My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2010/05/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
Minutes - 2010/05/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:24:26 AM
Creation date
7/12/2010 2:57:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
5/24/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council May 24, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 11 <br />• <br />Mayor Flaherty suggested Item 4 be removed completely as comparable communities were not <br />clearly defined within the document. In addition, he requested additional language be eliminated <br />under Pay Equity removing "the City may consider completing a market compensation survey" <br />and the paragraph following. Assistant Clerk-Administrator Crane felt these were acceptable <br />changes. <br />Council Member Mueller supported Mayor Flaherty's suggestions. <br />Council Member Hull asked for the purpose of a market compensation survey. Assistant Clerk- <br />Administrator Crane explained the purpose was to assist with retaining employees to maintain <br />comparable salaries. <br />Council Member Hull had no problem with leaving the market compensation survey information <br />in the Personnel Manual. <br />Clerk-Administrator Ericson stated this issue was tied to Item 4. Leaving the language in would <br />not hurt the policy and if removed, a compensation study could still be completed at the request <br />of the Council. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Gunn. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 7616, <br />• Revising Section 3.01 of the Mounds View Personnel Manual Pertaining to Compensation; <br />removing Item 4 and omitting the iinal paragraph on Page 43. <br />Council Member Stigney suggested half steps be taken between Step 1 and Step 2 on the pay <br />scale. He did not feel it was necessary for employees to change three steps in one calendar year <br />based on the current system. <br />AMENDMENT MOTION/SECOND: 5tigney/Gunn. To Revise Resolution 7616, revising the <br />pay scale to include a half step between Step 1 and Step 2, six months after date of hire; and that <br />5tep 2 shall not be reached before one year of employment with the City changing the pay scale <br />to a four year plan. <br />Finance Director Beer indicated the City had several union contracts based on the current pay <br />scale. <br />Council Member Stigney felt the original pay scale was quite liberal and now was the time to <br />reevaluate the timeframe of the pay scale. This would change the pay scale to a four year plan <br />versus the current three year plan. <br />Council Member Gunn clarified if the pay scale would then change to a six step plan. Finance <br />Director Beer suggested this be taken on as six steps with Step 1 at 80%, Step 2 at 821h°Io, Step 3 <br />at 85%, Step 4 at 90%, Step 5 at 95°Io and Step 6 at 100%. <br />• Council Member Stigney requested staff draft the appropriate language necessary to make this <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.