HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/22/2002LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2002
CITY HALL, 7:30 P.M.
The City Council is meeting as a legislative body to conduct the business of the City according to
ROBERT'S RULES OF ORDER AND THE STANDING RULES OF ORDER AND
BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. Unless so ordered by the Mayor, citizen participation is
limited to the times indicated and always within the prescribed rules of conduct for public input at
meetings.
1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER AT 7:30 P. M.
2. ROLL:
Councilmembers:
McCloskey Christensen
Gill -Gerbig Giannetti _
Mayor Dains
Staff Getschow
3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
4. APPROVAL
A. Approval of minutes of the regular City Council Meeting of 10/8/02
B. Approval of claims totaling $69,418.14
5. OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON ITEMS NOT ON
THE AGENDA
Any member of the public may speak at this time on any item NOT on the agenda. In
consideration of the public attending the meeting for specific items on the agenda, this portion of
the meeting will be limited to fifteen (15) minutes. Individuals are requested to limit their
comments to four (4) minutes or less. If the majority of the Council determines that additional
time on a specific issue is warranted, then discussion on that issue shall be continued under
Additional Items at the end of the agenda. Before addressing the City Council, members of the
public are asked to step up to the microphone, give their name, address and state the subject to be
discussed. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to any member
thereof. No person other than members of the Council and the person having the floor shall be
permitted to enter any discussion without permission of the presiding officer. Your participation,
as prescribed by the Council's ROBERT'S RULES OF ORDER AND THE STANDING RULES
OF ORDER AND BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, is welcomed and your cooperation is
greatly appreciated.
City of Lauderdale Council Agenda
October 22, 2002
Page 2
6. CONSENT
7. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS/RECOGNITIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/ CITIZENS
ADDRESSING STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
8. INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public hearings are conducted so that the public affected by a proposal may have input
into the decision. During hearings, all affected residents will be given an opportunity to
speak pursuant to the ROBERT'S RULES OF ORDER AND THE STANDING RULES
OF ORDER AND BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
10. ACTION
A. Resolution 102202A: A Resolution Accepting 2003 SCORE Funding
From Ramsey County for the Lauderdale Recycling Program
B. 3rd Quarter Financial and Investment Report
11. DISCUSSION
A. MNDOT and the Highway 280 Reconstruction Project
B. County Road Turnbacks
C. Refuse Task Force Community Meeting — Tuesday, October 29, 7: 00 p.m.
D. 2003 Street and Utility Improvements Timeline and Schedule
12. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
13. ADDITIONAL ITEMS
14. SET AGENDA FOR NEXT MEETING
15. ADJOURNMENT
Lauderdale City Council
Meeting Minutes
October 8, 2002
1. Meeting called to order at 6:05 P.M.
2. ROLL
Council present: Giannetti, Christensen, McCloskey, Gill -Gerbig and
Mayor Dains
Staff present: Getschow and Bownik
3. WORK SESSION WITH RAMSEY COUNTY OFFICIALS REGARDING
COUNTY TURNBACK ROADS 6:00-7: 30 p.m.
The Mayor and City Council discussed the county turnback road program with the
County Engineer, County Public Works Director, and the County Commissioner.
4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
A. Approval of Agenda. Motion by Giannetti, second by McCloskey to
approve the agenda. Motion carried unanimously.
5. APPROVAL
A. Approval of Minutes. Motion by Gill -Gerbig, second by Christensen to
approve the minutes of the regular City Council meeting of the
September 24, 2002. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Approval of Claims totaling $16,700.73. Motion by Giannetti, second by
McCloskey to approve the claims totaling $16,700.73. Motion carried
unanimously.
C. Approval of Pay Request #6 for the 2002 Street and Utility Improvements
for $337, 319.02. Motion by Giannetti, second by Gill -Gerbig to approve Pay
Request #6 for the 2002 Street and Utility Improvements for $337,319.02.
Motion carried unanimously
Lauderdale City Council
Meeting Minutes, October 8, 2002
Page 2
6. OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS ITEMS NOT ON THE
AGENDA
7. CONSENT
8. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS/RECOGNITIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
A. Halloween Party. The Mayor reminded everyone about the Halloween
party at City Hall on Thursday, October 31St from 5:00-7:00 p.m.
9. INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS
10. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. MNDOT Highway 280 Reconstruction. The Mayor provided a background
on the city's discussion on the highway reconstruction with MNDOT and the
neighboring cities that has occurred over the past year and a half. He also stated
that no action is scheduled for this evening. This is only a presentation and a
public hearing at this time.
Nancy Daubenberger, MNDOT Project Manager, provided information on the
scope of the highway project such as the receipt and status of grant funds; the
proposed layout of the roadway; the access closures from Highway 280; and the
sound wall proposed along Highway 280.
The Mayor opened the public hearing at 8:02 p.m.
Andi Moffat, 1747 Fulham Street, asked if there is traffic data that can be obtained
on the impact of more cars utilizing the Larpenteur interchange following the
potential closure of the access roads.
Tracey Koch, 1769 Walnut Street, expressed his support for this project as
presented and the sound wall that is a component of the project. In regards to the
wall, there was a compromise reached with the wall starting just north of lone
Street as opposed to starting at Larpenteur Avenue to maintain the view. Also, it
would be a shame to lose the federal dollars that were granted for this project by
not granting consent.
Lauderdale City Council
Meeting Minutes, October 8, 2002
Page 3
Rebecca Borman, 1905 Carl Street, stated that she was not in favor of this project
because of the proposed road closures. The situation at the Larpenteur
interchange will become even more unsafe. She proposed at least keeping Walnut
Street open.
Leslie Clapp, 1806 Walnut Street, also stated that she was not in favor of this
project because of the proposed road closures. The situation at the Larpenteur
interchange is not safe and more traffic on this interchange will only exacerbate
the problem. She also asked about the parameters and applicability of the grant
funding.
Alan Blat, 1886 Carl Street, asked how MNDOT knows if the sound wall and
sound abatement will work.
Dawn BartIla, 1911 Eustis Street, proposed keeping Walnut Street open and
possibly creating an acceleration lane on to Highway 280 in that location.
Gary Sax, 1935 Walnut Street, stated that he does not support this project in any
way. He is opposed to the road closures, the sound wall, and the band-aid repair
approach that is being employed here.
John Abeler, 2339 Roselawn Avenue (Roseville), stated that he supported the
proposed plan. He also thought that the closing of the access roads may benefit
the area by reducing through traffic.
John Antoncich, 1806 Walnut Street, asked what the timetable or schedule was for
reconstructing the Larpenteur interchange.
Hugh Currie, 1940 Pleasant Street, stated that he felt commuter through traffic is
increasing with the access roads from Highway 280.
Jake Bondelinde, 1779 Walnut Street, stated that the proposed highway
reconstruction plan including the sound wall is a good one. The safety
enhancements that are a part of this plan, such as closing the access roads, are
needed.
MNDOT representatives answered many of the questions that were presented by
the residents.
The Mayor closed the public hearing at 8:42 p.m.
Lauderdale City Council
Meeting Minutes, October 8, 2002
Page 4
The Mayor and City Council then discussed the proposed project.
Council member McCloskey expressed concern with the lowering of the grade at
Broadway that is being proposed by MNDOT.
The Mayor stated that resident involvement and pressure is needed to lobby the
State to get the Larpenteur interchange reconstructed. He also stated that over the
past eight years the general opinion of this project has shifted. A large majority of
residents now want to see a sound wall constructed.
Council member Gill -Gerbig stated that maybe a task force needs to be convened
for the Highway 280 corridor, especially as it related to the Larpenteur
interchange.
The City Council took a break at 8:55 p.m.
The meeting resumed at 9:20 p.m.
B. Boyer Ford: Conditional Use Permit for an auto sales, service, and repair
facility. Administrative Analyst Bownik stated Phillips Holdings is proposing a
Boyer Ford development involving the sale, service, and repair of heavy trucks.
At the September 24, 2002 Council meeting, Phillips Holdings requested and
received a zoning amendment to allow auto sales, service, and repair facilities as
an approved conditional use in the I-1 District.
Phillips Holdings currently owns a 3.7 -acre site at the corner of Trunk Highway
280 and Broadway. The original 6.8 -acre site was subdivided in 2001, and
Hamlin Auto Body purchased the southern 3.1 acres. Access to the site is from
Broadway Drive from a driveway that also provides access to Hamline Auto Body
and Enterprise Rent-A-Car to the south.
