Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ Special Conditions. Special consideration shall be <br />given to the "age" of a street or utility system when <br />determining the proportion of cost to be assessed to <br />benefitted properties. If it is necessary to reconstruct <br />or resurface a street or perform major repair/replacement <br />work on sewer and water utilities. before a reasonable <br />amount of time (10 to 12 years for resurfacing. 12 to 17 <br />years for partial reconstruction and 17 to 25 years for <br />total reconstruction) the assessment shall be calculated <br />on a pro-rated basis. The remaining cost shall be <br />recovered by means of the general ad valorem property tax <br />paid by the entire community or by other funds that may <br />become available to the City for infrastructure cost <br />recovery. <br /> <br />Subd.3 <br /> <br />METHODS OF ASSESSMENT <br /> <br />~ The nature of an improvement determines the method <br />of assessment. The objective is to choose an assessment <br />method which will arrive at a reasonable. fair and <br />equitable assessment which will be uniform upon the same <br />class of property within the assessed area. The most <br />frequently recognized assessment methods are: the unit <br />assessment. the front footage assessment and the area <br />assessment. Depending upon the individual project. any <br />one or a combination of these methods may be utilized to <br />arrive at an appropriate cost distribution. City staff <br />will consider all methods and weiqh their applicability <br />to the project and present a recommendation to the City <br />Council in the form of a mock assessment roll (or rolls) . <br />A description of each assessment and its corresponding <br />policy application is presented. A separate section <br />(Section III) will identify the appropriate matchup of <br />method with a specific type of project and analyze why <br />each is generally used. <br /> <br />The purpose of assessment formulas is to allocate <br />assessed costs among benefitted properties. the formula <br />should result in a allocation of assessments which is <br />reasonably related to the benefit received. Anyone <br />predetermined formula will not be appropriate in all <br />cases because of circumstances unique to the relationship <br />between the specific project and the specific properties <br />benefitted. When considering an assessment method or <br />formula for any given project. it may be necessary to <br />combine assessment methods or to modify the methods <br />described below. Therefore. the following description of <br />methods of assessments should be regarded as quidelines. <br />which may not be appropriate in all cases. <br />