Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/24/2023The City Council is meeting as a legislative body to conduct the business of the City according to Robert s Rules of Order and the Standing Rules of Ordei and Business of the City Council Unless so ordered by the Mayor, citizen participation is limited to the tines indicated and always withal the prescribed rules of conduct foi public input at meetings. 1. CALL TO ORDER THE LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 2. ROLL CALL APPROVALS a. Agenda b. Minutes of the January 10, 2023 City Council Meeting c. Claims Totaling $129,375.43 4. CONSENT a. December Financial Report 5. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS/RECOGNITIONS/PROCLAMATIONS 6. INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS / REPORTS a. Metropolitan Council Repiesentative Peter Lindstrom b. City Council Updates 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public hearings are conducted so that the public affected by a proposal may have input into the decision. During hearings all affected residents will be given an opportunity to speak pursuant to the Robert's Rules of Order and the standing r ules of order and business of the City Council. 8. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM a. Speed Limit Study Results Presented by Stantec Engineer Adam Capets 9. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 10. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 11. SET AGENDA FOR NEXT MEETING a. Quarterly Investment Report b. Union Contract c. City Administrator Employment Agreement d. Ramsey County Public Works Staff Update on Eustis Street Project e. League of Women Voters Presentation (February 28) f. Carbon Free Futures MN Coalition Presentation (March 28) 12. WORK SESSION a. Community Development Update LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 7:00 P.M. TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 2023 LAUDERDALE CITY HALL, 1891 WALNUT STREET The City Council is meeting as a legislative body to conduct the business of the City according to Robert s Rules of Order and the Standing Rules of Ordei and Business of the City Council Unless so ordered by the Mayor, citizen participation is limited to the tines indicated and always withal the prescribed rules of conduct foi public input at meetings. 1. CALL TO ORDER THE LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING 2. ROLL CALL APPROVALS a. Agenda b. Minutes of the January 10, 2023 City Council Meeting c. Claims Totaling $129,375.43 4. CONSENT a. December Financial Report 5. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS/RECOGNITIONS/PROCLAMATIONS 6. INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS / REPORTS a. Metropolitan Council Repiesentative Peter Lindstrom b. City Council Updates 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public hearings are conducted so that the public affected by a proposal may have input into the decision. During hearings all affected residents will be given an opportunity to speak pursuant to the Robert's Rules of Order and the standing r ules of order and business of the City Council. 8. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM a. Speed Limit Study Results Presented by Stantec Engineer Adam Capets 9. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 10. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 11. SET AGENDA FOR NEXT MEETING a. Quarterly Investment Report b. Union Contract c. City Administrator Employment Agreement d. Ramsey County Public Works Staff Update on Eustis Street Project e. League of Women Voters Presentation (February 28) f. Carbon Free Futures MN Coalition Presentation (March 28) 12. WORK SESSION a. Community Development Update b. Opportunity for the Public to Address the City Council Any member of the public may speak at this time on any item not on the agenda. In consideration for the public attending the meeting, this poi tion of the meeting will be limited to fifteen (15) minutes Individuals are requested to limit their comments to three (3) minutes or less. If the maim ity of the Council determines that additional time on a specific issue is warranted, then discussion on that issue shall be continued at the end of the agenda. Before addressing the City Council, members of the public are asked to step up to the microphone, give their name, address, and state the subject to be discussed. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to any member then eof. No person other than members of the Council and the person having the floor shall be permitted to entei any discussion without permission of the presiding officer. Your participation, as prescribed by the Robert's Rules of Order and the standing rules of order and business of the City Council, is welcomed and your cooperation is greatly appreciated. 13 ADJOURNMENT To provide public comments, join us via Zoom. You are invited to a Zoom webinar. When: Jan 24, 2023 07:00 PM Central Time (US and Canada) Topic: January 24, 2023 Lauderdale City Council Webinar Please click the link below to join the webinar: https://usO2« eb.zoom.us/J/84991336562?pwd=M1ROTUUza2dXSTJZV2RQTXF2aENpdz09 Passcode 704537 Or One tap mobile : US +16465588656„84991336562# or +16469313860„84991336562# Or Telephone: Dial(foi higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 646 558 8656 01 +1 646 931 3860 or +1 301 715 8592 of +1 305 224 1968 or +1 309 205 3325 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 253 205 0468 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 360 209 5623 or +1 386 347 5053 or +1 507 473 4847 or +1 564 217 2000 or +1 669 444 9171 or +1 669 900 9128 or +1 689 278 1000 of +1 719 359 4580 or 877 853 5247 (Toll Fiee) or 888 788 0099 (Toll Free) or 833 548 0276 (Toll Fiee) or 833 548 0282 (Toll Free) Webinar ID: 849 9133 6562 International numbers available: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kcJthLgGlu LAUDFRDALF4, CITY COUNCIL MIHETING MINUTI-i,S L auderdale City Hall 1891 Walnut Sheet L auderdale, MN 55113 P age 1 of 4 January 10, 2023 Call to Order Mayor Gaasch called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Swearing in Ceremony Administrator Butkowski performed the swearing in ceremony for Mayor Gaasch and Councilors Sayre and Kelly. Roll Call Councilors present: Jeff Dains, Sharon Kelly, Duane Pulford, hvan Sayre, and Mayor Mary Gaasch. Councilors absent: None. Staff present: Heather Butkowski, City Administrator; Jim tiownik, Assistant to the City Administrator and Miles Cline, Deputy City Clerk. Approvals Mayor Gaasch asked if there were any additions to the meeting agenda. There being none, Councilor Dains moved and seconded by Councilor Pulford to approve the agenda. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Gaasch asked if there were any corrections to the minutes of the December 13, 2022 city council meeting. There being none, Councilor Pulford moved and seconded by Councilor Dains to approve the minutes of the December 13, 2022 city council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Gaasch asked if there were any questions on the claims. There being none, Councilor Pulford moved and seconded by Councilor Sayre to approve the claims totaling $252,928.25. Motion carried unanimously. Consent Councilor Pulford moved and seconded by Councilor Kelly to approve the Consent Agenda thereby acknowledging the November Financial Report and approving Resolution No. 011023A — Approving 2023 Tobacco Licenses, Resolution No. 011023B — Approving 3.2 Off Sale Malt Liquor License for 2023; and Resolution No. 011023C — Designating Official Depository and Investment Institutions. Informational Presentations/Reports A. City Council Updates LAUDIh,RDALE CITY COUNCIL MFS FI,TING MINIJTN,S L auderdale City Hall 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 P age 2 of 4 January 10, 2023 Councilor Dains shared that the Metropolitan Council Transportation Accessibility Committee will host a Zoom meeting open to the public on January 24 and 25 in regards to Metro Mobility. Councilor Pulford stated that he attended a meeting with representatives from the Department of H omeland Security and the Bureau of Ciiminal Apprehension Fusion Center. Pulford continued to say that the Governor s Safety Conference would take place from February 22-24. Mayor Gaasch shared that she and Councilors Sayre and Pulford attended a meeting at Lauderdale City Hall with the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) and our neighboring cities. They discussed shared issues and concerns, and how the LMC can assist with solutions. Gaasch continued to say that as a board member of the LMC, she has been asked to be on a search committee to find a new executive director to replace their outgoing one. P ublic Hearings A. Resolution No. 011023D — A Resolution Establishing License and Permit Fees and Administrative Fees and Fines At the end of each calendar year, staff reviews the fee schedule in anticipation of the year ahead. Staff made a number of reorganizing revisions for clarity and recommend some fee changes. The primary update relates to how building permit fee are calculated even though the fees aren't changing much. Most cities reference a State of Minnesota Fee Schedule from 1997 when setting their fees. That schedule has not been in effect for years and recent lawsuits show that cities need to change their method of calculation. Another revision is to the interest rate for petition and waiver agreements. The City is earning well over 4.0% on investments, so the rate the city charges for special projects should increase to at least 5.0%. Mayor Gaasch opened the floor to those in attendance interested in addressing the Council on this topic. There being nobody interested in speaking, Mayor Gaasch closed the floor. Councilor Pulford moved and seconded by Councilor Sayre to adopt Resolution 011023D - A Resolution Establishing License and Permit Fees, and Administrative Fees and Fines as amended. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion/Action Item A Establish 2023 City Council Meeting Schedule Annually, the City Council sets its meeting schedule for the following year. If the Council continues to meet on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month, the schedule would be as LAUDF;RDALF, CITY COUNCIL MH;1 ,TING MINUThS Lauderdale City Hall 1891 Walnut Stieet Lauderdale, MN 55113 Page 3 of 4 January 10, 2023 presented in the packet. Holidays do not conflict with the proposed meeting schedule. After the Council adopts the meeting schedule, it will be posted at City Hall. Councilor Dains made a motion to adopt the City Council meeting schedule for 2023. This was seconded by Councilor Kelly and carried unanimously. B. 2023 Committee Appointments and Assignments The Council determines committee assignments and makes other designations at the beginning of the year. Staff carried over the assignments from 2022 to 2023 and noted where new appointments need to be made. Staff will revise the form based on the discussion. After Council discussion, Councilor Pulford was added as the Mayor Pro Tem, Mayor Gaasch was designated to the League of Minnesota Cities, Councilor Kelly was designated to Northeast Youth and Family Services, Councilor Sayre was added as the alternate for NineNorth, Councilor Sayre was designated as the Police Liaison, and Councilor Pulford was designated to the Ramsey County League of Local Governments. Set Agenda for Next Meeting Rutkowski stated that the January 10 council meeting might include Metropolitan Council representative Peter Lindstrom. Work Session A. Community Development Update Butkowski shared that the League of Minnesota Cities will host Day on the Hill on March 9 and asked who planned to attend. She also said Ramsey County staff would will host an open house regarding the county -owned southern portion of F4ustis Street on March 7. Finally, Mayor Gaasch shared that she had a resident ask if they could make cookies for the snow plowers. B Opportunity for the Public to Address the City Council Mayor Gaasch opened the floor to those in attendance interested in addressing the Council. There being nobody interested in speaking, Mayor Gaasch closed the floor. Closed Session Councilor Dains made a motion to enter a closed session to discuss the City Administrator job performance evaluation at 8 15 p.m. This was seconded by Councilor Sayre and carried unanimously. Councilor Pulford made a motion to come out of closed session at 9:08 p.m. This was seconded by Councilor Dains and carried unanimously. LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Lauderdale City Hall 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 Page 4 of 4 January 10, 2023 Councilor Kelly made a motion to increase the city administrator's compensation by 3% for 2023. This was seconded by Councilor Sayre and carried unanimously. Adj ournment Councilor Pulford moved and seconded by Councilor Kelly to adjourn the meeting at 9:10 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Miles Cline Deputy City Clerk To: From: Meeting Date: Subject: CITY OF LAUDERDALE LAUDERDALE CITY HALL 1891 WALNUT STREET LAUDERDALE, MN 55113 651-792-7650 651-631-2066 FAX Request for Council Action Mayor and City Council City Administrator January 24, 2023 List of Claims The claims totaling $129,375.43 are provided for City Council review and approval that includes check numbers 28258 to 28284. Accounts Payable Checks by Date -Detail by Check Date User: Printed: MILES CLINE 1/20/2023 2:18 PM Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Invoice No Description Check Date Reference Check Amount ACH 34 AFSCME MN Council 5 PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Union Dues ACH 43 ACH 44 ACH 45 ACH 46 28258 20 466044 466044 466044 28259 65 19150894 28260 373 6290084322 6290084322 6290087221 6290087221 01/20/2023 PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Uni( Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 34: Public Employees Retirement Association PR Batch 50200.01.2023 PERA Coordinated PR Batch 50200.01.2023 PERA Coordinated 01/20/2023 PR Batch 50200.01.2023 PER PR Batch 50200.01.2023 PER Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 43: Minnesota Department of Revenue PR Batch 50200.01.2023 State Income Tax 01/20/2023 PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Stat Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 44: ICMA Retirement Corporation PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Deferred Comp PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Deferred Comp 01/20/2023 PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Def( PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Def( Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 45: Internal Revenue Service PR Batch 50200.01.2023 FICA Employer Portio: PR Batch 50200.01.2023 FICA Employee Portio PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Medicare Employee Pc PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Federal Income Tax PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Medicare Employer Po Abdo LLP 2022 Audit 2022 Audit 2022 Audit Allstreain Inc. Fax Line 01/20/2023 PR Batch 50200.01.2023 FIC. PR Batch 50200.01.2023 FIC. PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Med PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Fed( PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Med Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 46: Total