECT's Operations from the Perspective of a Property Owner 11 E. Basis of Compensation 12 F. References 14 Letters of Recommendation City of Mound Letter of Recommendation 16 City of Spring Park Letter of Recommendation 17 Waterford Township Letter of Recommendation 18 Potential Conflicts of Interest 19 MNSPECT Disclosures 19 Applicant Authority 20 What Distinguishes MNSPECT From the Competition 21 MNSPECT's Certificate of Liability Insurance 22 3 B. Describe your firm's background and history, including the number of years in business and the number of personnel that are certified building officials (CBO), limited building officials (LBO), accessibility specialists, and non -licensed inspectors. Describe the training and experience (including years) of the persons who will be providing inspection services in Lauderdale. About MNSPECT, LLC Since 1987, MNSPECT has been providing comprehensive Designated Building Official and Supplemental/As-Needed Building Safety services for Minnesota communities, MNSPECT s highly - qualified, certified, and experienced team of Building Officials currently provides services for 32 communities. In calendar year 2020, we performed over 2000 plan reviews, issued over 4,800 permits, and performed more than 9,000 inspections. MNSPECT LLC was formed in 2010. MNSPECT Inc., the predecessor company to MNSPECT LLC, was incorporated in 1987 and was originally named Paul Waldron and Associates Limited. MNSPECT's many years of successful service to the communities we serve extends to all activities related to the administration and enforcement of the Minnesota State Codes for Accessibility, Building, Electrical, Energy, Fire, Fuel Gas, Industrialized/Modular Buildings, Manufactured Homes, Mechanical, Plumbing, and Prefabricated Buildings. The State of Minnesota demonstrates its confidence in our qualifications and competencies by granting MNSPECT approval to provide these specialized services, normally provided by the State: A. Approval from the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry to perform plan review and inspections on public buildings and State licensed facilities. B. Approval from the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry - Plumbing Plan Review and Inspections Unit to perform plumbing plan review on plumbing systems that serve the public. C. Approval from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety - State Fire Marshal Division to perform plan review and inspections on fire suppression systems and fire alarm systems. D. Approval from the Minnesota Department of Public Safety - State Fire Marshal Division to perform State required fire inspections on Minnesota Department of Human Services licensed facilities. These special authorities: a) allow for local oversight of projects b) optimize construction integrity in the design stages, and c) ensure all permit revenue for these projects of large magnitude stay with the community instead of going to the State. MNSPECT partners with communities to provide a high level of service for homeowners, building owners, contractors, and the Municipality. We work to exceed community goals and standards of service. Our expert knowledge of Minnesota Building Codes, our helpful and professional approach our commitment to timely service and communication and our focus on code education is our formula for success. Our motto is: "Helping You Comply with the Code." 4 Number of personnel that are certified building officials (CBO), limited building officials (LBO), accessibility specialists, and non -licensed inspectors: Certified Building Officials: 12 (nine Field Inspectors• three Plans Examiners) Limited Building Officials: 5 (three Field inspectors; two Plans Examiners) Licensed Architect 1 (Plan Reviewer) Accessibility Specialists: See Building Officials above Non -Licensed Field Inspector: 1 In addition: State -Approved Inspectors for Public Buildings and State -Licensed Facilities: Plan Review: 4 Field Inspections: 6 Fire Sprinkler/Fire Alarm Plan Reviews: 1 Fire Sprinkler/Fire Alarm Field Inspections: 3 State -Approved Commercial Plumbing Plans Examiner and Inspector: 1 See the following page for training and experience of all MNSPECT Inspectors. If selected to serve the City of Lauderdale MNSPECT will assign a primary and secondary field inspector. In addition, a Client Specialist designated to work with City Staff. Please note, other inspectors may perform services in Lauderdale should their areas of expertise be needed (i.e. Commercial Plumbing Inspector). 5 Identification and Qualifications of Personnel: Scott Qualle — President & Building Official since January 2006 Designated Building Official MN Certified Building Official B0002643 ICC Certified Building Official MN Approved for Inspection of Public Buildings and State Licensed Facilities Statutory Warranty Dispute Resolution Neutral (mediator) Erosion/Sediment Control Construction Installer/Inspector MN Foster/Daycare Fire Inspector MN Approved Continuing Education Instructor Building Inspection Technology (BIT) Certificate Associate in Applied Science Degree, BIT Associate in Applied Science Degree, Accounting Bachelor of Science Degree, Business Master's Degree in Business Administration (MBA) MN PCA Asbestos Inspector A113979 17 years code enforcement; 5 years construction/real estate experience Management Team Ty Turnquist since March 2005 Director of Operations • MN Certified Building Official B0002901 • Building Inspection Technology Certificate • MN Approved for Code Review and Inspections of Public Buildings and State Licensed Facilities • MN Approved for Fire Sprinkler and Fire Alarm Inspections Tracy Montgomery since June 2008 Officer Manager • Bachelor of Science Degree Jeff Munsterteiger since October 2017 Manager of Code Review • MN Certified Building Official B0002824 • ICC Certified Building Plans Examiner • Building Inspections Technology (BIT) Franklin Martin since May 2021 Manager of Field Inspections • MN Certified Building Official B0001821 • ICC Certified Building Official • MN Approved for Code Review and Inspections of Public Buildings and State Licensed Facilities • Master in Business Administration • SEC Regulatory Enforcement Certificate • Erosion/Sediment Control Construction Inspector • MN Approved Continuing Education Instructor • MN Foster/Daycare Fire Inspector • 17 yrs. code enforcement; 20 yrs. construction exp. • 13 yrs. code enforcement support • MN Approved for Code Review and Inspections of Public Buildings and State Licensed Facilities • 14 yrs. code enforcement; 23 yrs. construction exp. • Fellowship in London's Institute of Carpenters • Expert in Construction Litigation • 37 yrs. code enforcement 4 yrs. architecture exp. Field Inspection Team Dale Engelmann since January 2013 Senior Plumbing Code Reviewer/Plumbing Inspector Master Plumber PM062282 Backflow Prevention Inspector BT062282 MN Approved Commercial Plumbing Plans Examiner 8 yrs. code enforcement; 41 yrs. construction exp. Tracy Reimann since October 2016 Residential Field Inspector MN Certified Limited Building Official LB723665 Certified Home Inspector AHIT Bachelor of Science, Business Certified Radon Measurement Professional RMEA-00396 5 yrs. code enforcement; 10 yrs. construction exp. Karl Horning since January 2017 Senior Residential and Commercial Field Inspector MN Certified Building Official BO002662 Building Inspection Technology Certificate Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems License 21 yrs. code enforcement; 10 yrs. construction exp. Jim Grampre since April 2017 Senior Residential and Commercial Field Inspector MN Certified Building Official BO001497 Building Inspection Technology/AAS Degree 24 yrs. code enforcement; 10 yrs. construction exp. Robert Proulx since March 2019 Field Inspector MN Certified Limited Building Official LB746623 4 yrs. code enforcement Barry Brainard since April 2019 Senior Field Inspector MN Certified Building Official BO001299 ICC Certified Residential Plans Examiner and Inspector MN Approved for Code Review and Inspections of Public Buildings and State Licensed Facilities MN Approved for Fire Sprinkler and Fire Alarm Code Review and Inspections ICC Certified Permit Technician 37 yrs. code enforcement; 4 yrs. architecture exp. Bill Schwanke since June 2019 Senior Residential and Commercial Field Inspector MN Certified Building Official BO002200 17 yrs. code enforcement Jake Nelson —Since June 2019 Residential Field Inspector MN Certified Building Official Limited LB777681 ICC Residential Building Inspector Sediment and Erosion Control Inspector 2 yrs. code enforcement; 2 yrs. construction exp. David Rahn since September 2019 Senior Field Inspector MN Certified Building Official BO001772 Certified Building Official ICC 30 yrs. code enforcement; 27 yrs. construction exp. Abram Pulkrabek — Since February 2021 Residential Field Inspector Don Harmsen since March 2021 Commercial Field Inspector MN Certified Building Official BO002896 Building Inspection Technology Certificate MN Approved for Inspection of Public Buildings and State Licensed Facilities 18 yrs. code enforcement; 20 yrs. construction exp. 7 Code Review Team N ick Qualle since March 2005 Code Reviewer MN Certified Building Official B0002752 Building Inspection Technology Certificate N FPA 10001 Firefighter 1 and Firefighter 2 16 yrs. code enforcement; 3 yrs. construction exp. Brandon Holmes since November 2018 Code Reviewer MN Certified Building Official B0770894 2 yrs. code enforcement 15 yrs. construction exp. N icole Kastern since September 2019 Code Reviewer N ational Council of Architectural Registration Boards Minnesota Licensed Architect Leadership in Energy and Env. Design — LEED AP 2 yrs. code enforcement 19 yrs. architecture exp. Michael Hauan since March 2021 Code Reviewer Limited Building Official LB783560 Specialized Associate of Science Degree in Architecture Drafting and Design 20 yrs. in drafting and design exp. Kevin Kamerud since May 2021 Code Reviewer Limited Building Official LB8783561 Residential Building Contractor BC763356 23 yrs. in construction exp. Administrative Team Wendy Morrissey since August 2011 Operations Specialist Bachelor of Arts Degree 10 yrs. code enforcement support Tonia Sikorski since April 2019 Specialty Inspections Assistant Real Property Administrator Certificate, BOMI 2 yrs. code enforcement support Christy James since June 2017 Lead Client Specialist Bachelor of Arts Degree 4 yrs. code enforcement support Alex Knutson since April 2021 Client Specialist Lisa Thole since April 2021 Client Specialist Sandy Grochow since April 2021 Client Specialist Genevieve Munsterteiger since June 2018 Administrative Assistant -Receptionist 2 yrs. code enforcement support 8 C. Provide information about the firm's experience performing the following: • Building and fire code inspections: MNSPECT currently has nine field inspectors that are Certified Building Officials and three with Limited Building Official certifications. In addition, we have six Certified Building Officials that are approved by the State of Minnesota to do inspections on State -Licensed Facilities and Public Buildings. The Department of Labor and Industry performs a thorough review of all persons requesting this approval. MNSPECT has received approval from the State of Minnesota's Department of Labor and Industry and the State Fire Marshal's office for Fire Sprinkler and Alarm code review and field inspections. This approval allows MNSPECT to perform fire sprinkler and fire alarm field inspections on residential, commercial and State Licensed Facilities/Public buildings. In 2020, the ISO performed a thorough evaluation of MNSPECT and the municipalities that it serves using their Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule. MNSPECT received a Class 3 for commercial and industrial properties as well as one- and two- family residential properties. If you are unfamiliar with their classification, class 3 represents the highest score issued in Minnesota. As you can see, very few municipalities receive a score as high as ours! 1a; 1 Minnesota b 9 14 ▪ P.t. d Cort".:`r LI 3 The assessment that ISO performs analyzes the qualifications of the field inspectors and plans e xaminers, the amount of territory covered, the number of field inspections performed the n umber of code reviews completed, the use of tools (such as checklists for field inspectors), and the codes adopted by each municipality. A score of three tells us that we are adequately staffed and qualified! All of our inspectors have cellular enabled tablets, allowing for approved plans to be accessed from our cloud server, providing inspection results to stakeholders, and facilitating real-time communications and recordkeeping including photographs • Building and fire code plan reviews: MNSPECT currently staffs three Certified Building Officials, two Limited Building Officials and one licensed architect who perform residential and commercial plan reviews for MNSPECT. In addition, we have four State -approved, Certified Building Officials to perform plan reviews on State -Licensed Facilities and Public Buildings. 