Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/13/2007LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2007 7:30 P.M. CITY HALL 1891 WALNUT STREET 1. ROLL CALL r 2. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 3. APPROVALS a. Minutes of the February 27, 2007 City Council Meeting. b. Claims totaling $70,448.93. OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA CONSENT a) Authorize attendance at the 2007 Legislative Conference, March 28 — 29 for those Council members and Staff who wish to attend. Cost $125 per person. b) Authorize attendance at the 2007 League of Minnesota Cities Annual Conference and Marketplace June 27 — 29, Duluth for Council member and interested staff. c) Authorize increasing the amount in Petty Cash from $200 to $400 d) Approve rental housing licenses 6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS/RECOGNITION/PROCLAMATIONS 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public hearings are conducted so that the public affected by a proposal can have input in to the decision. a) Storm Water Management Plan b) Variance request Boyer Ford 8. REPORTS a) PCIC Report 9. DISCUSSION/ ACTION a) Accept Findings of Fact to deny rental license for 1768 Eustis 10. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA 11. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 12. SET AGENDA FOR NEXT MEETING a) Goal Setting Session b) Nuisance Ordinance c) Larpenteur Avenue 13. WORK SESSION 14. NEW BUSINESS / GENERAL UPDATE a) Administrator Update 1) Legislative Issues 2) Wireless Internet 3) 1931 Carl Street b) Council Communications 1) Fulham Street 2) BP Station MINUTES OF THE LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, FEBRUARY27, 2007 7.30 p.m. Lauderdale City Hall, 1891 Walnut Street Mayor pro -tem Doherty called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and asked City Administrator Heck to call the roll. Council members present: Karen Gill -Gerbig, Denise Hawkinson, Karen Doherty, and Clay Christensen. Heck informed the council that Mayor Dains called prior to the meeting and said that he would be arriving around 8:15 p.m. Also present for the meeting: Assistant to the City Administrator, Jim Bownik; Deputy City Clerk, Heather Butkowski; Bob Alsop, City's Civil Attorney; and Katrina Joseph, City's Prosecuting Attorney. Mayor pro -tem Doherty asked if there were additions or deletions to the agenda. Council member Christensen moved to approve the agenda. The motion was seconded by council member Hawkinson and carried. Mayor pro -tem Doherty asked if there were any comments or changes to the council meeting minutes of February 13, 2007. There were none. Council member Gill -Gerbig moved approval of the minutes and council member Hawkinson seconded. The motion carried. Mayor pro -tem Doherty asked if there were any questions on the claims. Council member Hawkinson moved approval of the claims in the amount of $33,716.83. Council member Christensen seconded the motion and it carried. The mayor pro -tem Doherty stated this was the time established for members of the public to address the Council with issues not present on the agenda. There were no members of the public who wished to address the Council. The mayor pro -tem Doherty asked if the Council wished to remove items from the consent agenda. No one wished to remove items from the consent agenda. Council member Gill -Gerbig moved approval of the consent agenda approving attendance at the following training seminars "Site Planning Basics", "Beyond the Basics of Planning and Zoning", and 112007 TIF Seminar", approving rental housing licenses, and approving the 2006 year-end investment report. The motion to approve the consent agenda was seconded by council member Christensen and carried. Chief John Ohl appeared before the Council and presented the 2006 Lauderdale Annual Police Report. He indicated total calls for service are down from last year, however, he - 1 - said both Part I and Part II crimes were up over last year. He said the reason for the Part I increase is thefts. Lauderdale encountered a rash of thefts from vehicles. The increase in Part II crimes is related to an increase in DWI arrests. Chief Ohl updated the Council on the hiring of two new officers. He said the new officers have been selected and begin with their Field Training Officer (FTO) on Monday, March 4. After the FTO period, they will begin on their own, and if all goes well, he anticipates Lauderdale will have 24 hour patrol service beginning June 1. He also provided the Council the current status of patrol hours. He said Lauderdale is receiving 20 hours per day everyday and more than twenty hours three to four days per week. The council thanked Chief Ohl for his good work and that of the officers. 7:50 p.m. Mayor pro -tem Doherty began the rental licensing hearing for 1768 Eustis Street. Heck provided the background and stated the owner of the house failed to comply with the deficiencies identified, and after the existing tenants moved out, he rented to new tenants in violation of the city's ordinance. Mr. Busse, owner of 1768 Eustis, was not present at the hearing. Council member Gill -Gerbig moved to deny a rental license for 1768 Eustis Street. The motion was seconded by council member Christensen and carried on a roll call vote with members Gill -Gerbig, Hawkinson, Christensen, and Doherty voting yes. Mayor Dains arrived at 8:11 p.m. The Council then discussed what action to take regarding Mr. Busse, the owner of 1768 Eustis Street, for non-compliance with the rental licensing code. Heck stated Mr. Robert Alsop and Ms. Katrina Joseph were present to assist the council in choosing a plan of action. Heck briefly described the action open to the council and outlined in a memorandum prepared by Mary Tietjen. Bob Alsop, city civil attorney, expressed his view that pursuing the administrative fee is the lengthiest process; a civil action is costly and lengthy. He does not have experience with a Tenant Remedy Action and feels the best course of action is a criminal action. Katrina Joseph, city prosecuting attorney, discussed with the council her success in dealing with similar issues in Richfield. She said her office is using both a civil temporary restraining order and criminal action to gain compliance. She outlined the process and effectiveness. After additional discussion, Mayor Dains asked for the desire of the council. Council member Gill -Gerbig moved to proceed with a temporary restraining order and criminal prosecution as outlined by Ms. Joseph. Council member Doherty -2- seconded the motion and it carried on a roll call vote with members Gill -Gerbig, Hawkinson, Doherty, Christensen, and Mayor Dains all voting yes. Heck updated the council on the status of the pop machine in the social room. He said it was donated by Joe Hughes several years ago and recently quit working. Heck said he was not sure how much it would cost to repair and is looking for guidance from the council on what they wish to do. After discussion, the consensus of the council was to not have the machine repaired as they would rather see funds spent on a new refrigerator for the kitchen. The council moved into the work session and started with discussion on the proposal for a dog park in the city. Council members expressed some disappointment that the members of the community who desire this amenity were not present for the meeting. Bownik provided some additional information to the council regarding the request. Council member Gill -Gerbig expressed support for an off -leash dog park, but indicated the location at the end of Walnut may not be the best place. She suggested using the hockey rink as a trial location for this summer. She suggested the openings to the hockey rink be closed up for this purpose. Additionally, Gill -Gerbig asked how many dogs were licensed in the city. Heck stated he did not know but would look it up in the animal license book. Mayor Dains said his main concern was the cost of the fencing for the dog park and thought using the hockey rink might be a good place to start. Council member Hawkinson expressed concern over the use of the hockey rink and felt that the plans for possibly paving the hockey rink were again being pushed back in favor of a new request. After additional discussion, the consensus of the council was to have the Park Committee review the use of the hockey rink as a test for the dog park. Heck provided information on purchasing city shirts for sale to the public and for council, staff and committee members. He indicated the city is out of the latest version of the tee shirt and members of the public have inquired as to when the city will have new ones for sale. Heck said staff discussed this issue and feels a couple varieties would be nice. Staff suggested a polo type shirt with "City of Lauderdale" embroidered and a tee shirt. Council member Doherty recalled the tee-shirts came out of the Park Committee and felt that the Park Committee should address this issue and provide a recommendation to the Council. -3- The consensus of the council was to have this issue discussed by the Park Committee and for the Park Committee to provide a recommendation on the shirts. The Council all liked the idea of a tee shirt and a polo shirt option and all agreed that darker colors are not desirable. Heck mentioned the City of Falcon Heights is pursuing a "Healthy Communities" grant with the idea of passing out pedometers to residents as an encouragement for them to walk more. Falcon Heights' Mayor suggested Lauderdale partner with Falcon Heights on the grant and compete to see which city could log the most miles. The consensus of the Council was to work with Falcon Heights on the grant and the program. Heck said the council traditionally holds a goal setting session early in the year. He said last year the council held the meeting before a council meeting and discussed the goals over a box lunch. Council member Doherty said she thought the goal setting was to be part of the budget process. Heck stated she was right. However, the council has not set any goals, except for the tennis and basketball courts and law enforcement, for 2007. Additional goals, not necessarily monetary in nature, need to be established for 2007. He then said goals for 2008 need to be brainstormed so cost estimates can be obtained and reviewed during the 2008 budget discussion. It was decided by the Council to hold the 2007 / 2008 goal planning session on Tuesday, March 27, 2007 at 5:00 p.m. All staff is required to attend and the city will provide a meal. The Mayor indicated the new section of General Update / New Items and Issue replaces the Administrator Update. The Mayor said he spoke to the administrator about this and wanted to provide an opportunity for council members to bring up additional or general questions for staff to look into. He indicated if there are specific issues related to the Administrator, they can be addressed at this time. Heck provided the council an update on the pending litigation status and the status with regard to 1931 Carl. Council member Gill -Gerbig moved to adjourn the meeting. Council member Christensen seconded the motion and the council adjourned at 9:45 p.m. M CITY OF LAUDERDALE Claims for Approval March 13, 2007 City Council Meetinq Payroll 3/09/07 Payroll: Direct Deposit # 500315-500319 $7,243.96 3/09/07 Payroll: Payroll Liabilities, e -payments 137E -139E $5,984.09 Vendor Claims 3/13/07 Claims: Check #s 18573-18589 $57,220.88 Subtotal of Claims From Above $70,448.93 Total Claims for Approval $70,448.93 CITY OF LAUDERDALE Payments Current Period: MARCH 2007 03/08/07 3:39 PM Page 1 Batch Name 030907paytax Payment Computer Dollar Amt $5,984.09 Posted Refer 115 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 Ck# 000137E 3/9/2007 Cash Payment G 101-21705 ICMA RETIREMENT 3/9/07 payroll $1,741.91 Invoice Transaction Date 3/8/2007 Due 0 NORTH STAR CHEC 10100 Total $1.741.91 Refer 116 PERA Ck# 000138E 3/9/2007 Cash Payment G 101-21704 PERA 3/9/07 payroll Invoice Transaction Date 3/8/2007 Due 0 NORTH STAR CHEC 10100 Total $1,431.74 $1,431.74 Refer 117 NORTH STAR BANK, CHECKING S Ck# 000139E 3/9/2007 Cash Payment G 101-21703 FICA WITHHOLDING. 3/9/07 payroll taxes $1,869.82 Invoice Cash Payment G 101-21701 FEDERAL TAXES 3/9/07 payroll taxes $940.62 Invoice Transaction Date 3/8/2007 Due 0 NORTH STAR CHEC 10100 Total $2,810.44 Fund Summary BATCH Total $5,984.09 10100 NORTH STAR CHECKING 101 $5,984.09 $5,984.09 Pre -Written Checks $5,984.09 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $0.00 Total $5,984.09 CITY OF LAUDERDALE *Check Detail Register© MARCH 2007 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 NORTH STAR CHECKING _ _m Paid Chk# 018573 3/13/2007 CINTAS E 601-49000-425 CLOTHING $28.65 pw clothing E 601-49000-425 CLOTHING $28.65 pw clothing Total CINTAS $57.30 Paid Chk# 018574 3/13/2007 CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS E 101-42200-321 FIRE CALLS $382.00 2/07 fire calls Total CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS $382.00 Paid Chk# 018575 3/13/2007 CITY OF ST ANTHONY E 101-42100-319 POLICE CONTRACT $43,291.66 3/07 police services Total CITY OF ST ANTHONY $43,291.66 Paid Chk# 018576 3/13/2007 EAST HENNEPIN AUTO SERVICE INC E 101-43100-212 MOTOR FUELS $28.80 2/07 motor fuels E 101-43100-212 MOTOR FUELS $3.20 2/07 motor fuels Total EAST HENNEPIN AUTO SERVICE INC $32.00 Paid Chk# 018577 3/13/2007 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE E 101-41200-308 TRAINING\CONFERENCES $125.00 bh - zoning training E 101-41200-308 TRAINING\CONFERENCES $125.00 hb - site planning training Total GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE $250.00 Paid Chk# 018578 3/13!2007 HOME DEPOT GRC E 101-43100-228 MISC REPAIRS MAINT SUPPLIE $68.45 furnace filters Total HOME DEPOT CRC $68.45 Paid Chk# 018579 3/13/2007 HUGHES & COSTELLO E 101-42300-305 LEGAL FEES $850.00 3/07 retainer & fees E 101-42300-355 MISC PRINTING/PROCESS SER $429.63 3/07 retainer & fees Total HUGHES & COSTELLO $1,279.63 Paid Chk# 018580 3/13/2007 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWS E 101-41600-309 DELIVERY $733.60 2/07 Roseville Review delivery Total LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWS $733.60 Paid Chk# 018581 3/13/2007 LMC E 601-49000-308 TRAINING\CONFERENCES $40.00 dh & jh safety training Total LMC $40.00 Paid Chk# 018582 3/13/2007 MET -COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER. E 601-49000-387 WATER TREATMENT SERVICE $8,377.59 4/07 wastewater service Total MET -COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER. $8,377.59 Paid Chk# 018583 3/13/2007 PARK SERVICE E 101-43100-212 MOTOR FUELS $230.50 2/07 motor fuels E 601-49000-212 MOTOR FUELS $25.61 2/07 motor fuels CITY OF LAUDERDALE *Check Detail Register© MARCH 2007 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total PARK SERVICE $256.11 Paid Chk# 018584 3/13/2007 RAMSEY COUNTY, PROP REC & REV E 101-42100-442 MISC Total RAMSEY COUNTY, PROP REC & REV $505.92 2/07 911 dispatch $bub. qz Paid Chk# 018585 3/13/2007 TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS E 101-41200-201 GENERAL SUPPLIES $190.90 4 pack of copier toner Total TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS $190.90 Paid Chk# 018586 3/13/2007 TWIN CITY SAW COMPANY- ---- E 101-43100-227 TOOLS & EQUIPMENT $31.84 2 replacement saw blades Total TWIN CITY SAW COMPANY $31.84 Paid Chk# 018587 3/13/2007 US BANK, DEBT SERVICES E 303-47300-621 FILE MAINTENANCE CHARGES $431.25 2002 bond mgmt contract E 304-47400-621 FILE MAINTENANCE CHARGES $431.25 2003 bond mgmt contract Total US BANK, DEBT SERVICES $862.50 Paid Chk# 018588 3/13/2007 WASTE MANAGEMENT A E 101-43100-384 REFUSE DISPOSAL $71.62 3/07 refuse pick up Total WASTE MANAGEMENT $71.62 Paid Chk# 018589 3/13/2007 XCEL ENERGY, CITY HALL E 101-43100-381 ELECTRIC $195.44 2/07 city hall gas and electri E 101-43100-383 GAS UTILITIES $594.32 2/07 city hall gas and electri Total XCEL ENERGY, CITY HALL $789.76 10100 NORTH STAR CHECKING $57,220.88 Fund Summary 10100 NORTH STAR CHECKING 101 GENERAL $47,857.88 303'02 ST/UTIL IMP DEBT SERVICE $431.25 304'03 ST/UTIL IMP DEBT SERVICE $431.25 601 SEWER UTILITIES $8,500.50 $57,220.88 LAUDERDALE COUNCIL E: ACTION FORM Action Requested Consent X Public Hearing Discussion Action Resolution Work Session Meeting Date March 13, 2007 ITEM NUMBER—Petty Cash Policy STAFF INITIAL HAB APPROVED BY ADMINISTRA" DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: Staff spoke with the auditors at the end of February. They said it was common for cities to have $400-$500 in petty cash. In order to reduce the need for a city credit card, staff pro- pose increasing the amount of petty cash on hand to $400. The $50 limit per purchase will stay the same, but the administrator may make exceptions as needed. OPTIONS: Adopt revised petty cash policy. Do not adopt revised petty cash policy. Direct staff on further changes needed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt revised petty cash policy. COUNCIL ACTION: CITY OF LAUDERDALE PETTY CASH FUND POLICY I. AUTHORITY Minnesota Statute 412.271, Subd. 5 authorizes the establishment of a petty cash fund. The purpose of this fund is to pay claims against the City that are impractical to pay in any other manner. The funds will be handled in a strict and transparent manner to prevent theft or fraud. III. REGULATIONS This fund will be regulated in the following manner: 1) the sum of four hundred dollars ($400) shall be deposited in the fund and shall be maintained as the fund balance; 2) the Deputy City Clerk, under the direction of the City Administrator, shall be the custodian of the fund; 3) the fund shall be kept in a secure, locked container; 4) the monies shall be disbursed by the custodian only for proper claims against the City which are impractical and inefficient to pay in any other manner; 5) all such claims shall be authorized by the City Administrator or designee; 6) no claim shall exceed $50 unless authorized by the City Administrator; 7) no claim shall be for salary or reimbursement of any personal expense of a City employee including mileage or other travel expenses; 8) the custodian of the fund shall regularly submit the claims to the City Council with a request for transfer of monies from the appropriate funds in order to maintain this fund. VI. PENALTY Any misuse of this Fund may be subject to disciplinary action according to City personnel policy and/or applicable State Law. G:\DeputyClerk\Finance & Investments\Petty Cash\Petty Cash Policy 2007.doc 1/2006 Revision LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM TYPE OF REQUEST Consent Action ❑ Resolution ❑ Information ❑ Work session ❑ MEETING DATE March 13, 2007 AGENDA NUMBER 5D — Rental Housing Licenses DESCRIPTIO BACKGROUND OR PAST COUNCIL ACTION Attached are the applications of those that have successfully completed their rental housing inspections. Each met the criteria for a tier one license as specified in City Code. David Hinrichs' property was inspected by one of Roseville's inspectors. OPTIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the attached license applications. MOTION BY STAFF ACTION SECOND L P 2 j C lit i CITY OF LAUDERDALE ire RENTAL PROPERTY LICENSURE APPLICATION (� 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, ITN 55113 Office: (651) 792-7650 Fax: (651) 631-2066 LICENSE PERIOD: Adoption through December 31, 2007 DATA PRIVACY NOTICE: The data you supply on this form will be used to assess your qualifications for the license. You are not legally required to provide this data, but we will not be able to grant the license without it. If a f,; license is granted, the data you have supplied will constitute a public record and copies may be issued to anyone requesting them. The required data allows us to distinguish you from other applicants; to identify you in our license files; to verify that you are the person who applied for the license; to contact you if additional information is required; and to determine if any conviction you may have on record might affect your suitability as a license holder. Your residence address and phone number will be considered public data unless you request this information to be private and provide an alternative address and telephone number (see below). Please sign to indicate that you have read the notice: I request that my residence address and phone number be considered privy e data. My alternative address and phone number are as follows: Alternative address: % �Y "C—UJ-h j S -t— City, City, State, Zip: F --//\j 5r//3 Telephone No.: 6/2 . (, V. %0 To License Applicant: Please complete all requested information on this application. Use separate paper for your responses, if needed. PROPERTY INFORMATION AND DESCRIPTION Rental Property Address: l F3 V✓C< ntc-t-"SC - Number of Rental Units: 2. Type of property: ( ) single family ( duplex ( ) multiple family dwelling No. of rental units that are: 1 BR: 02 2 BR: 3 BR: 4 BR: other: Total number of paved off street parking spaces:,?- - 3 PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION (Must list current owner) Owner's name: C rc. Sh rn Z_(jV-kc(_ 50ri ' Telephone No. 7c? Address: I Y�� -C2 ti S 5Jc-City, State, Zip: Owner is: Sole Proprietor *Partnership ( ) *Corporation ( ) * If a partnership or corporation, please include the names, addresses, and phone numbers for all partners/officers. BUILDING MANAGER, CARETAKER, OR RESIDENT AGENT (if 5+ units or owner does not live in Ramsey, Hennepin, Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Scott, Washington, Wright, Chisago, Isanti or Sherburne counties.) Name & title: a"1 L- Sl t, Telephone No. �u Address: i�' �'tt✓3� 5 �f City, State, Zip:YR �- EMERGENCY REPAIRS (must be completed) **Name: l c; 5 I l i ry Telephone No. Rental Unit Number (if applicable): **This person is authorized to institute emergency repairs and is designated by the owner for emergency repairs. This. person may be a resident. MORTGATE COMPANY OR LENDER INFOR�I_�IATION Mortgage company, lender, or vendee*** 4YLli�r��-Cly City, State, Zip: j1/t'1"j, /�,'2(�' Telephone No. ***If property was purchased on a Contract for Deed, please include vendee information. REGISTER OF OCCUPANCY The owner or its resident agent shall keep a current register of occupancy for each rental dwelling. This register of occupancy may be reviewed by the City at any time per 9-11-8-J of Lauderdale City Code. Provide the number of adult and children living in each residential unit. For multi -unit buildings, please provide the information on additional sheets of paper as needed. Unit No.: No. of adults: 2 No. of children under age 18: Unit No.: No, of adults: 1 No. of children under age 18: Unit No.: No. of adults: No. of children under age 18: Unit No.: No. of adults: No. of children under age 18: LICENSE FEE SCHEDULE Single family rental unit: Tier I initial license/ renewal $30.00 $ •30, Multi -family rental units: Tier I initial license/ renewal $30.00 base + $2.50/unit $ 2 .'5v Tier II license and renewal: $100.00 per rental unit not in compliance $ Inspection fee: $34.00 per inspection +$34.00 Note: Applications will not be processed until the city receives the proper fees. � b` SV Please make all checks payable to the "City of Lauderdale." Total: $ CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that no order of the City to repair, correct, or improve any part of this or any dwelling unit therein or pertaining to the operation thereof has been issued, or is presently outstanding which has not been fully complied with, to the complete satisfaction of any and all inspection officers of the City, to the best of my knowledge except as follow: Signature: FOR CITY USE ONLY Date: � . f `� 0 1 Department A proved Denied Date S.' ature -/ Building Insp. Administrator Date Fees ReceivedAmount Received Recei t # Date License Issued CITY OF LAUDERDALE' RENTAL PROPERTY LICENSURE APPLICATION ,7 1891 Walnut Street ��ltj1 Lauderdale, MNT 55113 Office: (651) 792-7650 Fax: (651) 631-2066 LICENSE PERIOD: Adoption through December 31, 2007 DATA PRIVACY NOTICE: The data you supply on this form will be used to assess your qualifications for the license. You are not legally required to provide this data, but we will not be able to grant the license without it. If a license is granted, the data you have supplied will constitute a public record and copies may be issued to anyone requesting them. The required data allows us to distinguish you from other applicants; to identify you in our license files; to verify that you are the person who applied for the license; to contact you if additional information is required; and to determine if any conviction you may have on record might affect your suitability as a license holder. Your residence address and phone number will be considered public data unless you request this information to be private and provide an alternative address and phone number ee below). Please sign to indicate that you have read the notice: I request that my residence address and phone number be considered private data. My alternative address and phone number are as follows: Alternative address: City, State, Zip: Telephone No.: To License Applicant: Please complete all requested information on this application. Use separate paper for your responses, if needed. PROPERTY INFORMATION AND DESCRIPTION Rental Property Address: ( c,, L U(65 `, s; 5 Number of Rental Units: Type of property: ( ) single family (V.) -duplex ( ) multiple family dwelling No. of rental units that are: 1 BR: 2 BR: ;Z 3 BR: 4 BR: other: Total number of paved off street parking spaces: 2V . PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION (Must list current owner) Owner's name: " , �y 1 . r I cis Telephone No. L2_S (x.33 1-0--7 Address: % 171 q C'�� 1 S'+— City, State, Zip: )let , 11 L-- J -,r- Lk V'K V. s5) l Owner is: Sole Proprietor (y-� *Partnership ( ) *Corporation ( ) * If a partnership or corporation, please include the names, addresses, and phone numbers for all partners/officers. BUILDING MANAGER, CARETAKER, OR RESIDENT AGENT (if 5+ units or owner does not live in Ramsey, Hennepin, Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Scott, Washington, Wright, Chisago, Isanti or Sherburne counties.) Name & title: Telephone No. Address: **Name: City, State, Zip: EMERGENCY REPAIRS (must be completed) Telephone No. Rental Unit Number (if applicable): **This person is authorized to institute emergency repairs and is designated by the owner for emergency repairs. This. person may be a resident. MORTGATE COMPANY OR LENDER INFORMATION Mortgage company, lender, or vendee***: Address: City, State, Zip: Telephone No. ***If property was purchased on a Contract for Deed, please include vendee information. REGISTER OF OCCUPANCY The owner or its resident agent shall keep a current register of occupancy for each rental dwelling. This register of occupancy may be reviewed by the City at any time per 9-11-8-J of Lauderdale City Code. Provide the number of adult and children living in each residential unit. For multi -unit buildings, please provide the information on additional sheets of paper as needed. Unit No.: No. of adults: No. of children under age 18: �� t Unit No.: j dt' No. of adults:_ No. of children under age 18: Unit No.: No. of adults: No. of children under age 18: Unit No.: No. of adults: No. of children under age 18: LICENSE FEE SCHEDULE Single family rental unit: Tier I initial license/ renewal $30.00 $ Multi -family rental units: Tier I initial license/ renewal $30.00 base + $2.50/unit $. Tier II license and renewal: $100.00 per rental unit not in compliance $ Inspection fee: $34.00 per inspection +$34.00 Note: Applications will not be processed until the city receives the proper fees. _ Please make all checks payable to the "City of Lauderdale." Total: $ La C -°' CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that no order of the City to repair, correct, or improve any part of this or any dwelling unit therein or pertaining to the operation thereof has been issued, or is presently outstanding which has not been fully complied with, to the complete satisfaction of any and all inspection officers of the City, to the best of my knowledge except as follow: FOR CITY USE ONLY Date: �_/1— Department Approved Denied Date Si nature Building Insp. Administrator Date Fees Received I Amount Received Recei t # Date License Issued 15,11 1 X061 ie t 3 1, 7 Ay� U41 -1 �-091 To: City Council From: Brian W. Heck, City Administrator ' Date: March 9, 2007 Re: MS4 — Public Hearing Annually the city is required to hold a public hearing to discuss our Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP). Lauderdale enacted ordinances requiring residents to collect animal waste and prohibiting the raking leaves into the street. Lauderdale sweeps the streets in the spring and the fall and places articles in the city newsletter regarding stormwater protection. Lauderdale will continue the activities already established and will review and evaluate additional programs and activities to further enhance the quality of stormwater. Attached is the 2005 MS4 Annual Report. Use of this form is mandatory. By completing this Annual Report form, you are "providing the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) with a summary of your status of compliance with permit conditions, including an assessment of the appropriateness of your identified best management practices and progress towards achieving your identified measurable goals for each of the minimum control measures" as required by the MS4 Permit. Submit your annual report by June 30, 2006 to: MS4 Stormwater Program Municipal Division Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 If you have questions about the MS4 Annual Report for 2005 form, please visit the MPCA's MS4 Web site, www.pea.state.mn.us/water/stormwater/stormwater-ms4.html or call the MPCA's Keith Cherryholmes (651) 296-6945, or Scott Fox (651) 296-9433. Contact the MPCA toll free at (800) 657-3864. City of Lauderdale Name of MS4 Brian B. Heck Name of Contact Person 651-792-7655 Telephone (include area code) 1891 Walnut Street Mailing Address Lauderdale MN 55113 City State ZIP code Minimal Control Measure #1: Public Education and Outreach on Stormwater Impacts A. Did you hold a public meeting for calendar year 2005 and discuss your Stormwater Pollution ® Yes ❑ No Prevention Program (SWPPP)? [Part V.G. Le] B. If you did not comply with this requirement, explain why. Please attach a separate sheet labeled `MCM--I c. ' C. How many individuals attended for stormwater? 0 D. What was the date of the public meeting? 2/22/05 E. On what date was it published? 