for 1/20/2023: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28258: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28259: ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel Gr 01/24/2023 January Uniforms January Uniforms January Uniforms January Uniforms 228.24 228.24 1,175.57 1,018.83 2,194.40 681.26 681.26 1,175.80 1,623.40 2,799.20 1,223.15 1,223.15 286.07 1,717.62 286.07 4,736.06 10,639.16 4,060.00 870.00 870.00 5,800.00 53.09 53.09 15.30 15.31 15.30 15.31. AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/20/2023 2:18 PM) Page 1 Check No Vendor No Invoice No 6290089663 6290089663 28261 384 613087 28262 389 28263 6 012023 28264 29 4286 28265 58 13307 28266 192 163366305 28267 25 RISK -002213 28268 40 2023007066160 28269 385 012023 28270 61 3000534 28271 386 61012 Vendor Name Description January Uniforms January Uniforms Ark Parent LLC 2379 Larp Sewer Repair Pet. & Waiver Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Vision Insurance Boyer Ford Trucks Inc Mirror Repairs 2012 Truck City of St Anthony January Police Services City of White Bear Lake 2023 Ramsey County GIS Fees Comcast Holdings Corporation January Internet County of Ramsey PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Short Term Disability PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Life Insurance PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Long Term Disability January Insurance Processing Fee Custom Truck One Source Plow Repairs Check Date Reference Total for Check Number 28260: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28261: 01/24/2023 PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Visi' Total for Check Number 28262: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28263: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28264: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28265: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28266: 01/24/2023 PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Shoi PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Life PR Batch 50200.01.2023 Lon; Total for Check Number 28267: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28268: Fusion Learning Partners 01/24/2023 2023 Membership Dues - 2023RCLLGMMBRI2 Gopher State One Call 2023 Operator Fee High Profile Grounds Maintenance Inc Larpenteur Avenue - Sidewalk Snow Clearing AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/20/2023 2:18 PM) Total for Check Number 28269: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28270: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28271: Check Amount 15.30 15.31 91.83 8,207.00 8,207.00 6.41 6A1 731.11 731.11 71,692.50 71,692.50 228.69 228.69 413.00 413.00 88.47 223.93 95.87 25.00 433.27 415.97 415.97 200.00 200.00 50.00 50.00 2,052.75 2,052.75 Page 2 Check No Vendor No Invoice No Vendor Name Description Check Date Reference Check Amount 28272 185 012023 012023 012023 28273 30 375439 375440 375440 28274 387 1022 28275 24 0001150250 28276 18 R44650 28277 390 012023 28278 388 0042110 28279 5 619861-12-22 28280 26 2031778 2031779 28281 4 SI005607 S1005607 28282 90 9924232531 9924232531 9924232531 Lauderdale Certified Auto Repair Inc 01/24/2023 December Fuel December Fuel December Fuel League of Minnesota Cities 2023 Introduction to Race Equity - SK 2023 Day on the Hill - MG, DP, ES 2023 Day on the Hill - HB Metro -INET IT Services Metropolitan Council February Waste Water Minnesota Equipment Inc Skid Steer Repairs MN Shade Tree Short Course 2023 MN Shade Tree Short Course - GB & TD PeopleService Inc January -February Wastewater Premium Waters Inc December Water Bottles Stantec Consulting Services Inc Eustis Street Discussions Speed Study and Analysis Total for Check Number 28272: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28273: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28274: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28275: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28276: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28277: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28278: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28279: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28280: The Neighborhood Recycling Company Inc 01/24/2023 December Multi -Family Recycling December Single Unit Dwelling Verizon Wireless December Cell Phone December Cell Phone December Cell Phone Total for Check Number 28281: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28282: 62.28 13.35 13.35 88.98 30.00 297.00 99.00 426.00 2,190.00 2,190.00 12,824.43 12,824.43 452.90 452.90 450.00 450.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 8.50 8.50 950.25 4,082.50 5,032.75 412.62 2,972.06 3,384.68 45.04 45.05 90.09 180.18 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/20/2023 2:18 PM) Page 3 Check No Vendor No Invoice No 28283 7 9357143-0500-7 28284 74 810355367 810413221 810517900 810677232 810677232 810679706 810679706 810679706 810679706 811076537 Vendor Name Description Waste Management Inc January Public Works Xcel Energy December Street Lighting 2430 Larpenteur Avenue W Larpenteur Bridge Lights 1891 Walnut Street 1891 Walnut Street 1885 Fulham Street 1885 Fulham Street 1917 Walnut Street 1917 Walnut Street Larpenteur Avenue Check Date Reference 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28283: 01/24/2023 Total for Check Number 28284: Total for 1/24/2023: Report Total (32 checks): Check Amount 55.59 55.59 522.36 16.98 50.29 658.64 230.35 143.89 128.87 200.25 33.51 81.50 2,066.64 118,736.27 129,375.43 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/20/2023 2:18 PM) Page 4 LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent X Public Hearing Discussion Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date January 24, 2023 ITEM NUMBER December Financial Report STAFF INITIAL APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: livery month, staff provide the Council with an updated copy of the city's finances. Follow- ing are the revenue expense and cash balance reports for December 2022. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: By approving the consent agenda, the Council acknowledges the city's financial report for December 2022. General Ledger Cash Balances User: heather.hutkowski Printed: 1/12/2023 2:38:46 PM Period 12 - 12 Fiscal Year 2022 Description Account Beg Bal MTD Debit MTD Credit Current Balance Cash Change Fund Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cash Cul rent Assets Petty Cash Petty Cash 101-00000-000-10100 101-00000-000-10300 226-00000-000-10100 227-00000-000-10100 228-00000-000-10100 305-00000-000-10100 306-00000-000-10100 401-00000-000-10100 403-00000-000-10100 404 00000-000-10100 406-00000-000-10100 414-00000-000-10100 416-00000-000-10100 602-00000-000-10100 603-00000-000-10100 101 -00000 -000 - Investments - Fair Value 101-00000-000- Adj Investments Grand Total 10200 10410 -2,995,392.08 100.00 1,431.32 76,909.94 249,012.98 8,322.38 237,045.95 149,536.64 425,336.67 203,401.58 343,284.82 366,440.98 84,320.15 868,025.14 370,247.35 388,023.82 300.00 300.00 3,646,264.53 3,646,264.53 4,034,588.35 495,066.36 0.00 0.00 87.69 306.24 10.24 291.53 183.90 523.09 250.15 422.18 450.66 103.70 48,236.37 14,615.20 560,547.31 0.00 0.00 355,245.10 355,245.10 915,792.41 584,646.92 0.00 1,531.09 5,604.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 82,324.97 5,821.63 679,929.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 679,929.39 -3,084,972.64 100.00 -99.77 71,392.85 249,319.22 8,332.62 237,337.48 149,720.54 425,859.76 203,651.73 343,707.00 366,891.64 84,423.85 833,936.54 379,040.92 268,641.74 300.00 300.00 4,001,509.63 4,001,509.63 4,270,451.37 GL - Cash Balances (01/12/2023 - 02:38 PM) Page 1 % ExpendCollect YTD Balance Current Period Description Account Number O NO Cl 4 V) p t O N N O\ VS O O\ V) \O O\ M O M 00 • vs Cl N tin O V') un O\ O wct Ooo O O N d CV O\ O\ d' \D \D V1 M M 00 dt 00 \p 00 M Vl 00 d '-+ N 00 00 00 1 N M ct V1 V1 0\ VD t� 00000 t� O N 00 a\ vn d. O N p . 000 4 Of\ .N-.. O J 0 000 v1 \O NMM\D N '-+ M N .-+ .-+ N N 00 C•l N IIA O O O O O p O O O O O p O r-+OOO p v10\000 \O vl O O NNcpc M N46) co 0 D U O p4 top N CID co c c c N O O O CV VDVD V) e-1 4 m4 471- O 0 N N OOR CS CT O\ cY O O O C1 NO O M O p t N M 0 O \D O d' O O N M O \O O M00N0 co oorcoO p Inod d 006 O 00 M 00 N M U bD 'G N cq U T U R3 U U va• i a) OO11) �N) N .• ro ti 44Pkcn000 V) 0 e-1 N e~ml 00 14 d M M V) N M N • ~ ei O Mrm• l O V) \D M 1/40ti 00 Izt 7 V) CD CN Cr\ 00 O \D N V) e -r \D N d cnW General Fund O GL - Revenue vs Expense (01/12/2023 - 02:39 PM) Ft, % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period Account Number 'D O N • O N ‘„D O O v 00 CD CD 1 O O O O p CD CD O O O • O O O N 00 •cF to O O VD vI p I O O tri p O O W 00 00 O r N 0000ON pcp I 0 VD C opo,N-� O 0 O re H N N G or) M N In 00 O N O O O tri c -Ni O o N O N O O N N O N ti U O OVD 0 p I O O 0 O CO re re CN M M co0 VD V) VI N t O O O p O O O 0 00 O ,moi O O O N N ON O v) rt M 1401 M N GL - Revenue vs Expense (01/12/2023 - 02:39 PM) % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period 0 0 4J .r: v A Account Nu CD CN O \p O 00 O O 0 7 N O O e j O6 trj O O O ri . .--1 ON -i at N 00 d', O� OSI C W 00 00 Cl vCD iir.-4 rml M N V) D ‘.4?"1.1 dam' 00O C tin Oi I ON. 00 rr C\ O O m O ti 60 ID 00 M CN 00 V -- N VD N d' VD CN CN VD O� CD 00 O VD p Oro O 000 ON 0 00 O O rr-i N M \D V� N M to O O O O O I O O N \D O \D p d Vi M N ywwl \O M M O SND N d0' VD et C4 CD CA D bb G >o U � �d c ao cd DA o ° r/) > a b4 •_ 0 _ a ;O t o • CD cn �a d b4 o 0 Na O a% t d�t, 4)) CU:'' U1" i a1 d iC d xx45 x wa�oU w x N N N N GL - Revenue vs Expense (01/12/2023 - 02:39 PM) % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period O N O N M O (+1 O4:4 - O �p O N o M d co N N M N N N rON N e -I N N N N ON M N O M M N O CN 11-4 N .~- e•-1 N b tn N r~-1 p l O N 1/4oO O O 1/40 O M M O O I O O in O O ct 4) 0 G > N a Ri N «$ co O C ct N cn a a 04_ x c a a o o A 44x4, g F4 L) w w P-1 N 1),—, iti c4' 13CD o cFIN- cj V x en N O N .D N NO 1) N .�N N --1 _ <1 Q) a) .-1 'r 8 b N G •� U CO `i W t t N GL - Revenue vs Expense (01/12/2023 - 0219 PM) O Cl N C O N N N O N ~ N D C 'd 0 ti 0 Cd N C •� nrr % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period Description Account Number N0I00 O - 1,366,785.88 1,366,785.88 p 0 M M 455,614.05 N H 0 O O O O vi M - 1,364,692.38 M M 00 00 1/40 O p M N b CT N - 1,364,592.38 00 00 en M U a4i O(21 W GO TIF Revenue Bonds 2018A O GL - Revenue vs Expense (01/12/2023 - 02:39 PM) 0 m CA Cr) o - N O N O 0 N N d i O I el VC IC C0 • 0) � 0-4 LL. % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period bL Account Number o O O O CA CA N O bb U b cD U N U • d et 514 cll WOfl n M C M O 514 2019A Improvement Bonds 1/40 M GL - Revenue vs Expense (01/12/2023 - 02:39 PM) a) rj N bo t W On CCS cp a) 0 CD cij Uw (c4, N 4-0 N a) eC 7:1 cd (1 PL4 4-4 % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period Account Number 0 0 0l 600 O O • t!) O O c\ N O O O 0 O bn ON 7 O O 00 H 0) d 0 0 o O O O O CD CD 1 O O O 00 O O O 0 O O O O 06 O 0 6 CD CD O O Op O O 6 O O d' c3 0 Ct N o 0 O N O CD 0 O Cr: O 000 d W O O O O 00 M General Capital Projects 0 v GL - Revenue vs Expense (01/12/2023 - 02:39 PM) % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period Description Account Number 0 0 0 O � O O O O O o p co oo O O O O 6 O oo 0o O O O p O p O O N N O 00 00 1 b O 00 00 00 O H O O d' 00cp 01 O O O O O 0 O O p O O O O O p O O O O p Ca N CA alcct V dn y nO WOflO O O O O O 1/40 O CO 00 1/40 O 00 00 H O O O ani W 0 GL - Revenue vs Expense (01/12/2023 - 02:39 PM) w O 447 6: % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period Description O 1--J 0 CVO O O Cd O O O O O o tn M wit M M N O O O CU <17 • d' O O O 000 O O Oc_3 'cF vot d' O O O O O w O N O O O Park Capital Projects O GL - Revenue vs Expense (01112/2023 - 02:39 PM) Pr, % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period 0 v A Account Number of CD o 0 O o 00 N (`1 0 0 O O N N 0 0 M M M M O O O O N _ O O N N M veer ler M M 00 N [h 1/40v Park Dedication GL - Revenue vs Expense (01/12/2023 - 02:39 PM) a O If r o 0 N N N • cg N 1.0 • Cbq(1.1 C ISta 4a 0 't7 0 cna.a w % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period Description Account Number N G • is up r24 bb 0 U a SL - d C. O f1: rim* ho 0 4 0 CU ani ai - 137,944.72 N vcr OT M e -i b b O 7 O cV 01 g C4 O 0 O O O 0 O p 00 O M 00 VD CD O 0 O O 0 b0 .L: V 1) N U N co 0 ti _ 0 WOO O - 137,944.72 O N et O N GO 00 e-1 N O �O O in d cp O O eri en d 7 DO "C b � Development GL - Revenue vs Expense (01/12/2023 - 0219 PM) 0 P \ G � t 0 Td.' & © 0 \ % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period Description \ \| 33 \ \� a3 a3 \ \ @ @ \ \ ( / 0 /� @ ? 3c 3 3 33 \ \� 33 33 / 0 § \ \ @ @ @ @ \ \ 0, • ( o \ mcw \5 a) 0al 0, caq 0ci 0 W Housing Redevelopment \ GL - Revenue vs Expense (01/12/2023 - 02:39 PM) % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period O O p O O O h O O V) 0 co co CD cn O 00 ‘71 coco 0 co p O MO O Ocp p O O 0 Account Number ids O O O O N O o MO p O p M C) 010 O 00 en O v) 00 o rn o 00 00 00 1/46 CO 0 Cr) O O p O O 0 b cctC C.1) 0 O cd > N 0) d it 0 N d d 0 0 0) kczt a 0000 00 0 t 00 'ct' N N 00 Q\ N 00 0 M ti 1,368,679.82 0 0 0 N 1/40 00 00 ti Ni O ti '-i -1,103,718.86 O O 0 0 O O O 0 0 TIF District No. 1-2 b 0 GL - Revenue vs Expense (01/12/2023 - 02:39 PM) a 1714 on ON M Ncq N O cq r" O N 1_. ct' N .%1 ,b waw % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period c) bfi 0 C4 Account Number O h M p O M CN p O VD O p coco o1/4 d; cn cD cF N N NI' 1/40 O V) <F p O VD M p O V� d� O O Q wcf O00 OI O O co p O 1/46 00 O O' O vi oo 00 N N O - 178,991.57 O v)VDO OI M VD M O p OccG CD O O C.- d' vi 4 00 00 4 efl 1---40000 O 4 CD VD O 00 VD 4 In dh�004 h h O N C1 O VD cn c0 N M d - OO O In 0 . I p 1n Nv p aT---4 M p 4 h Inc \O V M h O O O O p O O O O p 4 CD d' 000 O ti 00 1---1 M N h h bbA U .b 1) 0 al • N r-. U U G7 G ctt0 N a G Cf) 1 a) o 1% 47-21 �C o ° f nn1 00 000 - 310,952.93 251,045.00 4) 1-1 Gig N O Sanitary Sewer N 1/40 GL - Revenue vs Expense (01/12/2023 - 02:39 PM) P.( CD rt cn o ,x-. �p N CV O N N N N i ct c ' ' C'1 al C 0 4-4 •G �aaw TaalloJ/puadxa YTD Balance Current Period Description Account Number O ti V) o( O 7f O O N 00 OOH O O 0 0 IA v3 O a ri 000 i• o O OVDC10 O O rani CS v3 � O I 00 � V tri O O M N <t N CN 'tet O 4-1 O O O O O VD N O O 000 O ooc ,t O I N 06 0 VI; CS J o O '~V' O V1 b d" 00 V -- ON 00 Cl \O N 00 �t 0<- r-1 M 1.-+ e-1 \O N N N ' --4 .4-4 .-i CD OI .M-1 VD I—O cD o t ONV O M NNV�'OO 7 CN d• CN Qm 4M r N V) \O 00 r-1 0 0 0 p o O O O O p o 0 O O O p o O O O O p o 0 Oo00 p 00 hl000 p N lit M o M 'O N N O CD H O� d� tel N M Vj r-1 00 O r-1 10 N d' M H N .-1 up N 4) b A 0 N N p4 8 y U 0 1' U 0 Ch cn '1� bcC 0 0 0 H G U ti U ---4. W V) J54 N t:40 011 414) CU 1-4 U N O Cl. N vaC40 0 W n ciOUO Storm Water GL - Revenue vs Expense (01/12/2023 - 02:39 PM) O ch .r M O N M M N N 4n O O N N c ZZ I Cl 0 0 TJ'" `i • o PO a[1 % Expend/Collect YTD Balance Current Period tims b(. 