9 MNSPECT has received approval from the State of Minnesota's Department of Labor and Industry and the State Fire Marshal to perform Fire Sprinkler and Fire Alarm plan reviews. MNSPECT's plan reviewers perform upfront, comprehensive plan reviews. The review is comprised of an in-depth examination to verify that the minimum code requirements are met to safeguard the public health and general welfare. This is done through reviewing structural strength, means of egress, stability, sanitation, adequate light and ventilation, energy conservation, and safety to life and property. This level of plan review not only helps the project run smoothly with no surprises, but will help avoid mistakes in the field that can quickly increase the cost of the project. When errors are caught at the plan review stage, corrections in the field are minimized - saving time and money! MNSPECT performs electronic plan reviews. This enables our field inspectors to access approved plans while at inspections. It also enables our municipalities to retain electronic versions of approved plans. • Commercial plumbing/sprinkler plan reviews: Of the 38 municipalities with which the State has formal plumbing plan review agreements, MNSPECT municipalities account for 12 of them. Similar to fire sprinkler plan reviews addressed earlier, the Department of Labor and Industry, Plumbing Plan Review Department, gives authorization only to qualified persons to perform plumbing plan review for commercial projects. In addition, our approved Plumbing Plan Reviewer is approved to perform inspections on State -Licensed Facilities and Public Buildings. • Delegation agreements MNSPECT has with the State Fire Marshal: MNSPECT has staff that is approved by the State Fire Marshal to perform code reviews and field inspections on fire sprinkler and fire alarm projects In addition, MNSPECT has authorized personnel to perform day care and foster care inspections as well as annual fire inspections on commercial properties. • Fire marshal services: Fire marshal services is a broad area. MNSPECT performs fire sprinkler and fire alarm plan reviews and related field inspections; annual commercial fire inspections; day care and foster care fire inspections• and code enforcement for life safety issues. • Rental housing inspections: MNSPECT has a department that performs rental housing and property maintenance inspections. The department works closely with municipal staff to ensure that rental inspections are inspected and licenses are obtained. • Code enforcement services: As stated above, MNSPECT has a department that performs rental housing and property maintenance inspections. MNSPECT uses the municipal -approved ordinances to work with owners and tenants to bring properties into compliance with property maintenance and nuisance codes. 10 D. Describe your firm's operations from the perspective of a property owner: • What days of the week and times of day are inspections available? ✓ Office and Inspection Hours: 8:00 a.m. — 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday ✓ We utilize voicemail during off -hours ✓ We have an on-call inspector to accommodate emergencies ✓ We utilize a toll-free phone number, 888-446-1801 ✓ Each inspector is equipped with a mobile phone • How far in advance must inspections be scheduled? ✓ Same day (when possible), next day (standard), or date of applicant request ✓ We schedule all inspections through our office ✓ We request the applicant call at least one day prior • What is the turnaround time on typical residential and commercial plan reviews? ✓ Minimum of 1 business day (code review required) ✓ Permit processing time greatly depends on project type (residential vs. commercial), project scope (ranging from maintenance to new structures), and submitted information (complete vs. incomplete). Our goal with residential plan review is to complete the review in ten business days or less once all required information is received ✓ Our goal with commercial plan review is to complete the review in 15 business days or less once all required information is received. • By what methods can applicants submit permit applications (in person, online, mail, fax, email...)? ✓ MNSPECT prefers electronic permit submissions; however, we understand that not all applicants will have the ability to submit via email or a shared drive. ✓ MNSPECT will pick up and drop off permit submissions from City Hall. ✓ MNSPECT and municipal zoning staff work together to ensure that MNSPECT only reviews plans that zoning staff has approved. • Will property owners have opportunities to ask questions on code requirements in advance of submitting plans? ✓ efinitely! MNSPECT communicates with owners and contractors via inspection notices, phone calls or in-person meetings Our office phones are answered from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday (excluding holidays) In addition, our phone system has voice mail capabilities and messages are returned the following business day. Along with in-person meetings, MNSPECT utilizes Microsoft Teams for video meetings. This technology allows us to use screen sharing when reviewing building plans, codes, and other documents. 11 E. Basis for Compensation: 75% of the following fees (Commercial and Residential — Building, Plumbing, HVAC, Fire Suppression): • Permit fee ($50.00 Minimum) • Plan Review Fee* • Special Investigation Fee ($50.00 Minimum) • Plan reviews are required on all commercial and residential projects, with the exception of the following residential projects (as defined in the Minnesota Residential Code): residential roof covering replacements, exterior siding replacement, like -for -like window and exterior door replacements, plumbing work and mechanical work. 100% of the following fees: • Re -inspection fee • Copies • License look -up fee • Inspections outside of normal • Lead look -up fee business hours • Site inspection fee • Hourly fees • Moved and pre -moved building • Additional plan review fees • Manufactured home fees The following hourly rates apply when work is requested for Municipal code enforcement or special projects: D esignated Building Official $150.00 per Hour State Delegation Projects $150.00 per Hour Inspection / Plan Review Staff $95.00 per Hour Work outside the scope of the contract 95.00 per Hour Office / Support Staff 75.00 per Hour Rental Housing Inspections/Code Enforcement Nuisance Abatement /Fire Marshal Services $85.00 per Hour The following print fees apply for plan sheets (printed in color): • 8 1/2 x 11 1.00/page • 8 1/2 x 14 1.00/page • 11 x 17 2.00/page • Large plans 4.00/page One set for the job site will be provided at no additional cost. These printing fees apply to requested additional copies of plan sets. B illing: MNSPECT utilizes a monthly billing cycle to obtain compensation for monthly services rendered. Monthly compensation for provided services is based on that month's processed permit applications, hourly services provided, and printing fees. Inspector will submit logs with any such statements for services rendered under this section. Hourly fees are not normally charged unless services are requested by City Staff. G enerally, our invoices are due within 30 days of submission of a bill. We are open to discussing other billing methods as the client may request. 12 F. List of References and Potential Conflicts of Interest and Claims. Designated Building Official Clients: City of Bayport — Since Aug 2016 294 3rd Street North, Bayport, MN 55003 Adam Bell, Administrator City of Columbus — Since Mar 2021 16319 Kettle River Blvd. Columbus, MN 55025 Elizabeth Mursko, Administrator D ouglas Township — Since Jan 2011 PO Box 151, Hampton, MN 55031 Peggy Varien, Clerk City of Glencoe — Since Mar 1991 1107 11th St E, Ste. 107, Glencoe, MN 55336 Mark Larson Administrator G reenvale Township — Since Jan 2012 31800 Guam Ave Northfield, MN 55057 G reg Langer, Board Chair City of Hamburg — Since Jun 1989 181 Broadway, Hamburg, MN 55339 Jeremy Gruenhagen Clerk -Treasurer City of Hampton — Since Apr 2010 PO Box 128 Hampton, MN 55031 Judy O'Brien Administrator -Clerk City of Lake Elmo (interim) — Since December 2018 3880 Laverne Avenue, Suite 100, Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Kristina Handt, City Administrator City of Landfall Village — Since Aug 2019 O ne 4th Avenue, Landfall, MN 55128 Ed Shukle, City Administrator City of Lester Prairie — Since Mar 1997 PO Box 66 Lester Prairie, MN 55354 D oris Lundin, Clerk City of Maple Lake — Beginning Aug 2021 10 Maple Ave S, PO Box 757, Maple Lake, MN 55358 Elizabeth Borell, Deputy Clerk City of Mound —Since Jan 2003 2415 Wilshire Blvd, Mound, MN 55364 Sarah Smith, Community Development Director G reg Pederson, Fire Chief City of North St. Paul —Since September 2018 2400 Margaret Street, North St. Paul MN 55109 Brian Frandle, Interim City Manager City of Nowthen — Since December 2019 8188 - 199th Ave. NW, Nowthen, MN 55330 Lori Streich, Clerk/Treasurer Population: 3,792 Population: 4,055 Population: 755 Population: 5,467 Population: 754 Population: 521 Population: 699 Population: 9,100 Population: 756 Population: 1,726 Population 2,315 Population: 9,530 Population: 12,477 Population: 4,723 (651) 275-4404 (651) 419-9011 (651) 769-5061 (320) 864-5586 (507) 649-2376 (952) 467-3232 (651) 437-8846 (651) 747-3900 (651) 739-4123 (320) 395-2646 (320) 963-3611 (952) 472-0604 (952) 472-3533 (651) 747-2472 (763) 441-1347 13 Designated Building Official Clients cont.: City of Orono —Since March 2021 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director City of Plato — Since Jan 1994 PO Box 7, Plato, MN 55370 Gerri Scott, Clerk Ravenna Township — Since January 2019 20425 Red Wing Boulevard Hastings, MN 55033 Caroline Spurgeon, Township Clerk/Treasurer City of Silver Lake — Since Apr 1994 308 Main St W, Silver Lake, MN 55381 Karissa Kurth, Clerk City of Spring Park — Since May 2008 4349 Warren Ave, Spring Park, MN 55384 Dan Tolsma, Administrator City of Stewart — Since Sep 2008 PO Box 195, Stewart, MN 55385 Robin Johnson, Clerk Waterford Township — Since Apr 2014 517 Box 531, Northfield, MN 5505 Elizabeth Wheeler, Clerk Population: 8,113 Population: 307 Population: 2,436 Population: 818 Population: 1,794 Population: 544 Population: 478 (952) 249-4626 (320) 238-2432 (651) 4804902 (320) 327-2412 (952) 471-9051 (320) 562-2518 (651) 346 8467 14 Supplemental Back -Up Clients: City of Eagan (backup) — Since Nov 2013 Population: 66,527 3830 Pilot Knob Rd, Eagan, MN 55122 D