1/18/05 F. Summarize your plan to increase attendance at your public meeting: More frequent notice in the official newpaper, notice on the City web site and announcements on the cable access station. G. In what newspaper or publication of general interest did you publish the public notice of your meeting? [Part V.G.I .e.2] Please retain a copy of the public notice in your records. The Roseville Review H. You must implement a public education program to distribute educational materials to the community or conduct equivalent outreach activities about the impacts of stormwater discharges on water bodies and the steps that the public can take to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff. [Part V.G. La.] Please list the accomplishment under this permit requirement for the past year (January 2005 — December 2005): The city held a public hearing on the program and publised articles in the city's quarterly newsletter. I. You must specifically implement an education program that individually addresses each Minimum Control Measure [Part V.G. l.b.]: 1. Public education and outreach; wq-strm4-06 Page 1 of 6 3/06 2. Public participation; 3. Illicit discharge detection and elimination; 4. Construction site stormwater runoff control; 5. Post -construction stormwater management in new development and redevelopment; and 6. Pollution prevention/good housekeeping for municipal operations. Please provide a status update concerning your efforts to implement this education program for each of the Minimum Control Measures. Provide your response below or provide a separate sheet labeled `MCM--lh' The city will continue to publish information on illicit discharge to the storm sewers, such as oil, anti -freeze, fertilizers, and other substances that are known to adversly affect surface water. The city will play the program "Great Waters..." produced by Public Television in cooperation with the League of Minnesota Cities on a regular basis. The city will encourage the official newpaper and other local papers to include information on stornwater runoff control. The city will work with the various watershed districts for assistance in educating the public on alternative methods for contorling stormwater such as developing more water gardens and rain barrels. We will also work with developers to reduce the amount of non-penmiable surfaces and encourage green buildings including roof Minimal Control Measure #2: Public Participation/involvement A. During your public meeting, did you receive written and/or oral input on your SWPPP? [Part ❑ Yes ® No V.G.2.b.1-3] Input must be considered prior to submittal of your annual report. B. Did you create a record of comments and your response to comments/record of decision (ROD)? ® Yes ❑ No C. Have you kept the ROD in accordance with the permit? [Part V.G.2.b] ® Yes ❑ No D. Do you plan to incorporate any comments into your next SWPPP update? [Part V.G.2.c] List items: ® Yes ❑ No Minimum Control Measure #3: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination You must develop, implement and enforce a program to detect and eliminate illicit discharges as defined at 40 CFR 122.26(b)(2) into your SWPPP. You must also select and implement a program of appropriate BMPs and measurable goals for this minimum control measure. A. You must develop, if not already completed, a storm sewer system map showing the location of [Part V.G. 3.a.]: 1. Ponds, streams, lakes and wetlands that are part of your system; 2. Structural pollution control devices (grit chambers, separators, etc.) that are part of your system; 3. All pipes and conveyances in your system, as a goal -but at minimum -those pipes that are 24 inches in diameter and over; 4. Outfalls, including discharges from your system to other MS4s, or waters and wetlands that are not part of your system (where you do not have operational control); structures that discharge stormwater directly into groundwater; overland discharge points and all other points of discharge from your system that are outlets, not diffuse flow areas. Please explain here or on a separate sheet labeled MCM-3a, whatyour MS4 accomplished in developing this map during 2005: The city completed a comprehensive reconstruction of its' entire stormwater system, sanitary sewer system, and road system. This reconstruction began in 2001 and ended in 2005. B. You must, to the extent allowable under law, effectively prohibit, through ordinance or other regulatory mechanism, non-stormwater discharges from entering into your storm sewer [Part V.G.3.b.]; C. You must develop and implement a program to detect and address non-stormwater discharges, including illegal dumping, to your system; D. You must inform employees, businesses, and the general public in your MS4 area of hazards associated with illegal discharges and improper disposal of waste; wq-strm4-06 Page 2 of 6 3/06 E. You must address the following categories of non-stormwater discharges or flows (i.e., illicit discharges), only if you identify them as significant contributors of pollutants to your small MS4: Water line flushing, landscape irrigation, diverted stream flows, rising ground waters, uncontaminated ground water infiltration (as defined at 40 CFR 35.2005(20)), uncontaminated pumped ground water, discharges from potable water sources, foundation drains, air conditioning condensation, irrigation water, springs, water from crawl space pumps, footing drains, lawn watering, truck and car washing, flows from riparian habitats and wetlands, dechlorinated swimming pool discharges, and street wash water, discharges or flows from firefighting activities. Please explain here or on a separate sheet labeled `MCM--3b' what accomplishments your MS4 has made in 2005 regarding an illicit discharge ordinance, detection and elimination: We have not identified any of the above as being significant contributors of pollutants. Minimum Control Measure #4: Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control You must develop, implement, and enforce a program to reduce pollutants in any stormwater runoff to your small MS4 from construction activities within your jurisdiction that result in a land disturbance of greater than or equal to one acre or is less than one acre but is part of a common plan of development that will be one acre or greater. You must also select and implement a program of appropriate BMPs and measurable goals for this minimum control measure, at minimum: [Part V.G.4.] A. An ordinance or other regulatory mechanism to require erosion and sediment controls, as well as sanctions to ensure compliance, to the extent allowable under law. B. Requirements for construction site operators to implement appropriate erosion and sediment control best management practices; C. Requirements for construction site operators to control waste, such as discarded building materials, concrete truck washout, chemicals, litter, and sanitary waste at the construction site that may cause adverse impacts to water quality; D. Procedures for site plan review which incorporate consideration of potential water quality impacts; E. Procedures for receipt and consideration of reports of non compliance or other information on construction related issues submitted by the public, and F. Procedures for site inspection and enforcement of control measures. Please provide a status/update here or on a separate sheet labeled `MCM-4, ' concerning your efforts to meet this permit condition (be sure to indicate the citation for ordinance): The city has appropirate ordinances in place to address this issue, however; the city is fully developed and there are few, if anv, lots that meet the criteria in MCM#4. Minimum Control Measure #5: Post -construction Stormwater Managementin New Development and Redevelopment You must develop, implement, and enforce a program to address stormwater runoff from new development and redevelopment projects within your jurisdiction that disturb greater than or equal to one acre, including projects less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of development or sale that discharge into your small MS4. Your program must ensure that controls are in place that would prevent or reduce water quality impacts. You must also select and implement a program of appropriate BMPs and measurable goals for this minimum control measure. At minimum: A. Develop and implement strategies which include a combination of structural and/or non-structural BMP appropriate for your community; B. Use an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism to address post -construction runoff from new development and redevelopment projects to the extent allowable under law; and C. Ensure adequate long-term operation and maintenance of BMP installed as a result of these requirements. D. Do you feel your long-term operation and maintenance of your BMP is adequately funded? Please provide a status/update concerning your efforts to meet this permit condition. Please provide your response below or provide a separate sheet labeled `MCM-5: ' The city did not have any new construction or redevelopment in 2005. Should there be any development in the future, the city has adeqate ordinances in place to address the issues in MCM #5. wq-sh7n4-06 Page 3 of 6 3/06 Minimum Control Measure #6: Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal; Operations A. You must develop and implement an operation and maintenance program that includes a training component and has the ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from municipal operations. Training materials that are available from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, state and regional agencies, or other organizations may be used as appropriate or modified for your community. Your program must include employee training to prevent and reduce stormwater pollution from activities such as park and open space maintenance, fleet and building maintenance, new construction and land disturbances, and stormwater system maintenance. Please provide a status/update about your efforts in developing a Pollution Prevention Plan: The city provides street sweeping twice per year (spring and fall). Ordinance prohibitis depositing leaves and other yard waste in the street. The city may increase street sweeping activities and require the use of more efficient equipment based on the U of Minnesota study on street sweeping recently completed. B. Did you identify and inspect all of your structural pollution control devices such as trap manholes, ® Yes ❑ No grit chambers, sumps, floatable skimmers and separators, etc.? [Part V.G.6.b.2] C. How many structural pollution control devices do you have in your MS4 system? D. How many structural pollution control devices did you inspect? E. Calculate the percentage: If less than 100 % were inspected, please explain why below or on a separate sheet labeled `MCM--6e: ' F. Did you repair, replace, or maintain any structural pollution control devices? ® Yes ❑ No G. Briefly, summarize any significant unscheduled (not routine) maintenance or improvement activities stemming from inspections of your structural pollution control devices. What changes have been made to your SWPPP as a result? Please explain below or attach a separate sheet labeled `MCM-6g' H. Did you identify and inspect at least 20% of outfalls and stormwater ponds? [Part V.G.6.b.3] ® Yes ❑ No 1. How many of each of the following do you have in your MS4? a. Outfalls (see definition in Permit): b. Stormwater Ponds: 3 2. Indicate if these facilities have all been located, or have only been estimated: located 3. How many of each did you inspect? a. Outfalls: b. Stormwater Ponds: all 4. What is the percentage inspected for each? a. Percentage of Outfalls: b. Percentage of Stormwater Ponds: 100% 5. If less than 20% of each type (outfalls and stormwater ponds) was inspected, please explain why: Attach a separate sheet, if necessary, labeled `MCM-6h-S' 6. Briefly, summarize the dates of completion of major additional protection measures triggered by your inspections: [Part V.G.6.b.4] Attach a separate sheet, if necessary, labeled `MCM-6h-6' Additional SWPPP Issues A. Did you make a change to any identified best management practices or measurable goals that were ❑ Yes ® No submitted with your permit application? [Part V.G.6.b.1] If you responded yes, explain underpart B. B. Briefly list the best management practices using their unique identification numbers you used in your SWPPP or any measurable goals that will be changed in your updated SWPPP, and why they have changed: Attach a separate sheet if necessary labeled `7b.' wq-strm4-06 Page 4 of 6 3/06 C. Did you rely on any other entities (MS4s, consultants or contractors) to satisfy any portion of your ❑ Yes ® No SWPPP? If yes, please identify below the entity and for what activities: D. Do you discharge to waters with a restricted discharge? See Appendix C Part B; you may view the ®Yes ❑ No applicable rules at www.pca.state.mn.us/water/water mnrules.html. Ifyou need assistance with this determination, contact Keith Cherryholmes, MPCA, (651) 296-6945. If you answered "no" to question "D," above, skip ahead to the Owner or Operator Certification section of this application. No response is needed here unless there was a change in listing or where your discharge(s) is/are located since 2004. a) A map of the watersheds where your MS4 discharges to the waters with restricted discharge. Use a USGS map or equivalent b) A narrative estimate of the impervious surfaces where your MS4 discharges to the waters with restricted discharge (estimated total impervious from land use and zoning or existing data can be used if available). e) A narrative estimate of the future / projected impervious surfaces where your MS4 discharges to the waters with restricted discharge (using available zoning or planning information that may affect your future discharges). d) A narrative estimate of how your SWPPP can be altered to eliminate new or expanded discharges to the waters with restricted discharge. This consists of your preliminary plan to avoid, divert, or eliminate discharges to restricted waters, whenever possible. wq-strm4-06 Page 5 of 6 3/06 Owner or Operator Certification' The person with overall administrative responsibility for SWPPP implementation must sign the annual report. This person must be duly authorized and should be the person who signed the MS4 permit application or a successor. I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete (Minn. R. 7001.0070). I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment (Minn. R. 7001.0540). r Authorized Signature (This person must be duly authorized Date to sign the annual report for the MS4) Heck Brian City Administrator Last Name First Name Title 1891 Walnut Street Mailing Address Lauderdale MN 55113 City State ZIP code 651-792-7655 brian.bakken-heck@ci.lauderdale.mn.us Telephone (include area code) E-mail Address Submit your annual report by June 30, 2006 to: MS4 Stormwater Program Municipal Division Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 If you have questions about the MS4 Annual Report for 2005 form, please visit the MPCA's MS4 Web site, www.pca.state.mn.us/water/stormwater/stormwater-ms4.html or call the MPCA's Keith Cherryholmes (651) 296-6945 or Scott Fox (651) 296-9433. Contact the MPCA toll free at (800) 657-3864. wq-strm4-06 Page 6 of 6 3/06 LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM ACTION REQUESTED MEETING DATE March 13 2007 Consent Presentation ITEM NUMBER Sign Variance Request Public Hearing X Discussion STAFF INITIAL Jim Action X Resolution ` Work session APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: l I' The sign ordinance allows for a maximum combined surface area of 250 square feet of signage. In 2003, Boyer Trucks received a variance to the regulations to allow for up to 400 square feet of signage. There is currently 400 square feet of existing signage on the property. The current signs include two free-standing signs, one monument sign, and 5 panel signs. They are proposing to install one additional sign on the east side of their building. The size of the proposed sign is 100 square feet. The new sign would exceed the 400 square foot allotment by 100 square feet. Thus, Boyer Trucks is requesting that the council amend their previous variance application to allow for 500 square feet of signage on the property. Attached is their application, which includes an example of the proposed sign. OPTIONS: 1) Deny the amended variance request, stating the rationale for denial. 2) Approve the amended variance request as presented. 3) Approve the amended variance request with conditions, as deemed necessary. