Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 27, 2007 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br />1 Council Member Stigney asked whether the letter of agreement between Mr. Heltzer and the • <br />2 Church can be added as a condition. <br />3 <br />4 Attorney Riggs explained that the letter could become a condition. <br />s <br />6 Mr. Heltzer said that if this comes back for further subdivision, then there is a different property <br />7 owner involved, and he is concerned about how his utilities will be handled and who is <br />8 responsible to obtain the easements. <br />9 <br />1o Mr. Heltzer indicated that he does not agree to that letter at all. <br />lI <br />12 Attorney Riggs indicated that if this subdivision does not require moving utilities, then this <br />13 would not be necessary. He then said that there could be a condition that any fiirther subdivision <br />14 requires moving the utilizes, and that cost is to be born by the developer but, at this time, that is <br />15 premature as there is no request for further subdivision. <br />16 <br />1~ Council Member Mueller said she is concerned about adding the letter because it may seem that <br />18 the City is going along with any plans for future development and that is not the case. <br />19 <br />2o MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Marty. To Amend Resolution 7129 to Raise the Park Dedication <br />21 Fee to Option 3 at 10% for $8,655.00. <br />22 <br />23 Council Member Stigney said that this is a major subaivision whether or not they are a Church • <br />24 and he feels that $8,655.00 is a fair amount. <br />25 <br />26 Council Member Flaherty indicated he went with the Staff recommendation and the reasons are <br />27 that this subdivision has no impact on the City's park system. <br />28 <br />29 Council Member Stigney said that he feels that the park dedication fee should be applied to the <br />3o subdivided parcel. <br />31 <br />32 Mayor Marty agreed and said that he feels that the park dedication fee should apply to the .80 <br />33 subdivided acreage. <br />34 <br />35 Ayes - 2(Marty/Stigney) Nays - 3 Amendment failed. <br />36 <br />37 Mayor Marty said that there are views on both sides of this issue. However, the decision before <br />38 this Council is a major subdivision that meets the City's requirements. <br />39 <br />4o Council Member Stigney indicated that he agreed, but said it does not sway his mind on the park <br />41 dedication fee so he cannot support this. <br />42 <br />43 Ayes - 4 Nays - 1(Stigney) Motion carried. <br />44 • <br />