ale Schoeppner, Building Official City of Faribault (backup) — Since March 2020 Population: 23,851 208 NW 15t Avenue, Faribault, MN 55021 D eanna Kuennen, Community and Economic Development Director City of Forest Lake (backup) — Since Apr 2018 1408 Lake St South Forest Lake, MN 55025 Alan Newman, Fire Chief City of Golden Valley (backup) —Since Nov 2019 7800 Golden Valley Road, Golden Valley, MN 55427 Marc Nevinski, Physical Development Director City of Lino Lakes (backup) — Since July 2020 600 Town Center Pkwy, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Patrick Moonen, Building Official City of Mankato (backup) — Since Mar 2019 10 Civic Center Plaza Mankato, MN 56001 Molly Westman, Planning Assistant Mendota Heights (backup) — Since May 2017 A to Z Home Inspections (Mendota Sunfish Lake, Lilydale) 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Mike Andrejka, Building Official N ew Brighton (backup) — Since June 2021 803 Old Highway 8 NW N ew Brighton, MN 55092 Jeremy Wells, Building Official Scott County (backup) — Since Sept 2017 G overnment Center 200 Fourth Avenue West, Shakopee, MN 55379 Jami Neiber, Building Official Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community (backup) Since Aug 2017 2330 Sioux Trail NW, Pnor Lake, MN 55372 Rick Schlueter, Building Official City of Shorewood (backup) — Since Jan 2006 5755 Country Club Rd, Shorewood, MN 55331 Wade Woodward, Building Official Population: 20,220 Population: 21,755 Population 21, 733 Population: 42,610 Population: 12,890 Population: 22,556 Population: 20,315 Population: 658 Population: 7,496 (651)675-5675 (507) 333-0376 (651) 464-3550 (763) 593-8008 (651) 982-2463 (507) 387-8571 (651) 255-1143 (651) 638-2062 (952) 496-8883 (952) 496-6135 (952) 474-3236 15 Letters of Recommendation: Septernt?er 2, 2015 RE: R tter - Mn I am very pleased to provide a reference letter for MnSpect, who has been providing contractdcd building Inspection services to the City of Mound since 2005. President Scott qualle is Mound's designated Building Official. fvinSpect has a team of competent inspectors and personnel who provide prompt, courteous and professional service to our Staff and community. From my perspective, one aspect that sets fvinSpect apart is their ability to provide full service Inspection services, as they have qualified personnel to assist with re .idential and commercial projects and also provide plumbing and mechanical, electrical and electrical permitting. MnSpect Is also extremely cooper alive and quick to respond In Ole event there are special or unique circumstances related to permitting and inspections matters. I would be very happy to visit with you further about Mound's experience and relationship with MnSpect. You are most welcome to contact me chrectly at (952) 472.0604 or by entail at sarahsmi(h("cilyofrnuund.com. arah Smith Community Bevel 16 SPRING PA On (Ilk() %irtnclonko fu Whom It May (.'o11 Orn; 1110 ('ily of Spring Park has contracted with Mnspcct tier their permit process needs and fur building inspection service~ sine( May 2048 Prior to that lime Spring Park contracted with the City of Orono. fhC ('ity of Spring Park has !many challenges in that its iesidential (lousing stock consists of lake cabins undergoing remodclinl ur complete dllllulltilltl Iiollowcd by new construction. Spring I'mk. also has several nwlti-housinr, units (seven), a senior housml, campus (Presbyterian I tomes/1,oko Minnetonka Shorts), n large commercial district, a manufacturing district and a marina. Together, the City and reinspect have weathered the housing market/economic recession and the subsequent r(surq,Cnce. When the economy was at its worst, Mnspcct figured out a way to (ontinuc to sent the needs of their communities µ ithnul compromising their sen !Ceti. AI all tunes the City felt confident that Mnspcct would Continue to provide quality inspection services, no matter the economic climate. 'I'hc City Council is periodically updated by visits from Mn.spccl's staff The council looks (inward to and enjoys the ugxlates and it aflimis their continued eon fld(nue in Mnspcct, Our City heis built 1 relationship with Mnspcct That has gone beyond inspection services by asking Mnspcct staff to participate on in interview Team for an rwlmirlisirat or sulrch. reinspect staff also regularly attends ('ity staff muaings in order (0 coordinate ongoing projects with our planner, engineer, allot ney, and public works. City staff highly endorses Mapco's professioniI business Strategy and looks forward to an ongoing relationship with Mnspccrl 'Ihe City feels comfortable knowing as eve continue to grow and develop, Mnsdxxt will be able to provide equality services ILS WC IlIl1Ve forward together. Sincerely, Dan 'folsrna, (',fly Administrator Wendy Lewin, City Clerk Cit9 o[.S rit;i Park 4349 WARREN AVENUE, SPRING PARK, MINNF SO1A 55304-9711 (952) 471-9051 FAX (952)471-9 / WWW CI.SPRING PARK.MN.US 17 WA1'I;RF'ORI.) 'I.'OWNSiiiP i)ccrmber 4, 2.018 Whom 11 may (onccm Ito: Recommendation for \1NSI'Ll I, LLC am writing to recommend the sem iccs of MNS1'h'(`.1, IAA of Wncunia Mnuresota. NINSPt:Ci' has !ICU under contract tyit), Waterford "township since 2014. I spent twenty-three years as a government employee working for the City of Northfield and upon tclitemutl was deeded Town Clerk for \Vaterlianf 'township in Match 2014, I worked with Building Officials and Inspectors for OR City and since 2014 have had the privllcge to work closely tyi3h the MNSPE(1 loam. From my experience 1 can 1;115' 0181 prOlessk)na) 13ullding Otlicutls and Inspectors truly KIK Ye the axle is designed to protect current owners and their guests, contractor-, and future owners. Iltcrclorc, I can withouthesitation recommend MNSI'I Cl', I,LC. 'Flie Toss Iias relied on the expo,rtise of the \1NSI'i ('I' to in to perforin plan reviews and code urspecliuns for commercial as well as residential protects, such as n multi-gemrtatiunnl Roan(, a handicap accessible tiitraiic'fi including an elk sato! an an aging home on a challenging 1 ualscap e, a cowmen, ial youth wiesthng facility, two Viso-nregawall I Vlllnillnity Sadao gardens, new homes, remodels, decks, aecC.saaarV buildings and is currently advising the "Pawnshop 011 its 1885 Town 1I311. All the ntenrbets of the MNSPI:C 1' team arc great cummunicatoi . ()tie can call or e-mail and test assured Of felting a response almost alsva) s the same tlay, but Tor sure IIIc Heal day. I hey arc patient mid explain the cult to the homeowner, the contractor, the Town Board or IIIc 'I osvn Clerk. 'I hey are incredibly orgrini/cd and when the> star then twill have it done, it is done. 1\'ilbuul the MNSI'LCT teats it would be impossible to petiurnl my tespoasibititics as n'I'own (*ICI": and as the linzu-d Liaison for the Planning Cotnmisslon Not only are Ilicy responsive. to Ihc'township, Hwy 3IV aware of the numerous deadhncs of Ilse various property otvnets and ny Ihcir best to work %vith e%tryone in a timely mantle!. Please feel lice to contact enc at 507.261.3735 should you like to discuss MNSPFAIT, LEG'S qualifications and Waterford 'Township's experiences further, I'd he happy to expand on my recommendation. Sincerely, IIj bcih \1)�ic�ef \\ftatcrt ord'I'awarshrp Clerk 507-261-3235 '.O. Hot 41 - Norlht tad, ;NN 5't()57 51-346 i$l67 - v.atc I«nl(i I CO 18 Potential Conflicts of Interest: None MNSPECT Disclosures: MNSPECT has an interest in or affiliation with: Welcome Home Inspections — MNSPECT is the parent company of Welcome Home Inspections (WHI). WHI performs point of sale inspections for prospective home buyers. Several MNSPECT personnel are involved with WHI. Scott QuaIle, the owner of MNSPECT also owns Wall Bracing Code Verification Services (WBCVS) — This service assists builders and designers by confirming that wall bracing plans meet the submittal requirements of the MN State Residential Code and local jurisdictions administering the code. Scott Qualle, the owner of MNSPECT also owns MNSPECT Continuing Education, Inc. which is engaged in teaching codes and statutes to contractors, building officials, and other licensed professionals. MNSPECT Continuing Education has the direct experience and demonstrated expertise required to impart appropriate and related knowledge in the applicable construction codes. We believe that the code should be understood by all those responsible for designing, constructing, or inspecting to its requirements. Scott Qualle, the owner of MNSPECT also owns MNSPECT Code Consulting, Inc. which is engaged in investigating code matters for both property owners and building contractors. This work is done in jurisdictions where MNSPECT is not the Designated Building Official. Insurance Claims and/or ethics complaints over the last five years: None Independent Contractor: MNSPECT, LLC is an Independent Contractor, and as such assumes full responsibility for the actions of its personnel; as well as for the supervision, daily direction and control, provision of employment benefits, and payment of salary, of its personnel. The Municipality shall not be responsible to furnish any benefits to such personnel. MNSPECT carries Auto, Workers' Compensation, and General and Professional Liability Insurance covering all personnel it employs in service to its client Municipalities. MNSPECT shall provide at its sole expense, all necessary equipment, vehicles and supplies to carry out its obligations to the City, and shall be responsible for maintenance of required or appropriate certification and continuing education as required under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 19 Applicant Authority: DEPARTMENT flF LABOR AND INDUSTRY. LICENSE/CERTIFICATE/REGISTRATION DETAIL Class Type: Application N o: Expire Date: O rig Date: Enforcement Action: Workplace Experience: CERTIFIED BUILDING OFFICIAL Number: B0002643 194035 1/17/2022 1/17/2006 N O N /A CE status must be Name: Address: Phone: Status: ISSUED Effect Date: 1/18/2020 Print Date: 11/11/2019 CE Status*: ebeta l_'] iet" for a license to be renewed unless designated as N/A. QUALLE, SCOTT L 17030 13TH AVE N PLYMOUTH , MN 55447 952-442-7520 20 What Distinguishes MNSPECT from the Competition? 1) The integrity of MNSPECT owner Scott QuaIle, his expert staff, and the company -wide commitment to seamless consistency, 2) We believe in education about, and enforcement of, the Code, the whole Code, and nothing more than the Code; that no Code Official should ever require anything beyond the minimum requirements of the Code, nor accept anything less. 3) Our values include a commitment to doing things right. That includes a sensitivity to the concept of "time is money," so inspections are scheduled same or next day, whenever possible Our thorough and comprehensive plan reviews save time and money during the construction process by identifying deficiencies while the project is still on paper, not after the concrete has been poured, or materials have been installed We operate as an extension of the municipality and share your concern for cost containment 4) MNSPECT believes in Comprehensive Plan Review. We utilize a detailed checklist to mark up plans. Our knowledgeable code reviewers work with property owners, designers, builders and contractors to fully communicate any changes. A thorough plan review streamlines the process, saving time and money throughout construction. 5) MNSPECT utilizes technology. At the cutting edge of technology, MNSPECT prides itself in its capability of providing Comprehensive Plan Review to clientele that are at a distance by utilizing computers and high-resolution 4K monitors to perform plan review electronically, and cloud -based file storage for safe and simple access. In addition, we are partnering with a web -based software platform that will, in the future, facilitate tablet -based electronic inspection documentation (instead of traditional paper), speeding communication of inspection results to stakeholders, allowing photographs to augment the written comments, and increasing consistency through the inspection process. 