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approving the amended variance application as presented to add 100 square feet of signage for a total of 500 square feet. COUNCIL ACTION: FEB -01-2007 10:14 CITY*LAUDERDALE City of Lauderdale 1891 Walnut Street • Lauderdale • Minnesota 55113 Phone; 651.631.0300 Fax; 651.631.2066 ZONING APPLICATION Type of Request Amount __Variance $ 75 Zoning Amendment $100 Conditional Use $165 PUD N/A Other of Applicant g© palu-4s Name MN Address J�©L`� r'©/f4d+�Jla I�r City kd-94-J -1 er State T�l A) Zip 6516312066 P.02iO3 Address of Property (if different than above) Day Phone 5,o i Evening Phone !5Fax lam � - 5 n Please describe hy you are applying for this application W� Ll c. Applican s gnature Date Boyer Trucks Lauderdale 2500 Broadway Dr (Hwy 280 & Broadway St NE) Lauderdale, MN 55113 651-638-5800 800-570-8453 Boyer Ford Trucks 2425 Broadway St NE Minneapolis, MN 55413 612-378-6000 800-791-4948 Boyer Truck Parts 2601 Broadway St NE Minneapolis, MN 55413 612-378-0460 800-999-4327 Boyer Trucks Sioux Falls 2101 E Benson Rd Sioux Falls, SD 57104 605-336-6100 888-269-3773 Boyer Trucks Rogers 21701 Industrial Blvd Rogers, MN 55374 763-428-8660 800-220-8495 Boyer Trucks Savage 8025 Highway 101 Savage, MN 55378 952-846-6900 800-440-4769 Boyer Trucks Duluth -Superior 1202 Susquehanna Ave Superior, W154880 715-394-2460 877-394-9652 -[B30'Y E R 1__ffMU(:DM� City of Lauderdale 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 Dear Council Members, We are requesting a variance to increase the allowable signage on our property located at 2500 Broadway Drive in Lauderdale. Currently we have three free standing signs; two of them are 10 x 12 pedestal mounted, that display our manufacturer's products Trademark names. The third sign is a monument mounted sign, 5 x 20, that says "Boyer Trucks — Lauderdale" at the corner of our property. Because our building is a gun metal gray color without any contrasting color, it is often mistaken as a warehouse rather than the Retail business that it is. The Boyer Trucks — Lauderdale sign on the corner monument is easily blocked by traffic stopped at the traffic light. We propose to add a 5 x 20 lighted sign to the East wall of our building (as shown on the attached photograph) so that all travelers on Highway 280 will be able to see it. This would put us over the allowable 250 sq. ft. of signage, but would greatly enhance the image of our Lauderdale business. Please consider approving this variance at this time. Sincerely, Gary Lee Operations Manager Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer 11 1 rf i s E0, d -ld101 Dill df)O�qo NOuonKSNOO srli Him amnu-Nojm t� rdta Nr,�aatx+:gin AIn UYQ Ir (i I1 ii II I � it ii II _,_41 1L it- --41 t, --a1 --71 11 I1 11 z c¢I r �gII gll 11 .1 11 II 11 IL 11 11 ==:11 I• 11 ---1 r it 11 II it 11 IG II ---I1 Ii _ I �I I � I Ir II 11 I G II II i1 11 •II I t_ ar •— 1 I :I I ' II y ! 90: ET 2,00E-17E-Ndl LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED MEETING DATE March 13, 2007 Consent Special ITEM NUMBER PCIC Report Public Hearing Report X_ STAFF INITIAL Jim Discussion Action Resolution Work session APPROVED BY ADMINISTRATOR'' DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE AND PAST COUNCIL ACTION: The following is a summary of items discussed at March 5th PCIC meeting: Snow*Commotion— attached is an editorial from the March 6th Roseville Review. Doggie Park— agreed that the proposed site near Walnut/Ione may not be best suited for that type of use; consensus was to recommend that the hockey area be used as an off -leash Doggie Play Area (DPA) with the understanding that if hockey rink redevelopment occurs in the future that the DPA would no longer exist inside the hockey rink area and that there would be no guarantee that another one within the park or elsewhere would be established; attached is my latest communications with Jean Blat et al. about the issue as well as the Star Tribune article regarding dog parks and politics that was in my Friday Report. Park Improvement— the vinyl fence of the tennis court will be black; the location of the gate on the south side of the court will move from the south-west corner to the south-east corner; the committee narrowed down the color choices for the tennis court surface but is not yet ready to make a recommendation; the issue of replacing the practice board arose for the first time and I have began discussing this option with BRA. Merchandise— the committee is recommending light gray t -shirts and polo shirts with the words "City of Lauderdale" in blue on the upper left front of the shirts; the discussion for coffee mugs or other items will be continued. Garage Sale- set for Saturday, May 19th; committee discussed comp plan committee ideas for open house, garage sales at park, letting multi -family residents use the social room, and an auction, and decided that whatever the comp plan committee wants to do is fine with them as long as they do. not need to be involved. Organize Event Supplies- the committee helped me finish organizing the supplies; the counter in the social room is now empty and ready for disposal. Music in the Park (last minute addition)- Kathy Lerfald informed the committee that she is going to try to arrange bands to play in the park this summer. OPTIONS: I STAFF RECOMMENDATION: I COUNCIL ACTION: Roseville Little Canada Review I Pleased with Snow Commotion Page 1 of 1 AT V rL.N= Tuesday, March 06, 2007 Pleased with Snow Commotion Tuesday, March 06, 2007 Pleased with Snow Commotion To the editor: I would like to thank the city of Lauderdale for organizing the annual Snow Commotion. This is a free event offered to anyone in the community. I have a 10 -year old sister who waits for this event every year. The highlight for many kids under the age of 12 is the medallion hunt. The prize money for finding the medallion is only $25, but that never stops anyone. This year my sister and four friends found it deep in a snow bank, next to the baseball field backstop. They all split the money equally, so everyone got $5. I've never seen five happier kids! Another activity at the Snow Commotion is a horse -pulled hay wagon. The wagon goes back and forth between the Lauderdale Park and City Hall. At the park there is a bonfire, ice skating, and a sledding hill. City Hall has a book fair, arts and crafts, and hot food and drinks. This was a great place to warm up on a cold day, especially since it was only 10 degrees outside. This is also a good opportunity for neighbors to visit each other, because usually people stay inside when it is cold. I would like to thank all of the volunteers that make this event possible. I hope the Snow Commotion is held for many years to come. Jayce Parry Lauderdale Related Links Content © 2007 Lillie Suburban Newspapers Software ©1998-20071up! Software, All Rights Reserved http://www,rosevillereview.com/print,asp?ArtiClelD=1492&SectionID=J 5&SubSectionID=... 3/8/2007 Jim Bownik From: Jean Blat Ublat@msn.com] Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 5:56 PM To: Jim Bownik Subject: Re: Off Leash Dog Park --City Council Meeting Dear Jim, Thank you for replying. I think we were beginning to realize that it was not the best placement for our OLDP. Also, it appears that the council is willing to consider another option in the current park. I certainly hope that we can keep this idea alive and act upon it. I will pass the result to the others. Sincerely, Jean Blat ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim Bownik <mailto:Jim.Bownik@ci.lauderdale.mn.us> To: Jean Blat <mailto:jblat@msn.com> Cc: Brian Heck <mailto:brian.heck@ci.lauderdale.mn.us> ; Heather Butkowski <mailto:heather.butkowski@ci.lauderdale.mn.us> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 3:50 PM Subject: RE: Off Leash Dog Park --City Council Meeting Jean, Rebecca, and Barbara, The city council discussed your idea on Tuesday for a dog park at the open space area near Walnut and Ione. The consensus was that the proposed location is not ideally suited for use as a dog park due to the proximity of adjacent residential properties. The council expressed that the city should be sensitive to a potential noise issue resulting from dogs and people frequenting a dog park at that location. The potential cost of the project was also a concern. The consensus of the city council was to consider the possibility of using the hockey rink area as a seasonal off -leash Doggie Play Area (DPA). This idea will be discussed at the next Park & Community Involvement Committee Meeting and then again with the council at a future meeting. Thanks for your involvement and input. Jim Bownik Assistant to the City Administrator City of Lauderdale 1891 Walnut St Lauderdale, MN 55113 651-792-7656 direct jim.bownik@ci.lauderdale.mn.us -----Original Message ----- From: Jean Blat [mailto:jblat@msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 4:18 PM To: Jim Bownik Subject: Off Leash Dog Park --City Council Meeting To: Lauderdale City Council, February 27, 2007 From: Jean Blat, Rebecca Borman, Barbara Meier We feel that Lauderdale would benefit from an off -leash dog park. Those reasons have been presented at an earlier meeting. 0 Where best to put this park is a consideration. We trust that our city council members will do the best thing for everyone... perhaps even two designated areas would work. One site being southwest of Peace Lutheran church. Another site being in our main park ... perhaps just adding gates to the hockey rink area so the dogs would stay in there and out of the street. Personally, we'd like to see a bigger fenced in area. The city council has done remarkable job providing for the needs of the athletically inclined --soccer, hockey, softball, archery, etc. We have a lovely picnic area and play area for youngsters. We hope that the need for our dogs will be treated with equal respect. After all, there are more dogs in this town than children. Such a provision would be USED every day, day after day, as can be noted by the number of dogs in the university golf course on any given day during the winter. Spring, summer and fall present the biggest need for our dogs as the golf course, so far, has been willing to let the dogs play once the snow comes. We are a big block of taxpayers if we chose to get united. We already pay for licenses. At last check, I don't see any charges being levied to use the facilities that are already provided. Maybe everyone who uses the park in any way, shape or manner should have a license -- Sincerely, The OLDP contigent (Off Leash Dog Park) 01 No sleeping dogs in San Francisco pooch politics Pagel of 3 StarTribunexom ! MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL MINNESOTA Last update: February 25, 2007 —1:23 AM No sleeping dogs in San Francisco pooch politics The city's dog lovers don't just chase their tails. For their furry cause, they lobby, they form PACs. And they howl till they're heard. By John M. Glionna, Los Angeles Times SAN FRANCISCO - One supervisor calls it the political version of a pit bull attack. The mayor says grimly that he probably will solve the homeless problem first. Opponents face off in city parks, public meetings and on the Internet, and they sometimes resort to shoving matches and name-calling. Canine politics here can be dog-eat-dog. In this city named after St. Francis of Assisi, the patron saint of animals, the 120,000 dogs outnumber children. And although the debates are not unique -- leash or no leash, dog parks or people parks -- San Francisco's arguments are particularly high-pitched. The dog lobby is a political tour de force. Most parks have pro -dog groups. The leash debate draws huge crowds at hearings, which go on and on and require overflow rooms. Canine political action committees hold question -and -answer sessions with would-be officeholders. In the last mayoral race, candidate Matt Gonzales even inspired a group called "Mutts for Matt." Blogs rail against "dog haters." One dog group's motto is "Speak up now or forever hold your leash!" Bumper stickers say: "I'm a dog owner and I vote." And woe to those who want those furry wards tethered. Take Arnold Levine: He loves dogs. It's their owners he fears. Levine, 56, who has no pets, sits on the 12 -member Dog Advisory Committee, which consults with city park officials. He's been shouted down at meetings for, as he says, "having the audacity to take a stand against people who feel their dogs should run free at every park and beach in San Francisco." Dog owners, he says, have turned local Sunnyside Park into "a toilet." But when he suggested they leash and clean up after their pets, he felt their wrath. He found dog feces inside his car and on his lawn. "One woman repeatedly screamed 'You're not human!'" he said. Eventually, he sold his home and moved. http://www.startribune.com/484/v-print/story/1023588.html 3/8/2007 No sleeping dogs in San Francisco pooch politics Page 2 of 3 Caroline Murphy, who regularly walks Laika, a beagle -terrier mix, says Sunnyside dog owners have made a big effort, circulating "petiquette" guides and holding park cleanups. She described Levine as part of "a fringe element of very intolerant people." For politicians, it bites Officials say they feel caught in the middle. "It's the third rail of San Francisco politics," Supervisor Sean Elsbernd said. "There is no middle ground. City officials know that if they touch the issue, they're going to get hurt." Even Gonzales, backed by "Mutts for Matt," says "the dog lobby has a Tammany Hall reality. Someone walks into your office and says 'I got 30 votes here, what can you do for me?' They walk precincts. It's the way the religious right does politics." All dog owners want is to be left alone, insists Sally Stephens, head of the San Francisco Dog Owners Group. She says opponents mischaracterize the issue as one pitting children against dogs. Many families have both, she reasons. Opponents have overblown the acts of the irresponsible few who do not curb their pets, she said. "We're not saying we want everything," said Stephens, whose dog, Skates, is a border collie mix. "We just don't want the wholesale banning of dogs." San Francisco is home to some of America's first dog day-care centers, as well as dog hotels, holistic veterinarians and restaurants that allow pets to eat alongside their owners. Pet lovers or fanatics? The city has one of the nation's lowest animal shelter kill rates, with 82 percent of dogs and cats saved, according to animal welfare statistics. Its 225 parks feature 29 off -leash dog play areas (or DPAs), the most per square mile nationwide, officials say. City rules require owners to provide dogs with palatable and nutritious food, as well as water that is changed at least once a day and placed in a non -tipping bowl. Advocates persuaded officials to add the designation "guardian" any time the phrase "pet owner" is mentioned in city code. "Every city has pet lovers; this one has pet fanatics," said Warren Eckstein, host of the syndicated radio show "The Pet Show."If I were running for office there, I'd run my campaign out of the dog parks." http://www.startribune.com/484/v-print/story/1023588.html 3/8/2007 No sleeping dogs in San Francisco pooch politics Activists have gone to court to challenge leash restrictions at several beaches maintained by the Golden Gate National Recreational Area. Although federal law bans unleashed dogs from the beaches, pet owners say their dogs have run free there since before the National Park Service took control of the area in 1974. When the recreational area imposed new rules in 2002, the activists sued, saying officials had acted without public input. In 2005, a judge agreed -- and the Park Service is negotiating with several groups, including dog owners. Unusual, even for S.F. Page 3 of 3 Activists say recent battles with park officials were key to organizing the canine lobby. "We were minding our own business when suddenly people declared war," said David Looman, who in 2000 created SF Dog PAC, a political action committee. At one rally years ago, activists chanted "Woof! Woof!" and threw plastic dog bones into the air. "There were grown-ups howling at the moon," recalled attorney Enrique Pearce, a onetime mayoral aide. "It was unusual behavior, even for San Francisco." When park officials proposed creating specific off -leash areas in 2001, they received 2,400 comments, many from owners whose notes bore both human signature and dog paw print. "I completely oppose the draft dog policy and I will not allow my dog [and me] to be penned like criminals," wrote one owner. "I pledge civil disobedience before I will be degraded in such a manner." While dog owners have been quiet of late, "it's the adage of the sleeping dogs," Stephens said. Try any further restrictions, she warned, "and those sleeping dogs are going to wake up." ©2007 Los Angeles Times. All rights reserved. http://www.startribune.com/484/v-print/story/1023588.html 3/8/2007 LAUDERDALE COUNCIL ACTION FORM TYPE OF REQUEST Consent ❑ Action X Resolution ❑ Information ❑ Work session ❑ MEETING DATE Tuesday, March 13, 2007 AGENDA NUMBER 9A — Discussion/Action DESCRIPTION Findings of Fact for 1768 Eustis Street Rental Housing License I BACKGROUND OR PAST COUNCIL ACTION I rental license as provided in City Code. As part of this process, the council needs to adopt Findings of Fact to support its licensing action decision. OPTIONS i. Aaopt ine imamgs or iaci 2. Do not adopt the findings of fact STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Council adopt the attached findings of fact. MOTION BY SECOND STAFF ACTION Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF LAUDERDALE RESOLUTION NO. 031307A CITY COUNCIL'S FINDINGS RELATED TO THE DENIAL OF A RENTAL LICENSE FOR 1768 EUSTIS STREET WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code section 9-11-8, it is unlawful in the City of Lauderdale ("City") for a property owner to operate a rental dwelling without first having obtained a license from the City; and WHEREAS, in order to qualify for a rental license from the City, a property owner must pay an annual fee and pass an inspection showing that the property complies with the City's Code, the International Property Maintenance Code and all applicable building codes; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lauderdale, that pursuant to City Code section 9-11-12(C), the Council now makes the following Findings of Fact related to its denial of a rental license for the property located at 1768 Eustis Street: FINDINGS OF FACT Mr. Daniel Busse ("Busse") owns property located at 1768 Eustis Street in the City. Busse applied for a rental license on September 14, 2006. 