My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2010/05/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
Minutes - 2010/05/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:24:26 AM
Creation date
7/12/2010 2:57:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
5/24/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council May 24, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 17 <br />• <br />Council Member Hull asked if the City could tie the non-compliance issues to the liquor license <br />approval. Community Development Director Roberts stated the outstanding fees could be <br />attached but the signage issues could not. <br />Council Member Mueller felt it was unfortunate this business had outstanding compliance issues. <br />However, the economic environment was dif�cult at this time and the businesses were <br />struggling. She suggested the Council work with Robert's to resolve these issues as has been <br />done in the past with other struggling businesses. A payment plan could be established and she <br />encouraged the business owner to repair the parking lot before further harming his business <br />andior clientele. <br />Council Member Mueller requested staff inform Mr. Halverson of the sign ordinance and bring <br />the establishment into confornuty with the City code. She did not want to threaten the business <br />owner of losing his liquor license if all these issues were not resolved. <br />Council Member Stigney asked what staff's recommendation was at this time. Community <br />Development Director Roberts stated the frustration at this time was the City has had multiple <br />conversations with the owner and he was ignoring the City's letters and conversations to date. <br />He was tired of having the same conversation without any results. Staff recommended pursuing <br />all options to gain compliance, noting that the fees could be certified and added onto the property <br />• taxes. <br />City Attorney Riggs added that the CUP could be revoked as well if the owner was not willing to <br />comply with the City's code. <br />Council Member Gunn indicated the City's expectations were clearly spelled out for Mr. <br />Halverson in the Resolution passed by Council last year. <br />Council Member Hull stated he understood times were tough but it would not cost the property <br />owner anything to remove the unpermitted signs. <br />Mayor Flaherty felt the signs and the lawyer's fees should be handled as they were agreed upon <br />by the property owner. He suggested the Council discuss the CUP with Mr. Halverson and not <br />revoke the liquor license due to non-compliance. <br />Council Member Mueller agreed it would be bene�cial to invite Mr. Halverson to the next <br />meeting to discuss the CUP to resolve the non-compliance issues. <br />Finance Director Beer stated the Select Senior Project would be brought forward to the next <br />Council work session to discuss conduit debt in more detail. A representative from Ehlers will <br />be present. <br />• C. Reports of City Attorney. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.