Bownik discussed the performance standards that are evaluated for considering a
conditional use permit. He also stated that the City Engineer has also reviewed
and commented on the proposed development. In assessing these performance
standards and based upon the Engineer's review, the following potential
conditions were presented for consideration:
Lauderdale City Council
Meeting Minutes, October 8, 2002
Page 5
• The applicant must have an approved storm water management plan.
• The applicant will follow all local, regional, and state environmental
regulations and will make a reasonable effort to notify the City upon
notification of any such violation.
• The traffic issue related to the relatively short distance from Broadway to
the entrance of the facility. Once traffic has turned south onto the access
road from Broadway, vehicles trying to access the facility must turn left
(east) about forty feet into the site. This could be a conflict with
northbound traffic entering onto Broadway. A possible solution would be
to relocate the entrance to the facility approximately 220 feet to the south,
aligning it with the center of the proposed building.
• Glare may be a problem depending on the type of lighting used in the
parking lot and on the building. It may be a good idea to require down
cast lighting in the parking lot and possibly on the building.
• The developer should provide the city with a financial guarantee that the
work will be completed as specified. A development agreement is not
needed for the Boyer Ford site since the subdivision and final plat have
already been approved. Thus, it is recommended that in this case the
developer provide a letter of credit before the start of work at the site.
The estimated cost of the site improvements is $325,005. The letter of
credit would guarantee 150% of the cost, which would be $487,508.
The Mayor opened the conditional use permit public hearing at 9:33 p.m.
Phillip Maas, Phillips Holdings and Boyer Ford expressed concern with the letter
of credit. He offered to enter into an agreement with the City whereby he deposits
equitable funds with the City Attorney as opposed to providing a letter of credit.
The Mayor closed the conditional use public hearing at 9:35 p.m.
B. Boyer Ford: Height Variance Application.
The Mayor opened the variance application public hearing at 9:35 p.m.
James Waite, Smuckler Architects, presented some visual impressions of the
Boyer development and stated that the height of the building will fit in well with
the surrounding area.
The Mayor closed the variance application public hearing at 9:36 p.m.
Lauderdale City Council
Meeting Minutes, October 8, 2002
Page 6
11. ACTION
A. Boyer Ford: Conditional Use Permit Application. The City Administrator
stated that the alternative letter of credit proposal brought forth by Maas could be
resolved if the language of the proposed condition is that "the City requires a
letter of credit or similar instrument that is approved by City Staff, the City
Attorney and the City Engineer".
Council member Christensen stated his concerns with the lighting in this
development and recommends that a condition be placed for downcast lighting.
Skip Maas indicated that he would be providing downcast lighting and also has no
problem with relocating the access road into the development.
Motion by Gill -Gerbig, second by Christensen to grant a conditional use permit
for Phillips Holdings, L.L.C. (Boyer Ford) with the following conditions:
1. The applicant must have an approved storm water management plan.
2. The applicant will follow all local, regional, and state environmental
regulations and will make a reasonable effort to notify the City upon
notification of any such violation.
3. The applicant will relocate the entrance to the facility approximately 220 feet
to the south, aligning it with the center of the proposed building
4. Down cast lighting shall be used in the parking lot and with the building.
5. The developer should provide the City requires a letter of credit or similar
instrument that is approved by City Staff, the City Attorney and the City
Engineer at the estimated cost of the site improvements, which at this time
is $487,508.
Roll: Yes: all. Motion carried.
B. Consideration of a Storm Water Management Plan for Boyer Ford.
Motion by Christensen, second by Gianetti to approve the storm water
management plan as detailed by the City Engineer in his memorandum.
Roll: Yes: all. Motion carried.
Lauderdale City Council
Meeting Minutes, October 8, 2002
Page 7
C. Consideration of a Height Variance for Boyer Ford. Bownik stated that
this variance request for the decorative pyramid structure atop the building is
different from other variance requests because the Zoning Ordinance states that
"the Board may authorize a variance to the height regulations in any district
if...the structure is among or similar to any of the following: television and radio
towers, church spires, belfries, monuments, tanks, water and fire towers, grain
elevators, stage towers and scenery lofts, cooling towers, ornamental towers and
spires, chimneys, elevator bulkheads, smokestacks, conveyors, flagpoles, silos, air
conditioning and heating units and windmills."