0 Cb‘ CTN 000 O O O 0001 O O O O O CD 1 p O O O CD CD 01 O O p O O O O O 0 O O p c 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 p O O O O O O O O p O O O O p O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O OOOOI O O O O p O 0 0 0 p O O O O p O O O O 0 0 0 0 p OOOO OI O O O O p O O O O p 0 0 0 0 O O GL - Revenue vs Expense (01/12/2023 - 02:39 PM) % Expend/Collect U Cd ccs YTD Balance Current Period 1O CON N N O O N 00 t` 00 t-•;, rirM O e-1 e-1 04 a V1 M VO 00 N • N O ' • tG O O 1n �n N M 1--1 e— t� \C 00 O N t1 et o t N O N 111 In 0 O N 00 • M 00 Ch M 00 O V' Vi In e-1 M M Description Account Number 3 ' O O GC L I k o ca 0 "t7 • W GL - Revenue vs Expense (01/12/2023 - 02:39 PM) LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date January 24, 2023 ITEM NUMBER Speed Study Report STAFF INITIAL APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: The city council asked Stantec, the city's engineering firm to prepare a speed study to assess appropriate speeds for residential streets in Laudeidale. The conclusions start on page 24. As always, it would be nice if things could be simpler Howevei, hustis Street north of Lar- penteur and Roselawn from Fulham Street to Fustis Street can't be posted 20 mph because they are minor arterial streets. Having a mix of speed limits requires a lot more signage and that diagram is found on page 26. Adam Capets will provide an overview of the study during the meeting. Kellie Schlegel, the city engineer, also will attend. They will both be present through Zoom. No decisions need to be made during the meeting. If the council elects to lower speed limits, we would be looking at signage installation in the spring. Theie are a number of items to accomplish be- fore spring. First, most of the signage will be installed on county roads, so we would need permission from Ramsey County to install the signs. We would need to get the word out about the upcoming changes through our usual communication channels. Finally, we would need to discuss an enforcement strategy with the St. Anthony Police Depaitment. Based on the council's discussion, we will figure out next steps. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ai Stantec City of Lauderdale Speed Limit Study Evaluation of Speed Limits and Policy on Streets within the City of Lauderdale January 19, 2023 P repared for: H eather Butkowski, City Administrator City of Lauderdale 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 P repared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 733 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1000 Minneapolis MN 55402 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY The conclusions in the Report titled City of Lauderdale Speed Limit Study are Stantec's professional opinion, as of the time of the Report, and concerning the scope described in the Report. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the scope of work was conducted and do not take into account any subsequent changes. The Report relates solely to the specific project for which Stantec was retained and the stated purpose for which the Report was prepared. The Report is not to be used or relied on for any variation or extension of the project, or for any other project or purpose, and any unauthorized use or reliance is at the recipient's own risk. Stantec has assumed all information received from the City of Lauderdale (the "Client") and third parties in the preparation of the Report to be correct. While Stantec has exercised a customary level of judgment or due diligence in the use of such information, Stantec assumes no responsibility for the consequences of any error or omission contained therein. This Report is intended solely for use by the Client in accordance with Stantec's contract with the Client. While the Report may be provided to applicable authorities having jurisdiction and others for whom the Client is responsible, Stantec does not warrant the services to any third party. The report may not be relied upon by any other party without the express written consent of Stantec, which may be withheld at Stantec's discretion. Digitally signed by Flickinger, Will DN: CN="Flickinger, Will", OU=Internal, OU=users, OU=stantec, DC=corp, DC=ads Prepared by Date: 2023.01.19 15:34:11-06'00' (signature) Will Flickinger, EIT hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota Reviewed by _ Adam Capets, PE Digitally signed by Capets, Adam Date. 2023.01.19 15:42:54 -onion' (signature) Date: January 19, 2023 License Number: 60740 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 RELEVANT STATUTES 1 1.1 1 Section 169.011, Subd. 64 — Residential Roadway 1 1.1.2 Section 169.14; Subd. 2. — Speed Limits 1 1.1.3 Section 169.14; Subd. 5h. — Speed Limits on City Streets 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 2.1 ROADWAY JURISDICTION AND FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION 3 2.2 EXISTING SPEED LIMITS 5 2.2 1 Speed Data 6 2.3 CRASH DATA 6 2.4 TRAFFIC VOLUMES 8 2 4.1 Forecasted Volumes 8 2.5 EXISTING MULTIMODAL FACILITIES 9 2.6 LAND USE AND ZONING 10 3.0 GUIDANCE AND EXAMPLES IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS 14 3.1 NATIONAL GUIDANCE ON URBAN SPEED LIMITS 14 3.1.1 National Transportation Safety Board 14 3.1.2 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) 15 3.1.3 National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) 17 3.2 EFFECTIVENESS OF SPEED LIMITS IN REDUCING VEHICLE SPEEDS 18 3.3 SPEED LIMITS IN OTHER STATES 21 3.4 CHANGES IN OTHER CITIES 21 4.0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT CHANGES AND FINDINGS 23 4.1 LOCAL STREETS 23 4.2 COLLECTOR AND ARTERIAL STREETS 23 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS 24 5.1 SPEED LIMIT SIGNING 24 5.2 PUBLIC OUTREACH AND EDUCATION 25 5.3 ENFORCEMENT 26 6.0 REFERENCES 27 ca u:11938059981reportsltechnicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY LIST OF TABLES Table 1: 85th Percentile Speeds 6 Table 2: Forecast 2043 AADT Volumes 9 Table 3: Stopping Sight Distance vs. Vehicle Speeds 19 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Roadway Jurisdiction 4 Figure 2 Functional Classification 5 Figure 3 Crash Locations from 2019 to 2021 7 Figure 4 Existing AADT Volumes 8 Figure 5 Metro Transit Bus Stops and Routes 9 Figure 6 Existing Land Use 11 Figure 7 2040 Future Land Use 12 Figure 8 Existing Zoning Map 13 Figure 9 Pedestrian Crash Risk vs. Vehicle Speeds 20 Figure 10• Default Urban Speed Limit by State 21 Figure 11 Gateway Sign Example 25 Figure 12 25 mph Sign Example 25 Figure 13 Speed Limit Sign Plan 26 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C DETAILED SPEED DATA A MNCMAT2 CRASH SUMMARY B SPEED LIMIT POLICY C ca u:11938059981reports1technicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study,docx ii CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Introduction 1 .(1 INTRODUCTION In 2019, the Minnesota State Legislature passed amendments providing limited authority to cities to set speed limits on streets under their jurisdiction. This allows cities to choose to maintain a statutory 30 mph speed limit on streets within an urban district, adopt a 25 mph statutory speed limit on local residential streets, and/or adopt speed limits that may be different from the statutory limits following engineering study, implementation planning, and public education. This report provides context to consider changes to speed limits within the City of Lauderdale on city - owned streets and serves as the engineering study required to adopt speed limits that differ from statutory limits 1.1 RELFIVAN 1 STATUTFS According to Minnesota State Statutes 5169, several provisions govern setting or adjusting the statutory speed limits within a local jurisdiction under certain circumstances. The State Legislature passed new statutes pertaining to setting speed limits that are effective as of August 1, 2019, including the following: 1.1.1 Section 169.011, Subd. 64 - Residential Roadway "Residential roadway" means a city street or town road that is either (1) less than one-half mile in total length, or (2) in an area zoned exclusively for housing that is not a collector or arterial street. 1.1.2 Section 169.14; Subd. 2. Speed Limits (7) 25 miles per hour in residential roadways if adopted by the road authority having jurisdiction over the residential roadway; and (8) 35 miles per hour in a rural residential district if adopted by the road authority having jurisdiction over the rural residential district. (b) A speed limit adopted under paragraph (a), clause (7), is not effective unless the road authority has erected signs designating the speed limit and indicating the beginning and end of the residential roadway on which the speed limit applies. (c) A speed limit adopted under paragraph (a), clause (8), is not effective unless the road authority has erected signs designating the speed limit and indicating the beginning and end of the rural residential district for the roadway on which the speed limit applies. 1.1.3 Section 169.14; Subd. 5h. - Speed limits on City Streets A city may establish speed limits for city streets under the city's jurisdiction other than the limits provided in subdivision 2 without conducting an engineering and traffic investigation. This subdivision does not ca u: 1193305998\reportsltechnicalreports\city of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 1 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Introduction apply to town roads, county highways, or trunk highways in the city. A city that establishes speed limits pursuant to this section must implement speed limit changes in a consistent and understandable manner. The city must erect appropriate signs to display the speed limit. A city that uses the authority under this subdivision must develop procedures to set speed limits based on the city's safety, engineering, and traffic analysis. At a minimum, the safety, engineering, and traffic analysis must consider national urban speed limit guidance and studies, local traffic crashes, and methods to effectively communicate the change to the public. ca u:11938059981reportsltechnicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 2 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Existing Conditions 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing conditions data was collected or requested from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Ramsey County, and the City of Lauderdale and was used to evaluate and determine appropriate speed limits on city -owned streets. The data includes the following: o Existing roadway jurisdiction and functional classification Existing roadway speed limits o Crash data on public roadways for the past three full years o Existing annual average daily traffic (AADT) volumes o Existing land use and zoning 2.1 ROADWAY JURISDICTION AND FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION The existing roadway jurisdiction for streets within city limits will determine which speed limits can be modified by the City of Lauderdale following a revised speed limit policy. Figure 1 shows the current state, county, and municipal (city) jurisdiction. A few streets that are owned by a municipality straddle the Lauderdale city boundary: Como Avenue (MSAS 121) is almost exclusively owned and maintained by the City of Saint Paul and is omitted from this study o A portion of Roselawn Avenue between Pleasant and Fulham Streets is jointly owned by the Cities of Lauderdale and Roseville. Since Roseville has not adopted a speed limit reduction, this portion of Roselawn is omitted from this study o Fulham Street in the southeast corner of Lauderdale is jointly owned by the Cities of Lauderdale and Falcon Heights. In 2021, Falcon Heights adopted a citywide speed limit reduction, setting local streets like Fulham Street to 20 mph, thus this portion of Fulham Street was included in this study scv ca u:1193805998\reportsltechnicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 3 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Existing Conditions //Ro seville_ 7 :, 127 war M 121rja... 12 rjit t� :Ai Q: 4.. Luther Seminary City Boundary Trunk Highway Route System Interstate H ighway U .S. Highway MN Highway Other Trunk H ighway County State Aid Highway County State Aid Highway Other County Routes County Road n I Township Road Unorganized Territory Road Municipal State Aid Street r EL Figure 1: Roadway Jurisdiction Municipal State Aid Street Municipal Street The existing roadway functional classification will help decide the most appropriate speed limit based on its characteristics and intended usage within the roadway network. Figure 2 shows the functional classification of streets within city limits according to MnDOT. The city -owned portions of Eustis Street and Roselawn Avenue are designated as minor collector streets that consist of a 2 -lane urban section with a painted centerline, 10 -11 -foot through lanes, and shoulders of varying width. Street parking is allowed on the east side of Eustis Street. The remaining local streets are urban sections with parking on both sides. The space between cars parked on both sides is approximately 16 feet, which is wide enough for two passenger cars to pass each other at lower speeds. ca u:11933059931reports\technicalreports\city of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 4 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Existing Conditions 280 127 MnDOT Functional Classifications T Interstate Other Freeway or Expressway Principal Arterial - Other Luther seminary City Boundary - A Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local Figure 2: Functional Classification If changes to jurisdiction or functional classification of any street are proposed in the future, the City of Lauderdale must reassess the current speed limit to follow the revised speed limit policy. 2.2 FXISTING SPUD LIMITS Of the city -owned streets included in this study, only Eustis Street and Roselawn Avenue have an existing posted speed limit of 30 mph. The remaining local streets do not have a posted speed limit and are thus assumed to have a statutory speed limit per Minnesota state law. The Statute states in Section 169.14; Subd 2 that the statutory speed limit is set to "30 miles per hour in an urban district." 'EN ca u:1193805998\reportsltechnicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 5 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Existing Conditions Speed Data Speed data was collected at various locations and times within Lauderdale. The 85th percentile speed (the speed at which 85% of free-flow vehicles are traveling at or below) was determined for each location to assess the actual speed at which drivers are travelling compared to the street's speed limit and is shown in Table 1 Detailed speed data is included in Appendix A. Table 1: 85th:D `- rcentile Speeds Location and Speed Limit Date Collected 85th Percentile Speed (mph) Eustis Street, posted 30 mph (at Spring St, prior to all -way stop) Aril 2017 p 30 Pleasant Street, statutory 30 mph (between Roselawn Ave and Summer St) October 2018 26 Roselawn Avenue, posted 30 mph (at Fulham St, prior to all -way stop) May 2019 36 Eustis and Pleasant Streets had 85th percentile speeds at or below the speed limit of the street. Roselawn Avenue had an 85th percentile speed 6 mph above the speed limit, however it is important to note this portion of Roselawn is adjacent to fewer homes and park amenities than the portion of Roselawn considered in this study; speed characteristics may be closer to Eustis Street where more homes are adjacent to the street. While all -way stop control was implemented at the Eustis and Spring intersection and the Roselawn and Fulham intersection after the data was collected, it is reasonable to assume that the collected 85th percentile speeds represent speeds achieved between the stop conditions. 