Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04/12/2011
LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 7:30 P.M. TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 2011 LAUDERDALE CITY HALL, 1891 WALNUT STREET The City Council is meeting as a legislative body to conduct the business of the City according to Robert's Rules of Order and the Standing Rules of Order and Business of the City Council. Unless so ordered by the Mayor, citizen participation is limited to the times indicated and always within the prescribed rules of conduct for public input at meetings. 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL FIL&� 3. APPROVALS a. Agenda b. Minutes of the March 22, 2011, City Council Meeting c. Claims Totaling $80,948.63 4. CONSENT a. 2011 Rental Housing & HVAC Contractor Licenses b. PCIC Minutes 5. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS/RECOGNITIONS/PROCLAMATIONS 6. INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS / REPORTS a. Presentation of 2010 Audited Financial Statements by Andrew Berg —Abdo, Eick, and Meyers 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public hearings are conducted so that the public affected by a proposal may have input into the decision. During hearings all affected residents will be given an opportunity to speak pursuant to the Robert's Rules of Order and the standing rules of order and business of the City Council. 8. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEMS a. Acceptance of 2010 Audited Financial Statements b. Municipal Liquor Store Market Research — Consultant Paul Bilotta, Bonestroo c. Response to House of Representatives Redistricting Committee 9. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 10. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 11. SET AGENDA FOR NEXT MEETING a. Annual SWPPP Presentation — April 26 b. Walnut/lone Park Signage c. Bike Parking Grant Program d. March Finances and First Quarter Investment Report [P1IVAT D) 9114MT.Y. M,k a. Opportunity for the Public to Address the City Council Any member of the public may speak at this time on any item not on the agenda. In consideration for the public attending the meeting for specific items on the agenda, this portion of the meeting will be limited to fifteen (15) minutes. Individuals are requested to limit their comments to four (4) minutes or less. If the majority of the Council determines that additional time on a specific issue is warranted, then discussion on that issue shall be continued at the end of the agenda. Before addressing the City Council, members of the public are asked to step up to the microphone, give their name, address, and state the subject to be discussed. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to any member thereof. No person other than members of the Council and the person having the floor shall be permitted to enter any discussion without permission of the presiding officer. Your participation, as prescribed by the Robert's Rules of Order and the standing rules of order and business of the City Council, is welcomed and your cooperation is greatly appreciated. b. Budget Update and 2012-2013 Police Contract LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Lauderdale City Hall 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 Page l of 2 March 22, 2011 Mayor Dains called the City Council meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. Councilors present: Mary Gaasch, Roxanne Grove, Lara Mac Lean, and Mayor Jeff Dains. Councilor absent: Denise Hawkinson. Staff present: Heather Butkowski, City Administrator; Jim Bownik, Assistant to the City Administrator. Mayor Dains asked for changes to the meeting agenda. Butkowski noted that she will set up a meeting with business owners to review the Municipal Liquor Store Market Study after the April 12 meeting. Councilor Mac Lean moved to approve the agenda as amended. Councilor Grove seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Councilor Gaasch moved to approve the March S, 2011, City Council meeting minutes. Councilor Mac Lean seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Councilor Mac Lean moved approval of the claims totaling $37,663.26. Councilor Gaasch seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Mayor Dains asked if councilors wished to remove items from the consent agenda. There being no one, Councilor Mac Lean moved the consent agenda items: 2011 HVAC and tree contractors licenses, tile maintenance project by Dalco Inc., street sweeping by Mike McPhillips, Inc., and a financial update for January and February. Councilor Grove seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. State Representative Mindy Greiling and State Senator John Marty addressed the Council. They discussed bills being drafted in the House and Senate that would impact the City and residents, such as cuts to education, health and human services, and local government aid. The deadline for budget bills to be passed out of committee was March 25, so the legislature will begin working on policy bills. The Council took a five minute break. Mayor Dains said that Councilor Gaasch, City Administrator Butkowski, and he had attended the House Property Tax Committee meeting where testimony was taken from city officials regarding proposed cuts to local government aid. He also mentioned city officials would be attending the annual legislative conference for cities, counties, towns, and school districts that week. LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Lauderdale City Hall 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 Page 2 of 2 Butkowski said Bonestroo completed the municipal liquor store market research and would be at the April 12 meeting to review the analysis. Councilor Hawkinson suggested the group tour 2417 Larpenteur (the Union Hall) as it is for sale. The Council proposed touring the facility at 9:00 a.m. on March 31 if the realtor was able to show it then. Staff will confirm the time and date and post notice at City Hall. Butkowski reviewed the preliminary agenda for the next meeting, which included the police contract, 2012 budget, municipal liquor store market research, and the annual SWPPP presentation on April 26. Mayor Dains explained the Council was moving into the work session. Work sessions are a continuation of the meetings but not aired on community television. Mayor Dains asked if anyone in attendance wished to address the Council. No one present wished to do so. Butkowski presented a draft 2012 budget based on recent legislative proposals. She said the first House proposal would have resulted in a 36% reduction in revenue. The draft budget was based on a 23% reduction, based on a revised House proposal. The numbers will continue to change until the legislature and governor agree on a budget. Overall, what the numbers and legislative arguments show is that state aids and credits will continue to be volatile and the City has to look for ways to weather the volatility. The City Council discussed the significant and unsettling impact the legislative proposals would have on the City. The proposed budget prepared by staff cut all non -mandates city services including the deputy clerk position, city events, warming house staffing, park and rec programming, and the city newsletter. Even with these cuts, the budget gap for 2012 was $34,000 and $163,000 for 2013. The Council discussed the options available to the City in the long -run including consolidation, reduction in public safety services, a municipal liquor store to generate revenue, and selling of assets. Further discussion and decision making will happen as aid cuts are finalized. There being no further business on the council agenda, Councilor Mac Lean moved to adjourn the meeting. Councilor Grove seconded the motion and it carried. The meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, f a r t. f` Heather Butkows i City Administrator CITY OF LAUDERDALE CLAIMS FOR APPROVAL April 12, 2011 City Council Meeting Payroll 04/01/11 Payroll: Direct Deposit .