6) Our vast experience serving jurisdictions of all types and sizes (as des'gnated building official, interim building official and back-up inspections and/or code review): Thirty-two in total. We currently serve 15 jurisdictions with populations over 5,000 and 17 jurisdictions with populations under 5,000. We are adaptable to all sizes. Cities 26 Townships 4 Sovereign nation 1 County 1 7) The professionalism and capabilities of our staff Five of our staff members have come to MNSPECT from former designations as building officials. This provides us with unparalleled experience in dealing with an extensive variety of code scenarios and challenges. In addition, that experience creates an environment that promotes mentoring and fosters a learning environment 21 Heather Butkowski From. Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Tracy Montgomery <TMontgomery@mnspect.com> Tuesday, September 7, 2021 2:59 PM Heather Butkowski Scott Qualle; Matt Royer; Tracy Montgomery RE: Follow Up Question Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. Good Afternoon Heather, Keep the questions coming! What is our policy on employee vaccinations? We do not currently have a vaccination requirement. We do, however, value our Clients' wishes. If a client has a policy requiring vaccinations or weekly testing for its employees, we will do our best to provide inspector(s) that will meet this requirement. What is our policy on employee masking? We encourage all staff to wear masks when indoors and in close proximity with others, regardless of vaccination status. We also encourage safe, social distancing . Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic we have been in constant contact with our clients regarding their mask requirements. It is important for us to respect and follow local policies Do we anticipate making any changes to these policies? At this time, we do not have any immediate, upcoming changes. However, we are continuing to assess the situation and will continue working with our clients to make sure we meet their needs and satisfy their requirements. As we have in the past, we will continue to follow local and state requirements as they change. Please let me know if you have any additional questions related to COVID-19 protocol or anything else( TGictz Movttgowt.eru Office Manager MNSPECT, LLC P hone: 952-442-7520 Fax: 952-442-7521 E mail tracyAmnspect.com From. Heather Butkowski <Heather.Butkowski@lauderdalemn.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 7 2021 10:16 AM Subject: Follow Up Question G ood morning, I thought we would be past this by now, but since we are not, please answer the following. What is your policy on employee vaccinations? What is your policy on employee masking? Do you anticipate making any changes to these policies. It would be great to have your answers by the end of the day tomorrow as I am putting the materials together for the council to make a decision at our September 14 meeting. Thank you. Heather Butkowski City Administrator City of Lauderdale 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 651 792.7657 heather.butkowski@lauderdalemn.org LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date September 14, 2021 ITEM NUMBER 2022 Budget and Levy STAFF INITIAL APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: As promised staff were able to refine the preliminary budget with the additional information we received from Ramsey County. The good news is that there was a slight increase in fis- cal disparities revenue. The general fund budget as proposed shows a 3.2% increase. With no new state aid, the levy supports all of the anticipated cost increases. As a result, the pro- posed levy increase is 5.6%. As previously discussed, the budget reflects the shift from an on -staff building official to the expense of a contract. It also reflects the expense of a second public works staff member even though the scope of that position is still being worked out. 2022 is an election year and brings those additional costs. Staff will prepare a memo to go with the final budget that ex- plains the changes expected in 2022. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the budget and projected levy increase. Staff in- cluded a spreadsheet showing what other Ramsey County cities are proposing as well as the Assessor's Report which is full of interesting information on the changing values in Ramsey County. Aftei years of big value increases, many Ramsey County cities are experiencing little to no value increase. A median value home in Lauderdale is changing from $232,400 in 2021 to $231,550 for 2022. Many of the home sales this year were at Brandychase where the sales points are in the $150,000 neighborhood so I would expect that has something to do with the stabilizing of the values. The most interesting page is 22 of the Assessor's re- port. Ultimately when those values are plugged into the spreadsheet we use to show im- pact, the 5.6% levy increase results in a city property tax increase of $30.74 on a median valued home. The County continues to revise the tax capacity number through the end of the year so that could change slightly. Please let me know if you have any questions in ad- vance of the meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 2022 PROPOSED LEVY IMPACTS ON LAUDERDALE HOMES City Total Levy 2021-6.5% $899,710 2022-5.6% $950,351 Median Value 2019 Median Value 2020 Median Value 2021 Median Value 2022 Taxable Value 2021-6.5% $100,100 2022-5.6% $100,100 City Fiscal Disparities $146,325 $147,140 $206,300 $218,300 $232,400 $231,550 City City Net Local Levy Tax Capacity $753,385 $803,211 $2,716,823 $2,743,370 City Tax Rate 27.730% 29 278% x Tax Rate = City Tax on $126,000 Home/Lot 0.2773 Total Tax $277.58 0.2928 Total Tax $293.08 DIFFERENCE $15.49 5.58% Taxable Value 2021-6.5% $216,076 2022-5.6% $215,150 x Tax Rate = City Tax on Median Lauderdale Home 0.2773 Total Tax $599.19 0.2928 Total Tax $629.92 DIFFERENCE $30.74 5.13% Taxable Value 2021-6.5% $289,760 2022-5.6% $289,760 x Tax Rate = City Tax on $300,000 Home 0.2773 Total Tax $803.52 0.2928 Total Tax $848.37 DIFFERENCE $44.85 5.58% Estimated Preliminary Tax Levy Increases for Payable 2022 Arden Hills Blaine Falcon Heights G em Lake Lauderdale Little Canada Maplewood Mounds View N ew Brighton N orth St. Paul Roseville Shoreview Spring Lake Park St. Anthony Village ✓ adnais Heights White Bear Lake White Bear Township Average Low 3.00% 4.50% 9.50% 4.00% 3.00% 5.00% 5.50% 8.20% 4.50% 4.92% 4.56% 5.46% 4.80% 6.92% 19.25% 6.21% High 5.00% Range provided 4.50% 9.50% 6.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.50% 8.20% 6.50% 4.92% 4.56% 5.46% 4.80% 6.92% 19.25% 6.74% Range provided Range provided Range provided A i ' S`tic 1 ♦iS I.4,,, 4)1`I d. r. :;;y4% �••• t ,r' ,,t'. 1' tie' e r. fih` tt • r �. i 1 tpf(,cr,#�R . General Ledger 2022 Proposed General Fund Budget O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O cl N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O o o o O O O 0 O r-4 O O O O O OO O O O O O N 0 47t. kr)o 0 o 0 0 0 N r•-, d' N M •--I O to M NnN �--� M d' ?"' 0 d' N Pk .-, Il In M In rmt PO 0 O O O O 0 0 o O O O 0 0 Cy O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O . 6 . 6 . 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 . O '1:3 to o to O N o 0o N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M M r--+ It 0 r•-, .--1 O 0 irc �i re dam. N r--. N N .--4 0) m E t a) +) E a) .� 0 .0 0) 0 N.4 . cJ �-+ H � .40 Tci v) cn O Uci) v cd �A [Ti w a faxes Totals: Licenses and Permits Liquor Licenses Tobacco Licenses Other Business License/Permit HVAC Contractor License Animal License Building Permit Plumbing & Heating Permits 0_ O 0 O O 01-4 . 0 0 N 0 0 0 O 0 O O d171* -CD 4 00 CNmt N en = .--+ .--+ .-I *--1 r- I r-+ N N N N N 0 M M N M M M M M en M M Men Q - t t O O O N CD 5O Oi O O 0 O1 .-4 O /aOO .-4 Vt .d' 'd' It 'Ct. "t' (24 lt. tt. 471. '4 fit. mt 4Zt• d. N ca4 O\ N 00 ton O o Nei' 0 0 0 00 CD O CT r-I O It .--1 N 'n /LAN N M 'd' d' N 00 O O M M O NVO 00 00 en O 01 M M r-1 .--1 00 O O 0 O O .--I In O in in 00 N r-+ M v--+ '-4 0\ N General Ledger 2022 Proposed General Fund Budget O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O 0 0 O O O O 0 O 0 O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a1 O O O O in O 0 V V1 d' ,--i N N N t _ O in a) io ‘45 we M N in O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O o0 O O O O O O O O O O 01 0O O O O to O in to to d h N Rental Registration Excavating Peliuits Other State Grants & Aids Coronavirus Relief Fund Other Grants and Aids (METC Coronavirus Relief Fund 0\ 00 N In iii H 0 N U N >,iwww 0 ]n N N Ix (p iy 7`18 Pfl X7473 N E U U 0 P.9 0 G O N m d• M m in oo d• N 1� iO 0 h1 N N N O O 0_ O O O N N d' d' d'471. d' N N N M M m M M d' d• d' d' d' e M MM M Cr) M M Cr) M M M M M O O M O1 01 O O O d' O O O O 01 O cl en 0 O d• d• R4. d' d• d' d• d• Ry d• d' d' d' d• d• Zoning & Subdivision Fees Sale of Maps & Publications Administrative Fees Plan Check Fees Special Fire Services O O ).O O N O N ten O in O N in in cr O V1 N 00 O O 10 N VO O 0\ Cr) N d' '-0 00 O O ten O 00 N M d• iO 00 M ten N 'd' N N M d' tel NN M In 1-1 N 00 0 d' N 00 0 0 0 O •0 0 OT N M _O O VD 01 000 0000 N "t Cl N QA Cil OA O Cr) .-4 CT. -i d• rn d• in in General Ledger 2022 Proposed General Fund Budget o O O o O O o O O O O O O O o O O o O o O O o O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 o o o O 0 6 6 6 0 0 N d• O O O O O 0 0 O N O o 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o o o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 . . 6 O 6 O O 6 O 6 O 6 O O 6 O O O O O O O N d O O In O N iO --' Mowing & Garbage Cleanup Snow Removal Charges Park Shelter Fees Merchandise Sales N O O CD O O O Ne O N N 0 N N U N N a-+ 0 0 Aa 0 Ril N O-. w o i 0� 0 N b h k co 0 _ 0 cu Ch w U w n n 0 w 2y i OD N a) vO M O O U w No O In O 0 O O O O 00 N O 0 O 0 0 ,--1,--1m ‘ID M N m N a1 N (1/41 N N N hl N d' d' d• d' In �O ‘.0O �VZ)\O ‘.0O t.0O VD 1/40 1/40 M M M M M M M1 M M M M M M M O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O d' d' d• d• ' r::i d' P: d' d' d' d• d• • d' d' d' d• )e Interest on Investments Other Fees (Credit Card) Contributions & Donations Surcharges Collected Other Miscellaneous Revenue Contributions & Donations O O O N Q\ M d' co co \O N .1 (\I m Vl d' ul 00 O O Vl O V) 00 to N d' d• O O O O to M co 00 d' co co t•O O O\ vl vl O l� t— co Vl �t N ON ON M m N M cel CN DA N --+ 0 N N N t,i 0 11 Ail O O O O 0 O O O �`' t �1� . ;�� �• It rO O ti:�).• . Ckla • r ill 51 ^i V General Ledger 2022 Proposed General Fund Budget O O 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 O 0 O O 0 O O O O 0 O O O 0 O O O O N M d• O to O to O N \ D *--1 r-4 O O N O O en O ON O O \O 00 f n O\'‘ r:5 - N to r1 f O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 O 0 O O O O O O M O1 _ O O O Nen d• VI to O (NI n n r --i O 0 O\ 0 O M O d• O kr) M 00 n f Nn 00 Miscellaneous Revenue Totals: O •1 F O O u -)O 0 t.cht a--) O vv) bill < UO a� cn cu Cn al cd cn w_ G H C CD Cip $-4 0 cn bA 0 t-, 3 O < "Eli p-, 0 to 0 Jther Fine Jther Use: EXPEND] Personal S General Supplies O O O O 0 0 M N N .--4 .-4 .—+ N O O N N to O v--4 O\ 01 O . 1 r-1 r--4 v-4en en 0 N N O t--4 O O O TI '-' O O 0 O N O O O t--+ r-1 O O r -c O .--+ .--+ r-1 .--1 O .--i r--4 L4 'd' d• W O d• W d- d' d- d• W d- d• M O 0 0 00 O O 0 0 M O 00 . M N to N O N d' dNzt- a\ d- in 0 Cl 00 n n n 00 t--4 \D N •, r-4 nral O o O O O 00 N \O in O n `^ n n ,--4 W I4 00 r-4 .711. 