Motion by Gill -Gerbig, second by Gianetti to approve the height variance as
requested by Boyer Ford. Roll: Yes: all. Motion carried.
12. DISCUSSION
13. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
14. ADDITIONAL ITEMS
15. SET AGENDA FOR NEXT MEETING
1. 3rd Quarter Financial and Investment Report
2. Discussion items: Highway 280 reconstruction, county road turnbacks,
and the 2003 Improvements schedule
16. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Gill -Gerbig, second by McCloskey to adjourn at 10:00 P.M. Ayes: All.
CITY OF LAUDERDALE
Claims for Approval
October 22, 2002 City Council Meeting
Payroll
10/11/02 Payroll: Check # 7244-7248 $5,776.57
10/11/02 Payroll: EFT: Federal Withholding Taxes/FICA $2,396.71
10/11/02 Payroll: EFT: PERA $989.53
10/11/02 Payroll: EFT: ICMA Retirement Fund $1,185.96
Vendor Claims
10/22/02 Claims: Check # 16026-16041 $59,069.37
Subtotal of Claims From Above
$69,418.141
Total Claims for Approval $69,418.14
CITY OF LAUDERDALE
Vendor Transactions
CHECK Check Batch
Nbr Date Name Invoice Amount Comments
Search Name AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING
016026 10/22/02 102202claims 20178 $556.85 '02 st/util project: soil testing
Search Name AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING $556.85
Search Name AT & T
016027 10/22/02 102202claims 1222375990
Search Name AT & T
Search Name BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
016028 10/22/02 102202claims 91150
016028 10/22/02 102202claims 91151
016028 10/22/02 102202claims 91152
Search Name BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
Search Name CINTAS
016029 10/22/02 102202claims 10/22/02
Search Name CINTAS
Search Name CITY OF ST ANTHONY
016030 10/22/02 102202claims 508
Search Name CITY OF ST ANTHONY
Search Name GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD
016031 10/22/02 102202claims 10/22/02
Search Name GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD
Search Name LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWS
016032 10/22/02 102202claims 10/22/02
Search Name LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWS
Search Name MET -COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER.
016033 10/22/02 102202claims 745545
Search Name MET -COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER.
Search Name POSTMASTER
016034 10/22/02 102202claims 10/22/02
Search Name POSTMASTER
Search Name QWEST
016035 10/22/02 102202claims 10/22/02
016035 10/22/02 102202claims 10/22/02
Search Name QWEST
Search Name RAMSEY COUNTY, EXPENDITURES
016036 10/22/02 102202claims prrrv000196
016036 10/22/02 102202claims risk000484
Search Name RAMSEY COUNTY, EXPENDITURES
$2.85 10/02 long distance
$2.85
$1,336.50 08/02'01 st/util improve
$24,396.07 08/02'02 st/util improve
$583.00 08/02'02 st/util improve
$26,315.57
$74.46 10/7, 10/14 pw uniforms
$74.46
$18,421.09 11/02 police services
$18,421.09
$55.81 9/30/02 water delivery
$55.81
$688.15 09/02 delivery of roseville review
$688.15
$10,155.70 11/02 wastewater services
$10,155.70
$111.00 stamps for city hall
$111.00
$256.68 10/02 city hall phone
$56.10 10/02 autodial: malvern lift station
$312.78
$405.00 maintain assessment rolls
$1,134.66 10/02 employee benefits
$1,539.66
Search Name SAM'S CLUB
016037 10/22/02 102202claims 336 $10.42 video tapes
016037 10/22/02 102202claims 336 $98.02 gloves, light bulbs, cleaning supplies
Search Name SAM'S CLUB $108.44
Search Name SPRINT PCS
10/17/02 2:46 PM
Page 1
CITY OF LAUDERDALE
Vendor Transactions
10/17/02 2:46 PM
Page 2
CHECK
Check
Batch
Nbr
Date
Name Invoice
Amount Comments
016038
10/22/02
102202claims 10/22/02
$11.83 09/02 pw cell phone
016038
10/22/02
102202claims 10/22/02
$11.84 09/02 pw cell phone
Search Name SPRINT PCS
$23.67
Search Name WAGERS BUSINESS SYSTEMS
016039 10/22/02 102202claims cnin001708
Search Name WAGERS BUSINESS SYSTEMS
Search Name WALTER'S RUBBISH
016040 10/22/02 102202ciaims 140133
016040 10/22/02 102202claims 140133
Search Name WALTER'S RUBBISH
Search Name XCEL ENERGY
016041 10/22/02 102202claims 10/22/02
Search Name XCEL ENERGY
$225.00 4gtr02 copier maintenance
$225.00
$26.32 10/02 garbage service
$26.33 10/02 garbage service
$52.65
$425.69 09/02 street lighting
$425.69
Grand Total $59,069.37
MEMO
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Shannon Goyette, Deputy Clerk
Date: 10/22/02
Re: 2002 SCORE Funding Grant Application
SCORE Funding Grants are annually provided to municipalities in Ramsey County.