# 501152-501155 04/01/11 Payroll: Payroll Liabilities, e -payments 539E-541 E Vendor Claims 04/12/11 Claims: Check #'s 20673-20693 $5,933.50 $5,513.01 $69,502.121 SUBTOTAL $80,948.631 Total Claims for Approval $80,948.63 CITY OF LAUDERDALE 04/06/11 2:08 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: APRIL 2011 Batch Name 040111pyroll Payment Computer Dollar Amt $5,513.01 Posted Refer 1973 ICMA_RE_TIREMENT TRUST - 457 Ck# 000539E 4/1/2011 Cash Payment G 101-21705 ICMA RETIREMENT 4/1/11 payroll $1,821.30 Invoice Transaction Date 4/6/2011 Due 0 NORTH STAR CHEC 10100 Total $1,821.30 Refer 1974 NORTH STAR BANK, CHECKING S Ck# 000540E 4/1/2011 Cash Payment G 101-21703 FICA WITHHOLDING. 4/1/11 payroll $1,408.18 Invoice Cash Payment G 101-21701 FEDERAL TAXES 4/1/11 payroll $918.47 Invoice Transaction Date 4/6/2011 Due 0 NORTH STAR CHEC 10100 Total $2,326.65 Refer 1975 PERA Cash Payment G 101-21704 PERA Invoice Transaction Date 4/6/2011 Ck# 000541 E 4/1/2011 4/1/11 payroll Due 0 NORTH STAR CHEC 10100 Fund Summary BATCH Total 10100 NORTH STAR CHECKING 101 $5,513.01 $5,513.01 Pre -Written Checks $5,513.01 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $0.00 Total $5,513.01 Total $1,365.06 $1,365.06 $5,513.01 CITY OF LAUDERDALE *Check Detail Register© APRIL 2011 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 NORTH STAR CHECKING Paid Chk# 020673 4/12/2011 AMERICAN MESSAGING E 101-43000-391 TELEPHONE/PAGERS $52.19 4/11-3/12 pw pager E 602-49100-391 TELEPHONE/PAGERS $26.08 4/11-3/12 pw pager E 601-49000-391 TELEPHONE/PAGERS $26.08 4/11-3/12 pw pager Total AMERICAN MESSAGING $104.35 Paid Chk# 020674 4/12/2011 BONESTROO E 101-48100-306 CONSULTING FEES $1,584.07 liquor store market research Total BONESTROO $1,584.07 Paid Chk# 020675 4/12/2011 BUTKOWSKI, HEATHER E 101-41200-331 TRAVEL EXPENSE $103.33 HB 1811 mileage Total BUTKOWSKI, HEATHER $103.33 Paid Chk# 020676 4/12/2011 CINTAS E 602-49100-425 CLOTHING $57.45 pw clothing E 601-49000-425 CLOTHING $57.45 pw clothing Total CINTAS $114.90 rPaid Chk# 020677 4/12/2011 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS E 101-42100-321 FIRE CALLS $1,781.04 3/11 fire calls Total CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS $1,781.04 Paid Chk# 020678 4/12/2011 CITY OF ROSEVILLE E 101-41200-391 TELEPHONE/PAGERS $95.40 4/11 phone services E 101-41200-306 CONSULTING FEES $453.33 4/11 IT services Total CITY OF ROSEVILLE $548.73 Paid Chk# 020679 4/12/2011 CITY OF ST ANTHONY�� E 101-42100-319 POLICE CONTRACT $49,180.58 4/11 police services Total CITY OF ST ANTHONY $49,180.58 Paid Chk# 020680 4/12/2011 CROIX OIL E 601-49000-212 MOTOR FUELS $39.58 3/11 motor fuels E 101-43000-212 MOTOR FUELS $184.69 3/11 motor fuels E 602-49100-212 MOTOR FUELS $39.57 3/11 motor fuels Total CROIX OIL $263.84 Paid Chk# 020681 4/12/2011 EUREKA RECYCLING E 101-41200-201 GENERAL SUPPLIES $90.53 2 cartons paper Total EUREKA RECYCLING $90.53 Paid Chk# 020682 4/12/2011-GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD�� E 101-41200-208 WATER DELIVERY $73.36 3/11 water cooler and water Total GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD $73.36 Paid Chk# 020683 4/12/2011 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL E 101-43400-386 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL $13.15 3/11 locates CITY OF LAUDERDALE *Check Detail Register© APRIL 2011 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL $13.15 Paid Chk# 020684 4/12/2011 KONICA MINOLTA E 101-41200-401 COPIER CONTRACT $230.39 4/11 copier contract Total KONICA MINOLTA $230.39 Paid Chk# 020685 4/12/2011 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWS E 602-49100-352 PUBLIC INFO NOTICES $40.50 3/11 stormwater notice E 101-41100-352 PUBLIC INFO NOTICES $369.00 City Council Ordinance Total LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWS $409.50 Paid Chk# 020686 4/12/2011 MET -COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER. E 601-49000-387 WATER TREATMENT SERVICE $11,217.61 5/11 wastewater treatment otal MET -COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER. $11,217.61 Paid Chk# 020687 4/12/2011 MINNESOTA CONWAY E 101-43000-327 OTHER SERV- SEWER/NPDES 1 $125.13 '11 fire extinguisher inspection Total MINNESOTA CONWAY $125.13 Paid Chk# 020688 4/12/2011 MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY _ _'_ ____' E 101-43400-442 MISC $25.00 building official license Total MN DEPT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY $25.00 Paid Chk# 020689 4/12/2011 * POSTMASTER -STAMPS E 101-41200-203 POSTAGE $88.00 3 rolls stamps E 101-43400-203 POSTAGE $44.00 3 rolls stamps Total POSTMASTER - STAMPS $132.00 Paid Chk# 020690 4/12/2011 RAMSEY COUNTY, PROP REC & REV E 101-41200-355 MISC PRINTING/PROCESS SER $20.00 4/11 insurance benefits G 101-21706 HEALTH INSURANCE $378.74 4/11 insurance benefits E 101-42100-318 911 Dispatch $2,405.10 Jan, Feb, & March 911 dispatch E 101-42100-442 MISC $17.92 800 MHz radio licenses Total RAMSEY COUNTY, PROP REC. & REV $2,821.76 Paid Chk# 020691 4/12/2011 WASTE MANAGEMENT E 101-43000-384 REFUSE DISPOSAL $152.81 4/11 garbage service Total WASTE MANAGEMENT $152.81 Paid Chk# 020692 M4/12/2011 XCEL ENERGY, CITY HALL E 101-43000-381 ELECTRIC $208.09 3/11 City Hall electric E 101-43000-383 GAS UTILITIES $277.84 3/11 City Hall gas Total XCEL ENERGY, CITY HALL $485.93 Paid Chk# 0206934/12/2011 XCEL ENERGY, STREET LIGHTING E 101-43000-380 STREET LIGHT UTILITY $44.11 3/11 bridge lights Total XCEL ENERGY, STREET LIGHTING $44.11 10100 NORTH STAR CHECKING $69,502.12 CITY OF LAUDERDALE *Check Detail Register© APRIL 2011 Check Amt Invoice Comment Fund Summary 10100 NORTH STAR CHECKING 101 GENERAL $57,997.80 601 SEWER UTILITIES $11,340.72 602 STORM SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND $163.60 $69,502.12 LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM TYPE OF REQUEST Consent X Action ❑ Resolution ❑ Information ❑ Work session ❑ MEETING DATE April 12, 2011 AGENDA NUMBER 2011 Licenses DESCRIPTION 2011 Licenses BACKGROUND OR PAST COUNCIL ACTION The following applicants successfully met the criteria for their respective licenses. HVAC KB Service Co. — Little Canada Rental Housing Real Time Leasing — 2367 Larpenteur Avenue Tradewinds Properties — 1707 Carl Street Tree Contractor OPTIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION By approving the consent agenda, the Council approves the aforementioned licenses for 2011. COUNCIL ACTION MOTION BY SECOND STAFF ACTION ACTION REQUESTED Consent X LAUDERDALE COUNCIL MEETING DATE April 12, 2011 Special Public Hearing ITEM NUMBER PCIC Minutes Report Discussion/Action STAFF INITIAL Jim Resolution Work session APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Attached are the minutes from the Park & Community Involvement Committee meeting of April 4, 2011. OPTIONS: 1) Approve as consent item. 2) Remove from consent for discussion. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to acknowledge receipt of and placing on file the attached minutes of the Park & Community Involvement Committee. COUNCIL ACTION: 4/4/11 PCIC Minutes MINUTES MONDAY, APRIL 4, 2011 PARK & COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT COMMITTEE 1. CALL TO ORDER 6:31 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Members Present: Trygve Hansen, Monica Gallagher, Peiju Picard Members Absent: Staff & Council Present: Jim Bownik, Heather Butkowski, Roxanne Grove Others Present: Bob Milligan 3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Gallagher motioned to approve the minutes, second by Picard. Motion carried unanimously. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JANUARY 10, 2011 MEETING Gallagher motioned to approve the minutes, second by Picard. Motion carried unanimously. 5. REPORTS Butkowski provided an overview of the city's budget and how cuts to Local Government Aid (LGA) have affected the city's bottom line, and what further cuts may mean for city events and park capital improvement projects. Butkowski discussed other areas that could also be affected by cuts such as the deputy clerk position and the police contract. Butkowski informed the committee that the city is researching the possibility of a municipal liquor to generate more revenue. Gallagher said she warmed up to the idea of a municipal liquor store after hearing how it could help the city's financial situation. Hansen suggested developing a core business area along Larpenteur Avenue. B. Playground Improvements Phase II Bownik informed the committee that the council adopted a resolution in February, authorizing staff to submit a request for $31,312.43 in grant funds from Ramsey County for the playground. Bownik said County Staff has recommended full funding for Lauderdale's project. However, we will have to wait until May 10th to see if the County Board approves it, The County is also waiting to learn if the program will receive full funding this year. They are anticipating a 25% cut. 1 4/4/11 PCIC Minutes C. Snow*Commotion Wrap Up Bownik provided a summary of the event. Gallagher mentioned that one of the sleds in the cardboard sled race was constructed with a wood frame, which made things treacherous for other sledders. Bownik said he would talk to Pastor Dave about the rules for next year. Bownik also mentioned that a video of the event is on the city's website for those that were not able to attend. 6. DISCUSSION/ACTION A. Garage Sale Planning #1/1 Bownik updated the committee on plans for the event. Bownik stated that the event is streamlined and standard from year to year. Bownik will contact Moose Giannetti about advertising again on the back of the flyer. Hansen volunteered to prepare sandwich board signs. B. Music Under the Trees Series Planning #1/2 Milligan provided an update on plans for the event. The Fairlanes will perform Monday, June 13, and the Roseville Community Band will perform Monday, July 11. Both performances will be at 7:30 p.m. If Schwan's will not provide the frozen treats again this year, the committee agreed not to have treats in order to save money and staff time. Hansen informed the committee he had to leave, but Vice -Chair Gallagher would conclude the meeting. C. PCIC Member's Guide The committee reviewed changes to the Member's Guide. Gallagher suggested changing the word "spirit" in the mission statement to something more measurable. Bownik reviewed the new additions to the Member's Guide including the parks related sections of the Comprehensive Plan, City Budget, and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). D. Committee Bylaws Bownik reviewed the draft bylaw revisions including changing the way meetings are run from Robert's Rules of Order to the Consensus Process. Gallagher said she liked the Consensus suggestion, and recommended approval of the proposed changes. Bownik said he will ask the city attorney to review the draft before asking the council for approval. 7. OTHER BUSINESS 2 4/4/11 PCIC Minutes 8. SET PRELIMINARY AGENDA FOR NEXT MEETING Gallagher read the preliminary agenda for the next meeting. 9. SET DATE FOR NEXT MEETING The committee meets on Mondays at 6:30 p.m. The next meeting will be Monday, June 6 at 6:30 p.m. 10. ADJOURNMENT Gallagher adjourned the meeting at 8:06 p.m. 3 LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action X Resolution Work Session Meeting Date April 12, 2011 ITEM NUMBER 2010 Audit Report STAFF INITIAL APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Andy Berg, audit manager at Abdo, Eick, and Meyers, will be at the meeting to report on the City's 2010 audit. A copy of the audit is included with your packet. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to accept the 2010 audit findings and financial statements as prepared by Abdo, Eick, and Meyers. COUNCIL ACTION: LAUDERDALE COUNCIL E: I ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date April 12, 2011 ITEM NUMBER Liquor Store Market Research STAFF INITIAL APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: As you already know, Bonestroo completed the market research study. Paul will be at the meeting to discuss it in greater detail with the Council. