My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-22-2007
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
10-22-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:25:14 AM
Creation date
7/20/2010 9:56:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
10/22/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council October 22, 2007 <br />Regutar Meeting Page 10 <br />Council Member Flaherty said that he does not feel that any rights are being taken away. He then ~ <br />thanked the Task Force for the commitment to meet on this for two years and develop this <br />recommendation for the Council. <br />Council Member Hull asked if this could be changed from a levy to an assessment to give <br />everyone a voice on the project. <br />Mayor Marty indicated that millions can be saved by accelerating this program to 10 years rather <br />than 18 or 20. Mayor Marty said that this proposed project would move forward in a finite time <br />rather than be subject to delays and additional costs for residents. <br />Council Member Hull asked how the figures would be affected by exempting those that were <br />already assessed. He then suggested exempting them and increasing costs to other residents <br />slightly. <br />Council Member Stigney commented that the Task Force is trying to solve the streets issue and <br />develop a method for paying. He then said that "the devil is in the details" despite the fact that <br />the plan looks good on its face. <br />Council Member Stigney said that this does circumvent the petition process. He then said that <br />there is money in hand, and that should be spent down, and then the City should stay within the <br />general fund that establishes a cap an how much money can be generated. <br />Council Member Stigney said that maybe there should be an option to opt in or out for those that • <br />have paid an assessment. He then said that he thinks the Council should take a vote on whether <br />or not to go to referendum on this project. <br />Council Member Stigney said that the Finance Director has said that he is hopeful that there <br />would be enough money in the fund after 10 years and, if there is not, that means raising taxes to <br />pay for it. <br />Council Member Stigney said that using the funds to reduce t~es for streets would be an <br />excellent use of the levy reduction fund. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that the proposed plan has a lot of details that need to be <br />discussed and worked out to ensure that this plan can work, before tlus is decided upon. <br />Mayor Marty said that it is Council's job to look to the future, and look to what is best for the <br />residents. Mayor Marty commented that this must be done for the overall well being of the City <br />now, and in the future. <br />Mayor Marty said that he is glad that this street project did not go forward, because the new <br />policy is superior to how projects were done. He then commended the Finance Director and the <br />Task Force for thinking outside the box on ways to get the streets reconstructed within a • <br />relatively short amount of time and with limited cost to residents. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.