2. On October 3, 2006, the City notified Busse that an inspection of the property revealed several code violations that needed to be corrected within 30 days. The code violations include, but are not limited to, missing smoke detectors and extensive structural damage to the garage on the premises. 3. Busse subsequently corrected some, but not all, of the violations. 4. The City again notified Busse on December 18, 2006, that the violations needed to be corrected by January 5, 2007. 5. Busse again failed to correct the violations. 6. At no time did Busse appeal or challenge the findings of code violations pursuant to City Code section 9-11-11(D). 7. By letters dated January 8, and February 20, 2007, the City denied Busse's license application and informed him that he would have the opportunity to provide testimony or comments on his behalf at a hearing before the City Council on February 27, 2007. 8. At the time the license was denied, there were no tenants residing on the premises. However, Busse is currently renting the property without a license from the City. 9. The City Council held the hearing on the license denial on February 27, 2007. Busse did not attend. CONCLUSION After due notice, Busse has not corrected the outstanding code violations at the property located at 1768 Eustis Street. As a result, he is in violation of City Code, the International Property Maintenance Code, and the state building code, and does not qualify for a rental license. Therefore, Mr. Busse's application for a rental license is denied. Dated: March 13, 2007. Jeffrey Dains, Mayor ATTEST: Brian Heck, City Administrator The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 2 Memo To: City Council From: Brian W. Heck, City Administrator Date: March 9, 2007 Re: Administrator Update March 13, 2007 LEGISLATIVE: I attended the Metropolitan Area Managers Association monthly luncheon meeting on Thursday, March 8, 2007 and the topic of discussion was a legislative update. The main issues of Metro Cities and the League of Minnesota Cities continue to be two fold — Transportation funding and Local Government Aide. Several bills on transportation are pending and being discussed. On issue of concern is the distribution of MVEST for transportation. The League and Metro Cities supports a split of 38% metro 2% greater MN. The greater MN groups are pushing for up to a 9% share of the funds. Ironically, greater MN lobbied hard to defeat the amendment, now they want a greater share of the funds for transit. On the LGA front, a bill was heard in the senate to increase LGA by 100 million and create a new pot of funds for older, developed cities. Under this proposal, Lauderdale would benefit significantly. The interesting part this year is Mpls, St. Paul, Metro Cities, and the Suburban Mayors are holding together a collation and impressing on the legislature the significant disparity in LGA distribution, with 66% of the LGA going to out state cities and 34% being distributed to the metro area. There are some other issues being pushed by labor such as requiring expansion of sick leave usage to extended family (i.e. grandparents, aunts, uncles, etc.) and allowing cities and counties to extend health benefits to domestic partners. These two really don't impact Lauderdale. WIRELESS INTERNET: Heather and I attended a meeting at the City of Roseville to discuss the issue of re -energizing an existing radio based wireless internet system that could be used by residents on a subscriber basis. The provider is Ricochet. They have the proprietary system software to make the system operational. The cities own the hardware that is the radio receives and transmitters as well as the Wireless Access Points (WAP) on water towers and such. The proposal or idea is to light up the system, fill in any dead spots and have Ricochet provide management and support of the system. The city would have potential financial outlay but in exchange, would have some control over the monthly cost charged to subscribers. The system being looked at already exists and has the advantage of being radio based so penetration in to buildings is better. A system such as this provides an alternative to the existing offerings for high speed intent. I should note that I have been asked about when the city will get a wireless option by more than one resident. I do feel there is demand for this, the question is should the city invest in this type of system for the residents. 1931 CARL: attached is the response to Mr. Skow's February 25, 2007 letter sent via e-mail. GENERAL: I feel I am continuing to improve on those areas identified by the council. I am making an effort to contact and speak with the Mayor regarding the agenda and to communicate with the council members about issues they may want addressed. We are holding staff meetings regularly and I plan to start meeting with staff individually at least monthly to keep up to date on their projects. • Page 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of Governor Tim Pawlenty 130 State Capitol ♦ 75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard ♦ Saint Paul, MN 55155 MEMORANDUM To: Governing Bodies of Metropolitan Counties, Cities, and Townships From: John Hultquist, Director of Judicial, Board and Commission Appointments Date: March 7, 2007 Re: Metropolitan Council Vacancies and Public Hearing Information As per Minnesota Statutes 473.123, subdivision 3 (b), this memo provides notification of Metropolitan Council vacancies. The terms of all 16 members of the Metropolitan Council expired on January 1, 2007. I invite your participation and recommendations on these appointments. Please see the attached news release which describes the appointments process. If you have any questions, please contact me by telephone at 651-296-0019 or by e-mail at john.hultquist@state.mn.us. Voice: (651) 296-3391 or (800) 657-3717 Fax: (651) 296-2089 TDD: (651) 296-0075 or (800) 657-3598 Web site: http://www.govemor-state.rrm.us - An Equal Opportunity Employer Printed on recycled paper containing 15% post consumer material FFICE OF GOVERNOR TIM PAWLENTY 130 State Capitol . Saint Paul, MN 55155 ® (651) 296-000i 't W,41t�s f 1 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Contact: Brian McClung March 7, 2007 (651) 296-0001 GOVERNOR PAWLENTY ANNOUNCES METROPOLITAN COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS PROCESS Saint Paul — Governor Tim Pawienty today announced that he has appointed the following metropolitan citizens to serve on the Metropolitan Council Nominating Committee: Dave Clark, Chair Blaine, Blaine City Council Sherry Broecker, Forest Lake Mike Burton, Minnetonka Song Lo Fawcett, St. Paul Cyndee Fields, Eagan Paul Gaston, Vadnais Heights, Vadnais Heights City Council Mark Schiffman, Waconia, Waconia Mayor The Metropolitan Council Nominating Committee recommends candidates for the Metropolitan Council to the Governor. The terms of all 16 members of the Metropolitan Council expired in January 2007. These openings, which are geographically -based, were published by the Secretary of State's office on October 15, 2006. Although the posted application deadline was November 28, 2006, applications submitted to the Secretary of State's office by March 13, 2007 will be provided to the Nominating Committee in advance of the public hearing for their consideration. Applications may be downloaded from the Secretary of State's website, www.sos.state.mn.us. Applicants are asked to attach a current resume to their application. For a map of the metropolitan council districts, go to the website, http://www.metrocouncil.org/about/district maps htm. The Metropolitan Council Nominating Committee will hold a public hearing to accept statements from, or on behalf of, applicants for the Metropolitan Council. The public hearing will be conducted on Thursday, March 29, 2007, beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the Metropolitan Council chambers, located at 390 North Robert Street in St. Paul. The Metropolitan Council coordinates planning and development in the seven county metropolitan area and directly operates several regional services. The Metropolitan Council consists of 16 metropolitan citizens appointed from geographically defined districts in the seven county metropolitan area and a chair. All 17 members are appointed by the Governor, to four- year terms that are co -terminus with the Governor. -30- www.governonstate.mn.us ♦ (651) 296-0001 ♦ (651) 296-0056 fax s CITY OF LAUDERDALE LAUDERDALE CITU HALL # q _ec��� 1891 WALNUT STREET J&Jin&eLAUDERDALE, MN 55113 March 9, 2007 Mr. Harvey Skew 1931 Carl Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 Dear Mr. Skow: I received your e-mail and attached letter dated February 25, 2007 in which you provide rational for compensation for the claims of encroachment and drainage as well as proposed solutions that will resolve these issues. This letter serves as the city's response to your claims and the city's response to your proposed resolutions. The first issue you raise is one of encroachment. You maintain the city placed an alley partially on your property and did so in a way that resulted in an alleged illegal taking. For this alleged taking, you propose the city simply remove the material that is on your property and restore the area to its original condition. Alternately, you suggest the city compensate you for the use of this area in a "lease" arrangement. The city has evidence the alley area has been located in its present alignment for at least the past 20 years and possibly longer. Furthermore, removing the existing pavement will have an impact on the usability of the alley and restoration to its previous condition would entail placing class 5 gravel where the existing pavement is located. The city stands by and maintains its previous action and denies your claim of encroachment. The next issue you raise deals with drainage. Your resolution to drainage is to remove the existing catch basin located on your property. The county has an easement from you for the placement of this utility on your property and as such the city will not remove the structure and denies your claim. The city offers you the following proposed resolution regarding the original issue of the retaining wall. The city proposes to install a retaining wall on your property that will not extend into the alley right of way more than 6". The city will attempt to install the wall without disruption to the existing fence. If the city or its contractor is unable to install the wall without disrupting the fence, you will be notified and work will only continue upon written consent by you to proceed with permission to remove the existing fence. The city or its contractor will replace the existing fence. If you wish to have a new fence, you are responsible for the purchase and installation. Backfill, topsoil and grass seed will be placed behind the retaining wall. If you desire different plantings, you will be responsible for purchase and planting. The responsibility for ongoing maintenance of the retaining wall is yours. The city will do this work, as proposed, only after you sign a release from liability and future claims against the city. The temps of the release will be provided upon tentative agreement to these terms. Thank you for your consideration of this proposal. I look forward to your response. Sincerely, � Y Brian W. Heck' City Administrator City of Lauderdale Cc: Ron Batty, City Attorney Mayor and Council CITY OF LAUDERDALE J die ,74and in tfie Afettca 2VV7 jc3u0qE9 City of Lauderdale 1891 Walnut Street Lauderdale, MN 55113 2007 BUDGET SUMMARY The Lauderdale City Council adopted the 2007 annual budget on December 12, 2006 following several months of discussion and significant review. This document represents the results of those discussions and review. The Lauderdale City Council moved forward with two new major programs for 2007. One program is ongoing and the other is a major project Lauderdale began at the end of 2006, but whose results will be fully realized in 2007. The first program has the largest impact on the Lauderdale budget for 2007 and will continue to impact the budget for years to come. The City Council, seeing possible trends in increased criminal activity, especially in the burglaries of homes and theft from vehicles, discussed with the St. Anthony Police Department ways to increase the visibility, presence and effectiveness of Lauderdale's law enforcement services. The City Council and the St. Anthony Police Department arrived at an arrangement that will increase the patrol time in Lauderdale from the existing 16 hours to a full 24 hours by July 1, 2007. The increase in patrol hours will increase the police contract by just over 50% to a total annual cost of just over $500,000. This cost provides Lauderdale residents with a professional police officer and a police vehicle for 24 hours each day in addition to the support staff, communication system and related supplies the city has always received. In comparison, the cost to Lauderdale to develop its own department would be significantly more. For example, to continue 24 hour patrol service, Lauderdale would need to invest in three squad cars. Each vehicle costs approximately $30,000 fully equipped. To maintain 24 hour, 7 day a week patrol service, Lauderdale would need five officers and a police chief. Personnel costs are estimated at $300,000 and this does not include ongoing training and equipment such as uniforms and weapons. The greatest expense is the physical structure to house a police department. Lauderdale would need to significantly remodel existing facilities or construct a new facility to house a police department. In all, Lauderdale is receiving top notch service from St. Anthony at a little more than the cost of personnel and vehicles should Lauderdale choose to establish its own police force. What does the increase in patrol hours mean to the residents of Lauderdale? It means faster response time when there is a call for police