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: COUNCIL ACTION: 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonesVoo.com March 9, 2011 Ms. Heather Butkowski City Administrator City of Lauderdale 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 Re: Liquor store market study findings Dear Heather: Bonestroo evaluated the market potential for a new municipal liquor store located in Lauderdale. Based on the location of Lauderdale, the spending potential among trade area households and workers, and the distribution of competitive liquor stores within three miles of Lauderdale, we believe there is sufficient demand to support a liquor store in the range of 4,000 to 6,000 square feet. Our findings are based on the following analyses: Evaluation of Lauderdale Commercial District Commercial enterprises in Lauderdale are concentrated along a two block stretch of Larpenteur Avenue between Eustis Street and Highway 280. Within this area, there are a small number of successful businesses, such as the BP gas station and convenience store, Finn Sisu, and the Lauderdale Wellness Center. Although the area is not generally considered a primary commercial district, it would be an appropriate location for a liquor store because liquor stores are more destination oriented and typically do not require complementary businesses to support sales. Below are the strengths of the district as well some challenges that would need to be considered should a liquor store be developed in the district. Strengths • Centrally located within the metropolitan region • .Excellent access to the regional highway system with nearby Highway 280 Weaknesses • There is no defining character to the commercial district • There are only a modest number of businesses, which makes it difficult to achieve a critical mass of activity sonestroo City of Lauderdale Liquor Store Market Study Page 2 March 9, 2011 • The current mix of businesses appears to have very little in common and do not necessarily complement one another • Commercial properties generally front Larpenteur Avenue, which, at times, does not have a clear definition between the vehicular right-of-way, the pedestrian right-of-way, and private property • Non-commercial uses abut many of the commercial properties; therefore, it will be difficult to create opportunities through property acquisition and expansion • Small lot sizes and depth can limit the commercial potential for some users Traffic Patterns Customers would likely use Larpenteur/East Hennepin Avenue to access a liquor store. Larpenteur/East Hennepin is a major east -west thoroughfare that carries approximately 15,600 vehicles per day. To the east, Larpenteur primarily serves residential neighborhoods in Falcon Heights, Roseville, and the north western portions Saint Paul. Although there are important commercial nodes along the corridor, it is also characterized by residential uses, especially multifamily housing, and significant institutional uses, including large open spaces, such as the University of Minnesota's golf course and their experimental agricultural fields. To the west, Larpenteur Avenue becomes East Hennepin Avenue and it mostly serves a large industrial district known as the Mid -City Industrial Area. East Hennepin, however, does provide direct and convenient access to Downtown Minneapolis that is an alternative to Interstates 94 and 35W. Traveling north -south through the commercial district is not as straightforward as traveling east -west. Eustis is the only north -south local street that connects to other important roadways, such as Como Avenue, which is about 1/2 mile south of Larpenteur. A more important north -south thoroughfare is Highway 280. There is a full interchange at Larpenteur/East Hennepin that was recently improved in the wake of the Interstate 35W bridge collapse. After years of being a difficult and somewhat treacherous interchange, the interchange is now significantly improved. Highway 280 connects with Interstate 35W and Highway 36 to the north and Interstate 94 to the south. This makes the Lauderdale area one of the most convenient and centrally located in the entire Twin Cities. The most recent MnDOT traffic counts for Highway 280 are 49,500 vehicles per day south of Larpenteur Avenue and 38,000 vehicles per day north of Larpenteur Avenue. Although these figures are from 2008, MnDOT warns that they may still be impacted by the Interstate 35W bridge collapse and reconstruction of the Larpenteur/East Hennepin bridge over Highway 280. However, looking at the pre -collapse traffic counts (2005), there were still 48,000 vehicles per day south of Larpenteur and 43,000 north; so it is expected traffic counts will stabilize at 45,000-50,000 vehicles per day. City of Lauderdale Page 3 Liquor Store Market Study March 9, 2011 2008-2009 Traffic Volumes Minnesota Department of Transportation Competitive Review Bonestroo identified liquor stores within a three mile radius of Lauderdale to better understand the distribution of competitive stores, their position in the market place, and the potential trade area for a store located in Lauderdale. Not all of the stores identified would be considered competitive with a Lauderdale store. For example, some stores, though somewhat proximate to Lauderdale, have very small trade areas because of a dense concentration of residents and workers nearby or because of poor access. This is clearly the case for the two stores that primarily serve the University area as well as the small specialty shop located in the heart of the St. Anthony Park neighborhood. On the other end of the spectrum are stores that have a very broad trade area that likely extends to the entire metro area. These are stores that have a strong reputation and aggressively market themselves. Examples of this include Surdyk's and the Cellars. The following map and Table 1 provide information on the most competitive stores. t, p City of Lauderdale Page 4 Liquor Store Market Study March 9, 2011 Liquor Stores Near Lauderdale Lauderdale Liquor Store Market Study N WE 4,500 0 4,500 Feet S Subject Site Liquor Store Locations Trunk Highways ---- Other Roads 1 and 3 Mile Buffer from Site March 9, 2011 City BoundariesBonestroo _ ____ Open Water I:\532\532110000\GIS\Projectsmiquor stores.mxd City of Lauderdale Page 5 Liquor Store Market Study March 9, 2011 Table 1: Competitive Liquor Stores in and near the Lauderdale Trade Area Little Wine Shoppe Distance 2236 Carter Ave building in a primarily residential area. Very small St. Paul, MN 55108 trade area. J's Liquors 1.75 mi 3,700 13 Poor 37,500 Excellent visibility, but poor access from Parking Traffic 1.9 mi 1,500 4 Poor 27,000 Located at a highly recognizable corner; LRT Name/Location Lauderdale Size Spaces Access Counts Comments Little Wine Shoppe 0.8 mi 400 3 Poor 7,600 Small, specialty store tucked into a low visibility 2236 Carter Ave building in a primarily residential area. Very small St. Paul, MN 55108 trade area. J's Liquors 1.75 mi 3,700 13 Poor 37,500 Excellent visibility, but poor access 1559 Larpenteur Ave Falcon Heights, MN 55113 Sharret's Liquors 1.9 mi 1,500 4 Poor 27,000 Located at a highly recognizable corner; LRT 2389 University Ave construction will Beverly impact access for up to St. Paul, MN 55114 four years St. Anthony Village Wine & Spirits 1.9 mi 9,100 60 Good 11,500 Trade area strongly skewed to the west toward St. 2700 Highway 88 Anthony and northeast Mpls. Over $3.6 million in St. Anthony, MN 55418 sales in 2010. Snelling Liquors 2.0 mi 2,600 10 Poor 37,500 High visibility from Snelling Ave, but poor access 2217 Snelling Ave Roseville, MN 55113 Fairview Wine & Spirits 2.2 mi 5,000 10 Excellent 17,500 Location lacks a retail feel as many neighboring 2579 Fairview Ave uses low end office or industrial flex space Roseville, MN 55113 Rainbow Foods Liquors 2.6 mi 4,000 NA Excellent 15,700 Primarily captures grocery store shoppers 1201 