2.3 CRASH DATA Crash data for a three-year period between January 2019 and December 2021 was obtained from the Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (MnCMAT2) for crashes occurring within Lauderdale city limits. Crash locations were mapped as shown in Figure 3. A summary of crash data from MnCMAT2 is included in Appendix E. ca u:11938059981reportsltechnicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 6 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Existing Conditions r i . fee .t? 1 i1 �a q s 1 `1 Kited �' 0 I c Lauderdale 4,,1I i� ,.• `till 7.4i, O 4-'_ • �13°;It • L t.. r 1 o I. T tit 11 Sprinj Street Ul 111:1 M t 3 !.. t • % het, (n r _. 0 Crashes on City Streets O Crashes on Non -city Streets 1 I'• 0 t'• 4 _ -r ht. is ens° ball • :1:1! t 811113 vist _ r -I Figure 3: Crash Locations from 2019 to 2021 There were 76 reported crashes within city limits between 2019 and 2021. Of the 76 crashes, 7 occurred on Lauderdale city -owned streets, while the remaining 69 occurred on state or county -owned streets and highways. Crashes typically occur more frequently on higher -volume, higher -speed streets. Most of the crashes on non -city -owned streets occurred on MN Highway 280 at the intersection with Broadway Street and the interchange with Larpenteur Avenue. The following trends summarize the 7 crashes on city - owned streets: 0 1 crash resulted in possible injury (severity C) and 6 crashes resulted in property -damage only O No crashes resulted in fatal or serious injury O 5 crashes were sideswipe crashes involving parked cars, 2 of which were confirmed to involve driving under the influence 2 crashes were angle crashes O No crashes involving pedestrians or bicycles were reported, however these crashes occur less frequently than vehicle crashes and are often unreported. The absence of these crashes does not indicate a lack of concern for the safety of pedestrians and bicycles. ca u:11933059931reportsltechnicalreports\city of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 7 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Existing Conditions 2.4 TRAFFIC VOLINiES The latest AADT volumes on segments from MnDOT's Traffic Mapping Application, with the year they were collected, are shown in Figure 4. Heavy commercial AADT (HCAADT) was also collected on some segments and is shown alongside AADT. o I tcsco I N o {E %11864 2021 )OB) r N O NI M c a, IsA N Ivy N tn NOint tr 'O o > .r �1 15400°0021L, r c1 963 ft 375 (2020) m 1050 (9020) uderdale 1539,0 (20 No niversity N re105r(2012) asN 4814 (2021) N laaJ1S uaaAI2VJ 0 N O N 1.5 t an V Spring Street Ione Street 1ven►ir O N 10 0) T rO '45k J� 000 (2017 O r✓J co to Luther Seminary Lake Street Official HCAADT Official AADT Draper Avenui 1924 (2021) (te) =ulharr Str 100 (2020) Figure 4: Existing AADT Volumes Forecasted Volumes u of MN Ie! Bolstod GuI Coui se I nlwell'U'pfi Hoyt Avenue We Dud HendonitenUe Lauderdale and the surrounding area consist of urban and suburban areas that are developed with a mix of land uses, therefore significant traffic growth is not expected over the next 20 years. To provide a conservative estimate of future traffic volumes, the segments shown in Table 2 were forecasted to year 2043 with a 0.5% per year growth rate. ca u:1193805998\reportsltechnicalreports\city of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 8 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Existing Conditions Table 2: Forecast 2043 AA o VoI __ es i i Existing AADT (Year) SegmentNEP Forecast 2043 AADT Roselawn Avenue (W of Eustis St) 375 (2020) 420 Roselawn Avenue (E of Eustis St) 1,050 (2020) 1,180 Eustis Street (N of Larpenteur Ave) 1,200 (2016) 1,370 2.5 EXISTING MULTIMODAL FACILITIES There are limited bicycle and pedestrian facilities within Lauderdale, particularly along city -owned streets. Sidewalks are present along Larpenteur Avenue and a few streets south of Larpenteur adjacent to higher - density housing. The remaining streets do not have adjacent sidewalks. There are a few shared -use paths within Lauderdale Park in the northeast part of the city, with one running adjacent to Roselawn Avenue from Pleasant Street continuing into Roseville. There are no designated bicycle facilities in the city. While there is no pedestrian/bicycle count data available, pedestrians are known to use the street to get around. Two local Metro Transit routes run through Lauderdale — Route 30 and Route 61. Route 30 runs from Minneapolis on Larpenteur Avenue, then turns south on Eustis Street toward Saint Paul. Route 61 runs between Minneapolis and Falcon Heights on Larpenteur Bus stops are present on these streets and are shown in Figure 5. The location of these bus routes generates pedestrian traffic from north and south of Larpenteur. Additionally, Route 3 runs in Saint Paul on Como Avenue, which may attract pedestrians. YI\hf 'J'P 280 LP is weSsibfd 128 Golf Club Hc,u',o i 127 Lutliur Seminary it City Boundary Bus Stop Route 30 Route 61 Route 3 Figure 5: Metro Transit Bus Stops and Routes ca u:1193805998\reportsltechnicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 9 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Existing Conditions 2 6 LAND USE AND ZONING The existing land use, 2040 future land use according to the City of Lauderdale 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and zoning within city limits is shown in Figure 6, Figure 7, and Figure 8, respectively. Land use and zoning will help decide the most appropriate speed limit by considering the potential for certain pedestrians and other road users to be present. Land uses that require lower speed limits of nearby streets include parks or recreational areas, schools, and residential or senior living areas. Nearly all the parcels adjacent to city -owned streets consist of low-density residential, medium -density residential, high-density residential, and park space Existing land use along city -owned streets is mostly consistent with the zoning and future land use. One notable change to land use is the redevelopment of the institutional parcel on the corner of Eustis and Spring Streets, formerly a church, to high density senior living. This development is under construction as of January 2023. Existing land use along the remaining non -city -owned streets consists of industrial, utility, commercial, and residential uses. Future mixed use developments are anticipated on the south side of Larpenteur Avenue. ca u:11938059981reportsltechnicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 10 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Existing Conditions Existing Land Use pH Single Family Res TownhomefCondo Apartments Commercial Industrial Institutional Open Space Park and Recreation I Utility 1 i 4 m Como— -- ----a— w —r — Figure 6: Existing Land Use ROW Railroad ROW ca u:1193805998\reports\technicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 11 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Existing Conditions Land Use Designations 2040 Future Land Use LDR (3-5 DU/Ac.) MDR (5.01-10 DU/Ac.) I.2 HDR -C (10.01-30 DU/Ac.) HDR (12.01-30 DU/Ac.) MXD-N (5.01-10 DU/Ac.) MXD-S (12.01-30 DU/Ac.) BP Industrial Park/Open Space ROW RR ROW Figure 7: 2040 Future Land Use ca u:11938059981reportsltechnicalreportslcity of lauderdale speed limit study.docx 12 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Existing Conditions Broadway D R .n Avenue c7 1 IrlaWS 1 W Mal rr ii Win Mita r: rata Iris: 7 a � IWC Rosetawn Avenue roma PA I WS 1= Mg figs nisa DUN Ise . f otQ U' cci WO • J ummer Str et 1 11 'tp ' N aTgi 1 Li . II 4 a is P in W 1 t ll amawase r IQ _ELL Q v11;1( t. to en 444.A 4 , 1 ummer Str et 9, ,r 0 r s 5pnn tr9) , 1,•5 L1 N aTgi 1 Li . II 4 a is r Wit11 0 tf MP • , in W 1 t ll amawase T SW 34 r so. 4- en 444.A 4 , > w , ,T4 t r Do, ILL Is AI ■��3 il ,:,1\o to) 9, ,r 0 r s 5pnn tr9) lone Street w (3 tel tIn Dtt GO Larpenteur Avenue MIMI rte , 1,•5 L1 N aTgi 1 Li . II 4 a is r Wit11 0 tf MP • , in . , lone Street w (3 tel tIn Dtt GO Larpenteur Avenue MIMI rte , 1,•5 a o N aTgi 1 Li IV ■ in . , Ittrrg •1 SW 34 r so. K M� DI, it • v 444.A 4 , > w KO ti Qfl ufl t n (tit eTh u mg. r gris ..rt!.z— - N aTgi 1 Li V ■ in CJ t MI 11100 num Ittrrg •1 _a•Firg) tD?' 34 Trraiii so. it • v 444.A 4 'L1 4 w •j Do, ILL Is AI ■��3 itil" ,:,1\o to) Oil )1l, tu. N aTgi 1 Li V ■ in CJ t U '7 TY Ittrrg •1 f, 34 Trraiii so. it • v 444.A 4 'L1 4 ' I •j v 11' itil" ,:,1\o I v -I R-1 $vtow 4'n RO$4Gntw1 R-2 Urban Rosiidcntial R-3 hluPi$o Residential B-1 Community Business 1-1 Industrial C-1 Conservation Lake Right of Way Planned Un:t Dovclopment t •! ct,lr-1 IT tu. 17cti 723,d eyer"U u Ittrrg •1 Dna L Trraiii so. it • v 0 'L1 4 1 •j . 1, Lli 0 t.S1S c 7 1 . tv to 0 atib ti r 1 r Lauderdal Nature Comp Avenue � l_ PI I 0 i Fulham Stree Figure 8: Existing Zoning Map ca u:11938059981reportsltechnicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 13 IT 17cti 723,d eyer"U u U ry Ulu, a 4 to 0 atib ti r 1 r Lauderdal Nature Comp Avenue � l_ PI I 0 i Fulham Stree Figure 8: Existing Zoning Map ca u:11938059981reportsltechnicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 13 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Guidance and Examples in Other Jurisdictions 3.0 GUIDANCE AND EXAMPLES IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS 3.1 NATIONAL GUIDANCJ! ON URBAN SPEED LIMITS In recent years, there has been a trend nationally for local municipalities to create safer streets for non- vehicular users through the implementation of speed -reducing strategies in design, operations, and posted speed limits. Guidance on setting speed limits has evolved to a more holistic approach from the previously accepted practice of setting speed limits based on observed speeds. This new approach considers the vulnerability of non -vehicular users sharing the same right-of-way with vehicular traffic. Several municipalities in the Twin Cities metropolitan area have documented national research within their own speed limit evaluations. The following sections come from reports published by these municipalities, as noted: 3.1.1 National Transportation Safety Board From City of Minneapolis Speed Limit Evaluation, March 12, 2020: In 2017, the National Transportation Safety Board released a comprehensive report Reducing Speeding Related Crashes Involving Passenger Vehicles. The report directly addresses the traditional methods for setting speed limits and the challenges with those methods: Typically, speed limits are set by statue, but adjustments to statutory speed limits are generally based on the observed operating speeds for each road segment — specifically, the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. Raising speed limits to match the 85th percentile speed can result in unintended consequences. It may lead to higher operating speeds, and thus a higher 85th percentile speed. In general, there is not strong evidence that the 85th percentile speed within a given traffic flow equates to the speed with the lowest crash involvement rate for all road types. Alternative approaches and expert systems for setting speed limits are available, which incorporate factors such as crash history and the presence of vulnerable road users such as pedestrians (Executive Summary, Page X). The report goes on to say: The relationship between speed and injury severity affects more than just speeding vehicle occupants. This is particularly true in urban areas where the interaction between vehicles and vulnerable road users such as pedestrians is considerably higher. A safe system approach to setting speed limits emphasizes the consideration of human biomechanical tolerances and shifts the focus from vehicles to all road users Especially in urban areas, it has emerged as an alternative to the use of the 85th percentile speed in setting speed limits in speed zones (Rethinking How to Set Speed Limits, page 29). The report recommends changes to the Federal Highway Administration's Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) "to, at a minimum, incorporate the safe system approach for urban roads to strengthen protection for vulnerable road users" (page 29). ca u:11938059981reportsltechnicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 14 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Guidance and Examples in Other Jurisdictions 3.1.2 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUi'CU) The Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD) indicates that a study is required when speed limits different to the statutory limits are proposed. According to current statues: The statutory speed limit in Minnesota is 30 mph on streets in "urban districts" and 25 miles per hour on "residential roadways" if adopted by the road authority having jurisdiction over the residential roadway. This indicates that changing speed limits to 25 mph on city -owned local streets in residential districts is considered statutory. Furthermore, a speed study involving speed measurements along each street considered for speed reduction is not needed. The MnMUTCD has been revised in February 2022 to include the plaques "CITYWIDE" (R2-5aP) and "UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED" (R2 -5P), which are to be used if a jurisdiction has a policy of installing speed limit signs that are applicable throughout the jurisdiction unless otherwise posted. From City of Minneapolis Speed Limit Evaluation, March 12, 2020: The MUTCD sets minimum standards and provides guidance to ensure uniformity and consistency on the public transportation system. The MnMUTCD is used in the State of Minnesota. The MnMUTCD and MUTCD are generally identical and exact in language as it references speed limits. Therefore, it is routine that the MnMUTCD adopts the new and addendum language of the MUTCD Based on the National Transportation Safety Board recommendation, the National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (NCUTCD) began collecting feedback and considering changes to the MUTCD related to setting speed limits. The current MUTCD offers the following standards (not guidance) for setting speed limits: "Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles." "The Speed Limit sign... shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation, or as adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering study. The speed limits displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph" (Section 2B 13 page 56). The current MUTCD offers the following option (not guidance or standard) on setting speed limits: "States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies to reevaluate non -statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in the number of travel lanes, changes in the configuration of bicycle lanes, changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes." ca u:11938059981reportsltechnicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 15 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Guidance and Examples in Other Jurisdictions ® "When a speed limit within a speed zone is posted, it should be within 5 mph of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic" (Section 2B.13 page 58). ® "Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following: a. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance; b. The pace; c. Roadside development and environment; d. Parking practices and pedestrian activity; and e. Reported crash experience for at least a 12 -month period" (Section 2B.13, page 58). The National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (NCUTCD) recently approved recommended changes to the current MUTCD related to setting speed limits. These recommendations are provided to FHWA for consideration in the next edition of the MUTCD, which requires federal rulemaking. The FHWA has not initiated rule making for the next edition of the MUTCD yet, but this is expected to begin within the next year. The recommendations approved by the NCUTCD include: ® Removing from standard that "The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles." • Upgrading and revising the considerations for establishing speed zones to read: "Factors that should be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits within speed zones are the following: a. Speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles (such as current 85th percentile, the pace, and review of past speed studies). b. Reported crash experience for at least a 12 -month period relative to similar roadways. c. Road characteristics (such as lane widths, curb/shoulder condition, grade, alignment, median type, and sight distance). d. Road context (such as roadside development and environment including number of driveways and land use, functional classification, parking practices, presence of sidewalks/bicycle facilities). Road users (such as pedestrian activity, bicycle activity)." ® Revising the guidance statement regarding the posted speed limit being made within 5 mph of the 85"' percentile speed to apply only "on freeways, expressways, or rural highways." ca 01938059981reports\technicalreports1cty of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 16 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Guidance and Examples in Other Jurisdictions 3.1.3 National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) From City of Minneapolis Speed Limit Evaluation, March 12, 2020: The National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) guide City Limits: Setting Safe Speeds on Urban Streets, released in Summer 2020, provides urban speed limit guidance. This guide identifies two general approaches (citywide or by category of street) for setting speed limits and states the following: Cities have two options for setting default speed limits: citywide or by category of street (e.g., major, minor, alley). Citywide speed limits are generally easier to implement and may be easier for drivers to follow. However, in cities where there is clear differentiation between major arterial streets and local or minor streets, setting speed limits based on category of street can sometimes allow cities to lower speed limits on a large number of streets below what would be allowable citywide (i.e., 20 mph on minor streets vs. 25 mph citywide). If cities have the authority to set default speed limits, they should decide whether to implement citywide limits or category limits based on what makes the most sense given the local conditions (page 46). If setting a default citywide speed limit, NACTO recommends using 25 mph. "Setting or lowering default citywide speed limits is an inexpensive, scalable way to quickly improve safety outcomes, and establish a basis for larger safety gains Default citywide limits also provide consistent expectations and messages about speed across the jurisdiction, which is easy for drivers to follow" (page 47). If using category speed limit approach, NACTO recommends: 6 Major streets: 25 mph. A 25 mph speed limit on urban multi -lane streets has demonstrable safety benefits for all users. Major streets feature a combination of high motor vehicle traffic volume, signalization of major intersections, and an inherently multimodal street environment (page 49). Minor streets: 20 mph. A 20 mph speed limit on minor streets supports safe movement and contextually appropriate design on the majority of city streets. Since minor streets tend to have either very low volumes or operate at the speed of the most cautious driver, cities can apply a category speed limit to minor streets without detailed review of street often already present, as well as low -vehicle -volume streets with few or no transit stops (page 50). Alleys and shared streets: 10 mph NACTO identifies that cities can define "slow zones." ca u:11938059981reportsltechnicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 17 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Guidance and Examples in Other Jurisdictions Slow Zones are specifically designated areas with slower speeds that otherwise similar streets in the same jurisdiction. Neighborhood -scale or site-specific zones are useful for addressing high-priority areas such as areas with elevated collision rates or sensitive land uses (schools, parks, etc.). Cities should create slow zones based on their own location -specific needs, but several types of slow zones are relatively common (page 54). The guide provides examples of potential slow zones in school, park, and senior areas; neighborhoods and districts; and in downtown areas. The NACTO guide includes additional details for analyzing speeds on major streets if a jurisdiction is not able to set default citywide or category speed limits. The guide recommends setting safe speed limits by evaluating conflict density and activity level. Their recommendations say that streets with high activity and high conflict density should have 20 mph speed limits, while urban streets with low activity levels and low conflict density should have maximum speed limits of 35 mph. 3.2 EFFECTIVENESS OF SPEED LIMITS IN REDUCING VEHICLE SPEEDS From City of Golden Valley Speed Limit Study, November 3, 2020: Research is inconclusive on the effectiveness of speed limits in reducing vehicles speeds. Studies such as the ones conducted by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in 1997, WisDOT in 2009, and the City of Minneapolis in 2015 suggest that lowering speed limits without changing the road environment has little effect on speed. The Wisconsin study predominantly focused on high speed roadways while FHWA and Minneapolis studies looked at local roads in urban areas. There are, however, recent studies that have found statistically significant reductions in travel speeds when speed limits were lowered from 30 to 25 mph. A study out of Boston, MA and published by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety suggests that lowering the speed limit in urban areas is an effective countermeasure to reduce speeds and improve safety for all road users. When speeds were reduced from 30 mph to 25 mph, the City of Boston saw a 29.3 percent decline in speeds over 35 mph, and 8.5 percent decline in speeds over 30 mph, and a 2.9 percent reduction in vehicles exceeding the 25 mph speed limit. A series of pilot studies out of Missouri support the Boston finding, suggesting that lowering the speed on residential streets can result in a statistically significant reduction in travel speeds. The pilot project out of Springfield, MO also found that the "benefits of reducing speed limits on residential streets were carried over to the collector streets." It should be noted that in each instance, the lowering of speed limits coincided with education and enforcement campaigns to increase compliance with new speed limits. There have been numerous studies nationwide that demonstrate the relationship between vehicular speed and street safety. Higher speeds along a roadway generally lead to an increase in the likelihood of a crash occurring and the chances that this crash leads to severe injuries or death. ca u:11938059981reportsltechnicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 18 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Guidance and Examples in Other Jurisdictions The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) 2017 report Reducing Speeding -Related Crashes Involving Passenger Vehicles summarizes the connection between speed and safety: Speed -and therefore speeding -increases crash risk in two ways: (1) it increases the likelihood of being involved in a crash, and (2) it increases the severity of injuries sustained by all road users in a crash. The relationship between speed and crash involvement is complex, and it is affected by factors such as road type, driver age, alcohol impairment, and roadway characteristics like curvature, grade, width, and adjacent land use. In contrast, the relationship between speed and injury severity is consistent and direct. Higher vehicle speeds lead to larger changes in velocity in a crash, and these velocity changes are closely linked to injury severity. This relationship is especially critical for pedestrians involved in a motor vehicle crash, due to their lack of protection (Executive Summary, page ix). One of the most prominent factors in determining whether a crash occurs is how far it takes the vehicle to come to a complete stop. Table 3 below shows the relationship between stopping sight distance and speed Stopping sight distance is the length of roadway ahead that is visible to the driver. The available sight distance on a roadway should be sufficiently long to enable a vehicle traveling at or near the roadway design or posted speed to stop before reaching a stationary object in its path. From City of Minneapolis Speed Limit Evaluation, March 12, 2020: According to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), it takes the average driver 301 feet to stop at 40 mph, 197 feet at 30 mph, and 112 feet at 20 mph. A change from 30 to 20 mph results in a vehicle stopping 85 feet sooner, which is a significant distance. This distance is almost 5 vehicles in length assuming each vehicle is approximately 18 feet in length. Nationally, there are a few different ways to calculate stopping sight distances between each of these calculations takes into consideration different driver reaction times. AASHTO guidance is generally considered conservative, but it should be noted that it always takes longer to stop at higher speeds. Table 3: Stopping Sight Distance vs. Vehicle Speeds Metric Design speed (km/h) Brake reaction distance (m) Braking distance on level (m) Stopping sight distance Calculated Design (m) (m) Design speed (mph) Brake reaction distance (ft) US Customary Braking distance on level Calculated (ft) (ft) Stopping sight distance Design (ft) 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 13.9 20.9 27.8 34.8 41.7 48.7 55.6 62.6 69.5 76.5 83.4 90.4 4.6 10.3 18.4 28.7 41.3 56.2 73.4 92.9 114.7 138.8 165.2 193.8 18.5 31.2 46.2 63.5 83.0 104.9 129.0 155.5 184.2 215.3 248.6 284.2 20 35 50 65 85 105 130 160 185 220 250 285 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 55.1 73.5 91.9 110.3 128.6 147.0 165.4 183.8 202.1 220.5 238.9 257.3 275.6 294.0 21.6 38.4 60.0 86.4 117.6 153.6 194.4 240.0 290.3 345.5 405.5 470.3 539,9 614.3 76.7 111.9 151.9 196.7 246.2 300.6 359.8 423.8 492.4 566.0 644.4 727.6 815.5 908.3 80 115 155 200 250 305 360 425 495 570 645 730 820 910 Note: Brake reaction distance predicated on a time of 2.5 s; deceleration rate of 3,4 m/s2 calculated sight distance. [11.2 ft/s2) used to determine ca u;11938059981reportsltechnicalreports\city of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 19 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Guidance and Examples in Other Jurisdictions z0 MPH • \O111//1 30'_ ree MPH i• la WM* likatititt itgitith 40% 73% 13% of pedestrians wilt die or suffer a severe injury if hit by a vehicle at 20 mph of pedestrians will die or suffer a severe injury if hit bya vehicle at 30 mph of pedestrians will die or suffer a severe injury if hit by a vehicle at 40 mph Source : Brian C Tefft. 2013 NV. Foundation for Traffic Safety. Impact speed and a pedestrian's risk of severe injury or death 4 VISION Minneapolis ZERO Figure 9: Pedestrian Crash Risk vs. Vehicle Speeds Figure 9 shows the crash risks for pedestrians if they were struck at differing vehicular speeds. As shown in the figure, a person who is hit at higher speeds is significantly more likely to sustain severe injuries or even death. For example, a person hit at 30 mph is approximately three times as likely to be killed or suffer a severe injury as at 20 mph. While it is well known that lower traffic speeds increase safety, there has been less analysis on the impact of speed limits on traffic speeds. A 2018 Insurance Institute for Highway Safety study Lowering the Speed Limit from 30 to 25 mph in Boston. Effects on Vehicle Speeds is the most recent detailed look at the impact of a change in speed limits on vehicle speeds. The study concluded that "lowering the speed limit in urban areas is an effective countermeasure to reduce speeds and improve safety for all road users" (page 2) Additionally, from this study it was found that there were significant reductions in the odds of vehicles in Boston exceeding 25 mph, 30 mph, and 35 mph with the newly implemented speed limit. In this study, it was also noted that there was a 29.3 percent decline in the odds of speeding for vehicles traveling faster than 35 mph. The study shows the 85th percentile speed remained unchanged before and after the reduced default speed limit took effect. This shows that drivers are typically going to drive at a speed they feel comfortable with given the context and design of the street. Historically, the 85th percentile speed has been used to set speed limits on roadways. This was used because it helped lower the speed differential between vehicles along the roadway. The results of this study show that there was less speed differential ca u:1193805998\reportsltechnicalreports\city of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 20 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Guidance and Examples in Other Jurisdictions with the 25 mph speed limit than with the 30 mph speed limit since higher -end speeds decreased. This reinforces the fact that behavior on urban streets is different than rural and highway conditions. 3.3 SPEED LIMITS IN OTHER STATES To provide context for Minnesota's statutory speed limits, Figure 10 shows the urban statutory speed limit for each state in the United States as of 2017. Most states (30) had an urban statutory speed limit of 25 mph, including Minnesota's neighboring states. Additionally, 17 states allow a 20 mph speed limit if certain conditions are met. Since 2017, some states have made changes to their speed policies that include conditions for establishing lower speed limits. 2 . 1 C I 2 •v 211141 ..., Speed Limit f ?