My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 625
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Ordinances
>
0600-0699 (1997-2002)
>
Ordinance 625
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:16:51 PM
Creation date
2/2/2007 3:24:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Ordinances
MEETINGDATE
1/1/2007
Description
Ordinance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />relocation is done without an agreement first being made as to who shall pay the relocation cost, the Company's <br />relocation of the Facilities shall not be considered a waiver of any right to be reimbursed for the relocation cost. If <br />the Company claims that it should be reimbursed for a relocation cost, it shall notOy the City within thirty (30) days <br />of receipt of such order. <br /> <br />3.6. Relocation of Facilities in Public GrOlUld. The City may require the Company to relocate <br />Facilities within or remove Facilities from Public GrotUld upon a finding by the City that the Facilities have <br />become or will become a substantial impairment of the public use or ~oyment of ClUTent or planned use of the <br />Public Ground. The relocation or removal will be at the Company's expense when the City properly exercises its <br />police power. The Company does not waive its rights tUlder an existing easement or prescriptive right in the <br />Public Ground. The City will not require the removal of abandoned Gas Facilities in Public GrOtUld, unless those <br />Facilities have become or will become a substantial impainnent of the public use or ~oyment of the Public <br />Ground. <br /> <br />3.7. Street Improvements. Paving or Resurfucing. The City shall give the Company reasonable <br />written Notice of plans for street improvements where paving or resurfucing of a permanent nature is involved. <br />The Notice shall contain the nature and character of the improvements, the streets upon which the improvements <br />are to be made, the extent of the improvements and the time when the City will start the work, and, if more than <br />one street is involved, the order in which this worle is to proceed. The Notice shall be given to the Company a <br />sufficient length of time, considering seasonal wolking conditions, in advance of the actual commencement of the <br />work: to pennit the Company to make any additions, alterations or repairs to its Facilities the Company deems <br />necessaIy. <br /> <br />SECTION 4. FRANCHISE FEE. <br /> <br />4.1. Fonn. During the term of the franchise hereby granted, and in addition to pennit fees being <br />imposed or that the City has a right to impose, the City may charge the Company a franchise fee. The fee may be <br />(i) a percentage of gross revenues received by the Company for its operations within the City, or (Ii) a flat fee per <br />rustomer based on metered service to retail a.tstomers within the City or on some other similar basis, or (ill) a fee <br />based on units of energy delivered to any class of retail a.tstomers within the corporate limits of the City. The <br />formula for a franchise fee based on units of energy delivered may incorporate both commodity and demand units. <br />The method of imposing the franchise fee, the percentage of revenue rate, or the flat rate on the per unit rate may <br />differ for each rustomer class or combine the methods descnbed in (i) - (ill) above in assessing the fee. The City <br />shall seek to use a fonnula that provides a stable and predictable amount of fees, without placing the Company at a <br />competitive disadvantage. If the Company claims that the City-required fee fonnula is discriminatory or otherwise <br />places the Company at a competitive disadvantage, the Company shall provide a fonnula that will produce a <br />substantially similar fee amount to the City and reimburse the City's reasonable fees and costs in reviewing the <br />fonnula The City will attempt to accommodate the Company but is tUlder no franchise obligation to adopt the <br />Company-proposed franchise fee fonnula <br /> <br />4.2. Separate Ordinance. The franchise fee shall be imposed by separate ordinance duly adopted by <br />the City Council, which ordinance shall not be adopted until at least 60 days after written notice enclosing such <br />proposed ordinance has been served upon the Company by certified mail. The fee shall not become effective tUltil <br />at least 60 days after written notice enclosing such adopted ordinance has been served upon the Company by <br />certified mail. <br /> <br />4.3. Condition of Fee. The separate ordinance imposing the fee shall not be effective against the <br />Company unless it lawfully imposes a fee or tax of the same or substantially similar amount on the sale of gas <br /> <br />JMS-162951 <br />MU21O-14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.