HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/13/2004LAUDERDALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
TUESDAY, APRIL 13, 2004
CITY HALL, 7:00 P.M.
The City Council is meeting as a legislative body to conduct the business of the City according to
ROBERT'S RULES OF ORDER AND THE STANDING RULES OF ORDER AND
BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. Unless so ordered by the Mayor, citizen participation is
limited to the times indicated and always within the prescribed rules of conduct for public input at
meetings.
1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER AT 7:00 P. M.
2. ROLL: <0*0
Councilmembers:
McCloskey Christensen
Gill -Gerbig Giannetti
Mayor Dains
Staff: Getschow
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
4. APPROVAL
A. Approval of minutes of 3/23/04 City Council Meeting
B. Approval of claims totaling $44,301.77
5. OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON ITEMS NOT ON
THE AGENDA
Any member of the public may speak at this time on any item NOT on the agenda. In
consideration of the public attending the meeting for specific items on the agenda, this portion of
the meeting will be limited to fifteen (15) minutes. Individuals are requested to limit their
comments to four (4) minutes or less. If the majority of the Council determines that additional
time on a specific issue is warranted, then discussion on that issue shall be continued under
Additional Items at the end of the agenda. Before addressing the City Council, members of the
public are asked to step up to the microphone, give their name, address and state the subject to be
discussed. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to any member
thereof. No person other than members of the Council and the person having the floor shall be
permitted to enter any discussion without permission of the presiding officer. Your participation,
as prescribed by the Council's ROBERT'S RULES OF ORDER AND THE STANDING RULES
OF ORDER AND BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, is welcomed and your cooperation is
greatly appreciated.
City of Lauderdale Council Agenda
April 13, 2004
Page 2
6. CONSENT
7. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS/RECOGNITIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/ CITIZENS
ADDRESSING STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public hearings are conducted so that the public affected by a proposal may have input
into the decision. During hearings, all affected residents will be given an opportunity to
speak pursuant to the ROBERT'S RULES OF ORDER AND THE STANDING RULES
OF ORDER AND BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
9. INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS
A. 2003 Financial Statements and Audit: Andrew Berg -
Abdo, Abdo, Eick and Myers
10. EXECUTIVE SESSION RELATING TO ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE TO DISCUSS
PENDING LITIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF LAUDERDALE (KARKOC PARCEL)
11. ACTION
A. Approval of the 2003 Financial Statements and Audit Report
B. Resolution 041304A: A Resolution Authorizing Eminent Domain
Proceedings to Acquire Certain Real Property (Karkoc Parcel)
C. Consideration of the 2005-2006 Joint Powers Agreement for Police
Services with the City of Saint Anthony
D. Set a Date for 2004 Lauderdale Spring Clean -Up
12. ADDITIONAL ITEMS
13. SET AGENDA FOR NEXT MEETING
14. WORK SESSION DISCUSSION
A. Draft Zoning Ordinance — Chapters 4-6
B. Fulham Street County Improvement Project
C. Larpenteur Avenue Redevelopment
15. ADJOURNMENT
Lauderdale City Council
Meeting Minutes
March 23, 2004
1. Meeting called to order at 7:05 P.M.
2. ROLL
Council present: Giannetti, Christensen, McCloskey, Gill -Gerbig and
Mayor Dains
Staff present: Administrator Getschow and
Assistant to the Administrator Bownik
3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
A. Approval of Agenda. Motion by Giannetti, second by McCloskey to
approve the agenda. Roll: Yes: all. Motion carried.
4. APPROVAL
A. Approval of Minutes. Motion by McCloskey, second by Christensen to
approve the minutes of the March 9, 2004 City Council meeting. Motion carried
unanimously.
B. Approval of Claims totaling $49,162.12. Motion by Gill -Gerbig, second
by Giannetti to approve the claims totaling $49,162.12. Motion carried
unanimously.
5. OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS ITEMS NOT ON THE
AGENDA
6. CONSENT
Lauderdale City Council
Meeting Minutes, March 23, 2004
Page 2
7. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS/RECOGNITIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
INFORMATIONAL PRESENTATIONS
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Lot Coverage Variance at 1808 Eustis Street for a house addition.
Assistant to the City Administrator Bownik stated that Daniel Sherman, 1808
Eustis Street, is applying for a 6% variance to the lot coverage requirements to go
from 29% to 35% for the purpose of completing an addition to his house.
The lot size of the subject property is 40' x 132.20' (5,288 square feet). The two
structures on the property total 1,516 square feet, or 28.67% lot coverage. The
square footages of the existing structures are 796 for the house and 720 for the
garage. The addition to the house would add 333 square feet to the principal
structure, and 6.30% to the lot coverage. This would bring the total square feet of
covered structures on the property to 1,849 square feet, or 34.97% lot coverage.
Bownik stated that the Planning Commission did not meet to discuss the variance
request but did receive the information packet and have been invited and
encouraged to attend the council meeting in order to provide input to the Council.
The Mayor opened the public hearing at 7:10 p.m.
No one wished to address the City Council.
The Mayor closed the public hearing at 7:11 p.m.
10. ACTION
A. Lot Coverage Variance at 1808 Eustis Street for a house addition.
Council member Giannetti requested clarification on the lot size.
Motion by Gill -Gerbig, second by Christensen to approve the variance to the lot
coverage requirements to go to 35% for a house addition. Roll: Yes: all. Motion
carried.
Lauderdale City Council
Meeting Minutes, March 23, 2004
Page 3
B. Approval of Resolution 032304,4: Authorizing Application for the
Development of New Park at Walnut/Ione Street. Kevin Walsh, Deputy Clerk
stated that at the last meeting the Council requested that the details of the grant
and the development of the park should be discussed at the next Park and
Community Involvement Committee meeting as a result of the suggestion to
include exercise equipment in the application. Following this meeting, Walsh
was now ready to present the final components of the grant to the City Council.
The Park and Community Involvement Committee (PCIC) has made
recommendations regarding the development of the park that include installing a
fence around the perimeter of the north and west side of the park, a bituminous
pathway, building a bench shelter, landscaping on the north and west border lined
along the fence, and providing fitness equipment/stations. The DNR Grant is a
50/50 matching grant with funds available and budgeted in the Park Improvement
Fund to cover these expenses.
Council member Giannetti stated that this looks like a great grant application.
She thanked the Committee for their input and hard work.
Council member Gill -Gerbig also supported the grant application. She thought
the process that was employed to bring this final application to the Council was to
be commended.
Council member McCloskey stated that the City should consider placing this
exercise equipment in the Community Park where it may be used more often.
PCIC member Kim Hanson and PCIC Chair Karen Doherty stated the
Committee's reasoning for proposing to place the equipment in this park as
opposed to the Community Park. The reasoning was to based on the privacy that
this park can provide, along with the desire to emphasize the use of this park for
adults as opposed to young children because of the park's proximity to Highway
280.
The Mayor asked if the Committee was planning on discussing trail
improvements in the Community Park. Chair Doherty stated that this discussion
can be placed on a future Committee agenda.
Motion by Giannetti, second by Gill -Gerbig to approve of Resolution 032304A: A
Resolution Authorizing Application for the Development of New Park at
Walnut/Ione Street. Roll: Yes: all. Motion carried.