Larpenteur Ave Roseville, MN 55113 MGM Liquor Warehouse 2.7 mi 10,000 45 Excellent 15,700 High-profile chain with large selection 1102 Larpenteur Ave St. Paul, MN 55108 A liquor store located in Lauderdale would compete well with these existing stores. First, there is only one store located within one mile of Lauderdale, and that is a very small, highly specialized store that, due to its location, almost exclusively serves the immediate vicinity of the St. Anthony Park neighborhood. In all probability, many of the residents of the St. Anthony Park neighborhood would more readily frequent a Lauderdale liquor store if it carried a wide selection of products and was easy to access. Second, other nearby competitive stores have challenges as well. Sharret's and Snelling Liquors tend to be smaller than average, and, along with J's Liquors, have poor vehicle access that can be a deterrent to shoppers who value convenience. This leaves only one store located within two miles of Lauderdale that would be directly competitive, which is St. Anthony Village Wine & Spirits at the intersection of New Brighton Blvd and Kenzie Terrace. This store is also a municipal liquor store. Moreover, the store's annual report for 2010 indicated that it tallied more than $3.6 million in sales with over 160,000 individual transactions. This is a very high volume of sales, suggesting that the store is capturing sales from beyond a typical two-mile trade area. City of Lauderdale Page 6 Liquor Store Market Study March 9, 2011 Third, with nearly 16,000 cars along Larpenteur Avenue and another 40,000 to 50,000 along Highway 280, the Larpenteur commercial district enjoys excellent visibility that is equal to many of the nearby competitive liquor stores. Trade Area Based on the location of competitive stores, the trade area for a Lauderdale liquor store would roughly be the area bounded by Highway 36 and Interstate 35W on the north and west, the BNSF railroad on the south, and Snelling and Fairview Avenues on the east. Below is a map of the trade area. Within this area, there is only one existing liquor store, the small shop in the heart of the St. Anthony Park neighborhood. We would expect the majority of sales at a Lauderdale liquor store would come from residents and workers within this area. The map on the following page displays the trade area. Demographics Because the trade area has been fully developed for decades, support for a new liquor store will come primarily from existing households and workers who will consider a Lauderdale location to be more convenient and superior compared to where they currently purchase off -sale liquor. According to the Metropolitan Council, there were approximately 7,500 households and 27,000 workers in the trade area as of 2010. Although the trade area is fully developed, the Metropolitan Council anticipates that the trade area will increase by nearly 600 households and 2,600 workers by 2030. This will be due primarily to the redevelopment of underutilized properties in the trade area. Nonetheless, it suggests that the spending potential of the trade area will likely continue to grow rather than decline in the coming years. Table 2: Trade Area Households and Workers 2010-2030 Source: Metropolitan Council The age distribution of the trade area population is heavily skewed toward college-age persons. This is due primarily to the proximity of the University of Minnesota. As of 2009, over 19 percent of the trade area's population was between the ages of 20 and 24. This is in stark contrast to Ramsey and Hennepin Counties, in which 8 and 7 percent of the population is between the ages of 20 and 24, respectively. 2010 2020 2030 Chane 2010-2030 Number Percent Households 7,531 7,886 8,126 595 7.9% Workers 26,994 28,373 29,608 2,614 9.7% Source: Metropolitan Council The age distribution of the trade area population is heavily skewed toward college-age persons. This is due primarily to the proximity of the University of Minnesota. As of 2009, over 19 percent of the trade area's population was between the ages of 20 and 24. This is in stark contrast to Ramsey and Hennepin Counties, in which 8 and 7 percent of the population is between the ages of 20 and 24, respectively. City of Lauderdale Page 7 Liquor Store Market Study March 9, 2011 Lauderdale Liquor Store Trade Area Lauderdale Liquor Store Market Study N W E 0.5 0 0.5 Miles S 19 Subject Site Liquor Store Locations Trade Area Boundary 1 Mile Buffer from Site City Boundaries March 9, 2011 * Bonestroo 1:15321532110000iGISlProjectS\trade area.mxd q f e j City of Lauderdale Page 8 Liquor Store Market Study March 9, 2011 Table 3: Age Distribution of the Population 2009 Trade Area, Ramsey County, Hennepin County - 4 Trade Area Ramse County Henne in County A e Group Pop. I Dist. Pop. Dist. Pop. I Dist. 0 - 4 1,240 5.6% 35,693 7.1% 79,751 7.0% 5 - 9 825 3.7% 30,573 6.1% 67,761 6.0% 10-14 812 3.7% 31,139 6.2% 69,799 6.1% 115- 19 1.m s° ° - 6.4% 25-34 4,2731 3,647 19.2% 16.4% 38,855 76-18-1-2- 7.8% 15.3% 77 622 187,606 6. 16.5% ° 35-44 2,361 10.6% 63,999 12.8% 165,668 14.6% 45 - 54 2,242 10.1% 71 247 14.2% 172,501 15.2% 55-64 2,362 10.6% 51,554 10.3% 118,367 10.4% 65-74 1,194 5.4% 29,757 5.9% 60,185 5.3% 75-84 940 4.2% 23,314 4.7% 43,769 3.9% 85+ 5621 2.5% 11,106 2.2% 20,725 1.8% Total 22.246r 100.0% 500,436 100.0% 1,136,224 100.0% Source: US Census, 2005-2009 American Community Survey The prominence of younger households in the Trade Area is reflected in household incomes, which tend to be lower than those of Ramsey and Hennepin Counties. Table 4: Household Income 2009 Trade Area, Ramsey County, Hennepin County Median Household Income Average Household Income Trade Area $47,568 $67,368 Ramsey County $52,329 $70,164 Hennepin County 61,387 $84,682 Source: US Census, 2005-2009 American Community Survey Liquor Store Demand Calculation Based on the number of trade area households, workers, and their incomes, Bonestroo calculated the spending potential on alcohol and the amount needed to be captured to support a new store. The calculations take into consideration that not all area households or workers would purchase their alcohol at a new Lauderdale liquor store. Table 5 on the following page illustrates the methodology we used to calculate the potential size of a new store. City of Lauderdale Page 9 Liquor Store Market Study March 9, 2011 Table 5: Estimated Size of New Lauderdale Municipal Liquor Store Households in Lauderdale Trade Areal Z 7,531 (times) Average Trade Area Household Income x $67,368 (equals) Aggregate Trade Area Household Income = $507,348,408 (times) Percent of Trade Area Household Income Spent on Alcoholic Beverages^ x 0.70% (minus) Decrease in Spending by Trade Area Residents That Purchase Alcohol Outside of Trade Areas 50% (equals) Trade Area Household Spending Potential for Alcohol = 1,768,10 Number of Workers in Lauderdale Trade Areal Z 26,994 (times) Average Annual Income per Worker in Trade Area x $57,044 (equals) Aggregate Annual Income of Workers in Trade Area = $1,539,845,736 (times) Percent of Trade Area Worker Income Spent on Alcoholic Beverages4 x 0.70% (times) Proportion of Trade Area Worker Income Spent in Trade Area on Alcohol x 10% (equals) Potential Trade Area Worker Income Spent in Trade Area on Alcohol = $1,073,27 (equals) Total Spending Potential on Alcohol from Trade Area Residents and Workers = $2,841,38 (plus) Increase in Spending Potential from by drive-by Traffic + 10% (equals) Aggregate Spending by Trade Area Residents, Trade Area Workers, and Drive-by Traffic = $3,125,520 (divide by) Sales per Square Foots - $400 1 Metropolitan Council estimates and forecasts by TAZ, January 2008 Z Trade area includes the followinq TAZs: 416-422, 913-917, and 971-972 3 Based on US Census: American Community Survey, 2005-2009 4 US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics: Average Annual Expenditures and Characteristics, Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2009, Midwest States 5 Also known as leakage 6 Mn DEED, QCEW 3rd Quarter 2010, City of Minneapolis In urban markets, sites with superior visibility, high traffic counts, and convenient access can sometimes generate a significant portion of sales from drive-by traffic or those who live or work near but outside the Trade Area. This proportion can sometimes exceed 50% of sales. However, in the interest of being conservative, we have limited this proportion to a small percentage. 8 Based on Annual Sales Figures at other Municipal Liquor Stores City of Lauderdale Page 10 Liquor Store Market Study March 9, 2011 Conclusions Based on calculated demand, we believe there is sufficient spending potential in the trade area to support a new Lauderdale liquor store. Furthermore, we believe the commercial district in Lauderdale would be a good location to capture a significant proportion of the calculated demand for a number of reasons: 1. The general lack of directly competitive stores within one -mile of Lauderdale, especially in the employment district just west of Highway 280 2. The proximity of Highway 280 to provide easy access for potential customers who live outside of the Trade Area 3. The potential to provide excellent local access from Larpenteur Avenue with a controlled intersection at Eustis Street and the new interchange at Highway 280 Although our calculations indicate that support exists for up to an 8,000 square foot store, we strongly caution against trying to capture that large a proportion of the market. First, such a large store would create a set of challenges from a development perspective that could be avoided with a slightly smaller store (e.g., parking spaces, traffic impacts, lot size, etc.). Second, most stores rarely capture all of the market unless there are no competitive stores. This is an urban area with lots of choices, and the competition will be constantly upgrading and improving themselves in the interest of increasing market share. We are therefore projecting a 4,000-6,000 square foot store which will still be large enough to provide a full range of product in order to compete with the St. Anthony Store. As for the market position of a new store, we would suggest designing a full-service store that doesn't try to cater too much to any particular specialty or clientele. A new Lauderdale store will likely tap a variety of demographic groups and incomes, from younger college students to family households in Roseville and St. Anthony Park to middle income workers in nearby industrial districts. This would be mean offering a wide, well -stocked selection in each liquor category (i.e., beer, wine, and hard liquor). When selecting a site, if at all possible, we would suggest a store located in a manner that can take full advantage of capturing workers on their way home to work with convenient access points. If a site could be secured with visibility from Highway 280, either the building itself or through prominent signage, the store would be expected to generate larger drive-by sales. Heather, if you have any questions or concerns about the study, please let me know. I can be reached directly at 651-967-4551. Sincerely, Jay Demma Project Manager in charge of market research LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion X Action X Resolution Work Session Meeting Date April 12, 2011 ITEM NUMBER Redistricting Response STAFF INITIAL APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: State representatives Sarah Anderson and Mary Murphy are asking for feedback prior to be- ginning their work on redistricting. I presume the Council wants to remain in a legislative district with Roseville and I highlighted some reasons why. If you have any other ideas or comments for the letter, let me know before the meeting. I can then have the updated version ready for the council meeting. OPTIONS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: COUNCIL ACTION: Sarah Anderson State.Representative District 43A Redistricting Chair March 18, 2011 Heather Butkowski 1891 Walnut St Lauderdale, MN 55113-5137 Dear Heather, Mary Murphy State Representative District 6B Redistricting DFL Lead Over the past several weeks, the House Redistricting committee has traveled the state and taken public input. We appreciate those leaders from several county, city and township associations that were able to take the time to come testify before the committee. We wanted to take this opportunity to make sure all local officials have the opportunity to submit any input or express any concerns they may have to the committee. If any local officials or community members were not able to participate at the public hearings there is still time to submit in writing, your ideas, opinions or concerns to the committee. If you have any specific concerns over how your local legislative boundaries have impacted your communities, we would greatly appreciate any input you may have. It is also important to note that our offices are open for any questions you have as this important redistricting process moves forward. Our collective goal is to produce a fair plan and map for the entire state through the legislative process. We look forward to hearing from you in the near future. If you have any questions or concerns on this matter please do not hesitate to contact either of us at any time. Sincerely, ,j4.j& OJ4-4� Sarah Anderson Redistricting Chair Representative 43A 549 State Office Building 100 MLK Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155 651-296-5511 rep. sarah. andersonnhouse.nm rte. Mary Murphy Redistricting DFL Lead Representative 6B 343 State Office Building 100 MLK Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155 651-296-2676 rep.maU.murphy a,house.mn i 1i �0 1 �i April 12, 2011 State Representative Sarah Anderson 549 State Office Building 100 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155 Dear Representative Anderson, CITY OF LAUDERDALE LAUDERDALE CITY HALL 1891 WALNUT STREET LAUDERDALE, MN 55113 651-792-7650 651-631-2066 FAX On behalf of the Lauderdale City Council, I thank