My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2010/07/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
Minutes - 2010/07/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:24:45 AM
Creation date
8/13/2010 4:11:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
7/26/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 26, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br />Council Member Mueller questioned the purpose of the second driveway as it did not connect to • <br />the first driveway or the garage. Mr. Mecl stated his children park in it and it was used every <br />day. <br />Council Member Mueller asked staff if the second curb cut should remain to give the property <br />owner the option of subdividing his lot. Public Works Director DeBar indicated it was fairly <br />simple to put in a curb cut if needed in the future. <br />Mayor Flaherty commented that the second driveway did not appear to be a finished surface. He <br />reiterated that a second curb cut would be at the expense of the homeowner. Mr. Mecl stated the <br />second driveway was on the site when he purchased the home in the 1960's. He noted he would <br />be willing to pay for the second curb cut and to complete a finished surface for the second <br />driveway. <br />Council Member Gunn felt this request differed greatly from the previous request as this second <br />driveway was not connected and did not appear in any way to be a driveway. She stated she <br />would not support a second curb cut. <br />Council Member Mueller indicated the previous request was already a finished surface and <br />connected to the property's garage. <br />Council Member Stigney stated the second driveway appeared to be a parking pad and not a • <br />driveway. He noted he would not support a second curb cut. <br />Council Member Hull agreed. <br />Mayor Flaherty indicated the Council had to follow the City's code and did not feel the site was <br />designed to be a second driveway. He felt the Council could not make an exception or justify the <br />need for a second curb cut. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Deny the second Curb Cut request from Mr. Meckel at <br />6969 Knollwood Drive based on the fact it does not meet City Code requirements. <br />Ayes — 5 Nays — 0 Motion carried. <br />Dan Mueller, 8343 Groveland Road, expressed concern with the excessive number of vehicles <br />parked on a neighboring property. He urged City staff to take action, as the site was becoming a <br />growing concern. Mr. Mueller encouraged the Council to view the site to see he was not <br />exaggerating the problems with his neighbor's properiy. He then explained the City Code should <br />be enforced. <br />Mayor Flaherty requested staff follow up on this issue further to assure that City codes are being <br />enforced. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.