1-4 CD d' d' O O 0 N 00 n N r4 WJ t ct 1) 0 2022 Proposed General Fund Budget o o O O O O O O o o 0 o O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o O O 0 O o O O O O o o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 O O Vl N .1 d O O O O O O M O M M In co in in Vl N o0 00 00 00 ‘.�t d N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N v vl v Tcf• n bA 0 1) Minor Equipment & Tools le) N N O O 1-4 O o O M O M M Vl O Vl in in N o0 00 00 00 iri M M M Cl N N cn U bA 0 b cn up U O h taq 0) Training & Education Travel Expense Legal Notices Publishing Insurance & Bonds Dues & Subscriptions iii w 4-4h V) N oki 7c 4.2 ,cl U o. .J O W cs U a-.. U 6) d ° u a) cn Qi 0 O O O _O O O d M 0 M in ci M t--- e• n `M M M M dm in tt O O O O O O D O W 'cf' vet 'ch ''4 d' W d• ' O O N 01 O V N 00 00 00 0 O Capital Outlay Totals: EXPENDITURES TOTALS: W W E-� W QI W DEPARTMENT EXPENSES Legislative Totals: O M 0 Cr) M C• kri in in O O O O �' V"1 N N d'0 O 0 0 O O 00 Ol 'd' ^ O 4 N N N . 1 ,-. 4 00 \. ‘.6 cV N N General Ledger 2022 Proposed General Fund Budget o O O O O O o O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O o O O O o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O O O O O O o O O O o o O O O O O O O O O O O O O o ‘,O O O O N ‘.0 N a\ O O O O N h N 00 01 O O O d' a, \O d O 00 N N a, •17t- 0 4 O O 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 O O 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O a O O O cr• ' 00 O O O O O O O •0 O N O, 00 O O O to 01 0 O (�! d' 01 O d' 00 �D O t -r O 00 .-o N 00 M .-1 Ch 0 O N T 1, E . a W b (0E E E O Tia *E ~ g ;-6 0 U a L° O a n a w n Pay Deferred Compensation Health Insurance Dental Insurance Life Insurance Disability Insurance Long Term Care Insurance Unemployment Workers Compensation Insurai oo O O oO in O O O O O O O o _ N M _ N N trl N M 47? 'n N _ O O O N N N N M7-1 M v-I_M Mr --1 M dkr)' k N'cf' d' d' d' d' It d' d' <t d' d' d' <P <} ct M ~O O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 .--i .--i .--. .-. .-. 1--1 .-. .-. .--i .-. r• 1--1 .--( .-. .--. 'ch LI.) d' d' 4 7 ch 4 4 4 4 d' 4 'd' d' d' ‘7h 00 O O O N '4 00 4 N O O tn O 01 4 On O It M 00 N d' 0" 00 .-. N 01 M .--i 0" O O to O ‘.0 '0 Q\ d' M 00 O �0 Q1 O M 00 O D1 0\ 00 . 1 N 00 General Ledger 2022 Proposed General Fund Budget 0 0 o O O O O O O O O o o O 0 0 o O O o O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 O o O 0 o O O O o 0 O 0 0 0 0 6 0 in OO in O e ---in N O m 0 O 00 O N �D O in 0 o O O O O O 0 o O O O O O 0 0 \a o 0 0 0 O M O O O O 00 0 0 kr) 0 00 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O . o O 6 6 6 O 6 O 6 00 O 6 6 O O in OO O O D\ O O O t---iO d' O in Vl O O Vl M 00 C N O 00 00 00 O tri 00 Personal Services Totals: N 0 1) b N by V) 00 1- 0 cri 1 0Q a. 0. ¢ vo 023) ▪ 61) o 7 's id W (3 cn N _ b00i0 co ." ) cn V) o a" 0 5 o< d w H a N 0 a R. ) o O 0 O in o O Oa O O Oa O N m _ _ N M Q\471- Nin O O O d' d. O 0 O N N M N N N N N N N M m M M m m M d•d' d' d' I. d' I. d• d' d' d' d' *it d' N O O_ 0 O O 0 O M O O O 0_ 0 0 0 O O W d• d d' <t d' d• d• • LTl d' d• d• d' d• d• d E Other Communications Travel Expense d• 171-6 N 0 0 00 O M 10 O 0 00 N O O N O\ M 0\ In 0 'D 00 d' M 00 In N 0 do N '0N 00 d• M M 00 d' VD '-. N M N O %d' \ O d' N to Cr) M M N M V m 00 l� 00 in O 00 Vl 7 G\ 00 \D O Vl -44 M m General Ledger 2022 Proposed General Fund Budget 0 0 o O O O o O O o O o O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O O o 0 0 0 o o O O O O O O o O o O o o o O O O O O O O N O M O O O O O O d' O "D N O al O O O 00 Cr, M N N N N d ▪ s. Legal Notices Publishing Insurance & Bonds Oen_ d O O O Vehicle/Equipment Repairs Rents & Leases Bank Fees & Charges O O O O N Dues & Subscriptions Miscellaneous Charges VD N O N M 4 M M M 4 O O O N N Cil 00 O1 0 a O\ 0 0 O Cr N N N In N N N Vl d d d N N N Other Services and Charges Totals: EXPENDITURES TOTALS: DEPARTMENT REVENUES DEPARTMENT EXPENSES v) dJ .. W w n w E a O 0 O O O O 00 O a d N ON Cd o O O o 0 Cta e1 0 d. V~-' ��' d' ~O O 0 0 d• W d d' d Vl 0 a\ N N d' O O O O N d N CN N O\ M Vl M d N N N 00 M O\ N 00 N ON 00 M CN CIN 01 O\ 0 00 M N N VD 0 N t` N in 00 \D \0 \D ,--. N N N N N O N VD Vl 00 M d' O N �O �D d• .� N vl vl d• vl Ol '-D N O M l r, N N d• 00 ti N 7''1 \D M M M M M M N N CJ General Ledger 2022 Proposed Genera O 0 O O r 0 O Cr.) 0 w to to N r '4 O O 0 O O 00 00 0 O O 0 Deferred Compensation N N 0 O 0 O O N 00 O O 00 4-1 Health Insurance CC CC O 0 O O 0 In O O In Dental Insurance VD d' O O 0 0 O 0 1/40 O O o Life Insurance O en 'd' O O O 0 Disability Insurance O rt 4-1 '-t 0 ch O O 0 O O 0 O O O Unemployment O N Tzr .44 O d O O O O 0 O O 0 Workers Compensation Insuram 't U O M VD 444-1N O O 0 O 0 O O O 0 O N D, N 144 (V O W M Cr) O O O O 0 O General Supplies O rn In O O Minor Equipment & Tools 0 N ch O 4-4d 00 tntn 00 N o1 O O O 1-1 M N M 0 O 0 O O 0 en M O O O 0 O O O O O Miscellaneous Charges O\ O O M N General Ledger 2022 Proposed General Fund Budget O M 0 M in M 0 0 r. N in N N O O M M M O 0 0 Cr1 O\ Other Services and Charges Totals: EXPENDITURES TOTALS: In W z w W DEPARTMENT EXPENSES Elections Totals: o o O O o O o O o o 0 0 o O o o 0 O 0 Legal Services - Prosecution o in et d o o o ' rn ‘.• O en O O O d W N7t d' O O 0 0 0 O O 0 O o O O O cel N N M M M M O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O O 0 O t. M rn M M Other Services and Charges Totals: EXPENDITURES TOTALS: W z r1 w W DEPARTMENT EXPENSES Legal Services Totals: o O o 0 rn M CI N 1) 3-4 n 1:14w a o_ O_ O N O a. a, ^ O O Net W 47• 1* a, c) O \0 Vl O Len Vl O Vl 00 O M M M N 0 N NN N O 0 M N 1� N 01 O O O O N d' d• d• N d' d' d• d• �0 r-+ N N N N •. M M M v r. 0 N O N N \0 1� M rn 0 rn M M M VO CO \ .0 1� d' N N N N Vl N O 0 0 N N in tin Vl t- 00 0000 01 O O O O Vl ri .-+ . 1 M M M M *- tt 1 N bei t '—i ?-i 0 2022 Proposed General Fund Budget o O O O O o O O O O O O O o O O O O O O o O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O: Vl 00 M O C'1 vet N O M 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O; Vl QM O O O O N 'd' N N 00 Vl M 0 O N N N M Deferred Compensation H ealth Insurance Dental Insurance Life Insurance D isability Insurance U nemployment Workers Compensation Insurai o N O O o o 0 0 0 (NIN N N M M M_ _M d' in It�t d' '47Y d' 47h d- .7h d' O O O O O O 0 0 0 �t d' d' d' d' d' d' rs d' Personal Services Totals: Printed Forms O cn 0 O 0 0 0 _ M 0 O 0 0 d, d. 1. 1. 0 O 0 0 cri 0 W d' �t 7 W 47f. O M "la N O O O O M N V M d' h N 00 00 00 00 00 O N N O C`1 M .71.•O" 0 N N M N O 1� ‘.O O N 1O O O O O l� t o [ m m 1-4 N .' General Ledger 2022 Proposed General Fund Budget O O O O O O O O O Training & Education O O O O N rn O 971- Net t O O O O Insurance & Bonds VD 00 O O O Dues and Subscriptions Q1 N 01 N O N N rn N O d Other Services and Charges Totals: 00 00 O1 M EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 't vet d' \ N a, N M O M rn M cn W z P.1 z ni Q DEPARTMENT EXPENSES O d rn •cY O a, N M N O 1-1 vDP M Planning and Zoning Totals: rn O O O N O W N N 0 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Minor Equipment & Tools O O O O O O O O N NI 00 O W O O O O O O 1) U 0 0 0 a, c3 1) N W 0 O Telephone & Telegraph O en 1 O O N O O d O o O O O O O O O O O O o 0 o O o O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O O O o O O o O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o o O O O to o O to 0 tn rn O O O 0 o O 0 0 o o 0 o o O o 0 M M M O 0 O 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 O O O 0 O 0 0 0 O O O O (3 O O O O O O o O O O O O O O to O to O N 0 D 00 M M ‘.D --r Other Communications Insurance & Bonds V) 1-4 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 O cf. \ 0 O M Cr) M y cci w H cli 1) a N N Q0 _ R. C a 0 '� Q O A C/1 CA 3 G 0 o cct 0 v) •-I U O 0 V) 1- 0 O 0_ o 0 O 0 0 o O 0 0 o to N M ch to 71 '.D O N ‘.D CO 00 00 00 00 0 O N M M M M M M M r¢ 47 'd• to I' c}' d' 1171•71- �'�' �' 'c!' a' I. 'ch 4716O -O O O 0 0 O O O O O_ .Tt d• 'cl' d' d' d' 'ch d' 7t' 'd' d' W d' v 3 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: DEPARTMENT REVENUES DEPARTMENT EXPENSES kyr W d�y i-1 �D O� d' �D M4-1 O �D O O O't• O O o CD tto 00 00 d 1 ' CO00 to � 00 r. rn ' M 'F d N N (V 2022 Proposed Genera O• N N 10 Nit O to 0 O N O O O 000 d' N a, vD Q1 N 0 Nr--- 14 00 N N to N D; N N N_ D1 �1 General Ledger 2022 Proposed General Fund Budget o O O O O o o O O o O o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o rii o )n o 0 o 00 o N o N d; 00 O\ N in 0 00 O M M O M M kr) in p o0 00 00 00 [� N O ix) )D ttD itD 00 00 1/46_ v M N N ...i 00 00 00 0• 0 o O O o O O O O in N 0 M ch N N rn N _ _ O O N N VD O 0 0 00 M 00 00 General Government Buildings Totals: Police Contract Miscellaneous Charges o o o O l---- M O l I d O 0:) O 'r N CDW rr N7r• N:t es and Charges Totals: EXPENDITURES TOTALS: O DEPARTMENT REVENUES C�7 O 1/46 00 00 DEPARTMENT EXPENSES N O\ N 00 in Vl O in At O d' d• 'd' N71- vi N N Ni N `.� r r O d• ON M M 0 M N N O 00 ‘,D ‘D CD D N^ o 0 0 O, Vl M 01 O\ CP N .1 _ N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O 0 0 N 0 0 O 0 O L h 00 (--- l--- N Police Totals: op 0 Oh o 00 0 .d O H vi v vl (go E O .t O a) 0 > no cn . U U P1 0 ,c a) a) v - U H w+ O w w • v) z a) a o in o O W N N N id - O N �M dM • • N N d• W dveer s V in N co O d• N d• 'D a1 in in N o0 id d d• VI N M 00 a, O N 'D in 4 O O Odm N N (V dNN N N •4 •71- N General Ledger 2022 Proposed Genera O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O IA tri M 0 O Vl O M 0o d' tri N N in \D \O o0 '7F' N iD .-. N 00 O T-' O in to N N 00 00 ic N O O O O O O O in tri N N CI) w O U 1.) U LO al Et W N x w 1E) 7 b ac 0 W W i > Q _ U V) CO w w 0 a %. H H W - o Ca o_ O o O v, O O Oa o O o O 0 N N N_ N M M M M_ d' Vl 00 d• . d. d• ' .4 rt d' d' IIt d. �' d• d' O O O O O O 0 O O 0 0 0 (NI Cr NN Nd• W .d, d.471* d. d. "t d• d• rF d• .d. d. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O 00 O Cr; M \D O W kr; O O O h 71 N vl O N oo M 00 Vl M O 1-1 -J i--1 M ti ti D Deferred Compensation Health Insurance Dental Insurance Life Insurance Disability Insurance Unemployment Workers Compensation Insurai O d• d d• N N M in 1-n kr) r. d d• d VD \D M Ori O 01 M O N o0 d' in M to O OP‘ d' ^ M N N C+1 .-1 O N N M M o0 0o Vl \D "D _O o O O M [� O M Vl Moo N N CN rl 4 M kr) 00 00 Vl N nl N (\1 N N rF d M O.4444 N La ICS. General Ledger 2022 Proposed Genera O M a1 4-4 N '4 CO N O 0 O O 0 O O O Ct 0 0 161 a a M N O O 0 O 0 O O O General Supplies O O O O 0 O O 0 O O O O O 0 O 0 Expert & Professional Services N O O 0 O O 0 Training & Education O Net In N O O 0 O O 0 O O O vp N O O O O 0 O O O O O 0 O O O O O Legal Notices Publishing o N Nets O O 0 O O 0 N Insurance & Bonds 0 en O N O O N co M M hl 0 0 O O 0 O O Vehicle/Equipme O O O 0 O O O Rents & Leases O 0 O O 0 Dues & Subscriptions O M rnd d O di* O O 0 O O 0 Miscellaneous Charges O O d O O 0 0 O 0 O O Building Permit Surcharges In N General Ledger 2022 Proposed General Fund Budget 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o O O O O O o O O O o o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o O O O o O tri 0 0 0 oi 00 0 0 0 0 N rn 0 ct O o 0 N 1� M in O l t� N N '0 M O M co M M in d' d' 'd' N in v-) irk M •ch 1 d O 00 0 00 00 O N ,:k• t- ' dt d h in Other Services and Charges Totals: EXPENDITURES TOTALS: DEPARTMENT EXPENSES vi O v v 3 0 O d ao 0 4) .9 s/, 0 G _ ll--.. U N a� > 0 W a s w 0 H 0 a.1 w oft 5 an O o 0 0 o O N O o 0 o_ 0_ O_ _ N N_ N N M M nl d' d' <t d' d' d' 1' d' d' d' '^ O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 M O M M M M M M M M M M d' W d d' Tt d' 47t "t Tt "t d' 'd' O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O N O O O kr; k.<:5 d' V k.l O 4o O N .0 N O\ O 01 o O N _ .0 1O In (� VD M N I innM f Deferred Compensation Health Insurance Dental Insurance 00 0 O 0 0 -d' 0 0 N 0 'ch en N 0\ 01 0' M 1� 1/40 10 in in kO M M m ).15 ni N Vi kn kr; v) M \ a1 O O O d' d' Vl a\ M .--. 