Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council June 11, 2007 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />Council Member Stigney said that he is confused because Robert Waste is not a party to this and • <br />asked whether the Chief feels that he should be held accountable and whether the license should <br />not be renewed because of activities in the building. <br />Council Member Flaherty asked if there was a way to find out where the alcohol was purchased <br />from. <br />Chief Sommer indicated it would be difficult to do so. He then said that Edward Waste stated <br />that he purchases the alcohol retail from either Vino & Stogies or other liquor stores. <br />Council Member Flaherly asked whether the alcohol came from Mr. Waste's store. He then <br />asked how a residence and a business exist in one building at the same address. <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained that the family bought the property back in <br />the 1950's prior to the enactment of the enactment of the Zoning Code so this is considered a <br />legal nonconforming use. <br />Mayor Marty asked whether the central office or records from the security service could provide <br />information on when the alarms are on and off. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Mueller. To Move this to the June 25, 2007 Council Meeting to <br />Consider Possibility of Non-Renewal and To Allow Time for Information to be Obtained from <br />the Alarm Company and Authorize a Public Hearing to Consider Suspension of a Liquor • <br />License. <br />Mayor Marty said that the City Attorney would be at the June 25, 2007 meeting for guidance and <br />there is still time to renew prior to expiration of the license. <br />Council Member Mueller said that utility bills are behind and she would like to get that caught <br />up. <br />Mayor Marty said he would like the fire inspection done so that Council can move forward with <br />renewal if that is the desire of Council. <br />Mr. Waste indicated that the fire inspector had already been in to check. <br />Council Member Mueller asked whether Edward Waste or the other person involved in this <br />incident is employed by Mr. Waste. <br />Mr. Waste said that they are not. <br />Council Member Stigney said that from the motion made it sounded as if Mr. Waste can't prove <br />his store was closed and locked then he should lose his license and he is not so sure that should <br />be the case. <br />• <br />