Lauderdale City Council
Meeting Minutes, March 23, 2004
Page 4
C. Consider Revising Year -End Financial Transfer Allocations. The City
Administrator stated that the City has a policy whereby year-end excess general
fund dollars greater than 55% of general fund budgeted expenditures for the year
are transferred to certain capital improvement funds. The excess general funds
dollars are generated through revenues that are greater than what was budgeted
and through expenditures that come in under budget.
Currently the allocations are:
Street Improvement Fund (401) 70%
Storm Sewer Improvement Fund (403) 15%
Park Improvement Fund (404) 10%
General Capital Improvement Fund (402) 5%
The Administrator then stated that currently the highest percentage of excess
funds is sent to street and storm sewer capital funds. This was based on assisting
in the financing of the street and utility improvements. Now that the
improvements are being finalized and current discussions have been focused on
park improvements and general capital improvements such as the purchase of city
trucks and social room improvements, new allocations could be considered.
For discussion and consideration, the Administrator presented the following
possibility:
Park Improvement Fund (404)
30%
Street Improvement Fund (401)
30%
General Capital Improvement Fund (402)
20%
Storm Sewer Improvement Fund (403)
20%
The Administrator stressed once again that these percentages are excess general
fund dollars. They are unrealized gains that cannot always be counted on. In fact,
with the recent state aid cuts there will be less dollars for 2003 than there was in
prior years.
The Council consensus was that the proposed percentages are appropriate. They
represent where the City would like to place its capital spending priorities.
Motion by Christensen, second by McCloskey to adopt new percentage
allocations in the packet (above) for year-end transfer of excess general fund
dollars. Roll: Yes: all. Motion carried.
Lauderdale City Council
Meeting Minutes, March 23, 2004
Page 5
D. Consideration of 2004 Street Sweeping Quotations. Motion by Gill -
Gerbig, second by Giannetti to approve Mike McPhillips for a quotation not to
exceed $4,400 to perform street and alley sweeping for the year 2004. Roll: Yes:
all. Motion carried.
11. EXECUTIVE SESSION RELATING TO ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE TO
DISCUSS PENDING LITIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF LAUDERDALE
(KARKOC PARCEL)
The City Council went into executive session at 7:37 p.m. for the purpose of
attorney-client privilege to discuss pending litigation against the City of
Lauderdale regarding the Karkoc/Walsh Lake parcel.
The Council came back into open session at 9:06 p.m.
12. DISCUSSION
13. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
14. ADDITIONAL ITEMS
15. SET AGENDA FOR NEXT MEETING
1. 2003 Financial Statements and Audit
2. Work Session — Draft Zoning Ordinance, Fulham Street Project,
and Larpenteur Avenue Redevelopment
16. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Giannetti, second by Gill -Gerbig to adjourn at 9:08 P.M. Ayes: All.
CITY OF LAUDERDALE
Claims for Approval
April 13, 2004 City Council Meeting
Payroll
03/26/04 Payroll: Check # 7553-7558 $6,501.62
03/26/04 Payroll: EFT: Federal Withholding Taxes/FICA $2,628.50
03/26/04 Payroll: EFT: PERA $1,068.26
03/26/04 Payroll: EFT: ICMA Retirement Fund $1,137.52
March04 Payroll: EFT: State Withholding Taxes $945.30
04/09/04 Payroll: Check # 7566-7570 $6,544.99
< NON" Payroll: EFT: Federal Withholding Taxes/FICA $2,641.76
Q'4"/04 Payroll: EFT: PERA $1,075.46
/04 Payroll: EFT: ICMA Retirement Fund $1,137.52
Vendor Claims
04/13/04 Claims: Check # 16814-16839 $20,620.841
Subtotal of Claims From Above
$44,301.77
Total Claims for Approval $44,301.77
CITY OF LAUDERDALE 04/08/04 3:24 PM
Page 1
Vendor Transactions
CHECK Check Batch
Nbr Date Name Invoice
Amount Comments
Search Name AFSCME
016814 4/13/04 041304 4/13
$75.90 3/04 union dues
Search Name AFSCME
$75.90
Search Name AVENET, LLC
016815 4/13/04 041304 6475
$90.00 2g04 website hosting
Search Name AVENET, LLC
$90.00
Search Name BFI
016816 4/13/04 041304 4/13
$2,472.50 02/04 recycling
Search Name BFI
$2,472.50
Search Name BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
016817 4/13/04 041304 106989
$340.48 2/04 2003 st/util imp
016817 4/13/04 041304 106988
$343.00 2/04 general engineering
Search Name BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
$683.48
Search Name CINTAS
016818 4/13/04 041304 4/13
$86.40 3/25, 4/1, 4/8 pw uniforms
Search Name CINTAS
$86.40
Search Name CITY OF ROSEVILLE
016819 4/13/04 041304 4437
$164.08 4/04 technical services
Search Name CITY OF ROSEVILLE
$164.08
Search Name CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE
016820 4/13/04 041304 4452
$225.00 2004 ramsey co gis users group
Search Name CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE
$225.00
Search Name GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD
016821 4/13/04 041304 4/13
$51.76 3/04 water cooler
Search Name GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD
$51.76
Search Name GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE
016822 4/13/04 041304 4/13
$199.00 mcma/maca annual conference
Search Name GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE
$199.00
Search Name HOME DEPOT CRC
016823 4/13/04 041304 4/13
$24.46 garage door opener
016823 4/13/04 041304 4/13
$90.67 maintenance supplies
016823 4/13/04 041304 4/13
$297.46 garage improvements
Search Name HOME DEPOT CRC
$412.59
Search Name HUGHES & COSTELLO
016824 4/13/04 041304 4/13
$850.00 4/04 legal retainer
016824 4/13/04 041304 4/13
$49.75 4/04 print/process
Search Name HUGHES & COSTELLO
$899.75
Search Name KENNEDY & GRAVEN
016825 4/13/04 041304 60611
$19.95 2/04 print/process
016825 4/13/04 041304 60611
$1,586.00 2/04 legal fees
Search Name KENNEDY & GRAVEN
$1,605.95
Search Name MET -COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER.
CITY OF LAUDERDALE
Vendor Transactions
CHECK Check Batch
Nbr Date Name Invoice Amount Comments
016826 4/13/04 041304 772579 $7,655.87 5/04 wastewater services
Search Name MET -COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SER. $7,655.87
Search Name MN STATE TREASUER
016827 4/13/04 041304 4/13
Search Name MN STATE TREASUER
Search Name NORTH STAR BANK, PETTY
016828 4/13/04 041304 4/13
016828 4/13/04 041304 4/13
016828 4/13/04 041304 4/13
016828 4/13/04 041304 4/13
016828 4/13/04 0413044/13
Search Name NORTH STAR BANK, PETTY
Search Name OFFICE MAX
016829 4/13/04 041304 4/13
016829 4/13/04 041304 4/13
Search Name OFFICE MAX
Search Name PARK HARDWARE HANK
016830 4/13/04 041304 4/13
Search Name PARK HARDWARE HANK
Search Name PARK SERVICE
016831 4/13/04 041304 4/13
016831 4/13/04 041304 4/13
016831 4/13/04 041304 4/13
Search Name PARK SERVICE
Search Name RAMSEY COUNTY, PROP REC & REV
016832 4/13/04 041304 risk699
016832 4/13/04 041304 pubw4450
Search Name RAMSEY COUNTY, PROP REC & REV
Search Name RAPIT PRINTING
016833 4/13/04 041304 104533
Search Name RAPIT PRINTING
Search Name ROSEHILL SERVICE STATION
016834 4/13/04 041304 k152935
016834 4/13/04 041304 k152935
Search Name ROSEHILL SERVICE STATION
Search Name SAFE ASSURE CONSULTANTS, INC.
