My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2007/02/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
Minutes - 2007/02/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 2:14:05 PM
Creation date
7/20/2010 9:31:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
2/12/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council February 12, 2007 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br />• <br />Anna Schovanec of 7959 Sunnyside Road said that Council had passed the project in December <br />of 2006 so the only way to stop it would be to go forward with a petition. She then said that they <br />were not trying to misinform anyone but felt that a lot of the homeowners had a lot of questions <br />about the project. <br />Ms. Schovanec said that they talked to over 200 people and they have no interest in providing <br />false information but tried to provide information to the residents. <br />Ms. Schovanec said that a majority of people wanted to know why an additional survey was sent <br />out after a majority of people said they were not interested. <br />Mayor Marty indicated that the pavement index shows that these streets were the worst quality in <br />town, and that is why the project was considered for this part of town, and that is why the City <br />resurveyed and got somewhat of a majority. <br />Ms. Schovanec asked if the $200,000 costs include the survey costs. She then said that they did <br />not get paid for their door to door petition and resident contact. She further said that they did not <br />know until they were two weeks into the project that it was almost 2 to 1 against the project. <br />Ms. Schovanec said that they heard that residents wanted to sign the petition but did not think it <br />• would do any good. Another concern was with any more increased costs on the property taxes. <br />She then said that another big issue was with barrier curbs. <br />Ms. Schovanec said that residents expressed concern about grouped mailboxes and barrier curbs <br />and did not want to change the look of the neighborhood. <br />Ms. Schovanec indicated that there was concern of the residents on Red Oak Drive about traffic <br />voiume and they feit they were misled that this project would do something for their traffic. <br />Ms. Schovanec said that the majority of the people do not have strong support for the project. <br />She then suggested other ways of contacting residents than these meetings and asked the City to <br />consider less costly aiternatives for residents especially those on lower incomes. <br />Mayor Marty asked whether the levy passing for the school was the last straw. <br />Ms. Schovanec said that it is a budget concern for many and the addition of the school levy will <br />impact them. <br />Council Member Flaherty asked how many people did not know about the project. <br />Ms. Schovanec said it was about 10% that did not know, but there were varying levels of <br />knowledge among those that were aware of it. <br />• Mayor Marty asked where the information on losing trees in the boulevard concern came from. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.