service. It means more visibility as officers patrol the city an additional 8 hours each day. It means the officers assigned to work in Lauderdale will become even more familiar with the city and its residents, and in doing so, will notice when someone or something out of the ordinary is happening. The other major program adopted by the City Council for 2007 is community park improvements. Last fall, the City Council decided to move forward with a complete renovation of the tennis courts and basketball court. The improvements, when complete by June 2007, will result in two regulation sized tennis courts, two basketball courts, and trail improvements. The total estimated cost for these improvements is $188,000 and the project is being completed without an increase in property taxes.. The Council is using funds set aside over the past several years. The Council adopted a policy that distributes a portion of the General Fund balance at the end of the year to capital improvement funds. In addition to these funds, the City Council made the decision to close an inactive fund and transfer the balance to the Park Improvement Fund to cover the cost of the improvements and to ensure there are funds available for other improvements. Other expenditure areas of the budget are expected to remain relatively flat. Revenue is expected to increase slightly due to an increase in state aide and interest on investments. The following pages provide additional information for the General Fund and the city's dedicated Funds. GENERAL FUND The General Fund provides for funding of general government operations and is supported mainly by property taxes and state aide. The General Fund is the most flexible of the Funds operated by the City. General Fund Revenue is projected to be $1,032,081. It is anticipated that $550,900 or 53% of the General Fund revenue will come from property taxes. Another $410,131 will come from state aide, which represents an additional 40% of the general fund revenue for the year. The remaining revenue (7%) comes from licenses and permits, fines and fees, and interest income from investments. General Fund Expenditures are split among 19 individual budgets or accounts. Public Safety, consisting of Police, Fire and Prosecution, accounts for the largest expenditure area. The 2007 projected budget for Public Safety is $580,600. This represents 56% of the General Fund Budget. General Government, consisting of Legislative (City Council), Administration, Finance, Legal, Elections and Communications, accounts for $240,861 or 23% of General Fund Expenditures and is the next largest area of expenditure for Lauderdale. Culture and recreation, consisting of Park Administration, Park Maintenance, and Trees, makes up 8% of the General Fund and the remaining 13% consists of Buildings and Grounds, Engineering, Streets, and Planning and Inspections. OTHER FUNDS Other city funds are dedicated to specific expenses such as debt service payments for previous road improvements, capital improvements, and "business activity" such as the city's sewer operations fund. In general, these funds are supported through service fees and grants. The balances in these funds are dedicated to the fund and are used to support activities such as street improvements, sewer operations, park improvements, and maintenance of Lauderdale's buildings and grounds. Some of the funds are also supported through transfers from the General Fund when the audited fund balance exceeds 55% of operational funds. Lauderdale policy sends 20% of the excess to the Storm Sewer Improvement and General Capital Improvement Funds and 30% to the Park Improvement and Street Improvement Funds. Fund 409, the Water Utility Fund, was established to provide funds for major capital projects to the water system. Revenue was generated through a 5% surcharge on water and sewer usage. Several years ago, Lauderdale became a member of St. Paul Regional Water Service, and as such, was no longer responsible for the repair, maintenance or improvement of the water delivery system. As Lauderdale no longer provided maintenance or repair to the water system, the Council decided to close the fund and move existing dollars to the Park Improvement Fund to provide adequate funding for current and future park projects. The Council saw no reason to continue with the surcharge and, as of January 1, 2007, residents will no longer see this surcharge on their water and sewer bills. Revenue for dedicated funds is anticipated to be $724,366. The majority of the revenue will come from service charges for sewer. Sewer revenue is estimated to be $261,722 or 36%. Special assessments account for the next largest source of revenue at $170,687 or 24%. The third major source of revenue comes from the Tax Increment Finance district. This district will generate an estimated $157,000 or 22%. Expenditures in these Funds are budgeted at $932,081. The Debt Service funds account for the largest portion of expenditures at $393,190 and include principal, interest, and bond administration fees.1 Debt Service accounts for 42% of the Other Funds budget. Debt service on the bonds is paid partly by special assessments and interest generated by the city's fund balances. The bonds are fully supported and backed by the general taxing power and property taxes would be utilized should revenue from special assessments and interest fall short. So far, this has not been necessary. The next largest expense is the Sewer Utility Fund at a budgeted $220,111 accounting for 24% of the total expenditures. This is an enterprise or business activity fund and is supported by fees and charges based on sewer use by commercial and residential customers. The Sewer Utility Fund has no impact on property taxes. Rates on sewer usage have not changed for several years, and based on current estimates, will not be considered for adjustment for the next couple of years. The third major expenditure area is the Park Improvement Fund. Expenditures in this area are budgeted at $180,000 or 19% of dedicated fund expenditures. The expenditures in this area are supporting the rehabilitation of the Lauderdale Community Park tennis and basketball courts. This project has been under consideration by the City Council for the past 10 years. The following pages contain the complete 2007 Lauderdale City Budget starting with an overview of the combined General and Other Funds budgets. 1 Starting in 2000, Lauderdale began to sell bonds. Over a three year period, Lauderdale conducted three bond sales generating $3,120,000.00 for road and utility improvements. The outstanding balance, not including interest, is $2,375,000.00. Lauderdale will retire the first bond issue in 2012 and the last bond issue will expire in 2015. GENERAL FUND REVENUE 2006 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed CITY LEVIED TAXES 31010 Current Ad Valorem 338,436 385,979 409,071 369,805 471,000 31020 Delinquent Ad Valorem (1,034) 3,248 - 1,357 - 31030 Forfeited Tax Sales 127 (90) - 111 - 31040 Fiscal Disparities 84,408 76,919 78,198 74,284 79,900 SUB TOTAL PROPERTY TAXES 421,936 466,056 487,269 445,558 550,900 STATE AIDE 33401 Local Government Aide 248,712 296,712 359,622 359,418 408,143 33405 PERA Rate Increase Aide 1,198 1,198 - 1,198 1,198 33406 Market Value Home Credit 39,864 36,488 - 36,291 - TOTAL STATE AIDE 289,774 334,398 359,622 396,907 409,341 LICENSES AND FEES 32110 3.2 Alcohol License 30 90 60 65 65 32120 Cigarette License - 80 80 400 200 32130 Garbage Hauler Licenses 1,625 650 800 910 650 32140 HVAC Licenses 736 665 385 560 700 32150 Tree Company License 175 140 175 400 160 32160 Gas Station License 30 50 80 210 55 32180 Rental License Fee - - - 4,664 1,050 32240 Animal Licenses 130 260 100 410 100 34101 City Hall Rental 3,330 3,925 2,000 2,290 1,500 43103 Administrative Fee 15,240 372 - 145 - 34105 Sale of Publications - - 50 - - 34109 Copies 123 150 10 20 10 34111 Legal Fees 4,110 - - - - 34114 Advertising sales 1,375 - - 50 - 34115 General Government Miscellaneous - - 5,000 - - TOTAL LICENSES AND FEES 26,903 6,382 8,740 10,124 4,490 REVENUE OTHER 36100 Special Assessments 3,737 2,707 - 3,792 - 36101 Principal - 350 - - 36102 Penalties and Interest 73 371 50 541 - 36103 Tree Removal 14 - - - 36200 Miscellaneous Revenue - 17,752 - 3 - 36211 Investment Interest 7,196 19,729 8,000 28,425 15,000 36230 Donations - 1,820 - - - 36240 Surcharges 533 424 250 401 - 36250 Refunds and Reimbursements 468 1,013 500 5,110 - 36252 LMCIT Insurance Dividend 3,514 5,331 1,000 1,414 - 36255 Miscellaneous 50 34 - - - TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 15,584 49,531 9,800 39,686 15,000 LAW ENFORCEMENT 35,705 30,670 30,100 25,855 30,000 FIRE 8,366 1,828 5,500 2,709 3,500 PLANNING & INSPECTIONS 23,124 18,408 11,750 17,166 14,850 TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 4,000 TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE GENERAL REVENUE FUND EXPENDITURES Legislative Administrative Finance General Legal Elections Communications Police Fire Prosecution Buildings and Grounds Streets Engineering Planning & Inspections Trees Park Administration Park Maintenance Development EXPENDITURES BEFORE TRANSFERS Contingency Transfers Out TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 821,393 907,273 912,781 938,005 1,032,081 20,939 22,034 23,910 21,341 24,655 63,132 68,305 75,119 68,856 78,536 49,958 53,235 62,833 60,643 71,270 12,638 25,256 15,750 18,969 15,750 13,561 11,528 19,693 15,832 18,320 29,098 24,667 31,123 29,243 32,330 240,818 247,219 257,500 260,924 525,600 32,509 29,281 45,000 21,246 42,000 10,946 11,453 12,000 11,925 13,000 20,731 22,370 30,300 24,355 30,019 26,728 37,279 36,215 28,170 39,798 1,545 7,000 5,400 13,201 5,000 31,565 34,208 34,496 34,622 35,783 1,080 3,797 2,650 2,137 5,200 11,606 9,402 16,277 15,480 29,405 37,091 32,388 47,580 40,229 46,415 4,838 21,847 10,000 2,723 4,000 603,946 639,421 715,846 667,172 1,017,081 - - 10,000 - 15,000 214,896 353,016 130,000 130,000 - 818,842 992,437 855,846 797,172 1,032,081 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 41100 LEGISLATIVE Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed REVENUE Levy 14,377 State Aide 10,278 Other - TOTAL LEGISLATIVE REVENUE 24,655 EXPENDITURES Personnel 103 Part-time employees 13,200 13,200 13,100 13,200 13,200 13,200 122 FICA 1,010 1,010 1,002 1,010 1,010 1,010 Subtotal Personnel 14,210 14,210 14,102 14,210 14,210 14,210 General Operations 201 General Supplies - - 5 - 11 - 202 Permanent Supplies - - 25 - - - 203 Postage - - - - - - 305 Legal Fees - 500 - 500 - 500 308 Training and Conferences - 70 300 1,000 9 1,000 331 Travel - - 103 100 - 270 352 Publishing - - - - - - 361 General Liability 4,216 3,781 4,841 4,000 4,418 4,515 438 Dues and Subscriptions 2,301 2,323 2,362 3,750 2,528 3,755 439 Special Events - - 55 100 - 150 440 Meeting Expenses 54 55 241 250 165 255 442 Miscellaneous Expenses - - - - - - Subtotal General Operations 6,571 6,729 7,932 9,700 7,131 10,445 Capital Equipment 530 Furniture and Equipment 538 Computer software and Equipment Subtotal Capital Equipment - - - _ - - TOTAL LEGISLATIVE EXPENSE 20,781 20,939 22,034 23,910 21,341 24,655 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 41200 ADMINISTRATION Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed REVENUE Levy 42,515 State Aide 31,531 Other 4,490 TOTAL REVENUE 78,536 EXPENDITURES Personnel 101 Full-time employees - 39,154 33,408 41,237 40,684 44,726 104 Temp. employees - - 5,306 - - - 121 PERA - 2,247 1,510 2,439 2,441 2,684 122 FICA - 3,200 2,345 3,109 3,171 3,422 131 Benefits (health, dental, etc) - 3,332 3,149 4,290 3,627 4,620 151 Workers Compensation - 520 940 769 828 259 Subtotal Personnel - 48,453 46,657 51,844 50,753 55,711 General Operations 201 General Supplies - 1,988 2,700 2,000 1,035 2,100 203 Postage - 702 894 1,200 1,370 1,000 208 Water cooler water - 433 355 425 260 425 306 Consulting fees - - 5,625 1,000 - 1,000 308 Training and conferences - 952 1,528 5,000 2,033 5,000 331 Travel Expenses - 1,155 815 2,500 2,012 1,500 361 General liability - 2,895 3,711 3,000 3,452 3,000 391 Telephones/Pagers - 2,729 3,145 3,500 1,989 3,500 401 Copier - 945 682 1,000 1,212 1,000 404 Computer Repair/Maintenance - - - 500 - 500 409 Other equipment repair - - - 200 - - 437 Sales tax - - 8 - 39 - 438 Dues and Subscriptions - 1,827 1,014 2,500 1,894 2,500 442 Miscellaneous expenses - 264 326 250 383 300 Subtotal General Operations - 13,890 20,801 23,075 15,681 21,825 Capital Expenditures 530 Furniture and equipment - - - - - - 531 Office equipment - - - - - - 534 Office furniture - 586 640 - - - 538 Computers and technology - 203 208 200 2,423 1,000 Subtotal Capital - 789 847 200 2,423 1,000 TOTAL EXPENSES - 63,132 68,305 75,119 68,856 78,536 41300 FINANCE REVENUE Levy State Aide Other TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES Personnel 101 Full-time employees 121 PERA 122 FICA 131 Benefits (health, dental, etc) Subtotal Personnel General Operations 201 General Supplies 301 Auditing 303 Financial Contract 307 Computer Services 308 Training and conferences 442 Miscellaneous expenses Subtotal General Operations Capital Expenditures 530 Furniture and equipment 531 Office equipment 534 Office furniture 538 Computers and technology Subtotal Capital TOTAL EXPENSES 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed 32,283 23,987 15,000 71,270 - 33,864 29,287 39,027 37,902 42,983 - 1,953 1,760 2,258 2,274 2,579 - 2,810 1,760 2,258 2,912 3,288 - 2,265 2,564 4,290 3,766 4,620 - 40,891 35,373 47,833 46,854 53,470 - - 533 500 - 500 - 6,742 14,196 9,000 11,482 12,000 - - - 3,000 - 1,000 - 1,707 2,608 2,500 1,960 4,000 - - 499 - 100 100 - 618 26 - 247 200 - 9,067 17,862 15,000 13,789 17,800 - 49,958 53,235 62,833 60,643 71,270 41400 LEGAL - GENERAL REVENUE 17,106 15,000 Levy 437 State Aide 1,864 Other - 12,638 TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES 18,969 Personnel - 12,638 101 Full-time employees 104 Temp. employees 121 PERA 122 FICA 131 Benefits (health, dental, etc) 151 Workers Compensation Subtotal Personnel General Operations 305 Legal Fees - general 355 Miscellaneous Printing & Process 442 Miscellaneous expenses Subtotal General Operations TOTAL EXPENSES 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed 9,036 6,714 15,750 - 12,008 24,819 15,000 17,106 15,000 - 630 437 750 1,864 750 - 12,638 25,256 15,750 18,969 15,750 - 12,638 25,256 15,750 18,969 15,750 41500 ELECTIONS REVENUE 9,797 12,220 Levy 753 State Aide 1,788 Other - 477 TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES 588 Personnel - 690 101 Full-time employees 104 Temp. employees 121 PERA 122 FICA 131 Benefits (health, dental, etc) 151 Workers Compensation 14,106 Subtotal Personnel General Operations 201 General Supplies 202 Permanent Supplies 327 Other Services 331 Travel Expenses 352 Public information & Notices 409 Other equipment and repair 440 Meeting expenses 442 Miscellaneous expenses 200 Subtotal General Operations Capital Expenditures 530 Furniture and equipment 531 Office equipment 534 Office furniture 538 Computers and technology - Subtotal Capital - 323 TOTAL EXPENSES 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed 10,510 7,810 18,320 - 8,274 7,113 10,990 9,797 12,220 - 1,714 753 1,700 1,788 1,700 - 477 448 942 588 835 - 690 642 1,201 749 1,065 - 516 471 2,310 1,183 1,650 - 11,671 9,427 17,143 14,106 17,470 - 184 428 600 33 200 - 127 130 - 131 150 - - 142 75 161 150 - - - 200 16 200 11 - 75 154 150 - 18 - - - - 323 718 950 494 850 - 1,568 1,384 1,600 1,232 - - 1,568 1,384 1,600 1,232 - - 13,561 11,528 19,693 15,832 18,320 41600 COMMUNICATIONS REVENUE 13,410 14,786 Levy 673 State Aide 805 Other - 1,075 TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES 1,062 Personnel - 1,448 101 Full-time employees 104 Temp. employees 121 PERA 122 FICA 131 Benefits (health, dental, etc) 151 Workers Compensation 1,010 Subtotal Personnel General Operations 203 Postage 309 Delivery 352 Public Information & Notices 353 Newsletter Printing 354 Community Directory 