you,for requesting feedback regarding the upcoming redistricting process. We have three concerns that we would like you to take note of as the redistricting process moves ahead. First, Lauderdale is a small city, so we kindly ask that the City not be split into more than one legislative district. The City currently has one voting precinct and splitting us into multiple districts will increase our election costs. Next, Lauderdale is bordered by the cities of Roseville, Falcon Heights, St. Paul, and Minneapolis. As a city with a population of 2,379, it is not difficult to understand that Lauderdale has more in common with its suburban neighbors of Roseville and Falcon Heights than St. Paul and Minneapolis. We ask to remain part of a legislative grouping with Roseville as apposed to being a small sliver of a district dominated by one of the first-class cities. Finally, from the City's inception it has been part of the Roseville School District. The school connection has created strong community ties between Lauderdale and Roseville. We feel it does not make sense to remove Lauderdale from a legislative district that represents the rest of the school district. Thank you for gathering our input. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or city staff at 651.792.7650. Sincerely, Jeffrey Dains Lauderdale Mayor LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent Public Hearing Discussion Action Resolution Work Session X Meeting Date April 12, 2011 ITEM NUMBER Police Contract STAFF INITIAL APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: The legislature hasn't produced any new LGA figures. A summary of the most current bills is attached. Per the Senate proposal, the City would receive approximately what was budg- eted for this year. Per the House proposal, the City would receive its full certified LGA amount of $616,831 for 2011 and then take a cut in 2012. I don't put much stock in these numbers as the legislature proposes new budget solving bills daily. Since the last meeting I spoke with Mike Mornson and Chief Ohl. They are sympathetic to the City's situation but glad the City wants to work with them on an alternative arrangement instead of dropping the police contract entirely. The current contract says either city must notify the other city if it does not intend to renew the contract by April 15, otherwise a new agreement must be reached by June 15. The con- tract doesn't say what happens if the cities can't reach an agreement by mid-June. I asked city attorney, Ron Batty, if he thought we should be concerned. In short, he said yes. He was concerned the City would presume an agreement would be reached but with the legisla- ture in session there are still a number of unknowns. He questioned whether the City would be obligated to continue under the old contract for another year if a new agreement wasn't in place. Justin Miller and I went back and forth on the issue. The ideal would be to move the April 15 termination deadline to June 15 (the contract renewal deadline). Falcon Heights plans to ask for that and St. Anthony seems willing. The attached letter makes the same request from Lauderdale with the caveat that if the deadline is not extended, the City is providing notice of termination. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Consider whether the Council would like staff to send the letter. If so, the Council should make a motion to that effect. COUNCIL ACTION: i April 13, 2011 Michael Mornson City of St. Anthony 3301 Silver Lake Road St. Anthony, MN 55418 Dear Michael, CITY OF LAUDERDALE LAUDERDALE CITY HALL 1891 WALNUT STREET LAUDERDALE, MN 55113 651-792-7650 651-631-2066 FAx The Lauderdale City Council reviewed the proposed 2012-2013 policing costs. They appreciate St. Anthony City Council's efforts to minimize cost increases knowing that Lauderdale is greatly impacted by the on-going cuts and changes to state aids and credits. The Lauderdale City Council continues to review the numbers coming out of the Capitol and they lead to one conclusion, the City has to achieve a greater level of self-sufficiency so that every budget cycle doesn't hinge on last-minute legislative deal making. As we discussed briefly, the City anticipates 53% of this year's budget to come from state aid and fiscal disparities. The Council continues to evaluate the viability of a municipal liquor store. In the long run, they hope this alternative revenue stream will help make up for the lack of tax base. In the short term, the Council continues to look for ways to cut costs. The City's biggest expense is the police contract at 52% of the budget. The City was able to enjoy the 24-hour patrol because of large increases in local government aid. Without the same level of state funding, the City must begin scaling back on police services. The Council won't know what level of police service the City can afford until the legislature and governor reach consensus about the future of state aids and credits. We likely won't know that outcome until late May so we continue to prepare for the worst case scenario. The current police contract states that Lauderdale must notify St. Anthony by April 15 if the City plans to terminate the contract. While that is not the City's intention, the Council cannot ignore that deadline. One option to deal with the fiscal uncertainty is to extend the "termination" date. To that end, the City of Lauderdale formally asks that the April 15 "termination " date be extended to the contract renewal deadline of Jame 15. If this is not agreeable to St. Anthony, the Council feels it must reserve the right to terminate the agreement should Lauderdale and St. Anthony not be able to reach an agreement by June 15. As provided in Article XXI of the agreement, Lauderdale must give written notice to St. Anthony of its intention to terminate the agreement by April 15, 2011. Please consider this our notice. The City remains optimistic that Lauderdale and St. Anthony will be able to reach an agreement on the terms of the new contract by June 15 of this year and we look forward to working with you to that end. Let me know if you, your Council, or Chief Ohl have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Heather Butkowski City Administrator Reductions to LGA and MVHC reimbursement under House and Senate proposals Corrected April 1, 2011 - -- _-- city CERT 2011 LGA LGA 2011 Senate Tax Bill (lesser of 11 cert or 10 actual) 2011 LGA Difference 2012 LGA Change from House PT between House PT Certified 2011 to Division Report Certified 2011 i Division Report Sen Tax Bill Amended and House 2011Amended Difference between Certified 2011 and House 2012 2011 Reduction to WHC reimb. (House and Senate bills INDEPENDENCE - - - - - - (32,393) INTERNATIONAL FAI 3,994,769' 3,710,994 (283,775) 3,994,769 - 3,710,994 (283,775) (173,012) INVER GROVE HEIG - - - - (612,485) IONA 37,043 37,043 37,043 37,043 (2,619) IRON JUNCTION 12,230 12,230 12,230 12,230 (825) IRONTON 114,741 114,741 114,741 - 114,741 (14,896) ISANTI 500,425 