00 00 00 1/4c) M N d' M 01 M M M M 00 00 ('1 d' VC5 VO N N to Vl Vl V M General Ledger 1.) bO t t r 2022 Proposed Genera o O O o O O O O O O o O O O o O O o O O O o O o o O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O o O O O O O O 0 o c_i o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '.0 vi O O O M N 00 r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O �D Vl N O O O O O O .-. I in M Life Insurance Disability Insurance E 0 0 o. 0 Workers Compensation Insurai O co O O M_ M_ d' Vl d• d d' 1 O O O O en m en en d• d• d• d N 00 W Personal Services Totals: 0 0 cda c U a, 5 0 M Lu 0 Sa >r Equil Minor Computer Equipme O O O O O O O O O O M. ‘D l� N N N d' d' d• d' d' d• d' <t d• d' d• 4 N O O O O O O O O O O O d' d d d d• d d' d d d 00 Cr) O Ln N N 00 \D O O O O O O O O Cr) d' In C` CO O N 47f cel 'd'in N N N M 00 a\ 0 Cl C) 01 O 0 0 00 0 O 0 kr) d' 0 � N N 01 d• 00 O 00 d .--I N M tn 1) bD t N rl cd �-1 N 0 2022 Proposed General Fund Budget O O O N co co o co 0 o co bA U 'CS N 0 cD TI bA N czt b�A E0_ O W a) ) rel O d• 00-3 O w O en O rn d• O rn d O 00 M o o 0 O O 0 o o o o 0 0 o o o o I CNr co co co co O O O co co co O N Expert & Professional Services Tree Trimming and Removal M tn 00 00 NI N O rnN N tn N O 00 co o 0 O O O tn Training & Education O d O <t 0 O 0 o o Telephone & Telegraph O O o o 0 o O 0 O O O Other Communications O O o o 0 o co O O O O O O O 0 O 0 0 O O Insurance & Bonds O_ rn rn O rn d• d' 00 co co 0 o o 0 O O o O 0 Vehicle/Equipment Repairs o 0 0 o o 0 Rents & Leases CPC en CN h O o o 0 o o 0 O O O Dues & Subscriptions O M en d d• O rn d O o co 0 o o 0 Taxes & Licenses O CP rnd In rnO d• rn M O O o o 0 o O 0 O O O est 0 O W O O d• tn d rn O d 00 0 In 00 00 N 00 d General Ledger 2022 Proposed General Fund Budget O o o O o O O O O O O O O N O N N 0 0 0 0 O 00 CO 00 0 0 0 0 d' 3' •t 0 O 0 0 Ln N tr C 00 00 00 O t— 0 l- N 00 00 00 O O 0 Capital Outlay Totals: EXPENDITURES TOTALS: W z W DEPARTMENT EXPENSES Works Totals: U cn 9 by N U rID U Ny5 N 0 .0 _N cn O W Vehicle/Equipme O O 00 0 cr) yetO wd- 1—f M O O en O Ntr W n6 1 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O ces and Charges Totals: N cn N .L: 0 EXPENDITURES TOTALS: W z W DEPARTMENT EXPENSES Street Lighting Totals: Parks and Recreation Personal Services Full-time Employees O O N _O O_ O "71.• 1. N ^' O O in O <r W vt �t 0 O O �D �0 A0 AO VO t•O t• O O O O to 0 M O M M 4t O 'd' d' O 47Y nh N N 0\ 01 0\ NN N N N In 0 M M M C} In In to "0 '0 ‘.0 CO '0 N r -i O 0 O `-� in General Ledger bO t r Tr --t 1-x-4 2022 Proposed Genera o o O O o O O O O O O o o O O o o O o O O O O o O O o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 o O 0 0 O O O o O O O 0 O O o O 0 O O 0 o Ni_ rn \D o 0 0 0 00 0 t� O to O O O O M in O O in O O O ul in M O VD to d• r-+ l� to N O 00 O 00 00 O1 o 0 O O O O o O 0 O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O N 00 O O O t� t� O O 00 O O O O \D t� M to O 00 t•D Vl 00 0 O M O1 U N 01 '--. M N to O N d' M in M .-+ ^, Temporary Employees T cd P-� 0 PPI w Deferred Compensation Health Insurance Dental Insurance Life Insurance Disability Insurance Unemployment Workers Compensation Insurai o O O O in O O O o O O O '4 O\ N N to N M d' N I. 'el' d• • I. d• ' 4" d' d' d• 'd' d' d• O O O O O O O co O O O O in in in Vl to rn 'n in I!1 to Vl 7 4 d• 47th d' d• d• d• d' d' d• d' 00 00 Personal Services Totals: O rn (s, bA N ti 0 ta44C12 -I-3 C N N to w" 0 o 0 rn M N NN In N71* d N O 0 O CD In in in W d d d O d' N 00 01 N O O CPN 471- O coo dam' In 00 M N 00 M N --� M M inn M in O N 01 M d' 0\ \D t -D N O d' 0\ O 0\ 0 ,%D \D O l� 00 ‘ND d' to in N VD N d, N 00 ,--4 M (`I 10 in O 00 General Ledger 2022 Proposed General Fund Budget O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 CO O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O o O O O O O O O O O O 6 O O 6 O o O O O O o o 00 'n in N O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 6 O O 6 O O 6 6 6 O O 6 6 6 6 O O VD 0 in in in DD e Motor Fuels Chemicals & Chemical Produc cle/Equipment Parts Equip O O O 0 C a 0 Dap 4) ct C) P U O -0 0 g '&to 1 4.0 0 0 E a an0,3 4.3 s. rn •'� O U vi U N F rn 0 W a> R. u. o 0 0 o O oo o o 0 Ooo 0 o NVO N M _ a1 CT M ''4 _ _ v--1 (`I _ NN N d' CN 0 _ N M \0 00 00 N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M `d'd' 'd' 'ct d' d' d' cl' rh d' `7t d' d' 'd' d' O O O O O O O M O O O O 0 O O O d' et 't d' 'd' d' d' W d' m' <t <t d' d' d' d' Community Events Training & Education Telephone & Telegraph Insurance & Bonds Electric Utilities Water Utilities 00 wtt O O O M N cr‘ N N O\ O d' O d' t� General Ledger 2022 Proposed Genera O O 0 O 0 0 O O O O N cd 0 O O 0 O 0 0 O O 0 Refuse Disposal O O 0 O O 0 O 0 O O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 Vehicle/Equipment Repairs 00 0 0 0 "zt d' O O O O O o co 0 O rti O 0 0 N Rents & Leases O M O O O O 0 O O Recreation Programs O O 0 O 00 O O 0 O O 0 O O CU 1) 0 al E 023 0 bq C TJ Cr-) O O N d tnO d' M O O O 0 00 00 O al Outlay Totals: U O EXPENDITURES TOTALS: 00 O 1-1 00 0 00 O 00 O O rn DEPARTMENT REVENUES Cr1 Cri DEPARTMENT EXPENSES O o0 O 00 O 0 0 00 O Parks and Recreation Totals: 00 O 00 trl 00 00 Q1 0 O 0 O O 0 O O to N q Cl)) n U P.1 O g ti >U_CiP) 0 o a N N O Economic Devel O O 0 O O 0 O O 0 Miscellaneous Charges O N M d' N O General Ledger 2022 Proposed General Fund Budget o O o O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O O 0 o O o 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 o 0 O O 0 0 0 O o 0 O 0 O 0 0 O M M M M in t/1n In Vl O O 0 O O o O O O o O O O Other Services and Charges Totals: EXPENDITURES TOTALS: O DEPARTMENT EXPENSES N VD Development Totals: in in O in kr) N N N N N N N N o O O O O O O O 00 ito U bA 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 00 00 00 00 Other Uses Totals: EXPENDITURES TOTALS: DEPARTMENT EXPENSES Miscellaneous Unallocated Exp Totals: N tip U N O N .0 C 0 0 Transfer Out Other Uses Totals: EXPENDITURES TOTALS: O O O O O 0 O O O O 0 O O O 00 00 00 M M M O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O O 0 00 00 00 M M M • u rts a� it AN C7,/, r .4>i•'t„ pc. •t , tr. t. . f l 7• i • •b 5 l ` 1 t�`• '1 i!i4ji`r�l 1.� General Ledger 2022 Proposed General Fund Budget O O O O O w z w H z C-4 H w Q DEPARTMENT EXPENSES O O O Other Financing Uses Totals: Coronavirus Relief Fund O O O 0 Coronavirus Costs ON `D d' 00 M Rffd 4 0 • • N ,.s~ U E--4 'u v) Q w ON VD 00 M O, 00 M DEPARTMENT REVENUES DEPARTMENT EXPENSES O O O Coronavirus Relief Fund Totals: 00 M o O o tr, ire • w w Q 00 N d' N 00 • FUND EXPENSES N N CLN 00 `D •d' General Fund Totals: 1 mime (s) 4=1 4•=143) 0 N 0 N J 0 005 9 \ V 1..1.. O CN tan N Q Ramsey County Assessor c a) c O U O co LTJ G1 O ❑ (ii C. 1 1--- J 1— 0 1 c r' O O r 1 f 1 l O O _3 —, O. (C) \fl (CI O ❑ 0 Key Takeaways 1 _9% CO C� I CNI ci) lc) OA 0 4r% 0 i r_ Ci L-� CAI n L_,_ 0) (1) n r--_7:3 (11) Kai rTh' CO AY 2021/PY 2022 Trends Nal J 0,3) (S -1V) 0:3 Oc) 61_5; �= l cI [>- r i t [11111 (sT"-± L J $62,234,707,900 $60,492,642,500 0 0 N N 52,783,790,200 $49,490,455,200 $43,076,328,800 $45,733,160,800 0 cp o co c C6 CNI C'O 0 11 EA - 0 Lon a E $44,459,064,900 0 N co 0 CO 0 N 0 0 0 0 d' eft $38,636,657,800 $38,950,446,400 $36.963,250,700 r- N a O QO CN N O r - a O QO N N 0 CD N CD CD N �" N 0o 0.) CO r ao N coC r N �"N aa CD� N r CN �N CO1-0 CD CD N �" CN N a CD N N (0 r r N Q" N r- › (B O a N N o >, tn o N QN 6) 0 O R3 r - O QO N N CO O N CO C3 - N CD co CO N CD QN 'slaw LO O Co O N QO co oO o o o o o o o o ® (NI c) o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 ® 0 0 ® o ® o 0 o 0 0 0 © 0 0 0 0 o 0 () o 0 0 0 o 0 o o c- o © On ® 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 On tli o ui o la ® O (0 (0 d- d- 01 M CN Ea- Efl Eek Ea ki, EA- tt et> (1`„r'Tim) 131V101 AIM yiKr CO o Li L-� 0 oa • • D O 0) 0) W ) cici (6 O E O 1 0 22 co (0 2 O CL a CO COU O 0 U 1) J Q a- o a 4.1 O 1) co w O 0 O w E GJ 7 O (6-t Q 1 W CL 44 4( AY 2021/PY 2022 Trends z 0 U >- LU cea se C Sri trIt Cr1 lc j Jsu I (C_j I 13 CC I tLC 1 I 015) (1 C� % Recovered by Jurisdiction O N 1 r• 1 �n N 5 O N O M N 10 1 O O u0 n v 11r; aw rzs awc0 F:s .— w a� as _ C)G)et-s 2 r N 0.10 0 0 0 a) 0 0 Residentia (1/ (Ts 0 t 0 a) , K� (1) tj 1 (-0 (v) a) L 0) 0) c U 0 E E 0 U c0 c 0 0 O Nei O O ci CO 0 0 CO c ■ a z,‘v tbs + sc:D CO a 1 71: 0 0) b*?2 1 1 0 cu E itri + O re)7r. 0 + CO p d cu 0 L.) z 0 U (°) w Q (4o cu cu Mi I ceo F I Esd L—i [1 [ = I 0:1) Lati 1 ±I3T 1 It n 11 CO N . Tam NC a a Nib r N • • • ON N cn LA N N N r a, N 0 U� N � O 0, N 01)V� r � 0o v r 0 I CO 0 cO CO 0 LQ 0 N O "cr. 0 O cc CO - M CD CC) rn Co ON N O GH C ON 0 N N co td Co 0 d7 (731 0z) cy) tD r I~ Lti 6) N ON N 0 21N ri m O M IL CD ca c) 0 Cfl r N co 0 CO d' O oN 0 cn I\ 1 h O I Ln tri N cr) N rn r-- N oo Co 03 0 0 cs co M M 00 cp c9 N- ti C) 0 00 N iO N Ca 0 I Q. 'p N > O CO d- QO CO O O O O O 00 O O O N L{) CO O O O d' O CO O O CO 00 O N O O Lf) O N O O N - Lf) r- CO O LO O 4t' O CO O LO r- N— CO N O O LO CO 47 N O Ln CO O LO CO 01,000 O O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO C3) d" CO CO 'd' 228,' r- r- N O d' CD 231 d" O N O O) CO CO N CO N N N r c N RS W , Q 7 — O as N> . O 0 N N` 00 co 0 LO Lf) d' r- CO 0 L0 CO LO C7 CO 0 0 d' N CO N 0 O Cs CO C3) N O O Lf) 0) O to CO 0 0 LO O O O I 332.851 O O 0) CO 8,8 N ` N` 5,1 6,1 5,; 3,' 5,' CD 229 O CO N 0 C) r Ci) N in N N O O Lo 00 r- NNNNNCONNCOCO CD 00 / O N O O O O O O O r- C3) Ln r- O d- N7j- 00 O O O O O O CO N - 'Cr N r- N 0 _O _/ O C) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N CD O O 13,71 r CO N. CO CO CO r- 00 O CD N O N` win i`' i- 'd' N M N� 1-171 CO Q. 1 d' N N d' N d" NNNCNN 00 N. O wit r- O > N. r co c'0 0 O CO co 0 N O O O O O O LC) r Lf) N C) d' N r- Cfl N N N O Ln CO LC) CO Ln O O O O N 0) LO 47t' CO LO r- N O Ln C3) 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO d' 0) LO CO 'Cf' 255.81 r r 283.81 a 00 N CO IF d7 >2; L 51 3E LOi O CD N CO N CO N N N O O r- 0) CO r- O O O O O O CD CO 't- G) N- N O C D Nqs N r- N O 0 O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O 0 O LO 00 C) CO CX) X8.21 d- 471° 00 Lf) 07 d' CO N CD C3) 1L-8LZ I 172.81 0) CO CO CO CD CD N 00 N CO N 4 0 00 N 00 r- O Ln N N 0 N N a n MUNI # 0) N O CO CO C`') N. CO N� 'ct' CO Lf) N� 0) CO Lf) 10 CO N- CO C) C) CO N` r- CO CO 00 Ln CO 0) CO CO N - 0) 0) C St. Paul !hi Vi -§ North OaI CD co le Cal St. Anthl %... cu 'el) = • 2 c > cs) -,1 .. .0 L. 4- a) a . > ,em>2 w — `LiSII . 1==. _ • . C La ® ilk [�\ ] ca' zre Ci3 0 (i)W> WC,C, 2 - Property Tax Regressivity z 0 U >-•w ()Q It o El II 4 C-1 7 n 9 u 01 P-, L CD CO r co v V1 ( p.) ( I E C3 O O .1 O >) a nc i / \ Cl. /fi W �/ tvi I < ■ao coo F c ® W w x ( O rin4 c E > 0 cp °vat O • a t a--• ■ C 0 C CO i w CD C C, di . G l 0 t C 0 E t ro U) C(3 0 SFJ tem 0 a) O 0 a) 0 X CCS L Cv a O 2 0 0, C ■r_ Co -0 E 0 C L'==J `-a a, r 0 O ■ csi tt C� X 0 0 LL Co C O •ta=1 Ct C) ■ l� 1 ■ t/� U) C O v I L Co 4) 17) a) O T 0) 0 C) 0 NEIC ci•' reAl aaCi J 0 L ■11 Li L n cr- 0) to Countywide ill ,51 COil Etri PCL III in rl it% r N s''', , U ri'. en i r7 ti I t. V n , WIk.1 cn r,g . U ri. c�a N + U r�\ N tri N \U n••. c=0 (0 N '` ' , r; , c , ,-. 1 1U n'• N 0 ni \V rr, en co t I SJ n\ �a r-, ne) 1...r.1+.,V n\ N n (tea n\ N i n N U rig. en r--, r1 \ V q1 *-1 m M a a ri tri �U n•, cn '�• N +1U n' c_n N r-1 8-$: wt to i u7 r cotV �� cn to spun 0 C Lake wood iks t_. 3 F3 a in ; 0 . 