016835 4/13/04 041304 4/13
Search Name SAFE ASSURE CONSULTANTS, INC.
Search Name SBC PAGING
016836 4/13/04 041304 4/13
016836 4/13/04 041304 4/13
Search Name SBC PAGING
$14.00 1804 bldg permit surcharges
$14.00
$18.13 mileage kw
$47.73 mileage rg
$35.52 mileage jb
$2.67 certified mail
$6.00 nonresi reimb s wilberts ry rec
$110.05
$5.31 video tapes
$157.43 general office supplies
$162.74
$37.31 tools
$37.31
$187.44 3/04 truck fuel
$23.34 3/04 truck fuel
$22.57 3/04 truck maintenance
$233.35
$1,012.72 4/04 health benefits
$1,806.72 2/04 plow/sand
$2,819.44
$52.61 bldg permit hard cards
$52.61
$156.46 truck repair, muffler and tail pipes
$156.46 truck repair, muffler and tail pipes
$312.92
$780.00 2004 safety training
$780.00
$50.80 2004 pw pager
$50.80 2004 pw pager
$101.60
04/08/04 3:24 PM
Page 2
fY
CITY OF LAUDERDALE 04/08/04 3:24 PM
Page 3
Vendor Transactions
CHECK
Check
Batch
Nbr
Date
Name Invoice
Amount Comments
Search Name WAGERS BUSINESS SYSTEMS
016837
4/13/04
041304 arin24818
$199.60 toner for copier
Search Name WAGERS BUSINESS SYSTEMS
$199.60
Search Name WASTE MANAGEMENT
016838
4/13/04
041304 4/13
$30.56 4/04 garbage service
016838
4/13/04
041304 4/13
$30.55 4/04 garbage service
Search Name WASTE MANAGEMENT
$61.11
Search Name XCEL ENERGY
016839
4/13/04
041304 4/13
$198.85 3/04 utilities city hall
016839
4/13/04
041304 4/13
$66.28 3/04 utilities city hall
016839
4/13/04
041304 4/13
$107.60 3/04 utilitiescity hall
016839
4/13/04
041304 4/13
$35.87 3/04 utilities garage
016839
4/13/04
041304 4/13
$53.60 3/04 utilities garage
016839
4/13/04
041304 4/13
$53.60 3/04 utilities garage
016839
4/13/04
041304 4/13
$8.90 3/04 utilities garage
016839
4/13/04
041304 4/13
$8.90 3/04 utilities garage
016839
4/13/04
041304 4/13
$144.06 3/04 utilities park
016839
4/13/04
041304 4/13
$9.30 3/04 utilities park
016839
4/13/04
041304 4/13
$426.87 3/04 utilities st lighting
Search Name XCEL ENERGY
$1,113.83
Grand Total $20,620.84
Lauderdale City Council Memorandum
Council Meeting Date:
To:
From:
Agenda Item:
:io I le'•1] "m
April 13, 2004
Mayor and City Council
Rick Getschow, City Administrator
2003 Financial Statements and Audit Report
Andrew Berg from Abdo, Abdo, Eick & Myers will be at the Council meeting to present
the audit and financial statements for fiscal year 2003.
Enclosed in the packet under separate cover is a copy of the audit and its accompanying
management letter.
1. 2003 Annual Financial Report
2. 2003 Financial Report Management Letter
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve the audit and financial statements for fiscal year 2003.
Lauderdale City Council Memorandum
Council Meeting Date: April 13, 2004
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Rick Getschow, City Administrator
Agenda Item: Karkoc Property
BACKGROUND:
Mary Tietjen, an attorney Kennedy and Graven, who has been working on the Karkoc
case and appeared at the March 23, 2004 Council meeting will once again be present at
this meeting to update the City Council on the Karkoc issue.
Following an update on the issue in executive session, the Council can consider the
separate item of Resolution 041304A: A Resolution Authorizing Eminent Domain
Proceedings to Acquire Certain Real Property.
ENCLOSURES:
1. Resolution 041304A: A Resolution Authorizing Eminent Domain
Proceedings to Acquire Certain Real Property.
RESOLUTION NO. 041304A
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS
TO ACQUIRE CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
WHEREAS, the City of Lauderdale is a Minnesota municipal corporation organized and
operating under Minnesota law and is authorized by Minnesota Statutes Sections 412.211 and
465.01 to acquire private property for an authorized public purpose, using the procedure prescribed
in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 117; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to preserve significant portions of open space within the City
for park, natural resources, recreation and open space purposes; and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property contains approximately 0.25 acres, is partially wooded
lake- front property adjacent to similar city -owned property and would be desirable for the City and
its citizens to use for park, natural resources, recreation and open space purpose; and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is designated as not buildable under the City's zoning and
subdivision ordinances and applicable City and State shoreline setback requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is currently guided for open space under the City's
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City owns property adjacent to the Subject Property and thus, the
acquisition of the Subject Property would provide a contiguous area of open space.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lauderdale,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is convenient, desirable and necessary to acquire the Subject Property for the City
for park, recreation, natural resources and open space purposes.
2. Acquisition of the Subject Property for such purposes by eminent domain, in the
manner provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 117, is for public purposes and is hereby
authorized.
3. Due to the nature of the Subject Property, specifically that is unavailable for private
development, the City has determined that it would be an excellent parcel for addition to the City's
open space.
4. The City has been unable to reach a negotiated agreement with the owner of the
Subject Property.
The Property is in private ownership and use. There is no existing public use on the
Property.
6. The City Council determines that it is necessary, convenient and reasonable to
acquire the Subject Property for park, natural resources, recreation and open space purposes. The
City Council further determines that it is in the public interest to authorize and direct the acquisition
of the Subject Property for such purposes.
7. The City attorney and staff are authorized and directed on behalf of the City to
acquire fee simple title to the Subject Property as legally described below by the exercise of the
power of eminent domain pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 117.
8. The Subject Property is legally described as follows:
GARCELON'S ADDITION TO ST. PAUL N 1/2 OF LOT 5 AND ALL OF
LOT4BLK3
Adopted by the City Council in and for the City of Lauderdale, Minnesota this day
of .2004.
The foregoing resolution was moved by
seconded by
The vote was by roll call:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Administrator
and
Lauderdale City Council Memorandum
Council Meeting Date: April 13, 2004
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Rick Getschow, City Administrator
Agenda Item: 2005-2006 Police Contract
BACKGROUND:
As was stated in the March 26, 2004 Friday report, the City of Saint Anthony has
submitted a police contract proposal for 2005 and 2006.