-r.IPrs 3DMPH 2!MPH Figure 10: Default Urban Speed Limit by State 3.4 CHANGLS IN OTHER CITIES Sources: USOOT, NHTSA Asci 2017 Several nearby municipalities in the Twin Cities area have adopted speed limit reductions or are in the process of considering changes. This is important to consider given the need for consistency of speed limits between neighboring communities to maintain driver expectation and behavior, especially when streets cross city limits or follow the city boundary. A few notable examples are shown below: ao ca u:1193805998Ireportsltechnicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 21 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Guidance and Examples in Other Jurisdictions The City of Minneapolis adopted a policy that exercised MN 169.14; Subd 5h to reduce speed limits on many streets under their jurisdiction. Changes were completed citywide in 2020. Current speed limits in Minneapolis are: • 20 mph on minor streets (predominantly local residential streets) • 25 mph on most major streets (generally arterial and collector streets) • 35 mph on four short segments of major streets (based on specific conditions) • 10 mph in alleys The City of Saint Paul adopted changes in 2020 to speed limits on streets under their jurisdiction. The policy allows for exceptions in each category based upon an evaluation to determine whether a higher speed limit is appropriate based on context and design. Current speed limits in Saint Paul are: • 25 mph on major streets that are typically collector streets, minor arterials, and principal arterials • 20 mph on local streets • 10 mph in alleys The City of Falcon Heights adopted changes in 2021 to speed limits on streets under their jurisdiction. Falcon Heights set the following speed limits and guidelines: • Collector streets are generally major streets with 25 mph speed limits and were evaluated to determine whether a lower speed limit is appropriate based on context and design 25 mph on busier roads that connect neighborhoods • Local streets are generally minor streets with 20 mph speed limits and were evaluated to determine whether a higher speed limit is appropriate based on context and design. 35 mph on one of the busiest roads • 10 mph in alleys Other Minnesota cities that have either implemented or are currently considering similar speed limit reductions include Minnetonka, Edina, Saint Louis Park, Golden Valley, Saint Anthony, Mahtomedi, and Bayport, and Roseville. ca u:11938059981reportsltechnicalreports\city of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 22 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Proposed Speed Limit Changes and Findings 4.0 PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT CHANGES AND FINDINGS Based on the State Statutes and guidelines described in this report, the City of Lauderdale may choose to reduce the speed limit on city -owned streets across the board. Speed limits on state- and county -owned streets and highways will not be affected by this speed limit reduction. 4.1 LOCAL STREETS The City has the authority to reduce the speed limit on its local streets, designated by State Statute as "residential roadways", to 25 mph without the need for engineering analysis. However, based on the analysis performed in this report and the adoption of lower speed limits on local streets performed by other municipalities in the Twin Cities metropolitan area and around the country, the City can further reduce the speed limit on local streets to 20 mph, including Fulham Street on the Lauderdale -Falcon Heights boundary south of Larpenteur Avenue. Based on recent studies performed nationally, this reduction is likely to effectively reduce the existing speeds on local streets shown in Section 2 2, increasing the safety for all users, including vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles. The reduction to 20 mph is suitable for the nature of the local streets as they are functionally classified by MnDOT. These streets have lower volumes, fewer than 1,000 vehicles per day, as evident in the existing and forecast traffic volumes shown in Section 2 4. The local streets are exclusively adjacent to residential and park land uses, as shown in Section 2 5. The speed limit reduction will help increase the safety of pedestrians and bicycles who use the local streets to get around, as there are limited multimodal facilities in the city. A pedestrian who is hit by a vehicle at higher speeds is significantly more likely to sustain severe or fatal injuries, with a three -fold increase in the likelihood of death or severe injury at 30 mph when compared to 20 mph. 4.2 COLLECTOR AND ARTERIAL STREETS According to State Statute, without engineering analysis, streets designated as collectors or arterials within urban districts must remain at a minimum speed limit of 30 mph. The city -owned streets that fall under this category are Eustis Street between Larpenteur Avenue and Roselawn Avenue, and Roselawn Avenue between Eustis Street and Pleasant Street. However, based on the analysis performed in this report and the adoption of lower speed limits on collector and arterial streets in other municipalities in the Twin Cities and around the country, the city can further reduce the speed limit on these streets to 25 mph. Based on national research, this reduction is likely to effectively reduce the existing speeds on collector and arterial streets shown in Section 2 2 This change may increase safety on these higher -volume streets in Lauderdale. Of the 7 crashes occurring on city -owned streets described in Section 2 3 and Figure 3, 5 crashes may have been preventable if the vehicles involved were traveling at lower speeds Eustis Street and Roselawn Avenue are almost exclusively adjacent to residential and park land uses, as shown in Section 2 5, suitable environments to reduce speed limits to 25 mph. Additionally, the senior living residential development at the intersection of Eustis and Spring Streets would benefit from the 25 mph speed limit on Eustis Street. ca u:1193805998\reports\technicalreports\city of lauderdale speed limit study.docx 23 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Conclusions and Next Steps 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS The City of Lauderdale is considering reducing the speed limit on city -owned streets due to the recent S tate legislation enacted in 2019 regarding statutory speed limits. Speed limit reduction on both local streets and higher classification streets follows trends set by other cities to increase safety on these streets for all road users, particularly the most vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and bicyclists. S everal municipalities in the Twin Cities metropolitan area, including the adjacent cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, have adopted or are considering a reduced speed limit policy. Reducing the speed of traffic will decrease the likelihood of a crash between a vehicle and a non -vehicular road user that results in death or serious injury. Following a review of the State Statues, existing roadway conditions, and guidance from national entities and local municipalities, it is recommended that a city-wide 20 mph speed limit be implemented on local streets and 25 mph on city -owned collector and arterial streets. The 25 mph speed limit should be implemented on Eustis Street from Larpenteur Avenue to Roselawn Avenue, and Roselawn Avenue from Eustis Street to Pleasant Street. This speed limit reduction would not apply to state- and county -owned streets and highways such as MN Highway 280, Larpenteur Avenue, Fulham Street north of Larpenteur, and Eustis Street south of Larpenteur, which would maintain their existing speed limit. If the City chooses to adopt a speed limit reduction, the appropriate steps must be taken prior to the implementation of the new speed limits. These steps include speed limit signing, public outreach and education, and creating an enforcement plan. A speed limit policy has also been created for the City and is included in Appendix C. 5.1 SPEED LIMIT SIGNING S peed limit signing is required by the Statute for a speed limit reduction and informs drivers of the new speed limits adopted on a particular street. The Statue states the speed limit "is not effective unless the road authority has erected signs designating the speed limit and indicating the beginning and end of the residential roadway on which the speed limit applies." S igns should be created and placed in accordance with the MnMUTCD at the locations shown in Figure 13. The recommended signing plan for the proposed speed limit reduction includes the following: ® "Gateway" signs on collector and arterial streets beyond the city boundary indicating a citywide speed limit in Lauderdale of 20 mph unless otherwise posted. These signs may also be placed periodically in non -gateway locations as deemed appropriate or on local streets that cross or straddle city limits. These signs should resemble the sign shown in Figure 11. O 25 mph speed limit signs on the collector and arterial streets described in Section 4.2 These signs should resemble the sign shown in Figure 12. These signs should be placed under the following guidelines: o At speed limit transition points ca u:11938059981reportsltechnicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 24 4 • SPEED LIMIT 20 • • UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Conclusions and Next Steps o Beyond intersections with arterial or other high -traffic streets o Beyond municipal boundaries o At least once every mile and at least 1/4 -mile apart o Locations where it is necessary to remind road users of the speed limit [CITYWIDE Figure 11: Gateway Sign Example (MnMUTCD R2-1, R2-5aP, and R2 -5P) SPEED LIMIT 25 • Figure 12: 25 mph Sign Example (MnMUTCD R2-1) 5.2 PUBLIC OUTHACH AND MUCAI'ION The City should proactively communicate the speed limit reduction to drivers through outreach and education. The message of the outreach should Zink the speed limit reduction to its impacts on safety for non -vehicular road users and highlight the reasons for implementation. Methods of public outreach may include the following: o Lauderdale quarterly newsletter articles o Announcements on the Lauderdale webpage, include resources and maps O Local cable television and news announcements Flyers distributed with utility bills Presence at Day in the Park' community picnic ® Posts on social media outlets (Facebook, Linkedln, etc.) o Resident email campaigns ® Advertisements through local businesses, community centers, places of worship, etc. ca u:11938059981reportsltechnicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 25 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Conclusions and Next Steps 4 La uderda �S p ri n.g_S_t: 11 127 5.3 FVFORCFAAENT Luther Seminary 999 Gateway 20 mph 25 mph 30 mph Sign Figure 13: Speed Limit Sign Plan While enforcement is the last strategy typically considered when changing roadway infrastructure it is an important step in the process of speed limit reduction and is effective if done fairly and strategically. In its initial phases enforcement (contracted with the Saint Anthony Police Department) can be carried out with increased patrol visibility, increased traffic stops with warnings being issued for a 6 -month period for non - flagrant violations, writing citations for flagrant violations, and with passive means such as using speed trailers at certain locations. As enforcement is conducted over time, the new speed limits will become more credible and respected by drivers. ca u:11938059981reportsltechnicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 26 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY References 6.0 REFERENCES American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials. (2018). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 7th Edition. Washington, DC: AASHTO Dodds, Bryan, PE (2020). City of Minneapolis Speed Limit Evaluation. Minneapolis: Minneapolis Public Works Minnesota Department of Transportation. (2022) Enterprise MnDOT Mapping Application (EMMA). St. Paul: MnDOT - https://dotapp9.dot.state.mn.us/emma/ Minnesota Department of Transportation. (2022) Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool (MnCMAT). St. Paul: MnDOT - http://www.dot.state.mn.us/stateaid/mncmat2 html Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Traffic, Safety & Technology. (2022) Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD). St. Paul: MnDOT Minnesota Department of Transportation. (2022) MnDOT Functional Classifications. St. Paul: MnDOT - https://mndot.maps.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=d64dc550380547b1 a93e1071d0eaf 8e0 Minnesota Department of Transportation. (2022) Traffic Forecasting & Analysis Traffic Mapping Application. St. Paul: MnDOT - https://mndot.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index. html?id=7b3be07daed84e7fa170a9105 9ce63bb Rickart, Chuck, PE, PTOE. (2021). Speed Limit Policy, City of Mahtomedi, MN. Minneapolis: WSB SEH. (2020). Speed Limit Study, City of Golden Valley, Minnesota. St. Paul: SEH Swanson Haskamp Consulting. (2019). City of Lauderdale 2040 Comprehensive Plan. St. Paul: City of Lauderdale ca u:11938059981reportsltechnicalreportslcity of Lauderdale speed limit study.docx 27 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Appendix A -DETAILED SPEED DATA Place Currently Not Set Traffic Survey Summary Location: Eustis St & Spring St Start Date: 04-03-17 End Date: 04-05-17 Zone: Residential Start Time: 08:12:53 End Time: 08:46:40 Travel Direction: N Speed 1-19 20-21 22 - 23 24 - 25 26-27 28 - 29 30-31 Volume 34 105 140 % of Total 3.24% 10% 14.77% 13.34% 12.48% 32 - 33 52 4.95% 34-35 17 1.62% 36 - 37 15 1.42% 38 - 39 1 0.09% 40 - 999 Total Vehicles: 1049 Speed Statistics 10 MPH Pace Number Exceeding Limit Posted 30 Pace Speed 22 to 31 Speed 30+ 40+ 50+ Total #At/Under Limit 917 # in Pace 681 Number 132 0 0 132 # Over Limit 132 % in Pace 64.91% Percent 12 58% 0% 0% 12 58% Average Speed 23.79 85% Percentile 30 1' 04-06-2017, 08:26:04 4-+ CnO ing Z0 C 0 O o a) a: cts 0 Travel Direction: N co 2 aco -o "it' E CL W O) c Q) 0 a N U) 65 0* c �Gc ui VJCL W o 2 W 9j co 0 .. 