The funds are intended to be used for expenses related to the city's recycling
programs (administration, promotion, equipment, and collection), and the
amount to be distributed is calculated on a per capita basis. Receipt of these
monies enables the City of Lauderdale to maintain a lower-cost recycling
program than would be possible without the grant.
Grants are provided to a municipality pursuant to an agreement between the
County and the City following the grant application by the City. Since the
agreement is a formal document, strict guidelines and requirements exist which
must be adhered to by the receiving party. One of the requirements is a formal
request by the Council requesting allocation of SCORE Funding Grant monies.
The resolution to approve application for funding is enclosed in the packet.
Council Action Requested:
Adopt Resolution 102202A, requesting allocation of SCORE funding grant monies.
RESOLUTION NO. 102202A
THE CITY OF LAUDERDALE
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING 2003 SCORE FUNDING FROM RAMSEY
COUNTY FOR THE LAUDERDALE RECYCLING PROGRAM
WHEREAS, SCORE Funding Grants are available to municipalities in Ramsey
County for reimbursement of expense related to administration, promotion, and collection
of, recycling materials; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Lauderdale has a comprehensive curbside residential
recycling program currently in use; and,
WHEREAS, these funds will provide Lauderdale with a method of paying for
some incurred costs related to the administration of this program, thus aiding in keeping
the cost to the residents low;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Lauderdale City Council does
hereby authorize staff to submit an application to the St. Paul - Ramsey County
Department of Public Health - Environmental Health Section for allocation of 2003
SCORE Funding Grant Monies in the amount of $4,612.00.
I CERTIFY THAT the above resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of
Lauderdale on this 22nd day of October, 2002.
(ATTEST)
Jeffrey Dains, Mayor
(SEAL)
Rick Getschow, City Administrator
M E M O S B Y J A M E S
DATE: October 22, 2002
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM: James Bownik, Administrative Analyst
3rd Quarter 2002 Financial and Investment Report
There have been no unusual expenditures or revenues for the third quarter of this year. This
quarterly report reflects an accurate financial picture of the City's expenditures and revenues.
No changes to the accounting procedures are foreseen at this time.
Combined Funds 101 - 601
2001
2001
% of
2002
2002
% of
1/1 -9/30
Budget
Budget
1/1 -9/30
Budget
Budget
Actual
Budget
Actual
Revenues $1,036,777
$1,527,506
68%
$2,141,874
$1,734,227
124%
Expenditures $1,950,085
$1,571,194
124%
$1,981,208
$1,840,718
108%
The above table gives an overall picture of the City's finances compared to last year. While
revenues and expenditures both seem to be over budget, this is due to the 2002 street and
utility improvement project (Fund 412). As you are aware, the 2002 street and utility project had
not been ordered until after the budget had been approved. Thus, the actual revenues and
expenditures so far this year for Funds 101-601 include about $1,000,000 in revenues and
about $1,000,000 in expenditures from Fund 412, which the 2002 budget does not reflect.
General Fund 101 Revenues
Property taxes are mostly received in June/July and November. License and permit fees
increased $5,506 in the third quarter. Intergovernmental revenue, which is mostly local
government aid and fiscal disparities from the State, are generally received in July and
December. Public Safety revenue increased $8,790 this quarter due to court fines received.
Besides an annual bond fee payment from the Children's Home Society in the first quarter,
Charges for Services includes $850 in advertising fees for the Resident's Guide and a year total
of $2,250 for rental of the Social Room. $3,462 in interest was received this quarter, mostly
from the maturity of seven certificates of deposit. Miscellaneous revenues are mostly from the
first two quarters and include a donation from the Twin City Chinese Christian Church ($1000),
and reimbursement from Ramsey County for waste management fees charged to the City from
1986 to 1999 for properties that do not generate waste ($1,058).