0 3 Bear Lal Ju isdict I..... 13) ifrEs i d s V 0 w H Iep'a a) La x yrof Lt 0 Q 2 .4 y i 0 In I— II ei Ea LL LL ).) i 0 V i 0 I • o o C 9- CL co t a) Q 0 t_!.. z 0 >alU w Q De li visa -S3 E c n d� 0 L_o Co CD w CD C 0 n { , 0 a L n {� a) L u L � 0 a a cC 0 0 0 dLCC wee- •-o co o 0 17 o .71-• E ms3 1) 2 U N co €09. O 0 0 R N CO R Cl) 7-5 963 Q� W ) 1..1. Nal Cl) C0 R L st5 (c3 o -o a) c Qf) a) C a) C) at "5 C a) E t 0 0 a 0 a) C 0 N p a F- 0 co N Property Tax Refund z 0 U >- uJ Q It 1 J I D D c y t D 0 CO fir) 0 i‘m 0 0 v V C_s ,:f=5 (i) 00) t t 0 D 0 CD 4-1 D a 0 (N CO D U 0 n r CD a 0 m>. • a 0o V E 4 a) o L cti a) as 0 ihem 0 r N N ri C m ■ 0 a) E 0 0 C • I= V C/) 0 - 0 0) 0 CD >-• ef, t Q) a 0 2 a ■ n 0 CD 00 69- 0 S r b I 0 A homeowner 0 co CO no 0 •=II C ■ n ta) 0 0 C 0 N 0 0 7 `c r• 4- CD ACU 0 0 r • o C CVi N C= Ct r 0 0 E AY 2021 /PY 2022 Trends z 0 U Lll a iv I I_n _1 `u- n ■ ill a 0 142-73 0 rC cog u d OW LL ® . U. I 0 0 2 Lai cum �� �0 0) U) �ba C 0) CC) *--6 o p) b L.wa • Fs P cp, ❑ v"__ 0 CO ❑1 I Q L1fl ❑1 I I cb Cl1) 0) rthi 0 t 0 S_. co L 0-1 rD •A' C� 610 (l0 11 1- n C p 0 0 10 0 C" 1 1 I -1 C) 0) a) V2 W C tvicre; tr> c!l C1) co C eij co C Cl) E a O W C) 0 CU (I) r r - 0 0 0 0 N AY 2021/PY 2022 Trends z 0 U w Q (—j r L l�J (rd • U 0 CO to 07) 0 V a) H L _] U nLJ triu=-9 u(10 n r C" 0 9 I L 0 V 4 CO7 I L -- O Li ri(A _f.1, U cJ (1) n L_ - _I 0 , 1 I-- O 1 (i) n r _I n L— n r I n 0 I CO I O C f C I1 C) lots AY 2021/PY 2022 Trends z O U w N Q le N 3 J L 22 -fl CD C� Co ckasi �V 0 0 1 �l} C o ov nrroC L v! con W 0 n 0 I' ♦ n n csi) t-c_J L-1 r (v) 0 PPS/A� 4( J o) V-A 0) 0 H =1 :::: Ari- lin 0 G Y 0 C 0 0 LI 0 Y O .11 / C 0 0 • F C v / C ■ co t) 1 ma0 0 () C c) a) .__L Et,___=, a a) co . , t 0 0) U) 0 gi cc U) cci C U) 4.■ �s o 0 ■ U)= ■ 0 C CO 0 s(1) t7 U U. CU) U) L Ct C Ia L -J 0 0) IMMOINI nwts 0 CD sicta r C O U a) O U x t a) a 0 0 z 0 U w N a De It ■ 0 U en egattuiN 0 0 Ct C O 4J U 0 U X t C) 0 (13 4-1 0 U, 4-0 $512,570,052 S6207001070,00 en co up 0i cm int kb 00 on 0 N Ch 0 $600r0D0p000 N 0 csw vf $5 30,000,000 $540,0.00,000 $520,000,000 Q 0 g a a Q U) 0 C N �=1 a N 0 4- 03 4-10m F- 1 U) 4-1U 0 UI U • • 1 �H } w a It 1 C co a) i i Cti a) s o. C� co co 0 co o V Cfl O Co a icts C0 L CO CO 0) (DO N NI 71111 L r C0 • 0 C) V) E Co ncs t z 0 CM 0 (i) co J cc' -1E Ct 0) 0 SNEED Ct 1awj II IMMO V Co C) Co s.. ,_=_, (---: .�l pp A) U (i) W ric 0 0) 0 . w Co W U .CO C a s • col U I L O :=5 i l CN CN O [ C F 0 C (1) n r\PPP np/'�a\l v V COI W L L 0 a �+ -= r -- C) 0 O 0 r1-=3 C°: O 1 I {{{ r—� o 4=1:191 WOO) O 0 co a) E W X CO 1-6 4) a O 0 N N O N [-A MI 111 [1 (1� Tirj D1 tLn ] 0 (..) i >c?ij� UJ L 1 (I) © 2 u(1_-3 °CZ W d t---' [1 11 0 N ® 00 (Yi < CO M N C) r- LO I I o® 03 <a '� O) N O 00 M d" r N- 0O r- d' c r) LQ -- O a) w c U L0 N ■ Co (moi(13 C O -V eias 4=1 w ,vr. a O ® E C L 4 S.' -3"+ C N ® 00 (Yi < N.-- O N N-- 09- r- LO I I o® 03 <a O) N O CO ' r- r r• r ® E C 4 S.' Levu ($280,600 i C a) m co :4= .-J _ _ O) o •U . .I 0 U X CZ CO a) CD a .� o E fl cua�co _� �- o O cn > -0 as u) - C w " Q O E - ._-In r Q 4 CD r > -rte (( • c cO c -+-i 0UO 4' ® _c O (1) U = ~ -►-' Uov)0O O N CO O CO O N N O N r - N O N LC) r- CO O CO CO CO 0) O Co N d o0 � ' o Ln CO N d N N CO O N O O N Lf) N CO 0 CO IN- CO 6) CO r ---n N d- t` Ln O t� .J ~ COCN d N 0 N N ,O an a E a GO - J 4. 1.710I. SI Q J SC) CIC3 J -� I c a) ._ c U tCD D r C (Y Nag 0 a) U) a) (o a) 4) U a) U . • O 0 U) C a) id() O • co ta) a) 111 • Cll 2.) 0 0) C U) cC (I) w X co 4) O 0 N N O N ■ J C- 1 E - j, 1 c*Nil L r 0 "AL'v�J El L 7l t_ ® CD.� o (a ';-' "mc � C o as as CV r Q/ N � c m o/� V i • CD CD N.. r-- co�O zt cJ r co cu /� WW1 0 0.C) coOO \ L / r- 69- CZ. o U C) r' C�. n t, N s 0 a) 0) cts U J 69- 05 CoJ N 00 CDN 0 21 00 O N "t 0 0 0 ("se, o 47.t- O o o r` o CYi O r O N N` 0O O Lf) CO O r N o N N 07 o r rn N� 'Ct LQ N C3) LO CO O CO (NJ O O O C• O 0• 0 00 C3) N Cfl LQ r CO C• fl C• T) T- N- O N r r- NNS. CON Lf)rN- CO CO C6 Lo" - CO CO 0) r- CO r- CN 0 N C .O a E a Cfl 0 Co L a) I I. L > Q C CI) c— Lc co D N C o cn W n' U cn . . MV Home) $ 3,370 ;uno wv CD N.. 00 LO CO N r- LO M C.0 N-• N CO 00 r-- 00 't' I `Cr �' ® r' r' n e t 0 0 Na o6 N N in 4-a t1 ---- Q) C) C •® S X ca .__• 0 CO tom 0 (ll C c,-- Q n __.J 8) .r�..+ 4-i crs CJ '(U .0 ZZOZ i� u w 2 w 0 ® (� •w U ca _ — N —co oE v) _ > ) 0 0 0 ap _o o 0in iiis 4- 0 ii o cy) La-) _ 8 E c Id Sca 45 as .eti � (13viteaO a ,C ` _> C.) 00 o w CDUO — N s 0 a) 0) cts U J 69- 05 CoJ N 00 CDN 0 21 00 O N "t 0 0 0 ("se, o 47.t- O o o r` o CYi O r O N N` 0O O Lf) CO O r N o N N 07 o r rn N� 'Ct LQ N C3) LO CO O CO (NJ O O O C• O 0• 0 00 C3) N Cfl LQ r CO C• fl C• T) T- N- O N r r- NNS. CON Lf)rN- CO CO C6 Lo" - CO CO 0) r- CO r- CN 0 N C .O a E a Cfl 0 Co L a) I I. L > Q C CI) c— Lc co D N C o cn W n' U cn . . [7 Li Vic) I) V /� 4-0 LIU a Pi] (-(=-1 r v>s� CyU U� jI�rT1 E05 - c I U JIM n \Tr__ C ma 0 N la SI CO 0 R 00 co b) _ e 0 N CO CO r LO IC ist- N Perc Cha 3.1 E On.(7) if is . am. . 0 ft2z v� r, N I4 Lc (5) raa E On.(7) if is . am. . 8 .% Ll__ ..C= Qi 40 w — C.' L ci)-- +J _c Co 0 T 0 O CD CO d' N C3, CO N N 00 C r . ii \ LL •co 0 Ea o o r U c� (1) a� ommJ o, W :Cimia) CID CD (0 m / co \V ci W U To 0 w O cp c6 N Ct F- 0 N N N C) CO >41 npro Ct d E E ecsw w a N cfl 0) 00 CO O a) CO N C Lf; r C') N 6) If) CO (0 N C`7 O 00 N. CO J CO N- O N CO r— N J r0 N Na E a N N` cY) Co eft O N 00 O CO O N N O r r. N r LOCO N M 00 O 00 N` Ln LC) Off) N J 0 ..0 4 >C) < J wCO n N c D CO O C 0_ D �cpU) O 0 N t CO LO CO Market Value a) Ct 22. Cn N N O N z V w a De 1� 0 0,11 (a ❑L -1 1 t 01) ;unowv Nu----. W v 0 * _. N CD N. O) Nal ‘4:1' CO r- LO O) ,..s. N M ta r r- r-• CO CO LQ d' CO N- 1 °' 0 s� tt a) CC) N14 N "sr tet' Dr 1=§ C � � ea' 4391 ix ($483,000 Commercial) $ � Q. o ea Perc C V T Its ;unowv N CD N. O) Nal ‘4:1' CO r- LO O) o) '4" r r- N r - t N r 1 1 .t CC) N14 ea' 4391 ix ($483,000 Commercial) $ � V T Its • i r - U) a .3 U V 4 -CA N N N CO = a a C X X G C) B� (t (� CI Q) M b 0 U u) 2co co L.. (Ci D. ITI O as 0. , C� c� U O- � 0 '� _ L1- .c O U) 0 O- • 2® —I = t) co 0 DO c� > c o a) - E (o � CD 0 ® _- O O U -►,� � u) ct p w 0 o! U) 0 0 L L cl) -- - Ct U Co 0 a) I LC) '4 0 0 I` O (13 0 r N d LCA N r C3) LO CO O CO Cfl N 0 0 CO CrO C O c O 00 mct- CO CJS N CO Cfl N- .1 CO CO Cfl r LCA CO N- O) N r O N J 0 N <f3 N N- ti CO CO Co b9 r 4 In r- L() CO cfl N CO r CO 0 r Ln L() lOn IC CO cD N r r CO d I) < 0 J .ai—' � Ln D N c -? c Co o c ca CL (Th U cn W n' U cn O CN U) W o U) sco(B Q) C) Q) t3 00 O 0) C E U) )Q • Co Q� Co E Wco CI ❑ tT la5 2 0_ r� L ) CN d CN O 1 ;;'! ar tT)1) r1 i- gni J «I0 C) 0 t -- f4 0 y0 If) U) 0 rates and taxes idvi 4 ru ` 0 oa o 0 a)ONtoo Co o r` c'O r- O N N op 000 000 Lo 0 cop co C) ' co r - 0 ":"co d" O Lf) U i v- N r- r - N I` to CC) �+ r- C3) Ln CC) r - CC) CC) N O Ln __1 Co O CO CO CO r- CO O c?) N f` CC) Ln Ln r O0o CZ Cfl 0) Ln N � r` 0) N CO ' 69 - CD O r- Ln 0) N r- Ln O0 L{) N 00 00 N r� r- ao O r` —I N- CO 00 N- d r_ Ln r- Ln Ln Ln N CO Ln cc r` O CO CC) 6) N N C`) V- V- Assumptions: 613 I- 0 0 O r= r - O 4 45 Q J J N () N C+>N C -J co .2 C U 0 U) U) abueq 0 N 0 %85--,:' CO CD O r- r-- r 0 0 t— 00 Cb co' N 0 ;E12%) Ln N --t` co' O r- r - 8s: 0 00 O CO :::")-9, (1)(%) r- 00 co' ('7 0 0 N r- 00 N(Nei 0 CO t' ?-)2. N 0 0 0 00 N in coCfl d'7 ' .c O ' U lig (rNmil (: a) 0) N _ N Co c0 r. N N r4 N d' N i— ((Nye)) Kt) N d' CO r- N N N O N co d- r- O CO N N r- N- CO d- 'Cu Ln O) cO Ln d - N d' N r- N N N O O N N — x CO (Al C`0 C�0 N O 0 7,51 9,81 00 r CO - O N .(:::), 0 0 't N •+-J N (/) CO 00 N- CD N- d' N N r- C)) CD d' N- d' N N r- r- N d d' N- N M N d' CO O CD O N 00 0) M O r- O r- CO" CO CO N d' CO N CO Ln Ln Ln O CO Ln d' CO Cr) CO CO CO N - CONI" N- p 'Cr O CO 7.: $3,3 2.9 Co CO CI N E Om If)W x 4! 41 is CO CO r- r- O 1r N N O O N N O OO 00 O 1000 o a r- O CO CD O CO N N CO Ln N LO O N CD Ln d- N r- N i� O N CO r- LO CO N- 00 N CO N- O 00 N- N- 00 C)) CO N O Ln 00 d- r- O) N r- Ef3 d" N.- CO O "Cr N.- Cir) CO r - N --..CO C� 10 0) 2: N CO 1 1 1 1 1 n a I x u 0 •L U_ ig hwood tay 'ark C'0 r- O (0 C) 0 t -- f4 0 y0 If) U) 0 rates and taxes idvi 4 ru ` 0 oa o 0 a)ONtoo Co o r` c'O r- O N N op 000 000 Lo 0 cop co C) ' co r - 0 ":"co d" O Lf) U i v- N r- r - N I` to CC) �+ r- C3) Ln CC) r - CC) CC) N O Ln __1 Co O CO CO CO r- CO O c?) N f` CC) Ln Ln r O0o CZ Cfl 0) Ln N � r` 0) N CO ' 69 - CD O r- Ln 0) N r- Ln O0 L{) N 00 00 N r� r- ao O r` —I N- CO 00 N- d r_ Ln r- Ln Ln Ln N CO Ln cc r` O CO CC) 6) N N C`) V- V- Assumptions: 613 I- 0 0 O r= r - O 4 45 Q J J N () N C+>N C -J co .2 C U 0 U) U) a)0 CM c E N N 0 O o0 • W IC 0 0 N Ln Ln W 0 0 r- N. 6 (6 0 0 O 4 Ln M 0 0 CO N 6 r- ;.),&:). 0 07 C7 4 O 0 0 r- co r- O 0 Fin bOCD r- N N N O O N N 0 0 O 0 7,51 9,81 00 r 193,61 d d' d' 0) N- Hol 0' L. 7; ?.51 Co CO 4! 41 CO CO r- r- O 1r N N O O N N O OO 00 O 1000 N- CO r- O) N r- Ef3 19' 391 33: 361 2: 1 1 1 1 1 •L U_ ig hwood tay 'ark -(3 (0 P Q) I +Li U)4-1 CI C • -• CZ C v C += DTZCM tJ cn a. c v) • WQ L1J (u (_ _0 co E E1 — L„ c 0 o\ E >N co D O • V CO • We; m s- W O r- N OD_ Z O d Ln (O I W Ln Cfl fl - WD Cl.D E-- W= N 00r. N (ri d- r C) 0 t -- f4 0 y0 If) U) 0 rates and taxes idvi 4 ru ` 0 oa o 0 a)ONtoo Co o r` c'O r- O N N op 000 000 Lo 0 cop co C) ' co r - 0 ":"co d" O Lf) U i v- N r- r - N I` to CC) �+ r- C3) Ln CC) r - CC) CC) N O Ln __1 Co O CO CO CO r- CO O c?) N f` CC) Ln Ln r O0o CZ Cfl 0) Ln N � r` 0) N CO ' 69 - CD O r- Ln 0) N r- Ln O0 L{) N 00 00 N r� r- ao O r` —I N- CO 00 N- d r_ Ln r- Ln Ln Ln N CO Ln cc r` O CO CC) 6) N N C`) V- V- Assumptions: 613 I- 0 0 O r= r - O 4 45 Q J J N () N C+>N C -J co .2 C U 0 U) U) 2022 Property Tax Esti 11 0 CD u t ---i d L c:::: ---- d5 % C__99 CCI V [1 ILI] oti•stiles o; IC) 0) act 0 0 it r rn r--- lr; Lii O r c r .c U .,h CJ CN (n O N t' -- C)) CO CO 0 I L ) CO O CO O r 4) It) 0) N- r - C n N N N O) c r .r -, r It) r It) r N r J Lf) N r lt) N rn rG) (n O r pin rn r 0 IL ) Cr; O 0) O CO -• '-r r 0) CN Cr; w N- (,0 It) r r GJ (n oi r ti) N CO N Cr; r' O CN Assumptions: C<) O cN r --- IL) Cr; CO L<) 165.181,611 II) Co CO0 N- tt ) N ;a) J 4:1;• C I- 45 =L, J �. =I __ C c (Ti�' c c p o) O U) a O r T- r Ea -53 O N r- 00 r t-- N N N CO 'd' N d• r r r O< CO CO r C• N COO O M N N N CO r- La to d C N N Q ` Z 258 Lo in w 00 N < 2 00 MZD CO r r N N O N O r 321 stip Cha Nom 0 0a N O 0 0 N 7 Nom- 6 O 0 �a O 6 tri o o a C) CO 00 ri M M N` O Q a 't• 2 CD 4 o W 00 N N 0, O o tt N ai CO Q z o 'zt 00 • 0) r o N - r- Q ` z o 0, Q) N 'd' vi CO N 0 CD N 0 0 co CO 4 4 N N 0 O O N 0 N. O d- 0 co N N 0 0 O O NN` N N 0 0 0 O O O 6 La La N N N 0 N- CO 00 0 0 r- r- CO CO CSO CO 0 82(.? 10 L0 La LC) CO CO %0'€ 0 ?t d" M CO CO CO Q z --;0 N CO r 0 ('T-52 Q z 0 0 10 CO O NC CO N 0 N 4 N 0 d" 4 N d- d L6 Lid N N CO d" (Ni CO 1 1 4 1 o r O C`7 1 o a M O o o r Q a CO z CYO o a d" UD O O 1 O [- o o CO d- C`O CSO Q z o r C`7 0 o d" O O r 1 1 Q z o: �- (Ni N CO a 00 O 82 O r- N� r N O N 03 r .a12g.:,) r- r- O Od 1 1 O ip CO 8,&:), CO O 1-0 a) C3) O O d" d' d" r r r- O a) r- O O N N d d- D` O r- r- r- r- \ O D` d- Zt CO CO Q • O O N N Q O O r- r N N %Z'0 CO r- 1 d r- r- r 1 1 r t a o d' d' OO •(-31)o CO 00 LCj r 01 o N` 4 0 N - 4 0 o a co 00 co 03 CO CO a LO C37 o 0 Co co O CO 0 co co a r- 4 �o a) o) O CO 0 Co CO o (NI N` a o ( N N N N 8.0% 0 0 C3) CO) 4 d- 0 d- N 82 CO N r r: r 122 % Change an in Median ---- alue Value a N` N" O O o Cb 0 CIO d. 0 d- O CO CO 0303N a a o CM CD CD N N 0 CD N` 0 Lo Lo Ln L1 . a) CD r- r- a r CSO o a N` N - 6 Lf) 5.3% a OCO CO o 0 CO r- r- o cfl CO a o O O a N` r- o G) . r d d r O 0 0 MI- 0 CO O 0 0 N 10 CO ,550 O O 0 0 0 0 d d- O O CO O) 58,300 58,300 58,300 0 0 Ln 6 N- N O in r- N` CO N O O 0 0 10 in CO CO O O N N 350,350 0 0 N- OO N N 1,800 1,800 0 0 C3) r- CO N 0 0 0 T- 0 CO 5,701 5,701 664,051 664,051 $384,61 $384,61 1909Z 1 322,4 299/ • 314,600 335,850 O UP N` C5 LO N O O CD CD 0) CO 03- 03- 0) 0) N N 651,800 651,800 O CD O 0 CO N O O CD CD CO CO 0 o Cb 00 N N O CD OD Ili r N 336,450 336,450 0 CD OD Ln •It N 310,000 310,000 O CD O cfl 10 N 332.851 293.001 6387,51 ,71 295.4 2.32.4 r- CO N N CO CO Cn hts 623 CO N CO N 00 d' N N N CO CO CID N r- CO N N O C O N N CO r N CO CY) N CD hnnv 2.82 LO N (O r- N CO (J CO N CO N o ke 624 f n\nMn F74 s View 621 hts 1 k North Oaks 1 a 1 L'r : CO a t-- (o m o 0 o o C) _C co -o a) > co z h S1 COcO 0) c U) _ o Nz c a-• — CD _ U) Q — oti•stiles o; IC) 0) act 0 0 it r rn r--- lr; Lii O r c r .c U .,h CJ CN (n O N t' -- C)) CO CO 0 I L ) CO O CO O r 4) It) 0) N- r - C n N N N O) c r .r -, r It) r It) r N r J Lf) N r lt) N rn rG) (n O r pin rn r 0 IL ) Cr; O 0) O CO -• '-r r 0) CN Cr; w N- (,0 It) r r GJ (n oi r ti) N CO N Cr; r' O CN Assumptions: C<) O cN r --- IL) Cr; CO L<) 165.181,611 II) Co CO0 N- tt ) N ;a) J 4:1;• C I- 45 =L, J �. =I __ C c (Ti�' c c p o) O U) a O (1) 4-0 sp N 0 U coa) 0 a) c� CO C O • sa Slilkla'Alt amse county.us 1 z O U >- LU (1Q DeIt 0 I ra E i O a sC 0 ima X 1 • 2020 Mid -Year Update a) C 4— O a) CC5 a) smac 4— O CCS Q) CO"ti; a) a) E c CD a) Q) O 2 W a, a) co g)) o Co O -0 ( E cn -� s= 4) E I O a ° 0 E a) "c3o 1:4-•c o(1) L -� o. E ett>' t a) 4) U V 4) Q O W _c 9- O -a N CCS C CCS 4— O Co CO a) Cu a) co E a) Co E Co 0 Co L O Co Co Co ..c a) H I C C) E Cl) CI) 4) Co N Q assessment year. 4— O N (it 4- O Co co a) CC5 ij L Co E >, CCS t a D. a a) Co O 1 U)O Co a) ) Co wa) s_coCCS a) Co a) 0 O Tat a) O L a 4- O a O O L_ co ca a) > C C ,co a) 10 O O O O O O wcr• O Lc) co O O 0 O O C') tem Co a) Cts Co 0 a) a) O o -C L -�-�+ a O CDO O 4- .. 