My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-24-2007
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
09-24-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:25:05 AM
Creation date
7/20/2010 9:54:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
9/24/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 24, 2007 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br />Attorney Riggs indicated that he has had discussions with Mr. Beer on this matter, but he has not ~ <br />researched and provided an official opinion for Council with regard to the requirements of the <br />Charter. <br />Valerie Amundsen said that the Charter is to protect the citizens and they respect that. However, <br />Staff was directed to look into the legalities, and they understood that there were no legal issues <br />with it. <br />Richard Sonterre of 506Q Red Oak Drive said that he has been a big proponent of not repeating <br />the points already stated, but would like to say that he is disappointed that this is now an issue, <br />because the Task Force was led to believe that all legalities regarding the proposed financing <br />package had been reviewed and there were no issues. <br />Mr. Sonterre said that the Task Force would like to get at least something done in 2008 because <br />it is time to do so. <br />Mayor Marty said that the reason the 2008 project was picked, was due to the small size and the <br />achievability of it. It is the smallest project in the program. <br />Sandy Dewing said that the Finance Committee discussed more than one option, but did discuss <br />this option as the preferred one. Ms. Dewing said that this was the Task Force recommendation <br />and they did not recommend going to referendum, and she would like all language for a <br />referendum removed from the document, as the document is a recommendation from the Task • <br />Foxce. <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that looking at the schedule for the 2008 project is a <br />concern because the process needed to be started in August of 2007. It is possible to do so, but <br />the timeframe is tight, so his recommendation would be to wait. He then said that, as it is set up, <br />construction would not be able to start until late July, and that is unfavorable timing for the <br />project and that concerns Staff. <br />Council Member Mueller corrected the program length from 18 to 10 years, at the bottom of <br />Page 8, remove the last sentence, and remove the tax levy referendum from the document as that <br />is not the Task Force recommendation. <br />Council Member Flaherty said that it is his understanding that this document was supposed to be <br />simple and should be revised to be so. On Page 2, the language on trailways should come out; <br />Page 3, PCI remove the additionai verbiage on pavement rating; Page 7, pedestrian bicycle <br />accommodations should be removed as it does not seem necessary with this document; mail box <br />groupings he took out everything other than the U.S. Post Office has final approval; Page 8, <br />remove extra language on the cost of McDonald's, etc.; Remove language regarding the <br />referendum. <br />Council Member Flaherty indicated that the point was to be brief, so as not to confuse the points. • <br />More information is available if someone would like to have it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.