My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002 City Council Minutes
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
2002 City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2009 2:08:58 PM
Creation date
12/9/2009 2:08:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
515
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council January 7, 2002 <br />Special Meeting Page 16 <br />• <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he thought that City Administrator Miller was asked to <br />determine whether the equipment was home equipment rather than commercial, what the <br />warranty was, and ask the vendor if the warranty could be extended. <br />City Administrator Miller indicated that, according to verbal information received from the <br />vendor, the warranty would not be extended because the equipment is in the Community Center. <br />She then indicated that the liability issue was resolved because the representative from LMCIT <br />determined that there would not be an issue. She also noted that the current usage is no more <br />than what the at home usage would be based on documentation obtained from the YMCA that <br />indicates a less than one hour per day usage rate. <br />City Administrator Miller indicated that Staff had thought the vendor would extend the warranty <br />based on the limited usage but declined to do so because the equipment is in a public setting <br />making the warranty void. <br />Council Member Stigney asked what the warranty would have been if the equipment were not in <br />a public setting. He then indicated that the Mayor was told, when he placed the order, that the <br />equipment was for in home use. <br />City Administrator Miller indicated the equipment was purchased through a catalog and she is <br />• not sure that anyone on Staff checked to see if was commercial equipment. She also indicated <br />that, when the City took ownership of the equipment, no one checked to make sure the <br />equipment received was what was purchased. <br />Council Member Stigney commented that it was his understanding, during closed session <br />discussions, that when TSS placed the order Reebok informed Mr. Sonterre that the equipment <br />was for in home use and was not to be used in a commercial setting. He then said he feels that <br />the Mayor, as owner of TSS, should uphold whatever the warranty would have been. <br />Mayor Sonterre indicated that it was the opinion of Reebok that he was made aware of the fact <br />that the equipment was in home equipment and he has disputed that fact. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that Mayor Sonterre sold the equipment knowing it was <br />going into a commercial setting. He then indicated that since the equipment is not covered by <br />warranty he feels the person who sold the equipment, Mayor Sonterre, should provide whatever <br />the Reebok warranty would have been <br />Mayor Sonterre indicated that the equipment was part of an apparel catalog and he does not sell <br />the equipment and knows nothing about it. He indicated he never received any information on <br />the product other than the two-page portion of the apparel catalog. He then explained that while <br />on the Parks Commission he offered the catalog to the Commission because the Commission was <br />interested in purchasing equipment for the Community Center. He further explained that his <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.