355 Miscellaneous printing 3,151 Subtotal General Operations Capital Expenditures 530 Furniture and equipment 531 Office equipment 534 Office furniture 538 Computers and technology 250 Subtotal Capital 9,343 TOTAL EXPENSES 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed 18,548 13,782 32,330 - 13,562 12,248 13,621 13,410 14,786 - 763 673 805 805 887 - 1,075 975 1,027 1,062 532 - 1,448 1,428 1,320 1,127 1,650 - 16,847 15,324 16,773 16,404 17,855 - 1,200 850 3,300 1,010 1,800 - 8,469 7,517 7,500 8,515 8,250 - 309 0 300 164 175 - 669 736 1,000 3,151 4,000 - 1,374 - 2,000 - - 231 240 250 (0) 250 - 12,251 9,343 14,350 12,839 14,475 29,098 24,667 31,123 29,243 32,330 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 42100 POLICE Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed REVENUE Levy State Aide 34202 False Security Alarm 35101 Court Fines TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES Personnel 101 Full-time employees 104 Temp. employees 121 PERA 122 FICA 131 Benefits (health, dental, etc) 151 Workers Compensation Subtotal Personnel General Operations 319 Police Contract 308 Insurance 442 Miscellaneous expenses -Dispatch Subtotal General Operations TOTAL EXPENSES - - 100 - 35,705 30,670 30,000 - 35,705 30,670 30,100 284,331 211,269 25,855 30,000 25,855 525,600 240,818 247,219 255,000 255,254 519,500 - - 2,500 - - - - - 5,670 6,100 240,818 247,219 257,500 260,924 525,600 240,818 247,219 257,500 260,924 525,600 42200 FIRE REVENUE 12,898 17,000 Levy 14,001 State Aide 34202 False Fire Alarm 34203 Fire Inspection Fee 5,500 TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES - 2,200 Personnel 3,500 101 Full-time employees 104 Temp. employees 121 PERA 122 FICA 131 Benefits (health, dental, etc) 151 Workers Compensation Subtotal Personnel General Operations 320 Fire Contract 321 Fire calls 322 False Alarms 323 Fire Inspections Subtotal General Operations TOTAL EXPENSES 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed 22,088 16,412 - 6,866 359 2,500 2,169 2,000 - 1,500 1,469 3,000 540 1,500 8,366 1,828 5,500 2,709 42,000 - 12,898 12,898 16,000 12,898 17,000 - 12,565 14,001 20,000 7,898 20,000 - 4,847 1,795 5,500 - 2,500 - 2,200 588 3,500 450 2,500 - 32,509 29,281 45,000 21,246 42,000 - 32,509 29,281 45,000 21,246 42,000 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 42300 PROSECUTION Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed REVENUE Levy State aide Other TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES General Operations 305 Legal Fees 355 Miscellaneous printing Subtotal General Operations TOTAL EXPENSES 7,458 5,542 13,000 - 10,200 10,443 10,500 10,282 11,000 746 1,010 1,500 1,643 2,000 - 10,946 11,453 12,000 11,925 13,000 - 10,946 11,453 12,000 11,925 13,000 43100 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS REVENUE 10,985 12,055 Levy 397 State Aide 659 Other - 572 TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES Personnel 992 101 Full-time employees 104 Temp. employees 121 PERA 122 FICA 131 Benefits (health, dental, etc) 151 Workers Compensation 17,500 Subtotal Personnel General Operations 202 Permanent Supplies 212 Motor Fuels 213 Lubricants and other fluids 225 Landscaping Materials 227 Tools and Equipment 228 Miscellaneous Repairs & supplies 308 Training and conferences 327 Other Services 362 Property Insurance 363 Automotive Insurance 381 Electricity 382 Water 383 Gas Utilities 384 Refuse Disposal 391 Telephone/Pagers 402 Truck repair and Maintenance 426 Machinery rental 442 Miscellaneous 94 Subtotal General Operations Capital Expenditures 530 Furniture and equipment 538 Land - Subtotal Capital - - TOTAL EXPENSES 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed 16,785 13,234 30,019 7,388 7,062 11,513 10,985 12,055 - 395 397 691 659 723 - 572 578 881 872 992 - 575 615 1,320 952 1,320 - 2,080 2,816 3,095 1,195 604 - 11,010 11,468 17,500 14,664 15,694 - 1,081 396 1,100 93 500 - 1,800 2,339 2,500 2,084 3,000 - 182 119 175 82 150 - - - 150 - - - - 52 250 11 100 - 669 1,254 1,200 1,089 1,200 - - 200 - 200 - 110 94 500 621 500 - - - 650 - - - - - 375 - - - 1,496 2,668 1,500 2,122 2,000 - 60 70 75 47 75 - 2,651 2,561 2,650 1,981 2,700 - 363 505 400 804 900 - 246 280 275 366 500 - 1,063 563 500 356 2,500 - - - 300 - - - - - - 36 - - 9,721 10,902 12,800 9,691 14,325 20,731 22,370 30,300 24,355 30,019 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 43200 STREETS Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed REVENUE 100 - Levy - State Aide 322880 Street excavation permit 75 TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES 8,788 Personnel 10,054 101 Full-time employees 121 PERA 122 FICA 131 Benefits (health, dental, etc) 151 Workers Compensation 861 Subtotal Personnel General Operations 201 General Supplies 226 Signs 227 Tools and Equipment 228 Miscellaneous Repairs and Maintenance. 308 Training and conferences 313 Snow and Ice Removal 314 Street Sweeping 324 Alley Repair 328 Street Repair 381 Electric 200 Subtotal General Operations Capital Expenditures - 63 530 Furniture and equipment 531 Office equipment 534 Office furniture 538 Computers and technology 275 Subtotal Capital 540 TOTAL EXPENSES - TRANSFER TO 302,303,304 22,833 16,965 - 75 100 - 75 - - 75 100 - 75 39,798 - 10,053 8,788 10,973 10,054 11,260 - 536 539 658 603 676 - 777 784 839 812 861 - 780 840 1,320 846 1,320 - - - - 588 756 - 12,146 10,951 13,790 12,903 14,873 14 - - - 200 - 200 - 63 - 200 - 200 - 76 4 275 253 275 - - 540 - - - 4,867 16,911 11,000 3,704 11,000 - 4,400 4,400 5,000 5,390 6,000 - - 15 250 - 250 600 2,500 - 5,177 4,459 5,500 5,306 4,500 - 14,582 26,328 22,425 15,267 24,925 26,728 37,279 36,215 28,170 39,798 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 43300 ENGINEERING Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed REVENUE Levy State Aide Other TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES General Operations 304 Engineering Contract 442 Miscellaneous expenses Subtotal General Operations TOTAL EXPENSES 2,869 2,131 5,000 - 1,320 6,768 5,000 12,963 4,600 225 232 400 238 400 - 1,545 7,000 5,400 13,201 5,000 - 1,545 7,000 5,400 13,201 5,000 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 43400 PLANNING & INSPECTIONS Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed REVENUE 22,269 21,721 Levy 23,131 State Aide 13,037 Other 32210 Building Permits 32211 Zoning Permit Applications 32225 Plan Review 32230 Plumbing Permits 32270 HVAC Permits 34110 Variance Fee 34112 Conditional Use Permit 34113 Zoning Amendment 600 TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES 250 Personnel 700 101 Full-time employees 121 PERA 122 FICA 131 Benefits (health, dental, etc) 151 Workers Compensation - 100 Subtotal Personnel General Operations 201 General Supplies 202 Permanent Supplies 203 Postage 306 Consulting Fees 308 Training and conferences 312 Building Inspector 327 Other Services 331 Travel Expenses 355 Miscellaneous Printing 386 Gopher State One Call 442 Miscellaneous expenses 443 Surcharge Report - Subtotal General Operations Capital Expenditures - - 530 Furniture and equipment 531 Office equipment 534 Office furniture 538 Computers and technology 500 Subtotal Capital 84 TOTAL EXPENSES 12,009 8,924 22,364 22,269 21,721 75 23,131 - 15,723 13,037 10,000 11,778 11,000 - 345 305 200 190 50 - 5,169 3,198 1,000 2,945 2,500 - 704 708 150 1,306 600 - 858 845 250 823 700 - 225 150 150 - - - - 165 - 50 - - 100 - - - - - 23,124 18,408 11,750 17,166.11 35,783 22,364 22,269 21,721 21,392 23,131 - 1,217 1,249 1,303 1,284 1,338 - 1,756 1,812 1,662 1,682 1,770 - 1,607 2,342 2,310 1,792 2,310 - - - - - 134 - 26,944 27,672 26,996 26,150 28,683 - - 19 100 11 100 - - 100 - 107 - - - - - 359 250 2,475 1,969 2,500 1,969 2,500 - 280 419 500 470 500 - 2,277 2,000 927 2,000 780 835 1,500 2,939 500 - - - - 41 100 - - 124 250 106 250 - 257 312 250 493 500 - 451 84 - 789 - - 378 399 400 262 400 - 4,622 6,537 7,500 8,472 7,100 31,565 34,208 34,496 34,622 35,783 2003 43500 TREES Actual REVENUE 276 500 Levy - State aide 139 Other - TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES 130 General Operations 225 Landscaping Materials 228 Miscellaneous Repairs 308 Training and conferences 317 Tree Service 3,797 Subtotal General Operations 2,137 TOTAL EXPENSES 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed 2,983 2,217 5,200 - - 276 500 - - - - 139 - - - - 130 130 150 140 200 - 950 3,252 2,000 1,997 5,000 - 1,080 3,797 2,650 2,137 5,200 - 1,080 3,797 2,650 2,137 5,200 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 45100 PARK ADMINISTRATION Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed REVENUE 7,557 12,762 Levy 23,287 State aide 439 Other 740 TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES 632 Personnel 992 101 Full-time employees 121 PERA 122 FICA 131 Benefits (health, dental, etc) 151 Workers Compensation 29,105 Subtotal Personnel General Operations 371 Non-resident Reimbursement 442 Miscellaneous Expenses - Subtotal General Operations Capital Expenditures 550 Other Improvements 113 Subtotal Capital 413 TOTAL EXPENSES 16,870 12,535 29,405 - 9,167 7,557 12,762 12,338 23,287 - 549 439 754 740 1,397 - 778 632 961 992 1,781 - 973 662 1,500 997 2,640 - 11,467 9,289 15,977 15,067 29,105 - 139 113 300 74 300 - - - - 339 - 139 113 300 413 300 - 11,606 9,402 16,277 15,480 29,405 45200 PARK MAINTENANCE REVENUE 24,831 27,448 Levy 2,847 State aide 3,358 Other - 1,385 TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES 1,490 Personnel - 2,396 101 Full-time employees 104 Temp. employees 121 PERA 122 FICA 131 Benefits (health, dental, etc) 151 Workers Compensation 727 Subtotal Personnel General Operations 201 General Supplies 202 Permanent Supplies 225 Landscaping Materials 228 Miscellaneous Repairs & Maintenance 317 Tree Service 381 Electric 383 Gas Utility 384 Refuse 391 Telephones and Pages 403 Mower repair 412 Warming House Repair 427 Porta Potty Rental - 2,663 Subtotal General Operations Capital Expenditures - 550 Other Improvements 1,114 Subtotal Capital 1,013 TOTAL EXPENSES 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed 26,799 19,616 46,415 25,353 21,237 26,600 24,831 27,448 - 5,099 2,847 4,000 3,358 5,000 - 1,385 1,333 1,788 1,490 1,947 - 2,396 2,157 2,280 2,262 2,482 - 2,016 2,889 3,300 2,110 3,300 - 260 376 912 727 993 - 36,510 30,838 38,880 34,778 41,170 - 27 3,084 1,500 130 1,500 - - 66 - 75 - - 897 16 250 35 250 - 17 826 1,000 87 650 - 2,663 - 1,500 - - - 960 1,114 750 1,013 500 - 1,929 1,414 2,000 1,273 700 - 363 293 500 34 - - 58 447 250 116 295 - 581 1,550 - 321 500 95 140 500 218 250 - 413 508 450 578 600 - 8,001 9,457 8,700 3,879 5,245 - - - - 1,572 - - - - - 1,572 - - 37,091 32,388 47,580 40,229 46,415 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 48412 DEVELOPMENT Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed REVENUE Levy State aide Other - Transfer from 405 4,000 TOTAL REVENUE 4,000 EXPENDITURES Personnel 101 Full-time employees - - - - - - 104 Temp. employees - - - - - - 121 PERA - - - - - 122 FICA - - - - - 131 Benefits (health, dental, etc) - - - - - 151 Workers Compensation - - - - - Subtotal Personnel - - - - - - General Operations 306 Consulting Fees - 4,838 21,847 - - 3,500 442 Miscellaneous expenses 500 Subtotal General Operations - 4,838 21,847 - - 4,000 Capital Expenditures 550 Land 555 Other Improvements - - - 10,000 2,723 Subtotal Capital - - - 10,000 2,723 - TOTAL EXPENSES - 4,838 21,847 10,000 2,723 4,000 45300 CONTINGENCY - - - 10,000 REVENUE - - - 10,000 - 15,000 Levy State aide Other TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES Personnel 101 Full-time employees 104 Temp. employees 121 PERA 122 FICA 131 Benefits (health, dental, etc) 151 Workers Compensation Subtotal Personnel General Operations 444 CONTINGENCY FUNDS 710 OPERATING TRANSFERS Subtotal General Operations TOTAL EXPENSES 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed 8,606 6,394 15,000 - - - 10,000 - 15,000 - - - 10,000 - 15,000 - - - 10,000 - 15,000 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 45400 TRANSFERS OUT Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed REVENUE Levy 55,000 TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES 732 Transfers to 302 733 Transfers to 303 734 Transfers to 304 741 Transfers to 401 742 Transfers to 402 743 Transfers to 403 744 Transfers to 404 Total Transfers 55,000 25,000 25,000 - 70,000 262,554 35,000 - 35,000 35,000 70,000 - 13,469 6,139 - - 18,979 14,092 - - 8,979 4,092 - - 13,469 6,139 - - 214,896 353,016 130,000 2007 LAUDERDALE BUDGET SUMMARY OF FUNDS 201 - 601 Total Expenditures 201 Community Events Fund 2,025 2,203 2,448 2006 3,371 2,535 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 22,917 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed Total Revenues 28,129 38,640 301 TIF Debt Service Fund 141,755 144,025 201 Community Events Fund 2,476 2,440 3,141 2,405 4,120 2,235 202 Cable T.V. Fund 14,632 16,966 19,063 16,500 15,575 20,284 203 Recycling Fund 34,157 39,519 39,861 44,298 40,565 39,638 301 TIF Debt Service Fund 134,430 140,563 154,081 140,750 76,950 - 302 2000 Imp Debt Fund 97,993 70,728 73,496 51,000 44,971 56,739 303 2002 Imp Debt Fund 111,289 56,818 48,835 47,000 33,388 52,558 304 2003 Imp Debt Fund - 232,590 109,158 61,000 61,927 61,390 401 Street Improvement Fund 85,794 4,123 14,926 6,000 63,383 10,000 402 General Capital Impr. Fund 6,737 5,176 4,551 1,000 7,220 4,250 403 Storm Water Impr. Fund 49,549 47,615 53,680 49,500 54,497 52,500 404 Park Improvement Fund 1,227 1,435 2,770 1,200 4,538 3,000 405 TIF Project Fund - 181 590 - 81,659 157,000 407 Sewer Improvement Fund 1,296 1,002 1,660 - 3,402 3,000 409 Water Utility Fund 22,531 9,545 10,688 - 12,908 - 601 Sewer Utility Fund 473,210 226,565 232,530 227,500 235,861 261,772 Total Revenue Before Fund Balance 1,035,321 855,265 769,029 648,153 740,964 724,365 Use of Fund Balance 177,274 207,716 Total Revenues 11035,321 855,265 769,029 825,427 740,964 932,081 Total Expenditures 201 Community Events Fund 2,025 2,203 2,448 2,420 3,371 2,535 202 Cable T.V. Fund 14,567 15,548 13,621 24,688 22,917 26,140 203 Recycling Fund 35,128 41,275 31,414 37,571 28,129 38,640 301 TIF Debt Service Fund 141,755 144,025 - - - - 302 2000 Impr. Debt Fund 51,495 120,113 121,137 121,533 121,793 122,520 303 2002 Impr. Debt Fund 56,512 48,014 161,555 155,203 153,294 149,690 304 2003 Impr. Debt Fund - 32,988 28,599 140,013 127,606 120,980 401 Street Improvement Fund 33,538 - - 50,000 40,764 12,500 402 General Capital Impr. Fund - 25,522 28,666 50,500 37,509 12,500 403 Storm Water Impr. Fund 33,374 33,851 36,212 36,825 31,806 44,465 404 Park Improvement Fund 1,464 32,738 - - 96,680 180,000 405 TIF Project Fund 9,784 7,042 5,564 - 664 2,000 407 Sewer Improvement Fund 78 - - - - - 409 Water Utility Fund 18,333 - - - - - 601 Sewer Utility Fund 173,829 177,513 194,618 206,674 190,364 220,111 Total Expenditures 571,882 680,832 623,833 825,427 854,898 932,081 Surplus/(deficit) 463,439 174,434 145,196 - (113,935) - Community Events Fund 201 2006 DEPT. 45600 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed BEGINNING BALANCE - 2,897 3,134 3,827 3,812 4,560 REVENUES: 34786 Winter Event 179 155 717 270 1,178 150 34787 Garage Sale 50 50 60 60 - 50 34788 Day in the Park 1,332 1,272 1,317 1,150 1,483 1,100 34795 Halloween Donations 835 884 787 750 764 700 36211 Investment Interest 30 32 102 75 198 135 36255 Misc. 50 47 157 100 498 100 Total Revenue 2,476 2,440 3,141 2,405 4,120 2,235 EXPENDITURES: 202 Permanent Supplies 77 - - - 214 373 T -Shirts - 455 - - - - 375 Winter Event 639 110 768 760 808 800 376 Garage Sale 38 - - 50 - - 377 Day in the Park 710 893 984 875 1,134 975 378 Night Out 124 125 113 135 124 125 379 Halloween Event 323 405 420 400 700 415 437 Sales Tax - - 16 - 136 - 440 Meeting Expenses 114 215 147 200 256 220 Total Expenses 2,025 2,203 2,448 2,420 31371 2,535 Fund balance gain/loss 451 237 693 (15) 749 (300) 39200 Transfers In - - - - - - 710 Transfers Out - - - - - - Ending Fund Balance 2,897 3,134 3,827 3,812 4,560 4,260 Communications Fund 