2001
2001
% of
2002
2002
% of
1/1 -9/30
Budget
Budget
1/1 -9/30
Budget
Budget
Actual
Actual
Property Tax
235,440
439,032
54%
157,026
366,898
43%
Licenses & Permits
40,596
8,480
479%
17,270
8,480
204%
Intergovernmental
117,719
223,601
53%
219,403
423,687
52%
Public Safety
29,289
32,468
90%
29,767
32,468
92%
Charges for Services
21,441
250
8576%
19,746
810
2438%
Interest
26,277
12,000
219%
7,527
12,000
63%
Miscellaneous
3,713
0
+
5,280
0
+
Transfers
0
0
NA
0
0
NA
Total
$474,475
$715,831
66%
$456,019
$844,343
54%
Property taxes are mostly received in June/July and November. License and permit fees
increased $5,506 in the third quarter. Intergovernmental revenue, which is mostly local
government aid and fiscal disparities from the State, are generally received in July and
December. Public Safety revenue increased $8,790 this quarter due to court fines received.
Besides an annual bond fee payment from the Children's Home Society in the first quarter,
Charges for Services includes $850 in advertising fees for the Resident's Guide and a year total
of $2,250 for rental of the Social Room. $3,462 in interest was received this quarter, mostly
from the maturity of seven certificates of deposit. Miscellaneous revenues are mostly from the
first two quarters and include a donation from the Twin City Chinese Christian Church ($1000),
and reimbursement from Ramsey County for waste management fees charged to the City from
1986 to 1999 for properties that do not generate waste ($1,058).
General Fund 101 Expenditures
General Government
116,485
169,724
69%
134,345
18y,1 1 6
/ "i%
Public Safety
188,199
268,734
70%
198,120
277,272
72%
Public Works
59,376
101,733
58%
68,667
100,363
68%
Park & Recreation
37,412
48,696
77%
38,628
53,804
72%
Contingency
0
10,000
0%
0
10,000
0%
Transfers
0
110,000
0%
0
185,000
0%
Total
$401,472
$708,887
57%
$439,760
$816,152
54%
General fund expenditures are pretty much on par with the third quarter of last year. 38% of
this year's general fund expenditures can be attributed to police services ($165,790).
Snecial Revenue Funds 201 - 204
201 Community Events 2,047 4,225 48% 1,b4b L,Z t o I z7o
202 Cable T.V. 12,888 10,050 128% 12,882 10,100 128%
203 Recycling 18,423 28,282 65% 18,847 33,667 56%
Total $33,358 $42,557 78% $33,375 $46,042 72%
201 Community Events 3,653 3,450 106% 1,754 1,850 y5io
202 Cable T.V. 6,522 15,589 42% 9,721 14,380 68%
203 Recycling 20,099 30,555 66% 26,967 37,600 72%
Total $30,274 $49,594 61% $38,442 $53,830 71%
201 Community Events: Revenues/expenditures are mostly from Day in the Park
($1231/$782), Snow*Commotion ($136/$663), and the City -Wide Garage Sale ($101/$40).
202 Cable TV: Revenue is mostly from franchise fees ($12,550). An annual contribution of
$3,501 was made to the North Suburban Cable Commission in June.
203 Recycling: Revenue is mostly from recycling assessments received through property
tax statements ($13,882) and two Ramsey County SCORE Grant payments ($4,627). BFI has
been paid $20,178 so far this year.
TIF Debt Service Fund 301
Revenues $95,437 $212,500 45% $64,1 U3 ji1 /L,SUU Of7b
Expenditures $140,565 $211,065 67% $143,960 $204,460 70%
Revenues are received through tax monies twice per year. The City has made an annual TIF
Bond payment - $125,000 (principal) & two interest payments ($18,960) this year.
'nn naht Service Fund 302
Revenues $29,279 $70,000 4Z%o -OSU,_I _I 1 tp 114,LG'i /u
Expenditures $55,597 $55,697 100% $51,495 $51,495 100%
$48,742 has been received from assessment payments for the 2000 street project via property
taxes. The expenditure is from a general obligation bond interest payment in the first quarter.