The Saint Anthony and Falcon Heights City Councils' have approved or are planning to
approve their contracts. The draft of the contract is included in the packet and is similar
to the current contract that expires at the end of 2004. This agreement proposes a 3% cost
increase to the contract for 2005, and a 3.25% increase for 2006.
Below is a summary of the cost increases for the police contract over the past
eight (8) years:
• 1997:
8.4%
• 1998:
4%
• 1999:
5%
• 2000:
4%
• 2001:
3.5%
• 2002:
3.5%
• 2003:
4.5%
• 2004:
4.25%
The Saint Anthony City Manager's letter enclosed with the draft agreement states that the
proposed increase is necessary due to personnel increases, health insurance increases, and
cost increases due to the need to upgrade computer and radio systems.
ENCLOSURES:
1. February 9, 2004 letter from the City of Saint Anthony
2. Draft of Joint Powers Agreement for Police Services
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Consider the approval of the Joint Powers Agreement for Police Services with
the City of Saint Anthony for 2005-2006.
February 9, 2004
Rich Getschow
City of Lauderdale
1891 Walnut Street
Lauderdale, Minnesota 55113
Dear Rich:
Enclosed is a Joint Powers Agreement for police services for 2'00k& 2095 between the
Cities of Lauderdale and St. Anthony. Staff will recommend to the St. Anthony City
Council a 3% increase for contract year M4& for 29Q5 a 3.25% increase.
The proposed increase is. necessary to offset increased costs in the following areas:
✓ Salaries and benefits will increase over the next two years.
✓ Health insurance premiums have significantly increased.
✓ Increasing costs of maintenance (labor, tires, parts & etc.).
✓ Fuel costs continue to rise.
✓ Hennepin/Ramsey County 800 MHZ/VHF communications costs.
The proposed increase listed below is contingent on a favorable approval of the St.
Anthony City Council. In addition, as of this date, we have not settled our contracts for
wages and benefits with the Police Union for�,,1��0-. They have filed for
mediation and if we are unsuccessful to negotia e a coiilra�t that is favorable to the
current budget, the proposal is subject to change.
Here is a current Summary:
2004 Proposed Proposed
Contract 2005 2006
$240,818 $247,219 $255,254
Sincerely,
�d
Michael J. Mornson
City Manager
3301 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55418-1699 • www.ci.saint-anthony.mn.us • (612) 789-8881 • FAX (612) 781-9323
Our Mission is to be a progressive and livable community, a walkable village, which is safe and secure.
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
FOR POLICE SERVICES
This Agreement is made and entered into as of , 2004
between the CITY OF ST. ANTHONY, a municipal corporation under the laws of the
State of Minnesota ("St. Anthony") and the CITY OF LAUDERDALE, a municipal
corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota ("Lauderdale") . The services to
be performed under this Agreement will commence January 1, 2005.
I. PURPOSE
St. Anthony and Lauderdale have the power within their respective cities to provide
for the prevention of crime and for police protection. Under Minnesota Statutes,
Section 471.59, the cities may, by agreement, provide for the exercise of the police
power by one city on behalf of the other city.
This Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions under which St. Anthony will
provide police services for Lauderdale. St. Anthony will have full authority and
responsibility to provide services in accordance with all enabling legislation under the
laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of Lauderdale. St. Anthony will
provide feedback to the Lauderdale City Administrator and City Council on a regular
and timely basis, and will actively support the creation of a joint advisory committee
pursuant to Section IX of this Agreement, whose members come from both cities, and
whose purpose is to review, monitor, and ensure a successful relationship between
the two cities under this Agreement.
II. INTERPRETATION
This Agreement is entered following the preparation by Lauderdale of a Request for
Proposal for Police Services and the submission of a responsive Proposal by St.
Anthony (the "Proposal"). To the extent that any of the provisions of this Agreement
are inconsistent with the provisions of the Proposal, the provisions of this Agreement
will control. If any provision of this Agreement is ambiguous, the parties agree that
the Proposal may be looked to as evidence of the parties' intent.
III. SERVICES
St. Anthony will provide Lauderdale with 24 hour police service, and will physically
place a certified officer within the boundaries of Lauderdale 24 hours each day, except
in those instances when the officer makes an arrest and transports a prisoner, during
mutual aid situations, when providing a backup for another officer, or when called
away for a court appearance, booking or similar police matter. Subject to these
Joint Powers Agreement
for Police Services
Page 2
exceptions and in normal circumstances, St. Anthony will provide 24 hour police
protection and police presence each day within the City of Lauderdale. In those
instances stated above when an officer is not physically present in Lauderdale, St.
Anthony will respond to emergency police calls with other officers.
IV. LEVEL OF SERVICES
During the term of this Agreement, St. Anthony will provide to Lauderdale the same
police service extended to persons and property within St. Anthony, which will
include, but be limited to, the following:
A. Patrol services, with random patrolling of all residential, business and
public property areas during all shifts;
B. Police presence within the boundaries of Lauderdale 24 hours each day,
subject only to the exceptions noted above;
C. Animal control services as provided within the City of St. Anthony bythe
animal control service employed by St. Anthony;
D. Enforcement of all ordinances of Lauderdale which are intended to be
enforced by police officers, with special attention being given to parking,
winter and nuisance ordinances;
E. Ticketing for traffic violations will be done routinely. during normal shifts;
F. Crime prevention programs that encourage community involvement and
investment in the City of Lauderdale, including participation in the
Mayor's Commission, Family Violence Network, Neighborhood Watch
Programs, "McGruff Houses," and "Combat Auto Theft" programs; in
appropriate cases, referrals will be made to the Northwest Youth and
Family Services Youth Diversion Program;
G. Criminal investigations, crime lab service and supervisory service;
H. Reports on police services and activities, including weekly, monthly and
annual police reports;
I. Responses to medical emergencies, fires and other emergencies;
responses shall include, where appropriate, securing the scene for
fire/rescue personnel, accompanying fire/rescue personnel to the hospital
Joint Powers Agreement
for Police Services
Page 3
upon request of such personnel, and providing follow-up information to
fire/rescue personnel upon request of such personnel;
J. Officers will be available at Lauderdale City Hall to answer questions
from, and provide information regarding police activities to, Lauderdale
residents, business owners and staff on an as -needed basis;
K. License inspections, background investigations and license enforcement
services as called for under applicable state law or city ordinances;
L. Review and comment, upon request, of proposed Lauderdale ordinances
affecting police services or enforcement;
M. Follow-up on reported crimes with the person(s) who reported the crime,
including routine notification by telephone or mail as to the status of the
investigation; and
N. Special event traffic patrol services, including ten days per year during
the State Fair; and other events such as periodic parades and the
National Street Rods Association Convention.
V. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES
This Agreement will be effective January 1, 2005 and will continue until December 31,
2006. In consideration of the services to be provided under this Agreement,
Lauderdale will pay St. Anthony an annual fee of $247,219 for the year 2005, and an
annual fee of $255,254 for the year 2006, for the police services under this
Agreement. This Agreement will be effective January 1, 2005 and will continue
indefinitely unless canceled in accordance with the procedure outlined in Section XX
of this Agreement. Inconsideration of services provided for under this Agreement, St.
