My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-10-2007
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
09-10-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:25:00 AM
Creation date
7/20/2010 9:53:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
9/10/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 10, 2007 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br />• indicated he would like to see further information on the feasibility of installing automatic <br />valves. <br />Mr. Woehrle said that they have gas service men on duty 24/7 in the metro area. Mr. Woehrle <br />indicated that their response time is less than 20 minutes anywhere in the metro area and they <br />respond to hundreds of calls a year. He indicated that there are time constraints with this project <br />and, they would be concerned about installing the new technology in this location without the <br />time to test and review it. <br />Mr. Woehrle indicated that they do not believe that there is a need for automatic shutoff valves in <br />this location. He said that their competitors do not use this type of new technology. <br />Ken Glidden, 5240 Edgewood, said that Xcel would be concerned about cosfis, but as a resident <br />in the imrnediate location of the pipeline, this is important to him for safety. Mr. Glidden <br />suggested having the automatic valve, and then a manual valve,upstream 6 inches that can be <br />shut off by the service man, if the automatic vaive were #o faiL <br />Council asked that the information on automatic valves be brought to Council for consideration. <br />Mr. Worlie asked to be allowed to work with Staff rather than having to go before Council again <br />as that will hold up their project, and they wanted: to be up and running by Thanksgiving. <br />• Mayor Marty indicated that Xcel is free to work with Staff, however, the Council makes the <br />decision whether this goes or not. 1Vlayor Marty indicated that this would need to be presented to <br />Council at the next meeting in two weeks. <br />Council Member Stigney said that h~ likes filie idea of two valves, one automatic and one manual. <br />He asked that #he, suggestion b~ followed up on and provide information to Council on it. <br />Council Member Mueller said that she understands deadlines, however, first and foremost is the <br />safety of those that live in this community. <br />Jennifer Thu~lien-Smith, General Council for Xcel Energy, said that it is the position of Xcel that <br />they do have the right to excavate and replace their pipeline. She agreed that Xcel is subject to <br />the permit requirements of the City, however, the City may not arbitrarily deny the permit. The <br />technical experts have addressed all of the concerns raised by City Staff. Neighborhood concern <br />or expression of concern for public safety is not a valid reason for denial. <br />• <br />Ms. Thulien-Smith explained that this is just an expansion of the existing pipe in the public right <br />of way. The City must consent to pipeline maintenance, and aesthetics are not necessary to <br />protect the health, safety and welfare of the public. She then said that Xcel would work with City <br />Staff on the screening issue. Ms. Thulien-Smith indicated that, if the permit is not approved, <br />they will pursue their rights under Minnesota Law, including relief in district court. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.