'nq nPht Service Fund 303
Revenues $0 $0 NA mz,ozo �Pv
Expenditures $0 $0 NA $517 $0 +
The revenue is mostly from capitalized interest from the 2002 street and utility improvement
project bond proceeds. Expenditures are administrative fees paid for the financial contract.
C'.nniital Imnrnvement Funds 401 - 412
401 Street Improve
50,095
65,000
/ t1/o
b, /Z4
1 a,vuu
U /o
402 General Improve
1,586
21,000
8%
552
56,000
1 %
403 Storm Water Imp
58,407
91,718
64%
31,124
99,218
31%
404 Park Impove
9,120
2,000
456%
1,101
22,000
5%
405 TIF Project
0
70,000
0%
0
60,000
0%
407 Sanitary Sewer
10,636
11,500
92%
2,272
16,500
14%
409 Water Imp Fund
8,624
7,700
112%
5,087
7,700
66%
410'00 St/Util Imp Fund
88,808
0
+
1,730
0
+
411 '01 St/Util Imp Fund
0
0
NA
155,766
0
+
412'02 St/Util Imp Fund
0
0
NA
1,156,779
0
+
Total
$227,276
$268,918
85%
$1,360,135
$336,418
404%
401 Street Improve
0
50,000
0%
U
nU,000
v-ro
402 General Improve
20,694
26,000
80%
4,230
31,000
14%
403 Storm Water Imp
14,292
55,213
26%
21,919
61,139
36%
404 Park Impove
34
0
+
3,461
0
+
405 TIF Project
5,746
79,422
7%
6,579
70,045
9%
407 Sanitary Sewer
0
5,000
0%
0
10,000
0%
409 Water Imp Fund
0
0
NA
0
0
NA
410'00 St/Util Imp Fund
147,817
108,134
137%
2,496
0
+
411 101 St/Util Imp Fund
947,021
0
+
112,208
256,000
44%
412'02 St/Util Imp Fund
0
0
NA
993,294
0
+
Total
$1,135,604
$323,769
351%
$1,144,187
$488,184
234%
In most cases, revenue for these funds is from investment interest. So far this year, Funds 403
and 409 had additional revenue from storm sewer fees ($27,085) and water surcharge fees
($4,292). Fund 411 had revenues from a DNR flood mitigation grant ($85,666), prepayment of
assessments for the 2001 street project between September 25 and September 30 ($5,267),
and reimbursement from St. Paul Regional Water Services for water main improvements
($63,058). The revenue in Fund 412 is from general obligation bonds that will be used to pay
expenses incurred by the 2002 street and utility improvement project.
Expenses besides wages and benefits for Funds 401-409 so far this year include $4,207 for a
snow blower, $5,000 for the NPDES Phase 2 Guide Plan, and $3,461 for park land acquisition.
Fund 411 expenditures are mostly for street improvements ($98,818) and engineering
($12,759). Fund 412 expenditures are also mostly for street improvements ($740,961) and
engineering ($228,741).
Sewer Utilitv Fund 601
Revenue $176,952 $217,700 81% 4145,Mb 4)LLL,1 UU vain
Expenditures $186,573 $222,182 84% $162,847 $226,597 72%
Revenues and expenditures for Fund 601 are about what was expected thus far in 2002.
INVESTMENTS
The following is a comparison of the amount of funds the City has invested for the past 3 years:
September '00: $2,787,654 September '01: $2,341,603 September '02: $2,691,776
The City's investments as of September 30, 2002 are attached for your review.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Motion to approve the 3rd Quarter 2002 Financial & Investment Report.
O a
'm E
n.