Anthony and Lauderdale shall establish the fee for these services on a biennial basis
by May 15th of the even numbered year preceding each biennium.
VI. METHOD OF PAYMENT
St. Anthonywill bill Lauderdale monthlyfor 1/12 of the annual fee, and Lauderdale will
promptly remit payments to St. Anthony within 30 days after receiving each billing
from St. Anthony.
Joint Powers Agreement
for Police Services
Page 4
VII. LIABILITY
St. Anthony will be responsible for all liability incurred as a result of the actions of St.
Anthony police officers under this Agreement, and will hold Lauderdale, its officers
and employees harmless for any liability resulting from actions of a St. Anthony
employee and shall defend Lauderdale, its officers and employees, against any claim
for damages arising out of St. Anthony's performance of this Agreement; provided,
however, that if the claim, action or liability is one which is insured by St. Anthony's
liability insurer, Lauderdale will bear the first $5,000.00 of expense for any such claim,
action or liability, or expenses relation thereto, including attorneys' fees, to the extent
not covered by the insurer because of a deductible amount under the policy (which
deductible amount is currently $10,000.00).
VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY
The law enforcement and police services rendered to Lauderdale will be under the sole
direction of St. Anthony. The standards of performance, the hiring and discipline of
officers assigned, and other matters relating to regulations and policies related to
police employment, services and activities, will be within the exclusive control of St.
Anthony. The parties hereto expressly affirm the importance of work force diversity
and St. Anthony agrees to use reasonable efforts, within applicable departmental
budgetary limits, to recruit qualified female and minority police officers through the
Minnesota Police Recruitment System.
IX. JOINT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Both cities will appoint members to a joint advisory committee. The committee will
meet at least four times each year to ensure that this Agreement and the services
performed pursuant to this Agreement are meeting the expectations of both cities.
Any recommendations of the committee will be strictly advisory.
X. COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES
St. Anthony will furnish all communication equipment and any necessary supplies
required to perform the services which are to be rendered under this Agreement.
XI, COOPERATION AND ASSISTANCE AGREEMENTS
Lauderdale will be included in all cooperative agreements entered into by the St.
Anthony Police Department with other police services units.
Joint Powers Agreement
for Police Services
Page 5
XII. HEADQUARTERS
Headquarters for services rendered to Lauderdale under this Agreement will be located
at offices owned or leased by St. Anthony. The citizens of Lauderdale may notify
headquarters or Ramsey County radio dispatch for police services requested either in
person or by some other means of communication. St. Anthony officers may take
routine telephone calls and complete routine reports for Lauderdale at the Lauderdale
City Hall, and Lauderdale will have facilities available to the officers at Lauderdale City
Hall for this purpose. The facilities will include a desk, telephone, fax and copier.
XIII. EMPLOYEES OF ST. ANTHONY
Officers assigned to duty in Lauderdale will at all times be employees of St. Anthony.
All obligations with regard to workers compensation, PERA, withholding tax,
insurance, and similar personnel and employment matters will be the obligation of St.
Anthony. Lauderdale will not be required to furnish any fringe benefits or assume any
other liability of employment to any officer assigned to duty within Lauderdale.
XIV. ENFORCEMENT POLICIES
Enforcement policies of St. Anthony will prevail as the enforcement policies within
Lauderdale. A written statement of the current enforcement policies of St. Anthony
will be provided in writing to Lauderdale.
XV. ENFORCEMENT OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF LAUDERDALE
St. Anthony officers assigned to duty within Lauderdale will enforce Lauderdale
ordinances to the extent appropriate for enforcement by police officers.
XVI. OFFICERS OF LAUDERDALE
The officers assigned duty within Lauderdale will be provided with authority to
enforce the laws of the City of Lauderdale by proper action to be taken by the
Lauderdale City Council, and while performing services under this Agreement will be
considered police officers of Lauderdale. The Chief of Police of St. Anthonywill furnish
to the Lauderdale City Administrator the names of all St. Anthony police officers
assigned to Lauderdale and all such officers will be appointed officers of the City of
Lauderdale.
Joint Powers Agreement
for Police Services
Page 6
XVII. OFFENSES
All offenses within Lauderdale charged by police officers under this Agreement will be
charged in accordance with Lauderdale ordinances when possible; otherwise, the
charge will be made in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota or the
laws of the United States of America.
XVIII. COMMUNICATIONS
St. Anthony agrees to provide the Lauderdale Administrator with weekly, monthly and
annual police reports, in a format as is mutually agreed to by the St. Anthony Police
Chief and the Lauderdale City Administrator,
The St. Anthony Police Chief will regularly communicate with the Lauderdale City
Administrator in order to ensure that Lauderdale is knowledgeable about any police
activity in the City, and at the request of the Administrator the Police Chief will make
presentations to the Lauderdale City Council.
XIX. PROSECUTION AND REVENUES
Lauderdale will pay all costs of prosecution for all offenses charged within its
boundaries or under its ordinances. LEAA funds and confiscated drug funds will be
retained by St. Anthony. Fine revenues will be paid to Lauderdale. P.O.S.T. training
funds will be used for officer training.
XX. CONTINUATION OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement will be effective January 1, 2005 and will continue until terminated
as described in Paragraph XXI below. In consideration for services provided under this
Agreement, St. Anthony and Lauderdale shall establish the fee for police services on
a biennial basis on or before May 15th of the even numbered year preceding each
biennium.
XXI. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
Either St. Anthony or Lauderdale may terminate the Agreement by submitting a
written notification to terminate to the City Administrator of Lauderdale and the City
Manager of St. Anthony by April 15th of even numbered years that St. Anthony or
Lauderdale intends to terminate the Agreement. Termination of this Agreement shall
be effective on December 31st at 11;59 of the year that either St. Anthony or
Lauderdale terminate the Agreement.
Joint Powers Agreement
for Police Services
Page 7
MI. REVIEW OF AGREEMENT
From time to time the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be reviewed and
revised as St. Anthony and Lauderdale deem necessary.
XXIII. ASSIGNMENT
The rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement will not be assigned,
and St. Anthony will not subcontract for any services to be furnished to Lauderdale
(except as otherwise provided in this Agreement), without the prior written consent
of the other party.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above stated.
CITY OF LAUDERDALE
By:
Mayor
By:
City Administrator
Date:
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY
By:
Mayor
By:
City Manager
Date:
Lauderdale City Council Memorandum
Council Meeting Date:
To:
From:
Agenda Item:
T_T111,01161IP►I��
April 13, 2004
Mayor and City Council
Rick Getschow, City Administrator
Set Dates for the 2004 Spring Clean -Up
Each spring all properties in Lauderdale are inspected pursuant to Section 2-4-3 of
Lauderdale City Code. The Code mandates that all properties in the city be inspected
annually for violations that relate to public health and safety.
On an annual basis, the City Council must set a date for spring clean-up because the City
Code states "that all premises within the City shall be cleaned up by such date as may be
established by the City Council". Last year, the Council set April 28 -May 2 as Clean-up
week and May 5-9 as Inspection week.