4-1 U 03) a 0 ❑ 1 • _ 1 cn Jr1 �••1 0 00 0 Q 0 0rkt 1/40 in 9amp A 14..d (Li C4 tat r u CO N c0 N ecit0 N N 0 0 CL RI o ma G) 0 wit m� c - eLw vacs - ca o 4-' o aCO wo co O tn0 o ro r LI .y i to rI N 0 CO 1/40 rt c rim (N Nt') , N '3 P CO X11 O - •S ic ri ciair--- CI 0 N 0 O t O O 60 in e5 N 0 0 0 0 oeale 4 CO � 't? N 000 ��, N OIII11IQAFlo" H Q. Place Currently Not Set Daily Traffic Plow -15 minute interval Location: Eustis St & Spring St Zone: Residential Travel Direction: N Monday, 04-03-2017 87 Time AM Vehicle Count Hour Total Time PM Vehicle Count Hour Total 00:00to00:15 0 12:00to12:15 6 00:15 to 00:30 0 12:15 to 12:30 11 00:30 to 00:45 0 12:30 to 12:45 8 00:45 to 01:00 0 0 12:45 to 13:00 8 33 01:00 to 01:15 0 13:00 to 13:15 6 01:15 to 01:30 0 13:15 to 13:30 10 01:30 to 01:45 0 13:30 to 13:45 13 01:45 to 02:00 0 0 13:45 to 14:00 12 41 02:00 to 02:15 0 14:00 to 14:15 24 02:15to02:30 0 14:15to14:30 21 02:30 to 02:45 0 14:30 to 14:45 19 02:45 to 03:00 0 0 14:45 to 15:00 25 89 03:00 to 03:15 0 15:00 to 15:15 19 03:15 to 03:30 0 s 15:15 to 15:30 11 03:30 to 03:45 0 15:30 to 15:45 10 03:45 to 04:00 0 0 15:45 to 16:00 11 51 04:00 to 04:15 0 16:00 to 16:15 7 04:15to04:30 0 16:15 to 16:30 16 04:30 to 04:45 0 16:30 to 16:45 6 04:45 to 05:00 0 0 16:45 to 17:00 7 36 05:00 to 05:15 0 17:00 to 17:15 10 05:15 to 05:30 0 17:15 to 17:30 7 05:30 to 05:45 0 17:30 to 17:45 8 05:45 to 06:00 0 0 17:45 to 18:00 7 32 06:00 to 06:15 0 18:00 to 18:15 8 06:15 to 06:30 0 18:15 to 18:30 4 06:30 to 06:45 0 0 0 18:30 to 18:45 4 18:45 to 19:00 6 2 20 06:45 to 07:00 07:00 to 07:15 0 19:00 to 19:15 5 07:15 to 07:30 0 19:15 to 19:30 0 07:30 to 07:45 0 19:30 to 19:45 2 07:45 to 08:00 0 0 19:45 to 20:00 2 9 08:00 to 08:15 1 20:00 to 20:15 2 r 08:15 to 08:30 8 20:15 to 20:30 1 08:30 to 08:45 4 20:30 to 20:45 3 08:45 to 09:00 5 18 20:45 to 21:00 2 8 09:00 to 09:15 7 21:00 to 21:15 3 09:15 to 09:30 6 21:15 to 21:30 2 09:30 to 09:45 6 21:30 to 21:45 0 09:45 to 10:00 9 28 21:45 to 22:00 2 7 10:00 to 10:15 3 22:00 to 22:15 1 10:15 to 10:30 2 22:15 to 22:30 2 10:30 to 10:45 9 22:30 to 22:45 1 10:45 to 11:00 7 21 22:45 to 23:00 0 4 11:00 to 11:15 8 23:00 to 23:15 0 11:15 to 11:30 8 23:15 to 23:30 0 11:30 to 11:45 4 23:30 to 23:45 0 11:45 to 12:00 8 28 23:45 to 24:00 2 2 Total AM 87 Peak Hour AM 09:00 to 10:00 Peak Flow AM 28 Peak % of AM 32.18% Peak AM % of 24 6.55% Total PM 340 Peak Hour PM 14:00 to 15:00 Peak Flow PM 89 Peak % of PM 26.17% Peak PM % of 24 20.84% 04-06-2017, 08:27:12 Place Currently Not Set Traffic Summary Week Location. Eustis St & Spring St Zone: Residential 04-03-2017 to 04-09-2017 Travel Direction: N Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Weekday Weekend 04-03 04-04 04-05 04-06 04-07 04-08 04-09 Average Average Midnight 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 0 2 3 _ 0 0 0 0 1 0 4:00 0 8 11 0 0 0 0 3 0 5'00 0 14 19 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 00 0 24 24 0 0 0 0 9 0 7 00 0 8 11 0 0 0 0 3 0 8 00 18 20 10 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 00 28 26 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10:00 21 31 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 11:00 28 22 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 12:00 33 31 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 13:00 41 58 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 14:00 89 95 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 15:00 51 79 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 16:00 36 28 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 17:00 32 33 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 18:00 20 18 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 19:00 9 240 0 0 0 0 6 0 20:00 8 10 _� 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 21:00 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 22:00 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 23:00 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 427 543 79 0 0 0 0 209 0 04-06-2017, 08:2725 Place Currently Not Set Time vs Speed Location: Eustis St & Spring St Date: 04-03-2017 Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Zone: Residential Travel Direction: N 04-06-2517, 08:27:37 --- Speed Ranges --- -- Time Time Span Total 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36A0 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 66-70 71-75 76-80 81+ 00:00-00:59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00-01:59 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 02:00-02:59 1 0 0 $ 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 $ 0 0 0 03:00-03:59 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00-04:59 $ 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 0 0 0 05;00-05:59 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00-06:59 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00-07:59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 08:00-08:59 18 0 2 24 5 401 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:00-09:59 28 0 1 82 5 552 0 0 i s 0 0 0 0 0 10:00-10:59 21 0 1 3 3 4 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00-11:59 28 0 3 4 3 14 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00-12:59 33 0 2 2 1 7 173 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:00-13:59 41 0 0 5 2 12 1110 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00-14:59 89 0 2 7 2 18 50 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 15:00-15:59 51 0 0 10 4 13 18 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00-16:59 1 14 2 16 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17:00-17:590 35 1 3 12 10 1 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 13 18:00-18:591 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 51 19:00-19:59 1 2 0 3 40 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:00-20:59 8 0 0 0 2 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:00-21:59 7 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:00-22:59 4 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:00-23:59 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04-06-2517, 08:27:37 St. Anthony Police Department Case Number: 18007475 Combined Page 1 1900 Block of Pleasant Street Date Start: 11 -Oct -18 Date Endh 18 -Oct -18 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41 45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 >65 0 153 105 310 511 207 28 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 85 percentile = 26 St. Anthony Police Department Case Number: 18007475 Page 1 1900 Block of Pleasant Street Date Start: 11 -Oct -18 Date End: 18 -Oct -18 Combined Date\Speed (MPH) 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 4145 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 >65 Total 10/11/2018 0 12 13 26 56 16 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 126 10/12/2018 0 16 23 43 77 25 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 10/13/2018 0 14 12 47 63 35 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 174 10/14/2018 0 28 11 22 54 33 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 10/15/2018 0 30 16 54 80 35 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 220 10/16/2018 0 30 9 63 81 26 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 213 10/17/2018 0 13 12 43 81 30 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 187 10/18/2018 0 10 9 12 19 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 Combined Total 0 153 105 310 511 207 28 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 1322 85 percentile = 26 St. Anthony Police Department Case Number: 18007475 Page 1 1900 Block of Pleasant Street Date Start: 11 -Oct -18 Date Enda 18 -Oct -18 Combined Date\Speed (MPH) 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 >65 Total 10/11/2018 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14:00 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 10 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 15:00 0 0 2 2 4 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 16:00 0 0 3 1 0 5 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 17:00 0 0 1 0 3 2 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 18:00 6 0 4 0 2 4 0 7 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 20 19:00 08:00 0 2 0 1 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 20:00 0 0 1 4 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 21:00 0 0 0 1 0 6 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 11:00 22:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Day Total 0 0 0 12 13 26 56 16 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 126 0 10/12/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 06:00 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 07:00 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 08:00 0 2 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 09:00 0 3 3 2 7 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 10:00 0 3 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 11:00 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 12:00 0 0 1 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 13:00 0 1 0 3 7 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 14:00 0 1 0 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 15:00 0 2 10 6 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 16:00 0 2 5 6 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 17:00 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 18:00 0 0 2 3 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 19:00 0 0 0 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 20:00 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 21:00 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 22:00 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 23:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Day Total 0 16 23 43 77 25 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 St. Anthony Police Department Case Number: 18007475 Page 2 1900 Block of Pleasant Street Date Start: 11 -Oct -18 Date End: 18 -Oct -18 Combined Date\Speed (MPH) 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 >65 Total 10/13/2018 0 5 01:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 03:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 08:00 0 0 0 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 09:00 0 1 0 2 7 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 10:00 17 0 0 1 1 1 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 4 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 10 12:00 13:00 0 0 1 0 6 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 13:00 0 2 2 3 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 14:00 15:00 0 1 1 5 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 15:00 16:00 0 1 2 1 4 4 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 16:00 0 3 1 10 0 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 17:00 0 0 3 0 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 18:00 3 0 1 3 0 3 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 13 19:00 0 0 0 0 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 20:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 21:00 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 22:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 23:00 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 Day Total 0 14 12 47 63 35 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 174 10/14/2018 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 07:00 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 08:00 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 09:00 0 4 1 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 10:00 0 4 1 1 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 11:00 0 1 0 1 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 12:00 0 0 0 2 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 13:00 0 2 0 4 4 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 14:00 0 1 0 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 15:00 0 1 0 0 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 16:00 0 2 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 17:00 0 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 18:00 0 3 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 19:00 0 3 1 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 20:00 0 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 21:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 22:00 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 23:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Day Total 0 28 11 22 54 33 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 St. Anthony Police Department Case Number: 18007475 Page 3 1900 Block of Pleasant Street Date Start: 11 -Oct -18 Date End: 18 -Oct -18 Combined Date\Speed (MPH) 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 4145 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 >65 Total 10/15/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 02:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:00 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 06:00 0 0 0 4 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 07:00 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 1 08:00 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 08:00 0 1 0 3 4 4 0 4 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 09:00 0 3 14 0 3 10:00 4 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 10:00 0 0 1 0 2 0 6 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 12:00 11:00 0 6 0 0 1 0 2 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 1 12:00 6 0 7 3 5 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 13:00 2 0 1 0 2 2 0 9 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 23 14:00 0 0 0 1 0 5 4 0 4 16:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 15:00 0 0 4 21 0 4 5 8 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 16:00 0 0 3 0 7 0 5 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 17:00 0 0 5 0 1 5 5 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 6 18:00 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 9 6 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 19:00 0 0 1 0 1 22:00 1 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 21:00 Day 0 0 0 1 30 3 63 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 22:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 23:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Day Total 0 30 16 54 80 35 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 220 10/16/2018 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 05:00 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 06:00 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 07:00 0 1 0 4 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 08:00 0 0 1 6 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 09:00 0 3 1 4 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 10:00 0 1 0 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 11:00 0 0 0 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 12:00 0 6 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 13:00 0 2 1 6 11 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 14:00 0 1 0 2 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 15:00 0 1 0 3 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 16:00 0 4 3 7 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 17:00 0 8 3 9 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 18:00 0 2 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 19:00 0 1 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 20:00 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 21:00 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 22:00 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 23:00 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Day Total 0 30 9 63 81 26 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 213 St. Anthony Police Department Case Number: 18007475 Page 4 1900 Block of Pleasant Street Date Start: 11 -Oct -18 Date End: 18 -Oct -18 Combined Date\Speed (MPH) 1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 >65 Total 10/17/2018 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 03:00 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 04:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 06:00 0 0 0 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 07:00 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 08:00 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 09:00 0 1 1 2 3 4 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 10:00 4 0 3 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1 11:00 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12:00 0 0 0 2 5 5 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 13:00 0 0 2 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 14:00 153 105 0 2 1 28 6 4 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 15:00 0 0 1 2 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 16:00 0 0 1 5 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 17:00 0 3 1 4 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 18:00 0 0 1 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 19:00 0 2 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 20:00 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 21:00 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Day Total 0 13 12 43 81 30 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 187 10/18/2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 06:00 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 07:00 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 08:00 0 0 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 09:00 0 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 10:00 0 1 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 