202 2006 DEPT. 49500 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed BEGINNING BALANCE 35,923 35,988 37,406 42,849 34,661 27,319 REVENUES: 36253 Franchise Fees 14,300 16,579 18,240 16,000 14,143 19,334 36211 Investment Interest 332 387 824 500 1,432 950 33600 Grants - - - - Total Revenues 14,632 16,966 19,063 16,500 15,575 20,284 EXPENDITURES: 101 Reg. Full Time Employees 6,397 7,386 5,986 13,621 13,330 14,786 121 PERA Contributions 322 418 347 805 800 887 122 FICA Contributions 453 588 497 1,027 1,056 1,131 126 ICMA Retirement - - - - 131 Group Insurance 217 763 672 1,500 1,127 1,650 133 Life Insurance - - - - - 151 Workers Comp - - - - - 86 Personnel costs 7,389 9,155 7,501 16,953 16,313 18,540 202 Permanent Supplies - - - - - - 307 Web Hosting 685 360 450 360 300 420 327 Other Service 2,696 2,347 1,473 2,775 1,637 2,280 329 Cable Franchise Fee 3,797 3,686 4,196 4,600 4,667 4,900 530 Furniture and Equipment - - - - - Total Operating Costs 7,178 6,393 6,119 7,735 6,604 7,600 Total Expenses 14,567 15,548 13,621 24,688 22,917 26,140 Fund Balance gain/loss 65 1,418 5,443 (8,188) (7,342) (5,856) 39200 Transfers In - - - - - 710 Transfers Out - - - - - Ending Fund Balance 35,988 37,406 42,849 34,661 27,319 21,463 Recycling Fund 203 39200 Transfers In - - - - - 710 Transfers Out - - - - - Ending Fund Balance 20,067 18,311 26,758 33,485 45,921 46,919 2006 DEPT. 50000 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed Beginning Balance 21,038 20,067 18,311 26,758 33,485 45,921 REVENUES: 36100 Recycling Fee 29,837 34,287 34,900 39,633 34,644 34,663 33622 SCORE Grant 4,079 4,525 4,467 4,465 4,378 4,200 36211 Investment Interest 183 695 494 200 1,120 675 36255 Other 58 12 - - 423 100 Total Revenues 34,157 39,519 39,861 44,298 40,565 39,638 EXPENDITURES: 101 Reg. FT Employees 4,965 8,661 8,262 7,923 7,774 8,501 121 PERA Contributions 258 453 469 475 467 510 122 FICA Contributions 356 638 686 673 631 650 131 Group Insurance 81 890 989 900 570 990 151 Workers Comp - - - - - 49 Personnel costs 5,660 10,642 10,405 9,971 9,442 10,700 202 Permanent Supplies 200 - - - - - 327 Other Service 288 291 340 - 340 340 389 Recycling Contract 28,980 30,341 20,668 27,600 18,348 27,600 Operating Costs 29,468 30,632 21,008 27,600 18,688 27,940 Total Expenditures 35,128 41,275 31,414 37,571 28,129 38,640 Fund Balance Gain/Loss (971) (1,756) 8,447 6,727 12,435 998 39200 Transfers In - - - - - 710 Transfers Out - - - - - Ending Fund Balance 20,067 18,311 26,758 33,485 45,921 46,919 TIF Debt Service Fund 301 2006 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed 28,864 76,539 73,077 7,596 7,596 0 125,566 132,193 140,808 140,000 76,122 - 37 3,496 - 827 25 257 3,031 750 - 8,839 8,077 6,746 - - 134,430 140,563 154,081 140,750 76,950 EXPENDITURES: 601 Bond Principal 130,000 140,000 - - - - 611 Bond Interest 11,755 4,025 - - - - 621 File Maintenance Charges - - - - - - Total Expenditures 141,755 144,025 - - - - Fund Balance Gain/Loss (7,325) (3,462) 154,081 140,750 76,950 - 39200 Transfers In 710 Transfers Out Ending Fund Balance 55,000 - - - - - 219,562 148,346 76,539 73,077 7,596 0 84,546 0 DEPT. 47100 BEGINNING BALANCE REVENUES: 31050 Taxes 31051 Delinquent Taxes 36211 Investment Interest 39999 Other Total Revenue TIF Debt Service Fund 301 2006 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed 28,864 76,539 73,077 7,596 7,596 0 125,566 132,193 140,808 140,000 76,122 - 37 3,496 - 827 25 257 3,031 750 - 8,839 8,077 6,746 - - 134,430 140,563 154,081 140,750 76,950 EXPENDITURES: 601 Bond Principal 130,000 140,000 - - - - 611 Bond Interest 11,755 4,025 - - - - 621 File Maintenance Charges - - - - - - Total Expenditures 141,755 144,025 - - - - Fund Balance Gain/Loss (7,325) (3,462) 154,081 140,750 76,950 - 39200 Transfers In 710 Transfers Out Ending Fund Balance 55,000 - - - - - 219,562 148,346 76,539 73,077 7,596 0 84,546 0 2000 Improvements Debt Service Fund 302 2006 DEPT. 47200 BEGINNING BALANCE REVENUES: 36102 Penalties and Interest 36211 Investment Interest 36100 Special Assessments Total Revenue EXPENDITURES: 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed 328,142 374,640 325,255 277,614 232,081 180,260 601 Bond Principal 611 Bond Interest 621 File Maintenance Charges Total Expenditures Fund balance gain/loss 39200 Transfers In 710 Transfers Out Ending Fund Balance - 7,055 13,277 - 10,708 1,785 2,951 4,746 1,000 6,928 5,000 96,208 60,723 55,473 50,000 27,335 51,739 97,993 70,728 73,496 51,000 44,971 56,739 75,000 80,000 51,320 45,113 40,870 175 - 267 51,495 120,113 121,137 46,498 (49,385) (47,641) 85,000 85,000 90,000 36,333 36,333 .31,520 200 461 1,000 121,533 121,793 122,520 (70,533) (76,822) (65,781) 25,000 25,000 50,000 374,640 325,255 277,614 232,081 180,260 164,478 2002 Improvements Debt Service Fund 303 2006 DEPT. 47300 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed BEGINNING BALANCE 90,114 274,891 353,695 503,529 430,326 345,420 REVENUES: 36102 Penalties & interest 36211 Investment Interest 36100 Special Assessments Total Revenue EXPENDITURES: 601 Bond Principal 611 Bond Interest 621 File Maintenance Charges Total Expenditures Fund Balance Gain/Loss 39200 Transfers In 710 Transfers Out Ending Fund Balance - - - - 6,551 789 8,728 8,847 2,000 14,942 7,500 110,500 48,090 39,988 45,000 11,895 45,058 111,289 56,818 48,835 47,000 33,388 52,558 - - 115,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 55,580 47,640 45,915 45,003 42,403 38,690 932 374 640 200 892 1,000 56,512 48,014 161,555 155,203 153,294 149,690 54,777 8,804 (112,720) (108,203) (119,906) (97,132) 130,000 70,000 262,554 35,000 35,000 50,000 274,891 353,695 503,529 430,326 345,420 298,287 2003 Improvements Debt Service Fund 304 2006 DEPT. 47400 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed BEGINNING BALANCE 108,682 343,284 455,422 446,409 450,730 REVENUES: Bond Proceeds - - - - - 36102 Penalties & interest - - - - 14,200 36211 Investment Interest - 2,135 8,244 1,000 12,282 7,500 36100 Special Assessments - 230,455 100,914 60,000 35,445 53,890 Total Revenue - 232,590 109,158 61,000 61,927 61,390 EXPENDITURES: 601 Bond Principal - - - 100,000 100,000 95,000 611 Bond Interest - 32,988 28,599 39,813 26,930 24,980 621 File Maintenance Charges - - - 200 676 1,000 Total Expenditures - 32,988 28,599 140,013 127,606 120,980 Fund Balance Gain/Loss - 199,602 80,559 (79,013) (65,679) (59,590) 39200 Transfers In - 35,000 35,000 70,000 70,000 50,000 710 Transfers Out - - 3,421 - - - Ending Fund Balance - 343,284 455,422 446,409 450,730 441,140 NOTE: Revenue and expenditures adjusted per 2004 and 2005 audit 710 Transfers Out 359,857 - - - - - Ending Fund Balance 333,511 351,103 366,028 322,028 344,647 342,147 Street Improvement Fund 401 2006 DEPT. 48401 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed BEGINNING BALANCE 641,112 333,511 351,103 366,028 322,028 344,647 REVENUES: 36211 Investment Interest 6,307 4,123 8,787 6,000 34,319 10,000 36102 Penalties & Interest - - 9,056 - 13,826 - 36100 Special Assessments 79,487 - (2,917) - 15,238 - Total Revenue 85,794 4,123 14,926 6,000 63,383 10,000 EXPENDITURES: 328 Street Repair 1,189 - - 40,000 40,599 10,000 Street Reconstruction - - - - - - Engineering 32,349 - - 5,000 165 2,500 Trees - - - 5,000 - - Total Expenditures 33,538 - - 50,000 40,764 12,500 Fund Balance Gain/Loss 52,256 4,123 14,926 (44,000) 22,619 (2,500) 39200 Transfers In - 13,469 - - - - 710 Transfers Out 359,857 - - - - - Ending Fund Balance 333,511 351,103 366,028 322,028 344,647 342,147 39200 Transfers In 141,156 18,979 14,092 - 710 Transfers Out - - - - - - Ending Fund Balance 202,106 200,739 190,716 141,216 110,927 102,677 General Capital Improvement Fund 402 2006 DEPT. 48000 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed BEGINNING BALANCE 54,213 202,106 200,739 190,716 141,216 110,927 REVENUES: 36211 Investment Interest 637 2,176 4,551 1,000 6,710 4,250 39999 Other 6,100 3,000 - - 510 - Total Revenue 6,737 5,176 4,551 1,000 7,220 4,250 EXPENDITURES: 510 Land - - 112 - - - 520 Buildings - 22,756 - 22,000 - 12,500 521 City Garage - 322 1,516 - 74 - 523 Warming House - 2,444 - - - - 530 Furniture & Equipment - - - - - - 531 Office Equipment - - - 3,500 2,338 - 532 Copier - - - - - - 535 HVAC - - - - 6,835 - 538 Computers - - - 5,000 - - 540 Machinery & Equipment - - - - - - 543 Tractor - - - 20,000 28,262 - 550 Other Improvements - - - - - - 560 Vehicle - - - - - - 562 Truck - - 27,038 - - - Total Expenditures - 25,522 .28,666 50,500 37,509 12,500 Fund Balance Gain/Loss 6,737 (20,346) (24,114) (49,500) (30,289) (8,250) 39200 Transfers In 141,156 18,979 14,092 - 710 Transfers Out - - - - - - Ending Fund Balance 202,106 200,739 190,716 141,216 110,927 102,677 DEPT. 48403 BEGINNING BALANCE REVENUES: 37300 Storm Sewer Fee 36211 Investment Interest 39999 Other Total Revenue CyTl11)1%AF 0 -V1717 -V" T1%AF"1)l1171r1AF1MXTT TTTAT" A!1'? 2006 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed 304,537 117,392 140,135 161,695 174,370 197,061 46,437 3,112 46,176 1,438 50,364 3,316 47,000 2,500 47,919 6,578 47,500 5,000 49,549 47,615 53,680 49,500 54,497 52,500 EXPENDITURES: 101 Reg. FT Employees 17,907 28,483 28,030 28,026 25,602 28,232 102 On -Call Pay - - - - - 1,400 121 PERA Contributions 973 1,390 1,572 1,670 1,536 1,778 122 FICA Contributions 1,401 2,004 2,273 2,129 2,044 2,267 131 Group Insurance 1,036 1,974 3,041 3,000 2,223 3,300 151 Workers Compensation - - - - - 1,988 Total Personnel Costs 21,317 33,851 34,917 34,825 31,406 38,965 304 Engineering - - - 1,000 - 2,500 444 Contingency Funds - - 1,295 - - - 554 Storm System Repairs - - - - - 3,000 NPDES Phase II Permit 12,057 - - 1,000 401 - Other General Costs 12,057 - 1,295 2,000 401 5,500 Total Expenditures 33,374 33,851 36,212 36,825 31,806 44,465 Fund Balance Gain/Loss 16,175 13,764 17,468 12,675 22,691 8,035 39200 Transfers In 64,092 8,979 4,092 - - - 710 Transfers Out 267,412 - - - - - Ending Fund Balance 117,392 140,135 161,695 174,370 197,061 205,096 Park Improvement Fund 404 REVENUES: 33130 Grants 36230 2006 DEPT. 48404 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed BEGINNING BALANCE 116297 135,452 117,618 126,526 127,726 35,584 39200 Transfers In 710 Transfers Out Ending Fund Balance 272 - - - - 1,227 1,163 2,770 1,200 4,538 3,000 1,227 1,435 2,770 1,200 4,538 3,000 28,082 32,738 - - - - 1,464 - - - 68,598 180,000 1,464 32,738 - - 96,680 180,000 (237) (31,303) 2,770 1,200 (92,142) (177,000) 19,392 13,469 6,138 107,221 135,452 117,618 126,526 127,726 35,584 (34,195) REVENUES: 33130 Grants 36230 Donations 36211 Investment Interest Total Revenue EXPENDITURES: 304 Engineering 510 Land 524 Picnic Shelter 525 Playground (CDBG) 526 Park Path (CDBG) 527 General Park Improvement. Total Expenditures Fund Balance Gain/Loss 39200 Transfers In 710 Transfers Out Ending Fund Balance 272 - - - - 1,227 1,163 2,770 1,200 4,538 3,000 1,227 1,435 2,770 1,200 4,538 3,000 28,082 32,738 - - - - 1,464 - - - 68,598 180,000 1,464 32,738 - - 96,680 180,000 (237) (31,303) 2,770 1,200 (92,142) (177,000) 19,392 13,469 6,138 107,221 135,452 117,618 126,526 127,726 35,584 (34,195) TIF Project Fund 405 2006 DEPT. 48500 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed BEGINNING BALANCE 307,181 81,148 74,287 288,875 437,221 518,216 REVENUES: 36211 Investment Interest - 181 590 - 14,042 8,000 33419 Larpenteur Ave. Reimbursement. - - - - - - 31050 Taxes - Increment - - - - 67,617 149,000 Total Revenue - 181 590 - 81,659 157,000 EXPENDITURES: 101 FT Employees 7,829 5,158 3,414 - - - 121 PERA Contribution 386 342 228 - - - 122 FICA Contribution 550 489 317 - - - 131 Group Insurance 353 367 171 - - - 133 Life Insurance - - - - - - Total Personnel Costs 9,118 6,355 4,130 - - - 305 Legal Fees - - - - - - 327 Other Services 666 687 1,434 - 664 2,000 325 Other Imp. (Larpenteur) - - - - - - General operating costs 666 687 1,434 - 664 2,000 Total Expenditures 9,784 7,042 5,564 - 664 2,000 Fund Balance Gain/Loss (9,784) (6,861) (4,974) - 80,995 155,000 39200 Transfers In - - 219,562 148,346 - - 710 Transfers Out 216,249 - - - - 154,000 Ending Fund Balance 81,148 74,287 288,875 437,221 518,216 519,216 Sewer Improvement Fund 407 REVENUES: 36211 Investment Interest 36100 2006 DEPT. 48407 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed BEGINNING BALANCE 122,502 80,740 81,742 83,402 83,402 86,804 39200 Transfers In 710 Transfers Out Ending Fund Balance 1,296 1,002 1,660 - 3,402 3,000 1,296 1,002 1,660 - 3,402 3,000 78 - - - - 78 - - 1,218 1,002 1,660 3,402 3,000 235,195 42,980 - - - - - 80,740 81,742 83,402 83,402 86,804 324,999 REVENUES: 36211 Investment Interest 36100 Special Assessments Total Revenue EXPENDITURES: 304 Engineering 521 City Garage 562 City Truck purchase 544 Other Total Expenditures Fund Balance Gain/Loss 39200 Transfers In 710 Transfers Out Ending Fund Balance 1,296 1,002 1,660 - 3,402 3,000 1,296 1,002 1,660 - 3,402 3,000 78 - - - - 78 - - 1,218 1,002 1,660 3,402 3,000 235,195 42,980 - - - - - 80,740 81,742 83,402 83,402 86,804 324,999 Water Utility Improvement Fund 409 2006 DEPT. 48409 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed BEGINNING BALANCE 75,615 79,813 89,358 100,046 100,046 112,954 REVENUES: 36251 Surcharge 8,742 8,519 8,510 - 8,681 - 39200 Transfers - - - - - - 36211 Investment Interest 753 1,026 2,178 - 4,226 - 36250 Refunds and Reimbursemen 13,036 - - - - - Total Revenue 22,531 9,545 10,688 - 12,908 - EXPENDITURES: 1997 Larpenteur Ave Recon: 18,333 - - - - - Total Expenditures 18,333 - - - - - Balance before transfers 4,198 9,545 10,688 - 12,908 - 39200 Transfers In - - - - - - 710 Transfers Out - - - - - 112,954 Ending Fund Balance 79,813 89,358 100,046 100,046 112,954 - Sewer Utility Fund 601 2006 DEPT. 49000 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed Beginning Balance 122,413 173,567 222,619 260,530 281,356 326,854 REVENUES: 37210 Sewer Charges 223,678 224,321 224,113 225,000 224,610 254,772 36211 Investment Interest 1,305 2,244 5,416 2,500 11,251 7,000 3625o Refunds/Reimbursements 248,227 - - - - 37230 Penalties - - - - - 63255 Miscellaneous - - - - - - 39101 Sale of Assets - - 3,000 - - - Total Revenues 473,210 226,565 232,530 227,500 235,861 261,772 EXPENDITURES: 101 Reg. FT Employees 42,437 38,268 33,684 46,299 35,657 39,252 102 On -Call Pay 8,667 14,022 14,858 8,500 15,114 11,900 121 PERA Contributions 2,763 2,964 2,821 2,766 3,046 3,069 122 FICA Contributions 3,970 4,280 4,094 3,527 4,074 3,913 131 Group Insurance 3,018 4,156 4,331 4,200 4,298 4,620 151 Worker's Comp. 1,653 2,340 3,380 3,107 3,278 3,432 Total Personnel Costs 62,508 66,030 63,168 68,399 65,467 66,186 201 General Supplies - - - 100 - - 212 Motor Fuels 910 225 301 500 258 500 227 Tools & Equipment - 266 - 150 - 150 228 Misc. Repairs/Maint/Supply - - 1,115 250 (10) 250 301 Auditing 1,891 1,686 3,737 2,800 3,101 2,800 304 Engineering 190 - - 300 - 500 308 Training/Conferences 586 270 - 550 540 550 315 Sewer Jetting - - - 1,000 - 1,000 316 Sewer Televising - - - 250 - 5,000 327 Other Services 5,286 5,265 8,546 5,000 6,214 5,000 361 General Liability 2,540 2,068 2,651 2,000 2,466 2,500 362 Property Insurance 726 - - 625 - - 363 Automotive Insurance 387 - - 400 - - 381 Electric 1,029 0 - - - - 382 Water 82 101 70 75 90 75 383 Gas Utilities 1,215 (0) - - - 387 Met Council Sewer Charges 85,124 90,718 99,151 110,000 110,239 122,300 391 Telephones/Pagers 501 247 280 275 366 300 402 City Truck Repair/Maint. 431 1,007 139 500 - 500 425 Clothing 1,861 1,551 1,386 1,500 1,414 1,500 442 Misc. - - - 218 - 444 Contingency Funds - - - 1,000 - 1,000 DEPT. 49000 2003 2004 2005 2006 Unaudited 2007 Actual Actual Actual Adopted Actual Proposed 501 Depreciation 8,562 8,081 14,074 10,000 - 10,000 540 Machinery & Equipment - - - 1,000 - - General Operating Costs 111,321 111,483 131,450 138,275 124,896 153,925 Total Expenses 173,829 177,513 194,618 206,674 190,364 220,111 Fund Gain/Loss 299,381 49,052 37,912 20,826 45,498 41,661 39200 Transfers In - - - - - - 710 Transfers Out 248,227 - - - 235,195 Ending Fund Balance 173,567 222,619 260,530 281,356 326,854 133,320