4_ o -I-I co Ote- u) op c cts sc (13 in O � O O a o :0 E cu co Le X LO a) of> the current assess W 0) CCS L CD CO a) C Ct O O O O O Nto C) -o O a) Co C tO C) E W C a) Co t a) O L a r -so _c O O L O 0) a) co C) f C a) . L _c Sc,) a) U aim?? C to CCS L Q) a O L CCS ea C.) co 4- O C O U C) a) 4-- L a) a) -o C0 >, co U) .S(2_ a) CO C CCS tO a) E 4-16) Co a) a E CO Co a) .0 Co sae) a O a _c a) CCS O L O O CO a) 4— co a) U a) CO U) a) O v W C 0) co C a) a) -o _c CO CO C .O Co .0 9- -tia) Cn cU U L O Co a) H I a O as .v 4 Ct v t C) a. O L 0. 4 ' vJ O ■ c o C6 U ,� 9=1, co C>' Co Co co a o x C= C0 a) "92 cp (so C_ o u) _c co U — >'N "t Q) 4--- 0 O U a) co .4.c, Q 4O - •_ a) . •o t L `•- O O Cp O >> •- L 0 4_ a a) O > c -o a) C CC5 Co co . U o . >, at et c0 O O U a a O Oa a r, L L • M O O Nei >> >> N 2020 Mid -Year Update r U) 0 t _ 0) C O • o 1J (i) 0 >E mc c �.� O V 73 (/) C CO (13 0 -3 C Pa 0i.) (-Cs C: C /\�U) `3 60 (1) 1 I a `Y^'n a) oU a t O U ■ 0211102122 col CD ■ O i �) a) a CD E _, 0 O C (0 q-, 1- (1) r—� ) r c -a 0 U) suj ri0 Wu W C ■� tit z 0 U >e• w tan Q mislocA Co CJ c. 1 0 1� CO rI �) (I) w 4) q r � 0 00) 2 C vi CO fl 1-- 0 CO Son %-6-f 60I yI --( a) Ij C C� a) 0 C 0 03 U alas 0 0 U G� I t CD rC U f A C:_ U U I I r-� LC C , CI) r Ct, L- „t C ai 0 I� N a) I-- V t, tra) Co E q I- 0 C In 0,, 0 c1-3 0 (1) p I I 0 p II CyJ W b L;= C q 0 II 1 1 C C9 (I) Ct, 1-yyy, 1 GO 0 I (al 0 u I I c; 0 0 C a) a z 0 U >- LU Q it ■ cu cu 0 • milme 0 c.i Aso ■ ■ as • LL C N0 0' CS. Cril n r-1 N 00 d \ (sr; ref get 0 Y4 p1 U a t '71 Cra CO en } en en N r�N ', J co a' en 'r' 1 N < 0 Cra Crsi CrNi CO N (Nit •1 Oki Cie tar) 0 C f. en '"' it it CO en en CO �• !, f-1603 c�.1 0 0 CO e•� 03 eY'j TIN o 0 00 1 N N en e CO cts CO d. Ito 0 N 1-1 0 u CO CO CO e1 a' 0 R rml CfrO ii—iC Ne i in 00 0 0! iri OSI LrI 1/1 CA Cotwhili ON CO 1, f. f. 1 n 6 en U) vii U) C p1 :4)-1 H 0 U H H (I) Q) Ct E C!) W X O *472 co 0- O 0 N N O N C L . 1 Asp vlao s I I nr i , , LEL 0) 0J 1C111 ff-rj `\II� r t L C) N `C) CO t CO r- CO CO N- CO r-- I— CO LO b9 - N CO r CO O CO r ® O 0 CV 3 >b W v 4.11 as O;#, r N c Chai LO IM w ,C 0 CCS � O O c a L. z CO a. Cr ;uno w N `C) CO t CO O CO r I. r- f- r r- CD r N I LO IM CD Cr CO CO 8 r) Cti Lis C) •S S a - a a a • C a) C .2 (/).c 0) u) (Ts c.) x %(U co lc U u) 7-1 -� ...., o b o 0.) CD ,_ co CO sa) CD •X ® C) a) CU CD b E w cu co oU Ocn _ as U — cti .CCS 0) - 0 b _c 4.... a) ci) c . 0, ,_ c c a-) Its co co wa cu , . a) ,_, '4"E' 6 .0 a) ccs D a ..0 >1 r 4-1 r CO ..0 4-4 COUO -fria O O O U-- -+J O UCr(f)OO - 0 o 0 LC) O O J O 0 00 eft 6 0 N2 6 O 000 0 CO O N N O ' N r - O N Lf) CO • 00) 0 N N4- CC CO O 6) LC) r- LC) "cr N O O N Ln N CO O 00 CO O CO IC N d' O r` 000N- LQ r - CO M 4 N r- CO 0 N U) 0 0O , L. Q coJ CCO J SUN c c a) co o c . C) N Co Co 0) C E C!) Cn . k O IraE W X a) a O 0 N N O N mea z 0 U w (4) De It >41 CO) G li J 1] LI Tun° WV CO CO r 1 N- 1 d' O t� 40 07 N 'f' CO CO OD N ' EA- - W ® � Perc Chang 3.9` I � 09 si. t3 CD 1- 0 v C Pal as O ;-• �Oi Ozon . aL ca Q Tun° WV CO LO CO <A. 'd' 00 N 09- 1 N- 1 d' O t� 40 CO OD N ' EA- 00 it (0 V> li CO 69. si. t3 0 4- O C) E O > 2 O O M 0 C0 N trk as n - - - - - a) Cx O O .0 O a .2 C ;'� iy) czs o n. O N Q) 4-1 U al n >< >1 p 0 0 .g O _ C) = (13 Cl—M O O C) so CZ Q. 'a lila ) E a) CO Q as ecsco a3 C _ z.. " OII) O . C) . — C) 0 a ,C O (3 >1 c_ i L+-. 0 +' O L— �-. — c O c C O _Oj 0 . O COea .� � CDU0 0 V) -' O O U -+ ' 0 0 W00 -- 0 Ln O r- o ooa o d- o o N O N 0) CO c CO LfiU eft O N 00 CD O N N 0 N �- N O N LO N r- O O (0 CD CO CO 0 0 C N C• O' O 41- r- CO O) N ! - N LC) Lf) r- lej 00 Crj Lo C• D r= N CO N Lf) N r - O N EA - CD O N Lf) N O 0 CO N` CO CO CO - CN` Lf) N rLf)p Lf) `- CO N Lf) N 0 N Ci) `' Is Q /CI; "6 < I — _ o c CD o — r U 0 Co C) U) C) (0 O C) N N U • N O) C E U) Q . 1-11--] C-_ Eeb r- ScCi (d (C) Lif a 4.0 itht3 z •cr 0 >s ,r; U C) LU N f (t) l Q It L7 CI 01) dl) (cd 4u n o WV Lao in Lo1 Eft- CO L0 CD N• CO r- -= O t 0) ' ® L v LC) ® CRS CO LO r- r•- r- C� r- CD O . 69- 413- -c (� 2 tvi /ma^y �, "�' i.i OL. '°9 Ems I U L t' a C to 11. 4u n o WV Lao in Lo1 Eft- CO r- C) r- 619- r C.O I LC) ® r C9 .69- 69--I CO LO r- r•- r- 0) C/) 69- 413- ti.® 8 ali I W •i S- - a a- a :4-1 C C) wC co 4-•. '4- CD �, CD C) C O thr n X 'w t3 0w X1 0 •_ Q C W CO CN) = Co o co U a, — coits o w LD ca L. C C) a) Cll ._ ._ , u) c >, C — a)o 0 Co CT) 7ii ›, co • _c .� -J _c r .8 0 0 0 (..) ct w u 5 a LO O O Nct 0 r=oorCo 0) O C U co 0 0 N 00CO eft O N CO O CO O N N 0 N r - N It c0 LO N r- t` LO CO O CO 00 L0 O O C`7 4 CO CO O NJ O N O7 N ti 'J rn —I CO CO N <- N CCO ' CO N <-- O N O '4 CO L) N N- r.0 CO N CO LO CO Nr‘ CO LO d Ln Lf) J CO CO N CO r- Co N r- CO 0 N E U) Q €ft r `'J • N C0 0 .3- 14-1 0 0 0 0 CU 175 LLJ (n .c • 4) Co 0 C C0 r 0) E U) Q 4( Famous Fri ❑ ❑ L =_=J J LJ I Cis) (e/A 0 0 0 co co co CO cd 00 O O 10 O O d - O O d 05 L N N ea ea O O 0o O O O d' I. co L L N 6f en Change 9 to '20 o CO N r- �o CO CC) CO N-N.a) N N r- yable 321 000 O) O) N N N N O O -- .'---1 O O CO CC) 6F} (` � 10 o �o (000N - O O O I . ea 000 10 O) r- r- r- O I Changs '19 to '20 yable 320 , 53,100 0 0 0 rn J CO (Ni O O CO O O O cOCOt en EA O O 10 O O 0) CO N LD W CD 69 .?it:,:, O CO sz::::o M r O 03 N-N.a) N N r- 000 O) O) N N N N c:jo 0 N- if) r - CO CO N -- .'---1 o �o (000N - O O O I . •••••• Am. a , 0 0 0 CO O r -- N- 0 - N O O 0) O O CO 00 N CO 6e- r - fa ea O O O O O LD N in N. r- O CO CO ea ea c�o O) N CO Si CO d' 6634,900 N-N.a) N N r- 000 O) O) N N N N c:jo 0 N- if) r - CO CO N -- .'---1 . , 0 0 O O O N N O O O d' O O 09- N N r T- EA- 6g O O t` O O 0') N N N N N N N r - (CD CD ba (D C!) aa8 CO CO N. N- IC O 6634,900 N-N.a) N N r- 000 O) O) N N N N -- .'---1 . , O O N- O O 00 CO CO 69- L 69-I Ea O O N O O O LO CC) O O 10 O) 0) 69 (D ES 000 0o 00 r - OO o0 I I I 6915,800 6915,800 N-N.a) N N r- , C) U a) J U) r - J Cc) (\I CO cN o N CO c coM 0 0 0 (1. E) 0 0 0 0 O)o cci (lei 0 C0 CO 07 r= N- 1-0 CO N r- CO U) N- C) r- r O CO CO N 0 N r - O N C0 0D CO tfc O r 'Ct In O) N r- t{) CO U) ` N CO N-tCd O cO C7 I` d J U r- In 1-0)21%-: f) 0 r' ) CO O N () (10 r r N CA O J 0 r Q C J CO .O C >, 0 t D U UWCCUcn -o C a) w Co 0 E LL z 0 U LU a It tR-7 LE±I Ci J CC CO) I-, I Ck CI_ (cd Jc [1J1 Fl 0 0 0 O) O r-- r� CY) O O CO O O CD N Eft r" 03- r - CD CD CO C >, (Ni rx CO N W CL O O Lf) O O 10 O O O co co Eft N N Ef} Ef} O O CO O O CO - CO O Ef} W- O O OP) O O O) CO 'I' r- e° CO Ef} & OO O (O N. CO OO fc O o O (i) 00 00 6 6 0 N.- r - o.,,,g c,?g N N. Cfl OO IC) I I O O N �0. mt O O r- T--- r- O N N o Co 00 r- d- d' Cb R rC CY) CO W I -au r - - - 7 p222, S2_! $308 tone Y hi pin a3j C) ��� N Co co cfl cei C) N O ca CLS l_._. 0 rn 0 Cll Cc" c cpin CD Z Oco a CO o .. CO N X W I-- I- •5(13 $ $ I L CO ,_•. _,C) a3 M Z co > a w a. _-4-1 r i N--• N .. t a) 0 a. O O CO O O CO - CO O Ef} W- O O OP) O O O) CO 'I' r- e° CO Ef} & OO O (O N. CO OO fc 6 6 0 o.,,,g c,?g N N. Cfl OO IC) I I O O N �0. mt O O r- T--- r- O N N o Co 00 r- d- d' Cb R rC CY) CO W I -au $308 tone 5 S hi pin a3j 21 S__. a) O ca CLS l_._. N t c cpin CD Z Oco a CO o .. tI. a. W I-- I- •5(13 L CO ,_•. -C3 a3 Z co c a w a. H I- 0 0 0 N' d' co. O O O i O O 'd" O O N r- r- Ef} N N O O CO O O IC) cO CO CS) O O Ef} IQ Ef} Eft O O O O) O Or) M C`7 C7 I 6 6 o.,,,g c,?g N N. Cfl OO IC) I I O O N 0 0 O N N (/) Y Q d- d' Cb R rC CY) CO W I -au 5 S hi pin a3j 21 S__. a) O ca CLS l_._. N t c cpin CD Z L. a CO o .. O a. W I-- I- a) 0 a, O O co O O Eft O O L N N E} E} I I O O N O O d' N N C0 (0 O co CO in N.- eft C7 CY) GO- eft OO O N- N- co OO 00 6 6 o.,,,g c,?g N N. Cfl OO IC) I I O O N O O N O N N (/) Y Q 00 CO IC) N N. eft 0 CY) CO W I -au 3�sai hi pin a3j 21 S__. a) CO CLS l_._. t c CD Z L. a CO o co -1(7)CLS O a. W I-- I- O O N r EA- bg N CO CO- N- c COCO O O N N N- (1) ~ J yrC'7 N CO O N sui O a Q try E9 0 N N co co N CO CO O N Authority Levy a) - CL' J Z To c c c a CJ) U U n, 0) 0 Is 4J O C a) E 0) a) .5 a) L 41 O Q C C) w -o (I) 0 E U - z 0 U t) It} w Q --1 0 0 0 N N LO O N E (Ni (t +--s W U O O r- � O O (0 O O r - a0 00 N CO CO EA- Ef} O O N- O O CO O O 0') CO" M C.fl CO CO Ef} (B - a)•8%?, o 0 0 (0 CO O 6 6O o) N i4E 64E O U o N 0 a L 0.0% 0.0% r - - ,_ 25,2 - 25,2 ac::' O O O O -(s': (0 N n r- 03 N >, O (Z N (2 C) i a3 $30 $30 a)o ��a O N r- O N r cq r- r - CD (NI a3 0 _C U CD 6-- 0 ai C 0 Ne CO Cv CD 03 N nC15 N N1. CD >- X co CCOC) CD n E a co co CZ E 1rI 0 as I 2 Property: stima 3xabI( Dial N C in LI] Lima <ablt :alN I _, O O N O O O r- r-- r - a CY eft, EftE - O O r O O 00 N N N N LC) r - EA CO- Ef} 0 0 0 O O O (Nei Cd N r-, r- N ct- O C) N 358,51 i4E 64E aao O O N N N- Oi 0.0% 0.0% r - - ,_ 25,2 - 25,2 ac::' O O O O -(s': (0 N $1,3 $1,3 $ q ai C 0 Ne CO CCOC) CD n E a co co CZ arl kel 0 I CD °UCO0 Q_ 0 0 as N -- ti ti C6 06 O O CO O O d' r r- O Nn 1-6 CO CO Eft r- r- I Eft E- O O LO O O r- d' d' 00 (0 O O 0) C)) C0 CO CO EO- r- r - Et Ef} 0 0 0 Co co co Cfl Cfl 6 CO CO N r-, r- N ct- O C) N 358,51 aao O O N N N- Oi r - - ,_ 25,2 - 25,2 ac::' O O O O -(s': (0 N $1,3 $1,3 $ ai C 0 Ne CO CCOC) CZ arl kel 0 I CD °UCO0 Q_ C in LI] Lima <ablt :alN I E O O r - O O d' LO LO N3/4- C6 �Cfl (fl N� 00 00 CO M CO Ef} r- r - EA EI ft O O N O O CO O O CO C6r. C'') COO 00 COCO CY) COI- Eft N N EA e 0 0 (.3e, r-, r- N ct- O C) N r - - ,_ 25,2 - 25,2 ac::' O O O O -(s': (0 N CD °UCO0 Q_ C in LI] I— I 0 0 0 0 �nrnO'4 C6 O IC O C7 CO 0 N CO C CO U J ery a) J Cfl N Nci- CO N N CO C) co 0 0 N N- a) r- CO CY) CON 0 o O C0 0 CriN d' r -- CD CO O Co cc 1-6 Co N 05 00 CO r.O 06 00 0) O O N CO o CO o N N O r - N CO O O O nN Lx) 0 10 coN Cfl U) 0 4-1 UU�n'UCo Famous Friends z O U } wuw) Qoe .r 4rui witegsf UJ t C�0_ N N C CO W 0 o N r- r— O rn rn 6) N N N I I I O O ' O O d' O O N� co' C6 6 00 00 N LO E& I I O O 0) O (D N 00 00 N 0 0) 0) r N— O O O O O N- � P VTJ (0 � VJ co O O €& N N 0 O a) a 5 (t a ..L a) Ct O C) 0 t a 0 N O O O O O N L0 L N O O C3) CO CO 6} Ef} Ef} (0 I— z .+0-61 I— CO C CD N N N O O N O O N ✓ r- r N N (0 Cao co E& ✓ r 0 0 L{) Lf') O N N (0 N N r - O O rnDrn OO 0rnt ) 0) 0) N N O CO c0 N CO Cfl (NI (0(Du Ef}69. a) C . 5 O a C L U- 2 0 L E LL t a 0 a - 00 O O 00 L O O Cfl O O co N� N� N Cis (• 0 06- 1-0 LC () NSte �L• on CO- 63 co I - z O O O O O Cfl r- r- Cr) r. CO CO N r co C; O CO- ÷A- }EA- Ef- O 0 O ON}. .. MO N-• CO Co N r CO O O O O O N- 'C- r- 00 (O CO r C ) Ef} EO CO C) I' (ll CD X (t (° a) O co (ts pz (0 0 I— I- O O CO O O (9 N N N J CO CO N NC 6g 6 O O LO O O O O O mt O O 00 O O N O O t N N o O O d' Lf) 6 O t t t - O L6 t O ifj t N cd, t 121 21 -, .,, Rnai 86 rty: 3M, McKr N int 0 C CD U 0 21 N N o00 C U LO eft N O r J CO N CON co 0 Q O L Q_ €1, O N 0 00 o Co N N r- 0 r- N ER 05 N N 0000 CO N LO IC) J i N N co N oN C ,O E Q Authority Levy LL. c C c o U U n, ' O