In the Spring City newsletter that was recently mailed, it was stated that residents should
clean their yards throughout April and that the City would undertake inspections in early
May. Therefore, staff is recommending that Clean-up Week be April 26-30 and that
Inspection Week be May 3-7. This schedule matches up very well with last year's Spring
Clean -Up Week.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to set April 26-30 as Clean -Up Week and May 3-7 as Inspection Week.
Lauderdale City Council Memorandum
Council Meeting Date: April 13, 2004
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Rick Getschow, City Administrator
Agenda Item: Work Session Discussion
BACKGROUND:
Zoning Ordinance Draft
Included under separate cover in the March 8, 2004 packet was a draft of Chapters 4-6.
Since this item was tabled, it is now scheduled to be discussed at this work session.
Please come to the meeting with the draft material from that packet along with any
comments or suggestions that you may have.
Fulham Street (Non) Turnback
Even though several Friday reports have been devoted to updates on the Fulham Street
maintenance project, I felt that there should be some discussion on the issue as the
County prepares to undertake the recycle and overlay project this summer. Items of
discussion could include:
1. County plans to deal with drainage issues;
2. County neighborhood meeting plans; and
3. Scheduling and timing of the maintenance project
Larpenteur Avenue Redevelopment
I would like to update the City Council on some preliminary discussions that I have had
with a consultant regarding redevelopment services. Jim Prosser of Ehlers and
Associates, who was previously the city manager in the City of Richfield, presented me
with some material regarding his firm's redevelopment services. His firm has recently
worked with the cities of Saint Anthony, Falcon Heights, and Little Canada on their
redevelopment projects.
Based on the work session discussion and Council interest, Prosser could attend a future
Council work session to provide a presentation on his firm's redevelopment processes
and strategies.
Included in this packet is some background material on Ehlers redevelopment services.
ENCLOSURES:
1. City Case Studies of Ehlers and Associates Redevelopment Projects
2. Power Point Presentation slides for "Redevelopment Strategies"
�- - 91'
E H L E R S G G f
& ASSOCIATES I N C
Ehlers &Associates
knows what it takes to convert redevelopment plans into reality.
This knowledge comes from helping cities face the challenges of redevelopment. The following
case studies highlight Ehlers' experience with redevelopment. These projects demonstrate
the variety of redevelopment services available from Ehlers.
St. Anthony
Our redevelopment planning process has enabled St. Anthony to finally get results in efforts to replace the obsolete Apache Plaza
Mall. The 50 -acre redevelopment site will feature new retail, office space, townhomes, urban flats, senior cooperative units, as well as
a 5.6 -acre central park. When completed, the development will bring a total of 662 new housing units, 228,000 new sq. ft. of retail
and 25,000 sq. ft. of office space to the community.
Critical to the success of this redevelopment
has been a public involvement process in which .
thousands of residents and business people
worked together in open houses, forums and
workshops to create a vision for the new devel
opment, Silver Lake Village. Ehlers success
with redevelopment has found that for redevel-
opment to be completed, four elements must
be Present in the proposed project: �_ a AMCtgR�
ti„ 4
i
♦financial feasibility;
♦ market feasibility; .� a
♦ consistency with community goals; and,
♦ an experienced developer.
The Pratt Ordway Development Team is phasing the development on the 50 -acre site, with first phase - the retail and office space -
to be completed in 2005 and the final phase expected to be completed by 2007. Residents like the proposed development because
it will bring new life cycle housing choices to residents in a walkable, compact neighborhood that incorporates green spaces, the
park, trails, along with shops. The graphic is courtesy of the architect for the retail portion of the project, KKE architects.
Elk River
Elk River is very much like many small historic communities. Its historic
downtown was experiencing pressure from large retailers on the edge of
town, and in need of revitalization. But like many communities Elk River had
a number of failed proposals and efforts to begin redevelopment.
Elk River began working with Ehlers & Associates as its redevelopment con-
sultant in 2001. In September 2001, Elk River's Housing & Redevelopment
Authority developed a problem statement, identified the core business dis-
trict as the focus of the redevelopment, and developed a primary goal for
redevelopment.
In February 2002, the HRA held an open house for the community on
design objectives, concepts and development strategies. In March, the HRA
issued a request for proposals from developers and received five submittals.
Developer MetroPlains is completing financial feasibility and final site plans
on the project which will encompass two blockBl
s, uff and Jackson. Thj
e pro
ect will include 20,000 square feet of commercial development and both for -sale and rental housing units, along with a riverwalk
connection to a city park to be built among the river.
Falcon Heights
The major Twin Cities metropolitan area intersection of Snelling and Larpenteur in Falcon Heights will soon have a new look and new
function. The old 1940s -style Northhome strip mall is being replaced with new housing and 12,000 square feet of retail. The new
development will include 119 apartments, 56 senior housing units, 14 owner -occupied town homes and 12,000 square feet of retail
space. The development, by Sherman Associates, will be $35�ju
million to $40 million in new value on a site that had about $2I?
million of previous value.
Falcon Heights had been trying for 15 years to put together a
way to redevelop this high profile corner. Falcon Heights brought
Ehlers and Associates in as its redevelopment consultant in
2000 to get past the stalled planning/development efforts of
the past. Ehlers provided a redevelopment process and public
involvement process to get the community to participate in the
vision for the redevelopment.
After a process that involved about three years and about 20
community meetings, the community has not only been includ-
ed but has taken ownership in the probject. The public initiated
the discusssion on multi -family housing and senior housing and
provided input on development design guidelines. Early neigh-
borhood involvement helped to reduce resistance to the project,
including the "not in my backyard" factor. Developing a relationship early with the developer and beginning public involvement early
enabled the public to help shape the development. Recalling the previous failed efforts and the noting the completion of demolition
October 29 and beginning of construction the mayor told a newspaper reporter, "It's a dream come true.
Richfield
Richfield proves that redevelopment is a
powerful force. In recent years, significant
redevelopment successes can be seen in:
♦ Shops at Lyndale
♦ Richfield Rediscover
♦ Airport expansion
♦ Best Buy
Ehlers has played an extensive role in the redevelopment of Richfield. Our staff has played an active role in creating and implement-
ing the finance plans that were keys to each of these projects.
In 1999, Richfield City Manager Jim Prosser joined Ehlers. He brings direct experience on what it takes for a city to be successful in
redevelopment. With Ehlers, Jim continues to play an active role in the implementation of Richfield projects.
Ehlers is currently involved with the Cedar Avenue Redevelopment Area (CARA). CARA is a redevelopment project which was necessi-
tated by the expansion of adjacent Minneapolis - St. Paul airport. The 300+ acre residential area will be redeveloped to airport com-
patible uses including retail, office, hospitality and specially insulated replacement housing. Ehlers is providing project management
services including:
♦ Preparation of master development agreement
♦ Preparation of project budget
♦ Assistance with special legislation
♦ Coordination of acquisition, communications, project marketing
♦ Project financial feasibility analysis
♦ Development pro forma analysis
♦ TIF qualification
♦ TIF process coordination
♦ Developer negotiations
'Edina
Edina has long set the standard for quality redevelopment projects. The City's latest redevelopment effort, Grandview Square, contin-
ues the trend. Ehlers assisted the City in the evaluation of development proposals for a key redevelopment site. Ehlers created a
financial model to create an "apples -to -apples" analysis for four different mixed use development proposals. The analysis evaluated
the critical elements of each proposal: property value created, timing of development, amount and form of city assistance, and flow
of funds. Ehlers prepared detailed information for staff evaluation and summary profiles for City Council use.