a
m z
C]
(0 la @ (a
E E E E
O O O O
CO O O O
O CO � co
c0
co
EO
�
N N N
fA 69 69 EA
0000
N O O O
0) r 0) v
N t-
oo
O co r
c0 h t, n
D) 0) T O
EN 69 EH EA
W r 1� 10
r N M Cl)
O O o O
LO 0 )O u0
M rn rn 0)
N N N N
E E E E
Eo 0) �! V
c
m
N
m
C
.N
Y m
c @
m
m co
a) >
Y m N
E C C
.0 N a)
z w a
Y Y Y Y
rn0)mU)
T T T T
0 0 0 0
2 2 2
� xt oo us
J J J J
N N N N
O O O O
O T V 1-
7 -
co
N co M co
aM ED (
_T _T _T
L L L
c c c
E E E
d
O M O d
0) C >
EM N N t a1
O
2
m 00
N N C
M a
ED O N
Er~j r- m (00 ~ >
6> N 5
E9 EA
(,
0)
w M v
00 > a
(V Q
co co ca
� N �
a) N N
0 0 0
C 'O rn
J
Eu> .a
>
C
— N N
N d N
E U U
a z z
o 2i �E
m 0 0
LL
> j
>N O O)
ca co
J J
2 2
a) o -1o 0 0
0 o 0 0LO
c
a)
IL
0 0 0 o0 0
O O O !g 'o o
000 O c0 00
00 O N V t0
O O O O O N
69 Eli 69 W r
M M E00
N cl
N � �
O
O
M
O U
O C
O N N
O tT
m ca Q
a o 0 m
CL
C O O N N
°' aci E• '- m �
N
N Q E d
a, vE m r c
5 ti O F U 2 10-''
0 0 0 0 0
O o Lo oo
O 00 c0 c0
N O O V EO
OO Ow N
In 69 wo
r
M M EO
N N
N 6% co
O
O
M
0
O
>
m o E
m
m
E �> Via)
w o M m E
I a o' o o
N M z F
m
C
L d
v Q
a
d
L «
R
� C
a
I �; w w �; 4�; w
im oloo•m loo,
O N O
O O O O
W O O O
00 w
r �2 om
N N N
A w w to
O O O O
N O O O
N h
R C r
w r n
ol ON 0) m
M r In
o O o 0
laOmm
M O w q
N N N N
00000000000
60005000000
EEEEEEEEEE E
(omw(o(owwwm�2
Y Q Q
A c A U v Q
a r d o >
cm dvQGimZ 0 c
m C L y 0 m
C ro IL py V N X N
d m rn d c
E o Y c c Y a
1n G C ro ro Y Y ni
C y m m m s ro m N
r U v d m" 2 E m>
d 3
E E V w N c d
a'aEEom°amac
uL)L) f- zwa
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y y YY Y
(n UNVNN W0)to 0)U
T T T T T T T T T T T
0 0 'O V
O O O O O O O O o 0 0
q!' 4'i a2f oti ca ai .6 -a .6 oa of
C C C C C C C
N N N N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 o In
N N N N N N N N
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0
O O O O O O O N` w
N N N N N N N
00 W 00 00 W 00 W ? M N <D
T T T >.
Z
E E E E
h
d O
p N � d d
'd
co
69 W T N
tO M r N N
N N C
d
o E
m O
r-
N m N E
� 69 fA
i ` Y
cac)c
C C C C
2222E
li
o d
Elia
d C V V
3 d m
v a Z Z
o o
`o o
> >
E E
T
> >
ai ti Y C
C m m
O
l o 0 0 00 0*
O 0 0` c O
N
2
a
N
O
O
0 0 0 0 l
O r co O
O O O O w w
O O O N 't O
0 0 0 o) w vi
E9 fA 6-i W r
at q
o
M M
69
69 t,
0 0 0 0
O O co 00
0 0 o w w
N O O V w
°i 0 O t° n
O co r
C M
Zl
N
O
O
W
O
N
d _
C O
E
U) O Cl) �p a
C p T O 0
Z
N co F
,
Lauderdale City Council Memorandum
Council Meeting Date: October 22 2002
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Rick Getschow, City Administrator
Agenda Item: Council Meeting Discussion Items
BACKGROUND:
The following are the items for discussion that are updates and/or follow-ups from
discussions at recent Council meetings and work sessions.
1. Highway 280 Project. A public hearing was held at the last Council meeting of
October 8, 2002. The Council should briefly discuss the municipal consent action that is
requested from NINDOT and that is scheduled for the November 26, 2002 meeting.
2. County Road Turnbacks. As the County Commissioner and County Engineer
stated at the October 8 meeting — the Council needs to discuss the next step in the
turnback negotiation process.
3 Refuse Task Force Community Meeting. Another opportunity to remind
everyone of the meeting on Tuesday, October 29 and to provide a few more details on the
agenda of the meeting.
4 2003 Street and Utility Improvements Schedule. I will provide a planned
schedule of events for this improvement project. It is anticipated that it follow the same
timeline for consideration and approval as the prior improvements.
NO ENCLOSURES