313,359 (187,066) 500,425 313,359 (187,066) (92,264)' ISLE 62,284 25,272 (37,012) 62,284 25,272 (37,012) (19,575) IVANHOE 203,179 1 203,179 203,179 203,179 (15,120) JACKSON 1,222,742 1,086,755 (135,987) 1,222,742 - 1,086,755 (135,987) (79,490) JANESVILLE 817,827 724,872 (92,955) 817,827 - 724,872 (92,955) (51,043) JASPER 181806' 182,806 182,806 - 182,806 (11,314) JEFFERS 112,493 112,493 112,493 - 112,493 (6,752) JENKINS 4,118 - (4,118) 4,118 - - (4,118) (17,710) JOHNSON 7,000 7,000 7,000 - 7,000 (488) JORDAN 185,885 - (185,885) 185,885 - - (185,885) (120,400) KANDIYOHI 97,9521 97,952 97,952 - 97,952 (7,228) KARLSTAD 232,848 232,848 232,848 - 232,848 14,091) KASOTA 150,607' 143,296 (7,311) 150,607 - 143,296 (7,311) (7,420) KASSON 963,069 780,209 (182,860) 963,069 780,209 (182,860) (94,087) KEEWATIN 396,238 343,738 (52,500) 396,238 - 343,738 (52,500) (32,564) KELLIHER 110,4411 107,307 (3,134) 110,441 107,307 (3,134) (5,112) KELLOGG 83,859 83,859 83,859 83,859 (10,174) KENNEDY 66,764; 66,764 66,764 66,764 (5,033) KENNETH 10,330' 10,330 10,330 - 10,330 (697) KENSINGTON 54,270' 54,270 54,270 - 54,270 (3,781) KENT 20,567 20,567 20,567 - 20,567 (1,051) KENYON 558,961 " 466,643 (92,318) 558,961 - 466,643 (92,318) (39,512) KERKHOVEN 185,283 185,283 185,283 - 185,283 14,705) KERRICK 3,489 3,489 3,489 - 3,489 (604) KETTLE RIVER 22,510 22,510 22,510 - 22,510 (3,681) KIESTER 151,029 151,029 151,029 - 151,029 (13,580) KILKENNY 35,924 35,924 35,924 - 35,924 (2,642) KIMBALL 117,942: 117,942 - 117,942 - 117,942 (16,876) KINBRAE 501' 201 (300) 501 - 201 (300) (154) KINGSTON 13,4901 12,833 (657) 13,490 - 12,833 (657) (1,165) KINNEY 59,925 !1 59,925 59,925 - 59,925 - (4,732) LA CRESCENT 568,712 422,847 (145,865) 568,712 - 422,847 (145,865) (87,123) LA PRAIRIE 66,553_ 66,553 66,553 - 66,553 (9,102) LA SALLE " 16,635 16,635 16,635 16,635 ; (1,199) LAFAYETTE 120,676' 120,676 120,676 - 120,676 (7,636 LAKE BENTON 198,628 198,628 198,628 - 198,628 (14,273) LAKE BRONSON 71,423 71,423 71,423 - 71,423 LAKE CITY 855,124: 610,347 (244,777) 855,124 - 610,347 (244,777) (122,135) LAKE CRYSTAL 720,318 621,727 (98,591) 720,318 - 621,727 (98,591) (58,035) LAKE ELMO - - - - - (37,518) LAKE HENRY 5,886 5,886 5,886 - 5,886 (861) LAKE LILLIAN 33,155'- 33,155 33,155 - 33,155 (4,060) LAKE PARK 231,084' 231,084 - 231,084 231,084 (11,580) LAKE SHORE - - - - (10,434) LAKE ST. CROIX BEA 53,950 4,243 (49,707) 53,950 4,243 (49,707) (18,636) LAKE WILSON 76,722 76,722 76,722 76,722 (3,691) LAKEFIELD 682,824:1 614,261 (68,563) 682,824 614,261 (68,563) (39,492) LAKELAND 111,017 33,574 (77,443) 111,017 33,574 (77,443) (38,237) LAKELAND SHORES - - - (2,364) LAKEVILLE - - - - (731,494) LAMBERTON 287,784 287,784 287,784 287,784 (20,359) LANCASTER 75,242 75,242 75,242 75,242 (4,646) LANDFALL 117,195 79,977 (37,218) 117,195 79,977 (37,218) LANESBORO 204,52011 204,520 204,520 204,520 (20,384) LAP RTE 13,491: 10,915 (2,576) 13,491 10,915 (2,576) (2,208) LASTRUP 2,860'! 2,491 (369) '2,862 - 2,491 (369) (600) LAUDERDALE 616,831 516,153 (100,678) 616,831 - 516,153 (100,678) (29,766) LE CENTER 836,144'- 708,459 1 (127,685)1 836,144 1 708,459 (127,685) (48,449) amth�ony ilia e �% 3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418-1699 Office: (612) 782-3301 • Fax: (612) 782-3302 a www.ci.saint-anthony.mn.us March 15, 2011 Heather Butkowski City of Lauderdale 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, Minnesota 55113 Dear Heather: Enclosed is the Contract Agreement for police services for 2012 and 2013 between Lauderdale and the City of St. Anthony. The proposed increase for each contract year is 1% respectively. St. Anthony is sensitive to the current economic conditions and the potential impact of losing of Local Government Aid and Market Value Credits. The proposed budget submitted for your consideration was kept to a minimum; however a slight increase in cost is necessary to balance the budget. Some of the increases in cost include: ✓ Labor/Salaries increases. ✓ Health insurance premiums continue to increase each year. o 7.4% in 2009 0 7.7% in 2010 0 10.1% in 2011 ✓ Vehicle maintenance (labor, tires, parts & etc.). ✓ Fuel costs remain volatile and have the potential to go higher. ✓ Phase out of Ford (Crown Victoria's) to Chevy or Dodge. ✓ Employer pension contributions were increased by the State (PERA). The proposed cost of the contracts is listed below and is contingent on a favorable approval of the St. Anthony City Council. A summary of the cost for services is as follows: 2011 Proposed Proposed Contract 2012 2013 $590,167 $596,069 $602,030 If you have any questions, please contact me at 612-782-3311 or email me at mike.momson@ci.saint-anthony.mn.us Sin/ael , Mic. Mornson City Manager Enclosures Our Mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village, which is safe and secure. 2 -Year Contract 2011 Contract $590,167 2012 Contract 1.00% $596,069 2012 Contract $596,069 2013 Contract 1.00% $602,030 Revenues: - Lauderdale Summary of Lauderdale Budget For Fiscal Years 2012 & 2013 Total Lauderdale Budget General Fund TOTAL Personal Services 101-41100-321 101-41100-110 Salaries 101-41100-111 Overtime Salaries 101-41100-114 Employers Contribution/Pension 101-41100-115 Employers Contribution/Insurance 101-41100-117 Overtime Court Travel/School/Conference Total Personal Services Supplies 101-41100-226 General Supplies Total Supplies Other Services & Charges 101-41100-321 Other Services 101-41100-331 Communications 101-41100-333 Care & Support/Booking Fees 101-41100-334 Printing & Publishing 101-41100-339 Maintenance & Repair 10141100-341 Travel/School/Conference 101-41100-342 Subscriptions/Membership $590,167.00 Total Other Services & Charges TOTAL POLICE BUDGET $5,300.00 1.00% 1.00% $590,167.00 $596,069.00 $602,030.00 `2011 2012 2013 Falcon Heights Falcon Heights Falcon Heights $590,167.00 $596.069.00 $602.030.00 $590,167.00 $596,069.00 $602,030.00 2011 2012 2013 Falcon Heights Falcon Heights Falcon Heights $369,400.00 $373,100.00 $376,800.00 $6,100.00 $6,300.00 $6,500.00 $42,300.00 $43,400.00 $44,500.00 $55,300.00 $56,700.00 $58,100.00 $2,500.00 $2,600.00 $2,700.00 $475,600.00 $482,100.00 $488,600.00 $10.300.00 $10.600.00 $10.900.00 $10,300.00 $10,600.00 $10,900.00 $5,300.00 $5,500.00 $5,700.00 $7,600.00 $7,800.00 $8,000.00 $5,700.00 $5,900.00 $6,100.00 $2,900.00 $3,000.00 $3,100.00 $1,700.00 $1,800.00 $1,900.00 $2,900.00 $3,000.00 $3,100.00 $1,060.00 $1,090.00 $1,120.00 $27,160.00 $28,090.00 $29,020.00 $513,060.00 $520,790.00 $528,520.00 Other Budget Line Items 101-40510-335 Workers Compensation $11,600.00 $11,900.00 $12,200.00 101-41900-320 Animal Control $1,800.00 $1,900.00 $2,000.00 101-42200-222 Public Works/Fuels & Lubricants $10,700.00 $11,000.00 $11,300.00 101-42200-339 Public Works/Maintenance & Repair $13,400.00 $13,800.00 $14,200.00 401-47200-453 Squad Car/Capital Equipment $27,000.00 $28,400.00 $29,800.00 101-50000-349 Contingency For Unanticipated/Emergency Expenditures $12.607.00 $8,279.00 $4,010.00 TOTAL $590,167.00 $596,069.00 $602,030.00