Following selection of a development team, Ehlers participated in the negotiation of a development agreement. Ehlers' financial analy-
sis provided the information needed to set the form and amount of city assistance. The Grandview Square project will result in
80,000 square feet of office and 150 units of owner -occupied housing. The project will also contain a senior center and new county
library.
In previous years, Ehlers staff assisted Edina with the design and the implementation of the finance plan for the Centennial Lakes
redevelopment area.
Hopkins
Downtown. The Downtown area is the heart of Hopkins.
Ehlers has played an extensive role in the redevelopment of
downtown Hopkins. The City's most recent achievement is the
construction of the Hopkins Center for the Arts, Ehlers evaluated
options and assisted the City in the implementation of the facili-
ties finance plan. Other recent downtown projects include a
restaurant/theater complex.
Oaks of Mainstreet. Housing is an important part of the vitali-
ty of downtown Hopkins. Ehlers assisted the City with the rede-
velopment of a mobile home park into sixty six townhomes. This
redevelopment had been a City goal for more than 15 years and was realized in 1996. The financing for the development included a
complex mixture of five series of revenue bonds, general obligation tax increment bonds, and pay-as-you-go notes. Our first objective
was to protect the City's longterm financial interests while at the same time providing an incentive to the developer of the project to
build quality town homes and stay on budget for the project. Attesting to the success of the project are the sale of all housing units
and the retirement of two of the bond issues
County Road 3 Corridor Study. Ehl rs' staff served on a multi -firm team that created a comprehensive plan for the reconstruc-
tion of County Road 3 and the redevelopment of the adjacent land uses. Ehlers conducted financial analysis to determine the feasibil-
ity of project alternatives.
The finance plan created through the Corridor Study will allow the City to finance its share of the project without a complicated appli-
cation of special assessments. In 1997, Ehlers implemented phase 1 of the plan with the issuance of G.O. Tax Increment Bonds.
Mound
Mound shows that vision and patience are essential qualities of the redevelopment process. In 1989, the City of Mound prepared a
downtown redevelopment plan. Rusty Fifield of Ehlers was part of the multi -firm consulting team that worked with the City to create
the plan. Ten years later, the City retained Jim Prosser of Ehlers to serve as project manager as the actual redevelopment process
begins. Mound's Downtown Redevelopment includes five project areas encompassing 30 acres providing a projected 125,000 s.f. of
retail, 275 housing units, hotel, banquet facility and farmers market. Public improvements include relocation and expansion of a
County highway, a greenway, a new harbor and channel.
There are currently three separate developers involved in the redevelopment effort. Ehlers' project management services include:
♦ developer qualification
♦ coordination of acquisition, communications,
project marketing
♦ project financial feasibility analysis
♦ development pro forma analysis
♦ TIF qualification
♦ TIF process coordination
♦ Developer negotiations
Burnsville
In 1999, the City of Burnsville finalized its "Heart of the City" plan. The
plan serves as a guide for the redevelopment of this commercial and civic
core area. Like many plans, Heart of the City provides an exciting vision
with limited guidance on implementation. Burnsville turned to Ehlers &
Associates for assistance with the challanges of redevelopment. The first
step has been a developer RFP. Ehlers helped the City solicit and evaluate
proposals for development projects in the planning area.
Apple Valley 4,�a aE�.�a,�htw U-,P.1PA. A,&
Transit cane la ai ry
p y'nimportant role in development projects, Ehlers &Associates is familiar with transit issues through our work with
the Minnesota Valley Transit Authority (MVTA). Ehlers prepared the financial analysis on the viability of a mixed use development for
the Apple Valley transit station for MVTA. This project required a balanced perspective on transit needs, cooperation with adjacent pri-
vate development, and support from other governmental entities which were not accustomed to dealing with transit needs.
St. Louis Park
St. Louis Park's efforts to revi-
talize the Excelsior Boulevard
corridor and define a town cen-
ter serve as an excellent rede-
velopment case study.
Park Commons. The corner-
stone of the City's redevelop-
ment efforts is Park Commons.
At completion, this project will
bring over 500 housing units
and 240,000 square feet of
office/retail development into
St. Louis Park. The project pro-
duces over $120,000,000 in
private investment.
Ehlers staff plays a critical role.+ T"..�,,,,,�,,., y` ,� ►.,
on the staff/consultant team
leading the City's efforts. We,.,a1et!�!'!"�
provide the financial analysis of I►cSiRm kral"I"Ork '�" ` , I^it park. Mi�tr+Gx►In �� r
the City's ability to participate I
in the project. Our analysis
forecasts tax increment and other project revenues and links the revenues to project expenses and debt. Ehlers created the tax incre-
ment financing district that forms the key finance tool for the City. Ehlers served as financial advisor on $20,000,000 of bonds
issued by the City to finance land acquisition and site preparation.
EDA Financial Planning. With over $40,000,000 in outstanding TIF bonds, tax increment financing is an essential financial man-
agement issue for the City. Ehlers is assisting City Staff with financial analysis and planning for TIF districts and debt. The first phase
of the planning process focuses on meeting existing debt obligations. With a plan to support debt, the City can then explore the
capacity to use existing TIF districts to meet future redevelopment needs. The planning process:
♦ Project and test future tax increment revenues from each district.
♦ Estimated LGA/HACA penalty amounts.
♦ Designed plan to meet debt obligations and provide funding for other projects.
♦ Identified bond covenant and arbitrage compliance issues.
♦ Identified future debt management objectives and opportunities.
The second phase of the planning process will examine financing issues related to the Park Commons redevelopment project. Part of
this phase will look at the ability to drop parcels from existing TIF districts for new districts.
Special Service Districts. How do you make sure that your investment in redevelopment is sustainable? The City of St. Louis Park
turned to special service districts. As part of its comprehensive redevelopment plans, the City instituted improvements and enhance-
I W,4
.},Nilsi
j
_s
Y!}4
Ehlers staff plays a critical role.+ T"..�,,,,,�,,., y` ,� ►.,
on the staff/consultant team
leading the City's efforts. We,.,a1et!�!'!"�
provide the financial analysis of I►cSiRm kral"I"Ork '�" ` , I^it park. Mi�tr+Gx►In �� r
the City's ability to participate I
in the project. Our analysis
forecasts tax increment and other project revenues and links the revenues to project expenses and debt. Ehlers created the tax incre-
ment financing district that forms the key finance tool for the City. Ehlers served as financial advisor on $20,000,000 of bonds
issued by the City to finance land acquisition and site preparation.
EDA Financial Planning. With over $40,000,000 in outstanding TIF bonds, tax increment financing is an essential financial man-
agement issue for the City. Ehlers is assisting City Staff with financial analysis and planning for TIF districts and debt. The first phase
of the planning process focuses on meeting existing debt obligations. With a plan to support debt, the City can then explore the
capacity to use existing TIF districts to meet future redevelopment needs. The planning process:
♦ Project and test future tax increment revenues from each district.