11:00 0 5 4 7 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 12:00 0 1 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 13:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Combined Total 0 153 105 310 511 207 28 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 1322 85 percentile = 26 Weekday Average Average Day E (a LL_ c v 0 Ir (a LU c 3 ca a) 0 cC 0 ..0 m cnci0 c z O m a c -i LL 2019-05-30 2019-05-29 2019-05-28 2019-05-27 2019-05-26 2019-05-25 2019-05-24 c 3 ca 0) 0 CC 4-1 N aJ ct al co m rl c-1 iztN Ol N al 00 Ql lD O N cm -1 N 00 c-1 c-1 N cfl N kr) O N Cr) N 00 c-1 c-1 M m c-1 Ny. cict NJ O In m g<t r1 N N M r -i m N M rn N Ln w c--1 00 Fulham, North m N N rH Fulham, South N N N r-1 CO O tD � V �J ri N 4-1 0) (n (Z3 W c c 3 3 a) a) V) 0 0 CC CC J 0 Daily Traffic Peak Counts (PM) >- c 0 >- ro C ..c 0 z 2019-05-30 2019-05-29 2019-05-28 2019-05-27 2019-05-26 Lf) >- N (a ' -0 In L rn (a c-1 In o N 2019-05-24 LL_ N Ol M m M lD m M r-1 c 3 (0 v 0 r� W 00 1:1- N tN m In c-1 c-1 e-1 N m CO CO 00 O e--1 N N c -i N m N N CO 0) Fulham, North m N rt m Fulham, South N Ol N Roselawn, West Ql N N ._C 0 V) m N "a sio t 4-+ O 0 a 0 w N a) 0) a N 0 In 00 (a -0 N CU c -0 0.1 > - ca c 0 2019-05-30 2019-05-29 2019-05-28 2019-05-27 2019-05-26 Kt ct m c-1 � N N N cn ▪ N re( rZ N N m N N 00 O cal N w rl N (a -0 s - LL_ 2019-05-24 CO In gcr r N rl m N r` N c-1 r� N N r` 0 IO E E cra : IL LL 00 m Ict lO M wzt in LD m vcr rC wcr N lO M �io LO (n m 00 lO m rn M Roselawn, West N M r1 In M Roselawn, East a - o N v c >0) A (a L 4-0 (0 In (B -0 IL 2019-05-30 2019-05-29 2019-05-28 2019-05-27 2019-05-26 2019-05-25 2019-05-24 N to 00 res) 111 N N lD r1 O) m In N N 00 M N Ol m N co m N N N h m N m N Fulham, North Q1 N In N LO N 0 In E CO m c-1 lD m 00 wci m m In M lD m izt 00 m Ct N 00 M lO m gct c M 00 m ai M cm M Roselawn, West N 06 M Roselawn, East CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Appendix B - MNCMAT2 CRASH SUMMARY 00 MI Crash Summary 3�yr City only Report Version 1.0 February 2020 Crash Severity/Crash Year Crash Severity K - Fatal A - Serious Injury B - Minor Injury C - Possible Injury N - Prop Dmg Only U - Unknown Total Total 2012 2013 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2021 0 0 0 0 2 0 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 Crash Severity/Number of Vehicles Crash Severity Total 0 1 2 3+ K - Fatal A - Serious Injury B - Minor Injury C - Possible Injury N - Prop Dmg Only U - Unknown Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Basic Type Summary Total 0/ a Pedestrian B ike S ingle Vehicle Run Off Road S ingle Vehicle Other S ideswipe Same Direction S ideswipe Opposing Rear End H ead On Left Turn Angle Other Total 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 1:•-; 01 100.0 First Harmful Event Summary Total 0/ a Pedestrian B icyclist Motor Vehicle In Transport Parked Motor Vehicle Train D eer/Animal Other - Non Fixed Object Collision Fixed Object N on -Collision Harmful Events N on -Harmful Events Other/Unknown Total 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 28.6 5 71.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 7 100.0 Relationship to Intersection Summary Total 0/0 N ot at Intersection/Interchange Four -Way Intersection T or Y Intersection Five -Way Intersection or More Roundabout Intersection Related D riveway Access Related At School Crossing Railway Grade Crossing S hared Use Path or Trail Interchange or Ramp Crossover Related Acceleration/Deceleration Lane Other/Unknown Total 4 57.1 2 28.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 14.3 7 100.0 Weather 1 Summary Total 0/ 0 Clear Cloudy Rain S now S leet, Hail (Freezing Rain/Drizzle) Fog/Smog/Smoke B lowing Sand/Soil/Dirt/Snow S evere Crosswinds Other/Unknown Total 2 28.6 2 28.6 0 0.0 2 28.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 14.3 7 100.0 Light Condition Summary Total 0/ a D aylight S unrise S unset D ark (Str Lights On) D ark (Str Lights Off) D ark (No Str Lights) D ark (Unknown Light) Other/Unknown Total 2 28.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 57.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 14.3 7 100.0 Report Generated 01/08/2023 MnCMAT 2.0.0 Page 1 of 2 m� Crash Summary 3 yrCitymoniy Report Version 1.0 February 2020 Time of Day/Day of Week 00:00 02:00 01:59 03:59 From To SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT Total 0/ ° 04:00 05:59 06:00 07:59 08:00 09:59 10:00 11:59 12:00 13:59 14:00 15:59 16:00 17:59 18:00 19:59 20:00 21:59 22:00 23:59 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 28.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 1 0.0 14.3 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 1 0.0 14.3 0 0 3 0.0 0.0 42.9 Total °/ ° 1 14.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 14.3 2 28.6 3 42.9 0 0.0 7 100.0 100.0 100.0 Driver & Non -Motorist Age/Gender Summary Age <14 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90-94 95+ No Value Total 0/0 M F NR No Value 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4 4 28.6 28.6 0 6 0.0 42.9 Total 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 21.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 7.1 1 7.1 1 7.1 1 7.1 0 0.0 1 7.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 42.9 14 100.0 100.0 100.0 Selection Filter: Month Summary Total °/ ° January February March April May June July August S eptember October N ovember D ecember Total 3 42.9 1 14.3 0 0.0 1 14.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 14.3 0 0.0 1 14.3 0 0.0 7 100.0 Physical Condition Summary Total 0/0 Apparently Normal (Including No Drugs/Alcohol) Physical Disability (Short Term or Long Term) Medical Issue (III, Sick or Fainted) E motional (Depression, Angry, Disturbed, etc.) Asleep or Fatigued H as Been Drinking Alcohol H as Been Taking Illicit Drugs H as Been Taking Medications Other/Unknown N ot Applicable 5 62.5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 37.5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Total 8 100.0 WORK AREA: County('659472','659507') - FILTER: Year('2019','2020','2021') - SPATIAL FILTER APPLIED Analyst: Adam Capets Notes: Report Generated 01/08/2023 MnCMAT 2.0.0 Page 2 of 2 MI Crash Summary 3myr Non -city only Report Version 1.0 February 2020 Crash Severity/Crash Year Crash Severity K - Fatal A - Serious Injury B - Minor Injury C - Possible Injury N - Prop Dmg Only U - Unknown Total Total 2012 2013 2014 2015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 0 0 0 0 2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2019 0 0 2 6 25 0 33 2020 0 0 1 1 16 0 18 2021 0 0 1 1 16 0 18 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Crash Severity/Number of Vehicles Crash Severity Total 0 1 2 3+ K - Fatal A - Serious Injury B - Minor Injury C - Possible Injury N - Prop Dmg Only U - Unknown Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 8 0 1 57 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 32 0 69 0 23 40 0 0 0 2 4 0 6 Basic Type Summary Total 0/ 0 Pedestrian B ike S ingle Vehicle Run Off Road S ingle Vehicle Other S ideswipe Same Direction S ideswipe Opposing Rear End H ead On Left Turn Angle Other Total 0 0.0 0 0.0 22 31.9 1 1.4 9 13.0 1 1.4 24 34.8 0 0.0 0 0.0 11 15.9 1 1.4 69 100.0 First Harmful Event Summary Total 0/ 0 Pedestrian B icyclist Motor Vehicle In Transport Parked Motor Vehicle Train D eer/Animal Other - Non Fixed Object Collision Fixed Object Non -Collision Harmful Events Non -Harmful Events Other/Unknown Total 0 0 46 0 0 0 1 20 2 0 0 69 0.0 0.0 66.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 29.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 100.0 Relationship to Intersection Summary Total 0/0 N ot at Intersection/Interchange Four -Way Intersection T or Y Intersection Five -Way Intersection or More Roundabout Intersection Related D riveway Access Related At School Crossing Railway Grade Crossing S hared Use Path or Trail Interchange or Ramp Crossover Related Acceleration/Deceleration Lane Other/Unknown Total 40 58.0 7 10.1 5 7.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 8.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 14.5 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1.4 69 100.0 Weather 1 Summary Total O/ 0 Clear Cloudy Rain S now S leet, Hail (Freezing Rain/Drizzle) Fog/Smog/Smoke B lowing Sand/Soil/Dirt/Snow S evere Crosswinds Other/Unknown Total 38 55.1 17 24.6 4 5.8 9 13.0 1 1.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 69 100.0 Light Condition Summary Total 0/0 D aylight S unrise S unset D ark (Str Lights On) D ark (Str Lights Off) D ark (No Str Lights) D ark (Unknown Light) Other/Unknown Total 49 0 3 17 0 0 0 0 69 71.0 0.0 4.3 24.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Report Generated 01/08/2023 MnCMAT 2.0.0 Page 1 of 2 Crash Summary 3myr Nonncity.oniy Report Version 1.0 February 2020 Time of Day/Day of Week From To 00:00 01:59 02:00 03:59 04:00 05:59 06:00 07:59 08:00 09:59 10:00 11:59 12:00 13:59 14:00 15:59 16:00 17:59 18:00 19:59 20:00 21:59 22:00 23:59 Total °/ ° SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT Total 0/0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 3 2 4 2 1 1 1 4 1 2 3 2 0 2 2 0 2 1 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 9 11 15 10 7 8 9 13.0 15.9 21.7 14.5 10.1 11.6 13.0 1 1 1.4 1.4 0 6 15 14 6 8 7 3 5 0.0 8.7 21.7 20.3 8.7 11.6 10.1 4.3 7.2 3 4.31, 69 100.0 100.0 100.0 Driver & Non -Motorist Age/Gender Summary Age <14 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90-94 95+ No Value Total 0/ M F NR No Value Total 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 1.6 4 3.2 7 5.6 2 1.6 7 5.6 12 9.7 13 10.5 15 12.1 8 6.5 6 4.8 11 8.9 7 5.6 3 2.4 9 7.3 5 4.0 0 0.0 1 0.8 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0.8 11 8.9 124 100.0 100.0 100.0 0 0 0 0 1 3 3 2 6 7 11 9 5 5 10 5 3 8 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 1 5 2 6 3 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 82 31 0 11 66.1 25.0 0.0 8.9 Selection Filter: Month Summary Total 0/0 January February March April May June July August S eptember October N ovember D ecember Total 1 8 2 4 7 3 5 9 4 4 6 16 69 1.4 11.6 2.9 5.8 10.1 4.3 7.2 13.0 5.8 5.8 8.7 23.2 100.0 Physical Condition Summary Total 0/0 Apparently Normal (Including No Drugs/Alcohol) Physical Disability (Short Term or Long Term) Medical Issue (III, Sick or Fainted) Emotional (Depression, Angry, Disturbed, etc.) Asleep or Fatigued Has Been Drinking Alcohol Has Been Taking Illicit Drugs H as Been Taking Medications Other/Unknown N ot Applicable 105 92.9 0 0.0 1 0.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 1.8 1 0.9 0 0.0 4 3.5 0 0.0 Total 113 100.0 WORK AREA: County(16594721,16595071) - FILTER: Year('2019','2020','2021') - SPATIAL FILTER APPLIED Analyst: Adam Capets Report Generated 01/08/2023 Notes: MnCMAT 2.0.0 Page 2of2 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY Appendix C -SPEED LIMIT POLICY 4 CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY SPEED LIMIT POLICY PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND This document outlines policies for determining the speed limit on streets owned and maintained by the City of Lauderdale. This policy is being implemented to improve vehicle and pedestrian safety on streets within the City. The City of Lauderdale will address speed limit related concerns based upon guidelines from Minnesota Statues, Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) policies, Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD), and engineering judgement. The current speed limit on streets owned by the City of Lauderdale is 30 mph which is the statutory urban speed limit set by the Minnesota State Legislature. Changes to Minnesota Statutes Section 169.14 enacted on August 1, 2019 now allow Cities to establish speed limits on City streets under their jurisdiction on the statutory speed limits listed below: Minnesota Statutory Speed Limits: • 10 mph in alleys • 25 mph in residential roadways if adopted by the road authority having jurisdiction over the residential roadway • 30 mph on streets in urban districts • 35 mph in a rural residential district if adopted by the road authority having jurisdiction over the rural residential district ® 70 mph on rural interstate highways ® 65 mph on urban interstate highways or expressways • 55 mph on other roads The changes to the Statute grants Cities the authority to adopt a reduced speed limit of 25 mph on residential roadways under the jurisdiction. Additionally, the Statute grants Cities the authority to further reduce speed limits below 25 mph on roadways under their jurisdiction provided the City completes a technical evaluation per the procedures detailed in the State Statute. County- and State-owned streets and highways are not included in this authority. Speed limits adopted using the 2019 State Legislation would not be in effect unless the city erects signs designating the speed limit on the streets which the speed limit applies. i CITY OF LAUDERDALE SPEED LIMIT STUDY PROMURE TO SLT SPEED LIMIT ORS CITY STREIETS The primary citywide statutory speed limit in the City of Lauderdale is 30 mph based on Minnesota Statue Section 169.14 which granted the local road authority (City Council) with power to establish a reduced speed limit on a City -owned Street if the street in question meets the statutory requirements and the City Council adopts the reduced speed limit. The City Council may adopt a resolution implementing a Reduced Speed Limit of 20 mph on local City -owned Streets and 25 mph on collector or arterial City - owned Streets as recommended by the City of Lauderdale Speed Limit Study (2023). Gateway signs must be posted in accordance with MnMUTCD on all collector and arterial streets beyond the city boundary identifying the citywide 20 mph speed limit and indicating that the speed limit applies to all streets "unless otherwise posted" (as shown below). In addition, 25 mph speed limit signs must be posted in accordance with MnMUTCD on City -owned collector and arterial streets. Ramsey County and MnDOT roadways within the City of Lauderdale maintain their current posted speed limit. 1 l 1 CITYWIDE SPEED LIMIT UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED Gateway Sign (MnMUTCD R2-1, R2-5aP, and R2 -5P) SPEED L MIT I i 25 25 mph Sign (MnMUTCD R2-1) If a resident of the City would like to request a speed limit other than that currently authorized or posted on their street, they should send a formal request to the City Council. The request should identify the street name(s), the requested speed limit, the rationale for the request, and the contact information regarding the requestor. All requests will be referred to the City's Consultant Engineer to review and determine if the street in question meets the statutory requirements for a change. If the street meets the statutory requirements, and circumstances exist along the street that are clearly unique from other similar streets within the city, the request will be presented to the City Council for direction on further study and analysis. If authorized, the results of the study and analysis will be prepared and submitted to the City Council for final determination on the appropriate speed limit. If a speed limit change is approved by the City Council, the adopted speed limit will be effective upon the erection of appropriate signs designating the speed and indicating the beginning and end of the segment on which the speed limit is established. ii