♦ Estimated LGA/HACA penalty amounts.
♦ Designed plan to meet debt obligations and provide funding for other projects.
♦ Identified bond covenant and arbitrage compliance issues.
♦ Identified future debt management objectives and opportunities.
The second phase of the planning process will examine financing issues related to the Park Commons redevelopment project. Part of
this phase will look at the ability to drop parcels from existing TIF districts for new districts.
Special Service Districts. How do you make sure that your investment in redevelopment is sustainable? The City of St. Louis Park
turned to special service districts. As part of its comprehensive redevelopment plans, the City instituted improvements and enhance-
-monts to Excelsior Boulevard. Funds from the districts will be used to support a variety of services related to improvements made to
Excelsior Boulevard. In creating the districts, Ehlers:
♦ Analyzed the impacts on individual parcels from various funding options.
♦ Analyzed service charge options.
♦ Advised the City on the process to create the districts and impose the service charges.
♦ Prepared information explaining the district and finance concepts.
♦ Worked with City Staff and property owners to create consensus on plan.
Tax Abatement. Tax abatement is the newest development tool for local government. Ehlers helped the City undertake an abate-
ment that will result in a 54,000 square foot medical office building and small restaurant/commercial use on a polluted site. Ehlers
advised the City on the process and financial implications of tax abatement. To make this project possible, the City obtained tax
abatement commitments from the County and the School District.
Minnetonka
The City of Minnetonka was interested in producing a mixed
use development which would integrate retail, family rental
housing, townhomes, condominiums, various types of sen-
ior housing, common space and transit facilities in a rede-
velopment site along 1-394. Ehlers assisted the City in
attracting a major developer to acquire the existing land and
construct 250,000 square feet of retail and 100 luxury con-
dominiums. Ehlers' involvement also was also heavily con-
cerned with evaluating the benefits of certain public and pri-
vate amenities with the need for public assistance through
tax increment financing. The tax increment from the retail and condominiums was used to finance over 300 single family and multi-
family affordable housing units, public improvements, and public spaces. Moreover, this project was balanced with redevelopment
concerns of traffic, neighbors, a relocated church, and other existing land owners.
Little Canada
Our work in Little Canada shows the variety of ways Ehlers helps Minnesota cities meet the challenges of redevelopment.
Development Guide. Ehlers & Associates designed and led the planning process that resulted in the creation of a guide for the rede-
velopment of Little Canada's core commercial area. Ehlers assembled a consulting team that consisted of Maxfield Research and the
Hoisington Koegler Group to work on the project, We believe that this project represents an important first—a significant planning
study led by a financial consulting firm. The value of this approach is enhancing the ability to implement the plan. As the ongoing
financial advisor to the City of Little Canada, we have been able to carry the objectives of the Development Guide into real projects.
Work performed by Ehlers in this project include:
♦ Design and coordination of planning process.
♦ Create and lead public participation elements of process.
♦ Analysis of finance implications of development options.
♦ Preparation of implementation strategies.
♦ Preparation of final plan report.
♦ Creation of TIF district within study area.
The true test of a plan is the ability to help move towards the vision articulated in the plan. Here are some examples of how Ehlers
works with Little Canada to make the Development Guide become reality.
Market Place Renovation. Ehlers created a plan that made use of tax increment financing and the City's borrowing capacity to
encourage the redevelopment of a shopping center. Faced with the loss of the anchor grocery store, the City worked with a private
developer on a major renovation of the Market Place shopping center. The City issued bonds and loaned the proceeds to the develop-
er for the acquisition and renovation of the center. This step attracted new tenants to the center, including a larger grocery store. The
City also retained influence over the exterior improvements to the facility. The City's loan was paid off in less than three years. In
addition, the City received almost $200,000 in revenues that can be used to meet other development needs.
Developer RFP. An early step in the implementation process was to seek a private development "partner" for the area. Ehlers
worked with City Staff to create a solicitation of developer interest process. The objective of the process was to attract and select a
developer capable of creating new development within the parameters of the Development Guide, Development Guide serves as a
tool to attract and evaluate development projects. Ehlers created a cash flow model to identify the revenue and expense components
of the proposed projects and to test the feasibility of various development options.
Monticello
Downtown and Riverfront Plan. Ehlers & Associates served on a multi -firm consulting team that created a plan for the redevelop-
ment of the commercial core in Monticello. Ehlers played several roles in the planning process:
♦ Assist with the design of public participation elements.
♦ Assist with the creation of development plan alternatives.
♦ Evaluate finance options for use by the community.
♦ Prepare implementation strategies for the plan.
Ehlers' contributions to this project extend well beyond the adoption of the Plan. As the financial advisor to the City, Ehlers has
worked to make the Plan happen.
Revolving Loan Fund. Ehlers assisted the economic development authority with the creation of a downtown revolving loan pro-
gram. Ehlers created guidelines for the loan that tied to Plan objectives. We also analyzed the financial implications for various loan
and grant structures.
TIF Management. Ehlers provides tax increment financing assistance to the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority
(HRA). We assisted the HRA with the creation of seven new TIF Districts and the management of 25 existing districts. Ehlers assisted
in the creation of tax increment financing district encompassing the downtown and riverfront planing area. This TIF district will be an
important tool for Plan implementation.
Monticello Mall Renovation. The redevelopment of the Monticello Mall anchors the south end of downtown planning area. The
major renovation of this shopping center revolves around the anchor tenant—Cub Foods. Ehlers advised the City on the use of TIF
and in negotiations with the developer. This project achieved three important objectives. It brought about the redevelopment of an
aging commercial center. The project kept commercial activity concentrated in the downtown area. Finally, the project will spin off tax
increment revenues that can be used to meet other redevelopment needs.
Community Center. Ehlers played an active role in the planning for a multifunction community center. The 78,000 square foot
facility houses City offices, senior center, meeting rooms, aquatics center, gym and fitness facilities. The community center will also
serve as a National Guard training facility. Ehlers role in the project included:
♦ Identify and evaluate of finance options.
♦ Analyze financial impacts of project design options.
♦ Assist with National Guard use and funding agreement.
♦ Structure and implement finance plan.
At the time of sale, new members of the City Council threatened to terminate the project. This action made the long-term bonds
unmarketable. Ehlers creates and negotiated a temporary bond issue that allowed construction to continue and to protect the bond
holders. The City Council has since affirmed commitment to the project. In 2000, the facility opened and Ehlers assisted with perma-
nent financing.
REDEVELOPMENT
Uw- Uz:11111111111111
Keys to Successful Redevelopment
Verify Project Goals (examples) -
0 i,
Redevelopment Roles
Redevelopment Roles
Redevelopment Roles (cont'd)
Redevelopment Roles (Coned)
Redevelopment Roles
Community Participation to Build Support
Community Participation to Build Support
Communication
Review Target Development Uses
Prepare Request for Proposals
Developer Analysis
Developer Selection
Process Steps
Process Steps (cont'd)
Process Steps (cont'd)
Process Steps (cont'd)
Concepts are Framework
- Final Thoughts